LINE BUNDLES ON PROJECTIVE SPACE


 Polly Phelps
 2 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 LINE BUNDLES ON PROJECTIVE SPACE DANIEL LITT We wish to show that any line bundle over P n k is isomorphic to O(m) for some m; we give two proofs below, one following Hartshorne, and the other assuming some knowledge of sheaf cohomology. Throughout, let X be an integral scheme. Definition 1 (Cartier Divisors). We define O X to be the sheaf of groups which is the subsheaf of O X consisting of units, and K X be the sheaf associated to the presheaf K X : U Frac(Γ(U, O X )), which as we will see is actually just this presheaf in the integral case. (This can be generalized to nonintegral schemes by taking the total ring of fractions instead of the fraction field). Let K X be the sheaf of groups consisting of the units of K X. Then there is a short exact sequence 0 O X K X K X/O X 0; a Cartier Divisor is a global section of K X /O X. Elements of the image of the map Γ(X, K X ) Γ(X, K X /O X ) are principal divisors. Remark 1 (Explicitly writing down a Cartier Divisor). By our explicit construction of the quotient sheaf, a Cartier Divisor is an equivalence class [{U i, f i }] where the U i are an open cover of X, f i Γ(U i, K X ), and for each i, j, we have that f i /f j (where it is defined) is in the image of the map Γ(U i U j, O X) Γ(U i U j, K X). The equivalence relation here is that {U i, f i } {V i, g i } if the two collections have a common refinement, or, equivalently, if {U i V j, f i Ui V j } {U i V j, g j Ui V j } is a Cartier divisor. In this setup, we may write the product of two Cartier divisors {U i, f i }, {V i, g i } as {U i V j, f i g j }. We will soon motivate this definition. Before continuing, we wish to note quickly that Lemma 1. The group of Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors, that is is isomorphic to H 1 (X, O X ). coker(γ(x, K X) Γ(X, K X/O X)), Proof. By the long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology, it suffices to show that H 1 (X, K X ) = 0. We claim in fact that the sheaf K X is simply the constant sheaf S defined by Γ(U, S) = K, where K is the field of rational functions on X (the residue field of the generic point of X). This is a sheaf as X is irreducible. Indeed, let Spec(A), Spec(B) X be any two affine opens of X. As X is irreducible, both Spec(A), Spec(B) contain the generic point η of X; thus Frac(A) O X,η Frac(B). So K X agrees with S on basic opens, and thus agrees with S. But then K X is a flasque sheaf, and thus has vanishing cohomology. 1
2 We may now motivate Cartier divisors as a tool in our study of line bundles. Definition 2. We have noted before that isomorphism classes of line bundles over a scheme for a group, with the ring of regular functions as the identity, tensor product as the operation, and dualizing as the inverse. We call this group the Picard group of a scheme X, or Pic(X). Lemma 2 (Line Bundles are Cartier Divisors). There is a natural isomorphism L : Γ(X, K X/O X) {Invertible subsheaves of K X } Proof. We first define the desired map L. Given a Cartier divisor D = {U i, f i }, let L(D) be the subsheaf of K X generated by f 1 i on U i. Note that on intersections U i U j, f i /f j is invertible, so f 1 i, f 1 j generate the same submodule. The map is trivially welldefined across equivalence classes. Furthermore, note that given an invertible subsheaf of K X, say L K X, we may recover a divisor by letting U i be a cover of X on which L is trivial, and letting f i be the inverse of a local generator on U i, giving a Cartier divisor {U i, f i }. These maps are mutually inverse by construction. We must now check that the map is a homomorphism, e.g. that given two Cartier divisors D 1, D 2, we have that L(D 1 D2 1 ) L(D 1) L(D 2 ) 1, with the natural embedding in K X. But indeed, if D 1 = {U i, f i } and D 2 = {U i, g i }, then both sides are locally generated by f 1 i g i. Furthermore, it is clear that {X, 1} maps to O X K X, completing the proof. Lemma 3 (The Picard Group is the Cartier Class Group). We claim that the map above induces an isomorphism H 1 (X, O X) Pic(X). Proof. We first check that the map is welldefined and injective. This is exactly the claim that the kernel of the map Γ(X, K X/O X) {Invertible subsheaves of K X } Pic(X) is exactly the image of Γ(X, K X ) Γ(X, K X /O X ), where the last map sends an invertible subsheaf of K X to its isomorphism class. Equivalently, we wish to show that a divisor D is principal if and only if L(D) O X. If D is principal and given by some f Γ(X, K ), L(D) is simply f 1 O X, so sending 1 to f 1 gives an isomorphism O X L(D). Similarly, given such an isomorphism, the inverse of the image of the element 1 gives the desired principal divisor. To see surjectivity, it suffices to show that the map {Invertible subsheaves of K X } Pic(X) is surjective that is, that every line bundle on X admits an embedding into K X. Let L be a line bundle. Note that by our proof of Lemma 1, the sheaf K X is the constant sheaf S. Furthermore, for U with L trivial, we have Γ(U, L K X ) Γ(U, K X ), so L K X is the constant sheaf S as well, giving a map L L K X K X, where the first map is injective by integrality. This completes the proof. So to characterize line bundles on projective space P n k, it would suffice to compute the group Pic(Pn k ), and to find which element corresponds to, say, O(1). However, we need more computational tools before we can do this. From here on we assume that X is separated, noetherian and normal. Furthermore, for convenience we work in slightly less generality than Hartshorne; rather than assuming that the scheme is locally factorial, we assume it admits an open cover by the spectra of UFDs (all of these conditions are satisfied by P n k ). 2
3 Definition 3 (Weil Divisors). Prime divisors of X are closed integral subschemes of codimension one. The group of Weil divisors, denoted Div(X), is the free Abelian group generated by such primes. Let K = Γ(X, K X ). If p is a prime divisor of X with generic point η, the local ring O η,x is a discrete valuation ring (as e.g. v p : K Z. it is an integrally closed noetherian local ring of dimension one) with valuation Then there is a natural map K Div(X) given by sending f K to v p (f)p. We must show that this sum is finite. Choose an open affine U = Spec(A) on which f is regular (e.g. localize an open affine at the denominator of f); its complement is closed and thus by Noetherianness contains only finitely many prime divisors of X. By our choice of U, v p (f) 0 for p U; those p for which it is nonzero are precisely those containing Af, of which there are finitely many. It is clear that this map is a homomorphism. Divisors in the image of the map K Div(X) are called principal divisors. The cokernel of this map is the class group, denoted Cl(X). Before proceeding, we need a lemma. Lemma 4. Let A be a UFD with field of fractions K, and f K an element such that v p (f) = 0 for all p. Then f is a unit in A. Proof. It suffices to show that f is in A, as v p (1/f) = v p (f). Let f = u f ni i /u g j with f i, g j irreducible and f i g j for all i, j, and u, u units. Up to units, there is a unique way to do this, as A is a UFD. But then the product in the denominator must be empty, as otherwise v (gj)(f) 0 for any g j. But then f A, as desired. It is as yet unclear why Weil divisors should be a useful tool; the next lemma should clear this up. Lemma 5 (Cartier Divisors are the same as Weil Divisors). There is a natural isomorphism Div(X) Γ(X, K X/O X) which induces an isomorphism Cl(X) H 1 (X, O X). Proof. Let D be a Weil divisor, and let Spec(A i ) be an open affine cover of X where the A i are UFDs. Restricting D to each A i and writing it as n i,j p i,j, we may pick generators f i,j of each prime p i,j of A i appearing in D, and send D to the Cartier divisor {Spec(A i ), j f ni,j i,j }. This is a Cartier divisor as the ratios on intersections Spec(A i ) Spec(A j ) are units, by lemma 4 above. To map in the other direction, let {U i, f i } be a Cartier divisor; we send it to v p (f i ), where we choose an f i defined on an open U i containing p. The value is independent of this choice by the definition of a Cartier divisor. To see that the sum is finite, note that each f i has finitely many nonzero valuations by a previous argument we may assume there are only finitely many f i by Noetherianness. It is clear that these maps are mutually inverse. Furthermore, principal divisors map to principal divisors, giving the second isomorphism. We can now directly compute the class group of projective space. Lemma 6 (Computing Class Group using Weil Divisors). Let the degree of a Weil divisor D = n i p i on P n k be given by deg(d) = n i deg(p i ), where deg(p i ) is the degree of the homogeneous prime of k[x 0,..., x n ] 3
4 corresponding to p i. It is clear that deg is a homomorphism Div(X) Z. The degree function induces an isomorphism Cl(P n k) Z. Proof. First, we must show that the map is welldefined that is, that the degree of any principal divisor is zero. But this is clear a rational function on P n k is exactly an element of Frac(k[x 0,..., x n ]) of degree zero, and thus its divisor has degree zero. Furthermore, the map is clearly surjective, as e.g. the divisor H = (x 0 ) has degree 1. To see that the map is injective, we must check that any divisor of degree zero is principal. Indeed, let D = n i p i be a divisor of degree zero, and let f i be a generator of p i, which has degree deg(p i ) (such a generator exists as p i is a prime of height one in a UFD). Then f ni i divisor D. is a rational function inducing the So we now see that Z Cl(P n k ) Pic(Pn k ); all that remains is to see that O(1) corresponds to 1 Z. But this is easy trivializing O(1) locally on U x0, we see that the divisor of O(1) is (x 0 ), which has degree 1. So we ve shown the following: Theorem 1. Every line bundle on P n k is isomorphic to O(m) for some m Z. We give another proof of this claim, which doesn t use Lemma 6. Lemma 7 (Codimension 2 doesn t matter). Let U be an open subscheme of X. Then there is a natural surjective map Cl(X) Cl(U); if the codimension of X U is greater than or equal to 2, this map is an isomorphism. Proof. We have a diagram K Div(X) Cl(X) K Div(U) Cl(U) where the middle arrow is given by quotienting Div(X) by the free abelian group generated by prime divisors contained in X U, and the map Cl(X) Cl(U) is given by the functoriality of the cokernel. Surjectivity of this map follows immediately from the diagram. To see that the map is an isomorphism if X U has codimension greater than or equal to 2, note that primes of height one are unaffected by quotienting by a prime of greater height, so in fact the map Div(X) Div(U) is an isomorphism; principal divisors are the same as K X is a constant sheaf. Lemma 8. Let A be a Noetherian domain. Then if A is a unique factorization domain, Cl(Spec(A)) = 0. Proof. As A is a UFD, every prime of height one is principal. Let p be a prime divisor; then it is generated by some f, which clearly induces the divisor p. From here on let X = P n k. We may now directly compute H1 (P n k, O X ) Pic(Pn k ). Lemma 9 (Computing Class Group using Cohomology). We claim that H 1 (P n k, O X) Z. 4
5 Proof. Let P n k = Proj(k[x 0,..., x n ]). Consider the open subscheme given by U = U x0 U x1. We claim that X U has codimension 2; indeed, it is the complement of the closed subscheme cut out by (x 0, x 1 ), which is a prime of height 2. So by lemma 7, it suffices to compute H 1 (U, O X ) Cl(U) Cl(X) H1 (X, O X ). By lemma 8, we have that H 1 (U xi, O X ) Cl(U x i ) 0, so we may use {U x0, U x1 } as a Cech cover of U (as it is an acyclic cover for O X ). This gives the ordered Cech complex 0 k k k Z 0 as Γ(U xi, O X ) (k[x 0,..., x n ] xi ) 0 k, and Γ(U x0 U x1, O X ) (k[x 0,..., x n ] x0,x 1 ) 0 k {(x 0 /x 1 ) n } k Z. It is clear that the map k k k Z is surjective on the k coordinate and does not touch the Z coordinate, giving H 1 (P n k, O X ) Z as desired. To see that O(1) corresponds to 1 Z through this argument, we must analyze the transition map γ 01 : Γ(U x0 U x1, O(1)) Γ(U x0 U x1, O(1)) induced by the two trivializations on U x0, U x1. But in the problem set on Proj, we showed that this is induced by multiplying by x 0 /x 1 in one direction, and x 1 /x 0 in the other unwinding the Cech computation above, this corresponds exactly to 1 Z, as desired. So we have another proof of the claim. 5
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: GLOSSARY AND EXAMPLES
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: GLOSSARY AND EXAMPLES HONGHAO GAO FEBRUARY 7, 2014 Quasicoherent and coherent sheaves Let X Spec k be a scheme. A presheaf over X is a contravariant functor from the category of open
More informationAlgebraic Geometry Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationSection Divisors
Section 2.6  Divisors Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 Contents 1 Weil Divisors 1 2 Divisors on Curves 9 3 Cartier Divisors 13 4 Invertible Sheaves 17 5 Examples 23 1 Weil Divisors Definition 1. We say a
More informationPreliminary Exam Topics Sarah Mayes
Preliminary Exam Topics Sarah Mayes 1. Sheaves Definition of a sheaf Definition of stalks of a sheaf Definition and universal property of sheaf associated to a presheaf [Hartshorne, II.1.2] Definition
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 27
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 27 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Quasicoherent sheaves of ideals, and closed subschemes 1 2. Invertible sheaves (line bundles) and divisors 2 3. Some line bundles on projective
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY I, FALL 2016.
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY I, FALL 2016. DIVISORS. 1. Weil and Cartier divisors Let X be an algebraic variety. Define a Weil divisor on X as a formal (finite) linear combination of irreducible subvarieties of
More information12. Linear systems Theorem Let X be a scheme over a ring A. (1) If φ: X P n A is an Amorphism then L = φ O P n
12. Linear systems Theorem 12.1. Let X be a scheme over a ring A. (1) If φ: X P n A is an Amorphism then L = φ O P n A (1) is an invertible sheaf on X, which is generated by the global sections s 0, s
More informationExercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo. Alex Massarenti
Exercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo Alex Massarenti SISSA, VIA BONOMEA 265, 34136 TRIESTE, ITALY Email address: alex.massarenti@sissa.it These notes collect a series of
More informationthe complete linear series of D. Notice that D = PH 0 (X; O X (D)). Given any subvectorspace V H 0 (X; O X (D)) there is a rational map given by V : X
2. Preliminaries 2.1. Divisors and line bundles. Let X be an irreducible complex variety of dimension n. The group of kcycles on X is Z k (X) = fz linear combinations of subvarieties of dimension kg:
More informationMath 797W Homework 4
Math 797W Homework 4 Paul Hacking December 5, 2016 We work over an algebraically closed field k. (1) Let F be a sheaf of abelian groups on a topological space X, and p X a point. Recall the definition
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 18
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 18 CONTENTS 1. Invertible sheaves and divisors 1 2. Morphisms of schemes 6 3. Ringed spaces and their morphisms 6 4. Definition of morphisms of schemes 7 Last day:
More informationPicard Groups of Affine Curves
Picard Groups of Affine Curves Victor I. Piercey University of Arizona Math 518 May 7, 2008 Abstract We will develop a purely algebraic definition for the Picard group of an affine variety. We will then
More informationTopics in Algebraic Geometry
Topics in Algebraic Geometry Nikitas Nikandros, 3928675, Utrecht University n.nikandros@students.uu.nl March 2, 2016 1 Introduction and motivation In this talk i will give an incomplete and at sometimes
More informationAlgebraic Geometry Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationSynopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 4. Proposition (4.1.6). The canonical homomorphism ( ) is surjective [(3.2.4)].
Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 4 4.1. Definition of projective bundles. 4. Projective bundles. Ample sheaves Definition (4.1.1). Let S(E) be the symmetric algebra of a quasicoherent O Y module.
More informationLocally Free Sheaves
Locally Free Sheaves Patrick Morandi Algebra Seminar, Spring 2002 In these talks we will discuss several important examples of locally free sheaves and see the connection between locally free sheaves and
More informationAlgebraic Geometry Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationAlgebraic Geometry Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationRemarks on the existence of Cartier divisors
arxiv:math/0001104v1 [math.ag] 19 Jan 2000 Remarks on the existence of Cartier divisors Stefan Schröer October 22, 2018 Abstract We characterize those invertible sheaves on a noetherian scheme which are
More informationn P say, then (X A Y ) P
COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 35 7.2. The Picard group of a ring. Definition. A line bundle over a ring A is a finitely generated projective Amodule such that the rank function Spec A N is constant with value 1.
More informationChern classes à la Grothendieck
Chern classes à la Grothendieck Theo Raedschelders October 16, 2014 Abstract In this note we introduce Chern classes based on Grothendieck s 1958 paper [4]. His approach is completely formal and he deduces
More informationSection Blowing Up
Section 2.7.1  Blowing Up Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 Now we come to the generalised notion of blowing up. In (I, 4) we defined the blowing up of a variety with respect to a point. Now we will define
More informationHARTSHORNE EXERCISES
HARTSHORNE EXERCISES J. WARNER Hartshorne, Exercise I.5.6. Blowing Up Curve Singularities (a) Let Y be the cusp x 3 = y 2 + x 4 + y 4 or the node xy = x 6 + y 6. Show that the curve Ỹ obtained by blowing
More information1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties
0. Brief overview Cycles and bundles are intrinsic invariants of algebraic varieties Close connections going back to Grothendieck Work with quasiprojective varieties over a field k Affine Varieties 1.
More informationHigherDimensional Varieties
HigherDimensional Varieties Lecture notes for the CIMPA CIMAT ICTP School on Moduli of Curves February 22 March 4, 2016 Guanajuato, México Olivier Debarre March 11, 2016 Contents 1 Divisors 3 1.1 Weil
More informationCHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL. Paul Vojta. University of California, Berkeley. 18 February 1998
CHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL Paul Vojta University of California, Berkeley 18 February 1998 This chapter gives some preliminary material on number theory and algebraic geometry. Section 1 gives basic
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES.
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES. ANDREW SALCH 1. Affine schemes. About notation: I am in the habit of writing f (U) instead of f 1 (U) for the preimage of a subset
More informationHolomorphic line bundles
Chapter 2 Holomorphic line bundles In the absence of nonconstant holomorphic functions X! C on a compact complex manifold, we turn to the next best thing, holomorphic sections of line bundles (i.e., rank
More informationSection Projective Morphisms
Section 2.7  Projective Morphisms Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In this section we gather together several topics concerned with morphisms of a given scheme to projective space. We will show how a morphism
More informationCohomology and Base Change
Cohomology and Base Change Let A and B be abelian categories and T : A B and additive functor. We say T is halfexact if whenever 0 M M M 0 is an exact sequence of Amodules, the sequence T (M ) T (M)
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 7
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 7 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Intersecting with a pseudodivisor 1 2. The first Chern class of a line bundle 3 3. Gysin pullback 4 4. Towards the proof of the big theorem 4 4.1. Crash
More informationClassification of Complex Algebraic Surfaces
ALGANT Master Thesis in Mathematics Classification of Complex Algebraic Surfaces Alberto Corato Advised by Prof. Dajano Tossici Università degli Studi di Padova Université de Bordeaux Academic year 2017/2018
More informationArithmetic Algebraic Geometry
Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry 2 Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry Travis Dirle December 4, 2016 2 Contents 1 Preliminaries 1 1.1 Affine Varieties.......................... 1 1.2 Projective Varieties........................
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 43
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 43 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Facts we ll soon know about curves 1 1. FACTS WE LL SOON KNOW ABOUT CURVES We almost know enough to say a lot of interesting things about
More informationSCHEMES. David Harari. Tsinghua, FebruaryMarch 2005
SCHEMES David Harari Tsinghua, FebruaryMarch 2005 Contents 1. Basic notions on schemes 2 1.1. First definitions and examples.................. 2 1.2. Morphisms of schemes : first properties.............
More informationAN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO SERRE DUALITY FOR PROJECTIVE VARIETIES
AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO SERRE DUALITY FOR PROJECTIVE VARIETIES MATTHEW H. BAKER AND JÁNOS A. CSIRIK This paper was written in conjunction with R. Hartshorne s Spring 1996 Algebraic Geometry course at
More information6.1 Finite generation, finite presentation and coherence
! Chapter 6 Coherent Sheaves 6.1 Finite generation, finite presentation and coherence Before getting to sheaves, let us discuss some finiteness properties for modules over a commutative ring R. Recall
More informationPart III Positivity in Algebraic Geometry
Part III Positivity in Algebraic Geometry Theorems with proof Based on lectures by S. Svaldi Notes taken by Dexter Chua Lent 2018 These notes are not endorsed by the lecturers, and I have modified them
More informationMath 248B. Applications of base change for coherent cohomology
Math 248B. Applications of base change for coherent cohomology 1. Motivation Recall the following fundamental general theorem, the socalled cohomology and base change theorem: Theorem 1.1 (Grothendieck).
More informationThe Proj Construction
The Proj Construction Daniel Murfet May 16, 2006 Contents 1 Basic Properties 1 2 Functorial Properties 2 3 Products 6 4 Linear Morphisms 9 5 Projective Morphisms 9 6 Dimensions of Schemes 11 7 Points of
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 24
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 24 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Vector bundles and locally free sheaves 1 2. Toward quasicoherent sheaves: the distinguished affine base 5 Quasicoherent and coherent sheaves
More informationSection Higher Direct Images of Sheaves
Section 3.8  Higher Direct Images of Sheaves Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In this note we study the higher direct image functors R i f ( ) and the higher coinverse image functors R i f! ( ) which will
More informationthen D 1 D n = D 1 D n.
Lecture 8. Intersection theory and ampleness: revisited. In this lecture, X will denote a proper irreducible variety over k = k, chark = 0, unless otherwise stated. We will indicate the dimension of X
More informationAPPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS
APPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS We review in this appendix some basic definitions and results that we need about Chow groups. For details and proofs we refer to [Ful98]. In particular, we discuss
More informationREquivalence and ZeroCycles on 3Dimensional Tori
HU Yong REquivalence and ZeroCycles on 3Dimensional Tori Master thesis, defended on June 19, 2008 Thesis advisor: Dr. DORAY Franck Mathematisch Instituut, Universiteit Leiden Acknowledgements I would
More informationA course in. Algebraic Geometry. Taught by C. Birkar. Michaelmas 2012
A course in Algebraic Geometry Taught by C. Birkar Michaelmas 2012 Last updated: May 30, 2013 1 Disclaimer These are my notes from Caucher Birkar s Part III course on algebraic geometry, given at Cambridge
More informationON THE ISOMORPHISM BETWEEN THE DUALIZING SHEAF AND THE CANONICAL SHEAF
ON THE ISOMORPHISM BETWEEN THE DUALIZING SHEAF AND THE CANONICAL SHEAF MATTHEW H. BAKER AND JÁNOS A. CSIRIK Abstract. We give a new proof of the isomorphism between the dualizing sheaf and the canonical
More informationmult V f, where the sum ranges over prime divisor V X. We say that two divisors D 1 and D 2 are linearly equivalent, denoted by sending
2. The canonical divisor In this section we will introduce one of the most important invariants in the birational classification of varieties. Definition 2.1. Let X be a normal quasiprojective variety
More information214A HOMEWORK KIM, SUNGJIN
214A HOMEWORK KIM, SUNGJIN 1.1 Let A = k[[t ]] be the ring of formal power series with coefficients in a field k. Determine SpecA. Proof. We begin with a claim that A = { a i T i A : a i k, and a 0 k }.
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 6
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 6 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Divisors 2 1.1. Crash course in Cartier divisors and invertible sheaves (aka line bundles) 3 1.2. Pseudodivisors 3 2. Intersecting with divisors 4 2.1.
More informationIntroduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013
18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013 As usual, all the rings we consider are commutative rings with an identity element. 18.1 Regular local rings Consider a local
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 27
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 27 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Proper morphisms 1 2. Schemetheoretic closure, and schemetheoretic image 2 3. Rational maps 3 4. Examples of rational maps 5 Last day:
More informationMATH 221 NOTES BRENT HO. Date: January 3, 2009.
MATH 22 NOTES BRENT HO Date: January 3, 2009. 0 Table of Contents. Localizations......................................................................... 2 2. Zariski Topology......................................................................
More information(1) is an invertible sheaf on X, which is generated by the global sections
7. Linear systems First a word about the base scheme. We would lie to wor in enough generality to cover the general case. On the other hand, it taes some wor to state properly the general results if one
More informationTHE SMOOTH BASE CHANGE THEOREM
THE SMOOTH BASE CHANGE THEOREM AARON LANDESMAN CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 1.1. Statement of the smooth base change theorem 2 1.2. Topological smooth base change 4 1.3. A useful case of smooth base change
More informationMATH 233B, FLATNESS AND SMOOTHNESS.
MATH 233B, FLATNESS AND SMOOTHNESS. The discussion of smooth morphisms is one place were Hartshorne doesn t do a very good job. Here s a summary of this week s material. I ll also insert some (optional)
More informationAlgebraic varieties and schemes over any scheme. Non singular varieties
Algebraic varieties and schemes over any scheme. Non singular varieties Trang June 16, 2010 1 Lecture 1 Let k be a field and k[x 1,..., x n ] the polynomial ring with coefficients in k. Then we have two
More informationAlgebraic Geometry Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationCurves on P 1 P 1. Peter Bruin 16 November 2005
Curves on P 1 P 1 Peter Bruin 16 November 2005 1. Introduction One of the exercises in last semester s Algebraic Geometry course went as follows: Exercise. Let be a field and Z = P 1 P 1. Show that the
More informationCHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES
CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES During this first part of the course, we will establish a correspondence between various geometric notions and algebraic ones. Some references for this part of the
More informationMath 120 HW 9 Solutions
Math 120 HW 9 Solutions June 8, 2018 Question 1 Write down a ring homomorphism (no proof required) f from R = Z[ 11] = {a + b 11 a, b Z} to S = Z/35Z. The main difficulty is to find an element x Z/35Z
More informationABSTRACT NONSINGULAR CURVES
ABSTRACT NONSINGULAR CURVES Affine Varieties Notation. Let k be a field, such as the rational numbers Q or the complex numbers C. We call affine nspace the collection A n k of points P = a 1, a,..., a
More informationOral exam practice problems: Algebraic Geometry
Oral exam practice problems: Algebraic Geometry Alberto García Raboso TP1. Let Q 1 and Q 2 be the quadric hypersurfaces in P n given by the equations f 1 x 2 0 + + x 2 n = 0 f 2 a 0 x 2 0 + + a n x 2 n
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 25
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 25 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Quasicoherent sheaves 1 2. Quasicoherent sheaves form an abelian category 5 We began by recalling the distinguished affine base. Definition.
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 37
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 37 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Application of cohomology: Hilbert polynomials and functions, Riemann Roch, degrees, and arithmetic genus 1 1. APPLICATION OF COHOMOLOGY:
More information12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem
12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem 95 12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem After our study of smooth cubic surfaces in the last chapter, let us now come back to the general theory of
More informationGeometric invariant theory
Geometric invariant theory Shuai Wang October 2016 1 Introduction Some very basic knowledge and examples about GIT(Geometric Invariant Theory) and maybe also Equivariant Intersection Theory. 2 Finite flat
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.ag] 23 Dec 2009
GLOBALLY F REGULAR AND LOG FANO VARIETIES KARL SCHWEDE AND KAREN E. SMITH arxiv:0905.0404v2 [math.ag] 23 Dec 2009 Abstract. We prove that every globally F regular variety is log Fano. In other words,
More informationNOTES ON ABELIAN VARIETIES
NOTES ON ABELIAN VARIETIES YICHAO TIAN AND WEIZHE ZHENG We fix a field k and an algebraic closure k of k. A variety over k is a geometrically integral and separated scheme of finite type over k. If X and
More informationCourse 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra
Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra D. R. Wilkins Contents 3 Topics in Commutative Algebra 2 3.1 Rings and Fields......................... 2 3.2 Ideals...............................
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 48
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 48 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. A little more about cubic plane curves 1 2. Line bundles of degree 4, and Poncelet s Porism 1 3. Fun counterexamples using elliptic curves
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 24
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETR CLASS 24 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Normalization, continued 1 2. Sheaf Spec 3 3. Sheaf Proj 4 Last day: Fibers of morphisms. Properties preserved by base change: open immersions,
More information3. Lecture 3. Y Z[1/p]Hom (Sch/k) (Y, X).
3. Lecture 3 3.1. Freely generate qfhsheaves. We recall that if F is a homotopy invariant presheaf with transfers in the sense of the last lecture, then we have a well defined pairing F(X) H 0 (X/S) F(S)
More informationTheta divisors and the Frobenius morphism
Theta divisors and the Frobenius morphism David A. Madore Abstract We introduce theta divisors for vector bundles and relate them to the ordinariness of curves in characteristic p > 0. We prove, following
More informationCASTELNUOVOMUMFORD REGULARITY FOR PROJECTIVE CURVES
Università degli studi Roma Tre DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MATHEMATICS CASTELNUOVOMUMFORD REGULARITY FOR PROJECTIVE CURVES Advisor: Prof. EDOARDO SERNESI Candidate: ALESSANDRO
More informationCANONICAL EXTENSIONS OF NÉRON MODELS OF JACOBIANS
CANONICAL EXTENSIONS OF NÉRON MODELS OF JACOBIANS BRYDEN CAIS Abstract. Let A be the Néron model of an abelian variety A K over the fraction field K of a discrete valuation ring R. Due to work of MazurMessing,
More informationPorteous s Formula for Maps between Coherent Sheaves
Michigan Math. J. 52 (2004) Porteous s Formula for Maps between Coherent Sheaves Steven P. Diaz 1. Introduction Recall what the Thom Porteous formula for vector bundles tells us (see [2, Sec. 14.4] for
More informationLecture 3: Flat Morphisms
Lecture 3: Flat Morphisms September 29, 2014 1 A crash course on Properties of Schemes For more details on these properties, see [Hartshorne, II, 15]. 1.1 Open and Closed Subschemes If (X, O X ) is a
More informationMATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12
MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN 3.2.. Let Y be a Noetherian scheme. Show that any Y scheme X of finite type is Noetherian. Moreover, if Y is of finite dimension, then so is X. Write f
More informationNOTES ON DIVISORS AND RIEMANNROCH
NOTES ON DIVISORS AND RIEMANNROCH NILAY KUMAR Recall that due to the maximum principle, there are no nonconstant holomorphic functions on a compact complex manifold. The next best objects to study, as
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASSES 43 AND 44
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASSES 43 AND 44 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Flat implies constant Euler characteristic 1 2. Proof of Important Theorem on constancy of Euler characteristic in flat families
More informationIntroduction and preliminaries Wouter Zomervrucht, Februari 26, 2014
Introduction and preliminaries Wouter Zomervrucht, Februari 26, 204. Introduction Theorem. Serre duality). Let k be a field, X a smooth projective scheme over k of relative dimension n, and F a locally
More informationHYPERSURFACES IN PROJECTIVE SCHEMES AND A MOVING LEMMA
HYPERSURFACES IN PROJECTIVE SCHEMES AND A MOVING LEMMA OFER GABBER, QING LIU, AND DINO LORENZINI Abstract. Let X/S be a quasiprojective morphism over an affine base. We develop in this article a technique
More informationAlgebraic Geometry Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationCoherent Sheaves; Invertible Sheaves
CHAPTER 13 Coherent Sheaves; Invertible Sheaves In this chapter, k is an arbitrary field. a Coherent sheaves Let V D SpmA be an affine variety over k, and let M be a finitely generated Amodule. There
More informationPICARD GROUPS OF MODULI PROBLEMS II
PICARD GROUPS OF MODULI PROBLEMS II DANIEL LI 1. Recap Let s briefly recall what we did last time. I discussed the stack BG m, as classifying line bundles by analyzing the sense in which line bundles may
More informationAN EXPOSITION OF THE RIEMANN ROCH THEOREM FOR CURVES
AN EXPOSITION OF THE RIEMANN ROCH THEOREM FOR CURVES DOMINIC L. WYNTER Abstract. We introduce the concepts of divisors on nonsingular irreducible projective algebraic curves, the genus of such a curve,
More informationHonors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35
Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35 1. Let R be a commutative ring with 1 0. (a) Prove that the nilradical of R is equal to the intersection of the prime
More informationNéron Models of Elliptic Curves.
Néron Models of Elliptic Curves. Marco Streng 5th April 2007 These notes are meant as an introduction and a collection of references to Néron models of elliptic curves. We use Liu [Liu02] and Silverman
More information0.1 Spec of a monoid
These notes were prepared to accompany the first lecture in a seminar on logarithmic geometry. As we shall see in later lectures, logarithmic geometry offers a natural approach to study semistable schemes.
More informationRIEMANN S INEQUALITY AND RIEMANNROCH
RIEMANN S INEQUALITY AND RIEMANNROCH DONU ARAPURA Fix a compact connected Riemann surface X of genus g. Riemann s inequality gives a sufficient condition to construct meromorphic functions with prescribed
More informationSynopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 3
Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 3 3. Homogeneous spectrum of a sheaf of graded algebras 3.1. Homogeneous spectrum of a graded quasicoherent O Y algebra. (3.1.1). Let Y be a prescheme. A sheaf
More informationMT845: ALGEBRAIC CURVES
MT845: ALGEBRAIC CURVES DAWEI CHEN Contents 1. Sheaves and cohomology 1 2. Vector bundles, line bundles and divisors 9 3. Preliminaries on curves 16 4. Geometry of Weierstrass points 27 5. Hilbert scheme
More informationDedekind Domains. Mathematics 601
Dedekind Domains Mathematics 601 In this note we prove several facts about Dedekind domains that we will use in the course of proving the RiemannRoch theorem. The main theorem shows that if K/F is a finite
More informationMath 632 Notes Algebraic Geometry 2
Math 632 Notes Algebraic Geometry 2 Lectures by Karen Smith Notes by Daniel Hast Winter 2013 Contents 1 Affine schemes 4 1.1 Motivation and review of varieties........................ 4 1.2 First attempt
More informationSolutions of exercise sheet 8
DMATH Algebra I HS 14 Prof. Emmanuel Kowalski Solutions of exercise sheet 8 1. In this exercise, we will give a characterization for solvable groups using commutator subgroups. See last semester s (Algebra
More informationCHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES
CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES BRIAN OSSERMAN In this note, we introduce the concept which plays the role of compactness for varieties completeness. We prove that completeness can be characterized
More information14 Lecture 14: Basic generallities on adic spaces
14 Lecture 14: Basic generallities on adic spaces 14.1 Introduction The aim of this lecture and the next two is to address general adic spaces and their connection to rigid geometry. 14.2 Two open questions
More informationSystems of linear equations. We start with some linear algebra. Let K be a field. We consider a system of linear homogeneous equations over K,
Systems of linear equations We start with some linear algebra. Let K be a field. We consider a system of linear homogeneous equations over K, f 11 t 1 +... + f 1n t n = 0, f 21 t 1 +... + f 2n t n = 0,.
More informationReid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed.
Reid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed. Answer: Note that the first generator factors as (y
More information