arxiv: v3 [math.ap] 28 Mar 2018
|
|
- Adele Nelson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Electric field concentration in the presence of an inclusion with eccentric core-shell geometry Junbeom Kim Mikyoung Lim arxiv: v3 [math.ap] 28 Mar 218 May 3, 218 Abstract In this paper we analyze the gradient blow-up of the solution to the conductivity problem in two dimensions in the presence of an inclusion with eccentric core-shell geometry. Assuming that the core and shell have circular boundaries that are nearly touching, we derive an asymptotic formula for the solution in terms of the single and double layer potentials with image line charges. We also deduce an integral formula with image line charges for the problem relating to two nearly touching separated conductors. Mathematics subject classification MSC2): 35J25, 73C4 Key words. geometry, Image charge Contents Gradient blow-up, Conductivity equation, Bipolar coordinates, Anti-plane elasticity, Core-shell 1 Introduction 2 2 The bipolar coordinate system Geometry of the core-shell structure The bipolar coordinate system associated with the eccentric core-shell structure. 5 3 Decomposition of the solution in singular and regular terms Layer potential formulation Series expansions for the density functions in bipolar coordinates Blow-up contribution term in H and decomposition of the solution Asymptotics of the singular term in bipolar coordinates Series solution by the separation of variables Integral expression of the singular term in bipolar coordinates Optimal bounds This work is supported by the Korean Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning through NRF grant No. 216R1A2B41453 to M.L. and J.K.). Department of Mathematical Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Korea kjb2474@kaist.ac.kr, mklim@kaist.ac.kr). 1
2 5 Image line charge formula Line charge formula of the Lerch transcendent function Asymptotic formula for the core-shell geometry Asymptotic formula for the case of two separated disks Conclusion 27 1 Introduction We consider the conductivity problem in the presence of an inclusion with eccentric core-shell geometry which consists of a core and a surrounding shell, where the core and shell have circular boundaries that are nearly touching. Specifically, we let B i and B e be two disks such that B e contains B i, as drawn in Figure 2.1, where the core B i and shell B e \ B i have the constant conductivities k i and k e satisfying < k i, k e 1 <. The aim of the paper is to derive an asymptotic formula for the solution to the conductivity problem { σ u = in R 2, ux) Hx) = O x 1 1.1) ) as x, as the distance between B i and B e degenerates to zero. Here, σ denotes the conductivity profile σ = k i χb i ) + k e χb e \ B i ) + χr 2 \ B e ), H is an entire harmonic function, and χd) represents the characteristic function of a set D. The electrostatic interaction problem has been studied for a long time, including [37]. For two separated spheres, the series expression by separation of variables in bispherical coordinates and the method of image charges were developed [19, 2, 45]. The electric field may blow up as the distance tends toward zero [26], and it causes difficulty in the numerical computation. There have been many attempts to overcome this difficulty and to compute the asymptotic behavior of the electric field [11, 26, 38, 39, 4, 41]. For two dimensions, this problem can be also considered in relation to the stress concentration in composite materials. In composite structures, which consist of a matrix and inclusions, it is common for inclusions to be closely located. Having extreme material parameters is a necessary condition for inclusions to induce the electric field or the stress tensor blow-up. Li and Vogelius showed that the electric field is bounded if the inclusions conductivities are finite and strictly positive [31], and Li and Nirenberg extended this result to elliptic systems [32]. In recent years, the gradient blow-up feature of the electric field in the small area between the inclusions boundaries has attracted much attention due to its application to various imaging modalities, for example [28, 42]. In particular, the electric field concentration in the presence of two nearly touching separated inclusions has been intensively studied. We denote by ɛ the distance between the inclusions. The generic blow-up rate for conductors is ɛ 1/2 in two dimensions [9, 1, 12, 18, 26, 46, 47], and ɛ ln ɛ 1 in three dimensions [13, 14, 36]. In two dimensions, Ammari et al. deduced an optimal bound for two disks with arbitrary constant conductivities [7, 9], and Yun obtained the blow-up rate for perfect conductors of general shapes [46, 47]. The asymptotic behavior of the gradient blow-up solution was studied for perfect conductors of circular shapes by Kang et al. [22], and of arbitrary shapes by Ammari et al. [2] and Kang et al. [21]. For disks with arbitrary constant conductivities, Lim and Yu obtained an asymptotic formula for the electric field [34]. The blow-up feature for perfect conductors of a bow-tie 2
3 structure was investigated by Kang and Yun in [25]. In three dimensions, the blow-up rate for perfect conductors of general shapes was obtained by Bao et al. [13, 14]. For perfect conductors of spherical shapes, Ammari et al. showed that the potential difference in the conductors is necessary for the gradient blow-up [3], an optimal bound for the electric field concentration was obtained by Lim and Yun [36], and the asymptotic feature of the blow-up solution was investigated by Kang et al. [23] and by Lim and Yu [33]. Lekner calculated the field enhancement rate by using the bispherical coordinates [29]. Recently, Ammari and Yu developed a numerical method to compute the blow-up solution [44]. The blow-up rate for insulating inclusions is the same as perfectly conducting ones in two dimensions, but is different in three dimensions. Yun showed that the rate in three dimensions is 1/ɛ [48]. For the elasticity problem, Bao et al. obtained an upper bound in two dimensions [16], and this result was generalized to higher dimensions [17]. Recently, the gradient blow-up term of the solution in two dimensions was verified for convex hard inclusions by Kang and Yu [24] and for circular holes by Lim and Yu [35]. An inclusion with core-shell geometry can also induce the gradient blow-up for the solution to the conductivity problem as the distance between the boundaries of the core and shell degenerates to zero. In two dimensions, Ammari et al. obtained the blow-up rate ɛ 1/2 for core-shell geometry with circular boundaries [7]. Recently, Li et al. obtained an optimal bound for inclusions of general shapes in two dimensions and higher [3], and Bao et al. extended the result to the linear elasticity problem [15]. It is worth mentioning that a plasmonic structure of core-shell geometry induces the shielding effect on a region away from the structure [43]. Our goal in this paper is to characterize the electric field concentration for core-shell geometry with circular boundaries. We first show that only the linear term in Hx) contributes to the gradient blow-up. We then show that the gradient blow-up happens only in the shell area B e \B i. We finally express u by the single and double layer potentials with image line charges as follows: for x B e \ B i, ux) Hx) [ = C xr 2 ln x s ϕ 1 s) dσs) 2,),p 1 ] [ + C yr 2 x s, e 2 2 x s 2 ψ 1s) dσs),),p 1 ] [p 2,c i ] [p 2,c i ] ln x s ϕ 2 s) dσs) ] x s, e 2 x s 2 ψ 2s) dσs) + rx), where C x, C y, r 2 are some constants depending on the background potential function H and the geometry of the inclusion, and r is uniformly bounded independently of ɛ, x. The points p 1, p 2 and c i are defined according to B i and B e ; see Theorem 5.2 for further details. In the derivation, we use the bipolar coordinate system due to its convenience to solve the conductivity problem in the presence of two circular interfaces. We also deduce an integral expression with image line charges for the problem relating to two separated disks. The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we explain the core-shell geometry and the associated bipolar coordinate system. We decompose the solution u into a singular term and a regular term in section 3 and derive an asymptotic formula for the solution in terms of bipolar coordinates in section 4. Section 5 is about the image line charge formula, and we conclude with some discussion. ] 3
4 2 The bipolar coordinate system 2.1 Geometry of the core-shell structure We let B i and B e be the disks centered at c i and c e with the radii r i and r e, respectively. As stated before, we assume that B e contains B i and that the distance between the boundary circles, say ɛ = dist B i, B e ), is small. After appropriate shifting and rotation, the disk centers are c i = c i, ) and c e = c e, ) with c i = r2 e ri 2 r e r i ɛ) 2, c e = c i + r e r i ɛ. 2.1) 2r e r i ɛ) Note that r e > r i > and c e > c i > as shown in Figure 2.1. The closest points on B i and B e between B i and B e are, respectively, x i = x i, ) and x e = x e, ), with Note that x i, x e = Oɛ). x i = c i r i = 2ɛr e ɛ 2 2r e r i ɛ), x e = c e r e = 2ɛr i + ɛ 2 2r e r i ɛ). Figure 2.1: An inclusion with eccentric core-shell geometry left) and the coordinate level curves of associated bipolar coordinates right). For a disk D centered at c with radius r, the reflection of x = x, y) R 2 across D is R D x) = r2 x c) x c 2 + c. We also define R D z) C for z = x + iy such that R D x) = R{R D z)}, I{R D z)}). Here the symbols R{w} and I{w} indicate the real and imaginary parts of a complex number w, respectively. We then define the reflection of a function f across D as and the combined reflections as R D [f]x) = f R D x)) for x R 2, R D1 R D2 R Dn [f]x) = f R Dn R Dn 1 R D1 )x) ). 4
5 Let R i and R e denote the reflections across the circles B i and B e, respectively. Then, one can easily show that the combined reflections R i R e and R e R i have the same fixed points p 1 = α, ) and p 2 = α, ) with α = ɛ2ri + ɛ)2r e ɛ)2r e 2r i ɛ). 2.2) 2r e r i ɛ) One can also easily show that α = r ɛ + Oɛ ɛ), where r = 2ri r e r e r i. 2.3) The boundaries of B i and B e are then the coordinate level curves {ξ = ξ i } and {ξ = ξ e }, respectively, in the bipolar coordinate system ξ, θ) that will be defined below, with ξ i = ln c i + α lnr i ), ξ e = ln c e + α lnr e ). 2.4) For later use we set { ξ i,k = 2kξ i ξ e ) + ξ i, ξ e,k = 2kξ i ξ e ) + ξ e 2.5) for each k N. One can show so that ξ i,k ξ i and ξ e,k+1 ξ e. ξ i > ξ e >, 2.2 The bipolar coordinate system associated with the eccentric core-shell structure We set the bipolar coordinate system ξ, θ) R π, π] with respect to the two poles located at p 1 = α, ) and p 2 = α, ): for any point x = x, y) in the Cartesian coordinate system, the coordinates ξ, θ) are defined such that e ξ+iθ = α + z α z with z = x + iy. 2.6) In other words z = α eξ+iθ 1 e ξ+iθ + 1 = α sinh ξ cosh ξ + cos θ + iα sin θ cosh ξ + cos θ. 2.7) We write either x = xξ, θ) or z = zξ, θ) to specify bipolar coordinates if necessary. For a function u = ux), we may write uξ, θ) to indicate uxξ, θ)) for notational simplicity. Figure 2.1 illustrates the coordinate level curves of the bipolar coordinate system. Note that the two level curves {θ = π 2 } and {θ = π 2 } form one circle that is centered at the origin with radius α. Therefore, we have that zξ, θ) α if θ π 2, zξ, θ) > α if θ > π ) 5
6 One can easily see that the two scale factors coincide, i.e., x ξ = x θ = 1 hξ, θ), where In particular, the components of x/ ξ x ξ satisfy that x, y ξ ξ hξ, θ) = = α 1 + cos θ cosh ξ cosh ξ + cos θ) 2, 1 hξ,θ) u = hξ, θ) u ξ êξ + hξ, θ) u θ êθ, cosh ξ + cos θ. α y ξ = α sin θ sinh ξ cosh ξ + cos θ) 2 2.9). The gradient for a function ux, y) can be written as with ê ξ = x/ ξ x/ ξ, ê θ = x/ θ x/ θ. 2.1) For any ξ, the level curve {ξ = ξ } is the circle centered at c = c, ) with radius r such that c = α e2ξ + 1 e 2ξ, r = α. 2.11) 1 sinh ξ From 2.7), the center c has the bipolar coordinates 2ξ, π). On this circle, the normal and tangential derivatives of a function u satisfy that u = sgnξ )hξ, θ) u, 2.12) ν ξ=ξ ξ ξ=ξ u = sgnξ )hξ, θ) u, T ξ=ξ θ ξ=ξ where ν is the outward unit normal vector and T is the rotation of ν by π 2 -radian angle. We may simply write u ν ξ, θ) for u ν ξ=ξ ξ, θ). The reflection across the circle {ξ = ξ } is actually a reflection with respect to ξ-variable, as follows. Lemma 2.1. For a disk D whose boundary is the coordinate level curve {ξ = ξ } with some ξ, we have R D xξ, θ)) = x2ξ ξ, θ), for all ξ, θ) 2ξ, π). Proof. Assume that D has the center c = c, ) and the radius r. From 2.11), we deduce that c = x2ξ, π) and c + α)c α) = α2 sinh 2 = r 2, ξ For z = x + iy c + i, we have α + R D z) α R D z) = α + r 2 z c) z c 2 α r2 z c) z c 2 = c + α c α + c c = c + α c α e 2ξ = c + α c α. z c)c α) z c z c)c+α) z c c α) + z c) c + α) + z c) = c + α c α α z α + z = e2ξ ξ+iθ. We prove the lemma by use of 2.6). 6
7 3 Decomposition of the solution in singular and regular terms The gradient blow-up of the solution to 1.1) may or may not blow up depending on the applied field H. In this section, we show that only the linear term of H contributes to the blow-up feature. This property naturally leads to decomposition of the solution into a singular term that blows up as ɛ tends to zero) and a regular term that remains bounded independently of ɛ); see Theorem 3.7 for further details. 3.1 Layer potential formulation Let D be a bounded domain in R 2 with a Lipschitz boundary D. We define the single layer potential S D and the Neumann-Poincaré operator K D as S D [ϕ]x) = 1 ln x y ϕy) dσy), x R 2, 2π D K D [ϕ]x) = 1 2π p.v. x y, ν x x y 2 ϕy) dσy), x D, D where ϕ L 2 D). Here p.v. means the Cauchy principal value. They satisfy the relation ν S D[ϕ] ± = ± 1 ) 2 + K D ϕ on D, where ν is the outward normal vector on D. For a C 1,α -domain D, the operator K D is compact on L 2 D) and the eigenvalues of K D on L2 D) lie in 1/2, 1/2]; see [27]. The operator λi K D is invertible on L2 Ω) for λ 1/2 [5]. For more properties of the Neumann- Poincaré, see [4, 6]. The solution u to the conductivity equation 1.1) satisfies the transmission conditions and it can be expressed as u + u = k e on B e, ν ν u k e + u = k i on B i, ν ν where ϕ i, ϕ e ) are mean-zero functions satisfying with ux) = Hx) + S Bi [ϕ i ]x) + S Be [ϕ e ]x), 3.1) λ i I K B i S B i ν e λ i = S B e ν i λ e I K B e ϕi ϕ e ) H = ν H ν Bi Be 3.2) k i + k e 2k i k e ), λ e = k e + 1 2k e 1). 3.3) Here, ν i and ν e denote the outward unit normal vectors on B i and B e, respectively. Note that λ i, λ e > 1 2 due to the positive assumption on the conductivities k i, k e. The problem 3.1) is 7
8 solvable for λ i, λ e > 1 2 as shown in [1]. Since B i and B e are disks, K B i and K B e are zero operators on L 2 B i) and L 2 B e), respectively. So, the system of boundary integral equations 3.2) becomes λ i I S B i ν e S B e ν i λ e I ϕi ϕ e ) = H ν H ν Bi Be. 3.4) We can relate the tangential component and the normal component of the electric field on B i and B e. The following lemma will be used later. One can prove the lemma by slightly modifying the proof of [9, Theorem 2]. Lemma 3.1. Let u be the solution to 1.1) with an entire harmonic function H. Let H be the harmonic conjugate of H and σ = 1 k i χb i ) + 1 k e χb e \ B i ) + χr 2 \ B e ). Then, the solution v to the problem { σ v = in R 2, satisfies that vx) Hx) = O x 1 ) as x u T = v + u on B e, ν T = 1 v + on B i. k e ν 3.2 Series expansions for the density functions in bipolar coordinates The single layer potential associated with a disk can be written in terms of the reflection with respect to the disk s boundary. Lemma 3.2 [9]). Let D be a disk centered at c and ν be the outward unit normal vector on D. If v is harmonic in D and continuous on D, then we have [ v ] S D 1 vc) vx) + for x D, 2 2 x) = ν D 1 2 R D[v]x) + vc) for x R 2 \ D. 2 If v is harmonic in R 2 \ D, continuous on R 2 \ D and vx) as x, then we have [ v S D ν + D ] x) = 1 2 R D[v]x) for x D, 1 2 vx) for x R2 \ D. We now express the density functions ϕ i and ϕ e in 3.1) in series form by use of Lemma 2.1. Lemma 3.3. The density functions in 3.1) can be expressed as λ i ϕ i θ) = 1 1 ) 1 ) m hξ i, θ) H 2λ e 4λ m= i λ e hξ i,m, θ) ν ξ i,m, θ), λ e ϕ e θ) = H ν ξ e, θ) ) 1 ) m hξ e, θ) H 2λ i 2λ e 4λ i λ e hξ e,m+1, θ) ν ξ e,m+1, θ). m= 3.5) 8
9 Proof. First, we formally expand the solution ϕ i, ϕ e ) to 3.4) as follows uniform and absolute convergence will be proved later): λ i ϕ i = 1 1 ) 1 ) m Re R i ) m H ) Bi, 2λ e 4λ m= i λ e ν i λ e ϕ e = H Be ) 1 ) m Ri R e ) m R i H ) 3.6) Be. ν e 2λ i 2λ e 4λ i λ e ν e Using Lemma 3.2, we compute S Bi [ϕ i ] ν e and S Be [ϕ e ] = 1 S Be ν i λ e ν i = ) λ i 2λ e m= = λ i 2λ e = λ e ϕ e H ν e Be, 1 2λ i λ e [ H ] Be ν e 1 1 2λ e ) ) m= = 1 2λ e H ν i Bi 1 4λ i λ e = λ i ϕ i H ν i Bi. m= 1 m= ) m S Bi 4λ i λ e ν e 1 4λ i λ e λ e m= [ Re R i ) m H ) ] Bi ν i ) m ν e Ri R e R i ) m H ) Bi ) m [ S Be Ri R e ) m R i H ) ] Be 4λ i λ e ν i ν e ) 1 ) m Ri R e ) m+1 H ) Bi 4λ i λ e ν i Therefore the series solutions in 3.6) satisfy 3.4). For the entire harmonic function H, we have from Lemma 2.1 that R e R i Hξ, θ) = HR i R e ξ, θ)) = H2ξ i ξ e ) + ξ, θ), R i R e R i Hξ, θ) = HR i R e R i ξ, θ)) = H2ξ i ξ e ) + 2ξ i ξ, θ). Repeating the reflections, it follows that R e R i ) m Hξ, θ) = H2mξ i ξ e ) + ξ, θ), R i R e ) m R i Hξ, θ) = H2mξ i ξ e ) + 2ξ i ξ, θ). Recall that ξ i,m and ξ e,m+1 are given as 2.5). By use of 2.12) we deduce that Re R i ) m H ) Bi = hξ i, θ) ν i ξ H 2mξ i ξ e ) + ξ, θ)) ξ=ξi = hξ i, θ) H hξ i,m, θ) ν ξ i,m, θ), Ri R e ) m R i H ) Be = hξ e, θ) ν e ξ H 2mξ i ξ e ) + 2ξ i ξ, θ)) = hξ e, θ) H hξ e,m+1, θ) ν ξ e,m+1, θ). ξ=ξe 9
10 Therefore, the equation 3.6) becomes 3.5). Now, we show uniform and absolute convergence for the series expansions. ξ i,m ξ i and ξ e,m+1 ξ e. Since xξ i,m, θ), xξ e,m+1, θ) B e for all m and Recall that hξ i, θ) hξ i,m, θ) 1, hξ e, θ) hξ e,m+1, θ) 1, we have hξ i, θ) H hξ i,m, θ) ν ξ i,m, θ) Hx) L B e), hξ e, θ) H hξ e,m+1, θ) ν ξ e,m+1, θ) Hx) L B e). Note that 1 4λ i λ e < 1 due to λ i, λ e > 1 2. Therefore, each term in 3.6) in other words, each term in 3.5)) is bounded 1 m by Hx) L B e) 4λ i λ e. This implies convergence and so the proof is completed. Corollary 3.4. If k i and k e are bounded but not small, then u H) is uniformly bounded in R 2 independently of ɛ. Proof. From Lemma 3.3 and the analysis in its proof, we have ϕ i L B i ), ϕ e L B e) 6 H L B e) λ i λ e The jump formula for the single layer potential and 3.4) implies u ± L = ν λ i ± 1 B i ) 2 ϕ i L B i ). 3.7) Therefore we have uniform boundedness for normal derivatives of u on B i and B e. We can also prove uniform boundedness for tangential derivatives by using a harmonic conjugate of u, in view of Lemma 3.1. Since u H)x) satisfies the decay condition as x, u H) is uniformly bounded in R 2 independently of ɛ by the maximum principle. 3.3 Blow-up contribution term in H and decomposition of the solution We prove the following upper bounds of two series sums related with the scale factor function h, which is essential for showing that only the linear term of H contributes to the gradient blow-up. 1
11 Lemma 3.5. Let N ɛ = r ɛ, then we have N ɛ m= N ɛ m= hξ i, θ) hξ i,m, θ) hξ e, θ) hξ e,m+1, θ) where C is a constant independent of ɛ, θ. C zξ i, θ) C zξ e, θ) for all θ > π 2, for all θ > π 2, Proof. We prove the first inequality only. The second one can be shown in the same way. Note that hξ i, θ) hξ i,m, θ) = cosh ξ i + cos θ cosh ξ i,m + cos θ = cosh ξ i + cos θ) cosh ξ i,m cos θ) cosh ξ i cos θ) cosh ξ i cos θ) cosh ξ i,m + cos θ) cosh ξ i,m cos θ) cosh ξ i + cos θ) α 2 cosh ξ i,m cos θ) α 2 = zξ i,m, θ) 2 cosh ξ i cos θ) cosh ξ i,m + cos θ) zξ i, θ). 3.8) We use 2.6), to estimate the last term in the above equation, and obtain with γ = e 2ξ i ξ e). This implies α + zξ i,m, θ) α zξ i,m, θ) = eξ i,m+iθ = e 2mξ i ξ e) e ξi+iθ = γ m α + zξ i, θ) α zξ i, θ) zξ i,m, θ) = α zξ i, θ)γ m + 1) + αγ m 1) zξ i, θ)γ m 1) + αγ m + 1) = 1 + α γ m 1 zξ i, θ) γ m γ m. 1 α γ m zξ i, θ) From 2.3) and 2.11), we deduce ξ i = r r i ɛ + Oɛ ɛ) and ξe = r r e ɛ + Oɛ ɛ) so that ξ i ξ e = 2 r ɛ + Oɛ ɛ) 3.9) and r ɛ < γ = e 2ξ i ξ e) < r ɛ. Hence, by using 2.8) as well, we have for 1 m < r ɛ and θ > π 2 that and 1 + 2m ) ɛ < γ m < 1 + 5r r ɛ ɛ < e 5 r zξ i,m, θ) 1 + α e 5 1 zξ i,θ) 2 2m ɛ/r αe 5 +1) + 1 zξ i,θ) C 1 C 2 m + 1 zξ i,θ) with some positive constants C 1 and C 2 independent of ɛ, θ and m. Hence, we have zξ i,m, θ) zξ i, θ) C for 1 m < r, θ > π m zξ i, θ) + 1 ɛ ) 11
12 Note that for any t >, the following holds: m= 1 mt + 1) xt + 1) 2 dx = t. This completes the proof because of 3.8), 3.1) and the boundedness of zξ i, θ). Now, we show that u H) is bounded regardless of ɛ if Hx) = O x ) near the origin. Lemma 3.6. If Hx) = O x ) in a bounded region containing B e, then we have u H) L R 2 ) C for some constant C independent of k i, k e and ɛ. Proof. Let H denote the gradient with respect to the Cartesian coordinates, and ξ i,m, ξ e,m+1 are defined as 2.5). We first show that hξ i, θ) Hξ i,m, θ) C. 3.11) hξ i,m, θ) m= Here and after, C denotes a constant independent of ɛ, θ and m. For notational simplicity we decompose the series in 3.11) as hξ i, θ) Hξ i,m, θ) = hξ i,m, θ) m= + m r ɛ m> r ɛ := I + II and separately prove the uniform boundedness. assumption Hx) = O x ) in B e that For θ π 2, we have from 2.8) and the I C r ɛ zξ i,m, θ) C r ɛ α = O1). For θ > π 2, we have from Lemma 3.5 and 3.1) { C I zξi,m, zξ i, θ) max θ) } r : m = O1). ɛ We now estimate II. For m > r ɛ, we have ξ i,m > 1 due to 3.9) so that and hξ i, θ) hξ i,m, θ) = Therefore, it follows that cosh ξ i + cos θ cosh ξ i,m + cos θ m> r zξ i,m, θ) < Cα cosh ξ i 1 2 cosh ξ i,m II 4e 2mξi ξe) Czξ i,m, θ) ɛ 4e ξ i ξ i,m = 4e 2mξ i ξ e). Cα ξ i ξ e = O1). 12
13 In the same way, one can easily show that m= hξ i, θ) hξ e,m+1, θ) Hξ e,m+1, θ) C. 3.12) From 3.11), 3.12) and Lemma 3.3 we obtain ϕ i < C 1 1 ), ϕ e < C λ i 2λ e λ e and, thus, u ν = λ i ± 1 ± 2 ϕ i L B i ) C. L B i ) The same result holds on B e. We can also prove uniform boundedness for tangential derivatives by using a harmonic conjugate for the harmonic function; see Lemma 3.1. Following the same argument in the proof of cor 3.4, we have uniform boundedness for u H) in R 2 independently of ɛ. As a direct consequence of Lemma 3.6, we can decompose the solution into a singular term and a regular term as follows. Theorem 3.7. Let H be an arbitrary entire harmonic function. Set H 1 x) = H) x and H 2 x) = Hx) H 1 x). Then, the solution u to the transmission problem 1.1) has the decomposition ux) = u 1 x) + u 2 x), x R 2, 3.13) where u 1 and u 2 are the solutions to 1.1) with H 1 and H 2 in the place of H, respectively, and u 2 H 2 )x) L R 2 ) < C for some constant C independent of ɛ. Corollary 3.8. If λ i λ e > 1 4 equivalently, either k i > k e > 1 or k i < k e < 1), then for any entire function H we have u H) L R 2 ) C with some positive constant C independent of ɛ. Proof. Thanks to Theorem 3.7, we may consider only the linear function for H, say Hx, y) = ax + by. Then, from 2.12) we have 1 ) m hξ i, θ) H 4λ m= i λ e hξ i,m, θ) ν ξ i,m, θ) = 1 ) m hξ i, θ) a x ) 4λ i λ e ξ + b y ξ m= ξ=ξ i,m. x Note that from 2.9), ξ and their derivatives in ξ have at most a finite number of changes in sign when θ is fixed. Moreover, hξ i, θ) x ξ ξ i,m, θ), hξ i, θ) y ξ ξ i,m, θ) hξ i, θ) hξ i,m, θ) 1. ξ, y 13
14 Therefore, from the convergence property of alternating series we derive that 1 ) m hξ i, θ) H 4λ i λ e hξ i,m, θ) ν ξ i,m, θ) C H) and, in the same way, m= m= 1 ) m hξ e, θ) H 4λ i λ e hξ e,m+1, θ) ν ξ e,m+1, θ) C H). Hence, ϕ i, ϕ e are bounded independent of ɛ. Following the same argument in cor 3.4 we have uniform boundedness for u H). For the case of separated disks, a boundedness result comparable to Lemma 3.6 was derived in [8], based on the series expression in the Cartesian coordinates that is similar to 3.6). We emphasize that in this paper, we provide a much simpler proof thanks to Lemma Asymptotics of the singular term in bipolar coordinates From the analysis in the previous section, the gradient blow-up does not occur either when Hx) = O x ) or when λ i λ e > 1 4 equivalently, either k i > k e > 1 or k i < k e < 1). In this section, we first derive an asymptotic expansion for the solution to 1.1) assuming that H is a linear function and λ i λ e < 1 4 equivalently, either k i > k e, 1 > k e or k i < k e, 1 < k e ). We then characterize the gradient blow-up. We follow the derivation in [34], where the asymptotic behavior for the electric field was derived in the presence of two separated circular conductors. The gradient blow-up feature is essentially related to the following quantities: and τ i = k i k e k i + k e, τ e = 1 k e, τ = τ i τ e, β = r ln τ) 1 + k e 4, 4.1) ɛ C x = H) e 1 ), C y = H) e 2 ), 4.2) where e 1 = 1, ) and e 2 =, 1). Note that τ i = 1 2λ i, τ e = 1 2λ e and β >. 4.1 Series solution by the separation of variables In bipolar coordinates, harmonic functions admit the general solution expansion fξ, θ) = a + b ξ + c θ + n=1 [ ] a n e nξ + b n e nξ ) cos nθ + c n e nξ + d n e nξ ) sin nθ, where a n, b n, c n and d n are some constants. The linear functions x and y can be expanded as [ ] x = sgnξ)α ) n e n ξ cos nθ, y = 2α n=1 1) n e n ξ sin nθ. n=1 14
15 Lemma 4.1. We define A n e nξ iθ 2ξi) + B n e nξ iθ 2ξe)) for ξ < ξ e, with n=1 Ux) := C + A n e nξ iθ 2ξi) + B n e n ξ iθ)) for ξ e < ξ < ξ i, n=1 A n e n ξ iθ) + B n e n ξ iθ)) n=1 2α 1) n A n = τ 1 e 2nξ i ξ e) 1 2α 1) n B n = τ 1 e 2nξ i ξ e) 1 ) 1 τ 1 e e 2nξ i ξ e), 1 + τ 1 i e 2nξ i ξ e) ), for ξ > ξ i and C = n=1 A ne n 2ξ i iπ) + B n e inπ. Then, the functions x + R{Ux)} and y + I{Ux)} are the solutions to 1.1) for Hx) = x and Hx) = y, respectively. Proof. One can easily show that x+r{ux)} and y+i{ux)} satisfy the transmission condition in the equation 1.1) and demonstrate uniform convergence. We can prove the decay property in the same way as in Lemma 3.1 of [34]. Definition 1. The Lerch transcendent function is defined as We also define Lz; β) = ze β+1)t dt for z C, z < ) 1 + ze t P z; β) = z) z Lz; β) = ze β+1)t 1 + ze t ) 2 dt. Let us derive some properties on P for later use. By the integration by parts it follows that for all s >, P e s iθ ; β) = One can easily show that P e s+iθ ) = e βt e s t iθ 1 + e s t iθ ) 2 dt βt 1 + coshs + t) cos θ i sinhs + t) sin θ e 2coshs + t) + cos θ) 2 dt. 4.4) e βt 1 2coshs + t) + cos θ) dt 1 2βcosh s + cos θ). 4.5) For any s 2 > s 1 >, β > and θ π, the following holds: P e s2+iθ ; β) P e s1+iθ s 2 s 2 ; β) 2cosh s 1 + cos θ). 4.6) The following integral approximation for an infinite series sum is crucial to obtaining the gradient blow-up term of u. 15
16 Lemma 4.2 [34]). Let < a < a and < τ < 1. For arbitrary θ π, π], we have a τ m 1 e ma ) +a+iθ 1 + e ma+a+iθ ) 2 P e a a)+iθ ; ln τ ) a 4a cosha a) + cos θ. m=1 4.2 Integral expression of the singular term in bipolar coordinates We verify the asymptotic behavior of u in bipolar coordinates as follows. We will later express the gradient blow-up term of u in terms of the Cartesian coordinates in section 5. Theorem 4.3. Let u be the solution to 1.1). Then we have the following: a) The solution u admits that ux) = Hx) + C x r 2 R { q x; β, τ i, τ e )} + Cy r 2 I { q x; β, τ i, τ e )} + rx), x R 2, 4.7) where the singular function q is qx; β, τ i, τ e ) := 1 ) τ + τ i Le ξ iθ 2ξ i ; β) + ) τ + τ e Le ξ iθ 2ξ e ; β) in R 2 \ B e, ) τ + τ 2 i Le ξ iθ 2ξ i ; β) + ) τ + τ e Le ξ iθ ; β) in B e \ B i, ) τ + τ i Le ξ iθ ; β) + ) τ + τ e Le ξ iθ ; β) in B i, and rx) L R 2 ) < C for some constant C independent of ɛ. b) For any k i, k e, we have that u H) L R 2 \B e\b i C for some constant C independent of ɛ. The gradient blow-up occurs only when τ i, τ e are similar to 1 equivalently, )) < k e 1, k i ). For such a case, we have that in B e \ B i, u H)x) = C xr τ i + τ e + 2τ) 2 ɛ + C yr τ i + τ e + 2τ) 2 ɛ ) { } cosh ξ + cos θ R P e ξ iθ ; β) ê ξ ) { } cosh ξ + cos θ I P e ξ iθ ; β) ê ξ + O1), where O1) is uniformly bounded independently of ɛ and x. Proof. In view of Theorem 3.7, we may consider only the linear function for H. In other words, Hx) = H) 1, ))x + H), 1))y. Moreover, we can assume τ = τ i τ e > since the blow-up happens only in such a case. One can derive a series expansion for Ux) by differentiating the formula in Lemma
17 From the definition of P, we have q ξ = 1 τ + τ i )P e ξ iθ 2ξ i; β) τ + τ e )P e ξ iθ 2ξe ; β) in R 2 \ B e, τ + τ 2 i )P e ξ iθ 2ξ i; β) + τ + τ e )P e ξ iθ ; β) in B e \ B i, τ + τ i )P e ξ iθ ; β) + τ + τ e )P e ξ iθ ; β) in B i, q θ = i τ + τ i )P e ξ iθ 2ξ i; β) + τ + τ e )P e ξ iθ 2ξe ; β) in R 2 \ B e, τ + τ 2 i )P e ξ iθ 2ξ i; β) + τ + τ e )P e ξ iθ ; β) in B e \ B i, τ + τ i )P e ξ iθ ; β) + τ + τ e )P e ξ iθ ; β) in B i. Thanks to Lemma 4.2, one can show that Ux) = r 2 qx; β, τ i, τ e ) + O1), x R 2, 4.8) in a similar way as in the proof of [34, Lemma 5.1]. Since the functions x + R{Ux)} and y + I{Ux)} are, respectively, the solutions to 1.1) with Hx) = x and Hx) = y, we complete the proof of a). Now we prove b). From 4.8) it follows that u H)x) =C x r 2 R{ qx; β, τ i, τ e )} ê ξ )ê ξ + C x r 2 R{ qx; β, τ i, τ e )} ê θ )ê θ +C y r 2 I{ qx; β, τ i, τ e )} ê ξ )ê ξ + C y r 2 I{ qx; β, τ i, τ e )} ê θ )ê θ + O1). Using 2.1) and 4.6), we can show in a similar way as in [34, section 4.1] that q ê ξ = O1) + 1 τ i τ e )P e ξe iθ ; β) in R 2 \ B e, hξ, θ) τ 2 i + τ e + 2τ)P e ξ iθ ; β) in B e \ B i, τ e τ i )P e ξ iθ ; β) in B i, q ê θ = O1) + i 2 hξ, θ)τ e τ i )P e ξ iθ ; β) in R 2. By use of 4.5), we obtain that hξ, θ)p e ξ iθ ; β) 1 αβ Note that we have C ln τ. τ i τ e τ i τ e ln τ i ln τ e ln τ owing to τ > and τ i, τ e < 1. For τ i, τ e <, it follows that q C in R 2, so that the blow-up does not happen. For τ i, τ e >, we have that q ê ξ C in R 2 \ B e ) B i, q ê θ C in R 2. From 4.9) and the definition of h, α, we can derive the formula in b) and complete the proof. Figure 4.1 shows the graphs of the normal and tangential components of u on B e. As stated in Theorem 4.3b), only the normal component blows up as ɛ tends to zero. 4.9) 17
18 a) ɛ =.1, Hx) = x b) u H) ê ξ, ɛ =.1 c) u H) ê θ, ɛ =.1 d) ɛ =.1, Hx) = y e) u H) ê ξ, ɛ =.1 f) u H) ê θ, ɛ =.1 Figure 4.1: Electric field for the core-shell structure with r i = 1, r e = 2, k i = 1, and k e =.1, where ɛ =.1 or.1. The figures are contour plots of u H) the first column) and the graphs of u H) ê ξ and u H) ê θ on B e the second and third column, solid curve). Dashed curves are computed by using the singular term in Theorem 4.3a). The background potential is Hx) = x the first row) or Hx) = y the second row). 4.3 Optimal bounds Assume that k i = 1 and k e 1. Then, by using 4.4), one can easily deduce the upper and lower bounds for cosh ξ i + cos θ)p e ξi iθ ; β). Specifically, we have that cosh ξi + cos θ ) { } R P e ξi iθ ; β) C 1 for θ =, 4.1) cosh ξi + cos θ ) I { P e ξ i iθ ; β)} β + 1 C 1 β + 1)β + 3) for θ = π 2 with some positive constant C 1 independent of ɛ, β. Indeed, for θ = π 2 we have {P I e ξ i π 2 i ; β)} = e βt sinhξ i + t) 2 cosh 2 ξ i + t) dt = eβξ i e βt e t e t ξ i e t + e t ) 2 dt e βξ i e βt et e t ξ i 2e t ) 2 dt 1 e ξ i ) 4 β + 1 e 3ξi β + 3 C 1 β + 1)β + 3). 4.11) 18
19 Also, we can show that cosh ξ i + cos θ)p e ξi iθ ; β) C 2 β + 1 for some positive constant C 2 independent of ɛ, β, θ. Note that we have owing to β = 1 ɛβ + 1) 1 r k e + ɛ r 4 1 τ + O1 τ) 2 ) ) r k e. ɛ ɛ 4.12) In total, assuming k i = 1 and k e 1, the following holds with some positive constant C 1, C 2 independent of k e, k i, ɛ: If C x and C y =, then we have C 1 C x ɛ k e + If C x =, C y and r ke ɛ then we have C 1 C x u H) L B e\b i ) C 2 r k e + ɛ. r < C for some constant C independent of ɛ i.e., β is bounded), C y ɛ k e + 5 Image line charge formula C y u H) L B e\b i ) C 2 r k e + We obtained an asymptotic formula for the electric field in bipolar coordinates in the previous section, where the singular term is a linear combination of the Lerch transcendent functions. In this section, we rewrite the formula in terms of the Cartesian coordinates. It turns out that the singular term is actually the single and double layer potentials with line charges on the x-axis. Also, we derive an asymptotic formula for the case of two separated disks. As well as the core-shell geometry, the singular term for two separated disks can be expressed as the single and double layer potentials with line charges on the x-axis. 5.1 Line charge formula of the Lerch transcendent function We first express each component of the singular function q, that is, a linear combination of the Lerch transcendent function, in the Cartesian coordinates. Before stating the formulas, let us define some notations. Here and after, we denote by [x 1, x 2 ] the line segment connecting the two points x 1, x 2. We also write fs, ) = fs) for a function f defined on R. Lemma 5.1. Assume ξ. We denote by c = c, ) and r the center and radius of the level curve {ξ = ξ } for ξ. We denote by c = +, ) and r = for ξ =. We set the charge distribution functions as ϕ + s) = 2αβe 2βξ s α)β 1 s + α) β+1, ψ +s) = e 2βξ ϕ s) = 2αβe 2βξ s + α)β 1 s α) β+1, ψ s) = e 2βξ ɛ. r ) s α β for α < s < c, s + α ) s + α β for c < s < α. s α 19
20 Then, the following holds: a) For ξ < 2ξ, we have Le ξ+iθ 2ξ ; β) = [p 2, c ] x s, e 2 ln x s ϕ + s) dσs) + r + x) i [p 2, c ] x s 2 ψ + s) dσs), where the remainder term satisfies that r + x) 1 r for all x if ξ. b) For ξ > 2ξ, we have Le ξ iθ 2ξ ; β) = [ c, p 1 ] x s, e 2 ln x s ϕ s) dσs)+r x) i [ c, p 1 ] x s 2 ψ s) dσs), where the remainder term satisfies that r x) 1 r for all x if ξ. Proof. By integration by parts we have Lz; β) = ze t e βt 1 + ze dt t = ln1 + z) + β ln1 + ze t )e βt dt ) 1 + ze t = β ln e βt dt. 1 + z Here, we used the fact that β > to evaluate the integrand at t =. Owing to Lz; β) = Lz; β), it follows that R {Lz; β)} = 1 2 Lz; β) + Lz; β)) = β ln 1 + ze t 1 + z e βt dt. The imaginary part of Lz; β) becomes I { Lz; β) } = 1 Lz; β) Lz; β)) 2i = 1 ze β+1)t 2i 1 + ze 1 + ze = 1 2i ze β+1)t dt t t z z)e β+1)t 1 + ze t 2 dt = I{z}e β+1)t 1 + ze t 2 dt. 5.1) To prove a), we now assume ξ < 2ξ and set z = e ξ+iθ 2ξ. We first consider R {Lz; β)}. Note that z 1. We compute 1 + ze t = 1 + e ξ+iθ e 2ξ +t) ) = 1 e 2ξ+t) )1 + e ξ+iθ ) 1 e 2ξ+t) eξ+iθ 1 e 2ξ +t) = 1 e 2ξ+t) ) ) α zξ, θ) = 1 e 2ξ +t) α zξ, θ) 2α α zξ, θ) 2α zξ, θ) + α 1 + e 2ξ +t) 1 e 2ξ +t) ) + e 2ξ +t) 1 e 2ξ +t) ). 5.2) 2
21 For ease of estimation, we set In other words, From 5.2) it follows that st) = α 1 + e 2ξ +t) 1 e 2ξ +t). e t = e 2ξ st) α st) + α. 1 + ze t = 1 e 2ξ +t) zξ, θ) + st)). α zξ, θ) It is immediately clear that st) is the center of circle {ξ = ξ + t 2 } owing to 2.11). In particular, s) = c. Hence we have { } R Le ξ+iθ 2ξ ; β) = β ln 1 + ze t 1 + ze e βt dt 1 e 2ξ+t) ) zξ, θ) st)) = β ln 1 e 2ξ ) zξ, θ) s)) e βt dt = β Due to the fact that ln zξ, θ) st) e βt dt β ds = we have { } R Le ξ+iθ 2ξ ; β) = β with One can easily see that ln zξ, θ) s) e βt dt + L e 2ξ ; β). 2αe 2ξ +t) ) 1 e 2ξ +t) 2 dt = 1 s + α)s α)dt, 2α = 2αβe 2βξ ln zξ, θ) st) e βt dt ln zξ, θ) c + L e 2ξ ; β) c α ln zξ, θ) s s α)β 1 s + α) β+1 ds + r +zξ, θ)) r + zξ, θ)) = ln zξ, θ) c + L e 2ξ ; β). rzξ, θ)) 1 r for all ξ < 2ξ. We now consider I {Lz; β)}. Note that I { e ξ+iθ} { } α + zξ, θ) = I α zξ, θ) { } α + zξ, θ))α zξ, θ)) = I α zξ, θ) 2 2α = α zξ, θ) 2 I{ zξ, θ) }. 21
22 Using 5.1) and 5.2), we have { } I Le ξ+iθ 2ξ ; β) = = = e 2βξ I{e ξ+iθ 2ξ }e β+1)t 1 + e ξ+iθ 2ξ t 2 dt I { zξ, θ) } e βt zξ, θ) st) 2αe 2ξ+t) 2 ) 1 e 2ξ +t) 2 dt c α I { zξ, θ) } zξ, θ) s 2 ) s α β ds. s + α Note that I { zξ, θ) } = x s, e 2. Hence we complete the proof of a). We can prove b) in a similar way, where the remainder term is r x) = ln zξ, θ) + c + L e 2ξ ; β). 5.2 Asymptotic formula for the core-shell geometry We now express the singular part of u in terms of the single and double layer potential with image line charges on the x-axis. Theorem 5.2. Let u be the solution to 1.1) corresponding to an entire harmonic function H. For any < k i, k e 1 <, we have that u H) L R 2 \B e\b i C for some constant C )) independent of ɛ. The gradient blow-up for u may occur only when τ i, τ e are similar to 1 that is, equivalently, < k e 1, k i ). For k i, k e such that < k e < 1 and k e < k i, we have that in B e \ B i, [ ux) = Hx) + C xr 2 ] ln x s ϕ 1 s) dσs) ln x s ϕ 2 s) dσs) 2,), p 1 ] [p 2, c i ] [ + C yr 2 ] x s, e 2 2 x s 2 ψ x s, e 2 1s) dσs) x s 2 ψ 2s) dσs) + rx),,), p 1 ] where the charge distributions are [p 2, c i ] s + α)β 1 ϕ 1 s) = τ + τ e ) 2αβ s α) β+1 χ, α]s), ) s + α β ψ 1 s) = τ + τ e ) χ s α, α]s), ϕ 2 s) = τ + τ i ) 2αβe 2βξ s α)β 1 i s + α) β+1 χ [α, c i ]s), ) ψ 2 s) = τ + τ i ) e 2βξ i s α β χ s + α [α, ci]s), and rx) is uniformly bounded independently of ɛ and x. Proof. Applying Lemma 5.1 to Theorem 4.3 a) we prove the theorem. 22
23 Figure 5.1: Bold intervals indicate the support of line charges for the core-shell structure. a) k i = 1, k e =.3, ɛ =.1 β = , τ =.8869) b) k i = 1, k e =.158, ɛ =.1 β = 1, τ =.9387) c) k i = 1, k e =.1, ɛ =.1 β =.6325, τ =.968) Figure 5.2: Image line charges for the core-shell structure with r i = 1, r e = 2, k i = 1, ɛ =.1 and various k e -values. The left column shows 1 2 ϕ 1 ϕ 2 ), and the right column shows 1 2 ψ 1 ψ 2 ) in Theorem 5.2. As k e decreases, β approaches to. The density 1 2 ϕ 1 ϕ 2 ) is bounded if β 1, but diverges to near p 1 and p 2 if β < 1. 23
24 a) k i = 1, k e =.3, ɛ =.1 β =.62, τ =.8869) b) k i = 1, k e =.3, ɛ =.36 β = 1, τ =.8869) c) k i = 1, k e =.3, ɛ =.1 β = , τ =.8869) Figure 5.3: Image line charges for the core-shell structure with r i = 1, r e = 2, k i = 1, k e =.3 and various ɛ-values. The left column shows 1 2 ϕ 1 ϕ 2 ), and the right column shows 1 2 ψ 1 ψ 2 ) in Theorem 5.2. The support of line charges for the core-shell structure are drawn in Figure 5.1. As ɛ decreases, β increases so that 1 2 ϕ 1 ϕ 2 ) becomes bounded. 24
25 Figure 5.1 shows the support of the density functions in Theorem 5.2. One can easily see that ψ js) s = ϕ j s) for j = 1, 2 and from 2.11), ϕ 1 s) ds = τ + τ e, ϕ 2 s) ds = τ + τ i. The density functions show a different feature depending on β. The functions ϕ 1 and ϕ 2 are bounded if β 1, but they diverge to ± near p 1 or p 2 if β < 1. See Figure 5.2 and Figure 5.3. Remark 1. When β = equivalently τ i = τ e = 1), which is the limiting case of ln τ ɛ, we have that Le ξ+iθ 2ξ x s, e 2 ; ) = ln x p 2 + r + x) i [p 2, c ] x s 2 ds, ξ < 2ξ, Le ξ iθ 2ξ x s, e 2 ; ) = ln x p 1 + r x) + i x s 2 ds, ξ > 2ξ, [ c, p 1 ] where r + x) and r x) are bounded independently of ɛ, x. Hence, the singular term of u in 4.7) satisfies C x r R 2 { q x;, 1, 1 )} + C y r I 2 { q x;, 1, 1 )} = C x r 2 ln x p 1 x p 2 + C yr 2 [p 2, c ] [ c, p 1 ] where rx) are bounded independently of ɛ, x. x s, e 2 x s 2 ds + rx), x B e \ B i, 5.3) Recall that we denote by x i = x i, ) and x e = x e, ) the closest points on B i and B e between B i and B e, respectively. The gradient of the function in 5.3) blows up at x e as ɛ tends zero, since the distance between p 1 and p 2 is O ɛ). However, the solution to the following problem does not blow up: u = in R 2 \ B e, u ν = on B e, u x) Hx) = O x 1 ) as x. These facts imply that ux e ) for the solution u to 1.1) does not converge to u x e ) when k e and ɛ, satisfying that k i is fixed and ln τ ɛ. See [34, section 5.3] for a non-convergence result for u in the case of separated disks. 5.3 Asymptotic formula for the case of two separated disks We now consider the gradient blow-up feature for the solution u to 1.1) in the presence of two separated disks, say B 1 and B 2. In other words, the conductivity profile is given by 5.4) σ = k 1 χb 1 ) + k 2 χb 2 ) + χ R 2 \ B 1 B 2 ) ). 5.5) As before we assume that < k i, k e 1 <. For two separated disks with arbitrary conductivities, the asymptotic formula for the potential function in bipolar coordinates was derived in 25
26 [34]. In this section, we express the singular term by the single and double layer potential with line charges. We set B j to be the disk centered at c j, ) with radius r j, j = 1, 2. We denote by ɛ the distance between B 1 and B 2 ; see Figure 5.4 for the geometry of the two separated disks. We set R j to be the reflection with respect to B j, j = 1, 2. We can assume that, by appropriate shifting and rotation, the fixed points of the combined reflection R 1 R 2 are p 1 = α, ), p 2 = α, ) with ɛ2r1 + ɛ)2r 2 + ɛ)2r 1 + 2r 2 + ɛ) α =. 2r 1 + r 2 + ɛ) As for the core-shell geometry, we denote by ξ, θ) the bipolar coordinates defined with respect to the poles p 1 and p 2. We now set 2r1 r 2 r = r 1 + r 2 and τ 1 = k 1 1 k 1 + 1, τ 2 = k 2 1 k 2 + 1, τ = τ 1τ 2, β = r ln τ) 4. ɛ Lemma 5.3 [34]). Let u be the solution to 1.1) with σ given by 5.5). Then u satisfies that where ux) = Hx) + C x r 2 R { q x; β, τ i, τ e )} + Cy r 2 I { q x; β, τ i, τ e )} + rx), x R 2, 5.6) qx; β, τ 1, τ 2 ) := 1 τ + τ 1 )Le ξ+iθ) 2ξ 1 ; β) τ + τ 2 )Le ξ+iθ) 2ξ 2 ; β) in R 2 \ B 1 B 2 ), τ + τ 2 1 )Le ξ iθ ; β) τ + τ 2 )Le ξ+iθ) 2ξ 2 ; β) in B 1, τ + τ 1 )Le ξ+iθ) 2ξ 1 ; β) τ + τ 2 )Le ξ+iθ ; β) in B 2, and rx) L R 2 ) < C for some constant C independent of ɛ. Using the line charge formula of the Lerch transcendent function in section 5.1, one can easily show the following. Theorem 5.4. Let u be the solution to 1.1) with σ as given by 5.5). The gradient blow-up for u may occur only when τ is similar to 1 equivalently, k 1, k 2 1 or < k 1, k 1 1). Moreover, u satisfies the following integral formulas in R 2 \ B 1 B 2 ): a) For 1 < k 1, k 2 <, we have [ ux) = Hx) + C xr 2 ln x s ϕ 1 s) dσs) 2 [c 1,p 1 ] where the charge distributions are ϕ 1 s) = τ + τ 1 )2αβe 2βξ 1 ϕ 2 s) = τ + τ 2 )2αβe 2βξ 2 [p 2,c 2 ] s + α)β 1 s α) β+1 χ [c 1, α]s), s α)β 1 s + α) β+1 χ [α, c 2 ]s), and rx) L R 2 ) < C for some constant C independent of ɛ. 26 ln x s ϕ 2 s) dσs) ] + rx),
27 b) For < k 1, k 2 < 1, we have [ ux) = Hx) + C yr 2 2 [c 1,p 1 ] ] x s, ê y x s 2 ψ x s, ê y 1s) dσs) + [p 2,c 2 ] x s 2 ψ 2s) dσs) + rx), where the charge distributions are ) ψ 1 s) = τ + τ 1 )e 2βξ 1 s + α β χ s α [c1, α]s), ) ψ 2 s) = τ + τ 2 )e 2βξ 2 s α β χ s + α [α, c2]s), and rx) L R 2 ) < C for some constant C independent of ɛ. One can derive a similar line charge formula for u in B 1 B 2 by use of the line charge formula of the Lerch transcendent function in section Conclusion We have analyzed the gradient blow-up of the solution to the conductivity problem in the presence of an inclusion with core-shell geometry. We showed that the gradient blow-up happens only when the conductivities of the core and shell satisfy the conditions k e < 1 and k e < k i. We then derived an asymptotic formula for the potential function in terms of the bipolar coordinates. We finally expressed the asymptotic formula in terms of the single and double layer potentials with line charges. It will be of interest to generalize the result to core-shell geometry with arbitrary shapes, or to the elasticity problem. References [1] Habib Ammari, Giulio Ciraolo, Hyeonbae Kang, Hyundae Lee, and Graeme W Milton. Spectral theory of a Neumann Poincaré-type operator and analysis of cloaking due to anomalous localized resonance. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 282): , 213. [2] Habib Ammari, Giulio Ciraolo, Hyeonbae Kang, Hyundae Lee, and Kihyun Yun. Spectral analysis of the Neumann Poincaré operator and characterization of the stress concentration in anti-plane elasticity. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 281):275 34, 213. [3] Habib Ammari, George Dassios, Hyeonbae Kang, and Mikyoung Lim. Estimates for the electric field in the presence of adjacent perfectly conducting spheres. Quarterly of applied mathematics, 652): , 27. [4] Habib Ammari, Josselin Garnier, Wenjia Jing, Hyeonbae Kang, Mikyoung Lim, Knut Sølna, and Han Wang. Mathematical and statistical methods for multistatic imaging Vol. 298) Springer, 213. [5] Habib Ammari and Hyeonbae Kang. Reconstruction of small inhomogeneities from boundary measurements. Springer,
28 Figure 5.4: Geometry of two separated disks. Bold intervals indicate the support of line charges for the core-shell structure. a) k 1 = 1, k 2 = 15 left) and k 1 = 1/1, k 2 = 1/15 right). ɛ =.5 β = , τ =.7159) b) k 1 = , k 2 = left) and k 1 = 1/ , k 2 = 1/ right). ɛ =.5 β = 1, τ =.857) c) k 1 = 2, k 2 = 3 left) and k 1 = 1/2, k 2 = 1/3 right). ɛ =.5 β =.772, τ =.8464) Figure 5.5: Image line charges for the two separated disks with r 1 = 1.5, r 2 = 2, ɛ =.5 and various k 1, k 2 -values. The left column shows 1 2 ϕ 1 ϕ 2 ), and the right column shows 1 2 ψ 1 ψ 2 ) in Theorem
29 a) ɛ =.1 β =.5459, τ =.8464) b) ɛ =.3 β = 1, τ =.8464) c) ɛ =.1 β = , τ =.8464) Figure 5.6: Image line charges for the two separated disks with r 1 = 1.5, r 2 = 2 and various ɛ-values, where k 1 = 2, k 2 = 3 left column) and k 1 = 1/2, k 2 = 1/3 right column). The left column shows 1 2 ϕ 1 ϕ 2 ), and the right column shows 1 2 ψ 1 ψ 2 ) in Theorem 5.4. The support of line charges for the core-shell structure are drawn in Figure 5.4. As ɛ decreases, β increases so that 1 2 ϕ 1 ϕ 2 ) becomes bounded. 29
30 [6] Habib Ammari and Hyeonbae Kang. Polarization and Moment Tensors: With Applications to Inverse Problems and Effective Medium Theory, volume 162. Springer Science & Business Media, 27. [7] Habib Ammari, Hyeonbae Kang, Hyundae Lee, Jungwook Lee, and Mikyoung Lim. Optimal estimates for the electric field in two dimensions. Journal de mathématiques pures et appliquées, 884):37 324, 27. [8] Habib Ammari, Hyeonbae Kang, Hyundae Lee, Mikyoung Lim, and Habib Zribi. Decomposition theorems and fine estimates for electrical fields in the presence of closely located circular inclusions. Journal of Differential Equations, 24711): , 29. [9] Habib Ammari, Hyeonbae Kang, and Mikyoung Lim. Gradient estimates for solutions to the conductivity problem. Mathematische Annalen, 3322): , 25. [1] I. Babu ska, B. Andersson, P. Smith and K. Levin, Damage analysis of fiber composites. I. Statistical analysis on fiber scale, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg ), [11] G. K. Batchelor and R. W. O Brien, Thermal or Electrical Conduction Through a Granular Material, Proc. Roy. Soc. A ), [12] B. Budiansky and G. F. Carrier, High shear stresses in stiff fiber composites, Jour. Appl. Mech ), [13] Ellen Shiting Bao, Yan Yan Li, and Biao Yin. Gradient estimates for the perfect conductivity problem. Archive for rational mechanics and analysis, 1931): , 29. [14] Ellen Shiting Bao, Yan Yan Li, and Biao Yin. Gradient estimates for the perfect and insulated conductivity problems with multiple inclusions. Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 3511): , 21. [15] JiGuang Bao, Hongjie Ju, and Haigang Li. Optimal boundary gradient estimates for Lamé systems with partially infinite coefficients. Advances in Mathematics, 314: , 217. [16] JiGuang Bao, HaiGang Li, and YanYan Li. Gradient estimates for solutions of the Lamé system with partially infinite coefficients. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 2151):37 351, 215. [17] JiGuang Bao, HaiGang Li, and YanYan Li. Gradient estimates for solutions of the Lamé system with partially infinite coefficients in dimensions greater than two. Advances in Mathematics, 35: , 217. [18] Eric Bonnetier and Faouzi Triki. Pointwise bounds on the gradient and the spectrum of the neumann poincaré operator: the case of 2 discs. Contemp. Math, 577:81 92, 212. [19] Milford Harold Davis. Two charged spherical conductors in a uniform electric field: Forces and field strength. The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, 174): , [2] GB Jeffery. On a form of the solution of Laplace s equation suitable for problems relating to two spheres. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 87593):19 12,
31 [21] Hyeonbae Kang, Hyundae Lee, and KiHyun Yun. Optimal estimates and asymptotics for the stress concentration between closely located stiff inclusions. Mathematische Annalen, ): , 215. [22] Hyeonbae Kang, Mikyoung Lim, and KiHyun Yun. Asymptotics and computation of the solution to the conductivity equation in the presence of adjacent inclusions with extreme conductivities. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 992): , 213. [23] Hyeonbae Kang, Mikyoung Lim, and KiHyun Yun. Characterization of the electric field concentration between two adjacent spherical perfect conductors. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 741): , 214. [24] Hyeonbae Kang and Sanghyeon Yu. Quantitative characterization of stress concentration in the presence of closely spaced hard inclusions in two-dimensional linear elasticity. arxiv preprint arxiv: , 217. [25] Hyeonbae Kang and KiHyun Yun. Optimal estimates of the field enhancement in presence of a bow-tie structure of perfectly conducting inclusions in two dimensions. arxiv preprint arxiv:177.98, 217. [26] Joseph B Keller. Conductivity of a medium containing a dense array of perfectly conducting spheres or cylinders or nonconducting cylinders. Journal of Applied Physics, 344): , [27] Oliver Dimon Kellogg. Foundations of potential theory, volume 31. Springer Science & Business Media, 212. [28] J. B. Lassiter, J. Aizpurua, L. I. Hernandez, D. W. Brandl, I. Romero, S. Lal, J. H. Hafner, P. Nordlander and N. J. Halas. Close encounters between two nanoshells. Nano letters, 84): , 28. [29] John Lekner. Near approach of two conducting spheres: enhancement of external electric field. Journal of Electrostatics, 696): , 211. [3] Haigang Li and Longjuan Xu. Optimal estimates for the perfect conductivity problem with inclusions close to the boundary. arxiv preprint arxiv: , 217. [31] Yan Yan Li and Michael Vogelius. Gradient estimates for solutions to divergence form elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 1532):91 151, 2. [32] Yanyan Li and Louis Nirenberg. Estimates for elliptic systems from composite material. Communications on pure and applied mathematics, 567): , 23. [33] Mikyoung Lim and Sanghyeon Yu. Asymptotic analysis for superfocusing of the electric field in between two nearly touching metallic spheres. arxiv preprint arxiv: , 214. [34] Mikyoung Lim and Sanghyeon Yu. Asymptotics of the solution to the conductivity equation in the presence of adjacent circular inclusions with finite conductivities. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 4211): ,
Pointwise bounds on the gradient and the spectrum of the Neumann-Poincaré operator: The case of 2 discs
Pointwise bounds on the gradient and the spectrum of the Neumann-Poincaré operator: The case of discs Eric Bonnetier and Faouzi Triki Abstract. We compute the spectrum of the Neumann-Poincaré operator
More informationAnalysis of the anomalous localized resonance
Hyundae Lee(Inha University, Korea) Joint work with Habib Ammari, Giulio Ciraolo, Hyeonbae Kang, Graeme Milton. UCI, June 22, 2012 A conference on inverse problems in honor of Gunther Uhlmann Outline Introduction
More informationLECTURE 5 APPLICATIONS OF BDIE METHOD: ACOUSTIC SCATTERING BY INHOMOGENEOUS ANISOTROPIC OBSTACLES DAVID NATROSHVILI
LECTURE 5 APPLICATIONS OF BDIE METHOD: ACOUSTIC SCATTERING BY INHOMOGENEOUS ANISOTROPIC OBSTACLES DAVID NATROSHVILI Georgian Technical University Tbilisi, GEORGIA 0-0 1. Formulation of the corresponding
More informationDetermination of thin elastic inclusions from boundary measurements.
Determination of thin elastic inclusions from boundary measurements. Elena Beretta in collaboration with E. Francini, S. Vessella, E. Kim and J. Lee September 7, 2010 E. Beretta (Università di Roma La
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.ap] 9 Sep 2014
Localized and complete resonance in plasmonic structures Hoai-Minh Nguyen and Loc Hoang Nguyen April 23, 2018 arxiv:1310.3633v2 [math.ap] 9 Sep 2014 Abstract This paper studies a possible connection between
More informationMikyoung LIM(KAIST) Optimization algorithm for the reconstruction of a conductivity in
Optimization algorithm for the reconstruction of a conductivity inclusion Mikyoung LIM (KAIST) Inclusion Ω in R d For a given entire harmonic function H, consider { (χ(r d \ Ω) + kχ(ω)) u = in R d, u(x)
More informationSummer course: Plasmonic resonances
Summer course: Plasmonic resonances Faouzi TRIKI Grenoble-Alpes University, France Journées d été des mathématiciens tunisiens à l étranger Mediterranean Institute For The Mathematical Sciences July 20,
More informationarxiv: v4 [math.sp] 11 Jan 2015
Analysis of plasmon resonance on smooth domains using spectral properties of the Neumann-Poincaré operator Kazunori Ando Hyeonbae Kang arxiv:42.6250v4 [math.sp] Jan 205 January 24, 208 Abstract We investigate
More informationMATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA
MATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA For ω, consider an integral of the form I(ω) = e iωf(x) u(x) dx, where u Cc (R n ) complex valued, with support in a compact set K, and f C (R n ) real valued. Thus, I(ω)
More informationMath 185 Fall 2015, Sample Final Exam Solutions
Math 185 Fall 2015, Sample Final Exam Solutions Nikhil Srivastava December 12, 2015 1. True or false: (a) If f is analytic in the annulus A = {z : 1 < z < 2} then there exist functions g and h such that
More informationu xx + u yy = 0. (5.1)
Chapter 5 Laplace Equation The following equation is called Laplace equation in two independent variables x, y: The non-homogeneous problem u xx + u yy =. (5.1) u xx + u yy = F, (5.) where F is a function
More informationThe purpose of this lecture is to present a few applications of conformal mappings in problems which arise in physics and engineering.
Lecture 16 Applications of Conformal Mapping MATH-GA 451.001 Complex Variables The purpose of this lecture is to present a few applications of conformal mappings in problems which arise in physics and
More information3 2 6 Solve the initial value problem u ( t) 3. a- If A has eigenvalues λ =, λ = 1 and corresponding eigenvectors 1
Math Problem a- If A has eigenvalues λ =, λ = 1 and corresponding eigenvectors 1 3 6 Solve the initial value problem u ( t) = Au( t) with u (0) =. 3 1 u 1 =, u 1 3 = b- True or false and why 1. if A is
More informationMATH 131P: PRACTICE FINAL SOLUTIONS DECEMBER 12, 2012
MATH 3P: PRACTICE FINAL SOLUTIONS DECEMBER, This is a closed ook, closed notes, no calculators/computers exam. There are 6 prolems. Write your solutions to Prolems -3 in lue ook #, and your solutions to
More informationPartial Differential Equations
Part II Partial Differential Equations Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2015 Paper 4, Section II 29E Partial Differential Equations 72 (a) Show that the Cauchy problem for u(x,
More informationAsymptotic Spectral Imaging
Rennes p. /4 Asymptotic Spectral Imaging Habib Ammari CNRS & Ecole Polytechnique Rennes p. 2/4 Motivation Image internal defects from eigenvalue and eigenvector boundary measurements (or spectral measurements).
More informationSecond Midterm Exam Name: Practice Problems March 10, 2015
Math 160 1. Treibergs Second Midterm Exam Name: Practice Problems March 10, 015 1. Determine the singular points of the function and state why the function is analytic everywhere else: z 1 fz) = z + 1)z
More informationTaylor and Laurent Series
Chapter 4 Taylor and Laurent Series 4.. Taylor Series 4... Taylor Series for Holomorphic Functions. In Real Analysis, the Taylor series of a given function f : R R is given by: f (x + f (x (x x + f (x
More information2 A Model, Harmonic Map, Problem
ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS JOHN E. HUTCHINSON Department of Mathematics School of Mathematical Sciences, A.N.U. 1 Introduction Elliptic equations model the behaviour of scalar quantities u, such as temperature or
More informationConsidering our result for the sum and product of analytic functions, this means that for (a 0, a 1,..., a N ) C N+1, the polynomial.
Lecture 3 Usual complex functions MATH-GA 245.00 Complex Variables Polynomials. Construction f : z z is analytic on all of C since its real and imaginary parts satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann relations and
More informationAero III/IV Conformal Mapping
Aero III/IV Conformal Mapping View complex function as a mapping Unlike a real function, a complex function w = f(z) cannot be represented by a curve. Instead it is useful to view it as a mapping. Write
More informationMAT389 Fall 2016, Problem Set 11
MAT389 Fall 216, Problem Set 11 Improper integrals 11.1 In each of the following cases, establish the convergence of the given integral and calculate its value. i) x 2 x 2 + 1) 2 ii) x x 2 + 1)x 2 + 2x
More information1 Discussion on multi-valued functions
Week 3 notes, Math 7651 1 Discussion on multi-valued functions Log function : Note that if z is written in its polar representation: z = r e iθ, where r = z and θ = arg z, then log z log r + i θ + 2inπ
More informationIn this chapter we study elliptical PDEs. That is, PDEs of the form. 2 u = lots,
Chapter 8 Elliptic PDEs In this chapter we study elliptical PDEs. That is, PDEs of the form 2 u = lots, where lots means lower-order terms (u x, u y,..., u, f). Here are some ways to think about the physical
More informationMATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Spring 2018 Professor: Jared Speck
MATH 8.52 COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # 6 8.52 Introduction to PDEs, Spring 208 Professor: Jared Speck Class Meeting # 6: Laplace s and Poisson s Equations We will now study the Laplace and Poisson equations
More informationPART IV Spectral Methods
PART IV Spectral Methods Additional References: R. Peyret, Spectral methods for incompressible viscous flow, Springer (2002), B. Mercier, An introduction to the numerical analysis of spectral methods,
More informationRECONSTRUCTION OF SMALL INTERFACE CHANGES OF AN INCLUSION FROM MODAL MEASUREMENTS II: THE ELASTIC CASE
RECONSTRUCTION OF SMALL INTERFACE CHANGES OF AN INCLUSION FROM MODAL MEASUREMENTS II: THE ELASTIC CASE HABIB AMMARI, ELENA BERETTA, ELISA FRANCINI, HYEONBAE KANG, AND MIKYOUNG LIM Abstract. In order to
More informationWeek 2 Notes, Math 865, Tanveer
Week 2 Notes, Math 865, Tanveer 1. Incompressible constant density equations in different forms Recall we derived the Navier-Stokes equation for incompressible constant density, i.e. homogeneous flows:
More informationScattering of electromagnetic waves by thin high contrast dielectrics II: asymptotics of the electric field and a method for inversion.
Scattering of electromagnetic waves by thin high contrast dielectrics II: asymptotics of the electric field and a method for inversion. David M. Ambrose Jay Gopalakrishnan Shari Moskow Scott Rome June
More informationMTH4101 CALCULUS II REVISION NOTES. 1. COMPLEX NUMBERS (Thomas Appendix 7 + lecture notes) ax 2 + bx + c = 0. x = b ± b 2 4ac 2a. i = 1.
MTH4101 CALCULUS II REVISION NOTES 1. COMPLEX NUMBERS (Thomas Appendix 7 + lecture notes) 1.1 Introduction Types of numbers (natural, integers, rationals, reals) The need to solve quadratic equations:
More information(x 1, y 1 ) = (x 2, y 2 ) if and only if x 1 = x 2 and y 1 = y 2.
1. Complex numbers A complex number z is defined as an ordered pair z = (x, y), where x and y are a pair of real numbers. In usual notation, we write z = x + iy, where i is a symbol. The operations of
More informationMATH 452. SAMPLE 3 SOLUTIONS May 3, (10 pts) Let f(x + iy) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) be an analytic function. Show that u(x, y) is harmonic.
MATH 45 SAMPLE 3 SOLUTIONS May 3, 06. (0 pts) Let f(x + iy) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) be an analytic function. Show that u(x, y) is harmonic. Because f is holomorphic, u and v satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations:
More informationMathematical Tripos Part IA Lent Term Example Sheet 1. Calculate its tangent vector dr/du at each point and hence find its total length.
Mathematical Tripos Part IA Lent Term 205 ector Calculus Prof B C Allanach Example Sheet Sketch the curve in the plane given parametrically by r(u) = ( x(u), y(u) ) = ( a cos 3 u, a sin 3 u ) with 0 u
More informationCoupled second order singular perturbations for phase transitions
Coupled second order singular perturbations for phase transitions CMU 06/09/11 Ana Cristina Barroso, Margarida Baía, Milena Chermisi, JM Introduction Let Ω R d with Lipschitz boundary ( container ) and
More informationMath 417 Midterm Exam Solutions Friday, July 9, 2010
Math 417 Midterm Exam Solutions Friday, July 9, 010 Solve any 4 of Problems 1 6 and 1 of Problems 7 8. Write your solutions in the booklet provided. If you attempt more than 5 problems, you must clearly
More informationMATH 220: MIDTERM OCTOBER 29, 2015
MATH 22: MIDTERM OCTOBER 29, 25 This is a closed book, closed notes, no electronic devices exam. There are 5 problems. Solve Problems -3 and one of Problems 4 and 5. Write your solutions to problems and
More informationAn eigenvalue method using multiple frequency data for inverse scattering problems
An eigenvalue method using multiple frequency data for inverse scattering problems Jiguang Sun Abstract Dirichlet and transmission eigenvalues have important applications in qualitative methods in inverse
More informationMATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Fall 2011 Professor: Jared Speck
MATH 8.52 COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # 6 8.52 Introduction to PDEs, Fall 20 Professor: Jared Speck Class Meeting # 6: Laplace s and Poisson s Equations We will now study the Laplace and Poisson equations
More informationPointwise bounds on the gradients in composite materials
Pointwise bounds on the gradients in composite materials E. Bonnetier, Université de Grenoble-Alpes Eric.Bonnetier@imag.fr Outline: 1. Introduction/motivation 2. Pointwise bounds on the gradients in composite
More information6.3 Fundamental solutions in d
6.3. Fundamental solutions in d 5 6.3 Fundamental solutions in d Since Lapalce equation is invariant under translations, and rotations (see Exercise 6.4), we look for solutions to Laplace equation having
More informationNumerical Solutions to Partial Differential Equations
Numerical Solutions to Partial Differential Equations Zhiping Li LMAM and School of Mathematical Sciences Peking University Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations Finite Difference Methods
More informationSEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS WITH DEPENDENCE ON THE GRADIENT
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2012 (2012), No. 139, pp. 1 9. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu SEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC
More informationComplex Analysis MATH 6300 Fall 2013 Homework 4
Complex Analysis MATH 6300 Fall 2013 Homework 4 Due Wednesday, December 11 at 5 PM Note that to get full credit on any problem in this class, you must solve the problems in an efficient and elegant manner,
More informationPreliminary Exam 2018 Solutions to Morning Exam
Preliminary Exam 28 Solutions to Morning Exam Part I. Solve four of the following five problems. Problem. Consider the series n 2 (n log n) and n 2 (n(log n)2 ). Show that one converges and one diverges
More informationExercises involving contour integrals and trig integrals
8::9::9:7 c M K Warby MA364 Complex variable methods applications Exercises involving contour integrals trig integrals Let = = { e it : π t π }, { e it π : t 3π } with the direction of both arcs corresponding
More informationASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE FOR SOLUTIONS OF THE NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS. Tian Ma. Shouhong Wang
DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS Website: http://aimsciences.org DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS Volume 11, Number 1, July 004 pp. 189 04 ASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE FOR SOLUTIONS OF THE NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS Tian Ma Department of
More informationFinal Exam - MATH 630: Solutions
Final Exam - MATH 630: Solutions Problem. Find all x R satisfying e xeix e ix. Solution. Comparing the moduli of both parts, we obtain e x cos x, and therefore, x cos x 0, which is possible only if x 0
More informationThe Factorization Method for Inverse Scattering Problems Part I
The Factorization Method for Inverse Scattering Problems Part I Andreas Kirsch Madrid 2011 Department of Mathematics KIT University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and National Large-scale Research Center
More informationLecture Notes on PDEs
Lecture Notes on PDEs Alberto Bressan February 26, 2012 1 Elliptic equations Let IR n be a bounded open set Given measurable functions a ij, b i, c : IR, consider the linear, second order differential
More informationSolutions to Complex Analysis Prelims Ben Strasser
Solutions to Complex Analysis Prelims Ben Strasser In preparation for the complex analysis prelim, I typed up solutions to some old exams. This document includes complete solutions to both exams in 23,
More informationSynopsis of Complex Analysis. Ryan D. Reece
Synopsis of Complex Analysis Ryan D. Reece December 7, 2006 Chapter Complex Numbers. The Parts of a Complex Number A complex number, z, is an ordered pair of real numbers similar to the points in the real
More informationConformal maps. Lent 2019 COMPLEX METHODS G. Taylor. A star means optional and not necessarily harder.
Lent 29 COMPLEX METHODS G. Taylor A star means optional and not necessarily harder. Conformal maps. (i) Let f(z) = az + b, with ad bc. Where in C is f conformal? cz + d (ii) Let f(z) = z +. What are the
More informationOn the p-laplacian and p-fluids
LMU Munich, Germany Lars Diening On the p-laplacian and p-fluids Lars Diening On the p-laplacian and p-fluids 1/50 p-laplacian Part I p-laplace and basic properties Lars Diening On the p-laplacian and
More informationare harmonic functions so by superposition
J. Rauch Applied Complex Analysis The Dirichlet Problem Abstract. We solve, by simple formula, the Dirichlet Problem in a half space with step function boundary data. Uniqueness is proved by complex variable
More informationSOLUTION OF THE DIRICHLET PROBLEM WITH L p BOUNDARY CONDITION. Dagmar Medková
29 Kragujevac J. Math. 31 (2008) 29 42. SOLUTION OF THE DIRICHLET PROBLEM WITH L p BOUNDARY CONDITION Dagmar Medková Czech Technical University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Technical
More informationChapter II. Complex Variables
hapter II. omplex Variables Dates: October 2, 4, 7, 2002. These three lectures will cover the following sections of the text book by Keener. 6.1. omplex valued functions and branch cuts; 6.2.1. Differentiation
More informationJournal of Solid Mechanics and Materials Engineering
and Materials Engineering Analysis of In-Plane Problems for an Isotropic Elastic Medium with Many Circular Holes or Rigid Inclusions Mutsumi MIYAGAWA, Jyo SHIMURA, Takuo SUZUKI and Takanobu TAMIYA Dept.of
More informationESTIMATES FOR THE MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION
GLOBAL W 2,p ESTIMATES FOR THE MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION O. SAVIN Abstract. We use a localization property of boundary sections for solutions to the Monge-Ampere equation obtain global W 2,p estimates under
More informationAsymptotic behavior of infinity harmonic functions near an isolated singularity
Asymptotic behavior of infinity harmonic functions near an isolated singularity Ovidiu Savin, Changyou Wang, Yifeng Yu Abstract In this paper, we prove if n 2 x 0 is an isolated singularity of a nonegative
More informationSHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES. 1. Introduction
SHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES GILES AUCHMUTY Abstract. This paper describes sharp inequalities for the trace of Sobolev functions on the boundary of a bounded region R N. The inequalities bound (semi-)norms
More informationReconstruction Scheme for Active Thermography
Reconstruction Scheme for Active Thermography Gen Nakamura gnaka@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp Department of Mathematics, Hokkaido University, Japan Newton Institute, Cambridge, Sept. 20, 2011 Contents.1.. Important
More informationHarmonic Analysis Homework 5
Harmonic Analysis Homework 5 Bruno Poggi Department of Mathematics, University of Minnesota November 4, 6 Notation Throughout, B, r is the ball of radius r with center in the understood metric space usually
More informationComplex Variables & Integral Transforms
Complex Variables & Integral Transforms Notes taken by J.Pearson, from a S4 course at the U.Manchester. Lecture delivered by Dr.W.Parnell July 9, 007 Contents 1 Complex Variables 3 1.1 General Relations
More informationTopic 4 Notes Jeremy Orloff
Topic 4 Notes Jeremy Orloff 4 auchy s integral formula 4. Introduction auchy s theorem is a big theorem which we will use almost daily from here on out. Right away it will reveal a number of interesting
More informationSolutions to Exercises 6.1
34 Chapter 6 Conformal Mappings Solutions to Exercises 6.. An analytic function fz is conformal where f z. If fz = z + e z, then f z =e z z + z. We have f z = z z += z =. Thus f is conformal at all z.
More informationA global solution curve for a class of free boundary value problems arising in plasma physics
A global solution curve for a class of free boundary value problems arising in plasma physics Philip Korman epartment of Mathematical Sciences University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio 4522-0025 Abstract
More informationAsymptotics of generalized eigenfunctions on manifold with Euclidean and/or hyperbolic ends
Asymptotics of generalized eigenfunctions on manifold with Euclidean and/or hyperbolic ends Kenichi ITO (University of Tokyo) joint work with Erik SKIBSTED (Aarhus University) 3 July 2018 Example: Free
More informationMath Spring 2014 Solutions to Assignment # 12 Completion Date: Thursday June 12, 2014
Math 3 - Spring 4 Solutions to Assignment # Completion Date: Thursday June, 4 Question. [p 67, #] Use residues to evaluate the improper integral x + ). Ans: π/4. Solution: Let fz) = below. + z ), and for
More informationOn some weighted fractional porous media equations
On some weighted fractional porous media equations Gabriele Grillo Politecnico di Milano September 16 th, 2015 Anacapri Joint works with M. Muratori and F. Punzo Gabriele Grillo Weighted Fractional PME
More informationMathematical Analysis and Applications Seminar
Mathematical Analysis and Applications Seminar Contact: Hyeonbae Kang, 032-860-7622, hbkang@inha.ac.kr Hyundae Lee, 032-860-7623, hdlee@inha.ac.kr 2010, Oct. 15 (Fri.) 4:00, 5W254 Inha Univ. Kazumi Tanuma
More informationComplex Variables. Instructions Solve any eight of the following ten problems. Explain your reasoning in complete sentences to maximize credit.
Instructions Solve any eight of the following ten problems. Explain your reasoning in complete sentences to maximize credit. 1. The TI-89 calculator says, reasonably enough, that x 1) 1/3 1 ) 3 = 8. lim
More informationThe Method of Small Volume Expansions and Applications to Emerging Medical Imaging
The Method of Small Volume Expansions and Applications to Emerging Medical Imaging Hyeonbae Kang hbkang@inha.ac.kr people.math.inha.ac.kr/ hbkang Inha University Oct. 14, 2009, KAIST p. 1/5 Contents Method
More informationMOMENTS OF HYPERGEOMETRIC HURWITZ ZETA FUNCTIONS
MOMENTS OF HYPERGEOMETRIC HURWITZ ZETA FUNCTIONS ABDUL HASSEN AND HIEU D. NGUYEN Abstract. This paper investigates a generalization the classical Hurwitz zeta function. It is shown that many of the properties
More informationLecture 13: Electromagnetic Theory Professor D. K. Ghosh, Physics Department, I.I.T., Bombay. Poisson s and Laplace s Equations
Poisson s and Laplace s Equations Lecture 13: Electromagnetic Theory Professor D. K. Ghosh, Physics Department, I.I.T., Bombay We will spend some time in looking at the mathematical foundations of electrostatics.
More informationTD M1 EDP 2018 no 2 Elliptic equations: regularity, maximum principle
TD M EDP 08 no Elliptic equations: regularity, maximum principle Estimates in the sup-norm I Let be an open bounded subset of R d of class C. Let A = (a ij ) be a symmetric matrix of functions of class
More informationThe elliptic sinh-gordon equation in the half plane
Available online at www.tjnsa.com J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 8 25), 63 73 Research Article The elliptic sinh-gordon equation in the half plane Guenbo Hwang Department of Mathematics, Daegu University, Gyeongsan
More informationWavelet moment method for Cauchy problem for the Helmholtz equation
Wavelet moment method for Cauchy problem for the Helmholtz equation Preliminary report Teresa Regińska, Andrzej Wakulicz December 9, 2005 - Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences, e-mail:
More informationCOMPLETELY INVARIANT JULIA SETS OF POLYNOMIAL SEMIGROUPS
Series Logo Volume 00, Number 00, Xxxx 19xx COMPLETELY INVARIANT JULIA SETS OF POLYNOMIAL SEMIGROUPS RICH STANKEWITZ Abstract. Let G be a semigroup of rational functions of degree at least two, under composition
More informationSobolev Spaces. Chapter 10
Chapter 1 Sobolev Spaces We now define spaces H 1,p (R n ), known as Sobolev spaces. For u to belong to H 1,p (R n ), we require that u L p (R n ) and that u have weak derivatives of first order in L p
More informationMathematics (Course B) Lent Term 2005 Examples Sheet 2
N12d Natural Sciences, Part IA Dr M. G. Worster Mathematics (Course B) Lent Term 2005 Examples Sheet 2 Please communicate any errors in this sheet to Dr Worster at M.G.Worster@damtp.cam.ac.uk. Note that
More informationCounting geodesic arcs in a fixed conjugacy class on negatively curved surfaces with boundary
Counting geodesic arcs in a fixed conjugacy class on negatively curved surfaces with boundary Mark Pollicott Abstract We show how to derive an asymptotic estimates for the number of closed arcs γ on a
More informationCOMPACTLY SUPPORTED ORTHONORMAL COMPLEX WAVELETS WITH DILATION 4 AND SYMMETRY
COMPACTLY SUPPORTED ORTHONORMAL COMPLEX WAVELETS WITH DILATION 4 AND SYMMETRY BIN HAN AND HUI JI Abstract. In this paper, we provide a family of compactly supported orthonormal complex wavelets with dilation
More informationNew Identities for Weak KAM Theory
New Identities for Weak KAM Theory Lawrence C. Evans Department of Mathematics University of California, Berkeley Abstract This paper records for the Hamiltonian H = p + W (x) some old and new identities
More informationProblem: A class of dynamical systems characterized by a fast divergence of the orbits. A paradigmatic example: the Arnold cat.
À È Ê ÇÄÁ Ë ËÌ ÅË Problem: A class of dynamical systems characterized by a fast divergence of the orbits A paradigmatic example: the Arnold cat. The closure of a homoclinic orbit. The shadowing lemma.
More informationSpectral theory of a Neumann-Poincaré-type operator and analysis of anomalous localized resonance II
Spectral theory of a Neumann-Poincaré-type operator and analysis of anomalous localized resonance II Habib Ammari Giulio Ciraolo Hyeonbae Kang Hyundae Lee Graeme W. Milton December 2, 202 Abstract If a
More informationApplied Numerical Mathematics. High-order numerical schemes based on difference potentials for 2D elliptic problems with material interfaces
Applied Numerical Mathematics 111 (2017) 64 91 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Applied Numerical Mathematics www.elsevier.com/locate/apnum High-order numerical schemes based on difference potentials
More informationAsymptotic Behavior of Waves in a Nonuniform Medium
Available at http://pvamuedu/aam Appl Appl Math ISSN: 1932-9466 Vol 12, Issue 1 June 217, pp 217 229 Applications Applied Mathematics: An International Journal AAM Asymptotic Behavior of Waves in a Nonuniform
More informationINDEX. Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, for sequences, boundary points, bounded functions, 142 bounded sets, 42 43
INDEX Abel s identity, 131 Abel s test, 131 132 Abel s theorem, 463 464 absolute convergence, 113 114 implication of conditional convergence, 114 absolute value, 7 reverse triangle inequality, 9 triangle
More informationComplex Analysis, Stein and Shakarchi The Fourier Transform
Complex Analysis, Stein and Shakarchi Chapter 4 The Fourier Transform Yung-Hsiang Huang 2017.11.05 1 Exercises 1. Suppose f L 1 (), and f 0. Show that f 0. emark 1. This proof is observed by Newmann (published
More informationAsymptotic Expansions
Asymptotic Expansions V 1.5.4 217/1/3 Suppose we have a function f(x) of single real parameter x and we are interested in an approximation to f(x) for x close to x. The approximation might depend on whether
More informationChapter 30 MSMYP1 Further Complex Variable Theory
Chapter 30 MSMYP Further Complex Variable Theory (30.) Multifunctions A multifunction is a function that may take many values at the same point. Clearly such functions are problematic for an analytic study,
More informationMathematical Tripos Part III Michaelmas 2017 Distribution Theory & Applications, Example sheet 1 (answers) Dr A.C.L. Ashton
Mathematical Tripos Part III Michaelmas 7 Distribution Theory & Applications, Eample sheet (answers) Dr A.C.L. Ashton Comments and corrections to acla@damtp.cam.ac.uk.. Construct a non-zero element of
More informationIntrinsic finite element modeling of a linear membrane shell problem
arxiv:3.39v [math.na] 5 Mar Intrinsic finite element modeling of a linear membrane shell problem Peter Hansbo Mats G. Larson Abstract A Galerkin finite element method for the membrane elasticity problem
More informationRule ST1 (Symmetry). α β = β α for 1-forms α and β. Like the exterior product, the symmetric tensor product is also linear in each slot :
2. Metrics as Symmetric Tensors So far we have studied exterior products of 1-forms, which obey the rule called skew symmetry: α β = β α. There is another operation for forming something called the symmetric
More informationHamburger Beiträge zur Angewandten Mathematik
Hamburger Beiträge zur Angewandten Mathematik Numerical analysis of a control and state constrained elliptic control problem with piecewise constant control approximations Klaus Deckelnick and Michael
More informationNPTEL web course on Complex Analysis. A. Swaminathan I.I.T. Roorkee, India. and. V.K. Katiyar I.I.T. Roorkee, India
NPTEL web course on Complex Analysis A. Swaminathan I.I.T. Roorkee, India and V.K. Katiyar I.I.T. Roorkee, India A.Swaminathan and V.K.Katiyar (NPTEL) Complex Analysis 1 / 20 Complex Analysis Module: 10:
More informationMORE CONSEQUENCES OF CAUCHY S THEOREM
MOE CONSEQUENCES OF CAUCHY S THEOEM Contents. The Mean Value Property and the Maximum-Modulus Principle 2. Morera s Theorem and some applications 3 3. The Schwarz eflection Principle 6 We have stated Cauchy
More informationComplex Numbers. The set of complex numbers can be defined as the set of pairs of real numbers, {(x, y)}, with two operations: (i) addition,
Complex Numbers Complex Algebra The set of complex numbers can be defined as the set of pairs of real numbers, {(x, y)}, with two operations: (i) addition, and (ii) complex multiplication, (x 1, y 1 )
More informationMathematics of Physics and Engineering II: Homework problems
Mathematics of Physics and Engineering II: Homework problems Homework. Problem. Consider four points in R 3 : P (,, ), Q(,, 2), R(,, ), S( + a,, 2a), where a is a real number. () Compute the coordinates
More informationExistence and Regularity of Stable Branched Minimal Hypersurfaces
Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly Volume 3, Number 2 (Special Issue: In honor of Leon Simon, Part 1 of 2 ) 569 594, 2007 Existence and Regularity of Stable Branched Minimal Hypersurfaces Neshan Wickramasekera
More information