Industrial Organization

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Industrial Organization"

Transcription

1 Industrial Organization Lecture Notes Sérgio O. Parreiras Fall, 2017

2 Outline Mathematical Toolbox Intermediate Microeconomic Theory Revision Perfect Competition Monopoly Oligopoly

3 Mathematical Toolbox How to use the toolbox: 1 Casually read it once so you can classify your understanding of the topics in three categories: mastered, familiar but not mastered, and never seen before. 2 Read it again but, skip the mastered topics. 3 In your second reading, make sure to have pen and paper at hand and, Mathematica open and running. 4 Work the learning-by-doing exercises using pen and paper and, verify using Mathematica if your answers are correct. 5 When you have problems with Mathematica as you will for sure refer to the crash tutorial and Mathematica s help documentation. As last resort, me your.nb file.

4 Mathematical Toolbox Matrices A matrix is just a convenient way of displaying information. A n by m matrix A is composed of n m entires. The entry A ij is displayed in the ith row and jth column. Example of a 3 by 3 matrix, A = A 11 A 12 A 13 A 21 A 22 A 23 A 31 A 32 A 33.

5 Mathematical Toolbox Matrices A matrix is just a convenient way of displaying information. A n by m matrix A is composed of n m entires. The entry A ij is displayed in the ith row and jth column. Example of a 3 by 3 matrix, A = A 11 A 12 A 13 A 21 A 22 A 23 A 31 A 32 A 33.

6 Mathematical Toolbox: Matrix Multiplication a 11 a a 1p a 21 a a 2p a n1 a n2... a np A : n rows p columns b 11 b b 1q b 21 b b 2q b p1 b p2... b pq B : p rows q columns c 11 c c 1q c 21 c c 2q c n1 c n2... c nq a 21 b 12 a 22 b 22 a 2p b p C = A B : n rows q columns

7 Matrix Multiplication Examples A 1 n = (p 1, p 2,..., p n ) and B n 1 = u(x 1 ) u(x 2 ). u(x n ) C 1 1 = A B = p 1 u(x 1 ) + p 2 u(x 2 ) p n u(x n )

8 Matrix Multiplication Examples A 1 n = (p 1, p 2,..., p n ) and B n 1 = u(x 1 ) u(x 2 ). u(x n ) C 1 1 = A B = p 1 u(x 1 ) + p 2 u(x 2 ) p n u(x n )

9 Matrix Multiplication Mathematica In Mathematica to enter the matrices, we type: A = ( ) A :={{1, 0, 3}, {5, 4, 7}} and B = B :={{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {7, 0}} shift+enter To multiply the matrices, type: A.B shift+enter. ( A B = ).

10 Mathematical Toolbox Partial Derivatives Often we wish to evaluate the marginal impact of ONE given variable on some function of several variables. M y f = f(x, y +, z) f(x, y, z) f(x, y, z) = lim y 0 We refer to M y as: 1 The marginal change f with respect to y. 2 The partial derivative of f wrt y. 3 The slope of f wrt y.

11 Partial Derivatives How to Compute M y f = f(x, y +, z) f(x, y, z) f(x, y, z) = lim y 0 To compute the partial derivative with respect a given variable y in the above example we use the exact same rules of derivation you learn in calculus with one variable. What about the other variables? We treat all the other variables that are not of interest (x and z in the example above) as constants. In Mathematica, we use the command D to compute partial derivatives. For example, we use D[f[x, y, z], y] to compute M y f. See the crash tutorial for additional examples.

12 Partial Derivatives How to Compute M y f = f(x, y +, z) f(x, y, z) f(x, y, z) = lim y 0 To compute the partial derivative with respect a given variable y in the above example we use the exact same rules of derivation you learn in calculus with one variable. What about the other variables? We treat all the other variables that are not of interest (x and z in the example above) as constants. In Mathematica, we use the command D to compute partial derivatives. For example, we use D[f[x, y, z], y] to compute M y f. See the crash tutorial for additional examples.

13 Partial Derivatives How to Compute M y f = f(x, y +, z) f(x, y, z) f(x, y, z) = lim y 0 To compute the partial derivative with respect a given variable y in the above example we use the exact same rules of derivation you learn in calculus with one variable. What about the other variables? We treat all the other variables that are not of interest (x and z in the example above) as constants. In Mathematica, we use the command D to compute partial derivatives. For example, we use D[f[x, y, z], y] to compute M y f. See the crash tutorial for additional examples.

14 Partial Derivatives How to Compute M y f = f(x, y +, z) f(x, y, z) f(x, y, z) = lim y 0 To compute the partial derivative with respect a given variable y in the above example we use the exact same rules of derivation you learn in calculus with one variable. What about the other variables? We treat all the other variables that are not of interest (x and z in the example above) as constants. In Mathematica, we use the command D to compute partial derivatives. For example, we use D[f[x, y, z], y] to compute M y f. See the crash tutorial for additional examples.

15 Partial Derivatives Examples

16 Partial Derivatives Learning-by-doing exercises Compute the marginal utilities MU X and MU Y for the following utility functions: 1 u(x, y) = 1 4 x y 2 u(x, y) = 1 2 x y 3 u(x, y) = 1 3 ln(x) ln(y)

17 Mathematical Tool Box, The Chain Rule: If h(x) = f(g(x)) then h (x) = f (g(x)) g (x)

18 Chain Rule Learning-by-doing exercises 1 For each of the composite functions below tell us, What are the corresponding f and g and compute h. a) h(x) = 2x b) h(x) = exp( ρ x) c) h(x) = (4 + x σ ) 1 σ 2 Use the Chain Rule to obtain the marginal utilities M X and M Y of the utility function, u(x, y) = 2 3 exp( x) 1 3 exp( y). 3 If k(x) = f(g(h(x))) is a composition of three functions, apply the chain rule twice to compute k (x). 4 Consider f(x, y) and g(x) compute the total derivative of f(x, g(x)) with respect to x using the Chain Rule and partial derivatives.

19 Mathematical Toolbox Taylor s Approximation Consider a function of one variable defined on the real line, f : R R. If f is differentiable, we write the first order Taylor approximation: f(x + h) f(x) f (x) h The approximation works well only if h is small. For a function of two variables and h = (h 1, h 2 ) we have a similar expression: f(x + h 1, y + h 2 ) f(x, y) x f(x, y) h 1 + y f(x, y) h 2

20 Mathematical Toolbox Taylor s Approximation Consider a function of one variable defined on the real line, f : R R. If f is differentiable, we write the first order Taylor approximation: f(x + h) f(x) f (x) h The approximation works well only if h is small. For a function of two variables and h = (h 1, h 2 ) we have a similar expression: f(x + h 1, y + h 2 ) f(x, y) x f(x, y) h 1 + y f(x, y) h 2

21 Mathematical Toolbox Taylor s Approximation Consider a function of one variable defined on the real line, f : R R. If f is differentiable, we write the first order Taylor approximation: f(x + h) f(x) f (x) h The approximation works well only if h is small. For a function of two variables and h = (h 1, h 2 ) we have a similar expression: f(x + h 1, y + h 2 ) f(x, y) x f(x, y) h 1 + y f(x, y) h 2

22 Mathematical Toolbox, Marginal Utility & Taylor s Approximation: U = U(x + x, y + y ) U(x, y) MU x x + MU y y

23 Taylor s Approximation Learning-by-doing exercises Using Taylor s approximation, for each of the utility functions below, compute the change in utility when the consumer moves from consuming the basket (100, 100) to consuming the basket (105, 99). 1 u(x, y) = 1 4 x y 2 u(x, y) = 1 2 x y 3 u(x, y) = 1 3 ln(x) ln(y) 4 u(x, y) = 2 3 exp( x) 1 3 exp( y) Hint: What is the value of X? What is the value of Y? What is the value of MU X and MU Y when the basket (100, 100) is consumed?

24 Mathematical Toolbox Implicit Functions Let f(x, y) be a real-valued function of two variables and let g(x) be a real-valued function of one-variable with the following property: If we set y = g(x), f remains constant as we change x. that is, f(x, g(x)) = c for all x, where c is a constant. We refer to the function g as an implicit function since g is implicitly defined by the equation f(x, g(x)) = c.

25 Mathematical Toolbox Implicit Functions Let f(x, y) be a real-valued function of two variables and let g(x) be a real-valued function of one-variable with the following property: If we set y = g(x), f remains constant as we change x. that is, f(x, g(x)) = c for all x, where c is a constant. We refer to the function g as an implicit function since g is implicitly defined by the equation f(x, g(x)) = c.

26 Mathematical Toolbox Implicit Functions Let f(x, y) be a real-valued function of two variables and let g(x) be a real-valued function of one-variable with the following property: If we set y = g(x), f remains constant as we change x. that is, f(x, g(x)) = c for all x, where c is a constant. We refer to the function g as an implicit function since g is implicitly defined by the equation f(x, g(x)) = c.

27 Implicit Functions Learning-by-doing exercises For the utility curves below, find the equation of the indifference curve that gives utility c: 1 u(x, y) = 1 4 x y 2 u(x, y) = 1 2 x y 3 u(x, y) = 1 3 ln(x) ln(y) 4 u(x, y) = 2 3 exp( x) 1 3 exp( y) Hint: set u(x, y) = c and solve for y, this is your g function...

28 Mathematical Toolbox Implicit Function Theorem If f(x, g(x)) = c for all x, where c is a constant. f(x, g(x)) Then, g (x) = x f(x, g(x)). y

29 Mathematical Tools The Implicit Function Theorem Proof: Taking the total derivative of f with respect to x, d dx f(x, g(x)) = x f(x, g(x)) x x + y f(x, g(x)) x g(x) = x f(x, g(x)) + y f(x, g(x)) g (x) Since, d f(x, g(x)) dx f(x, g(x)) = 0 g (x) = x. y f(x, g(x)) As f is constant along g(x), we also call g an iso-curve of f. Indifference curves and iso-cost curves are examples of iso-curves that you should be familiar.

30 The Implicit Function Theorem Learning-by-doing exercises For the utility curves below: a) find the marginal rate of substitution; b) in the MRS, replace y by the implicit function g you found in the previous learning-by-doing exercise and simplify the expression; c) compute g (x) for the implicit functions of the previous exercise; d) compare the results you found in items (b) and (c). 1 u(x, y) = 1 4 x y 2 u(x, y) = 1 2 x y 3 u(x, y) = 1 3 ln(x) ln(y) 4 u(x, y) = 2 3 exp( x) 1 3 exp( y)

31 Mathematical Toolbox Interior Solutions Maximizing a function of one variable defined on the real line, f : R R. Maximization Problem max f(x) x R (P) First order condition f (x) = 0 (FOC) Second order condition f (x) 0 (SOC) Any point x satisfying FOC and SOC is a candidate for an interior solution.

32 Mathematical Toolbox Interior and Corner Solutions Maximizing a function of one variable defined on an interval, f : [a, b] R. As before, Maximization Problem max f(x) b x a (P) First order condition f (x) = 0 (FOC) Second order condition f (x) 0 (SOC) Any point x satisfying FOC and SOC is a candidate for an interior solution and now, x = a is a candidate for a corner solution if f (a) 0. x = b is a candidate for a corner solution if f (b) 0.

33 Mathematical Toolbox Concavity and Convexity Consider any function f : R k R. Definition: f is concave if and only if, for all α [0, 1], and any two points x, y R k, we have f (α x + (1 α) y) α f(x) + (1 α) f(y). Another definition: We say that f is convex if f is concave.

34 Mathematical ToolBox Global Maxima Proposition. Assume f is concave and also assume that x satisfy the FOC then x is a solution to the maximization problem (i.e. x is a global maximum).

35 Consumer Choice ECON 410, Revision List of ingredients: U : R R utility function x = (x 1, x 2,..., x n) basket of goods p = (p 1, p 2,..., p n) price list I consumer s income Consumer s goal: max x subject to: x 0 p x I U(x)

36 Consumer Choice Learning by Doing Exercise Let ε > 0 be a fixed positive number. 1 How many dollars does the consumer save when he/she reduces consumption of good i by ε units? 2 How many units of good j can the consumer buy with the saved amount you found in (1)? 3 Use Taylor s approximation to estimate the change in utility as a function of MU i, MU j, ε, p i, and p j.

37 Consumer Choice Learning by Doing Exercise Let ε > 0 be a fixed positive number. 1 How many dollars does the consumer save when he/she reduces consumption of good i by ε units? 2 How many units of good j can the consumer buy with the saved amount you found in (1)? 3 Use Taylor s approximation to estimate the change in utility as a function of MU i, MU j, ε, p i, and p j.

38 Consumer Choice Learning by Doing Exercise Let ε > 0 be a fixed positive number. 1 How many dollars does the consumer save when he/she reduces consumption of good i by ε units? 2 How many units of good j can the consumer buy with the saved amount you found in (1)? 3 Use Taylor s approximation to estimate the change in utility as a function of MU i, MU j, ε, p i, and p j.

39 Consumer Choice ECON 410, Revision Assume the the optimal basket x has positive amounts of each good. Then it must be the case that: MU i p i for any two goods i and j, and = MU j p j p x = I.

40 410 Review Work in groups of two or three to answer the following. Assume two goods such that MU 1 = 3 and MU 2 = 10 for Anna. 1 If the utility of Anna s endowment is 2 but she gives up 1 unit of good 1 in exchange for 1/2 units of good 2, what is her utility after the trade? 2 If p 1 = 10 and p 2 = 20, should Anna buy more or less of good 1? and of good 2? 3 If p 1 = 10 and p 2 = 40, should Anna buy more or less of good 1? and of good 2? 4 If p 1 = 1 what is the maximum value of p 2 so that Anna would be willing to not reduce her consumption of good 2?

41 Consumer Choice Learning By Doing Exercises 1 Let x 1 be the (monthly) change in consumption of good 1 and x 2 the change in consumption of good 1. The changes for the other goods is zero. If prices and (monthly) income do not change and the consumer always spend the entirety of the income every month, show or argue that p 1 x 1 = p 2 x 2. 2 Using the Taylor s formula for estimating the change in utility, U = MU 1 x 1 + MU 2 x 2. Show that if MU 1 /p 1 > MU 2 /p 2 and x 1 > 0 with p 1 x 1 = p 2 x 2 then U > 0. Hint: First, try to show the result using numerical values for MU 1, MU 2, p 1, and p 2 and set x 1 = +1. Next, do the same but replace the numerical value for the economic variables.

42 Lecture 1 What IO is about? Trusts and cartels became pervasive in the US economy in the XIX century, watch this clip. But with the passage of the Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) and the Clayton Antitrust Act (1904), read Chapter 1 of section 15 of the U.S. code. However, it is not easy to answer if a dominant firm is exercising monopoly power and restricting competition. Listen to this podcast on Google. A major topic of Industrial Organization (IO) is market structure. That is, characterizing and identifying different market structures: competitive markets, monopoly, oligopoly,

43 Perfect Competition Definition Competitive Behavior A buyer or a seller is said to be competitive if he/she believes that the market price is given and that his/her actions do not influence the market price.

44 Perfect Competition Non-Increasing Returns to Scale Two firms: i = 1, 2 with costs TC i (q i ) = c i q i. Linear inverse demand: p = a b Q = a b (q 1 + q 2 ). Competitive Equilibrium The triplet (p, q 1, q 2 ) is a competitive equilibrium if: 1 give p, q i solves 2 p = a b (q 1 + q 2 ) max q i π i (q i ) = p q i TC i (q i )

45 Individual Supply Functions Constant Returns to Scale The supply function of firm i = 1, 2 is: + if p > c i, q i (p) = [0, + ] if p = c i, 0 if p < c i.

46 The Competitive Equilibrium If a > c 2 c 1, the unique competitive equilibrium price is p = c 1 and: 1 if c 1 < c 2 then q 2 = 0 and q 1 = (a c 1 )/b; 2 if c 1 = c 2 then Q = q 1 + q 2 = (a c 1 )/b and q 1, q 2 0.

47 Returns to Scale Definition Assume we increase all inputs by the same ratio, λ > 0. So that total costs increase by λ. If production increases by: 1 a ratio of λ 2 more than a ratio of λ 3 less than a ration of λ We say that the firm s technology has : 1 constant returns to scale: Q ATC(Q) = TC(Q)/Q stays constant 2 increasing returns to scale: Q ATC(Q) = TC(Q)/Q 3 decreasing returns to scale: Q ATC(Q) = TC(Q)/Q

48 Competitive Equilibrium Increasing Returns to Scale TC(q) = F + c q. Suppose that a > c, then if the firms technology exhibit increasing returns to scale (decreasing average cost), a competitive equilibrium does not exist.

49 Competitive Equilibrium Increasing Returns to Scale TC(q) = F + c q. Suppose that a > c, then if the firms technology exhibit increasing returns to scale (decreasing average cost), a competitive equilibrium does not exist.

50 Social Welfare Definition Given a market price p and N firms in the industry, we define the social welfare by: N W(p) = CS(p) + π i (p) i=1 That is, the social welfare is the consumer surplus (area under the demand curve) plus the firm s profits.

51 Social Welfare Recall (ECON 410) that the consumer surplus, CS(p), at a market price is p 0 measures how much consumers would be willing to pay for the quantity that they demand at this price minus the actual amount they pay. In turn, the willingness to pay to consume Q(p 0 ) units is measured by the area under the demand curve. p p = a b Q p 0 = a b Q 0 Q 0 Q

52 Social Welfare Recall (ECON 410) that the consumer surplus, CS(p), at a market price is p 0 measures how much consumers would be willing to pay for the quantity that they demand at this price minus the actual amount they pay. In turn, the willingness to pay to consume Q(p 0 ) units is measured by the area under the demand curve. p p = a b Q p 0 = a b Q 0 Q 0 Q

53 Social Welfare Recall (ECON 410) that the consumer surplus, CS(p), at a market price is p 0 measures how much consumers would be willing to pay for the quantity that they demand at this price minus the actual amount they pay. In turn, the willingness to pay to consume Q(p 0 ) units is measured by the area under the demand curve. p p = a b Q p 0 = a b Q 0 Q 0 Q

54 Social Welfare Recall (ECON 410) that the consumer surplus, CS(p), at a market price is p 0 measures how much consumers would be willing to pay for the quantity that they demand at this price minus the actual amount they pay. In turn, the willingness to pay to consume Q(p 0 ) units is measured by the area under the demand curve. p p = a b Q p 0 = a b Q 0 Q 0 Q

55 Social Welfare continued... The social welfare is: W(p) = CS(p) + N π i (p) That os, the social welfare is the consumer surplus (area under the demand curve minus payments to the firms) plus the firm s profits. Moreover, since the sum of the firms profits is p Q N i=1 TC i(q i ), where Q = N i=1, when we add the consumer surplus (which subtracts the payments to the firms) to the profits (which includes the payments to the firms), the term p Q (the payment to the firms/the firms revenue) is cancelled. Thus, we can also write i=1 W(p) = area under the demand curve at Q(p) N TC i (q i ). i=1 } {{ } total cost

56 Social Welfare continued... The social welfare is: W(p) = CS(p) + N π i (p) That os, the social welfare is the consumer surplus (area under the demand curve minus payments to the firms) plus the firm s profits. Moreover, since the sum of the firms profits is p Q N i=1 TC i(q i ), where Q = N i=1, when we add the consumer surplus (which subtracts the payments to the firms) to the profits (which includes the payments to the firms), the term p Q (the payment to the firms/the firms revenue) is cancelled. Thus, we can also write i=1 W(p) = area under the demand curve at Q(p) N TC i (q i ). i=1 } {{ } total cost

57 Social Welfare An Example Assume a linear inverse demand, p = a b Q and linear costs TC i (q i ) = c q i. Thus, the total costs are simply N i=1 TC i(q i ) = c N i=1 q i = c Q. Since fixed costs are zero (in this example), total cost is just the area under the marginal cost curve. The are under the demand curve is: (a p 0) Q 0 2 +p 0 Q 0 = (a + p 0 )Q 0 /2 = (2a bq 0 )Q 0 /2. Total costs are: c Q 0 p a p = a b Q p 0 = a b Q 0 c Q 0 Q

58 Social Welfare An Example Assume a linear inverse demand, p = a b Q and linear costs TC i (q i ) = c q i. Thus, the total costs are simply N i=1 TC i(q i ) = c N i=1 q i = c Q. Since fixed costs are zero (in this example), total cost is just the area under the marginal cost curve. The are under the demand curve is: (a p 0) Q 0 2 +p 0 Q 0 = (a + p 0 )Q 0 /2 = (2a bq 0 )Q 0 /2. Total costs are: c Q 0 p a p = a b Q p 0 = a b Q 0 c Q 0 Q

59 Social Welfare An Example Assume a linear inverse demand, p = a b Q and linear costs TC i (q i ) = c q i. Thus, the total costs are simply N i=1 TC i(q i ) = c N i=1 q i = c Q. Since fixed costs are zero (in this example), total cost is just the area under the marginal cost curve. The are under the demand curve is: (a p 0) Q 0 2 +p 0 Q 0 = (a + p 0 )Q 0 /2 = (2a bq 0 )Q 0 /2. Total costs are: c Q 0 p a p = a b Q p 0 = a b Q 0 c W(p 0 ) Q 0 Q

60 Social Welfare The competitive equilibrium maximizes the social welfare In the example: W =(2a bq)q/2 cq W =(a bq) c = p c = 0 p = c Q

61 Perfect Competition Discussion 1 In a competitive market, can we have few firms? or firms with different technologies? 2 In a competitive equilibrium, how the profits of the firms with the better technology (i.e., lower marginal and average costs) differ from the profits of the firms with the worse technology? 3 What are the long-run incentives that firms in a competitive market face? 4 Listen to the podcast How stuff gets cheap?

62 Monopoly Unlike competitive firms, the monopolist firm takes into account its actions affects the market price. Notice that: max π i(q) = p(q) Q TC(Q) Q Q π = p (Q) Q + p(q) MC(Q) = 0 }{{} MR MC(Q ) = p(q ) + p (Q ) (Q ) < p. The monopoly equilibrium price is higher than the marginal cost.

63 Monopoly Unlike competitive firms, the monopolist firm takes into account its actions affects the market price. Notice that: max π i(q) = p(q) Q TC(Q) Q Q π = p (Q) Q + p(q) MC(Q) = 0 }{{} MR MC(Q ) = p(q ) + p (Q ) (Q ) < p. The monopoly equilibrium price is higher than the marginal cost.

64 Monopoly Unlike competitive firms, the monopolist firm takes into account its actions affects the market price. Notice that: max π i(q) = p(q) Q TC(Q) Q Q π = p (Q) Q + p(q) MC(Q) = 0 }{{} MR MC(Q ) = p(q ) + p (Q ) (Q ) < p. The monopoly equilibrium price is higher than the marginal cost.

65 Monopoly with two markets max π i (Q) = p 1 (Q 1 ) Q 1 + p 2 (Q 2 ) Q 2 TC(Q 1 + Q 2 ) Q 1,Q 2 π = p Q 1(Q) Q 1 + p 1 (Q 1 ) MC(Q 1 + Q 2 ) = 0, 1 }{{} MR 1 π = p Q 2(Q) Q 2 + p 2 (Q 2 ) MC(Q 1 + Q 2 ) = 0 2 }{{} MR 2

66 Monopoly with two markets max π i (Q) = p 1 (Q 1 ) Q 1 + p 2 (Q 2 ) Q 2 TC(Q 1 + Q 2 ) Q 1,Q 2 π = p Q 1(Q) Q 1 + p 1 (Q 1 ) MC(Q 1 + Q 2 ) = 0, 1 }{{} MR 1 π = p Q 2(Q) Q 2 + p 2 (Q 2 ) MC(Q 1 + Q 2 ) = 0 2 }{{} MR 2

67 Monopoly Podcasts by Planet Money, NPR 1 What A 16th Century Guild Teaches Us About Competition 2 Mavericks, Monopolies And Beer 3 Why It s Illegal To Braid Hair Without A License

68 Cartel There are N firms in the industry which form a cartel whose aim is to maximize their joint profits. We assume a linear inverse demand, p = a b Q and quadratic costs, TC i (q i ) = F + c q i, in which F and c are positive constants (the fixed cost and marginal cost).

69 Cartel Equilibrium The cartel s profit is: π = (a b(q q N )) (q q N ) TC 1 (q 1 ) +... TC N (q N ) }{{}}{{}}{{} } p {{ Q } Sum of total costs Revenue To find the quantities that max. its profits we must solve the first-order conditions: π = bq + (a bq) MC i (q i ) = 0, i = 1,..., N. q i }{{} MR Since the marginal revenue is the same for all firms, in eq., their marginal cost, which equals the MR, must also be equal. But then, the individuals quantities must also be equal! So Q = N q where the value of q solves: bnq + (a bnq) c q = 0.

70 A crash review of Game Theory Consider N firms indexed by i = 1, 2,... N, and let π i denote the profit of firm i. Let s i denote a strategy of firm i (s i could be the quantity that firm i is producing, or the price it charges, or even the location choice...). Fix the strategy that the others are choosing s i = (s 1,..., s i 1, s i+1,..., s N ). We define the best response function of firm i to s i, and we write BR i (s i ) as the strategy or strategies that maximize the payoff of firm i when the others follow the strategy s i.

71 A crash review of Game Theory Notice that the best response is a function: its value depend on the choice of the others firms. Of course, when choices are simultaneous, the firm does not observe the strategy choices of the rival. So, you should think of the best response as the plan the firm intended to carry if the firm believes that the others will play a given strategy s i. We read the subscript i as not i. That is, s i is a list of strategies (one for each firm) of the firms that are distinct from firm i.

72 A crash review of Game Theory Nash equilibrium Definition An equilibrium (a Nash eq.) is a list of strategies (one for each firm) such that each firm is best responding to the choice of the others.

73 Cournot Oligopoly Competition in Quantities We consider an industry that produces an homogeneous good whose market demand is p = a b Q. There are N firm and each firm has a total cost function TC i (q i ) (notice that different firms might have different cost functions!).

74 Cournot Oligopoly Competition in Quantities We assume non-increasing returns to scale so that the marginal cost is increasing with quantity. In this case, to find the best-response function of firm i, we set the marginal profit equal to zero and solve for q i : π i =(a b (q q N )q i TC i (q i ) q i π i =a b (q q i 1 + 2q i + q i+1 MC i (q i ) = 0 BR i (q i ) solves the above equation

75 Finding a best response Consider the case of three firms with TC i (q i ) = c q i for i = 1, 2, 3 (in this case all firms have the same cost function). To find the best-response function of firm 1: π 1 =(a b (q 1 + q 2 + q 3 ) q 1 c q 1 π 1 =a b (2q 1 + q 2 + q 3 ) c = 0 q 1 q 1 = BR 1 (q 2, q 3 ) = a c bq 2 bq 3 2b solves the above equation

76 Finding a Nash eq. Continuing the example above, to find the Nash eq., we must solve the system of equations below, which is equivalent to every firm be best responding: q 1 = a c bq 2 bq 3, 2b q 2 = a c bq 1 bq 3, 2b q 3 = a c bq 1 bq 2 2b Exercise: Check that q 1 = q 2 = q 3 = a c 4b is a Nash eq.

77 Bertrand Oligopoly Competition in prices In the Cournot games, the best response was single valued but in general the best response is set-valued. We may have several (or even infinite) number of best responses to s i. It is even possible the best response to s i may fail to exist! This is the case, when firms compete in prices.

78 Bertrand Competition Duopoly There are no fixed costs and the marginal cost is constant, c. The market demand is P = a bq but firms compete in prices. The firm charging the lowest price captures the entire market. If both firms charge the same, they split the market. Profits are: ( ) a p1 (p 1 c) if p 1 < p 2, b ( π 1 (p 1, p 2 ) = a p1 ) b (p 1 c) 2 if p 1 = p 2 and 0 if p 1 > p 2. For player 2, π 2 (p 1, p 2 ) = π 1 (p 2, p 1 ).

79 Bertrand Competition Duopoly There are no fixed costs and the marginal cost is constant, c. The market demand is P = a bq but firms compete in prices. The firm charging the lowest price captures the entire market. If both firms charge the same, they split the market. Profits are: ( ) a p1 (p 1 c) if p 1 < p 2, b ( π 1 (p 1, p 2 ) = a p1 ) b (p 1 c) 2 if p 1 = p 2 and 0 if p 1 > p 2. For player 2, π 2 (p 1, p 2 ) = π 1 (p 2, p 1 ).

80 Bertrand Competition Duopoly There are no fixed costs and the marginal cost is constant, c. The market demand is P = a bq but firms compete in prices. The firm charging the lowest price captures the entire market. If both firms charge the same, they split the market. Profits are: ( ) a p1 (p 1 c) if p 1 < p 2, b ( π 1 (p 1, p 2 ) = a p1 ) b (p 1 c) 2 if p 1 = p 2 and 0 if p 1 > p 2. For player 2, π 2 (p 1, p 2 ) = π 1 (p 2, p 1 ).

81 Bertrand Oligopoly Equilibrium ( ) a p1 Suppose that p 2 > p 1 then π 1 = (p 1 c) and thus, b π 1 = a + c 2p 1 p 1 b > 0. That is, as long as firm 2 is charging a higher price and (a + c)/2 > p 1, firm 1 has incentives to raise its own price up to the point in which p 1 = (a + c)/2. But if p 1 > c, firm 2 has an incentive to charge a lower price and capture the entire market. Thus, in an eq. it must be that p 1 = p 2 c. Exercise: verify that p 1 = p 2 = c is a Nash equilibrium.

82 Oligopoly with differentiated products textbook, : pp We consider a demand system for two products given by: p 1 = α βq 1 γq 2, p 2 = α βq 2 γq 1, We define δ = γ 2 /β 2 and refer to it as a measure of product differentiation. The smaller δ is, the more differentiated are the products. The larger δ is, the more homogeneous are the products. Notice that since we assume γ < β, the measure δ lies in the interval (0, 1).

83 Oligopoly with differentiated products textbook, : pp Learning by doing exercise, assume that firms compete choosing quantities and face zero costs of production and: 1 Write the profits of the firms as a function of the quantities q 1, q 2 and the demand parameters α, β and γ. 2 Equate the marginal profit of each firm to zero and solve for the best-response functions. 3 Find the Nash equilibrium. 4 Show that profits decrease as γ > 0 increases. 5 Explain why product differentiation increases the equilibrium profits. Solution (Mathematica.nb file)

84 Oligopoly with Differentiated (by location) products textbook, , pp First, firms choose locations A and B on the interval [0, L]. Second, firms chose their prices, p A and p B. Consumers are uniformly distributed on the interval [0, L]. Assume that A B. The utility of a consumer who is located at point x is: p A τ A x if buys from firm A u i = p B τ B x if buys from firm B. Here, τ > 0 measures the consumer s transportation costs.

85 Oligopoly with Differentiated (by location) products textbook, , pp Assume A B and that there is a consumer located at A x (p A, p B ) B who is indifferent between buying from A or B. Then, p A τ(x A) = p B τ(b x ) x = (A + B)/2 + (p B p A )/(2τ) Learning by doing exercise, assume that firms compete choosing quantities and face zero costs of production and: 1 In the above case, explain why the demand for A is q A = x and the demand for B is q B = L x. 2 Write the profit of firm A. 3 Compute the best-response (price) function of firm A to p B. 4 Do the same for firm B and then, solve for the eq. prices. Solution (Mathematica.nb file)

86 Oligopoly with Differentiated (by location) products textbook, , pp Once we obtain the equilibrium prices p A and p B which should be functions of the locations. We analyze the choice of location. Plug the eq. prices you found previously and then compute A π A and show it is postive. That is, firm A wants to move closer to the location of firm B...

87 Mergers Measures of Industry Concentration Label firms so that q 1 q 2 q 3 etc... Definitions: s i = 100 q i Q is the market share of firm i. I 4 = s 1 + s 2 + s 3 + s 4 is the market share of the top four firms. I HH = N i=1 s2 i is the index of market concentration, note that: 0 < I HH

88 Mergers Horizontal Mergers Merger increases joint profits but: Firms outside the merger may profit from the merger. The merger reduces consumers surplus but the social surplus might increase (if the merger has strong cost saving efficiency properties).

89 Mergers Vertical Mergers, textbook, 8.2.2: pp

90 Research and Development A basic model: V value of innovation α probability of discovering a successful innovation. I research and development costs (R&D investment). With one firm, invest if and only the expected benefits are larger than the costs: αv I 0.

91 Research and Development With two firms, i=1,2, if both invest, profits are: V I only firm i is successful. π i = V/2 I both firms are successful. 0 firm i fails.

92 Research and Development With two firms, i=1,2: 1 If both invest, expected profits are: π 1 = π 2 = α 2 (V/2) + (1 α)αv I. 2 If firm 1 invests but firm 2 does not, expected profits are: π 1 = αv I and π 2 = 0.

93 Research and Development Depending on V, α and I there are several possible cases to consider: 1 If αv I < 0, no firms invest. 2 If α 2 (V/2) + (1 α)αv I > 0, both firms invest. 3 If α 2 (V/2) + (1 α)αv I < 0 < αv I, one firm invests while the other does not.

94 Research and Development Is investment efficient? The social surplus is the sum of profits (for simplicity we assume zero consumer surplus): if both firms invest, W = (1 (1 α) 2 )V 2I; and if only one firm invests, W = αv I. 1 If α 2 (V/2) + (1 α)αv I > 0 but (1 (1 α) 2 )V 2I < αv I there is over investment. 2 If α 2 (V/2) + (1 α)αv I < 0 < αv I but (1 (1 α) 2 )V 2I > αv I there is under investment.

Bertrand Model of Price Competition. Advanced Microeconomic Theory 1

Bertrand Model of Price Competition. Advanced Microeconomic Theory 1 Bertrand Model of Price Competition Advanced Microeconomic Theory 1 ҧ Bertrand Model of Price Competition Consider: An industry with two firms, 1 and 2, selling a homogeneous product Firms face market

More information

Advanced Microeconomics

Advanced Microeconomics Advanced Microeconomics Leonardo Felli EC441: Room D.106, Z.332, D.109 Lecture 8 bis: 24 November 2004 Monopoly Consider now the pricing behavior of a profit maximizing monopolist: a firm that is the only

More information

Classic Oligopoly Models: Bertrand and Cournot

Classic Oligopoly Models: Bertrand and Cournot Classic Oligopoly Models: Bertrand and Cournot Class Note: There are supplemental readings, including Werden (008) Unilateral Competitive Effects of Horizontal Mergers I: Basic Concepts and Models, that

More information

Oligopoly Theory. This might be revision in parts, but (if so) it is good stu to be reminded of...

Oligopoly Theory. This might be revision in parts, but (if so) it is good stu to be reminded of... This might be revision in parts, but (if so) it is good stu to be reminded of... John Asker Econ 170 Industrial Organization January 23, 2017 1 / 1 We will cover the following topics: with Sequential Moves

More information

Answer Key: Problem Set 1

Answer Key: Problem Set 1 Answer Key: Problem Set 1 Econ 409 018 Fall Question 1 a The profit function (revenue minus total cost) is π(q) = P (q)q cq The first order condition with respect to (henceforth wrt) q is P (q )q + P (q

More information

EconS Oligopoly - Part 2

EconS Oligopoly - Part 2 EconS 305 - Oligopoly - Part 2 Eric Dunaway Washington State University eric.dunaway@wsu.edu November 29, 2015 Eric Dunaway (WSU) EconS 305 - Lecture 32 November 29, 2015 1 / 28 Introduction Last time,

More information

Industrial Organization Lecture 7: Product Differentiation

Industrial Organization Lecture 7: Product Differentiation Industrial Organization Lecture 7: Product Differentiation Nicolas Schutz Nicolas Schutz Product Differentiation 1 / 57 Introduction We now finally drop the assumption that firms offer homogeneous products.

More information

Answer Key: Problem Set 3

Answer Key: Problem Set 3 Answer Key: Problem Set Econ 409 018 Fall Question 1 a This is a standard monopoly problem; using MR = a 4Q, let MR = MC and solve: Q M = a c 4, P M = a + c, πm = (a c) 8 The Lerner index is then L M P

More information

Industrial Organization, Fall 2011: Midterm Exam Solutions and Comments Date: Wednesday October

Industrial Organization, Fall 2011: Midterm Exam Solutions and Comments Date: Wednesday October Industrial Organization, Fall 2011: Midterm Exam Solutions and Comments Date: Wednesday October 23 2011 1 Scores The exam was long. I know this. Final grades will definitely be curved. Here is a rough

More information

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6 Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO April 10, 017 Administrative Stuff Homework # is due at the end of class. I will post the solutions on the website later today. The midterm

More information

4. Partial Equilibrium under Imperfect Competition

4. Partial Equilibrium under Imperfect Competition 4. Partial Equilibrium under Imperfect Competition Partial equilibrium studies the existence of equilibrium in the market of a given commodity and analyzes its properties. Prices in other markets as well

More information

Mathematical Foundations -1- Constrained Optimization. Constrained Optimization. An intuitive approach 2. First Order Conditions (FOC) 7

Mathematical Foundations -1- Constrained Optimization. Constrained Optimization. An intuitive approach 2. First Order Conditions (FOC) 7 Mathematical Foundations -- Constrained Optimization Constrained Optimization An intuitive approach First Order Conditions (FOC) 7 Constraint qualifications 9 Formal statement of the FOC for a maximum

More information

Oligopoly Notes. Simona Montagnana

Oligopoly Notes. Simona Montagnana Oligopoly Notes Simona Montagnana Question 1. Write down a homogeneous good duopoly model of quantity competition. Using your model, explain the following: (a) the reaction function of the Stackelberg

More information

Market Power. Economics II: Microeconomics. December Aslanyan (VŠE) Oligopoly 12/09 1 / 39

Market Power. Economics II: Microeconomics. December Aslanyan (VŠE) Oligopoly 12/09 1 / 39 Market Power Economics II: Microeconomics VŠE Praha December 2009 Aslanyan (VŠE) Oligopoly 12/09 1 / 39 Microeconomics Consumers: Firms: People. Households. Monopoly. Oligopoly Now Perfect Competition.

More information

Static Models of Oligopoly

Static Models of Oligopoly Static Models of Oligopoly Cournot and Bertrand Models Mateusz Szetela 1 1 Collegium of Economic Analysis Warsaw School of Economics 3 March 2016 Outline 1 Introduction Game Theory and Oligopolies 2 The

More information

Microeconomic Theory -1- Introduction

Microeconomic Theory -1- Introduction Microeconomic Theory -- Introduction. Introduction. Profit maximizing firm with monopoly power 6 3. General results on maximizing with two variables 8 4. Model of a private ownership economy 5. Consumer

More information

Lecture 1: Introduction to IO Tom Holden

Lecture 1: Introduction to IO Tom Holden Lecture 1: Introduction to IO Tom Holden http://io.tholden.org/ Email: t.holden@surrey.ac.uk Standard office hours: Thursday, 12-1PM + 3-4PM, 29AD00 However, during term: CLASSES will be run in the first

More information

EconS Sequential Competition

EconS Sequential Competition EconS 425 - Sequential Competition Eric Dunaway Washington State University eric.dunaway@wsu.edu Industrial Organization Eric Dunaway (WSU) EconS 425 Industrial Organization 1 / 47 A Warmup 1 x i x j (x

More information

Basics of Game Theory

Basics of Game Theory Basics of Game Theory Giacomo Bacci and Luca Sanguinetti Department of Information Engineering University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy {giacomo.bacci,luca.sanguinetti}@iet.unipi.it April - May, 2010 G. Bacci and

More information

Game Theory and Algorithms Lecture 2: Nash Equilibria and Examples

Game Theory and Algorithms Lecture 2: Nash Equilibria and Examples Game Theory and Algorithms Lecture 2: Nash Equilibria and Examples February 24, 2011 Summary: We introduce the Nash Equilibrium: an outcome (action profile) which is stable in the sense that no player

More information

Research and Development

Research and Development Chapter 9. March 7, 2011 Firms spend substantial amounts on. For instance ( expenditure to output sales): aerospace (23%), o ce machines and computers (18%), electronics (10%) and drugs (9%). is classi

More information

Firms and returns to scale -1- John Riley

Firms and returns to scale -1- John Riley Firms and returns to scale -1- John Riley Firms and returns to scale. Increasing returns to scale and monopoly pricing 2. Natural monopoly 1 C. Constant returns to scale 21 D. The CRS economy 26 E. pplication

More information

Lecture 2F: Hotelling s Model

Lecture 2F: Hotelling s Model Econ 46 Urban Economics Lecture F: Hotelling s Model Instructor: Hiroki Watanabe Spring Hiroki Watanabe / 6 Hotelling s Model Monopoly (N = ) 3 (N = ) 4 Nash Equilibrium 5 Oligopoly (N ) N 4 6 Summary

More information

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2012

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2012 Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2012 The time limit for this exam is 4 hours. It has four sections. Each section includes two questions. You are

More information

Oligopoly. Oligopoly. Xiang Sun. Wuhan University. March 23 April 6, /149

Oligopoly. Oligopoly. Xiang Sun. Wuhan University. March 23 April 6, /149 Oligopoly Xiang Sun Wuhan University March 23 April 6, 2016 1/149 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Game theory 3 Oligopoly models 4 Cournot competition Two symmetric firms Two asymmetric firms Many symmetric firms

More information

Firms and returns to scale -1- Firms and returns to scale

Firms and returns to scale -1- Firms and returns to scale Firms and returns to scale -1- Firms and returns to scale. Increasing returns to scale and monopoly pricing 2. Constant returns to scale 19 C. The CRS economy 25 D. pplication to trade 47 E. Decreasing

More information

Econ Slides from Lecture 10

Econ Slides from Lecture 10 Econ 205 Sobel Econ 205 - Slides from Lecture 10 Joel Sobel September 2, 2010 Example Find the tangent plane to {x x 1 x 2 x 2 3 = 6} R3 at x = (2, 5, 2). If you let f (x) = x 1 x 2 x3 2, then this is

More information

Durable goods monopolist

Durable goods monopolist Durable goods monopolist Coase conjecture: A monopolist selling durable good has no monopoly power. Reason: A P 1 P 2 B MC MC D MR Q 1 Q 2 C Q Although Q 1 is optimal output of the monopolist, it faces

More information

Trade policy III: Export subsidies

Trade policy III: Export subsidies The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies - wiiw June 25, 2015 Overview Overview 1 1 Under perfect competition lead to welfare loss 2 Effects depending on market structures 1 Subsidies to

More information

Cournot and Bertrand Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly with Endogenous Technology Adoption *

Cournot and Bertrand Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly with Endogenous Technology Adoption * ANNALS OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE 16-1, 231 253 (2015) Cournot and Bertrand Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly with Endogenous Technology Adoption * Hongkun Ma School of Economics, Shandong University,

More information

ANSWER KEY 2 GAME THEORY, ECON 395

ANSWER KEY 2 GAME THEORY, ECON 395 ANSWER KEY GAME THEORY, ECON 95 PROFESSOR A. JOSEPH GUSE (1) (Gibbons 1.6) Consider again the Cournot duopoly model with demand given by the marginal willingness to pay function: P(Q) = a Q, but this time

More information

Theory Field Examination Game Theory (209A) Jan Question 1 (duopoly games with imperfect information)

Theory Field Examination Game Theory (209A) Jan Question 1 (duopoly games with imperfect information) Theory Field Examination Game Theory (209A) Jan 200 Good luck!!! Question (duopoly games with imperfect information) Consider a duopoly game in which the inverse demand function is linear where it is positive

More information

1 + x 1/2. b) For what values of k is g a quasi-concave function? For what values of k is g a concave function? Explain your answers.

1 + x 1/2. b) For what values of k is g a quasi-concave function? For what values of k is g a concave function? Explain your answers. Questions and Answers from Econ 0A Final: Fall 008 I have gone to some trouble to explain the answers to all of these questions, because I think that there is much to be learned b working through them

More information

The Consumer, the Firm, and an Economy

The Consumer, the Firm, and an Economy Andrew McLennan October 28, 2014 Economics 7250 Advanced Mathematical Techniques for Economics Second Semester 2014 Lecture 15 The Consumer, the Firm, and an Economy I. Introduction A. The material discussed

More information

T R(y(L)) w L = 0. L so we can write this as p ] (b) Recall that with the perfectly competitive firm, demand for labor was such that

T R(y(L)) w L = 0. L so we can write this as p ] (b) Recall that with the perfectly competitive firm, demand for labor was such that Problem Set 11: Solutions ECO 301: Intermediate Microeconomics Prof. Marek Weretka Problem 1 (Monopoly and the Labor Market) (a) We find the optimal demand for labor for a monopoly firm (in the goods market

More information

General Equilibrium and Welfare

General Equilibrium and Welfare and Welfare Lectures 2 and 3, ECON 4240 Spring 2017 University of Oslo 24.01.2017 and 31.01.2017 1/37 Outline General equilibrium: look at many markets at the same time. Here all prices determined in the

More information

Microeconomics Qualifying Exam

Microeconomics Qualifying Exam Summer 2013 Microeconomics Qualifying Exam There are 72 points possible on this exam, 36 points each for Prof. Lozada s questions and Prof. Kiefer s questions. However, Prof. Lozada s questions are weighted

More information

Conjectural Variations in Aggregative Games: An Evolutionary Perspective

Conjectural Variations in Aggregative Games: An Evolutionary Perspective Conjectural Variations in Aggregative Games: An Evolutionary Perspective Alex Possajennikov University of Nottingham January 2012 Abstract Suppose that in aggregative games, in which a player s payoff

More information

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis Solutions to Midterm Exam

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis Solutions to Midterm Exam Advanced Microeconomic Analsis Solutions to Midterm Exam Q1. (0 pts) An individual consumes two goods x 1 x and his utilit function is: u(x 1 x ) = [min(x 1 + x x 1 + x )] (a) Draw some indifference curves

More information

On revealed preferences in oligopoly games

On revealed preferences in oligopoly games University of Manchester, UK November 25, 2010 Introduction Suppose we make a finite set of observations T = {1,..., m}, m 1, of a perfectly homogeneous-good oligopoly market. There is a finite number

More information

Game Theory Review Questions

Game Theory Review Questions Game Theory Review Questions Sérgio O. Parreiras All Rights Reserved 2014 0.1 Repeated Games What is the difference between a sequence of actions and a strategy in a twicerepeated game? Express a strategy

More information

Oligopoly. Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 Spring 2009

Oligopoly. Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 Spring 2009 Oligopoly Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 Spring 2009 1 Oligopoly A monopoly is an industry consisting a single firm. A duopoly is an industry consisting of two firms. An oligopoly is an industry

More information

Econ 8601: Industrial Organization (Thomas J. Holmes) Lecture 1. Part 1: The Cost of Monopoly in General Equilibrium. μ 1

Econ 8601: Industrial Organization (Thomas J. Holmes) Lecture 1. Part 1: The Cost of Monopoly in General Equilibrium. μ 1 Econ 8601: Industrial Organization (Thomas J. Holmes) Lecture 1 Part 1: The Cost of Monopoly in General Equilibrium Set of goods [0, 1], x [0, 1] aparticulargood. Utility function of representative consumer

More information

Deceptive Advertising with Rational Buyers

Deceptive Advertising with Rational Buyers Deceptive Advertising with Rational Buyers September 6, 016 ONLINE APPENDIX In this Appendix we present in full additional results and extensions which are only mentioned in the paper. In the exposition

More information

In the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Microeconomics 1. Graduate School of Management and Economics. Dr. S.

In the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Microeconomics 1. Graduate School of Management and Economics. Dr. S. In the Name of God Sharif University of Technology Graduate School of Management and Economics Microeconomics 1 44715 (1396-97 1 st term) - Group 1 Dr. S. Farshad Fatemi Chapter 10: Competitive Markets

More information

where u is the decision-maker s payoff function over her actions and S is the set of her feasible actions.

where u is the decision-maker s payoff function over her actions and S is the set of her feasible actions. Seminars on Mathematics for Economics and Finance Topic 3: Optimization - interior optima 1 Session: 11-12 Aug 2015 (Thu/Fri) 10:00am 1:00pm I. Optimization: introduction Decision-makers (e.g. consumers,

More information

EconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 2018

EconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 2018 EconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 018 Show all your work clearly and make sure you justify all your answers. NAME 1. Consider the market for smart pencil in which only one firm (Superapiz) enjoys a

More information

Mathematics for Economics ECON MA/MSSc in Economics-2017/2018. Dr. W. M. Semasinghe Senior Lecturer Department of Economics

Mathematics for Economics ECON MA/MSSc in Economics-2017/2018. Dr. W. M. Semasinghe Senior Lecturer Department of Economics Mathematics for Economics ECON 53035 MA/MSSc in Economics-2017/2018 Dr. W. M. Semasinghe Senior Lecturer Department of Economics MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS LERNING OUTCOMES: By the end of this course unit

More information

GS/ECON 5010 Answers to Assignment 3 W2005

GS/ECON 5010 Answers to Assignment 3 W2005 GS/ECON 500 Answers to Assignment 3 W005 Q. What are the market price, and aggregate quantity sold, in long run equilibrium in a perfectly competitive market f which the demand function has the equation

More information

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016 UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016 More on strategic games and extensive games with perfect information Block 2 Jun 12, 2016 Food for thought LUPI Many players

More information

EC3224 Autumn Lecture #03 Applications of Nash Equilibrium

EC3224 Autumn Lecture #03 Applications of Nash Equilibrium Reading EC3224 Autumn Lecture #03 Applications of Nash Equilibrium Osborne Chapter 3 By the end of this week you should be able to: apply Nash equilibrium to oligopoly games, voting games and other examples.

More information

Katz and Shapiro (1985)

Katz and Shapiro (1985) Katz and Shapiro (1985) 1 The paper studies the compatibility choice of competing firms in industries with network externalities. Also investigated are the social vs. private incentives of compatibility

More information

EconS Nash Equilibrium in Games with Continuous Action Spaces.

EconS Nash Equilibrium in Games with Continuous Action Spaces. EconS 424 - Nash Equilibrium in Games with Continuous Action Spaces. Félix Muñoz-García Washington State University fmunoz@wsu.edu February 7, 2014 Félix Muñoz-García (WSU) EconS 424 - Recitation 3 February

More information

October 16, 2018 Notes on Cournot. 1. Teaching Cournot Equilibrium

October 16, 2018 Notes on Cournot. 1. Teaching Cournot Equilibrium October 1, 2018 Notes on Cournot 1. Teaching Cournot Equilibrium Typically Cournot equilibrium is taught with identical zero or constant-mc cost functions for the two firms, because that is simpler. I

More information

EXAMINATION #4 ANSWER KEY. I. Multiple choice (1)a. (2)e. (3)b. (4)b. (5)d. (6)c. (7)b. (8)b. (9)c. (10)b. (11)b.

EXAMINATION #4 ANSWER KEY. I. Multiple choice (1)a. (2)e. (3)b. (4)b. (5)d. (6)c. (7)b. (8)b. (9)c. (10)b. (11)b. William M. Boal Version A EXAMINATION #4 ANSWER KEY I. Multiple choice (1)a. ()e. (3)b. (4)b. (5)d. (6)c. (7)b. (8)b. (9)c. (10)b. (11)b. II. Short answer (1) a. 4 units of food b. 1/4 units of clothing

More information

Oligopoly. Firm s Profit Maximization Firm i s profit maximization problem: Static oligopoly model with n firms producing homogenous product.

Oligopoly. Firm s Profit Maximization Firm i s profit maximization problem: Static oligopoly model with n firms producing homogenous product. Oligopoly Static oligopoly model with n firms producing homogenous product. Firm s Profit Maximization Firm i s profit maximization problem: Max qi P(Q)q i C i (q i ) P(Q): inverse demand curve: p = P(Q)

More information

ECON 255 Introduction to Mathematical Economics

ECON 255 Introduction to Mathematical Economics Page 1 of 5 FINAL EXAMINATION Winter 2017 Introduction to Mathematical Economics April 20, 2017 TIME ALLOWED: 3 HOURS NUMBER IN THE LIST: STUDENT NUMBER: NAME: SIGNATURE: INSTRUCTIONS 1. This examination

More information

University of Warwick, Department of Economics Spring Final Exam. Answer TWO questions. All questions carry equal weight. Time allowed 2 hours.

University of Warwick, Department of Economics Spring Final Exam. Answer TWO questions. All questions carry equal weight. Time allowed 2 hours. University of Warwick, Department of Economics Spring 2012 EC941: Game Theory Prof. Francesco Squintani Final Exam Answer TWO questions. All questions carry equal weight. Time allowed 2 hours. 1. Consider

More information

Ralph s Strategic Disclosure 1

Ralph s Strategic Disclosure 1 Ralph s Strategic Disclosure Ralph manages a firm that operates in a duopoly Both Ralph s (privatevalue) production cost and (common-value) inverse demand are uncertain Ralph s (constant marginal) production

More information

Oligopoly Theory 2 Bertrand Market Games

Oligopoly Theory 2 Bertrand Market Games 1/10 Oligopoly Theory 2 Bertrand Market Games May 4, 2014 2/10 Outline 1 Bertrand Market Game 2 Bertrand Paradox 3 Asymmetric Firms 3/10 Bertrand Duopoly Market Game Discontinuous Payoff Functions (1 p

More information

EC476 Contracts and Organizations, Part III: Lecture 2

EC476 Contracts and Organizations, Part III: Lecture 2 EC476 Contracts and Organizations, Part III: Lecture 2 Leonardo Felli 32L.G.06 19 January 2015 Moral Hazard: Consider the contractual relationship between two agents (a principal and an agent) The principal

More information

Solutions for Assignment #2 for Environmental and Resource Economics Economics 359M, Spring 2017

Solutions for Assignment #2 for Environmental and Resource Economics Economics 359M, Spring 2017 Solutions for Assignment #2 for Environmental and Resource Economics Economics 59M, Spring 207 Due date: Wednesday, March, 207 A. Kolstad, Ch., problem. Ans. (a) The Pareto criterion fails completeness,

More information

Answer Key for M. A. Economics Entrance Examination 2017 (Main version)

Answer Key for M. A. Economics Entrance Examination 2017 (Main version) Answer Key for M. A. Economics Entrance Examination 2017 (Main version) July 4, 2017 1. Person A lexicographically prefers good x to good y, i.e., when comparing two bundles of x and y, she strictly prefers

More information

= 2 = 1.5. Figure 4.1: WARP violated

= 2 = 1.5. Figure 4.1: WARP violated Chapter 4 The Consumer Exercise 4.1 You observe a consumer in two situations: with an income of $100 he buys 5 units of good 1 at a price of $10 per unit and 10 units of good 2 at a price of $5 per unit.

More information

Static (or Simultaneous- Move) Games of Complete Information

Static (or Simultaneous- Move) Games of Complete Information Static (or Simultaneous- Move) Games of Complete Information Introduction to Games Normal (or Strategic) Form Representation Teoria dos Jogos - Filomena Garcia 1 Outline of Static Games of Complete Information

More information

CHAPTER 4: HIGHER ORDER DERIVATIVES. Likewise, we may define the higher order derivatives. f(x, y, z) = xy 2 + e zx. y = 2xy.

CHAPTER 4: HIGHER ORDER DERIVATIVES. Likewise, we may define the higher order derivatives. f(x, y, z) = xy 2 + e zx. y = 2xy. April 15, 2009 CHAPTER 4: HIGHER ORDER DERIVATIVES In this chapter D denotes an open subset of R n. 1. Introduction Definition 1.1. Given a function f : D R we define the second partial derivatives as

More information

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2016

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2016 Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2016 The time limit for this exam is four hours. The exam has four sections. Each section includes two questions.

More information

Test code: ME I/ME II, 2004 Syllabus for ME I. Matrix Algebra: Matrices and Vectors, Matrix Operations, Determinants,

Test code: ME I/ME II, 2004 Syllabus for ME I. Matrix Algebra: Matrices and Vectors, Matrix Operations, Determinants, Test code: ME I/ME II, 004 Syllabus for ME I Matri Algebra: Matrices and Vectors, Matri Operations, Determinants, Nonsingularity, Inversion, Cramer s rule. Calculus: Limits, Continuity, Differentiation

More information

Game theory lecture 4. September 24, 2012

Game theory lecture 4. September 24, 2012 September 24, 2012 Finding Nash equilibrium Best-response or best-reply functions. We introduced Nash-equilibrium as a profile of actions (an action for each player) such that no player has an incentive

More information

Lecture #11: Introduction to the New Empirical Industrial Organization (NEIO) -

Lecture #11: Introduction to the New Empirical Industrial Organization (NEIO) - Lecture #11: Introduction to the New Empirical Industrial Organization (NEIO) - What is the old empirical IO? The old empirical IO refers to studies that tried to draw inferences about the relationship

More information

EconS Advanced Microeconomics II Handout on Subgame Perfect Equilibrium (SPNE)

EconS Advanced Microeconomics II Handout on Subgame Perfect Equilibrium (SPNE) EconS 3 - Advanced Microeconomics II Handout on Subgame Perfect Equilibrium (SPNE). Based on MWG 9.B.3 Consider the three-player nite game of perfect information depicted in gure. L R Player 3 l r a b

More information

ECO 2901 EMPIRICAL INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION

ECO 2901 EMPIRICAL INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION ECO 2901 EMPIRICAL INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION Lecture 7 & 8: Models of Competition in Prices & Quantities Victor Aguirregabiria (University of Toronto) Toronto. Winter 2018 Victor Aguirregabiria () Empirical

More information

Self-test for applicants M.Sc. Economics

Self-test for applicants M.Sc. Economics Self-test for applicants M.Sc. Economics First of all, we thank you for considering the Friedrich Schiller University Jena, and in particular this master program in economics, for your future academic

More information

Math Review ECON 300: Spring 2014 Benjamin A. Jones MATH/CALCULUS REVIEW

Math Review ECON 300: Spring 2014 Benjamin A. Jones MATH/CALCULUS REVIEW MATH/CALCULUS REVIEW SLOPE, INTERCEPT, and GRAPHS REVIEW (adapted from Paul s Online Math Notes) Let s start with some basic review material to make sure everybody is on the same page. The slope of a line

More information

September Math Course: First Order Derivative

September Math Course: First Order Derivative September Math Course: First Order Derivative Arina Nikandrova Functions Function y = f (x), where x is either be a scalar or a vector of several variables (x,..., x n ), can be thought of as a rule which

More information

GARP and Afriat s Theorem Production

GARP and Afriat s Theorem Production GARP and Afriat s Theorem Production Econ 2100 Fall 2017 Lecture 8, September 21 Outline 1 Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preferences 2 Afriat s Theorem 3 Production Sets and Production Functions 4 Profits

More information

Economics 101. Lecture 2 - The Walrasian Model and Consumer Choice

Economics 101. Lecture 2 - The Walrasian Model and Consumer Choice Economics 101 Lecture 2 - The Walrasian Model and Consumer Choice 1 Uncle Léon The canonical model of exchange in economics is sometimes referred to as the Walrasian Model, after the early economist Léon

More information

Introduction to General Equilibrium: Framework.

Introduction to General Equilibrium: Framework. Introduction to General Equilibrium: Framework. Economy: I consumers, i = 1,...I. J firms, j = 1,...J. L goods, l = 1,...L Initial Endowment of good l in the economy: ω l 0, l = 1,...L. Consumer i : preferences

More information

CHAPTER 3: OPTIMIZATION

CHAPTER 3: OPTIMIZATION John Riley 8 February 7 CHAPTER 3: OPTIMIZATION 3. TWO VARIABLES 8 Second Order Conditions Implicit Function Theorem 3. UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION 4 Necessary and Sufficient Conditions 3.3 CONSTRAINED

More information

Department of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. May 2009

Department of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. May 2009 Department of Agricultural Economics PhD Qualifier Examination May 009 Instructions: The exam consists of six questions. You must answer all questions. If you need an assumption to complete a question,

More information

Part I: Exercise of Monopoly Power. Chapter 1: Monopoly. Two assumptions: A1. Quality of goods is known by consumers; A2. No price discrimination.

Part I: Exercise of Monopoly Power. Chapter 1: Monopoly. Two assumptions: A1. Quality of goods is known by consumers; A2. No price discrimination. Part I: Exercise of Monopoly Power Chapter 1: Monopoly Two assumptions: A1. Quality of goods is known by consumers; A2. No price discrimination. Best known monopoly distortion: p>mc DWL (section 1). Other

More information

Functions. A function is a rule that gives exactly one output number to each input number.

Functions. A function is a rule that gives exactly one output number to each input number. Functions A function is a rule that gives exactly one output number to each input number. Why it is important to us? The set of all input numbers to which the rule applies is called the domain of the function.

More information

Final Exam Review Packet

Final Exam Review Packet 1 Exam 1 Material Sections A.1, A.2 and A.6 were review material. There will not be specific questions focused on this material but you should know how to: Simplify functions with exponents. Factor quadratics

More information

Final Exam Review Packet

Final Exam Review Packet 1 Exam 1 Material Sections A.1, A.2 and A.6 were review material. There will not be specific questions focused on this material but you should know how to: Simplify functions with exponents. Factor quadratics

More information

Topic 3: Application of Differential Calculus in

Topic 3: Application of Differential Calculus in Mathematics 2 for Business Schools Topic 3: Application of Differential Calculus in Economics Building Competence. Crossing Borders. Spring Semester 2017 Learning objectives After finishing this section

More information

Low-Quality Leadership in a Vertically Differentiated Duopoly with Cournot Competition

Low-Quality Leadership in a Vertically Differentiated Duopoly with Cournot Competition Low-Quality Leadership in a Vertically Differentiated Duopoly with Cournot Competition Luca Lambertini Alessandro Tampieri Quaderni - Working Paper DSE N 750 Low-Quality Leadership in a Vertically Di erentiated

More information

The Monopolist. The Pure Monopolist with symmetric D matrix

The Monopolist. The Pure Monopolist with symmetric D matrix University of California, Davis Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics ARE 252 Optimization with Economic Applications Lecture Notes 5 Quirino Paris The Monopolist.................................................................

More information

Game Theory. Monika Köppl-Turyna. Winter 2017/2018. Institute for Analytical Economics Vienna University of Economics and Business

Game Theory. Monika Köppl-Turyna. Winter 2017/2018. Institute for Analytical Economics Vienna University of Economics and Business Monika Köppl-Turyna Institute for Analytical Economics Vienna University of Economics and Business Winter 2017/2018 Static Games of Incomplete Information Introduction So far we assumed that payoff functions

More information

Econ 121b: Intermediate Microeconomics

Econ 121b: Intermediate Microeconomics Econ 121b: Intermediate Microeconomics Dirk Bergemann, Spring 2011 Week of 1/8-1/14 1 Lecture 1: Introduction 1.1 What s Economics? This is an exciting time to study economics, even though may not be so

More information

On Hotelling s Stability in Competition

On Hotelling s Stability in Competition On Hotelling s Stability in Competition Claude d Aspremont, Jean Jaskold Gabszewicz and Jacques-François Thisse Manuscript received March, 1978; revision received June, 1978 Abstract The purpose of this

More information

Chapter 7. Endogenous Growth II: R&D and Technological Change

Chapter 7. Endogenous Growth II: R&D and Technological Change Chapter 7 Endogenous Growth II: R&D and Technological Change 225 Economic Growth: Lecture Notes 7.1 Expanding Product Variety: The Romer Model There are three sectors: one for the final good sector, one

More information

Overview. Producer Theory. Consumer Theory. Exchange

Overview. Producer Theory. Consumer Theory. Exchange Overview Consumer Producer Exchange Edgeworth Box All Possible Exchange Points Contract Curve Overview Consumer Producer Exchange (Multiplicity) Walrasian Equilibrium Walrasian Equilibrium Requirements:

More information

Introduction to Game Theory

Introduction to Game Theory Introduction to Game Theory Part 2. Dynamic games of complete information Chapter 2. Two-stage games of complete but imperfect information Ciclo Profissional 2 o Semestre / 2011 Graduação em Ciências Econômicas

More information

3. Partial Equilibrium under Imperfect Competition Competitive Equilibrium

3. Partial Equilibrium under Imperfect Competition Competitive Equilibrium 3. Imperfect Competition 3. Partial Equilirium under Imperfect Competition Competitive Equilirium Partial equilirium studies the existence of equilirium in the market of a given commodity and analyzes

More information

Differentiation. 1. What is a Derivative? CHAPTER 5

Differentiation. 1. What is a Derivative? CHAPTER 5 CHAPTER 5 Differentiation Differentiation is a technique that enables us to find out how a function changes when its argument changes It is an essential tool in economics If you have done A-level maths,

More information

Bayesian Games and Mechanism Design Definition of Bayes Equilibrium

Bayesian Games and Mechanism Design Definition of Bayes Equilibrium Bayesian Games and Mechanism Design Definition of Bayes Equilibrium Harsanyi [1967] What happens when players do not know one another s payoffs? Games of incomplete information versus games of imperfect

More information

Backwards Induction. Extensive-Form Representation. Backwards Induction (cont ) The player 2 s optimization problem in the second stage

Backwards Induction. Extensive-Form Representation. Backwards Induction (cont ) The player 2 s optimization problem in the second stage Lecture Notes II- Dynamic Games of Complete Information Extensive Form Representation (Game tree Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium Repeated Games Trigger Strategy Dynamic Games of Complete Information Dynamic

More information

Growing competition in electricity industry and the power source structure

Growing competition in electricity industry and the power source structure Growing competition in electricity industry and the power source structure Hiroaki Ino Institute of Intellectual Property and Toshihiro Matsumura Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo [Preliminary

More information

Empirical Industrial Organization (ECO 310) University of Toronto. Department of Economics Fall Instructor: Victor Aguirregabiria

Empirical Industrial Organization (ECO 310) University of Toronto. Department of Economics Fall Instructor: Victor Aguirregabiria Empirical Industrial Organization (ECO 30) University of Toronto. Department of Economics Fall 208. Instructor: Victor Aguirregabiria FINAL EXAM Tuesday, December 8th, 208. From 7pm to 9pm (2 hours) Exam

More information

Wireless Network Pricing Chapter 6: Oligopoly Pricing

Wireless Network Pricing Chapter 6: Oligopoly Pricing Wireless Network Pricing Chapter 6: Oligopoly Pricing Jianwei Huang & Lin Gao Network Communications and Economics Lab (NCEL) Information Engineering Department The Chinese University of Hong Kong Huang

More information