Triregular Leftmost without Loop and Reverse Arc Graph Varieties of Graph Algebra of Type (2,0)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Triregular Leftmost without Loop and Reverse Arc Graph Varieties of Graph Algebra of Type (2,0)"

Transcription

1 International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 12, Triregular Leftmost without Loop and Reverse Arc Graph Varieties of Graph Algebra of Type (2,0) Montri Thongmoon and Tiang Poomsa-ard Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham 44150, Thailand Abstract Graph algebras establish a connection between directed graphs without multiple edges and special universal algebras of type (2,0). We say that a graph G satisfies a term equation s t if the corresponding graph algebra A(G) satisfies s t. A class of graph algebras V is called a graph variety if V = Mod g Σ where Σ is a subset of T (X) T (X). A graph variety V = Mod g Σ is called a triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph variety if Σ is a set of triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc term equations. In this paper we characterize all triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties. For varieties and other basic concept of universal algebra see e.g. [2] Mathematics Subject Classification: 05B25, 08B15 Keywords: varieties, triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties, term, binary algebra, graph algebra 1 Introduction. Graph algebras have been invented in [12] to obtain examples of nonfinitely based finite algebras. To recall this concept, let G = (V, E) be a (directed) graph with the vertex set V and the set of edges E V V. Define the graph algebra A(G) corresponding to G with the underlying set V { }, where is a symbol outside V, and with two basic operations, namely a nullary operation pointing to and a binary one denoted by juxtaposition, given for

2 558 M. Thongmoon and T. Poomsa-ard u, v V { } by uv = { u, if (u, v) E,, otherwise. In [11] graph varieties had been investigated for finite undirected graphs in order to get graph theoretic results (structure theorems) from universal algebra via graph algebras. In [10] these investigations are extended to arbitrary (finite) directed graphs where the authors ask for a graph theoretic characterization of graph varieties, i.e., of classes of graphs which can be defined by term equations for their corresponding graph algebras. The answer is a theorem of Birkhoff-type, which uses graph theoretic closure operations. A class of finite directed graphs is equational (i.e., a graph variety) if and only if it is closed with respect to finite restricted pointed subproducts and isomorphic copies. In [6] T. Poomsa-ard characterized hyperidentitis in the class of associative graph algebras. In [7], [8] T. Poomsa-ard, J. Wetweerapong and C. Samartkoon characterized hyperidentitis in the class of idempotent graph algebras and the class of transitive graph algebras respectively. In [4] J. Khampakdee and T. Poomsa-ard characterized hyperidentities in the class of (xy)x x(yy). In [3] M. Krapeedaeng and T. Poomsa-ard characterized all biregular leftmost graph varieties. In [1] A. Anantpinitwatna and T. Poomsa-ard characterized hyperidentities in biregular leftmost graph varieties. We say that a graph variety V = Mod g Σ is called a triregular without loop and reverse arc graph variety if Σ is a set of triregular without loop and reverse arc term equations. In this paper we characterize all triregular without loop and reverse arc graph varieties. 2 Terms and graph varieties In [9] R. Pöschel was introduced terms for graph algebras, the underlying formal language has to contain a binary operation symbol (juxtaposition) and a symbol for the constant (denoted by, too). Definition 2.1. The set T (X) of all terms over the alphabet is defined inductively as follows: X = {x 1, x 2, x 3,...} (i) every variable x i, i = 1, 2, 3,..., and are terms; (ii) if t 1 and t 2 are terms, then t 1 t 2 is a term;

3 Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties 559 (iii) T (X) is the set of all terms which can be obtained from (i) and (ii) in finitely many steps. Terms built up from the two-element set X 2 = {x 1, x 2 } of variables are thus binary terms. We denote the set of all binary terms by T (X 2 ). The leftmost variable of a term t is denoted by L(t) and rightmost variable of a term t is denoted by R(t). A term, in which the symbol occurs is called a trivial term. Definition 2.2. For each non-trivial term t of type τ = (2, 0) one can define a directed graph G(t) = (V (t), E(t)), where the vertex set V (t) is the set of all variables occurring in t and the edge set E(t) is defined inductively by E(t) = φ if t is a variable and E(t 1 t 2 ) = E(t 1 ) E(t 2 ) {(L(t 1 ), L(t 2 ))} where t = t 1 t 2 is a compound term. L(t) is called the root of the graph G(t), and the pair (G(t), L(t)) is the rooted graph corresponding to t. Formally, we assign the empty graph φ to every trivial term t. Definition 2.3. A non-trivial term t of type τ = (2, 0) is called a term without loop and reverse arc if and only if for any x V (t), (x, x) / E(t) and for any x, y V (t) with x y if (x, y) E(t), then (y, x) / E(t). A term equation s t of type τ = (2, 0) is called triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc term equation if and only if V (s) = V (t), V (t) = 3, L(s) = L(t) and s, t are terms without loop and reverse arc. Definition 2.4. We say that a graph G = (V, E) satisfies a term equation s t if the corresponding graph algebra A(G) satisfies s t (i.e., we have s = t for every assignment V (s) V (t) V { }), and in this case, we write G = s t. Given a class G of graphs and a set Σ of term equations (i.e., Σ T (X) T (X)) we introduce the following notation: G = Σ if G = s t for all s t Σ, G = s t if G = s t for all G G, G = Σ if G = Σ for all G G, IdG = {s t s, t T (X), G = s t}, Mod g Σ = {G G is a graph and G = Σ}, V g (G) = Mod g IdG. V g (G) is called the graph variety generated by G and G is called graph variety if V g (G) = G. G is called equational if there exists a set Σ of term equations such that G = Mod g Σ. Obviously V g (G) = G if and only if G is an equational class. In [9] it was shown that any non-trivial term t over the class of graph algebras has a uniquely determined normal form term NF (t) and there is an

4 560 M. Thongmoon and T. Poomsa-ard algorithm to construct the normal form term to a given term t. Now, we want to describe how to construct the normal form term. Let t be a non-trivial term. The normal form term of t is the term NF (t) constructed by the following algorithm: (i) Construct G(t) = (V (t), E(t)). (ii) Construct for every x V (t) the list l x = (x i1,..., x ik(x) ) of all outneighbors (i.e., (x, x ij ) E(t), 1 j k(x)) ordered by increasing indices i 1... i k(x) and let s x be the term (...((xx i1 )x i2 )...x ik(x) ). (iii) Starting with x := L(t), Z := V (t), s := L(t), choose the variable x i Z V (s) with the least index i, substitute the first occurrence of x i by the term s xi, denote the resulting term again by s and put Z := Z \ {x i }. Continue this procedure while Z φ. The resulting term is the normal form NF (t). The algorithm stops after a finite number of steps, since G(t) is a rooted graph. Without difficulties one shows G(NF (t)) = G(t), L(NF (t)) = L(t). Definition 2.5. Let G = (V, E) and G = (V, E ) be graphs. A homomorphism h from G into G is a mapping h : V V carrying edges to edges,that is, for which (u, v) E implies (h(u), h(v)) E. Further in [5] it was proved the following proposition: Proposition 2.1. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and let h : X { } V { } be an evaluation of the variables such that h( ) =. Consider the canonical extension of h to the set of all terms. Then there holds: if t is a trivial term then h(t) =. Otherwise, if h : G(t) G is a homomorphism of graphs, then h(t) = h(l(t)), and if h is not a homomorphism of graphs, then h(t) =. By the property of the normal form term and Proposition 2.1, we have the following proposition: Proposition 2.2. Let G = (V, E) be a graph s and t be non-trivial terms. Then G = s t if and only if G = NF (s) NF (t). 3 Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arcs graph varieties We see that if s and t are terms such that V (s) V (t) or L(s) L(t), then there exists a complete graph (a complete graph which has more than one vertices) which does not belong to the graph variety Mod g {s t}. In this study we will investigate only the graph varieties which contain all complete graphs. By Proposition 2.2, we see that for any Σ T (X) T (X) and Σ is the set of term equations NF (s) NF (t), if s t Σ. Then Mod g Σ

5 Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties 561 and Mod g Σ are the same graph variety. Hence if we want to find all triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arcs graph varieties, then it is enough to find all graph varieties Mod g Σ such that Σ is any subset of T T, where T = {s 1, s 2, s 3, s 4, s 5, s 6, s 7 } and s 1 = x(yz), s 2 = x(zy), s 3 = (xy)z, s 4 = x(y(zx)), s 5 = x(z(yx)), s 6 = (x(yz))z, s 7 = (xy)(zy)}. Clearly, for each i = 1, 2, 3,..., 7, K 0 = Mod g {s i s i } is the set of all graph algebras. In [5] it was proved: Proposition 3.1. Let s and t be non-trivial terms from T (X) with variables V (s) = V (t) = {x 0, x 1,..., x n } and L(s) = L(t). Then a graph G = (V, E) satisfies s t if and only if the graph algebra A(G) has the following property: A mapping h : V (s) V is a homomorphism from G(s) into G iff it is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Proposition 3.1 gives a method to check whether a graph G = (V, E) satisfies the term equation s t. The following are all graphs with at most two vertices which satisfy at least one term equation s i s j, i = 1, 2,..., 7, j = 1, 2,..., 7, i j. G 1 G 2 G 3 G 4 G 5 G 6 G 7 G 8 G 9 The following are all connected graphs with three vertices which each edges are above graphs. G 10 G 11 G 12 G 13 G 14 G 15 G 16 G 17 G 18 G 19 G 20 G 21 G 22 G 23

6 562 M. Thongmoon and T. Poomsa-ard G 27 G 24 G 25 G 26 G 28 G 29 G 30 G 31 G 32 G 33 G 34 G 35 G 36 G 37 G 38 G 39 G 40 G 41 G 42 G 43 G 44 G 45 G 46 G 47 G 48 G 49 G 50 G 51 G 52 G 53 G 54 G 55 G 56 G 57 G 58 G 59 G 60 G 61 G 62 G 63 G 64 G 65 G 66 G 67 G 68 G 69 G 70 G 71 G 72

7 Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties 563 G 73 G 74 G 75 G 76 G 77 G 78 G 79 G 80 G 81 G 82 G 83 G 84 G 85 G 86 G 87 G 88 G 89 G 90 G 91 G 92 G 93 G 94 G 95 Then all triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties are characterized by the following theorems: Theorem 3.1. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 1 = Mod g {x(yz) x(zy)}. Then G K 1 if and only if for any a, b, c V, (a, b), (b, c) E if and only if (a, c), (c, b) E. Proof. Let G = (V, E) be a graph. Suppose that G K 1 and for any a, b, c V, suppose that (a, b), (b, c) E. Let s and t be non-trivial terms such that s = x(yz) and t = x(zy) and let h : V (s) V be a function such that h(x) = a, h(y) = b and h(z) = c. We see that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. By Proposition 3.1, we have h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Since (x, z), (z, y) E(t), we have (h(x), h(z)) = (a, c) E and (h(z), h(y)) = (c, b) E. In the same way, if (a, c), (c, b) E, then we can prove that (a, b), (b, c) E. Conversely, suppose that G = (V, E) be a graph which has property that, for any a, b, c V, (a, b), (b, c) E if and only if (a, c), (c, b) E. Let s and t be non-trivial terms such that s = x(yz) and t = x(zy) and let h : V (s) V be a function. Suppose that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Since

8 564 M. Thongmoon and T. Poomsa-ard (x, y), (y, z) E(s), we have (h(x), h(y)), (h(y), h(z)) E. By assumption we get (h(x), h(z)), (h(z), h(y)) E. Hence h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. In the same way we can prove that, if h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G, then it is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Then, by Proposition 3.1 we get A(G) satisfies s t. By Theorem 3.1, we see that the graphs which belong to K 1 are the graphs G i A, A = { G 1,G 2,G 3,G 4,G 9,G 10,G 11,G 14,G 24,G 26,G 64,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.2. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 2 = Mod g {x(yz) (xy)z}. Then G K 2 if and only if for any a, b, c V, if (a, b) E, then (b, c) E if and only if (a, c) E. Proof. Let G = (V, E) be a graph. Suppose that G K 2 and for any a, b, c V, suppose that (a, b), (b, c) E. Let s and t be non-trivial terms such that s = x(yz) and t = (xy)z and let h : V (s) V be a function such that h(x) = a, h(y) = b and h(z) = c. We see that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. By Proposition 3.1, we have h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Since (x, z) E(t), we have (h(x), h(z)) = (a, c) E. In the same way, if (a, b), (a, c) E, then we can prove that (b, c) E. Conversely, suppose that G = (V, E) be a graph which has property that, for any a, b, c V, if (a, b) E, then (b, c) E if and only if (a, c) E. Let s and t be non-trivial terms such that s = x(yz) and t = (xy)z and let h : V (s) V be a function. Suppose that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Since (x, y), (y, z) E(s), we have (h(x), h(y)), (h(y), h(z)) E. By assumption we get (h(x), h(y)), (h(x), h(z)) E. Hence h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. In the same way we can prove that, if h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G, then it is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Then, by Proposition 3.1 we get A(G) satisfies s t. By Theorem 3.2, we see that the graphs which belong to K 2 are the graphs G i B, B = {G 1,G 2,G 4,G 9,G 14,G 26,G 64,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.3. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 3 = Mod g {x(yz) x(y(zx))}. Then G K 3 if and only if for any a, b, c V if (a, b), (b, c) E, then (c, a) E. Proof. Let G = (V, E) be a graph. Suppose that G K 3 and for any a, b, c V, suppose that (a, b), (b, c) E. Let s and t be non-trivial terms such that s = x(yz) and t = x(y(zx)) and let h : V (s) V be a function such that h(x) = a, h(y) = b and h(z) = c. We see that h is a homomorphism from G(s)

9 Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties 565 into G. By Proposition 3.1, we have h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Since (z, x) E(t), we have (h(z), h(x)) = (c, a) E. Conversely, suppose that G = (V, E) be a graph which has property that, for any a, b, c V, if (a, b), (b, c) E, then (c, a) E. Let s and t be nontrivial terms such that s = x(yz) and t = x(y(zx)) and let h : V (s) V be a function. Suppose that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Since (x, y), (y, z) E(s), we have (h(x), h(y)), (h(y), h(z)) E. By assumption we get (h(z), h(x)) E. Hence h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Clearly that, if h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G, then it is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Then, by Proposition 3.1 we get A(G) satisfies s t. By Theorem 3.3, we see that the graphs which belong to K 3 are the graphs G i C, C = { G 1,G 2 G 3,G 9,G 10,G 24,G 66,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.4. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 4 = Mod g {x(yz) x(z(yx))}. Then G K 4 if and only if for any a, b, c V, (a, b), (b, c) E if and only if (a, c), (c, b), (b, a) E. Proof. The proof is similar as the proof of Theorem 3.1. By Theorem 3.4, we see that the graphs which belong to K 4 are the graphs G i D, D = {G 1,G 2,G 3,G 9,G 10,G 24,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.5. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 5 = Mod g {x(yz) (x(yz))z}. Then G K 5 if and only if for any a, b, c V if (a, b), (b, c) E, then (a, c) E. Proof. The proof is similar as the proof of Theorem 3.3. By Theorem 3.5, we see that the graphs which belong to K 5 are the graphs G i E, E = {G 1,G 2,...,G 6,G 9,...,G 15,G 24,...,G 29,G 52,...,G 59,G 64,G 65,G 82,G 83, G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.6. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 6 = Mod g {(xy)z x(y(zx))}. Then G K 6 if and only if for any a, b, c V, if (a, b) E, then (a, c) E if and only if (b, c), (c, a) E. Proof. The proof is similar as the proof of Theorem 3.2. By Theorem 3.6, we see that the graphs which belong to K 6 are the graphs G i F, F = {G 1,G 2,G 9,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs.

10 566 M. Thongmoon and T. Poomsa-ard Theorem 3.7. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 7 = Mod g {(xy)z (x(yz))z}. Then G K 7 if and only if for any a, b, c V if (a, b), (a, c) E, then (b, c) E. Proof. The proof is similar as the proof of Theorem 3.3. By Theorem 3.7, we see that the graphs which belong to K 7 are the graphs G i H, H = {G 1,G 2,G 4,G 9,G 14,G 26,G 34,G 51,G 64,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.8. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 8 = Mod g {x(y(zx)) x(z(yx))}. Then G K 8 if and only if for any a, b, c V, (a, b), (b, c), (c, a) E if and only if (a, c), (c, b), (b, a) E. Proof. The proof is similar as the proof of Theorem 3.1. By Theorem 3.8, we see that the graphs which belong to K 8 are the graphs G i I, I = {G 1,G 2,...,G 65,G 78,...;G 83,G 92,...,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.9. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 9 = Mod g {x(y(zx)) (x(yz))z}. Then G K 9 if and only if for any a, b, c V, if (a, b), (b, c) E, then (c, a) E if and only if (a, c) E. Proof. The proof is similar as the proof of Theorem 3.2. By Theorem 3.9, we see that the graphs which belong to K 9 are the graphs G i J, J = {G 1,G 2,G 3,G 7,G 8,G 9,G 10,G 16,G 24,G 30,G 31,G 38,G 39,G 46,...,G 51, G 92,...,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 10 = Mod g {(x(yz))z (xy)(zy)}. Then G K 10 if and only if for any a, b, c V, if (a, c), (a, b) E, then (b, c) E if and only if (c, b) E. Proof. The proof is similar as the proof of Theorem 3.2. By Theorem 3.10, we see that the graphs which belong to K 10 are the graphs G i L, L = {G 1,...,G 4,G 7,...,G 11,G 14,G 16,G 19, G 24,G 26,G 30,G 31,G 32,G 34,G 38, G 39,G 41,G 43,G 46,...,G 52,G 55,G 60, G 61,G 64,G 66,G 70,G 73,G 78,G 80,G 89,G 92,...G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. By checking the graphs in K 1 and the graphs in Mod g {x(yz) (xy)(zy)}, we found that they are the same graph variety. After that we use the Proposition 3.1 recheck again as the following theorem:

11 Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties 567 Theorem Let K = Mod g {x(yz) (xy)(zy)}. Then K = K 1. Proof. Let G = (V, E) be a graph. Suppose that G K 1. Let s, t and t are terms such that s = x(yz), t = (xy)(zy) and t = x(zy) and let h : V (s) V be a function. Suppose that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Since (x, y), (y, z) E(s), we have (h(x), h(y)), (h(y), h(z)) E. Since G K 1. By Theorem 3.1 we have (h(x), h(z)), (h(z), h(y)) E. So h is a homomorphism from G(t ) into G. From (h(x), h(y)), (h(x), h(z)), (h(z), h(y)) E, we have that h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Suppose that h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Since (x, y), (z, y), (x, z) E(t), we have (h(x), h(y)), (h(z), h(y)), (h(x), h(z)) E. Since G K 1 and (h(x), h(z)), (h(z), h(y)) E. By Theorem 3.1 we have (h(x), h(y)), (h(y), h(z)) E. So we have that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Then, by Proposition 3.1 we get G K. Let G K. Suppose that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Since (x, y), (y, z) E(s), we have (h(x), h(y)), (h(y), h(z)) E. Since G K. By Proposition 3.1 we have h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Since (z, y), (x, z) E(t), we get (h(z), h(y)), (h(x), h(z)) E. Hence h is a homomorphism from G(t ) into G. Suppose that h is a homomorphism from G(t ) into G. Since (x, z), (z, y), E(t ), we have (h(x), h(z)), (h(z), h(y)) E. Let h : V (t ) V be a function such that h (x) = h(x), h (y) = h(z) and h (z) = h(y). Hence h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Since G K, we get that h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Since (x, z), (z, y) E(t) we have (h (x), h (z)) = (h(x), h(y)) E and (h (z), h (y)) = (h(y), h(z)) E. Hence h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Then, by Proposition 3.1 we get G K 1. Hence K = K 1. In the similar way, we have the following K 1 = Mod g {x(yz) x(zy)} = Mod g {x(yz) (xy)(zy)} = Mod g {x(zy) (x(yz))z}; K 2 = Mod g {x(yz) (xy)z} = Mod g {x(zy) (xy)z}; K 3 = Mod g {x(yz) x(y(zx))} = Mod g {x(zy) x(z(yx))}; K 4 = Mod g {x(yz) x(z(yx))} = Mod g {x(zy) x(y(zx))}; K 5 = Mod g {x(yz) (x(yz))z} = Mod g {x(zy) (xy)(zy)}; K 6 = Mod g {(xy)z x(y(zx))} = Mod g {(xy)z x(z(yx))};

12 568 M. Thongmoon and T. Poomsa-ard K 7 = Mod g {(xy)z (x(yz))z} = Mod g {(xy)z (xy)(zy)}; K 9 = Mod g {x(y(zx)) (x(yz))z} = Mod g {x(y(zx)) (xy)(zy)} = Mod g {x(z(yx)) (x(yz))z} = Mod g {x(z(yx)) (xy)(zy)}. Hence there are only ten triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties Mod g {s i s j } with i j for all i = 1, 2, 3,..., 7, j = 1, 2, 3,..., 7. Since for any Σ T T, we have the triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties Mod g Σ = s t Σ Mod g{s t}. Therefore we can find all triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties in the following way: At first let A = {K 0, K 1,..., K 10 }. Find the intersection between two elements of A. If there are some of them do not belong to A, then add them into A to get the set A 1. Do the same manner for A 1 to get A 2. Continuing this process until to get the set A n such that all intersection between two elements of A n belong to itself. Then, A n close under inclusion. Let K 11 = K 5 K 10. Then by Theorem 3.5 and Theorem 3.10 we see that the graphs which belong to K 11 are the graphs G i M, M = {G 1, G 2,G 3,G 4,G 9, G 10,G 11,G 14,G 24,G 26,G 52,G 55,G 64,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Let K 12 = K 7 K 9. Then by Theorem 3.7 and Theorem 3.9 we see that the graphs which belong to K 12 are the graphs G i N, N = {G 1, G 2,G 9,G 51,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Let K 13 = K 8 K 10. Then by Theorem 3.8 and Theorem 3.10 we see that the graphs which belong to K 13 are the graphs G i O, O = {G 1, G 2,G 3,G 4,G 7,G 8, G 9,G 10,G 11,G 14, G 16,G 19,G 24,G 26,G 30,G 31,G 32,G 34,G 38, G 39,G 41,G 43,G 46,G 47, G 48,G 49,G 50,G 51, G 52,G 55,G 60,G 61,G 64,G 78,G 80,G 92,G 93,G 94,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Further we prove that K 3 K 9 = K 4 and K 3 K 10 as the following theorems. Theorem K 3 K 9 = K 4. Proof. Let G = (V, E) be a graph. Suppose that G K 4. For any a, b, c V, suppose that (a, b), (b, c) E. Since G K 4, we have (a, c), (c, b), (b, a) E. From (a, c), (c, b) E and G K 4 we have (c, a) E. Hence G K 3. For any a, b, c V, suppose (a, b), (b, c), (c, a) E. From (b, c), (c, a) E and G K 4, we have (a, c) E. Suppose (a, b), (b, c), (a, c) E. From (a, b), (b, c) E and G K 4, we have (c, b), (b, a) E. From (a, c), (c, b) E and G K 4 we have (c, a) E. Hence G K 9. So G K 3 K 9. Therefore

13 Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties 569 K 4 K 3 K 9. Suppose that G K 3 K 9. For any a, b, c V, suppose that (a, b), (b, c) E. Since G K 3, we have (c, a) E. From (a, b), (b, c), (c, a) E and G K 9, we have (a, c) E. From (c, a), (a, b), (b, c) E and G K 9, we have (c, b) E. From (b, c), (c, a), (a, b) E and G K 9 we have (b, a) E. For any a, b, c V, suppose that (a, c), (c, b), (b, a) E. Since G K 9, we have (a, b) E. From (b, a), (a, c), (c, b) E and G K 9, we have (b, c) E. Then, we have G K 4. Hence K 3 K 9 K 4. Therefore K 3 K 9 = K 4. Theorem K 3 K 10. Proof. Let G = (V, E) be a graph. Let G K 3 and for any a, b, c V, suppose that (a, c), (a, b), (b, c) E. From (a, b), (b, c) E and G K 3, we have (c, a) E. From (c, a), (a, c) E and G K 3, we have (c, c) E. From (b, c), (c, c) E and G K 3, we have (c, b) E. Suppose that (a, c), (a, b), (c, b) E. From (a, c), (c, b) E and G K 3, we have (b, a) E. From (b, a), (a, b) E and G K 3, we have (b, b) E. From (c, b), (b, b) E and G K 3, we have (b, c) E. Then G K 10. Therefore K 3 K 10. In the similar way, we have K 8 K 10 = K 13, K 5 K 10 = K 11, K 7 K 9 = K 12, K 1 K 7 = K 2, K 2 K 4 = K 6, K 12 K 2 = K 6, K 12 K 4 = K 6, K 1 K 9 = K 4, K 1 K 3 = K 4, K 9 K 13, K 5 K 8, K 1 K 11, K 2 K 1, K 11 K 13 and K 7 K 13. We found that the set K = {K 0, K 1, K 3,..., K 13 } close under inclusion. Hence K is the set of all triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties. Since the intersection of any family of triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties is again a triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph variety, K forms a poset under inclusion, in which two elements have a greatest lower bound (their intersection) and least upper bound (the intersection of all triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties which contain both of them), Thus we have a lattice (K;, ), called the triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc lattice of graph varieties. The following is the Hasse diagram of this lattice.

14 570 M. Thongmoon and T. Poomsa-ard K 0 K 10 K 8 K 13 K 5 K 3 K 9 K 11 K 1 K 7 K 4 K 2 K12 K 6 Acknowledgment The authors are very grateful to the referee for his careful work and suggestions which improved the quality of the paper. We also would like to thank the Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University for their financial support. References [1] A. Ananpinitwatna and T. Poomsa-ard, Identities in biregular leftmost graph varieties of type (2,0), Asian-European J. of Math., 2(1), 2009, [2] K. Denecke and S.L. Wismath, Universal Algebra and Applications in Theoretical Computer Science, ChapmanHall/CRC [3] M. Krapeedang and T. Poomsa-ard, Biregular leftmost graph varieties of graph algebras of type (2,0), will be appear. [4] J. Khampakdee and T. Poomsa-ard, Hyperidentities in (xy)x x(yy) graph algebras of type (2,0), Bull. Khorean Math. Soc. 44(2007), no. 4, [5] E. W. Kiss, R. Pöschel and P. Pröhle, Subvarieties of varieties generated by graph algebras, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 54(1990), no [6] T. Poomsa-ard, Hyperidentities in associative graph algebras, Discuss. Math. Gen. Algebra Appl. 20(2000), no. 2,

15 Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties 571 [7] T. Poomsa-ard, J. Wetweerapong and C. Samartkoon Hyperidentities in idempotent graph algebras, Thai J. Math. 2(2004), no. 1, [8] T. Poomsa-ard, J. Wetweerapong and C. Samartkoon Hyperidentities in transitive graph algebras, Discuss. Math. Gen. Algebra Appl. 25(2005), no. 1, [9] R. Pöschel, The equational logic for graph algebras, Z. Math. Logik Grundlag. Math. 35(1989), no. 3, [10] R. Pöschel, Graph algebras and graph varieties, Algebra Universalis, 27(1990), no. 4, [11] R. Pöschel and W. Wessel, Classes of graphs definable by graph algebras identities or quasiidentities, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolonae 28(1987), [12] C. R. Shallon, Nonfinitely based finite algebras derived from lattices, Ph. D. Dissertation, Uni. of California, Los Angeles, Received: August, 2009

Identities in (X(YZ))Z with Reverse Arc Graph Varieties of Type (2,0)

Identities in (X(YZ))Z with Reverse Arc Graph Varieties of Type (2,0) International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 28, 1365-1376 Identities in (X(YZ))Z with Reverse Arc Graph Varieties of Type (2,0) Apinant Anantpinitwatna and Tiang Poomsa-ard Department of Mathematics,

More information

Classes of Universal Graphs Definable by Universal Graph Algebra Quasi-Identities

Classes of Universal Graphs Definable by Universal Graph Algebra Quasi-Identities International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 8, 2013, no. 16, 789-799 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com Classes of Universal Graphs Definable by Universal Graph Algebra Quasi-Identities P. Jampachon and T. Poomsa-ard

More information

Equational Logic. Chapter Syntax Terms and Term Algebras

Equational Logic. Chapter Syntax Terms and Term Algebras Chapter 2 Equational Logic 2.1 Syntax 2.1.1 Terms and Term Algebras The natural logic of algebra is equational logic, whose propositions are universally quantified identities between terms built up from

More information

Fuzzy M-solid subvarieties

Fuzzy M-solid subvarieties International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 5, 2011, no. 24, 1195-1205 Fuzzy M-Solid Subvarieties Bundit Pibaljommee Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science Khon kaen University, Khon kaen 40002, Thailand

More information

GENERATING SETS AND DECOMPOSITIONS FOR IDEMPOTENT TREE LANGUAGES

GENERATING SETS AND DECOMPOSITIONS FOR IDEMPOTENT TREE LANGUAGES Atlantic Electronic http://aejm.ca Journal of Mathematics http://aejm.ca/rema Volume 6, Number 1, Summer 2014 pp. 26-37 GENERATING SETS AND DECOMPOSITIONS FOR IDEMPOTENT TREE ANGUAGES MARK THOM AND SHEY

More information

Minimal Characteristic Algebras for Rectangular k-normal Identities

Minimal Characteristic Algebras for Rectangular k-normal Identities Algebra Colloquium 18 : 4 (2011) 611 628 Algebra Colloquium c 2011 AMSS CAS & SUZHOU UNIV Minimal Characteristic Algebras for Rectangular k-normal Identities K. Hambrook S.L. Wismath Department of Mathematics

More information

On the Complete Join of Permutative Combinatorial Rees-Sushkevich Varieties

On the Complete Join of Permutative Combinatorial Rees-Sushkevich Varieties International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 1, 2007, no. 1, 1 9 On the Complete Join of Permutative Combinatorial Rees-Sushkevich Varieties Edmond W. H. Lee 1 Department of Mathematics, Simon Fraser University

More information

EQUATIONS OF TOURNAMENTS ARE NOT FINITELY BASED

EQUATIONS OF TOURNAMENTS ARE NOT FINITELY BASED EQUATIONS OF TOURNAMENTS ARE NOT FINITELY BASED J. Ježek, P. Marković, M. Maróti and R. McKenzie Abstract. The aim of this paper is to prove that there is no finite basis for the equations satisfied by

More information

Section Summary. Relations and Functions Properties of Relations. Combining Relations

Section Summary. Relations and Functions Properties of Relations. Combining Relations Chapter 9 Chapter Summary Relations and Their Properties n-ary Relations and Their Applications (not currently included in overheads) Representing Relations Closures of Relations (not currently included

More information

Closure operators on sets and algebraic lattices

Closure operators on sets and algebraic lattices Closure operators on sets and algebraic lattices Sergiu Rudeanu University of Bucharest Romania Closure operators are abundant in mathematics; here are a few examples. Given an algebraic structure, such

More information

Universal Algebra for Logics

Universal Algebra for Logics Universal Algebra for Logics Joanna GRYGIEL University of Czestochowa Poland j.grygiel@ajd.czest.pl 2005 These notes form Lecture Notes of a short course which I will give at 1st School on Universal Logic

More information

SIMPLE LOGICS FOR BASIC ALGEBRAS

SIMPLE LOGICS FOR BASIC ALGEBRAS Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 44:3/4 (2015), pp. 95 110 http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/0138-0680.44.3.4.01 Jānis Cīrulis SIMPLE LOGICS FOR BASIC ALGEBRAS Abstract An MV-algebra is an algebra (A,,,

More information

MULTI-HYPERSUBSTITUTIONS AND COLOURED SOLID VARIETIES arxiv: v2 [math.ra] 29 Nov 2008

MULTI-HYPERSUBSTITUTIONS AND COLOURED SOLID VARIETIES arxiv: v2 [math.ra] 29 Nov 2008 MULTI-HYPERSUBSTITUTIONS AND COLOURED SOLID VARIETIES arxiv:0811.4764v2 [math.ra] 29 Nov 2008 K. DENECKE, J. KOPPITZ, SL. SHTRAKOV Abstract. Hypersubstitutions are mappings which map operation symbols

More information

THE LATTICE OF SUBVARIETIES OF SEMILATTICE ORDERED ALGEBRAS

THE LATTICE OF SUBVARIETIES OF SEMILATTICE ORDERED ALGEBRAS THE LATTICE OF SUBVARIETIES OF SEMILATTICE ORDERED ALGEBRAS A. PILITOWSKA 1 AND A. ZAMOJSKA-DZIENIO 2 Abstract. This paper is devoted to the semilattice ordered V-algebras of the form (A, Ω, +), where

More information

DISTRIBUTIVE, STANDARD AND NEUTRAL ELEMENTS IN TRELLISES. 1. Introduction

DISTRIBUTIVE, STANDARD AND NEUTRAL ELEMENTS IN TRELLISES. 1. Introduction Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae Vol. LXXVII, 2 (2008), pp. 167 174 167 DISTRIBUTIVE, STANDARD AND NEUTRAL ELEMENTS IN TRELLISES SHASHIREKHA B. RAI Abstract. In this paper, the concepts of distributive, standard

More information

Introduction to Kleene Algebras

Introduction to Kleene Algebras Introduction to Kleene Algebras Riccardo Pucella Basic Notions Seminar December 1, 2005 Introduction to Kleene Algebras p.1 Idempotent Semirings An idempotent semiring is a structure S = (S, +,, 1, 0)

More information

1. Quivers and their representations: Basic definitions and examples.

1. Quivers and their representations: Basic definitions and examples. 1 Quivers and their representations: Basic definitions and examples 11 Quivers A quiver Q (sometimes also called a directed graph) consists of vertices and oriented edges (arrows): loops and multiple arrows

More information

Definition: A binary relation R from a set A to a set B is a subset R A B. Example:

Definition: A binary relation R from a set A to a set B is a subset R A B. Example: Chapter 9 1 Binary Relations Definition: A binary relation R from a set A to a set B is a subset R A B. Example: Let A = {0,1,2} and B = {a,b} {(0, a), (0, b), (1,a), (2, b)} is a relation from A to B.

More information

Section 7.1 Relations and Their Properties. Definition: A binary relation R from a set A to a set B is a subset R A B.

Section 7.1 Relations and Their Properties. Definition: A binary relation R from a set A to a set B is a subset R A B. Section 7.1 Relations and Their Properties Definition: A binary relation R from a set A to a set B is a subset R A B. Note: there are no constraints on relations as there are on functions. We have a common

More information

Introduction to generalized topological spaces

Introduction to generalized topological spaces @ Applied General Topology c Universidad Politécnica de Valencia Volume 12, no. 1, 2011 pp. 49-66 Introduction to generalized topological spaces Irina Zvina Abstract We introduce the notion of generalized

More information

FREE STEINER LOOPS. Smile Markovski, Ana Sokolova Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Republic of Macedonia

FREE STEINER LOOPS. Smile Markovski, Ana Sokolova Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Republic of Macedonia GLASNIK MATEMATIČKI Vol. 36(56)(2001), 85 93 FREE STEINER LOOPS Smile Markovski, Ana Sokolova Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Republic of Macedonia Abstract. A Steiner loop, or a sloop, is a groupoid

More information

P.S. Gevorgyan and S.D. Iliadis. 1. Introduction

P.S. Gevorgyan and S.D. Iliadis. 1. Introduction MATEMATIČKI VESNIK MATEMATIQKI VESNIK 70, 2 (208), 0 9 June 208 research paper originalni nauqni rad GROUPS OF GENERALIZED ISOTOPIES AND GENERALIZED G-SPACES P.S. Gevorgyan and S.D. Iliadis Abstract. The

More information

Semigroup, monoid and group models of groupoid identities. 1. Introduction

Semigroup, monoid and group models of groupoid identities. 1. Introduction Quasigroups and Related Systems 16 (2008), 25 29 Semigroup, monoid and group models of groupoid identities Nick C. Fiala Abstract In this note, we characterize those groupoid identities that have a (nite)

More information

F -inverse covers of E-unitary inverse monoids

F -inverse covers of E-unitary inverse monoids F -inverse covers of E-unitary inverse monoids Outline of Ph.D. thesis Nóra Szakács Supervisor: Mária B. Szendrei Doctoral School of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Szeged 2016 1 1 Introduction

More information

The variety of commutative additively and multiplicatively idempotent semirings

The variety of commutative additively and multiplicatively idempotent semirings Semigroup Forum (2018) 96:409 415 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00233-017-9905-2 RESEARCH ARTICLE The variety of commutative additively and multiplicatively idempotent semirings Ivan Chajda 1 Helmut Länger

More information

A Structure of KK-Algebras and its Properties

A Structure of KK-Algebras and its Properties Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 6, 2012, no. 21, 1035-1044 A Structure of KK-Algebras and its Properties S. Asawasamrit Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut s University

More information

Unary Automatic Graphs: An Algorithmic Perspective 1

Unary Automatic Graphs: An Algorithmic Perspective 1 Unary Automatic Graphs: An Algorithmic Perspective 1 This paper studies infinite graphs produced from a natural unfolding operation applied to finite graphs. Graphs produced via such operations are of

More information

cse303 ELEMENTS OF THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION Professor Anita Wasilewska

cse303 ELEMENTS OF THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION Professor Anita Wasilewska cse303 ELEMENTS OF THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION Professor Anita Wasilewska LECTURE 1 Course Web Page www3.cs.stonybrook.edu/ cse303 The webpage contains: lectures notes slides; very detailed solutions to

More information

Sets and Motivation for Boolean algebra

Sets and Motivation for Boolean algebra SET THEORY Basic concepts Notations Subset Algebra of sets The power set Ordered pairs and Cartesian product Relations on sets Types of relations and their properties Relational matrix and the graph of

More information

NEW CLASSES OF SET-THEORETIC COMPLETE INTERSECTION MONOMIAL IDEALS

NEW CLASSES OF SET-THEORETIC COMPLETE INTERSECTION MONOMIAL IDEALS NEW CLASSES OF SET-THEORETIC COMPLETE INTERSECTION MONOMIAL IDEALS M. R. POURNAKI, S. A. SEYED FAKHARI, AND S. YASSEMI Abstract. Let be a simplicial complex and χ be an s-coloring of. Biermann and Van

More information

Boolean Algebra CHAPTER 15

Boolean Algebra CHAPTER 15 CHAPTER 15 Boolean Algebra 15.1 INTRODUCTION Both sets and propositions satisfy similar laws, which are listed in Tables 1-1 and 4-1 (in Chapters 1 and 4, respectively). These laws are used to define an

More information

Math.3336: Discrete Mathematics. Chapter 9 Relations

Math.3336: Discrete Mathematics. Chapter 9 Relations Math.3336: Discrete Mathematics Chapter 9 Relations Instructor: Dr. Blerina Xhabli Department of Mathematics, University of Houston https://www.math.uh.edu/ blerina Email: blerina@math.uh.edu Fall 2018

More information

ClC (X ) : X ω X } C. (11)

ClC (X ) : X ω X } C. (11) With each closed-set system we associate a closure operation. Definition 1.20. Let A, C be a closed-set system. Define Cl C : : P(A) P(A) as follows. For every X A, Cl C (X) = { C C : X C }. Cl C (X) is

More information

Finite Simple Abelian Algebras are Strictly Simple

Finite Simple Abelian Algebras are Strictly Simple Finite Simple Abelian Algebras are Strictly Simple Matthew A. Valeriote Abstract A finite universal algebra is called strictly simple if it is simple and has no nontrivial subalgebras. An algebra is said

More information

DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICES ON GRAPH ORIENTATIONS

DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICES ON GRAPH ORIENTATIONS DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICES ON GRAPH ORIENTATIONS KOLJA B. KNAUER ABSTRACT. Propp gave a construction method for distributive lattices on a class of orientations of a graph called c-orientations. Given a distributive

More information

Lecture Notes: Selected Topics in Discrete Structures. Ulf Nilsson

Lecture Notes: Selected Topics in Discrete Structures. Ulf Nilsson Lecture Notes: Selected Topics in Discrete Structures Ulf Nilsson Dept of Computer and Information Science Linköping University 581 83 Linköping, Sweden ulfni@ida.liu.se 2004-03-09 Contents Chapter 1.

More information

D-bounded Distance-Regular Graphs

D-bounded Distance-Regular Graphs D-bounded Distance-Regular Graphs CHIH-WEN WENG 53706 Abstract Let Γ = (X, R) denote a distance-regular graph with diameter D 3 and distance function δ. A (vertex) subgraph X is said to be weak-geodetically

More information

ON VARIETIES OF LEFT DISTRIBUTIVE LEFT IDEMPOTENT GROUPOIDS

ON VARIETIES OF LEFT DISTRIBUTIVE LEFT IDEMPOTENT GROUPOIDS ON VARIETIES OF LEFT DISTRIBUTIVE LEFT IDEMPOTENT GROUPOIDS DAVID STANOVSKÝ Abstract. We describe a part of the lattice of subvarieties of left distributive left idempotent groupoids (i.e. those satisfying

More information

Jónsson posets and unary Jónsson algebras

Jónsson posets and unary Jónsson algebras Jónsson posets and unary Jónsson algebras Keith A. Kearnes and Greg Oman Abstract. We show that if P is an infinite poset whose proper order ideals have cardinality strictly less than P, and κ is a cardinal

More information

INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS

INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS BRIAN OSSERMAN We discuss the inverse limit construction, and consider the special case of inverse limits of finite groups, which should best be considered as topological

More information

On the Structure of Rough Approximations

On the Structure of Rough Approximations On the Structure of Rough Approximations (Extended Abstract) Jouni Järvinen Turku Centre for Computer Science (TUCS) Lemminkäisenkatu 14 A, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland jjarvine@cs.utu.fi Abstract. We study

More information

On star forest ascending subgraph decomposition

On star forest ascending subgraph decomposition On star forest ascending subgraph decomposition Josep M. Aroca and Anna Lladó Department of Mathematics, Univ. Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona, Spain josep.m.aroca@upc.edu,aina.llado@upc.edu Submitted:

More information

ACLT: Algebra, Categories, Logic in Topology - Grothendieck's generalized topological spaces (toposes)

ACLT: Algebra, Categories, Logic in Topology - Grothendieck's generalized topological spaces (toposes) ACLT: Algebra, Categories, Logic in Topology - Grothendieck's generalized topological spaces (toposes) Steve Vickers CS Theory Group Birmingham 2. Theories and models Categorical approach to many-sorted

More information

Characterizing the Equational Theory

Characterizing the Equational Theory Introduction to Kleene Algebra Lecture 4 CS786 Spring 2004 February 2, 2004 Characterizing the Equational Theory Most of the early work on Kleene algebra was directed toward characterizing the equational

More information

When does a semiring become a residuated lattice?

When does a semiring become a residuated lattice? When does a semiring become a residuated lattice? Ivan Chajda and Helmut Länger arxiv:1809.07646v1 [math.ra] 20 Sep 2018 Abstract It is an easy observation that every residuated lattice is in fact a semiring

More information

CHAPTER 4. βs as a semigroup

CHAPTER 4. βs as a semigroup CHAPTER 4 βs as a semigroup In this chapter, we assume that (S, ) is an arbitrary semigroup, equipped with the discrete topology. As explained in Chapter 3, we will consider S as a (dense ) subset of its

More information

ANNIHILATOR IDEALS IN ALMOST SEMILATTICE

ANNIHILATOR IDEALS IN ALMOST SEMILATTICE BULLETIN OF THE INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICAL VIRTUAL INSTITUTE ISSN (p) 2303-4874, ISSN (o) 2303-4955 www.imvibl.org /JOURNALS / BULLETIN Vol. 7(2017), 339-352 DOI: 10.7251/BIMVI1702339R Former BULLETIN

More information

A MODEL-THEORETIC PROOF OF HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ

A MODEL-THEORETIC PROOF OF HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ A MODEL-THEORETIC PROOF OF HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ NICOLAS FORD Abstract. The goal of this paper is to present a proof of the Nullstellensatz using tools from a branch of logic called model theory. In

More information

The Essentially Equational Theory of Horn Classes

The Essentially Equational Theory of Horn Classes The Essentially Equational Theory of Horn Classes Hans E. Porst Dedicated to Professor Dr. Dieter Pumplün on the occasion of his retirement Abstract It is well known that the model categories of universal

More information

FREE SYSTEMS OF ALGEBRAS AND ULTRACLOSED CLASSES

FREE SYSTEMS OF ALGEBRAS AND ULTRACLOSED CLASSES Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae Vol. LXXV, 1(2006), pp. 127 136 127 FREE SYSTEMS OF ALGEBRAS AND ULTRACLOSED CLASSES R. THRON and J. KOPPITZ Abstract. There is considered the concept of the so-called free

More information

Tutorial Obtain the principal disjunctive normal form and principal conjunction form of the statement

Tutorial Obtain the principal disjunctive normal form and principal conjunction form of the statement Tutorial - 1 1. Obtain the principal disjunctive normal form and principal conjunction form of the statement Let S P P Q Q R P P Q Q R A: P Q Q R P Q R P Q Q R Q Q R A S Minterm Maxterm T T T F F T T T

More information

Finite homogeneous and lattice ordered effect algebras

Finite homogeneous and lattice ordered effect algebras Finite homogeneous and lattice ordered effect algebras Gejza Jenča Department of Mathematics Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology Slovak Technical University Ilkovičova 3 812 19

More information

20 Group Homomorphisms

20 Group Homomorphisms 20 Group Homomorphisms In Example 1810(d), we have observed that the groups S 4 /V 4 and S 3 have almost the same multiplication table They have the same structure In this paragraph, we study groups with

More information

Simplification by Truth Table and without Truth Table

Simplification by Truth Table and without Truth Table Engineering Mathematics 2013 SUBJECT NAME SUBJECT CODE MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL CODE REGULATION UPDATED ON : Discrete Mathematics : MA2265 : University Questions : SKMA1006 : R2008 : August 2013 Name of

More information

Completeness of Star-Continuity

Completeness of Star-Continuity Introduction to Kleene Algebra Lecture 5 CS786 Spring 2004 February 9, 2004 Completeness of Star-Continuity We argued in the previous lecture that the equational theory of each of the following classes

More information

A note on congruence lattices of slim semimodular

A note on congruence lattices of slim semimodular A note on congruence lattices of slim semimodular lattices Gábor Czédli Abstract. Recently, G. Grätzer has raised an interesting problem: Which distributive lattices are congruence lattices of slim semimodular

More information

A CHARACTERIZATION OF LOCALLY FINITE VARIETIES THAT SATISFY A NONTRIVIAL CONGRUENCE IDENTITY

A CHARACTERIZATION OF LOCALLY FINITE VARIETIES THAT SATISFY A NONTRIVIAL CONGRUENCE IDENTITY A CHARACTERIZATION OF LOCALLY FINITE VARIETIES THAT SATISFY A NONTRIVIAL CONGRUENCE IDENTITY KEITH A. KEARNES Abstract. We show that a locally finite variety satisfies a nontrivial congruence identity

More information

Remarks on categorical equivalence of finite unary algebras

Remarks on categorical equivalence of finite unary algebras Remarks on categorical equivalence of finite unary algebras 1. Background M. Krasner s original theorems from 1939 say that a finite algebra A (1) is an essentially multiunary algebra in which all operations

More information

cse303 ELEMENTS OF THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION Professor Anita Wasilewska

cse303 ELEMENTS OF THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION Professor Anita Wasilewska cse303 ELEMENTS OF THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION Professor Anita Wasilewska LECTURE 3 CHAPTER 1 SETS, RELATIONS, and LANGUAGES 6. Closures and Algorithms 7. Alphabets and Languages 8. Finite Representation

More information

1 Introduction We adopt the terminology of [1]. Let D be a digraph, consisting of a set V (D) of vertices and a set E(D) V (D) V (D) of edges. For a n

1 Introduction We adopt the terminology of [1]. Let D be a digraph, consisting of a set V (D) of vertices and a set E(D) V (D) V (D) of edges. For a n HIGHLY ARC-TRANSITIVE DIGRAPHS WITH NO HOMOMORPHISM ONTO Z Aleksander Malnic 1 Dragan Marusic 1 IMFM, Oddelek za matematiko IMFM, Oddelek za matematiko Univerza v Ljubljani Univerza v Ljubljani Jadranska

More information

A Note on Generalized Topology

A Note on Generalized Topology International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 6, 2011, no. 1, 19-24 A Note on Generalized Topology Gh. Abbaspour Tabadkan and A. Taghavi Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Sciences Damghan University, Damghan,

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 10 Sep 2018

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 10 Sep 2018 THE LATTICE OF VARIETIES OF IMPLICATION SEMIGROUPS SERGEY V. GUSEV, HANAMANTAGOUDA P. SANKAPPANAVAR, AND BORIS M. VERNIKOV arxiv:1809.03148v1 [math.gr] 10 Sep 2018 Abstract. An implication semigroup is

More information

On injective constructions of S-semigroups. Jan Paseka Masaryk University

On injective constructions of S-semigroups. Jan Paseka Masaryk University On injective constructions of S-semigroups Jan Paseka Masaryk University Joint work with Xia Zhang South China Normal University BLAST 2018 University of Denver, Denver, USA Jan Paseka (MU) 10. 8. 2018

More information

Chapter 9: Relations Relations

Chapter 9: Relations Relations Chapter 9: Relations 9.1 - Relations Definition 1 (Relation). Let A and B be sets. A binary relation from A to B is a subset R A B, i.e., R is a set of ordered pairs where the first element from each pair

More information

ON FUZZY TOPOLOGICAL BCC-ALGEBRAS 1

ON FUZZY TOPOLOGICAL BCC-ALGEBRAS 1 Discussiones Mathematicae General Algebra and Applications 20 (2000 ) 77 86 ON FUZZY TOPOLOGICAL BCC-ALGEBRAS 1 Wies law A. Dudek Institute of Mathematics Technical University Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27,

More information

COMBINATORIAL GROUP THEORY NOTES

COMBINATORIAL GROUP THEORY NOTES COMBINATORIAL GROUP THEORY NOTES These are being written as a companion to Chapter 1 of Hatcher. The aim is to give a description of some of the group theory required to work with the fundamental groups

More information

HOW IS A CHORDAL GRAPH LIKE A SUPERSOLVABLE BINARY MATROID?

HOW IS A CHORDAL GRAPH LIKE A SUPERSOLVABLE BINARY MATROID? HOW IS A CHORDAL GRAPH LIKE A SUPERSOLVABLE BINARY MATROID? RAUL CORDOVIL, DAVID FORGE AND SULAMITA KLEIN To the memory of Claude Berge Abstract. Let G be a finite simple graph. From the pioneering work

More information

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gm] 21 Jan 2005

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gm] 21 Jan 2005 arxiv:math/0501341v1 [math.gm] 21 Jan 2005 SUBLATTICES OF LATTICES OF ORDER-CONVEX SETS, I. THE MAIN REPRESENTATION THEOREM MARINA SEMENOVA AND FRIEDRICH WEHRUNG Abstract. For a partially ordered set P,

More information

A NEW COMBINATORIAL FORMULA FOR CLUSTER MONOMIALS OF EQUIORIENTED TYPE A QUIVERS

A NEW COMBINATORIAL FORMULA FOR CLUSTER MONOMIALS OF EQUIORIENTED TYPE A QUIVERS A NEW COMBINATORIAL FORMULA FOR CLUSTER MONOMIALS OF EQUIORIENTED TYPE A QUIVERS D. E. BAYLERAN, DARREN J. FINNIGAN, ALAA HAJ ALI, KYUNGYONG LEE, CHRIS M. LOCRICCHIO, MATTHEW R. MILLS, DANIEL PUIG-PEY

More information

SYNTACTIC SEMIGROUP PROBLEM FOR THE SEMIGROUP REDUCTS OF AFFINE NEAR-SEMIRINGS OVER BRANDT SEMIGROUPS

SYNTACTIC SEMIGROUP PROBLEM FOR THE SEMIGROUP REDUCTS OF AFFINE NEAR-SEMIRINGS OVER BRANDT SEMIGROUPS SYNTACTIC SEMIGROUP PROBLEM FOR THE SEMIGROUP REDUCTS OF AFFINE NEAR-SEMIRINGS OVER BRANDT SEMIGROUPS JITENDER KUMAR AND K. V. KRISHNA Abstract. The syntactic semigroup problem is to decide whether a given

More information

Tutorial on Universal Algebra, Mal cev Conditions, and Finite Relational Structures: Lecture I

Tutorial on Universal Algebra, Mal cev Conditions, and Finite Relational Structures: Lecture I Tutorial on Universal Algebra, Mal cev Conditions, and Finite Relational Structures: Lecture I Ross Willard University of Waterloo, Canada BLAST 2010 Boulder, June 2010 Ross Willard (Waterloo) Universal

More information

Axioms of Kleene Algebra

Axioms of Kleene Algebra Introduction to Kleene Algebra Lecture 2 CS786 Spring 2004 January 28, 2004 Axioms of Kleene Algebra In this lecture we give the formal definition of a Kleene algebra and derive some basic consequences.

More information

Partial cubes: structures, characterizations, and constructions

Partial cubes: structures, characterizations, and constructions Partial cubes: structures, characterizations, and constructions Sergei Ovchinnikov San Francisco State University, Mathematics Department, 1600 Holloway Ave., San Francisco, CA 94132 Abstract Partial cubes

More information

NOTES ON PLANAR SEMIMODULAR LATTICES. IV. THE SIZE OF A MINIMAL CONGRUENCE LATTICE REPRESENTATION WITH RECTANGULAR LATTICES

NOTES ON PLANAR SEMIMODULAR LATTICES. IV. THE SIZE OF A MINIMAL CONGRUENCE LATTICE REPRESENTATION WITH RECTANGULAR LATTICES NOTES ON PLANAR SEMIMODULAR LATTICES. IV. THE SIZE OF A MINIMAL CONGRUENCE LATTICE REPRESENTATION WITH RECTANGULAR LATTICES G. GRÄTZER AND E. KNAPP Abstract. Let D be a finite distributive lattice with

More information

Class Notes on Poset Theory Johan G. Belinfante Revised 1995 May 21

Class Notes on Poset Theory Johan G. Belinfante Revised 1995 May 21 Class Notes on Poset Theory Johan G Belinfante Revised 1995 May 21 Introduction These notes were originally prepared in July 1972 as a handout for a class in modern algebra taught at the Carnegie-Mellon

More information

Anna University, Chennai, November/December 2012

Anna University, Chennai, November/December 2012 B.E./B.Tech. DEGREE EXAMINATION, NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2012 Fifth Semester Computer Science and Engineering MA2265 DISCRETE MATHEMATICS (Regulation 2008) Part - A 1. Define Tautology with an example. A Statement

More information

MITSCH S ORDER AND INCLUSION FOR BINARY RELATIONS

MITSCH S ORDER AND INCLUSION FOR BINARY RELATIONS MITSCH S ORDER AND INCLUSION FOR BINARY RELATIONS D. G. FITZGERALD Abstract. Mitsch s natural partial order on the semigroup of binary relations has a complex relationship with the compatible partial order

More information

BINARY REPRESENTATIONS OF ALGEBRAS WITH AT MOST TWO BINARY OPERATIONS. A CAYLEY THEOREM FOR DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICES

BINARY REPRESENTATIONS OF ALGEBRAS WITH AT MOST TWO BINARY OPERATIONS. A CAYLEY THEOREM FOR DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICES International Journal of Algebra and Computation Vol. 19, No. 1 (2009) 97 106 c World Scientific Publishing Company BINARY REPRESENTATIONS OF ALGEBRAS WITH AT MOST TWO BINARY OPERATIONS. A CAYLEY THEOREM

More information

Foundations of Mathematics

Foundations of Mathematics Foundations of Mathematics Andrew Monnot 1 Construction of the Language Loop We must yield to a cyclic approach in the foundations of mathematics. In this respect we begin with some assumptions of language

More information

From Residuated Lattices to Boolean Algebras with Operators

From Residuated Lattices to Boolean Algebras with Operators From Residuated Lattices to Boolean Algebras with Operators Peter Jipsen School of Computational Sciences and Center of Excellence in Computation, Algebra and Topology (CECAT) Chapman University October

More information

On α-embedded subsets of products

On α-embedded subsets of products European Journal of Mathematics 2015) 1:160 169 DOI 10.1007/s40879-014-0018-0 RESEARCH ARTICLE On α-embedded subsets of products Olena Karlova Volodymyr Mykhaylyuk Received: 22 May 2014 / Accepted: 19

More information

3. Abstract Boolean Algebras

3. Abstract Boolean Algebras 3. ABSTRACT BOOLEAN ALGEBRAS 123 3. Abstract Boolean Algebras 3.1. Abstract Boolean Algebra. Definition 3.1.1. An abstract Boolean algebra is defined as a set B containing two distinct elements 0 and 1,

More information

THE MAXIMAL SUBGROUPS AND THE COMPLEXITY OF THE FLOW SEMIGROUP OF FINITE (DI)GRAPHS

THE MAXIMAL SUBGROUPS AND THE COMPLEXITY OF THE FLOW SEMIGROUP OF FINITE (DI)GRAPHS THE MAXIMAL SUBGROUPS AND THE COMPLEXITY OF THE FLOW SEMIGROUP OF FINITE (DI)GRAPHS GÁBOR HORVÁTH, CHRYSTOPHER L. NEHANIV, AND KÁROLY PODOSKI Dedicated to John Rhodes on the occasion of his 80th birthday.

More information

Relation between Graphs

Relation between Graphs Max Planck Intitute for Math. in the Sciences, Leipzig, Germany Joint work with Jan Hubička, Jürgen Jost, Peter F. Stadler and Ling Yang SCAC2012, SJTU, Shanghai Outline Motivation and Background 1 Motivation

More information

A GENERAL THEORY OF ZERO-DIVISOR GRAPHS OVER A COMMUTATIVE RING. David F. Anderson and Elizabeth F. Lewis

A GENERAL THEORY OF ZERO-DIVISOR GRAPHS OVER A COMMUTATIVE RING. David F. Anderson and Elizabeth F. Lewis International Electronic Journal of Algebra Volume 20 (2016) 111-135 A GENERAL HEORY OF ZERO-DIVISOR GRAPHS OVER A COMMUAIVE RING David F. Anderson and Elizabeth F. Lewis Received: 28 April 2016 Communicated

More information

James J. Madden LSU, Baton Rouge. Dedication: To the memory of Paul Conrad.

James J. Madden LSU, Baton Rouge. Dedication: To the memory of Paul Conrad. Equational classes of f-rings with unit: disconnected classes. James J. Madden LSU, Baton Rouge Dedication: To the memory of Paul Conrad. Abstract. This paper introduces several families of equational

More information

Reachability relations and the structure of transitive digraphs

Reachability relations and the structure of transitive digraphs Reachability relations and the structure of transitive digraphs Norbert Seifter Montanuniversität Leoben, Leoben, Austria seifter@unileoben.ac.at Vladimir I. Trofimov Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg,

More information

A collection of topological Ramsey spaces of trees and their application to profinite graph theory

A collection of topological Ramsey spaces of trees and their application to profinite graph theory A collection of topological Ramsey spaces of trees and their application to profinite graph theory Yuan Yuan Zheng Abstract We construct a collection of new topological Ramsey spaces of trees. It is based

More information

Relations on Hypergraphs

Relations on Hypergraphs Relations on Hypergraphs John Stell School of Computing, University of Leeds RAMiCS 13 Cambridge, 17th September 2012 Relations on a Set Boolean algebra Converse R = R Complement R = R Composition & residuation

More information

The Blok-Ferreirim theorem for normal GBL-algebras and its application

The Blok-Ferreirim theorem for normal GBL-algebras and its application The Blok-Ferreirim theorem for normal GBL-algebras and its application Chapman University Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Orange, California University of Siena Department of Mathematics

More information

NOTES ON PLANAR SEMIMODULAR LATTICES. IV. THE SIZE OF A MINIMAL CONGRUENCE LATTICE REPRESENTATION WITH RECTANGULAR LATTICES

NOTES ON PLANAR SEMIMODULAR LATTICES. IV. THE SIZE OF A MINIMAL CONGRUENCE LATTICE REPRESENTATION WITH RECTANGULAR LATTICES NOTES ON PLANAR SEMIMODULAR LATTICES. IV. THE SIZE OF A MINIMAL CONGRUENCE LATTICE REPRESENTATION WITH RECTANGULAR LATTICES G. GRÄTZER AND E. KNAPP Abstract. Let D be a finite distributive lattice with

More information

SUBLATTICES OF LATTICES OF ORDER-CONVEX SETS, III. THE CASE OF TOTALLY ORDERED SETS

SUBLATTICES OF LATTICES OF ORDER-CONVEX SETS, III. THE CASE OF TOTALLY ORDERED SETS SUBLATTICES OF LATTICES OF ORDER-CONVEX SETS, III. THE CASE OF TOTALLY ORDERED SETS MARINA SEMENOVA AND FRIEDRICH WEHRUNG Abstract. For a partially ordered set P, let Co(P) denote the lattice of all order-convex

More information

Chordal Graphs, Interval Graphs, and wqo

Chordal Graphs, Interval Graphs, and wqo Chordal Graphs, Interval Graphs, and wqo Guoli Ding DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY BATON ROUGE, LA 70803-4918 E-mail: ding@math.lsu.edu Received July 29, 1997 Abstract: Let be the

More information

Note on p-competition Graphs and Paths

Note on p-competition Graphs and Paths Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics (2018) 42: 575 584 Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics c SEAMS. 2018 Note on p-competition Graphs and Paths Y. Kidokoro, K. Ogawa, S. Tagusari, M. Tsuchiya Department

More information

Domination in Cayley Digraphs of Right and Left Groups

Domination in Cayley Digraphs of Right and Left Groups Communications in Mathematics and Applications Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 271 287, 2017 ISSN 0975-8607 (online); 0976-5905 (print) Published by RGN Publications http://www.rgnpublications.com Domination in Cayley

More information

The cocycle lattice of binary matroids

The cocycle lattice of binary matroids Published in: Europ. J. Comb. 14 (1993), 241 250. The cocycle lattice of binary matroids László Lovász Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary, H-1088 Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 Ákos Seress*

More information

THE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS. K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter

THE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS. K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter THE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter Abstract. In previous work, the second author introduced a topology, for spaces of irreducible representations,

More information

Myung-Hwan Kim and Byeong-Kweon Oh. Department of Mathematics, Seoul National University, Seoul , Korea

Myung-Hwan Kim and Byeong-Kweon Oh. Department of Mathematics, Seoul National University, Seoul , Korea REPRESENTATIONS OF POSITIVE DEFINITE SENARY INTEGRAL QUADRATIC FORMS BY A SUM OF SQUARES Myung-Hwan Kim and Byeong-Kweon Oh Department of Mathematics Seoul National University Seoul 151-742 Korea Abstract.

More information

7. Homotopy and the Fundamental Group

7. Homotopy and the Fundamental Group 7. Homotopy and the Fundamental Group The group G will be called the fundamental group of the manifold V. J. Henri Poincaré, 895 The properties of a topological space that we have developed so far have

More information

Arc-transitive pentavalent graphs of order 4pq

Arc-transitive pentavalent graphs of order 4pq Arc-transitive pentavalent graphs of order 4pq Jiangmin Pan Bengong Lou Cuifeng Liu School of Mathematics and Statistics Yunnan University Kunming, Yunnan, 650031, P.R. China Submitted: May 22, 2012; Accepted:

More information