SCIFED. Publishers. SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics. The Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT): A New A-Causal Computation Physics.

Transcription

1 Research Article SCIFED Publishers JehonathanBentwich,, 017, S1:1 SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics Open Access The Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT): A New A-Causal Computation Physics * Jehonathan Bentwich * Independent Researcher, Israel Abstract Contemporary Theoretical Physics state is akin to pre-1905 Einstein s Relativity Paradigmatic Shift: i.e., the two pillars of Modern Physics, e.g., Quantum Mechanics (QM) and Relativity Theory (RT)seem contradictory and up to 90% of all mass and energy in the universe is missing (hypothesized to comprise dark energy and dark matter ). However, one of the leading candidates (TOE) namely: the Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT) which was recently validated empirically through the Proton-Radius Puzzle findings [1] offers a satisfactory resolution of this apparent QM-RT theoretical inconsistency based on the discovery of a singular higherordered Universal Computational Principle (UCP) which computes every exhaustive spatial pixel in the physical universe at any minimal time point (e.g., c /h ) comprising a rapid series of Universal Simultaneous Computational Frames (USCF s); Indeed, this singular simultaneous computation of all exhaustive spatial pixels in the universe by the UCP is called: A-Causal Computation and negates the possibility of the existence of any material-causal physical relationships (e.g., quantum or relativistic). It is suggested that such A-Causal Computation represents a fundamental Paradigmatic Shift in Theoretical Physics because it negates both QM and RT current Material-Causal Paradigm, instead embedding- the primary QM and RT empirical findings within the singular higher-ordered CUFT UCP A-Causal Computation Paradigm; As such, this new CUFT A-Causal Computation Paradigm in Physics discards dark-matter, dark-energy as superfluous (akin to Relativity s discarding of the hypothetical ether concept) and is shown to revise the and indeed may challenge key fundamental theoretical concepts such as: the Arrow of Time conundrum, the Second Law of Thermodynamics and even the Big-Bang Theory. Introduction Twenty-first century Physics finds itself at a theoretical crisis akin to Einstein s pre-1905 Relativity Theory Paradigmatic Shift: the two primary pillars of modern Physics, namely: Relativity Theory (RT) and Quantum Mechanics (QM) [1-4] seem contradictory of each other and there exist a series of unresolved Physical Conundrums which cannot be explained (in a satisfactory manner) by either QM or RT, i.e., the most prominent conundrum being dark-matter and dark-energy (e.g., up to 90% of all mass and energy in the universe cannot be accounted for by these QM and RT theoretical models! Based on Thomas Kuhn s well known analysis of the evolution of Science (196), which highlighted the fact that scientific progress is characterized through alternating phases of Standard Science in which scientific inquiry is based upon an established Scientific Paradigm, which then leads to critical junctures in which this Standard Paradigm can no longer account for a series of phenomena and there *Corresponding author: JehonathanBentwich, Independent Researcher, Israel. drbentwich@gmail.com Tel: Received August 17, 017; Accepted August 31, 017; Published September 14, 017 Citation: JehonathanBentwich (017) The Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT): A New A-Causal Computation Physics. S1:1. Copyright: 017 JehonathanBentwich. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. page 1 of 17

2 Citation: JehonathanBentwich (017) The Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT): A New A-Causal Computation Physics. S1:1. exists a basic theoretical inconsistency within this Standard Paradigm; According to Kuhn, such critical junctures are the hallmark for the onset of a basic Paradigmatic Shift which seeks to find a New Paradigm which can resolve all of these theoretical inconsistencies and unexplained conundrums (by the Standard Paradigm) Hence, it is suggested that the current state of theoretical Physics signifies precisely such an urgent need for a Paradigmatic Shift, i.e., from the current Materialistic-Reductionistic Standard Paradigm towards a New A-Causal Paradigm represented by the recently discovered Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT) [5-5]. Indeed, if we are to follow Kuhn s rigorous criteria for satisfactory Paradigmatic Shifts it is suggested that the CUFT satisfies each of these set of rigorous scientific criteria which include: a) The New Paradigm s capacity to replicate all previous (QM and RT) Standard Paradigm s findings and laws. b) The New Paradigm s ability to resolve all principle (QM-RT) theoretical inconsistencies. c) The New Paradigm s capability of explaining all unresolved Physical Conundrums in a satisfactory manner. The New Paradigm s capacity to identify at least one differential-critical prediction, e.g., an empirical instance for which its own theoretical predictions differ from those of the Standard Paradigm (e.g., QM and RT predictions). e) Empirical validation of such differential-critical prediction of the New (CUFT) Paradigm as opposed to the Standard Model (QM and RT) predictions. f) *Ideally, this New (CUFT) Paradigm should open new Theoretical Vistas which should incorporate the Standard Paradigm as a special case within a broader theoretical framework (* to quote Einstein s set of criteria for such a desired New Paradigm in Physics) Well, the purpose of this article is to prove that the CUFT indeed satisfies each of these rigorous scientific criteria for a Paradigmatic Shift in 1 st century Physics and to outline the nature and characterizations of this New CUFT A-Causal Computation Paradigm, i.e., its incorporation of the Standard (QM and RT) Materialistic- Reductionistic Paradigm as a special case within the singular (higher-ordered) A-Causal Computation framework, and the new Universal Computational/ Consciousness Principle based theoretical vistas opened through the CUFT s New Paradigm. 1. Theoretical Postulates of the CUFT Perhaps the best starting point to examine the validity of such alternative Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT) is to outline its key theoretical postulates and delineate its primary theoretical success in offering a satisfactory resolution of the key theoretical inconsistencies that exist between QM and RT (as well as its proven capacity to replicate all known Quantum ore Relativistic phenomena or laws); The CUFT is based upon six Theoretical postulates, namely: the Duality Principle, Universal Computational Principle, Computational Invariance Principle, Universal Consciousness Principle, Ontological Relativism and Human Consciousness Expansiveness Spectrum postulates[5-5]. The Duality Principle discovered a basic computational flaw underlying both QM and RT as constituting Self- Referential Ontological Computational Systems (SROCS) which inevitably lead to both logical inconsistency and ensuing computational indeterminacy, hence pointing at the need for a singular higher-ordered computational principle which can (alone) compute all simultaneously co-occurring subatomic probe-target and relativistic observer- phenomenon exhaustive pairs. Consequently, the Duality Principle leads to the Universal Computational Principle s assertion regarding the existence of a singular computational principle which computes the simultaneous co-occurrence of all exhaustive spatial pixels in the universe at any minimal time point (c /h), e.g., producing an extremely rapid series of Universal Simultaneous Computational Frames. The Universal Computational Principle postulate also stipulates that it possesses three Computational Dimensions (e.g., Framework, Consistency and Locus ) whose combination produces the four basic features of space, time, energy and mass. Next, the Computational Invariance Principle asserts that since only the Universal Computational Principle remains computationally invariant, i.e., exists singularly both in-between USCF frames and also computes the four basic physical features (through its three Computational Dimensions) during the USCF frames, whereas these four secondary computational physical features are computationally variant (e.g., exist only during the USCF frames but not in-between frames) then we must conclude that only this Universal page of 17

3 Citation: JehonathanBentwich (017) The Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT): A New A-Causal Computation Physics. S1:1. Computational Principle may be regarded as permanent while the four ( secondary computational ) physical features may only be considered as phenomenal Consequently, the Universal Consciousness Principle proclaims that since this UCP needs to produce- retain- and evolve- each spatial pixel in the physical universe across the (extremely rapid) series of USCF frames (e.g., and also singularly exists in-between any two subsequent frames) then this Universal Computational Principle also possesses all of the characteristics of a Universal Consciousness Principle i.e., it is cognizant of- retains- and evolvesany phenomenal physical feature in the universe, and also exists in and of itself without any reference for any physical feature Finally, the CUFT discovered the existence of a Universal Computational Formula which fully integrates the four basic physical features of space, time, energy and mass as secondary computational features arising from the extremely rapid computation of the Universal Computational Principle (e.g., carried out at the incredible rate of c /h ): c s e =. h t m Based on a recent empirical validation of the Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT) through the discovery of the Proton-Radius Puzzle [1] which precisely fulfills one (of three) differential-critical predictions of the CUFT (e.g., differentiating it from the predictions of both QM and RT), the CUFT has been recognized as a satisfactory [5-5].. A-Causal Computation Physics Based on the acceptance of this CUFT as an appropriate (TOE) [5, 6, 8, 35] capable of resolving all Quantum-Relativistic inconsistencies, replicating all major QM and RT empirical phenomena and the above mentioned recent validation of one of its (three) differential-critical predictions (differentiating it from the predictions of both QM and RT predictions) now sets the stage for recognizing the A-Causal Computation Paradigmatic Shift that it signifies; Hence, our current discussion of the New A-Causal Computation Paradigm in Physics and its ensuing need to reformulateand embed all known quantum and relativistic phenomena and laws within its singular higher-ordered theoretical framework is based upon the above mentioned empirical validation of the CUFT as a satisfactory Theory of Everything ; Specifically, the recent empirical validation of one of the CUFT s differential-critical predictions, e.g., the abovementioned Proton-Radius Puzzle which differentiated it from the predictions of both QM and RT, alongside the CUFT s proven capacity to replicate all QM and RT phenomena and laws as well as resolve their principle theoretical inconsistencies satisfied all of the rigorous scientific criteria postulated by Kuhn (196) necessary to adopt a New Paradigm in Science, thereby validating the CUFT as a satisfactory New Paradigm in Physics; Indeed, as shown above, the key difference that exist between the CUFT New A-Causal Computation Paradigm and the existent Material-Causality Paradigm of QM and RT is that whereas the existent Material- Causal Paradigm assumes that any quantum or relativistic phenomenon arises as a result of the direct physical interaction between any given relativistic (space-time or energy-mass) phenomenon and a relativistic observer or between any given subatomic probe and target elements, the New A-Causal Computation Paradigm of the CUFT posits that there cannot exist any such material-causal physical interactions (e.g., which determine or produce any quantum or relativistic phenomenon).instead, the CUFT s A-Causal Computation asserts that it is only due to the singularity of the Universal Computational Principle (UCP) A-Causal Computation of all spatial-pixels in the physical universe at any given minimal time point (c /h) which produces any of the four (secondary computational) physical properties of space, time, energy and mass at any of these exhaustive spatial pixels in the universe Hence, according to this new CUFT s A-Causal Computation Paradigm all quantum and relativistic phenomena have to be revised such that they are derived from this singularity of the UCP A-Causal Computation, e.g., which produces all quantum and relativistic effects simultaneously, rather than are produced through any physical interaction/s between a relativistic observer and any (space-time or energy-mass) phenomenon or between any subatomic probe and target elements! This Paradigmatic Shift from QM and RT current Material-Causal Paradigm towards the CUFT s new A-Causal Computation Paradigm indeed requires a total revision of the basic theoretical modeling of all known quantum and relativistic phenomena (and even laws); this is due to the fact that the current conceptualization of all quantum or relativistic phenomena, elements and even laws stem from QM and RT (above mentioned) Material- Causal assumption; Thus, for instance, all quantum page 3 of 17

4 Citation: JehonathanBentwich (017) The Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT): A New A-Causal Computation Physics. S1:1. (complimentary) target values are derived as a result of its direct physical interaction with another subatomic target element which brings about the collapse of the (hypothetical) probe s probability wave function. Likewise, all relativistic (space-time or energy-mass) phenomena are contingent on the direct physical interaction of a particular relativistic observer and this phenomenon; But, according to the new A-Causal Computation CUFT Paradigm, the determination of the values of any subatomic target element or of any relativistic phenomenon cannot be the result of any direct (or even indirect) physical interaction, but instead can only be determined through the singularity of the UCP A-Causal simultaneous computation of all exhaustive spatial pixels in the physical universe (at any given minimal time-point c /h comprising single or multiple USCF s frame/s), e.g., including all exhaustive quantum pairs of subatomic probe-target elements or relativistic pairs of observer-phenomenon This implies that from the singular (higher-ordered) perspective of the CUFT, there cannot exist any collapse of the target s probability wave function as a result of its physical interaction with the subatomic probe element, nor does the signal of light s physical interaction with a given relativistic (space-time or energy-mass) phenomenon and a given relativistic observer determine the values of such relativistic phenomenon Instead, the CUFT s A-Causal Computation forces us to revise- and embed- all quantum and relativistic phenomena based on the singularity of the UCP simultaneous computation of all exhaustive spatial pixels in the physical universe; Therefore, the main aim of this article is to delineate the necessary transformation of all known quantum and relativistic phenomena (and relationships) as integral and embedded elements within the singularity of the UCP s A-Causal Computation, e.g., formalized through the UCP s Universal Computational Formula. Hence, the primary effort should be to demonstrate: a) In what manner are the basic quantum and relativistic phenomena (and laws) embedded within the CUFT s A-Causal Computation (represented by the Universal Computational Formula)? b) What are the special cases (or conditions) in which these known quantum or relativistic phenomena (or laws) applicable; and c) What may be the new frontiers of this new A-Causal Computation Paradigm in Physics? 3. Differentiating the A-Causal Computation Paradigm from QM & RT Material-Causality Thus, the starting point for establishing the new A-Causal Computation based Physics is based on a delineation of the divergence of both QM and RT from their currently assumed material-causal paradigm; In the case of QM, the application of the CUFT s Duality Principle, Universal Computational Principle and Computational Invariance Principle theoretical postulates force us to abandon this implicit material-causal assumption of Quantum Mechanics; This is because (as outlined above and previously: [5-5] the Duality Principle proves that the materialistic-reductionistic Self-Referential Ontological Computational System (SROCS) computational structure of QM inevitably leads to both logical inconsistency and computational indeterminacy ; this is due to the Quantum Mechanical SROCS assumption wherein it is assumed that the determination of the complimentary values of any given subatomic target element are determined solely based on that target s direct (or even indirect) physical interactions with another subatomic probe element which leads to a situation in which the measured values of the subatomic target element both exist and do not exist at the same computational level of the direct physical interaction between the probe and target elements, constituting a logical inconsistency. However, it is precisely due to this apparent intrinsic logical inconsistency ensuing from QM SROCS assumed computational structure that the Duality Principle evinces the impossibility of this assumed SROCS (material-causal) computational structure; Instead, the Duality Principle points at the existence of a singular higher-ordered Universal Computational Principle which computes all exhaustive hypothetical subatomic probetarget pairs, thereby asserting the existence of the UCP s singular A-Causal Computation, which precludes the possibility of any material-causal relationships between any (hypothetical) subatomic probe and target elements! Hence, the adoption of the UCP s singular A-Causal Computation of all exhaustive hypothetical subatomic probe and target elements (at any given minimal time-point, e.g., c /h comprising a single or multiple USCF s frame/s) forces us to abandon the current material-causal (SROC structure) of QM in favor of a higher-ordered non-causal simultaneous computation by the UCP of all exhaustive spatial pixels in the physical universe! This implies that we cannot (any longer) hold page 4 of 17

5 Citation: JehonathanBentwich (017) The Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT): A New A-Causal Computation Physics. S1:1. on to the current probabilistic modeling of the existence of a probability wave function- e.g., of the target element prior to its direct physical interaction with another subatomic probe element which then causes a collapse of this assumed probability wave function into a complimentary space-energy or temporal-mass value of the measured subatomic target element Instead, we have to adopt the singularity of the UCP s simultaneous A-Causal Computation of all subatomic probe-target and relativistic observer-phenomenon exhaustive pairs comprising the entire physical universe at any minimal time point (c /h). In much the same manner, the singularity of the UCP A-Causal Computation forces us to acknowledge the (computational) impossibility of the current relativistic assumed SROCS computational structure; wherein it is assumed that it is the direct physical interaction between any given relativistic observer and corresponding (space-time or energy-mass) phenomenon which (solely) determines the physical values of such relativistic phenomenon ; this is due (once again) to the Duality Principle s assertion regarding the relativistic SROCS inevitable leading to both logical inconsistency and ensuing computational indeterminacy which are contradicted by robust empirical evidence indicating the capacity of relativistic systems to determine the values of any given relativistic phenomenon: Hence, whereas the relativistic SROCS computational structure is shown to lead to a situation in which a certain relativistic phenomenon (e.g., space-time or energy-mass) value seems to both exist and not exist for differential mobilization of the same relativistic observer [5-5] thereby constituting a logical inconsistency, which also results in an inevitable computational indeterminacy, the Duality Principle asserts that because there is robust empirical evidence showing the capacity of such relativistic systems to determine the values of the given (space-time or energy-mass) phenomenon then this negates the basic assumed relativistic SROCS computational structure; Instead, the Duality Principle asserts the existence of the singular higher-ordered Universal Computational Principle which simultaneously computes all co-occurring spatial pixels in the physical universe (at a minimal time point c /h comprising a single or multiple USCF s), i.e., including all hypothetical exhaustive relativistic observer and phenomenon values at any given such minimal time-point/s! Once again, this Universal Computational Principle (UCP) simultaneous computation of all exhaustive hypothetical spatial pixels in the physical universe (at any given minimal time-point) forces us to abandon the current relativistic (SROCS) materialcausal assumption wherein it is the direct physical interaction between any given (space-time or energy-mass) phenomenon and any given relativistic observer (e.g., based on the constancy of the speed of light) that determines the given value of this relativistic phenomenon. But, due to the Duality Principle proof for the unfeasible structure of Relativity s (currently assumed) SROCS material-causal computational structure, we have to relinquish it in favor of the CUFT s UCP A-Causal Computation which asserts that all relativistic observer-phenomenon and quantum subatomic probe-target hypothetical exhaustive pairs must be computed simultaneously by the UCP (e.g., comprising all exhaustive hypothetical spatial pixels in the physical universe at any given minimal time-point comprising single or multiple USCF s frame/s). Hence, the next step along the development of the CUFT s New Physics is to articulate the basic computational structure of the CUFT (in general) and to stipulate the computational mechanics associated with the UCP Universal Computational Formula which computes the entire physical universe at any given minimal time-point (comprising the extremely rapid series, e.g., c /h) comprising the USCF s frames series; 4. The CUFT: Single- Multiple- and Exhaustive- Computation In order to reconcile- and indeed embed- the well validated quantum and relativistic empirical findings and phenomena, it may be helpful to bring in one of the key computational characteristics of the CUFT which is associated with its UCP A-Causal Computation, namely: its conception of single- multiple- and exhaustive- spatialtemporal computation; As stated above, the CUFT A-Causal Computation of the UCP implies that this UCP simultaneously computes all exhaustive spatial pixels in the physical universe at any minimal time-point (e.g., c /h) comprising a single (or multiple USCF s frame/s). Therefore, embedded within this exhaustive USCF s frames series are also more restrictive computational perspectives which are in fact also computed by this UCP such as the computation of the degree of change (consistency) or lack of change (inconsistency) for singlespatial-temporal (relativistic) objects or (subatomic) particles or for multiple- spatial temporal (subatomic) wave movements. Indeed, according to the CUFT, the UCP s (A-Causal) computation of the four basic physical page 5 of 17

6 Citation: JehonathanBentwich (017) The Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT): A New A-Causal Computation Physics. S1:1. features of space, time, energy and mass is carried out based on its three (above mentioned) Computational Dimensions of Consistency, Framework and Locus, wherein the computational combination of the Framework Dimension s frame level with the consistent and inconsistent levels (of the Consistency Dimension) gives rise to the physical features of space and energy, and conversely Framework s combination of its object level together with Consistency s consistent and inconsistent levels produces the two physical features of mass and energy ; Interestingly, such UCP exhaustive computation of the four physical features of each and every spatial pixel in the physical universe (based on the UCP s Framework and Consistency Dimensions combinations) succeeds in replicating all observed quantum and relativistic phenomena but it does so based on the UCP s A-Causal Computation (e.g., simultaneous computation of all exhaustive spatial pixels in the physical universe at a minimal time-point c /h) negates the abovementioned basic material-causal assumption underlying both QM and RT; This is because for instance, the observed empirical simultaneous measurement accuracy constraint Uncertainty Principle is explained through the UCP s A-Causal simultaneous exhaustive computation of any given object s frame consistent and inconsistent space and energy complimentary pairs, or simultaneous exhaustive computation of any object s object consistent and inconsistent mass and time complimentary pairs; Therefore, instead of QM s Heisenberg s Uncertainty Principle [9] current theoretical explanation of this simultaneous measurement accuracy constraint (of these complimentary pairs ) which is due to the direct physical interaction of the two subatomic probe and target elements (e.g., which alters their complimentary physical features); the UCP s A-Causal Computation theoretical account of these complimentary pairs stems from its identified intrinsic computational constraint imposed by the UCP s exhaustive computation of the consistent and inconsistent levels of Framework s frame (e.g., space and energy) or object levels, e.g., giving rise to the exhaustive computational pairs of space and energy or of mass and time! Therefore, the UCP New Physics A-Causal Computation Paradigm replaces QM s material-causal assumed direct physical interaction between the subatomic probe and target elements, e.g., which is assumed to cause the complimentarily of space and energy or time and mass by an intrinsic computational constraint imposed by the UCP s simultaneous computation of its two exhaustive computational pairs of frame s consistent (space) and inconsistent (energy) levels or of object s consistent (mass) and inconsistent (time) levels. In much the same manner, the UCP s A-Causal Computation embeds all single- spatial-temporal particle measurements within its broader multiplespatial-temporal wave computation, thereby offering an alternative theoretical explanation for QM s current material-causal probabilistic interpretation which assumes that it is the direct physical interaction between the target s assumed probability wave function and the subatomic probe which causes the collapse of the entire probability wave function into a localized (complimentary) target measurement; Instead of this QM material-causal assumption, the UCP s A-Causal Computation postulates that each single- spatial-temporal particle (target) measurement is embedded within the broader multiple spatial-temporal wave computation, and therefore every time that we measure a single spatialtemporal measurement, i.e., such as through a localized physical interaction between a subatomic probe and target elements we are bound to obtain a single particle measurement, which in truth represents one of the multifarious single spatial-temporal particle constituents of the (broader) multi spatial-temporal wave computation! Hence, instead of QM s currently assumed collapse of the target s probability wave function as caused by its direct physical interaction with another probe element, the CUFT s posits that even prior to- and irrespective of- any such material-causal physical interaction between the subatomic probe and target elements, at each minimal time-point (e.g., c /h ) the UCP simultaneously computes all spatial pixels in the physical universe, e.g., comprising a single (exhaustive) Universal Simultaneous Computational Frame (USCF) which nevertheless embeds within it the more restrictive computational perspectives of the single- spatial-temporal particle and the (relatively) broader multiple spatialtemporal wave computation; Hence, both prior to- and irrespective of- any apparent material-causal physical interaction between the subatomic probe and target single spatial-temporal particle elements, these single spatial-temporal particle elements are nevertheless embedded within the broader multi spatial-temporal wave computational perspective; Therefore, instead of QM s currently assumed collapse of the target s page 6 of 17

7 Citation: JehonathanBentwich (017) The Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT): A New A-Causal Computation Physics. S1:1. probability wave function based on its direct physical interaction with the probe element, the CUFT s A-Causal Computation posits that all that exists is an extremely rapid (c /h) series of UCP s simultaneously computed USCF s frame/s which embeds within it also the more restrictive computational perspectives of single multispatial particle/s which are embedded within broader multi spatial-temporal wave movements Indeed, this exhaustive A-Causal Computation perspective discards Quantum Mechanics contemporary material-causal probabilistic interpretation which is dependent upon the direct physical interaction between the subatomic probe and target elements for the collapse of the probability wave function instead asserting that both the more restrictive (measured) single- spatial-temporal target particle and the broader multi spatial-temporal wavefunction are embedded within the exhaustive Universal Simultaneous Computational Frame/s! We should also note that according to this exhaustive computational perspective of the UCP s A-Causal Computation simultaneous computation of all exhaustive spatial pixels in the physical universe at each minimal time-point (e.g., comprising a single or multiple USCF s frames) there cannot arise any such material-causal physical interactions, i.e., such as between the subatomic probe and target elements which is assumed to cause the collapse of the probability wave function since the UCP simultaneously computes all spatial-pixels in the universe at any minimal time-point (comprising single or multiple USCF s frames)! Interestingly, this exhaustive A-Causal Computation of the UCP which embeds within it the more restrictive single- spatial-temporal particle and multi spatial-temporal wave computational perspectives may also assist in resolving the apparent physical conundrums of QM s particle-wave duality and the apparent key theoretical inconsistency that exists between Relativity s fundamental constraint imposed by the speed of light limit imposed on the transmission of any signal across space and time (on the one hand) and QM s empirically validated phenomenon of quantum-entanglement, e.g., which seems to indicate that information can be transferred (between such entangled particles ) instantaneously (thereby negating Relativity s light-speed constraint imposed on the transmission of information); This is because the UCP s exhaustive A-Causal Computation which embeds both the single-spatial-temporal (subatomic) particle or (relativistic) object and the multiple spatial-temporal wave computational perspectives obviously embraces the existence of both the particle and wave measurements i.e., with the determination of whether indeed a particle or wave measurement arises depending strictly on the type of measurement we employ: that is whether we are measuring only a single spatial- point at each point in time (which yields a particle measurement) or whether we opt to measure more than a single spatial point at each temporal point (yielding a wave measurement)! Similarly, this UCP exhaustive A-Causal Computation can resolve the abovementioned apparent fundamental contradiction between Relativity s light-speed constraint imposed on the transmission of any signal (or interaction) across space and time and the Quantum Entanglement (Horodecki et al., 007)phenomenon which seems to indicate an instantaneous transmission ; this is because once we take into consideration that this apparent QM-RT theoretical inconsistency arises from their (respective) use of relativistic single spatial-temporal light particle vs. quantum s multi spatial-temporal wave computation which are both embedded within the UCP s exhaustive A-Causal Computation simultaneous computation of all spatial pixels in the physical universe at every minimal time-point (e.g., comprising a single or multiple USCF s frame/s): then, we realize that whereas Relativity s lightspeed constraint represents the single spatial-temporal light particle perspective, the quantum-entanglement phenomenon attests to the broader multi- spatial-temporal wave computational perspective, e.g., which is embedded in- and in fact points at- the exhaustive UCP s simultaneous computation of all spatial pixels in the physical universe at a minimal time-point (comprising a single or multiple USCF s frame/s which also includes the simultaneous computation of any two entangled particles ). 5. The UCP A-Causal Computation: Re-thinking QM & RT We therefore see that the CUFT s new A-Causal Computation Paradigm forces us to relinquish Physics current material-causal paradigm underlying both QM and RT, in favor of a singular higher-ordered UCP which simultaneously computes all spatial-pixels comprising the physical universe embedded within a series of Universal Simultaneous Computational Frames (USCF s); Indeed, this new, higher-ordered and exhaustive UCP computational perspective is not only capable of replicating all empirically validated quantum and relativistic phenomena and resolves the basic theoretical page 7 of 17

8 Citation: JehonathanBentwich (017) The Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT): A New A-Causal Computation Physics. S1:1. inconsistency between these theories it goes further in embedding both QM and RT as integral computational elements within the singularity of the UCP s Universal Computational Formula, which can be clearly seen when representing this Universal Computational Formula in its two quantum and relativistic formats: Universal Computational Formula (UCF): c s e =. h t m s c 1) Relativistic Derivative: e = m t h c ) Quantum Derivative: t m = s e h However, as can be noted from both of the UCF s quantum and relativistic formats, the role that particular quantum and relativistic elements play within the UCF is computational: thus, for instance, the relativistic speed of light may be taken as representing the maximal degree of displacement across USCF s frames, whereas quantum s Planck s constant may be regarded as representing the minimal degree of displacement across USCF s frames Likewise, their combination as c /h is shown to yield the rate of UCP computation of the rapid series of USCF s! More generally, since the UCP s A-Causal Computation views each of the four physical features of space, time, energy and mass as secondary computational features arising from the same singular UCP A-Causal Computation of the rapid series of USCF s frames e.g., as different combinations of the UCP s Framework and Consistency Computational Dimensions; then their variously (previously) validated empirical relationships (partially represented in the quantum and relativistic formats) merely represents their embedding within the singularity of the UCP s Universal Computational Formula (representing the mechanics of the UCP s A-Causal Computation ). Indeed, this embedding of particular quantum and relativistic computational elements within the singularity of the UCP s Universal Computational Formula points at some of the CUFT s identified differential critical predictions which differentiates the CUFT from both QM and RT; In fact these differential-critical predictions also specify the particular conditions in which the CUFT s Universal Computational Formula (UCP) is identical with the current known quantum or relativistic formats, i.e., best represented through the special conditions in which this UCP s quantum or relativistic formats equals the known quantum and relativistic laws or relationships: s c Relativistic Format e = m t h tmc Quantum Format = h se Thus, for instance, we can observe that the Relativistic Format of the Universal Computational Formula when the spatial value of a given particle divided by its temporal value and multiplied by Planck s constant equals = 1, then the Universal Computational Formula gives the same observed value dictated by Relativity Theory, i.e., E = Mc. Likewise, we can note that in the Quantum Format of the UCF when c divided by s*e = 1, or when c * t*m = 1, then the UCF replicates Quantum s complimentary pairs equation! In all other instances the UCF provides us with values that diverge from those of both Quantum and Relativistic models, but we can see that these QM and RT theoretical models are embedded as special cases within the more comprehensive theoretical framework of the CUFT s Universal Computational Formula. Another important aspect of this singular higher-ordered Universal Computational Formula is that it completely integrates the four basic (secondary computational) physical features of space, time, energy and mass within a singular formula, and moreover depicts the key elements and relationships found in QM and RT as computational elements arising from the singularity of the UCP A-Causal Computation of the series of USCF s frames through the UCP s three Computational Dimensions (e.g., of Framework, Consistency and Locus ); Thus, for instance, we can see that the Universal Computational Principle s rapid production of the series of USCF s frames (e.g., at the rate of c /h occupying the left side of the equation) produces a ratio of these four basic physical features of space divided by time multiplies by energy divided by mass : c s e =. h t m page 8 of 17

9 Citation: JehonathanBentwich (017) The Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT): A New A-Causal Computation Physics. S1:1. Indeed, if we wanted to present more directly these computational relationships that exist between these four secondary computational physical features all stemming from the singular computation of the UCP, we could present the UCF in this manner: c t e = h s m which essentially points at the fact that the computational ratio s between the UCP s Framework s object-inconsistent ( time ) and frame-consistent ( space ) should be the same as between Framework s frame-inconsistent and object-consistent computational features! Indeed, the more we investigate the UCP s singular A-Causal Computation, e.g., represented by the Universal Computational Formula i.e., and in particular, its embedding of the various quantum and relativistic elements (and relationships) the more readily we can recognize that the various quantum and relativistic features (and relationships) are produced through the singularity of the UCP s A-Causal Computation; Thus, for instance, if we examine the UCF s embedding of Relativity s spacetime and energy-mass ratios (e.g., s/t and e/m ) we find that they are represented in inversed complimentary formats representing their frame-consistent (space) divided by object-inconsistent (time) and multiplied by their inverse ratio of frame-inconsistent (energy) divided by object-consistent (mass) elements. Perhaps a clearer way of representing the UCP s A-Causal Computation embedding of Relativity s space-time s curvature by the energy-mass equivalence, which is nevertheless affected by the integrated aspects of the UCP s rate of computation (e.g., c /h ) given by: c e m = s. h t Another fascinating facet of this full integration of quantum and relativistic elements as embedded within the singular higher-ordered Universal Computational Principle s Universal Computational Principle is the coalescing of the relativistic square of the speed of light ( c ) representing the maximal (possible) degree of change across USCF s frames, together with quantum s Planck s constant ( h ), which represents the minimal degree of change across those series of given USCF s frames ; Taken together, this (relativistic) c divided by the (quantum) h yields the Universal Computational Principle s rate of USCF s frames! Thus, we see that the CUFT s discovery of the singular higher-ordered Universal Computational Principle s extremely rapid (c /h) computation of the series of USCF s frames, e.g., including its three Computational Dimensions computation of the four spatial pixels (of space, time, energy and mass at every exhaustive spatial pixel in the physical universe at every minimal time point, c /h) utilizes- embeds- and fully integrates- the apparently distinct quantum and relativistic features, elements and relationships In fact, due to the above illustrated embedding of these quantum and relativistic elements and relationships within the Universal Computational Principle s generalized Universal Computational Formula e.g., as special cases within the Universal Computational Formula s representation, perhaps Einstein s prophetic statement that he wishes his Theory of Relativity to become a special case within a broader generalization is fulfilled within the framework of the CUFT s singular full integration and embedding of both QM and RT within the broader Universal Computational Formula. More generally, we can ascertain that the singularity of the UCP s A-Causal Computation represented through its Universal Computational Formula fully embeds- and integrates the various quantum and relativistic features and relationships as integral elements arising from the singularity of the UCP s rapid production of the four basic physical features through its extremely rapid computation of the series of USCF s frames based on its three Computational Dimensions (of Framework, Consistency and Locus): This in fact implies that the most general representation of the UCP s A-Causal Computation may be represented through its extremely rapid computation (c /h) of the rapid series of exhaustive universal USCF s series based on its three Computational Dimensions: c F { f, o}, C{ c, ic}, L{ g,1} t e h = s m The important point to be noted from this generalized format of the Universal Computational Formula is that it clearly represents the Universal Computational Principle s (UCP s) A-Causal Computation i.e., wherein all of the spatial pixels in the physical universe (at any minimal time-point) are computed simultaneously by this UCP; Moreover, based on the CUFT s Computational Invariance page 9 of 17

10 Citation: JehonathanBentwich (017) The Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT): A New A-Causal Computation Physics. S1:1. Principle, e.g., which states that since it is only the UCP which both produces the rapid series of USCF s frames (and computes the four basic secondary computational physical features of space, time, energy and mass at every spatial pixels within them) and also exists (solely) in-between any two subsequent USCF s frames, whereas these four (secondary computational) physical features exist only during the USCF s frames (as computed singularly by this UCP) but do not exist in-between any two subsequent USCF s frames, then the Computational Invariance Principle asserts that only the UCP may be considered computationally invariant whereas the four basic physical features (of space, time, energy and mass ) are computationally variant, e.g., exists only phenomenally (and transiently) Therefore, the generalized format of the Universal Computational Formula evinces that the whole production and- sustenance- and evolution- of any spatial pixel in the physical universe is solely and singularly computed by this UCP, and that there cannot exist any material-causal relationships between any such two (or more) spatial pixels, forces, effects etc. (e.g., either within the same USCF frame or across different USCF s frames) due to their singular production by the Universal Computational Principle simultaneously (e.g., at each USCF frame) and the only computationally invariant UCP is the a-causal determinant of their reappearance, sustenance and indeed evolution across the series of USCF s frames. 6. The UCP s A-Causal Production of the Physical Universe Hence, based on the CUFT s recognition of the Universal Computational Principle s singular and sole production- sustenance- and evolution- of every spatial pixel in the physical universe i.e., and hence of the entire physical universe itself, we reach the inevitable A-Causal Computation conclusion whereby both the development of the universe as well as its constant re-production (e.g. sustenance) are solely contingent upon the simultaneous and exhaustive computation of each and every spatial pixel in the universe by this singular higher-ordered Universal Computational Principle, e.g., at every minimal timepoint c /h comprising any single or multiple USCF s frame/s)! The key point to be emphasized here is that this A-Causal Computation new Paradigm in Theoretical Physics differentiates itself from the current materialcausal paradigm underlying both QM and RT is that instead of the universe evolving- and depending- solely on any material-causal interactions (e.g., at the quantum or relativistic levels), i.e., being caused by earlier antecedent material causes or interactions, the new A-Causal Physics Paradigm of the UCP asserts that all existing- previous- and future- states (and developments, phenomena, structure etc.) of the physical universe may only be accounted for through its sole and singular production by the Universal Computational Principle s continuous re-production of each and every spatial pixel in the physical universe; Indeed, as stated by the Computational Invariance Principle, the four (secondary computational) physical features of space, time, energy and mass (e.g., computed by the UCP for each and every spatial pixel in the universe at every minimal time-point comprising a single or multiple USCF s frame/s) represent merely computationally variant phenomenal (and transient) features which exist only during the USCF s and are computed solely by the Universal Computational Principle, whereas the only computationally invariant element which exists both during the USCF s frames (e.g., computing these four physical features at every spatial pixel in the universe) and in-between any two (subsequent) USCF s frames is this singular Universal Computational Principle; Hence, according to this Computational Invariance Principle we may only regard this Universal Computational Principle to constitute the sole computationally invariant reality which exists permanently and which gives rise to the physical universe through its computation of the four physical features at every spatial pixel in the universe at every minimal timepoint, e.g., comprising the rapid series of USCF s But, if this is so, then there cannot be any physical or material element or cause or effect which can either pass or affect any other spatial pixel, phenomenon or entity either within the same USCF frame or across different USCF s frames! This is because all of the spatial pixels of any given (single or multiple) USCF s frame/s are computed solely and simultaneously by this UCP (e.g., at any given single USCF frame, so that there cannot exist any material-causal interaction between them), and none of these spatial pixels (including their four corresponding four secondary computational physical features of space, time, energy and mass ) exist in-between the USCF s frames and therefore have to be reproduced (or evolved ) by the UCP for every USCF new frame We therefore reach the inevitable (albeit somewhat counterintuitive ) theoretical conclusion wherein the existencesustenance- and even evolution- of each and every spatial page 10 of 17

11 Citation: JehonathanBentwich (017) The Computational Unified Field Theory (CUFT): A New A-Causal Computation Physics. S1:1. pixel in the physical universe, e.g., as well as the entire physical universe is solely and singularly computed and originated by the Universal Computational Principle as expressed through its Universal Computational Formula! This means that (as shown earlier) the Material- Causal prevailing paradigm underlying both QM and RT Physics must be fundamentally revised to indicate that any physical state, phenomenon, effect observed at the quantum or relativistic levels cannot be explained (any longer) through any exhaustive hypothetical series of physical interactions or material factors; As we stated above, in QM the probabilistic interpretation currently assumes that it is the direct (or indirect) physical interaction/s between any given subatomic probe and ( probability wave function ) subatomic target element which determined the (assumed) collapse of this target s (assumed) probability wave function. Hence, the current material-causal probabilistic QM model is negated by the above UCP assertion that at every minimal time-point every spatial pixel in the physical universe is computed solely and singularly by this UCP, e.g., therefore negating the possibility of any such material-causal physical interactions between the subatomic probe and target elements as determining the subatomic physical reality! Likewise, the currently assumed Relativistic model of the physical reality also posits that any relativistic (space-time or energy-mass) phenomenon is determined based on the direct physical interaction of a relativistic observer and such phenomenon; But as we ve seen, such materialcausal assumption is negated by the UCP s A-Causal Computation of every spatial pixel in the physical universe at every minimal time-point (comprising a single or multiple USCF frame) i.e., instead pointing at the singularity of the UCP s computation of all spatial pixels during each single USCF s frame, and its re-production across subsequent frames (e.g., since as stated by the Computational Invariance Principle the physical features do not exist in-between USCF s frames and therefore have to be reproduced with every USCF frame by the UCP ) Hence, the theoretical conclusion derived from the UCP s A-Causal Computation negation of both QM and RT material-causal basic assumption may be potentially quite far reaching, but it is still warranted based on the above analysis, i.e., indicating that the most generalized mathematical formalization of both QM and RT has to be rejected in favor of the singular higher-ordered UCP s Universal Computational Formula (which has been shown to embed- fully integrate- and indeed transcend these two material-causal invalid computational models); In the case of Relativity Theory, Einstein s Field Equations represents most generally the (implicit) material-causal assumption underlying Relativity, i.e., implying that it is the direct and dynamic physical interaction between massive objects and space-time which determines the curvature of this spacetime, and conversely that this curvature of space-time by these massive objects which determines the movement pathways of these massive objects. Einstein s Field Equations 1 8π G Gµυ Rµυ Rgµυ = T c 4 µυ But, since we ve seen that the UCP s A-Causal Computation (coupled with its associated Computational Invariance Principle) negates the existence of any such material-causal physical relationships (e.g., due to the above-mentioned simultaneous computation of all exhaustive spatial pixels in the physical universe at any minimal time point comprising a single or multiple USCF s frame/s), then this Einstein s Field Equation generalized format is rejected by the CUFT s UCP A-Causal Computation Universal Computational Formula! In much the same manner, we have to reject the most generalized mathematical representation of Quantum Mechanics collapse of the Probability Wave Function caused by its direct physical interaction with another external agent (i.e., observation); this is because this Probability Wave Function Mathematical formulation posits that prior to the direct physical interaction of the subatomic probe element with the (assumed probability wave function of the) subatomic target element the target exists as a probability wave function dispersed over al almost infinite region of space, and only following this direct physical interaction between the subatomic probe and target elements does the target s probability wave function collapses into a complimentary defined particle measurement [7,31,3]. ψ φ i Wherein prior to the direct physical interaction between the wave function and the observer (or observation) the wave function is assumed to comprise a linear combination of the eigenbasis of the particular subatomic physical feature measured, but then caused page 11 of 17