The Dirac equation. L= i ψ(x)[ 1 2 2
|
|
- Christina Fowler
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Dirac equation Infobox 0.1 Chapter Summary The Dirac theory of spinor fields ψ(x) has Lagrangian density L= i ψ(x)[ m]ψ(x) / 2 where/ γ µ µ. Applying the Euler-Lagrange equation yields the Dirac equation [/ +m]ψ(x)=0 TheDiracmatricesobey{γ µ,γ ν }=2η µν withη µν themetricofminkowski space-time. The equal time anti-commutation relations are {ψ a (x),ψ b (y)}δ(x 0 y 0 )=δ b aδ 4 (x y) {ψ a (x),ψ b (y)}δ(x 0 y 0 )=0, {ψ a (x),ψ b (y)}δ(x 0 y 0 )=0 The Dirac theory has a phase symmetry which results in the conserved Noether current corresponding to particle number, J µ V (x)= ψ(x)γ µ ψ(x) The Dirac theory is Poincare invariant. The Noether currents associated with this symmetry,j µ (x)= T µν (x)f ν (x), can be formed from the appropriate Killing vectors f µ (x) and the symmetric, conserved energymomentum tensor T µν (x)= i 4 ψ(x)[γ µ ν +γ ν µ γ µ ν γ ν µ ]ψ(x) With the explicit representation γ i =[ 0 σi σ i 0 ], γ0 =[ 0 I I 0 ] (1) 1
2 and the ortho-normal helicity eigenvectors, the Dirac field is ψ(x)= d 3 k ei k x iet 2(2π) d 3 k e i k x+iet 2(2π) 3 2 σ ku + = k u +, σ ku = k u i 1 k /Eu + 1+ k /Eu a + ( k)+ + i 1+ k /Eu 1 k /Eu a ( k) i 1 k /Eu + 1+ k /Eu b +( i 1+ k)+ k /Eu + 1 k /Eu b ( k) (2) where E( k)= k2 +m 2. and the non-vanishing anti-commutation relations are {a + ( k),a +( k )}=δ( k k ), {a ( k),a ( k )}=δ( k k ) (3) {b + ( k),b +( k )}=δ( k k ), {b + ( k),b +( k )}=δ( k k ) (4) The vacuum is defined by a ± (k) O>=0, b ± (k) O>=0 k and particle and anti-particle states are created by a ±(k) and b ±(k), respectively. The Noether charges for phase and translation symmetries are given by N= d 3 xjv(x)= 0 d 3 k (a s(k)a s (k) b s(k)b s (k)) s=± H= d 3 xt 00 (x)= d 3 k k2 +m 2 (a s(k)a s (k)+b s(k)b s (k)) s=± P i = d 3 xt 0i (x)= d 3 k s=± k i (a s(k)a s (k)+b s(k)b s (k)) 2
3 1 The Dirac Equation So far, we have formulated an approach to the quantum mechanics of a many-particle system which led us to the non-relativistic field equation, in the absence of interactions, i h t ψ( x,t)=[ h 2 2m 2 +ǫ F ]ψ σ ( x,t)=0 (5) In this Lecture,we shall discuss the equation which replaces this one in a relativistic theory. From our point of view, the main difference between the two is symmetry. The field equation above has Galilean symmetry. We want to trade it for an equation that has Lorentz symmetry. We will continue to discuss a many-fermion system and to give the discussion a physical context, we will call the fermions electrons with the idea that they will eventually become the electrons of quantum electrodynamics. We have ignored the interaction terms in the above equation. We will continue to do this, to assume that the fermions are noninteracting. Later on, once we have a relativistic field equation, we will let the fields interact. To seek the appropriate relativistic wave equation, we could recall our discussion of the previous chapters. If we simply postulate a Hamiltonian with a relativistic dispersion relation, so that the wave equation (5) is replaced by i h t ψ σ( x,t)= m 2 c 4 c 2 h 2 2 ψ σ ( x,t) (6) the resulting theory has difficulties with causality. There is a finite probability of the particle propagating faster than the speed of light. The difficulty lies in the fact that the hamiltonian operator on the right-hand-side of this equation is not a polynomial in derivatives. Having all orders in derivatives, it is not a local differential operator. Dirac found a way to replace this equation by one where the hamiltonian has the same spectrum, but the operator is a polynomial in derivatives. We also have this goal. Let us begin by postulating the existence of an anti-particle which would satisfy and equation similar to (8) but with negative energy, i h t ψ σ ( x,t)= m 2 c 4 c 2 h 2 2 ψ σ ( x,t) (7) Assuming that both the particle and the anti-particle occur in the same theory, we could We could combine the two into the same multi-component 3
4 field to find i h t [ψ σ( x,t) ψ σ ( x,t) ]=[ m2 c 4 c 2 h m 2 c 4 c 2 h 2 2[[ψ σ( x,t) ψ σ ( x,t) ] (8) One might wonder whether there is a matrix hamiltonian which has eigenvalues ± m 2 c 2 +c 2 h 2 k 2 and which is polynomial in derivatives. There is no such 2 2 matrix. We thus need to involve the spin indices and consider [ ψ σ( x,t) ] as a four-component object. It is Dirac s great insight that our ψ σ ( x,t) problem can be solved with a 4 4 matrix. (We caution the reader that equation (8) is still not quite correct, as it has that form only in a particular basis for spins.) Consider the four Hermitian 4 4 matrices which have the algebraic properties β, α 1, α 2, α 3 ββ=i, βα i +α i β=0, α i α j +α j α i =2δ ij I wherei is the 4 4 unit matrix. (Alternatively, if we consider matrices with the above properties, there is a way to show that the minimal size of such matrices is 4 4. Then, we consider the wave equation i h ψ 1 ( x,t) ψ 1 ( x,t) ψ 2 ( x,t) =[βmc t ψ 3 ( x,t) 2 ψ +i hc α ] 2 ( x,t) ψ 3 ( x,t) ψ 4 ( x,t) ψ 4 ( x,t) The Dirac hamiltonian h D =[βmc 2 +i hc α ] (9) is a hermitian operator. It must have real eigenvalues. What is more h 2 D =m 2 c 4 h 2 c 2 2 (10) so, since the eigenvalues of 2 are k 2, h D has eigenvalues± m 2 c 4 + h 2 c 2 k 2, which is the desired property. Moreover, h D is a polynomial, in fact it is at most linear in derivatives, and it is therefore a local operator. 4
5 To make the Dirac equation look more covariant, we can define the matrices β=iγ 0, α=γ 0 γ (11) γ 0 = γ 0, γ i =γ i (12) {γ µ,γ ν }=2η µν (13) γ µ are called the Dirac gamma-matrices. Using them, the Dirac equation is the matrix differential equation 4 b=1 or, with implicit summations over indices, [γ µ ab µ+ mc h δ ab]ψ b ( x,t)=0 (14) [/ µ +m]ψ(x)=0 (15) where we shall use the slash notation / γ µ µ. We will hereafter assume that we are using a system of units where h=1 and where c=1. We shall find it useful to define the following quantity ψ(x) ψ (x)γ 0 Using this definition and taking a hermitian conjugate of the equation in (16), we obtain ψ(x)[ / m]=0 (16) The Dirac equation has a structure similar to the Schrödinger wave equation with the difference that, what we would call the single-particle Hamiltonian, h D, is a matrix and it is linear, rather than quadratic, in derivatives. We might expect that the Hamiltonian of the quantum field theory is given by H 0 = d 3 xψ (x)h D ψ(x)= d 3 xh(x) (17) H(x)=i ψ(x)[ γ +m]ψ(x) (18) and that the time derivative of ψ( x,t) is generated by this Hamiltonian by taking a commutator, i t ψ(x)=[ψ(x),h 0] 5
6 In fact this will indeed be the case if the field operator obeys the equal-time anti-commutation relations {ψ a ( x,t),ψ b ( y,t)}=δ b aδ 3 ( k y) {ψ a ( x,t),ψ b ( y,t)}=0, {ψ a ( x,t),ψ b ( y,t)}=0 (19) Our task in the following will be to assume that ψ( x,t) indeed obeys the Dirac equation and this anti-commutation relation and to find a solution of them. We have not discussed why the Dirac equation is relativistic. We will put off the details until later. Here, we observe that, given the anti-commutation algebra of the Dirac matrices, (γ µ µ ) 2 =γ µ γ ν µ ν = 1 2 {γµ,γ ν } µ ν = 2 Using this identity, we can operate the matrix valued differential operator ( γ ν ν +m) on the Dirac equation from the left to obtain ( γ ν ν +m)(γ µ µ +m)ψ=0 ( 2 +m 2 )ψ=0 We see that, if ψ(x) obeys the Dirac equation, it also obeys the relativistic wave equation( 2 +m 2 )ψ(x)=0. This implies that the solutions of the Dirac equation also obey this relativistic wave equation, and must therefore propagate like relativistic matter waves. 2 Solving the Dirac equation To see how the Dirac equation is solved, it is useful to choose a specific form for the Dirac matrices γ i =[ 0 σi σ i 0 ], γ0 =[ 0 I I 0 ] (20) wherei is the 2 2 unit matrix and σ i are the 2 2 Pauli matrices σ 1 =[ ], σ2 =[ 0 i i 0 ], σ3 =[ ] (21) The Pauli matrices have the properties σ i σ j +σ j σ i =2δ ij I, σ i σ j σ j σ i =2iǫ ijk σ k 6
7 where ǫ ijk is the totally antisymmetric tensor with ǫ 123 = 1. It is easy to confirm that the explicit form (20) indeed have the correct anti-commutation algebra for Dirac matrices. With the matrices in (20), the Dirac equation is m I [ 0 + σ ][ u(x) ]=0 (22) I 0 + σ m v(x) where we have split the four-component Dirac spinor into u(x) an v(x) which are two 2-component objects. To solve the differential equation, we use the ansatz [ u(x) v(x) ]=eipµ η µνx ν [ u v ]=e iωt+i k x [ u v ] (23) mu i[iω σ k]v=0 (24) mv+i[iω+ σ k]u=0 (25) We have now reduced the Dirac equation to two matrix equations. Equation (25) determines the 2-component object v in terms of u, that is, if u were known, we could determine v as Plugging this into (24) yields the condition v= i m [Iω+ σ k]u (26) ω 2 = k 2 +m 2 (27) which has two solutions for ω, ω= k2 +m 2 and ω= k2 +m 2, the positive and negative energy solutions, respectively. In the following, we will use the notation where ω is the frequency which can be either positive or negative, and E( k)= k2 +m 2 is positive, and sometimes abbreviated by E. Next, we note that σ k is a Hermitian matrix which can be diagonalized. Once diagonal, it has real eigenvalues. The eigenstates of this matrix are said to be eigenstates of helicity. It is left as an exercise to the reader to show that there exist two eigenvectors, σ ku + = k u +, σ ku = k u u +u + =1=u u, u +u =0=u u + 7
8 We shall find the following identities very useful u + u += k + σ k 2 k, u u = k σ k 2 k Then, putting it all together, we have four linearly independent solutions which we can superimpose to form the Dirac field, ψ(x)= d 3 k ei k x iet i 1 3 k /Eu + 2(2π) 2 1+ k /Eu a + ( k)+ + i 1+ k /Eu 1 k /Eu a ( k) + d 3 k e i k x+iet i 1 3 k /Eu + 2(2π) 2 1+ k /Eu b +( i 1+ k)+ k /Eu + 1 k /Eu b ( k) (28) where E( k)= k2 +m 2. This solution will obey the anti-commutation relation for the Dirac field(19) if the Fourier coefficients satisfy the non-vanishing anti-commutation relations are {a + ( k),a +( k )}=δ( k k ), {a ( k),a ( k )}=δ( k k ) (29) {b + ( k),b +( k )}=δ( k k ), {b + ( k),b +( k )}=δ( k k ) (30) All other combinations have vanishing anti-commutators. We can easily check that, with these anti-commutation relations for creation and annihilation operators, the solution in equation (28) obeys equations (19). With this solution, the Hamiltonian is H 0 = d 3 k k2 +m 2 (a +( k)a + ( k)+a ( k)a ( k)+b +( k)b + ( k)+b ( k)b ( k)) and the number operator is N= d 3 xψ (x,t)ψ( x,t) (31) = d 3 k(a +( k)a + ( k)+a ( k)a ( k) b +( k)b + ( k) b ( k)b ( k)) (32) In both of the above expressions, we have dropped infinite constants. Unlike in the non relativistic theory, the vacuum energy density and the vacuum 8
9 charge density both contain infinite constants which we have to simply drop in order to have a sensible Hamiltonian and number operator. We see from the expression (32), that, in direct analogy to the non relativistic system that we have studied, electrons, which are associated with a ± ( k) and a ±( k) contribute positively to the particle number whereas holes, or positrons, which are associated with b ± ( k) and b ±( k), have negative particle number. What differs from the non-relativistic theory is the fact that electrons and positrons have the same energy spectrum. Since the energy of a single electron, k2 +m 2, can be arbitrarily large, for large values of k, it is also so for holes (or positrons). This means that, as we shall seen, unlike the Fermi sea, the relativistic analog, which we can call the Dirac sea, is infinitely deep. This is what leads to the infinite values of the energy and number densities (which we have dropped). Another difference with the nonrelativistic theory, where the electron had a state of well-defined spin is that in the relativistic theory, it is the helicity (the states labeled by subscripts (+) and (-)), which are important. The helicity can be thought of as the projection of the spin in the direction of motion of the fermion. We construct the basis of the Hilbert space beginning with the vacuum O> which we assume is normalized, <O O>=1 and has the property that it is annihilated by all of the annihilation operators, a + ( k) O>=0, a ( k) O>=0, b + ( k) O>=0, b ( k) O>=0 for all values of k. Then, multi particle and anti-particle states are created by operating creation operators a +( k 1 )...a +( k m )a ( k 1)...a ( k m )b +( l 1 )...b +( l n )b ( l 1)...b ( l n ) O> These states are eigenstates of particle number, N, with eigenvalue N=m+m n n and they are eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, H 0, with eigenvalue the total energy, E= m 1 k 2 i +m2 + m 1 ( k i )2 +m n 1 l 2 i +m2 + n 1 ( l i )2 +m 2
10 3 Lorentz Invariance The Dirac equation is clearly invariant under translations of the space-time coordinates. If ψ( x,t) is a solution then ψ( x+ a,t+τ), with constants a and τ, is also a solution. What about Lorentz transformations. Let us begin by recalling how a Lorentz transformation of a scalar field is implemented. In our discussion of Lorentz invariance, we have derived the transformation property of the scalar field, with infinitesimal transformation φ(x)=φ(λ 1 x) δφ x =ω µν x µ ν φ(x) We would expect this transformation to be a symmetry of any relativistic waveequationthatascalarfieldwouldobey. Weexpectthat,underaLorentz transformation, the argument of the Dirac field also changes. However, the Dirac field has four components and the Lorentz transformation could also mix the components. ψ(x)=s(λ)ψ(λ 1 x) Here, S(Λ) is a 4 4 matrix which depends on the Lorentz transformation. Since a Lorentz transformation should be invertible, we expect that S is an invertible matrix, that is, that dets 0. This transformation is a symmetry of the Dirac equation if the transformed field also satisfies the equation, that is, if 0=[/ +m] ψ(x)=[/ +m]s(λ)ψ(λ 1 x)=s[s 1 γ µ SΛ 1ν µ x) (Λ 1 x) ν+m]ψ(λ 1 The equation is unchanged if S 1 γ µ S=Λ µ νγ ν If the transformation is infinitesimal, so that Λ ν µ=δ ν µ+ω ν µ and S=1+s, the Dirac equation will be invariant if A matrix which does the job is γ µ s sγ µ =ω µν γ ν s= 1 4 [γρ,γ σ ]ω ρσ 10
11 This can be seen by using the algebra for Dirac matrices. The upshot is that the infinitesimal Lorentz transformation of the Dirac spinor is δψ(x)=ω µν [x µ ν [γµ,γ ν ]]ψ(x) (33) For a rotation about the i-axis, where ω kj =ǫ jki θ i, this gives what we would expect, θ ( x δψ(x)=i[ 1 i σ) 0 0 θ ( x 1 i σ)]ψ(x) that is, a rotation is generated by a combination of an angular momentum operator L i =( x p) i =( x 1 i ) i and a spin operator 1 2 σi. Then, in particular, under infinitesimal rotations, the electron density transforms like a scalar field, δ(ψ (x)ψ(x))=( θ x )(ψ (x)ψ(x)) However, for an Lorentz transformation, that is, a boost with small velocity v δψ(x)=v i [x 0 i x i γ0 γ i ]ψ(x) (34) and the density is not a scalar, but has the transformation law δ(ψ (x)ψ(x))=v i (x 0 i x i 0 )(ψ (x)ψ(x))+ v ψ (x)γ 0 γψ(x) (35) Its infinitesimal transformation is like the time-component of a vector field, j µ (x)=(ψ (x)ψ(x),ψ (x)γ 0 γ i ψ(x)) (36) Indeed, we could examine the full Lorentz transformation law and see that j µ (x) transforms like a vector field. 4 Electric current In the above, we have examined the transformation law for the electron density and we found that it transforms like the time-component of a vector field (36). We will see shortly that this vector field obeys the continuity equation, µ j µ (x)=0, which we would expect for a conserved current and, 11
12 when our Dirac fermions are identified with electrons, it will be identified with the electric current. In non-relativistic terminology, j 0 (x) is the charge density and j(x) is the current density. In relativistic physics, we simply call j µ (x) a current or a conserved current. We consider the Dirac equation and its conjugate [/ +m]ψ=0, ψ [γ µ µ +m]=0 Then,wenotethat,γ µ γ 0 = γ 0 γ µ,sothat,ifwemultiplythesecondequation above from the right by γ 0 we obtain [/ µ +m]ψ=0, ψ γ 0 [ / +m]=0 We shall shorten the notation by defining Then, we can write the current as ψ(x) ψ (x)γ 0 (37) j µ (x)= ψ(x)γ µ ψ(x) (38) Now, we are ready to use derive the continuity equation. We form the current and we assume that the Dirac spinor satisfies the Dirac equation. Then, µ j µ (x)= µ ( ψ(x)γ µ ψ(x))= ψ[/ + / ]ψ(x)= ψ(x)[ m+m]ψ(x)=0 This continuity equation for the current implies the conservation of charge, which we have so far called the number operator, d dt N= d dt d 3 xψ (x)ψ(x)= d 3 x ψ(x) γψ(x)= d 2 σˆn ψ(x) γψ(x) where we have used Gauss theorem to write the last term as a surface integral at the infinite boundary of three dimensional space. If our boundary conditions are such that the quantum expectation value of the current density goes to zero sufficiently rapidly there, the number operator is conserved. 12
13 5 The Energy-Momentum Tensor The Dirac equation can be derived from an action S= d 4 xl(x) where L(x) = i ψ(x)[ 1 1 +m]ψ(x) / 2 2 Here we have defined the action as in integral of a Lagrangian density. The i in front and the symmetrization of the derivative operators are present to make the Lagrangian density real. The Dirac equation is easily recovered from this action using a variational principle. The equal time anticommutation relation that we have used is also compatible with this action. Here, although it has little effect what we shall do in the rest of this chapter, we note that the classical theory of the Dirac field requires that we use anticommuting classical fields for Fermions. In this sense, Fermions are never truly classical in that even the classical fields should anti-commute with each other. Now, consider an infinitesimal space-time translation x µ x µ +ǫ µ, Under this transformation δψ(x)= ǫ µ µ ψ(x), δ ψ(x)= ǫ µ µ ψ(x) δl(x)= µ [ǫ µ L(x)] The fact that the Lagrangian density varies by a total derivative term means that the infinitesimal translation is a symmetry of the theory. Of course, we already knew that this should be the case, since we have already seen that the equation of motion has this symmetry. To find the Noether current, we assume that the transformation parameter now depends on the coordinates, ǫ µ (x). The variation of the Lagrangian now has the form δl(x)= µ [ǫ µ (x)l(x)] λ ǫ ρ (x) i 2 ψ(x)(γ λ ρ ρ γ λ )ψ(x) Now, if ǫ µ (x) vanishes sufficiently rapidly at the boundaries of the integral so that boundary terms can be ignored, and if we assume that the equations 13
14 of motion are obeyed, the action must vanish for any variation, in particular, with any ǫ µ (x) with any profile. Then, we must have λ [ i 2 ψ(x)(γ λ ρ γ λ ρ )ψ(x)]=0 It is easy to confirm that this is indeed the case by using the equation of motion. We have identified a conserved quantity which is related to translation symmetry. It is called the energy-momentum tensor T λρ 0 (x)= i 2 ψ(x)[γ λ ρ γ λ ρ ]ψ(x), λ T λρ 0 (x)=0 We note for future reference, that the four-divergence of the energy-momentum tensor on its second index also vanishes, ρ T λρ 0 (x)=0 It is easy to see this using the equation of motion. The space integral of the time-component of this energy-momentum tensor is the generator of space-time translations, P ρ = d 3 xt 0ρ 0 (x)= i 2 d 3 xψ (x)[ ρ ρ ]ψ(x) We should eliminate the time derivative from the integrand for P 0 by using the equation of motion. This means replacing 0 ψ by ih D ψ where h D is defined in equation (9). The result is that P 0 is the second quantized Dirac hamiltonian. Now, consider an infinitesimal Lorentz transformation, δψ(x)=ω µν [x µ ν [γµ,γ ν ]]ψ(x) δ ψ(x)=ω µν x µ ν ψ(x) ψ(x) 1 4 [γµ,γ ν ] Under this transformation, δl(x)=ω µν x µ ν L(x)= ν [ω µν x µ L(x)] where, in the last step, we used the fact that ω µν = ω νµ. The fact that the Lagrangian density varies by a total derivative term means that the Lorentz 14
15 transformation is a symmetry of the theory. Of course, we already knew that this should be the case, since we have already demonstrated that the equation of motion has this symmetry. To find the Noether current, we assume that the transformation parameter depends on the coordinates, ω µν (x). The variation of the Lagrangian now has the form δl(x)= ν [ω µν (x)x µ L(x)] λ ω ρσ i 2 ψ(x)(γ λ [x ρ σ [γρ,γ σ ]] [x ρ σ 1 4 [γρ,γ σ ]]γ λ )ψ(x) Now, if ω µν (x) vanishes sufficiently rapidly at the boundaries of the integral so that boundary terms can be ignored, and if we assume that the equations of motion are obeyed, the action must vanish for any variation, in particular, with any profile of ω ρσ (x). Then, we must have where λ M λρσ (x)=0 M λρσ (x)= T λρ 0 xσ +T λσ 0 x ρ + ψ(x){γ λ, i 4 [γρ,γ σ ]}ψ(x) (39) where T µν 0 (x) is the energy-momentum tensor which was associated with translations. It is easy to confirm explicitly that λ M λρσ (x)=0 by using the equation of motion and the algebra of gamma-matrices. Again, the space integral of the time component M ρσ = d 3 xm 0ρσ (x) has vanishing time derivative and it generates the Lorentz transformation of the Dirac field. There are good reasons why it is convenient to have a symmetric energymomentum tensor. By modifying T ρσ 0 (x) to make it symmetric, we will be able to unify the generator of translations and Lorentz transformations. Let us first begin by using the above development in order to get a symmetric energy-momentum tensor. We will do this by adding a term to it which is where T ρσ (x)=t ρσ 0 (x)+ λs λρσ (x) 15
16 1. λ S λρσ (x)= 1 2 (Tρσ 0 (x) Tσρ (x)) 2. ρ λ S λρσ (x)=0 and σ λ S λρσ (x)=0 (which are actually implied by the above). 3. d 3 x λ S λ0σ (x)=0 so that the new, symmetric energy-momentum tensor is the same generator of translations as the old one. We begin with the observation that the last term on the right-handside in M λρσ (x) in equation (39) is due to the spin of the electron. It is sometimes called the spin tensor. Note that, µ M λρσ (x)=0, λ T λρ 0 (x)=0 and ρ T λρ 0 (x)=0 imply the divergence of the last term is proportional to the anti-symmetric part of T λρ 0 (x), λ ( ψ(x){γ λ, i 4 [γρ,γ σ ]}ψ(x))=t ρσ 0 (x) Tσρ 0 (x) This accomplishes the first step, it demonstrates that that the anti-symmetric part of T ρσ 0 (x) is equal to the four-divergence. What is more, since, as we have observed above, T ρσ (x) has vanishing four-divergence on both of its indices, we also know that ρ [ λ ( ψ(x){γ λ, i 4 [γρ,γ σ ]}ψ(x))]=0, σ [ λ ( ψ(x){γ λ, i 4 [γρ,γ σ ]}ψ(x))]=0 Finally d 3 x λ ( ψ(x){γ λ, i 4 [γ0,γ σ ]}ψ(x))= d 3 x t ( ψ(x){γ 0, i 4 [γ0,γ σ ]}ψ(x))=0 where, in the middle term, we have dropped the spatial integral of the spatial divergence since we assume that the fields fall off sufficiently at spatial infinity that the surface integral that one would obtain by using Gauss theorem would vanish. The last term vanishes as a result of the gamma-matrix algebra. We have shown that the antisymmetric part of the energy momentum tensor satisfies all of the criteria for λ S λρσ. This allows us to simply drop the anti-symmetric part of the energy-momentum tensor without altering the fact that it is conserved and that the spatial integral of its time component is a generator of translations. We then keeps its symmetric part, which it is easiest to obtain by simply symmetrizing T µν 0 (x), T µν (x)= 1 2 (Tµν 0 (x)+tνµ (x)) 16
17 or T µν (x)= i 4 ψ(x)[γ µ ν +γ ν µ γ µ ν γ ν µ ]ψ(x), λ T νµ (x)=0 (40) Now, finally, we note that the trace of the energy-momentum tensor is T µ µ (x) η µν T µν (x)= im ψ(x)ψ(x) (41) is proportional to the mass of the Dirac field. When the mass vanishes, the theory has an extended space-time of symmetry. We will comment on this below. If we recall that a space-time symmetry is a coordinate transformation which is generated by a Killing vector ˆf µ (x), we might make a candidate for a conserved current by contracting the energy-momentum tensor with the vector field which generates the co-ordinate transformation, T µ f (x) Tµ ν(x)f ν (x) Then, to have a conservation law, we need µ T µ f (x)=0 With a vector field f µ (x), we will have such a conservation law if: 1. T µν (x) is conserved, i.e. µ T µν (x)=0. Then µ T µˆf(x)=0 if ˆf µ = a µ, a constant vector. A translation invariant field theory should have a conserved energy-momentum tensor. A field theory can be translation invariant without being Lorentz invariant. It would still have a conserved energy-momentum tensor. However, if the theory is not Lorentz invariant, it should not be possible to symmetrize the energymomentum tensor. 2. T µν (x) is conserved and T µν (x)=t νµ (x) is symmetric. Then T µˆf(x) is conserved when ˆf µ (x) obeys the Killing equation µ ˆfν (x)+ ν ˆfµ (x)=0 A conserved, symmetric energy-momentum tensor can thus be used to generate all of the symmetries of Minkowski space. A translation and Lorentz invariant field theory should have a conserved and symmetric energy-momentum tensor. 17
18 3. Finally,T µν (x)isconserved,symmetricandhasvanishingtrace,t µ µ(x)= 0. Then T µ f (x) is conserved when fµ (x) satisfies the conformal Killing equation µ f ν (x)+ ν f µ (x) η µν 2 λf λ (x)=0 and it generates a conformal transformation. Notice that all solutions of the Killing equation are also solutions of the conformal Killing equation. However, the conformal Killing equation is less restrictive. It has more solutions than the Killing equation. The extra solutions correspond to conformal transformations. A conformal field theory should have a conserved, symmetric and traceless energy-momentum tensor. Our example of the non-interacting Dirac field is a conformal field theory when m=0. 18
Attempts at relativistic QM
Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics should incorporate both quantum mechanics and special relativity. However historically combining quantum mechanics and
More informationQuantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics
More informationQuantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics
More informationQuantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics
More informationThe Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz
Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz October 2013 Lorentz Transformation Properties of the Dirac Field First, rotations. In ordinary quantum mechanics, ψ σ i ψ (1) is
More informationAs usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 6: Lectures 11, 12
As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation Week 6: Lectures, The Dirac equation and algebra March 5, 0 The Lagrange density for the Dirac equation
More informationQuantum Physics 2006/07
Quantum Physics 6/7 Lecture 7: More on the Dirac Equation In the last lecture we showed that the Dirac equation for a free particle i h t ψr, t = i hc α + β mc ψr, t has plane wave solutions ψr, t = exp
More informationwhere P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation
1 Content of the course Quantum Field Theory by M. Srednicki, Part 1. Combining QM and relativity We are going to keep all axioms of QM: 1. states are vectors (or rather rays) in Hilbert space.. observables
More information3 Quantization of the Dirac equation
3 Quantization of the Dirac equation 3.1 Identical particles As is well known, quantum mechanics implies that no measurement can be performed to distinguish particles in the same quantum state. Elementary
More informationRelativistic Waves and Quantum Fields
Relativistic Waves and Quantum Fields (SPA7018U & SPA7018P) Gabriele Travaglini December 10, 2014 1 Lorentz group Lectures 1 3. Galileo s principle of Relativity. Einstein s principle. Events. Invariant
More informationQuantum Field Theory Notes. Ryan D. Reece
Quantum Field Theory Notes Ryan D. Reece November 27, 2007 Chapter 1 Preliminaries 1.1 Overview of Special Relativity 1.1.1 Lorentz Boosts Searches in the later part 19th century for the coordinate transformation
More informationLecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics
Lecture 10 The Dirac equation WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics The Dirac equation The Dirac equation is a relativistic quantum mechanical wave equation formulated by British physicist
More informationMaxwell s equations. electric field charge density. current density
Maxwell s equations based on S-54 Our next task is to find a quantum field theory description of spin-1 particles, e.g. photons. Classical electrodynamics is governed by Maxwell s equations: electric field
More informationLecture 4 - Dirac Spinors
Lecture 4 - Dirac Spinors Schrödinger & Klein-Gordon Equations Dirac Equation Gamma & Pauli spin matrices Solutions of Dirac Equation Fermion & Antifermion states Left and Right-handedness Non-Relativistic
More informationGeometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010
March 4, 2010 Many uses of Mathematics in Physics The language of the physical world is mathematics. Quantitative understanding of the world around us requires the precise language of mathematics. Symmetries
More informationQuantum Electrodynamics Test
MSc in Quantum Fields and Fundamental Forces Quantum Electrodynamics Test Monday, 11th January 2010 Please answer all three questions. All questions are worth 20 marks. Use a separate booklet for each
More informationQuantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams
Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams III. Quantization of constrained systems and Maxwell s theory 1. The
More information1 Free real scalar field
1 Free real scalar field The Hamiltonian is H = d 3 xh = 1 d 3 x p(x) +( φ) + m φ Let us expand both φ and p in Fourier series: d 3 p φ(t, x) = ω(p) φ(t, x)e ip x, p(t, x) = ω(p) p(t, x)eip x. where ω(p)
More information3.3 Lagrangian and symmetries for a spin- 1 2 field
3.3 Lagrangian and symmetries for a spin- 1 2 field The Lagrangian for the free spin- 1 2 field is The corresponding Hamiltonian density is L = ψ(i/ µ m)ψ. (3.31) H = ψ( γ p + m)ψ. (3.32) The Lagrangian
More informationParity P : x x, t t, (1.116a) Time reversal T : x x, t t. (1.116b)
4 Version of February 4, 005 CHAPTER. DIRAC EQUATION (0, 0) is a scalar. (/, 0) is a left-handed spinor. (0, /) is a right-handed spinor. (/, /) is a vector. Before discussing spinors in detail, let us
More informationH&M Chapter 5 Review of Dirac Equation
HM Chapter 5 Review of Dirac Equation Dirac s Quandary Notation Reminder Dirac Equation for free particle Mostly an exercise in notation Define currents Make a complete list of all possible currents Aside
More informationPHY 396 K. Solutions for homework set #9.
PHY 396 K. Solutions for homework set #9. Problem 2(a): The γ 0 matrix commutes with itself but anticommutes with the space-indexed γ 1,2,3. At the same time, the parity reflects the space coordinates
More informationClassical Field Theory
Classical Field Theory Asaf Pe er 1 January 12, 2016 We begin by discussing various aspects of classical fields. We will cover only the bare minimum ground necessary before turning to the quantum theory,
More informationDirac Equation. Chapter 1
Chapter Dirac Equation This course will be devoted principally to an exposition of the dynamics of Abelian and non-abelian gauge theories. These form the basis of the Standard Model, that is, the theory
More informationPlan for the rest of the semester. ψ a
Plan for the rest of the semester ϕ ψ a ϕ(x) e iα(x) ϕ(x) 167 Representations of Lorentz Group based on S-33 We defined a unitary operator that implemented a Lorentz transformation on a scalar field: and
More informationTHE DIRAC EQUATION (A REVIEW) We will try to find the relativistic wave equation for a particle.
THE DIRAC EQUATION (A REVIEW) We will try to find the relativistic wave equation for a particle. First, we introduce four dimensional notation for a vector by writing x µ = (x, x 1, x 2, x 3 ) = (ct, x,
More informationThe Dirac Equation. Topic 3 Spinors, Fermion Fields, Dirac Fields Lecture 13
The Dirac Equation Dirac s discovery of a relativistic wave equation for the electron was published in 1928 soon after the concept of intrisic spin angular momentum was proposed by Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck
More informationParticle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof. Mark Thomson. Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation. Non-Relativistic QM (Revision)
Particle Physics Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof. Mark Thomson + e - e + - + e - e + - + e - e + - + e - e + - Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation Prof. M.A. Thomson Michaelmas 2011 45 Non-Relativistic QM (Revision)
More informationLorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama
Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 30A, Spring 007, Hitoshi Murayama 1 Poincaré Symmetry In order to understand the number of degrees of freedom we need
More informationWeek 1, solution to exercise 2
Week 1, solution to exercise 2 I. THE ACTION FOR CLASSICAL ELECTRODYNAMICS A. Maxwell s equations in relativistic form Maxwell s equations in vacuum and in natural units (c = 1) are, E=ρ, B t E=j (inhomogeneous),
More informationFunctional determinants
Functional determinants based on S-53 We are going to discuss situations where a functional determinant depends on some other field and so it cannot be absorbed into the overall normalization of the path
More informationQuantum Field Theory II
Quantum Field Theory II T. Nguyen PHY 391 Independent Study Term Paper Prof. S.G. Rajeev University of Rochester April 2, 218 1 Introduction The purpose of this independent study is to familiarize ourselves
More informationLSZ reduction for spin-1/2 particles
LSZ reduction for spin-1/2 particles based on S-41 In order to describe scattering experiments we need to construct appropriate initial and final states and calculate scattering amplitude. Summary of free
More informationREVIEW REVIEW. A guess for a suitable initial state: Similarly, let s consider a final state: Summary of free theory:
LSZ reduction for spin-1/2 particles based on S-41 In order to describe scattering experiments we need to construct appropriate initial and final states and calculate scattering amplitude. Summary of free
More informationMSci EXAMINATION. Date: XX th May, Time: 14:30-17:00
MSci EXAMINATION PHY-415 (MSci 4242 Relativistic Waves and Quantum Fields Time Allowed: 2 hours 30 minutes Date: XX th May, 2010 Time: 14:30-17:00 Instructions: Answer THREE QUESTIONS only. Each question
More informationParticle Physics Dr. Alexander Mitov Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation
Dr. A. Mitov Particle Physics 45 Particle Physics Dr. Alexander Mitov µ + e - e + µ - µ + e - e + µ - µ + e - e + µ - µ + e - e + µ - Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation Dr. A. Mitov Particle Physics 46 Non-Relativistic
More informationTutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n)
Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n) 1 Definition of Clifford Algebra A set of N Hermitian matrices γ 1, γ,..., γ N obeying the anti-commutator γ i, γ j } = δ ij I (1) is the basis for an algebra called
More information1 Quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime
1 Quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime The theory of quantum fields in curved spacetime is a generalization of the well-established theory of quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime. To a great extent,
More informationRepresentations of Lorentz Group
Representations of Lorentz Group based on S-33 We defined a unitary operator that implemented a Lorentz transformation on a scalar field: How do we find the smallest (irreducible) representations of the
More informationContinuous symmetries and conserved currents
Continuous symmetries and conserved currents based on S-22 Consider a set of scalar fields, and a lagrangian density let s make an infinitesimal change: variation of the action: setting we would get equations
More informationCHAPTER 1. SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS
CHAPTER 1. SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS 1.1 PARTICLES AND FIELDS The two great structures of theoretical physics, the theory of special relativity and quantum mechanics, have been combined
More informationExercises Symmetries in Particle Physics
Exercises Symmetries in Particle Physics 1. A particle is moving in an external field. Which components of the momentum p and the angular momentum L are conserved? a) Field of an infinite homogeneous plane.
More informationREVIEW. Quantum electrodynamics (QED) Quantum electrodynamics is a theory of photons interacting with the electrons and positrons of a Dirac field:
Quantum electrodynamics (QED) based on S-58 Quantum electrodynamics is a theory of photons interacting with the electrons and positrons of a Dirac field: Noether current of the lagrangian for a free Dirac
More informationPhysics 557 Lecture 5
Physics 557 Lecture 5 Group heory: Since symmetries and the use of group theory is so much a part of recent progress in particle physics we will take a small detour to introduce the basic structure (as
More information129 Lecture Notes More on Dirac Equation
19 Lecture Notes More on Dirac Equation 1 Ultra-relativistic Limit We have solved the Diraction in the Lecture Notes on Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, and saw that the upper lower two components are large
More informationL = e i `J` i `K` D (1/2,0) (, )=e z /2 (10.253)
44 Group Theory The matrix D (/,) that represents the Lorentz transformation (.4) L = e i `J` i `K` (.5) is D (/,) (, )=exp( i / /). (.5) And so the generic D (/,) matrix is D (/,) (, )=e z / (.53) with
More informationx 3 x 1 ix 2 x 1 + ix 2 x 3
Peeter Joot peeterjoot@pm.me PHY2403H Quantum Field Theory. Lecture 19: Pauli matrices, Weyl spinors, SL2,c, Weyl action, Weyl equation, Dirac matrix, Dirac action, Dirac Lagrangian. Taught by Prof. Erich
More informationThe Klein-Gordon equation
Lecture 8 The Klein-Gordon equation WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics The bosons in field theory Bosons with spin 0 scalar (or pseudo-scalar) meson fields canonical field quantization
More informationPhysics 582, Problem Set 1 Solutions
Physics 582, Problem Set 1 Solutions TAs: Hart Goldman and Ramanjit Sohal Fall 2018 1. THE DIRAC EQUATION [20 PTS] Consider a four-component fermion Ψ(x) in 3+1D, L[ Ψ, Ψ] = Ψ(i/ m)ψ, (1.1) where we use
More informationThe Hamiltonian operator and states
The Hamiltonian operator and states March 30, 06 Calculation of the Hamiltonian operator This is our first typical quantum field theory calculation. They re a bit to keep track of, but not really that
More information3P1a Quantum Field Theory: Example Sheet 1 Michaelmas 2016
3P1a Quantum Field Theory: Example Sheet 1 Michaelmas 016 Corrections and suggestions should be emailed to B.C.Allanach@damtp.cam.ac.uk. Starred questions may be handed in to your supervisor for feedback
More informationQuantization of Scalar Field
Quantization of Scalar Field Wei Wang 2017.10.12 Wei Wang(SJTU) Lectures on QFT 2017.10.12 1 / 41 Contents 1 From classical theory to quantum theory 2 Quantization of real scalar field 3 Quantization of
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department 8.323: Relativistic Quantum Field Theory I PROBLEM SET 2
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department 8.323: Relativistic Quantum Field Theory I PROBLEM SET 2 REFERENCES: Peskin and Schroeder, Chapter 2 Problem 1: Complex scalar fields Peskin and
More information2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics
Chapter 2 Green Functions and Observables 2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics We will be interested in studying the properties of the ground state of a quantum mechanical many particle system. We
More information7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields
7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields 7.1 The Dirac Equation and Quantum Field Theory The Dirac equation is a relativistic wave equation which describes the quantum dynamics of spinors. We will see in this section
More information11 Spinor solutions and CPT
11 Spinor solutions and CPT 184 In the previous chapter, we cataloged the irreducible representations of the Lorentz group O(1, 3. We found that in addition to the obvious tensor representations, φ, A
More informationLecture notes for FYS610 Many particle Quantum Mechanics
UNIVERSITETET I STAVANGER Institutt for matematikk og naturvitenskap Lecture notes for FYS610 Many particle Quantum Mechanics Note 20, 19.4 2017 Additions and comments to Quantum Field Theory and the Standard
More informationWeek 5-6: Lectures The Charged Scalar Field
Notes for Phys. 610, 2011. These summaries are meant to be informal, and are subject to revision, elaboration and correction. They will be based on material covered in class, but may differ from it by
More informationSpinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
Chapter Spinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. The Lorentz Transformation of the Dirac Bispinor We will provide in the following a new formulation of the Dirac equation in the chiral representation
More informationG : Quantum Mechanics II
G5.666: Quantum Mechanics II Notes for Lecture 5 I. REPRESENTING STATES IN THE FULL HILBERT SPACE Given a representation of the states that span the spin Hilbert space, we now need to consider the problem
More informationParticle Notes. Ryan D. Reece
Particle Notes Ryan D. Reece July 9, 2007 Chapter 1 Preliminaries 1.1 Overview of Special Relativity 1.1.1 Lorentz Boosts Searches in the later part 19th century for the coordinate transformation that
More informationPHY 396 K. Solutions for problem set #6. Problem 1(a): Starting with eq. (3) proved in class and applying the Leibniz rule, we obtain
PHY 396 K. Solutions for problem set #6. Problem 1(a): Starting with eq. (3) proved in class and applying the Leibniz rule, we obtain γ κ γ λ, S µν] = γ κ γ λ, S µν] + γ κ, S µν] γ λ = γ κ( ig λµ γ ν ig
More informationIntroduction to gauge theory
Introduction to gauge theory 2008 High energy lecture 1 장상현 연세대학교 September 24, 2008 장상현 ( 연세대학교 ) Introduction to gauge theory September 24, 2008 1 / 72 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 Dirac equation
More informationInstructor: Sudipta Mukherji, Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar
Chapter 1 Lorentz and Poincare Instructor: Sudipta Mukherji, Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar 1.1 Lorentz Transformation Consider two inertial frames S and S, where S moves with a velocity v with respect
More informationLecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics
Lecture 5 Hartree-Fock Theory WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Particle-number representation: General formalism The simplest starting point for a many-body state is a system of
More information2 Quantization of the scalar field
22 Quantum field theory 2 Quantization of the scalar field Commutator relations. The strategy to quantize a classical field theory is to interpret the fields Φ(x) and Π(x) = Φ(x) as operators which satisfy
More informationHIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY
HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY I.L. Buchbinder Tomsk I.L. Buchbinder (Tomsk) HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY Wroclaw, April, 2011 1 / 27 Aims Brief non-expert non-technical review of some old
More informationClassical field theory 2012 (NS-364B) Feynman propagator
Classical field theory 212 (NS-364B Feynman propagator 1. Introduction States in quantum mechanics in Schrödinger picture evolve as ( Ψt = Û(t,t Ψt, Û(t,t = T exp ı t dt Ĥ(t, (1 t where Û(t,t denotes the
More information2.4 Parity transformation
2.4 Parity transformation An extremely simple group is one that has only two elements: {e, P }. Obviously, P 1 = P, so P 2 = e, with e represented by the unit n n matrix in an n- dimensional representation.
More information752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian
752 Final April 16, 2010 Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The standard model Lagrangian L SM = L Y M + L W D + L Y u + L H The rst term, the Yang Mills
More informationHamiltonian Field Theory
Hamiltonian Field Theory August 31, 016 1 Introduction So far we have treated classical field theory using Lagrangian and an action principle for Lagrangian. This approach is called Lagrangian field theory
More informationΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ αβγδεζηθικλμνξοπρςστυφχψω +<=>± ħ
CHAPTER 1. SECOND QUANTIZATION In Chapter 1, F&W explain the basic theory: Review of Section 1: H = ij c i < i T j > c j + ij kl c i c j < ij V kl > c l c k for fermions / for bosons [ c i, c j ] = [ c
More informationΨ L 1 2 (1 γ 5)Ψ. Ψ R 1 2 (1 + γ 5)Ψ (2.3.1)
.3 THE SPIN 1 FERMION FIELD We next desire to describe non-interacting (free) particles with spin 1.Aswe know these particles will obey Fermi- Dirac statistics due to the Pauli exclusion principle. Hence,
More informationThe path integral for photons
The path integral for photons based on S-57 We will discuss the path integral for photons and the photon propagator more carefully using the Lorentz gauge: as in the case of scalar field we Fourier-transform
More informationSymmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws
Chapter Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws The dynamical properties and interactions of a system of particles and fields are derived from the principle of least action, where the action is a 4-dimensional
More informationWhy quantum field theory?
Why quantum field theory? It is often said that quantum field theory is the natural marriage of Einstein s special theory of relativity and the quantum theory. The point of this section will be to motivate
More informationQFT. Unit 1: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
QFT Unit 1: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics What s QFT? Relativity deals with things that are fast Quantum mechanics deals with things that are small QFT deals with things that are both small and fast What
More information1.7 Plane-wave Solutions of the Dirac Equation
0 Version of February 7, 005 CHAPTER. DIRAC EQUATION It is evident that W µ is translationally invariant, [P µ, W ν ] 0. W is a Lorentz scalar, [J µν, W ], as you will explicitly show in homework. Here
More information1 Mathematical preliminaries
1 Mathematical preliminaries The mathematical language of quantum mechanics is that of vector spaces and linear algebra. In this preliminary section, we will collect the various definitions and mathematical
More informationmsqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197
msqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197 Bibliography Dirac, P. A. M., The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th Edition, (Oxford University Press, London, 1958). Feynman, R. P. and A. P. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics
More informationLecture 19 (Nov. 15, 2017)
Lecture 19 8.31 Quantum Theory I, Fall 017 8 Lecture 19 Nov. 15, 017) 19.1 Rotations Recall that rotations are transformations of the form x i R ij x j using Einstein summation notation), where R is an
More informationSolution of the Dirac equation in presence of an uniform magnetic field
Solution of the Dirac equation in presence of an uniform magnetic field arxiv:75.4275v2 [hep-th] 3 Aug 27 Kaushik Bhattacharya Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico,
More informationWeek 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books
Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter Weiberg, Chapter 5 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 1, 1 Free field Lagrangians
More informationOverthrows a basic assumption of classical physics - that lengths and time intervals are absolute quantities, i.e., the same for all observes.
Relativistic Electrodynamics An inertial frame = coordinate system where Newton's 1st law of motion - the law of inertia - is true. An inertial frame moves with constant velocity with respect to any other
More informationPhysics 217 Solution Set #3 Fall 2016
Physics 217 Solution Set #3 Fall 2016 1. Consider a massive spin-1/2 particle with four-momentum p µ = (E; p and helicity λ (where 2λ = ±1. The spin four-vector is defined as: s µ = 1 ( p ; E p. m p Verify
More informationWeek 1. 1 The relativistic point particle. 1.1 Classical dynamics. Reading material from the books. Zwiebach, Chapter 5 and chapter 11
Week 1 1 The relativistic point particle Reading material from the books Zwiebach, Chapter 5 and chapter 11 Polchinski, Chapter 1 Becker, Becker, Schwartz, Chapter 2 1.1 Classical dynamics The first thing
More informationPhysics 221AB Spring 1997 Notes 36 Lorentz Transformations in Quantum Mechanics and the Covariance of the Dirac Equation
Physics 221AB Spring 1997 Notes 36 Lorentz Transformations in Quantum Mechanics and the Covariance of the Dirac Equation These notes supplement Chapter 2 of Bjorken and Drell, which concerns the covariance
More informationPROBLEM SET 1 SOLUTIONS
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department 8.323: Relativistic Quantum Field Theory I Prof.Alan Guth February 29, 2008 PROBLEM SET 1 SOLUTIONS Problem 1: The energy-momentum tensor for source-free
More informationDisclaimer. [disclaimer]
Disclaimer This is a problem set (as turned in) for the module physics755. This problem set is not reviewed by a tutor. This is just what I have turned in. All problem sets for this module can be found
More informationPhysics 214 UCSD/225a UCSB Lecture 11 Finish Halzen & Martin Chapter 4
Physics 24 UCSD/225a UCSB Lecture Finish Halzen Martin Chapter 4 origin of the propagator Halzen Martin Chapter 5 Continue Review of Dirac Equation Halzen Martin Chapter 6 start with it if time permits
More informationPhysics 217 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Fall u(p,λ) by any method of your choosing.
Physics 27 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Fall 206. The helicity spinor u(p, λ satisfies u(p,λu(p,λ = 2m. ( In parts (a and (b, you may assume that m 0. (a Evaluate u(p,λ by any method of your choosing. Using the
More informationLecture 4 - Relativistic wave equations. Relativistic wave equations must satisfy several general postulates. These are;
Lecture 4 - Relativistic wave equations Postulates Relativistic wave equations must satisfy several general postulates. These are;. The equation is developed for a field amplitude function, ψ 2. The normal
More informationExtending the 4 4 Darbyshire Operator Using n-dimensional Dirac Matrices
International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics 2015; 1(3): 19-23 Published online February 19, 2016 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ijamtp) doi: 10.11648/j.ijamtp.20150103.11
More informationFundamental equations of relativistic fluid dynamics
CHAPTER VI Fundamental equations of relativistic fluid dynamics When the energy density becomes large as may happen for instance in compact astrophysical objects, in the early Universe, or in high-energy
More informationPreliminaries: what you need to know
January 7, 2014 Preliminaries: what you need to know Asaf Pe er 1 Quantum field theory (QFT) is the theoretical framework that forms the basis for the modern description of sub-atomic particles and their
More informationLecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)
Lecture 0: A (Brief) Introduction to Group heory (See Chapter 3.3 in Boas, 3rd Edition) Having gained some new experience with matrices, which provide us with representations of groups, and because symmetries
More informationNumerical Methods in Quantum Field Theories
Numerical Methods in Quantum Field Theories Christopher Bell 2011 NSF/REU Program Physics Department, University of Notre Dame Advisors: Antonio Delgado, Christopher Kolda 1 Abstract In this paper, preliminary
More informationHeisenberg-Euler effective lagrangians
Heisenberg-Euler effective lagrangians Appunti per il corso di Fisica eorica 7/8 3.5.8 Fiorenzo Bastianelli We derive here effective lagrangians for the electromagnetic field induced by a loop of charged
More informationTools for supersymmetry
Tools for supersymmetry Antoine Van Proeyen KU Leuven Wolfersdorf, September 2014 Based on some sections of the book Supergravity Plan for the lectures 1. Symmetries 2. Clifford algebras and spinors 3.
More informationFermionic Algebra and Fock Space
Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space Earlier in class we saw how harmonic-oscillator-like bosonic commutation relations [â α,â β ] = 0, [ ] â α,â β = 0, [ ] â α,â β = δ α,β (1) give rise to the bosonic Fock
More information