ON THE M 3 M 1 QUESTION
|
|
- Christiana Scott
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Vlume 5, 1980 Pages ON THE M 3 M 1 QUESTION by Gary Gruehage Tplgy Prceedigs Web: Mail: Tplgy Prceedigs Departmet f Mathematics & Statistics Aubur Uiversity, Alabama 36849, USA tplg@aubur.edu ISSN: COPYRIGHT c by Tplgy Prceedigs. All rights reserved.
2 TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume ON THE M3 ~ Ml QUESTION Gary Gruehage 1. Itrducti I 1961, J. Ceder [C] defied the Mi-spaces, i = 1,2,3, prved that M ~ M ~ M ad asked whether ay f the l 2 3, implicatis reversed. H. Juila [J] ad the authr [G ] l idepedetly prved that M 3 -spaces, usually called "stratifiable spaces," are M 2. The questi remais whether M ~ M that is, whether every stratifiable space has a 3 l, a-clsure-preservig base. Sme partial results btaied s far are that the clsed image f a metric space is M l (F. Slaughter [Sl]), ad that a-discrete stratifiable spaces are M [G ]. Recetly, R. Heath ad Juila shwed that l 2 every stratifiable space is the image f a Ml-space uder a perfect retracti (ad hece is a clsed subset f a Ml-space) Let us call a space which is a cutable ui f clsed metrizable subspaces a Fa-metrizable space. I the first part f this paper, we prve that every stratifiable Fa-metrizable space is MI. May cmm examples f stratifiable spaces seem t be f this type. Fr example, all the examples give i Ceder's paper, as well as the chuk-cmplexes (which he prves t be M I ), are Fa-metrizable. Hyma's M-spaces [H], called paracmplexes ad prved M I by J. Nagata [N], are als f this type. Ather iterestig class f stratifiable spaces is the fllwig. Let I be a idex set, ad fr each i E I,
3 78 Gruehage let Xi be a stratifiable space. Let p E D X., where "0" iei 1 detes the bx prduct. Let y {x E 0 X.: x{i) = p{i) iei 1 fr all but fiitely may i E I}. Brges [B ] prved that 3 if each Xi is stratifiable, s is Y. It is t hard t shw that if each Xi is Fa-metrizable, the s is Y; hece Y is M l i this case. I [G ], we asked whether a stratifiable space which 2 has a a-discrete etwrk csistig f cmpact-sets is M l. Sice cmpact stratifiable spaces are metrizable, ur result implies a affirmative aswer t this questi. Ufrtuately, the class f stratifiable Fa-metrizable spaces is t clsed uder clsed maps. I fact, the clsed image f a metric space eed t be Fa-metrizable [F]. It must be M thugh, by Slaughter's result mel, tied abve. Nw suppse a space X has the fllwig prperty: wheever Had K are clsed subsets f X with H c K, the H has a a-clsure-preservig uter base i K (i.e., there is a a-clsure-preservig cllecti lj f relatively pe subsets f K such that wheever H c 0, 0 pe, there exists U E lj with H cue 0). I the secd secti f this paper, we prve that if a Ml-space X has the abve prperty, the every clsed image f X is M ad l has the same prperty. Frm the fact that stratifiable Fa-metrizable spaces are M it is easily shw that they l, als have the abve prperty. Thus every clsed image f a stratifiable Fa-metrizable space is M This geeralizes l Slaughter's therem, ad aswers a questi f Nagata ccerig the paracmplexes metied abve.
4 TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume Nagata als shwed that if X is a paracmplex, the Id X < if ad ly if X has a a-cls~re-preservig base B such that Id(aB) < - 1 fr every B E B. He asked if this result is true fr ay Ml-space. Mizkami [M] shwed that it is true fr a Ml-space which is Fa-metrizable ad satisfies a certai further cditi. With ur techiques, we ca shw it is true fr ay stratifiable Fa-metrizable space. 2. Defiitis ad Other Prelimiaries All spaces are assumed t be regular. Let A O dete the iterir f a set A. A cllecti ~ f subsets f a space X is iterir-preservig if wheever ~' c ~, the (~') = {G : G E ~'}. A cllecti H f subsets f X is alsure-preservig if wheever H' c U{H: H E H'}. H, the uh' It is easy t see that the set f cmplemets f a iterir-preservig family is clsure-preservig, ad vice-versa. If H is a subset f a space X, a uter base fr H is a cllecti lj f pe subsets f X such that wheever H is ctaied i a pe set 0, the there exists U E lj such that H c U c:. A cllecti B is a quasi-base fr X if wheever x E U, U pe, there exists B E B such that x E B O c B c U. (B detes the iterir f B.) A space X is a Ml-spaae (M 2 -spaae) if X has a a-clsure-preservig base (quasibase). A M 3 -spaae, r stratifiable spaae, is the same as a M 2 -space.
5 80 Gruehage We will fte use the fllwig characterizati f M 2 -spaces due t Nagata [N ]. 2 Therem 2.1 (Nagata). A regular space X is a M 2 -space if ad ly if fr each x E X ad E W 3 there exists a pe eighbrhd g(x) f x such that (1) y E g (x) :::;> g (y) c g (x); ad (2) if H is clsed ad x ~ H 3 there exists Ew such that x f U 9 (x). xeh Clearly, we may assume g(x) ~ gl(x) A cllecti J is a etwrk fr X if wheever x E U, U pe, there exists F E J such that x E Feu. X is a a-space if X has a a-discrete etwrk. A space X is mtically rmal if fr every pair (H,K) f disjit clsed subsets, there exists a pe set D(H,K) such that (1) H c D(H,K) c D(H,K) c X - K; (2) H c H' ad K ~ K' => D(H,K) c D(H',K'). We shall be usig the fact that stratifiable spaces are paracmpact ad perfectly rmal [e], that they are a-spaces [H], ad that they are mtically rmal [HLZ]. Als, every subspace f a stratifiable space is stratifiable [C], ad every clsed image f a stratifiable space is stratifiable [B]. 3. Mai Results, Outlies fthe Prfs, ad Sme Questis Sice the prf f ur mai results are rather lg ad tedius, we will defer them t later sectis, givig ly brief utlies here.
6 TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume Therem 3.1. Let X be stratifiable ad Fa-metrizable. The X is MI. Als~ Id X ~ if ad ly if X h~r a a-clsure-preservig base B such that Id(aB) < -l fr each B E B. Outlie f prf. Suppse X is stratifiable. The there exist g(x) 's satisfyig the cditis f Therem 2.1. The stadard way t get a a-clsure-preservig quasi-base back frm the g(x) 's is as fllws. Fr each clsed set H, defie G(H) = U g(x). xeh frm prperty (1) f Therem 2.1 that Y = {G(H): H is clsed, Hex} is iterir-preservig. Hece, B = {X - G (H): H clsed, Hex} is clsure-preservig, ad frm prperty (2), clsed quasi-base. preservig base wuld be t defie It is easy t see U B is a Ew A aive attempt t get a a-clsure f B = {(X - G (H)): H clsed, HeX}. Hwever, B' may fail t be clsure-preservig. But it turs ut that if the G(H) 's are regular pe sets, the B' will be clsure-preservig. (See Lemma 5.1.) S we cstruct g(x) 's satisfyig the cditis f Therem 2.1 s that the crrespdig G(H) 's are regular pe. We d this by cstructig a certai sequece VO,V l, f lcally fiite pe cvers f X, ad the use the Vi's t cstruct the g(x) IS, s that: (i) each g(x) is a elemet f sme Vi; (ii) fr each m E w, every ui f elemets f U V.. 1 l<m is regular pe; ad
7 82 Gruehage (iii) if H is clsed ad y f u g (x), the there exists XEH a iteger k such that y f Cl (U{g(x): x E H, g (x) f u [I.}). i<k 1 It easily fllws that G (H) = U g (x) is regular pe xeh wheever H is clsed. The Fa-metrizable hypthesis is used t btai prperty (iii). It is pssible t cstruct [10,[11' ad the g(x)'s satisfyig (i) ad (ii) i ay stratifiable space. The "if" part f the last statemet f Therem 3.1 is a result f Nagata [N ]. T btai the "ly if" part, 2 we shw that if Id X <, we ca cstruct the V.'s s 1 that Id(aV) < -l fr each V E Vi. It the fllws that Id(aB) < -l fr each B E B' Therem 3.2. Suppse X is stratifiable ad has the fllwig prperty: wheever H ad~k are clsed subsets f X with H c K, the H has a a-clsure-preservig uter base i K. The every clsed image f X has the same prperty, ad is therefre M I Outlie f prf. Let (*) dete the prperty f Therem 3.2. Ay stratifiable space satisfyig (*) is MI. This fllws easily frm the facts that every clsed subset has a a-clsure-preservig uter base, ad that stratifiable spaces are a-spaces. Let f be a clsed map f X t Y, where X is stratifiable ad satisfies (*). Sice every clsed subset K f Y is the clsed image f a stratifiable space satisfyig (*), amely f-l(k), it is eugh t shw that every clsed
8 TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume image f a stratifiable space satisfyig (*) has the prperty that every clsed subset has a a-clsure-preservig uter base. S we are de if we shw that Y has this prperty. li -1 By a therem f Okuyama [0], Y = Y' U y, where f (y) is cmpact fr each y E Y', ad y" is a-discrete. We use this t shw that Y Y U Y where Y is a clsed l, irreducible image f a clsed subset X f X, ad Y is l pe ad a-discrete. Frm results i [BL], it fllws that every clsed subset f Y has a a-clsure-preservig uter base i Y. Thus Y ca be writte as the ui f a clsed subspace havig the prperty we wat, ad a pe a-discrete subspace. The fial step is t shw that ay stratifiable space which admits such a decmpsiti als has the prperty that every clsed subset has a a-clsure-preservig uter base. Remark. Fr stratifiable spaces, prperty (*) is equivalet t the fllwig prperty: wheever Had K are clsed subsets f X with H c K, the K/H is MI. Crllary 3.3. The clsed image f a stratifiable Fa-metrizable space is MI. Prf. Suppse X is stratifiable ad Fa-metrizable. Let H eke X, where Had K are clsed. stratifiable ad Fa-metrizable, hece MI. The K/H is By the abve remark, X satisfies the cditis f Therem 3.2. It is t kw whether every M1-space satisfies the prperty f Therem 3.2. I fact, it is t kw if
9 84 Gruehage every clsed subset f a Ml-space is MI. Hwever, the result f Heath ad Juila metied i the itrducti implies, as they te, that this questi is equivalet t the M ~ M questi. It is als t kw whether every 3 I clsed subset f a Ml-space has a a-clsure-preservig uter base. But if t, the by results f Ceder, there is a stratifiable space which is t MI. O the ther had, Brges ad Lutzer [BL] have shw that if each pit f a stratifiable space has a a-clsure-preservig base, the every stratifiable space is MI. Brges ad Lutzer have als shw that if every clsed subspace f a space X is M the every perfect image f I, X is MI. This suggests the fllwig questi, which wuld geeralize Therem 3.2 if aswered affirmatively. Questi 3.4. If every clsed subspace f a space X is M is every clsed image f X als M? I, I A class f spaces which Heath ad Juila called M-spaces may have a imprtat rle t play i settlig the M ~ M 1 questi. A M-space is a space which has 3 a a-clsure-preservig base f pe ad clsed sets. It is easy t see that every subspace f a M-space is M. Thus every perfect image f a M-space is MI. Recetly, Juila [J ] has btaied a alterate prf that strati 2 fiable Fa-metrizable spaces are M I are perfect images f M-spaces. by shwig that they Heath ad Juila ask whether every stratifiable space is the perfect image f a M-space. If s, the M => MI. Our ext crllary 3
10 TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume shws that it wuld be eugh (fr the purpse f btaiig M =>M ) t prve that every stratifiable space is the 3 l clsed image f a M-space. Crllary 3.5. The clsed image f a M-space is Prf. We shw that every M-space X satisfies the prperty f Therem 3.2. If K c X, the K is M. By mimicig Ceder's prf that every clsed subset f a M -space has a clsure-preservig uter quasi-base, we see 2 that every clsed subset f K has a clsure-preservig base i K. The class f stratifiable Fa-metrizable spaces is t clsed uder clsed maps r cutable prducts. These are still M f curse. I fact, sice prducts f perfect l, maps are perfect, the cutable prduct X f stratifiable Fa-metrizable spaces is the perfect image f a M-space. Hece X satisfies the prperty f Therem 3.2, ad s every clsed subspace ad clsed image f X is MI. But further iteratis f the prcedures f takig clsed subspaces, clsed images, ad cutable prducts, prduces spaces that I ca't prve are MI. What e might aim fr is a sluti t the fllwig: Prblem 3.6. Fid a class f Ml-spaces which ctais the Fa-metrizable spaces, ad which is clsed uder clsed subspaces, clsed images, ad cutable prducts. Nte that the class f stratifiable F -metrizable a spaces is clsed uder arbitrary subspaces, perfect images,
11 86 Gruehage ad fiite prducts. The class f stratifiable spaces satisfyig the prperty f Therem 3.2 is clsed uder clsed subspaces ad clsed images. Thus e wuld have a sluti t the Prblem 3.6 if e culd shw that this prperty is clsed uder cutable prducts. Fr ather apprach, te that the class f perfect images f M-spaces satisfies all the desired prperties except perhaps clsure uder clsed images. Althugh we d't d it here, the techiques f secti 6 ca be used t shw that if a stratifiable space X is the ui f a clsed Ml-space ad a Fa-metrizable space, the X is MI. This suggests a cuple f questis, fr which affirmative aswers t bth (r a egative aswer t e) wuld bviusly settle the M ~ M questi., 3 I Questi 3.7. If a stratifiable space X is a cutable ui f a clsed M subspaces, is X M? I I Questi 3.8. Is every stratifiable space the cutable ui f clsed M 1 subspaces? 4. Prelimiary Lemmas I this secti we preset a series f lemmas regular pe sets, leadig up t the result that i a paracmpact hereditarily rmal space, every pe cver has a lcally fiite refiemet V such that every ui f elemets f V is regular pe. I fact, if W is ay lcally fiite cllecti such that every ui f elemets f W is regular pe, the V ca be cstructed s that
12 TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume every ui f elemets f V U W is regular pe. Lemma 4.1. Let X be a hepeditapily pmal space. Suppse U~ V~ ad U U V ape pegulap pe~ ad H is a pelatively clsed subset f v. Suppse H is ctaied i a pe set. The thepe is a set W such that HeW c V~ wc O~ ad bth Wad U U W ape pegulap pe. If X is pepfectly pmal~ Id X < ~ ad Id(aU) < -l~ the we ca btai Id(aW) ~ -l. Ppf. Let 0' be a pe set such that H c 0' c a' c O. Usig the hereditary rmality X, we ca fid pe sets VI ad V such that 2 -v -v H c VI c VI c V 2 c V 2 c V 0', where XV detes the clsure f A i the subspace V. 0 let W = ~V-I--U-U~ v We claim that W has the desired 2. prperties. Nw Clearly, Hew c V, ad Wc O. Als, sice the itersecti f tw regular pe sets is regular pe, W is regular pe. It remais t shw W U U is regular pe. T see this, suppse p E W U U - W U U. Observe that w-u-u c VI U U. Thus p E V--I--U-U- - U. Hece p E VI' sice U is regular pe. Als, p E v-u-u - U (V U U) - U, s P E V. Hece p E VI V c V 2. S we have 0 p E =V-l~U-u~ V = W, ctradicti. 2 U au. T see the last statemet, te that aw c av U av l 2 Sice Id V <, we ca btai Id(aVV i ) ~ -l, i = 1,2, where "a " detes the budary f a set i the v subspace v. Nw av = [av av] U avv Thus Id(aV ) i i i. i ~ -l, ad s Id(aV U av U au) < -l. Thus Id(aW) < -l. l 2
13 88 Gruehage Lemma 4.2. If Uis a cllecti f subsets f a space X such that every fiite ui f elemets f Uis regular pe, the every fiite ui f fiite itersectis f elemets f U is regular pe. Prf. This fllws frm the fact that a fiite ui f fiite itersectis f elemets f Uca be writte as the fiite itersecti f fiite uis f elemets f U, ad that a fiite itersecti f regular pe sets is regular pe. Lemma 4.3. Suppse Uis a fiite cllecti f pe sets f a hereditarily rmal space X such that every ui f elemets f Uis regular pe. Let H C 0, H clsed, pe. The there exists a set W such that HeW c 0, ad every ui f elemets f U U {W} is regular pe. If X is perfectly rmal, Id X ~, ad Id(aU) < -l fr each U E U, the we ca btai Id(aW) < -l. Prf. If I U/ = 1, apply Lemma 1 with U the elemet f U, V = X, ad Had 0 as i the hypthesis f this lemma. The set W guarateed by Lemma 4.1 is easily see t satisfy the desired cditis. Nw suppse lui = > 1. Let U = {U,ul,---,U l}. - Let W be a regular pe set such that HeW ewe 0, 0 ad (uu) u W is regular pe. Suppse W has bee defied, k <. Fr each subset k I f k + 1 distict elemets f {O,l,---,-l}, let H(I) (aw ) ( U.). The the hyptheses f Lemma 4.1 k iei 1 are satisfied with U = U U., V U., H = H(I), ad 0 jfi J iei 1 as i this lemma. (Nte the use f Lemma 4.2 t get U U V
14 TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume regular pe.) Let W(I) be the set give by Lemma 4.1, ad let W = W U (U{W(I): le, III = k + I}). k + l k Let W = W. We claim that W has the desired prperty. T see this, assume mc U U {W}, ad x E um - Um. Clearly, we may assume W E mad x E W. Let I = {i < : x E Ui}' ad let m = I II If m = 0, 0 0 the x E (UO) U W - ( UU) U W = (uo) u W - (UU) U W 0 0' ctradicti. S we may assume m > 1. The x f Wm-l' fr therwise x E aw m _ l ( U.) = H (I) c W(I) c W. S iei 1 there is a pe set G such that x E G c (Um) ( U.) (X - W 1). iei 1 m- Sice W(I) U ( U U.) is regular pe ad des't cjfi J tai x, there exists y E G with Y f W(I) U ( u U.). jfi J Y E um, s Y E U(m - {W} ) r yew. Sice U(m - {W}) c U U., it must be true that yew. Thus there exists a jfi J empty set J c such that y E W(J). Sice y f W l, m But we have IJI > m. Sice y f W(I), we have J ~ I. Therefre, there exists j E J - I. But W(J) c --u. c u., iej 1 J ctradictig y f -u-u.. jfi J Thus W has the desired prperty. The last statemet f Lemma 4.3 fllws because W is the ui f a fiite umber f sets btaied frm the applicati f Lemma 4.1. Lemma 4.4. Let U be a pe cver f a paracmpact hereditarily rmal space X, ad let V be a lcally fiite cllecti such that every ui f elemets f V
15 90 Gruehage is regular pe. The there is a lcally fiite refiemet W f lj such that every ui f elemets f V U W is regular pe. If X is perfectly rmal, Id X ~, ad Id(aV) < -l fr each V E V, the we ca btai Id(aW) < -l fr each W E W. Prf. Let J U I be a lcally fiite pe cver Ew f X by sets whse clsures refie lj ad meet ly fiitely may elemets f V, ad such that each J is discrete. Let ~ = {G F : F E J} be a shrikig f J; i.e., ~ is a pe cver such that G F c F fr each F E J. Let V(F) = {V E V: V F ~ ~}. Fr each F E J ' let W be the set F give by Lemma 4.3 where lj = V(F), H = G ad F. F, The G c W c F, ad every ui f elemets f V U {W F F F : F E J } is regular pe. Let W Nw suppse that fr each F E J k, k <, we have defied a W such that F (i) W = {W : F E J is a discrete cllecti f k F k } pe sets; (ii) if F E J k, the G - U (uwj ) c W c F; F F j<k (iii) if F E J k, the W F G, F = ~ wheever F' E J. J with j < k; (iv) every ui f elemets f V U ( u W) is regular j j~k pe. TO defie W fr F E F I, let 0 = {OF: F E I } be a discrete cllectis f pe sets such that G F - u (uw k ) c OF c F, ad k< OF (U {G F : F E J k' k < }) ~
16 TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume This is pssible, sice U{G : F E J k < } c U (UW ). F k, k< k Nw, fr each F E I, let W be the set give by Lemma 4.3 F applied t the case where U= V(F) U {uw k : k < }, H = G F u (uw k ), ad 0 = OF. k< It ia easy t check that W = {W : F E J} satisfies F prperties (i)-(iii) abve. T see that (iv) is satisfied, suppse x E um - Um, where V U ( u W k ). Sice this k< cllecti is lcally fiite, we may assume mis fiite ad x E M - M fr every M E m. Let I = {k < : m W ~ ~}. k Fr each i E I, x ~ fr sme W E W. 1 uw. ]. sice W. 1 is discrete ad x E W- W By the iducti hypthesis, we ca assume there exists W E m W, where F E J. The F m V = m V(F), sice x E W c F. Thus x is i the F iterir f the clsure f but is t i this set, ctradictig the way W was defied F (i.e., the abve set must be regular pe). fies (iv). Thus W satis Let W= U W That Wis a refiemet f U fllws Ew frm prperty (ii). That Wis lcally fiite fllws frm (i) ad (iii). Ad that every ui f elemets f V U W is regular pe fllws frm (iv) ad the lcal fiiteess. Let us see hw t btai the last statemet f Lemma 4.4. First te that uder the hyptheses we ca get Id(aW) ~ -l fr W E W ' sice these sets were als btaied frm Lemma 4.3. If it's true fr W E U W the k, k< it's als true fr W E W, sice these sets were als
17 92 Gruehage btaied frm Lemma 4.3, with the U f Lemma 4.3 beig a subset f V tgether with {UW : k < }, ad Id(d(UW )) k k < -l fr k < sice each W is discrete. k 5. Stratifiable F-Metrizable Spaces I this secti, we prve that stratifiable Fa-metrizable spaces are MI. First, a easy lemma. Lemma 5.1. Let U be a iterir-preservig cllecti f regular pe subsets f a space X. The {(X - U): U E U} is clsure-preservig. Prf. Suppse U' c U, ad x E U{ (X - U): U E U/}. Suppse fr each U E U', we have x f (X - U)O. Sice each U is regular pe, we must have x E U fr each U E U'. Thus x E U', which is a pe set missig (X - U)O fr every U E U'. This ctradicti establishes the lemma. Prf f Therem 3.1. Let X be a stratifiable Fa-metrizable space. Let X U M, where each M is a Ew clsed, metrizable subspace f X. Let M, mew,m where 0 is pe.,m Let {U'} be a sequece f relatively pe cvers,m mew f M which is a develpmet fr M Fr each U' E U',m' let U be pe i X such that U M U', ad U c 0,m Let U = {U: U' E U' },m,m Fr each x E X ad Ew, let g(x) be a pe eighbrhd f x such that the g(x) 's satisfy the cditis f Therem 2.1, ad that g(x) = X fr each x E X. Let J = u I be a clsed etwrk fr X such that each I is Ew
18 TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume discrete. Fr each F E I, let U F be a pe set such c ~ wheever F ' E J, F ' ~ F. Let V U ({gi(x): i < ad F c gi(x)}). Sice the F F gi (x) I s satisfy prperty- (1) f Therem 2.1, V is pe. F Nw use Lemma 4.4 t iductively cstruct a sequ~ce V,V, 6f lcally fiit.e pe cvers f X such that 1 (i) V + star-refies V ; l (ii) V refies {V : F E J.} u {X - uj.} fr each i < ; F 1 1 (iii) V refies U.. u {X - M.} fr each i,j _< ; 1,J 1 (iv) every ui f elemets f U V. is regular pe.. 1 l< It is easy t see frm Lemma 4.2 that we may assume that if x E X, the {V E V.: x E V, i < } is a elemet f V 1 Claim I. Fr each x E X, fr each Ew, there exists mew such that st(x,v ) c g (x). m Prf f Claim I. There exists l > ad F E J I such that x E F l c g(x). (T get ~, we ca assume that each I is repeated ifiitely fte.) If x EVE V l, the by (ii), V c V = U ({gi (y): i 2. l ad F c gi (y)}) F F g (x). l Let m = + 1. The st(x,v ) is ctaied i sme m elemet f V I' s st (x, V ) c m g (x) Claim II. If H is clsed i x, ad y f H M, the there exists mew ad V E V such that y E V ad st(v,v ) m m H M ~. Prf f Claim II. If Y f M, there exists l such that y ~ 0 I. Let m = + l + 1, ad pick V E V with, m y E V. The st (V, V ) ewe V + W must be ctaied i I. m
19 94 Gruehage sme eleiet f U,U {X Each elemet f U,is,, ctaied i 0," s W c X - M. Thus st(v,v ) H m M ~. If Y E M, there exists " E 00 such that st(y,lj ), H M =~. Let m = + + 1, ad pick V E V with m y E V. The st(v,v ) ewe V+. But W c U fr sme m U E U ", where y E U M E lj' ". Thus U H M ~,,, s st(v,v ) H M ~. m Fr each x E X, let j(x) E 00 be such that x E Mj(x) U M.. Frm Claims I ad II, it is easy t see that, i<j (x) 1 fr each Ew, there is a least iteger l(,x) such that st(x,vl(,x» c g(x) - U M.. We defie g~(x) = {v E Vi: i<j (x) 1 x EVE V., i < l(j(x) +, x)}. By the statemet immedi 1 ately precedig Claim I we have g~(x) E Vl(j(x)+,x). It's t re~lly ecessary t have this, but we said we culd get it i the utlie i secti 3. Claim III. If Y E g~(x), the g~(y) c g~(x). Prf f Claim III. If Y E g~(x), the y E gj(x)+(x) c g(x), s g(y) c g(x). Sice g~(x) (U M.) = ~, i<j (x) 1 we have j(y) ~ j(x). Thus gj. (y)+(y) - U M. c i<j (y) 1 gj.(x)+(x) - U M. If l(j(y)+,y) < l(j(x)+,x), the i <j (x) 1 we wuld have st(x,vl(j(y)+,y» c st(y,vl(j(y)+,y» c gj. (y)+(y) -.U. M i c gj. (x)+(x) - U M.. This cl<j (y) i<j (x) 1 tradicts the defiiti f l(j(x)+,x). Thus l(j(y)+,y) > 1 (j (x) +,x), ad s 9 I (y)/ c 9 I (x) - I
20 TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume Fr each clsed set H, defie G(H) = U g' (x). By xeh Claim III, the cllecti {G (H): H clsed, HeX} is iterir-preservig. Sice g~(x) c g(x), the g~(x) 's satisfy prperty (2) f Therem 2.1, s if we defie B = {(X - G (H» 0: H clsed, Hex} the U B is a base fr X. By Lemma 5.1, each B is Ew clsure-preservig if G(H) is always regular pe. we are fiished after prvig the ext claim. S Claim IV. G(H) is regular pe. Prf f Claim IV. Suppse y E G(H) - G(H). There exists k E w such that y f u gk(x). xeh S, sice g~ (x) c gj (x) + (x), y $ Cl (U {g~ (x): x E H, j (x) > k}). By Claim II, fr each j < k, there exists m E wad j V. E V such that y E V. ad st(v.,v ) H M. = ~. J m. J J m j J J Let V = V. Suppse x E H, j(x) < k, ad g~(x) V ~ ~. j <k J Nw g~(x) is ctaied i sme W E Vl(j(x)+,x)' ad W Vj(x) ~~. If l(j(x)+,x) ~ mj(x)' the W c st(v. ( ) V ). But x E W H MJ.(x)' s J x, m j (x) x E st(v.( },V ) H M. (x)' ctradicti. Thus J x mj(x) J l(j (x)+,x) < m j (x). Let m = sup{m.}. j<k J Y ~ We see, the, that Cl (u{g~ (x): x E H, j (x) < k, 1 (j (x)+,x) ~ m}). Cmbiig this with the first paragraph, we have y t Cl(u{g~(x): x E H, l(j(x)+,x) ~ m}). Thus y is i the iterir f the clsure f thse g~(x) 's
21 96 Gruehage which are elemets f U V.. This c?tradicts the fact that i<m 1 uis f elemets f U V. are regular pe l ad the. 1 l<m prf that X is M I is fiished. Nw suppse Id X <. We will shw hw t btai Id(aB) < -l fr each B E U B. Sic~ a(a - Gk(H)) c Ew agk(h), we will be de if we ca get Id(aGk(H)) < -l fr a arbitrary k E wad clsed set H. By Lemma 4.4, we ca add the fllwig t the list f prperties f the sequece V,V I, : (v) Fr each Ew ad V E V, Id(aV) < -l. The sice each gk(x) is the itersecti f fiitely may members f U V., we have Id(agk(x)) < -l~ iew 1 Suppse y E agk(h). we see that there exists mew such that The by the prf f Claim IV, y t Cl (U {gk (x): x E Had gk (x) ~. U Vi}) l<m Thus there is a eighbrhd f y meetig ly fiitely may elemets f {gk(x): x E H}, ad s we have lc Id(aGk(H)) < -l. Sice X is hereditarily paracmpact, Id (dg (H» < -l. k 6. Clsed Images I this secti we prve Therem 3.2. We preset the mai part f the prf as a series f lemmas, sme f which may be f idepedet iterest. A map f: X ~ Y is irreducibze if prper clsed subset maps t Y.
22 TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume Lemma 6.1. Suppse X is stratifiable, ad f: X + Y is a clsed ctiuus surjecti. The there exists a clsed set X c X such that fl : X + f(x ) is irreducible, x ad Y - f(x ) is pe ad a-discrete. Prf By a therem f Okuyama [0], Y = Y U Y l, where each pit f Y has a cmpact pre-image, ad Y l a-discrete. Let C= {XI C X: Xl is clsed ad f(x I ) ~ Y}. is Partially rder Cby iclusi. It is easy t see frm the fact that f-l(y) is cmpact fr each y E Y that every chai [ i C has a lwer bud, amely [. Thus C has a miimal elemet X. X is clsed, ad Y - f(x ) C Y l, hece is a-discrete. The miimality f X fix: X + f(x ) is irreducible. [BL] implies that The ext lemma is essetially due t Brges ad Lutzer Lemma 6.2. If each clsed subset f X has a a-clsurepreservig uter base, ad f: X + Y is clsed ad irredu~ible, the each clsed subset f Y has a a-clsure-preservig uter base. Prf. Suppse Key is clsed. Let U = U U be a Ew is clsure-preserv uter base fr f-l(k) such that each 0 ig. Fr A C X, let f#(a) {y E Y: f-l(y) c A}. By [BL, Lemma 3.3], 0' = {f#(u): U EO} is clsure-preservig. Thus 0# = u 0# is a a-clsure-preservig uter base fr K. Ew Lemma 6.3. A clsed set K c X has a -clsure-preservig uter base if ad ly if fr each clsed HeX - K,
23 98 Gruehage there exists a sequece {G (H,K)} Ew such that (1) each G(H,K) is a regular pe set ctaiig H; (2) fr each E W 3 {G(H,K): H clsed 3 H K =~} is iterir-preservig; ad (3) fr each clsed HeX - K 3 there exists Ew such that G(H,K) K = ~. Prf. T see the "if" part, suppse we are give G (H,K)'s satisfyig (1)-(3). Let U = {(X - G (H,K»: G (H,K) K = ~}. By (3), U = U lj is a uter base fr Ew K. By (1), (2), ad Lemma 5.1, each U is clsure preservig. T see the "ly if" part, suppse U = U U is a Ew uter base fr K, where each U is clsure-preservig. Defie G (H,K) = X - U{U: U E U ad IT H = ~}. Clearly G (H,K) is pe ad ctais H. Sice U is a uter base fr K, (3) hlds. Sice the set f cmplemets f a clsure-preservig cllecti is iterir-preservig, (2) hlds. It remais t prve that G(H,K) is regular pe. Suppse x f G(H,K). The there is U E U with x E IT ad IT H =~. The U G(H,K) = ~, ad every pe set c taiig x meets U. Thus x f ~G--(H=-,K~) Lemma 6.4. Suppse Y = Y U Y 13 where Y is m tically rmal, Y is clsed 3 ad Y = Y - Y. Let K l be clsed i Y. If U is a iterir-preservig cllecti f relatively pe subsets f Y whse clsures miss K 3 the e ca assig t each U E U a set U* pe i Y such that
24 TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume U E U/}]. (1) U* Y u " (2) U* Y u; (3) U* K = ~; ad (4) if y E u'" where U' c U" the y E [iu*: Prf. Accrdig t [B 2, Therem 2.4], sice Y is mtically rmal, fr each x E Y ad pe eighbrhd U f x, e ca assig a pe eighbrhd U x that f x such (i) U c V => Ux c Vxi (ii) U x V y ~ l' => x E U r y E V. Nte that (ii) implies U c U. x Fr each U E U, let U* = U [(U U Y ) - K] That (1) xeu l x is satisfied is bvius. T see (2), suppse y E (U*' Y) - U. Let W be a pe eighbrhd f y such that W U ~~. Sice W U* ~ 1', there exists x E U such that y w [(U U Y ) - K)x ~~. This ctradicts prperty (ii) y l abve. T see (4), suppse y E U', where U' c U. The [ ( ( U ') U Y1) - K] y C [(U U Y1) - K] y c U* fr each U E UI. It remais t prve (3). Suppse y E U* K. Sice IT K = ij, it fllws frm (2) that y E Yl The (Yl)y U* ~ 1', s there exists x E U such that (Yl)y [U U Y ) l K]x ~ 1', agai ctradictig (ii) Lemma 6.5. Let X be stratifiable ad a-discrete" ad suppse fr each x E X we have assiged a eighbrhd O(x) f x. The e ca assig t each x E X a pe eighbrhd U(x) f x such that
25 100 Gruehage ( 1) U (x) c a (x) ; (2) y E U(x) ~ U(y) c U(x); (3) if HeX is ezsed 3 the U U(x) is pe ad xeh clsed. Prf. The prf is similar t that f [G Therem 2, 1]. Let X = U F, where each F is clsed discrete, ad Ew F F = ~ if m ~. Fr each x E X, let (x) be the m least iteger such that x E F(x). Let D be a mte rmality peratr fr X. Iductively, defie, fr each x E X, a set U(x) ctaiig x such that (i) {U(x): x E F } is a discrete cllecti f pe ad clsed sets; ad (ii) U(x) c a(x) D({x}, u F.) ({u(y): x E U(y) i < (x) 1 ad (y) < (x) }. Sice X is a-dimesial ad cllectiwise-rmal, the abve cstructi ca easily be carried ut. These U(x) 's clearly satisfy (1). Als, if Y E U(x), the (x) < (y), s U(y) c U(x) by (ii). Thus (2) hlds. Fially, t see (3), suppse H is clsed ad y f U U(x). xeh The D(H,{y}) ~ D({x}, u F.) fr all x E H with i<(x) 1 (x) > (y). Thus D (H, {y}) ~ U{U (x): x E H, (x) > (y) }, ad s y ~ U{U(x): x E H, (x) > (y)}. But U{U(x): x E H, (x) < (y)} is pe ad clsed. Thus y ~ U U(x). xeh Lemma 6.6. Suppse Y is stratifiable 3 Y = Y U Yl~ where Y is clsed, Y is a-discrete, ad Y Y l =~. If l every clsed subset f Y has a a-clsure-preservig uter
26 TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume base i Y' the every clsed subset f Y has a -clsurepreservig uter base. Prf. Fr a clsed set Hey, let H = H Y ad HI = H Y Let Key be clsed. We will shw that K has l. a -clsure-preservig uter base. Fr clsed Hey - K, let G(H,K ) be a relatively pe subset f Y havig the prperties f Lemma 6.3. If G(H,K ) K = ~; let G(H,K )* be as i Lemma 6.4. Otherwise, let G(H,K )* Y. Let {g(y): Y E Y, Ew} have the prperties f Therem 2.1. Let Y U' where each U is pe ad Ew ctais U + l. Fr each x E Y - K, let O(x) l = [(U(x) U (x)+2) g(x) (x)] - such that x E U(x). K, where (x) is the largest iteger Let U(x) be as i Lemma 6.5 applied t Y. 1 Nw fr H clsed, Hey - K, ad Ew, defie V (H,K) = G (H,K ) * U (U {U (x) : x E [G (H, K ) * U H] Y }). 0 0 l We will shw that prperties (1)-(3) f Lemma 6.3 hld fr the V(H,K) IS. First we will shw that V(H,K) Y = G(H,K ). Suppse t. The there exists Y E V(H,K) - G(H,K ). Observe by Lemma 6.5 that V(H,K) Y l is pe ad clsed i Y l. Thus Y E Y. By Lemma 6.4, y $ G(H,K )*. Als y $ H, s there exists Ew such that y ~ Cl(U{g (x): 0 x E G(H,K )* U H}). Thus y ~ C1(U{U(x): x E (G(H,K )* U H) Y U }). But C1(U{U(x): x E (G(H,K )* U H) l Yl (Y - U )}) c Y - U +1. Thus Y ~ V (H,K), ctradicti.
27 102 Gruehage Clearly V(H,K) is pe ad ctais H. Suppse y E V(H,K) - V(H,K). Sice V(H,K) Y l is clsed i Y l, we have y E Y V (H,K) = G (H,K ) Sice G (H.,K ) is regular pe i Y' each eighbrhd f Y ctais a pit Z E Y - G(H,K ) The z t V(H,K). Thus V(H,K) is regular pe, ad s prperty (1) f Lemma 6.3 hlds. T see (2), suppse II' is a cllecti f clsed sets missig K, ad y E V (H, K). We may assume V(H,K) ~ Y. HE II' The y t K. If Y E Y the U(y) C V(H;K) fr each H E l, II' If Y E Y' the ye G (H,K ), s by Lemma 6.4, HEll' 0 0 y E ( G (H,K )*)0 c V (H,K). Thus (2) hlds. HEll' 0 0 HEll' Fially, t see (3), let Hex - K be clsed. There ~. If Y E V(H,K) K, the sice V(H,K) Y G(H,K )' we have y E Y l But V(H,K) Y is clsed i Y ad misses K. Thus V(H,K) I I K = ~. Prf f Therem 3.2. Therem 3.2 prperty (*). Let us call the prperty f Suppse X is a stratifiable space satisfyig (*), ad let f: X ~ Y be a clsed map f X t Y. The Y is stratifiable. We eed t shw that Y satisfies (*). Let Key be clsed. Sice fl f-l(k) is clsed, by Lemma 6.1, there exists a clsed set K C K such that K is the clsed irreducible image f a clsed subset f f-l(k), ad K - K is a-discrete. By Lemma 6.2, ad the fact that every clsed subset f X satisfies (*), we see that every
28 TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume clsed subset f K has a a-clsure-preservig uter base i K. The by Lemma 6.6, every clsed subset f K has a a-clsure-preservig uter base i K. Thus Y satisfies (*) Refereces [B ] C. R. Brges, O stratifiable spaces, Pacific J. l Math. 17 (1966), [B 2 ], Fur geeralizatis f stratifiable [BL] [C] [F] spaces, Geeral Tplgy ad its Relatis t Mder Aalysis ad Algebra, Prague Sympsium, 1971, , Direct sums f stratifiable spaces, Fud. Math. C (1978), ad D. Lutzer, Characterizatis ad mappigs f Mi-spaces, Tplgy Cferece VPI, Spriger Verlag Lecture Ntes i Mathematics, N. 375, J. Ceder, Sme geeralizatis f metric spaces, Pacific J. Math. 11 (1961), B. Fitzpatrick, Jr., Sme tplgically cmplete spaces, Geeral Tbplgy ad its Applicatis 1 (1971), [G ] G. Gruehage, Stratifiable spaces are M2, Tplgy l Prceedigs 1 (1976), [G ], Stratifiable a-discrete spaces are M l, 2 Prc. AIDer. Math. Sc. 72 (1978), [He] [HJ] [HLZ] R. Heath, Stratifiable spaces are a-spaces, Ntices AIDer. Math. Sc. 16 (1969), 761. ad H. Juila, Stratifiable spaces as subspaces ad ctiuus images f M l -spaces (pre prit). R. Heath, D. Lutzer, ad P. Zer, Mtically rmal spaces, Tras. AIDer. Math. Sc. 178 (1973), [Hy] D. M. Hyma, A categry slightly larger tha the metric ad CW-categries, Mich. Math. J. 15 (1968),
29 104 Gruehage [J ] H. J. K. Jui1a, Neighbrets, Pacific J. Math (1968), [J ], Stratifiable spaces as subspaces ad c 2 tiuus images f M 1 -spaces, hadwritte tes. [M] T. Mizkami, O Nagata's prblem fr paracmpact a-metric spaces, Tplgy ad App1. II (1980), [N ] J. Nagata, A survey f the thery f geeralized 1 metric spaces, Prc. Third Prague Sympsium, 1971, [N ], O Hyma's M-space, Tplgy Cferece 2 VPI, Spriger-Verlag Lecture Ntes i Mathematics N. 375, [0] A. Okuyama, a-spaces ad clsed mappigs, I, Prc. [S] Japa Acad. 44 (1968), F. Slaughter, The clsed image f a metrizable space is M Prc. AIDer. Math. Sc. 37 (1973), , Aubur Uiversity Aubur, Alabama 36849
Intermediate Division Solutions
Itermediate Divisi Slutis 1. Cmpute the largest 4-digit umber f the frm ABBA which is exactly divisible by 7. Sluti ABBA 1000A + 100B +10B+A 1001A + 110B 1001 is divisible by 7 (1001 7 143), s 1001A is
More informationMulti-objective Programming Approach for. Fuzzy Linear Programming Problems
Applied Mathematical Scieces Vl. 7 03. 37 8-87 HIKARI Ltd www.m-hikari.cm Multi-bective Prgrammig Apprach fr Fuzzy Liear Prgrammig Prblems P. Padia Departmet f Mathematics Schl f Advaced Scieces VIT Uiversity
More informationFunction representation of a noncommutative uniform algebra
Fucti represetati f a cmmutative uifrm algebra Krzysztf Jarsz Abstract. We cstruct a Gelfad type represetati f a real cmmutative Baach algebra A satisfyig f 2 = kfk 2, fr all f 2 A:. Itrducti A uifrm algebra
More informationChapter 3.1: Polynomial Functions
Ntes 3.1: Ply Fucs Chapter 3.1: Plymial Fuctis I Algebra I ad Algebra II, yu ecutered sme very famus plymial fuctis. I this secti, yu will meet may ther members f the plymial family, what sets them apart
More informationUNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY. Department of Mathematics PROBABILITY THEORY, STATISTICS AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH GROUP. Memorandum COSOR 76-10
EI~~HOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Departmet f Mathematics PROBABILITY THEORY, STATISTICS AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH GROUP Memradum COSOR 76-10 O a class f embedded Markv prcesses ad recurrece by F.H. Sims
More informationK [f(t)] 2 [ (st) /2 K A GENERALIZED MEIJER TRANSFORMATION. Ku(z) ()x) t -)-I e. K(z) r( + ) () (t 2 I) -1/2 e -zt dt, G. L. N. RAO L.
Iterat. J. Math. & Math. Scl. Vl. 8 N. 2 (1985) 359-365 359 A GENERALIZED MEIJER TRANSFORMATION G. L. N. RAO Departmet f Mathematics Jamshedpur C-perative Cllege f the Rachi Uiversity Jamshedpur, Idia
More informationIJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2 Issue 12, December
IJISET - Iteratial Jural f Ivative Sciece, Egieerig & Techlgy, Vl Issue, December 5 wwwijisetcm ISSN 48 7968 Psirmal ad * Pararmal mpsiti Operatrs the Fc Space Abstract Dr N Sivamai Departmet f athematics,
More informationMATH Midterm Examination Victor Matveev October 26, 2016
MATH 33- Midterm Examiati Victr Matveev Octber 6, 6. (5pts, mi) Suppse f(x) equals si x the iterval < x < (=), ad is a eve peridic extesi f this fucti t the rest f the real lie. Fid the csie series fr
More informationMORE ON CAUCHY CONDITIONS
Volume 9, 1984 Pages 31 36 http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/ MORE ON CAUCHY CONDITIONS by S. W. Davis Topology Proceedigs Web: http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/ Mail: Topology Proceedigs Departmet of Mathematics
More informationA new Type of Fuzzy Functions in Fuzzy Topological Spaces
IOSR Jurnal f Mathematics (IOSR-JM e-issn: 78-578, p-issn: 39-765X Vlume, Issue 5 Ver I (Sep - Oct06, PP 8-4 wwwisrjurnalsrg A new Type f Fuzzy Functins in Fuzzy Tplgical Spaces Assist Prf Dr Munir Abdul
More informationMarkov processes and the Kolmogorov equations
Chapter 6 Markv prcesses ad the Klmgrv equatis 6. Stchastic Differetial Equatis Csider the stchastic differetial equati: dx(t) =a(t X(t)) dt + (t X(t)) db(t): (SDE) Here a(t x) ad (t x) are give fuctis,
More informationA New Method for Finding an Optimal Solution. of Fully Interval Integer Transportation Problems
Applied Matheatical Scieces, Vl. 4, 200,. 37, 89-830 A New Methd fr Fidig a Optial Sluti f Fully Iterval Iteger Trasprtati Prbles P. Padia ad G. Nataraja Departet f Matheatics, Schl f Advaced Scieces,
More informationD.S.G. POLLOCK: TOPICS IN TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS STATISTICAL FOURIER ANALYSIS
STATISTICAL FOURIER ANALYSIS The Furier Represetati f a Sequece Accrdig t the basic result f Furier aalysis, it is always pssible t apprximate a arbitrary aalytic fucti defied ver a fiite iterval f the
More informationENGI 4421 Central Limit Theorem Page Central Limit Theorem [Navidi, section 4.11; Devore sections ]
ENGI 441 Cetral Limit Therem Page 11-01 Cetral Limit Therem [Navidi, secti 4.11; Devre sectis 5.3-5.4] If X i is t rmally distributed, but E X i, V X i ad is large (apprximately 30 r mre), the, t a gd
More informationON FREE RING EXTENSIONS OF DEGREE N
I terat. J. Math. & Mah. Sci. Vl. 4 N. 4 (1981) 703-709 703 ON FREE RING EXTENSIONS OF DEGREE N GEORGE SZETO Mathematics Departmet Bradley Uiversity Peria, Illiis 61625 U.S.A. (Received Jue 25, 1980) ABSTRACT.
More informationPRODUCTS OF SPACES OF COUNTABLE TIGHTNESS
Vlume 6, 1981 Pges 115 133 http://tplgy.ubur.edu/tp/ PRODUCTS OF SPACES OF COUNTABLE TIGHTNESS by Yshi Tk Tplgy Prceedigs Web: http://tplgy.ubur.edu/tp/ Mil: Tplgy Prceedigs Deprtmet f Mthemtics & Sttistics
More information5.1 Two-Step Conditional Density Estimator
5.1 Tw-Step Cditial Desity Estimatr We ca write y = g(x) + e where g(x) is the cditial mea fucti ad e is the regressi errr. Let f e (e j x) be the cditial desity f e give X = x: The the cditial desity
More informationSTRONG QUASI-COMPLETE SPACES
Volume 1, 1976 Pages 243 251 http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/ STRONG QUASI-COMPLETE SPACES by Raymod F. Gittigs Topology Proceedigs Web: http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/ Mail: Topology Proceedigs Departmet of
More informationFourier Method for Solving Transportation. Problems with Mixed Constraints
It. J. Ctemp. Math. Scieces, Vl. 5, 200,. 28, 385-395 Furier Methd fr Slvig Trasprtati Prblems with Mixed Cstraits P. Padia ad G. Nataraja Departmet f Mathematics, Schl f Advaced Scieces V I T Uiversity,
More informationMetric Space Properties
Metric Space Properties Math 40 Fial Project Preseted by: Michael Brow, Alex Cordova, ad Alyssa Sachez We have already poited out ad will recogize throughout this book the importace of compact sets. All
More informationA NOTE ON LEBESGUE SPACES
Volume 6, 1981 Pages 363 369 http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/ A NOTE ON LEBESGUE SPACES by Sam B. Nadler, Jr. ad Thelma West Topology Proceedigs Web: http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/ Mail: Topology Proceedigs
More informationLecture Notes for Analysis Class
Lecture Notes for Aalysis Class Topological Spaces A topology for a set X is a collectio T of subsets of X such that: (a) X ad the empty set are i T (b) Uios of elemets of T are i T (c) Fiite itersectios
More informationENGI 4421 Central Limit Theorem Page Central Limit Theorem [Navidi, section 4.11; Devore sections ]
ENGI 441 Cetral Limit Therem Page 11-01 Cetral Limit Therem [Navidi, secti 4.11; Devre sectis 5.3-5.4] If X i is t rmally distributed, but E X i, V X i ad is large (apprximately 30 r mre), the, t a gd
More informationCopyright 1978, by the author(s). All rights reserved.
Cpyright 1978, by the authr(s). All rights reserved. Permissi t make digital r hard cpies f all r part f this wrk fr persal r classrm use is grated withut fee prvided that cpies are t made r distributed
More informationSolutions. Definitions pertaining to solutions
Slutis Defiitis pertaiig t slutis Slute is the substace that is disslved. It is usually preset i the smaller amut. Slvet is the substace that des the disslvig. It is usually preset i the larger amut. Slubility
More informationUniversity Microfilms, A XEROX Company. Ann Arbor, Michigan
72-10,168 VAN CASTEREN, Jhaes A., 1943 GENERALIZED GELFAND TRIPLES. Uiversity f Hawaii, Ph.D., 1971 Mathematics Uiversity Micrfilms, A XEROX Cmpay. A Arbr, Michiga THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED
More informationare specified , are linearly independent Otherwise, they are linearly dependent, and one is expressed by a linear combination of the others
Chater 3. Higher Order Liear ODEs Kreyszig by YHLee;4; 3-3. Hmgeeus Liear ODEs The stadard frm f the th rder liear ODE ( ) ( ) = : hmgeeus if r( ) = y y y y r Hmgeeus Liear ODE: Suersiti Pricile, Geeral
More informationSOME REMARKS ON FREELY DECOMPOSABLE MAPPINGS
Volume, 1977 Pages 13 17 http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/ SOME REMARKS ON FREELY DECOMPOSABLE MAPPINGS by C. Bruce Hughes Topology Proceedigs Web: http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/ Mail: Topology Proceedigs Departmet
More informationAxioms of Measure Theory
MATH 532 Axioms of Measure Theory Dr. Neal, WKU I. The Space Throughout the course, we shall let X deote a geeric o-empty set. I geeral, we shall ot assume that ay algebraic structure exists o X so that
More informationRMO Sample Paper 1 Solutions :
RMO Sample Paper Slutis :. The umber f arragemets withut ay restricti = 9! 3!3!3! The umber f arragemets with ly e set f the csecutive 3 letters = The umber f arragemets with ly tw sets f the csecutive
More informationf n (x) f m (x) < ɛ/3 for all x A. By continuity of f n and f m we can find δ > 0 such that d(x, x 0 ) < δ implies that
Lecture 15 We have see that a sequece of cotiuous fuctios which is uiformly coverget produces a limit fuctio which is also cotiuous. We shall stregthe this result ow. Theorem 1 Let f : X R or (C) be a
More informationFINITE BOOLEAN ALGEBRA. 1. Deconstructing Boolean algebras with atoms. Let B = <B,,,,,0,1> be a Boolean algebra and c B.
FINITE BOOLEAN ALGEBRA 1. Decnstructing Blean algebras with atms. Let B = be a Blean algebra and c B. The ideal generated by c, (c], is: (c] = {b B: b c} The filter generated by c, [c), is:
More informationAN ARC-LIKE CONTINUUM THAT ADMITS A HOMEOMORPHISM WITH ENTROPY FOR ANY GIVEN VALUE
AN ARC-LIKE CONTINUUM THAT ADMITS A HOMEOMORPHISM WITH ENTROPY FOR ANY GIVEN VALUE CHRISTOPHER MOURON Abstract. A arc-like cotiuum X is costructed with the followig properties: () for every ɛ [0, ] there
More informationCommon Coupled Fixed Point of Mappings Satisfying Rational Inequalities in Ordered Complex Valued Generalized Metric Spaces
IOSR Joural of Mathematics (IOSR-JM) e-issn: 78-578, p-issn:319-765x Volume 10, Issue 3 Ver II (May-Ju 014), PP 69-77 Commo Coupled Fixed Poit of Mappigs Satisfyig Ratioal Iequalities i Ordered Complex
More informationThe value of Banach limits on a certain sequence of all rational numbers in the interval (0,1) Bao Qi Feng
The value of Baach limits o a certai sequece of all ratioal umbers i the iterval 0, Bao Qi Feg Departmet of Mathematical Scieces, Ket State Uiversity, Tuscarawas, 330 Uiversity Dr. NE, New Philadelphia,
More informationThe generalized marginal rate of substitution
Jural f Mathematical Ecmics 31 1999 553 560 The geeralized margial rate f substituti M Besada, C Vazuez ) Facultade de Ecmicas, UiÕersidade de Vig, Aptd 874, 3600 Vig, Spai Received 31 May 1995; accepted
More informationA NOTE ON INVARIANT SETS OF ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEMS
Acta Math. Hugar., 2007 DOI: 10.1007/s10474-007-7013-6 A NOTE ON INVARIANT SETS OF ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEMS L. L. STACHÓ ad L. I. SZABÓ Bolyai Istitute, Uiversity of Szeged, Aradi vértaúk tere 1, H-6720
More informationAn S-type upper bound for the largest singular value of nonnegative rectangular tensors
Ope Mat. 06 4 95 933 Ope Matematics Ope Access Researc Article Jiaxig Za* ad Caili Sag A S-type upper bud r te largest sigular value egative rectagular tesrs DOI 0.55/mat-06-0085 Received August 3, 06
More informationUniversity of Colorado Denver Dept. Math. & Stat. Sciences Applied Analysis Preliminary Exam 13 January 2012, 10:00 am 2:00 pm. Good luck!
Uiversity of Colorado Dever Dept. Math. & Stat. Scieces Applied Aalysis Prelimiary Exam 13 Jauary 01, 10:00 am :00 pm Name: The proctor will let you read the followig coditios before the exam begis, ad
More informationMATHEMATICS 9740/01 Paper 1 14 Sep hours
Cadidate Name: Class: JC PRELIMINARY EXAM Higher MATHEMATICS 9740/0 Paper 4 Sep 06 3 hurs Additial Materials: Cver page Aswer papers List f Frmulae (MF5) READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS FIRST Write yur full ame
More informationControl Systems. Controllability and Observability (Chapter 6)
6.53 trl Systems trllaility ad Oservaility (hapter 6) Geeral Framewrk i State-Spae pprah Give a LTI system: x x u; y x (*) The system might e ustale r des t meet the required perfrmae spe. Hw a we imprve
More informationHomology groups of disks with holes
Hmlgy grups f disks with hles THEOREM. Let p 1,, p k } be a sequence f distinct pints in the interir unit disk D n where n 2, and suppse that fr all j the sets E j Int D n are clsed, pairwise disjint subdisks.
More informationx 2 x 3 x b 0, then a, b, c log x 1 log z log x log y 1 logb log a dy 4. dx As tangent is perpendicular to the x axis, slope
The agle betwee the tagets draw t the parabla y = frm the pit (-,) 5 9 6 Here give pit lies the directri, hece the agle betwee the tagets frm that pit right agle Ratig :EASY The umber f values f c such
More informationMath 61CM - Solutions to homework 3
Math 6CM - Solutios to homework 3 Cédric De Groote October 2 th, 208 Problem : Let F be a field, m 0 a fixed oegative iteger ad let V = {a 0 + a x + + a m x m a 0,, a m F} be the vector space cosistig
More informationTREE-LIKE CONTINUA AS LIMITS OF CYCLIC GRAPHS
Volume 4, 1979 Pages 507 514 http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/ TREE-LIKE CONTINUA AS LIMITS OF CYCLIC GRAPHS by Lex G. Oversteege ad James T. Rogers, Jr. Topology Proceedigs Web: http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/
More informationSolution. 1 Solutions of Homework 1. Sangchul Lee. October 27, Problem 1.1
Solutio Sagchul Lee October 7, 017 1 Solutios of Homework 1 Problem 1.1 Let Ω,F,P) be a probability space. Show that if {A : N} F such that A := lim A exists, the PA) = lim PA ). Proof. Usig the cotiuity
More informationFull algebra of generalized functions and non-standard asymptotic analysis
Full algebra f geeralized fuctis ad -stadard asympttic aalysis Tdr D. Tdrv Has Veraeve Abstract We cstruct a algebra f geeralized fuctis edwed with a caical embeddig f the space f Schwartz distributis.
More informationIt is always the case that unions, intersections, complements, and set differences are preserved by the inverse image of a function.
MATH 532 Measurable Fuctios Dr. Neal, WKU Throughout, let ( X, F, µ) be a measure space ad let (!, F, P ) deote the special case of a probability space. We shall ow begi to study real-valued fuctios defied
More informationA REMARK ON A PROBLEM OF KLEE
C O L L O Q U I U M M A T H E M A T I C U M VOL. 71 1996 NO. 1 A REMARK ON A PROBLEM OF KLEE BY N. J. K A L T O N (COLUMBIA, MISSOURI) AND N. T. P E C K (URBANA, ILLINOIS) This paper treats a property
More informationEXAMPLES OF HEREDITARILY STRONGLY INFINITE-DIMENSIONAL COMPACTA
Volume 3, 1978 Pages 495 506 http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/ EXAMPLES OF HEREDITARILY STRONGLY INFINITE-DIMENSIONAL COMPACTA by R. M. Schori ad Joh J. Walsh Topology Proceedigs Web: http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/
More informationTheorem 3. A subset S of a topological space X is compact if and only if every open cover of S by open sets in X has a finite subcover.
Compactess Defiitio 1. A cover or a coverig of a topological space X is a family C of subsets of X whose uio is X. A subcover of a cover C is a subfamily of C which is a cover of X. A ope cover of X is
More informationMAT1026 Calculus II Basic Convergence Tests for Series
MAT026 Calculus II Basic Covergece Tests for Series Egi MERMUT 202.03.08 Dokuz Eylül Uiversity Faculty of Sciece Departmet of Mathematics İzmir/TURKEY Cotets Mootoe Covergece Theorem 2 2 Series of Real
More informationQuantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers. David Miller
Quatum Mechaics fr Scietists ad Egieers David Miller Time-depedet perturbati thery Time-depedet perturbati thery Time-depedet perturbati basics Time-depedet perturbati thery Fr time-depedet prblems csider
More informationTHE DEVELOPMENT OF AND GAPS IN THE THEORY OF PRODUCTS OF INITIALLY M-COMPACT SPACES
Vlume 6, 1981 Pages 99 113 http://tplgy.auburn.edu/tp/ THE DEVELOPMENT OF AND GAPS IN THE THEORY OF PRODUCTS OF INITIALLY M-COMPACT SPACES by R. M. Stephensn, Jr. Tplgy Prceedings Web: http://tplgy.auburn.edu/tp/
More informationA Proof of Birkhoff s Ergodic Theorem
A Proof of Birkhoff s Ergodic Theorem Joseph Hora September 2, 205 Itroductio I Fall 203, I was learig the basics of ergodic theory, ad I came across this theorem. Oe of my supervisors, Athoy Quas, showed
More informationBIRKHOFF ERGODIC THEOREM
BIRKHOFF ERGODIC THEOREM Abstract. We will give a proof of the poitwise ergodic theorem, which was first proved by Birkhoff. May improvemets have bee made sice Birkhoff s orgial proof. The versio we give
More informationE o and the equilibrium constant, K
lectrchemical measuremets (Ch -5 t 6). T state the relati betwee ad K. (D x -b, -). Frm galvaic cell vltage measuremet (a) K sp (D xercise -8, -) (b) K sp ad γ (D xercise -9) (c) K a (D xercise -G, -6)
More informationCommutativity in Permutation Groups
Commutativity i Permutatio Groups Richard Wito, PhD Abstract I the group Sym(S) of permutatios o a oempty set S, fixed poits ad trasiet poits are defied Prelimiary results o fixed ad trasiet poits are
More informationOn Strictly Point T -asymmetric Continua
Volume 35, 2010 Pages 91 96 http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/ O Strictly Poit T -asymmetric Cotiua by Leobardo Ferádez Electroically published o Jue 19, 2009 Topology Proceedigs Web: http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/
More informationBest bounds for dispersion of ratio block sequences for certain subsets of integers
Aales Mathematicae et Iformaticae 49 (08 pp. 55 60 doi: 0.33039/ami.08.05.006 http://ami.ui-eszterhazy.hu Best bouds for dispersio of ratio block sequeces for certai subsets of itegers József Bukor Peter
More informationI I L an,klr ~ Mr, n~l
MATHEMATICS ON MATRIX TRANSFORMATIONS OF CERTAIN SEQUENCE SPACES BY H. R. CHILLINGWORTH (Commuicated by Prof. J. F. KoKS!IIA at the meetig of Jue 29, 1957) I this paper we determie the characteristics
More informationMath 341 Lecture #31 6.5: Power Series
Math 341 Lecture #31 6.5: Power Series We ow tur our attetio to a particular kid of series of fuctios, amely, power series, f(x = a x = a 0 + a 1 x + a 2 x 2 + where a R for all N. I terms of a series
More informationInfinite Sequences and Series
Chapter 6 Ifiite Sequeces ad Series 6.1 Ifiite Sequeces 6.1.1 Elemetary Cocepts Simply speakig, a sequece is a ordered list of umbers writte: {a 1, a 2, a 3,...a, a +1,...} where the elemets a i represet
More informationCardinality Homework Solutions
Cardiality Homework Solutios April 16, 014 Problem 1. I the followig problems, fid a bijectio from A to B (you eed ot prove that the fuctio you list is a bijectio): (a) A = ( 3, 3), B = (7, 1). (b) A =
More informationInformation Theory and Statistics Lecture 4: Lempel-Ziv code
Iformatio Theory ad Statistics Lecture 4: Lempel-Ziv code Łukasz Dębowski ldebowsk@ipipa.waw.pl Ph. D. Programme 203/204 Etropy rate is the limitig compressio rate Theorem For a statioary process (X i)
More informationBIO752: Advanced Methods in Biostatistics, II TERM 2, 2010 T. A. Louis. BIO 752: MIDTERM EXAMINATION: ANSWERS 30 November 2010
BIO752: Advaced Methds i Bistatistics, II TERM 2, 2010 T. A. Luis BIO 752: MIDTERM EXAMINATION: ANSWERS 30 Nvember 2010 Questi #1 (15 pits): Let X ad Y be radm variables with a jit distributi ad assume
More informationTHE FINITENESS OF THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP FOR ATOROIDAL 3-MANIFOLDS WITH GENUINE LAMINATIONS
j. differential gemetry 50 (1998) 123-127 THE FINITENESS OF THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP FOR ATOROIDAL 3-MANIFOLDS WITH GENUINE LAMINATIONS DAVID GABAI & WILLIAM H. KAZEZ Essential laminatins were intrduced
More informationA LIMITED ARITHMETIC ON SIMPLE CONTINUED FRACTIONS - II 1. INTRODUCTION
A LIMITED ARITHMETIC ON SIMPLE CONTINUED FRACTIONS - II C. T. LONG J. H. JORDAN* Washigto State Uiversity, Pullma, Washigto 1. INTRODUCTION I the first paper [2 ] i this series, we developed certai properties
More informationLecture 2. The Lovász Local Lemma
Staford Uiversity Sprig 208 Math 233A: No-costructive methods i combiatorics Istructor: Ja Vodrák Lecture date: Jauary 0, 208 Origial scribe: Apoorva Khare Lecture 2. The Lovász Local Lemma 2. Itroductio
More information[1 & α(t & T 1. ' ρ 1
NAME 89.304 - IGNEOUS & METAMORPHIC PETROLOGY DENSITY & VISCOSITY OF MAGMAS I. Desity The desity (mass/vlume) f a magma is a imprtat parameter which plays a rle i a umber f aspects f magma behavir ad evluti.
More informationIf a subset E of R contains no open interval, is it of zero measure? For instance, is the set of irrationals in [0, 1] is of measure zero?
2 Lebesgue Measure I Chapter 1 we defied the cocept of a set of measure zero, ad we have observed that every coutable set is of measure zero. Here are some atural questios: If a subset E of R cotais a
More informationStudy of Energy Eigenvalues of Three Dimensional. Quantum Wires with Variable Cross Section
Adv. Studies Ther. Phys. Vl. 3 009. 5 3-0 Study f Eergy Eigevalues f Three Dimesial Quatum Wires with Variale Crss Secti M.. Sltai Erde Msa Departmet f physics Islamic Aad Uiversity Share-ey rach Ira alrevahidi@yah.cm
More informationPhysical Chemistry Laboratory I CHEM 445 Experiment 2 Partial Molar Volume (Revised, 01/13/03)
Physical Chemistry Labratry I CHEM 445 Experimet Partial Mlar lume (Revised, 0/3/03) lume is, t a gd apprximati, a additive prperty. Certaily this apprximati is used i preparig slutis whse ccetratis are
More informationSolutions to Midterm II. of the following equation consistent with the boundary condition stated u. y u x y
Sltis t Midterm II Prblem : (pts) Fid the mst geeral slti ( f the fllwig eqati csistet with the bdary cditi stated y 3 y the lie y () Slti : Sice the system () is liear the slti is give as a sperpsiti
More informationThe Boolean Ring of Intervals
MATH 532 Lebesgue Measure Dr. Neal, WKU We ow shall apply the results obtaied about outer measure to the legth measure o the real lie. Throughout, our space X will be the set of real umbers R. Whe ecessary,
More informationAuthor. Introduction. Author. o Asmir Tobudic. ISE 599 Computational Modeling of Expressive Performance
ISE 599 Cmputatial Mdelig f Expressive Perfrmace Playig Mzart by Aalgy: Learig Multi-level Timig ad Dyamics Strategies by Gerhard Widmer ad Asmir Tbudic Preseted by Tsug-Ha (Rbert) Chiag April 5, 2006
More informationActive redundancy allocation in systems. R. Romera; J. Valdés; R. Zequeira*
Wrkig Paper -6 (3) Statistics ad Ecmetrics Series March Departamet de Estadística y Ecmetría Uiversidad Carls III de Madrid Calle Madrid, 6 893 Getafe (Spai) Fax (34) 9 64-98-49 Active redudacy allcati
More informationBETWEEN QUASICONVEX AND CONVEX SET-VALUED MAPPINGS. 1. Introduction. Throughout the paper we denote by X a linear space and by Y a topological linear
BETWEEN QUASICONVEX AND CONVEX SET-VALUED MAPPINGS Abstract. The aim of this paper is to give sufficiet coditios for a quasicovex setvalued mappig to be covex. I particular, we recover several kow characterizatios
More informationRiesz-Fischer Sequences and Lower Frame Bounds
Zeitschrift für Aalysis ud ihre Aweduge Joural for Aalysis ad its Applicatios Volume 1 (00), No., 305 314 Riesz-Fischer Sequeces ad Lower Frame Bouds P. Casazza, O. Christese, S. Li ad A. Lider Abstract.
More informationOn groups of diffeomorphisms of the interval with finitely many fixed points II. Azer Akhmedov
O groups of diffeomorphisms of the iterval with fiitely may fixed poits II Azer Akhmedov Abstract: I [6], it is proved that ay subgroup of Diff ω +(I) (the group of orietatio preservig aalytic diffeomorphisms
More informationMean residual life of coherent systems consisting of multiple types of dependent components
Mea residual life f cheret systems csistig f multiple types f depedet cmpets Serka Eryilmaz, Frak P.A. Cle y ad Tahai Cle-Maturi z February 20, 208 Abstract Mea residual life is a useful dyamic characteristic
More informationDIVISIBILITY PROPERTIES OF GENERALIZED FIBONACCI POLYNOMIALS
DIVISIBILITY PROPERTIES OF GENERALIZED FIBONACCI POLYNOMIALS VERNER E. HOGGATT, JR. Sa Jose State Uiversity, Sa Jose, Califoria 95192 ad CALVIN T. LONG Washigto State Uiversity, Pullma, Washigto 99163
More informationA NOTE ON AN R- MODULE WITH APPROXIMATELY-PURE INTERSECTION PROPERTY
Joural of Al-ahrai Uiversity Vol.13 (3), September, 2010, pp.170-174 Sciece A OTE O A R- ODULE WIT APPROXIATELY-PURE ITERSECTIO PROPERTY Uhood S. Al-assai Departmet of Computer Sciece, College of Sciece,
More informationInternational Journal of Mathematical Archive-7(6), 2016, Available online through ISSN
Iteratioal Joural of Mathematical Archive-7(6, 06, 04-0 Available olie through www.ijma.ifo ISSN 9 5046 COMMON FIED POINT THEOREM FOR FOUR WEAKLY COMPATIBLE SELFMAPS OF A COMPLETE G METRIC SPACE J. NIRANJAN
More information6 Integers Modulo n. integer k can be written as k = qn + r, with q,r, 0 r b. So any integer.
6 Itegers Modulo I Example 2.3(e), we have defied the cogruece of two itegers a,b with respect to a modulus. Let us recall that a b (mod ) meas a b. We have proved that cogruece is a equivalece relatio
More informationTHE ASYMPTOTIC PERFORMANCE OF THE LOG LIKELIHOOD RATIO STATISTIC FOR THE MIXTURE MODEL AND RELATED RESULTS
ON THE ASYMPTOTIC PERFORMANCE OF THE LOG LIKELIHOOD RATIO STATISTIC FOR THE MIXTURE MODEL AND RELATED RESULTS by Jayata Kumar Ghsh Idia Statistical I$titute, Calcutta ad Praab Kumar Se Departmet f Bistatistics
More informationMath 778S Spectral Graph Theory Handout #3: Eigenvalues of Adjacency Matrix
Math 778S Spectral Graph Theory Hadout #3: Eigevalues of Adjacecy Matrix The Cartesia product (deoted by G H) of two simple graphs G ad H has the vertex-set V (G) V (H). For ay u, v V (G) ad x, y V (H),
More informationMcGill University Math 354: Honors Analysis 3 Fall 2012 Solutions to selected problems
McGill Uiversity Math 354: Hoors Aalysis 3 Fall 212 Assigmet 3 Solutios to selected problems Problem 1. Lipschitz fuctios. Let Lip K be the set of all fuctios cotiuous fuctios o [, 1] satisfyig a Lipschitz
More informationThe Borel hierarchy classifies subsets of the reals by their topological complexity. Another approach is to classify them by size.
Lecture 7: Measure ad Category The Borel hierarchy classifies subsets of the reals by their topological complexity. Aother approach is to classify them by size. Filters ad Ideals The most commo measure
More informationCh. 1 Introduction to Estimation 1/15
Ch. Itrducti t stimati /5 ample stimati Prblem: DSB R S f M f s f f f ; f, φ m tcsπf t + φ t f lectrics dds ise wt usually white BPF & mp t s t + w t st. lg. f & φ X udi mp cs π f + φ t Oscillatr w/ f
More informationProduct measures, Tonelli s and Fubini s theorems For use in MAT3400/4400, autumn 2014 Nadia S. Larsen. Version of 13 October 2014.
Product measures, Toelli s ad Fubii s theorems For use i MAT3400/4400, autum 2014 Nadia S. Larse Versio of 13 October 2014. 1. Costructio of the product measure The purpose of these otes is to preset the
More information(A sequence also can be thought of as the list of function values attained for a function f :ℵ X, where f (n) = x n for n 1.) x 1 x N +k x N +4 x 3
MATH 337 Sequeces Dr. Neal, WKU Let X be a metric space with distace fuctio d. We shall defie the geeral cocept of sequece ad limit i a metric space, the apply the results i particular to some special
More informationANOTHER GENERALIZED FIBONACCI SEQUENCE 1. INTRODUCTION
ANOTHER GENERALIZED FIBONACCI SEQUENCE MARCELLUS E. WADDILL A N D LOUIS SACKS Wake Forest College, Wisto Salem, N. C., ad Uiversity of ittsburgh, ittsburgh, a. 1. INTRODUCTION Recet issues of umerous periodicals
More informationSequences and Series of Functions
Chapter 6 Sequeces ad Series of Fuctios 6.1. Covergece of a Sequece of Fuctios Poitwise Covergece. Defiitio 6.1. Let, for each N, fuctio f : A R be defied. If, for each x A, the sequece (f (x)) coverges
More informationA Combinatorial Proof of a Theorem of Katsuura
Mathematical Assoc. of America College Mathematics Joural 45:1 Jue 2, 2014 2:34 p.m. TSWLatexiaTemp 000017.tex A Combiatorial Proof of a Theorem of Katsuura Bria K. Miceli Bria Miceli (bmiceli@triity.edu)
More informationREMARKS ON CLOSURE-PRESERVING SUM THEOREMS
Volume 13, 1988 Pages 125 136 http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/ REMARKS ON CLOSURE-PRESERVING SUM THEOREMS by J. C. Smith ad R. Telgársky Topology Proceedigs Web: http://topology.aubur.edu/tp/ Mail: Topology
More informationSOME FIBONACCI AND LUCAS IDENTITIES. L. CARLITZ Dyke University, Durham, North Carolina and H. H. FERNS Victoria, B. C, Canada
SOME FIBONACCI AND LUCAS IDENTITIES L. CARLITZ Dyke Uiversity, Durham, North Carolia ad H. H. FERNS Victoria, B. C, Caada 1. I the usual otatio, put (1.1) F _
More informationON THE FUZZY METRIC SPACES
The Joural of Mathematics ad Computer Sciece Available olie at http://www.tjmcs.com The Joural of Mathematics ad Computer Sciece Vol.2 No.3 2) 475-482 ON THE FUZZY METRIC SPACES Received: July 2, Revised:
More informationA Characterization of Compact Operators by Orthogonality
Australia Joural of Basic ad Applied Scieces, 5(6): 253-257, 211 ISSN 1991-8178 A Characterizatio of Compact Operators by Orthogoality Abdorreza Paahi, Mohamad Reza Farmai ad Azam Noorafa Zaai Departmet
More informationf t(y)dy f h(x)g(xy) dx fk 4 a. «..
CERTAIN OPERATORS AND FOURIER TRANSFORMS ON L2 RICHARD R. GOLDBERG 1. Intrductin. A well knwn therem f Titchmarsh [2] states that if fel2(0, ) and if g is the Furier csine transfrm f/, then G(x)=x~1Jx0g(y)dy
More information