arxiv:hep-th/ v2 11 Sep 1999
|
|
- Dorthy Marion Simon
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Generalized BFT Formalism of Electroweak Theory in the Unitary Gauge Yong-Wan Kim, Young-Jai Park and Sean J. Yoon Department of Physics, Sogang University, C.P.O.Box 42, Seoul 00-6, Korea (January 7, 208) arxiv:hep-th/98038v2 Sep 999 Abstract We systematically embed the SU(2) U() Higgs model in the unitary gauge into a fully gauge invariant theory by following the generalized BFT formalism. We also suggest a novel path how to get a first-class Lagrangian directly from the original second-class one using the BFT fields..0.ef,.5.-q,.5.ex Typeset using REVTEX ywkim@physics3.sogang.ac.kr yjpark@ccs.sogang.ac.kr yoonsj@mail.lgcit.com, Permanent address: LG Corporate Institute of Technology, Seoul , Korea
2 A phenomenological example of constrained systems [,2] is provided by the SU(2) U() Higgs model with spontaneous symmetry breakdown whose quantization is usually carried out in the so called unitary gauge. The model in this gauge is characterized by both of second- and first-class constraints in the language of Hamiltonian formalism. Since the strong implementation of second-class constraints generally leads to non-polynomial field dependent Dirac brackets which may pose problems, one can circumvent them associated with this non-polynomial dependence by embedding second-class constrained system into first-class one in an extended phase space through the formalism of Batalin et al (BFT) [3]. Now, while preserving the Poisson structure, we can successfully quantize the system implementing first-class constraints on physical states. Recently, we have introduced BFT fields [4] through which the construction of physical observables such as Hamiltonian is much easier than the direct adoption of BFT method. When used BFT fields in second-class constrained system, there is an elegant one-to-one correspondence to first-class constrained system in an extended phase space. Moreover, the use of BFT fields makes it possible to analyze a rather complicated non-abelian constrained system [5,6] conveniently. On the other hand, we have studied the spontaneously broken abelian U() [7] and non-abelian SU(2) [8] Higgs models, which are of fully second-class constraints due to the completely broken symmetry, as toy models. In this paper we analyze the non-abelian SU(2) U() Higgs model in the unitary gauge by following the generalized BFT procedure [3,4]. This real phenomenonlogical model is highly non-trivial contrast to the U() and SU(2) models because there still remains U() em symmetry after spontaneous symmetry breaking. It also needs to embed first-class constraints as well as second-class constraints in this SU(2) U() Higgs model in order to keep the consistency and simplicity of constraint algebra as shown it later. Starting from the second-class Lagrangian, we construct an effectively first-class constrained system. We then show that the results by using BFT fields coincide with those obtained by gauging the second-class Lagrangian and performing a suitable canonical transformation. We also suggest an economic novel path at the classical level to obtain the 2
3 first-class Lagrangian from the second-class one. Let us consider the non-abelian SU(2) U() Higgs model in the unitary gauge, which describes the bosonic part of the Weinberg-Salam model [9], L u = 4 Fa µνf µνa 4 G µνg µν + 8 ρ2 (g 2 B µ B µ 2gg B µ A µ3 +g 2 A a µa µa )+ 2 µρ µ ρ+v(ρ), () wherev(ρ)isthehiggspotential, V(ρ) = µ2 2 (ρ+v)2 λ 4 (ρ+v)4, withthevacuumexpectation value v, and the g and g denote the U() and SU(2) coupling constants, respectively. The field strength tensors are F a µν = µa a ν νa a µ +gǫabc A b µ Ac ν, (a =,2,3) and G µν = µ B ν ν B µ. The momenta canonically conjugate to A 0a, A ia, B 0, B i, and ρ in the Hamiltonian formalism are given by π a 0 = 0, π a i = F a i0, p 0 = 0, p i = G i0, and π ρ = ρ, respectively. We thus have the primary constraints π a 0 0 and p 0 0. The canonical Hamiltonian density associated with the Lagrangian () is found to be H C = 2 (πa i )2 + 2 (p i) (π ρ) Fa ij Fija + 4 G ijg ij + 8 ρ2 (g 2 (B i ) 2 2gg B i A i3 +g 2 (A ia ) 2 ) + 2 ( iρ) 2 V(ρ) 8 ρ2 (g 2 (B 0 ) 2 2gg B 0 A 03 +g 2 (A 0a ) 2 ) A 0a (D i π i ) a B 0 i p i, (2) where (D i π i ) a = i π a i +gǫ abc A ib π c i. Since persistency in time of the primary constraints leads to further constraints, this system is described by the set of eight constraints as ω = p 0, ω 2 = i p i 4 ρ2 gg A ρ2 g 2 B 0, ω a 3 = πa 0, ω a 4 = (D i π i ) a + 4 ρ2 g 2 A 0a 4 ρ2 gg B 0 δ a3. (3) The corresponding constraints algebra is given by Σ ij = {ω i (x),ω j (y)} 0 4 ρ2 g 2 4 = ρ2 g ρ2 gg δ a3 4 ρ2 gg δ a3 0 U() mixed 0 4 ρ2 gg δ a3 4 ρ2 gg δ a ρ2 g 2 δ ab 4 ρ2 g 2 δ ab gǫ ( ) c abc D k π k mixed SU(2) δ 3 (x y). (4) 3
4 Each block of the matrix represents the U() [7] and SU(2) Higgs models [8] with additional mixed components in the off-diagonal part. But, the matrix (4) is of zero determinant, which means that among the constraints (3) there still exist first-class ones related to the unbroken symmetry. In order to efficiently extract out first-class constraints, let us redefine the constraints (3) as Ω a ωa 3 = πa 0, Ω a 2 ωa 4 = (Di π i ) a + 4 ρ2 g 2 A 0a 4 ρ2 gg B 0 δ a3, (5) T gω +g ω 3 3 = gp 0 +g π 3 0, T 2 gω 2 +g ω ρ 2 g 2[gg (D i π i ) 2 ω 3 gg (D i π i ) ω 2 3] = g i p i +g (D i π i ) (D i π ρ 2 g 2[gg i ) 2 π0 gg (D i π i ) π0 2 ]. (6) Then, the constraints Ω a and Ω a 2 become second-class as {Ω a i (x),ωb j (y)} = ab ij (x,y) = 0 4 ρ2 g 2 δ ab while the T and T 2 are first-class as 4 ρ2 g 2 δ ab gǫ abc( ) c D k π k {T 2 (x),ω 2 (y)} = 4 ρ 2g (D i π i ) 3 Ω δ3 (x y) 0, {T 2 (x),ω 2 2(y)} = 4 ρ 2g (D i π i ) 3 Ω 2 δ 3 (x y) 0, {T 2 (x),ω 3 2 (y)} = 4 ρ 2g [(D i π i ) Ω +(Di π i ) 2 Ω 2 ]δ3 (x y) 0, δ3 (x y), (7) {T (x),ω a i (y)} = {T i(x),t j (y)} = 0. (8) The SU(2) U() Higgs model in the unitary gauge thus has two first- as well as six secondclass constraints. As is well known, after breaking the SU(2) U() symmetry spontaneously, the SU(2) U() symmetry is broken into the combined symmetry U() em. As a result, the vector fields, W ± µ ( = (A µ ia 2 µ)/ 2 ) and Z µ (= cosθa 3 µ sinθb µ, tanθ = g /g) have acquired masses equal to MW(ρ) 2 = 4 ρ2 g 2 and MZ(ρ) 2 = 4 ρ2 (g 2 +g 2 ), while A µ (= sinθa 3 µ + cosθb µ ) has remained massless. In fact, the first-class constraints (6) describe this residual U() em symmetry, i.e., the existence of the massless gauge fields. 4
5 We now convert this system of the second- Ω a i and first-class constraints T i into a completely equivalent first-class system at the expense of additional degrees of freedom. It is important to note that we should embed the first-class constraints as well as the second-class constraints. Embedding only the second-class constraints Ω a i in general does not preserve the first-class algebra as it is clear in (8). In order to embed the second-class constraints (5) by following the BFT method [3], we introduce auxiliary fields Φ a and Φ 2a corresponding to Ω a and Ωa 2 of symplectic structure { Φ ia (x),φ jb (y) } = ω ij ab (x,y) = ǫij δ ab δ 3 (x y), (i,j =,2). (9) The effective first-class constraints Ω a i are now constructed as a power series in the auxiliary fields, Ω a i = Ωa i + n= Ω (n)a i, where Ω (n)a i (n =,..., ) are homogeneous polynomials in the auxiliary fields {Φ jb } of degree n. These will be determined by the requirement that the constraints Ω a i be strongly involutive: { Ωa i (x), Ω b j(y) } = 0. (0) Making a general ansatz Ω ()a i (x) = d 3 yx ab ij (x,y)φjb (y), () and substituting () into (0) leads to the condition of d 3 zx ac ik(x,z)ǫ kl X bc jl(y,z) = ab ij(x,y). (2) Then, Eq. (2) has a solution of Xij ab (x,y) = 4 ρ2 g 2 δ ab 0 2 gǫabc (D k π k ) c δ ab δ3 (x y). (3) From the symplectic structure of (9), we may identify the auxiliary fields with canonicallyconjugatedpairs. Wemakethisexplicitbyadoptingthenotation,(Φ a,φ 2a ) (θ a,π a θ). Substituting (3) into () and iterating this procedure one finds the strongly involutive first-class constraints to be given by 5
6 Ω a = π a ρ2 g 2 θ a, Ω a 2 = V ab (θ)(d i π i ) b + 4 ρ2 g 2 A 0a 4 ρ2 gg B 0 δ a3 +π a θ. (4) Here, V(θ) = n=0 ( ) n (n+)! (ad θ)n, and (ad θ) ab = gǫ acb θ c, where ad θ = gθ a T a with T c ab = ǫ acb denotes the Lie algebra-valued field θ in the adjoint representation. This completes the construction of the effective first-class constraints corresponding to the second-class ones. The construction of effective first-class Hamiltonian H can be also obtained along similar lines as inthecase of the constraints, i.e., by representing it asapower series intheauxiliary fields and requiring { Ω a i, H} = 0 subject to the condition H[J;θ a = π a θ = 0] = H C, where J denotescollectively thevariables(a µa,π a µ,bµ,p µ,ρ,π ρ )oftheoriginalphasespace. However, we shall follow a novel path [4,5,0] by noting that any functional of first-class fields will also be first-class. We require BFT fields J corresponding to J in the extended phase space to be strongly involutive with the effective first-class constraints Ω a i, i.e., { Ω a i, J} = 0, which leads us to the identification H = H C [ J]. The BFT fields J are now obtained as a power series in the auxiliary fields (θ a,πθ a ), whose iterative solutions lead to the following compact infinite series as à 0a = A 0a + 4 g 2 ρ 2πa θ 4 g 2 ρ 2 ( U ab (θ) V ab (θ) ) (D i π i ) b, à ia = U ab (θ)a ib +V ab (θ) i θ b, ( π µ a = π0 a + ) 4 g2 ρ 2 θ a, U ab (θ)πi b, B µ = B µ, p µ = p µ 4 gg ρ 2 θ 3 δ µ0, ρ = ρ, π ρ = π ρ + 2 g2 ρa 0a θ a 2 gg ρb 0 θ 3, (5) where U(θ) = ( ) n n=0 (ad θ) n = e ad θ. Therefore, we can obtain the first-class Hamilto- n! nian density H C, expressed in terms of the BFT fields as H C = H C [ J] = 2 (πa i) (p i) ( π ρ + 2 g2 ρa 0a θ a 2 gg ρb 0 θ 3 ) (Fa ij) (G ij) ρ2 g 2 (B i ) 2 4 ρ2 gg B i( U 3a (θ)a ia +V 3a (θ) i θ a) + 8 ρ2 g 2( U ab (θ)a ib +V ab (θ) i θ b) 2 6
7 + 2 ( iρ) 2 V(ρ)+ 2 ρ 2 g 2 ( (D i π i ) a) 2 2 ρ 2 g 2( Ω a 2) 2 B 0 { g T 2 4 ρ 2 g 2 ( g U 2a (θ)(d i π i ) a Ω g U a (θ)(d i π i ) a Ω2 ) }. (6) We moreover observe from these BFT fields that the effective first-class constraints (4) can be written as Ω a = πa 0, Ω a 2 = ( D i π i ) a + 4 ρ2 g 2 Ã 0a 4 ρ2 gg B0 δ a3. (7) Note that comparing with the second-class constraints Ω a i in Eq.(5), we see that the constraints (7) are just the second-class constraints expressed in terms of the BFT variables in the extended phase space, showing that there exists one-to-one mapping between the variables of the reduced and extended phase spaces. As described before, for consistency we should embed the initially first-class constraints T i ineq.(6) aswell intheextended phasespace. MakinguseoftheBFTfields, theseeffective first-class constraints can be easily obtained as T = g p 0 +g π 3 0 = gp 0 +g π 3 0, T 2 = g i p i +g ( D i π i ) ρ 2 g 2 [ gg ( D i π i ) 2 Ω gg ( D i π i ) Ω2 ] = g i p i +g U 3a (θ)(d i π i ) a + 4 ρ 2 g 2 [ gg U 2a (θ)(d i π i ) a Ω gg U a (θ)(d i π i ) a Ω2 ]. (8) We do not here need to introduce extra auxiliary fields for embedding these first-class constraints. It is only sufficient to use the BFT fields which are constructed from a pair of the auxiliary fields, (θ,π θ ). As results of (8), the general properties of the first-class constraints are preserved as { T i (x), T j (y)} = 0, { Ω a i (x), Ω b j (y)} = 0, { Ω a i(x), T j (y)} = 0. (9) 7
8 We can moreover easily show that the Poisson brackets of the BFT fields are related with the Dirac brackets of the original fields in the unitary gauged SU(2) U() model. Therefore, making use of the BFT fields, we have shown that the second-class (5), the first-class constraints (6) and the Hamiltonian with their algebraic relations in the reduced phase space can be replaced with their effective first-class quantities with the strongly involutive algebraic relations in the extended phase space, showing their form invariance in the two phase spaces. This in general means that when we quantize the system in the path integral formulation, due to the strongly involutive relations of the first-class quantities the partition functional of model can be expressed in a simple fashion, i.e., there are no terms of U a bc, V a b coupled with ghost variables obtained from the usual relations of {Ω a,ω b } = U ab c Ωc, {Ω a,h} = V a b Ωb. Thus, as a result of the BFT construction, we have systematically obtained the final set of the effective first-class constraints ( Ω a i, T j ) and Hamiltonian H C since U ab c, V a b appear to be zero in Eq.(9). Now, in order to interpret the results of the BFT construction of the effective first-class constraints and Hamiltonian, let the Lagrangian () be gauged by making the substitution A µa µa = U ab (θ)a µb +V ab (θ) µ θ b. We then obtain ˆL = L u +L WZ, (20) where L WZ = 4 ρ2 gg B µ( (U 3a δ 3a )A a µ +V 3a µ θ a) + 8 ρ2 g 2( 2V ab A µa µ θ b +V ab V ac µ θ b µ θ c) (2) plays the role of the Wess-Zumino-Witten (WZW) term like the case of the gauge-invariant formulation of two-dimensional chiral gauge theories [,2]. We then have the momenta π a θ canonically conjugate to θ a as π a θ = 4 ρ2 gg B 0 V 3a + 4 ρ2 g 2 (U bc A 0c +V bc 0 θ c )V ba. The other canonical momenta π a µ, p µ, and π ρ are the same as before. Hence the primary constraints are of the form, ˆΩ a = π a 0 0 and ˆΩ 2 = p 0 0. The canonical Hamiltonian corresponding to (20) reads Ĥ C = 2 (πa i) (p i) (π ρ) ρ 2 g 2(πb θ(v ) ba ) Fa ijf ija + 4 G ijg ij 8
9 + 8 ρ2 g 2 (B i ) 2 4 ρ2 gg B i ( U 3a A ia +V 3a i θ a) + 8 ρ2 g 2( U ab A ib +V ab i θ b) ( iρ) 2 V(ρ) A 0a( (D i π i ) a +π b θ(v ) bc U ca) B 0 ( ) i p i g g πa θ(v ) a3, (22) where we used the following properties of the Lie algebra-valued functions of U(θ) and V(θ) [8]: U ac (θ)u bc (θ) = U ca (θ)u cb (θ) = δ ab, U ab (θ) = U ba ( θ), U ca (θ)v cb (θ) = V ab ( θ), V ab (θ) = V ba ( θ), (V ) ac (θ)v cb (θ) = δ ab,u ac (θ)v bc (θ) = V ab (θ), (23) Persistency in time of the primary constraints with ĤC implies secondary constraints associated with the Lagrange multipliers A 0a and B 0. We again have the set of eight first-class constraints as ˆΩ a = π a 0 0, ˆΩ 2 = p 0 0, ˆΩ a 3 = (Di π i ) a +π b θ (V ) bc U ca 0, ˆΩ 4 = i p i g g πa θ (V ) a3 0. (24) We can easily check that all the algebra (24) between these constraints strongly vanishes except {ˆΩ a 3, ˆΩ b 3 } = gǫabcˆωc 3 0. It now remains to establish the relation with the BFT results. We first rewrite the momentum π a θ in terms of Â0a as π a θ = 4 ρ2 gg B 0 V 3a (θ)+ 4 ρ2 g 2  0b V ba (θ). Making use of Eqs. (23) and (24), we obtain  0a = 4 ( ) U abˆωb ρ 2 g 2 3 U ab (D i π i ) b + ρ2 4 gg B 0 δ a3. (25) Comparing this with A 0a rewritten by Eqs.(5) and (7), we conclude Â0a Ã0a since Â0a and Ã0a are identical up to additive terms proportional to the constraints. This establishes the equivalence of µa and õa. Furthermore, using the matrix U(θ) and V(θ) we can write the constraints ˆΩ a 3 V ab (θ)ˆω b 3 = V ab (θ)(d i π i ) b + π a θ and ˆΩ 4 g U 3a (θ)ˆω a 3 + gˆω 4 = g U 3a (θ)(d i π i ) a + g i p i. Now, performing the canonical transformation [8] as 9
10 π0 a π0 a + 4 ρ2 g 2 θ a, πθ a πθ a + 4 ρ2 g 2 A 0a 4 ρ2 gg B 0 δ a3, p 0 p 0 4 ρ2 gg θ 3, π ρ π ρ + 2 ρg2 A 0a θ a 2 ρgg B 0 θ 3, (26) we see that the first-class constraints shown in Eq.(24) map into the effective constraints (4) and (8) in the BFT construction as follows ˆΩ a = πa ρ2 g 2 θ a = Ω a, V ab (θ)ˆω b 3 = V ab (θ)(d i π i ) b +πθ a + 4 ρ2 g 2 A 0a 4 ρ2 gg B 0 δ a3 = Ω a 2, g ˆΩ3 +gˆω 2 = g π0 3 +gp 0 = T, g U 3a (θ)ˆω a 3 +gˆω 4 = g U 3a (θ)(d i π i ) a +g i p i T 2. (27) We have thus found that the effective constraints Ω a 2 are related with the abelian conversion [2] of the constraints ˆΩ a 3 on which the matrix V(θ) plays a role of converting the non-abelian constraints into the abelian ones. We can finally check the relation between ĤC and H C as given by (22) and (6). Making use of  0a and the canonical transformation (26), the expression (22) for ĤC may be rewritten in the following form in order to compare with H C Ĥ C = 2 (πa i) (p i) ( π ρ + 2 g2 ρa 0a θ a 2 gg ρb 0 θ 3 ) (Fa ij) (G ij) ρ2 g 2 (B i ) 2 4 ρ2 gg B i( U 3a A ia +V 3a i θ a) + 8 ρ2 g 2( U ab A ib +V ab i θ b) ( iρ) 2 V(ρ)+ 2 ρ 2 g 2 ( (D i π i ) a) ρ 2 g 2(ˆΩ a 3 )2 (A 0a + 4 ρ 2 g 2(Di π i ) a )ˆΩ a 3 B0ˆΩ4. (28) Then, we immediately obtain the equivalence relation ĤC H C [ J] since ĤC is identical with H C [ J] up to additive terms proportional to the constraints. We thus have arrived at a simple interpretation of the results obtained in the generalized BFT formalism. On the other hand, to obtain the corresponding Lagrangian from the first-class Hamiltonian, we should perform momenta integrations in the partition functional with the delta 0
11 functionals of the effective first-class constraints and proper gauge fixing functions in the measure [7,4]. However, these procedures could not provide a reasonable result in the nonabelian cases [5,0,8] because there exist the infinite series terms in some variables such as à 0a and Ω a 2. In this paper, we thus suggest a novel path at the classical level that one can directly get the first-class Lagrangian from the original second-class one. This approach consists in gauging the Lagrangian (), i.e., by making use of the BFT fields, A µa õa, B µ B µ and ρ ρ. Since the fields B µ and ρ in Eq.(5) do not have any auxiliary fields, the substitution is trivially performed. And the spatial components Ãia of the vector potential contain only the fields of the configuration space, and take the usual form of the gauge transformation, i.e., à ia U ab (θ)a ib + V ab (θ) i θ b. However, since Ã0a contain the term of π a θ as in Eq.(5), we should first replace this with some ordinary fields before carrying out the above substitution. This replacement is possible because we have identical relations between the BFT fields. From the useful novel property [4] of K(J;θ a,π a θ ) = K( J), where K, K are any secondclass and its corresponding effective first-class function, respectively, we in particular observe the following relation for π a i fields: π i a = i à a 0 0Ãa i +gǫabc à b iãc 0 ( = i A a g 2 ρ 2πa θ 4 ) ( U ab V ab) (D i π g 2 ρ 2 i ) b 0 (U ab A b i +Vab i θ b ) ( +gǫ abc (U bd A d i +V bd i θ d ) A c g 2 ρ 2πc θ 4 ) g 2 ρ 2 (Uce V ce )(D i π i ) e. (29) Comparing these with the BFT fields of π a i in Eq.(5), i.e., π a i = U ab (θ)π b i = Uab (θ)( i A b 0 0 A b i +gǫbcd A c i Ad 0 ), we see that the following relations should be kept for the consistency π a θ = 4 g2 ρ 2( (U ab (θ) V ab (θ))(d i π i ) b A 0a +U ab (θ)a 0b +V ab (θ) 0 θ b), (30) which make it possible to directly rewrite Ã0a as à 0a = U ab (θ)a 0b +V ab (θ) 0 θ b. (3) This is the form of the gauge transformation of A 0a fields. As a result, gauging the original Lagrangian () as
12 à µa U ab (θ)a µb +V ab (θ) µ θ b, Bµ B µ, ρ ρ, (32) we have directly arrived at the first-class Lagrangian as L(õa, B µ, ρ) = L(A µa,b µ,θ a,ρ) = ˆL GI. (33) Therefore, using the novel relations between the BFT fields, we can easily obtain the Lagrangian on the space of gauge invariant functionals, and our approach shows that the previous gauging process of the Lagrangian in (20) make sense. ( ) 0 ρ(x)+v = Finally, by defining the complex scalar doublet φ(x) = 2 e igθa (x) τa 2 ) with the auxiliary fields θ a playing the role of the Goldstone bosons, and W(θ) ( 0 ρ(x)+v the Pauli matrices τ a ( i τa 2 = ta ), we can easily rewrite the Lagrangian (33) as ˆL GI = 4 Fa µνf µνa 4 G µνg µν +(D µ φ) (D µ φ)+v(φ φ), (34) where D µ = µ i g 2 B µ i g 2 τa A a µ. We therefore have arrived at the symmetric SU(2) U() Higgs model from the starting symmetry broken Lagrangian () through the BFT construction. This proves that the BFT formalism recovers from the underlying gauge symmetry of the system. The main objective of this paper was to provide a non-trivial Hamiltonian embedding of a second-class theory into a first-class one, following the generalized BFT procedure. As a result, we have constructed the effective first-class constraints corresponding to the initially first-class as well as second-class constraints, and Hamiltonian in particular obtained from the BFT fields. This process has a great advantage in this non-abelian case as compared with the usual BFT approach. We have also observed that the effective first-class constraints and the Poisson brackets of the BFT fields have the form invariance between the original and extended phase spaces, which shows that the BFT fields could be interpreted as the gauge invariant extension of the second-class variables to the extended phase space. On the other hand, we have also established the equivalence between the effective first-class quantities and corresponding ones obtained by gauging the second-class Lagrangian, and observed that the auxiliary fields θ a introduced in the BFT method play the role of the 2
13 Goldstone bosons. As a result of the novel relations between the BFT fields, we have finally obtained the Lagrangian on the space of gauge invariant functionals, which makes it possible to understand the role of the BFT fields in the configuration space. Finally, we hope that through this generalized BFT formalism the full unbroken symmetry of the universe will be successfully obtained from the real effective theory describing present symmetry broken phase. Acknowledgment Two of the authors (Y. W. Kim and Y. J. Park) would like to thank Prof. K. D. Rothe for his valuable comments and warm hospitality at the Institute für Theoretische Physik. The present study was partly supported by the Basic Science Research Institute Program, the Korea Research Foundation, Project No D
14 REFERENCES [] P. A. M. Dirac, Can. J. Math. 2, 29 (950): Lectures on Quantum Mechanics (Yeshiva University, New York 964). [2] M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems (Princeton University, New Jersey 992). [3] I. A. Batalin and E. S. Fradkin, Phys. Lett. B80, 57 (986); Nucl. Phys. B279, 54 (987); I. A. Batalin and I. V. Tyutin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6, 3255 (99). [4] W. T. Kim, Y. W. Kim, M. I. Park, Y. J. Park and S. J. Yoon, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. 23, 325 (997); Y. W. Kim, M. I. Park, Y. J. Park and S. J. Yoon, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A2, 427 (997). [5] R. Banerjee and J. Barcelos-Neto, Nucl. Phys. B499, 453 (997); M. I. Park and Y. J. Park, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A3, 279 (998). [6] W. Oliveira and J. A. Neto, Nucl. Phys. B533, 6 (998). [7] Y. W. Kim and Y. J. Park, Mod. Phys. Lett. A3, 20 (998). [8] Y. W. Kim, Y. J. Park and K. D. Rothe, J. Phys. G24, 953 (998). [9] S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 264 (967); A. Salam, in Elementary Particle Physics, ed., N. Svartholm (Almgvist and Wiksells, Stockholm, 968), p.367. [0] Y. W. Kim and K. D. Rothe, Nucl. Phys. B5, 50 (998). [] O. Babelon, F. A. Schaposnik and C. M. Viallet, Phys. Lett. B77, 385 (986); K. Harada and I. Tsutsui, Phys. Lett. B83, 3 (987). [2] E. Abdalla, M. C. B. Abdalla and K. D. Rothe, Non-perturbative methods in twodimensional Quantum Field Theory, World Scientific, Singapore, 99. 4
arxiv:hep-th/ v1 23 Mar 1998
SOGANG HEP 225/97 Generalized BFT Formalism of SU(2 U( Higgs Model Sean J. Yoon, Yong-Wan Kim and Young-Jai Park Department of Physics, Sogang University, C.P.O.Box 42, Seoul 00-6, Korea arxiv:hep-th/98038v
More informationHamiltonian Embedding of SU(2) Higgs Model in the Unitary Gauge
HD THEP 97 28 SOGANG HEP 222/97 Hamiltonian Embedding of SU(2) Higgs Model in the Unitary Gauge arxiv:hep-th/9711092v1 13 Nov 1997 Yong-Wan Kim 1, Young-Jai Park 1 and Klaus D. Rothe 2 Institut für Theoretische
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 11 May 1998
SOGANG HEP 223/97, HD THEP 97 29 Quantization of spontaneously broken gauge theory based on the BFT BFV Formalism Yong-Wan Kim and Young-Jai Park arxiv:hep-th/9712053v2 11 May 1998 Department of Physics
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 21 Jan 1997
SOGANG-HEP 209/96 December 996(revised) The Quantization of the Chiral Schwinger Model Based on the BFT BFV Formalism arxiv:hep-th/97002v 2 Jan 997 Won T. Kim, Yong-Wan Kim, Mu-In Park, and Young-Jai Park
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 1 Dec 1998
SOGANG-HEP 235/98 Lagrangian Approach of the First Class Constrained Systems Yong-Wan Kim, Seung-Kook Kim and Young-Jai Park arxiv:hep-th/9812001v1 1 Dec 1998 Department of Physics and Basic Science Research
More informationImproved BFT embedding having chain-structure arxiv:hep-th/ v1 3 Aug 2005
hep-th/0508022 SOGANG-HEP315/05 Improved BFT embedding having chain-structure arxiv:hep-th/0508022v1 3 Aug 2005 Yong-Wan Kim 1 and Ee Chang-Young 2 Department of Physics and Institute for Science and Technology,
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 7 Nov 1998
SOGANG-HEP 249/98 Consistent Dirac Quantization of SU(2) Skyrmion equivalent to BFT Scheme arxiv:hep-th/9811066v1 7 Nov 1998 Soon-Tae Hong 1, Yong-Wan Kim 1,2 and Young-Jai Park 1 1 Department of Physics
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 2 Oct 1998
SOGANG-HEP 238/98 October 2, 1998 Two Different Gauge Invariant Models in Lagrangian Approach arxiv:hep-th/9810016v1 2 Oct 1998 Seung-Kook Kim, Yong-Wan Kim, and Young-Jai Park Department of Physics, Seonam
More informationBFT quantization of chiral-boson theories
BFT quantization of chiral-boson theories IF-UFRJ-20/94 arxiv:hep-th/9408038v1 5 Aug 1994 R. Amorim and J. Barcelos-Neto Instituto de Física Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro RJ 21945-970 - Caixa
More informationImproved BFT quantization of O(3) nonlinear sigma model
SOGANG-HEP 257/99 Improved BFT quantization of O(3) nonlinear sigma model Soon-Tae Hong a,wontaekim b, and Young-Jai Park c Department of Physics and Basic Science Research Institute, Sogang University,
More informationBFT embedding of noncommutative D-brane system. Abstract
SOGANG-HEP 271/00 BFT embedding of noncommutative D-brane system Soon-Tae Hong,WonTaeKim, Young-Jai Park, and Myung Seok Yoon Department of Physics and Basic Science Research Institute, Sogang University,
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v2 28 Nov 2000
Improved Dirac quantization of a free particle Soon-Tae Hong, Won Tae Kim and Young-Jai Park Department of Physics and Basic Science Research Institute, Sogang University, C.P.O. Box 1142, Seoul 100-611,
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 11 Jan 1999
SOGANG-HEP 249/98 Consistent Dirac Quantization of SU(2) Skyrmion equivalent to BFT Scheme arxiv:hep-th/9811066v2 11 Jan 1999 Soon-Tae Hong 1, Yong-Wan Kim 1,2 and Young-Jai Park 1 1 Department of Physics
More informationarxiv:gr-qc/ v2 6 Apr 1999
1 Notations I am using the same notations as in [3] and [2]. 2 Temporal gauge - various approaches arxiv:gr-qc/9801081v2 6 Apr 1999 Obviously the temporal gauge q i = a i = const or in QED: A 0 = a R (1)
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v3 19 Jun 1998
hep-th/9702134 SOGANG-HEP 212/97 Non-Abelian Proca model based on the improved BFT formalism arxiv:hep-th/9702134v3 19 Jun 1998 Mu-In Park a and Young-Jai Park b, Department of Physics and Basic Science
More informationNon Abelian Higgs Mechanism
Non Abelian Higgs Mechanism When a local rather than global symmetry is spontaneously broken, we do not get a massless Goldstone boson. Instead, the gauge field of the broken symmetry becomes massive,
More informationDepartment of Physics and Basic Science Research Institute, Sogang University, C.P.O. Box 1142, Seoul , Korea. (November 26, 2001) Abstract
CP 1 model with Hopf term and fractional spin statistics Soon-Tae Hong,Bum-HoonLee, and Young-Jai Park Department of Physics and Basic Science Research Institute, Sogang University, C.P.O. Box 1142, Seoul
More informationGroup Structure of Spontaneously Broken Gauge Theories
Group Structure of SpontaneouslyBroken Gauge Theories p. 1/25 Group Structure of Spontaneously Broken Gauge Theories Laura Daniel ldaniel@ucsc.edu Physics Department University of California, Santa Cruz
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 11 Sep 1996
Gauge Independence of the Lagrangian Path Integral in a Higher-Order Formalism arxiv:hep-th/9609037v2 Sep 996 I.A. Batalin I.E. Tamm Theory Division P.N. Lebedev Physics Institute Russian Academy of Sciences
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory I Contact: Michael Kachelrieß, tel. 99890701 Allowed tools: mathematical tables Some formulas can be found on p.2. 1. Concepts.
More informationAs usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 8: Lectures 15, 16
As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 8: Lectures 15, 16 Masses for Vectors: the Higgs mechanism April 6, 2012 The momentum-space propagator
More informationSnyder noncommutative space-time from two-time physics
arxiv:hep-th/0408193v1 25 Aug 2004 Snyder noncommutative space-time from two-time physics Juan M. Romero and Adolfo Zamora Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Apartado
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 17 Jun 2003
HD-THEP-03-28 Dirac s Constrained Hamiltonian Dynamics from an Unconstrained Dynamics arxiv:hep-th/030655v 7 Jun 2003 Heinz J. Rothe Institut für Theoretische Physik Universität Heidelberg, Philosophenweg
More informationEmergence of Yang Mills theory from the Non-Abelian Nambu Model
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PPER OPEN CCESS Emergence of Yang Mills theory from the Non-belian Nambu Model To cite this article: C.. Escobar and L. F. Urrutia 2016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 761 012058
More informationQFT Dimensional Analysis
QFT Dimensional Analysis In the h = c = 1 units, all quantities are measured in units of energy to some power. For example m = p µ = E +1 while x µ = E 1 where m stands for the dimensionality of the mass
More informationRepresentations of Sp(6,R) and SU(3) carried by homogeneous polynomials
Representations of Sp(6,R) and SU(3) carried by homogeneous polynomials Govindan Rangarajan a) Department of Mathematics and Centre for Theoretical Studies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012,
More informationAttempts at relativistic QM
Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics should incorporate both quantum mechanics and special relativity. However historically combining quantum mechanics and
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 4 Sep 2009
The Gauge Unfixing Formalism and the Solutions arxiv:0904.4711v2 [hep-th] 4 Sep 2009 of the Dirac Bracket Commutators Jorge Ananias Neto Departamento de Física, ICE, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora,
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 13 Sep 2001
Compactification of gauge theories and the gauge invariance of massive modes. Amorim a and J. Barcelos-Neto b Instituto de Física Universidade Federal do io de Janeiro J 21945-97 - Caixa Postal 68528 -
More informationSupergravity in Quantum Mechanics
Supergravity in Quantum Mechanics hep-th/0408179 Peter van Nieuwenhuizen C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics Stony Brook University Erice Lectures, June 2017 Vienna Lectures, Jan/Feb 2017 Aim of
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v3 27 Mar 2007
FIUN-GCP-07/3 W-gauge boson condensation via background currents arxiv:hep-ph/07036v3 7 Mar 007 C. A. Peña and C. J. Quimbay Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Ciudad Universitaria,
More informationAnomaly. Kenichi KONISHI University of Pisa. College de France, 14 February 2006
Anomaly Kenichi KONISHI University of Pisa College de France, 14 February 2006 Abstract Symmetry and quantization U A (1) anomaly and π 0 decay Origin of anomalies Chiral and nonabelian anomaly Anomally
More informationWeek 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books
Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter Weiberg, Chapter 5 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 1, 1 Free field Lagrangians
More informationDuality between constraints and gauge conditions
Duality between constraints and gauge conditions arxiv:hep-th/0504220v2 28 Apr 2005 M. Stoilov Institute of Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Sofia 1784, Bulgaria E-mail: mstoilov@inrne.bas.bg 24 April
More informationQuantum Field Theory III
Quantum Field Theory III Prof. Erick Weinberg April 5, 011 1 Lecture 6 Let s write down the superfield (without worrying about factors of i or Φ = A(y + θψ(y + θθf (y = A(x + θσ θ A + θθ θ θ A + θψ + θθ(
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 1 Mar 2000
February 2000 IUT-Phys/00-02 arxiv:hep-th/0003010v1 1 Mar 2000 Classification of constraints using chain by chain method 1 F. Loran, 2 A. Shirzad, 3 Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences P.O.
More informationLecture 6 The Super-Higgs Mechanism
Lecture 6 The Super-Higgs Mechanism Introduction: moduli space. Outline Explicit computation of moduli space for SUSY QCD with F < N and F N. The Higgs mechanism. The super-higgs mechanism. Reading: Terning
More informationPath Integral Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field Coupled to A Spinor
EJTP 6, No. 22 (2009) 189 196 Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics Path Integral Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field Coupled to A Spinor Walaa. I. Eshraim and Nasser. I. Farahat Department of
More informationHiggs Boson Phenomenology Lecture I
iggs Boson Phenomenology Lecture I Laura Reina TASI 2011, CU-Boulder, June 2011 Outline of Lecture I Understanding the Electroweak Symmetry Breaking as a first step towards a more fundamental theory of
More informationMagnetic Charge as a Hidden Gauge Symmetry. Abstract
Magnetic Charge as a Hidden Gauge Symmetry D. Singleton Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 901 (January 14, 1997) Abstract A theory containing both electric and magnetic
More informationTHE STANDARD MODEL AND THE GENERALIZED COVARIANT DERIVATIVE
THE STANDAD MODEL AND THE GENEALIZED COVAIANT DEIVATIVE arxiv:hep-ph/9907480v Jul 999 M. Chaves and H. Morales Escuela de Física, Universidad de Costa ica San José, Costa ica E-mails: mchaves@cariari.ucr.ac.cr,
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 13 Feb 1992
Chiral Bosons Through Linear Constraints H. O. Girotti, M. Gomes and V. O. Rivelles Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 2516, 1498 São Paulo, SP, Brazil. arxiv:hep-th/92243v1 13
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 15 Aug 2000
hep-th/0008120 IPM/P2000/026 Gauged Noncommutative Wess-Zumino-Witten Models arxiv:hep-th/0008120v1 15 Aug 2000 Amir Masoud Ghezelbash,,1, Shahrokh Parvizi,2 Department of Physics, Az-zahra University,
More informationAula/Lecture 18 Non-Abelian Gauge theories The Higgs Mechanism The Standard Model: Part I
Física de Partículas Aula/Lecture 18 Non-Abelian Gauge theories The The : Part I Jorge C. Romão Instituto Superior Técnico, Departamento de Física & CFTP A. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal 2016
More informationThe Dirac Propagator From Pseudoclassical Mechanics
CALT-68-1485 DOE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT The Dirac Propagator From Pseudoclassical Mechanics Theodore J. Allen California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 9115 Abstract In this note it is
More informationHamilton-Jacobi Formulation of A Non-Abelian Yang-Mills Theories
EJTP 5, No. 17 (2008) 65 72 Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics Hamilton-Jacobi Formulation of A Non-Abelian Yang-Mills Theories W. I. Eshraim and N. I. Farahat Department of Physics Islamic University
More information1 Canonical quantization conformal gauge
Contents 1 Canonical quantization conformal gauge 1.1 Free field space of states............................... 1. Constraints..................................... 3 1..1 VIRASORO ALGEBRA...........................
More informationQuantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams
Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams III. Quantization of constrained systems and Maxwell s theory 1. The
More informationInteracting Theory of Chiral Bosons and Gauge Fields on Noncommutative Extended Minkowski Spacetime
Commun. Theor. Phys. 57 (0 855 865 Vol. 57, No. 5, May 5, 0 Interacting Theory of Chiral Bosons and Gauge Fields on Noncommutative Extended Minkowski Spacetime MIAO Yan-Gang (,,3, and ZHAO Ying-Jie (,
More informationSymmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions
Symmetries, Fields and Particles 013 Solutions Yichen Shi Easter 014 1. (a) Define the groups SU() and SO(3), and find their Lie algebras. Show that these Lie algebras, including their bracket structure,
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 14 Jan 1997
Transformation of second-class into first-class constraints in supersymmetric theories arxiv:hep-th/9701058v1 14 Jan 1997 J. Barcelos-Neto and W. Oliveira Instituto de Física Universidade Federal do Rio
More informationVacuum Energy and Effective Potentials
Vacuum Energy and Effective Potentials Quantum field theories have badly divergent vacuum energies. In perturbation theory, the leading term is the net zero-point energy E zeropoint = particle species
More informationInter-brane distance stabilization by bulk Higgs field in RS model
EPJ Web of Conferences 58, 0500 07 QFTHEP 07 DOI: 0.05/epjconf/07580500 Inter-brane distance stabilization by bulk Higgs field in RS model Vadim Egorov,, and Igor Volobuev, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear
More informationQuantum Field Theory III
Quantum Field Theory III Prof. Erick Weinberg January 19, 2011 1 Lecture 1 1.1 Structure We will start with a bit of group theory, and we will talk about spontaneous symmetry broken. Then we will talk
More informationchapter 3 Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and
chapter 3 Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Nambu-Goldstone boson History 1961 Nambu: SSB of chiral symmetry and appearance of zero mass boson Goldstone s s theorem in general 1964 Higgs (+others): consider
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 25 Dec 2008
An alternative interpretation of the Weinberg-Salam model. arxiv:08.33v2 [hep-th] 25 Dec 2008 L. D. Faddeev St. Petersburg Dept. of Steklov Mathematical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences Si nous ne
More informationChern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee
Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee Maxwell Theory Maxwell Theory: Gauge Transformation and Invariance Gauss Law Charge Degrees of
More informationNew Model of massive spin-2 particle
New Model of massive spin-2 particle Based on Phys.Rev. D90 (2014) 043006, Y.O, S. Akagi, S. Nojiri Phys.Rev. D90 (2014) 123013, S. Akagi, Y.O, S. Nojiri Yuichi Ohara QG lab. Nagoya univ. Introduction
More informationGoldstone Bosons and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in QCD
Goldstone Bosons and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in QCD Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz May 2011 Before reading this handout, carefully read Peskin and Schroeder s
More informationLecture III: Higgs Mechanism
ecture III: Higgs Mechanism Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking The Higgs Mechanism Mass Generation for eptons Quark Masses & Mixing III.1 Symmetry Breaking One example is the infinite ferromagnet the nearest
More informationThe Higgs Mechanism and the Higgs Particle
The Higgs Mechanism and the Higgs Particle Heavy-Ion Seminar... or the Anderson-Higgs-Brout-Englert-Guralnik-Hagen-Kibble Mechanism Philip W. Anderson Peter W. Higgs Tom W. B. Gerald Carl R. François Robert
More informationConfined chirally symmetric dense matter
Confined chirally symmetric dense matter L. Ya. Glozman, V. Sazonov, R. Wagenbrunn Institut für Physik, FB Theoretische Physik, Universität Graz 28 June 2013 L. Ya. Glozman, V. Sazonov, R. Wagenbrunn (Institut
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 23 Mar 1995
Straight-line string with curvature L.D.Soloviev Institute for High Energy Physics, 142284, Protvino, Moscow region, Russia arxiv:hep-th/9503156v1 23 Mar 1995 Abstract Classical and quantum solutions for
More informationLecture 5: Sept. 19, 2013 First Applications of Noether s Theorem. 1 Translation Invariance. Last Latexed: September 18, 2013 at 14:24 1
Last Latexed: September 18, 2013 at 14:24 1 Lecture 5: Sept. 19, 2013 First Applications of Noether s Theorem Copyright c 2005 by Joel A. Shapiro Now it is time to use the very powerful though abstract
More informationetc., etc. Consequently, the Euler Lagrange equations for the Φ and Φ fields may be written in a manifestly covariant form as L Φ = m 2 Φ, (S.
PHY 396 K. Solutions for problem set #3. Problem 1a: Let s start with the scalar fields Φx and Φ x. Similar to the EM covariant derivatives, the non-abelian covariant derivatives may be integrated by parts
More informationThe Gauge Principle Contents Quantum Electrodynamics SU(N) Gauge Theory Global Gauge Transformations Local Gauge Transformations Dynamics of Field Ten
Lecture 4 QCD as a Gauge Theory Adnan Bashir, IFM, UMSNH, Mexico August 2013 Hermosillo Sonora The Gauge Principle Contents Quantum Electrodynamics SU(N) Gauge Theory Global Gauge Transformations Local
More informationD-Branes at Finite Temperature in TFD
D-Branes at Finite Temperature in TFD arxiv:hep-th/0308114v1 18 Aug 2003 M. C. B. Abdalla a, A. L. Gadelha a, I. V. Vancea b January 8, 2014 a Instituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista
More informationChern-Simons gauge theory The Chern-Simons (CS) gauge theory in three dimensions is defined by the action,
Lecture A3 Chern-Simons gauge theory The Chern-Simons (CS) gauge theory in three dimensions is defined by the action, S CS = k tr (AdA+ 3 ) 4π A3, = k ( ǫ µνρ tr A µ ( ν A ρ ρ A ν )+ ) 8π 3 A µ[a ν,a ρ
More informationTowards a manifestly diffeomorphism invariant Exact Renormalization Group
Towards a manifestly diffeomorphism invariant Exact Renormalization Group Anthony W. H. Preston University of Southampton Supervised by Prof. Tim R. Morris Talk prepared for UK QFT-V, University of Nottingham,
More information11 Group Theory and Standard Model
Physics 129b Lecture 18 Caltech, 03/06/18 11 Group Theory and Standard Model 11.2 Gauge Symmetry Electromagnetic field Before we present the standard model, we need to explain what a gauge symmetry is.
More informationA Lax Representation for the Born-Infeld Equation
A Lax Representation for the Born-Infeld Equation J. C. Brunelli Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Departamento de Física CFM Campus Universitário Trindade C.P. 476, CEP 88040-900 Florianópolis, SC
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 24 Sep 1998
ICTP/IR/98/19 SISSA/EP/98/101 Quantum Integrability of Certain Boundary Conditions 1 arxiv:hep-th/9809178v1 24 Sep 1998 M. Moriconi 2 The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics Strada
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 25 Nov 2015
The Non-Linear Higgs Legacy of the LHC Run I Tyler Corbett, 1, Oscar J. P. Éboli,3 Dorival Gonçalves, 4 J. Gonzalez Fraile, 5 Tilman Plehn, 5 and Michael Rauch 6 1 C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics,
More informationDonoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6
1 Week 7: Non linear sigma models and pion lagrangians Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter 9.3 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6 Weinberg, Chap. 19 1 Goldstone boson lagrangians
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 8 Jun 2000
Partially emedding of the quantum mechanical analog of the nonlinear sigma model R. Amorim a, J. Barcelos-Neto and C. Wotzasek c Instituto de Física Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro RJ 1945-970 -
More informationSECOND-ORDER LAGRANGIAN FORMULATION OF LINEAR FIRST-ORDER FIELD EQUATIONS
SECOND-ORDER LAGRANGIAN FORMULATION OF LINEAR FIRST-ORDER FIELD EQUATIONS CONSTANTIN BIZDADEA, SOLANGE-ODILE SALIU Department of Physics, University of Craiova 13 Al. I. Cuza Str., Craiova 00585, Romania
More informationThe Phases of QCD. Thomas Schaefer. North Carolina State University
The Phases of QCD Thomas Schaefer North Carolina State University 1 Plan of the lectures 1. QCD and States of Matter 2. The High Temperature Phase: Theory 3. Exploring QCD at High Temperature: Experiment
More informationMASS GAP IN QUANTUM CHROMODYNAMICS
arxiv:hep-th/0611220v2 28 Nov 2006 MASS GAP IN QUANTUM CHROMODYNAMICS R. Acharya Department of Physics & Astronomy Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-1504 November 2006 Abstract We present a heuristic
More informationGauge invariant accounts of the Higgs mechanism
Gauge invariant accounts of the Higgs mechanism Ward Struyve 1 Institute of Theoretical Physics, K.U.Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 00D, B 3001 Leuven, Belgium. Institute of Philosophy, K.U.Leuven, Kardinaal
More informationPseudo-Hermiticity and Generalized P T- and CP T-Symmetries
Pseudo-Hermiticity and Generalized P T- and CP T-Symmetries arxiv:math-ph/0209018v3 28 Nov 2002 Ali Mostafazadeh Department of Mathematics, Koç University, umelifeneri Yolu, 80910 Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey
More informationAspects of Spontaneous Lorentz Violation
Aspects of Spontaneous Lorentz Violation Robert Bluhm Colby College IUCSS School on CPT & Lorentz Violating SME, Indiana University, June 2012 Outline: I. Review & Motivations II. Spontaneous Lorentz Violation
More informationExistence of Antiparticles as an Indication of Finiteness of Nature. Felix M. Lev
Existence of Antiparticles as an Indication of Finiteness of Nature Felix M. Lev Artwork Conversion Software Inc., 1201 Morningside Drive, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266, USA (Email: felixlev314@gmail.com)
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 6 Mar 2000
Consistent Batalin Fradkin quantization of Infinitely Reducible First Class Constraints Stefano Bellucci and Anton Galajinsky INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, C.P. 3, 00044 Frascati, Italia arxiv:hep-th/990990v
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 10 Apr 2006
Gravitation with Two Times arxiv:hep-th/0604076v1 10 Apr 2006 W. Chagas-Filho Departamento de Fisica, Universidade Federal de Sergipe SE, Brazil February 1, 2008 Abstract We investigate the possibility
More informationPath Integral Quantization of Constrained Systems
Islamic University-Gaza Deanery of Graduate Science Faculty of Science Department of Physics Path Integral Quantization of Constrained Systems BY Tahany Riziq Dalloul Supervisor Dr. Nasser I. Farahat A
More informationVector Fields. It is standard to define F µν = µ ϕ ν ν ϕ µ, so that the action may be written compactly as
Vector Fields The most general Poincaré-invariant local quadratic action for a vector field with no more than first derivatives on the fields (ensuring that classical evolution is determined based on the
More informationParticle Physics I Lecture Exam Question Sheet
Particle Physics I Lecture Exam Question Sheet Five out of these 16 questions will be given to you at the beginning of the exam. (1) (a) Which are the different fundamental interactions that exist in Nature?
More informationLecture II: Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity
Lecture II: Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity (Courses in canonical gravity) Yaser Tavakoli December 16, 2014 1 Space-time foliation The Hamiltonian formulation of ordinary mechanics is given
More informationON ABELIANIZATION OF FIRST CLASS CONSTRAINTS
ON ABELIANIZATION OF FIRST CLASS CONSTRAINTS arxiv:hep-th/9504153v1 28 Apr 1995 S A Gogilidze, A M Khvedelidze, V N Pervushin Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research,
More informationAn extended standard model and its Higgs geometry from the matrix model
An extended standard model and its Higgs geometry from the matrix model Jochen Zahn Universität Wien based on arxiv:1401.2020 joint work with Harold Steinacker Bayrischzell, May 2014 Motivation The IKKT
More informationSymmetry Groups conservation law quantum numbers Gauge symmetries local bosons mediate the interaction Group Abelian Product of Groups simple
Symmetry Groups Symmetry plays an essential role in particle theory. If a theory is invariant under transformations by a symmetry group one obtains a conservation law and quantum numbers. For example,
More information752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian
752 Final April 16, 2010 Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The standard model Lagrangian L SM = L Y M + L W D + L Y u + L H The rst term, the Yang Mills
More informationHIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY
HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY I.L. Buchbinder Tomsk I.L. Buchbinder (Tomsk) HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY Wroclaw, April, 2011 1 / 27 Aims Brief non-expert non-technical review of some old
More informationSUSY Breaking in Gauge Theories
SUSY Breaking in Gauge Theories Joshua Berger With the Witten index constraint on SUSY breaking having been introduced in last week s Journal club, we proceed to explicitly determine the constraints on
More informationLecture 7: N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theory
Lecture 7: N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theory José D. Edelstein University of Santiago de Compostela SUPERSYMMETRY Santiago de Compostela, November 22, 2012 José D. Edelstein (USC) Lecture 7: N = 2 supersymmetric
More informationIntroduction to Group Theory
Chapter 10 Introduction to Group Theory Since symmetries described by groups play such an important role in modern physics, we will take a little time to introduce the basic structure (as seen by a physicist)
More informationShow, for infinitesimal variations of nonabelian Yang Mills gauge fields:
Problem. Palatini Identity Show, for infinitesimal variations of nonabelian Yang Mills gauge fields: δf i µν = D µ δa i ν D ν δa i µ..) Begin by considering the following form of the field strength tensor
More informationTwistor Strings, Gauge Theory and Gravity. Abou Zeid, Hull and Mason hep-th/
Twistor Strings, Gauge Theory and Gravity Abou Zeid, Hull and Mason hep-th/0606272 Amplitudes for YM, Gravity have elegant twistor space structure: Twistor Geometry Amplitudes for YM, Gravity have elegant
More information3 Quantization of the Dirac equation
3 Quantization of the Dirac equation 3.1 Identical particles As is well known, quantum mechanics implies that no measurement can be performed to distinguish particles in the same quantum state. Elementary
More informationSymmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions
Symmetries, Fields and Particles 03 Solutions Yichen Shi July 9, 04. a Define the groups SU and SO3, and find their Lie algebras. Show that these Lie algebras, including their bracket structure, are isomorphic.
More information