CP violation lectures
|
|
- Hilda Patrick
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CP violation lectures MARCELLA BONA University of London Intercollegiate Postgraduate Course in Elementary Particle Physics Lecture 3
2 Outline recap on three types of CP violation recap on angles direct CP violation sides of the Unitarity Triangle extraction of the CKM parameters the LHC experiments D system 2
3 3 kinds of CP violation (recap) 1. Direct CP violation. P( B0 f ) P( B0 f ) t=0 mixing Cartoon shows the decay of a B0 or B0 into a CP eigenstate fcp. B0 B Af CP ay dec 0 t f Af t 2. Indirect CP violation (CPV in mixing). P( B0 B0 ) P( B0 B0 ) 3. CPV in the interference between mixing and decay. Need more than one amplitude to have a non zero CP violation: interference 3
4 sin2 in golden b ccs modes (recap) V*cbVcs branching fraction: (10 3) the colour suppressed tree dominates and the t penguin has the same weak phase of the tree theoretical uncertainty: S ~ sin2 C~0 model independent data driven estimation from J/ 0 data: SJ/ K0 = SJ/ K0 sin2 = ± model dependent estimates of the u and c penguin biases SJ/ K0 = SJ/ K0 sin2 ~ (10 3) H.Li, S.Mishima 4 JHEP 0703:009 (2007) SJ/ K0 = SJ/ K0 sin2 ~ (10 ) H.Boos et al. Phys. Rev. D73, (2006) 4
5 CP violation: (recap) Interference between box and tree results in an asymmetry that is sensitive to in B hh decays: h =,, Loop corrections are not negligible for Vtd* : + Loops (penguins) Vub : Vtd : Chh 0 Shh sin(2 ) Chh sin( ) 2 S hh 1 Chh sin(2 eff ) P T Measure S eff Need to determine = eff [P/T is different for each final state] 5
6 CP violation: (recap) Combining all the modes to maximize our knowledge of.. evidence of CP violation bayesian analysis: the quantity plotted is now the Probability Density Function (PDF) no CP violation observed SM = (92 ± 7) 6
7 and DK trees (recap) D(*)K(*) decays: from BRs and BR ratios, no time dependent analysis, just rates the phase is measured exploiting interferences: two amplitudes leading to the same final states some rates can be really small: ~ 10 7 Vcb (~ 2) Theoretically clean (no penguins neglecting the D0 mixing) Vub= Vub e i (~ 3) 7
8 8
9 Time integrated CP asymmetries Charged B mesons do not oscillate. Measure a direct CP asymmetry by comparing amplitudes of decay: Event counting exercise! With two (or more) amplitudes see that we need different weak and strong phases to generate it. We can use this technique when studying neutral B mesons decaying to a self tagging final state. limited by our knowledge of weak phases and of the strong phase differences. But there are many possible measurements that we can compare! 9
10 Direct CP violation (recap) both neutral and charged B's tagging not always necessary (charged and "self tagging" modes) higher efficiency interference between (at least) two amplitudes contributing to the same final state i: strong phase CP even i: weak phase CP odd the measured asymmetry becomes: ACP interesting interesting modes: modes: K K :: penguin+tree penguin+tree K K :: pure pure penguin penguin 10
11 Direct CP violation B0 K : Tree and gluonic penguin contributions d d Compute time integrated asymmetry = ± Experimental results from Belle, BaBar, and CDF have significant weight in the world average of this CP violation parameter. 6.1 Direct CP violation present in B decays. Unknown strong phase differences between amplitudes, means we can t use this to measure weak phases! 11
12 Direct CP violation B+ K : Color suppressed tree and gluonic penguin contributions s Experimentally measure: s + K K+ A(K ) = ± Difference between B+ and B0 asymmetries: A(K ) = ± Difference claimed to be an indication of new physics, however: Theory calculations assume that only T+P contribute to K, and C+P contribute to K. The C contribution is larger than originally expected in K. Belle K analysis For example, see G. Hou arxiv: and references therein. 12
13 Is there a k puzzle? Only SCET includes a non factorizable O( QCD/mb) charming penguin All these approaches neglect the CKM suppressed O( QCD/mb) corrections 13
14 The k amplitudes CKM enhanced CKM suppressed A(B0 K = Vts Vtb* P1(c) Vus Vub* {E1 P1GIM(u c)} A(B+ K = Vts Vtb* P1(c) + Vus Vub* {A1 P1GIM(u c)} 2 A(B+ K = Vts Vtb* P1(c) 2 A(B0 K = Vts Vtb* P1(c) Charming Penguin ~ Vus Vub* {E1+E2+A1 P1GIM(u c)} Vus Vub* {E2+P1GIM(u c)} 2 Vus Vub* ~ 4 The ingredients: The elements of the CKM matrix (from the UT analysis) Color Allowed (E1) and Color suppressed (E2) tree level emissions Charming (P1) and GIM (P1GIM) penguins Annihilation (A1) 14
15 The k amplitudes CKM enhanced CKM suppressed A(B0 K = Vts Vtb* P1(c) Vus Vub* {E1 P1GIM(u c)} A(B+ K = Vts Vtb* P1(c) + Vus Vub* {A1 P1GIM(u c)} 2 A(B+ K = Vts Vtb* P1(c) 2 A(B0 K = Vts Vtb* P1(c) Charming Penguin ~ Vus Vub* {E1+E2+A1 P1GIM(u c)} Vus Vub* {E2+P1GIM(u c)} 2 Vus Vub* ~ 4 15
16 Direct CP violation searches ACP 0 no CP violation This is a small sub set of decays where we have searched for direct CP violation. 2 observed signals (> 5 ): K and ; possible effects (> 3 ): K+, hk*0, K*0,, D(*)0K(*), and D0CPK. 16
17 CP violation: Searching for new physics sin2 has been measured to O(1 ) accuracy in b ccs decays. Can use this to search for signs of New Physics (NP) if: Identify a rare decay sensitive to sin2 (loop dominated process). Measure S precisely in that mode (Seff). Control the theoretical uncertainty on the Standard Model pollution ( SSM). Compute. In the presence of NP: SNP 0 W u,c, t s,,( KK ) b CP s 0 g B d s 0 K d S Many tests have been performed in: B d processes. B s processes. Unknown heavy particles can introduce new amplitudes that can affect physical observables of loop dominated processes. Observables that might be affected include branching fractions, CP asymmetries, forward backward asymmetries and so on. A successful search requires that we understand Standard Model contributions well! 17
18 SM uncertainties on S To find NP we need to understand the SM contributions to a process. Leading order term is expected to be the same as a SM weak phase. Higher order terms including re scattering, suppressed amplitudes, final state radiation and so on can modify our expectations. Some channels are better understood than others.?? Sign of S correction is mode dependent. Most precise S correction is for B0 K0, where Stheory ~ Concentrate efforts on well understood channels. QCDF Beneke, PLB620, 143 (2005) SCET/QCDF, Williamson and Zupan, PRD74, (2006) QCDF Cheng, Chua and Soni, PRD72, (2005) SU(3) Gronau, Rosner and Zupan, PRD74, M.Bona CP violation lecture (2006) 18
19 Overview of S measurements Comparing sin2 in different physical processes, we see good agreement with the b ccs reference point. (reference point) Most of the b s penguin channels have sin2 eff < sin2. Need to perform a mode by mode precision measurement in order to properly decouple Standard Model uncertainties from possible signals of NP. We need at least 50ab 1 to start performing measurements that will have comparable experimental and theoretical uncertainties in b s penguin processes. Can start to do the same with and once we have a precision measurement from one mode. 19
20 Sides of the Unitarity Triangle 20
21 Sides of the Unitarity Triangle Use theory to relate partial branching fractions to Vub for a given region of phase space. Several theoretical schemes available. 21
22 Sides of the Unitarity Triangle Use theory to relate partial branching fractions to Vcb for a given region of phase space. 22
23 Side measurements: Vcb and Vub Vub BR(B Xul ) in a limited region of phase space. similarly for Vcb F is a form factor. Need theoretical input to relate the differential rate measurement to Vcb. Reconstruct both B mesons in an event. Study the Brecoil to measure Vub. Measure BR as a function of ql2, mx, mmiss or El and use theory to convert these results into Vub. Can study modes exclusively or inclusively. Several models available to estimate Vub and Vcb The resulting values have a significant model uncertainty. 23
24 Vcb and Vub in 2015 exclusive result inclusive result inclusive result exclusive result LCHb ratio result 24
25 Unitarity Triangle analysis 25
26 Unitarity Triangle analysis in the SM SM UT analysis: provide the best determination of CKM parameters test the consistency of the SM ( direct vs indirect determinations) provide predictions for future experiments (ex. sin2, ms,...) analysis from M. Bona et al. (UTfit) JHEP0507:028,
27 the method and the inputs Bayes Theorem } } Standard Model + OPE/HQET/ Lattice QCD to go mt from quarks to hadrons M. Bona et al. (UTfit Collaboration) JHEP 0507:028,2005 hep ph/ M. Bona et al. (UTfit Collaboration) JHEP 0603:080,2006 hep ph/
28 Unitarity Triangle analysis in the SM Vcb/Vub K ms/ md md B
29 Unitarity Triangle analysis in the SM Observables Accuracy Vub/Vcb ~ 13% K ~ 0.5% md ~ 1% md/ ms ~ 1% sin2 ~ 3% cos2 ~ 15% ~ 7% ~ 11% BR(B ) ~ 19% 29
30 Unitarity Triangle analysis in the SM 95% Prob = ± = ± analysis from M. Bona et al. (UTfit) JHEP0507:028,
31 Angles vs the others = ± = ± % Prob = ± = ±
32 Compatibility plots A way to measure the agreement of a single measurement with the indirect determination from the fit using all the other inputs: test for the SM description of the flavour physics Color code: agreement between the predicted values and the measurements at better than 1, 2,...n exp = (68.3 ± 7.5) UTfit = (68.6 ± 3.7) The cross has the coordinates (x,y)=(central value, error) of the direct measurement exp = (92.2 ± 6.2) UTfit = (87.3 ± 3.9) 32
33 tensions sin2 exp = ± sin2 UTfit = ± ~1.5 Vubexp = (3.75 ± 0.46) 10 3 VubUTfit = (3.63 ± 0.13)
34 tensions Vub (excl) Vub (incl) sin2 exp = ± sin2 UTfit = ± ~1.5 Vubexp = (3.75 ± 0.46) 10 3 VubUTfit = (3.63 ± 0.13)
35 Unitarity Triangle analysis in the SM obtained excluding the given constraint from the fit Pull (# ) Observables Measurement Prediction sin ± ± ~ ± ± 3.7 < ± ± 3.9 <1 Vub ± ± 0.13 <1 Vub 103 (incl) 4.40 ± 0.31 ~ 2.3 Vub 103 (excl) 3.42 ± 0.22 <1 Vcb ± ± 0.7 <1 BK ± ± <1 BR(B )[10-4] 1.14 ± ± 0.07 ~ 1.3 BR(Bs ll)[10-9] 2.8 ± ± 0.15 ~ 1.4 BR(Bd ll)[10-9] 0.39 ± ± ~ 1.7 ASLs ± ± <1 A ± ± 0.02 ~
36 standard model predictions: B BR(B ) = (1.14 ± 0.22) 10 4 SM prediction enhanced or reduced by factor rh: ~1.4 indirect determinations from UT BR(B ) = (0.81 ± 0.07) 10 4 M.Bona et al, [hep ph] 36
37 more standard model predictions from CMS+LHCb from CMS+LHCb BR(Bs ) = (2.8 ± 0.7) 10 9 ~1.4 indirect determinations from UT BR(Bs ll) = (3.88 ± 0.15) 10 9 time integration included, but no corrections BR(Bd ) = (3.9 ± 1.6) ~1.7 BR(Bd ll) = (1.13 ± 0.07)
38 Unitarity triangle fit beyond the SM 1. fit simultaneously for the CKM and the NP parameters (generalized UT fit) add most general loop NP to all sectors use all available experimental info find out NP contributions to ΔF=2 transitions 2. perform a ΔF=2 EFT analysis to put bounds on the NP scale consider different choices of the FV and CPV couplings 38
39 generic NP parameterization: SM Bd and Bs mixing amplitudes (2+2 real parameters): Aq =C B e 2i B q q A SM q e 2i CB e 2i B s SM q = 1 ANP q A SM q s = e B s H NP mq /K =C B / m mq/ K SM K =C KSM A Bd J / K S CP Bs SM A 2i NP =1 SM q A NP e A SM e 2i s SM 2i q e assume NP only in loop K =sin 2 B AqSL =Im q12 / Aq SM eff 2i q q Observables: q NP B s H eff H eff B s d A Bs J / CP ~sin 2 s B s q / mq =Re q12 / Aq 39
40 NP analysis results = ± = ± degeneracy of broken by ASL SM is = ± = ±
41 NP parameter results K system dark: 68% light: 95% SM: red cross C K = 1.07 ± 0.16 Aq=C B e q CBd = 1.08 ± 0.16 Bd = ( 2.1 ± 3.2) 2i ϕ B q A SM q e SM 2i ϕ q CBs vs Bs CBs = 1.06 ± 0.08 CBd vs Bd Bs = (1.4 ± 2.0) 41
42 NP parameter results ( Aq = 1+ NP Aq A SM q e NP SM ) 2i(ϕq ϕq ) SM q A e SM 2i ϕq dark: 68% light: 95% SM: red cross The ratio of NP/SM amplitudes is: < prob. in Bd mixing < prob. in Bs mixing 42
43 Testing the new physics scale At the high scale new physics enters according to its specific features At the low scale use OPE to write the most general effective Hamiltonian. the operators have different chiralities than the SM NP effects are in the Wilson Coefficients C NP effects are enhanced up to a factor 10 by the values of the matrix elements especially for transitions among quarks of different chiralities up to a factor 8 by RGE M. M. Bona Bona et et al. al. (UTfit) (UTfit) JHEP JHEP 0803:049, :049,2008 arxiv: arxiv:
44 Effective BSM Hamiltonian for F=2 transitions The Wilson coefficients Ci have in general the form Putting bounds on the Wilson coefficients give insights into the NP scale in different NP scenarios that enter through Fi and Li Fi: function of the NP flavour couplings Li: loop factor (in NP models with no tree level FCNC) : NP scale (typical mass of new particles mediating F=2 transitions) 44
45 Contribution to the mixing amplitutes analytic expression for the contribution to the mixing amplitudes arxiv: : for magic numbers a,b and c, = S( )/ S(mt) analogously for the K system to obtain the p.d.f. for the Wilson coefficients Ci( ) at the new physics scale, we switch on one coefficient at a time in each sector and calculate its value from the result of the NP analysis. 45
46 Testing the TeV scale The dependence of C on changes on flavour structure. we can consider different flavour scenarios: Generic: C( ) = / 2 Fi~1, arbitrary phase NMFV: C( ) = FSM / 2 Fi~ FSM, arbitrary phase MFV: C( ) = FSM / 2 F1~ FSM, Fi 1~0, SM phase (Li) is the coupling among NP and SM ~ 1 for strongly coupled NP ~ W ( S) in case of loop coupling through weak (strong) interactions If no NP effect is seen lower bound on NP scale if NP is seen upper bound on NP scale FSM is the combination of CKM factors for the considered process 46
47 lower bounds on the scale Generic: C( ) = / 2, Fi~1, arbitrary phase ~ 1 for strongly coupled NP To obtain the lower bound for loop mediated contributions, one simply multiplies the bounds by s ( 0.1) or by W ( 0.03). ~ W in case of loop coupling through weak interactions Lower bounds on NP scale (in TeV at 95% prob.) Non perturbative NP > TeV NP in W loops > TeV 47
48 lower bound on the scale NMFV: C( ) = FSM / 2, Fi~ FSM, arbitrary phase ~ 1 for strongly coupled NP To obtain the lower bound for loop mediated contributions, one simply multiplies the bounds by s ( 0.1) or by W ( 0.03). ~ W in case of loop coupling through weak interactions Lower bounds on NP scale (in TeV at 95% prob.) NP in W loops > 2.9 TeV Non perturbative NP > 96 TeV 48
49 B Physics beyond the B Factories This naturally splits into two categories of experiment (with overlapping physics reach): B Physics experiments at the LHC Amongst other physics, ATLAS and CMS will study B mesons (as long as the muon triggers have low enough threshold) LHCb dedicated B physics experiment. B Physics experiments not at the LHC a e+e Super B Factory work in progress Super KEK B in Japan 49
50 B Physics Experiments at the LHC There are 3 B physics experiments at the LHC: LHCb is a dedicated forward arm spectrometer (a specialised detector with the aim of doing a fantastic job at studying B physics from pp collisions). The pp beams are defocused near the interaction point of LHCb, so the luminosity of collisions is a lot lower than at the GPDs. ATLAS and CMS are general purpose detectors. The cross section for B hadron production is very large, and the luminosity of the pp collisions at these detectors is the same as for the rest of the GPD physics programme for these two experiments
51 LHCb Detector Single arm spectrometer design. UK Groups: Bristol Cambridge Edinburgh Imperial College Liverpool Glasgow Oxford RAL running at a reduced luminosity as the beams are locally defocused: design luminosity (already reached) cm 2s 1 51
52 ATLAS and CMS detectors Both of these GPDs have almost a 4 coverage Very forward b jets are lost down the beam pipe Good identification of b quarks is essential for tagging in new physics searches (e.g. the H bb search). The physics programmes of both experiments will be dominated by direct new physic searches, but they will also be in a position to play an important role in searching for rare B decays, and furthering our understanding of B physics. 52
53 Possible Future Experiments Planned future experiment: Super KEK B, KEK, Japan: aim to collect a factor of times the data of BaBar and Belle. The detector technology choice is similar to BaBar and Belle (with upgrades to deal with the expected increase in data rate). Accelerator R&D is underway in order to move a step closer to realising the luminosity increase required to have a SuperB factory. KEK: incremental upgrades to KEK B are being tested 53
54 CP violation in the D system B factories have measured the D mixing (2007) The time integrated CP asymmetry have contributions from both direct CP violation (in the decays) and indirect CP violation (in the mixing or in interference) In the SM, indirect CP violation in charm is expected to be very small and universal between CP eigenstates: predictions of about O(10 3) for CPV parameters Direct CP violation can be larger in SM: it depends on final state (on the specific amplitudes contributing) negligible in Cabibbo favoured modes (SM tree dominates everything) In singly Cabibbo suppressed modes: up to O( ) plausible Both can be enhanced by NP, in principle up to O(%) 54
55 Where to look for direct CP violation Remember: need (at least) two contributing amplitudes with different strong and weak phases to get CPV. D0 K+K and D0 + decays: Singly Cabibbo suppressed modes with gluonic penguin diagrams Several classes of NP can contribute... but also non negligible SM contribution 55
56 No CP violation measured so far 56
57 s and s measurement from Bs J/ The time evolution of the meson BS and BS is described by the superposition of BH and BL states, with masses ms ± ms/2 and lifetimes S ± S /2. These states deviate from defined values CP = ± 1, as described in the SM by the mixing phase S ( S = 2 S), SM prediction (fit): S = ± rad S = ± ps 1 New Physics can contribute to S, and change the ratio S / ms. In general, the decay to a final state that is coupled to BS and/or BS, exhibits fast oscillations driven by ms. Interference between amplitudes for both states generates CP violation, and conveys information on S. If B/B flavour at production is not determined (not tagged), the fast oscillations cannot be observed, but interference terms remain if the final state is described by a superposition of amplitudes of different CP values. 57
58 angular analysis in Bs J/ In the decay BS(BS) J/ l+l K+K different components in the angular distributions amplitudes correspond to CP = +1 or 1 The transversity angles are used to describe the angular distributions 58
59 angular analysis in Bs J/ Angular analysis as a function of proper time and b tagging Similar to Bd measurement in Bd J/ K* Additional sensitivity from the s terms (negligible for Bd) Dunietz et al. Phys.Rev.D63:114015,2001 Ambiguities for s s, s s, cos( ) cos( ) transversity basis: W(,, ) and : direction of the + from J/ decay : between the decay planes of J/ and 59
60 angular analysis in Bs J/ 60
61 Look at the future ( ) ~ 0.9 (Vcb) ~ 1.1% (Vub) ~ 2.2% errors from tree only fit on and : ( ) = [currently 0.051] ( ) = [currently 0.050] errors predicted from Belle II + LHCb upgrade ( ) ~ 0.2 (BK) ~ 0.1% (fb BB) ~ 0.5% errors from 5 constraint fit on and : ( ) = [currently 0.034] ( ) = [currently 0.015] 61
62 Summary Points to consider to measure a CP violating asymmetry. Need more than one amplitude (more than one Feynman diagram) to have a non zero CP violation signal. Neutral mesons can be used to measure the weak phase cleanly (usually). Charged mesons can be used to measure direct CP violation. Knowledge of strong phases limits how you can interpret these measurements in terms of the weak phases. Need a model, and many measurements to say anything sensible. Even then you will have a large theoretical uncertainty. You can count the CKM vertex factors in the Feynman diagrams to tell you relative sizes of decays that you expect (This works for tree level processes. You need to consider colour / Zweig supression for more detailed guesses). 62
63 Summary (II) The B factories have tested the CKM mechanism to an unprecedented level: ~ 16%, 15% CKM works at this level. ~ 4.7% 3% Still not enough CP violation to explain the universal matter antimatter asymmetry! Need more precise searches for new physics and possible deviations from CKM. the unitarity triangle fit is an useful tool to exploit all the flavour physics contributions to extract SM and NP parameters and also insight on the NP scale. LHCb and the next generation B factory will start to build on the knowledge of BaBar and Belle soon. 63
64 Conclusions The study of CP violation is a fundamental part of particle physics, and cosmology. It revolves around EPR experiments with correlated B, D, K, mesons, and quantum interference studies. We don t really understand it. The CKM mechanism works well but it is incomplete. It is only a small part of the story. We don t know if CP violation in leptons, or some new physics scenario really explains the matter antimatter asymmetry questions arising from the Big Bang. Eventually we hope to understand the reason behind this conundrum, and in doing so we will either find new particle physics, or new cosmological effects. Given that its very hard to have an asymmetry in the big bang that doesn t get washed out by inflation the money is on new physics effects/particles to be discovered! 64
65 backup 65
66 Side measurements: Vub Vub BR(B Xul ) in a limited region of phase space. Reconstruct both B mesons in an event. Study the Brecoil to measure Vub. Measure BR as a function of ql2, mx, mmiss or El and use theory to convert these results into Vub. Can study modes exclusively or inclusively. Several models available to estimate Vub The resulting values of Vub have a significant model uncertainty. 66
67 Exclusively reconstructed b ul If we fully reconstruct one B meson in an event, then Study B decays to: Fully reconstruct BRECO Extract yields from m2miss q 2 8(GeV ) 2 with a single in the event, we can infer P and reconstruct the. 8 q 2 16(GeV ) 2 q 2 16(GeV ) 2 (reduces form factor dependence) Clean signals but low efficiency Fully Reconstructed BRECO decay Then compute Vub. Lepton B0 X B0 Semi-leptonic b ul decay Use the beam energy to constrain P to effectively reconstruct from the missing energy momentum: mmiss m = 0. 67
68 Vub: Using q2 distribution Use B l decays BR(B0 l ) = Light cone sum rules Unquenched LQCD Unquenched LQCD: (Vub)EXPT ~ 5% (Vub)THEORY ~ 11 to 17% Experiments have also studied higher mass meson l decays 68
69 Vub: Using MX distribution High background from cl decays. Kinematic cuts are used to suppress background. Use Operator Product Expansions to translate measured branching fractions to Vub. Measure branching fraction in different kinematic regions. B Xcℓ background All D* D D** Xu 69
70 Side measurements: Vcb Use the differential decay rates of B D*l to determine Vcb : F is a form factor. Need theoretical input to relate the differential rate measurement to Vcb. Reconstruct BaBar D*e paper m mk mk Measurement is not statistically limited, so use clean signal mode for D K decay only. Extract signal yield, F(1) Vcb and from 3D binned fit to data. 70
71 Side measurements: Vcb Use the differential decay rates of B Dl to determine Vcb : G is a form factor. Need theoretical input to relate the differential rate measurement to Vcb. Use a sample of fully reconstructed tag B mesons, then look for the signal. Improves background rejection, at the cost of signal efficiency. Reconstruct the following D decay channels: is related to q2 of the B meson to the D 71
72 Vcb B Dl G(1) Vcb =( ) 10 3 Vcb =( ) 10 3 Using G(1)= from Okamoto et al., NPPS 140, 461 (2005). B D*l F(1) Vcb =( ) 10 3 Vcb =( ) 10 3 Using F(1)= from Laiho, arxiv: [hep lat]. 72
Updates from UTfit within and beyond the Standard Model
Updates from UTfit within and beyond the Standard Model Marcella Bona Queen Mary, University of London SUSY 2013 26 August 2013 Trieste, Italy unitarity Triangle analysis in the SM SM UT analysis: provide
More informationStandard Model updates and new physics analysis with the Unitarity Triangle fit
Standard Model updates and new physics analysis with the Unitarity Triangle fit Marcella Bona A. Bevan, M. Bona, M. Ciuchini, D. Derkach, E. Franco, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, F. Parodi, M. Pierini, C.
More informationSearching for New Physics in Heavy Flavours
Searching for New Physics in Heavy Flavours Luca Silvestrini INFN, Rome Introduction Status of flavour physics in the SM UT beyond the SM and constraints on NP CP violation in Charm Physics Conclusions
More informationWeak Decays, CKM, Anders Ryd Cornell University
Weak Decays, CKM, CP Violation Anders Ryd Cornell University Presented at the International Conference on Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Delphi, Greece, June 6-11, 2005 Page: 1 Flavor Physics The study
More informationBs studies at a SuperB: physics case and experimental potentialities
Bs studies at a SuperB: physics case and experimental potentialities 1 2 3 4 5 6 E.Baracchini1,2, M.Bona3, F.Ferroni1,2, G.Isidori2,4, G.Martinelli1,2, M.Pierini5, G.Piredda1,2, F.Renga1,2, A.Stocchi6
More informationRecent results from rare decays
Recent results from rare decays Jeroen van Tilburg (Physikalisches Institut Heidelberg) Don t worry about the number of slides: Only half of them is new Advanced topics in Particle Physics: LHC physics,
More informationBounds on New Physics from the Unitarity Triangle fit: Summer'06 update
Bounds on New Physics from the Unitarity Triangle fit: Summer'06 update University of Wisconsin, Madison on behalf of UTfit Collaboration http://www.utfit.org M. Bona, M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, V. Lubicz,
More informationMoriond QCD La Thuile, March 14 21, Flavour physics in the LHC era. An introduction. Clara Matteuzzi. INFN and Universita Milano-Bicocca
Moriond QCD La Thuile, March 14 21, 2009 Flavour physics in the LHC era An introduction Clara Matteuzzi INFN and Universita Milano-Bicocca 1 Contents 1. The flavor structure of the Standard Model 2. Tests
More informationLHCb Discovery potential for New Physics
Beam induced splash in LHCb Imperial College London LHCb Discovery potential for New Physics Introduction Physics with LHCb Flavour physics can provide unique input on the type of New Physics If we express
More informationLHCb New B physics ideas
Imperial College London Beam induced splash in LHCb LHCb New B physics ideas Ulrik Egede @ Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 2 nd meeting 17 March 2009 Introduction 2/21 Physics case for LHCb
More informationRecent results from LHCb. A.Hicheur (UFRJ, Brazil) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration SILAFAE 2016, Guatemala November 14-18, 2016
Recent results from LHCb A.Hicheur (UFRJ, Brazil) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration SILAFAE 2016, Guatemala November 14-18, 2016 Outline Physics program LHCb experiment Highlights of recent results Mostly
More informationRare decays at LHCb Siim Tolk (NIKHEF, Amsterdam) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration
Rare decays at LHCb Siim Tolk (NIKHEF, Amsterdam) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Bormio 2014 Rare decays at LHCb Siim Tolk (NIKHEF, Amsterdam) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Other talks from
More informationLHCb Overview. Barbara Storaci on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration
LHCb Overview Barbara Storaci on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CERN Council, December 14 th, 2012 Overview Introduction Collaboration Type of physics considered Detector Detector performances Selection
More informationFlavour physics in the LHC era
Maria Laach school, september 2012 An introduction to Flavour physics in the LHC era and quest for New Physics (an experimentalist s point of view) Clara Matteuzzi INFN and Universita Milano-Bicocca 1
More informationSearch for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at B Factories
Search for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at B Factories Gautier Hamel de Monchenault CEA-Saclay DAPNIA/SPP on behalf of the BABAR & BELLE Collaborations Moskow, 29 July 2006 New Physics in Flavor Sector
More informationOverview of LHCb Experiment
Overview of Physics @ LHCb Experiment Yuanning Gao, Tsinghua University Representing the LHCb Collaboration Detector performance CKM triangles Other topics (selected) Conclusions A very selective review!
More informationPerspectives in B Physics: Results from LHCb
Pheno 2017 Symposium Pittsburgh, May 8 th, 2017 Perspectives in B Physics: Results from LHCb Ulrich Uwer Heidelberg University on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Outline: b s Introduction Unitarity Triangle
More informationLecture III. Measurement of sin 2 in B K 0 S. Measurement of sin 2 in B + -, B + - Measurement of in B DK. Direct CP Violation
Lecture III Measurement of sin 2 in BK S Measurement of sin 2 in BK S Measurement of sin 2 in B + -, B + - Measurement of in BDK Direct CP Violation Model-independent Test for New Physics Prospects Strategy
More informationBelle II perspectives on Unitarity Triangle sides and angles
Belle II perspectives on Unitarity Triangle sides and angles A.Passeri (INFN Roma Tre) on behalf of the Belle II collaboration EU grant 644294 XIII Meeting on B Physics Marseille october 1 st 2018 01/10/2018
More informationAdvances in Open Charm Physics at CLEO-c
Advances in Open Charm Physics at CLEO-c Paras Naik CLEO-c 2230104-002 Solenoid Coil Barrel Calorimeter Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detector Drift Chamber Inner Drift Chamber / Beampipe SC Quadrupole Pylon
More informationLHCb results relevant to SUSY and BSM physics
LHCb results relevant to SUSY and BSM physics SUSY 2013, 31 st August 2013 Mitesh Patel (Imperial College London) On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Introduction The interest in B physics : Virtual contributions
More informationRecent CP violation measurements. Advanced topics in Particle Physics: LHC physics, 2011 Jeroen van Tilburg 1/38
Recent CP violation measurements Advanced topics in Particle Physics: LHC physics, 2011 Jeroen van Tilburg 1/38 Recap of last week What we have learned last week: Indirect searches (CP violation and rare
More informationThe LHC Heavy Flavour Programme
The LHC Heavy Flavour Programme Tatsuya Nakada CERN and EPFL LHC Flavour Workshop 26-28.03.07, CERN 1 Contents 1) Introduction 2) LHC Experiments 3) Physics with 2008 data 4) Flavour Physics >2008 5) Conclusions
More informationLHCb Physics and prospects. Stefano Perazzini On behalf of LHCb Collabora4on MENU nd June 2010
LHCb Physics and 2010-11 prospects Stefano Perazzini On behalf of LHCb Collabora4on MENU2010 2 nd June 2010 Physics: OUTLINE Flavor physics and CPV in the quark sector Search for New Physics The LHCb Experiment
More informatione + e - (1) Silicon Vertex Detector
3.1 GeV (4) Electromagnetic Calorimeter (3) Cerenkov- Detector (2) Drift Chamber (5) 1.5 T Solenoid (6) Instrumented Iron Yoke e + e - (1) Silicon Vertex Detector 9.0 GeV e + e - Colliders as B Factories
More informationHeavy Flavour Physics at the LHC. Lessons from the first phase of the LHC DESY 27 September 2012
Heavy Flavour Physics at the LHC University of Warwick and CERN Lessons from the first phase of the LHC DESY 27 September 2012 1 Outline Heavy flavour production at the LHC The LHCb experiment Selected
More informationCP Violation in the B(s) meson system at LHCb Julian Wishahi on behalf of the LHCb collaboration
CP Violation in the B(s) meson system at Julian Wishahi on behalf of the collaboration 5th Rencontres de Moriond, Electroweak Session, 2th of March 215 CPV in Interference of Mixing/Decay interference
More informationStandard Model of Particle Physics
Standard Model of Particle Physics Chris Sachrajda School of Physics and Astronomy University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ UK SUSSP61, St Andrews August 8th 23rd 2006 Contents 1. Spontaneous Symmetry
More informationDirect CPV. K.Trabelsi kek.jp
Direct CPV K.Trabelsi karim.trabelsi@ kek.jp '' Theoretical issues in heavvy flavor physics'' K puzzle LP2011, Amol Dighe Old puzzle Before 2004, the K π puzzle was said to be in the ratios of averaged
More information(Heavy Quark) Flavour Physics at LHC
Tevatron and LHC WS17/18 TUM S.Bethke, F. Simon V13: Heavy Quarks at LHC 1 Lecture 13: (Heavy Quark) Flavour Physics at LHC flavour physics - intro CKM quark mixing matrix goals of flavour physics heavy
More informationRecent results from the LHCb
PLANCK 2017 AGH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Bartłomiej Rachwał (AGH Kraków) on behalf of LHCb collaboration Recent results from the LHCb 20 th Planck Conference physics beyond the Standard Model
More informationResults from B-Physics (LHCb, BELLE)
Prospects for Charged Higgs Uppsala, Sweden, 16-18 September 2014. Results from B-Physics (LHCb, BELLE) Valery Pugatch Kiev Institute for Nuclear Research, NASU On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 1 OUTLINE
More informationCharmless b-meson and b-baryon decays at LHCb. Adam Morris
Charmless b-meson and b-baryon decays at Adam Morris University of Edinburgh on behalf of the Collaboration 13 th International Conference on Heavy Quarks and Leptons 6 th May 16 A. Morris (Edinburgh Charmless
More informationLHCb results and prospects
LHCb results and prospects M. Witek (IFJ PAN Cracow, Poland) On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Miami 2011 Conference Fort Lauderdale, Florida 800 physicists 15 countries 54 institutes CERN LHC Large
More informationRecent results on CKM/CPV from Belle
Recent results on CKM/CPV from Belle Alexander Leopold for the Belle Collaboration Insitute of High Energy Physics Austrian Academy of Sciences HEPMAD 15, September 21 st 2015 A. Leopold (HEPHY) Belle
More informationDecadimenti senza charm e misure di α alle B-Factory
Decadimenti senza charm e misure di α alle B-Factory Marcella Bona INFN e Università di Torino Incontri sulla Fisica delle Alte Energie Quark pesanti Lecce, 24 Aprile 2003 IFAE Lecce, Quark Pesanti, 24
More informationSearch for NP with B s ->m + m - and B->K *0 m + m -
Search for NP with B s ->m + m - and B->K *0 m + m - (on behalf of CMS collaboration at LHC) Sanjay Kumar Swain NISER, December 2014 Theoretical introduction Analysis of B s ->m + m - & B->K *0 m + m -
More informationPhysics opportunities with an upgraded LHCb detector in the HL-LHC era
Physics opportunities with an upgraded LHCb detector in the HL-LHC era Sascha Stahl, CERN on behalf of the LHCb collaboration Some slides inspired by the very nice experimental and theoretical flavour
More informationNeville Harnew University of Oxford
Review of Unitarity Triangle and Spectroscopy Measurements with LHCb Neville Harnew University of Oxford On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration September 5 th 2017 1 Outline General introduction The LHCb
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 10 Aug 2011
The Physics Potential of SuperB F. F. Wilson 1 on behalf of the SuperB Collaboration STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK arxiv:1108.2178v1 [hep-ex] 10 Aug 2011 SuperB
More informationLa Belle Epoque. K.Trabelsi kek.jp Lausanne, 22 Jan, 2009
La Belle Epoque K.Trabelsi karim.trabelsi @ kek.jp Lausanne, Jan, 9 Belle Epoque : was a period in European social history that began during th the late 19 and lasted until World War I... considered as
More informationCP violation and rare decays Tim Gershon University of Warwick. 4 June 2015
CP violation and rare decays University of Warwick Blois2015: 27th Rencontres de Blois on "Particle Physics and Cosmology" th 4 June 2015 Quark flavour mixing a.k.a. CKM phenomenology V CKM 3 A i 1 2 1
More informationMeasurement of γ from B DK and related modes at LHCb
Measurement of γ from B DK and related modes at LHCb Till Moritz Karbach CERN moritz.karbach@cern.ch Outline I. LHCb measurements two-body GLW/ADS four-body ADS GGSZ B Dh, followed by: GLW: ADS: GGSZ:
More informationRecent CP violation measurements
Recent CP violation measurements 1/38 Recap of last week What we have learned last week: Indirect searches (CP violation and rare decays) are good places to search for effects from new, unknown particles.
More informationCKM Matrix and CP Violation in Standard Model
CKM Matrix and CP Violation in Standard Model CP&Viola,on&in&Standard&Model&& Lecture&15& Shahram&Rahatlou& Fisica&delle&Par,celle&Elementari,&Anno&Accademico&2014815& http://www.roma1.infn.it/people/rahatlou/particelle/
More informationLHCb: first results and prospects for the run
Journal of Physics: Conference Series : first results and prospects for the 1-11 run To cite this article: J P Palacios and the Lhcb Collaboration 1 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 9 1 View the article online for
More informationCP violation and rare decays at LHCb. Jibo HE (UCAS), for the LHCb collaboration Presented at CLHCP PKU
CP violation and rare decays at LHCb Jibo HE (UCAS), for the LHCb collaboration Presented at CLHCP 2016 @ PKU Beauty/charm production Large production cross-section @ 7 TeV Minibias ~60 mb Charm ~6 mb
More informationFlavour Physics at hadron machines
Flavour Physics at hadron machines KIAS Phenomenology Workshop Seoul, Korea, 17-19 November 2011 T. Nakada EPFL-LPHE Lausanne, Switzerland B physics, started with hadron machine First discovery of b-quark
More informationExperimental prospects for B physics and discrete symmetries at LHC and future projects
Experimental prospects for B physics and discrete symmetries at LHC and future projects University of Warwick DISCRETE 2010 Symposium on Prospects in the Physics of Discrete Symmetries 6th December 2010
More informationFlavour Opportunities at the Intensity Frontier
Flavour Opportunities at the Intensity Frontier INFN, Rome Introduction Where we stand and where we are heading to in flavour physics Future scenarios & interplay with LHC Conclusions INTRODUCTION The
More informationResults from the B-factories (Lecture 2)
Results from the B-factories (Lecture 2) Helmholz International Summer School HEAVY QUARK PHYSICS Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Dubna, Russia, August 11-21, 28 1 Previous lecture b c interfering
More informationPoS(CHARM2016)074. Searches for CPV in D + decays at LHCb
Università di Pisa and Sezione INFN di Pisa, Pisa, Italy E-mail: simone.stracka@cern.ch Singly-Cabibbo-suppressed D + decays are a good place to search for CP violation in charm, (s which in the Standard
More informationBased on arxiv:0812:4320 In collaboration with A. Dedes, J Rosiek. Informal CIHEP Pizza Lunch February 6, 2009
A Case Study of B s µ + µ in the MSSM Based on arxiv:0812:4320 In collaboration with A. Dedes, J Rosiek. Cornell University Informal CIHEP Pizza Lunch February 6, 2009 Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP
More informationRare b and c decays at LHCb
Rare b and c decays at Preema Pais, EPFL! on behalf of the Collaboration!! HQL 8 May 8, 8 Yamagata, Japan RARE DECAYS AT Diverse physics program studying decays of b,c,s hadrons (Non-exhaustive) sampling:
More informationCP Violation in the B system
CP Violation in the B system Outline: Mixing induced CPV and B s mixing phase s Search for CPV in B s mixing Direct CPV in B DK and CKM phase Direct CPV in charmless B decays new Ulrich Uwer Heidelberg
More informationFuture Belle II experiment at the KEK laboratory
Future Belle II experiment at the KEK laboratory Jarosław Wiechczyński 27.03.2017 Rencontres de Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions 2 Outline B factories and their features SuperKEKB collider and
More informationStandard Model of Particle Physics SS 2013
Lecture: Standard Model of Particle Physics Heidelberg SS 213 Flavour Physics I + II 1 Contents PART I Determination of the CKM Matrix CP Violation in Kaon system CP violation in the B-system PART II Search
More informationNew physics searches via FCNC b s ll decays at ATLAS
New physics searches via FCNC b s ll at ATLAS Marcella (QMUL) on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration UK Flavour Workshop Durham, UK September 5th, 2017 B physics in ATLAS very limited (wo)man power but a
More informationNew Physics & Future B Physics Programs CP violation Rare Decays
Andrey Golutvin ARGUS & ITEP/Moscow New Physics & Future B Physics Programs CP violation Rare Decays 1 Experimental Facilities LHCb forward spectrometer (running in pp collider mode) Data taking starts
More informationR. Mureşan. University of Oxford On behalf of LHCb Collaboration. Prepared for the CERN Theory Institute "Flavour as a Window to New Physics at LHC"
May 8 CERN Theory Institute Charm Physics at LHCb R. Mureşan University of Oxford On behalf of LHCb Collaboration Prepared for the CERN Theory Institute "Flavour as a Window to New Physics at LHC" R. Mureşan
More informationHadronic B/D decays in factorization assisted topology diagram approach
Hadronic B/D decays in factorization assisted topology diagram approach Cai-Dian Lü( 吕才典 ) CFHEP, Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Based on work collaborated with Hsiang-nan Li, Ying Li, F-S.
More informationLHCb status. Marta Calvi. for the LHCb Collaboration. 103 rd LHCC meeting University Milano-Bicocca and INFN
LHCb status 103 rd LHCC meeting 22.09.2010 Marta Calvi University Milano-Bicocca and INFN for the LHCb Collaboration Data taking 3.2 pb -1 on tape eff ~91% Stable data taking, high efficiency in all systems,
More informationCP Violation sensitivity at the Belle II Experiment
CP Violation sensitivity at the Belle II Experiment for the Belle II collaboration Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München 29th Rencontres de Blois May 30th 2017 The Unitarity Triangle All flavor variables
More informationMeasurement of the. Maren Ugland. Bergen group meeting
Measurement of the B µµ BF s Maren Ugland Bergen group meeting - 25.11.2009 Introduction Neutral B-meson decays to two leptons are very sensitive to new physics. Since B s 0 l + l - involves a flavor changing
More informationB-physics with ATLAS and CMS
Physics at LHC-2008 Split-CROATIA, 29.9. 4.10.2008 B-physics with ATLAS and CMS Brigitte Epp, Astro- and Particle Physics, University of Innsbruck, Austria representing ATLAS / CMS collaborations B-physics
More informationElementary Particles, Flavour Physics and all that...
Elementary Particles, Flavour Physics and all that... 1 Flavour Physics The term Flavour physics was coined in 1971 by Murray Gell-Mann and his student at the time, Harald Fritzsch, at a Baskin-Robbins
More informationPoS(CKM2016)113. Measurement of γ from B meson decay to D ( ) K ( )
LAL, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France. E-mail: frederic.machefert@in2p3.fr The LHCb experiment has measured the angle γ of the unitarity triangle using B D ( ) K ( ) decays and with an integrated
More informationCharm mixing and CP violation at LHCb
Charm mixing and CP violation at LHCb Alex Pearce on behalf of the LHCb collaboration 13 th 19 th March 216 Moriond EW, La Thuile 1 / 15 Introduction Why charm? Mixing and CP violation established in kaon
More informationA.Mordá. INFN - Padova. 7 th July on behalf of the Belle2 Collaboration. CP Violation sensitivity at the Belle II Experiment
A. Mordá CP Violation sensitivity at the Belle II Experiment 7 th July 7 / CP Violation sensitivity at the Belle II Experiment A.Mordá on behalf of the Belle Collaboration INFN - Padova 7 th July 7 Introduction
More informationRadiative Penguin decays at BaBar. Debbie Bard University of Edinburgh
Radiative Penguin decays at BaBar Debbie Bard University of Edinburgh PEP II Asymmetric B factory: 9GeV eˉ, 3.1GeV e + Record instantaneous luminosity just over 1x10 34 cmˉ²sˉ² Total recorded BaBar luminosity
More informationCP Violation at the LHC - workshop 2017
CP Violation at the LHC - SM@LHC workshop 217 Sarah Karodia on behalf of the LHCb collaboration, including results from ATLAS, CMS and LHCb University of Glasgow May 2, 217 Sarah Karodia (UoG) SM@LHC 217
More informationTheoretical study of rare B/D decays
Theoretical study of rare B/D decays Cai-Dian Lü( 吕才典 ) CFHEP, Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing 1 Outline n Introduction/Motivation n Theory of non-leptonic B/D decays n Factorization assisted
More informationNew Physics search in penguin B-decays
New Physics search in penguin B-decays Sanjay Swain, SLAC on behalf of BABAR Collaboration 13 th -18 th Dec 2007 Miami 2007 Outline What is New Physics (NP)? b > (d, s) penguin decays Exclusive Semi-inclusive
More informationParticle Physics II CP violation. Lecture 3. N. Tuning. (also known as Physics of Anti-matter ) Niels Tuning (1)
Particle Physics II CP violation (also known as Physics of Anti-matter ) Lecture 3 N. Tuning Niels Tuning (1) Plan 1) Mon 5 Feb: Anti-matter + SM 2) Wed 7 Feb: CKM matrix + Unitarity Triangle 3) Mon 26
More informationMeasurements of CP violating phases in B decays at LHCb
Measurements of CP violating phases in B decays at Sevda Esen [Heidelberg University] on behalf of the collaboration Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d Aoste, 1-7 March 215 CP Violation in the SM
More informationMeasurements of the phase φ s at LHCb
Measurements of the phase φ s at LHCb V. Batozskaya 1 on behalf of LHCb collaboration 1 National Centre for Nuclear Research, Warsaw, Poland XXIII Cracow Epiphany Conference 9-12 January 2017 V. Batozskaya
More informationMixing and CP violation in beauty and charm at LHCb
Mixing and CP violation in beauty and charm at LHCb Jinlin Fu INFN e Università di Milano On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Moriond QCD 217 La Thuile, March 25 April 1, 217 Introduction Violation of
More information2! s measurement using B 0 s J/"# at LHCb
2! s measurement using B 0 s J/"# at LHCb Géraldine Conti for the LHCb Collaboration EPFL, Lausanne E-mail: geraldine.conti@epfl.ch LPHE-2009-009 A measurement of the phase of the B 0 s B 0 s oscillation
More informationB Factories. Alan Watson University of Birmingham, UK
Towards (φ ) and γ (φ ) at the 2 3 B Factories Alan Watson University of Birmingham, UK The Unitarity Triangle Source of CP in the Standard Model 1 λ 2 /2 λ Aλ 3 (ρ iη) V CKM λ 1 λ 2 /2 Aλ 2 Αλ 3 (1 ρ
More informationAdrian Bevan Department of Physics Liverpool University Liverpool, United Kingdom (from the BABAR Collaboration.)
BABAR-PROC-04/138 SLAC-PUB-10874 Measurements of sin 2α/φ 2 from B ππ, ρπ and ρρ modes. Adrian Bevan Department of Physics Liverpool University Liverpool, United Kingdom (from the BABAR Collaboration.)
More informationCP Violation Studies at DØ
CP Violation Studies at DØ Bd Bs Bd Bs Rick Van Kooten Indiana University For the DØ Collaboration LHCP 13 Barcelona, Spain 13 18 May 13? CP Violation Three kinds: In mixing: Mass eigenstates in mesonic
More informationViolazione diret t a di CP e decadiment i rari del mesone B a BaBar
Violazione diret t a di CP e decadiment i rari del mesone B a BaBar Gianluca Cavoto Univ.Roma La Sapienza INFN Roma 1 Seminario fisica dei campi e delle particelle Sezione INFN Roma 8 ottobre 24 The CKM
More informationRare beauty and charm decays at LHCb
Rare beauty and charm decays at LHCb Marcin Chrząszcz 1,2 on behalf of the LHCb collaboration 1 University of Zurich, 2 Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2014 August 25, 2014
More informationCharm physics at LHCb
Charm physics at LHCb Alexey Dzyuba on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 29th of August 2017, Moscow 18th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Charm quark Important properties: High mass
More informationHow well do we know the Unitarity Triangle? An experimental review
SLAC-PUB-1281 hep-ex/78.3238 September 27 How well do we know the Unitarity Triangle? An experimental review Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Physics, Room 26-443, 77 Massachusetts
More informationRESULTS FROM B-FACTORIES
XL International Meeting on Fundamental Physics Benasque, May 12 RESULTS FROM B-FACTORIES (IFIC Valencia) τ - τ + τ - τ + B factories KEKB s=10.58 GeV e + e- Υ(4s) Υ(4s) B B z ~ c βγ τ B ~ 200µm BaBar
More informationThe progress and prospect on charm mixing
BINP The progress and prospect on charm mixing Vitaly Vorobyev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics and Novosibirsk State University On behalf of Belle & Belle II Collaborations 2 nd international workshop
More informationFlavour Physics at LHC
Flavour Physics at LHC ICFP2009, Hanoi, September 2009 Tatsuya Nakada LPHE/EPFL Introduction (I) There exist solid observations for physics beyond the Standard Model T. Nakada ICFP2009 Hanoi September
More informationCracking the Unitarity Triangle
Cracking the Unitarity Triangle Latest Results from BABAR Masahiro Morii Harvard University NEPPSR 2004, Craigville, MA Unitarity Triangle Already seen it a few times this week VV + VV + VV = 0 ud ub cd
More informationCP violation in B h h
CP violation in B h h - for the LHCb collaboration CNRS/IN2P3 - Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire de Clermont Ferrand Standard Model @ LHC - Copenhagen, 13 April 2012 Introduction Direct CP asymmetry
More informationThe Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. CMS Note. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. CMS prospects for heavy flavour physics
Available on CMS information server CMS NOTE -2011/008 The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland 10 November 2011 (v2, 14 November 2011) CMS
More informationSearch for a heavy gauge boson W e
Search for a heavy gauge boson W e Cornell University LEPP Journal Club Seminar April 1, 2011 The LHC Machine 2 The beginning of the LHC era First collisions at 7 TeV confirmed on March 30, 2010 There
More informationRecent Results on Radiative and Electroweak Penguin B Decays at Belle. Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
Recent Results on Radiative and Electroweak Penguin B Decays at Belle Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University) Introduction Loop processes are sensitive to physics Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) since unobserved
More informationStandard Model of Particle Physics SS 2012
Lecture: Standard Model of Particle Physics Heidelberg SS 212 Flavour Physics I + II 1 And the winner is Congratulations! Prize 2 Examination Who needs a grade for this lecture (e.g. Erasmus students)?
More informationLHCb Semileptonic Asymmetry
CERN E-mail: mika.vesterinen@cern.ch A recent measurement of the CP violating flavour specific asymmetry in B s decays, a s sl, is presented. This measurement is based on a data sample corresponding to
More informationHiroyuki Sagawa KEK OHO 1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
Hiroyuki Sagawa KEK OHO 1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan In the neutral B meson system, it is possible to measure the CKM angle α using the decay mode b uud in the presence of penguin pollution. Here the recent
More informationQuark flavour physics
Quark flavour physics Michal Kreps Physics Department Plan Kaon physics and SM construction (bit of history) Establishing SM experimentally Looking for breakdown of SM Hard to cover everything in details
More informationCP violation in quark flavor physics
CP violation in quark flavor physics Stefania Gori University of Cincinnati Testing CP-violation for baryogengesis University of Massachusetts, Amherst, March 29, 2018 Outline and aim of the talk Outline
More informationThe pheno analysis of B K ( ) µ + µ decays in 2011+
Moriond Electroweak, La Thuile, March 13-20, 2011 The pheno analysis of B K ( ) µ + µ decays in 2011+ likewise, B s Φµ + µ Gudrun Hiller, Dortmund based on works with Christoph Bobeth and Danny van Dyk
More informationRecent BaBar results on CP Violation in B decays
Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Recent BaBar results on CP Violation in B decays To cite this article: Arantza Oyanguren 2013 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 447 012029 View the article online for
More information