Form 21: Result of Systematic Review of ISO deliverable

Transcription

1 Form 21: Result of Systematic Review of ISO deliverable Date: ISO/TC 131/SC4 N 770 Title of TC/SC concerned: Metallic tube connections for fluid power and general use -- Test methods for hydraulic fluid power connections This document is to be completed by the committee secretariat and circulated within 6 months of the termination of the review period to (1) all P- and O-members, organizations and committees in liaison, (2) the ISO Central Secretariat, (3) the TC secretariat in the case of review in an SC. Review: Start date: End date: Reference number and title of ISO deliverable: ISO ISO English title: Metallic tube connections for fluid power and general use -- Test methods for hydraulic fluid power connections French title: Raccords de tubes métalliques pour transmissions hydrauliques et pneumatiques et applications générales -- Méthodes d'essai pour raccords pour transmissions hydrauliques Results (the compilation of results is given as an annex) The following criteria have been met: 1. A simple majority of voting P-members has proposed the following action: a withdrawal b revision/amendment c confirmation 2. X It has been adopted/is intended to be adopted (with or without change) or is used by at least 5 countries FORM 21 - Result of SR Version 01/2015

2 In the light of results, the following action is proposed and will be considered the committee decision unless objections are received within one month of circulation of this form: Criteria 1 a met or criteria 2 not met: withdrawal Criteria 1 b & 2 met see Note: revision amendment minor revision (to be registered as a FDIS stage 50.00) Note: The choice between revision and amendment is essentially based on an assessment of whether or not the changes are limited (amendment) or if they require the redevelopment of the whole document (revision). To be determined by the committee secretariat. A minor revision may be selected if the proposed changes do not impact the technical content. In the case of a Revision or an Amendment, the project is to be registered as: A Working draft (WD stage 20-00) A Committee draft (CD stage 30.00) A Draft International Standard (DIS stage 40.00) A call for experts must be launched for revisions or amendments. However there is no minimum number of active P-members required. The scope of the document is confirmed Note: an expansion of scope will require a NWIP ballot and the completion of Form 4. See clause of the ISO/IEC Directives Part 1 and Consolidated ISO Supplement. Proposed development track 1 (24 months) 2 (36 months - default) 3 (48 months) Proposed Project Leader (name and address): Lou Moreiras, lmoreiras@parker.com This proposal will be developed by: An existing Working Group (please specify which one: TC 131/SC 4/WG 6) A new Working Group (title: Click here to enter text.) Note: establishment of a new WG must be approved by committee resolution The TC/SC directly Criteria 1c & 2, met: Confirmation For TS and PAS ONLY: Conversion to an International Standard FORM 21 - Result of SR Version 01/2015

3 No final decision can yet be taken for the following reason(s) (indicate when decision is expected): Other (Please describe, e.g. division into parts, combination with another IS, registration as a PWI) A full revision is needed to address the comments Secretariat: ANSI Date: Signature of TC/SC Secretary: Rockhill, Denise FORM 21 - Result of SR Version 01/2015

4 Systematic Review voting result Reference ISO 19879:2010 (Ed 2) Committee ISO/TC 131/SC 4 Edition number 2 Vienna agreement ISO lead English title French title Metallic tube connections for fluid power and general use -- Test methods for hydraulic fluid power connections Raccords de tubes métalliques pour transmissions hydrauliques et pneumatiques et applications générales -- Méthodes d'essai pour raccords pour transmissions hydrauliques Start date Opened on Status End date :16:26 Closed on :35:04 Closed Voting stage Systematic review Version number 1 Vote in parallel with Questions Q.1 Q.2 Q.3 Q.4 Q.5 Q.6 Recommended action Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? Votes by members Country Member Status Confirm Revise / Amend Withdraw Abstain lack of consensus Abstain lack of expertise Q.2 Q.3 Q.4 Q.5 Q.6 Australia SA O-Member X No No No No Brazil ABNT P-Member X No No No No China SAC P-Member X Yes Identical No No France AFNOR P-Member X Yes Identical No Germany DIN P-Member X Yes Identical No Yes (experts nominated) Yes (experts nominated) India BIS P-Member X No No No No

5 Votes by members Country Member Status Confirm Revise / Amend Withdraw Abstain lack of consensus Abstain lack of expertise Q.2 Q.3 Q.4 Q.5 Q.6 Italy UNI P-Member X Yes Identical No Japan JISC P-Member X Yes Modified No Yes (experts nominated) Yes (experts nominated) Netherlands NEN P-Member X Yes Identical No No Poland PKN P-Member X Yes Identical No No Portugal IPQ P-Member Russian Federation GOST R P-Member X No No No No Sweden SIS P-Member X No No No No Ukraine DSTU P-Member X No No No No United Kingdom BSI P-Member X Yes Identical No No United States ANSI Secretariat X No Yes No Yes (experts nominated) P-Members TOTALS Total of P-Members voting (*) : 13 Confirm : 11 Revise / Amend : Yes 6 No 7 Identical 1 Modified 1 Yes 5 No 0 Yes 14 No 5 Yes 9 No Withdraw : 0 TOTALS Yes 7 No 7 Identical 1 Modified 1 Yes 6 No 0 Yes 15 No 5 Yes 10 No (*): P-Members having abstained are not counted Answers to Q.1: "Recommended action" (all votes) 0 x Withdraw 2 x Revise / Amend 11 x Confirm 0 x Abstain (consensus) Italy (UNI) Brazil (ABNT) China (SAC) France (AFNOR) Germany (DIN) India (BIS) Japan (JISC) Netherlands (NEN) Poland (PKN) Russian Federation (GOST R) Ukraine (DSTU) United Kingdom (BSI) 2 x Abstain (expertise) Australia (SA) Sweden (SIS) Comments Team, ANSI ISO Need to consider the previously submitted Chinese comments and observations listed in document 131/4/6 N422. Suggest a minor revision to include the comments in document 131/4/6 N422. Answers to Q.2: "Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?" (all votes)

6 Answers to Q.2: "Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?" (all votes) 8 x Yes China (SAC) France (AFNOR) Germany (DIN) Italy (UNI) Japan (JISC) Netherlands (NEN) Poland (PKN) United Kingdom (BSI) 7 x No Australia (SA) Brazil (ABNT) India (BIS) Russian Federation (GOST R) Sweden (SIS) Ukraine (DSTU) Comments Australia (SA) Tasker, Samantha Ms Brazil (ABNT) Caetano, Brian Mr China (SAC) LUO, Jing Mr France (AFNOR) Lubineau, Catherine Mme Germany (DIN) Dürer, Jörn Mr India (BIS)., RAJPAL Mr Italy (UNI) Pisani, Emanuela Ms Japan (JISC) Chiba, Makoto Mr Netherlands (NEN) van Straaten, Jacqueline Mrs Poland (PKN) Pachulska, Lucyna Ms. Russian Federation (GOST R) Szajniak, Igor Mr Sweden (SIS) Jonsson, Joel Mr Ukraine (DSTU) Polyakova, Irina Mrs United Kingdom (BSI) O'Neil-Shaw, Sarah Ms Team, ANSI ISO no comment stakeholders are studying this subject GB/T NF EN ISO 19879:2010 DIN EN ISO UNI EN ISO 19879:2011 JIS B nen-en PN-EN ISO 19879:2011 This International Standard isn't intended to be adopted in next two year as a national standard Not of interest to Swedish stakeholders. This Standard will be adopted as a national BS EN ISO 19879:2010 Not adopted as a national standard. Answers to Q.3: "Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified?" (all votes) 7 x Identical 1 x Modified Comments China (SAC) France (AFNOR) Germany (DIN) Italy (UNI) Netherlands (NEN) Poland (PKN) United Kingdom (BSI) Japan (JISC) Japan (JISC) Chiba, Makoto Mr Since flange connectors are not popular in our country, we have deleted them. Answers to Q.4: "If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard?" (all votes) 1 x Yes 6 x No Australia (SA) Brazil (ABNT) India (BIS) Russian Federation (GOST R) Sweden (SIS) Ukraine (DSTU)

7 Answers to Q.4: "If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard?" (all votes) Comments Team, ANSI ISO Document is used in the U.S. without national adoption. Answers to Q.5: "Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country?" (all votes) 0 x Yes 15 x No Australia (SA) Brazil (ABNT) China (SAC) France (AFNOR) Germany (DIN) India (BIS) Italy (UNI) Japan (JISC) Netherlands (NEN) Poland (PKN) Russian Federation (GOST R) Sweden (SIS) Ukraine (DSTU) United Kingdom (BSI) Answers to Q.6: "In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project?" (all votes) 5 x Yes 10 x No Comments France (AFNOR) Germany (DIN) Italy (UNI) Japan (JISC) Australia (SA) Brazil (ABNT) China (SAC) India (BIS) Netherlands (NEN) Poland (PKN) Russian Federation (GOST R) Sweden (SIS) Ukraine (DSTU) United Kingdom (BSI) France (AFNOR) Lubineau, Catherine Mme Germany (DIN) Dürer, Jörn Mr Italy (UNI) Pisani, Emanuela Ms Japan (JISC) Chiba, Makoto Mr Team, ANSI ISO Olivier GUILLOU - PARKER HANNEFIN Olivier CLOAREC - ARTEMA German experts to ISO/TC 131/SC 4/WG 6 Mr. Giovanni Stucchi (already appointed in ISO/TC 131/SC 4/WG 6) Mr. Hirofumi Iwasaki: Ihara Science Corpolation Ted Amling, Parker Hannifin, tamling@parker.com Harry Patel, Parker Hannifin, hpatel@parker.com Luis Moreiras, Parker Hannifin, lmoreiras@parker.com Comment files from voters China (SAC) LUO, Jing Mr Italy (UNI) Pisani, Emanuela Ms See linked comment file: ISO (Ed 2) SAC.doc (access restricted to ballot audience) See linked comment file: ISO (Ed 2) UNI.doc (access restricted to ballot audience)

8 Template for comments and secretariat observations Date: April.10 Document: Project: MB/ NC 1 Line number (e.g. 17) Clause/ Subclause (e.g. 3.1) Paragraph/ Figure/ Table/ (e.g. Table 1) Type of Comments Proposed change Observations of the comment 2 secretariat CN 1 te ISO will be replaced by ISO Change ISO to ISO Accepted CN 6 te The glossary leakage test is same as that of ISO 6605, but the test method is different. CN Table 4 te the test pressure for a minimum of 60s is not too clear Change leakage test to air leakage test Change the test pressure for a minimum of 60s to the test pressure for 60s to 120s Accepted Accepted 1. 1 MB = Member body / NC = National Committee (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **) 2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial ISO/IEC/CEN/CENELEC electronic balloting commenting template/version page 1 of 2

9 Template for comments and secretariat observations Date: April.10 Document: Project: MB/ NC 1 Line number (e.g. 17) Clause/ Subclause (e.g. 3.1) Paragraph/ Figure/ Table/ (e.g. Table 1) Type of Comments Proposed change Observations of the comment 2 secretariat 1 MB = Member body / NC = National Committee (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **) 2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial ISO/IEC/CEN/CENELEC electronic balloting commenting template/version page 2 of 2

10 Template for comments and secretariat observations Date: Document: ISO Project: MB/ NC 1 Line number (e.g. 17) Clause/ Subclause (e.g. 3.1) Paragraph/ Figure/ Table/ (e.g. Table 1) Type of Comments Proposed change Observations of the comment 2 secretariat IT Page 1 TE WARNING Some of the tests described in this International Standard are considered hazardous. It is, therefore, essential that, in conducting these tests, all appropriate safety precautions be strictly adhered to. Attention is drawn to the danger of burst, fine jets (which can penetrate the skin) and energy release of expanding gases. To reduce the hazard of energy release, bleed air out of test specimens prior to pressure testing. Tests shall be set up and performed by properly trained personnel. To be deleted. Insert in the draft the following used in the ISO DIS "5.1 Safety considerations Some of the tests described in this International Standard are considered hazardous. It is therefore essential that, in conducting these tests, all appropriate safety precautions be strictly applied. In particular, attention is drawn to the following situations: a) bursting of the coupling or hose; b) fine jets, which can penetrate the skin; c) energy release caused by expanding gases. d) handling of objects at high and low temperatures e) movement of actuators and metallic parts when attachments and the endurance test machine are used Tests shall be set up and performed by properly trained personnel To reduce the hazard of fluid injection, test assemblies shall be protected with adequate safeguards To reduce the hazard of energy release, air shall be bled from test assemblies before applying pressure To reduce the hazard of burns, test assemblies shall be handled with the appropriate tools To reduce the risk of injury to personnel, test equipment and test assemblies shall be protected with adequate safeguards, and moving automatic mechanisms shall not be operated manually Appropriate personal protective equipment shall be used at all times during testing. " Noted (Based on later discussions during WG 4, the "Warning" statement would remain as presently written). 1 MB = Member body / NC = National Committee (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **) 2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial ISO/IEC/CEN/CENELEC electronic balloting commenting template/version page 1 of 2

11 Template for comments and secretariat observations Date: Document: ISO Project: MB/ NC 1 Line number (e.g. 17) Clause/ Subclause (e.g. 3.1) Paragraph/ Figure/ Table/ (e.g. Table 1) Type of Comments Proposed change Observations of the comment 2 secretariat IT TE Test at extreme temperature low and high. To be evaluated Noted 1 MB = Member body / NC = National Committee (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **) 2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial ISO/IEC/CEN/CENELEC electronic balloting commenting template/version page 2 of 2