Closing date of voting Secretariat BSI

Transcription

1 REPORT OF VOTING ON ISO/IS losing date voting ISO/T 67 /S 7 Secretariat BSI A report shall be returned to ISO/S no later than 3 months after the closing date voting on the IS, whether or not s have been reviewed and/or a new text has been prepared. Preliminary report (submitted in those cases where s are still to be considered and/or a decision has not yet been taken, or where it is decided that the nature s indicates a need for further consultation and/or reversion to a previous project development stage). To be followed by a 'Final report'. Any preliminary report is for ISO/S for information, and is not circulated to member bodies) Final report (submitted either immediately, when all s have been reviewed and a decision can be taken, or following a 'Preliminary report'. The final report is circulated by ISO/S to member bodies, and is distributed with any associated IS or FIS text) 1 Result the voting The above-mentioned document was circulated to member bodies with a request that the ISO entral Secretariat be informed whether or not member bodies were in favour registration the IS as a Final raft International Standard or for publication in the case unanimous approval. The vote closed on the date indicated above. The replies listed in annex A have been received. 3 omments received Observations the secretariat See annex B (if appropriate) 4 ecision the hairman Preliminary report (no annexes required) The s are under review and/or a decision on further procedure has not yet been taken The project is to revert to the Preparatory Stage (a new working draft will be developed) The project is to revert to the ommittee Stage (a new committee draft will be developed) Final report Having received 100% approval from the member bodies voting, the IS is approved for direct publication without change other than editorial (no FIS vote) (Option not applicable to projects progressing under the Vienna Agreement) A revised text is to be submitted to ISO/S for the approval procedure (FIS vote) A revised text is to be submitted to ISO/S for a further enquiry (IS) vote Remarks (e.g. observations on how s were reviewed, date by which a decision is to be taken, date when a text is expected) Enclosures A Formal response to s attached B Signature the Secretary Signature the hairman M K Greenley ate 08/0/011 P Smedley ate 08/0/011 FORM 13 (ISO) Page 1 1 Version

2 Ballot Information Reference ISO/IS ommittee ISO/T 67/S 7 Edition number 1 English title French title Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Site-specific assessment mobile fshore units -- Part 1: Jack-ups Industries du pétrole et du gaz naturel -- Évaluation spécifique au site d'unités mobiles en mer -- Partie 1: Plates-formes auto-élévatrices Start date End date Opened by ISO/S on :07:08 losed by ISO/S on Status Pending Voting stage Enquiry Version number 1 Vienna agreement ISO lead Result voting P-Members voting: 15 in favour out 15 = 100 % (requirement >= 66.66%) (P-Members having abstained are not counted in this vote.) Member bodies voting: 0 negative votes out 19 = 0 % (requirement <= 5%) Approved

3 Votes by members ountry Member Status Approval isapproval Abstention Argentina IRAM P-Member X Austria ASI X Brazil ABNT P-Member X anada S P-Member X * hina SA P-Member X enmark S P-Member X Finland SFS P-Member France AFNOR P-Member X * Germany IN O-Member X * Indonesia BSN P-Member X Italy UNI P-Member X Japan JIS P-Member X Kazakhstan KAZMET P-Member X Korea, Republic KATS P-Member X Netherlands NEN P-Member X * Norway SN P-Member X * Pakistan PSQA X Poland PKN O-Member X Portugal IPQ X Qatar QS P-Member X Romania ASRO P-Member X Russian Federation GOST R P-Member X Singapore SPRING SG P-Member X * Spain AENOR O-Member X Sweden SIS X United Kingdom BSI Secretariat X USA ANSI P-Member P-Member TOTALS Total P-Members voting: TOTALS (*) A file was submitted with this vote

4 omments from Voters anada S P-Member ISO_IS_ _S.doc France AFNOR P-Member ISO_IS_ _AFNOR.doc Germany IN O-Member ISO_IS_ _IN.doc Netherlands NEN P-Member ISO_IS_ _NEN.doc Norway SN P-Member ISO_IS_ _SN.doc Singapore SPRING SG P-Member ISO_IS_ _SPRING SG.doc

5 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS Source Total te & te/ed ed, ge, ed/ge From International Ballot: NEN Plus separate mark-up and the Attachments below! FR/AFNOR E/IN A/S NO/SN SG/SPRING US Total Int Ballot From bench-marking (): BASS 0 Benchmarking - Bennett & Associates Benchmarking - GL Noble enton Inc: (+8 in nd round) (+8 in 3 rd round) GMUS Benchmarking - Global Maritime USA / RPSE Inc: (+4 in nd round) Benchmarking - Gusto Inc: (+4 in nd round) Total GRAN TOTAL : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

6 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted US << withdrawn>> ge The provision the first sentence in the last paragraph should only apply during hurricane season In the first sentence the last paragraph, add ",during the hurricane season," after the words " significantly reduced" US << withdrawn>> ed In the last paragraph, there are several items listed under "Examples strengthening" that have nothing to do with strengthing. Start a new paragraph beginning with the 4th item. GENERAL E 0 General ge Please complete and/or delete all explanatory notes (<< >>) in the whole document. d US 0 All Sections ge IA is engaging in a benchmarking study planned to be completed in 010 evaluating the impact the draft ISO text on the exisiting jack-up fleet. Most existing fleet has been designed to class rules and impact should be assessed for a range designs and locations prior to implementing. As the benchmarking study will be complete after the IS ing period has ended, it is recommended that the ISO work group consider any recommendations and s for when the benchmarking study is concluded. d US 0 All Sections ge This document is not yet in useable form as a standard. There are several notes on critical open subjects that need to be resolved. The references need to be finalized. Resubmit after completion benchmark study. d NEN 0 general ge These electronic s are a WOR document comprising 5 sections, as follows: section 1 is the actual ISO s table; d section is Attachment 1 and contains the text selected (sub)clauses from lause (A.)5 to (A.)13 with proposed amendments; section 3 is Attachment and contains the Abbreviated terms and symbols lause 4, and the lauses A.1 to A.4 (with again mainly symbols) from A, with proposed amendments; section 4 is Attachment 3 and contains B with : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

7 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) NEN 0 general on each submitted proposed amendments.; section 5 is Attachment 4 with suggestions for (partial) amendments to Figure Section 1 is in landscape orientation; the 4 attachments in sections, 3, 4 and 5 are in portrait orientation. The full set s consists these electronic s supplemented with a number hard copy pages, marked-up with editorial and other proposed changes. These hard copy pages will be made available to the convenor S 7 / WG 7 for the information WG 7. Amendments in all electronic parts are made using track changes on the IS text. ue to the introduction a new laptop, a new operating system and a new WOR version during the review period, the colour coding in track changes went all over the place and could not be controlled. ifferent colours suggest contributions from different reviewers (which is not the case), while colours even changed between different openings the document during its preparation. Therefore colours should be disregarded; the only relevant distinctions are strike through for deletions and underlining for new text. throughout ed Spelling: UK English spelling is not consistently used throughout the document. Incorrect spelling observed should be corrected where these occur. change s to z in: Accepted - summarises, summarised, summarising - mobilise - localise - categorise, categorisation Remove the comma after the following : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

8 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted abbreviations, where these occur: - i.e. (instead i.e.,) - e.g. (instead e.g.,) By contrast, use a comma before these abbreviations: -., i.e.. -, e.g. NEN 0 general throughout ed Within the document consistent spelling should be applied. Additionally, a degree consistency between all standards in the ISO 1900 series is pursued, although not fully achieved. Therefore there is a preference for conforming to the spelling generally used in earlier standards. For the items in the next column the spelling in ISO varied, or departed from the spelling in other ISO standards. Use consistent spelling for the following words or phrases: - manned evacuated is variously spelled with and without hyphen; a consistent form should be chosen (in ISO 1990 it is spelled without hyphen); - degree--freedom, with and without hyphens; should be spelled consistently with hyphens; - exceedance with an a was chosen as the preferred spelling in ISO standards, in preference to the spelling with an e. - non-linear, non-linearity/ties are mostly spelled as one word in this document, but should consistently be spelled with a hyphen, in accordance with the Oxford ictionary. - time domain with and without hyphen; should be spelled consistently as words without a hyphen, as per other ISO standards; - subset is one word, not with a hyphen; Accepted : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

9 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted - data are plural and should be used with plural verbal forms; - long-crested and short-crested should be consistently written with a hyphen; - long-term and short-term followed by a noun should similarly be written with a hyphen; - site-specific should consistently be spelled with a hyphen; - cross-section(s)/cross-sectional should consistently be spelled with a hyphen; - replace - wherever it occurs by twodimension(al) and 3- by threedimension(al) ; - punch-through is written with and without hyphen; the form with is probably the preferred one; - sea states are two words, not one; - loadset should consistently be spelled as one word, not as two and not with a hyphen. NEN 0 general throughout te There are many cross-references to ISO TR , including reference to specific (sub)clause numbers (question: is the numbering in the same as in ??). As document ISO TR does not yet exist it is difficult to determine the relevance and correctness such cross-references. Generally speaking, reference to ISO TR is best avoided wherever possible. Even after critical consideration the necessity cross-referencing ISO TR , it appears unlikely that these will all disappear. Therefore ISO TR needs to be added to the Bibliography with an appropriate reference number. It appears best to adopt a general, sequential reference number, not related to (sub)clause numbering, similar to those used for non-normative standards in the introduction to lause 3 (see there). NEN 0 throughout ed Where no guidance is fered in the annex(es), the hange, wherever this occurs, No guidance Accepted. : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

10 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted general standard phrase is No guidance is fered. fered to No guidance is fered NEN 0 general NEN 0 general NEN 0 general NEN 0 general NEN 0 general NEN 0 general throughout ed Return period indications are written without hyphen and year in full. throughout ed In accordance with ISO irectives, units following a number should always be used with their formal abbreviation. The abbreviation minute is min. When names units are used in the text without a number they are written out in full. throughout te/ed Symbols for variables are in Times New Roman font and italics, subscripts are in Arial and upright. If the subscript itself is a variable, then it is also in italics. P- occurs many times. onsider (perhaps by consulting with the ISO editors) if this should be seen as a combination symbols or as a notion, a term. In the latter case it may need to be defined as such. throughout te/ed The ISO style for definitions symbols in equations is: - where without a capital 1 st letter and without a colon; - symbol X followed by is (the) instead = ; - a semi-colon after each definition, and a full stop after the last. throughout te/ed For some (sub)clauses editorial corrections and/or suggestions for text changes cannot be properly entered in this Table. These items are given in WOR format in one the attachments to this Table using track changes (see at the top the table). (Sub)clauses concerned are marked with see attachment 1 (or, or 3, or 4) in column 6 this table. throughout ed After having progressed to lause 7 and A.7, entering relatively minor editorial details electronically in the table or its attachments proved too time-consuming to permit Examples: 50 year, 100 year. Examples: 10 m, 5 s, m/s, 10 min, etc. Examples: metres, seconds, minutes, etc. The ISO rules for symbols are generally observed, but not everywhere. Where in error they should be corrected. Apply the ISO style wherever definitions following equations are given. See Attachment 1,, 3 or 4. Please note that in copying from the IS in pfd format to this Word document, symbol fonts are not always maintained in the attachments; no consistent attempt was made to correct such changes font. See markings on separate hard copy pages. Accepted Accepted Incorporated most but not all s. d. : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

11 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) Foreword on each submitted continuing in this manner. Therefore, from lause 8 and A.8 onwards, (minor) editorial details have been marked-up on separate hard copy pages the IS that accompany these electronic s and form an integral part with them; they are additional to and do not replace electronic s. Some time later still, marking-up hard copy pages developed into a practical and convenient procedure, also for more general suggested changes. NEN Foreword Nearly all the text is standard text supplied by ISO S. In the final FIS submission it should only be checked that the listing ISO series standards corresponds with the latest version. See at that time the latest published ISO standard(s) for (an) example(s). Introduction NEN Introduction para 1, line 3 te/ed Insert petrochemical in line with the full title T 67. This seems a bit odd for jack-ups, but it is in accordance with the introduction for the recently published ISO NEN Introduction para, last sentence NEN Introduction para 5, 1 st sentence ed te/ed For ISO the verbal form in this sentence was rejected by ISO S, despite the fact that it appeared in all earlier ISO standards. The sentence was reconstructed as shown in column 6. Is the site-specific assessment not also dependent on the task to be performed? hange to used by the petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries worldwide. hange to It is necessary, therefore, to consider the implications involved in modifications in relation to the overall reliability fshore structural systems. Suggest amending to: Site-specific assessment is normally carried out when an existing jack-up unit is to be installed at a specific site to perform a specific task. NEN Introduction para 5, last ed Enhanced clarity in distinguishing standards in the ISO Suggest amending to: Agreed d Agreed Agreed Agreed : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

12 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) NEN Introduction para 7, 1st sentence NEN Introduction para 8, nd sentence. on each submitted sentence series from other practices/standards. In some instances the original design all or part the structure could be in accordance with other standards in the ISO series, and in some cases different practices or standards could have been applied. ed Rearrange the sentence into a more direct form for better reading. Suggest amending to: A provides background to and guidance on the use this document and should be read in conjunction with the main body this document. te/ed Improved clarity. hange to: Supplementary information is presented in informative es to G. lause 1 Agreed NEN 01 para 3, line 1 te/ed Error. hange ISO to ISO Agreed NEN 01 para 4, nd sentence Agreed Agreed ed Punctuation. Insert comma after However. Agreed NEN 01 NOTE te/ed The verb may is only allowed to express permission. hange may to could. A 01 3 te "When assessing a jack-up operating in such areas, the assessor should supplement the provisions this standard with the procedures relating to ice actions and ice management contained in ISO " This above statement is taken directly from the ISO IS. ISO is the only standard in the ISO suite that provides ice action factors and associated annual probabilities for design events. The above statement refers to "procedures" relating to ice actions. It is recommended that "procedures" be changed to "provisions" to ensure that ice actions are specified appropriately for jack-ups, as they are for all other types structures. hange "When assessing a jack-up operating in such areas, the assessor should supplement the provisions this standard with the procedures relating to ice actions and ice management contained in ISO " to "When assessing a jack-up operating in such areas, the assessor should supplement the provisions this standard with the provisions relating to ice actions and ice management contained in ISO " Procedures to avoid ice actions seem more relevant than provisions to calculate them. Revised to: "When assessing a jack-up operating in such areas, the assessor should supplement the provisions this standard with the provisions relating to ice actions and procedures for ice management contained in ISO ". eleted: other eleted: Background eleted: is provided in informative A, which eleted: - eleted: : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

13 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted A 01 3 te The standard states: This document does not address design, transportation to and from site or installation and removal from site. However it is recommended that the assumptions used in the assessment be checked against the as-installed configuration. Add notes to provide additional clarity. 4. RS rules and the IMO MOU code also provide guidance for design jack-ups. For transportation to and from site or installation and removal from site, refer to ISO US 01 5 th para. ed hange to Yes. lause NEN 0 ISO te This standard is not normative; it is only referenced in A.1.7 with a recommendation NOT to use ! NEN 0 ISO te I question if this standard is normative. Other than in lause 3, it is only referenced in 9.1 in an informative manner ( supporting information can be found in ), while is said to take precedence in case conflict. NEN 0 ISO te The only reference to ISO is in lause 1 with a REOMMENATION to supplement ISO with ISO in regions subject to sea ice and icebergs. lause 3 Remove ISO from lause. Instead, give it a reference number and include it in the Bibliography. It is probably best (and acceptable to ISO) to give this and similar references to other standards a sequential number [1], [], [3], etc., entering them at the beginning the Bibliography, before starting to use the special subclause reference numbering. Remove ISO from lause. Instead, give it a reference number and include it in the Bibliography as for ISO If ISO is truly intended to be normative, a change should to shall in lause 1 is appropriate. If, however, it is intended that ISO is only informative, then ISO should be removed from lause, given a reference number in lause 1 and be included in the Bibliography as for the preceding two entries. NEN 03 introductory te/ed Standards listed in the introductory sentence to lause 3 Remove ISO (if it is removed from the Agreed authors are the opinion that it is not intended to apply to j-u. End addition not included made an informative reference. : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

14 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted sentence seem to be normative by implication (according to the somewhat painful debate with the S editor for ISO ). Other ISO standards from which definitions are taken can be named in an added NOTE. See column 6. Normative standards), and add ISO 1990, which is normative. hange to For the purposes this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 19900, ISO , ISO and ISO 1990 and the following apply. eleted: ISO , NOTE Other terms and definitions relevant for the use this part are also found in ISO and ISO NEN 03 ge I am pleased that the number definitions has been substantially reduced compared to -F (from 109 to 84). However, in my opinion a further reduction is possible; see entries for lause 3 below. NO 03 ge 3. Shall, may and should should be precisely defined as: can verbal form used for statements possibility and capability, whether material, physical or casual may verbal form used to indicate a course action permissible within the limits this ISO standard shall verbal form used to indicate requirements strictly to be followed in order to conform to this ISO standard and from which no deviation is permitted, unless accepted by all involved parties should verbal form used to indicate that among several possibilities one is recommended as particularly suitable, without mentioning or excluding others, or that a certain course action is preferred, but not necessarily required d d : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

15 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted NEN ed improved formulation. hange crest wave to wave crest. Agreed NO te 3.1 should use only 10-4 as the stipulated level. No to 10-4 is quoted as "abnormal" in NEN ed no capital at the beginning a term or a definition. hange Assessment to assessment. Agreed E ed Please check the cross reference " see A " and all other in this document. see A Agreed; to change. NEN ed Inappropriate verbal form. directly above is unclear; what is presumably meant is in a direct vertical line above the footprint ; on top would then appear the correct formulation. hange to: submerged weight all the soil which can be present on top the spudcan NEN NOTE ed Editorial amendments. line 1: change might to can. lines 1 and 3: is the subscript o or 0? and it should be upright instead in italics. line 3: put a comma between effects and see. NEN NOTE ed The NOTE is not correctly copied from ISO hange may to can. Agreed NEN 03.1 te/ed omponent is only short for structural component in elete 3.1. No 3.76 and can easily be missed. NEN NOTES ed te Numbering NOTES. For 3, both environmental consequences and economic consequences should be low; see ISO Number the NOTES with 1 and. hange and/or to and NEN ed Add source definition. Add [ISO 1990:007]. Agreed NEN ed The abbreviation AF should be below the defined term. Interchange term (on 1 st line) and abbreviation (on nd line). NEN te/ed The AF SOF is calculated for a one degree--freedom linear system model, approximating the real system, subjected to periodic excitation. That is the distinguishing feature with the AF RANOM, not whether the mean value Agreed Agreed Agreed, but with modifications. and/or changed to or Agreed hange to Agreed ratio the amplitude a dynamic action effect to the amplitude the corresponding static action effect for periodic excitation a linear one degree- eleted: might eleted: directly above : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

16 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) NEN and te/ed on each submitted is included or not. The terms AF SOF and AF RANOM are not used in the document. They only appear here in 3.16 / 3.17 and in the abbreviated terms in 4.1. Just AF is the only abbreviation that occurs frequently. The corresponding symbols are expressed by K AF, SOF/RANOM. -freedom model approximation jack-up behaviour onsider deleting these terms from lause 3, ensuring that they are appropriately described / defined in the text relevant clauses (notably 10 and A.10). US ge Refer to Sec. 5.5 Add (see 5.5) after "NOTE" Agreed NEN 03.0 ed Suggested editorial improvement. hange to wind, wave and current conditions to which the structure can be subjected during its deployment No, prefer the current version US 03.6 te Add damping change "inertial" to "inertial and damping" We say "part" and will retain the definition as copied from 1990:007. NEN te/ed The phrase i.e. with no current present is not quite correct and at least ambiguous. I suggest to remove it and to add a NOTE for clarity; see proposal in next column. hange to: wave frequency a periodic wave in a reference frame that is stationary with respect to the wave NOTE If there is no current, the reference frame is also stationary with respect to the sea floor. If there is a current, the reference frame moves with the same speed and in the same direction as the current. NEN ed There appears to be a preference for that over which. hange which to that. Agreed NEN ed efinitions are not closed f with a full stop or otherwise. Remove colon after jack-up. Agreed NEN NOTE ed Punctuation. Insert comma between 19 years and but. Agreed NEN te The definition is essentially copied from ISO , with zero-crossing replaced by zero-upcrossing. I do not understand the reason for this change. In a gaussian sea there is no difference between upcrossings and downcrossings. Furthermore, the 1 st NOTE refers to a hange the definition from zero-upcrossing to zero-crossing. Accordingly: - delete the nd NOTE Agreed Agreed We do not agree. Whilst the number up-x and down-x are the same the number crossings is twice that. eleted:, each excluding their mean value eleted: to eleted:, i.e. with no current present : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

17 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) SPR ING SG 1 on each submitted wave spectrum that by implication also refers to a gaussian process. Therefore I strongly recommend to revert to zero crossing alone. - change zero-upcrossing to zero-crossing wherever this term appears in the text ed/te There is an error in the formulation for Tz. enominator subscripts should be "". NEN NOTE te Error in the equation under the square roots. hange the denominator the fraction from m 0 to m, for argument f as well as argument. GM US formula ed Formula should read: m_0/m_ under both square root signs 3. Terms and efinitions 3.43 te Incorrect subscript, it should be m in the denominator. RESOLVE IN APRIL VERSION m_0/m_ Tz = T = (m0 ( f ) / m ( f )) 1/ = π (m0 (ω ) / m (ω )) 1/. enominator subscripts should be "". Agreed - see NEN Agreed - see NEN NEN te/ed No definition is given! This is also completely unnecessary as member is only short for structural member in 3.77; 3.44 can easily be missed. See also 3.1 before, and 3.77 further on. elete We elect to keep current definition A ed The words structural member are out place - Replace structural member with see structural member, following the format 3.1 E ed Please delete the definition 3.44 (3.77 is the same). No; revise as per A. GM US 03. Terms and efinitions 3.44 ed No definition is given for member RESOLVE IN APRIL VERSION Repeat definition given in 3.77 d NEN NOTE te/ed The definition nominal stress from 3.34 in ISO 1990 is given in Therefore I suggest a different formulation the NOTE. hange formulation the NOTE to NOTE Modelled after Agreed Incorporated : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

18 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted NEN ed efinitions should not start with an article; and suggest deleting repeat the word operations / operating. NEN te/ed o not repeat the term in the nd line. Abbreviations can be linked to the defined term, but V Lo is not an abbreviation but a symbol, and symbols are not linked to a defined term in lause 3. hange to: manual that defines. elete the nd line the term. NEN te/ed Improvement in clarity the definition. hange to: maximum vertical reaction under a spudcan supporting the in-water weight the jack-up during the entire preloading operation NEN NOTE 1 and NOTE te/ed Punctuation and suggested improvement the formulation for NOTE 1. larification for NOTE that the preload reaction is the reaction per spudcan Te preload reaction, note : "This is the maximum reaction that would be obtained during preloading if the jack-up were installed on a solid rock foundation." Is a rock foundation at (waterdepth + penetration) level intended here? In other words should the water buoyancy the penetrated leg be taken into account? NO ed The definition should be improved. << assume this is RP? >> hange to: NOTE 1 The in-water weight is the full weight the hull, variable load and preload ballast, plus the legs and spudcans and any contained water, less the buoyancy in water the legs and spudcans (calculated from their external dimensions). Soil buoyancy. NOTE This is the maximum reaction on a spudcan that would be obtained during preloading if the jack-up were installed on a solid rock foundation. NEN ed Editorial correction as per irectives. Remove brackets around SF and put SF on a separate nd line. Agreed Believe needed. Moved to note. Agreed Agreed Agreed V Lo included in the definition and revised and retained (P4 had proposed it s deletion). Agreed eleted: the operating eleted: the eleted: reactions eleted:, eleted: each eleted:, required to eleted: : eleted: ; eleted: ; eleted: water : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

19 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted NEN te/ed orrection. Only the term representative value is defined in ISO 19900; the word representative is used in its normal usage sense and is not a defined term. NEN NOTE ed Symbols should be in italics font TNR, with subscripts upright in Arial. elete the first line with representative. hange fonts Hs and Tz and Tp accordingly. Agreed Agreed A NOTE ed The bar is missing from the square root symbol Add bar to square root symbol NEN NOTE 1 te The difference between member and structural component is obscure. If there is an intended difference this should be clearly explained. However, I have not been able to find this in the document and I suspect that such an intended difference does not exist. NEN te/ed component is just the shortened form the full term structural component ; including this with the defined term seems superfluous (although it does not harm). The right term to use is structural component (or component only for short), which is a defined term in accordance with other ISO standards. The word member can be used with its normal dictionary meaning. In a structural sense it may be considered as an alternative, a synonym to component, if using the same word tends to become repetitive or a circular description. Another possible alternative is (structural) part. elete member and structural member, and rephrase NOTE 1. NB: the text the document should be reviewed for removal member and/or rewording as appropriate. onsider deleting component and keeping structural component only. NEN NOTE, line 3 ed Verbal form. hange may to can ; it is a possibility. Agreed What is in document is consistent and needed for the document structure as presented to reduce confusion. isagreed NEN te/ed Superfluous and mot meaningful; see also 3.44 and elete isagreed NEN ed Spelling. Time-averaged should be written with a hyphen. Agreed NEN NOTE te/ed Error in number. hange definition 3.33 to definition 3.37, and close f the NOTE with a full stop. NEN NOTE te/ed The definition is verbatim from ISO :003. Replace NOTE by [ISO :003]. Agreed NEN te/ed Is it foundations utilization (plural) or foundation ecide if the term should be Agreed Agreed : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

20 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted utilization (singular)? I doubt that the concept utilization can be extended to cover more than one foundation at a time. Formulation. foundations utilization: or foundation utilization. Remove brackets from (maximum value the) ratio.. NEN NOTE 5 te/ed Wrong reference number. hange definition 3.57 to definition Agreed A NOTE 4 ed Utilization is defined by an I here, but a U later (symbol in lause 4.6 and lause 13.. NEN te working stress does not appear in the document. lause 13 (see 13.) even explicitly states that the assessment shall follow a partial safety factor format. If introduced after all, a definition should be provided. GM US 03. Terms and efinitions lause 4 and A.4 NEN 04 and A.4 4 and A.4 in their entirety lause ed No definition given RESOLVE IN APRIL VERSION Various s, including deletions abbreviations or symbols not used; additions abbreviations or symbols used but not listed; spelling, wording; numbering A.4.7 to A.4.1 (new A.4.13); precision and consistency definitions symbols; relationships (equations) between variables do not belong to listings as in lause 4 and A.4 and should be deleted. Adopt a consistent symbol for utilization, unless there is a reason for two different symbols. elete elete. See Attachment. hange I to U Agreed d Yes ; do not agree with 4 th bullet. Removed equations from symbols. : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

21 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted NEN line 3 ed Missing word. hange to general requirements specified in ISO Agreed Ge Extreme events = storm, as per A first sentence.. extreme storm events... No; needs to include earthquakes. NEN 05. para1, line 6 ed Punctuation. Add a closing comma to the subordinate clause ISO TR ,. Agreed NEN 05. Figure 5.-1 te/ed A figure like this is in principle extremely useful; it can serve as a road map for the user/assessor. However, to serve this role well it should be carefully reviewed and upgraded with regard to contents, phrasing, correct and full referencing, and editorially. This should be done by the editing team the WG originating the document. I have given this some attention and present my observations here to assist the amendment process; this is done in the form s (below) and a copy the figure with suggestions through track changes (see Attachment 4). omments: the assessment represented by the figure does not include earthquake and fatigue assessments; fine, but make this clear, e.g. in a note in or with the figure and/or in the title; after obtaining data, the assessment situation(s) (5.4), limit states (5.3) and exposure level (5.5) should be determined; add these as one or more separate step(s) between the 1 st and nd block; add a note in or with the figure to the effect that a cross-referenced number always includes a crossreference to the corresponding number in A; See also Attachment 4. Figure extensively updated : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

22 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted the present nd block: will other aspects limit suitability? is rather mysterious: other than what? Perhaps adjacent facilities are meant, perhaps more conditions such as this; name these and/or refer to the appropriate place where these aspects are dealt with. Reference to hydrodynamic coefficients and foundations seem out place here. 6 th block down in the main tree: refer to the determination all actions (hydrodynamic coefficients and wind actions are only two a whole pack); 7 th block down: determination responses can only be performed if it is preceded by the application (factored) actions: an important step in 8.8; editorially: use capitals (1 st letter an entry only); use cross-references: delete lause ; ensure correctness; be specific and complete; put references in brackets; phrasing: amend so as to be precise and clear; the one but last block on the right: this presupposes that earlier assessments were done using cruder models, but this is nowhere stated; this could be overcome by making the 4 blocks on responses and assessment in the central tree more specific; phrase the one but last block on the right such that use more realistic (and more detailed) models for structure, foundations and assessments could resolve failure acceptance; include a reference to 10.9 there. NB: these s and Attachment 4 should not be seen as exhaustive; finalizing the figure is a task to be taken up by the WG! : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

23 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted 05. Fig 5.-1 Ge The overall flow chart fig 5.-1 is not completely in accordance with the text in clause 5. (see s below) 05. Fig 5.-1 Ge There is no reference to earthquake (screening) assessment as per clause Fig 5.-1 Ge There is no reference to various parts the document, such as: - selection exposure level clause operating conditions being critical - long term application (11) - temperature as limit state (13.10) - wave headings, variability natural period, range penetration 05. Fig 5.-1 Ge Establish hydrodynamic coefficients and wind loads is inconsistent and not complete, we suggest actions, clause Fig 5.-1 Ge After having selected to incorporate fixity, one must adapt his analysis model, not continue with response 05. Fig 5.-1 Te lause refers to displacement check step 3. The flow chart suggests hull deflections as a last check when step check is satisfied. This is at best inconsistent. The step 3 displacement check requires an (if significant) iteration into the response model and rechecking structural and foundation checks See NEN re Fig 5.-1 See NEN re Fig 5.-1 See NEN re Fig 5.-1 See NEN re Fig 5.-1 See NEN re Fig 5.-1 See NEN re Fig Fig 5.-1 Ed Text refers to Unit acceptable, not suitable See NEN re Fig 5.-1 : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

24 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted 05. Fig 5.-1 Te When unit satisfies clause 5. step a) but subsequently NOT step b) for foundation, we assume an structural assessment analysis is needed starting with actions and model, not with determine response 05. Fig 5.-1 Ge We can t see why will other aspects limit suitability is to be done as a second step. We suggest it to be a final step. We also find it rather cryptic 05. Fig 5.-1 Ge Top box: jack-up data is further described in clause 6., not Fig 5.-1 Ge nd box: reference to clause 7.3, but no other aspects mentioned in that section 05. Fig 5.-1 Ge nd box: reference to clause 9, other foundation aspects are listed in clause Fig 5.-1 Ed etermine Responses box Reference to instead 10.5, and to fig See NEN re Fig 5.-1 See NEN re Fig 5.-1 See NEN re Fig 5.-1 See NEN re Fig 5.-1 See NEN re Fig 5.-1 Addressed by previous updates. GM US 05. Assessment Approach Figure 5.-1 te It is unclear what hydrodynamic aspects limit jack-up suitability Remove reference to hydrodynamics or explain in 7.3 NEN 05.3 line 1 ed Simplification by removing duplication. hange to: ISO divides the limit states into four categories as described below; normally only the ULS.. NEN 05.3 a) para 1, lines 5 and 6 ed Editorial adjustments. hange to:. are summarized in normative B. For the ULS, the integrity the structure should be Resolved in updated figure Agreed Agreed eleted:. As described below, eleted: Normative eleted: Under the action : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

25 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted unimpaired, but damage to non safety-critical (secondary) structure the jack-up can be tolerated. US 05.3 a) ed with the jack-up the most critical operating configuration with the jack-up in the most critical operating configuration US 05.3 a) te When the ULS metocean conditions are within the defined SLS limits for the jack-up 05.3 a) paragraph Ge We have difficulty with the status earthquake in the assessment: Is it required to do at least a screening (following 10.7) or only when deemed necessary (section 5.3 a, or section 10.3 unusual circumstances). Also not in the flow chart in figure NEN 05.3 a) para, line a) nd paragraph When the ULS metocean conditions are within the defined ULS limits for the jack-up ed Missing word. hange to:. shall be assessed with the jack-up in the most critical operating configuration. Ed 3rd line, add "in": this ULS situation shall be assessed with the jack-up _in_ the most critical operating configuration this ULS situation shall be assessed with the jackup in the most critical operating Agreed Our wording is correct; the point is that the rig will not be placed into ULS configuration if the SLS threshold is not exceeded. This thought is covered in the at the end 5.3 a). Alan ixon says: I disagree with the US ; if the text is read carefully then I think it's meaning is clear. However, it does need careful reading, and I feel it's readability could be improved through wordsmithing. Updates included to align with draft update to Now Excluded from scope flowchart. Agreed See NEN above eleted: may : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

26 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted NEN 05.3 a) to d) te/ed There is an inconsistency in referring to limit states in singular or plural form: a) ls unspecific, b) and c) use singular; d) uses plural. Generally speaking, referring to limit states should preferably be in plural form as, within each type, there are more than one limit state. onsider updating the text. Agreed A 05.3 Section a) nd paragraph 1 st sentence ed Wording shall be assessed with the jack-up the most critical NO 05.3 d) ge 5.3 d) ALS loads related to ship collisions have to be stipulated based on a risk analysis. NEN para 1, lines 5 to 7 ed Removing a comma and use a defined term. hange to: NEN ed At first sight may could indeed be seen as permission. However, in combination with the 3 rd sentence it appears more likely that pinned spudcans are seen as being the normal case. Then the verbal form is better changed. NO te 5.4. A pinned assumption for the spud cans is not necessarily a conservative assumption, neither for the geotechnical stability nor for the structural analysis. The moments will be higher near the spud can with fixity than with a pinned solution. Shear and axial forces will be the same. A more correct statement is given in The text in 5.4. can be Insert in shall be assessed with the jack-up in the most critical. any required configuration change shall be evaluated and appropriate assumptions incorporated into the assessment calculations. Any required restrictions on the operations shall be included in the operations manual. hange may be to are normally. If there are unusual risks (ship collision and others), then the text requires that these ALS cases are investigated. Operations manual is an existing document. We can only modify procedure. Keep existing Agreed Agree to update by adding a with text from, and reference to, the 1 st para If there is foundation moment the axial forces will be less severe and the shear forces re-distribute. eleted:, eleted: operating procedures : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

27 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) on each submitted deleted Ge Not all jack-up legs do have spudcans The efinition spudcan addresses this Ge Leg length reserve 13.7: shall at least be 1.5m versus clause 5.4.6: recommended requirements seems to be contradicting Ge A Site-specific assessment is, by definition (see 3.4), the evaluation the jack-up and which should include consideration potential effects adjacent structures to the jack-up. onsequences to adjacent structures are thus not an implicit part a SSA but may be relevant to consider (further). It may be considered the assessor s responsibility to as a minimum highlight any potential problems/issues. NEN line ed Adding a comma. Put a comma between made and e.g. :.inconsistent with the assumptions made, e.g. penetration, NEN a) last sentence te/ed Use more specific phrase. hange to:. for the assessment earthquake events.. elete "recommended" elete "considered and" NEN st bullet ed Removing a comma. Remove comma after or near to. OK, but remove both commas. NEN NOTE after bullets te/ed Adjustment text for greater clarity. hange to: This classification includes risk loss human life for people other than personnel being part the jack-up's normal complement and personnel on any adjacent structure that could be affected by failure the jack-up; all such personnel fall under the S1 category (see 5.5.). The primary driver for the classification in consequence categories is eleted: consideration : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version

28 Template for s and secretariat observations ate: ocument: ISO/IS (3) 4 5 (6) (7) NEN a) para te A jack-up adjacent to a 1 facility should also be classed as 1. on each submitted damage to the environment or to society ( ). hange sentence to: Unless the above conditions apply a jack-up shall normally be categorized as or 3. However, if an adjacent facility that could be affected by failure the jack-up is categorized as 1, then the jackup shall also be categorized as 1. NEN NOTE 1 ed line 3: spelling categorisation. last line: verbal form. categorisation should be categorization with a z. The cost.. raises the consequences. NEN NOTE te/ed Precision in formulation. hange to.include the potential for significant unintended release. US te << It is expected that we will say: >> and << from WG7 to the reader... A te Reference is made to 50 year independent extremes in various sections the standard. These issues should be resolved by the FIS stage. Recommend note be included in the Introduction the standard as to the extensive benchmarking process and best practice in the international community in this regard. NEN para 3, line ed Be specific in cross-references. hange below to in Table NEN text under Table te/ed Two issues. 1. There is a discrepancy here. ertain specifications are also given for L and L3. However, in the whole document no further distinction is made between L1, L and L3 requirements, while the NOTE in explicitly states that (for now) only the manned nonevacuated (L1) category is addressed.. Assuming the current text remains here some changes are proposed; see column This discrepancy should be resolved by making a clear statement, preferably early in the document. If L and L3 categories are intended to be covered, they should also be dealt with in an appropriate manner in the other clauses.. amend text to read: The following provisions apply to categories L1, isagree. With reference to 1, in some parts the world platforms are designated 1 when they do not have 1 level risk. Also they may no longer be operating with 1 level risk. d. added at the end 4 th para the introduction. NOTE removed from No longer needed in updated and other minor revisions Agree to. ERP have some concern that : ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE olumns 1,, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting ing template/version