An interaction measure for control configuration selection for multivariable bilinear systems
|
|
- Posy Reynolds
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Nonlinear Dyn DOI 1.17/s z ORIGINAL PAPER An interaction measure for control configuration selection for multivariable bilinear systems Hamid Reza Shaker Jakob Stoustrup Received: 27 June 212 / Accepted: 3 November 212 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 212 Abstract Control configuration selection is the procedure of choosing the appropriate input and output pairs for the design of decoupled (SISO or block) controllers for multivariable systems. This step is an important prerequisite for a successful industrial control strategy. In industrial practice it is often the case that systems which need to be controlled are non-linear, and linear models are insufficient to describe the behavior of the processes. The focus of this paper is on the problem of control configuration selection for a class of non-linear systems which is known as bilinear systems. A gramian-based interaction measure for control configuration selection of MIMO bilinear processes is described. In general, most of the results on the control configuration selection, which have been proposed so far, can only support linear systems. The proposed gramian-based interaction measure not only supports bilinear processes but also can be used to propose a richer sparse or block diagonal controller structure. The method is illustrated further with the help of some illustrative examples. H.R. Shaker ( ) Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark shr@et.aau.dk J. Stoustrup Section for Automation and Control, Department of Electronics Systems, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark jakob@es.aau.dk Keywords Process control Bilinear systems Interaction measure 1 Introduction The technological world of today has been witnessing the increased complexity due to the rapid development of the process plants and the manufacturing processes. The computational complexity, the reliability problems and the restrictions in communication make the centralized control of such large-scale complex systems expensive and difficult. To cope with these problems, several decentralized control structures have been introduced and implemented over the last few decades [1]. The decentralized controllers have several advantages, which make them popular in industry. The decentralized controllers are easy to understand for operators, easy to implement and to re-tune [1, 2]. The decentralized control systems design is a twostep procedure. The controller structure selection and input output pairing is the first main step and the controller synthesis for each channel is the second step of the decentralized control. The focus of this paper is on pairing and the controller structure selection of the decentralized control systems. This issue is a key problem in the design of decentralized and distributed control systems, which directly affects the stability and the performance of the control systems. The interaction measures play an important role in the
2 H.R. Shaker, J. Stoustrup suitable pairing and the controller structure selection for the decentralized and the distributed control. Interaction measures make it possible to study input output interactions and to partition a process into subsystems in order to reduce the coupling, to facilitate the control and to achieve a satisfactory performance. The interaction measures have received a lot of attention over the last few decades [2, 3]. There are two broad categories of interaction measures in the literature. The first category is the relative gain array (RGA) and its related indices [4 9] and the second category is the family of the gramian-based interaction measures [1 13]. The most well-known and commonly used interaction measure is the relative gain array (RGA), which was first proposed in [4]. In the RGA, d.c. gain of the process is used for the construction of the channel interaction measure. The RGA is not sensitive to delays and more importantly it considers the process just at a particular frequency. The RGA has been studied by several other researchers (see, e.g. [5, 6]). There are also other similar measures of interaction, which use dc gain of the process e.g. the NI (the Niederlinski index) [7]. The NI does not provide more information for pairing compared to RGA. The RGA and the NI have been extended for input output pairing of unstable MIMO systems in [2]. The relative interaction array (RIA) is an interaction measure, which is similar to RGA and it is based on considering the interaction as an unmodeled term at d.c. RIA does not provide more information than the RGA about the channel interactions of the process. These indices use the model of the processes at zero frequency. In [6, 8], the relative dynamic gain array (RDGA) was proposed for the first time. The RDGA shows how the interaction varies over the frequency. The idea is further generalized in [9] by the generalized relative dynamic gains (GRDG). This method was mainly proposed for 2 2systems. The second category of interaction measures is the family of gramian-based methods. A method from this category was first proposed in [1] and further in [11]. In this category, the observability and the controllability gramians are used to form the Participation Matrix (PM). The elements of the PM encode the information of the channel interactions. PM is used for pairing and the controller structure selection. The Hankel Interaction Index Array (HIIA) is a similar interaction measure, which was proposed in [12]. The gramian-based interaction measures have several advantages over the interaction measures in the RGA category. The gramian-based interaction measures take the whole frequency range into account rather than a single frequency. This family of the interaction measures suggests more suitable pairing and allows more complicated controller structures. For more details regarding the applications and the differences between two main categories of the interaction measures, see [11 14]. The gramian-based interaction measures have proven to be very useful measures, which encode more information on channel interactions compared to the family of RGA interaction measures. The results on the gramian-based interaction measures, which have been proposed so far, only support linear systems. However, in many applications, linear models are often insufficient to describe the behavior of the processes. On the other hand, due to the complexity of non-linear systems, methods for analyzing non-linear systems or synthesizing their controllers are not as well developed as their linear counterparts. This is the main reason that the interaction measures and controller structure selection issue are not studied extensively for non-linear systems compared to linear systems. Bilinear systems constitute an important class of non-linear systems which comprise perhaps the simplest class of non-linear models with a lot of practical applications. Bilinear systems enjoy wellestablished theories and find applications in the variety of fields to describe the practical processes ranging from electrical networks, hydraulic systems to heat transfer, and chemical processes [2]. Moreover, many highly non-linear systems may be modeled as bilinear systems with appropriate state feedback or can be approximated as bilinear systems in the socalled bilinearization process see e.g. [21, 22, 26] and [29]. In this paper, the gramian-based interaction measure is extended to support bilinear processes. The proposed interaction measure is used for pairing and the controller structure selection. The paper is organized as follows. In the next section, we review the concept of the gramians for bilinear systems. The interpretation of the controllability and observability gramians is also discussed in this section. Section 3 presents how gramians can be used to quantify the channel interactions for bilinear sys-
3 An interaction measure for control configuration selection for multivariable bilinear systems tems. The application of the proposed interaction measure in pairing and the controller structure selection is explained in this section. Section 4 presents the extension of the proposed interaction measure for possible non-square bilinear systems. In Sect. 5, the proposed method is illustrated further with the help of some illustrative examples including a bilinear model of a hydraulic rotary multi-motor system. Section 6 concludes the paper. The notation used in this paper is as follows: M denotes the transpose of matrix if M R n m and complex conjugate transpose if M C n m. The standard notation >, (<, ) is used to denote the positive (negative) definite and semidefinite ordering of matrices. Struc(Π) denotes the structure of a MIMO system Π. Foram p MIMO system Π with input u(t) R m and output y(t) R p, Struc(Π) = [π ij ] p m is a symbolic array π ij =, if there exists a subsystem in Π with input u j and output y i. Otherwise: π ij =. 2 Controllability and observability gramians The controllability and the observability gramians are well-known matrices, which are widely used to check the controllability and the observability of dynamical systems. The gramians are also widely used in the process of model order reduction [15, 16]. The controllability and observability gramians show how difficult a system is to control and to observe, respectively. This is an interesting feature which makes gramians very useful for pairing and for the control structure selection. For a discrete-time bilinear dynamical system which is described by x(k + 1) = Ax(k) + m j=1 N j x(k)u j (k) Π : + Bu(k), y(k) = Cx(k). (1) Here x(k) R n,u(k) R m,y(k) R p, the controllability gramian P is defined as [17 19]: P :=... i=1 k i = k 1 = P i P i, (2) P 1 (k 1 ) = A k1 B, P i (k 1,...,k i ) (3) = A k i [ N 1 P i 1 N 2 P i 1 N m P i 1 ], and the observability gramian Q is defined as Q :=... Q i Q i, (4) i=1 k i = Q 1 (k 1 ) = CA k1, k 1 = Q i 1 N 1 Q i 1 N 2 Q i (k 1,...,k i ) =. Ak i. Q i 1 N m (5) The gramians are given by the solutions of the generalized Lyapunov equations [19]: AP A P + A QA Q + m N j PNj + BB =, j=1 m Nj QN j + C C =. j=1 (6) The generalized Lyapunov equations can be solved iteratively. The controllability gramian P can be obtained from [19]: P = lim Pˆ i (7) i APˆ 1 A Pˆ 1 + BB =, A ˆ P i A ˆ P i + i = 2, 3,... m j=1 N j ˆ P i 1 N j + BB =, (8) In other words, all what we need to do is to run (8) and to compute Pˆ i s and terminate the computation when Pˆ i converges to a constant matrix. Dually the observability gramian can be computed [19]. The controllability and observability gramians are defined analogously for continuous-time systems. Let Π be a
4 H.R. Shaker, J. Stoustrup continuous-time bilinear system described by ẋ(t) = Ax(t) + m j=1 N j x(t)u j (t) Π : + Bu(t), y(t) = Cx(t), (9) x(t) R n,u(t) R m,y(t) R p, the controllability gramian P is defined as [3] P := i=1 P 1 (t 1 ) = e At 1 B P i P i dt 1 dt i, (1) P i (t 1,...,t i ) (11) = e At i [ N 1 P i 1 N 2 P i 1... N m P i 1 ] and the observability gramian is defined as Q := i=1 Q 1 (t 1 ) = Ce At 1, Q i 1 N 1 Q i 1 N 2 Q i (t 1,...,t i ) =. eat i. Q i 1 N m Q i Q i dt 1 dt i, (12) (13) These gramians are given by the solutions of the generalized Lyapunov equations: AP + PA + A Q + AQ + m N j PNj + BB =, (14) j=1 m Nj QN j + C C =. (15) j=1 Analogous to discrete-time case, the generalized Lyapunov equations can be solved iteratively. More details on gramians and its interpretations and computations arediscussedin[19] and [3]. 3 Interaction measure In this section, an interaction measure for the square discrete-time and continuous-time bilinear MIMO Fig. 1 MIMO system with input u R m and output y R m processes (Fig. 1) is built upon the notion of the gramians. The trace of the cross gramian is used as a convenient basis to present the channel interaction and to select the most appropriate controller structure. For a square MIMO bilinear system Π with representation (1), we have B =[b 1 b 2... b m ], C =[c 1 c 2... c m ]. (16) A set of elementary SISO systems can be associated to the MIMO system, such that each SISO system has a single input u j (t) and single output y i (t). The state-space representation of each elementary system is given by { x(k + 1) = Ax(k) + Nj x(k)u Π ij : j (k) + b j u j (k), y i (k) = ci x(k), (17) with gramians P j and Q i. The controllability gramian P j and the observability gramian Q i for the elementary systems are the solutions to AP j A P j + N j P j N j + b j b j =, A Q i A Q i + N j Q in j + c i c i =. (18) Following a similar procedure for a continuous-time MIMO bilinear system Π with representation (9), a set of elementary SISO systems can be associated to the system: {ẋ(t) = Ax(t) + Nj x(t)u Π ij : j (t) + b j u j (t), y i (t) = ci x(t). (19) The controllability gramian P j and the observability gramian Q i for the elementary systems are the solu-
5 An interaction measure for control configuration selection for multivariable bilinear systems tions to AP j + P j A + N j P j N j + b j b j =, A Q i + AQ i + N j Q in j + c i c i =. (2) The information of the channel interaction which is obtained from the gramians of the elementary systems is encompassed into the so-called participation matrix (PM): Ψ =[ψ ij ] R m m, (21) ψ ij = trace[p j Q i ] mi=1 mj=1 trace[p j Q i ]. (22) Note that ψ ij < 1 and m mj=1 i=1 ψ ij = 1. The participation matrix highlights the elementary subsystems, which are more important in the description of MIMO systems, and in this way it shows the suitable pairing and the appropriate controller structure to select. For pairing and the controller structure selection, the structure of the nominal system Π n needs to be obtained. The nominal model is a model, which is obtained by keeping some of the elementary subsystems of the actual MIMO process and ignoring the rest. For example, assume that one of the ordinary methods for pairing is used and a decentralized control is synthesized. If the inputs and outputs are re-labeled, one only needs to design m independent SISO controller loops, for elementary diagonal subsystems. In this case:. Struc(Π o ) =... (23) m m For the designed controller C we have. Struc(C) =... (24) m m The elements of the PM show which elementary subsystems are significant and should be considered in the nominal model. When ψ ij is small, the associated elementary subsystem to the pair (i, j) is either hard to control or hard to observe. This shows that this subsystem does not have any significant effect in the actual input output relation and could be ignored in the nominal model. When ψ ij is larger than 1/m 2, some states in the elementary system with output y j and input u j are easy to control and easy to observe and therefore Π ij is a good candidate to be kept in the nominal system. The suitability of the pairing and the performance of the controller structure highly depend on how close the sum of the chosen ψ ij elements is to one. When the sum of the chosen ψ ij elements is close to one, the nominal and the actual model are close to each other and the error is not significant. The complexity of the selected controller structure depends on the number of the ψ ij elements. In the completely decentralized control, which is the least complicated controller structure, the number of the chosen elements would be m. For example consider a 3 3 process model with PM: Ψ = To pair inputs and outputs for decentralized control structure, we have to select one element per row and one element per column. ψ 11,ψ 12,ψ 21 > 1/m 2, therefore their associated elementary subsystems are good candidates to be involved in the nominal model. However, the best paring for a decentralized controller can be obtained with (u 1,y 1 ), (u 2,y 3 ), (u 3,y 2 ) which are associated with Σ = ψ 11 + ψ 23 + ψ 32 =.437. The structure of the nominal model is Struc(Π o ) =. A simple controller structure for selection is the structure of Πo 1: Struc(C) = Struc ( Πo 1 ) =. If practically it is possible to use more complicated control structures than completely decentralized control, y 1 could be commanded from u 2 and then we will have Σ = ψ 11 + ψ 12 + ψ 23 + ψ 32 =.599.
6 H.R. Shaker, J. Stoustrup The structure of the nominal model then will be Struc(Π o ) =. A simple controller structure to select: Struc(C) = Struc ( Πo 1 ) =. In this case the structure is partially decentralized. 4 Pairing and the controller structure for non-square systems Non-square systems are multivariable systems with an unequal number of inputs and outputs. Non-square systems are divided into two classes: systems with more inputs than outputs and systems with more outputs than inputs. Although non-square plants are often encountered in many engineering disciplines, the theory for analysis and control of non-square plants even for linear systems is not well developed. The main strategy for control of non-square processes is the squaring strategy. That is, the necessary number of outputs or inputs are added or deleted from the system to obtain a square plant. Then, the wellestablished control methods can be used for the nonsquare processes. However, this has its own problems. Introducing some more outputs and inputs results in more costs and maintenance issues and ignoring some of the inputs will certainly degrade the degrees of freedom for achieving the desired response. If we delete some outputs, it degrades the reliability of our measurements. For non-square linear systems with more inputs than outputs, the control considering the nonsquare system structure leads to higher performance compared with the squared case [31, 32]. For nonsquare systems with more outputs than inputs, the notion of perfect control in the least squares sense similar to the one proposed in [32] can be derived. However, a natural extension of our proposed interaction measure to non-square bilinear system is presented in the sequel. For a non-square MIMO bilinear system with representation (1), we have B =[b 1 b 2... b m ], C =[c 1 c 2... c p ]. (25) If we associate a set of elementary SISO systems to this MIMO system such that each SISO system has a single input u j (t) and single output y i (t), the statespace representation of each elementary system will be { x(k + 1) = Ax(k) + Nj x(k)u Π ij : j (k) + b j u j (k), y i (k) = ci x(k). Assume that the controllability and the observability gramians for these subsystems are P j and Q i. The non-square PM is defined as Ψ =[ψ ij ] R m p, (26) ψ ij = trace[p j Q i ] p i=1 mj=1 trace[p j Q i ]. (27) The criterion for the control structure selection based on this PM is similar to the one of the square system. The only difference is that if the structure of the nominal model is Struc(Π o ), a simple non-square suggested structure for the controller Cwill be Struc(C) = Struc ( Π o + ), (28) + denotes the Moore Penrose pseudo inverse. The procedure is similar for continuous-time bilinear systems. 5 Pairing and the controller structure selection: illustrative examples In this section, three numerical examples are used to illustrate the proposed controller structure selection method. The first example is a square continuous-time bilinear model, the second is a non-square continuoustime bilinear model and the last one is a discrete-time bilinear model of a multi-motor hydraulic system. 5.1 Continuous-time bilinear model Consider a continuous-time bilinear model with the following standard state-space representation: {ẋ(t) = Ax(t) + 3j=1 N j x(t)u j (t) + Bu(t), (29) y(t) = Cx(t).
7 An interaction measure for control configuration selection for multivariable bilinear systems Here 3 A = 7, 15.7 N 1 = N 2 = 3,.7 N 3 =, B = 6, C = Solving the Lyapunov equation for the subsystems, the PM is computed as Ψ = The structure of nominal model which this PM suggests for a decentralized control is Struc(Π o ) =. This structure is associated to Σ = ψ 22 + ψ 31 + ψ 13 =.7461 and a simple controller which is suggested for this is Struc(C) =. A more complicated model structure is Struc(Π o ) = which is associated to Σ = ψ 22 + ψ 31 + ψ 13 + ψ 12 =.9655 and a simple controller which is suggested for this is Struc(C) =. 5.2 Non-square bilinear model Consider a non-square bilinear model with three inputs and two outputs and the following standard statespace representation: {ẋ(t) = Ax(t) + 3j=1 N j x(t)u j (t) + Bu(t), (3) y(t) = Cx(t), 3 A = 7, 15.7 N 1 = N 2 = 3,.7 N 3 =, 3 2 B = 6, 5 [ ] 1 1 C =. 2.1 The non-square PM for this system is ( ) Ψ = The nominal model which this PM suggests for a decentralized control is ( ) Struc(Π o ) =, and therefore a simple controller which is suggested for this is Struc(C) = Struc ( Π o + ) =. A more complicated model structure according to PM is ( ) Struc(Π o ) =
8 and therefore a simple controller which is suggested for this is Struc(C) = Struc ( Π o + ) =. 5.3 Discrete-time bilinear model In the sequel, the proposed interaction measure is used for pairing and the controller structure selection for a discrete-time bilinear model for a hydraulic multi-motor rotary system. In general, hydraulic systems are highly non-linear dynamical systems; see, e.g. [27, 28]. The linear models are not sufficiently accurate to describe them and consequently the controllers which are designed based on the linear models of the hydraulic systems quite often do not give satisfying results in practice. On the other hand, due to the complexity of the highly non-linear hydraulic models, methods for analyzing them or synthesizing their controllers are not well developed and often they are difficult to apply in practice. In between the spectrum of different models to describe a hydraulic system from linear model to highly non-linear models, the bilinear models often offer an adequately accurate model with a well-developed theory for the analysis and control [23 25]. Consider a continuous-time bilinear model of the hydraulic rotary multi-motor system in [23]. The model is discretized by Euler s forward discretization method with the sampling time T s =.1. One should note that in general we do not have to discretize the model as we have developed the method for the continuous-time case in previous sections. However, to illustrate the method and to see how the method works for discrete-time systems, discretization is performed to obtain a discrete-time example. The discrete-time bilinear model is x(k + 1) = Ax(k) + 3 j=1 N j x(k)u j (k) Π : + Bu(k), (31) y(k) = Cx(k), A =.99997, H.R. Shaker, J. Stoustrup 1 N 1 =, C = 1, 1.7 N 2 =.3,.7 N 3 =,.3 2 B = 6. 1 The participation matrix (PM) for this bilinear system is obtained using the proposed method: Ψ = The ψ 21,ψ 31 entries are significant compared to other entries. The Σ associated to the best possible pairing for the decentralized control is Σ = ψ 33 + ψ 12 + ψ 21 = The structure of the nominal model for this pairing will be Struc(Π o ) =. The suggested simple control structure for this pairing is Struc(C) = Struc ( Πo 1 ) =. If it is allowed to use more complex controllers than decentralized control (partially decentralized), y 1 could be commanded from u 3 and then we have Σ = ψ 33 + ψ 21 + ψ 12 + ψ 31 =.8918, associated with Struc(Π o ) =.
9 An interaction measure for control configuration selection for multivariable bilinear systems The simple control structure for this pairing is Struc(C) = Struc ( Πo 1 ) =. The Σ for this structure is very close to one. 6 Conclusion A gramian-based interaction measure for the decentralized control of bilinear processes is proposed in this paper. The proposed MIMO interaction measure is the extension of its gramian-based analogous counterpart, which has been proposed for decentralized input output pairing as well as for the controller architecture selection for the linear processes. The proposed measure reveals more information about the ability of the channels to be controlled and to be observed and provides hints for the selection of the richer controller structures such as triangular, sparse and block diagonal. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Danish Research Council for Technology and Production Sciences. References 1. Scattolini, R.: Architectures for distributed and hierarchical model predictive control a review. J. Process Control 19(5), (29) 2. Hovd, M., Skogestad, S.: Pairing criteria for decentralised control of unstable plants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 33, (1994) 3. Van de Wal, M., De Jager, B.: A review of methods for input/output selection. Automatica 37(4), (21) 4. Bristol, E.H.: On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 11, (1966) 5. Skogestad, S., Morari, M.: Implications of large RGA elements on control performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 26, (1987) 6. Witcher, M.F., McAvoy, T.J.: Interacting control systems: steady-state and dynamic measurement of interaction. ISA Trans. 16(3), (1977) 7. Niederlinski, A.: A heuristic approach to the design of linear multivariable interacting control systems. Automatica 7, (1971) 8. Bristol, E.H.: Recent results on interaction in multivariable process control. In: 71st AIChE Conference, Miami, Florida, USA (1978) 9. Gagnon, E., Desbiens, A., Pomerleau, A.: Selection of pairing and constrained robust decentralized PI controllers. In: American Control Conference, San Diego, California, USA, pp (1999) 1. Conley, A., Salgado, M.E.: Gramian based interaction measure. In: The 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Sydney, Australia, pp (2) 11. Salgado, M.E., Conley, A.: MIMO interaction measure and controller structure selection.int.j.control 77(4), (24) 12. Wittenmark, B., Salgado, M.E.: Hankel-norm based interaction measure for input-output pairing. In: Proc. of the 22 IFAC World Congress, Barcelona, Spain (22) 13. Halvarsson, B.: Comparison of some gramian based interaction measures. In: IEEE International Symposium on Computer Aided Control System Design (CACSD 28), Part of IEEE Multi-Conference on Systems and Control, San Antonio, Texas, USA, pp (28) 14. Samuelsson, P., Halvarsson, B., Carlsson, B.: Interaction analysis and control structure selection in a wastewater treatment plant model. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 13(6), (25) 15. Antoulas, A.C.: Approximation of Large-Scale Dynamical Systems. Advances in Design and Control. SIAM, Philadelphia (25) 16. Gugercin, S., Antoulas, A.: A survey of model reduction by balanced truncation and some new results. Int. J. Control 77, (24) 17. Dorissen, H.T.: Canonical forms for bilinear systems. Syst. Control Lett. 13(1), (1989) 18. D Alessandro, P., Isidori, A., Ruberti, A.: Realization and structure theory of bilinear dynamic systems. SIAM J. Control 12, (1974) 19. Zhang, L., Lam, J., Huang, B., Yang, G.H.: On gramians and balanced truncation of discrete-time bilinear systems. Int. J. Control 76, (23) 2. Mohler, R.R.: Nonlinear Systems, vol. II. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1991) 21. Svoronos, S., Stephanopoulos, G., Aris, R.: Bilinear approximation of general non-linear dynamic systems with linear inputs. Int. J. Control 31, (198) 22. Deutscher, J.: Nonlinear model simplification using L2- optimal bilinearization. Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst. 11, 1 19 (25) 23. Guo, L., Shone, A., Ding, X.: Control of hydraulic multimotor systems based on bilinearization. Automatica 3(9), (1994) 24. Schwarz, H., Dorissen, H.T., Guo, L.: Bilinearization of nonlinear systems. In: Systems Analysis and Simulation, vol. 46, pp Akademie Verlag, Berlin (1988) 25. Guo, L., Schwarz, H.: A control scheme for bilinear systems and application to a secondary controlled hydraulic rotary drive. In: Proc. 28th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, Tampa, FL, pp (1989) 26. Juang, J.-N.: Continuous-time bilinear system identification. Nonlinear Dyn. 39, (25) 27. Chen, C.-T.: Hybrid approach for dynamic model identification of an electro-hydraulic parallel platform. Nonlinear Dyn. 67, (212) 28. Scheidl, R., Manhartsgruber, B.: On the dynamic behavior of servo-hydraulic drives. Nonlinear Dyn. 17, (1998)
10 H.R. Shaker, J. Stoustrup 29. van de Wouw, N., Nijmeijer, H., van Campen, D.H.: A Volterra Series approach to the approximation of stochastic nonlinear dynamics. Nonlinear Dyn. 27, (22) 3. Zhang, L., Lam, J.: On H 2 model reduction of bilinear systems. Automatica 38, (22) 31. Treiber, S., Hoffman, D.W.: Multivariable constraint control using a frequency domain design approach. In: Proceeding of the 3rd Conference on Chem. Proc. Control, Amsterdam (1986) 32. Khaki-Sedigh, A., Moaveni, B.: Control Configuration Selection for Multivariable Plants. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. Springer, Berlin (29)
Control Configuration Selection for Multivariable Descriptor Systems
Control Configuration Selection for Multivariable Descriptor Systems Hamid Reza Shaker and Jakob Stoustrup Abstract Control configuration selection is the procedure of choosing the appropriate input and
More informationControl Configuration Selection for Multivariable Descriptor Systems Shaker, Hamid Reza; Stoustrup, Jakob
Aalborg Universitet Control Configuration Selection for Multivariable Descriptor Systems Shaker, Hamid Reza; Stoustrup, Jakob Published in: 2012 American Control Conference (ACC) Publication date: 2012
More informationHANKEL-NORM BASED INTERACTION MEASURE FOR INPUT-OUTPUT PAIRING
Copyright 2002 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain HANKEL-NORM BASED INTERACTION MEASURE FOR INPUT-OUTPUT PAIRING Björn Wittenmark Department of Automatic Control Lund Institute of Technology
More informationUpper and Lower Bounds of Frequency Interval Gramians for a Class of Perturbed Linear Systems Shaker, Hamid Reza
Aalborg Universitet Upper and Lower Bounds of Frequency Interval Gramians for a Class of Perturbed Linear Systems Shaker, Hamid Reza Published in: 7th IFAC Symposium on Robust Control Design DOI (link
More informationFrequency interval balanced truncation of discretetime bilinear systems
Jazlan et al., Cogent Engineering 206, 3: 203082 SYSTEMS & CONTROL RESEARCH ARTICLE Frequency interval balanced truncation of discretetime bilinear systems Ahmad Jazlan,2 *, Victor Sreeram, Hamid Reza
More informationDesign of Decentralised PI Controller using Model Reference Adaptive Control for Quadruple Tank Process
Design of Decentralised PI Controller using Model Reference Adaptive Control for Quadruple Tank Process D.Angeline Vijula #, Dr.N.Devarajan * # Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering Sri Ramakrishna
More informationOptimal Sensor and Actuator Location for Descriptor Systems using Generalized Gramians and Balanced Realizations
Optimal Sensor and Actuator Location for Descriptor Systems using Generalized Gramians and Balanced Realizations B. MARX D. KOENIG D. GEORGES Laboratoire d Automatique de Grenoble (UMR CNRS-INPG-UJF B.P.
More informationCANONICAL LOSSLESS STATE-SPACE SYSTEMS: STAIRCASE FORMS AND THE SCHUR ALGORITHM
CANONICAL LOSSLESS STATE-SPACE SYSTEMS: STAIRCASE FORMS AND THE SCHUR ALGORITHM Ralf L.M. Peeters Bernard Hanzon Martine Olivi Dept. Mathematics, Universiteit Maastricht, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht,
More informationLMI Based Model Order Reduction Considering the Minimum Phase Characteristic of the System
LMI Based Model Order Reduction Considering the Minimum Phase Characteristic of the System Gholamreza Khademi, Haniyeh Mohammadi, and Maryam Dehghani School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Shiraz
More informationModel Reduction for Unstable Systems
Model Reduction for Unstable Systems Klajdi Sinani Virginia Tech klajdi@vt.edu Advisor: Serkan Gugercin October 22, 2015 (VT) SIAM October 22, 2015 1 / 26 Overview 1 Introduction 2 Interpolatory Model
More informationEECE 460. Decentralized Control of MIMO Systems. Guy A. Dumont. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of British Columbia
EECE 460 Decentralized Control of MIMO Systems Guy A. Dumont Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of British Columbia January 2011 Guy A. Dumont (UBC EECE) EECE 460 - Decentralized
More informationOptimal triangular approximation for linear stable multivariable systems
Proceedings of the 007 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July -3, 007 Optimal triangular approximation for linear stable multivariable systems Diego
More informationPerformance assessment of MIMO systems under partial information
Performance assessment of MIMO systems under partial information H Xia P Majecki A Ordys M Grimble Abstract Minimum variance (MV) can characterize the most fundamental performance limitation of a system,
More informationAN EXTENSION OF GENERALIZED BILINEAR TRANSFORMATION FOR DIGITAL REDESIGN. Received October 2010; revised March 2011
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 2012 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 8, Number 6, June 2012 pp. 4071 4081 AN EXTENSION OF GENERALIZED BILINEAR TRANSFORMATION
More informationDesign of Decentralized Fuzzy Controllers for Quadruple tank Process
IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, VOL.8 No.11, November 2008 163 Design of Fuzzy Controllers for Quadruple tank Process R.Suja Mani Malar1 and T.Thyagarajan2, 1 Assistant
More informationResearch Article Stabilization Analysis and Synthesis of Discrete-Time Descriptor Markov Jump Systems with Partially Unknown Transition Probabilities
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 7(4): 728-734, 214 DOI:1.1926/rjaset.7.39 ISSN: 24-7459; e-issn: 24-7467 214 Maxwell Scientific Publication Corp. Submitted: February 25,
More informationMulti-Input Multi-output (MIMO) Processes CBE495 LECTURE III CONTROL OF MULTI INPUT MULTI OUTPUT PROCESSES. Professor Dae Ryook Yang
Multi-Input Multi-output (MIMO) Processes CBE495 LECTURE III CONTROL OF MULTI INPUT MULTI OUTPUT PROCESSES Professor Dae Ryook Yang Fall 2013 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering Korea University
More informationH 2 -optimal model reduction of MIMO systems
H 2 -optimal model reduction of MIMO systems P. Van Dooren K. A. Gallivan P.-A. Absil Abstract We consider the problem of approximating a p m rational transfer function Hs of high degree by another p m
More informationTHE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM
THE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan 1 1 Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University
More informationDECENTRALIZED PI CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR NON LINEAR MULTIVARIABLE SYSTEMS BASED ON IDEAL DECOUPLER
th June 4. Vol. 64 No. 5-4 JATIT & LLS. All rights reserved. ISSN: 99-8645 www.jatit.org E-ISSN: 87-395 DECENTRALIZED PI CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR NON LINEAR MULTIVARIABLE SYSTEMS BASED ON IDEAL DECOUPLER
More informationBUMPLESS SWITCHING CONTROLLERS. William A. Wolovich and Alan B. Arehart 1. December 27, Abstract
BUMPLESS SWITCHING CONTROLLERS William A. Wolovich and Alan B. Arehart 1 December 7, 1995 Abstract This paper outlines the design of bumpless switching controllers that can be used to stabilize MIMO plants
More information1 Introduction 198; Dugard et al, 198; Dugard et al, 198) A delay matrix in such a lower triangular form is called an interactor matrix, and almost co
Multivariable Receding-Horizon Predictive Control for Adaptive Applications Tae-Woong Yoon and C M Chow y Department of Electrical Engineering, Korea University 1, -a, Anam-dong, Sungbu-u, Seoul 1-1, Korea
More informationFrequency-Domain Balanced Stochastic Truncation for Continuous and Discrete Time Systems
80 International Journal of Control, Hamid Automation, Reza Shaker and Systems, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 80-85, April 2008 Frequency-Domain Balanced Stochastic runcation for Continuous and Discrete ime Systems
More informationCHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER
114 CHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER 5.1 INTRODUCTION Robust control is a branch of control theory that explicitly deals with uncertainty in its approach to controller design. It also refers
More informationLINEAR QUADRATIC OPTIMAL CONTROL BASED ON DYNAMIC COMPENSATION. Received October 2010; revised March 2011
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 22 ISSN 349-498 Volume 8, Number 5(B), May 22 pp. 3743 3754 LINEAR QUADRATIC OPTIMAL CONTROL BASED ON DYNAMIC
More informationarxiv: v1 [cs.sy] 2 Apr 2019
On the Existence of a Fixed Spectrum for a Multi-channel Linear System: A Matroid Theory Approach F Liu 1 and A S Morse 1 arxiv:190401499v1 [cssy] 2 Apr 2019 Abstract Conditions for the existence of a
More informationInteraction Analysis and Control of Bioreactors for Nitrogen Removal
IT Licentiate theses 27- Interaction Analysis and Control of Bioreactors for Nitrogen Removal BJÖRN HALVARSSON UPPSALA UNIVERSITY Department of Information Technology Interaction Analysis and Control
More informationFEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control
FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control Lecture 8: Youla parametrization, LMIs, Model Reduction and Summary [Ch. 11-12] Elling W. Jacobsen, Automatic Control Lab, KTH Lecture 8: Youla, LMIs, Model Reduction
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF RÖSSLER PROTOTYPE-4 CHAOTIC SYSTEM BY STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL
International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology (IJFCST),Vol., No., March 01 OUTPUT REGULATION OF RÖSSLER PROTOTYPE-4 CHAOTIC SYSTEM BY STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan
More informationIMPULSIVE CONTROL OF DISCRETE-TIME NETWORKED SYSTEMS WITH COMMUNICATION DELAYS. Shumei Mu, Tianguang Chu, and Long Wang
IMPULSIVE CONTROL OF DISCRETE-TIME NETWORKED SYSTEMS WITH COMMUNICATION DELAYS Shumei Mu Tianguang Chu and Long Wang Intelligent Control Laboratory Center for Systems and Control Department of Mechanics
More informationKrylov-Subspace Based Model Reduction of Nonlinear Circuit Models Using Bilinear and Quadratic-Linear Approximations
Krylov-Subspace Based Model Reduction of Nonlinear Circuit Models Using Bilinear and Quadratic-Linear Approximations Peter Benner and Tobias Breiten Abstract We discuss Krylov-subspace based model reduction
More informationA Survey for the Selection of Control Structure for Distillation Columns Based on Steady State Controllability Indexes
Iranian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 6, No. 2 (Spring), 2009, IAChE A Survey for the Selection of Control Structure for Distillation Columns Based on Steady State Controllability Indexes K. Razzaghi,
More informationMultirate MVC Design and Control Performance Assessment: a Data Driven Subspace Approach*
Multirate MVC Design and Control Performance Assessment: a Data Driven Subspace Approach* Xiaorui Wang Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2V4
More informationA Method for PID Controller Tuning Using Nonlinear Control Techniques*
A Method for PID Controller Tuning Using Nonlinear Control Techniques* Prashant Mhaskar, Nael H. El-Farra and Panagiotis D. Christofides Department of Chemical Engineering University of California, Los
More informationDynamic Modeling, Simulation and Control of MIMO Systems
Dynamic Modeling, Simulation and Control of MIMO Systems M.Bharathi, C.Selvakumar HOD, Department of Electronics And Instrumentation, Bharath University Chennai 600073, India Prof & Head, St.Joseph s College
More informationConvex Optimization Approach to Dynamic Output Feedback Control for Delay Differential Systems of Neutral Type 1,2
journal of optimization theory and applications: Vol. 127 No. 2 pp. 411 423 November 2005 ( 2005) DOI: 10.1007/s10957-005-6552-7 Convex Optimization Approach to Dynamic Output Feedback Control for Delay
More information3.1 Overview 3.2 Process and control-loop interactions
3. Multivariable 3.1 Overview 3.2 and control-loop interactions 3.2.1 Interaction analysis 3.2.2 Closed-loop stability 3.3 Decoupling control 3.3.1 Basic design principle 3.3.2 Complete decoupling 3.3.3
More informationCBE495 LECTURE IV MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL
What is Model Predictive Control (MPC)? CBE495 LECTURE IV MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL Professor Dae Ryook Yang Fall 2013 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering Korea University * Some parts are from
More informationModel Based Fault Detection and Diagnosis Using Structured Residual Approach in a Multi-Input Multi-Output System
SERBIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Vol. 4, No. 2, November 2007, 133-145 Model Based Fault Detection and Diagnosis Using Structured Residual Approach in a Multi-Input Multi-Output System A. Asokan
More informationSimulation of Quadruple Tank Process for Liquid Level Control
Simulation of Quadruple Tank Process for Liquid Level Control Ritika Thusoo 1, Sakshi Bangia 2 1 M.Tech Student, Electronics Engg, Department, YMCA University of Science and Technology, Faridabad 2 Assistant
More informationH 2 optimal model reduction - Wilson s conditions for the cross-gramian
H 2 optimal model reduction - Wilson s conditions for the cross-gramian Ha Binh Minh a, Carles Batlle b a School of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Dai
More informationOn an internal multimodel control for nonlinear multivariable systems - A comparative study
On an internal multimodel control for nonlinear multivariable systems A comparative study Nahla Touati Karmani Dhaou Soudani Mongi Naceur Mohamed Benrejeb Abstract An internal multimodel control designed
More informationA New Subspace Identification Method for Open and Closed Loop Data
A New Subspace Identification Method for Open and Closed Loop Data Magnus Jansson July 2005 IR S3 SB 0524 IFAC World Congress 2005 ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Signals, Sensors & Systems
More informationStructured State Space Realizations for SLS Distributed Controllers
Structured State Space Realizations for SLS Distributed Controllers James Anderson and Nikolai Matni Abstract In recent work the system level synthesis (SLS) paradigm has been shown to provide a truly
More informationTHIS paper deals with robust control in the setup associated
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 50, NO 10, OCTOBER 2005 1501 Control-Oriented Model Validation and Errors Quantification in the `1 Setup V F Sokolov Abstract A priori information required for
More informationRegulating Web Tension in Tape Systems with Time-varying Radii
Regulating Web Tension in Tape Systems with Time-varying Radii Hua Zhong and Lucy Y. Pao Abstract A tape system is time-varying as tape winds from one reel to the other. The variations in reel radii consist
More informationSmall Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability
Small Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability Zhong-Ping Jiang Yuan Wang. Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering Polytechnic University Brooklyn, NY 11201, U.S.A. zjiang@control.poly.edu Dept. of
More informationDecentralized and distributed control
Decentralized and distributed control Models of large-scale systems M. Farina 1 G. Ferrari Trecate 2 1 Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione (DEI) Politecnico di Milano, Italy farina@elet.polimi.it
More informationMODEL REDUCTION OF SWITCHED SYSTEMS BASED ON SWITCHING GENERALIZED GRAMIANS. Received May 2011; revised September 2011
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 2012 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 8, Number 7(B), July 2012 pp. 5025 5044 MODEL REDUCTION OF SWITCHED SYSTEMS BASED
More informationLPV Decoupling and Input Shaping for Control of Diesel Engines
American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June -July, WeB9.6 LPV Decoupling and Input Shaping for Control of Diesel Engines Javad Mohammadpour, Karolos Grigoriadis, Matthew Franchek,
More informationModel reduction of interconnected systems
Model reduction of interconnected systems A Vandendorpe and P Van Dooren 1 Introduction Large scale linear systems are often composed of subsystems that interconnect to each other Instead of reducing the
More informationOptimization based robust control
Optimization based robust control Didier Henrion 1,2 Draft of March 27, 2014 Prepared for possible inclusion into The Encyclopedia of Systems and Control edited by John Baillieul and Tariq Samad and published
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM
OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-600 06, Tamil Nadu, INDIA
More informationResults on stability of linear systems with time varying delay
IET Control Theory & Applications Brief Paper Results on stability of linear systems with time varying delay ISSN 75-8644 Received on 8th June 206 Revised st September 206 Accepted on 20th September 206
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationBALANCING-RELATED MODEL REDUCTION FOR DATA-SPARSE SYSTEMS
BALANCING-RELATED Peter Benner Professur Mathematik in Industrie und Technik Fakultät für Mathematik Technische Universität Chemnitz Computational Methods with Applications Harrachov, 19 25 August 2007
More informationTime-delay feedback control in a delayed dynamical chaos system and its applications
Time-delay feedback control in a delayed dynamical chaos system and its applications Ye Zhi-Yong( ), Yang Guang( ), and Deng Cun-Bing( ) School of Mathematics and Physics, Chongqing University of Technology,
More informationFINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES. Danlei Chu, Tongwen Chen, Horacio J. Marquez
FINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES Danlei Chu Tongwen Chen Horacio J Marquez Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton
More informationDirect and Indirect Gradient Control for Static Optimisation
International Journal of Automation and Computing 1 (2005) 60-66 Direct and Indirect Gradient Control for Static Optimisation Yi Cao School of Engineering, Cranfield University, UK Abstract: Static self-optimising
More informationACTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE WANG-CHEN-YUAN SYSTEM
ACTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE WANG-CHEN-YUAN SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-600
More informationRECURSIVE SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION IN THE LEAST SQUARES FRAMEWORK
RECURSIVE SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION IN THE LEAST SQUARES FRAMEWORK TRNKA PAVEL AND HAVLENA VLADIMÍR Dept of Control Engineering, Czech Technical University, Technická 2, 166 27 Praha, Czech Republic mail:
More informationTHERE are a class of complex large-scale systems which
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL, NO, MAY 99 Networked Coordination-Based Distributed Model Predictive Control for Large-Scale System Yi Zheng, Shaoyuan Li, and Hai Qiu Abstract A class
More informationComputation of Stabilizing PI and PID parameters for multivariable system with time delays
Computation of Stabilizing PI and PID parameters for multivariable system with time delays Nour El Houda Mansour, Sami Hafsi, Kaouther Laabidi Laboratoire d Analyse, Conception et Commande des Systèmes
More informationNetworked Control Systems, Event-Triggering, Small-Gain Theorem, Nonlinear
EVENT-TRIGGERING OF LARGE-SCALE SYSTEMS WITHOUT ZENO BEHAVIOR C. DE PERSIS, R. SAILER, AND F. WIRTH Abstract. We present a Lyapunov based approach to event-triggering for large-scale systems using a small
More informationOutput Regulation of the Tigan System
Output Regulation of the Tigan System Dr. V. Sundarapandian Professor (Systems & Control Eng.), Research and Development Centre Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-6 6, Tamil Nadu,
More informationA new approach to the realization problem for fractional discrete-time linear systems
BULLETIN OF THE POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES TECHNICAL SCIENCES Vol 64 No 26 DOI: 55/bpasts-26-2 A new approach to the realization problem for fractional discrete-time linear systems T KACZOREK Faculty of
More informationApproximate MLD System Model of Switched Linear Systems for Model Predictive Control
Special Issue on SICE Annual Conference 2016 SICE Journal of Control Measurement and System Integration Vol. 10 No. 3 pp. 136 140 May 2017 Approximate MLD System Model of Switched Linear Systems for Model
More informationParameter Estimation of Single and Decentralized Control Systems Using Pulse Response Data
Parameter Estimation of Single and Decentralized Control Systems Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 003, Vol. 4, No. 3 79 Parameter Estimation of Single and Decentralized Control Systems Using Pulse Response Data
More informationDigital Control Engineering Analysis and Design
Digital Control Engineering Analysis and Design M. Sami Fadali Antonio Visioli AMSTERDAM BOSTON HEIDELBERG LONDON NEW YORK OXFORD PARIS SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO Academic Press is
More informationInternal Model Control of A Class of Continuous Linear Underactuated Systems
Internal Model Control of A Class of Continuous Linear Underactuated Systems Asma Mezzi Tunis El Manar University, Automatic Control Research Laboratory, LA.R.A, National Engineering School of Tunis (ENIT),
More informationSubspace-based Identification
of Infinite-dimensional Multivariable Systems from Frequency-response Data Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey October 12, 2008 Outline 1 2 3 4 Noise-free
More informationLinear System Theory. Wonhee Kim Lecture 1. March 7, 2018
Linear System Theory Wonhee Kim Lecture 1 March 7, 2018 1 / 22 Overview Course Information Prerequisites Course Outline What is Control Engineering? Examples of Control Systems Structure of Control Systems
More informationResearch Article Volume 6 Issue No. 6
DOI 1.41/216.1797 ISSN 2321 3361 216 IJESC ` Research Article Volume 6 Issue No. 6 Design of Multi Loop PI/PID Controller for Interacting Multivariable Process with Effective Open Loop Transfer Function
More informationFAULT-TOLERANT CONTROL OF CHEMICAL PROCESS SYSTEMS USING COMMUNICATION NETWORKS. Nael H. El-Farra, Adiwinata Gani & Panagiotis D.
FAULT-TOLERANT CONTROL OF CHEMICAL PROCESS SYSTEMS USING COMMUNICATION NETWORKS Nael H. El-Farra, Adiwinata Gani & Panagiotis D. Christofides Department of Chemical Engineering University of California,
More informationModel reduction of bilinear systems described by input output difference equation
International Journal of Systems Science volume??, number??, Month?? 00?, pages 8 Model reduction of bilinear systems described by input output difference equation S. A. AL-BAIYAT A class of single input
More informationMULTILOOP CONTROL APPLIED TO INTEGRATOR MIMO. PROCESSES. A Preliminary Study
MULTILOOP CONTROL APPLIED TO INTEGRATOR MIMO PROCESSES. A Preliminary Study Eduardo J. Adam 1,2*, Carlos J. Valsecchi 2 1 Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC) (Universidad
More informationAn Architecture for Fault Tolerant Controllers
An Architecture for Fault Tolerant Controllers Henrik Niemann Ørsted DTU, Automation Technical University of Denmark Building 326, DK2800 Lyngby, Denmark Email: hhn@oersted.dtu.dk www.oersted.dtu.dk/staff/all/hhn/
More informationComparative analysis of decoupling control methodologies and multivariable robust control for VS-VP wind turbines
Comparative analysis of decoupling control methodologies and multivariable robust control for VS-VP wind turbines Sergio Fragoso, Juan Garrido, Francisco Vázquez Department of Computer Science and Numerical
More information4F3 - Predictive Control
4F3 Predictive Control - Lecture 2 p 1/23 4F3 - Predictive Control Lecture 2 - Unconstrained Predictive Control Jan Maciejowski jmm@engcamacuk 4F3 Predictive Control - Lecture 2 p 2/23 References Predictive
More informationTrack-Following Control Design and Implementation for Hard Disk Drives with Missing Samples
Track-Following Control Design and Implementation for Hard Disk Drives with Missing Samples Jianbin Nie Edgar Sheh Roberto Horowitz Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley,
More informationReachability metrics for bilinear complex networks
Reachability metrics for bilinear complex networks Yingbo Zhao and Jorge Cortés Abstract Controllability metrics based on the controllability Gramian have been widely used in linear control theory, and
More informationOn Identification of Cascade Systems 1
On Identification of Cascade Systems 1 Bo Wahlberg Håkan Hjalmarsson Jonas Mårtensson Automatic Control and ACCESS, School of Electrical Engineering, KTH, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden. (bo.wahlberg@ee.kth.se
More informationPerformance of an Adaptive Algorithm for Sinusoidal Disturbance Rejection in High Noise
Performance of an Adaptive Algorithm for Sinusoidal Disturbance Rejection in High Noise MarcBodson Department of Electrical Engineering University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 842, U.S.A. (8) 58 859 bodson@ee.utah.edu
More informationImprove Performance of Multivariable Robust Control in Boiler System
Canadian Journal on Automation, Control & Intelligent Systems Vol. No. 4, June Improve Performance of Multivariable Robust Control in Boiler System Mehdi Parsa, Ali Vahidian Kamyad and M. Bagher Naghibi
More informationTwo-Link Flexible Manipulator Control Using Sliding Mode Control Based Linear Matrix Inequality
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering PAPER OPEN ACCESS Two-Link Flexible Manipulator Control Using Sliding Mode Control Based Linear Matrix Inequality To cite this article: Zulfatman
More informationApplications of CAS to analyze the step response of a system with parameters
Applications of CAS to analyze the step response of a system with parameters Takuya Kitamoto kitamoto@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp Faculty of Education Yamaguchi University 753-8513 Japan Abstract Recently, Computer
More informationand Mixed / Control of Dual-Actuator Hard Disk Drive via LMIs
and Mixed / Control of Dual-Actuator Hard Disk Drive via LMIs Nasser Mohamad Zadeh Electrical Engineering Department Tarbiat Modares University Tehran, Iran mohamadzadeh@ieee.org Ramin Amirifar Electrical
More informationWeighted balanced realization and model reduction for nonlinear systems
Weighted balanced realization and model reduction for nonlinear systems Daisuke Tsubakino and Kenji Fujimoto Abstract In this paper a weighted balanced realization and model reduction for nonlinear systems
More informationMANY adaptive control methods rely on parameter estimation
610 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 52, NO 4, APRIL 2007 Direct Adaptive Dynamic Compensation for Minimum Phase Systems With Unknown Relative Degree Jesse B Hoagg and Dennis S Bernstein Abstract
More informationA New Internal Model Control Method for MIMO Over-Actuated Systems
Vol. 7, No., 26 A New Internal Model Control Method for MIMO Over-Actuated Systems Ahmed Dhahri University of Tuins El Manar, National Engineering School of Tunis, Laboratory of research in Automatic Control,
More informationChapter 2 Review of Linear and Nonlinear Controller Designs
Chapter 2 Review of Linear and Nonlinear Controller Designs This Chapter reviews several flight controller designs for unmanned rotorcraft. 1 Flight control systems have been proposed and tested on a wide
More informationAn LQ R weight selection approach to the discrete generalized H 2 control problem
INT. J. CONTROL, 1998, VOL. 71, NO. 1, 93± 11 An LQ R weight selection approach to the discrete generalized H 2 control problem D. A. WILSON², M. A. NEKOUI² and G. D. HALIKIAS² It is known that a generalized
More informationCONTROL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS VIA BLIND SOURCE DECONVOLUTION. Kenji Sugimoto and Yoshito Kikkawa
CONTROL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS VIA LIND SOURCE DECONVOLUTION Kenji Sugimoto and Yoshito Kikkawa Nara Institute of Science and Technology Graduate School of Information Science 896-5 Takayama-cho, Ikoma-city,
More informationH 2 Suboptimal Estimation and Control for Nonnegative
Proceedings of the 2007 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July 11-13, 2007 FrC20.3 H 2 Suboptimal Estimation and Control for Nonnegative Dynamical Systems
More informationA Generalised Minimum Variance Controller for Time-Varying MIMO Linear Systems with Multiple Delays
WSEAS RANSACIONS on SYSEMS and CONROL A Generalised Minimum Variance Controller for ime-varying MIMO Linear Systems with Multiple Delays ZHENG LI School of Electrical, Computer and elecom. Eng. University
More informationPosition Control Using Acceleration- Based Identification and Feedback With Unknown Measurement Bias
Position Control Using Acceleration- Based Identification and Feedback With Unknown Measurement Bias Jaganath Chandrasekar e-mail: jchandra@umich.edu Dennis S. Bernstein e-mail: dsbaero@umich.edu Department
More informationPerformance Limitations for Linear Feedback Systems in the Presence of Plant Uncertainty
1312 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 48, NO. 8, AUGUST 2003 Performance Limitations for Linear Feedback Systems in the Presence of Plant Uncertainty Graham C. Goodwin, Mario E. Salgado, and
More informationModel-based PID tuning for high-order processes: when to approximate
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 25 Seville, Spain, December 2-5, 25 ThB5. Model-based PID tuning for high-order processes: when to approximate
More informationProcess Identification for an SOPDT Model Using Rectangular Pulse Input
Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(5), 586-592 (2001) SHORT COMMUNICATION Process Identification for an SOPDT Model Using Rectangular Pulse Input Don Jang, Young Han Kim* and Kyu Suk Hwang Dept. of Chem. Eng., Pusan
More informationIdentification of continuous-time systems from samples of input±output data: An introduction
SaÅdhanaÅ, Vol. 5, Part, April 000, pp. 75±83. # Printed in India Identification of continuous-time systems from samples of input±output data: An introduction NARESH K SINHA Department of Electrical and
More information