arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.soft] 5 May 2006

Transcription

1 Shear-induced crstallization of a dense rapid granular flow: hdrodnamics beond the melting point? Evgeni Khain and Baruch Meerson 2 Department of Phsics and Michigan Center for Theoretical Phsics, The Universit of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 489 and 2 Racah Institute of Phsics, Hebrew Universit of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 994, Israel arxiv:cond-mat/6534v cond-mat.soft] 5 Ma 26 We investigate shear-induced crstallization in a ver dense flow of mono-disperse inelastic hard spheres. We consider a stead plane Couette flow under constant pressure and neglect gravit. We assume that the granular densit is greater than the melting point of the equilibrium phase diagram of elastic hard spheres. We emplo a Navier-Stokes hdrodnamics with constitutive relations all of which except the shear viscosit) diverge at the crstal packing densit, while the shear viscosit diverges at a smaller densit. The phase diagram of the stead flow is described b three parameters: an effective Mach number, a scaled energ loss parameter, and an integer number m: the number of half-oscillations in a mechanical analog that appears in this problem. In a stead shear flow the viscous heating is balanced b energ dissipation via inelastic collisions. This balance can have different forms, producing either a uniform shear flow or a variet of more complicated, nonlinear densit, velocit and temperature profiles. In particular, the model predicts a variet of multi-laer two-phase stead shear flows with sharp interphase boundaries. Such a flow ma include a few zeroshear solid-like) laers, each of which moving as a whole, separated b fluid-like regions. As we are dealing with a hard sphere model, the granulate is fluidized within the solid laers: the granular temperature is non-zero there, and there is energ flow through the boundaries of the solid laers. A linear stabilit analsis of the uniform stead shear flow is performed, and a plausible bifurcation diagram of the sstem, for a fixed m, is suggested. The problem of selection of m remains open. PACS numbers: 45.7.Mg, 83.5.Ax I. INTRODUCTION In spite of extensive experimental and theoretical studies of dense granular flows, a theoretical description of these flows remains challenging ]. Multi-particle contacts and friction, intrinsic in slow dense flows, invalidate the kinetic theor 2, 3]. Furthermore, even rapid dense flowsthat is, flows dominated b binar collisions) present significant difficulties for analsis. Dilute and moderatel dense flows of mono-disperse inelastic hard sphere fluids are describable, for not too high inelasticit of collisions, b Navier-Stokes hdrodnamics 3], which can be derived in a sstematic wa from the kinetic theor: a one-particle kinetic equation properl generalized to account for inelastic collisions 2, 3]. Hdrodnamic equations, that is conservation laws for the mass and momentum of the granulate, and a balance equation for the energ, ma still be valid, for a hard sphere fluid, at higher densities, after the disorder-order transition occurs. However, the respective constitutive relations are not derivable from a kinetic equation anmore. In this work we attempt to address this difficult and suggest a possible hdrodnamic description of a sheared rapid granular flow that exhibits crstallization. Shearinduced ordering in a dense granular medium has attracted much recent attention. It was investigated experimentall usuall for slow flows) b man groups 4, 5, 6]. The crstallization dnamics in inelastic hard sphere fluids has been also extensivel studied in MD simulations 7, 8]. In this work we will be dealing with an idealized model of inelastic particle collisions characterized b a constant coefficient of normal restitution r, and focus on a plane shear flow. The present work is a next step in a series of recent attempts of extending granular hdrodnamics of inelastic hard sphere fluids to high densities 9,, ]. Grossman et al. 9] investigated a prototpical sstem of inelastic hard disks at zero gravit, placed in a two-dimensional rectangular box, one wall of which serving as a thermal wall. Grossman et al. suggested an equation of state, granular heat conductivit and inelastic energ loss rate which interpolated between the dilute limit and the close vicinit of the hexagonal close packing, where freevolume arguments are available. The densit profiles, obtained b solving the hdrostatic equations numericall, were in good agreement with the results of MD simulations 9]. Meerson et al. ] considered a similar twodimensional granular sstem, but with gravit. The sstemwasdrivenfrombelowba thermal base. Emploing the constitutive relations suggested b Grossman et al. 9], Meerson and coworkers found stead-state densit and temperature profiles and observed good agreement with MD simulations, including the region of the levitating cluster, where the densit is ver close to that of hexagonal close packing ]. Bocquet et al. ] emploed hdrodnamic equations to model a granular shear flow where the densit approached the random close packing densit. The also compared their theor with experiment in a circular Couette flow ]. As a shear flow was present, Bocquet and coworkers had to specif, in addition to the rest of the

2 2 constitutive relations, the coefficient of shear viscosit. In experiment the granular temperature had been found to decrease more slowl, with an increase of the distance from the shear surface, than the velocit. To account for this finding, Bocquet et al. assumed that the shear viscosit diverges more rapidl, at random close packing, than the rest of the transport coefficients. We emplo in this work Navier-Stokes granular hdrodnamics for a description of a stead crstallized shear flow of an assembl of mono-disperse inelastic hard spheres under constant pressure. Our approach is similar to that taken b Bocquet et al. ], with two important differences. First, we focus on the ordered crstalline phase which ends at the crstalhexagonal or facecentered cubic) close packing densit φ fcc, whereas Bocquet et al. considered the metastable disordered phase which ends at the random close packing densit φ rcp. Second, we assume that the shear viscosit diverges at a smaller densit than the rest of transport coefficients, see below. This assumption brings about the possibilit of a two-phase stead flow. In general, a granular shear flow reaches a stead state when the viscous heating makes up for the energ dissipation via inelastic collisions. As we show here, this balance can be achieved in different was, producing either a uniform shear flow, or a variet of flows with nonlinear densit, velocit and temperature profiles. Working in the range of densities beond the melting point, we determine the phase diagram of dense stead flows in terms of three parameters: an effective Mach number, a scaled energ loss parameter, and an integer number m: the number of half-oscillations in a mechanical analog that appears in this problem. There are regions on this phase diagram where two or more different stead flow solutions are possible for the same values of the parameters. To get an additional insight, we perform a linear stabilit analsis of the uniform stead shear flow. Based on these results, we suggest a plausible bifurcation diagram of the sstem which, in some region of the parameter space, describes bistabilit and hsteresis. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Sec. 2 we introduce our shear-induced crstallization scenario and the governing hdrodnamic equations and constitutive relations. Section 3 describes our model of a zerogravit constant-pressure shear flow and focuses on the analsis of a crstallized stead shear flow in different regimes. Section 4 presents a linear stabilit analsis of the uniform shear flow solution and suggests a plausible bifurcation diagram of the sstem. Details of the linear stabilit analsis are presented in the Appendix. Section 5 includes a brief discussion and summar of our results. II. PRESSURE-DENSITY DIAGRAM AND HYDRODYNAMIC EQUATIONS Figure depicts, in the coordinates volume fraction - pressure, the phase diagram of a homogeneous macroscopic sstem of elastic hard spheres 2]. The volume fraction φ = π/6)d 3 n where n is the particle number densit, and d is the particle diameter) changes from zero to φ fcc = 2π/6.74, the densit of crstal either hexagonal, or face-centered cubic) close packing, the densest possible packing of spheres in three dimensions. The phase diagram includes four branches. The disordered, or gas/liquid branch starts at φ = and continues until the freezing point that occurs at φ.494. Then this branch splits into two branches. The horizontal constant pressure) branch describes coexistence of the disordered and ordered phases. It starts at the freezing point and ends at the melting point at φ.545. At larger volume fractions the sstem is in the ordered crstalline phase that ends at the densit of the crstal close packing φ fcc. The last branch is a metastable extension of the gas/fluid branch. It starts at the freezing point and ends at random close packing at φ rcp.64. Clearl, each branch is described b a separate equation of state. The phase diagram, presented in Fig., appears in the context of a homogeneous sstem in either equilibrium, or a metastable state. Granular sstems are usuall inhomogeneous and, no less important, the are intrinsicall far from equilibrium, due to inelastic collisions between particles. We will deal, however, with a small inelasticit of particle collisions and, in the spirit of kinetic theor 2, 3], assume that the sstem is everwhere close to local thermodnamic equilibrium, so the phase diagramand the constitutive relations presented below) are valid locall. Let the fluid densit be sufficientl large, so that the volume fraction is everwhere above the melting point. There are two possible phases here. One of them is the disordered phase the the metastable branch in Fig. ), the other one is the crstallized phase. Each of the two phases, disordered and ordered, can have inhomogeneous temperature and densit profiles, without violating the constanc of the pressure. Furthermore, domains of disordered phase can in principle coexist with domains of the ordered phases again, without violating the constanc of the pressure). Shear-induced crstallization apparentl represents a non-equilibrium) phase transition, so that the metastable disordered branch gives wa, everwhere, to the stable ordered branch. This work addresses ver dense flows, where the volume fraction is close to that of the crstalline close packing, φ fcc φ φ fcc. We assume that the ordered crstalline branch of the phase diagram see Fig. ) has alread won in the competition with the disordered branch. To describe a flow in this phase, one needs hdrodnamic equations. These represent the mass conservation dn dt the momentum conservation n dv dt n v =, ) = P ng, 2)

3 3 Pressure P) Metastable branch Freezing Volume fraction φ) To RCP Melting.74 To FCC Close packed) FIG. : Phase diagram of elastic hard sphere fluid, see text. and the energ balance 3 2 n dt dt = QP : v Γ, 3) where Γ is the energ loss rate due to the inelasticit of binar collisions. Here nr, t) is the number densit of grains, Tr,t) is the granular temperature, vr,t) is the mean flow velocit, P is the stress tensor, g is the gravit acceleration, Q is the heat flux, and d/dt = / tv is the total derivative. In the following we will put the particlemasstounit. ThestresstensorPcanbewritten as P = pn,t)µn,t)trd)]i2ηn,t) ˆD, 4) where D = /2) v v) T] 5) is the rate of deformation tensor, ˆD = D trd)i 6) 3 is the deviatoric part of D, and I is the identit tensor. We assume that the heat flux Q is given b the Fourier law Q = κn,t) T. 7) Similarl to dilute 3] and moderatel dense 4] rapid granularflows, therecanbeanadditionaltermineq.7), proportional to the densit gradient. This term must vanish as r, and it can be neglected in the nearl elastic limit q that we are interested in throughout this paper. To make the formulation complete, one needs constitutive relations: the equation of state p = pn,t) and the dependences of the transport coefficients µ, η and κ, and of the energ loss rate Γ on n and T. For small and moderate densities, these relations can be derived from the Boltzmann or Enskog equation, properl generalized to account for inelastic collisions 2, 3]. For ver large densities, that we are interested in, one can use free volume arguments 5]. The resulting equation of state is p = p n 2 c T n c n, 8) where n c = 2/d 3 is the particle number densit at close packing, and p is a numerical factor of order unit. Here and in the followingwewill write n c insteadofn fcc facecentered cubic). The temperature dependence in Eq. 8) is exact. We assume that all transport coefficients except for the shear viscosit η, see below), diverge like n c n) near the close packing densit 9]. Therefore, one can write the bulk viscosit coefficient µn,t), the thermal conductivit κn, T), and the energ loss rate Γn,T) in the following form µ = µ n c T /2 n c n)d 2, κ = κ n c T /2 n c n)d 2, Γ = Γ r 2 ) n 2 c T 3/2 n c n)d. 9) Equations9)arevalidinthelimitn c n n c. Thetemperature dependences are exact. The numerical factors µ, κ, and Γ are of order unit and presentl unknown; the can be found in MD simulations. The same tpe of divergence of the transport coefficients again, except for the coefficient of shear viscosit η) was assumed in Ref. ], but in the vicinit of the random close packing densit. There is a recent evidence in the literature that the shear viscosit coefficient η of elastic hard disk fluid grows faster with the densit, at high densities, than the rest of the transport coefficients 6]. We believe that this behavior remains qualitativel correct also for three dimensional sstems. Bocquet et al. ] accounted for this fact in their description of the plane shear flow near the random close packing densit. The proposed, b analog with the behavior of supercooled liquids above the glass transition, that the shear viscosit coefficient diverges at random close packing densit, but with a larger exponent: η n rcp n) β, β >. In our model of a crstallized shear flow we suggest a different approach. We will accommodate a recent finding of Luding et al. 6] that the shear viscosit coefficient diverges like n c n) at a densit n c < n c : η = η n c T /2 n c n)d 2, ) where η is a numerical factor of order unit, which is presentl unknown. Divergence of the shear viscosit implies that the fluid is jammed on a macroscopic length scale. While a shear flow in a macroscopicall jammed sstem is impossible, the sstem of hard spheres ma still

4 4 have finite temperature, pressure, heat conduction, and collisional energ loss. There are arguments in the literature see, e.g., Santos et al. 7]) that stead sheared states of granular fluids are intrinsicall non-newtonian that is, require a description beond Navier-Stokes order). Wh are such effects not included in our description? The reason is that non-newtonian effects arise when one treats the inelasticit of particle collisions in a non-perturbative wa postulating that the Boltzmann equation, generalized to inelastic collisions, remains applicable for finite inelasticit). In this paper we work in the limit of nearl elastic particle collisions. In the first order in the inelasticit one does not need to take into account an inelasticit corrections to the transport coefficients for example, to the shear viscosit). The onl place where the inelasticit enters in this leading-order theor is the inelastic loss term Γ in the energ equation 3). III. STEADY SHEAR FLOW CLOSE TO CRYSTALLIZATION Now let us introduce the flowsetting we will be dealing with in the rest of the paper. We consider a plane Couette geometr. The model sstem is infinite in the horizontal x) direction and driven b the upper wall = H that moves horizontall with velocit u. The lower wall = is at rest of course, in the absence of gravit the upper and lower walls are interchangeable). The height H of the laer in this setting is not fixed. Instead, the upper wall is maintained at a constant pressure P, like in a recent experiment b Gollub s group 5]. As alread mentioned above, we assume a ver dense flow, so that the volume fraction is close everwhere to that of close packing: φ fcc φ φ fcc. As we consider a stead horizontal motion, the number densit n, the granular temperature T and the horizontal velocit u depend onl on the vertical coordinate. Then it follows from the -component of the momentum equation 2) that the pressure is constant throughout the sstem: p) = P. ) Now we write down the x-component of the momentum equation 2) and rewrite the energ balance equation 3): d η du ) =, d d d κ dt ) ) 2 du η Γn,T) =, 2) d d d where the constitutive relations are given b Eqs. 8)- ). Equations 8)-2) must be complemented b boundar conditions. We will assume rough walls and no-slip boundar conditions for the horizontal velocit: u = ) =, u = H) = u. The problem of evaluation of the granular heat flux at the rough walls was addressed b Chou 8]. He considered a model where inelastic spheres were driven b walls with attached halfspheres bump walls.) Extending an earlier treatment b Richman 9], Chou calculated the heat flux and the slip velocit at the boundaries. He showed that the heat flux at the boundaries can be positive or negative, depending on whether the slip work is larger or smaller than the energ loss due to inelastic particle collisions with the walls. For some values of parameters the total heat flux to the boundaries vanishes 8]. For simplicit, we will assume a vanishing heat flux and therefore prescribe dt/d = ) = dt/d = H) =. The total number of particles is conserved, which ields a normalization condition for the densit: H n)d = N, where N isthe numberofparticlesperunit areainthe xz plane. Let us rescale the vertical coordinate b the a priori unknown) sstem height H, the horizontal velocit u b the upper plate velocit u, the densit n b the closepacking densit n c, and the temperature T b the ratio P /n c of the constant applied pressure and close-packing densit. Rewriting the equations in the scaled form, we obtain η MT /2 κ λ n d T /2 d du d T p n =, ) du =, λ n d ) d T /2 dt d n d ) 2 Γ 2RT 3/2 =, 3) κ n where M = n c u 2 /P is the square of the effective Mach number of the flow, and λ = n c/n c is a small positive numerical factor. For simplicit, the three presentl unknown constants p = O), η /κ = O) and Γ /κ = O) are taken to be unit in the following. As the sstem height is unknown a priori, the scaled quantit R = r 2 )H 2 /2d 2 ) must be determined from the solution of the problem. From the first of Eqs. 3) we find a simple relation between the scaled densit and temperature: T) = n). Then, introducing a convenient auxiliar variable ǫ) = n)] /2, we rewrite the remaining Eqs. 3) as du 2c d = M ǫ 2 λ ǫ, 4) d 2 ǫ cλ c R)ǫ =, 5) d2 ǫ where c is an unknown constant to be found from the solution of the problem. The boundar and normalization conditions are u = ) =, u = ) =,

5 5 dǫ dǫ = ) = = ) =, d d ǫ) 2 ] d = f R/2, 6) where f = r 2 ) /2 Nd 2 /2. The stead flow equations 4)-6) include two known) scaled parameters: M and f. There are five unknown parameters in the problem: c, R and three arbitrar constants which determine the solutions of the ordinar differential equations 4) and 5) for u) and ǫ), respectivel. Correspondingl, there are five conditions 6) to determine the unknown parameters. In the following, when solving the equations numericall, we put λ =.5. Before we get into a detailed description of the stead flowsolutionsofeqs. 4)-6), hereisanoverviewofthe results. Strikingl, there is an infinite number of stead flow solutions. The all can be parameterized b three parameters: the scaled numbers M and f and an integer number m =,2,... For a fixed m, there are three possible tpes of solutions in different regions of the phase diagram M,f), see Fig. 2. The simplest solution is the uniform, or linear shear flow that exists for an values of M and f. Here the velocit gradient, densit and temperature are all constant. In region B between the solid and dashed lines of Fig. 2), there is an additional onephase solution: the one with nonlinear profiles of densit, temperature and velocit. Finall, there is a multi-laer two-phase solution which exists in regions A and B, that is below the dashed line. The flow there is organized in several distinct laers. In the solid-phase laers the densit is larger than the critical densit n c at which the shear viscosit diverges. Therefore, these laers move as a whole with a velocit u = const, while the temperature and densit profiles are non-trivial. In the fluid phase laers there is a mean flow with non-trivial profiles of the velocit, temperature and densit. The densit, temperature, heat flux and velocit are continuous at the interface between the laers. This means in particular, that there is no macroscopic flow in the bottom laer of the granulate, and the inelastic energ losses there are balanced b the conduction of heat from the flowing) top laer. Now let us consider these solutions in more detail. We start with the simplest one: the uniform shear flow. Here ǫ is independent of, and Eq. 5) ields ǫ = cλ c R. Substituting this value into Eq. 4) and integrating in, we obtain a linear velocit profile 2λ u) = R. 7) M c R) Using the normalization condition and the condition FIG. 2: Hdrodnamic phase diagram of the stead flow solutions for m = the upper panel) and m = 2 the lower panel) in terms of the scaled parameters f and M. In the regions A there are: a multi-laer flow and an unstable) uniform flow. In the regions B there are: a multi-laer flow, a non-uniform flow and an unstable) uniform flow. In the regions C there is onl a stable) uniform flow. In the forbidden regions the granulate is not dense enough for our theor to be valid. Plausible bifurcation diagrams, corresponding to the dotted arrows f = 2, are shown, for the cases of m = and m = 2 in Fig. 7. u = ) =, we obtain cλ c R = f R and c = R 2λR2 M. 8) Solving these two algebraic equations, we calculate R R = f 2 2 λ) 2 M λ) f 2 2M λ) ) ] /2 f 2 9) and obtain the scaled velocit profile and the constant value of ǫ: u ) =, ] /2 λ)k ǫ = ǫ = λ, 2) k 2k ) /2

6 6 where k = M λ)f 2. Notice that ǫ alwas satisfies the condition ǫ > λ /2 or, in the original variables, n < n c: the densit of the uniform flow is smaller than the critical densit at which the shear viscosit diverges. Note also that although the uniform shear flow solution Eq. 2)] formall exists everwhere, the assumption ǫ demands k. Therefore, the solution is valid for M f 2 / λ). This inequalit breaks down in the forbidden regions of the phase diagram, see Fig. 2. The nonlinear solution, which exists in region B, can be found numericall. We used the following numerical procedure, realized in Matlab. Let us denote ǫ ǫ = ). For fixed R and f, we first solve Eq. 5) b varing parameters ǫ and c and demanding dǫ/d = ) = and the normalization condition. This procedure ields ǫ). Then we solve Eq. 4) and find the velocit profile u) and the corresponding value of parameter M from the condition u = ) =. An important insight into the nature of this solution is provided b a mechanical analog following from Eq. 5). Let ǫ be a coordinate, while the vertical coordinate be time. Then Eq. 5) describes a Newtonian particle oscillating in the potential well Uǫ) = /2)c R)ǫ 2 cλlnǫ. The boundar conditions select a famil of solutions. A tpical solution includes an integer number m of halves of the oscillation period, and a completion of these oscillations takes the sstem a unit time, mτ/2 = see Eq. 2)], where τ is the oscillation period. Figure 3 shows an example of particle in the potential well, while the resulting spatial profiles of ǫ), u) and n) for a one-half of a full oscillation m = ), and for a full oscillation m = 2), are shown in Fig. 4. At a fixed m, this solution exists in region B of the phase plane of parameters f and M. This region is limited b two curves M = Mf) see Fig. 2). The first curve is obtained as one approaches the bottom of the potential well. Here the oscillation amplitude that is, the densit contrast in the sstem) vanishes. Expanding the potential Uǫ) near the bottom of the potential well ǫ = cλ/c R)] /2, we can calculate the oscillation period τ: τ = 2 ) /2 2 m = π. 2) c R The bottom of the well corresponds to a uniform shear flow, but Eq. 2) must be obeed arbitraril close to the bottom of the well. Using Eq. 2) and the second equation of Eqs. 8), we obtain R = mπ/2)m/λ) /2 and c = R m 2 π 2 /2. Substituting it into the first equation of Eqs. 8), we obtain the lower boundar of region B in terms of f and M: f = mπ ) /2 M 2 λ ) /4 ] λ λm)/2. 22) mπ For m = and m = 2 these curvesare shown b the solid lines in Fig. 2. The determine the boundar between the regions A and B for each m. U.9.8 Region B ε ε = λ / FIG. 3: The mechanical analog for Eq. 5). Shown is a trajector the dashed line) of a classical particle in the potential well Uǫ) the solid line, see text) which corresponds to regions B in Fig. 2. See Figure 4 for the resulting spatial profiles, which correspond to a one-half of the oscillation m = ) and a full oscillation m = 2, here the potential changes as the parameter M is different.) The oscillating solutions exist onl inside the potential well, and onl for ǫ = ) > λ /2, when the densit is everwhere below the critical densit at which the shear viscosit diverges. The parameters for this figure are M =.558 and f = 2. ε u n ε u n FIG. 4: The profiles of ǫ) = n)] /2 the upper row), the scaled velocit u) the middle row), and the scaled densit n) the bottom row), which correspond to region B in Figure 2. The profiles in the left column respectivel, in the right column) correspond to m =, a one-half of a full oscillation respectivel, to m = 2, a full oscillation) in the potential well, see Fig. 3. The parameters are f = 2 and M =.558 the left column), and f = 2 and M =.5 the right column). The second limiting curve plotted b the dashed lines in Fig. 2 for m = and m = 2) is obtained numericall b putting ǫ = λ /2 see Fig. 3). This curve determines the boundar between the regions B and C. Now let us consider the most interesting multi-laer two-phase famil of solutions, parameterized b the same

7 7 number m that now can be associated with the number of solid laers. Due to continuit of the velocit field, there is no macroscopic flow in the bottom laer of the granulate for an m, while the inelastic energ losses there are balanced b the heat conduction from the fluid-like top laer. A tpical flow here consists of m zero-shear solid-like) laers, each of which moving as a whole, separated b fluid-like regions. As we are dealing with a hard-sphere model, the granulate is fluidized within the solid laers: the granular temperature is non-zero, and there is energ flow through the boundaries of the laers. Let us first consider the m = solution. Here the onl solid-like laer is at the bottom, and it is at rest. Putting c = in Eqs. 5) and 4) we obtain ǫ) = ǫ coshr /2 ). The height of the bottom laer is determined from the condition ǫh) = λ /2. At the interface between the two laers we demand continuit of the densit and, therefore, of the temperature), of the heat flux, and of the velocit. Similarl to the procedure performed in region B, we solve the problem numericall b shooting in two parameters ǫ and c for the top laer) for fixed values of R and f, and then calculate the profiles and the respective value of the parameter M. Tpical profiles ǫ), u) and n) for m = are shown in Fig. 5, the left column. A multi-laer solution m > is obtained in a similar wa, b demanding that the velocit in an solid laer is constant, while the densit, temperature, heat flux and velocit are continuous at all interfaces between the laers. Tpical profiles of ǫ), u) and n) for m = 2 are shown in Fig. 5, right panel. ε u n ε u n FIG. 5: The profiles of ǫ) the upper row), the velocit u) the middle row) and the densit n) the bottom row) for the two-phase solution, for m = the left column) and m = 2 the right column). The solutions for the fluid solid) laers are shown b the solid dotted) lines. The parameters are f = 2 and M =.492 the left column), and f = 2 and M =.48 the right column.) At this point let us return, for a moment, to the case where the viscosit singularit is assumed to be at the same densit n c as the rest of transport coefficient. In this case λ =, and the onl possible solution is a uniform shear flow. Indeed, as ǫ must be positive, the onl acceptable solution of Eq. 5) with λ =, which obes the no-flux boundar conditions, is ǫ = const and c = R. Then the normalization condition the last of Eqs. 6)] ields ǫ 2 = f/r /2. One can obtain this solution directl b putting λ = in Eq. 2). Therefore, the assumption of a nonzero λ the specific form of viscosit divergence, Eq. )], is crucial for the existence of non-trivial solutions. One can see that, at fixed m, two different kinds of stead flow solutions exist in region A, for the same values of parameters M and f. Furthermore, three different kinds of stead flow solutions exist in region B, again for the same values of parameters M and f see Fig. 2). What is the selection rule for these solutions? We give a partial answerto this question in the next section b performing a linear stabilit analsis of the uniform dense shear flow. Then we suggest plausible bifurcation diagrams of the sstem for different m. IV. LINEAR STABILITY AND BIFURCATIONS Our linear stabilit analsis of the uniform flow deals with the full set oftime-dependent) hdrodnamic equations )-3) and constitutive relations 8)-). The details of linear stabilit analsis are shown in Appendix. Adding a small perturbations to the uniform shear flow and linearizing the equations, we finall arrive at a quadratic characteristic equation for the growth/damping rate Γ as a function of parameters and the wave number k Eq. A.4), see Appendix.] The two roots of this equation are real and correspond to two different collective modes of the sstem. One of them alwas decas. The other one is a purel growing mode for sufficientl small k, that is for long-wavelength perturbations. At small k we obtain: Γ = 2R 2 λk 2 >, 23) M Lǫ M f R /2 ) where L = 2M) /2 H/d. For sufficientl large k, Γ is negative: the heat conduction suppresses the instabilit. The critical wave number for the instabilit is k = 2Rλ /2 /M /2. Thedependenceofthescaledgrowth rate Γ on the scaled wave number k is shown in Fig. 6. Using Eq. 9), we obtain k = f 2 λ /2 2 λ) 2 M /2 M λ) f 2 2M λ) ) ] /2 f 2. 24) Notice that the time scale separation, emploed here for the reduction of the order of the dispersion equation see Appendix), breaks down when ǫ approaches λ /2. As one can see from Eq. 2), this happens, for a fixed

8 8..2. Γ k δ..2. a) M M * M FIG. 6: The scaled growth rate Γ, calculated from Eq. A.4), versus the scaled wave number k. The long-wavelength modes with k < k the value of k is indicated b the asterisk) are unstable. The parameters f = 2, M =.2, λ =.5, and L = correspond to region A in Fig. 2a and to region C in Fig. 2b. f, when M becomes sufficientl small. Importantl, the final results 23) and 24) remain valid in the general case, as we obtained from the full, unreduced fourthorder dispersion equation for Γk). The wave number k of the perturbation is quantized b the boundar conditions. Indeed, the velocit perturbations must vanish at the upper and lower plates: u =,t) = u =,t) = v =,t) = v =,t) =. These conditions ield a discrete spectrum of wave numbers: k = πm, where m =,2,3,... Therefore, the instabilit threshold is k = π. This equation determines a curve fm) on the f,m) plane. One can see that this curve coincides with the curve fm) determined b Eq. 22) for m = : the borderline between regions A and B in Fig. 2. Similarl, the threshold for m = 2 perturbation k = 2π coincides with the curve fm) determined b Eq. 22) for m = 2, and so on. This is not entirel surprising: as the instabilit is aperiodic, its threshold is provided b the marginal stabilit condition. It is convenient to characterize each stead flow solution b the maximum densit contrast it predicts. In terms of the auxiliar variable ǫ, we can define δ as the maximum change in ǫ throughout the sstem for m = this gives δ ǫ = ) ǫ = ).] We can calculate δ as a function of parameters f and M for each stead flow solution. Figure 7 shows all the resulting branches of the solution for m = and m = 2) for a fixed f, while M serves as a control parameter. Furthermore, there is an infinite number of bifurcation diagrams for multi-laer solutionsfor allintegersm > ), whichcan be computed in a similar wa. In order to determine the bifurcation diagram of the sstem at a fixed m, one needs to perform a linear stabilit analsis of each branch of the solution. Unfortunatel, such an analsis is quite cumbersome for the so- δ FIG. 7: A conjectured bifurcation diagrams of the stead flow for f = 2 and λ =.5. Shown is the densit contrast δ versus M for different stead flow solutions for m = the upper panel) and m = 2 the lower panel). The stable and unstable branches are indicated b the solid and dashed lines, respectivel. We proved that the uniform flow δ = ) is unstable at M < M. The dash-dotted line in the upper panel is the asmptote of the branch bifurcating from the point M = M : δ = M M ) /2. lutions with δ. It is natural to assume that bifurcation, which occurs in the vicinit of the point M = M, at which the uniform shear flow the one with δ = ) changes from unstable at M < M f)] to stable at M > M f)], is an inverse pitchfork bifurcation. Based on this assumption, we obtain a simple bifurcation diagram, presented in Fig. 7. The stable solutions are indicated b solid lines, the unstable solutions b dashed lines. Let us consider the case of m = and follow the uniform shear flow solution for which δ = ) as M increases, starting from a small value, at fixed f. We pass from region A to region B of the hdrodnamic phase diagram see the dotted arrow in Fig. 2) via an inverse pitchfork bifurcation. Here the uniform shear flow solution becomes stable, while the bifurcating second solution the one with nonlinear densit and velocit profiles) must be unstable. Exploiting the mechanical analog see Fig. 3), we can find the asmptote of the unstable branch in the close vicinit of the bifurcation point: δ = Af)M M ) /2. Now let us move along the unstable branch δ and increase M. At some critical value of M, which depends on f, we reach the border be- M b)

9 9 tween regions B and C. Here the unstable branch ends, as for larger M region C) the onl possible solution is the uniform shear flow. There is, however, another solution whichexistsat smallerm. Figure7showsthis stable branch which corresponds to the two-phase solution in regions A and B see Fig. 2). This simple scenario predicts bistabilit at sufficientl small values of the parameter M, and a hsteresis on the interval M f),m f)], see Fig. 7. Note that the parameter L does not affect the bifurcation diagram, it onl sets the time scales of transient motions in the sstem. V. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION We have considered here some aspects of shear-induced crstallization in a dense but rapid mono-disperse granular shear flow. We focused on a stead crstallized flow under a constant pressure and zero gravit. Assuming ver high densities, n c n n c, we emploed a version of the Navier-Stokes hdrodnamics for inelastic hard sphere fluid with ad hoc constitutive relations based on the free volume argument. In contrast to earlier works on rapid granular shear flow, we assumed that the shear viscosit coefficient η diverges at a densit smaller than the close packing densit n c, while the rest of the constitutive relations diverge at n = n c. We have determined the phasediagramofthe steadflowin termsofthreeparameters: the effective Mach number, the scaled inelastic energ loss parameter, and an integer number m. In a stead flow the viscous heating of the granulate is balanced b energ dissipation through inelastic collisions. This balance is achieved, in different parts of the phase diagram, in different was, producing either a uniform shear flow with constant velocit gradient, densit and temperature), or a flow with nonlinear velocit, densit and temperature profiles. In some regions in the phase diagram two or three different stead flow solutions are possible for the same values of the parameters. We performed a linear stabilit analsis of the uniform flow, and suggested a plausible bifurcation diagram of the flow at a fixed m, which predicts bi-stabilit and hsteresis. We are unable as et to find a selection principle that would prefer certain stead state solutions out of a multitude of solutions at different m. This non-trivial selection problem should be addressed in the future work. One of the predictions of this work is the existence and, we conjecture, stabilit) of two-phase solutions. The simplest solution of this tpe consists of a zero-shear solid-like) laer at the bottom and a flowing top laer. Though there is no mean flow in the bottom laer, the particles there undergo thermal motion, and the granular temperature and pressure are non-zero. As a result, there is energ transfer through the bottom laer. There also exist two-phase multi-laer solutions, where solid-like laers, each of which moving as a whole, are separated b fluid-like regions with nonlinear velocit, densit and temperature profiles. The existence of these solutions is a direct consequence of our assumption that the coefficient of shear viscosit η in Eq. ) diverges at a densit which is smaller than the close packing densit n c. A comparison of our results with those of Alam and coworkers is in order now. Alam et al. 2] investigated a plane Couette shear flow of inelastic hard sphere fluid, in a sstem with a fixed height, in a wide interval of densities: from the dilute limit to the random close packing densit. The emploed constitutive relations, all of which including the viscosit) diverge at the random close packing densit n r. The found instabilit of the uniform shear flow when the inelasticit of the particle collisions becomes large enough or, alternativel, when the fixed) sstem height exceeds a critical value for a fixed inelasticit. The uniform shear flow instabilit considered in our work is quite different: it requires viscosit divergence at a smaller densit than the rest of constitutive relations. Indeed, Eqs. 22) and 24) show that this instabilit disappears when λ goes to zero. Although the parameter λ was identicall zero in Ref. 2], instabilit was observed. Where does the difference come from? To remind the reader, the constitutive relations that we used assume a ver dense sstem. Respectivel, our results are valid onl at leading order in the parameter n c n)/n c. We checked that, if one takes into account onl the leading order terms in n r n)/n r in the equations of Alam et al. 2], the instabilit disappears. Its worth mentioning that the stead flow equations 4)-6) would not change if the crstal close packing densit n c were replaced b the random close packing densit n r. Such a formulation would follow from the assumption that the shear viscosit diverges at a densit smallerthann r. Itwouldpredictavarietofsteadstate solutions on the metastable branch, in the vicinit of the random close packing. We hope that the basic assumptions of our modelincluding the specific form of viscosit divergence) and its non-trivial predictions will be tested in MD simulations and in experiment on dense but rapid granular flow. Our work focused on a dense but rapid granular flow, assuming that the granulate is full fluidized. In experiment it should be easier to achieve this regime when the shear is ver large, so that the effective Mach number is of order unit see Fig. 7.) Most experiments with dense granular flows are performed with slow flows, where the effective Mach number is small. For example, in the experiment of Gollub s group 5] the parameter M was about 5 5. In this regime the particles far from the moving boundar are in persistent contact with each other 5], inter-particle friction is important see also 2]), and the model of inelastic hard spheres and the Navier-Stokes hdrodnamics) is inapplicable. In general, the model of inelastic hard sphere fluid is considered as a good approximation for dilute and moderatel dense flows. Its validit range for dense flows is not well known 3]. Indeed, the particle collision rate increases with the densit, so the assumption of instan-

10 taneous collisions, intrinsic in the model of hard spheres, ma become restrictive at high densities. Being aware of this limitation, we still believe that the model of inelastic hard spheres can capture some of the phsics of dense flow. Like in man other problems, it is useful to push this model to an extreme and analze its predictions some of which being quite unexpected as we have shown) in detail. We notice in passing that the two-phase flow predicted in this work resembles experimentall observed shear bands: localized regions of ordered granular flow, coexisting with essentiall immobile solid-like regions 22]. The future experimental and theoretical work should elucidate the exact conditions under which shear-induced crstallization develops in granular flows. Though crstallization under shearing is well documented in MD simulations 7, 8], a recent experiment 23] showed that, under certain conditions, shearing can lead to disorder. Finall, wedid notattempt to describeinthis workthe shear-induced crstallization process. Such a description is beond the reach of theor as of present. A promising approach to this problem should deal, in addition to the hdrodnamic fields, with an order parameter field and its dnamics. For slow granular flows such a description is now emerging 24]. Acknowledgments We acknowledge useful discussions with J.P. Gollub, S. Luding, P.V. Sasorov, J.-C. Tsai, and A. Vilenkin. The work was supported b the the Israel Science Foundation grant No. 7/5) and b the German-Israel Foundation for Scientific Research and Development Grant I /23). APPENDIX: DETAILS OF LINEAR STABILITY ANALYSIS Let u and v be the velocit components in the x and directions, respectivel. We assume that the small perturbations to the uniform stead shear flow do not break the smmetr of the flow in the x and z directions: n,t) = n n,t), T,t) = T T,t), u,t) = u )u,t), v,t) = v,t), A.) where index denotes the uniform stead shear flow, see Eqs.2), whilet = n = ǫ 2. Linearizingthehdrodnamic equations with respect to small perturbations, we arrive at n t n v =, ) u Ln t v du = d { = T /2 λ n v Ln t = L p M T /2 n u 4T /2 T 2T 3 λ n ) 3 2 Ln T t L v = M T/2 du λ n d 2RT3/2 n 2 u 3T n 2T n ) n λ n v ] T /2 T n, ) ) ] } du, d ) )] T n du 2T λ n d ), A.2) where L = 2M) /2 H/d, the time is measured in the units of H/u, and the value of H is determined b the unperturbed flow, that is b the uniform stead flow solution. One can check that the new parameter L which is absent in the stead state problem, but enters the linear stabilit analsis), is full determined b the scaled parameters f and M and b the restitution coefficient r. A further simplification emplos time scale separation. Let us compare the characteristic time scales of the problem. The acoustic time scale is τ = Hǫ /P /n c ) /2, the heat conduction time scale is τ 2 = τ H/d), the energ loss time scale is τ 3 = τ H/dR)], and the viscous time is τ 4 = τ H/d)ǫ 2 λ)/ǫ 2. If the densit is not too close to the densit at which the shear viscosit diverges, that is if H/d)ǫ 2 λ)/ǫ 2, one can separate the different time scales and eliminate the acoustic-like) fast modes. This is equivalent to the assumption that the perturbations evolve in pressure equilibrium with the surroundings 25]. Using the condition p / t = instead of the full momentum equation the thirdequationin Eqs.A.2)], weobtaint = n. Then, differentiating the second equation of Eqs. A.2) with respecttoandsubstituting v / fromthefirstequation of Eqs. A.2), we arrive at L 2 ǫ ) ) u = 2 { ǫ 2 L n t M ǫ ǫ 2 λ t n ǫ 2 u ǫ 2 λ n 2ǫ 2 n )]}, ǫ 2 λ 2 ] 3 ǫ ) = 2 ǫ 2 ǫ 2 2 u n 2ǫ 2 n ǫ 2 λ ) n )] Rn ǫ =, where we substituted du /d = and T = n = ǫ 2. Consider a single Fourier mode of the perturbation: n,t) = ñexpγtik), u,t) = ũexpγtik),

11 where k is the wave number. Looking for nontrivial solutions, we obtain deta) =, where the elements of the matrix A are A = ΓL 4R2 ǫ k 2 M 2 Rk2, M ǫ A 2 = ΓLkf 2Rǫ k 3 R /2 M, 3f A 2 = ΓL A 22 = 4Rkǫ. R/2 2R/2 f ) k2 ǫ 4R2 ǫ M, A.3) where the coefficients are ) a 2 = Lk 2 3f2, 2R a = 4RLkǫ f ) R/2 M Lf k3 3Rǫ 2 ) R /2 ǫ M 2R2 2 ǫ M f 2, ) a = 2Rk3 k 2 4R2 λ. M M Equation A.3) ields a quadratic equation for Γ: a 2 Γ 2 a Γa =, A.4) ] Challenges in Granular Phsics, edited b T.C. Halse and A. Metha World Scientific, Singapore, 22). 2] J. T. Jenkins and M. W. Richman, Phs. Fluids 28, ); Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 87, ). 3] C. S. Campbell, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 22, 57 99); I. Goldhirsch, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, ). 4] M. Nicolas, P. Duru, and O. Pouliquen, Eur. Phs. J. E 3, 39 2). 5] J.-C. Tsai, G. A. Voth, and J. P. Gollub, Phs. Rev. Lett. 9, ); J.-C. Tsai and J. P. Gollub, Phs. Rev. E 7, ); ibid 72, ). 6] N. W. Mueggenburg, Phs. Rev. E 7, 33 25). 7] P. Zamankhan, T. Tnjala, W. Polashenski, P. Zamankhan, and P. Sarkomaa, Phs. Rev. E 6, ). 8] M. Alam and S. Luding, Phs. Fluids 5, ). 9] E.L. Grossman, T. Zhou, and E. Ben-Naim, Phs. Rev. E 55, ). ] L. Bocquet, W. Losert, D. Schalk, T. C. Lubensk, and J. P. Gollub, Phs. Rev. E 65, 37 22); L. Bocquet, J. Errami, and T. C. Lubensk, Phs. Rev. Lett. 89, ). ] B. Meerson, T. Pöschel, and Y. Bromberg, Phs. Rev. Lett. 9, ). 2] M.D.RintoulandS.Torquato, J. Chem.Phs.5, ); Phs. Rev. Lett. 77, ); Phs. Rev. E 58, ); R. K. Bowles and R. J. Speed, Phsica A 262, ). 3] J.J. Bre, F. Moreno, and J.W. Duft, Phs. Rev. E 54, ); N.SelaandI.Goldhirsch, J.FluidMech.36, 4 998); J.J. Bre, J.W. Duft, C.S. Kim, and A. Santos, Phs.Rev.E58, ); R.Soto, M.Mareschal, and D. Risso, Phs. Rev. Lett. 83, ). 4] J.F. Lutsko, Phs. Rev. E 72, ). 5] Z.W. Salsburg and W.W. Wood, J. Chem. Phs. 37, ), and references therein. 6] R. Garcia-Rojo, S. Luding, and J. J. Bre, cond-mat/567. 7] A. Santos, V. Garzo, and J.W. Duft, Phs. Rev. E 69, ). 8] C.S. Chou, Phsica A 287, 27 2). 9] M.W. Richman, Acta Mech. 75, ). 2] M. Alam and P. R. Nott, J. Fluid Mech 377, ); M. Alam, V. H. Arakeri, P. R. Nott, J. D. Goddard, and H. J. Herrmann, J. Fluid. Mech. 523, ). 2] S.J. Moon, J.B. Swift, and H.L. Swinne, Phs. Rev. E 69, 33 24). 22] D.M. Mueth, G.F. Debregeas, G.S. Karczmar, P.J. Eng, S.R. Nagel, and H.M. Jaeger, Nature 46, 385 2). 23] K.E. Daniels and R.P. Behringer, Phs. Rev. Lett. 94, 68 25). 24] D. Volfson, L.S. Tsimring, and I.S.Aranson, Phs. Rev. Lett. 9, ); Phs. Rev. E 68, 23 23); ibid 69, ). 25] B. Meerson, Rev. Mod. Phs. 68, ).