(Supersymmetric) Grand Unification
|
|
- Mabel Nash
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 (Supersymmetric) Grand Unification Jürgen Reuter Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Uppsala, 15. May 2008
2 Literature General SUSY: M. Drees, R. Godbole, P. Roy, Sparticles, World Scientific, 2004 S. Martin, SUSY Primer, arxiv:hep-ph/ H. Georgi, Lie Algebras in Particle Physics, Harvard University Press, 1992 R. Slansky, Group Theory for Unified Model Building, Phys. Rep. 79 (1981), 1. R. Mohapatra, Unification and Supersymmetry, Springer, 1986 P. Langacker, Grand Unified Theories, Phys. Rep. 72 (1981), 185. P. Nath, P. Fileviez Perez, Proton Stability..., arxiv:hep-ph/ U. Amaldi, W. de Boer, H. Fürstenau, Comparison of grand unified theories with electroweak and strong coupling constants measured at LEP, Phys. Lett. B260, (1991), 447.
3 Scalar self-ia: (H H) (H H) 2 J. Reuter SUSY GUTs Uppsala, The Standard Model (SM) Theorist s View Renormalizable Quantum Field Theory (only with Higgs!) based on SU(3) c SU(2) w U(1) Y non-simple gauge group L L = ( ) ν l L Q L = ( ) u d L u c R d c R l c R [ν c R] Interactions: Gauge IA (covariant derivatives in kinetic terms): [( )] h + h 0 µ D µ = µ + i X k g k V a µ T a Yukawa IA: Y u Q L H uu R + Y d Q L H d d R + Y e L LH d e R ˆ+Y n L LH uν R
4 The group-theoretical bottom line Things to remember: Representations of SU(N) fundamental reps. φi N, ψ i N, adjoint reps. A j i N 2 1 SU(N) invariants: contract all indices φ iψ i φ ia j i ψj ɛ ijφ iξ j ɛ ijk φ iξ jη k ˆ Symmetry properties: Young tableaux The (group-theoretical) essence of the SM: remember: Q el. = T 3 + Y 2 Q L u c R d c R L L e c R H d H d ν c R (2, 3) 1 3 (1, 3) 4 3 (1, 3) 2 3 (2, 1) 1 (1, 1) 2 (2, 1) 1 (2, 1) 1 (1, 1) 0
5 Loose Ends/Deficiencies of the Standard Model Incompleteness Electroweak Symmetry Breaking Higgs boson Origin of neutrino masses Dark Matter: m DM 100 GeV Theoretical Dissatisfaction 28 free parameters strange fractional U(1) quantum numbers Hierarchy problem M H [GeV] Λ 2 m 2 h = m Λ 2 (loop factors) Λ[GeV]
6 Supersymmetry 800 connects gauge and space-time symmetries multiplets with equal-mass fermions and bosons SUSY is broken in Nature stabilizes the hierarchy Q J Q m [GeV] H 0, A 0 H± 300 χ 0 χ χ ± 2 g ũl, dr ũr, dl t2 b2 b1 t1 Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) Charginos, Neutralinos, Gluino Sleptons, Squarks, Sneutrinos R parity: discrete symmetry 200 ll νl τ2 χ 0 2 χ ± 1 LSP: Dark matter h 0 lr τ1 χ 0 1 Superpartners have identical gauge quantum numbers
7 Supersymmetry: Symmetry between fermions and bosons Q boson = fermion Q fermion = boson Effectively: SM particles have SUSY partners (e.g. f L,R fl,r ) SUSY: additional contributions from scalar fields: f L,R f L,R H H H H Σ f H N f λ 2 f f L,R ( ) d k + + terms without quadratic div. k 2 m 2 fl k 2 m 2 fr for Λ : Σ f H N f λ2 f Λ 2
8 quadratic divergences cancel for N fl = N fr = N f λ 2 f = λ 2 f complete correction vanishes if furthermore m f = m f Soft SUSY breaking: m 2 f = m 2 f + 2, λ 2 f = λ 2 f Σ f+ f H N f λ 2 f correction stays acceptably small if mass splitting is of weak scale realized if mass scale of SUSY partners M SUSY < 1TeV SUSY at TeV scale provides attractive solution of hierarchy problem
9 Anatomy of MSSM Yukawa couplings Superpotential: W = ˆΦ 1 ˆΦ2 ˆΦ3 Φ 1 Φ 2 Φ 3 = (φ 1 φ 2 ) 2,..., ( ψ 1 ψ 2 ) φ3 NB: part of scalar potential from gauge kinetic terms (light Higgs) MSSM superpotential W MSSM = Y u u c QH u + Y d d c QH d + Y e e c LH d + µh u H d Ignorance about SUSY breaking shows up as soft-breaking terms : Gaugino and sparticle masses, trilinear scalar potential terms µ problem: EWSB demands µ O(100 GeV 1 TeV) Additional SUSY degrees of freedom modify vacuum polarization Unification of gauge couplings possible
10 (Gauge) Unification and the running of couplings
11 (Gauge) Unification and the running of couplings Renormalization group (RG) running of gauge couplings: dg a d log µ = g3 a 16π 2 B a SM B a = ( 41 10, 19 6, 7) MSSM B a = ( 33 5, 1, 3) U(1) α i SU(2) SU(3) Standard Model µ (GeV)
12 (Gauge) Unification and the running of couplings Renormalization group (RG) running of gauge couplings: dg a d log µ = g3 a 16π 2 B a SM B a = ( 41 10, 19 6, 7) MSSM B a = ( 33 5, 1, 3) U(1) U(1) MSSM α i SU(2) α i SU(2) SU(3) Standard Model SU(3) µ (GeV) µ (GeV)
13 (Gauge) Unification and the running of couplings Renormalization group (RG) running of gauge couplings: dg a d log µ = g3 a 16π 2 B a SM B a = ( 41 10, 19 6, 7) MSSM B a = ( 33 5, 1, 3) U(1) U(1) MSSM α i SU(2) α i SU(2) SU(3) Standard Model SU(3) µ (GeV) µ (GeV)
14 The prime example: (SUSY) SU(5) SU(5) MX SU(3) c SU(2) w U(1) Y MZ SU(5) has = 24 generators: 24 (8, 1) 0 (1, 3) 0 (1, 1) 0 }{{}}{{}}{{} W B G β α SU(3) c U(1) em (3, 2) 5 3 }{{} X,Y (3, 2) 5 3 }{{} X,Ȳ
15 The prime example: (SUSY) SU(5) SU(5) MX SU(3) c SU(2) w U(1) Y MZ SU(5) has = 24 generators: SU(3) c U(1) em 24 (8, 1) 0 (1, 3) 0 (1, 1) 0 }{{}}{{}}{{} W B G β α 24 A = g A a λa 2 = g 2G a λa GM 2 a=1 2 X X X Y Y Y 2 g 2 15 B (3, 2) 5 3 }{{} X,Y X X X (3, 2) 5 3 }{{} X,Ȳ Ȳ Ȳ Ȳ 2W a σ
16 Quantum numbers q Hypercharge: λ 12 3 Y = Y = 1 diag( 2, 2, 3, 3, 3) Quantized hypercharges are fixed by non-abelian generator Weak Isospin: T1,2,3 = λ 9,10,11/2 Electric Charge: Q = T 3 + Y/2 = diag( 1, 1, 1, 1, 0) Prediction for the weak mixing angle (with RGE running): α 1 (M Z) = (2), α s(m Z) = (20), s 2 w(m Z) = (3) non-susy: s 2 w(m Z) = 23 + α(m Z ) α s(m Z ) 201
17 Quantum numbers q Hypercharge: λ 12 3 Y = Y = 1 diag( 2, 2, 3, 3, 3) Quantized hypercharges are fixed by non-abelian generator Weak Isospin: T1,2,3 = λ 9,10,11/2 Electric Charge: Q = T 3 + Y/2 = diag( 1, 1, 1, 1, 0) Prediction for the weak mixing angle (with RGE running): α 1 (M Z) = (2), α s(m Z) = (20), s 2 w(m Z) = (3) non-susy: s 2 w(m Z) = 23 + α(m Z ) 134 α s(m Z ) SUSY: s 2 w(m Z) = 1 + α(m Z ) 7 5 α s(m Z ) 15 New Gauge Bosons Two colored EW doublets: (X, Y ), ( X, Ȳ ) with charges ± 4 3, ± 1 3
18 Exercise 10: SUSY GUTs and sin 2 θ W The renormalization group equations for the coupling constants g i, i = 1, 2, 3 are given by: In the SM, the coefficients b i for the gauge groups SU(i) are: dα i d ln µ = bi α 2 i 2π. (1) b 3 = Ng, b 2 = Ng N H, b 1 = 20 9 Ng N H, where N g is the number of generations and N H the number of Higgs doublets. a) Why has b 1 a different form as b 2 and b 3? Show that the solution of (1) is:! 1 α = 1 i(µ) α bi i(µ 0) 4π ln µ 2 µ 2 0 (2) b) In a Grand Unified Theory (GUT) we should have the following relation at the GUT M X : q 5/3g 1(M X ) = g 2(M X ) = g 3(M X ) = g GUT. (3) In a GUT like SU(5) MX SU(3) c h SU(2) L U(1) Y, d c, L are together in a multiplet ( 5), as well as u c, e c, Q (10). Demand that tr T a T bi = 1 2 δab to find the normalization of hypercharge.
19 Furthermore, we have: α 1 = α(µ) α 2 = α(µ) (4) c 2 W (µ) s 2 W (µ) c) For the scale µ 0 = M X take the the GUT scale. Express s 2 W (µ) as a function of α(µ) ans ln(m GUT /µ). Replace the logarithm by a corresponding relation containing α(µ) and α 3(µ) α s(µ). Keep the b i explicite. c) Wo do you get with α(m Z ) 1/128 and α s(m Z ) 0.12 for s 2 W (M Z), M X and α GUT? Experimentally, the weak mixing angle has the value s 2 W = (3). d) Due to the additional particle content of the MSSM the coefficients of the renormalization group equations for the coupling constants are changed with respect to the SM. In the MSSM they are: b 3 = 9 + 2N g, b 2 = 6 + 2N g N H, b 1 = 10 3 Ng 1 2 N H, Repeat the above calculations for the MSSM. What changes?
20 Fermions (Matter Superfields) The only possible way to group together the matter: d c 0 u c u c u d d c 5 = : d c 1 u c 0 u c u d 10 = : u c u c 0 u d l 2 u u u 0 e c ν l d d d e c 0 Remarks 5 = (3, 1) 2 3 (1, 2) 1 10 = (3, 2) 1 3 (3, 1) 4 3 (1, 1) 2 2 = = 2, (5 5)a = 10, (3 3) a = 3, ( ) a = Quarks and leptons in the same multiplet Fractional charges from tracelessness condition (color!) 5 and 10 have equal and opposite anomalies ν c must be SU(5) singlet
21 Interactions e e ν Leptoquark couplings d X u Y d Y (and SUSY vertices) u u Diquark couplings u X d Y (and SUSY vertices) Vector bosons induce e.g. decay p e + π 0 u u Y d e + d
22 The doublet-triplet splitting problem SU(5) breaking: Higgs Σ in adjoint 24 rep. 0 Σ 0 = w diag(1, 1, 1, 3 2, 3 2 ) M X = M Y = g w other breaking mechanisms possible (e.g. orbifold)
23 The doublet-triplet splitting problem SU(5) breaking: Higgs Σ in adjoint 24 rep. 0 Σ 0 = w diag(1, 1, 1, 3 2, 3 2 ) M X = M Y = g w other breaking mechanisms possible (e.g. orbifold) (MS)SM Higgs(es) included in = : 0 1 D D D h + C A h 0 5 = : 0 D c 1 D c D c h C A h 0 5 = (3, 1) 2 3 (1, 2) 1 5 = (3, 1) 2 3 (1, 2) 1 D, D c coloured triplet Higgses with charges ± 1 3 also induces proton decay mh 100 GeV, m D GeV Doublet-triplet splitting problem
24 Naive estimate of proton lifetime u u e + u u d d d Effective 4-fermion operator (analogy to muon decay) d L F = 4G F 2 (µγ κ ν µ )(ν e γ κ e) G 2 F = g2 2 8MW 2 192π3 G 2 F m5 µ τ(µ eν µ ν µ ) L GUT = 4G GUT 2 G GUT 2 = τ(p e + π 0 ) (uγu)(eγd) g 2 8MGUT 2 192π3 G 2 GUT m5 p Proton lifetime for α(m GUT ) 1/24 and M GUT GeV: τ(p e + π 0 M ) 4 GUT [α(m GUT )] 2 m 10 31±1 years 5 p Compare: τ SM p years (gravity-induced)
25 Proton decay crucial for GUT search Tracking calorimeter (SOUDAN) or RICH Cherenkovs Super-Kamiokande: 50 kt water RICH measure change and time for reconstruction γ γ π 0 P + e
26 Proton decay crucial for GUT search Tracking calorimeter (SOUDAN) or RICH Cherenkovs Super-Kamiokande: 50 kt water RICH measure change and time for reconstruction γ γ 0 π P + e Channel τ p(10 30 years) p invisible 0.21 p e + π p µ + π p νπ + 25 p νk p e + η p µ + η p e + ρ 0 75 p µ + ρ p νρ p e + ω p µ + ω p e + K p µ + K p νk p e + γ 670 p µ + γ 478 New experiments: HyperK (1 Mt), UNO (650 kt), European project Fréjus (1 Mt) Precision: 10 years running = years
27 SuperK abuse: Neutrino masses Long time no see: no proton decay until now Looking for neutrino appearance and disappearance events Neutrino oscillations discovered (end of 1990s): P (ν i ν j ) products of mixing matrices sin 2 ( m 2 i m2 j 2E L ) See-saw mechanism points to a high scale: Majorana mass term M R for ν c not forbidden by SM symmetries!! 0 v ν L (ν L, ν R) v M R ν R (5) v Neutrino masses: m ν Y 2 ν M R with M R GeV
28 Yukawa coupling unification and all that... MSSM: negative sign of m H comes for free provided that... assume GUT scale (as motivated by coupling constant unification) take universal input parameters at the GUT scale (see msugra below) run down to the electroweak scale with RGEs ~ l ~ g H q ~ W ~ B ~ H Exactly one parameter turns negative: the µ in the Higgs potential But this only works if m t = GeV and M SUSY 1 TeV
29 Sfermion Systematics Off-diagonal element prop. to mass of partner quark (tan β v u/v d ) mixing important in stop sector (sbottom sector for large tan β) Taken into account also for stau sector Mixing makes (often) τ 1 lightest slepton (NLSP), t 1 lightest squark gauge invariance relation between m t 1, m t 2, θ t, m b1, m b2, θ b No right-handed sneutrinos (GUT-scale?) Characteristics from renormalization group equations: m 2 d = m K 3 + K 2 + L 36 K1 + D d L m 2 ũ = m 2 1 L 0 + K 3 + K K1 + Dũ L K m 2 1/2 m 2 ũ = m 2 4 R 0 + K K1 + Dũ R m 2 dr = m K K1 + D d R K m 2 1/2 m 2 ẽ = m 2 1 L 0 + K K1 + Dẽ L m 2 ν = m K K1 + D ν K3 ( ) m2 1/2 m 2 ẽ L = m K 1 + DẽR
30 The gluino Color octet fermion cannot mix with any other MSSM state Pure QCD interactions GUT-inspired models imply at any RG scale (up to tiny 2-loop corrections): M 3 = α s α sin2 θ W M 2 = 3 α s 5 α cos2 θ W M 1 Translates to mass relations near TeV scale: Crucial for SUSY detection: Proof its fermion nature Proof its Majorana nature Proof its octet nature M 3 : M 2 : M 1 6 : 2 : 1
31 The Question of Anomalies Anomaly: violation of a symmetry of the classical Lagrangian by quantum effects Global symmetries: most welcome π γγ, m η Local symmetry: a catastratophe (breakdown of very definition of the theory!) SM/MSSM anomaly-free accidentally: lepton and quark contributions cancel (in each gen.) Ameliorated slightly in SU(5): 5 and 10 cancel
32 Why chiral exotics? Unification verification only with megatons? What about colliders? SPA: super precision accurately Look for chiral exotics Physics beyond MSSM provides handle to GUT scale µ problem NMSSM trick Singlet superfield with TeV-scale VEV Doublet-triplet splitting problem, Longevity of the proton Try to keep D, D c superfields at TeV scale Need mechanism to prevent rapid proton decay Need to rearrange running for unification Flavour problem Flavour might help protecting the proton
33 Sketch of a model Superpotential: W= W MSSM + W D + W N W MSSM = Y u u c QH u + Y d d c QH d + Y e e c LH d W D = Y D Du c e c + Y Dc D c QL W S = Y S H SH u H d + Y S D SDD c U(1) S symmetry gauged at high energies, radiative breaking of global left-over U(1) 0 S 0 generates µh and µ D See-saw mechanism ν c at M ν GeV m ν v2 M ν ev At M ν left-right symmetric model: SU(2) L SU(2) ( ) ( ) u c ν c Q R =, L R = d c l c H = ( Hu H d ) D D c
34 RGE running 60 Running of 1/α, MSSM with 1 [(H u, D) (H d, D c )] SU(3) c SU(2) L SU(2) R 40 1/α 1 1/α /α 3 1/α log (µ [GeV])
35 RGE running 60 Running of 1/α, MSSM with 1 [(H u, D) (H d, D c )] SU(4) c SU(2) L SU(2) R 40 1/α 1 1/α /α 3 1/α log (µ [GeV])
36 RGE running 60 Running of 1/α, MSSM with 3 [(H u, D) (H d, D c )] SU(4) c SU(2) L SU(2) R 40 1/α /α 2 1/α log (µ [GeV])
37 Matter-Higgs unification: E 6 Pati-Salam group SU(4) c SU(2) L SU(2) R Q L = (Q, L) = (4, 2, 1) Q R = ((u c, d c ), (ν c, l c )) = (4, 1, 2) H = (H u, H d ) = (1, 2, 2) D = (D, D c ) = (6, 1, 1) S = (1, 1, 1)
38 Matter-Higgs unification: E 6 Pati-Salam group SU(4) c SU(2) L SU(2) R Q L = (Q, L) = (4, 2, 1) Q R = ((u c, d c ), (ν c, l c )) = (4, 1, 2) H = (H u, H d ) = (1, 2, 2) D = (D, D c ) = (6, 1, 1) S = (1, 1, 1) Be radical: Embed everything in fundamental rep. of E 6 fundamental 27 contains exactly the stuff above adjoint: 78 Matter and Higgs fields in one big multiplet 3 generations of S and D 3 generations of Higgs fields: Higgs (VEV) vs. unhiggs (no VEV) Problem of FCNCs: Introduce Z2 symmetry (H parity)
39 Flavour Symmetry and proton decay Assume SU(3) F or SO(3) F flavour symmetry Left-right symmetry: SU(2)L SU(2) R, SU(3) c, SU(3) F Diquark couplings vanish identically: DQ LQ L = ɛ abc ɛ αβγ ɛ jk D a α (Q L) b βj (QL)c γk Baryon number is symmetry of the superpotential SU(2)R and SU(3) F breaking spurions? symmetry breaking by condensates linear/bilinear in fundamental reps.: D, D c couple to other quarks only as singlets Integrating out heavy fields: baryon number emerges as low-energy symmetry, flavour symmetry not Leptoquark couplings possible
40 Flavour Symmetry and proton decay Assume SU(3) F or SO(3) F flavour symmetry Left-right symmetry: SU(2)L SU(2) R, SU(3) c, SU(3) F Diquark couplings vanish identically: DQ LQ L = ɛ abc ɛ αβγ ɛ jk D a α (Q L) b βj (QL)c γk Baryon number is symmetry of the superpotential SU(2)R and SU(3) F breaking spurions? symmetry breaking by condensates linear/bilinear in fundamental reps.: D, D c couple to other quarks only as singlets Integrating out heavy fields: baryon number emerges as low-energy symmetry, flavour symmetry not Leptoquark couplings possible Toy model: E 8 E 6 SU(3) F 248 = flavour-symmetric Kaluza-Klein tower of mirror mmatter 273 breaks E 8 mirror-higgs superfields µ term breaks E6 to PS, breaks flavour
41 A little bit of Pheno Next step: Provide a viable low-energy spectrum Extended MSSM Higgs sector relaxed Higgs bounds (light pseudoscalars) possibly large invisible decay ratio lightest unhiggs: H parity protected dark matter dark matter mix: interesting relic abundance (relaxes all neutralino bounds!) Pair production of unhiggses/unhiggsinos, cascade decays (Down-type) Leptoquarks, Leptoquarkinos 3 generations at TeV scale produced in gluon fusion, single production final states: tτ, bντ, tτ,... if flavor symmetry leaves traces: gq Dl enhanced, decays tµ, te Extended neutralino sector like in NMSSM no Z
42 Summary Grand Unification: Old theoretical idea (35 yrs.) All interactions in Nature essentially one (gravity?) Experimental hint from LEP (LHC?) High-scale recently supported by neutrino masses (see-saw?) Prediction: proton decay (lifetime?) No experimental evidence: τ p > yrs. Search will become longer better: yrs. Decay of heavy particles: source of missing CP violation Stabilization of large scale difference: Strong interactions disfavored (?) Supersymmetry (Unification seems perfect) Quasi-natural breaking chain: E 8 E 6 SO(10) SU(5) G SM Lots of open questions: FLAVOR!!!!! µ probl., doublet-triplet splitting probl. Yukawa coupling pattern GUT breaking: Higgs vs. boundary conditions
43 Some Unification needs time
Unification without Doublet-Triplet Splitting SUSY Exotics at the LHC
Unification without Doublet-Triplet Splitting SUSY Exotics at the LHC Jürgen Reuter Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg W. Kilian, JR, PLB B642 (2006), 81; and work in progress (with F. Deppisch, W. Kilian)
More informationUnification without Doublet-Triplet Splitting SUSY Exotics at the LHC
Unification without Doublet-Triplet Splitting SUSY Exotics at the LHC Jürgen Reuter Carleton University, Ottawa University of Freiburg W. Kilian, J. Reuter, PLB B642 (2006), 81, and work in progress (with
More informationLHC Phenomenology of SUSY multi-step GUTs
0/14 J. Reuter LHC Phenomenology of SUSY multi-step GUTs PHENO 09, Madison, 1.5.009 LHC Phenomenology of SUSY multi-step GUTs Jürgen Reuter Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg W. Kilian, JR, PL B64 (006),
More informationIntroduction to Supersymmetry
Introduction to Supersymmetry I. Antoniadis Albert Einstein Center - ITP Lecture 5 Grand Unification I. Antoniadis (Supersymmetry) 1 / 22 Grand Unification Standard Model: remnant of a larger gauge symmetry
More informationLecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model
Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model Why is the Standard Model incomplete? Grand Unification Baryon and Lepton Number Violation More Higgs Bosons? Supersymmetry (SUSY) Experimental signatures for SUSY
More informationGrand Unification. Strong, weak, electromagnetic unified at Q M X M Z Simple group SU(3) SU(2) U(1) Gravity not included
Pati-Salam, 73; Georgi-Glashow, 74 Grand Unification Strong, weak, electromagnetic unified at Q M X M Z Simple group G M X SU(3) SU() U(1) Gravity not included (perhaps not ambitious enough) α(q ) α 3
More informationPhysics 662. Particle Physics Phenomenology. February 21, Physics 662, lecture 13 1
Physics 662 Particle Physics Phenomenology February 21, 2002 Physics 662, lecture 13 1 Physics Beyond the Standard Model Supersymmetry Grand Unified Theories: the SU(5) GUT Unification energy and weak
More informationUniversal Extra Dimensions
Universal Extra Dimensions Add compact dimension(s) of radius R ~ ant crawling on tube Kaluza-Klein tower of partners to SM particles due to curled-up extra dimensions of radius R n = quantum number for
More informationSUSY Phenomenology & Experimental searches
SUSY Phenomenology & Experimental searches Slides available at: Alex Tapper http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~tapper/lecture.html Objectives - Know what Supersymmetry (SUSY) is - Understand qualitatively the
More informationE 6 Spectra at the TeV Scale
E 6 Spectra at the TeV Scale Instituts-Seminar Kerne und Teilchen, TU Dresden Alexander Knochel Uni Freiburg 24.06.2010 Based on: F. Braam, AK, J. Reuter, arxiv:1001.4074 [hep-ph], JHEP06(2010)013 Outline
More informationSupersymmetry Basics. J. Hewett SSI J. Hewett
Supersymmetry Basics J. Hewett SSI 2012 J. Hewett Basic SUSY References A Supersymmetry Primer, Steve Martin hep-ph/9709356 Theory and Phenomenology of Sparticles, Manual Drees, Rohini Godbole, Probir
More informationLecture 03. The Standard Model of Particle Physics. Part III Extensions of the Standard Model
Lecture 03 The Standard Model of Particle Physics Part III Extensions of the Standard Model Where the SM Works Excellent description of 3 of the 4 fundamental forces Explains nuclear structure, quark confinement,
More informationThe Physics of Heavy Z-prime Gauge Bosons
The Physics of Heavy Z-prime Gauge Bosons Tevatron LHC LHC LC LC 15fb -1 100fb -1 14TeV 1ab -1 14TeV 0.5TeV 1ab -1 P - =0.8 P + =0.6 0.8TeV 1ab -1 P - =0.8 P + =0.6 χ ψ η LR SSM 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 2σ m Z'
More informationPseudo-Dirac Bino as Dark Matter and Signatures of D-Type G
and Signatures of D-Type Gauge Mediation Ken Hsieh Michigan State Univeristy KH, Ph. D. Thesis (2007) ArXiv:0708.3970 [hep-ph] Other works with M. Luty and Y. Cai (to appear) MSU HEP Seminar November 6,
More informationBeyond the SM: SUSY. Marina Cobal University of Udine
Beyond the SM: SUSY Marina Cobal University of Udine Why the SM is not enough The gauge hierarchy problem Characteristic energy of the SM: M W ~100 GeV Characteristic energy scale of gravity: M P ~ 10
More informationIntroduction to SUSY. Giacomo Polesello. INFN, Sezione di Pavia
. Introduction to SUSY Giacomo Polesello INFN, Sezione di Pavia Why physics beyond the Standard Model? Gravity is not yet incorporated in the Standard Model Hierarchy/Naturalness problem Standard Model
More informationIs SUSY still alive? Dmitri Kazakov JINR
2 1 0 2 The l o o h c S n a e p o r Eu y g r e n E h g i of H s c i s y PAnhjou, France 2 1 0 2 e n 6 19 Ju Is SUSY still alive? Dmitri Kazakov JINR 1 1 Why do we love SUSY? Unifying various spins SUSY
More informationSUSY and Exotics. UK HEP Forum"From the Tevatron to the LHC, Cosener s House, May /05/2009 Steve King, UK HEP Forum '09, Abingdon 1
SUSY and Exotics Standard Model and the Origin of Mass Puzzles of Standard Model and Cosmology Bottom-up and top-down motivation Extra dimensions Supersymmetry - MSSM -NMSSM -E 6 SSM and its exotics UK
More informationSUPERSYMETRY FOR ASTROPHYSICISTS
Dark Matter: From the Cosmos to the Laboratory SUPERSYMETRY FOR ASTROPHYSICISTS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 29 Jul 1 Aug 2007 SLAC Summer Institute 30 Jul 1 Aug 07 Feng 1 Graphic: N.
More informationExceptional Supersymmetry. at the Large Hadron Collider
Exceptional Supersymmetry at the Large Hadron Collider E 6 SSM model and motivation Contents Why go beyond the Standard Model? Why consider non-minimal SUSY? Exceptional SUSY Structure, particle content
More informationA light singlet at the LHC and DM
A light singlet at the LHC and DM of the R-symmetric supersymmetric model Jan Kalinowski University of Warsaw in collaboration with P.Diessner, W. Kotlarski and D.Stoeckinger Supported in part by Harmonia
More informationSearches for Supersymmetry at ATLAS
Searches for Supersymmetry at ATLAS Renaud Brunelière Uni. Freiburg On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration pp b b X candidate 2 b-tagged jets pt 52 GeV and 96 GeV E T 205 GeV, M CT (bb) 20 GeV Searches for
More informationLecture 4 - Beyond the Standard Model (SUSY)
Lecture 4 - Beyond the Standard Model (SUSY) Christopher S. Hill University of Bristol Warwick Flavour ++ Week April 11-15, 2008 Recall the Hierarchy Problem In order to avoid the significant finetuning
More informationThe Constrained E 6 SSM
The Constrained E 6 SSM and its signatures at the LHC Work with Moretti and Nevzorov; Howl; Athron, Miller, Moretti, Nevzorov Related work: Demir, Kane, T.Wang; Langacker, Nelson; Morrissey, Wells; Bourjaily;
More informationKaluza-Klein Theories - basic idea. Fig. from B. Greene, 00
Kaluza-Klein Theories - basic idea Fig. from B. Greene, 00 Kaluza-Klein Theories - basic idea mued mass spectrum Figure 3.2: (Taken from [46]). The full spectrum of the UED model at the first KK level,
More informationSupersymmetry Breaking
Supersymmetry Breaking LHC Search of SUSY: Part II Kai Wang Phenomenology Institute Department of Physics University of Wisconsin Madison Collider Phemonology Gauge Hierarchy and Low Energy SUSY Gauge
More informationNeutrino Masses and Dark Matter in Gauge Theories for Baryon and Lepton Numbers
Neutrino Masses and Dark Matter in Gauge Theories for Baryon and Lepton Numbers DPG Frühjahrstagung 014 in Mainz Based on Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 31801 (013), Phys. Rev. D 88, 051701(R) (013), arxiv:1309.3970
More information+ µ 2 ) H (m 2 H 2
I. THE HIGGS POTENTIAL AND THE LIGHT HIGGS BOSON In the previous chapter, it was demonstrated that a negative mass squared in the Higgs potential is generated radiatively for a large range of boundary
More informationAndrey Katz C. Brust, AK, S. Lawrence, and R. Sundrum; arxiv:
SUSY, the Third Generation and the LHC Andrey Katz C. Brust, AK, S. Lawrence, and R. Sundrum; arxiv:1011.6670 Harvard University January 9, 2012 Andrey Katz (Harvard) SUSY petite January 9, 2012 1 / 27
More informationCrosschecks for Unification
Crosschecks for Unification Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn Crosschecks for Unification, Planck09, Padova, May 2009 p. 1/39 Questions Do present observations give us hints for
More informationA model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:
I. THE STANDARD MODEL A model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:. The symmetries of the Lagrangian; 2. The representations of fermions
More informationSUSY models of neutrino masses and mixings: the left-right connection
SUSY models of neutrino masses and mixings: the left-right connection GK Workshop Bad Liebenzell Wolfgang Gregor Hollik October 10, 2012 INSTITUT FÜR THEORETISCHE TEILCHENPHYSIK KIT CAMPUS SÜD KIT University
More informationThe Standard Model and beyond
The Standard Model and beyond In this chapter we overview the structure of the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics, its shortcomings, and different ideas for physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM)
More informationBeyond the SM, Supersymmetry
Beyond the SM, 1/ 44 Beyond the SM, A. B. Lahanas University of Athens Nuclear and Particle Physics Section Athens - Greece Beyond the SM, 2/ 44 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Beyond the SM Grand Unified Theories
More informationSplit SUSY and the LHC
Split SUSY and the LHC Pietro Slavich LAPTH Annecy IFAE 2006, Pavia, April 19-21 Why Split Supersymmetry SUSY with light (scalar and fermionic) superpartners provides a technical solution to the electroweak
More informationDynamical Solution to the µ/b µ Problem in Gauge Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking
Dynamical Solution to the µ/b µ Problem in Gauge Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking Carlos E.M. Wagner EFI and KICP, University of Chicago HEP Division, Argonne National Lab. Work done in collaboration with
More informationLittle Higgs Models Theory & Phenomenology
Little Higgs Models Theory Phenomenology Wolfgang Kilian (Karlsruhe) Karlsruhe January 2003 How to make a light Higgs (without SUSY) Minimal models The Littlest Higgs and the Minimal Moose Phenomenology
More informationMinimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). Nausheen R. Shah
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). Nausheen R. Shah June 8, 2003 1 Introduction Even though the Standard Model has had years of experimental success, it has been known for a long time that it
More informationSupersymmetry at the LHC
Supersymmetry at the LHC What is supersymmetry? Present data & SUSY SUSY at the LHC C. Balázs, L. Cooper, D. Carter, D. Kahawala C. Balázs, Monash U. Melbourne SUSY@LHC.nb Seattle, 23 Sep 2008 page 1/25
More informationDark matter and IceCube neutrinos
IL NUOVO CIMENTO 38 C (2015) 31 DOI 10.1393/ncc/i2015-15031-4 Colloquia: IFAE 2014 Dark matter and IceCube neutrinos R. Biondi Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e Chimiche, Università degli Studi di L Aquila,
More informationModels of Neutrino Masses
Models of Neutrino Masses Fernando Romero López 13.05.2016 1 Introduction and Motivation 3 2 Dirac and Majorana Spinors 4 3 SU(2) L U(1) Y Extensions 11 4 Neutrino masses in R-Parity Violating Supersymmetry
More informationEarly SUSY Searches in Events with Leptons with the ATLAS-Detector
Early SUSY Searches in Events with Leptons with the ATLAS-Detector Timo Müller Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz 2010-29-09 EMG Annual Retreat 2010 Timo Müller (Universität Mainz) Early SUSY Searches
More informationSupersymmetry, Dark Matter, and Neutrinos
Supersymmetry, Dark Matter, and Neutrinos The Standard Model and Supersymmetry Dark Matter Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics The Physics of Supersymmetry Gauge Theories Gauge symmetry requires existence
More informationLectures on Supersymmetry I
I Carlos E.M. Wagner HEP Division, Argonne National Laboratory Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago Ecole de Physique de Les Houches, France, August 5, 005. PASI 006, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico,
More informationA Domino Theory of Flavor
A Domino Theory of Flavor Peter Graham Stanford with Surjeet Rajendran arxiv:0906.4657 Outline 1. General Domino Framework 2. Yukawa Predictions 3. Experimental Signatures General Domino Framework Inspiration
More informationFuzzy extra dimensions and particle physics models
Fuzzy extra dimensions and particle physics models Athanasios Chatzistavrakidis Joint work with H.Steinacker and G.Zoupanos arxiv:1002.2606 [hep-th] Corfu, September 2010 Overview Motivation N = 4 SYM
More informationProperties of the Higgs Boson, and its interpretation in Supersymmetry
Properties of the Higgs Boson, and its interpretation in Supersymmetry U. Ellwanger, LPT Orsay The quartic Higgs self coupling and Supersymmetry The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model Higgs
More informationStrings and Particle Physics
Strings and Particle Physics Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn Germany Strings and Particle Physics, SUSY07 p.1/33 Questions What can we learn from strings for particle physics?
More informationYukawa and Gauge-Yukawa Unification
Miami 2010, Florida Bartol Research Institute Department Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware, USA in collaboration with Ilia Gogoladze, Rizwan Khalid, Shabbar Raza, Adeel Ajaib, Tong Li and Kai
More informationStrings, Exceptional Groups and Grand Unification
Strings, Exceptional Groups and Grand Unification Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn Strings, Exceptional Groups and Grand Unification, Planck11, Lisbon, June 2011 p. 1/39 Outline
More informationF. Börkeroth, F. J. de Anda, I. de Medeiros Varzielas, S. F. King. arxiv:
F. Börkeroth, F. J. de Anda, I. de Medeiros Varzielas, S. F. King S FLASY 2015 arxiv:1503.03306 Standard Model Gauge theory SU(3)C X SU(2)L X U(1)Y Standard Model Gauge theory SU(3)C X SU(2)L X U(1)Y SM:
More informationThe Standard Model of particle physics and beyond
The Standard Model of particle physics and beyond - Lecture 3: Beyond the Standard Model Avelino Vicente IFIC CSIC / U. Valencia Physics and astrophysics of cosmic rays in space Milano September 2016 1
More informationPHYSICS BEYOND SM AND LHC. (Corfu 2010)
PHYSICS BEYOND SM AND LHC (Corfu 2010) We all expect physics beyond SM Fantastic success of SM (LEP!) But it has its limits reflected by the following questions: What is the origin of electroweak symmetry
More informationNovember 24, Scalar Dark Matter from Grand Unified Theories. T. Daniel Brennan. Standard Model. Dark Matter. GUTs. Babu- Mohapatra Model
Scalar from November 24, 2014 1 2 3 4 5 What is the? Gauge theory that explains strong weak, and electromagnetic forces SU(3) C SU(2) W U(1) Y Each generation (3) has 2 quark flavors (each comes in one
More informationThe Super-little Higgs
The Super-little Higgs Csaba Csaki (Cornell) with Guido Marandella (UC Davis) Yuri Shirman (Los Alamos) Alessandro Strumia (Pisa) hep-ph/0510294, Phys.Rev.D73:035006,2006 Padua University, July 4, 2006
More informationHiggs Signals and Implications for MSSM
Higgs Signals and Implications for MSSM Shaaban Khalil Center for Theoretical Physics Zewail City of Science and Technology SM Higgs at the LHC In the SM there is a single neutral Higgs boson, a weak isospin
More informationNew Physics from the String Vacuum
New Physics from the String Vacuum The string vacuum Extended MSSM quivers String remnants Small neutrino masses Quivers: Cvetič, Halverson, PL, JHEP 1111,058 (1108.5187) Z : Rev.Mod.Phys.81,1199 (0801.145)
More informationHow high could SUSY go?
How high could SUSY go? Luc Darmé LPTHE (Paris), UPMC November 24, 2015 Based on works realised in collaboration with K. Benakli, M. Goodsell and P. Slavich (1312.5220, 1508.02534 and 1511.02044) Introduction
More informationSupersymmetry, Baryon Number Violation and a Hidden Higgs. David E Kaplan Johns Hopkins University
Supersymmetry, Baryon Number Violation and a Hidden Higgs David E Kaplan Johns Hopkins University Summary LEP looked for a SM Higgs and didn t find it. Both electroweak precision measurements and supersymmetric
More informationDark Matter Implications for SUSY
Dark Matter Implications for SUSY Sven Heinemeyer, IFCA (CSIC, Santander) Madrid, /. Introduction and motivation. The main idea 3. Some results 4. Future plans Sven Heinemeyer, First MultiDark workshop,
More information(Extra)Ordinary Gauge Mediation
(Extra)Ordinary Gauge Mediation David Shih IAS Based on: Clifford Cheung, Liam Fitzpatrick, DS, hep-ph/0710.3585 DS, hep-th/0703196 The LHC is coming... What will we see? The MSSM The MSSM is still the
More informationSearches for Beyond SM Physics with ATLAS and CMS
Searches for Beyond SM Physics with ATLAS and CMS (University of Liverpool) on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations 1 Why beyond SM? In 2012 the Standard Model of Particle Physics (SM) particle content
More informationSU(3)-Flavons and Pati-Salam-GUTs
SU(3)-Flavons and Pati-Salam-GUTs Florian Hartmann in collaboration with Wolfgang Kilian and Karsten Schnitter Universität Siegen Theoretische Physik I Dortmund, 03.07.2012 Outline 1 Running couplings
More informationHeterotic Supersymmetry
Heterotic Supersymmetry Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn Heterotic Supersymmetry, Planck2012, Warsaw, May 2012 p. 1/35 Messages from the heterotic string Localization properties
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 9 Jul 2013
SISSA 45/01/EP Phenomenology of Minimal Unified Tree Level Gauge Mediation at the LHC arxiv:130.1305v [hep-ph] 9 Jul 013 Maurizio Monaco a, Maurizio Pierini b, Andrea Romanino a and Martin Spinrath a a
More information125 GeV Higgs Boson and Gauge Higgs Unification
125 GeV Higgs Boson and Gauge Higgs Unification Nobuchika Okada The University of Alabama Miami 2013, Fort Lauderdale, Dec. 12 18, 2013 Discovery of Higgs boson at LHC! 7/04/2012 Standard Model Higgs boson
More informationReφ = 1 2. h ff λ. = λ f
I. THE FINE-TUNING PROBLEM A. Quadratic divergence We illustrate the problem of the quadratic divergence in the Higgs sector of the SM through an explicit calculation. The example studied is that of the
More informationOutline: Introduction Search for new Physics Model driven Signature based General searches. Search for new Physics at CDF
PE SU Outline: Introduction Search for new Physics Model driven Signature based General searches R Search for new Physics at CDF SUperSYmmetry Standard Model is theoretically incomplete SUSY: spin-based
More informationSupersymmetry Highlights. Kevin Hambleton
Supersymmetry Highlights Kevin Hambleton Outline SHO Example Why SUSY? SUSY Fields Superspace Lagrangians SUSY QED MSSM i Warm Up A Hint Of SUSY... Remember Quantum Simple Harmonic Oscillator... Canonical
More informationSpectral Triples and Supersymmetry
Ma148b Spring 2016 Topics in Mathematical Physics Reference: Wim Beenakker, Thijs van den Broek, Walter van Suijlekom, Supersymmetry and Noncommutative Geometry, Springer, 2015 (also all images in this
More informationSearches at LEP. Ivo van Vulpen CERN. On behalf of the LEP collaborations. Moriond Electroweak 2004
Searches at LEP Moriond Electroweak 2004 Ivo van Vulpen CERN On behalf of the LEP collaborations LEP and the LEP data LEP: e + e - collider at s m Z (LEP1) and s = 130-209 GeV (LEP2) Most results (95%
More information*** LIGHT GLUINOS? Cracow-Warsaw Workshop on LHC Institut of Theoretical Physics, University of Warsaw
LIGHT GLUINOS? Cracow-Warsaw Workshop on LHC 15.01.2010 Marek Olechowski Institut of Theoretical Physics, University of Warsaw LIGHT GLUINOS? Early supersymmetry discovery potential of the LHC Phenomenology
More informationProton decay theory review
Proton decay theory review Borut Bajc J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia Lyon, 12 1 Introduction STANDARD MODEL: renormalizable level: accidental B and L conservation (no invariants that violate
More informationNaturalizing Supersymmetry with the Relaxion
Naturalizing Supersymmetry with the Relaxion Tony Gherghetta University of Minnesota Beyond the Standard Model OIST Workshop, Okinawa, Japan, March 4, 2016 Jason Evans, TG, Natsumi Nagata, Zach Thomas
More informationPhysics at e + e - Linear Colliders. 4. Supersymmetric particles. M. E. Peskin March, 2002
Physics at e + e - Linear Colliders 4. Supersymmetric particles M. E. Peskin March, 2002 In this final lecture, I would like to discuss supersymmetry at the LC. Supersymmetry is not a part of the Standard
More informationUpdates in the Finite N=1 SU(5) Model
Updates in the Finite N=1 SU(5) Model Gregory Patellis Physics Department, NTUA Sven Heinemeyer, Myriam Mondragon, Nicholas Tracas, George Zoupanos arxiv:1802.04666 March 31, 2018 Updates in the Finite
More informationElements of Grand Unification
Elements of Grand Unification Problems with the Standard Model The Two Paths Grand Unification The Georgi-Glashow SU(5) Model Beyond SU(5) arger Groups Supersymmetry Extra Dimensions Additional Implications
More information12 Mar 2004, KTH, Stockholm. Peter Skands Dept. of Theoretical High Energy Physics, Lund University LHC
12 Mar 2004, KTH, Stockholm Peter Skands Dept. of Theoretical High Energy Physics, Lund University RPV-SUSY @ LHC Including how to: Save the proton from a Supersymmetric Death. Measure a Neutrino Angle
More informationBeyond the MSSM (BMSSM)
Beyond the MSSM (BMSSM) Nathan Seiberg Strings 2007 SUSY 2012 Based on M. Dine, N.S., and S. Thomas, to appear Assume The LHC (or the Tevatron) will discover some of the particles in the MSSM. These include
More informationDirac gauginos, R symmetry and the 125 GeV Higgs
Claudia Frugiuele Dirac gauginos, R symmetry and the 125 GeV Higgs with E.Bertuzzo, T. Grègoire and E. Ponton hep ph 1402.5432 GOAL 8, 14/08/2014 OUTLINE Dirac gauginos and natural SUSY R symmetric models
More informationProton Decay and GUTs. Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) Durham July 20, 2005
Proton Decay and GUTs Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) SUSY05 @ Durham July 20, 2005 Why do we pursue proton decay? Minimal SU(5) GUT excluded by IMB Minimal SUSY SU(5) GUT excluded by SuperKamiokande Why do
More informationMaria Dimou In collaboration with: C. Hagedorn, S.F. King, C. Luhn. Tuesday group seminar 17/03/15 University of Liverpool
Maria Dimou In collaboration with: C. Hagedorn, S.F. King, C. Luhn Tuesday group seminar 17/03/15 University of Liverpool 1 Introduction Outline The SM & SUSY Flavour Problem. Solving it by imposing a
More informationAspects of the Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.) 200 202 (2010) 120 129 www.elsevier.com/locate/npbps Aspects of the Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model Peter Athron a, Jonathan P. Hall b, Richard Howl b, Stephen
More informationGauge-Higgs Unification on Flat Space Revised
Outline Gauge-Higgs Unification on Flat Space Revised Giuliano Panico ISAS-SISSA Trieste, Italy The 14th International Conference on Supersymmetry and the Unification of Fundamental Interactions Irvine,
More informationIntroduction to SUSY. Giacomo Polesello. INFN, Sezione di Pavia
. Introduction to SUSY Giacomo Polesello INFN, Sezione di Pavia Introduction For 20 years SUSY most popular template for exploration of new physics SUSY: large class of models with many possible signatures
More informationThe discrete beauty of local GUTs
The discrete beauty of local GUTs Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn The discrete beauty of local grand unification, GUTs and Strings, MPI München, February 2010 p. 1/33 Outline
More informationSpontaneous CP violation and Higgs spectra
PROCEEDINGS Spontaneous CP violation and Higgs spectra CERN-TH, CH-111 Geneva 3 E-mail: ulrich.nierste@cern.ch Abstract: A general theorem relating Higgs spectra to spontaneous CP phases is presented.
More informationNatural SUSY and the LHC
Natural SUSY and the LHC Clifford Cheung University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab N = 4 SYM @ 35 yrs I will address two questions in this talk. What is the LHC telling us about
More informationAnomaly and gaugino mediation
Anomaly and gaugino mediation Supergravity mediation X is in the hidden sector, P l suppressed couplings SUSY breaking VEV W = ( W hid (X) + W vis ) (ψ) f = δj i ci j X X ψ j e V ψ 2 i +... Pl τ = θ Y
More informationA Simulated Study Of The Potential For The Discovery of the Supersymmetric Sbottom Squark at the ATLAS Experiment
A Simulated Study Of The Potential For The Discovery of the Supersymmetric Sbottom Squark at the ATLAS Experiment By Rishiraj Pravahan University of Texas at Arlington Outline Why do we need Supersymmetry?
More informationSearch for SUperSYmmetry SUSY
PART 3 Search for SUperSYmmetry SUSY SUPERSYMMETRY Symmetry between fermions (matter) and bosons (forces) for each particle p with spin s, there exists a SUSY partner p~ with spin s-1/2. q ~ g (s=1)
More informationPati-Salam GUT-Flavour Models with Three Higgs Generations
Pati-Salam GUT-Flavour Models with Three Higgs Generations Florian Hartmann in collaboration with Wolfgang Kilian and Karsten Schnitter based on: JHEP 1405 (2014) 064 and arxiv:1405.1901 Universität Siegen
More informationSupersymmetric Grand Unification
OHSTPY-HEP-T-08-xxx Supersymmetric Grand Unification Stuart Raby Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, 191 W. Woodruff Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Abstract Three lectures on supersymmetric
More informationThe SCTM Phase Transition
The SCTM Phase Transition ICTP / SAIFR 2015 Mateo García Pepin In collaboration with: Mariano Quirós Motivation The Model The phase transition Summary EW Baryogenesis A mechanism to explain the observed
More informationSplit Supersymmetry A Model Building Approach
Split Supersymmetry A Model Building Approach Kai Wang Phenomenology Institute Department of Physics the University of Wisconsin Madison UC Riverside HEP Seminar In Collaboration with Ilia Gogoladze (Notre
More informationSupersymmetry V. Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) PiTP 05, IAS
Supersymmetry V Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) PiTP 05, IAS Plan Mon: Non-technical Overview what SUSY is supposed to give us Tue: From formalism to the MSSM Global SUSY formalism, Feynman rules, soft SUSY
More informationLeaving Plato s Cave: Beyond The Simplest Models of Dark Matter
Leaving Plato s Cave: Beyond The Simplest Models of Dark Matter Alexander Natale Korea Institute for Advanced Study Nucl. Phys. B914 201-219 (2017), arxiv:1608.06999. High1 2017 February 9th, 2017 1/30
More informationSM predicts massless neutrinos
MASSIVE NEUTRINOS SM predicts massless neutrinos What is the motivation for considering neutrino masses? Is the question of the existence of neutrino masses an isolated one, or is connected to other outstanding
More informationThe Standard Model and Beyond
The Standard Model and Beyond Nobuchika Okada Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Alabama 2011 BCVSPIN ADVANCED STUDY INSTITUTE IN PARTICLE PHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY Huê, Vietnam, 25-30,
More informationTwin Higgs Theories. Z. Chacko, University of Arizona. H.S Goh & R. Harnik; Y. Nomura, M. Papucci & G. Perez
Twin Higgs Theories Z. Chacko, University of Arizona H.S Goh & R. Harnik; Y. Nomura, M. Papucci & G. Perez Precision electroweak data are in excellent agreement with the Standard Model with a Higgs mass
More information