Cosmic Large-scale Structure Formations

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Cosmic Large-scale Structure Formations"

Sara Marshall
5 years ago
Views:

1 Cosmic Large-scale Structure Formations Bin HU Office: 京师大厦 9907

2 18 weeks outline Background (1 w) universe geometry and matter components (1 hr) Standard candle (SNIa) (0.5 hr) Standard ruler (BAO) (0.5 hr) Linear perturbation (9 w) relativistic treatment perturbation (2 hr) primordial power spectrum (2 hr) linear growth rate (2 hr) galaxy 2-pt correlation function (2 hr) Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) (2 hr) Redshift Space Distortion (RSD) (2 hr) Weak Lensing (2 hr) Non-linear perturbation (6 w) Non-linear power spectrum (2 hr) halo model (2 hr) N-body simulation algorithms (2 hr) Press-Schechter (PS) halo mass function (2 hr) Extended-PS (EPS) halo mass function (2 hr) halo bias & halo density profile (2 hr) Statistical analysis (2 w) Monte-Carlo Markov Chain sampler (2 hr) CosmoMC use (2 hr) Einstein-Boltzmann codes (2 hr)

3 G µν = 8πGT µν G µν + Λg µν = 8πGT µν unstable to tiny pert. static universe: closed universe contained dust and cc Einstein 1917 Hubble 1929 v=h0d The further galaxy is, the faster escape from us must be closed universe! universe is expanding prediction:tcmb=5k measurement: TCMB=2.7255K Gamow 1948

4 T~1GeV T~1MeV quark -> proton&neutron nucleosynthesis: create light element D, He, Li T~1eV z~(100,1000) recombination: p + + e - -> H hot dark ages z~(6,10) z<2 z<1 reionization cold galaxy cluster Dark energy

GR is a classical theory, does not involve any quantum phenomenon no!

Mass δ P i δλ " 2GM c2 the inertial energy of particle with mass M: E Mc2

/ G ~ 10 GeV when the system energy approaches Planck mass, we need to

5 GR is a classical theory, does not involve any quantum phenomenon no! A typical Schwarzschild black hole radius uncertainty principle: Planck Mass δ P i δλ " 2GM c2 the inertial energy of particle with mass M: E Mc2 19 M * ~! / G ~ 10 GeV when the system energy approaches Planck mass, we need to quantise gravity! Planck scale Inflation happens between them GUT scale From t=0 to10-44 s Planck time), cosmic energy scale is above 1019 GeV (Planck energy)

A photon from t=0,with velocity c/3, via 380,000yr can travel: 38x10 4 /3 lyr

8 billion yr, can travel: 138x10 8 lyr~5x10 9 pc remove the co-moving factor

6 why do we need inflation? 1deg 2 ~(pi/180) 2 ~1/3600 full sky 4pi/(1/3600)~50,000 sound horizon(z=1100) 1º A photon from t=0,with velocity c/3, via 380,000yr can travel: 38x10 4 /3 lyr ~3x10 4 pc t=13.8 billion yr O A photon from t=0,with velocity c, via 13.8 billion yr, can travel: 138x10 8 lyr~5x10 9 pc remove the co-moving factor az=0/az=1100~1000 t= 380,000yr horizon problem ratio:5x10 9 /3x10 4 /10 3 ~140 t=0 A B C x 2d sphere,totally ~20,000 causal disconnected region

7 To solve horizon need enlarge the physical size of forward light-cone,by a factor 100. e N ~100, N~5 (e-folding number) t=13.8 billion yr O t= 380,000 yr t=0 A B C x

8 continue to push back to GUT scale t=13.8 billion yr O t= 380,000yr out of causal connection t=0 A B C x t=10-36 s (GUT scale) [Pb1.] How many e-folds do we need to solve the horizon this epoch?

( E pl E eq ) 4 ~ 10 108 H 2 ρ a 4 radiation era radiation era covers most parts of the energy scale 10 54 a

9 flatness problem Ω k < GeV 10 3 ev 10 ev Planck era DE era equality era ρ pl ρ de = ( E pl E de ) 4 ~ ρ pl ρ eq = ( E pl E eq ) 4 ~ H 2 ρ a 4 radiation era radiation era covers most parts of the energy scale a 2 H 2 ρ monopole problem GUT huge mount of stable magnetic monopole m~10 16 GeV ρ mon > [gm / cm 3 ] completely dominated by monopole! ρ c ~ [gm / cm 3 ] Ω = ρ mon ρ c > 10 11

factor e 60 how to:qausi-de Sitter phase exponential expansion in RD/MD era,

t a = e HiΔt H i Δt = 60 H~ const Guth 1980 H -1 Henry Tye t2 x t1 [Guth &

10 The way out? within10-36 s, stretch the physical scale of the forward light-cone by a factor e 60 how to:qausi-de Sitter phase exponential expansion in RD/MD era, a~t # (power law), too slow! t a = e HiΔt H i Δt = 60 H~ const Guth 1980 H -1 Henry Tye t2 x t1 [Guth & Tye, 1979, PRL, Phase Transitions and Magnetic Monopole Production in the Very Early Universe ] [Guth, 1980, PRD, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems ]

1 3M pl 2 V(φ) inflationary mechanism does not only solve several problems on the background level, but also, naturally gives

11 mechanism: a scalar field slowly roll in its potential S = d 4 x g[ 1 2 µ φ µ φ V(φ)] ρ = 1 2! φ 2 + V(φ) P = 1 2! φ 2 V(φ)!φ 2 V(φ) P # ρ H 2 = 1 3M pl 2 [1 2! φ 2 + V(φ)] H 2! 1 3M pl 2 V(φ) inflationary mechanism does not only solve several problems on the background level, but also, naturally gives the initial conditions needed by the CMB and LSS formation! (we force on this) cosmic time evolution is deterministic! t P(k,z 0 ) = D 2 (z i,z 0 )P i (k) obs evolution IC initial condition is stochastic!

12 inflaton action linear order action plug unperturbed FRWL metric background field e.o.m (deriv) (deriv) quadratic action (deriv) (deriv) Mukhanov-Sasaki eq. mf 2 (negative mass sq) sub-horizon limit V,φφ m f 2 ;m f ~ H in this energy level ( Mpl>>H ), inflaton behaves as massless particle Simple Harmonic oscillator with 0-mass in Minkowski space (no feel of curvature) e.g. V(φ) = 1 2 m f 2 φ 2 H 2! 1 3M pl 2 V(φ) φ ~ M pl ;δφ ~ H validation of our calculation! H M pl we quantise δφ NOT φ up to now, no quantum gravity theory available (@Mpl scale)

in the curved space-time, will naturally gives α =β=0 (Bunch-Davis vacuum) (adiabatic state) (no particle creation) If we zoom in

13 classical field a(t) = e Ht τ0 a(τ ) = τ (deriv) general solution For a classical vacuum, no reason to excite any state, so it is natural to choose However, the quantum fluct. in the curved space-time, will naturally gives α =β=0 (Bunch-Davis vacuum) (adiabatic state) (no particle creation) If we zoom in (time & space), a classical vacuum, is full of instantaneous particle creations and annihilations. (oﬀ-set of the equilibrium position denotes for the particle creation/annihilation) the quantum field view of space-time: string matrix

14 quantum oscillation <phi phi> Horizon scale

15 fluct. freeze out <phi phi>

16 Let us fix a space point! x = 0, record scalar field amplitude f (τ,! x = 0) A 1 e iω 1iτ A 2 e iω 2iτ A 3 e iω 3iτ at quantum level, the scalar field can be treated as an assembly of simple harmonics! Quantum Field is a collection of Quantum mechanics f (τ,! x) = < ˆf i ˆf > f (τ,! x = 0) classical solution quantum operator ˆf = f i ˆ δ < ˆ δ >= 0,< ˆ δ i ˆ δ >= 1 Gaussian random variables

17 quantization of the pert. mode function f k (τ ) : is chosen to be the classical field solution!! conjugate momentum! (deriv) [ ˆf! k (τ ), ˆπ! k ' (τ )] = iδ (! k +! k ') quantum effect for classical pert. (α,β) could be arbitrary large The difference between classical & quantum pert. for quantum pert. the wave function must be unitary (probability normalised to unity) α 2 + β 2 = 1 decoherence However, the afterward cosmic evolution is classical process, e.g. galaxy formation sub-horizon f k ~ e ikτ 2k two quantum states separated by a scale k -1, are in coherence! (correlated amplitude and phase) quantum π k ~ ike ikτ 2k decoherence classical super-horizon f k ~ i 2k 3/2 τ < 0 [ ˆf k, ˆπ k ' ] 0 >= iδ (k + k ') < 0 [ ˆf k, ˆπ k ] 0 >= 0 non-commute quantum state (deriv) commute π k ~ i 2k 3/2 τ 2 (deriv) classical state

18 primordial scalar power spectrum a(τ ) = τ 0 ah = H a = 1 τ Hτ (deriv) dimensionless power spectrum super-horizon mode f k ~ i 2k 3/2 τ causal connection (deriv) freeze out evolve again (lecture2) the amplitude of the pert. is proportional to inflationary energy scale! (by measuring the amp we can know the inflation energy scale) oscillate [Pb2.] H 2 V Δ R ~ (V,V ') gauge-inv curvature pert. or scalar pert. per. se. could NOT determine the inflation energy scale! (its amp also depends on the potential slop)

blue-tilt spectrum time flow n s 1 = d log Δ 2 R d log k ~ 2ε η (deriv) red-tilt: n s 1 < 0 amp is

19 nearly scale-inv power spectrum if ε, H purely constant exact scale-inv ε! H H 2 η d logε dn a = e N = e H dt Harrison-Zeldovich spectrum 1st time derivative 2nd time derivative blue-tilt spectrum time flow n s 1 = d log Δ 2 R d log k ~ 2ε η (deriv) red-tilt: n s 1 < 0 amp is large on the large scale x long wave-length mode first cross horizon blue-tilt: n s 1 > 0 amp is large on the small scale k 1 H -1 k 2 t

creation/annihilation, why not the graviton? no symmetry prevent this! [Pb3.] [Pb4.] exactly the same as scalar pert. V.

20 tensor pert. (primordial gravitational such high energy scale, if inflaton could have instantaneous particle creation/annihilation, why not the graviton? no symmetry prevent this! [Pb3.] [Pb4.] exactly the same as scalar pert. V.S. only depends on H! direct probe of inflation scale! that is why we need measure PGW! fundamental physics (see pic in prev) [Pb5.] scalar spec can be both red & blue tensor spec must be both blue! (otherwise, violate null energy condition)

21 quantum oscillation <h+ h+> Horizon scale

22 P s (k) = A s ( k k p ) n s 1 P T (k) = A T ( k k p ) n T quantum fluct. freeze out, stop oscillating <h+,x h+,x> The same mechanism for graviton! the reason why tensor & scalar power spectra are so similar!

23 Further reading Baumann lecture note/chapter 6 Physical Foundations of Cosmology/Mukhanov

Structures in the early Universe. Particle Astrophysics chapter 8 Lecture 4

Structures in the early Universe Particle Astrophysics chapter 8 Lecture 4 overview Part 1: problems in Standard Model of Cosmology: horizon and flatness problems presence of structures Part : Need for