Structural Design under Fuzzy Randomness
|
|
- Basil Richard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 NSF workshop on Reliable Engineering Computing, September 15-17, 2004 Center for Reliable Engineering Computing, Georgia Tech Savannah, GA Structural Design under Fuzzy Randomness Michael Beer 1) Martin Liebscher 2) Bernd Möller 2) 1) Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science Rice University, Houston, TX 2) Institute for Statics and Dynamics of Structures Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
2 Program 1 Introduction 2 Uncertainty models 3 Quantification of uncertainty 4 Fuzzy structural analysis 5 Fuzzy probabilistic safety assessment 6 Structural design based on clustering 7 Examples 8 Conclusions
3 Introduction (1) 1 Introduction the engineer s endeavor realistic structural analysis and safety assessment prerequisites: suitably matched computational models geometrically and physically nonlinear algorithms for numerical simulation of structural behavior appropriate description of structural parameters uncertainty has to be accounted for in its natural form
4 Introduction (2) 1 Introduction modeling structural parameters geometry? material? loading? foundation?
5 Introduction (3) 1 Introduction deterministic variable random variable x f(x) F(x) x! very few information! changing reproduction conditions! uncertain measured values! linguistic assessments! experience, expert knowledge alternative uncertainty models fuzzy variable fuzzy random variable
6 Fuzzy sets 2 Uncertainty models α-level set α-discretization X α = { x X µ X(x) α } X {( X ( ))} = X α ; µ α µ X (x) X α i α X αi, αk i α k αi, membership function α α k k (0;1] α k x αk l X αk x αk r x support S(X)
7 Fuzzy random variables (1) 2 Uncertainty models fuzzy random variable X fuzzy result of the uncertain mapping Ω 6 F(ú n ) Ω... space of the random elementary events ω F(ú n )... set of all fuzzy numbers x in ú n X is the fuzzy set of all possible originals X j original X j µ(x) ω 1 ω 2 ω 3 ω 4 ω 5 ω 6 x 1 x 4 ω 0 Ω x 2 x 6 x 3 x 5 real valued random variable X that is completely enclosed in X x 0 X = ú 1
8 Fuzzy random variables (2) 2 Uncertainty models fuzzy probability distribution function F(x) F(x) = bunch of the F j (x) of the originals X j of X F(x) = {( F (x); (F (x)))} α µ F (x) = [ F (x); F (x)] α µ (F F α α l α α r (x)) = α α (0;1] 1 max P X j α l (x) = j, α ; = t µ(f(x)) x, t X t k F(x i ) F α=0 r (x i ) F α=0 l (x i ) x = k ú n ;1 k x, t X = Fα r (x) = max P X j, α = t j tk < xk ;k = 1,..., n ú n F(x) F α=1 (x i ) n 0.5 f(x) f(x) F(x) x i µ = 0 µ = 1 x µ = 0 µ = 1 x
9 Fuzzy random variables (3) 2 Uncertainty models special case fuzzy random variable X special case real random variable X µ(f(x)) F(x) µ(f(x)) 1 1 F(x) fuzzy variable x µ(f(x)) F(x) x 0 F(x) 1 x µ(x) 1 x 0 x 0 x
10 3 Quantification of uncertainty Quantification of fuzzy variables (fuzzification) objective and subjective information, expert knowledge limited data µ(β D ) n 4 β D = <7.5; 14.17; 57.5> linguistic assessment µ(β D ) low medium high β D [N/mm²] single uncertain measurement µ(d) β D [N/mm²] expert experience µ(x) crisp kernel set fuzzy interval d x
11 Quantification of fuzzy random variables 3 Quantification of uncertainty statistical information comprising partially non-stochastic uncertainty small sample size fuzzification of the uncertainty of statistical estimations and tests non-constant reproduction conditions that are known in detail separation of fuzziness and randomness by constructing groups non-constant, unknown reproduction conditions; uncertain measure values fuzzification of the sample elements followed by statistical evaluation s α=0 r s s α=1 s α=0 l _ x α=0 l F(x) with fuzzy parameters and fuzzy functional type _ x α=1 _ x _ x α=0 r F(x) µ = 1 µ = 0, interaction without interaction F(x) x
12 Basic numerical solution procedure 4 Fuzzy structural analysis fuzzy input variable x 1 = X 1 x 1 x = (...; x i ;...) 6 z = (...; z j ;...) x 1 0 X 1,α mapping x 2 0 X 2,α operator fuzzy input variable x 2 = X 2 x 1,α r X 1,α x 1,α l µ(x 1 ) µ(x 2 ) z j 0 Z j,α α α-level optimization α x 2,α r X 2,α x 2,α l x 2 µ(z j ) α fuzzy result variable z j = Z j z j,α l Z j,α z j,α r z j
13 Modified evolution strategy 4 Fuzzy structural analysis x 2 crisp input subspace X α x 2,α r lower distance bound upper distance bound for generating offspring points starting point improvement of z j no improvement of z j optimum point x opt,α x 2,α l x 1,α l x 1,α r x 1 post-computation recheck of all results for optimality
14 Fuzzy First Order Reliability Method (1) 5 Fuzzy probabilistic safety assessment original space of the basic variables fuzzy randomness Y f(x) fuzziness Y g(x) = 0 x 2 joint fuzzy probability density function f(x) µ = 1 µ = 0 fuzzy limit state surface g(x) = 0 fuzzy survival region X s : g(x) > 0 µ = 0 µ = 1 fuzzy failure region X f : g(x) < 0 x 1
15 5 Fuzzy probabilistic safety assessment Fuzzy First Order Reliability Method (1) g(x) α=1 > 0 x 2 g(x) α=1 = 0 g(x) α=1 = 0 g(x) α=1 # 0 x 2 µ(x s ) µ(x f ) g(x) = 0 fuzzy failure region X f : g(x) # 0 fuzzy survival region X s : g(x) > 0 x 1 x 1
16 Fuzzy First Order Reliability Method (1) 5 Fuzzy probabilistic safety assessment original space of the basic variables fuzzy randomness Y f(x) fuzziness Y g(x) = 0 fuzzy design point x B P f = x... f (x) X ; x f X s dx x 2 joint fuzzy probability density function f(x) µ = 1 fuzzy µ = 0 limit state µ(x surface g(x) B ) = 0 1 s Fuzzy First Order Reliability Method fuzzy survival region X s : g(x) > 0 µ = 0 µ = 1 x B t fuzzy failure region X f : g(x) < 0 x 1
17 5 Fuzzy probabilistic safety assessment Fuzzy First Order Reliability Method (2) complete fuzziness in h(y) = 0 y 2 n NN (y) h(y) = 0 0 ψ 2 ψ 1 standard normal space fuzzy design point y B fuzzy reliability index β y 1 µ(β) { p ( X ) ; m } β t i j fuzzy survival region h(y) > 0 β fuzzy design point y B µ = 0 µ = 1 α β α fuzzy failure region h(y) < 0 β α l β α r β
18 5 Fuzzy probabilistic safety assessment Fuzzy First Order Reliability Method (3) selection of an α-level numerical solution B α-level optimization determination of an original of each basic variable determination of one trajectory of f(x) determination of a single point in the space of the fuzzy structural parameters determination of one element of g(x) = 0 computation of one element β i of β α µ(β) β β α β i comparison of β i with β α l and β α r α number of α-levels sufficient? β β α l β α r
19 6 Structural design based on clustering Structural design based on clustering B concept fuzzy structural analysis and fuzzy probabilistic safety assessment set M(x) of discrete points x i in the input subspace, set M(z) of the assigned discrete points z i in the result subspace design constraints CT h subdividing M(z) into permissible and non-permissible points assigned permissible and non-permissible points within M(x) separate clustering of the permissible and non-permissible points from M(x) elimination of all non-permissible clusters including intersections with permissible clusters permissible clusters of design parameters representing alternative design variants
20 Design constraint µ(x 1, x 2 ) 1 z = f(x 1, x 2 ) 6 Structural design based on clustering µ(z) 1 α α 0 x 2 α 0 fuzzy result variable z z fuzzy input variables x 1 and x 2 x 1 points from α-level optimization permissible points non-permissible points permissible structural design variants, assessment of alternatives
21 Cluster analysis 6 Structural design based on clustering k-medoid method fuzzy cluster method x 2 crisp C1 C2 x 2 C1 C2 " c $ 0.25 " c $ C2 representative objects dissimilarity C3 similarity C3 C1 C3 determination of representative objects assignment of remaining objects to the most similar representative objects x 1 minimization of the functional c' k jv'1 j x 1 n i,j'1 µr iv µr jv d(i,j) 2 j n j'1 µr jv
22 6 Structural design based on clustering Design variants B modified fuzzy input variables modeling selection of a cluster or cluster combination definition of the support of the fuzzy input variable based on the cluster boundaries definition of the mean value x with :(x) = 1 construction of the membership function oriented to the primary fuzzy input variable based on " c -levels from fuzzy clustering representative object or prototype as mean value geometrical cluster center as mean value :(x) prototype " c = 0.5 " c = 0.25 x
23 6 Structural design based on clustering Assessment of alternative design variants (1) defuzzification JAIN-algorithm :(z) 1 k=2 k=1 CHEN-algorithm :(z) 1 : s (z) k=1 : s (z) k=0.5 maximizing set k z inf[ z] µ(z max ) z z = sup[ z] inf [ z] z z z z s z l [ ] µ (z) = sup min µ(z);µ(z ) z z z 0 z z r max z 0 = µ s zr zl + zl with: max z z l z 0 z r minimizing set z min with: k sup[ z] z µ(z min ) z z = sup[ z] inf [ z] z z z z additional methods: level rank method centroid method z
24 6 Structural design based on clustering Assessment of alternative design variants (2) constraint distance :(z) robustness modified SHANNON s entropy [ ] H(z) = k µ(z) ln(µ(z)) + (1 µ ( z)) ln(1 µ(z)) dz z z z 0 d s perm_z z relative sensitivity measure d s max uncertainty of the fuzzy result variables in relation to the uncertainty of the fuzzy input variables B(z ) j = H(z j) H(x ) i j min
25 Deterministic computational model 7 Examples geometrically and physically nonlinear numerical analysis of plane (prestressed) reinforced concrete bar structures imperfect straight bars with layered cross sections numerical integration of a system of 1st order ODE for the bars interaction between internal forces incremental-iterative solution technique to take account of complex loading processes consideration of all essential geometrical and physical nonlinearities: - large displacements and moderate rotations - realistic material description of reinforced concrete including cyclic and damage effects
26 Reinforced concrete frame 7 Examples 6000 mm νap V 0 νap 0 νap V 0 cross sections: 500/350 concrete: C 20/25 reinforcement steel: BSt i 16 2 i 16 4 i 16 stirrups: i 8 s = 200 concrete cover: c = P H (1) k n 3 (2) 4 ν load factor P H = 10 kn P V 0 = 100 kn p 0 = 10 kn/m 1 2 (3) k n loading process: 1) dead load 2) horizontal load P H 3) vertical loads νap V 0 and νap 0
27 Fuzzy structural analysis (1) 7 Examples fuzziness fuzzy rotational spring stiffness k n = < 5; 9; 13 > MNm/rad fuzzy load factor ν = < 5.5; 5.9; 6.7 > µ(k n ) deterministic values µ(ν) k n [MNm/rad] ν
28 Fuzzy structural analysis (2) 7 Examples fuzzy load-displacement dependency (left-hand frame corner, horizontal) ν fuzzy structural response µ = µ = v H (3) [cm] fuzzy displacement µ(v H (3)) deterministic solution v H (3) [cm]
29 Fuzzy structural analysis (3) 7 Examples fuzzy failure load influence of the deterministic fundamental solution nonlinearities considered: g + p = geometrical and physical p = only physical g = only geometrical µ(ν) 0.5 ν g+p ν p ν g ν ν
30 FFORM B analysis I (1) 7 Examples load factor ν: X 1 extreme value distribution Ex-Max Type I (GUMBEL) m = < 5.7; 5.9; 6.0 > σ = < 8; 0.11; 0.12 > x 1 x 1 fuzzy randomness rotational spring stiffness k n : X 2 logarithmic normal distribution x 0,2 m σ x 2 x 2 = 0 MNm/rad = < 8.5; 9.0; 1 > MNm/rad = < 0; 1.35; 1.50 > MNm/rad f(x 1 ) 4.0 µ = 0 µ = 1 f(x 2 ) 0.3 µ = 0 µ = x x 2 [MNm/rad]
31 FFORM B analysis I (2) 7 Examples original space of the fuzzy probabilistic basic variables joint fuzzy probability density function crisp limit state surface fuzzy design point x 2 [MNm/rad] µ = µ = 0.5 µ = g(x 1 ; x 2 ) > 0 f(x 1 ; x 2 ) s µ(x B ) s α=0 r s α=1 5 6 s α=0 l x B g(x 1 ; x 2 ) < 0 7 g(x 1 ; x 2 ) = 0 8 x 1
32 FFORM B analysis I (3) 7 Examples crisp standard joint probability density function fuzzy limit state surface fuzzy design point fuzzy reliability index y 2 h(y 1 ; y 2 ) = 0 safety verification h(y 1 ; y 2 ) > 0-4 n NN (y 1 ; y 2 ) ψ 2 β 2 ψ 1 4 standard normal space y B 8 y 1 h(y 1 ; y 2 ) < 0 µ = µ = 0.5 µ = 0.5 µ(β) β > 3.8 = req_β FORM-solution β
33 FFORM B analysis II (1) 7 Examples fuzziness and fuzzy randomness f(x 1 ) fuzzy probabilistic basic variable X 1 : load factor ν 4.0 extreme value distribution Ex-Max Type I (GUMBEL) m x = < 5.7; 5.9; 6.0 > σ 1 = < 8; 0.11; 0.12 > x 1 µ = 0 µ = 1 fuzzy structural parameter: rotational spring stiffness k n fuzzy triangular number k n µ(k n ) = < 5; 9; 13 > MNm/rad x k n [MNm/rad]
34 FFORM B analysis II (2) 7 Examples original space of the fuzzy probabilistic basic variables fuzzy probability density function fuzzy limit state surface f(x 1 ) g(x 1 ) = ν -x 1 > 0 survival f(x 1 ) µ = 0 µ = 1 g(x 1 ) = ν -x 1 = 0 ν g+p (from fuzzy structural analysis) µ(ν) g(x 1 ) = ν -x 1 < 0 failure fuzzy integration limit x 1
35 FFORM B analysis II (3) 7 Examples fuzzy reliability index, safety verification µ(β) req_β = 3.8 β II FORM-solution β 2 < 3.8 = erf_β 0.4 β β β comparison with the result from FFORM-analysis I β 1 $ 3.8 = req_β µ(β) β I modified SHANNON&s entropy H u (β Ι ) = 1.41Ak < 2.48Ak= H u (β ΙΙ ) β
36 Structural design based on clustering (1) 7 Examples load factor ν: X 1 extreme value distribution Ex-Max Type I (GUMBEL) m = < 5.7; 5.9; 6.0 > σ = < 8; 0.11; 0.12 > x 1 x 1 rotational spring stiffness k n : X 2 logarithmic normal distribution x 0,2 m σ x 2 x 2 = 0 MNm/rad = < 8.5; 9.0; 1 > MNm/rad = < 0; 1.35; 1.50 > MNm/rad f(x 1 ) m = 0 m = 1 f(x 2 ) m = 0 m = x x 2 [MNm/rad]
37 Structural design based on clustering (2) 7 Examples fuzzy reliability index design constraint µ($) 0.4 req_$ = 3.8 reliability index req_$ $ fuzzy cluster analysis modified fuzzy probabilistic basic variables design variant 1 2 load factor ν rotational spring stiffness k n [MNm/rad] m - σ - x 1 σ - x 1 m - x 2 x 2 < 5.85; 5.90; 6.0 > < 8; 0.10; 0.12 > < 8.5; 9.0; 9.6 > < 1.30; 1.40; 1.50> < 5.70; 5.85; 6.0 > < 8; 0.10; 0.11 > < 8.9; 9.5; 1 > < 2; 1.14; 1.26 >
38 Structural design based on clustering (3) 7 Examples FFORM-analysis with the modified fuzzy probabilistic basic variables design variant 1 µ(ß 1 ) design variant 2 µ(ß 2 ) ß 1 ß 2 defuzzification after CHEN relative sensitivity z 01 = 4.60 z 02 = 5.12 B 1 = B 2 = 77.48
39 Conclusions 8 Conclusions consideration of non-stochastic uncertainty in structural analysis, design, and safety assessment enhanced quality of prognoses regarding structural behavior and safety direct design of structures by means of nonlinear analysis
40 Advertisement A detailed explanation of all concepts presented and much more may be found in the book: Bernd Möller Michael Beer Fuzzy Randomness Uncertainty Models in Civil Engineering and Computational Mechanics Springer-Verlag, 2004 Dept. of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Rice University, Houston, TX
Institute for Statics und Dynamics of Structures Fuzzy probabilistic safety assessment
Institute for Statics und Dynamics of Structures Fuzzy probabilistic safety assessment Bernd Möller Fuzzy probabilistic safety assessment randomness fuzzy randomness fuzzyness failure Fuzzy- Probabilistik
More informationFuzzy Randomness. Bernd Moller Michael Beer
Fuzzy Randomness Bernd Moller Michael Beer Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH Engineering ONLINE LIBRARY springeronline.com Bernd Moller Michael Beer Fuzzy Randomne Uncertainty in Civil Engineering
More informationFuzzy probabilistic structural analysis considering fuzzy random functions
Fuzzy probabilistic structural analysis considering fuzzy random functions.-u. Sickert, M. Beer, W. Graf & B. Möller Institute of Structural Analysis, Dresden University of Technology, Germany Keywords:
More informationFuzzy probabilistic method for the safety assessment
B. Möller, M. Beer, W. Graf, A. Hoffmann, J.U. Sickert Fuzzy probabilistic method for the safety assessment Abstract The safety of structures may only be realistically assessed provided all input data
More informationFUZZY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD AND ITS APPLICATION
TRENDS IN COMPUTATIONAL STRUCTURAL MECHANICS W.A. Wall, K.U. Bletzinger and K. Schweizerhof (Eds.) CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain 2001 FUZZY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD AND ITS APPLICATION B. Möller*, M. Beer, W. Graf
More informationFuzzy analysis as alternative to stochastic methods theoretical aspects
4. LS-DYNA Anwenderforum, Bamberg 2005 Robustheit Fuzzy analysis as alternative to stochastic methods theoretical aspects Bernd Möller, Michael Beer, Martin Liebscher TU Dresden, Germany Abstract: A realistic
More informationReduction of Random Variables in Structural Reliability Analysis
Reduction of Random Variables in Structural Reliability Analysis S. Adhikari and R. S. Langley Department of Engineering University of Cambridge Trumpington Street Cambridge CB2 1PZ (U.K.) February 21,
More informationSensitivity and Reliability Analysis of Nonlinear Frame Structures
Sensitivity and Reliability Analysis of Nonlinear Frame Structures Michael H. Scott Associate Professor School of Civil and Construction Engineering Applied Mathematics and Computation Seminar April 8,
More informationStructural Reliability Analysis using Uncertainty Theory
Structural Reliability Analysis using Uncertainty Theory Zhuo Wang Uncertainty Theory Laboratory, Department of Mathematical Sciences Tsinghua University, Beijing 00084, China zwang058@sohu.com Abstract:
More informationComparison study of the computational methods for eigenvalues IFE analysis
Applied and Computational Mechanics 2 (2008) 157 166 Comparison study of the computational methods for eigenvalues IFE analysis M. Vaško a,,m.sága a,m.handrik a a Department of Applied Mechanics, Faculty
More informationS. Freitag, B. T. Cao, J. Ninić & G. Meschke
SFB 837 Interaction Modeling Mechanized Tunneling S Freitag, B T Cao, J Ninić & G Meschke Institute for Structural Mechanics Ruhr University Bochum 1 Content 1 Motivation 2 Process-oriented FE model for
More informationUncertain Structural Reliability Analysis
Uncertain Structural Reliability Analysis Yi Miao School of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China 474989741@qq.com Abstract: The reliability of structure is already applied in some
More informationMODELING OF EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTY IN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES USING A ROBUST GENETIC ALGORITHM
Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems Vol. 12, No. 2, (2015) pp. 23-40 23 MODELING OF EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTY IN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES USING A ROBUST GENETIC ALGORITHM M. BAGHERI, M. MIRI AND N.
More informationVORONOI APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATION FOR LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR MATERIALS
The 4 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October -7, 008, Beijing, China VORONOI APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATION FOR LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR MATERIALS K.
More informationC.-H. Lamarque. University of Lyon/ENTPE/LGCB & LTDS UMR CNRS 5513
Nonlinear Dynamics of Smooth and Non-Smooth Systems with Application to Passive Controls 3rd Sperlonga Summer School on Mechanics and Engineering Sciences on Dynamics, Stability and Control of Flexible
More informationSpectral methods for fuzzy structural dynamics: modal vs direct approach
Spectral methods for fuzzy structural dynamics: modal vs direct approach S Adhikari Zienkiewicz Centre for Computational Engineering, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Wales, UK IUTAM Symposium
More informationProgramação orientada a objetos em FORTRAN
Universidade de São Paulo Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual - BDPI Departamento de Engenharia de Estrutura - EESC/SET Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - EESC/SET 011 Programação orientada
More informationReduction of Random Variables in Structural Reliability Analysis
Reduction of Random Variables in Structural Reliability Analysis S. ADHIKARI AND R. S. LANGLEY Cambridge University Engineering Department Cambridge, U.K. Random Variable Reduction in Reliability Analysis
More informationDesign of 2D Elastic Structures with the Interval Parameters
Design of 2D Elastic Structures with the Interval Parameters ANDRZEJ POWNUK The University of Texas at El Paso Department of Mathematical Sciences El Paso, Texas USA andrzej@pownuk.com NAVEEN KUMAR GOUD
More informationLeveraging Dynamical System Theory to Incorporate Design Constraints in Multidisciplinary Design
Leveraging Dynamical System Theory to Incorporate Design Constraints in Multidisciplinary Design Bradley A. Steinfeldt and Robert D. Braun Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 3332-15 This work
More informationNeural Network Based Response Surface Methods a Comparative Study
. LS-DYNA Anwenderforum, Ulm Robustheit / Optimierung II Neural Network Based Response Surface Methods a Comparative Study Wolfram Beyer, Martin Liebscher, Michael Beer, Wolfgang Graf TU Dresden, Germany
More informationSabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are
More informationUncertainty modelling using software FReET
Uncertainty modelling using software FReET D. Novak, M. Vorechovsky, R. Rusina Brno University of Technology Brno, Czech Republic 1/30 Outline Introduction Methods and main features Software FReET Selected
More informationResearch Article Influence of the Parameterization in the Interval Solution of Elastic Beams
Structures Volume 04, Article ID 3953, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/0.55/04/3953 Research Article Influence of the Parameterization in the Interval Solution of Elastic Beams Stefano Gabriele and Valerio Varano
More informationPrediction of Reliability Index and Probability of Failure for Reinforced Concrete Beam Subjected To Flexure
Prediction of Reliability Index and Probability of Failure for Reinforced Concrete Beam Subjected To Flexure Salma Taj 1, Karthik B.M. 1, Mamatha N.R. 1, Rakesh J. 1, Goutham D.R. 2 1 UG Students, Dept.
More informationFuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Techniques. Joakim Lindblad. Outline. Constructing. Characterizing. Techniques. Joakim Lindblad. Outline. Constructing.
Topics of today Lecture 4 Membership functions and joakim@cb.uu.se. Ch. 10. Ch. 9.1 9.4 Nonspecificity Fuzziness Centre for Image Analysis Uppsala University 2007-02-01, 2007-02-01 (1/28), 2007-02-01 (2/28)
More informationExercises with solutions (Set D)
Exercises with solutions Set D. A fair die is rolled at the same time as a fair coin is tossed. Let A be the number on the upper surface of the die and let B describe the outcome of the coin toss, where
More information4. Convex optimization problems
Convex Optimization Boyd & Vandenberghe 4. Convex optimization problems optimization problem in standard form convex optimization problems quasiconvex optimization linear optimization quadratic optimization
More informationNTNU Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology Department of Marine Technology TMR 4195 DESIGN OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES
NTNU Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology Department of Marine Technology EXERCISE 4 TMR 495 DESIGN OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES Distr. Date: 9 th Feb 4 Sign: Q. Chen Mandatory Exercise This exercise
More informationSevere accident risk assessment for Nuclear. Power Plants
PSA 2017- September 2017 IRSN Severe accident risk assessment for Nuclear * Power Plants * Enhancing nuclear safety An original approach to derive seismic fragility curves - Application to a PWR main steam
More informationPolynomial chaos expansions for structural reliability analysis
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOMATIC ENGINEERING CHAIR OF RISK, SAFETY & UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION Polynomial chaos expansions for structural reliability analysis B. Sudret & S. Marelli Incl.
More informationNUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF CORNERS IN RC FRAMES USING STRUT-AND-TIE METHOD AND CDP MODEL
Numerical simulations of corners in RC frames using Strut-and-Tie Method and CDP model XIII International Conference on Computational Plasticity. Fundamentals and Applications COMPLAS XIII E. Oñate, D.R.J.
More informationOptimal Uncertainty Quantification of Quantiles
Optimal Uncertainty Quantification of Quantiles Application to Industrial Risk Management. Merlin Keller 1, Jérôme Stenger 12 1 EDF R&D, France 2 Institut Mathématique de Toulouse, France ETICS 2018, Roscoff
More informationInterval Finite Element Methods for Uncertainty Treatment in Structural Engineering Mechanics Rafi L. Muhanna Georgia Institute of Technology USA
Interval Finite Element Methods for Uncertainty Treatment in Structural Engineering Mechanics Rafi L. Muhanna Georgia Institute of Technology USA Second Scandinavian Workshop on INTERVAL METHODS AND THEIR
More informationReliability analysis of geotechnical risks
Reliability analysis of geotechnical risks Lazhar Belabed*, Hacene Benyaghla* * Department of Civil Engineering and Hydraulics, University of Guelma, Algeria Abstract The evaluation of safety or reliability
More informationPerformance based Engineering
Probability based based Methods in Performance based Engineering Fatemeh Jalayer University of Naples Federico II A RELAXED WORKSHOP ON PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING July 2-4 2009 The characterization
More informationResearch Collection. Basics of structural reliability and links with structural design codes FBH Herbsttagung November 22nd, 2013.
Research Collection Presentation Basics of structural reliability and links with structural design codes FBH Herbsttagung November 22nd, 2013 Author(s): Sudret, Bruno Publication Date: 2013 Permanent Link:
More informationStructural Reliability
Structural Reliability Thuong Van DANG May 28, 2018 1 / 41 2 / 41 Introduction to Structural Reliability Concept of Limit State and Reliability Review of Probability Theory First Order Second Moment Method
More informationDynamic analysis of a reinforced concrete shear wall with strain rate effect. Synopsis. Introduction
Dynamic analysis of a reinforced concrete shear wall with strain rate effect Synopsis A simplified analysis method for a reinforced concrete shear wall structure considering strain rate effects is presented.
More informationFuzzy Stochastic Finite Element Method FSFEM
Intitute for Static und Dynamic of Structure Fuzzy Stochatic Finite Element Method - FSFEM Bernd Möller Fuzzy Stochatic Analyi from fuzzy tochatic ampling to fuzzy tochatic analyi Slide 2 Fuzzy Stochatic
More informationInformation geometry for bivariate distribution control
Information geometry for bivariate distribution control C.T.J.Dodson + Hong Wang Mathematics + Control Systems Centre, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology Optimal control of stochastic
More informationNUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE OF RC STRUCTURES WITH ENERGY DISSIPATORS
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE OF RC STRUCTURES WITH ENERGY DISSIPATORS ABSTRACT : P Mata1, AH Barbat1, S Oller1, R Boroschek2 1 Technical University of Catalonia, Civil Engineering
More informationCHAPTER 14 BUCKLING ANALYSIS OF 1D AND 2D STRUCTURES
CHAPTER 14 BUCKLING ANALYSIS OF 1D AND 2D STRUCTURES 14.1 GENERAL REMARKS In structures where dominant loading is usually static, the most common cause of the collapse is a buckling failure. Buckling may
More informationALGORITHM FOR NON-PROPORTIONAL LOADING IN SEQUENTIALLY LINEAR ANALYSIS
9th International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures FraMCoS-9 Chenjie Yu, P.C.J. Hoogenboom and J.G. Rots DOI 10.21012/FC9.288 ALGORITHM FOR NON-PROPORTIONAL LOADING
More informationRELIABILITY ANALYSIS IN BOLTED COMPOSITE JOINTS WITH SHIMMING MATERIAL
25 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES RELIABILITY ANALYSIS IN BOLTED COMPOSITE JOINTS WITH SHIMMING MATERIAL P. Caracciolo, G. Kuhlmann AIRBUS-Germany e-mail: paola.caracciolo@airbus.com
More informationCivil Engineering. Elixir Civil Engg. 112 (2017)
48886 Available online at www.elixirpublishers.com (Elixir International Journal) Civil Engineering Elixir Civil Engg. 112 (2017) 48886-48891 Prediction of Ultimate Strength of PVC-Concrete Composite Columns
More informationHowever, reliability analysis is not limited to calculation of the probability of failure.
Probabilistic Analysis probabilistic analysis methods, including the first and second-order reliability methods, Monte Carlo simulation, Importance sampling, Latin Hypercube sampling, and stochastic expansions
More information4.2 Partial factor method based on the design value approach
4.2 Partial factor method based on the design value approach 2 nd draft Milan Holicky & Miroslav Sykora* * Czech Technical University in Prague, Klokner Institute, Prague, Czech Republic e-mail: milan.holicky@klok.cvut.cz;
More informationECONOMICS 207 SPRING 2006 LABORATORY EXERCISE 5 KEY. 8 = 10(5x 2) = 9(3x + 8), x 50x 20 = 27x x = 92 x = 4. 8x 2 22x + 15 = 0 (2x 3)(4x 5) = 0
ECONOMICS 07 SPRING 006 LABORATORY EXERCISE 5 KEY Problem. Solve the following equations for x. a 5x 3x + 8 = 9 0 5x 3x + 8 9 8 = 0(5x ) = 9(3x + 8), x 0 3 50x 0 = 7x + 7 3x = 9 x = 4 b 8x x + 5 = 0 8x
More informationNONLINEAR SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE (SSI) ANALYSIS USING AN EFFICIENT COMPLEX FREQUENCY APPROACH
NONLINEAR SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE (SSI) ANALYSIS USING AN EFFICIENT COMPLEX FREQUENCY APPROACH Dan M. GHIOCEL 1 ABSTRACT The paper introduces a novel approach for modeling nonlinear hysteretic behavior
More informationSharp Interval Estimates for Finite Element Solutions with Fuzzy Material Properties
Sharp Interval Estimates for Finite Element Solutions with Fuzzy Material Properties R. L. Mullen, F.ASCE Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7201 rlm@po.cwru.edu
More informationFuzzy Geometric Distribution with Some Properties Dr. Kareema Abed AL-Kadim 1, Abdul Hameed Ashwya 2
Fuzzy Geometric Distribution with Some Properties Dr. Kareema Abed AL-Kadim 1, Abdul Hameed Ashwya 2 1 Department of Mathematics, Babylon University, College of Education for Pure Sciences, Hilla, Iraq,
More informationConvex optimization problems. Optimization problem in standard form
Convex optimization problems optimization problem in standard form convex optimization problems linear optimization quadratic optimization geometric programming quasiconvex optimization generalized inequality
More informationCombining Interval and Probabilistic Uncertainty in Engineering Applications
Combining Interval and Probabilistic Uncertainty in Engineering Applications Andrew Pownuk Computational Science Program University of Texas at El Paso El Paso, Texas 79968, USA ampownuk@utep.edu Page
More informationBOOK OF COURSE WORKS ON STRENGTH OF MATERIALS FOR THE 2 ND YEAR STUDENTS OF THE UACEG
BOOK OF COURSE WORKS ON STRENGTH OF MATERIALS FOR THE ND YEAR STUDENTS OF THE UACEG Assoc.Prof. Dr. Svetlana Lilkova-Markova, Chief. Assist. Prof. Dimitar Lolov Sofia, 011 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS GENERAL
More informationRepetitive control mechanism of disturbance rejection using basis function feedback with fuzzy regression approach
Repetitive control mechanism of disturbance rejection using basis function feedback with fuzzy regression approach *Jeng-Wen Lin 1), Chih-Wei Huang 2) and Pu Fun Shen 3) 1) Department of Civil Engineering,
More informationSets of Joint Probability Measures Generated by Weighted Marginal Focal Sets
Sets of Joint Probability Measures Generated by Weighted Marginal Focal Sets Thomas Fetz Institut für Technische Mathemati, Geometrie und Bauinformati Universität Innsbruc, Austria fetz@mat.uib.ac.at Abstract
More informationModel parameter uncertainties and correlations: quantification and assessment of impacts on seismic collapse risk
IASSAR Safety, Reliability, Risk, Resilience and Sustainability of Structures and Infrastructure 12th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability, Vienna, Austria, 6 10 August 2017 Christian Bucher,
More informationEnvironmental Contours for Determination of Seismic Design Response Spectra
Environmental Contours for Determination of Seismic Design Response Spectra Christophe Loth Modeler, Risk Management Solutions, Newark, USA Jack W. Baker Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Env. Eng.,
More informationEurocode 8 Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings
in the Euro-Mediterranean Area Eurocode 8 Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings Paolo Emilio Pinto Università di Roma La Sapienza Urgency of guidance documents for assessment and retrofit in
More informationCALIBRATED RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR COLLAPSE ASSESSMENT UNDER MULTIVARIATE HAZARD AND STRUCTURAL RESPONSE UNCERTAINTIES
10NCEE Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering July 21-25, 2014 Anchorage, Alaska CALIBRATED RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR COLLAPSE ASSESSMENT UNDER MULTIVARIATE
More informationPILE SOIL INTERACTION MOMENT AREA METHOD
Pile IGC Soil 2009, Interaction Moment Guntur, INDIA Area Method PILE SOIL INTERACTION MOMENT AREA METHOD D.M. Dewaikar Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, India. E-mail:
More information4. Convex optimization problems
Convex Optimization Boyd & Vandenberghe 4. Convex optimization problems optimization problem in standard form convex optimization problems quasiconvex optimization linear optimization quadratic optimization
More informationFeasibility of dynamic test methods in classification of damaged bridges
Feasibility of dynamic test methods in classification of damaged bridges Flavio Galanti, PhD, MSc., Felieke van Duin, MSc. TNO Built Environment and Geosciences, P.O. Box 49, 26 AA, Delft, The Netherlands.
More informationSafety Envelope for Load Tolerance and Its Application to Fatigue Reliability Design
Safety Envelope for Load Tolerance and Its Application to Fatigue Reliability Design Haoyu Wang * and Nam H. Kim University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 Yoon-Jun Kim Caterpillar Inc., Peoria, IL 61656
More informationPBEE Design Methods KHALID M. MOSALAM, PROFESSOR & SELIM GÜNAY, POST-DOC UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
PBEE Design Methods KHALID M. MOSALAM, PROFESSOR & SELIM GÜNAY, POST-DOC UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Outline 1.Introduction 2. 3.Non optimization-based methods 2 Introduction Courtesy of Prof. S.
More informationSolution of Nonlinear Equations
Solution of Nonlinear Equations In many engineering applications, there are cases when one needs to solve nonlinear algebraic or trigonometric equations or set of equations. These are also common in Civil
More informationPERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK
PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM - 613 403 - THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Sub : Strength of Materials Year / Sem: II / III Sub Code : MEB 310
More informationUncertain Systems are Universal Approximators
Uncertain Systems are Universal Approximators Zixiong Peng 1 and Xiaowei Chen 2 1 School of Applied Mathematics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China 2 epartment of Risk Management
More informationTHEORETICAL PART (10 p)
Solutions to the written exam (004-04-17) in Ship structures Basic course Solutions to the written exam 004-04-17 in Ship structures Basic course THEORETICAL PART (10 p) Question 1 (.5 p) Somewhere between
More information2.4 Annihilators, Complemented Subspaces
40 CHAPTER 2. WEAK TOPOLOGIES AND REFLEXIVITY 2.4 Annihilators, Complemented Subspaces Definition 2.4.1. (Annihilators, Pre-Annihilators) Assume X is a Banach space. Let M X and N X. We call the annihilator
More informationAN EFFICIENT APPROACH FOR SOLVING A WIDE CLASS OF FUZZY LINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS
AN EFFICIENT APPROACH FOR SOLVING A WIDE CLASS OF FUZZY LINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS A. V. KAMYAD N. HASSANZADEH J. CHAJI Abstract. In this paper we are going to introduce an efficient approach for solving
More informationHW1 solutions. 1. α Ef(x) β, where Ef(x) is the expected value of f(x), i.e., Ef(x) = n. i=1 p if(a i ). (The function f : R R is given.
HW1 solutions Exercise 1 (Some sets of probability distributions.) Let x be a real-valued random variable with Prob(x = a i ) = p i, i = 1,..., n, where a 1 < a 2 < < a n. Of course p R n lies in the standard
More informationUncertainty Quantification in MEMS
Uncertainty Quantification in MEMS N. Agarwal and N. R. Aluru Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering for Advanced Science and Technology Introduction Capacitive RF MEMS switch Comb drive Various
More informationSoil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition
ABSTRACT: Soil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition G. Dok ve O. Kırtel Res. Assist., Department of Civil Engineering, Sakarya University,
More informationA fuzzy finite element analysis technique for structural static analysis based on interval fields
A fuzzy finite element analysis technique for structural static analysis based on interval fields Wim Verhaeghe, Maarten De Munck, Wim Desmet, Dirk Vandepitte and David Moens Department of Mechanical Engineering,
More informationImprecise probability in engineering a case study
Imprecise probability in engineering a case study Tutorial, ISIPTA 11 Innsbruck, July 25 28, 2011 Michael Oberguggenberger Unit of Engineering Mathematics University of Innsbruck, Austria http://techmath.uibk.ac.at
More informationHandling imprecise and uncertain class labels in classification and clustering
Handling imprecise and uncertain class labels in classification and clustering Thierry Denœux 1 1 Université de Technologie de Compiègne HEUDIASYC (UMR CNRS 6599) COST Action IC 0702 Working group C, Mallorca,
More informationComparison of Fuzzy Operators for IF-Inference Systems of Takagi-Sugeno Type in Ozone Prediction
Comparison of Fuzzy Operators for IF-Inference Systems of Takagi-Sugeno Type in Ozone Prediction Vladimír Olej and Petr Hájek Institute of System Engineering and Informatics, Faculty of Economics and Administration,
More informationDynamic Response of EPS Blocks /soil Sandwiched Wall/embankment
Proc. of Second China-Japan Joint Symposium on Recent Development of Theory and Practice in Geotechnology, Hong Kong, China Dynamic Response of EPS Blocks /soil Sandwiched Wall/embankment J. C. Chai 1
More informationNEW CONTROL STRATEGY FOR LOAD FREQUENCY PROBLEM OF A SINGLE AREA POWER SYSTEM USING FUZZY LOGIC CONTROL
NEW CONTROL STRATEGY FOR LOAD FREQUENCY PROBLEM OF A SINGLE AREA POWER SYSTEM USING FUZZY LOGIC CONTROL 1 B. Venkata Prasanth, 2 Dr. S. V. Jayaram Kumar 1 Associate Professor, Department of Electrical
More informationTHE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATIONS BASED ON LRFD FOR JAPANESE HIGHWAYS
THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATIONS BASED ON LRFD FOR JAPANESE HIGHWAYS Hideaki Nishida 1,Toshiaki Nanazawa 2, Masahiro Shirato 3, Tetsuya Kohno 4, and Mitsuaki Kitaura 5 Abstract One of the motivations
More informationLecture: Convex Optimization Problems
1/36 Lecture: Convex Optimization Problems http://bicmr.pku.edu.cn/~wenzw/opt-2015-fall.html Acknowledgement: this slides is based on Prof. Lieven Vandenberghe s lecture notes Introduction 2/36 optimization
More informationJ. Harish* and R.P. Rokade + *Graduate scholar Valliammai Engineering College, Kattankulathur, India + Principal Scientist
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 6, June-2017 109 Stochastic finite element analysis of simple hip truss Abstract- In this paper, nodal displacements and member
More informationANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATION FOR
Structural Eng./Earthquake Eng., JSCE, Vol. 17, No. 1, 21s-35s, 2000 April (J. Struct. Mech. Earthquake Eng., JSCE, No. 647/I-51) APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATION
More informationApplication of the Fuzzy Weighted Average of Fuzzy Numbers in Decision Making Models
Application of the Fuzzy Weighted Average of Fuzzy Numbers in Decision Making Models Ondřej Pavlačka Department of Mathematical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Palacký University
More informationCUSUM(t) D data. Supplementary Figure 1: Examples of changes in linear trend and CUSUM. (a) The existence of
Supplementary Figures a b a(t) a(t) c t d t d(t) d(t) t t e f CUSUM(t) D data t CUSUM(t) D data t Supplementary Figure 1: Examples of changes in linear trend and CUSUM. (a) The existence of an abrupt jump
More informationUncertain Logic with Multiple Predicates
Uncertain Logic with Multiple Predicates Kai Yao, Zixiong Peng Uncertainty Theory Laboratory, Department of Mathematical Sciences Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China yaok09@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn,
More informationSeismic Assessment of a RC Building according to FEMA 356 and Eurocode 8
1 Seismic Assessment of a RC Building according to FEMA 356 and Eurocode 8 Ioannis P. GIANNOPOULOS 1 Key words: Pushover analysis, FEMA 356, Eurocode 8, seismic assessment, plastic rotation, limit states
More informationSection 6.2: THE KERNEL AND RANGE OF A LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS
Section 6.2: THE KERNEL AND RANGE OF A LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS When you are done with your homework you should be able to Find the kernel of a linear transformation Find a basis for the range, the rank,
More informationUNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability:
UNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability: Analysis of thin rectangular plates subject to bending, twisting, distributed transverse load, combined bending and in-plane loading Thin plates having
More informationComparison of Structural Models for Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Frame Buildings
Comparison of Structural Models for Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Frame Buildings Dj. Ladjinovic, A. Raseta, A. Radujkovic & R. Folic University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Novi Sad,
More informationSeismic performance quantification of steel corrugated shear wall system
Seismic performance quantification of steel corrugated shear wall system Laszlo Gergely Vigh, (Geri) Visiting scholar, Stanford, CA Asst. Prof., Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Dept. Of
More informationDRAFT - Math 101 Lecture Note - Dr. Said Algarni
2 Limits 2.1 The Tangent Problems The word tangent is derived from the Latin word tangens, which means touching. A tangent line to a curve is a line that touches the curve and a secant line is a line that
More informationEDEM DISCRETIZATION (Phase II) Normal Direction Structure Idealization Tangential Direction Pore spring Contact spring SPRING TYPES Inner edge Inner d
Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo Bulletin of ERS, No. 48 (5) A TWO-PHASE SIMPLIFIED COLLAPSE ANALYSIS OF RC BUILDINGS PHASE : SPRING NETWORK PHASE Shanthanu RAJASEKHARAN, Muneyoshi
More informationStudy Guide/Practice Exam 3
Study Guide/Practice Exam 3 This study guide/practice exam covers only the material since exam. The final exam, however, is cumulative so you should be sure to thoroughly study earlier material. The distribution
More informationA fuzzy finite element analysis technique for structural static analysis based on interval fields
A fuzzy finite element analysis technique for structural static analysis based on interval fields Wim Verhaeghe, Maarten De Munck, Wim Desmet, Dirk Vandepitte and David Moens Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
More informationEEE 8005 Student Directed Learning (SDL) Industrial Automation Fuzzy Logic
EEE 8005 Student Directed Learning (SDL) Industrial utomation Fuzzy Logic Desire location z 0 Rot ( y, φ ) Nail cos( φ) 0 = sin( φ) 0 0 0 0 sin( φ) 0 cos( φ) 0 0 0 0 z 0 y n (0,a,0) y 0 y 0 z n End effector
More informationRobustness - Offshore Wind Energy Converters
Robustness of Structures - February 4-5, 2008, Zurich 1-14 Robustness - Offshore Wind Energy Converters Sebastian Thöns Risk and Safety, Institute of Structural Engineering (IBK) ETH Zurich Division VII.2:
More informationShear Strength of Slender Reinforced Concrete Beams without Web Reinforcement
RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Shear Strength of Slender Reinforced Concrete Beams without Web Reinforcement Prof. R.S. Chavan*, Dr. P.M. Pawar ** (Department of Civil Engineering, Solapur University, Solapur)
More information