ATLAS Measurements of the ridge(s) in p+pbcollisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, (2013) and arxiv:

Transcription

1 ALAS Measurements of the ridge(s) in p+pbcollisions Soumya Mohapatra Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, (213) and arxiv: EC* rento 7 th May 213

2 Ridges in Pb-Pb, p-p and p+pb 2 CMS Pb+Pb ridge p+pb ridge p+p ridge wo-particle correlations show long range correlation structure along η at ϕ=.

3 Ridges in Pb-Pb, p-p and p+pb 3 CMS Pb+Pb ridge p+pb ridge p+p ridge wo-particle correlations show long range correlation structure along η at ϕ=. Is there an effective mechanism that rules them all? Is it initial state effect, final state effect or both? Final state effect may not imply hydro.

4 Ridges in Pb-Pb, p-p and p+pb 4 CMS Pb+Pb ridge p+pb ridge p+p ridge wo-particle correlations show long range correlation structure along η at ϕ=. Is there an effective mechanism that rules them all? Is it initial state effect, final state effect or both? Final state effect may not imply hydro. Is there an away-side ridge in pp and ppb?

5 Ridges in Pb-Pb, p-p and p+pb 5 CMS Pb+Pb ridge p+pb ridge p+p ridge wo-particle correlations show long range correlation structure along η at ϕ=. Is there an effective mechanism that rules them all? Is it initial state effect, final state effect or both? Final state effect may not imply hydro. Is there an away-side ridge in pp and ppb? What is its detailed p, η, and centrality dependence?

6 ALAS Detector 6

7 ALAS Detector 7 Inner detector η <2.5 racking coverage : η <2.5

8 ALAS Detector 8 Inner detector η <2.5 racking coverage : η <2.5 Forward Calorimeter (Fcal) 3.2< η <4.9 FCal coverage : 3.2< η <4.9 used to determine Centrality (Pb side only)

9 High multiplicity event 9 contains 273 tracks with p >.4 GeV, but only p >1 GeV tracks are shown 9

10 Event activity : N ch vsσe (Pb) 1 >.4 GeV with p rec N ch ALAS p+pb s NN =5.2 ev, L -1 1 µb η < Pb ΣE 3.1<η<4.9 [GeV] Broad correlation between ΣE (Pb) with N ch, but overall along diagonal No overlap between Fcaland tracking detectors => no auto-correlation bias in event activity definition

11 Event activity classes (centrality) 11 ] -1 [GeV Pb (1/N ) dn /dσe evt evt ALAS p+pb s NN = 5.2 ev, Sept. 212 L -1 1 µb Central Peripheral 3.2<η<4.9 Classes made by dividing ΣE in Pb-going side into 12 fine classes. Four coarse classes: Pb ΣE [GeV] >8 GeV(-2%), 55-8 GeV(2-9%), GeV(9-39%) and <2 GeV(48-1%)

12 Near side ridge in p-pb 12 See long-range correlations along Δηat Δφ= in central p-pbevents

13 Ridge on away side? 13 ALAS p+pb =5.2 ev s NN -1 L int 1 µb, ΣE >8 GeV (a) ALAS p+pb =5.2 ev s NN -1 L int 1 µb, ΣE <2 GeV (b).5<p a,b <4 GeV.5<p a,b <4 GeV 1.4 C( φ, η) C( φ, η) Subtracting a pedestal and integrated over away side ( ) ξ ZYAM C φ, η d φ 4 φ 2 η φ 2 η

14 Ridge on away side? 14 ALAS p+pb =5.2 ev s NN -1 L int 1 µb, ΣE >8 GeV (a) ALAS p+pb =5.2 ev s NN -1 L int 1 µb, ΣE <2 GeV (b).5<p a,b <4 GeV.5<p a,b <4 GeV 1.4 C( φ, η) C( φ, η) Subtracting a pedestal and integrated over away side ( ) ξ ZYAM C φ, η d φ Away-side is broadened along Δη, for central events. Is there an away-side ridge? 4 φ 2 η C( η) - ξ ZYAM.1.5 ALAS.5<p a,b φ >2π/3 4 p+pb <4 GeV φ 2-1 s NN =5.2 ev, L 1 µb int ΣE >8 GeV η ΣE <2 GeV η

15 Per rigger Yields 15 Y(ΔΦ)=(Number of pairs)/(number of triggers) Pedestal(ZYAM) Compare central PY with peripheral PY for 2< Δη <5 In peripheral case see away-side jet contribution See ridge on near side in central events Excess is also seen on away side

16 Per rigger Yields 16 Y(ΔΦ)=(Number of pairs)/(number of triggers) Pedestal(ZYAM) Compare central PY with peripheral PY for 2< Δη <5 In peripheral case see away-side jet contribution See ridge on near side in central events Excess is also seen on away side

17 Per rigger Yields 17 Y(ΔΦ)=(Number of pairs)/(number of triggers) Pedestal(ZYAM) Compare central PY with peripheral PY for 2< Δη <5 In peripheral case see away-side jet contribution See ridge on near side in central events Excess is also seen on away side Excess is symmetric

18 Auto-correlation bias for N ch based result 18 Y int.6 ALAS.5<p a,b p+pb Near: φ <π/3 Away: φ >2π/3-1 s NN =5.2 ev, L 1 µb <4 GeV, 2< η <5 Y int.6 ALAS.5<p a,b p+pb Near: φ <π/3 Away: φ >2π/3-1 s NN =5.2 ev, L 1 µb <4 GeV, 2< η <5.4 Difference.4 Difference ΣE Pb [GeV] N ch clear drop in the away-side yield for events explicitly required to have small N ch : Auto-correlation bias

19 Auto-correlation bias for N ch based result 19 Y int.6 ALAS.5<p a,b p+pb Near: φ <π/3 Away: φ >2π/3-1 s NN =5.2 ev, L 1 µb <4 GeV, 2< η <5 Y int.6 ALAS.5<p a,b p+pb Near: φ <π/3 Away: φ >2π/3-1 s NN =5.2 ev, L 1 µb <4 GeV, 2< η <5.4 Difference.4 Difference ΣE Pb [GeV] N ch clear drop in the away-side yield for events explicitly required to have small N ch : Auto-correlation bias

20 PY for different trigger p 2 Central Y ( φ)= Y ( φ) Y ( φ) 2 Peripheral Y ( φ) is very well described by: a + a cos(2 φ)

21 p dependence of ridge yield Y int integrated yield.4.2 ALAS p+pb -1 s NN =5.2 ev, L 1 µb.5 < p Near b < 4 GeV 2 < η < 5 φ <π/3 (a) Pb ΣE > 8 GeV Pb ΣE < 2 GeV Difference Away 21 φ >2π/3 (b) Y int.4 φ <π/3 (c).4 φ >2π/3 (d) Yield difference [GeV] Subtraction of recoil has no effects on the near-side, but is important for the away-side. Yield difference is symmetric Ridge persists to at least 6 GeV! p a p a [GeV]

22 p dependence of ridge yield Y int integrated yield.4.2 ALAS p+pb -1 s NN =5.2 ev, L 1 µb.5 < p Near b < 4 GeV 2 < η < 5 φ <π/3 (a) Pb ΣE > 8 GeV Pb ΣE < 2 GeV Difference Away 22 φ >2π/3 (b) Y int.4 φ <π/3 (c).4 φ >2π/3 (d) Yield difference [GeV] Subtraction of recoil has no effects on the near-side, but is important for the away-side. Yield difference is symmetric Ridge persists to at least 6 GeV!, similar p dependence as Pb+Pb ridge : suggestive of hydrodynamic origin p a p a [GeV]

23 Recoil subtracted correlation function 23 Remove the recoil on the per-trigger level, then convert the remainder back into a 2D correlation function C ( PY Central + Pedestal Central PY Peripheral )

24 Recoil subtracted correlation function 24 Remove the recoil on the per-trigger level, then convert the remainder back into a 2D correlation function C ( PY Central + Pedestal Central PY Peripheral ) Ridge remains symmetric to Δη=5 and ~ constant, and for all FCalE classes he near-side removal of short-range correlations not complete! (about 5-1% signal remain)

25 C ( φ, η) C( φ, η) φ φ η After recoil removal: charge dependence ALAS p+pb s NN =5.2 ev -1 a,b L 1 µb.5<p <4 GeV Pb ΣE > 8 GeV η unlike-sign pairs 25 C( φ, η) -4-4 C ( φ, η) φ φ η ALAS p+pb s NN =5.2 ev -1 a,b L 1 µb.5<p <4 GeV Pb ΣE > 8 GeV η like-sign pairs

26 C ( φ, η) C( φ, η) φ φ η After recoil removal: charge dependence ALAS p+pb s NN =5.2 ev -1 a,b L 1 µb.5<p <4 GeV Pb ΣE > 8 GeV η unlike-sign pairs Ridge magnitude and its symmetry do not dependent on charge combinations 26 C( φ, η) -4-4 C ( φ, η) φ φ η ALAS p+pb s NN =5.2 ev -1 a,b L 1 µb.5<p <4 GeV Pb ΣE > 8 GeV like-sign pairs 26 η

27 Peripheral subtracted correlation function 27 Extract anisotropy c n from correlation function: c n v n,n

28 Peripheral subtracted correlation function 28 Extract anisotropy c n from correlation function: c n v n,n Factorize c n (as in Heavy Ion 2PC s): c (p, p ) = s (p )s (p ) a b a b n n n s n (p a )=c n (p a,p b ) / c n (p b,p b )

29 Peripheral subtracted correlation function 29 Extract anisotropy c n from correlation function: c n v n,n Factorize c n (as in Heavy Ion 2PC s): c (p, p ) = s (p )s (p ) a b a b n n n s n (p a )=c n (p a,p b ) / c n (p b,p b )

30 Factorization of s n 3 Check whether we get the same answer using different ref. p.

31 Factorization of s n 31 Check whether we get the same answer using different ref. p. he factorization is valid at 1-2% level for s 2!

32 Measurement of correlations via cumulants 32 Can also study the long correlations via 2 and 4 particle cumulants 4-particle cumulantssuppresses short range two particle correlations (jets, resonance decays etc) Peripheral subtraction not necessary v 2 {4} centrality and p dependence similar to the results from 2PC for central events Some deviation for peripheral events

33 Comparison to hydro calculations 33 Hydro calculations: P. Bozek and W. Broniowski, Phys. Lett. B 718 (213) 1557 v 2 {4} and results from 2PC consistent with hydro calculations

34 Comparison to CGC calculations 34 Also possible from initial stage saturation effects (C.G.C) Ridge magnitude and p dependence is well described Kevin Dusling, Raju Venugopalan(arXiv )

35 Summary 35 long-range correlations(ridges) are seen in central p-pbevents. he ridge is also present on the away side. Magnitude is almost flat out till Δη =5 and increases with centrality. Shape largely described by a cos(2δφ) component p dependence of the ridge is similar to that seen in HI collisions Magnitude as quantified by 2 nd harmonic coefficient (c 2 ) increases till ~3GeV then drops Suggests similar origin of ridge in p-pb Also possible from initial stage effects (C.G.C)

36 BACKUPS

37 Centrality Dependence

38 charge dependence of the yield 38 Y int.4.3 ALAS.5<p a,b -1 p+pb s NN =5.2 ev, L 1 µb <4 GeV, 2< η <5, Near: φ <π/3 like-sign pairs unlike-sign pairs Y int.6 ALAS.5<p a,b -1 p+pb s NN =5.2 ev, L 1 µb <4 GeV, 2< η <5, Away: φ >2π/3 like-sign pairs unlike-sign pairs.2 all pairs.4 all pairs ΣE Pb [GeV] 5 1 ΣE Pb [GeV] No change dependence of the per-trigger yield

39 Recoil subtracted correlation function 39 Remove the recoil on the per-trigger level, then convert the remainder back into a 2D correlation function C ( PY Central + Pedestal Central PY Peripheral ) Ridge remains symmetric to Δη=5 and ~ constant, and for all FCalE classes he near-side removal of short-range correlations not complete! (about 5-1% signal remain)

40 Illustrate bias with HIJING simulation Hijinghas no ridge, mostly short range correlations. Clear bias effects in N ch based selections ch 3.1<η<4.9 4 η <2.5

41 Parameters