Iterations of the projection body operator and a remark on Petty s conjectured projection inequality
|
|
- Daniela Carson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Iterations of the projection body operator and a remar on Petty s conjectured projection inequality C. Saroglou and A. Zvavitch November 10, 015 Abstract We prove that if a convex body has absolutely continuous surface area measure, whose density is sufficiently close to the constant, then the sequence {Π m K} of convex bodies converges to the ball with respect to the Banach-Mazur distance, as m. Here, Π denotes the projection body operator. Our result allows us to show that the ellipsoid is a local solution to the conjectured inequality of Petty and to improve a related inequality of Lutwa. 1 Introduction As usual, we denote by x, y the inner product of two vectors x, y R d and by x the length of a vector x R d. A body is a compact set with nonempty interior. For a body K which is star-shaped with respect to the origin its radial function is defined by ρ K (u = max{t 0 : tu K} for every u S. A body K is called a star body if it is star-shaped at the origin and its radial function ρ K is positive and continuous. We say that a set K is symmetric if it is centrally symmetric with center at the origin, i.e. for every x K we get x K. We write A for the -dimensional Lebesgue measure (volume of a measurable set A R d, where = 1,..., d is the dimension of the minimal flat containing A. We recall also the definition of the Banach-Mazur distance between symmetric bodies K and L d BM (K, L = inf{t 1 : L T K tl, for some T GL(d}. The above distance turns out to be extremely useful when one would lie to study questions invariant under the linear transformation. For a convex body K, the support function h K (ξ : S R + is defined as h K (ξ = max x, ξ. x K We refer to [Ga, Gr, Ko, KoY, Sc] for definitions and properties of star-shaped and convex bodies and corresponding functionals. The projection body of a convex body K in R d is defined as the body with support function h ΠK (x = K x, for all x S, 010 Mathematics subject classification. 5A0, 53A15, 5A39. Key words and phrases. Convex bodies; Projection Bodies; Petty s projection inequality.. Supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation Grant DMS and by the Simons Foundation. 1
2 where K x denotes the orthogonal projection of K onto the subspace x = {y R d : x, y = 0}. The direct application of Cauchy projection formula gives us h ΠK (x = 1 x, y ds K (y, x S, S where S K is the surface area measure of K, viewed as a measure on S. When S K is absolutely continuous (with respect to the Lebesgue measure on the sphere, its density f K is called curvature function of K. It is very interesting to study the iterations of projection body operator. It is trivial to see that the projection body of Euclidean ball B d is again, up to a dilation, B, d moreover the same property is true for a unit cube B. d Weil [W1] proved that if K is a polytope in R d, then Π K is homothetic to K if and only if K is a linear image of cartesian products of planar symmetric polygons or line segments. But no other description of fixed points of projection body operator is nown as well as no much nown about possible convergence of the sequence Π m K. Clearly, Weil s result tell us that one cannot expect in general that Π m K B, d with respect to the Banach-Mazur distance. It seems more plausible, however, that Π m K B, d if K has absolutely continuous surface area measure and d 3 (for d =, if K is symmetric, then Π K = 4K. We refer to [Ga, Sc] for more information about this problem. We are going to show the following: Theorem 1.1. Let d 3. There exists an ε d > 0 with the following property: For any convex body K in R d, with absolutely continuous surface area measure and the curvature function f K satisfying f T K 1 < ε d, for some T GL(d, we have Π m K B d, in the sense of the Banach-Mazur distance. The idea of the above theorem follows from the study of the properties of intersection body operator done in [FNRZ]. The intersection body IK of a star body K was defined by Lutwa in [Lu1] using the radial function of the body IK: ρ IK (u = K u, for u S. Again it is trivial to see that IB d is a dilate of B d and I K = 4K for symmetric K R, but no much information is nown about other fixed points of I (see [Lu4]. In [FNRZ] authors shown that B d is a local attractor: Theorem A. Let d 3. There exists an ε d > 0 with the following property: For any star body K in R d, which satisfies ρ T K 1 < ε d, for some T GL(d (in other words, K is close, in Banach-Mazur distance, to B d, we have I m K B, d in the sense of the Banach-Mazur distance. Another reason to consider Theorem 1.1 is that it can be applied to study of Petty s conjectured inequality. Indeed, it was shown by Petty [P1] that the quantity P (K := ΠK / K is affine invariant. Petty [P] also conjectured the following: Conjecture 1.. Let d 3. The affine invariant P (K is minimal if and only if K is an ellipsoid. The restriction d 3 is because in the plane it is well nown that ΠK 4 K, with equality if and only if K is symmetric (see, for example, [Sa]. Petty s conjecture, if true, would be a very strong inequality, as it would imply a number of important isoperimetric inequalities, such as the classical isoperimetric inequality, the Petty projection inequality (see [Zh] for a functional form and the affine isoperimetric inequality. Very little seem to be nown about the conjecture of Petty. For instance, as shown in [Sa], Steiner symmetrization fails for this problem. A useful fact, that will be used subsequentlyestablished by Schneider, is that P (K P (ΠK, (1
3 with equality if and only if K is homothetic to Π K (see [Sch1] or [Sc, pp 570]. In particular, it follows that every solution to the Petty problem must be a zonoid (a body which is a limit of Minowsi sum of segments. Although bodies with minimal surface area significantly larger than the surface area of the ball (of the same volume satisfy the Petty conjecture (see e.g. [GP], no natural class of convex bodies was nown to satisfy the Petty conjecture (natural class means that is connected with respect to the Banach-Mazur distance and contains the ball. Below, we have a result towards this direction. Theorem 1.3. Let d 3. There exists an ε d > 0 with the following property: For any nonellipsoidal convex body K in R d, which has absolutely continuous surface area measure and satisfies f T K 1 < ε d, for some T GL(d, we have P (K > P (B d. Proof: Let K be a convex body that satisfies the assumptions of Theorem 1.3. The functional P is continuous with respect to the Banach-Mazur distance (this follows immediately from continuity of volume measure and the continuity of the projection body operation, see [Sc] for more details, so by Theorem 1.1, P (Π m K P (B. d Also, the sequence P (Π m K is non-increasing, thus P (K P (ΠK lim m P (Πm K = P (B d, with equality in the first inequality if and only if K is homothetic to Π K (see inequality (1 from above. But if K is homothetic to Π K, then trivially Π m K K, with respect to the Banach-Mazur distance, which shows that K is an ellipsoid. This is a contradiction and our assertion follows. One might hope that Theorem 1.1 can more generally show that for every convex body K, which is sufficiently close to the ellipsoid with respect to the Banach-Mazur distance, we have P (K P (B. d The difficulty here is that even if we assume that K is smooth enough, the fact that K is close to B d does not guarantee that f K is close to f B d. Indeed, the curvature function f K can be written as a determinant involving second derivatives of h K. Thus to guarantee that f K is close to f B n we need to have a restriction on second derivatives of h K, which is an almost equivalent statement to the fact that f K is close to f B d. Unfortunately, we also do not see how direct approximation methods may help. However, the next remar explains how one can restate Theorem 1.3 involving the Banach-Mazur distance. Remar 1.4. As we discussed above, it is enough to solve the conjecture of Petty in the class of zonoids. Moreover, to prove the inequality, it is enough to consider only zonoids with absolutely continuous surface area measure. This class corresponds to the class of centroid bodies of star bodies. Therefore, Petty s conjectured inequality (without equality cases is equivalent to the following statement: the affine invariant S(K := ΠΓK / ΓK is minimal among all star bodies K if K is an ellipsoid. Here, ΓK denotes the centroid body of K i.e. the convex body whose support function is given by h ΓK (x = K x, y dy, x Rd. Theorem 1.3 says that if the star body K is close enough (in the sense of the Banach-Mazur distance to the ball, then S(K S(B. d Denote by W i the i-th quermassintegral functional in R d, i = 0, 1,..., d 1, which is the mixed volume of d i copies of a convex body K with i copies of B d (see [Sc] for exact definitions and properties. Recall the Alesandrov-Fenchel inequalities for quermassintegrals: W d i i+1 (K ω dw d i 1 i (K, i = 0,..., d, ( where K is any convex body and ω d = B d (see [Sc]. Lutwa [Lu3] proved that if Petty s conjecture was proven to be true, then a family of inequalities that are stronger than ( would 3
4 have been established. These conjectured inequalities involve the notion of the i-th projection body Π i K of K, whose support function is given by: h ΠiK(u = W i u (K u, i = 0,..., d, where W i u stands for the i-th quermassintegral in u. Note that ΠK = Π 0 K. Actually, Lutwa in [Lu3] established a certain member of this family of inequalities: W d (Π d K ω W d (K, (3 where d 3, with equality if and only if K is a ball. To see that (3 is stronger than ( (in the sense that it interpolates (, for i = d 1, note that since W (K is proportional to the mean width of K (see also [Lu3], we get: Thus by ( we obtain: W (Π d K = ω W d (K, (4 ω d ω W d (Π d K W (K, with equality if and only if Π d K is a ball. Theorem 1.3 allows us to prove a stronger version of Lutwa s inequality: Theorem 1.5. Let K be a convex body in R d, d 3. Then, W d (Π d K d(d ω (d 1 ω d W (K + ω (d 1 W d (K. This inequality is sharp for the ball. Moreover, if K is not centrally symmetric, then the inequality is strict. As noted in [Lu3], since W 0 (K = K and Π 0 K = ΠK, in the plane (3 becomes ΠK 4 K, which as mentioned earlier is nown to hold and, also, the inequality is strict if K is not centrally symmetric. Therefore, Theorem 1.5 is trivially true in dimension as well. The paper is organized as follows: in Section we use the method of Spherical Harmonics together with basic lemmata from [FNRZ] to present a proof of Theorem 1.1 and Section 3 is dedicated to the proof of Theorem 1.5. Acnowledgment: We are indebted to Fedor Nazarov who suggested to us the direct lin between Q transform and the Radon transform (equation (5 below and Dmitry Ryabogin for many valuable discussions. Iterations of the projection body operator The goal of this section is to establish Theorem 1.1. Let us first fix some notation. If f : S R, denote by R(f the normalized Radon transform of f (i.e. R(1 = 1. In other words, R(f(x = 1 S d fdy, x S. S x Consider functions g 1,..., g : S R and define the function Q(g 1,..., g : S R as : Q(g 1,..., g (x = c d... det(x 1,..., x g 1 (x 1... g (x dx 1... dx. S x S x 4
5 We abbreviate Q(f := Q(f,..., f and Q(g 1 [], g [d 1 ] = Q(g 1,..., g }{{} 1, g,..., g. }{{} times times The constant c d is chosen so that Q(1 = 1. Denote, also, by H f the -th spherical harmonic of f, N. It is well nown (see e.g. [Gr], Lemma 3.4.7, page 103 that R(H f = ( 1/ v,d H f, if is even and R(Hf = 0 if is odd, where ( 1 v,d = (d 1(d (d + 3. Note that H f 0 = S 1 S fdx and that f H f 0 f. It will be essential for us to consider different actions of a linear operator T GL(d on a function f : S R. We define T f = f(t x/ T x T x 1 and T f = f(t x/ T x T x (d+1. Let K be a convex body with a curvature function f K it was proved by Lutwa [Lu], that if T SL(d, then f T K = T f K. On the other hand, for t > 0, we have f tk = t f K. Therefore, for T GL(d, since T/ dett 1/d SL(d, it follows easily that f T K = dett (/d T f K. Moreover, it was shown by Weil [W] that projection body of K again has absolutely continuous surface area measure and its density is proportional to Q(f K. For this section, it will be convenient to normalize ΠK, so that Q(f K = f ΠK. The proof of Theorem 1.1 will be done through a modification of the proof of Theorem A. All constants that appear in this section will depend on the dimension d only. For a 0, the following norm was introduced in [FNRZ]: f Ua = inf{m > 0 : f < M and n N, p n polynomial of degree n, s.t. f p n < Mn a }. If f Ua <, we say that f belongs to the class U a. It was shown in [FNRZ, proof of Lemma 6, Step 1] that there exist constants a, L, C > 0, with the following properties: (i If ϕ : S R is a function with ϕ < ε, for some 0 < ε < 1 and ϕ Ua < 1/L, then ϕ < Cε 4 d+3. (ii If f = 1 + ϕ and T GL(d with T = I + Q, for some Q GL(d, then where z = O( Q ε d+3 + Q, T f = 1 Qx, x + ϕ(x + z(x, where by Q we denote the operator norm of Q. Thus, since we get T x d = 1 d Qx, x + O( Q, T f(x = 1 (d + 1 Qx, x + ϕ(x + d Qx, x ϕ(x + O( Q ε d+3 + Q = 1 (d + 1 Qx, x + ϕ(x + O( Q ε d+3 + Q. Choose Q such that (d + 1 Qx, x = H ϕ (x. Then, Hϕ (x ϕ < ε. Write Qx, x = d i,j=1 q ijx i x j. Then, since S x 1 x x 3 x 4 dx = S x 1x x 3 dx = 0, we have: Qx, x = i j q ij x i x j + d qii x i = l 1 qij + l i=1 5 i j d qii min{l 1, l }qij, i=1
6 for all i, j, where l 1, l are positive constants that depend only on the dimension. This easily implies that Q = O(ε. Therefore, T f = 1 + ψ, with ψ = ϕ H ϕ d+5 + O(ε d+3. Thus, ψ ϕ + O(ε d+5 d+3 ε + C ε d+5 d+3 and ψ ϕ + H ϕ + O(ε d+5 d+3 C ε 4 d+3. Finally, since ϕ H ϕ has no second degree spherical harmonic in its expansion, we have Hψ C ε d+5 d+3. Therefore, we have the following: Lemma.1. There exist constants a, L, C > 0, with the following property: Whenever a function ϕ : S R satisfies ϕ < ε, for some 0 < ε < 1 and ϕ Ua < 1/L, then (i ϕ < Cε 4 d+3 and (ii there exists T GL(d, such that if we set f = 1 + ϕ, then T f = 1 + ψ, with ψ ε + Cε d+5 d+3, ψ Cε 4 d+3 and H ψ Cε d+5 d+3. We will also need two more lemmas from [FNRZ]. Lemma.. (Lemma 3 in [FNRZ] Let a 0. i If f, g U a, then fg Ua C f Ua g Ua. ii Let T GL(d with T, T 1. Then, for every δ > 0 and for every f U a, we have T f Ua δ C δ f U a. iii If f U a, then Rf Ua+d C f Ua. Lemma.3. (Lemma 5 in [FNRZ] Let β > a. For every σ > 0, there exists a constant C 0 = C σ,a,β > 0, such that f Ua C 0 f + σ f Uβ. From Lemma., we get the following: Lemma.4. Let a 0 and f U a. The following are true: i Qf Ua+d C f U a. ii Let T GL(d, with T, T 1. Then, for every δ > 0, we have T f Ua δ C δ f Ua. Proof: (i We notice that det ( ( (x 1,..., x = det d d (x 1,..., x, ξ for any ξ S and x 1,..., x ξ, thus Q(g 1,..., g (ξ = c d... det(x 1,..., x g (x dx 1... dx S ξ S ξ =1 = c d... det d d(x 1,..., x, ξ g (x dx 1... dx S ξ S ξ =1 ( = c d... sign(σξ σ(d x,σ( g (x dx 1... dx, S ξ S ξ σ S d =1 =1 where (x,1,... x,d are the coordinates of the vector x R d, S d is the set of permutations of d elements and the last equality follows from the Leibniz formula for determinant. Thus, 6
7 Q(g 1,..., g (ξ = c d S ξ... = c d = c d S ξ σ 1,σ S d sign(σ 1 sign(σ ξ σ1(dξ σ(d σ 1,σ S d sign(σ 1 sign(σ ξ σ1(dξ σ(d σ 1,σ S d sign(σ 1 sign(σ ξ σ1(dξ σ(d =1 S x =1 (x,σ1(x,σ( =1 x,σ1(x,σ(g (x dx R ( x,σ1(x,σ(g (x (ξ. Next we apply the triangular inequality to get that Qf Ua+d c d ξ σ 1(dξ σ(d R ( x,σ1(x,σ(g (x (ξ σ 1,σ S We use Lemma. (i together with the fact that ξ i ξ j a+d c to get Now, by Lemma. (iii we derive: =1 ( Qf Ua+d C 0 max R(x ix j f(x Ua+d. 1 i,j d and again by Lemma. (i, we conclude: ( Qf Ua+d C 0 C max x ix j f(x Ua 1 i,j d ( Qf Ua+d C 0 C C max x ix j Ua f U 1 i,j d a =1 U a+d. = C f U a. (ii Fix δ > 0. By Lemma. (ii, we have T f Ua δ f Ua, so Lemma. (i implies: T f Ua δ C T x d Ua δ f Ua δ C C δ T x d Ua δ f Ua. For f 1, we have T f = T x 1, thus again by Lemma. (i, (ii, we get: which finishes the proof. T x d Ua δ (C d T x 1 d U a δ (C d (C δ d 1 d U a = (C d (C δ d, Lemma.5. Fix d > and let a, L, C be the constants from Lemma.1. There exist 0 < λ < 1 and ɛ > 0, with the following property: If ε (0, ɛ and f : S R is a function with f = 1 + ϕ, ϕ = 0, ϕ S < ε and ϕ Ua < 1/L, then there exists T GL(d and γ > 0, such that the function f = γq(t f can be written as f = 1 + ϕ, for some ϕ with ϕ = 0, S ϕ Ua < 1/L and ϕ < λε. Proof: Use Lemma.1 to find T GL(d, such that T f = 1 + ψ, ψ ε + Cε d+5 d+3, ψ Cε 4 d+3 and H ψ Cε d+5 d+3. g (x dx 1... dx 7
8 Using rotation invariance of Haar measure we get that... det(x 1..., x d, x dx 1... dx d S ξ S ξ is a constant for all x S ξ. Thus, it follows that for any function g, we have: Q(g, 1[d ] = R(g. (5 One should also notice, that the constant in the above equality is exactly 1, by setting g = 1. Therefore Let ν = = Similarly, we have: Write Q(T f = Q(1 + ψ ( d 1 = Q(ψ[], 1[d 1 ] =0 ( d 1 = 1 + (d 1R(ψ + Q(ψ[], 1[d 1 ]. ( Q(ψ[], 1[d 1 ]. Then, ν H ν 0 ν = = = = = = (d 1 max ν H0 ν ν = Q( ψ [], 1[d 1 ] ψ 1 Q( ψ, 1[d ] ψ 1 R( ψ ψ 1 ψ (1 + C d ε 4 d+3 Cε = C 1 ε d+7 d+3. (6 = Q( ψ [], 1[d 1 ] ψ C ε 8 d+3. (7 Q(T f = 1+(R(ψ+ν = 1+(H ψ 0 +Hν 0 +(RH ψ +(R(ψ Hψ 0 Hψ +(ν Hν 0 and set ζ = (d 1H ψ 0 + Hν 0. Since ζ is a constant, we have: ζ (d 1 H ψ 0 + Hν 0 (d 1 ψ + ν C 3 ε. 8
9 Also, (d 1 RH ψ (d 1 H ψ Cε d+5 d+3 and since decomposition of R(ψ into spherical harmonics does not contain spherical harmonics of odd degree, we have: (d 1 R(ψ H ψ 0 Hψ = (d 1 v,d H ψ =4 (d 1v 4,d H ψ = =4 3 d + 1 ψ Hψ 0 Hψ provided that ε is small enough. Tae γ = (1 + ζ 1 = O(ε and set 3 4 ψ 3 d+5 (ε + Cε d+3 4 C ε, (8 ϕ := γ [ (d 1RH ψ + (d 1R(ψ Hψ 0 Hψ + (ν Hν 0 ]. Then, by (6, (8 and the fact that (d 1 RH ψ Cε d+5 d+3, we immediately get: ϕ (1 + C ε ( Cε d+5 d+3 + C ε + C 1 ε d+7 d+3 Cε, provided that ε is sufficiently small. Moreover, by (7, we get: ϕ γ ( (d 1 R(ψ H ψ 0 + ν H ν 0 γ ( (d 1 ψ + C ε 4 d+3 C4 ε 4 d+3. Finally, to estimate ϕ Ua, note that T, T 1, f Ua <. Fix any 0 < δ < 1. Then, by Lemma.4 we get T f Ua δ+d T f Ua δ C δ f Ua < C δ. Again, Lemma.4 implies Therefore, γq(t f Ua δ+d γc δ C f U a γc δ C =: C 5. ϕ Ua δ+d = γq(t f 1 Ua δ+d C =: C 6. Now, one may use Lemma.3 with σ = 1/(C 6 L, to conclude: ϕ Ua C a,a δ+d ϕ + σ ϕ Ua+δ+d C 7 ε 4 d+3 + C6 /(C 6 L 1/L, provided that ε is small enough. Proof of Theorem 1.1: Since the iteration Lemma.5 is established, the rest of the proof of Theorem 1.1 is exactly the same as the proof of Theorem A. For the sae of completeness, we will briefly repeat the argument. Let K be a convex body with absolutely continuous surface area measure and f K 1 < ε, for some 0 < ε < 1. Then, f K U0 < 1 + ε and by Lemma.4 we easily get f Π m K Um(d < C m (1 + ε m. Choosing m such that a < m(d < a, where a is the constant from Lemma.5, we conclude that f Πm K Uβ < C, where β = m(d. On the other hand, it is clear from the definition of Q(f that since 1 ε f K 1 + ε, we have: (1 ε (m f Πm K (1 + ε (m. So, f Πm K/( f S Πm K = 1 + ϕ, with ϕ = 0 and S ϕ Uβ 1 + f Π m K Uβ /( f Π m K < C. S 9
10 Clearly, ϕ C ε, so by Lemma.3, we get: ϕ Ua C σ,a,β C ε+σc 1/L, provided that ε is small enough. Therefore, replacing K with Π m K, we may assume that the assumptions of Lemma.5 hold. Since the factor dett (/d can be eliminated by rescaling, Lemma.5 implies that for each m N, there exists T m GL(d, such that f Tm(Π m K 1 0, as m and f Tm(Π m K Ua < 1/L. Now, Lemma.1 (i implies that f Tm(Π m K 1 0, as required. 3 Proof of Theorem 1.5 In this section, some facts from the theory of mixed volumes and quermassintegrals of convex bodies will be used. We refer to [Sc] for an extensive discussion on this topic. Let m N, t 1,..., t m R and K 1,..., K m be convex bodies in R d. Recall the classical Minowsi formula about mixed volumes: m t 1 K t m K m = t i1... t id V (K i1,..., K id. (9 i 1,...,i d =1 Note, also, that W j (K = V (K[d j], B d [j] (K appears d j times and B d appears j times, j = 0,..., d 1. For instance, W 0 (K, W 1 (K and W (K are proportional to the volume, the surface area and the mean width of K respectively. We will establish an inequality of the form W d (Π d K a d W (K + β d W d (K, where a d and β d are positive constants that depend only on d and we will prove that there is equality when K = B d. The computation of the exact values of a d and β d is an elementary (but rather tedious tas and it is left to the reader. In what follows, every constant that appears will depend only on the dimension. In order to prove Theorem 1.5, we would lie to be able to claim that functions t B d + tk and t Π(B d + tk well defined and twice differentiable at t = 0. Unfortunately, this cannot be expected to be true for a general convex body K. To overcome this difficulty, we will first prove our theorem for symmetric convex bodies K with smooth boundary. It is well nown (see [W3] or again [Sc] that in this case K is a generalized zonoid, i.e. the support function of K is given by h K (u = 1 x, u f(xdx, S where f : S R is an even, continuous function. Let δ = ( max f(x 1. For each t ( δ, δ we define a convex body M t via its support x S function h Mt (u = 1 x, u (1 + tf(xdx, u S. (10 S Note that for t > 0, M t = ΠB d + tk, while for t < 0 Minowsi addition is replaced with Minowsi subtraction. Although Minowsi subtraction, when meaningful, does not always have good behavior (see [Sc], the integral representation (10 (since 1 + tf 0 for t < δ, allows us, by a result of Weil, to derive nice integral expressions for the volumes of M t and ΠM t (see [W1] or [Sc] for M t and [Sa] for ΠM t. Those formulas give us that the functions M t and ΠM t are polynomials in t, hence both twice differentiable in ( δ, δ. This simple observation will be crucial for the proof of Theorem
11 Moreover, we also note that the curvature function f Mt is proportional to Q(1 + tf. Thus, there exists δ > 0 such that f Mt is sufficiently close to 1 for t < δ. Next, applying Theorem 1.3, we conclude that P (M t P (B d for t < δ. Thereby, it follows by an obvious rescaling that the point t = 0 is a local minimizer for the function t P (B d + tk. One can chec that if for two twice differentiable functions f, g : R R + with g(0, g (0 > 0, the function f/g is attains a local minimum at 0, then f (0/g (0 f(0/g(0 and there is equality if f/g is constant. Therefore, d dt Π(Bd + tk ΠBd d ( B d t=0 B d dt + tk d ( =: A d B d t=0 dt + tk, (11 t=0 with equality if K = B. d By definition, the first and second derivative of the function t B d +tk at t = 0 are proportional to W (K and W d (K respectively. Hence an elementary calculation shows that d ( B d dt + tk = γ d W(K + δ d W d (K. t=0 Next, note that for u S, using (9, we have: h Π(B d +tk(u = (B d + tk u = t(k u + B d = B u d + ζ i,d t i W d i 1 (K u where ζ i,d are positive constants. Therefore, again by (9, we get: Π(B d + tk = = i=1 d ζ i,d t i h Πd i 1 K(u + h ΠB d (u, t 0, i=1 d ζ i,d t i Π d i 1 K + ζ 0,d B d i=1 = t ( η d W d (Π d K + θ d W (Π d 3 K + Θ(t + O(t 3 = t ( η d W d (Π d K + λ d W d (K + Θ(t + O(t 3, t 0, where we used (4. Consequently, d Π(B d dt + tk = η d W d (Π d K + λ d W d (K, t=0 so (11 becomes: W d (Π d K γ d W η (K + δ d λ d W d (K =: a d W d η (K + β d W d (K. d Note that since (11 is sharp for the ball, the last inequality is also sharp. To conclude that β d > 0, notice that if β d 0, then by the use of ( and (4, for i = d, we would get: a d W (K W d (Π d K+ β d W d (K ω d W (Π d K+ β d ω d W (K =: a dw (K, for all convex bodies K, with equality everywhere if K is a ball. This is a contradiction, thus β d > 0. 11
12 We have established our inequality for symmetric convex bodies with smooth boundary. This extends easily to all symmetric convex bodies. Assume, now, that K is a general convex body. Define the difference body DK = 1 (K K. Since DK is symmetric, we have: W d (Π d DK a d W (DK + β d W d (DK. By the additivity of the mean width functional, we immediately conclude that Π d DK = Π d K and W (DK = W (K. Hence, we only need to prove that W d (DK W d (K and the inequality is strict if K is not centrally symmetric. By the additivity of mixed volumes, we easily get: W d (DK = 1 V (K, K, Bd [d ] + 1 V (K, K, Bd [d ]. Finally, use the general Alesandrov-Fenchel inequality to conclude that V (K 1,..., K d V (K 1, K 1, K 3,..., K d V (K, K, K 3,..., K d, V (K, K, B d,..., B d V (K, K, B d,..., B d 1 V ( K, K, B d,..., B d 1 = Wd (K. It is well nown (see [Sc, Theorem 7.6.] that there is equality in the last inequality if and only if K is centrally symmetric, which ends our proof. Before ending this note, we would lie to remar that our method does not provide further information about the equality cases for the inequality of Theorem 1.5. One may naturally conjecture that there is equality if and only if K is a ball. References [FNRZ] A. Fish, F. Nazarov, D. Ryabogin, A. Zvavitch, The behavior of iterations of the intersection body operator in a small neighborhood of the unit ball, Adv. Math., 6 (011, no 3, [Ga] [Gr] R. J. Gardner, Geometric tomography. Second edition, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications 58 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 006. H. Groemer, Geometric Applications of Fourier Series and Spherical Harmonics, Cambridge University Press, New Yor, [GP] A. Giannopoulos, M. Papadimitrais, Isotropic surface area measures, Mathematia 46 ( [Ko] A. Koldobsy, Fourier Analysis in Convex Geometry, Math. Surveys and Monographs, AMS, Providence RI 005. [KoY] A. Koldobsy, V. Yasin, The Interface between Convex Geometry and Harmonic Analysis, CBMS Regional Conference Series, 108, American Mathematical Society, Providence RI, 008. [Lu1] E. Lutwa, Intersection bodies and dual mixed volumes, Advances in Math. 71 (1988, [Lu] E. Lutwa, Centroid bodies and dual mixed volumes, Proc. London Math. Soc. 60 (1990, [Lu3] E. Lutwa, On quermassintegrals of mixed projection bodies, Geom. Dedicata 33 (
13 [Lu4] E. Lutwa, Selected affine isoperimetric inequalities, In a Handboo of Convex Geometry, ed. by P.M. Gruber and J.M. Wills. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993, pp [P1] [P] [Sa] C. M. Petty, Projection bodies Proc. Colloquium on Convexity (Copenhagen, Kobenhavns Univ. Mat. Inst., Copenhagen. C. M. Petty, Isoperimetric problems. Proceedings of the Conference on Convexity and Combinatorial Geometry (Univ. Olahoma, Norman, Ola., Dept. Math., Univ. Olahoma, Norman, Ola., C. Saroglou, Volumes of projection bodies of some classes of convex bodies, Mathematia 57 ( [Sch1] R. Schneider, Geometric inequalities for Poisson processes of convex bodies and cylinders, Results Math. 11 ( [Sc] R. Schneider, Convex bodies: the Brunn-Minowsi theory. Second expanded edition. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications 151, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 014. [W1] W. Weil, Über die Projetionenörper onvexer Polytope, Arch. Math. ( [W] W. Weil, Kontinuierliche Linearombination won Strecen, Math. Z. 148 ( [W3] W. Weil, Centrally symmetric convex bodies and distributions, Israel J. Math. 4 (1976, [Zh] G. Zhang, The affine Sobolev inequality, J. diff. geom. 53 (1999, Christos Saroglou Department of Mathematical Sciences Kent State University Kent, OH 444, USA address: csaroglo@ent.edu & christos.saroglou@gmail.com Artem Zvavitch Department of Mathematical Sciences Kent State University Kent, OH 444, USA address: zvavitch@math.ent.edu 13
Star bodies with completely symmetric sections
Star bodies with completely symmetric sections Sergii Myroshnychenko, Dmitry Ryabogin, and Christos Saroglou Abstract We say that a star body is completely symmetric if it has centroid at the origin and
More informationGAUSSIAN MEASURE OF SECTIONS OF DILATES AND TRANSLATIONS OF CONVEX BODIES. 2π) n
GAUSSIAN MEASURE OF SECTIONS OF DILATES AND TRANSLATIONS OF CONVEX BODIES. A. ZVAVITCH Abstract. In this paper we give a solution for the Gaussian version of the Busemann-Petty problem with additional
More informationGaussian Measure of Sections of convex bodies
Gaussian Measure of Sections of convex bodies A. Zvavitch Department of Mathematics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 652, USA Abstract In this paper we study properties of sections of convex bodies
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.mg] 22 Mar 2010
June 15, 2018 arxiv:1003.4056v1 [math.mg] 22 Mar 2010 THE BEHAVIOR OF ITERATIONS OF THE INTERSECTION BODY OPERATOR IN A SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE UNIT BALL ALEXANDER FISH, FEDOR NAZAROV, DMITRY RYABOGIN,
More informationVolumes of projection bodies of some classes of convex bodies
Volumes of projection bodies of some classes of convex bodies Christos Saroglou University of Crete Department of Mathematics Abstract Schneider posed the problem of determining the maximal value of the
More informationThe unit ball is an attractor of the intersection body operator
Advances in Mathematics 226 (2011) 2629 2642 www.elsevier.com/locate/aim The unit ball is an attractor of the intersection body operator Alexander Fish a, Fedor Nazarov a, Dmitry Ryabogin b,, Artem Zvavitch
More informationRECONSTRUCTION OF CONVEX BODIES OF REVOLUTION FROM THE AREAS OF THEIR SHADOWS
RECONSTRUCTION OF CONVEX BODIES OF REVOLUTION FROM THE AREAS OF THEIR SHADOWS D. RYABOGIN AND A. ZVAVITCH Abstract. In this note we reconstruct a convex body of revolution from the areas of its shadows
More informationGENERAL MIXED CHORD-INTEGRALS OF STAR BODIES
ROCKY MOUNTAIN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Volume 46, Number 5, 206 GENERAL MIXED CHORD-INTEGRALS OF STAR BODIES YIBIN FENG AND WEIDONG WANG ABSTRACT. Mixed chord-integrals of star bodies were first defined
More informationOn a Generalization of the Busemann Petty Problem
Convex Geometric Analysis MSRI Publications Volume 34, 1998 On a Generalization of the Busemann Petty Problem JEAN BOURGAIN AND GAOYONG ZHANG Abstract. The generalized Busemann Petty problem asks: If K
More informationA NEW ELLIPSOID ASSOCIATED WITH CONVEX BODIES
A NEW ELLIPSOID ASSOCIATED WITH CONVEX BODIES Erwin Lutwak, Deane Yang, and Gaoyong Zhang Department of Mathematics Polytechnic University Brooklyn, NY 11201 Abstract. It is shown that corresponding to
More informationEstimates for the affine and dual affine quermassintegrals of convex bodies
Estimates for the affine and dual affine quermassintegrals of convex bodies Nikos Dafnis and Grigoris Paouris Abstract We provide estimates for suitable normalizations of the affine and dual affine quermassintegrals
More informationBulletin of the. Iranian Mathematical Society
ISSN: 1017-060X (Print) ISSN: 1735-8515 (Online) Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society Vol. 41 (2015), No. 3, pp. 581 590. Title: Volume difference inequalities for the projection and intersection
More informationNAKAJIMA S PROBLEM: CONVEX BODIES OF CONSTANT WIDTH AND CONSTANT BRIGHTNESS
NAKAJIMA S PROBLEM: CONVEX BODIES OF CONSTANT WIDTH AND CONSTANT BRIGHTNESS RALPH HOWARD AND DANIEL HUG Dedicated to Rolf Schneider on the occasion of his 65th birthday ABSTRACT. For a convex body K R
More informationDeviation Measures and Normals of Convex Bodies
Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie Contributions to Algebra Geometry Volume 45 (2004), No. 1, 155-167. Deviation Measures Normals of Convex Bodies Dedicated to Professor August Florian on the occasion
More informationAFFINE ISOPERIMETRIC INEQUALITIES. Erwin Lutwak, Deane Yang, and Gaoyong Zhang. Department of Mathematics Polytechnic University Brooklyn, NY 11201
L p AFFINE ISOPERIMETRIC INEQUALITIES Erwin Lutwak, Deane Yang, and Gaoyong Zhang Department of Mathematics Polytechnic University Brooklyn, NY 11201 Affine isoperimetric inequalities compare functionals,
More informationDAR S CONJECTURE AND THE LOG-BRUNN-MINKOSKI INEQUALITY
DAR S CONJECTURE AND THE LOG-BRUNN-MINKOSKI INEQUALITY DONGMENG XI AND GANGSONG LENG Abstract. In 999, Dar conjectured if there is a stronger version of the celebrated Brunn-Minkowski inequality. However,
More informationMinkowski Valuations
Minkowski Valuations Monika Ludwig Abstract Centroid and difference bodies define SL(n) equivariant operators on convex bodies and these operators are valuations with respect to Minkowski addition. We
More informationINEQUALITIES FOR DUAL AFFINE QUERMASSINTEGRALS
INEQUALITIES FOR DUAL AFFINE QUERMASSINTEGRALS YUAN JUN AND LENG GANGSONG Received 18 April 2005; Revised 2 November 2005; Accepted 8 November 2005 For star bodies, the dual affine quermassintegrals were
More informationTHE STEINER FORMULA FOR EROSIONS. then one shows in integral geometry that the volume of A ρk (ρ 0) is a polynomial of degree n:
THE STEINER FORMULA FOR EROSIONS. G. MATHERON Abstract. If A and K are compact convex sets in R n, a Steiner-type formula is valid for the erosion of A by K if and only if A is open with respect to K.
More informationRotation Invariant Minkowski Classes of Convex Bodies
Rotation Invariant Minkowski Classes of Convex Bodies Rolf Schneider and Franz E. Schuster Abstract A Minkowski class is a closed subset of the space of convex bodies in Euclidean space R n which is closed
More informationALEXANDER KOLDOBSKY AND ALAIN PAJOR. Abstract. We prove that there exists an absolute constant C so that µ(k) C p max. ξ S n 1 µ(k ξ ) K 1/n
A REMARK ON MEASURES OF SECTIONS OF L p -BALLS arxiv:1601.02441v1 [math.mg] 11 Jan 2016 ALEXANDER KOLDOBSKY AND ALAIN PAJOR Abstract. We prove that there exists an absolute constant C so that µ(k) C p
More informationNAKAJIMA S PROBLEM FOR GENERAL CONVEX BODIES
NAKAJIMA S PROBLEM FOR GENERAL CONVEX BODIES DANIEL HUG ABSTRACT. For a convex body K R n, the kth projection function of K assigns to any k-dimensional linear subspace of R n the k-volume of the orthogonal
More informationValuations on Polytopes containing the Origin in their Interiors
Valuations on Polytopes containing the Origin in their Interiors Monika Ludwig Abteilung für Analysis, Technische Universität Wien Wiedner Hauptstraße 8-10/1142, 1040 Wien, Austria E-mail: monika.ludwig@tuwien.ac.at
More information1 Directional Derivatives and Differentiability
Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1 Directional Derivatives and Differentiability Let E R N, let f : E R and let x 0 E. Given a direction v R N, let L be the line through x 0 in the direction v, that is, L :=
More informationORLICZ MIXED INTERSECTION BODIES
Vol. 37 ( 07 No. 3 J. of Math. (PRC ORICZ MIXED INTERSECTION BODIES GUO Yuan-yuan, MA Tong-yi, GAO i (.School of Mathematics and Statistics, Northwest Normal University, anzhou 730070, China (.School of
More informationBanach Journal of Mathematical Analysis ISSN: (electronic)
Banach J. Math. Anal. 2 (2008), no., 70 77 Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis ISSN: 735-8787 (electronic) http://www.math-analysis.org WIDTH-INTEGRALS AND AFFINE SURFACE AREA OF CONVEX BODIES WING-SUM
More informationOn mixed discriminants of positively definite matrix
Also available at http://amc-journal.eu ISSN 1855-3966 printed edn., ISSN 1855-3974 electronic edn. ARS MATHEMATICA CONTEMPORANEA 9 2015 261 266 On mixed discriminants of positively definite matrix Chang-Jian
More informationRigidity and Non-rigidity Results on the Sphere
Rigidity and Non-rigidity Results on the Sphere Fengbo Hang Xiaodong Wang Department of Mathematics Michigan State University Oct., 00 1 Introduction It is a simple consequence of the maximum principle
More informationMeasuring Ellipsoids 1
Measuring Ellipsoids 1 Igor Rivin Temple University 2 What is an ellipsoid? E = {x E n Ax = 1}, where A is a non-singular linear transformation of E n. Remark that Ax = Ax, Ax = x, A t Ax. The matrix Q
More informationA class of non-convex polytopes that admit no orthonormal basis of exponentials
A class of non-convex polytopes that admit no orthonormal basis of exponentials Mihail N. Kolountzakis and Michael Papadimitrakis 1 Abstract A conjecture of Fuglede states that a bounded measurable set
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.mg] 29 Sep 2015
ON BODIES WITH DIRECTLY CONGRUENT PROJECTIONS AND SECTIONS arxiv:1412.2727v2 [math.mg] 29 Sep 2015 M. ANGELES ALFONSECA, MICHELLE CORDIER, AND DMITRY RYABOGIN Abstract. Let K and L be two convex bodies
More informationTHE DUAL BRUNN-MINKOWSKI THEORY FOR BOUNDED BOREL SETS: DUAL AFFINE QUERMASSINTEGRALS AND INEQUALITIES
June 22, 2007 THE DUAL BRUNN-MINKOWSKI THEORY FOR BOUNDED BOREL SETS: DUAL AFFINE QUERMASSINTEGRALS AND INEQUALITIES R. J. GARDNER Abstract. This paper develops a significant extension of E. Lutwak s dual
More informationBrunn-Minkowski type inequalities for L p Blaschke- Minkowski homomorphisms
Available online at www.tjnsa.com J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 9 (206), 6034 6040 Research Article Brunn-Minkowski type inequalities for L p Blaschke- Minkowski homomorphisms Feixiang Chen a,b,, Gangsong Leng
More informationON SUCCESSIVE RADII AND p-sums OF CONVEX BODIES
ON SUCCESSIVE RADII AND p-sums OF CONVEX BODIES BERNARDO GONZÁLEZ AND MARÍA A. HERNÁNDEZ CIFRE Abstract. We study the behavior of the so called successive inner and outer radii with respect to the p-sums
More informationRate of convergence of geometric symmetrizations
Rate of convergence of geometric symmetrizations B. Klartag School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel Abstract It is a classical fact, that given an arbitrary convex
More informationGeometry and topology of continuous best and near best approximations
Journal of Approximation Theory 105: 252 262, Geometry and topology of continuous best and near best approximations Paul C. Kainen Dept. of Mathematics Georgetown University Washington, D.C. 20057 Věra
More informationLaplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas
Chapter 1 Laplace s Equation Let be an open set in R n. A function u C 2 () is called harmonic in if it satisfies Laplace s equation n (1.1) u := D ii u = 0 in. i=1 A function u C 2 () is called subharmonic
More informationL p -Width-Integrals and Affine Surface Areas
LIBERTAS MATHEMATICA, vol XXX (2010) L p -Width-Integrals and Affine Surface Areas Chang-jian ZHAO and Mihály BENCZE Abstract. The main purposes of this paper are to establish some new Brunn- Minkowski
More informationOn John type ellipsoids
On John type ellipsoids B. Klartag Tel Aviv University Abstract Given an arbitrary convex symmetric body K R n, we construct a natural and non-trivial continuous map u K which associates ellipsoids to
More informationDerivatives of Harmonic Bergman and Bloch Functions on the Ball
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 26, 1 123 (21) doi:1.16/jmaa.2.7438, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Derivatives of Harmonic ergman and loch Functions on the all oo
More informationASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE FOR SOLUTIONS OF THE NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS. Tian Ma. Shouhong Wang
DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS Website: http://aimsciences.org DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS Volume 11, Number 1, July 004 pp. 189 04 ASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE FOR SOLUTIONS OF THE NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS Tian Ma Department of
More informationCharacterization of Self-Polar Convex Functions
Characterization of Self-Polar Convex Functions Liran Rotem School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel Abstract In a work by Artstein-Avidan and Milman the concept of
More informationISOPERIMETRIC INEQUALITY FOR FLAT SURFACES
Proceedings of The Thirteenth International Workshop on Diff. Geom. 3(9) 3-9 ISOPERIMETRIC INEQUALITY FOR FLAT SURFACES JAIGYOUNG CHOE Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, 3-7, Korea e-mail : choe@kias.re.kr
More informationVISCOSITY SOLUTIONS. We follow Han and Lin, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations, 5.
VISCOSITY SOLUTIONS PETER HINTZ We follow Han and Lin, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations, 5. 1. Motivation Throughout, we will assume that Ω R n is a bounded and connected domain and that a ij C(Ω)
More informationA sharp Rogers Shephard type inequality for Orlicz-difference body of planar convex bodies
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci. Vol. 124, No. 4, November 2014, pp. 573 580. c Indian Academy of Sciences A sharp Rogers Shephard type inequality for Orlicz-difference body of planar convex bodies
More informationRing-like structures of frequency domains of wavelets
Ring-like structures of frequency domains of wavelets Zhihua Zhang and Naoki aito Dept. of Math., Univ. of California, Davis, California, 95616, UA. E-mail: zzh@ucdavis.edu saito@math.ucdavis.edu Abstract.
More informationS chauder Theory. x 2. = log( x 1 + x 2 ) + 1 ( x 1 + x 2 ) 2. ( 5) x 1 + x 2 x 1 + x 2. 2 = 2 x 1. x 1 x 2. 1 x 1.
Sep. 1 9 Intuitively, the solution u to the Poisson equation S chauder Theory u = f 1 should have better regularity than the right hand side f. In particular one expects u to be twice more differentiable
More informationBRUNN-MINKOWSKI INEQUALITY FOR L p -MIXED INTERSECTION BODIES
Miskolc Mathematical Notes HU e-issn 1787-2413 Vol. 18 (2017), No. 1, pp. 507 514 DOI: 10.18514/MMN.2017.416 BRUNN-MINKOWSKI INEQUALITY FOR L p -MIXED INTERSECTION BODIES CHANG-JIAN HAO AND MIHÁLY BENCE
More informationJUHA KINNUNEN. Harmonic Analysis
JUHA KINNUNEN Harmonic Analysis Department of Mathematics and Systems Analysis, Aalto University 27 Contents Calderón-Zygmund decomposition. Dyadic subcubes of a cube.........................2 Dyadic cubes
More informationAffine surface area and convex bodies of elliptic type
Affine surface area and convex bodies of elliptic type Rolf Schneider Abstract If a convex body K in R n is contained in a convex body L of elliptic type (a curvature image), then it is known that the
More informationMINKOWSKI PROBLEM FOR POLYTOPES. α i u i = 0.
ON THE L p MINKOWSKI PROBLEM FOR POLYTOPES DANIEL HUG, ERWIN LUTWAK, DEANE YANG, AND GAOYONG ZHANG Abstract. Two new approaches are presented to establish the existence of polytopal solutions to the discrete-data
More informationA LOCALIZATION PROPERTY AT THE BOUNDARY FOR MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION
A LOCALIZATION PROPERTY AT THE BOUNDARY FOR MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION O. SAVIN. Introduction In this paper we study the geometry of the sections for solutions to the Monge- Ampere equation det D 2 u = f, u
More informationLARGE DEVIATIONS OF TYPICAL LINEAR FUNCTIONALS ON A CONVEX BODY WITH UNCONDITIONAL BASIS. S. G. Bobkov and F. L. Nazarov. September 25, 2011
LARGE DEVIATIONS OF TYPICAL LINEAR FUNCTIONALS ON A CONVEX BODY WITH UNCONDITIONAL BASIS S. G. Bobkov and F. L. Nazarov September 25, 20 Abstract We study large deviations of linear functionals on an isotropic
More informationMINKOWSKI AREAS AND VALUATIONS. Monika Ludwig. Abstract
MINKOWSKI AREAS AND VALUATIONS Monika Ludwig Abstract All continuous GL(n) covariant valuations that map convex bodies to convex bodies are completely classified. This establishes a characterization of
More informationAPPLICATION OF A FOURIER RESTRICTION THEOREM TO CERTAIN FAMILIES OF PROJECTIONS IN R 3
APPLICATION OF A FOURIER RESTRICTION THEOREM TO CERTAIN FAMILIES OF PROJECTIONS IN R 3 DANIEL OBERLIN AND RICHARD OBERLIN Abstract. We use a restriction theorem for Fourier transforms of fractal measures
More informationConvex Geometry. Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg. Applications of the Brascamp-Lieb and Barthe inequalities. Exercise 12.
Applications of the Brascamp-Lieb and Barthe inequalities Exercise 12.1 Show that if m Ker M i {0} then both BL-I) and B-I) hold trivially. Exercise 12.2 Let λ 0, 1) and let f, g, h : R 0 R 0 be measurable
More informationOn the cells in a stationary Poisson hyperplane mosaic
On the cells in a stationary Poisson hyperplane mosaic Matthias Reitzner and Rolf Schneider Abstract Let X be the mosaic generated by a stationary Poisson hyperplane process X in R d. Under some mild conditions
More informationOn polynomially integrable convex bodies
On polynomially integrable convex bodies A. oldobsky, A. Merkurjev, and V. Yaskin Abstract An infinitely smooth convex body in R n is called polynomially integrable of degree N if its parallel section
More informationThe De Giorgi-Nash-Moser Estimates
The De Giorgi-Nash-Moser Estimates We are going to discuss the the equation Lu D i (a ij (x)d j u) = 0 in B 4 R n. (1) The a ij, with i, j {1,..., n}, are functions on the ball B 4. Here and in the following
More informationSHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES. 1. Introduction
SHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES GILES AUCHMUTY Abstract. This paper describes sharp inequalities for the trace of Sobolev functions on the boundary of a bounded region R N. The inequalities bound (semi-)norms
More informationIMA Preprint Series # 2143
A BASIC INEQUALITY FOR THE STOKES OPERATOR RELATED TO THE NAVIER BOUNDARY CONDITION By Luan Thach Hoang IMA Preprint Series # 2143 ( November 2006 ) INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS UNIVERSITY
More information3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due ). Show that the open disk x 2 + y 2 < 1 is a countable union of planar elementary sets. Show that the closed disk x 2 + y 2 1 is a countable
More informationThe small ball property in Banach spaces (quantitative results)
The small ball property in Banach spaces (quantitative results) Ehrhard Behrends Abstract A metric space (M, d) is said to have the small ball property (sbp) if for every ε 0 > 0 there exists a sequence
More informationEXPOSITORY NOTES ON DISTRIBUTION THEORY, FALL 2018
EXPOSITORY NOTES ON DISTRIBUTION THEORY, FALL 2018 While these notes are under construction, I expect there will be many typos. The main reference for this is volume 1 of Hörmander, The analysis of liner
More informationFinite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product
Chapter 4 Hilbert Spaces 4.1 Inner Product Spaces Inner Product Space. A complex vector space E is called an inner product space (or a pre-hilbert space, or a unitary space) if there is a mapping (, )
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ds] 31 Jul 2018
arxiv:1807.11801v1 [math.ds] 31 Jul 2018 On the interior of projections of planar self-similar sets YUKI TAKAHASHI Abstract. We consider projections of planar self-similar sets, and show that one can create
More informationREGULARITY FOR INFINITY HARMONIC FUNCTIONS IN TWO DIMENSIONS
C,α REGULARITY FOR INFINITY HARMONIC FUNCTIONS IN TWO DIMENSIONS LAWRENCE C. EVANS AND OVIDIU SAVIN Abstract. We propose a new method for showing C,α regularity for solutions of the infinity Laplacian
More informationOPERATIONS BETWEEN SETS IN GEOMETRY RICHARD J. GARDNER, DANIEL HUG, AND WOLFGANG WEIL
OPERATIONS BETWEEN SETS IN GEOMETRY January 4, 2013 RICHARD J. GARDNER, DANIEL HUG, AND WOLFGANG WEIL Abstract. An investigation is launched into the fundamental characteristics of operations on and between
More information9 Radon-Nikodym theorem and conditioning
Tel Aviv University, 2015 Functions of real variables 93 9 Radon-Nikodym theorem and conditioning 9a Borel-Kolmogorov paradox............. 93 9b Radon-Nikodym theorem.............. 94 9c Conditioning.....................
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.dg] 7 May 2016
THE IMPROVED ISOPERIMETRIC INEQUALITY AND THE WIGNER CAUSTIC OF PLANAR OVALS arxiv:151.6684v [math.dg] 7 May 16 MICHA L ZWIERZYŃSKI Abstract. The classical isoperimetric inequality in the Euclidean plane
More informationProblem Set 6: Solutions Math 201A: Fall a n x n,
Problem Set 6: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016 Problem 1. Is (x n ) n=0 a Schauder basis of C([0, 1])? No. If f(x) = a n x n, n=0 where the series converges uniformly on [0, 1], then f has a power series
More informationQuotient for radial Blaschke-Minkowski homomorphisms by Chang-Jian Zhao (1), Wing-Sum Cheung (2)
Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roumanie Tome 60 108) No. 2 2017 147 157 Quotient for radial Blaschke-Minkowski homomorphisms by Chang-Jian Zhao 1) Wing-Sum Cheung 2) Abstract Some new inequalities for quotient
More informationRecall that any inner product space V has an associated norm defined by
Hilbert Spaces Recall that any inner product space V has an associated norm defined by v = v v. Thus an inner product space can be viewed as a special kind of normed vector space. In particular every inner
More informationAuerbach bases and minimal volume sufficient enlargements
Auerbach bases and minimal volume sufficient enlargements M. I. Ostrovskii January, 2009 Abstract. Let B Y denote the unit ball of a normed linear space Y. A symmetric, bounded, closed, convex set A in
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.mg] 26 Jul 2016
Extension of the first mixed volume to nonconvex sets Emmanuel Tsukerman University of California, Berkeley arxiv:1607.0780v1 [math.mg] 6 Jul 016 July 7, 016 Abstract We study the first mixed volume for
More informationIntroduction to Real Analysis Alternative Chapter 1
Christopher Heil Introduction to Real Analysis Alternative Chapter 1 A Primer on Norms and Banach Spaces Last Updated: March 10, 2018 c 2018 by Christopher Heil Chapter 1 A Primer on Norms and Banach Spaces
More informationMath The Laplacian. 1 Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution
Math. 209 The Laplacian Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution Let be a bounded open set in R n, n 2, with smooth boundary. The fact that the boundary is smooth means that at each point x the external
More informationGeneralized metric properties of spheres and renorming of Banach spaces
arxiv:1605.08175v2 [math.fa] 5 Nov 2018 Generalized metric properties of spheres and renorming of Banach spaces 1 Introduction S. Ferrari, J. Orihuela, M. Raja November 6, 2018 Throughout this paper X
More informationNotions such as convergent sequence and Cauchy sequence make sense for any metric space. Convergent Sequences are Cauchy
Banach Spaces These notes provide an introduction to Banach spaces, which are complete normed vector spaces. For the purposes of these notes, all vector spaces are assumed to be over the real numbers.
More informationRegularity for Poisson Equation
Regularity for Poisson Equation OcMountain Daylight Time. 4, 20 Intuitively, the solution u to the Poisson equation u= f () should have better regularity than the right hand side f. In particular one expects
More informationSpectral Gap and Concentration for Some Spherically Symmetric Probability Measures
Spectral Gap and Concentration for Some Spherically Symmetric Probability Measures S.G. Bobkov School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, 127 Vincent Hall, 26 Church St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455,
More informationLECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY
LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY 1. The Hopf-Rinow Theorem Recall that a Riemannian manifold (M, g) is called geodesically complete if the maximal defining interval of any geodesic is R. On the other
More informationSome lecture notes for Math 6050E: PDEs, Fall 2016
Some lecture notes for Math 65E: PDEs, Fall 216 Tianling Jin December 1, 216 1 Variational methods We discuss an example of the use of variational methods in obtaining existence of solutions. Theorem 1.1.
More informationWhitney s Extension Problem for C m
Whitney s Extension Problem for C m by Charles Fefferman Department of Mathematics Princeton University Fine Hall Washington Road Princeton, New Jersey 08544 Email: cf@math.princeton.edu Supported by Grant
More informationSUCCESSIVE-MINIMA-TYPE INEQUALITIES. U. Betke, M. Henk and J.M. Wills
SUCCESSIVE-MINIMA-TYPE INEQUALITIES U. Betke, M. Henk and J.M. Wills Abstract. We show analogues of Minkowski s theorem on successive minima, where the volume is replaced by the lattice point enumerator.
More informationBANACH SPACES IN WHICH EVERY p-weakly SUMMABLE SEQUENCE LIES IN THE RANGE OF A VECTOR MEASURE
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 124, Number 7, July 1996 BANACH SPACES IN WHICH EVERY p-weakly SUMMABLE SEQUENCE LIES IN THE RANGE OF A VECTOR MEASURE C. PIÑEIRO (Communicated by
More informationNumerical Solutions to Partial Differential Equations
Numerical Solutions to Partial Differential Equations Zhiping Li LMAM and School of Mathematical Sciences Peking University The Residual and Error of Finite Element Solutions Mixed BVP of Poisson Equation
More informationGrowth Theorems and Harnack Inequality for Second Order Parabolic Equations
This is an updated version of the paper published in: Contemporary Mathematics, Volume 277, 2001, pp. 87-112. Growth Theorems and Harnack Inequality for Second Order Parabolic Equations E. Ferretti and
More informationBORELL S GENERALIZED PRÉKOPA-LEINDLER INEQUALITY: A SIMPLE PROOF. Arnaud Marsiglietti. IMA Preprint Series #2461. (December 2015)
BORELL S GENERALIZED PRÉKOPA-LEINDLER INEQUALITY: A SIMPLE PROOF By Arnaud Marsiglietti IMA Preprint Series #2461 December 215 INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 4 Lind
More informationA. Iosevich and I. Laba January 9, Introduction
K-DISTANCE SETS, FALCONER CONJECTURE, AND DISCRETE ANALOGS A. Iosevich and I. Laba January 9, 004 Abstract. In this paper we prove a series of results on the size of distance sets corresponding to sets
More informationConvexity in R n. The following lemma will be needed in a while. Lemma 1 Let x E, u R n. If τ I(x, u), τ 0, define. f(x + τu) f(x). τ.
Convexity in R n Let E be a convex subset of R n. A function f : E (, ] is convex iff f(tx + (1 t)y) (1 t)f(x) + tf(y) x, y E, t [0, 1]. A similar definition holds in any vector space. A topology is needed
More informationTHE MATTILA INTEGRAL ASSOCIATED WITH SIGN INDEFINITE MEASURES. Alex Iosevich and Misha Rudnev. August 3, Introduction
THE MATTILA INTEGRAL ASSOCIATED WITH SIGN INDEFINITE MEASURES Alex Iosevich and Misha Rudnev August 3, 005 Abstract. In order to quantitatively illustrate the role of positivity in the Falconer distance
More informationMORE NOTES FOR MATH 823, FALL 2007
MORE NOTES FOR MATH 83, FALL 007 Prop 1.1 Prop 1. Lemma 1.3 1. The Siegel upper half space 1.1. The Siegel upper half space and its Bergman kernel. The Siegel upper half space is the domain { U n+1 z C
More informationA Brunn Minkowski theory for coconvex sets of finite volume
A Brunn Minkowski theory for coconvex sets of finite volume Rolf Schneider Abstract Let C be a closed convex cone in R n, pointed and with interior points. We consider sets of the form A = C \ K, where
More informationSharp Sobolev Strichartz estimates for the free Schrödinger propagator
Sharp Sobolev Strichartz estimates for the free Schrödinger propagator Neal Bez, Chris Jeavons and Nikolaos Pattakos Abstract. We consider gaussian extremisability of sharp linear Sobolev Strichartz estimates
More informationHelly's Theorem and its Equivalences via Convex Analysis
Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 2014 Helly's Theorem and its Equivalences via Convex Analysis Adam Robinson Portland State University Let us know
More informationA VOLUME INEQUALITY FOR POLAR BODIES. Erwin Lutwak, Deane Yang and Gaoyong Zhang. Abstract
A VOLUME INEQUALITY FOR POLAR BODIES Erwin Lutwak, Deane Yang and Gaoyong Zhang Abstract A sharp affine isoperimetric inequality is established which gives a sharp lower bound for the volume of the polar
More informationWeighted norm inequalities for singular integral operators
Weighted norm inequalities for singular integral operators C. Pérez Journal of the London mathematical society 49 (994), 296 308. Departmento de Matemáticas Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 28049 Madrid,
More informationRiemann integral and volume are generalized to unbounded functions and sets. is an admissible set, and its volume is a Riemann integral, 1l E,
Tel Aviv University, 26 Analysis-III 9 9 Improper integral 9a Introduction....................... 9 9b Positive integrands................... 9c Special functions gamma and beta......... 4 9d Change of
More informationNUMERICAL RADIUS OF A HOLOMORPHIC MAPPING
Geometric Complex Analysis edited by Junjiro Noguchi et al. World Scientific, Singapore, 1995 pp.1 7 NUMERICAL RADIUS OF A HOLOMORPHIC MAPPING YUN SUNG CHOI Department of Mathematics Pohang University
More information