Cylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon
|
|
- Mary Gray
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon Sunggeum Hong, Joonil Kim and han Woo Yang Abstract. In this paper we prove that sharp weak-type estimates for the maximal operators associated with a cylindric distance function associated with a convex polygon on H p (R 3 ) when 2/3 < p < and δ = 3( ), or when p p = 2/3 and δ > 3( ). p Mathematics Subject lassification (2). Primary 42B5 ; Secondary 42B3. Keywords. ylinder multipliers, Minkowski functional, Polygon, Hardy spaces.. Introduction Let P be a convex polygon in R 2 which contains the origin in its interior. Let ρ be the associated Minkowski functional defined by We define a distance function m as ρ(ξ ) = inf{ɛ > : ɛ ξ P}, ξ. (.) m(ξ, ξ 3 ) = max{ρ(ξ ), ξ 3 } with ξ = (ξ, ξ 2 ). We note that ( m(ξ, ξ 3 ) 2 ) δ is supported on a bounded cylinder. Here t δ = t δ for t > and zero otherwise. For a Schwartz function f S(R 3 ) let f(ξ) = R 3 f(y) e i<y,ξ> dy denote by the Fourier transform of f. For δ > we consider T δ ɛ f(ξ) = ( m(ξ)2 ɛ 2 ) δ f(ξ), ξ = (ξ, ξ 3 ) R 2 R, and the maximal operators T δ f(x, x 3 ) = sup Tɛ δ f(x, x 3 ), (x, x 3 ) R 2 R. ɛ> This work was supported (in part) by research funds from hosun University, 27.
2 2 Sunggeum Hong, Joonil Kim and han Woo Yang The cylinder multipliers were previously studied by H. Luer in [4]. He considered the case where ρ(ξ ) = ξ with ξ R n. It is worth noticing that the the multiplier m with ρ(ξ ) = ξ has singularities on the boundary and along the cone ξ = ξ 3 and that the singularity inside the bounded cylinder yields the restriction on p for L p boundedness of the operator associated with the multiplier ( m 2 ) δ. He showed that if n 3 and p >, there is a restriction on p for which L p boundedness of T δ holds (see also [9]). Recently it is shown in [3] that the maximal operator associated with this cylindric distance function m(ξ, ξ 3 ) = max{ ξ, ξ 3 } with n = 2 satisfies a sharp weak type estimate on H p (R 3 ) when 4/5 < p < with critical index δ = δ c (p) := 3/p 5/2, or p = 4/5 and δ > δ c (p). In the cases of higher dimensional cases, n 3, one can show that a critical index in the above sense does not exist because the kernel F [( m 2 ) δ ] is not even integrable independently of δ where F [g] is the inverse Fourier transform of g (see [4, 9] for details). This type of restriction on p was also observed by P. Oswald in [5, 6]. He considered Marcinkiewicz-Riesz means associated with a non-smooth distance function m defined by m(ξ) = max{ ξ,..., ξ n } where ξ R n. We note that this distance function coincides with cylindric distance function when n = 2. He established sharp weak type estimates for the maximal operators associated with this multiplier when (n )/n < p < with critical index δ = δ M (p) := n( p ), or p = (n )/n and δ > δ M (p). However when the distance function does not have any singularity inside the boundary of the unit ball, this kind of phenomenon is not detected. Actually for the case m(ξ) = ξ Stein, Taibleson and Weiss in [8] finished drawing the full picture of the corresponding maximal operators, that is, when δ = δ s (p) := n(/p /2) /2 the maximal operators is of weak type (p, p) for the functions in H p (R n ), < p <. The purpose of this paper is to obtain a sharp weak type (p, p) estimate for the maximal operator T δ associated with a convex polygon on H p (R 3 ). This is a general version of Marcinkiewicz-Riesz means associated with non-smooth distance functions due to P. Oswald [6] on three dimensions. Here H p are the standard real Hardy space as defined in E. Stein [7]. Theorem.. The maximal operator T δ is bounded from H p (R 3 ) to L p (R 3 ); that is T δ f f Lp (R 3 ) H p (R 3 ) (.2) if and only if 2/3 < p < and δ > 3( p ). The constant does not depend on f. Theorem.2. If 2/3 < p < and δ = 3( p ) or p = 2/3 and δ > 3( p ), then T δ maps H p (R 3 ) boundedly into weak-l p (R 3 ), that is, { (x, x 3 ) R 2 R : T δ f(x, x 3 ) > α } α p f p H p (R 3 ), (.3) where the constant does not depend on α or f, and B denotes the Lebesgue measure of B.
3 ylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon 3 Remark.3. (i) Let δ p = 3( p ) be the critical index. If δ δ p or p 2/3, one can find that T δ fails to be bounded on L p (R 3 ) in Section 4. We also show that T 3/2 is unbounded from H 2/3 (R 3 ) to weak-l 2/3 (R 3 ). Thus we note that the indicated ranges of parameters p and δ can not be improved. (ii) For the maximal operator T δ associated with a convex polyhedron on H p (R n ), n 4, we can show that (n )/n < p < and δ = n( p ), or p = (n )/n and δ > n( p ) conditions are sufficient for strong and weak type (p, p) estimates by extending the methods in Theorems. and.2. However, we do not know whether the indicated ranges of parameters p and δ are sharp. (iii) For δ > since the kernel function in Lemmas 2.2 and 2.3 of Section 2 is integrable, T δ is bounded on L p (R 3 ) for p. (iv) When p = and δ =, the operator is not bounded on L (R 3 ) but it can be proved that it is bounded from Hprod (R3 ) to L (R 3 ), where Hprod (R3 ) is the product Hardy space. We shall use A B if cb A B for some constants c, >. 2. Kernel estimates In this section we shall estimate the kernel of cylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon. We shall consider Tɛ δ f(x, x 3 ) = (2π) 3 where K ɛ (x, x 3 ) = R R R 2 e i<x For each ɛ, the kernel K ɛ has the property R 2 K ɛ (x y, x 3 y 3 ) f(y, y 3 ) dy dy 3,ξ >ix 3ξ 3 ( m(ξ) 2 ɛ 2 ) δ dξ dξ 3. K ɛ (, ) = ɛ 3 K (ɛ, ɛ ). (2.) We initially decompose ( ρ(ξ ) 2) δ by triangulation, where ρ is the associated Minkowski functional defined by ρ(ξ ) = inf{ɛ > : ɛ ξ P}. Definition 2.. () For θ, θ 2 < 2π, (cos θ, sin θ ) (cos θ 2, sin θ 2 ) if and only if θ < θ 2. (2) For w = (w, w 2 ) R 2 \ {}, we define w = ( w, w 2 ) = w/ w. Let V [P] be the set of vertices of P. We write V [P] = {v i } L i= and v i = (v,i, v 2,i ). We may assume that ṽ i ṽ i for i =,..., L. Let i be a triangle with vertices {v i, v i, } when i =,..., L and {v L, v, } when i = L. Let ϕ (R 2 ) be supported in B(, ) with ϕ (ξ ) = for ξ B(, /2). Let φ(ξ) be the angle between the positive ξ 3 -axis and ξ. We let ω and ω 2 be smooth functions in φ such that ω and ω 2 are supported in {φ(ξ) π/2 ɛ } and {φ(ξ) π/2 ɛ },
4 4 Sunggeum Hong, Joonil Kim and han Woo Yang and ω ω 2, where ɛ is chosen to be so small that the following arguments hold true. We set ν(ξ) = ( m(ξ) 2 ) δ and decompose the multiplier ν as ν(ξ) = ν(ξ)ϕ (ξ ) ν(ξ)( ϕ (ξ )) = ν(ξ)ϕ (ξ ) ν(ξ)ϕ 2 (ξ ) = ν(ξ)ϕ (ξ )ω (ξ) ν(ξ)ϕ (ξ )ω 2 (ξ) ν(ξ)ϕ 2 (ξ )ω (ξ) ν(ξ)ϕ 2 (ξ )ω 2 (ξ), where ξ = (ξ, ξ 3 ) R 2 R. Let a i, b i (i =,..., L) be unit vectors satisfying ṽ i a i b i ṽ i when i =,..., L and ṽ L a i b i. For unit vectors u and w, we define seg(u, w) as a segment in S from u to w counterclockwise. Let η i be smooth functions in S supported in seg(a i, b i ) when i =,..., L and in seg(a L, b ) when i = L satisfying L η i on S. i= Now we decompose ν as L ν(ξ) = ν(ξ)ϕ (ξ )ω (ξ)η i (ξ / ξ ) = i= L i= L ν(ξ)ϕ (ξ )ω 2 (ξ)η i (ξ / ξ ) i= L ν(ξ)ϕ 2 (ξ )ω (ξ)η i (ξ / ξ ) i= M,up i (ξ) L i= M,down i (ξ) L ν(ξ)ϕ 2 (ξ )ω 2 (ξ)η i (ξ / ξ ) i= L i= M,up i (ξ) L i= M,down i (ξ). Let φ (R) be supported in [/2, 2] such that k=2 φ(2k s) = for s (, /4) and set φ k = φ(2 k ) (k = 2, 3,...) and φ (s) = χ (, ) k=2 φ(2k s). To simplify the notations we define l i (ξ) = α i ξ β i ξ 2. For the notational convenience we set K = K. We denote and K,up i K,up i K = = F [M,up i ], K,down i = F [M,down i ], = F [M,up i ], K,down i = F [M,down i ], L i= [ K,up i K,down i K,up i K,down i ],
5 ylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon 5 where F [f] is denoted by the inverse Fourier transform of f. We let α i ξ β i ξ 2 = (i =,..., N) be equations of edges of P whose end points are v i and v i when i =,..., N and v N and v when i = N. We set l i (ξ) = α i ξ β i ξ 2, ( ) αi β A = i, α i β i l i, (x) = deta (β ix α i x 2 ), and l i,2 (x) = deta ( β ix α i x 2 ), l i,3 (x) = x 3. For the decays of the kernels, it is enough to estimate K,up i and K,up i because the arguments for K,down i and K,down i are similar to those for K,up i and K,up i. We denote K,up i = Ki and K,up i = Ki in Lemmas 2.2 and 2.3 for our convenience. We first consider the decays of Ki = F [M i ]. From now on since the arguments will be symmetric, it suffices to treat the case of l i (ξ), l i (ξ), ξ 3 >. Lemma 2.2. For each i there are estimates as follows : Ki (x) ( max a { l i,a (x) } l i,b (x) ± l i,c (x) ) 2 (2.2) where a b c 3. ( max a { l i,a (x) }) 2 ( min b { l i,b (x) }), Proof. Suppose that l i, (x) max{ l i,2 (x), l i,3 (x) }. If l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x), then we write M i (ξ) = [ ( l i (ξ) 2 ) δ ( l i (ξ) 2 ) δ ] ϕ (ξ )ω (ξ)η i (ξ / ξ ) (2.3) ( l i (ξ) 2 ) δ ϕ (ξ )ω (ξ)η i (ξ / ξ ) = M, i (ξ) M,2 i (ξ). For the estimates of M, i we need more decomposition as follows : M, i (ξ) = φ j (l i (ξ) l i (ξ))φ k (l i (ξ))φ l (l i (ξ) ξ 3 ) M, i (ξ) j,k,l = j,k,l M, i,j,k,l (ξ), and set K, i,j,k,l = F [M, i,j,k,l ]. By using a change of variables ξ = l i (ξ), ξ 2 = l i (ξ), and ξ 3 = ξ 3, we have K, i,j,k,l (x) = R e i<(a ) t x,ξ >ix 3ξ 3 M, R 2 i,j,k,l (ξ, ξ 3) dξ dξ 3,
6 6 Sunggeum Hong, Joonil Kim and han Woo Yang where ξ = (ξ, ξ 2). We make a change of variables ζ = ξ 2 ξ, ζ 2 = ξ 2, and ζ 3 = ξ 2 ξ 3 to write (x) (2.4) = e i{ li,(x)ζ (l i,(x)l i,2(x)l i,3(x))ζ 2 l i,3(x)ζ 3} φ j (ζ )φ k (ζ 2 )φ l (ζ 3 ) R 3 K, i,j,k,l Ω(ζ, ζ 3 )ζ (2ζ 2 ζ ) ( sζ 2 2 ( s)(ζ 2 ζ ) 2 ) δ ds dζ dζ 2 dζ 3, where Ω(ζ, ζ 3 ) = ϕ (A ζ ) ω (A ζ, ζ 3 ) η i (A ζ / A ζ ), ζ = (ζ 2 ζ, ζ 2 ) and ζ = (ζ, ζ 3 ). We note that ζ (2ζ 2 ζ ) 2 j 2 min{j,k}. The integration by parts yields K, i,j,k,l (x) 2 j 2 min{j,k} ( 2 j l i, (x) ) N ( 2 l (2.5) l i,3 (x) ) N2 ( 2 k l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x) ) N3 ( ) N ( ) N2 ( ) N3φj (ζ )φ k (ζ 2 )φ l (ζ 3 )Ω(ζ, ζ 3 ) dζ dζ 2 dζ 3. R ζ 3 ζ 2 ζ 3 We make use of the size of the support to obtain K, i,j,k,l (x) 2 2j 2 k 2 min{j,k} 2 l ( 2 j (2.6) l i, (x) ) N ( 2 k l i, (x) l i,2 (x) ± l i,3 (x) ) N2 ( 2 l l i,3 (x) ). N3 We now consider the summation over j, k, and l for (2.6). If we assume that min{j, k} = j, then j,k,l K, j,k,l (x) ( 2 j l i,(x) ( 2 l l i,3(x) ( 2 k l i,(x) 2 3j 2 l 2 k 2 j l i,(x) > 2 l l i,3(x) > 2 k l i,(x) > 2 j(3 N) l i, (x) N) 2 l( N2) l i,3 (x) N2) (2.7) 2 k( N3) l i, (x) N3) ( l i, (x) ) 3 ( l i, (x) l i,2 (x) ± l i,3 (x) )( l i,3 (x) ), where l i, (x) = l i, (x) l i,2 (x) ± l i,3 (x).
7 ylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon 7 We use l i, (x) l i, (x) l i,2 (x) ± l i,3 (x) to have K, (x) (2.8) ( l i, (x) ) 2 ( l i, (x) l i,2 (x) ± l i,3 (x) ) 2 ( l i,3 (x) ). If min{j, k} = k, then we obtain (2.8) by straightforward computations, replacing 2 k by 2 2k, and 2 k( N3) by 2 k(2 N3) in (2.7). On the other hand if l i, (x) l i,3 (x) l i,2 (x), we replace M, i by [ ( ξ 2 3 ) δ ( l i (ξ) 2 ) δ ] ϕ (ξ )ω (ξ)η i (ξ / ξ ), (2.9) and i,j,k,l (ξ) = φ j(ξ 3 l i (ξ))φ k (ξ 3 l i (ξ))φ l (ξ 3 ) M, i (ξ). M, If we make a change of variables and integration by parts as in (2.4) and (2.5) we have K, i,j,k,l (x) 2 2j 2 k 2 l 2 min{j,l} ( 2 j l i, (x) ) N ( 2 l l i, (x) l i,2 (x) ± l i,3 (x) ) N2 ( 2 k l i,2 (x) ). N3 If we sum over j, k, and l likewise (2.7), then K, (x) (2.) ( l i, (x) ) 2 ( l i, (x) l i,2 (x) ± l i,3 (x) ) 2 ( l i,2 (x) ). Thus, from (2.8) and (2.) we get K, (x) ( l i, (x) ) 2 ( min{ l i,2 (x), l i,3 (x) }) ( l i, (x) l i,2 (x) ± l i,3 (x) ) 2. Now it remains to treat the case M,2 i. We decompose M,2 i (ξ) = [( l i (ξ) 2) δ ϕ (ξ )ω (ξ)η i (ξ / ξ ) (2.) ϕ (ξ )ω (ξ)η i (ξ / ξ ) = M,3 i (ξ) M,4 i (ξ). To control the size of l i (ξ), l i (ξ) and ξ 3, we split M,3 i such as M,3 i (ξ) = φ j (l i (ξ)) φ k (l i (ξ)) φ l (ξ 3 )M,3 i (ξ) j,k,l = j,k,l M,3 i,j,k,l (ξ),
8 8 Sunggeum Hong, Joonil Kim and han Woo Yang and set K,3 i,j,k,l = F [M,3 i,j,k,l ]. Then by a change of variables ζ = l i (ξ), ζ 2 = l i (ξ), and ζ 3 = ξ 3, we have K,3 i,j,k,l (x) = e i<(a ) t x,ζ >ix 3ζ 3 M,3 i,j,k,l (ζ, ζ 3 ) dζ dζ 3 R R 2 = e i{li,(x)ζ l i,2(x)ζ 2l i,3(x)ζ 3} φ j (ζ ) φ k (ζ 2 ) φ l (ζ 3 ) ζ 2 R R 2 η i (A ζ / A ζ ) ϕ (A ζ )ω (A ζ, ζ 3 ) ( s ζ 2 ) δ ds dζ dζ 3, where ζ = (ζ, ζ 2 ). We integrate by parts to obtain K,3 i,j,k,l (x) 2 3j 2 k 2 l ( 2 j l i, (x) ) N ( 2 k l i,2 (x) ) N2 ( 2 l l i,3 (x) ) N3. After we sum over j, k and l, we have K,3 i (x) ( l i, (x) ) 3 ( l i,2 (x) ) ( l i,3 (x) ) χ { l i,(x) max{ l i,2(x), l i,3(x) }}. Finally we deal with M,4 i. By the choice of η i we obtain L L M,4 i (ξ) = η i (ξ / ξ )ϕ (ξ )ω (ξ) = ϕ (ξ )ω (ξ), i= i= which gives a fast decay after the inverse Fourier transform. The arguments for the remaining cases are the same with those of the previous case. If l i,2 (x) max{ l i,3 (x), l i, (x) }, we can switch the roles of l i (ξ) and l i (ξ) in (2.3), (2.9) and (2.). If l i,3 (x) max{ l i,2 (x), l i, (x) }, we can replace the roles of l i (ξ) and ξ 3 in (2.3), (2.9) and (2.).We thus leave the details to the interested readers. K,up i Now we turn to estimate Ki = F [M i ]. We recall that we denote K i =. We write M i (ξ) = ( m(ξ) 2 ) δ ϕ 2 (ξ )ω (ξ)η i (ξ / ξ ). For this we need further decompositions as follows : M i (ξ) = j,k,l φ j ( l i (ξ) ) φ k ( l i (ξ) ) φ l ( ξ 3 )M i (ξ) = j,k,l M i,j,k,l(ξ). We set K i,j,k,l = F [M i,j,k,l], and K i = j,k,l K i,j,k,l.
9 ylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon 9 Likewise Lemma 2.2, without loss of generality it is enough to show the case of l i (ξ), l i (ξ), ξ 3 >. Lemma 2.3. For each i there are estimates as follows : Ki (x) (2.2) ( max a { l i,a (x) }) δ ( l i,b (x) )( l i,c (x) ) ( max a { l i,a (x) }) 2 ( min b { l i,b (x) }) { ( l i,b (x) l i,c (x) ) δ }, ( l i,a (x) l i,b (x) l i,c (x) ) δ b c where a b c 3. Proof. We split M i,j,k,l as three cases dependent on the size of j, k and l. ase (i) j k l, or k j l. ase (ii) j l k, or l j k. ase (iii) k l j, or l k j. We begin with ase (i). From this case we can consider four subcases, that is, j > k > l, k > j > l, j k, and j k, k l. Suppose first that j > k > l. Then by definition of m we have m(ξ) = l i (ξ). Now we write M i,j,k,l(ξ) = ( l i (ξ) 2 ) δ φ j ( l i (ξ))φ k ( l i (ξ))φ l ( ξ 3 ) B i (ξ), where B i (ξ) = ϕ 2 (ξ )ω (ξ)η i (ξ / ξ ). By change of variables ζ = l i (ξ), ζ 2 = l i (ξ) and ζ 3 = ξ 3, we have Ki,j,k,l(x) = ) t x,ζ >ix 3ζ 3 φ j ( ζ )( ζ) 2 δ R R 2 e i<(a φ k ( ζ 2 )φ l ( ζ 3 ) B i (A ζ, ζ 3 ) dζ dζ 3, where (A ) t x = (l i, (x) l i,2 (x)) and ζ = (ζ, ζ 2 ). If we integrate by parts with respect to ζ, ζ 2 and ζ 3, we obtain Ki,j,k,l(x) (2.3) ( 2 j l i, (x) ) N ( 2 k l i,2 (x) ) N2 ( 2 l l i,3 (x) ) N3 R R 2 ( ) N ( ) N2 ( ) N3 µi,j,k,l (ζ, ζ 3 ) ζ ζ 2 ζ 3 dζ dζ 3, where µ i,j,k,l (ζ, ζ 3 ) = ( ζ 2 ) δ φ j ( ζ )φ k ( ζ 2 )φ l ( ζ 3 )B i (A ζ, ζ 3 ). The integrand of (2.3) is bounded by 2 j(δ) 2 k 2 l ( 2 j l i, (x) ) N ( 2 k l i,2 (x) ) N2 ( 2 l. (2.4) N3 l i,3 (x) )
10 Sunggeum Hong, Joonil Kim and han Woo Yang If l i,a (x) max{ l i,b (x), l i,c (x) }, we use (2.4) directly when a =, apply the fact j > k when a = 2, and use the fact j > l in (2.4) when a = 3 to get Ki,j,k,l(x) ( max{ l i,a (x) }) δ ( l i,b (x) ) j,k,l where a b c 3. Suppose now that k > j > l, we have m(ξ) = l i (ξ), and ( l i,c (x) ), M i,j,k,l(ξ) = ( l i (ξ) 2 ) δ φ j ( l i (ξ))φ k ( l i (ξ))φ l ( ξ 3 ) B i (ξ). If we replace j by k in the previous arguments, we obtain the same results. Suppose now that j k and j, k > l. In this case, the size of l i (ξ) and l i (ξ) is comparable, we subtract the harmless term to gain the decays. If l i, (x) max{ l i,2 (x), l i,3 (x) }, we decompose M i,j,k,l(ξ) = [ ( l i (ξ) 2 ) δ ( l i (ξ) 2 ) δ ] φ j ( l i (ξ)) φ k ( l i (ξ)) φ l ( ξ 3 ) B i (ξ) ( l i (ξ) 2 ) δ φ j ( l i (ξ))φ k ( l i (ξ)) φ l ( ξ 3 ) B i (ξ) = M, i,j,k,l (ξ) M,2 i,j,k,l (ξ). Now dyadic parallelogram may intersect with the singular line l i (ξ) = l i (ξ), and thus we need to overcome the singularity. Hence, we decompose once more such as i,j,k,l (ξ) = φ σ ( l i(ξ) l i (ξ) ) M, i,j,k,l (ξ) M, = σ=k σ=k M, i,j,k,l,σ (ξ), and set K, i,j,k,l,σ = F [M, i,j,k,l,σ ], K,2 i,j,k,l = F [M,2 i,j,k,l ]. By using a change of variables ξ = l i (ξ), and ξ 2 = l i (ξ), and ξ 3 = ξ 3, we have K, i,j,k,l,σ (x) = R = R e i<(a ) t x,ξ >ix 3ξ 3 M, R 2 R 2 e i<(a (ξ 2 2 ξ 2 ) i,j,k,l,σ (ξ, ξ 3) dξ dξ 3 ) t x,ξ >ix 3ξ 3 φj ( ξ )φ k ( ξ 2)φ l ( ξ 3)φ σ ( ξ ) ( s ξ 2 2 ( s)ξ 2 ) δ ds B i (A ξ, ξ 3) dξ dξ 3. ξ 2
11 ylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon We make a change of variables ζ = ξ /ξ 2, ζ 2 = ξ 2, and ζ 3 = ξ 3 to write K, i,j,k,l,σ (x) = R 3 e i{li,(x)ζ ζ 2 l i,2 (x)ζ 2 l i,3 (x)ζ 3 } φ j ( ζ ζ 2 )φ k ( ζ 2 ) φ l ( ζ 3 )φ σ ( ζ )ζ 2 2( ζ 2 ) (2.5) ( sζ 2 2 ( s) ζ 2 2 ζ 2 ) δ ds B i (A ζ, ζ 3 ) ζ 2 dζ dζ 2 dζ 3, where ζ = (ζ ζ 2, ζ 2 ). We note that ζ 2 2( ζ 2 ) 2 σ and ( sζ 2 2 ( s) ζ 2 2 ζ 2 ) δ ds 2 k(δ ). We integrate by parts and make use of the size of the support to obtain K, i,j,k,l,σ (x) 2 σ ( 2 σ l i, (x) ) N ( 2 l (2.6) l i,3 (x) ) N3 R3 2 k(δ ) ( ) N ( ) N2 ( ) N3φj ( 2 k ( ζ ζ 2 ) l i, (x)ζ l i,2 (x) ) N2 ζ ζ 2 ζ 3 φ l ( ζ 3 )φ k ( ζ 2 )φ σ ( ζ ) B i (A ζ, ζ 3 ) ζ2 3 dζ dζ 2 dζ 3 2 2σ 2 δk 2 l ( 2 σ l i, (x) ) N ( 2 k l i, (x) l i,2 (x) ) N2 ( 2 l l i,3 (x) ). N3 Also in view of (2.3) we can get K,2 i,j,k,l (x) 2 j(δ) ( 2 j l i, (x) ) N 2 k ( 2 k l i,2 (x) ) N 2 l ( 2 l l i,3 (x) ) N. If we sum over σ, k, and l, then K, i,j,k,l,σ (x) K,2 i,j,k,l (x) l σ k j,k,l j k ( l i, (x) ) 2 ( l i, (x) l i,2 (x) ) δ ( l i,3 (x) ) ( l i, (x) ) δ ( l i,2 (x) )( l i,3 (x) ) χ { l i,(x) max{ l i,2(x), l i,3(x) }. If l i,2 (x) max{ l i, (x), l i,3 (x) }, we write M i,j,k,l(ξ) = [ ( l i (ξ) 2 ) δ ( l i (ξ) 2 ) δ ] φ j ( l i (ξ)) φ k ( l i (ξ)) φ l ( ξ 3 ) B i (ξ) (2.7) ( l i (ξ) 2 ) δ φ j ( l i (ξ))φ k ( l i (ξ)) φ l ( ξ 3 ) B i (ξ) = M,3 i,j,k,l (ξ) M,4 i,j,k,l (ξ).
12 2 Sunggeum Hong, Joonil Kim and han Woo Yang Since dyadic parallelogram may intersect with the singular line l i (ξ) = l i (ξ), we need further dyadic decomposition. We write M,3 i,j,k,l (ξ) = = σ=k σ=k φ σ ( l i(ξ) l i (ξ) ) M,3 i,j,k,l (ξ) M,3 i,j,k,l,σ (ξ), and set K,3 i,j,k,l,σ = F [M,3 i,j,k,l,σ ], K,4 i,j,k,l = F [M,4 i,j,k,l ]. By using a change of variables and integrate by parts likewise (2.5) and (2.6), we have K,3 i,j,k,l,σ (x) (2.8) 2 2σ 2 δk 2 l ( 2 σ l i,2 (x) ) N ( 2 k l i, (x) l i,2 (x) ) N ( 2 l l i,3 (x) ) N, and thus l j k σ k K,3 i,j,k,l,σ (x) K,4 i,j,k,l (x) j,k,l ( l i,2 (x) ) 2 ( l i, (x) l i,2 (x) ) δ ( l i,3 (x) ) ( l i, (x) )( l i,2 (x) ) δ ( l i,3 (x) ) χ { l i,2(x) max{ l i,3(x), l i,(x) }. If l i,3 (x) > max{ l i, (x), l i,2 (x) }, in this case the subtraction of the multiplier likewise (2.8) does not help to get the desired estimate. Thus, we use the fact σ j, k > l in (2.5) and (2.8) to obtain K,3 i,j,k,l,σ (x) 2 σ ( 2 σ l i,a (x) ) N 2 δk ( 2 k l i, (x) l i,2 (x) ) N 2 2l ( 2 l l i,3 (x) ) N where a = or 2. Thus, this leads to l j k σ k K,3 i,j,k,l,σ (x) ( l i,3 (x) ) 2 ( l i, (x) l i,2 (x) ) δ ( min{ l i, (x), l i,2 (x) }).
13 ylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon 3 Suppose that j k and k l. If l i, (x) max{ l i,2 (x), l i,3 (x) }, we decompose M i,j,k,l(ξ) = [ ( m(ξ) 2 ) δ ( l i (ξ) 2 ) δ ] (2.9) φ j ( l i (ξ)) φ k ( l i (ξ)) φ l ( ξ 3 ) B i (ξ) ( l i (ξ) 2 ) δ φ j ( l i (ξ))φ k ( l i (ξ)) φ l ( ξ 3 ) B i (ξ) = M,5 i,j,k,l (ξ) M,6 i,j,k,l (ξ). If l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x), we take m(ξ) = l i (ξ) in (2.9). Then since dyadic parallelogram may intersect with two singular lines l i (ξ) = l i (ξ) and l i (ξ) = ξ 3, we need more dyadic decomposition such as We set M,5 i,j,k,l (ξ) = = σ=j τ=l σ=j τ=l φ σ ( l i(ξ) l i (ξ) ) φ τ ( ξ 3 l i (ξ) ) M,5 i,j,k,l (ξ) M,5 i,j,k,l,σ,τ (ξ). K,5 i,j,k,l,σ,τ = F [M,5 i,j,k,l,σ,τ ], If we follow the same way as (2.5) and 2.6, we have K,5 i,j,k,l,σ,τ (x) 2 2σ ( 2 σ l i, (x) ) N K,6 i,j,k,l = F [M,6 i,j,k,l ]. 2 δk 2 τ ( 2 k l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x) ) N ( 2 τ l i,3 (x) ) N. If l i, (x) l i,3 (x) l i,2 (x), we take m(ξ) = ξ 3 in (2.9). Then we have M,5 i,j,k,l (ξ) = Similarly as before, = σ=j τ=k σ=j τ=k φ σ ( l i(ξ) ) φ τ ( l i(ξ) ) M,5 i,j,k,l ξ 3 ξ (ξ) 3 M,5 i,j,k,l,σ,τ (ξ). K,5 i,j,k,l,σ,τ (x) 2 2σ ( 2 σ l i, (x) ) N 2 δl ( 2 l l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x) ) N 2 τ ( 2 τ l i,2 (x) ) N,
14 4 Sunggeum Hong, Joonil Kim and han Woo Yang Thus the summation leads to [ j k, j l k, σ j, τ l l, σ j, τ k ] K,5 i,j,k,l,σ,τ (x) K,6 i,j,k,l (x) j,k,l ( l i, (x) ) 2 ( l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x) ) δ ( min{ l i,2 (x), l i,3 (x) }) ( l i, (x) ) δ ( l i,2 (x) )( l i,3 (x) ) χ { l i,(x) max{ l i,2(x), l i,3(x) }. To treat the remaining cases l i,2 (x) max{ l i,3 (x), l i, (x) } and l i,3 (x) max{ l i,2 (x), l i, (x) }, if we apply the similar arguments, we have the desired estimates such that Ki,j,k,l(x) ( max{ l i,2 (x), l i,3 (x) }) 2 ( l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x) ) δ ( min b3 { l i,b (x) }) ( l i, (x) )( max{ l i,2 (x), l i,3 (x) }) δ ( min{ l i,2 (x), l i,3 (x) }). Lastly since the arguments for ase (ii) and ase (iii) are symmetric to those for ase (i), and we omit here. This completes the proof. Remark 2.4. The estimates for the derivatives of the kernel can be obtained by the fact that γ =N (K i )(γ) = γ =N Ψ(γ) K i and γ =N (K i )(γ) = γ =N Ψ(γ) 2 Ki for some Schwartz functions Ψ, Ψ 2 S(R 3 ). Thus, it is easily seen that the decays of the derivatives of the kernels are the same with those of kernels in Lemmas 2.2 and 2.3 with different constants, respectively. 3. Hardy spaces In this section we shall prove Theorems. and.2. We begin with the definition of Hardy spaces. Definition 3.. Let < p and s be an integer that satisfies s 3( p ). Let Q be a cube in R 3. We say that a is a (p, s)-atom associated with Q if a is supported on Q R 3 and satisfies (i) a L (R 3 ) Q /p ; (ii) a(x) x β dx =, R 3 where β = (β, β 2, β 3 ) is a pair of non-negative integers satisfying β β β 2 β 3 s, and x β = x β xβ2 2 xβ3 3.
15 ylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon 5 If {a j } is a collection of (p, s)-atoms and {c j } is a sequence of complex numbers with j= c j p <, then the series f = j= c ja j converges in the sense of distributions, and its sum belongs to H p with the quasinorm (see [7]) [8]. ( f H p = inf c j p) /p. j= cjaj=f To prove Theorem.2 we shall need a lemma by Stein, Taibleson and Weiss Lemma 3.2. Suppose < p < and {f j } is a sequence of measurable functions such that j= {x : f j (x) > α > } α p for j =, 2, 3,. If j= c j p, then { } x : c j f j (x) > α 2 p p α p. Proof. See Lemma.8 in [8]. j= We shall use the following elementary lemma to obtain weak type estimates in the proof of Proposition 3.4. Set Ω = { x : x x 2 x 3 > 2 }, Ω 2 = { x : x x 2 x 3 > 2, x x x 2 ± x 3 > }. Lemma 3.3. Let a, b, c and p < be positive real numbers. (a) If a b c = 3 p, a > p, b < p, and c < p, then { x Ω : x a x 2 b x 3 c > α/ } α p. (b) If a b c > 3 p, a = p, b > p, and c > p, then { x Ω 2 : x a x x 2 ± x 3 b x 3 c > α/ } α p. Proof. We consider (a). If a b c = 3 p, a > p and b, c < p, then (a c)/b > 2. The weak type set in the right-hand side of (a) is bounded by {(x,x 2,x 3) :2< x 2 α b x 3 c b x a b,2< x 3 x, x >α abc } By applying Fubini s theorem, we obtain the weak type estimates x 2 dx α b x {x :2< x α abc } α 3 abc = α p, since x x 3 > 2. {x : x > α abc } dx 2 dx 3 dx. ac b dx
16 6 Sunggeum Hong, Joonil Kim and han Woo Yang For (b) we assume that a b c > 3 p, a = p, b > p, and c > p. By change of variables x 2 = x ± x ± x 2 we obtain { (x, x 2, x 3 ) : x a x 2 b x 3 c > α/ } since b a > and c a >. α p α p, x 2 b a x3 c a dx 2 dx 3 To prove Theorem.2, we shall need uniform weak type estimates for T δ with a (p, N)-atom (N 3( p )). Proposition 3.4. Suppose f is a (p, N)-atom (N 3( p )) on R3. Suppose that 2/3 < p < and δ = 3( p ) or p = 2/3 and δ > 3( p ). Then there exists a constant = (p) such that {(x, x 3 ) R 2 R : T δ f(x, x 3 ) > α} α p (3.) for all α >. Proof. Let f be supported in a cube Q of diameter centered at the origin. We first consider the case (x, x 3 ) Q which is the cube centered at the origin with diameter 4. In view of (2.) and Lemmas 2.2 and 2.3 we can easily see that K ɛ is integrable and its L norm is independent of ɛ. Thus we have T δ ɛ f(x, x 3 ) K ɛ f K ɛ Q /p. Therefore T δ f(x, x 3 ) = sup Tɛ δ f(x, x 3 ) Q /p ɛ> for all (x, x 3 ) Q, and which implies that for α > { (x, x 3 ) Q : T δ f(x, x 3 ) > α/ } α p. (3.2) Hence it suffices to show that for α > { (x, x 3 ) R 3 \ Q : T δ f(x, x 3 ) > α/ } α p. We note that Tɛ δ = L i= T ɛ,i δ. We denote T ɛ,i δ f = T ɛ,i f T ɛ,i f, where T ɛ,i f = Kɛ,i f and T ɛ,i f = K ɛ,i f. For the notational convenience we set K,i = K i and K,i = K i. We fix ɛ and use the fact that f is supported in Q to write T δ ɛ,if(x, x 3 ) T ɛ,if(x, x 3 ) T ɛ,if(x, x 3 ) ɛ 3 Q f(y, y 3 ) K i (ɛ(x y ), ɛ(x 3 y 3 )) dy dy 3 ɛ 3 Q f(y, y 3 ) K i (ɛ(x y ), ɛ(x 3 y 3 )) dy dy 3.
17 ylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon 7 We set x = l i, (x), x 2 = l i,2 (x), x 3 = l i,3 (x), x = x x 2 x 3, y = l i, (y), y 2 = l i,2 (y), and y 3 = l i,3 (y) in (2.2) and (2.2). By the kernel estimates in Lemmas 2.2, 2.3 and (2.), we write and Tɛ,if(x) [ ɛ Q 3 f(y) ( ɛ max j { x j y j }) δ ( ɛ x k y k )( ɛ x l y l ) ( ɛ max j { x j y j }) 2 ( ɛ min k { x k y k }) { ] ( ɛ x j y j x k y k ) δ } ( ɛ x y ) δ dy dy 2 dy 3 j k = T A ɛ,if(x) T B ɛ,if(x) T ɛ,if(x), Tɛ,if(x) [ ɛ Q 3 f(y) ( ɛ max j { x j y j }) 2 ( ɛ min k { x k y k }) ] ( ɛ max j { x j y j } (x k y k ) ± (x l y l ) ) 2 dy dy 2 dy 3, where j k l 3. From (x, x 3 ) (Q ) c, we consider the following three cases : ase (i) x > 2, or x 2 > 2, or x 3 > 2, ase (ii) x 2, or x 2 2, or x 3 2, ase (iii) x > 2, x 2 > 2, and x 3 > 2. We first treat ase (i). Suppose that x > 2, x 2 2, and x 3 2. Then we have T A ɛ,if(x) ɛ (3 δ 2) x δ χ { x 4}. (3.3) From (x y ) (x 2 y 2 ) (x 3 y 3 ) x, x y x 2 y 2 x, and x y x 3 y 3 x, we have and Tɛ,if(x) B Tɛ,if(x) (3.4) ɛ (3 2 δ ) x 2δ ɛ(3 2 δ ) x 2 χ { x 4}, T ɛ,if(x) ɛ (3 2 2) x 4 χ { x 4}. (3.5) For the remaining case x 2 > 2, or x 3 > 2, we switch x and x 2, x and x 3, respectively in (3.3) through (3.5) to obtain Tɛ,if(x) δ max j { x j } δ χ { x k 4, x l 4} χ { xj 4, j3}, (3.6)
18 8 Sunggeum Hong, Joonil Kim and han Woo Yang where j k l 3. We now treat ase (ii). Suppose that x 2, x 2 > 2, and x 3 > 2. Then we have Tɛ,if(x) A ɛ (3 δ ) max{ x 2, x 3 } δ min{ x 2, x 3 } χ { x2 4, x 3 4}. (3.7) From (x y )(x 2 y 2 )(x 3 y 3 ) (x 2 y 2 )(x 3 y 3 ), x y x 2 y 2 x 2, and x y x 3 y 3 x 3, we have T B ɛ,if(x) T ɛ,if(x) {ɛ (3 2 δ ) max{ x 2, x 3 } 2 x 3 x 2 δ (3.8) Likewise ɛ (3 2 δ ) max{ x 2, x 3 } 2 χ { x 2 x 3 2} ɛ (3 2 δ ) max{ x 2, x 3 } 2δ χ {min{ x 2, x 3 }4} ɛ (3 2 δ ) max{ x 2, x 3 } 2 min{ x 2, x 3 } δ χ { x2 4, x 3 4}}. T ɛ,if(x) {ɛ (3 2 2 ) max{ x 2, x 3 } 2 x 3 x 2 2 (3.9) ɛ (3 2 2 ) max{ x 2, x 3 } 2 χ { x 2 x 3 2} ɛ (3 2 2 ) max{ x 2, x 3 } 4 χ {min{ x 2, x 3 }4} χ { x2 4, x 3 4}}. Thus, (3.7) through (3.9), and symmetric arguments for the remaining two cases x 2, or x 3 2 lead to Tɛ,if(x) δ χ { xj 4, j3 } (3.) { max j { x j } min{2,δ} min k { x k } min{δ,} max j { x j } 2 x j x k min{2,δ} } max j { x j } 2 χ { x j x k 2} χ { xj >2, x k >2, min l { x l }2}, where j k l 3.
19 ylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon 9 Finally, we consider ase (iii). Similarly (3.6) and (3.), we have Tɛ,if(x) δ { max j { x j } δ x k x l max j { x j } 2 min k { x k } j l x j x l δ max j { x j } 2 min k { x k } χ { x j x l 2, j l} max j { x j } 2 min k { x k } ( x min{2,δ} χ { x 2} (3.) )} χ{ xj >2}. where j k l 3 and x = max j { x j } x k ± x l. Then we apply hebyshev s inequality for (3.6), (3.), and use Lemma 3.3 and hebyshev s inequality for (3.) to obtain { (x, x 3 ) R 3 \ Q : sup Tɛ,if(x δ, x 3 ) > α/ } α p. (3.2) ɛ Now we consider the complementary case we fix ɛ <. Let P i,n be the N-th order Taylor polynomial of the function y 3 ɛ 3 K i (ɛ(x y ), ɛ(x 3 y 3 )) expanded about the origin. Then by using the moment conditions on f in Definition 3..(ii) and integrating with respect to y 3 first, we write Tɛ,if(x δ, x 3 ) = f(y, y 3 ) [ɛ 3 K i (ɛ(x y ), ɛ(x 3 y 3 )) P i,n (y 3 )] dy 3 dy. Q By using the integral version of the mean value theorem, we obtain ɛ 3 K i (ɛ(x y ), ɛ(x 3 y 3 )) P i,n (y 3 ) ɛ 3 ɛ (N) [,] N N K,i y N 3 (ɛ(x y ), ɛ(x 3 ûy 3 )) du du N where û = N i= u i. Since we gain ɛ (N) and the kernel K,i has the same decay after taking derivatives, we use the same argument as above to obtain (3.6), (3.), (3.) and Lemma 3.3 for ɛ <, which imply { (x, x 3 ) R 3 \ Q : T δ ɛ,if(x, x 3 ) > α/ } α p. (3.3) Together with (3.2), and (3.3), we see that { (x, x 3 ) (Q ) c : T δ ɛ,if(x, x 3 ) > α/ } α p. For the summation over i, we apply Lemma 3.2. Since L i= ( ) p =, we (L) /p thus get { (x, x 3 ) (Q ) c : T δ f(x, x 3 ) > α/ } { (x, x 3 ) (Q ) c : α p. L i= sup ɛ> Tɛ,i δ } f(x, x 3 ) α > (L ) /p (L ) /p
20 2 Sunggeum Hong, Joonil Kim and han Woo Yang Thus, together with (3.2) it follows that (3.) holds for the cube Q of diameter. Now we suppose that f is a (p, N)-atom (N 3( p )), supported in a cube Q of diameter σ centered at (x Q, x 3Q). By translation invariance we can assume (x Q, x 3Q) = (, ). Let h(x, x 3 ) = σ 3/p f(σx, σx 3 ). Then h is an atom supported in the cube Q centered at (, ) and we write Tɛ δ f(x, x 3 ) = σ 3/p h(σ (x y ), σ (x 3 y 3 )) K ɛ (y, y 3 ) dy dy 3 R R 2 = σ 3/p Tɛσ δ h(σ x, σ x 3 ), which implies sup ɛ> Tɛ δ f(x, x 3 ) = σ 3/p sup Tɛ δ h(σ x, σ x 3 ). ɛ> We therefore have { (x, x 3 ) R 3 : T δ f(x, x 3 ) > α/ } = { (x, x 3 ) R 3 : T δ h(σ x, σ x 3 ) > σ 3/p α/ } (σ 3/p α) p σ 3 = α p. This completes the proof. We are now ready to prove Theorem.2 which is an immediate consequence of Proposition 3.4 and Lemma 3.2. Proof of Theorem.2. Let f = j= c jf j H p (R 3 ) where f j s are (p, N)-atoms and j= c j p <. Since the kernel (see Lemmas 2.2, 2.3) is integrable and the coefficient {c j } is l convergent, it is easy to see that Tɛ δ f is well defined and can be written Tɛ δ f = c j Tɛ δ f j. By Proposition 3.4, we therefore have j= {(x, x 3 ) : T δ f j (x, x 3 ) α} α p. Lastly, if we apply Lemma 3.2 we obtain the desired estimates (.3). 4. The proof of Theorem. In this section we prove Theorem. and the results in Theorems. and.2 cannot be improved in the sense that there exists a function f in H p space such that if δ δ p = 3( p ), then T δ f L p = and if p 2/3, then T δ f L p =. To construct those functions we shall need the following lemma.
21 ylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon 2 Lemma 4.. If f S(R 3 ) and R 3 x β f(x) dx = for all β N p with N p > 3( p ), then f is in Hp (R 3 ), < p <. Proof. Let us choose Φ (R 3 ) supported in the unit ball so that Φ(x)dx. We set Mf(x) = sup t> Φ t f(x), and want to show that Mf Lp (R 3 ). If x, it is easy to see that x (Mf(x))p dx f p. We now consider the case x >. When t x /, R t 3 y) Φ((x ) f(y) dy 3 t N ( x ) N. When t > x /, we use the moment condition and f S(R 3 ), we obtain [ Φ t (x y) f(y) dy = Φt (x y) (Φ t ) (α) (x) yα ] f(y) dy. R α! 3 α N p Thus, by the mean value theorem for integral Φ t (x y) f(y) dy R 3 R 3 α =N p (Φ t ) (α) (x θy) yα f(y) dθ dy α! ( x ) (Np3) R 3 y Np f(y) dy. We note that (Φ t ) (α) (y) t 3 α x 3 α on the last inequality above. Since ( N p 3)p > 3, Mf(x) = sup t> Φ t f(x) is in L p (R 3 ). Proof of Theorem.. We first show the sufficiency. Let f be a (p, N)-atom (N 3( p )) on R3 and supported in a cube Q. Due to the translation invariance and maximality of T δ as above we may assume that Q is centered at the origin with diameter. In view of atomic decomposition, it suffices to show that there exists a independent of f such that sup Tɛ δ f L p (R 3 ) Q /p. ɛ> By the integrability of the kernel, it is easy to see that sup Tɛ δ f p L ɛ> p (Q ) Q Q dx dx 3. For the complementary case we take the p-th power on both sides in (3.6), (3.), and (3.) and integrate them if 2/3 < p < and δ > 3( p ). Then we can obtain the L p boundedness (.2) as desired. We now show the necessity. Let φ be a smooth function in R 3 supported in a neighborhood of a vertex of P. Let B be an open ball centered at a vertex v i of P and v j / U if j i and let φ be a nonnegative smooth cut-off function supported
22 22 Sunggeum Hong, Joonil Kim and han Woo Yang in B and whose values in a neighborhood of v i are identically. We choose suitable cut-off functions φ β supported in R 3 \ P and constants c β such that R 3 [ φ (x) β N p c β φβ (x)] x β dx =, where β = (β, β 2, β 3 ) is a pair of non-negative integers satisfying β β β 2 β 3 s, and x β = x β xβ2 2 xβ3 3. We set f(x) = φ (x) c β φβ (x). β N p In view of Lemma 4., f is in H p (R 3 ). From the support conditions it is easy to see that T δ f(ξ) = ( m2 (ξ)) δ φ (ξ). We therefore have T δ f(x) = e i<x,ξ> ( m 2 (ξ)) δ φ (ξ)dξ. R 3 We may assume that φ is of the form φ (ξ) = φ(l i (ξ))φ(l i (ξ))φ(ξ 3 ), where φ is a smooth cut-off function which is supported in a small neighborhood of and identically near. We then have T δ f(x) = e i<x,ξ> ( m 2 (ξ)) δ φ(l i (ξ))φ(l i (ξ))φ(ξ 3 ) dξ dξ 2 dξ 3 R 3 = e i[li,(x)l i(ξ)l i,2(x)l i(ξ)l i,3(x)ξ 3] ( m 2 (ξ)) δ R 3 φ(l i (ξ))φ(l i (ξ))φ(ξ 3 ) dξ dξ 2 dξ 3. By setting ξ = l i (ξ), ξ 2 = l i (ξ), ξ 3 = ξ 3, x = l i, (x), and x 2 = l i,2 (x), we then have = T δ f(x ) ξ ξ ξ 2 ξ 2 ξ 3 ξ 3 e i(x ξ x 2 ξ 2 x 3 ξ 3 ) ( ξ 2 ) δ φ(ξ )φ(ξ 2)φ(ξ 3) dξ 2 dξ 3 dξ = U V W. e i(x ξ x 2 ξ 2 x 3 ξ 3 ) ( ξ 2 2 ) δ φ(ξ )φ(ξ 2)φ(ξ 3) dξ 3 dξ dξ 2 e i(x ξ x 2 ξ 2 x 3 ξ 3 ) ( ξ 3 2 ) δ φ(ξ )φ(ξ 2)φ(ξ 3) dξ dξ 2 dξ 3
23 ylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon 23 Integrating by parts about ξ 2 and ξ 3 variables in U we obtain and ξ = eix 2 ξ ix 2 ξ = eix 3 ξ ix 3 e ix 2 ξ 2 φ(ξ 2 ) dξ 2 φ(ξ ) eix 2 ξ dφ(ξ ) (ix 2 )2 dξ (ix 2 )2 e ix 3 ξ 3 φ(ξ 3 ) dξ 3 φ(ξ ) eix 3 ξ dφ(ξ ) (ix 3 )2 dξ (ix 3 )2 ξ ξ e ix 2 ξ 2 d2 φ(ξ 2) (dξ 2 )2 dξ 2, e ix 3 ξ 3 d2 φ(ξ 3) (dξ 3 )2 dξ 3, because φ is a smooth function in R 3 supported in a neighborhood of a vertex of P. Thus we see that the first terms eix 2 ξ ix φ(ξ ) and eix 3 ξ 2 ix φ(ξ ) are leading terms in the above integrals, respectively. With those terms we rewrite the integral about ξ to have U = (ix 2 )(ix 3 ) ( ) e i(x x 2 x 3 )ξ ξ 2 δ φ(ξ ) 3 dξ. If we apply the asymptotic expansion in [] (p.46-5) in U, we obtain where e i(x x 2 x 3 )ξ ( ξ 2 ) δ φ(ξ ) 3 dξ = A N (x, x 3) O((x x 2 x 3) N ), = A N (x, x 3) N µ= Γ(µ δ ) [φ(ξ µ! ) 3 ] (µ) ()(x x 2 x 3) µ δ e i(x x 2 x 3 ), and φ(ξ ) 3 are -functions. Then we write U = x 2 x 3 (x x 2 x 3 )δ j x 2 x 3 (x µ= x 2 x 3 )µδ = U a U b. Since U b has a nice decay U b x 2 x 3 (x x 2, x 3 )δ
24 24 Sunggeum Hong, Joonil Kim and han Woo Yang we have that U a is a leading term, where U a = B. (4.) l i,2 (x)l i,3 (x)(l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x)) δ If we apply the same argument as above for V and W, the leading terms are B 2, (4.2) l i,3 (x)l i, (x)(l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x)) δ B 3 l i, (x)l i,2 (x)(l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x)) δ, respectively. Thus from (4.) and (4.2) we obtain that T δ f(x) l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x) δ j k3 3 j= l i,j(x) l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x) δ. l i,j (x)l i,k (x) If δ 3( p ) and < p <, it follows that T δ f p p 3 { l i,j(x) >2, j3} j= l dx i,j(x) p l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x) δp l i, (x) p l i,2 (x) p l i,3 (x) (δ)p dx { l i,3(x) > l i,2(x) > l i,(x) >2} 2 ( p) 2 If < p 2/3, we have 2 l i,3 (x) 2 (3δ)p dl i,3 (x) =. T δ f p p { l i,j(x) >2, j3} 3 j= l dx i,j(x) p l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x) δp { l i,(x) l i,2(x) l i,3(x), l i,3(x) 2,/2< l i,(x)l i,2(x)l i,3(x) <2} 4 ( p) 2 l i,3 (x) 3p dl i,3 (x) =. dx l i,3 (x) 3p Finally, we consider the negative result of Theorem.2. Let p = 2/3 and δ δ p = 3(/p ) on the region D = {x : l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x), l i,3 (x) 2} in (4.3).
25 ylinder multipliers associated with a convex polygon 25 If p = 2/3 and δ > δ p, we put δ = δ p 2ɛ for some ɛ >. By a change of variable l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x) = l i (x), we have {x : T δ f(x) > α} α 2 3 α 2 3. { x D : l i,(x) 2 l i,(x)l i,2(x)l i,3(x) δ l i,3(x) >α} { x D : l i,(x) 2 3 l i(x) ( 2 3 ɛ ) l i,3(x) ( 2 3 ɛ ) >α} 2 2 dx dx l i (x) 3 2 ( 2 3 ɛ) l i,3 (x) 3 2 ( 2 3 ɛ) dl i (x) dl i,3 (x) On the other hand if p = 2/3 and δ = 3/2, then l i, (x) 2 l i, (x) l i,2 (x) l i,3 (x) δ l i,3 (x) l i, (x)l i,2 (x)l i,3 (x) 3 2 on D. Thus, it follows that {x : T δ f(x) > α} dx = { x D : l i,(x)l i,2(x)l i,3(x) 3 2 >α} {x : l i,(x) l i,2(x), l i,2(x) l i,3(x), 2 l i,3(x) α 2 9 } {x : l i,(x) l i,2(x), l i,2(x) α 3 l i,3(x) 2, l i,3(x) > α 2 9 } {2< l i,3(x) α 2 9 } α 2 3 ( ln(/α)). l i,3 (x) dl i,3 (x) α 2 3 dx { l i,3(x) >α 2 9 } dx l i,3 (x) dl i,3(x) References [] A. Erdélyi, Asymptotic expansions, Dover, New York, 956. [2] S. Hong, J. Kim and. W. Yang, Risez means associated with convex polygons, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 33 (27), [3] S. Hong, P. Taylor and. W. Yang, Weak type estimates for maximal operators with a cylindric distance function, Math. Z. 253 (26), 24. [4] H. Luers, On Riesz means with respect to a cylinder distance function, Anal. Math. 4 (988), [5] P. Osvalćd, Marcinkiewicz means of double Fourier integrals in H p, p, Moscow Univ. Math. Bull. 38 (983), [6] P. Oswald, On Marcinkiewicz-Riesz summability of Fourier integrals in Hardy spaces, Math. Nachr. 33 (987), [7] E. M. Stein, Harmonic analysis : Real variable method, orthogonality and oscillatory integrals, Princeton Univ. Press, 993. [8] E. M. Stein, M. H. Taibleson and G. Weiss, Weak type estimates for maximal operators on certain H p classes, Rend. irc. Mat. Palermo(2) suppl. (98), 8 97.
26 26 Sunggeum Hong, Joonil Kim and han Woo Yang [9] P. Taylor, Bochner-Riesz means with respect to a rough distance function, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 359 (27), Sunggeum Hong Department of Mathematics hosun University Gwangju 5-759, Korea skhong@mail.chosun.ac.kr Joonil Kim Department of Mathematics hung-ang University Seoul , Korea jikim@cau.ac.kr han Woo Yang Department of Mathematics Korea University Seoul 36-7, Korea cw yang@korea.ac.kr
SCALE INVARIANT FOURIER RESTRICTION TO A HYPERBOLIC SURFACE
SCALE INVARIANT FOURIER RESTRICTION TO A HYPERBOLIC SURFACE BETSY STOVALL Abstract. This result sharpens the bilinear to linear deduction of Lee and Vargas for extension estimates on the hyperbolic paraboloid
More informationMAXIMAL AVERAGE ALONG VARIABLE LINES. 1. Introduction
MAXIMAL AVERAGE ALONG VARIABLE LINES JOONIL KIM Abstract. We prove the L p boundedness of the maximal operator associated with a family of lines l x = {(x, x 2) t(, a(x )) : t [0, )} when a is a positive
More informationWeighted norm inequalities for singular integral operators
Weighted norm inequalities for singular integral operators C. Pérez Journal of the London mathematical society 49 (994), 296 308. Departmento de Matemáticas Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 28049 Madrid,
More informationATOMIC DECOMPOSITIONS AND OPERATORS ON HARDY SPACES
REVISTA DE LA UNIÓN MATEMÁTICA ARGENTINA Volumen 50, Número 2, 2009, Páginas 15 22 ATOMIC DECOMPOSITIONS AND OPERATORS ON HARDY SPACES STEFANO MEDA, PETER SJÖGREN AND MARIA VALLARINO Abstract. This paper
More informationHARMONIC ANALYSIS. Date:
HARMONIC ANALYSIS Contents. Introduction 2. Hardy-Littlewood maximal function 3. Approximation by convolution 4. Muckenhaupt weights 4.. Calderón-Zygmund decomposition 5. Fourier transform 6. BMO (bounded
More information8 Singular Integral Operators and L p -Regularity Theory
8 Singular Integral Operators and L p -Regularity Theory 8. Motivation See hand-written notes! 8.2 Mikhlin Multiplier Theorem Recall that the Fourier transformation F and the inverse Fourier transformation
More informationA NEW PROOF OF THE ATOMIC DECOMPOSITION OF HARDY SPACES
A NEW PROOF OF THE ATOMIC DECOMPOSITION OF HARDY SPACES S. DEKEL, G. KERKYACHARIAN, G. KYRIAZIS, AND P. PETRUSHEV Abstract. A new proof is given of the atomic decomposition of Hardy spaces H p, 0 < p 1,
More informationDerivatives of Harmonic Bergman and Bloch Functions on the Ball
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 26, 1 123 (21) doi:1.16/jmaa.2.7438, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Derivatives of Harmonic ergman and loch Functions on the all oo
More informationSingular Integrals. 1 Calderon-Zygmund decomposition
Singular Integrals Analysis III Calderon-Zygmund decomposition Let f be an integrable function f dx 0, f = g + b with g Cα almost everywhere, with b
More informationOn pointwise estimates for maximal and singular integral operators by A.K. LERNER (Odessa)
On pointwise estimates for maximal and singular integral operators by A.K. LERNER (Odessa) Abstract. We prove two pointwise estimates relating some classical maximal and singular integral operators. In
More informationSHARP L p WEIGHTED SOBOLEV INEQUALITIES
Annales de l Institut de Fourier (3) 45 (995), 6. SHARP L p WEIGHTED SOBOLEV INEUALITIES Carlos Pérez Departmento de Matemáticas Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 28049 Madrid, Spain e mail: cperezmo@ccuam3.sdi.uam.es
More informationChapter One. The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity
Chapter One The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity Our story begins with a classical situation: convolution with homogeneous, Calderón- Zygmund ( kernels on R n. Let S n 1 R n denote the unit sphere
More informationA SHORT PROOF OF THE COIFMAN-MEYER MULTILINEAR THEOREM
A SHORT PROOF OF THE COIFMAN-MEYER MULTILINEAR THEOREM CAMIL MUSCALU, JILL PIPHER, TERENCE TAO, AND CHRISTOPH THIELE Abstract. We give a short proof of the well known Coifman-Meyer theorem on multilinear
More informationBoth these computations follow immediately (and trivially) from the definitions. Finally, observe that if f L (R n ) then we have that.
Lecture : One Parameter Maximal Functions and Covering Lemmas In this first lecture we start studying one of the basic and fundamental operators in harmonic analysis, the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function.
More informationSOLUTIONS TO HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 4
SOLUTIONS TO HOMEWOK ASSIGNMENT 4 Exercise. A criterion for the image under the Hilbert transform to belong to L Let φ S be given. Show that Hφ L if and only if φx dx = 0. Solution: Suppose first that
More information4 Riesz Kernels. Since the functions k i (ξ) = ξ i. are bounded functions it is clear that R
4 Riesz Kernels. A natural generalization of the Hilbert transform to higher dimension is mutiplication of the Fourier Transform by homogeneous functions of degree 0, the simplest ones being R i f(ξ) =
More informationLaplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas
Chapter 1 Laplace s Equation Let be an open set in R n. A function u C 2 () is called harmonic in if it satisfies Laplace s equation n (1.1) u := D ii u = 0 in. i=1 A function u C 2 () is called subharmonic
More informationDissipative quasi-geostrophic equations with L p data
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. (), No. 56, pp. 3. ISSN: 7-669. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu (login: ftp) Dissipative quasi-geostrophic
More informationON THE BEHAVIOR OF THE SOLUTION OF THE WAVE EQUATION. 1. Introduction. = u. x 2 j
ON THE BEHAVIO OF THE SOLUTION OF THE WAVE EQUATION HENDA GUNAWAN AND WONO SETYA BUDHI Abstract. We shall here study some properties of the Laplace operator through its imaginary powers, and apply the
More informationJUHA KINNUNEN. Harmonic Analysis
JUHA KINNUNEN Harmonic Analysis Department of Mathematics and Systems Analysis, Aalto University 27 Contents Calderón-Zygmund decomposition. Dyadic subcubes of a cube.........................2 Dyadic cubes
More information. A NOTE ON THE RESTRICTION THEOREM AND GEOMETRY OF HYPERSURFACES
. A NOTE ON THE RESTRICTION THEOREM AND GEOMETRY OF HYPERSURFACES FABIO NICOLA Abstract. A necessary condition is established for the optimal (L p, L 2 ) restriction theorem to hold on a hypersurface S,
More informationClassical Fourier Analysis
Loukas Grafakos Classical Fourier Analysis Second Edition 4y Springer 1 IP Spaces and Interpolation 1 1.1 V and Weak IP 1 1.1.1 The Distribution Function 2 1.1.2 Convergence in Measure 5 1.1.3 A First
More informationMath 172 Problem Set 8 Solutions
Math 72 Problem Set 8 Solutions Problem. (i We have (Fχ [ a,a] (ξ = χ [ a,a] e ixξ dx = a a e ixξ dx = iξ (e iax e iax = 2 sin aξ. ξ (ii We have (Fχ [, e ax (ξ = e ax e ixξ dx = e x(a+iξ dx = a + iξ where
More informationESTIMATES FOR MAXIMAL SINGULAR INTEGRALS
ESTIMATES FOR MAXIMAL SINGULAR INTEGRALS LOUKAS GRAFAKOS Abstract. It is shown that maximal truncations of nonconvolution L -bounded singular integral operators with kernels satisfying Hörmander s condition
More informationVISCOSITY SOLUTIONS. We follow Han and Lin, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations, 5.
VISCOSITY SOLUTIONS PETER HINTZ We follow Han and Lin, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations, 5. 1. Motivation Throughout, we will assume that Ω R n is a bounded and connected domain and that a ij C(Ω)
More informationRANDOM PROPERTIES BENOIT PAUSADER
RANDOM PROPERTIES BENOIT PAUSADER. Quasilinear problems In general, one consider the following trichotomy for nonlinear PDEs: A semilinear problem is a problem where the highest-order terms appears linearly
More informationMATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA
MATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA For ω, consider an integral of the form I(ω) = e iωf(x) u(x) dx, where u Cc (R n ) complex valued, with support in a compact set K, and f C (R n ) real valued. Thus, I(ω)
More informationFourier Series. ,..., e ixn ). Conversely, each 2π-periodic function φ : R n C induces a unique φ : T n C for which φ(e ix 1
Fourier Series Let {e j : 1 j n} be the standard basis in R n. We say f : R n C is π-periodic in each variable if f(x + πe j ) = f(x) x R n, 1 j n. We can identify π-periodic functions with functions on
More informationWe denote the space of distributions on Ω by D ( Ω) 2.
Sep. 1 0, 008 Distributions Distributions are generalized functions. Some familiarity with the theory of distributions helps understanding of various function spaces which play important roles in the study
More informationHerz (cf. [H], and also [BS]) proved that the reverse inequality is also true, that is,
REARRANGEMENT OF HARDY-LITTLEWOOD MAXIMAL FUNCTIONS IN LORENTZ SPACES. Jesús Bastero*, Mario Milman and Francisco J. Ruiz** Abstract. For the classical Hardy-Littlewood maximal function M f, a well known
More informationHausdorff operators in H p spaces, 0 < p < 1
Hausdorff operators in H p spaces, 0 < p < 1 Elijah Liflyand joint work with Akihiko Miyachi Bar-Ilan University June, 2018 Elijah Liflyand joint work with Akihiko Miyachi (Bar-Ilan University) Hausdorff
More informationUnimodular Bilinear multipliers on L p spaces
Jotsaroop Kaur (joint work with Saurabh Shrivastava) Department of Mathematics, IISER Bhopal December 18, 2017 Fourier Multiplier Let m L (R n ), we define the Fourier multiplier operator as follows :
More informationALMOST ORTHOGONALITY AND A CLASS OF BOUNDED BILINEAR PSEUDODIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS
ALMOST ORTHOGONALITY AND A CLASS OF BOUNDED BILINEAR PSEUDODIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS Abstract. Several results and techniques that generate bilinear alternatives of a celebrated theorem of Calderón and Vaillancourt
More informationDuality of multiparameter Hardy spaces H p on spaces of homogeneous type
Duality of multiparameter Hardy spaces H p on spaces of homogeneous type Yongsheng Han, Ji Li, and Guozhen Lu Department of Mathematics Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN Internet Analysis Seminar 2012
More informationRemarks on localized sharp functions on certain sets in R n
Monatsh Math (28) 85:397 43 https://doi.org/.7/s65-7-9-5 Remarks on localized sharp functions on certain sets in R n Jacek Dziubański Agnieszka Hejna Received: 7 October 26 / Accepted: August 27 / Published
More informationDIEUDONNE AGBOR AND JAN BOMAN
ON THE MODULUS OF CONTINUITY OF MAPPINGS BETWEEN EUCLIDEAN SPACES DIEUDONNE AGBOR AND JAN BOMAN Abstract Let f be a function from R p to R q and let Λ be a finite set of pairs (θ, η) R p R q. Assume that
More informationHERMITE MULTIPLIERS AND PSEUDO-MULTIPLIERS
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 124, Number 7, July 1996 HERMITE MULTIPLIERS AND PSEUDO-MULTIPLIERS JAY EPPERSON Communicated by J. Marshall Ash) Abstract. We prove a multiplier
More informationTHE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n
THE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n BAISHENG YAN Abstract. We present an elementary L 2 -Hodge theory on whole R n based on the minimization principle of the calculus of variations and some
More informationThe Calderon-Vaillancourt Theorem
The Calderon-Vaillancourt Theorem What follows is a completely self contained proof of the Calderon-Vaillancourt Theorem on the L 2 boundedness of pseudo-differential operators. 1 The result Definition
More informationHarmonic Analysis Homework 5
Harmonic Analysis Homework 5 Bruno Poggi Department of Mathematics, University of Minnesota November 4, 6 Notation Throughout, B, r is the ball of radius r with center in the understood metric space usually
More informationTopics in Harmonic Analysis Lecture 6: Pseudodifferential calculus and almost orthogonality
Topics in Harmonic Analysis Lecture 6: Pseudodifferential calculus and almost orthogonality Po-Lam Yung The Chinese University of Hong Kong Introduction While multiplier operators are very useful in studying
More informationAnalytic families of multilinear operators
Analytic families of multilinear operators Mieczysław Mastyło Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań Nonlinar Functional Analysis Valencia 17-20 October 2017 Based on a joint work with Loukas Grafakos M.
More informationOSCILLATORY SINGULAR INTEGRALS ON L p AND HARDY SPACES
POCEEDINGS OF THE AMEICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 24, Number 9, September 996 OSCILLATOY SINGULA INTEGALS ON L p AND HADY SPACES YIBIAO PAN (Communicated by J. Marshall Ash) Abstract. We consider boundedness
More informationLECTURE 5: THE METHOD OF STATIONARY PHASE
LECTURE 5: THE METHOD OF STATIONARY PHASE Some notions.. A crash course on Fourier transform For j =,, n, j = x j. D j = i j. For any multi-index α = (α,, α n ) N n. α = α + + α n. α! = α! α n!. x α =
More informationAn introduction to Birkhoff normal form
An introduction to Birkhoff normal form Dario Bambusi Dipartimento di Matematica, Universitá di Milano via Saldini 50, 0133 Milano (Italy) 19.11.14 1 Introduction The aim of this note is to present an
More informationRESTRICTION. Alex Iosevich. Section 0: Introduction.. A natural question to ask is, does the boundedness of R : L 2(r+1)
FOURIER TRANSFORM, L 2 THEOREM, AND SCALING RESTRICTION Alex Iosevich Abstract. We show, using a Knapp-type homogeneity argument, that the (L p, L 2 ) restriction theorem implies a growth condition on
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ca] 29 Dec 2018
A QUANTITATIVE WEIGHTED WEAK-TYPE ESTIMATE FOR CALDERÓN-ZYGMUND OPERATORS CODY B. STOCKDALE arxiv:82.392v [math.ca] 29 Dec 208 Abstract. The purpose of this article is to provide an alternative proof of
More informationL p Bounds for the parabolic singular integral operator
RESEARCH L p Bounds for the parabolic singular integral operator Yanping Chen *, Feixing Wang 2 and Wei Yu 3 Open Access * Correspondence: yanpingch@26. com Department of Applied Mathematics, School of
More informationON THE KAKEYA SET CONJECTURE
ON THE KAKEYA SET CONJECTURE J.ASPEGREN Abstract. In this article we will prove the Kakeya set conjecture. In addition we will prove that in the usual approach to the Kakeya maximal function conjecture
More informationCenter of Gravity and a Characterization of Parabolas
KYUNGPOOK Math. J. 55(2015), 473-484 http://dx.doi.org/10.5666/kmj.2015.55.2.473 pissn 1225-6951 eissn 0454-8124 c Kyungpook Mathematical Journal Center of Gravity and a Characterization of Parabolas Dong-Soo
More informationDaniel M. Oberlin Department of Mathematics, Florida State University. January 2005
PACKING SPHERES AND FRACTAL STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES IN R d FOR d 3 Daniel M. Oberlin Department of Mathematics, Florida State University January 005 Fix a dimension d and for x R d and r > 0, let Sx, r) stand
More informationKernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels
Kernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels 2. Positive Definite Kernel and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space Kenji Fukumizu The Institute of Statistical Mathematics. Graduate University
More informationAPPROXIMATE IDENTITIES AND YOUNG TYPE INEQUALITIES IN VARIABLE LEBESGUE ORLICZ SPACES L p( ) (log L) q( )
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 35, 200, 405 420 APPROXIMATE IDENTITIES AND YOUNG TYPE INEQUALITIES IN VARIABLE LEBESGUE ORLICZ SPACES L p( ) (log L) q( ) Fumi-Yuki Maeda, Yoshihiro
More informationAALBORG UNIVERSITY. Compactly supported curvelet type systems. Kenneth N. Rasmussen and Morten Nielsen. R November 2010
AALBORG UNIVERSITY Compactly supported curvelet type systems by Kenneth N Rasmussen and Morten Nielsen R-2010-16 November 2010 Department of Mathematical Sciences Aalborg University Fredrik Bajers Vej
More informationGaussian Measure of Sections of convex bodies
Gaussian Measure of Sections of convex bodies A. Zvavitch Department of Mathematics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 652, USA Abstract In this paper we study properties of sections of convex bodies
More informationMULTI-PARAMETER PARAPRODUCTS
MULTI-PARAMETER PARAPRODUCTS CAMIL MUSCALU, JILL PIPHER, TERENCE TAO, AND CHRISTOPH THIELE Abstract. We prove that the classical Coifman-Meyer theorem holds on any polydisc T d of arbitrary dimension d..
More information2. Function spaces and approximation
2.1 2. Function spaces and approximation 2.1. The space of test functions. Notation and prerequisites are collected in Appendix A. Let Ω be an open subset of R n. The space C0 (Ω), consisting of the C
More informationWavelets and modular inequalities in variable L p spaces
Wavelets and modular inequalities in variable L p spaces Mitsuo Izuki July 14, 2007 Abstract The aim of this paper is to characterize variable L p spaces L p( ) (R n ) using wavelets with proper smoothness
More informationAlgebras of singular integral operators with kernels controlled by multiple norms
Algebras of singular integral operators with kernels controlled by multiple norms Alexander Nagel Conference in Harmonic Analysis in Honor of Michael Christ This is a report on joint work with Fulvio Ricci,
More informationNotes. 1 Fourier transform and L p spaces. March 9, For a function in f L 1 (R n ) define the Fourier transform. ˆf(ξ) = f(x)e 2πi x,ξ dx.
Notes March 9, 27 1 Fourier transform and L p spaces For a function in f L 1 (R n ) define the Fourier transform ˆf(ξ) = f(x)e 2πi x,ξ dx. Properties R n 1. f g = ˆfĝ 2. δλ (f)(ξ) = ˆf(λξ), where δ λ f(x)
More informationRESULTS ON FOURIER MULTIPLIERS
RESULTS ON FOURIER MULTIPLIERS ERIC THOMA Abstract. The problem of giving necessary and sufficient conditions for Fourier multipliers to be bounded on L p spaces does not have a satisfactory answer for
More information1 Fourier Integrals of finite measures.
18.103 Fall 2013 1 Fourier Integrals of finite measures. Denote the space of finite, positive, measures on by M + () = {µ : µ is a positive measure on ; µ() < } Proposition 1 For µ M + (), we define the
More information(b) If f L p (R), with 1 < p, then Mf L p (R) and. Mf L p (R) C(p) f L p (R) with C(p) depending only on p.
Lecture 3: Carleson Measures via Harmonic Analysis Much of the argument from this section is taken from the book by Garnett, []. The interested reader can also see variants of this argument in the book
More informationOscillatory integrals
Chapter Oscillatory integrals. Fourier transform on S The Fourier transform is a fundamental tool in microlocal analysis and its application to the theory of PDEs and inverse problems. In this first section
More informationMath The Laplacian. 1 Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution
Math. 209 The Laplacian Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution Let be a bounded open set in R n, n 2, with smooth boundary. The fact that the boundary is smooth means that at each point x the external
More informationWEAK HARDY SPACES LOUKAS GRAFAKOS AND DANQING HE
WEAK HARDY SPACES LOUKAS GRAFAKOS AND DANQING HE Abstract. We provide a careful treatment of the weak Hardy spaces H p, (R n ) for all indices 0 < p
More informationEXPOSITORY NOTES ON DISTRIBUTION THEORY, FALL 2018
EXPOSITORY NOTES ON DISTRIBUTION THEORY, FALL 2018 While these notes are under construction, I expect there will be many typos. The main reference for this is volume 1 of Hörmander, The analysis of liner
More informationChapter 8 Integral Operators
Chapter 8 Integral Operators In our development of metrics, norms, inner products, and operator theory in Chapters 1 7 we only tangentially considered topics that involved the use of Lebesgue measure,
More informationHardy spaces associated to operators satisfying Davies-Gaffney estimates and bounded holomorphic functional calculus.
Hardy spaces associated to operators satisfying Davies-Gaffney estimates and bounded holomorphic functional calculus. Xuan Thinh Duong (Macquarie University, Australia) Joint work with Ji Li, Zhongshan
More informationAPPLICATION OF A FOURIER RESTRICTION THEOREM TO CERTAIN FAMILIES OF PROJECTIONS IN R 3
APPLICATION OF A FOURIER RESTRICTION THEOREM TO CERTAIN FAMILIES OF PROJECTIONS IN R 3 DANIEL OBERLIN AND RICHARD OBERLIN Abstract. We use a restriction theorem for Fourier transforms of fractal measures
More informationComplex Analysis, Stein and Shakarchi Meromorphic Functions and the Logarithm
Complex Analysis, Stein and Shakarchi Chapter 3 Meromorphic Functions and the Logarithm Yung-Hsiang Huang 217.11.5 Exercises 1. From the identity sin πz = eiπz e iπz 2i, it s easy to show its zeros are
More informationMaximum norm estimates for energy-corrected finite element method
Maximum norm estimates for energy-corrected finite element method Piotr Swierczynski 1 and Barbara Wohlmuth 1 Technical University of Munich, Institute for Numerical Mathematics, piotr.swierczynski@ma.tum.de,
More informationSINGULAR INTEGRAL OPERATORS WITH ROUGH CONVOLUTION KERNELS. Andreas Seeger University of Wisconsin-Madison
SINGULA INTEGAL OPEATOS WITH OUGH CONVOLUTION KENELS Andreas Seeger University of Wisconsin-Madison. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to investigate the behavior on L ( d ), d, of a class of singular
More informationTHE HARDY LITTLEWOOD MAXIMAL FUNCTION OF A SOBOLEV FUNCTION. Juha Kinnunen. 1 f(y) dy, B(x, r) B(x,r)
Appeared in Israel J. Math. 00 (997), 7 24 THE HARDY LITTLEWOOD MAXIMAL FUNCTION OF A SOBOLEV FUNCTION Juha Kinnunen Abstract. We prove that the Hardy Littlewood maximal operator is bounded in the Sobolev
More information1 Continuity Classes C m (Ω)
0.1 Norms 0.1 Norms A norm on a linear space X is a function : X R with the properties: Positive Definite: x 0 x X (nonnegative) x = 0 x = 0 (strictly positive) λx = λ x x X, λ C(homogeneous) x + y x +
More informationOn an uniqueness theorem for characteristic functions
ISSN 392-53 Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, 207, Vol. 22, No. 3, 42 420 https://doi.org/0.5388/na.207.3.9 On an uniqueness theorem for characteristic functions Saulius Norvidas Institute of
More informationM K -TYPE ESTIMATES FOR MULTILINEAR COMMUTATOR OF SINGULAR INTEGRAL OPERATOR WITH GENERAL KERNEL. Guo Sheng, Huang Chuangxia and Liu Lanzhe
Acta Universitatis Apulensis ISSN: 582-5329 No. 33/203 pp. 3-43 M K -TYPE ESTIMATES FOR MULTILINEAR OMMUTATOR OF SINGULAR INTEGRAL OPERATOR WITH GENERAL KERNEL Guo Sheng, Huang huangxia and Liu Lanzhe
More informationA LOCALIZATION PROPERTY AT THE BOUNDARY FOR MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION
A LOCALIZATION PROPERTY AT THE BOUNDARY FOR MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION O. SAVIN. Introduction In this paper we study the geometry of the sections for solutions to the Monge- Ampere equation det D 2 u = f, u
More informationCHARACTERIZATIONS OF PSEUDODIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON THE CIRCLE
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 125, Number 5, May 1997, Pages 1407 1412 S 0002-9939(97)04016-1 CHARACTERIZATIONS OF PSEUDODIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON THE CIRCLE SEVERINO T. MELO
More informationNOTES ON THE REGULARITY OF QUASICONFORMAL HOMEOMORPHISMS
NOTES ON THE REGULARITY OF QUASICONFORMAL HOMEOMORPHISMS CLARK BUTLER. Introduction The purpose of these notes is to give a self-contained proof of the following theorem, Theorem.. Let f : S n S n be a
More informationSARASON S COMPOSITION OPERATOR OVER THE HALF-PLANE
SARASON S COMPOSITION OPERATOR OVER THE HALF-PLANE BOO RIM CHOE, HYUNGWOON KOO, AND WAYNE SMITH In memory of Donald Sarason Abstract. Let H = {z C : Im z > 0} be the upper half plane, and denote by L p
More informationThe Dirichlet boundary problems for second order parabolic operators satisfying a Carleson condition
The Dirichlet boundary problems for second order parabolic operators satisfying a Martin Dindos Sukjung Hwang University of Edinburgh Satellite Conference in Harmonic Analysis Chosun University, Gwangju,
More informationSOME PROPERTIES OF CONJUGATE HARMONIC FUNCTIONS IN A HALF-SPACE
SOME PROPERTIES OF CONJUGATE HARMONIC FUNCTIONS IN A HALF-SPACE ANATOLY RYABOGIN AND DMITRY RYABOGIN Abstract. We prove a multi-dimensional analog of the Theorem of Hard and Littlewood about the logarithmic
More informationAnalysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version
Analysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version Frank Pacard To cite this version: Frank Pacard. Analysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version. 3rd cycle. Téhéran (Iran, 2006, pp.75.
More informationTOOLS FROM HARMONIC ANALYSIS
TOOLS FROM HARMONIC ANALYSIS BRADLY STADIE Abstract. The Fourier transform can be thought of as a map that decomposes a function into oscillatory functions. In this paper, we will apply this decomposition
More informationA RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DIRICHLET AND REGULARITY PROBLEMS FOR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS. Zhongwei Shen
A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DIRICHLET AND REGULARITY PROBLEMS FOR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS Zhongwei Shen Abstract. Let L = diva be a real, symmetric second order elliptic operator with bounded measurable coefficients.
More informationTaylor and Laurent Series
Chapter 4 Taylor and Laurent Series 4.. Taylor Series 4... Taylor Series for Holomorphic Functions. In Real Analysis, the Taylor series of a given function f : R R is given by: f (x + f (x (x x + f (x
More informationClassical Fourier Analysis
Loukas Grafakos Classical Fourier Analysis Third Edition ~Springer 1 V' Spaces and Interpolation 1 1.1 V' and Weak V'............................................ 1 1.1.l The Distribution Function.............................
More informationSolution to Homework 4, Math 7651, Tanveer 1. Show that the function w(z) = 1 2
Solution to Homework 4, Math 7651, Tanveer 1. Show that the function w(z) = 1 (z + 1/z) maps the exterior of a unit circle centered around the origin in the z-plane to the exterior of a straight line cut
More informationJordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 5(4), 2012, pp
Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 5(4), 2012, pp223-239 BOUNDEDNESS OF MARCINKIEWICZ INTEGRALS ON HERZ SPACES WITH VARIABLE EXPONENT ZONGGUANG LIU (1) AND HONGBIN WANG (2) Abstract In
More informationSeul Lee, Dong-Soo Kim and Hyeon Park
Honam Mathematical J. 39 (2017), No. 2, pp. 247 258 https://doi.org/10.5831/hmj.2017.39.2.247 VARIOUS CENTROIDS OF QUADRILATERALS Seul Lee, Dong-Soo Kim and Hyeon Park Abstract. For a quadrilateral P,
More informationBOUNDS FOR A MAXIMAL DYADIC SUM OPERATOR
L p BOUNDS FOR A MAXIMAL DYADIC SUM OPERATOR LOUKAS GRAFAKOS, TERENCE TAO, AND ERIN TERWILLEGER Abstract. The authors prove L p bounds in the range
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 18 May 2017
Littlewood-Paley-Stein functions for Schrödinger operators arxiv:175.6794v1 [math.ap] 18 May 217 El Maati Ouhabaz Dedicated to the memory of Abdelghani Bellouquid (2/2/1966 8/31/215) Abstract We study
More informationThe Hilbert transform
The Hilbert transform Definition and properties ecall the distribution pv(, defined by pv(/(ϕ := lim ɛ ɛ ϕ( d. The Hilbert transform is defined via the convolution with pv(/, namely (Hf( := π lim f( t
More informationNECESSARY CONDITIONS FOR WEIGHTED POINTWISE HARDY INEQUALITIES
NECESSARY CONDITIONS FOR WEIGHTED POINTWISE HARDY INEQUALITIES JUHA LEHRBÄCK Abstract. We establish necessary conditions for domains Ω R n which admit the pointwise (p, β)-hardy inequality u(x) Cd Ω(x)
More informationApproximation by Conditionally Positive Definite Functions with Finitely Many Centers
Approximation by Conditionally Positive Definite Functions with Finitely Many Centers Jungho Yoon Abstract. The theory of interpolation by using conditionally positive definite function provides optimal
More informationASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE FOR SOLUTIONS OF THE NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS. Tian Ma. Shouhong Wang
DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS Website: http://aimsciences.org DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS Volume 11, Number 1, July 004 pp. 189 04 ASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE FOR SOLUTIONS OF THE NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS Tian Ma Department of
More informationMATH 173: Problem Set 5 Solutions
MATH 173: Problem Set 5 Solutions Problem 1. Let f L 1 and a. Te wole problem is a matter of cange of variables wit integrals. i Ff a ξ = e ix ξ f a xdx = e ix ξ fx adx = e ia+y ξ fydy = e ia ξ = e ia
More informationJordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 9(1), 2016, pp BOUNDEDNESS OF COMMUTATORS ON HERZ-TYPE HARDY SPACES WITH VARIABLE EXPONENT
Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS 9(1, 2016, pp 17-30 BOUNDEDNESS OF COMMUTATORS ON HERZ-TYPE HARDY SPACES WITH VARIABLE EXPONENT WANG HONGBIN Abstract. In this paper, we obtain the boundedness
More informationMicrolocal Methods in X-ray Tomography
Microlocal Methods in X-ray Tomography Plamen Stefanov Purdue University Lecture I: Euclidean X-ray tomography Mini Course, Fields Institute, 2012 Plamen Stefanov (Purdue University ) Microlocal Methods
More information