MiniMaxSat: : A new Weighted Solver. Federico Heras Javier Larrosa Albert Oliveras
|
|
- Buddy Nash
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MiniMaxSat: : A new Weighted Max-SAT Solver Federico Heras Javier Larrosa Albert Oliveras
2 SAT (x v y), ( y v z), ( z v w)
3 SAT (x v y), ( y v z), ( z v w) x=y=z=w=true Satisfiable
4 SAT (x), ( x v y), ( x v y v z), ( x v y v z)
5 SAT (x), ( x v y), ( x v y v z), ( x v y v z) Unsatisfiable
6 Max-SAT (x), ( x v y), ( x v y v z), ( x v y v z)
7 Max-SAT (x), ( x v y), ( x v y v z), ( x v y v z) x=y=z=true Optimum: 1
8 Weighted Max-SAT (x,5), ( x v y,6), ( x v y v z,3), ( x v y v z,7)
9 Weighted Max-SAT (x,5), ( x v y,6), ( x v y v z,3), ( x v y v z,7) x=y=true, z=false Optimum: 3
10 Overview (Weighted) Max-SAT: Given a set of weighted clauses, find an assignment of the variables such that the sum of the weights of the violated clauses is minimized. Complexity: NP-Hard Hard.
11 Overview Applications: Max-Cut Max-Clique Bayesian Networks Combinatorial Auctions Binate Covering Problem... Recent Algorithms: Focused on computing better lower boundings for Max-SAT.
12 MiniMaxSat: MiniSat: Contributions Two Watched literals. Learning and backjumping. Novel: Lower bound based on the best previous approaches. Extension of probing to Max-SAT. Pseudo boolean optimization to Max-SAT.
13 Outline Preliminaries Search Lower Bound Additional Features Empirical Results Conclusions and Future Work
14 Max-SAT Notation (C,T) (l,t) (,lb) ub Hard Clauses, otherwise soft clauses Unit propagation over hard unit clauses Lower Bound Upper Bound Hard Conflict: A hard clause is falsified. Soft Conflict: lb >= ub
15 Outline Preliminaries Search Lower Bound Additional Features Empirical Results Conclusions and Future Work
16 Search Function Search() ub:= :=LocalSearch(); Loop Propagate(); if (Hard Conflict) LearnAndBackjump (); else if (Soft Conflict) ChronoBactrack (); else if (Complete Assignment) ub=lb lb; ChronoBactrack (); else SelectLit();
17 Outline Preliminaries Search Lower Bound Additional Features Empirical Results Conclusions and Future Work
18 Previous work Inconsistent subset: Subset of clauses that cannot be satisfied simultaneously by any assignment. Hyper-resolution[Heras06]. UP lower bound [Li05].
19 Weighted Resolution (Max-RES) (x A,u), ( x B,w) (where m=min{u,w}) (A B,m), (x A,u-m), ( x B, w-m), (x A B,m), ( x A B,m) [Larrosa IJCAI 05] Complete calculus: : [Bonet[ SAT 06]
20 Weighted Resolution (Max-RES) Clashing clauses (x A,u), ( x B,w) (where m=min{u,w}) (A B,m), (x A,u-m), ( x B, w-m), (x A B,m), ( x A B,m) Resolvent Posterior clashing clauses Compensation clauses [Larrosa IJCAI 05] Complete calculus: : [Bonet[ SAT 06]
21 A = ( x,2) B = (x v w,1) C = (x v y,t) D = (x v z,2) E = ( y v z,3) Lower bound
22 A = ( x,2) B = (x v w,1) C = (x v y,t) D = (x v z,2) E = ( y v z,3) Lower bound x(a)
23 Lower bound A = ( x,2) B = (x v w,1) C = (x v y,t) D = (x v z,2) E = ( y v z,3) z(d) y(c) w(b) x(a)
24 Lower bound A = ( x,2) B = (x v w,1) C = (x v y,t) D = (x v z,2) E = ( y v z,3) z(d) y(c) w(b) x(a)
25 Lower bound A = ( x,2) B = (x v w,1) C = (x v y,t) D = (x v z,2) E = ( y v z,3) z(e) z(d) y(c) w(b) x(a)
26 Lower bound A = ( x,2) B = (x v w,1) C = (x v y,t) D = (x v z,2) E = ( y v z,3) z(e) z(d) y(c) w(b) x(a)
27 Lower bound A = ( x,2) B = (x v w,1) C = (x v y,t) D = (x v z,2) E = ( y v z,3) Conflicting clause z(e) z(d) y(c) w(b) x(a)
28 Lower bound A = ( x,2) B = (x v w,1) C = (x v y,t) D = (x v z,2) E = ( y v z,3) z(e) z(d) y(c) w(b) x(a)
29 Lower bound A = ( x,2) B = (x v w,1) C = (x v y,t) D = (x v z,2) E = ( y v z,3) z(e) z(d) y(c) w(b) x(a) E
30 Lower bound A = ( x,2) B = (x v w,1) C = (x v y,t) D = (x v z,2) E = ( y v z,3) z(e) z(d) E x v y D y(c) w(b) x(a)
31 Lower bound A = ( x,2) B = (x v w,1) C = (x v y,t) D = (x v z,2) E = ( y v z,3) z(e) z(d) E x v y D C y(c) w(b) x x(a)
32 Lower bound A = ( x,2) B = (x v w,1) C = (x v y,t) D = (x v z,2) E = ( y v z,3) z(e) z(d) E x v y D C y(c) w(b) x A x(a)
33 Lower bound A = ( x,2) B = (x v w,1) C = (x v y,t) D = (x v z,2) E = ( y v z,3) z(e) z(d) ( y v z,3) (x v y,2) (x v z,2) (x v y,t) y(c) w(b) (x,2) ( x,2) x(a) (,2) ( x v z,1), ( x v y v z,2), (x v y v z,2), (x v y,t), (x v w,1)
34 Lower bound A = ( x,2) B = (x v w,1) C = (x v y,t) D = (x v z,2) E = ( y v z,3) z(e) z(d) ( y v z,3) (x v y,2) (x v z,2) (x v y,t) Repeat the process until UP does not lead to falsify a clause y(c) w(b) x(a) (x,2) (,2) ( x,2) ( x v z,1), ( x v y v z,2), (x v y v z,2), (x v y,t), (x v w,1)
35 Patterns with non-binary clauses ( x,w 1 ), ( y, w 2 ), ( z, w 3 ), (x v y v z, w 4 ) ( x, w 1 ), (x v y, w 2 ), ( z, w 3 ), (x v y v z, w 4 ) ( x, w 1 ), (x v y, w 2 ), (x v y v z, w 3 ), (q v z, w 4 ), ( q, w 5 )
36 Outline Preliminaries Search Lower Bound Additional Features Empirical Results Conclusions and Future Work
37 Probing Add a unit clause (l,t). Simulate unit propagation. Build reslution tree. Apply Max-Sat resolution. As a result, add a new unit clause ( l,w). A = ( x v y,1) B = ( x v z,1) C = ( y v z,1) C ( x,1) B A
38 Pseudo Boolean to Max-SAT PBO: Minimization function (c 1 x 1 +c 2 x 2 + +c n x n ). Pseudo boolean constraints. To Max-SAT: Min. Function: For each term c i x i create a new unit soft clause ( x i,c i ). Pseudo boolean constraints: To hard clauses using BDDs, Sorters or Adders [Een06].
39 Branching heuristic Depending on the problem structure: Compute Jeroslow-like heuristic in the root node. Compute VSIDS-like heuristic on hard conflicts.
40 Outline Preliminaries Max-SAT Search Resolution for Max-SAT Lower Bound Additional Features Empirical Results Conclusions and Future Work
41 Results Solvers from different communities: Maxsatz: Unweighted Max-SAT solver. Max-DPLL (Toolbar): Weighted Max-SAT solver. Toolbar: WCSP solver. Pueblo: Pure pseudo-boolean optimizer. Minisat+: Translates to several instances of SAT. Pentium 4, 3 Ghz, Linux, 10 mins limit.
42 Results (Max-SAT, Max-CUT) MaxSatz MiniMaxSat Max-DPLL
43 Results (Max-Clique,Max-One) MaxClique DIMACS: 34, second Max-DPLL 29. MiniMaxSat Max-DPLL Pueblo Minisat+
44 Results (Comb. Auctions) MiniMaxSat Max-DPLL Pueblo Minisat+
45 Results WCSP direct encoding: Planning and Max-CSP PBE: Garden, Min Prime, Logic Synthesis, Miplib
46 Outline Preliminaries Max-SAT Search Resolution for Max-SAT Lower Bound Additional Features Empirical Results Conclusions and Future Work
47 Conclusions MiniMaxSat: Novel lower bound and probing. Integrates SAT and Max-SAT techniques. PBO to Max-SAT. Very robust Weighted Max-SAT solver.
48 Future Work Adapt VSIDS heuristic to soft clauses. Incorporate Backjumping over soft conflicts.
Improving Unsatisfiability-based Algorithms for Boolean Optimization
Improving Unsatisfiability-based Algorithms for Boolean Optimization Vasco Manquinho Ruben Martins Inês Lynce IST/INESC-ID, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal SAT 2010, Edinburgh 1 / 27 Motivation
More informationahmaxsat: Description and Evaluation of a Branch and Bound Max-SAT Solver
Journal on Satisfiability, Boolean Modeling and Computation 9 (2015) 89-128 ahmaxsat: Description and Evaluation of a Branch and Bound Max-SAT Solver André Abramé Djamal Habet Aix Marseille Université,
More informationNew Inference Rules for Efficient Max-SAT Solving
New Inference Rules for Efficient Max-SAT Solving Federico Heras and Javier Larrosa Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya Jordi Girona 1,3 Barcelona, Spain fheras@lsi.upc.edu, larrosa@lsi.upc.edu Abstract
More informationSolving (Weighted) Partial MaxSAT with ILP
Solving (Weighted) Partial MaxSAT with ILP Carlos Ansótegui 1 and Joel Gabàs 1 DIEI, Univ. de Lleida carlos@diei.udl.cat joel.gabas@diei.udl.cat Abstract. Several combinatorial optimization problems can
More informationIntroduction to Solving Combinatorial Problems with SAT
Introduction to Solving Combinatorial Problems with SAT Javier Larrosa December 19, 2014 Overview of the session Review of Propositional Logic The Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF) Modeling and solving combinatorial
More informationIntroduction Algorithms Applications MINISAT. Niklas Sörensson Chalmers University of Technology and Göteborg University
SAT ALGORITHMS AND APPLICATIONS nik@cschalmersse Chalmers University of Technology and Göteborg University Empirically Successful Classical Automated Reasoning a CADE-20 Workshop 22nd - 23th July, 2005
More informationUsing PMaxSat Techniques to Solve the Maximum Clique Problem
Using PMaxSat Techniques to Solve the Maximum Clique Problem Alexandre Prusch Züge Renato Carmo Ricardo Tavares de Oliveira Fabiano Silva Universidade Federal do Paraná Programa de Pós-Graduação em Informática
More informationNew Inference Rules for Max-SAT
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 30 (2007) 321 359 Submitted 11/06; published 10/07 New Inference Rules for Max-SAT Chu Min Li LaRIA, Université de Picardie Jules Verne 33 Rue St. Leu, 80039
More informationFoundations of Artificial Intelligence
Foundations of Artificial Intelligence 31. Propositional Logic: DPLL Algorithm Malte Helmert and Gabriele Röger University of Basel April 24, 2017 Propositional Logic: Overview Chapter overview: propositional
More informationAutomated Program Verification and Testing 15414/15614 Fall 2016 Lecture 3: Practical SAT Solving
Automated Program Verification and Testing 15414/15614 Fall 2016 Lecture 3: Practical SAT Solving Matt Fredrikson mfredrik@cs.cmu.edu October 17, 2016 Matt Fredrikson SAT Solving 1 / 36 Review: Propositional
More informationLOGIC PROPOSITIONAL REASONING
LOGIC PROPOSITIONAL REASONING WS 2017/2018 (342.208) Armin Biere Martina Seidl biere@jku.at martina.seidl@jku.at Institute for Formal Models and Verification Johannes Kepler Universität Linz Version 2018.1
More informationPropositional Logic: Evaluating the Formulas
Institute for Formal Models and Verification Johannes Kepler University Linz VL Logik (LVA-Nr. 342208) Winter Semester 2015/2016 Propositional Logic: Evaluating the Formulas Version 2015.2 Armin Biere
More informationFoundations of Artificial Intelligence
Foundations of Artificial Intelligence 32. Propositional Logic: Local Search and Outlook Martin Wehrle Universität Basel April 29, 2016 Propositional Logic: Overview Chapter overview: propositional logic
More informationResolution-based lower bounds in MaxSAT
Constraints (2010) 15:456 484 DOI 10.1007/s10601-010-9097-9 Resolution-based lower bounds in MaxSAT Chu Min Li Felip Manyà Nouredine Ould Mohamedou Jordi Planes Published online: 24 July 2010 Springer
More informationCardinality Networks: a Theoretical and Empirical Study
Constraints manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Cardinality Networks: a Theoretical and Empirical Study Roberto Asín, Robert Nieuwenhuis, Albert Oliveras, Enric Rodríguez-Carbonell Received:
More informationPropositional Logic. Methods & Tools for Software Engineering (MTSE) Fall Prof. Arie Gurfinkel
Propositional Logic Methods & Tools for Software Engineering (MTSE) Fall 2017 Prof. Arie Gurfinkel References Chpater 1 of Logic for Computer Scientists http://www.springerlink.com/content/978-0-8176-4762-9/
More informationMinimal Model Generation with respect to an Atom Set
Minimal Model Generation with respect to an Atom Set Miyuki Koshimura 1, Hidetomo Nabeshima 2, Hiroshi Fujita 1, and Ryuzo Hasegawa 1 1 Kyushu University, Motooka 744, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0395 Japan,
More informationFrom SAT To SMT: Part 1. Vijay Ganesh MIT
From SAT To SMT: Part 1 Vijay Ganesh MIT Software Engineering & SMT Solvers An Indispensable Tactic for Any Strategy Formal Methods Program Analysis SE Goal: Reliable/Secure Software Automatic Testing
More informationSolving MaxSAT by Successive Calls to a SAT Solver
Solving MaxSAT by Successive Calls to a SAT Solver Mohamed El Halaby Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science Cairo University Giza, 12613, Egypt halaby@sci.cu.edu.eg arxiv:1603.03814v1 [cs.ai] 11
More informationSatisfiability and SAT Solvers. CS 270 Math Foundations of CS Jeremy Johnson
Satisfiability and SAT Solvers CS 270 Math Foundations of CS Jeremy Johnson Conjunctive Normal Form Conjunctive normal form (products of sums) Conjunction of clauses (disjunction of literals) For each
More informationInference Rules in Local Search for Max-SAT
Inference Rules in Local Search for Max-SAT André Abramé and Djamal Habet Aix Marseille University, LSIS UMR 7296 Av. Escadrille Normandie Niemen 13397 Marseille Cedex 2 (France) {andre.abrame, djamal.habet@lsis.org
More informationSolving SAT Modulo Theories
Solving SAT Modulo Theories R. Nieuwenhuis, A. Oliveras, and C.Tinelli. Solving SAT and SAT Modulo Theories: from an Abstract Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland Procedure to DPLL(T) Mooly Sagiv Motivation
More informationFoundations of Artificial Intelligence
Foundations of Artificial Intelligence 8. Satisfiability and Model Construction Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland Procedure, Phase Transitions, GSAT Joschka Boedecker and Wolfram Burgard and Bernhard Nebel
More informationAlgorithms for Satisfiability beyond Resolution.
Algorithms for Satisfiability beyond Resolution. Maria Luisa Bonet UPC, Barcelona, Spain Oaxaca, August, 2018 Co-Authors: Sam Buss, Alexey Ignatiev, Joao Marques-Silva, Antonio Morgado. Motivation. Satisfiability
More informationClassical Propositional Logic
Classical Propositional Logic Peter Baumgartner http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~baumgart/ Ph: 02 6218 3717 Data61/CSIRO and ANU July 2017 1 / 71 Classical Logic and Reasoning Problems A 1 : Socrates is a
More informationIntroduction. Chapter Context
Chapter 1 Introduction As soon as an Analytical Engine exists, it will necessarily guide the future course of the science. Whenever any result is sought by its aid, the question will then arise But what
More informationTutorial 1: Modern SMT Solvers and Verification
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Tutorial 1: Modern SMT Solvers and Verification Sayan Mitra Electrical & Computer Engineering Coordinated Science Laboratory University of Illinois at Urbana
More informationImprovements to Core-Guided Binary Search for MaxSAT
Improvements to Core-Guided Binary Search for MaxSAT A.Morgado F.Heras J.Marques-Silva CASL/CSI, University College Dublin Dublin, Ireland SAT, June 2012 Outline Motivation Previous Algorithms - Overview
More informationA brief introduction to practical SAT solving
A brief introduction to practical SAT solving What can I expect from SAT today? Daniel Le Berre Joint work with Anne Parrain, Pascal Rapicault, Olivier Roussel, Laurent Simon, and others CRIL-CNRS UMR
More informationSolvers for the Problem of Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) Will Klieber Aug 31, 2011
Solvers for the Problem of Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) Will Klieber 15-414 Aug 31, 2011 Why study SAT solvers? Many problems reduce to SAT. Formal verification CAD, VLSI Optimization AI, planning, automated
More informationPropositional Logic: Models and Proofs
Propositional Logic: Models and Proofs C. R. Ramakrishnan CSE 505 1 Syntax 2 Model Theory 3 Proof Theory and Resolution Compiled at 11:51 on 2016/11/02 Computing with Logic Propositional Logic CSE 505
More informationuncorrected proof An efficient solver for weighted Max-SAT Teresa Alsinet Felip Manyà Jordi Planes
DOI.7/s898-007-966-9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 An efficient solver for weighted Max-SAT Teresa Alsinet Felip Manyà Jordi Planes Received: 3 July 2006 / Accepted: 8 May 2007 SpringerScience+BusinessMediaLLC2007
More informationAn instance of SAT is defined as (X, S)
SAT: Propositional Satisfiability 22c:45 Artificial Intelligence Russell & Norvig, Ch. 7.6 Validity vs. Satisfiability Validity: A sentence is valid if it is true in every interpretation (every interpretation
More informationSatisifiability and Probabilistic Satisifiability
Satisifiability and Probabilistic Satisifiability Department of Computer Science Instituto de Matemática e Estatística Universidade de São Paulo 2010 Topics Next Issue The SAT Problem The Centrality of
More informationPruning Search Space for Weighted First Order Horn Clause Satisfiability
Pruning Search Space for Weighted First Order Horn Clause Satisfiability Naveen Nair 123, Anandraj Govindan 2, Chander Jayaraman 2, Kiran TVS 2, and Ganesh Ramakrishnan 21 1 IITB-Monash Research Academy,
More informationAdding Flexibility to Russian Doll Search
Adding Flexibility to Russian Doll Search Margarita Razgon and Gregory M. Provan Department of Computer Science, University College Cork, Ireland {m.razgon g.provan}@cs.ucc.ie Abstract The Weighted Constraint
More informationVerification using Satisfiability Checking, Predicate Abstraction, and Craig Interpolation. Himanshu Jain THESIS ORAL TALK
Verification using Satisfiability Checking, Predicate Abstraction, and Craig Interpolation Himanshu Jain THESIS ORAL TALK 1 Computer Systems are Pervasive Computer Systems = Software + Hardware Software/Hardware
More informationFormal Verification Methods 1: Propositional Logic
Formal Verification Methods 1: Propositional Logic John Harrison Intel Corporation Course overview Propositional logic A resurgence of interest Logic and circuits Normal forms The Davis-Putnam procedure
More informationTopics in Model-Based Reasoning
Towards Integration of Proving and Solving Dipartimento di Informatica Università degli Studi di Verona Verona, Italy March, 2014 Automated reasoning Artificial Intelligence Automated Reasoning Computational
More informationLecture 2 Propositional Logic & SAT
CS 5110/6110 Rigorous System Design Spring 2017 Jan-17 Lecture 2 Propositional Logic & SAT Zvonimir Rakamarić University of Utah Announcements Homework 1 will be posted soon Propositional logic: Chapter
More informationSatisfiability Modulo Theories
Satisfiability Modulo Theories Bruno Dutertre SRI International Leonardo de Moura Microsoft Research Satisfiability a > b + 2, a = 2c + 10, c + b 1000 SAT a = 0, b = 3, c = 5 Model 0 > 3 + 2, 0 = 2 5 +
More informationAttacking AES via SAT
Computer Science Department Swansea University BCTCS Warwick, April 7, 2009 Introduction In the following talk, a general translation framework, based around SAT, is considered, with the aim of providing
More informationCOMP219: Artificial Intelligence. Lecture 20: Propositional Reasoning
COMP219: Artificial Intelligence Lecture 20: Propositional Reasoning 1 Overview Last time Logic for KR in general; Propositional Logic; Natural Deduction Today Entailment, satisfiability and validity Normal
More informationA Clause Tableau Calculus for MinSAT
A Clause Tableau Calculus for MinSAT Chu Min LI, a Felip MANYÀ b and Joan Ramon SOLER b a Université de Picardie, Amiens, France b IIIA-CSIC, Bellaterra, Spain Abstract. We define a clause tableau calculus
More informationInterleaved Alldifferent Constraints: CSP vs. SAT Approaches
Interleaved Alldifferent Constraints: CSP vs. SAT Approaches Frédéric Lardeux 3, Eric Monfroy 1,2, and Frédéric Saubion 3 1 Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, Chile 2 LINA, Université
More informationSolving hard industrial combinatorial problems with SAT
UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA SOFTWARE DEPARTMENT PhD in Computing Solving hard industrial combinatorial problems with SAT Ignasi Abío Roig Advisors: Robert Nieuwenhuis and Albert Oliveras and Enric
More informationA New Look at BDDs for Pseudo-Boolean Constraints
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 45 (22) 443-48 Submitted 3/2; published /2 A New Look at BDDs for Pseudo-Boolean Constraints Ignasi Abío Robert Nieuwenhuis Albert Oliveras Enric Rodríguez-Carbonell
More informationChapter 7 R&N ICS 271 Fall 2017 Kalev Kask
Set 6: Knowledge Representation: The Propositional Calculus Chapter 7 R&N ICS 271 Fall 2017 Kalev Kask Outline Representing knowledge using logic Agent that reason logically A knowledge based agent Representing
More informationNP-Complete Reductions 2
x 1 x 1 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 3 x 4 x 4 12 22 32 CS 447 11 13 21 23 31 33 Algorithms NP-Complete Reductions 2 Prof. Gregory Provan Department of Computer Science University College Cork 1 Lecture Outline NP-Complete
More informationSAT-Solving: From Davis- Putnam to Zchaff and Beyond Day 3: Recent Developments. Lintao Zhang
SAT-Solving: From Davis- Putnam to Zchaff and Beyond Day 3: Recent Developments Requirements for SAT solvers in the Real World Fast & Robust Given a problem instance, we want to solve it quickly Reliable
More informationLook-Ahead Based SAT Solvers
p01c05 lah 2008/11/20 16:31 page 155 #1 Handbook of Satisfiability Armin Biere, Marijn Heule, Hans van Maaren and Toby Walsh (Eds.) IOS Press, 2009 c 2009 Marijn J.H. Heule and Hans van Maaren and IOS
More informationIntroduction to SAT (constraint) solving. Justyna Petke
Introduction to SAT (constraint) solving Justyna Petke SAT, SMT and CSP solvers are used for solving problems involving constraints. The term constraint solver, however, usually refers to a CSP solver.
More informationEncoding Basic Arithmetic Operations for SAT-Solvers
Encoding Basic Arithmetic Operations for SAT-Solvers Ramón BÉJAR 1, Cèsar FERNÁNDEZ and Francesc GUITART Computer Science Department, Universitat de Lleida (UdL) Abstract. In this paper we start an investigation
More informationTranslating a Satallax Refutation to a Tableau Refutation Encoded in Coq
Translating a Satallax Refutation to a Tableau Refutation Encoded in Coq Bachelor Seminar - first talk Advisor: Chad Brown Supervisor: Gert Smolka Department of Computer Science Saarland University October
More informationComputational Logic. Davide Martinenghi. Spring Free University of Bozen-Bolzano. Computational Logic Davide Martinenghi (1/30)
Computational Logic Davide Martinenghi Free University of Bozen-Bolzano Spring 2010 Computational Logic Davide Martinenghi (1/30) Propositional Logic - sequent calculus To overcome the problems of natural
More informationEECS 219C: Computer-Aided Verification Boolean Satisfiability Solving III & Binary Decision Diagrams. Sanjit A. Seshia EECS, UC Berkeley
EECS 219C: Computer-Aided Verification Boolean Satisfiability Solving III & Binary Decision Diagrams Sanjit A. Seshia EECS, UC Berkeley Acknowledgments: Lintao Zhang Announcement Project proposals due
More informationChapter 7 Propositional Satisfiability Techniques
Lecture slides for Automated Planning: Theory and Practice Chapter 7 Propositional Satisfiability Techniques Dana S. Nau University of Maryland 12:58 PM February 15, 2012 1 Motivation Propositional satisfiability:
More informationPreprocessing QBF: Failed Literals and Quantified Blocked Clause Elimination
Preprocessing QBF: Failed Literals and Quantified Blocked Clause Elimination Florian Lonsing (joint work with Armin Biere and Martina Seidl) Institute for Formal Models and Verification (FMV) Johannes
More informationSatisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT)
Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) Sylvain Conchon Cours 7 / 9 avril 2014 1 Road map The SMT problem Modern efficient SAT solvers CDCL(T) Examples of decision procedures: equality (CC) and difference
More informationLecture 9: Search 8. Victor R. Lesser. CMPSCI 683 Fall 2010
Lecture 9: Search 8 Victor R. Lesser CMPSCI 683 Fall 2010 ANNOUNCEMENTS REMEMBER LECTURE ON TUESDAY! EXAM ON OCTOBER 18 OPEN BOOK ALL MATERIAL COVERED IN LECTURES REQUIRED READINGS WILL MOST PROBABLY NOT
More informationUsing Graph-Based Representation to Derive Hard SAT instances
Using Graph-Based Representation to Derive Hard SAT instances Gilles Audemard, Saïd Jabbour, and Lakhdar Saïs CRIL - Université d Artois - Lens, France {audemard,jabbour,sais}@cril.fr Abstract. In this
More informationOn the Relative Efficiency of DPLL and OBDDs with Axiom and Join
On the Relative Efficiency of DPLL and OBDDs with Axiom and Join Matti Järvisalo University of Helsinki, Finland September 16, 2011 @ CP M. Järvisalo (U. Helsinki) DPLL and OBDDs September 16, 2011 @ CP
More informationPropositional Calculus
Propositional Calculus Dr. Neil T. Dantam CSCI-498/598 RPM, Colorado School of Mines Spring 2018 Dantam (Mines CSCI, RPM) Propositional Calculus Spring 2018 1 / 64 Calculus? Definition: Calculus A well
More informationClique is hard on average for regular resolution
Clique is hard on average for regular resolution Ilario Bonacina, UPC Barcelona Tech July 27, 2018 Oxford Complexity Day Talk based on a joint work with: A. Atserias S. de Rezende J. Nordstro m M. Lauria
More informationIntSat: From SAT to Integer Linear Programming
IntSat: From SAT to Integer Linear Programming CPAIOR 2015 (invited talk) Robert Nieuwenhuis Barcelogic.com - Computer Science Department BarcelonaTech (UPC) 1 Proposed travel arrangements (next time):
More informationLogic in AI Chapter 7. Mausam (Based on slides of Dan Weld, Stuart Russell, Dieter Fox, Henry Kautz )
Logic in AI Chapter 7 Mausam (Based on slides of Dan Weld, Stuart Russell, Dieter Fox, Henry Kautz ) Knowledge Representation represent knowledge in a manner that facilitates inferencing (i.e. drawing
More informationWatched Literals in a Finite Domain SAT Solver A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY.
Watched Literals in a Finite Domain SAT Solver A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Anurag Jain IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
More informationVLSI CAD: Lecture 4.1. Logic to Layout. Computational Boolean Algebra Representations: Satisfiability (SAT), Part 1
VLSI CAD: Logic to Layout Rob A. Rutenbar University of Illinois Lecture 4.1 Computational Boolean Algebra Representations: Satisfiability (SAT), Part 1 Some Terminology Satisfiability (called SAT for
More informationPropagation = Lazy Clause Generation
Propagation = Lazy Clause Generation Olga Ohrimenko 1, Peter J. Stuckey 1, and Michael Codish 2 1 NICTA Victoria Research Lab, Department of Comp. Sci. and Soft. Eng. University of Melbourne, Australia
More informationClause/Term Resolution and Learning in the Evaluation of Quantified Boolean Formulas
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 1 (1993) 1-15 Submitted 6/91; published 9/91 Clause/Term Resolution and Learning in the Evaluation of Quantified Boolean Formulas Enrico Giunchiglia Massimo
More informationSolving Bayesian Networks by Weighted Model Counting
Solving Bayesian Networks by Weighted Model Counting Tian Sang, Paul Beame, and Henry Kautz Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 {sang,beame,kautz}@cs.washington.edu
More informationSatisfiability Modulo Theories
Satisfiability Modulo Theories Summer School on Formal Methods Menlo College, 2011 Bruno Dutertre and Leonardo de Moura bruno@csl.sri.com, leonardo@microsoft.com SRI International, Microsoft Research SAT/SMT
More informationComp487/587 - Boolean Formulas
Comp487/587 - Boolean Formulas 1 Logic and SAT 1.1 What is a Boolean Formula Logic is a way through which we can analyze and reason about simple or complicated events. In particular, we are interested
More informationAdvanced Artificial Intelligence, DT4048
Advanced Artificial Intelligence, DT4048 Part 5 Boolean Satisfiability Federico Pecora federico.pecora@oru.se Center for Applied Autonomous Sensor Systems (AASS) Örebro University, Sweden What is Boolean
More informationModern Sat Solving CDCL Tutorial Singapore Winter School Fahiem Bacchus, University of Toronto
Modern Sat Solving CDCL Tutorial Singapore Winter School 2019 Why Sat solving? Practical Problem A that lies in NP Encoding to SAT Well engineered SAT Solver Solution to A without having to build a special
More informationAutomatic Generation of Redundant Models for Permutation Constraint Satisfaction Problems
Manuscript Latex Source Click here to download Manuscript: article.tex 0 0 0 0 0 0 Automatic Generation of Redundant Models for Permutation Constraint Satisfaction Problems Y.C. Law and J.H.M. Lee Department
More informationLessons from MIP Search. John Hooker Carnegie Mellon University November 2009
Lessons from MIP Search John Hooker Carnegie Mellon University November 2009 Outline MIP search The main ideas Duality and nogoods From MIP to AI (and back) Binary decision diagrams From MIP to constraint
More informationExtending DPLL-Based QBF Solvers to Handle Free Variables
Extending DPLL-Based QBF Solvers to Handle Free Variables Will Klieber, Mikoláš Janota, Joao Marques-Silva, Edmund Clarke July 9, 2013 1 Open QBF Closed QBF: All variables quantified; answer is True or
More informationNotes for Lecture 2. Statement of the PCP Theorem and Constraint Satisfaction
U.C. Berkeley Handout N2 CS294: PCP and Hardness of Approximation January 23, 2006 Professor Luca Trevisan Scribe: Luca Trevisan Notes for Lecture 2 These notes are based on my survey paper [5]. L.T. Statement
More informationThe Calculus of Computation: Decision Procedures with Applications to Verification. Part I: FOUNDATIONS. by Aaron Bradley Zohar Manna
The Calculus of Computation: Decision Procedures with Applications to Verification Part I: FOUNDATIONS by Aaron Bradley Zohar Manna 1. Propositional Logic(PL) Springer 2007 1-1 1-2 Propositional Logic(PL)
More informationLecture 20: conp and Friends, Oracles in Complexity Theory
6.045 Lecture 20: conp and Friends, Oracles in Complexity Theory 1 Definition: conp = { L L NP } What does a conp computation look like? In NP algorithms, we can use a guess instruction in pseudocode:
More informationHeuristics for Efficient SAT Solving. As implemented in GRASP, Chaff and GSAT.
Heuristics for Efficient SAT Solving As implemented in GRASP, Chaff and GSAT. Formulation of famous problems as SAT: k-coloring (1/2) The K-Coloring problem: Given an undirected graph G(V,E) and a natural
More informationCS156: The Calculus of Computation
CS156: The Calculus of Computation Zohar Manna Winter 2010 It is reasonable to hope that the relationship between computation and mathematical logic will be as fruitful in the next century as that between
More informationFast SAT-based Answer Set Solver
Fast SAT-based Answer Set Solver Zhijun Lin and Yuanlin Zhang and Hector Hernandez Computer Science Department Texas Tech University 2500 Broadway, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA {lin, yzhang, hector}@cs.ttu.edu
More informationArtificial Intelligence
Torralba and Wahlster Artificial Intelligence Chapter 11: Propositional Reasoning, Part II 1/69 Artificial Intelligence 11. Propositional Reasoning, Part II: SAT Solvers How to Efficiently Think About
More informationLecture Notes on SAT Solvers & DPLL
15-414: Bug Catching: Automated Program Verification Lecture Notes on SAT Solvers & DPLL Matt Fredrikson André Platzer Carnegie Mellon University Lecture 10 1 Introduction In this lecture we will switch
More informationChapter 7 Propositional Satisfiability Techniques
Lecture slides for Automated Planning: Theory and Practice Chapter 7 Propositional Satisfiability Techniques Dana S. Nau CMSC 722, AI Planning University of Maryland, Spring 2008 1 Motivation Propositional
More informationCSI 4105 MIDTERM SOLUTION
University of Ottawa CSI 4105 MIDTERM SOLUTION Instructor: Lucia Moura Feb 6, 2010 10:00 am Duration: 1:50 hs Closed book Last name: First name: Student number: There are 4 questions and 100 marks total.
More informationSat-Solving Based on Boundary Point Elimination
Sat-Solving Based on Boundary Point Elimination Eugene Goldberg, Pete Manolios Northeastern University, USA HVC-2010, October 5-7, Haifa, Israel Outline Introduction BPE-SAT Experimental results and conclusions
More informationTowards Understanding and Harnessing the Potential of Clause Learning
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 22 (2004) 319-351 Submitted 12/03; published 12/04 Towards Understanding and Harnessing the Potential of Clause Learning Paul Beame Henry Kautz Ashish Sabharwal
More informationInterpolation. Seminar Slides. Betim Musa. 27 th June Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Interpolation Seminar Slides Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Betim Musa 27 th June 2015 Motivation program add(int a, int b) { var x,i : int; l 0 assume(b 0); l 1 x := a; l 2 i := 0; while(i < b) {
More informationPropagation in CSP and SAT
Propagation in CSP and SAT Yannis Dimopoulos 1 and Kostas Stergiou 2 1 Department of Computer Science University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus yannis@cs.ucy.ac.cy 2 Department of Information and Communication
More informationCS:4420 Artificial Intelligence
CS:4420 Artificial Intelligence Spring 2018 Propositional Logic Cesare Tinelli The University of Iowa Copyright 2004 18, Cesare Tinelli and Stuart Russell a a These notes were originally developed by Stuart
More informationDecision Diagrams for Discrete Optimization
Decision Diagrams for Discrete Optimization Willem Jan van Hoeve Tepper School of Business Carnegie Mellon University www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/vanhoeve/mdd/ Acknowledgments: David Bergman, Andre Cire, Samid
More informationCSE507. Introduction. Computer-Aided Reasoning for Software. Emina Torlak courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse507/17wi/
Computer-Aided Reasoning for Software CSE507 courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse507/17wi/ Introduction Emina Torlak emina@cs.washington.edu Today What is this course about? Course logistics Review of
More informationAbstract Answer Set Solvers with Backjumping and Learning
Under consideration for publication in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 1 Abstract Answer Set Solvers with Backjumping and Learning YULIYA LIERLER Department of Computer Science University of Texas
More informationPrice: $25 (incl. T-Shirt, morning tea and lunch) Visit:
Three days of interesting talks & workshops from industry experts across Australia Explore new computing topics Network with students & employers in Brisbane Price: $25 (incl. T-Shirt, morning tea and
More informationApproximating Probabilistic Inference
Approximating Probabilistic Inference Kuldeep S. Meel PhD Student CAVR Group Joint work with Supratik Chakraborty (IITB), Daniel J. Fremont (UCB), Sanjit A. Seshia (UCB), Moshe Y. Vardi (Rice) 1 IoT: Internet
More informationMaxSAT Resolution with the Dual Rail Encoding
MaxSAT Resolution with the Dual Rail Encoding Maria Luisa Bonet 1, Sam Buss 2, Alexey Ignatiev 3,4, Joao Marques-Silva 3, Antonio Morgado 3 1 Computer Science Department, Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña,
More informationA brief introduction to Logic. (slides from
A brief introduction to Logic (slides from http://www.decision-procedures.org/) 1 A Brief Introduction to Logic - Outline Propositional Logic :Syntax Propositional Logic :Semantics Satisfiability and validity
More information