A Derivation of Vector and Momentum Matrices
|
|
- Georgia Beasley
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A Derivation of Vector and Momentum Matrices arxiv:math-ph/040002v 4 Jan 2004 Richard Shurtleff February 23, 2008 Abstract Nonunitary, finite-dimensional matrix representations of the Poincaré algebra are found. These covariant representations may already be known but are less well-known than the unitary, canonical representations or the continuous representations with momentum as a gradiant operator. Given standard angular momentum (spin matrices satisfying the Lorentz algebra of rotations and boosts, the calculation here finds corresponding vector matrices and the momentum matrices that generate translations. The standard spin matrices and momentum matrices together satisfy the commutation rules of the Poincaré algebra. Irreducible Lorentz spin matrices fail to produce vector matrices. General, nontrivial vector matrices can be deduced from those found here for reducible spin matrices with spin (A,B (C,D, where A C = B D = /2. Useful vector matrix formulas that are hard to find elsewhere are displayed here in detail. A problem set is included. Introduction A vector matrix is both a vector and a tensor. Under a Lorentz transformation Λ ν µ the vector matrix V µij transforms like a vector: V µij Λ ν µ V νij. Also, given an n-dimensional representation D ij (Λ of the proper homogeneous Lorentz group, the vector matrix transforms as a second rank tensor: V µij D ij (ΛV µjk D kl (Λ. Equating the results, we get D ij (ΛV µjk D kl (Λ = Λ µ ν V νil, ( affiliation and mailing address: Department of Applied Mathematics and Sciences, Wentworth Institute of Technology, 550 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, USA, ZIP 025, telephone number: ( , fax number: ( , address: shurtleffr@wit.edu
2 INTRODUCTION 2 where summation over repeated indices is assumed, indices µ, ν {, 2, 3, 4} with indices {, 2, 3} ( = {x, y, z} labeling a right-handed rectilinear spatial reference frame and 4 ( = t labeling the time component, and i, j {, 2,..., n}. A well known example of a set of vector matrices is the set of the gamma matrices found in the relativistic wave equations for spin /2 particles such as the electron. Equation ( is then a special case of Pauli s Fundamental Theorem. [] Commutation rules follow directly from (. For example, let Λ = R be a rotation of the x, y-plane about the origin through an infinitesimal angle δ. Then cosδ and sin δ δ and Λ µ ν V ν {V x δv y, V y + δv x, V z, V t }, where indices ij can be inferred from the context and are dropped. Now let J z be the z-angular momentum matrix which generates R so that D ± ij(r I ij ± iδj zij, where I ij is the n n unit matrix. Substituting these in ( gives [J z, V x ] ik = J zij V xjk V xij J zjk = iv yik, (2 [J z, V y ] ik = J zij V yjk V yij J zjk = iv xik. Matrix multiplication and summation over repeated indices are understood. These two commutation rules and the commutation rules like it can be used to calculate the vector matrices V µij of any given n n matrix representation of the homogeneous Lorentz group. Since there are three angular momentum components, J i with i {, 2, 3}, and four vector indices, V µ with µ {, 2, 3, 4}, there are twelve commutation rules like (2. Another twelve come from the boost generators K i, for a total of 24 commutation rules to be satisfied by vector matrices. There are not always any nonzero solutions. Irreducible Lorentz representations can be characterized by the spin pair (A, B, with 2A and 2B integers. We show that nontrival vector matrices do not exist for irreducible Lorentz representations. However, there are nonzero vector matrices for reducible representations with spin (A, B (C, D when A C = /2 and B C = /2. The results for more general spin types can be deduced from the results obtained here. Explicit formulas for vector matrix components are collected in an Appendix which are to be used with the standard set of angular momentum and boost generator matrices displayed in Sec. 3 Momentum generates translations and translations, rotations and boosts together make up the inhomogeneous Lorentz group of spacetime symmetries known as the Poincaré group. Translations commute, so the matrix representation of momentum P µij is a set of four vector matrices that commute. Once the expressions for vector matrices are found it is but a short step to apply the rule [P µ, P ν ] = 0 and obtain an n n matrix representation of the Poincaré algebra. The representations of the Poincaré algebra found here are nonunitary, being extensions of nonunitary n n matrix representations of the homogeneous Lorentz group and should
3 2 THE POINCARÉ COMMUTATION RULES 3 not be confused with the unitary representations of the Poincaré algebra familiar since the work by Wigner. [2] [5] Sections 2 and 3 establish notation. In Sec. 2 the well-known commutation rules of the Poincaré algebra are presented, [6] [0] and the rules for vector matrices are identified. In Sec. 3 formulas for the matrices of the irreducible matrix representations (A, B of the (homogeneous Lorentz group are recalled from the literature. [] The details of the derivation of the vector matrices take up most of the remainder of the article. In Sec. 4 we find that there are no vector matrices with any of the irredicible matrix representations of the Lorentz group, so, in Sec. 5 we consider reducible Lorentz representations with spin (A, B (C, D. In Sections 4 and 5 we take advantage of the diagonal nature of matrices J z and K z. The step-up and step-down matrices J ± give recursion relations in Sec. 6. Then the recursion relations are solved in Sec. 7 for matrices V ± which are combinations of V x and V y. The results determine V z and V t in Sec. 8. Having found expressions for vector matrices, momentum matrices are obtained in Sec. 9. An Appendix collects expressions for the vector matrix components in terms of the spins A, B, C, D and two free parameters AB and t2 CD. The derivation illustrates standard techniques by first applying commutation rules with diagonal matrices and then dealing with step-up and step-down matrices. Also potentially interesting to students is the appearance of the matrices for spin (A, B (C, D. A complication commonly found in the literature [9],[] is found here: we use double indices that reflect the spin structure; matrix indices ij in ( become ab; cd in Sec. 3. The formulas for the components of vector matrices serve as reference for more advanced students and practitioners. A problem set is attached to help assure understanding, to provide the reward of investigation, and to offer an exploration of topics extending beyond the text. 2 The Poincaré Commutation Rules There are ten Poincaré generators, the four components of momentum generate translations, the three components of angular momentum generate rotations and the three components of boost generators generate boosts. The commutator of any two different Poincaré generators is a homogeneous linear combination of generators. The commutation rules of the Poincaré algebra are well known. [6] [0] The fifteen rules that do not involve the momentum form the commutation rules of the homogeneous Lorentz algebra, [J i, J j ] = iǫ ijk J k [J i, K j ] = iǫ ijk K k [K i, K j ] = iǫ ijk J k (3 where J k is the k component of the angular momentum, K k is the k component of the boost generator and ǫ ijk determines the sign: ǫ ijk is antisymmetric in ijk with ǫ xyz = and
4 3 IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE LORENTZ GROUP 4 i, j, k {x, y, z}. Twenty-four rules are linear and homogeneous in momentum components. They can be deduced from ( by appropriate choices for Λ. A vector matrix is a set of four square matrices that obeys the 24 rules linear in momentum. Writing the four components of a vector as V µ = {V i, V t }, µ {x, y, z, t}, the rules are [J i, V j ] = iǫ ijk V k [K i, V j ] = iv t δ ij (4 [J i, V t ] = 0 [K i, V t ] = iv i δ ij (5 References [4] and [5] display rules using the same spacetime metric as here, the diagonal matrix with diagonal {,,, }, but with contravariant vector matrices {V i, V t } = {V i, V t }. This accounts for minus signs in the rules involving V t. The final six rules are quadratic in momentum components and state that momentum components P µ = {P i, P 4 } commute. Thus the P µ obey the rules (4 and (5 for vectors as well as the following six rules that say that the components commute, [P µ, P ν ] = 0 (6 where µ, ν {x, y, z, t}. Eqns. (3 - (6 (with P µ for V µ in (4 and (5 are the commutation rules of the Poincaré algebra. 3 Irreducible Representations of the Lorentz Group Matrices representing the components of angular momentum and boosts of the homogeneous Lorentz group and satisfying (3 are well known and given by standard expressions. [] The irreducible representations of the (homogeneous Lorentz group are catalogued by the pair (A, B, where 2A and 2B are non-negative integers. Following standard procedures [],[2], one begins by writing a 2A + dimensional representation of the rotation group: M +(A σσ = (M (A x + im y (A σσ = r σ (A δ σ,σ + (7 where M (A σσ = (M (A x im y (A σσ = s (A σ δ σ,σ (8 (M (A z σσ = σ δ σσ (9 σ, σ { A, A +,..., A, A} (0
5 4 IRREDUCIBLE LG REPRESENTATIONS - NO SOLUTIONS 5 and with r (A σ s (A σ r σ (A = = r (A σ = (A σ (A + σ + ( (A + σ (A σ + (2 and s (A σ zero outside the allowed range of σ in (0. The matrices {M x (A, M y (A, z } satisfy the commutation rules of the Lie algebra of the rotation group: [M i, M j ] = M (A iǫ ijk M k. Next define the (2A + (2B + dimensional matrices A k and B k, (A k ab,a b (M (A k a,a δ b,b (B k ab,a b (M (B k b,b δ a,a (3 Then the (A, B representation of the Lorentz group can be taken to be the following (2A + (2B + dimensional matrices J (A,B k and K (A,B k By (7-(4, we find J (A,B k = A k + B k K (A,B k = i(a k B k (4 (J +(A,B ab,a b = r (A a δ a,a +δ b,b + r (B b δ a,a δ b,b + (5 (J (A,B ab,a b = s (A a δ a,a δ b,b + s (B b δ a,a δ b,b (6 (K +(A,B ab,a b = i(r (A a δ a,a +δ b,b r (B b δ a,a δ b,b + (7 (K (A,B ab,a b = i(s (A a δ a,a δ b,b s (B b δ a,a δ b,b (8 (J (A,B z ab,a b = (a + bδ a,a δ b,b (9 (K (A,B z ab,a b = i(a bδ a,a δ b,b (20 Note that J z and K z are diagonal (superscript (A, B is suppressed whenever possible; their nonzero components have the double index ab equal to the double index a b. 4 Irreducible LG Representations - No Solutions Suppose we choose as angular momentum and boost matrices the J i and K i of the (A, B irreducible representation of the Lorentz group. One can check that the commutation rules (3 are satisfied.
6 5 REDUCIBLE LG REPRESENTATIONS 6 Next, we seek vector matrices V µ that solve the 24 commutation rules (4 and (5. Let us begin with the rules (4 and (5 that involve the diagonal matrices J z and K z. By (4, we have [J z, V x ] = iv y and [J z, V y ] = iv x which imply that V x = [J z, [J z, V x ]]. Hence V x = [J (A,B z, [J (A,B z, V x ]] = (J (A,B z We also have [K z, V x ] = 0, which implies [K (A,B z 2 V x 2J z (A,B V x J z (A,B + V x (J z (A,B 2 (2, V x ] = K z (A,B V x V x K z (A,B = 0 (22 With (9 and (20 for J (A,B z and K (A,B z, we get from (2 (V x ab,a b = [(a + b (a + b ] 2 (V x ab,a b (23 and from (22 we get [(a b (a b ](V x ab,a b = 0. (24 One can quickly show that (23 and (24 imply that either a a = b b = ± 2 or (V x ab,a b = 0 (25 But, by (0, the indices a and a must differ by an integer n aa since a and a range over the set { A, A +,...,A, A}. Since the indices cannot differ by ±/2, we get the trivial result, a a = b b = n aa ± (V x ab,a b 2 = 0. (26 Thus V x vanishes and that implies that all four V µ vanish because the others can be written as commutators of V x with J z +(A,B, J y +(A,B, and K x +(A,B by (4. We have V µ = 0. (Irreducible J (A,B, K (A,B (27 There are no non-zero vector matrices V µ, and therefore also no non-zero momentum matrices P µ, satisfying the Poincaré commutation rules with the angular momentum and boost matrices of an irreducible representation of the homogeneous Lorentz group. 5 Reducible LG Representations Since irreducible representations fail to produce interesting results, we next try reducible representations of the Lorentz group. The simplest of these have angular momentum and
7 5 REDUCIBLE LG REPRESENTATIONS 7 boost matrices in block diagonal form with two irreducible representations along the diagonal. Consider the (2A+(2B + + (2C +(2D+ dimensional representation of the Lorentz group which combines an (A, B and a (C, D representation. In block matrix notation, we have ( J 0 J = = 0 J 22 ( J (A,B 0 0 J (C,D ( K 0 K = = 0 K 22 ( K (A,B 0 0 K (C,D with J (A,B and K (A,B as in Section 3 and similar expressions for J (C,D and K (C,D. Putting the unknown vector matrices V µ in block matrix form, we get ( Vµ V V µ = µ2 V µ2 V µ22 The commutator [J, V ] in block matrix form is ( J.V [J, V ] = V.J J.V 2 V 2.J 22 J 22.V 2 V 2.J J 22.V 22 V 22.J 22 The commutation rules (4 and (5, by inspection of the diagonal blocks of (30, do not mix (A, B and (C, D representations. Thus the results of Section 4 for irreducible Lorentz representations apply to V and V 22 and we infer that V = 0 and V 22 = 0. However, the 2 and 2 blocks of [J, V ] do mix the (A,B and the (C,D representations and so the results of Section 4 do not apply to the off-diagonal blocks of V. Thus we have, by Section 4 and without loss of generality, V µ = ( 0 Vµ2 V µ2 0 (28 (29 (30. (3 The unknowns are now the components of the off-diagonal blocks V µ2 and V µ2 of the four vector matrices V µ. As in Section 4, we consider the equations in (4 and (5 that involve the diagonal matrices J z and K z. Here, as there, we have V x = [J z, [J z, V x ]] from [J z, V x ] = iv y and [J z, V y ] = iv x. For the 2 block, by (28, (30, and (3, these commutation rules give V x2 = [J z, [J z, V x ]] 2 = (J (A,B z And we have [K z, V x ] = 0, which gives By (9 and (20 for J (A,B z 2 V x2 2J z (A,B V x2 J z (C,D + V x2 (J z (C,D 2 (32 [K z, V x ] 2 = K z (A,B.V x2 V x2.k z (C,D = 0. (33, J (C,D z, K z (A,B, and K z (C,D in (32 and (33 we get (V x2 ab,cd = [(a + b (c + d] 2 (V x2 ab,cd (34
8 5 REDUCIBLE LG REPRESENTATIONS 8 By (34 and (35, we find that either [(a b (c d](v x2 ab,cd = 0 (35 a c = b d = ± 2 or (V x2 ab,cd = 0 (36 Compare (36 with Eqn. (25. In (25 a and a could not differ by a half, so there are no nontrivial solutions to (25. But a and c can differ by a half, so there may be nontrivial solutions to (36. Since spins A, B, C, D must be integers or half-integers and by (0 A a, B b, C c, D d are all integers, we find from (36 that when V x2 0, A = C + n + /2 B = D + m + /2, (37 where n and m are integers. (Proof: In (36, let a = A n and c = C n 2, so that A C = n 2 n ±/2. Thus either A or C is an integer while the other is half an odd integer and likewise for B and D. Using deltas to enforce (36, we have can write the ab, cd component of the block V x2 as (V x2 ab,cd = abδ a,c+/2 δ b,d+/2 + u 2 abδ a,c /2 δ b,d /2, (38 where ab and u2 ab are as-yet-undetermined coefficients. From J z and V x we can get V y ; by (4, we have iv y = [J z, V x ]. By (9, (28, (29, (30 and (38, we get the 2 block of iv y, i(v y2 ab,cd = ab δ a,c+/2δ b,d+/2 u 2 ab δ a,c /2δ b,d /2 (39 Comparing (38 and (39 suggest defining simpler matrices V + and V by (V + 2 ab,cd 2 (V x2 + iv y2 ab,cd = abδ a,c+/2 δ b,d+/2 (40 (V 2 ab,cd 2 (V x2 iv y2 ab,cd = u 2 ab δ a,c /2δ b,d /2 (4 To determine the 2-block of V + and V, exchange the (A, B and (C, D blocks in the matrices J k and K k, (28. The effect is to exchange a c, b d, 2 in (40 and (4. We get (V + 2 cd,ab 2 (V x2 + iv y2 cd,ab = t 2 cd δ c,a+/2δ d,b+/2 (42 (V 2 cd,ab 2 (V x2 iv y2 cd,ab = u 2 cdδ c,a /2 δ d,b /2 (43
9 6 STEP-UP AND DOWN; RECURSIONS 9 Thus we have and V + = V = ( 0 V + ( 2 V 2 + = 0 ( 0 V ( 2 V2 = 0 0 ab δ a,c+/2δ b,d+/2 cd δ c,a+/2δ d,b+/2 0 t 2 u 2 0 u 2 cd δ c,a /2δ d,b /2 0 abδ a,c /2 δ b,d /2 Note carefully that there may not be a variable ab for every allowed value of a and b because the factors δ a,c+/2 and δ b,d+/2 in (40. These factors imply that (V 2 + ab,cd depends on ab only when c = a /2 and d = b /2. Thus the indices of t2 ab are restricted also by the ranges of c and d, forcing the indices a and b of ab to be in the following ranges (44 (45 t (2 ab : max[ A, C + 2 ] a min[a, C + 2 ] (46 t (2 ab : max[ B, D + 2 ] b min[b, D + 2 ] (47 Similar restrictions apply to the ranges of the variables t 2 cd, u 2 ab, and u 2 cd. In this section we have considered the commutation rules involving the vector matrices V x and V y and the diagonal matrices J z and K z. The resulting simplification is evident in Eqns. (44 and (45. Next we consider the commutation rules of V x and V y with the given matrices J x and J y. 6 Step-Up and Down; Recursions Define the step-up and step-down matrices J + and J, J + = J x + ij y and J = J x ij y, (48 so-named by their effect on eigenvectors of J z. The commutation rules (4 applied to the commutators of J + and J with the matrices V + and V yield [J ±, V ± ] = 0 and [J ±, V ] = ±V z, (49 which are simpler than the equivalent equations with J x and J y. By (5, (6, and (28, we find the needed formulas for J ±, J + = ( r (A a δ a,a +δ b,b + r (B b δ a,a δ b,b r c (C δ c,c +δ d,d + r (D d δ c,c δ d,d + (50
10 6 STEP-UP AND DOWN; RECURSIONS 0 ( s J (A a = δ a,a δ b,b + s (B b δ a,a δ b,b 0 0 s (C c δ c,c δ d,d + s (D (5 d δ c,c δ d,d Consider the 2-block [J +, V + ] 2 = 0, and, with V + from (44 and J + from (50, we have (r a t (A 2 a,b r(c c ab δ a,c+3/2δ b,d+/2 = 0 (52 (r (B b t2 a,b r (D d abδ a,c+/2 δ b,d+3/2 = 0 (53 From [J, V ] 2 = 0, with V from (45 and J from (5, we get (s (A a+u 2 a+,b s (C c u 2 abδ c,a+3/2 δ d,b+/2 = 0 (54 (s (B b+ u2 a,b+ s (D d u 2 abδ c,a+/2 δ d,b+3/2 = 0 (55 Note that these are recursion relations in the indices a and b. From the right-hand equation in (49, we have [J +, V ] 2 = [J, V + ] 2. With V ± and J ± from (44, (45, (50 and (5, we have (r a u (A 2 a,b r(c c u 2 ab + s(b b+ t2 a,b+ s(d d ab δ a,c+/2δ b,d /2 = 0 (56 (r (B b u2 a,b r(d d u 2 ab + s(a a+ a+,b s(c c ab δ c,a+/2δ d,b /2 = 0 (57 Without loss of generality we can assume that A > C, because we can interchange the AB and CD blocks in the J and K matrices whenever C > A. Thus, by interchanging the AB and CD blocks if necessary, we can assume that n is positive or zero in (37. We have A = C + n + 2 (n 0. (58 The factor δ a,c+3/2 in Eqn. (52 implies that the recursion relation is trivial unless c = a 3/2 = /2+a = C +n A+a, where we use /2 = C +n A from (58. By definition (, r c (C vanishes for c C 0, i.e. for c C = n A + a 0. Thus r c (C vanishes for a A n + and the recursion relation (52 implies that (r (A a a,b r (C c abδ b,d+/2 = r (A a a,bδ b,d+/2 = 0 (a A n +. (59 By (46 and (59 and since r (A a is not zero for A a A +, we have a,b = 0 for min[a, C + /2] a max[a n +, A +, C + /2]. If n, then min[a, C + /2] = A and max[a n +, A +, C + /2] A, implying a = A is in the range and therefore A,b = 0. The recursion formula (52 makes all the t2 s vanish. We have A+2,b = = t2 A,b = 0 (A C + 3/2 (60
11 7 APPLYING THE RECURSION RELATIONS Substituting ab = 0 into Eqn. (56, now gives an equation similar to (52, but with us intead of ts. The same reasoning that gave (60 gives all u 2 ab = 0. And similar reasoning applied to the 2-block gives t 2 cd = u 2 cd = 0, and V + = V = 0, i.e. V x = V y = 0. By (4, all four vector matrices vanish and we have, for n, V µ = 0 (A C + 3/2. (6 Since n is positive or zero by assumption in (58, we conclude that V µ = 0 unless n = 0. When n = 0 in (58, there are no recursion relations that reduce to a single term as in (59. Note that the requirement a A n + would require a A + and that exceeds the range of index a, by (0. Thus there may be nonzero vector matrices for A = C + /2. Dropping the restriction that A be larger than C we see that C = A + /2 could give nonzero matrices V µ. By investigations of the recursion relations for the B and D indices we find that the vector matrices V µ are zero unless A = C ± 2 and B = D ± 2 (62 Thus the requirement that there be nonzero vector matrices severely limits the choice of spins (A, B (C, D. 7 Applying the Recursion Relations The problem of finding vector matrices V µ has reduced to finding the quantities ab, t2 cd, u2 ab, and u 2 cd in V + and V, (44 and (45. In this section we find that the recursion relations (52-(57 allow the ts and us to be written as functions of A, B, C, D with two of the ts, AB and t 2 CD, remaining as free parameters. We need only consider the two of the possibilities in (62 with A > C, since we can interchange the (A, B and (C, D blocks of the J and K matrices if C > A. The two cases are A = C + /2; B = D ± /2. We take B > D as Case and D > B as Case 2. Case : A = C + /2; B = D + /2. Consider the recursion relation (52 and start with a = A. Then the delta function factor δ a,c+3/2 in (52 determines c = a 3/2 = A 3/2 = C. For any allowed index b, by ( and (52, we have A,b = r(c C r (A A A,b = [C (C ][C + (C + ] [A (A ][A + (A + ] t2 A,b = 2A 2A A,b. (63 Substituting successive values of a, a = A,..., A + 2, into the recursion relation, we find that A + a a,b = A,b (64 2A
12 7 APPLYING THE RECURSION RELATIONS 2 The recursion (53 gives similar results for the b indices. We get a,b = A + a 2A B + b 2B A,B. (Case (65 for all values of the indices, A + a A and B + b B allowed by Eqn. (46. Recursions (54 and (55 give a formula for the us. We get A a B b u 2 a,b = u 2 A, B. (Case (66 2A 2B for all allowed values of the indices, A a A and B b B. Substituting ab and u 2 ab from (65 and (66 into Eqn.(56, we get A + a B b ( A,B + 2A 2B u2 A, B = 0. (67 For a A and b B in (67, we have u 2 A, B = A,B (Case (68 Eqn. (57 produces the same result. Equations (65, (66 and (68 determine the quantities ab and u 2 ab for Case, A = C + /2 and B = D + /2. Case 2: A = C + /2; B = D /2. For Case 2, start the recursion relation (53 with b = B. The delta function factor δ b,d+3/2 in (53 determines d = b 3/2 = B 3/2 = D 2. Then for any allowed index a, by ( and (53 we have a,b = r(d D 2 r (B B a,b = [D (D 2][D + (D 2 + ] [B (B ][B + (B + ] t2 a,b = 2 a,b (69 Substituting successive values of b, b = B,..., B +, into the recursion relation, we find that a,b = B b + a,b. (70 Applying the recursion (64 for the a-index, we get a,b = A + a 2A B b + t 2 A,B. (Case 2 (7 for all allowed indices, A + a A and B b B in Eqn. (46.
13 8 COMPLETING THE SET OF VECTOR MATRICES 3 Similar work with Eqn. (54 and Eqn. (55 gives a formula for the us. We get u 2 a,b = A a 2A B + b + u 2 A, B (Case 2 (72 for all allowed indices, A a A and B b B. Substituting ab and u2 ab from (7 and (72 in Eqns.(56 and (57, we get Equations (7, (72 and (73 determine the quantities ab and B = D /2. To determine the 2-block quantities t 2 cd and u 2 u 2 A, B = t2 A,B (Case 2. (73 and u2 ab for Case 2, A = C + /2 cd, interchange the (A, B and (C, D blocks in the J k and K k matrices (28. The effect is to exchange a c, b d, 2, Case Case 4, and Case 2 Case 3. Thus the equations for t 2 cd and u 2 cd can be transcribed from (65, (66 and (68 for Case and from (7, (72 and (73 for Case 2. At this point we could write expressions for the vector matrices V + and V. However, we wait until we can also write V z and V t. 8 Completing the Set of Vector Matrices Expressions for vector matrices V z and V t in terms of V + and V follow from the commutation rules. By (49, V z = [J +, V ] and, with J + and V from (45 and (50, we have V z2 = 2 [(ra a u 2 a,b r C c u 2 a,bδ a,c+/2 δ b,d /2 + (r B b u 2 a,b r D d u 2 a,bδ a,c /2 δ b,d+/2 ]. (74 The formula expresses the components of the matrix V z in terms of known functions. An expression for V t can be found by (4, [ik +, V ] = i[k x + ik y, V x iv y ]/2 = V t. By (7 and (28, the needed matrix ik + is found to be ik + = ( r (A a δ a,a +δ b,b r (B b δ a,a δ b,b r c (C δ c,c +δ d,d r (D d δ c,c δ d,d + This together with V from (45 gives V t2 = 2 [(ra a u2 a,b rc c u2 a,b δ a,c+/2δ b,d /2 (r B b u2 a,b rd d u2 a,b δ a,c /2δ b,d+/2 ]. (76 To obtain the 2-blocks of V z and V t make the following exchanges in the 2-blocks: 2, {A, a} {C, c}, and {B, b} {D, d} (75
14 9 MOMENTUM MATRICES 4 Note that the terms in brackets in these expressions for V z and V t differ only in sign, so it is preferable to display the combinations V z ± V t since the many cancellations simplify the displayed expressions. The explicit formulas for the matrix components of V µ are lengthy so they have been placed in an appendix. The collection of formulas in Appendix A is the main result of this paper. 9 Momentum Matrices Momentum matrices P µ satisfy the commutation rules (4 and (5 for vector matrices as well as rule (6 which says that momentum matrices commute, [P µ, P ν ] = 0. For Case, with A = C + /2; B = D + /2 and by (82 - (85, the -block of [P +, P ] gives [P +, P Ab + ab ] ;a,a,b,b = ABt 2 CDδ a,a δ b,b = 0, (A = C + /2; B = D + /2 (77 AB where P ± = (P x ± ip y /2. Choosing a = A and b = B, we get [P +, P ] ;A,a,B,b = 2 AB AB t2 CD δ A,a δ B,b = 0. (78 Since neither A nor B can be zero in Case and the delta functions are nonzero for a = A and b = B, we have AB = 0 or t 2 CD = 0. (79 Inspection of (82 - (97 shows that AB is a common factor in all components of P µ 2 and t 2 CD is a common factor in all components of P 2. µ Thus, by (79, the momentum matrix has one of the following two block matrix forms, either ( 0 0 P µ = Vµ 2 0 or P µ = ( 0 V 2 µ. ( One can show that the same result holds for all cases, A = C ± /2; B = D ± /2: the momentum matrices P µ are the vector matrices V µ, (82-(97, with either the 2-block or the 2-block set equal to zero. That P 2 should be zero relates back to the definition of momentum as the generator of translations. Let T(a be a translation through displacement a. Then P 2 = 0 implies that T(a = exp ( iap = iap and allows T(bT(a = T(a+b to have a matrix representation.
15 A FORMULAS FOR VECTOR MATRICES 5 A Formulas for Vector Matrices We now give formulas for the matrix components of V µ for spin (A, B (C, D. Results for V µ in the general case of spin (A i, B i can be deduced from the formulas here, see Problem 4. The angular momentum matrices J i and the boost matrices K i can be found by (28 and (5 through (20. The matrices V µ are n n square matrices with n = (2A+(2B ++(2C +(2D+, with components put in block matrix form, ( ( (V V = ab,ab (V 2 ab,cd = (V 2 cd,ab (V 22 cd,cd 0 (V 2 ab,cd (V 2 cd,ab 0, (8 since the and 22 blocks are null in all four cases. The indices {ab, cd} and {cd, ab}are pairs of double indices originating from the (A, B (C, D representation of the Lorentz group. Replacing the pairs of double indices with pairs of single indices, e.g. {ab, cd} {i, j}, is discussed in the problem set, see Problem 3. The indices have ranges a { A, A +,...,A}, b { B, B +,...,B}, c { C, C +,..., C}, d { D, D +,..., D}. The formulas for the (V 2 ± ab,cd blocks for Case, A = C + /2; B = D + /2, come from substituting (65, (66 and (68 in (40 and (42. The (V z2 ±V t2 ab,cd blocks for Case come from substituting (66 and (68 in (74 and (76. For Case 2, A = C + /2; B = D /2, use (7, (72 and (73 instead of (65, (66 and (68. Cases and 2 become Cases 4 and 3 when we swap (A, B (C, D (C, D (A, B. Thus the formulas of Case 4 and 3 can be obtained from those of Cases and 2 by the exchanges {A, a} {C, c}, {B, b} {D, d}, 2. Four cases give nontrivial solutions, A = C ± /2; B = D ± /2. Case : A = C + /2; B = D + /2. (V 2 ± ab,cd = A ± a B ± b 2 (V x2 ± iv y2 ab,cd = ± ABδ a,c±/2 δ b,d±/2 (82 2A 2B A ± a B b 2 (V z2 ± V t2 ab,cd = AB δ a,c /2δ b,d±/2 (83 2A 2B (V ± 2 cd,ab = 2 (V x2 ± iv y2 cd,ab = ± A a B b t 2 CD δ c,a±/2δ d,b±/2, (84 2 (V z2 ± V t2 cd,ab = + A a B ± b t 2 CD δ c,a±/2δ d,b /2 (85
16 A FORMULAS FOR VECTOR MATRICES 6 Case 2: A = C + /2; B = D /2. (V ± 2 ab,cd = 2 (V x2 ± iv y2 ab,cd = A ± a 2A D d t 2 AB δ a,c±/2 δ b,d±/2 (86 A ± a 2 (V z2 ± V t2 ab,cd = ± D ± d t 2 AB δ a,c±/2 δ b,d /2 (87 2A (V ± 2 cd,ab = 2 (V x2 ± iv y2 cd,ab = A a D ± d 2D t 2 CDδ c,a±/2 δ d,b±/2 (88 2 (V z2 ± V t2 cd,ab = D d A a t 2 CD δ c,a±/2δ d,b /2 (89 2D Case 3: A = C /2; B = D + /2. (V 2 ± ab,cd = 2 (V x2 ± iv y2 ab,cd = B ± b C c 2B AB δ a,c±/2δ b,d±/2 (90 2 (V z2 ± V t2 ab,cd = B b C c AB δ a,c±/2δ b,d /2 (9 2B (V ± 2 cd,ab = 2 (V x2 ± iv y2 cd,ab = C ± c 2C B b t 2 CD δ c,a±/2 δ d,b±/2 (92 C ± c 2 (V z2 ± V t2 cd,ab = ± B ± b t 2 CD δ c,a±/2 δ d,b /2 (93 2C Case 4: A = C /2; B = D /2. (V ± 2 ab,cd = 2 (V x2 ± iv y2 ab,cd = ± C c D d AB δ a,c±/2δ b,d±/2 (94 2 (V z2 ± V t2 ab,cd = + C c D ± d (V ± 2 cd,ab = 2 (V x2 ± iv y2 cd,ab = ± AB δ a,c±/2δ b,d /2 (95 C ± c D ± d t 2 CD δ c,a±/2δ d,b±/2 (96 2C 2D 2 (V z2 ± V t2 cd,ab = C ± c 2C D d 2D t 2 CDδ c,a±/2 δ d,b /2 (97
17 B PROBLEMS 7 B Problems. Use Appendix A with (A, B = (0, /2 and (C, D = (/2, 0 and an appropriate choice of free parameters AB and t2 CD to obtain a set of Dirac gamma matrices V µ = γ µ. Show that the matrices satisfy V µ V ν + V ν V µ = 2η µν I, where η is the metric and I is the 4x4 unit matrix. (The matrix indices on the V µ and I are suppressed. 2. The Euclidean group in two dimensions, E 2. [3] Rotations R in the x, y plane about the origin can be represented with the z-angular momentum generator J z given by 0 i 0 J z = i 0 0, which acts on vector components {x, y, }. The constant third component indicates the direct product of {x, y} with a scalar which doesn t change under rotations. Let V xij and V yij be vector matrices obeying the commutation rules [J z, V x ] ij = iv yij and [J z, V y ] ij = iv xij. The group of motions in the x, y-plane including the rotations R and x and y translations is called E 2. (a Find V xij and V yij from the commutation rules. (b Find the momentum matrices P xij and P yij. 3. Single index notation. One may reduce the double index (a, b to a single index i. For example, with A = B = /2, we can write (a, b i by {( /2, /2, ( /2, +/2 2, (+/2, /2 3, (+/2, +/2 4}, so that i {, 2, 3, 4}. With this numbering system and the formulas of Case 3 in Appendix A, find the ten 7 7 matrices J k, K k, V µ for spin (A, B (C, D = (/2, /2 (, 0. Verify one commutation rule from each set of rules (3 - (6. 4. What spins A, B, C, D, E, F give non-zero vector matrices V µ when the Js and Ks form the (A, B (C, D (E, F reducible representation of the Lorentz algebra (3? Argue from the linearity of V µ in rules (4 and (5 or, as in Sec. 4, use the diagonal matrices J z and K z to decide which blocks of the vector matrices are possibly non-zero or argue otherwise. 5. Vector Representation. Calculate the momentum matrices P µ for (A, B = (/2, /2 and (C, D = (0, 0 with Pµ 2 0 and Pµ 2 = 0. Find the similarity transformation S that takes these P µ s to the following set of matrices, SPS = P, where δ µ,x P µ = δ µ,y δ µ,z δ µ,t
18 B PROBLEMS 8 Show that and ( + ix µ P µ 2 = ( + i2x µ P µ e ixµp µ = + ixµ P µ. 6. Now show that the new generators in the previous problem (the J s, K s and P s produce matrices D(L, a that represent Poincaré transformations in the form ( L µ D(L, a = ν a µ 0 where L µ,ν is a (4x4 homogeneous Lorentz transformation and a = {a x, a y, a z, a t } is the translation vector. [4] (First, verify that the AB block of J s and K s form the regular representation for which the matrices D(L, 0 are well known. Then use the off-diagonal P s from Problem 6 to finish. Or proceed some other way. 7. Find all spins (A, B (C, D such that the commutators of the vector matrices are proportional to the angular momentum and boost generators expressed in four dimensional notation, i.e. [V µ, V ν ] = kj µν, where k is constant, J µν is antisymmetric in µ, ν, J ij = ǫ ijk J k, and K it = K i. [There is at least one solution, the Dirac gamma matrices of Problem.] 8. Find all spins (A, B (C, D such that the anti-commutator of the vector matrices is proportional to the metric, that is, {V µ, V ν } = V µ V ν + V µ V ν = kη µν I, where k is constant, η µν = diag{,,, +} is the metric and I is the unit matrix. [There is at least one solution, the Dirac gamma matrices of Problem. Can you show that the Dirac gammas are the only vector matrices for spin (A, B (C, D whose commutators and anticommutators produce the angular momentum matrices and the metric as in problems 7 and 8?]
19 REFERENCES 9 References [] J.J.Sakurai, Advanced Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 967, Appendix C (Paulis fundamental theorem. [2] Wigner, E., Annals of Mathematics, 40, 49 (939. [3] Kim, Y. S. and Noz, M. E., Theory and Applications of the Poincaré Group (D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, 986, Chapter III. [4] Tung, W., Group Theory in Physics (World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, 985, Sec [5] Weinberg, S., The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. I (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 995, Sec. 2.5 and references therein. [6] The Resource Letter in Ref. [9] contains many references to articles published prior to 98. References [7] to [0] are only some of the many resources available to those interested in the Poincaré group and its algebra. The same comment applies to the references for other topics listed below. [7] Kim, Y. S. and Noz, M. E., op. cit. [8] Tung, W., op. cit., Chapt. 0; [9] The Resource Letter: Stuewer, R. H., Am. J. Phys., Vol. 49, No. 4, April 98, pp [0] Hamermesh, M., Group Theory and its Application to Physical Problems (Addison- Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Massachusetts, 964. [] Weinberg, S., op. cit., Sec. 5.6 and references therein. [2] Tung, W., op. cit., Sec [3] Tung, W., op. cit., Sec. 9.; [4] Hamermesh, M., op. cit., Sec. 2.4.
Massless Particle Fields, with Momentum Matrices
Massless Particle Fields, with Momentum Matrices arxiv:hep-th/4151v2 16 Jan 24 Richard Shurtleff August 5, 218 Abstract Nontrivial translation matrices occur for spin (A,B) (C,D) with A C = B D = 1/2,
More informationParity P : x x, t t, (1.116a) Time reversal T : x x, t t. (1.116b)
4 Version of February 4, 005 CHAPTER. DIRAC EQUATION (0, 0) is a scalar. (/, 0) is a left-handed spinor. (0, /) is a right-handed spinor. (/, /) is a vector. Before discussing spinors in detail, let us
More informationRotation Eigenvectors and Spin 1/2
Rotation Eigenvectors and Spin 1/2 Richard Shurtleff March 28, 1999 Abstract It is an easily deduced fact that any four-component spin 1/2 state for a massive particle is a linear combination of pairs
More informationRepresentations of Lorentz Group
Representations of Lorentz Group based on S-33 We defined a unitary operator that implemented a Lorentz transformation on a scalar field: How do we find the smallest (irreducible) representations of the
More informationPlan for the rest of the semester. ψ a
Plan for the rest of the semester ϕ ψ a ϕ(x) e iα(x) ϕ(x) 167 Representations of Lorentz Group based on S-33 We defined a unitary operator that implemented a Lorentz transformation on a scalar field: and
More informationChapter 1 LORENTZ/POINCARE INVARIANCE. 1.1 The Lorentz Algebra
Chapter 1 LORENTZ/POINCARE INVARIANCE 1.1 The Lorentz Algebra The requirement of relativistic invariance on any fundamental physical system amounts to invariance under Lorentz Transformations. These transformations
More informationL = e i `J` i `K` D (1/2,0) (, )=e z /2 (10.253)
44 Group Theory The matrix D (/,) that represents the Lorentz transformation (.4) L = e i `J` i `K` (.5) is D (/,) (, )=exp( i / /). (.5) And so the generic D (/,) matrix is D (/,) (, )=e z / (.53) with
More informationLorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama
Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 30A, Spring 007, Hitoshi Murayama 1 Poincaré Symmetry In order to understand the number of degrees of freedom we need
More informationThe Lorentz Force Law and Spacetime Symmetries
The Lorentz Force Law and Spacetime Symmetries arxiv:math-ph/546v1 4 Apr 25 Richard Shurtleff August 5, 218 Abstract Assume that arc length is measured with the flat spacetime metric. Then, for the most
More informationTutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n)
Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n) 1 Definition of Clifford Algebra A set of N Hermitian matrices γ 1, γ,..., γ N obeying the anti-commutator γ i, γ j } = δ ij I (1) is the basis for an algebra called
More informationAttempts at relativistic QM
Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics should incorporate both quantum mechanics and special relativity. However historically combining quantum mechanics and
More informationmsqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197
msqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197 Bibliography Dirac, P. A. M., The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th Edition, (Oxford University Press, London, 1958). Feynman, R. P. and A. P. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics
More informationPhysics 557 Lecture 5
Physics 557 Lecture 5 Group heory: Since symmetries and the use of group theory is so much a part of recent progress in particle physics we will take a small detour to introduce the basic structure (as
More informationQuantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics
More informationIntroduction to relativistic quantum mechanics
Introduction to relativistic quantum mechanics. Tensor notation In this book, we will most often use so-called natural units, which means that we have set c = and =. Furthermore, a general 4-vector will
More informationIntroduction to Group Theory
Chapter 10 Introduction to Group Theory Since symmetries described by groups play such an important role in modern physics, we will take a little time to introduce the basic structure (as seen by a physicist)
More informationReview and Notation (Special relativity)
Review and Notation (Special relativity) December 30, 2016 7:35 PM Special Relativity: i) The principle of special relativity: The laws of physics must be the same in any inertial reference frame. In particular,
More informationLecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)
Lecture 0: A (Brief) Introduction to Group heory (See Chapter 3.3 in Boas, 3rd Edition) Having gained some new experience with matrices, which provide us with representations of groups, and because symmetries
More informationSymmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws
Chapter Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws The dynamical properties and interactions of a system of particles and fields are derived from the principle of least action, where the action is a 4-dimensional
More informationA GENERALLY COVARIANT FIELD EQUATION FOR GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM. Institute for Advanced Study Alpha Foundation
A GENERALLY COVARIANT FIELD EQUATION FOR GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM Myron W. Evans Institute for Advanced Study Alpha Foundation E-mail: emyrone@aol.com Received 17 April 2003; revised 1 May 2003
More informationAs usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 6: Lectures 11, 12
As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation Week 6: Lectures, The Dirac equation and algebra March 5, 0 The Lagrange density for the Dirac equation
More information2. Lie groups as manifolds. SU(2) and the three-sphere. * version 1.4 *
. Lie groups as manifolds. SU() and the three-sphere. * version 1.4 * Matthew Foster September 1, 017 Contents.1 The Haar measure 1. The group manifold for SU(): S 3 3.3 Left- and right- group translations
More informationA matrix over a field F is a rectangular array of elements from F. The symbol
Chapter MATRICES Matrix arithmetic A matrix over a field F is a rectangular array of elements from F The symbol M m n (F ) denotes the collection of all m n matrices over F Matrices will usually be denoted
More informationThe Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz
Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz October 2013 Lorentz Transformation Properties of the Dirac Field First, rotations. In ordinary quantum mechanics, ψ σ i ψ (1) is
More informationELEMENTARY LINEAR ALGEBRA
ELEMENTARY LINEAR ALGEBRA K R MATTHEWS DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND First Printing, 99 Chapter LINEAR EQUATIONS Introduction to linear equations A linear equation in n unknowns x,
More informationA Generally Covariant Field Equation For Gravitation And Electromagnetism
3 A Generally Covariant Field Equation For Gravitation And Electromagnetism Summary. A generally covariant field equation is developed for gravitation and electromagnetism by considering the metric vector
More informationGROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule
GROUP THEORY PRIMER New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule 1. Tensor methods for su(n) To study some aspects of representations of a
More information1. Rotations in 3D, so(3), and su(2). * version 2.0 *
1. Rotations in 3D, so(3, and su(2. * version 2.0 * Matthew Foster September 5, 2016 Contents 1.1 Rotation groups in 3D 1 1.1.1 SO(2 U(1........................................................ 1 1.1.2
More informationAngular momentum and Killing potentials
Angular momentum and Killing potentials E. N. Glass a) Physics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 4809 Received 6 April 995; accepted for publication September 995 When the Penrose
More informationWigner s Little Groups
Wigner s Little Groups Y. S. Kim Center for Fundamental Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 2742, U.S.A. e-mail: yskim@umd.edu Abstract Wigner s little groups are subgroups of the Lorentz
More informationThe Homogenous Lorentz Group
The Homogenous Lorentz Group Thomas Wening February 3, 216 Contents 1 Proper Lorentz Transforms 1 2 Four Vectors 2 3 Basic Properties of the Transformations 3 4 Connection to SL(2, C) 5 5 Generators of
More informationLecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics
Lecture 10 The Dirac equation WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics The Dirac equation The Dirac equation is a relativistic quantum mechanical wave equation formulated by British physicist
More informationQuantum Field Theory III
Quantum Field Theory III Prof. Erick Weinberg January 19, 2011 1 Lecture 1 1.1 Structure We will start with a bit of group theory, and we will talk about spontaneous symmetry broken. Then we will talk
More informationSpinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
Chapter Spinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. The Lorentz Transformation of the Dirac Bispinor We will provide in the following a new formulation of the Dirac equation in the chiral representation
More informationPHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Rigid Body Motion Introduction + Math Review
1 PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics Rigid Body Motion Introduction + Math Review 2 How to describe a rigid body? Rigid Body - a system of point particles fixed in space i r ij j subject to a holonomic constraint:
More informationThe Lorentz and Poincaré Groups in Relativistic Field Theory
The and s in Relativistic Field Theory Term Project Nicolás Fernández González University of California Santa Cruz June 2015 1 / 14 the Our first encounter with the group is in special relativity it composed
More informationExtending the 4 4 Darbyshire Operator Using n-dimensional Dirac Matrices
International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics 2015; 1(3): 19-23 Published online February 19, 2016 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ijamtp) doi: 10.11648/j.ijamtp.20150103.11
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 20 Feb 2001
Massless particles of any spin obey linear equations of motion Bojan Gornik a, Norma Mankoč Borštnik b arxiv:hep-th/0102067v2 20 Feb 2001 a Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana,
More informationQM and Angular Momentum
Chapter 5 QM and Angular Momentum 5. Angular Momentum Operators In your Introductory Quantum Mechanics (QM) course you learned about the basic properties of low spin systems. Here we want to review that
More informationThe Matrix Representation of a Three-Dimensional Rotation Revisited
Physics 116A Winter 2010 The Matrix Representation of a Three-Dimensional Rotation Revisited In a handout entitled The Matrix Representation of a Three-Dimensional Rotation, I provided a derivation of
More informationTHE DIRAC EQUATION (A REVIEW) We will try to find the relativistic wave equation for a particle.
THE DIRAC EQUATION (A REVIEW) We will try to find the relativistic wave equation for a particle. First, we introduce four dimensional notation for a vector by writing x µ = (x, x 1, x 2, x 3 ) = (ct, x,
More informationO(3,3)-like Symmetries of Coupled Harmonic Oscillators
from J. Math. Phys. 36 3940-3954 1995. O33-like Symmetries of Coupled Harmonic Oscillators D. Han National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center Code 910.1 Greenbelt Maryland
More informationThe Lorentz and Poincaré groups. By Joel Oredsson
The Lorentz and Poincaré groups By Joel Oredsson The Principle of Special Rela=vity: The laws of nature should be covariant with respect to the transforma=ons between iner=al reference frames. x µ x' µ
More informationParticles and Deep Inelastic Scattering
Particles and Deep Inelastic Scattering Heidi Schellman University HUGS - JLab - June 2010 June 2010 HUGS 1 Course Outline 1. Really basic stuff 2. How we detect particles 3. Basics of 2 2 scattering 4.
More informationClassical Mechanics in Hamiltonian Form
Classical Mechanics in Hamiltonian Form We consider a point particle of mass m, position x moving in a potential V (x). It moves according to Newton s law, mẍ + V (x) = 0 (1) This is the usual and simplest
More informationa 11 x 1 + a 12 x a 1n x n = b 1 a 21 x 1 + a 22 x a 2n x n = b 2.
Chapter 1 LINEAR EQUATIONS 11 Introduction to linear equations A linear equation in n unknowns x 1, x,, x n is an equation of the form a 1 x 1 + a x + + a n x n = b, where a 1, a,, a n, b are given real
More informationLévy-Leblond and Schrödinger equations. for Spinor Wavefunctions
Adv. Studies Theor. Phys., Vol. 7, 2013, no. 17, 825-837 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/astp.2013.3672 Generalized Lévy-Leblond and Schrödinger Equations for Spinor Wavefunctions
More informationGROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS
GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS Wu-Ki Tung World Scientific Philadelphia Singapore CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 PREFACE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Particle on a One-Dimensional Lattice 1.2 Representations
More informationQuantum Field Theory Notes. Ryan D. Reece
Quantum Field Theory Notes Ryan D. Reece November 27, 2007 Chapter 1 Preliminaries 1.1 Overview of Special Relativity 1.1.1 Lorentz Boosts Searches in the later part 19th century for the coordinate transformation
More informationIntroduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory
Department of Mathematics University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, TX USA Febuary, 2016 Recall Einstein s famous equation, E 2 = (Mc 2 ) 2 + (c p) 2, where c is the speed of light, M is the classical
More information1 Matrices and vector spaces
Matrices and vector spaces. Which of the following statements about linear vector spaces are true? Where a statement is false, give a counter-example to demonstrate this. (a) Non-singular N N matrices
More informationCluster Properties and Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
Cluster Properties and Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Wayne Polyzou polyzou@uiowa.edu The University of Iowa Cluster Properties p.1/45 Why is quantum field theory difficult? number of degrees of freedom.
More information4. The Dirac Equation
4. The Dirac Equation A great deal more was hidden in the Dirac equation than the author had expected when he wrote it down in 1928. Dirac himself remarked in one of his talks that his equation was more
More informationExistence of Antiparticles as an Indication of Finiteness of Nature. Felix M. Lev
Existence of Antiparticles as an Indication of Finiteness of Nature Felix M. Lev Artwork Conversion Software Inc., 1201 Morningside Drive, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266, USA (Email: felixlev314@gmail.com)
More informationChapter Two Elements of Linear Algebra
Chapter Two Elements of Linear Algebra Previously, in chapter one, we have considered single first order differential equations involving a single unknown function. In the next chapter we will begin to
More informationG : Quantum Mechanics II
G5.666: Quantum Mechanics II Notes for Lecture 7 I. A SIMPLE EXAMPLE OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM ADDITION Given two spin-/ angular momenta, S and S, we define S S S The problem is to find the eigenstates of the
More informationOn angular momentum operator in quantum field theory
On angular momentum operator in quantum field theory Bozhidar Z. Iliev Short title: Angular momentum operator in QFT Basic ideas: July October, 2001 Began: November 1, 2001 Ended: November 15, 2001 Initial
More informationLectures April 29, May
Lectures 25-26 April 29, May 4 2010 Electromagnetism controls most of physics from the atomic to the planetary scale, we have spent nearly a year exploring the concrete consequences of Maxwell s equations
More informationIn this lecture we introduce the supersymmetry algebra, which is the algebra encoding the set of symmetries a supersymmetric theory should enjoy.
The supersymmetry algebra In this lecture we introduce the supersymmetry algebra, which is the algebra encoding the set of symmetries a supersymmetric theory should enjoy.. Lorentz and Poincaré groups
More informationAngular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics
Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics In classical mechanics the angular momentum L = r p of any particle moving in a central field of force is conserved. For the reduced two-body problem this is the content
More informationSpecial Relativity. Chapter The geometry of space-time
Chapter 1 Special Relativity In the far-reaching theory of Special Relativity of Einstein, the homogeneity and isotropy of the 3-dimensional space are generalized to include the time dimension as well.
More information1.7 Plane-wave Solutions of the Dirac Equation
0 Version of February 7, 005 CHAPTER. DIRAC EQUATION It is evident that W µ is translationally invariant, [P µ, W ν ] 0. W is a Lorentz scalar, [J µν, W ], as you will explicitly show in homework. Here
More informationSome Concepts used in the Study of Harish-Chandra Algebras of Matrices
Intl J Engg Sci Adv Research 2015 Mar;1(1):134-137 Harish-Chandra Algebras Some Concepts used in the Study of Harish-Chandra Algebras of Matrices Vinod Kumar Yadav Department of Mathematics Rama University
More informationExplicit gauge covariant Euler Lagrange equation
Explicit gauge covariant Euler Lagrange equation Clinton L. Lewis a Division of Science and Mathematics, West Valley College, Saratoga, California 95070 Received 11 November 2008; accepted 22 May 2009
More information2.4 Parity transformation
2.4 Parity transformation An extremely simple group is one that has only two elements: {e, P }. Obviously, P 1 = P, so P 2 = e, with e represented by the unit n n matrix in an n- dimensional representation.
More informationPhysics 209 Fall 2002 Notes 5 Thomas Precession
Physics 209 Fall 2002 Notes 5 Thomas Precession Jackson s discussion of Thomas precession is based on Thomas s original treatment, and on the later paper by Bargmann, Michel, and Telegdi. The alternative
More informationSpace-time geometry of relativistic particles
published in J. Math. Phys. 31, 55-60 1990). Space-time geometry of relativistic particles Y. S. Kim Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 074 E. P. Wigner
More informationLecture 5: Sept. 19, 2013 First Applications of Noether s Theorem. 1 Translation Invariance. Last Latexed: September 18, 2013 at 14:24 1
Last Latexed: September 18, 2013 at 14:24 1 Lecture 5: Sept. 19, 2013 First Applications of Noether s Theorem Copyright c 2005 by Joel A. Shapiro Now it is time to use the very powerful though abstract
More informationLagrangian Description for Particle Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics Single-Particle Case
Lagrangian Description for Particle Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics Single-Particle Case Roderick I. Sutherland Centre for Time, University of Sydney, NSW 26 Australia rod.sutherland@sydney.edu.au
More informationSymmetries, Fields and Particles. Examples 1.
Symmetries, Fields and Particles. Examples 1. 1. O(n) consists of n n real matrices M satisfying M T M = I. Check that O(n) is a group. U(n) consists of n n complex matrices U satisfying U U = I. Check
More informationSpin Statistics Theorem
What is? University of Chicago, Department of Physics May 11, 2008 What is? Organization of this talk Contents of and a little history A few heuristic methods to prove the theorem Elementary proof Understand
More informationLecture notes on Quantum Computing. Chapter 1 Mathematical Background
Lecture notes on Quantum Computing Chapter 1 Mathematical Background Vector states of a quantum system with n physical states are represented by unique vectors in C n, the set of n 1 column vectors 1 For
More information232A Lecture Notes Representation Theory of Lorentz Group
232A Lecture Notes Representation Theory of Lorentz Group 1 Symmetries in Physics Symmetries play crucial roles in physics. Noether s theorem relates symmetries of the system to conservation laws. In quantum
More informationCross-sections. Kevin Cahill for 524 January 24, There are two standard ways of normalizing states. We have been using continuum normalization
Cross-sections Kevin Cahill for 54 January 4, 013 1 Fermi s Golden Rule There are two standard ways of normalizing states. We have been using continuum normalization p p = δ (3) (p p). (1) The other way
More informationFree totally (anti)symmetric massless fermionic fields in d-dimensional anti-de Sitter space
Free totally (anti)symmetric massless fermionic fields in d-dimensional anti-de Sitter space R. R. Metsaev Department of Theoretical Physics, P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Leninsky prospect 53, 11794,
More informationbe stationary under variations in A, we obtain Maxwell s equations in the form ν J ν = 0. (7.5)
Chapter 7 A Synopsis of QED We will here sketch the outlines of quantum electrodynamics, the theory of electrons and photons, and indicate how a calculation of an important physical quantity can be carried
More informationExercises Symmetries in Particle Physics
Exercises Symmetries in Particle Physics 1. A particle is moving in an external field. Which components of the momentum p and the angular momentum L are conserved? a) Field of an infinite homogeneous plane.
More informationLittle groups and Maxwell-type tensors for massive and massless particles
EUROPHYSICS LETTERS 15 November 1997 Europhys. Lett., 40 (4), pp. 375-380 (1997) Little groups and Maxwell-type tensors for massive and massless particles S. Başkal 1 and Y. S. Kim 2 1 Department of Physics,
More informationAppendix C Lorentz group and the Dirac algebra
Appendix C Lorentz group and the Dirac algebra This appendix provides a review and summary of the Lorentz group, its properties, and the properties of its infinitesimal generators. It then reviews representations
More informationDirac Equation. Chapter 1
Chapter Dirac Equation This course will be devoted principally to an exposition of the dynamics of Abelian and non-abelian gauge theories. These form the basis of the Standard Model, that is, the theory
More informationUnitary rotations. October 28, 2014
Unitary rotations October 8, 04 The special unitary group in dimensions It turns out that all orthogonal groups SO n), rotations in n real dimensions) may be written as special cases of rotations in a
More informationMATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS. + + x 1 x 2. x n 8 (4) 3 4 2
MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS AND MATRICES Representation of a linear system The general system of m equations in n unknowns can be written a x + a 2 x 2 + + a n x n b a
More information,, rectilinear,, spherical,, cylindrical. (6.1)
Lecture 6 Review of Vectors Physics in more than one dimension (See Chapter 3 in Boas, but we try to take a more general approach and in a slightly different order) Recall that in the previous two lectures
More informationBiquaternion formulation of relativistic tensor dynamics
Apeiron, Vol. 15, No. 4, October 2008 358 Biquaternion formulation of relativistic tensor dynamics E.P.J. de Haas High school teacher of physics Nijmegen, The Netherlands Email: epjhaas@telfort.nl In this
More informationDefinition 2.3. We define addition and multiplication of matrices as follows.
14 Chapter 2 Matrices In this chapter, we review matrix algebra from Linear Algebra I, consider row and column operations on matrices, and define the rank of a matrix. Along the way prove that the row
More informationIsotropic harmonic oscillator
Isotropic harmonic oscillator 1 Isotropic harmonic oscillator The hamiltonian of the isotropic harmonic oscillator is H = h m + 1 mω r (1) = [ h d m dρ + 1 ] m ω ρ, () ρ=x,y,z a sum of three one-dimensional
More informationCitation for published version (APA): Halbersma, R. S. (2002). Geometry of strings and branes. Groningen: s.n.
University of Groningen Geometry of strings and branes Halbersma, Reinder Simon IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please
More information1.3 Translational Invariance
1.3. TRANSLATIONAL INVARIANCE 7 Version of January 28, 2005 Thus the required rotational invariance statement is verified: [J, H] = [L + 1 Σ, H] = iα p iα p = 0. (1.49) 2 1.3 Translational Invariance One
More information8.323 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory I
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 8.33 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory I Spring 008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. Prof.Alan Guth
More informationA note on the principle of least action and Dirac matrices
AEI-2012-051 arxiv:1209.0332v1 [math-ph] 3 Sep 2012 A note on the principle of least action and Dirac matrices Maciej Trzetrzelewski Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik, Albert-Einstein-Institut,
More information! 4 4! o! +! h 4 o=0! ±= ± p i And back-substituting into the linear equations gave us the ratios of the amplitudes of oscillation:.»» = A p e i! +t»»
Topic 6: Coupled Oscillators and Normal Modes Reading assignment: Hand and Finch Chapter 9 We are going to be considering the general case of a system with N degrees of freedome close to one of its stable
More informationPhysics 218 Polarization sum for massless spin-one particles Winter 2016
Physics 18 Polarization sum for massless spin-one particles Winter 016 We first consider a massless spin-1 particle moving in the z-direction with four-momentum k µ = E(1; 0, 0, 1). The textbook expressions
More informationPion Lifetime. A. George January 18, 2012
Pion Lifetime A. George January 18, 01 Abstract We derive the expected lifetime of the pion, assuming only the Feynman Rules, Fermi s Golden Rule, the Dirac Equation and its corollary, the completeness
More informationContinuous symmetries and conserved currents
Continuous symmetries and conserved currents based on S-22 Consider a set of scalar fields, and a lagrangian density let s make an infinitesimal change: variation of the action: setting we would get equations
More informationVector boson character of the static electric field
Chapter 12 Vector boson character of the static electric field (Paper 66) by Myron W. Evans Alpha Institute for Advanced Study (AIAS). (emyrone@aol.com, www.aias.us, www.atomicprecision.com) Abstract The
More informationNewman-Penrose formalism in higher dimensions
Newman-Penrose formalism in higher dimensions V. Pravda various parts in collaboration with: A. Coley, R. Milson, M. Ortaggio and A. Pravdová Introduction - algebraic classification in four dimensions
More informationSrednicki Chapter 24
Srednicki Chapter 24 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George November 4, 2012 Srednicki 24.1. Show that θ ij in equation 24.4 must be antisymmetric if R is orthogonal. Orthogonality of R implies that: Writing
More informationWeek 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books
Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter Weiberg, Chapter 5 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 1, 1 Free field Lagrangians
More informationSymmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions
Symmetries, Fields and Particles 013 Solutions Yichen Shi Easter 014 1. (a) Define the groups SU() and SO(3), and find their Lie algebras. Show that these Lie algebras, including their bracket structure,
More informationChapter 13. Local Symmetry
Chapter 13 Local Symmetry So far, we have discussed symmetries of the quantum mechanical states. A state is a global (non-local) object describing an amplitude everywhere in space. In relativistic physics,
More information