Effect and minimization of errors in in-situ ground
|
|
- Betty West
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Effect and minimization of errors in in-situ ground impedance measurements Roland Kruse, Volker Mellert Oldenburg University, Inst. of Physics, 6 Oldenburg, Germany Abstract The transfer function method is a procedure to measure the surface impedance of grounds in-situ. In this article, the influence of measurement errors on the predicted surface impedance is investigated numerically. Even small errors in the range of accuracy of common measurement equipment can lead to significant errors in the impedance. This is especially true for errors in the transfer function at frequencies below about 5 Hz and for highly reflecting grounds. To a lesser degree, errors in the measurement geometry contribute to the uncertainty of the estimated impedance. To minimize these effects, an improved geometry is suggested for the frequency range 4 Hz significantly reducing the average error. However, even with this optimized geometry the average error for high impedance grounds, like compacted silt, in this frequency range will be around 5 %. Therefore, the use of the transfer function method can t be recommended in this case unless the requirements in accuracy are very low for a specific application or particular favourable measurement conditions are given.
2 Keywords: Ground impedance; In-situ impedance measurement PACS Bh Introduction The surface impedance of outdoor grounds is an important parameter for the prediction of the sound propagation, especially for small distances when the effect of meteorological factors is often low compared to the ground effect. Generally, the measurement of the ground impedance can only be done using in-situ methods because small samples for use in the impedance tube [] do not correctly represent the properties of the extended and sometimes layered / inhomogeneous outdoor ground. Commonly used for in-situ impedance measurements both in room acoustics and for outdoor use - are impulse-echo ( Adrienne ) methods [,3] and the two-microphone (transfer function) technique [4, Iterative Procedure ]. While the impulse-echo methods, because of their simple theoretical background, are easy the implement, they rely on a plane wave like reflection and are therefore not adequate for low frequencies and small or even grazing incidence angles. The two-microphone method, on the other hand, is commonly used in combination with a sound field model taking the spherical nature of the waves at low frequencies into account and is therefore, theoretically, well suited for that purpose. A variant of this method is used in the American standard ANSI S.8 [5]. In this standard, the magnitude of the transfer function between two microphones situated above the ground is measured using one of three predefined geometries. The user will then (visually) compare this level difference spectrum with spectra provided in the standard and choose the one that fits best over the whole frequency range. These spectra ( templates ) were derived using a sound field model and a surface impedance from either a one or a two- parameter absorber model. Thereby, the user will obtain absorber parameters by which the surface impedance can easily be calculated.
3 Currently, a new ANSI standard is proposed (working group S/WG ) to allow a direct deduction of the ground impedance without the use of templates. This procedure, while requiring a sophisticated data evaluation, would have the advantage of being independent of any absorber model. The use of the transfer function method in such a standard raises concerns about the robustness of the method, because the method may become more widespread and may be used by persons less experienced in this area of acoustics. The influence of selected measurement errors on the predicted surface impedance is investigated in this paper. Small errors in the measurement geometry can hardly be avoided. Distance measurements, e.g. with a tape measure, have limited accuracy and the ground surface is not well defined. Another source of errors is the fact that the model requires the knowledge of the position of the acoustical centre of the loudspeaker which can be different from its geometrical centre [6]. Errors may not only occur in the geometry but also in the measured transfer function T. Phase errors arise from the fact that standard microphones are not phase-matched. Errors in the magnitude of T can arise from slight differences in calibration and frequency response of the microphones. Both errors may also follow from unwanted reflections, e.g. from the measurement equipment or other reflecting objects nearby as well as from meteorological influences (wind, temperature) causing spatial or temporal changes in the speed of sound. The necessary measurement precision is derived from the error predictions. Subsequently, an optimization is done to select the best measurement geometry for a given frequency range and surface impedance. All impedances presented are normalized to the impedance of air and assume an exp(iωt) time dependence. Experimental procedure Measurement set-up Measurements of the two-microphone transfer function were done on a (grass covered) soccer field. The temperature was 7 C and the wind speed < m/s. The background noise
4 was below 45 db(a). The measurement set-up is shown in fig.. The sound source was a cm loudspeaker in a (3 cm)³ closed cabinet. The emitted signal was pink noise with a level of not less than 8 db(a) at the microphone positions to ensure the signal was well above the background noise. B&K 489 microphones (/, IEC 65 Type ) with windscreens were used. The transfer function T as defined in eq. was determined using B&K PULSE, p representing the sound pressure at the two microphone positions. It is equal to the ratio of the velocity potentials φ. T p( upper) φ( upper) = p( lower) φ( lower) = () Five measurements at different locations were done. Geometry B from ANSI S.8 was used as it showed the best overall performance on this type of ground: Source height (h s ) = cm, upper microphone height (h ru ) = cm, lower microphone height (h rl ) = 5 cm, source- receiver distance (R) = m. Sound field model and impedance deduction A widespread model for the reflection of spherical waves on a locally reacting impedance plane [7] was used for the calculation of the surface impedance from the two-microphone transfer function. This model assumes an exp(-iωt) time dependence. The velocity potential φ is a function of the lengths of the direct path r and reflected path r, the wave number k, the angle of incidence θ and the normalized surface admittance β. It is defined by eq with e = r ikr + [ R p + ( R p e ) F] r ikr φ () F = + i π λe λ ² erfc( iλ) (3) R p is the reflection coefficient for plane waves (eq.4).
5 p sin( θ ) β = sin( θ ) + β R (4) The numerical distance λ is defined in eq.5 representing a common simplification of the definition by [8]. λ = ikr (sin( θ ) + β ) (5) The surface impedance Z was calculated from the measured transfer function T (eq.) and geometry by the Newton-Raphson algorithm which finds the zero of the function (predicted T observed T) and therefore gains the surface impedance Z which minimizes the difference between the observed transfer function and the transfer function predicted by the model. This very efficient method has been described in [9]. The calculation was started at the lowest frequency point ( Hz) with a seed value for the iteration of β =.5. The obtained solution is used as seed value for the next higher frequency point. While the iteration may, in general, sometimes converge on a wrong solution (local minima), such a behaviour was not observed even if the initial seed value was varied. For all calculations, Matlab R6b was used. The Matlab code can be found on the authors webpage. Effect of errors To determine the influence of errors in the geometry or transfer function on the estimated surface impedance, a two-parameter model (eq.4,5) [5] was (least square) fitted to the impedance using data from 4 4 Hz, averaged over /3 rd octave bands, to obtain an estimate Z of the impedance at low frequencies. Im( Z σ e Re( Z / ρc ) = (4) πγρ f / ρ c σ f c α e e ) = + (5) πγρ 8πγf
6 ρ and c c are the density and speed of sound in air, γ the ratio of specific heats, σ e the effective flow resistivity and α e a parameter representing an effective rate of change of porosity with depth. Now, the transfer function T was calculated from this impedance using geometry B (or geometry B with slight errors). T was then slightly changed in amplitude (±. db) or phase (±.5 ) and the surface impedance calculated. The predicted impedance with measurement errors is then compared to the nominal impedance Z. These error estimated were chosen to account mainly for the differences in the microphone frequency responses which, in a free sound field, were determined to be. db resp..5, on average. Additional. db were added to allow for other (external) influences. Geometry optimization To find an optimized geometry for the lower frequency range, which is least sensitive to measurement errors, the following procedure was used: ) Bounds for the geometry were chosen to allow for an easy set-up and keeping the distances small to minimize the influence of meteorological factors. ) The achievable precision of the measurement (resp. the measurement errors) was defined. 3) The magnitude of the estimated surface impedance Z was calculated for all geometries on a 5 cm grid. 4) Because of the possible nonlinear relation between the errors and their effect on Z, it is not sufficient to calculate the error in Z only for the maximum error estimate. The calculation was done for four values within the error range, e.g. for the error in T, estimated to be ±. db, the values -., -.,.,. db were chosen. The resulting error E x was defined as the standard deviation of Z for the four error values, calculated at each frequency point with the predictand Z. 5) To allow for an efficient calculation, the effects of the errors were considered to be independent except for the magnitude and phase of the transfer function. This reduces
7 the number of calculations for each frequency point and geometry to 56 instead of 496 needed if all error combinations were considered. 6) Step 3 was repeated for three surface impedances Z (low, medium, high) from twoparameter models [5]: Pine forest floor (σ e = 7.5 kpas/m²,α e = 6 m - ), soccer field (σ e = kpas/m²,α e = 4 m - ) and compacted silt (σ e = 4 kpas/m²,α e = -5 m - ). The calculation was done for the frequency range 4 Hz divided into /3 rd octave steps, the number of frequency points N thereby being seven. 7) In analogy to the Gaussian error propagation law, the (relative) average total error ATE for each geometry was defined as the geometrical sum of the single errors E x divided by the true impedance Z - averaged over the frequency range f (eq.6). ATE = N f E T ² + E hru ² + E Z hrl ² + E hs ² + E R ² (6) The optimal geometry - observing the boundary conditions in table shall be the geometry with the lowest ATE. Results The estimated surface impedance of the soccer field (average of five measurements) is shown in fig.. While the course of the impedance is rather smooth and does agree well with impedance models for grass-covered ground [] for frequencies above about 4 Hz, the decrease in impedance at lower frequencies does not at all agree with models for porous absorbers. Effect of errors The fitted two-parameter model on which the error analysis is based is shown in fig.. The obtained absorber parameters σ e = kpas/m² and α e = 4 m - are comparable to the values σ e = 83 kpas/m² and α e = 4 m - which are stated for lawn in the ANSI standard.
8 In fig.3, the effect of an error of. db resp..5 in the transfer function is shown. Even small errors in T cause high errors in the estimated surface impedance at low frequencies. It should also be noted that the magnitude of the error does not necessarily increase continuously with decreasing frequency. In fig.4, the effect of an error in the microphone positions is presented. The effect is much smaller than the effect of an error in T, but errors in the upper microphone position can still cause significant deviations. Not shown but also observed is the fact that errors in the source height and source- receiver distance have only a minor effect on the surface impedance estimate (for geometry B and the assumed impedance of the soccer field). The large effect of transfer function errors will now be further analysed. In fig. 5 and 6, the relative error in the real and imaginary part of the impedance is shown in relation to magnitude and phase errors of T. The effect is not only large but also asymmetric: For most of the error combinations the real part of the impedance will be too low and the imaginary part too high. Furthermore, there s a strong interaction between the effect of magnitude and phase errors. From fig.5 and 6 as well as likewise diagrams for the combinations h ru, h rl and h s, R, the following estimates for the necessary measurement precision (geometry B, 5 Hz) are derived, if the error is to be smaller than % in both real and imaginary part and no interactions between the three error combinations are considered: T ±.3 db, phase(t) ±., h ru ± cm, h rl ± cm, h s ±.5 cm, R ± 5 cm A likewise analysis revealed that for high surface impedances or lower frequencies the necessary precision becomes even higher. In case of high surface impedances this is not only true for the transfer function but also for the geometry. Matlab code for generating these diagrams can be found on the authors website.
9 Geometry optimization The results of the optimization of the geometry for the frequency range 4 Hz for three different surface impedances can be found in tab.. For all impedances, the optimum values R = 3 m, h s =.5 m and h rl = 5 cm are the same, while the upper microphone height varies between m and.8 m. The effect of this optimization on the average total error ATE is shown in fig.7. In comparison with the predefined geometries from the ANSI standard, the average error can be reduced significantly for all three surface impedances to about half of the value of the best of these geometries. However, for the high surface impedance the ATE is still 53%. In fig.8, the effect of an error of. db resp..5 in the transfer function is shown, comparable to fig.3 for geometry B. The error is significantly reduced, esp. in the imaginary part. Discussion Taken into account the results of the error analysis, it seems that the often reported decrease of the predicted surface impedance at low frequencies is the result of measurement uncertainties. The investigated soccer field was large, flat and homogeneous, it therefore resembles one of the best measurement location one can hope to encounter during ground impedance measurements. On the other hand, small errors in the transfer function result in deviations from the expected surface impedance as observed in the measurement, with the real part being too low and the imaginary part too high. To a lesser degree, this is also true for errors in the geometry, esp. the upper microphone height. To obtain acceptable results at low frequencies with geometry B, which is well suited for frequencies above 4 Hz and ground with medium impedance, the necessary measurement precision for an error less than % is already high at 5 Hz and can only be achieved with very great care and high quality equipment including phase-matched microphones. Fortunately, the effect of errors in the geometry on the impedance is less asymmetric compared to the effect of errors in the transfer function and can therefore be reduced by
10 averaging multiple measurements on the same ground including repositioning of source and receivers. The optimized geometry for the frequency range 4 Hz does feature a significant advantage over the predefined geometries with respect to its error sensitivity, but the average error for high impedance surfaces is still high. The very high error for geometry C in this case does agree with the standards recommendation to use this geometry only for very soft grounds. It should be kept in mind that the necessary measurement precision itself depends on how accurate the surface impedance needs to be measured and therefore on the specific application. In general, the effect of a given percental error in the impedance is highest near the first ground dip, the frequency range in which the presence of the ground leads to a high attenuation compared to the free field situation. The position of the ground dip depends on the impedance and geometry. As an example, the ground dip above the soccer field with source and receiver at m height and the distance between them being m is located around 75 Hz. In this case, an error of -5 % in the surface impedance leads to an underestimation of the sound pressure at 4 Hz by 7 db, while at khz the sound pressure is overestimated by only 3 db. Below 4 Hz, the error decreases and reaches.3 db at Hz. For higher propagation distances, the error does decrease slower with decreasing frequency. Thus, the frequency range below khz should receive particular attention regarding errors in the predicted surface impedance. Conclusion The two-microphone method is an established procedure for the in-situ measurement of the surface impedance. A disadvantage is that it is sensitive to errors both in the measured transfer function and, to a minor degree, to errors in the geometry. The effect of these errors depends on the measurement geometry and the surface impedance. For low impedance surfaces, it is possible to measure with acceptable accuracy at frequencies > Hz even with the predefined geometries from the ANSI standard. Unfortunately, such highly absorbing
11 materials rarely occur in nature with the important exception of snow. For materials with higher flow resistivity, the use of the predefined geometries can t be recommended for frequencies below about 5 Hz. The optimization procedure, on the other hand, leads to a geometry which provides a significant higher error tolerance and should enable the researcher to obtain reasonable results down to Hz. However, for materials with a very high surface impedance like compacted silt or asphalt, even the optimized geometry cannot guarantee low errors. Taken in mind that the proposed source-receiver distance is 3 m and therefore the maximum allowed distance for the optimization it is possible that better geometries with larger distances exist. Larger distances, however, would be more affected by meteorological factors and require large surfaces. Therefore, the use of the two-microphone method is not recommended in such situations unless the requirements in accuracy are low for a specific application or very favourable measurement conditions (large, flat surfaces, no wind) and high quality equipment including phase- matched microphones are available. Acknowledgement The authors would like to thank their student Ping Rong for his helpful comments on the data processing and interpretation and his valuable Matlab programming. References. ISO Determination of sound absorption coefficient and impedance in impedance tubes - Part : Transfer-function method. International Organization for Standardization Mommertz E. Angle-Dependent In-situ Measurement of Reflection Coefficients Using a Subtraction Technique. Applied Acoustics (995); 46: 5-63
12 3. CEN/TS Road traffic noise reducing devices - Test method for determining the acoustic performance - Intrinsic characteristics - In situ values of sound reflection and airborne sound insulation. European Committee for Standardization Allard JF, Champoux Y. In Situ Two-Microphone Technique for the Measurement of the Acoustic Surface Impedance of Materials. Noise Control Engineering Journal (989); 3(): ANSI S (R4). Template Method for Ground Impedance. American National Standards Institute. (4) 6. Fuhs S, Höldrich R, Tomberger G. Validierung des Entfernungsgesetzes und Korrektur der Gruppenlaufzeit und des akustischen Zentrums des Lautsprechers im Adrienne- Verfahren. DAGA 6. Braunschweig. 7. Nobile MA, Hayek SI. Acoustic propagation over an impedance plane. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (985); 78(4): Ingard U. On the Reflection of a Spherical Wave from an Impedance Plane. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (95); 3(3): Taherzadeh S, Attenborough K. Deduction of ground impedance from measurements of excess attenuation spectra. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (999); 5(3): Donato RJ. Impedance models for grass-covered ground. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (977); 6(3):
13 Figures R = m Upper mic. Loudspeaker hs = cm θ Ground hru = cm hrl = 5 cm Lower mic. Fig. : Measurement set-up for the transfer function method. Geometry B from ANSI S.8.
14 5 5 Impedance Frequency [Hz] Fig. : Predicted surface impedance of a grass covered soccer field. Real part ( ), imaginary part ( ), fitted two-parameter model ( ).
15 3 Impedance Frequency [Hz] Fig. 3: Effect of errors in the transfer function on the estimated surface impedance for geometry B. Correct impedance ( ), transfer function increased by. db ( ), phase error of +.5 ( ).
16 3 Impedance Frequency [Hz] Fig. 4: Effect of errors in the microphone position on the estimated surface impedance for geometry B. Correct impedance ( ), upper microphone cm too high ( ), lower microphone cm too high ( ).
17 Error in magnitude of the transfer function [db] Error in phase of the transfer function [deg] Fig. 5: Effect of errors in the magnitude and phase of the transfer function on the real part of the predicted surface impedance for geometry B at 5 Hz. Relative error ( = %). Error in magnitude of the transfer function [db] Error in phase of the transfer function [deg]
18 Error in magnitude of the transfer function [db] Error in phase of the transfer function [deg] Fig. 6: Effect of errors in the magnitude and phase of the transfer function on the imaginary part of the predicted surface impedance for geometry B at 5 Hz. Relative error ( = %). Error in magnitude of the transfer function [db] Error in phase of the transfer function [deg]
19 .5 Average total error.5 Z_low Z_medium Z_high Fig. 7: Average total error (relative) in the predicted surface impedance for three surface impedances and geometries A C [5] as well as the optimized geometry. Geometry A ( ), B ( ), C ( ), optimized geometry ( )..5 Average total error.5 Z_low Z_medium Z_high
20 4 3 Impedance Frequency [Hz] Fig. 8: Effect of errors in the transfer function on the estimated surface impedance for the optimized geometry. Correct impedance ( ), transfer function increased by. db ( ), phase error of +.5 ( ).
21 Tables Range [m] Error estimate Transfer function - ±.db, ±.5 Lower microphone height.5 - ± cm Distance upper lower mic.. - ± cm Source height..5 ± cm Source-receiver distance - 3 ± 5 cm Tab. : Boundary conditions for the geometry optimization. Ranges of the geometry and estimates of the achievable measurement precision. Low impedance Medium High impedance impedance Lower microphone height 5 cm 5 cm 5 cm Upper microphone height m.95 m.8 m Source height.5 m.5 m.5 m Source-receiver distance 3 m 3 m 3 m Tab. : Results of the geometry optimization for the frequency range 4 Hz for three different surface impedances.
A simple model for estimating excess attenuation of road traffic noise
A simple model for estimating excess attenuation of road traffic noise Kohei Yamamoto and Mitsuyasu Yamashita Kobayasi Institute of Physical Research, 3-20-41, Higashimotomachi, Kokubunji, 185 Japan (Received
More informationON SITE DETERMINATION OF SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENT OF ROAD PAVEMENTS USING MOBILE LABORATORY
ON SITE DETERMINATION OF SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENT OF ROAD PAVEMENTS USING MOBILE LABORATORY Fabio Lo Castro, Sergio Iarossi, Massimiliano De Luca, Elena Ascari, Domenico Stanzial, Gaetano Licitra CNR-IDASC
More informationA technique based on the equivalent source method for measuring the surface impedance and reflection coefficient of a locally reacting material
A technique based on the equivalent source method for measuring the surface impedance and reflection coefficient of a locally reacting material Yong-Bin ZHANG 1 ; Wang-Lin LIN; Chuan-Xing BI 1 Hefei University
More informationAbsorption boundary conditions for geometrical acoustics
Absorption boundary conditions for geometrical acoustics Cheol-Ho Jeong a) Acoustic Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark Defining
More informationUncertainties associated with the use of a sound level meter
NPL REPORT DQL-AC 002 Uncertainties associated with the use of a sound level meter Richard Payne April 2004 April 2004 ABSTRACT Uncertainties associated with the use of a sound level meter Richard Payne
More informationinter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE
Copyright SFA - InterNoise 2000 1 inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering 27-30 August 2000, Nice, FRANCE I-INCE Classification: 1.0 MODELING AND OPTIMIZATION
More informationEXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF THE EUROPEAN METHODOLOGY FOR TESTING NOISE BARRIERS IN SITU: SOUND REFLECTION
000059.doc/0 EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF THE EUROPEAN METHODOLOGY FOR TESTING NOISE BARRIERS IN SITU: SOUND REFLECTION M. GARAI, P. GUIDORZI DIENCA, University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136,
More informationA practical device to determine the reflection coefficient of acoustic materials in-situ based on a Microflown and microphone sensor
A practical device to determine the reflection coefficient of acoustic materials in-situ based on a Microflown and microphone sensor R. Lanoye 1a, H.-E. de Bree b, W. Lauriks a and G. Vermeir a 1 Aspirant
More informationTHE ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMNET SYSTEM USING TWO MICROPHONES
P-7 THE ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMNET SYSTEM USING TWO MICROPHONES RYU, YUNSEON BRUEL & KJAER SOUND & VIBRATION MEASUREMENT A/S SKODSBORGVEJ 307 NAERUM 2850 DENMARK TEL : +45 77 41 23 87 FAX : +45 77
More informationBasic Study on a Laboratory Measurement Method of the Normal-Incidence Scattering Coefficient
Basic Study on a Laboratory Measurement Method of the Normal-Incidence Scattering Coefficient Hyojin LEE, Tetsuya SAKUMA Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan. 1. Introduction
More informationProgress in sound reflection measurements on noise barriers in situ
Progress in sound reflection measurements on noise barriers in situ Massimo Garai a) Paolo Guidorzi b) Luca Barbaresi c) Department of Energy, Nuclear and Environmental Control Engineering, University
More informationThis document is a preview generated by EVS
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SPÉCIFICATION TECHNIQUE TECHNISCHE SPEZIFIKATION CEN/TS 16272-5 April 2014 ICS 93.100 English Version Railway applications - Track - Noise barriers and related devices acting on
More informationAnswer - SAQ 1. The intensity, I, is given by: Back
Answer - SAQ 1 The intensity, I, is given by: Noise Control. Edited by Shahram Taherzadeh. 2014 The Open University. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 142 Answer - SAQ 2 It shows that the human
More informationCOMPARATIVE ANALISIS OF SEVERAL ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENTS PACS: Bh
COMPARATIVE ANALISIS OF SEVERAL ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENTS PACS: 43.58.Bh J. González Suárez 1 ; M. Machimbarrena Gutiérrez 1 ; A.Tarrero Fernández. 2 ; T. Lorenzana Lorenzana 3 ; A. Moreno Arranz
More informationTransmission loss of rectangular silencers using meso-porous and micro-perforated linings
Transmission loss of rectangular silencers using meso-porous and micro-perforated linings T.E.Vigran Acoustic Group, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Norwegian University of Science and
More informationACOUSTIC INTRINSIC PERFORMANCES OF NOISE BARRIERS: ACCURACY OF IN SITU MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
Twelfth International Congress on Sound and Vibration ACOUSTIC INTRINSIC PERFORMANCES OF NOISE BARRIERS: ACCURACY OF IN SITU MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES Francesco Asdrubali, Giulio Pispola and Francesco D Alessandro
More informationWHITE PAPER. Challenges in Sound Measurements Field Testing JUNE 2017
WHITE PAPER Challenges in Sound Measurements Field Testing JUNE 2017 1 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Sound propagation, simplified approach 3 Sound propagation at ideal conditions 5 Sound propagation
More informationinter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE
Copyright SFA - InterNoise 2000 1 inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering 27-30 August 2000, Nice, FRANCE I-INCE Classification: 0.0 BACKSCATTERING
More informationSound power level measurement in diffuse field for not movable sources or emitting prominent discrete tones
CFA 2018 - Le Havre Sound power level measurement in diffuse field for not movable sources or emitting prominent discrete tones F. Bessaca et P. Cellardb a CETIAT, Domaine Scientifique de la Doua, 25,
More informationThe frequency and angular dependence of the absorption coefficient of common types of living plants
The frequency and angular dependence of the absorption coefficient of common types of living plants Jevgenjia PRISUTOVA 1 ; Kirill V. HOROSHENKOV 1 ; Jean-Philippe GROBY 2 ; Bruno BROUARD 2 1 1 Department
More informationEvaluation of standards for transmission loss tests
Evaluation of standards for transmission loss tests M. Cassidy, R. K Cooper, R. Gault and J. Wang Queen s University Belfast, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Ashby Building, Stranmillis
More informationISO 354 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Acoustics Measurement of sound absorption in a reverberation room
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 354 Second edition 2003-05-15 Acoustics Measurement of sound absorption in a reverberation room Acoustique Mesurage de l'absorption acoustique en salle réverbérante Reference
More informationMeasurement of airflow resistance by the alternating flow method
Measurement of airflow resistance by the alternating flow method Wittstock, Volker Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Germany. Schmelzer, Martin Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Germany. Summary
More informationA Transfer Matrix Method for Estimating the Dispersion and Attenuation of Plane Waves in a Standing Wave Tube
Purdue University Purdue e-pubs Publications of the Ray W. Herrick Laboratories School of Mechanical Engineering 2009 A Transfer Matrix Method for Estimating the Dispersion and Attenuation of Plane Waves
More informationISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Acoustics Acoustic insulation for pipes, valves and flanges
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 15665 First edition 2003-08-15 Acoustics Acoustic insulation for pipes, valves and flanges Acoustique Isolation acoustique des tuyaux, clapets et brides Reference number ISO
More informationAcoustics Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors Part 2: General method of calculation
ISO 9613-2 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD First edition 1996-12-15 Acoustics Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors Part 2: General method of calculation Acoustique Attenuation du son lors de sa propagation
More informationThe measurement of complex acoustical properties of homogeneous materials by means of impulse response in a plane wave tube
The measurement of complex acoustical properties of homogeneous materials by means of impulse response in a plane wave tube Paolo Bonfiglio, Francesco Pompoli, Nicola Prodi Dipartimento di Ingegneria,
More informationImprovement of the Delany-Bazley and Miki models for fibrous sound-absorbing materials
Acoust. Sci. & Tech. 9, (8) PAPER #8 The Acoustical Society of Japan Improvement of the Delany-Bazley and s for fibrous sound-absorbing materials Takeshi Komatsu Industrial Research Institute of Shizuoka
More informationCOMPARISON OF THE METHODS TO CALIBRATE THE DIFFUSE FIELD SENSITIVITY OF LABORATORY STAND- ARD MICROPHONE
COMPARISON OF THE METHODS TO CALIBRATE THE DIFFUSE FIELD SENSITIVITY OF LABORATORY STAND- ARD MICROPHONE Wan-Ho Cho, Hyu-Sang Kwon, and Ji-Ho Chang Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Center
More informationMeasurement of Acoustic Properties of light weight concrete SL-Deck
DELTA Test Report TEST Reg. no. 100 Measurement of Acoustic Properties of light weight concrete SL-Deck Performed for Abeo A/S Project no.: I100486 Page 1 of 25 30 June 2014 DELTA Venlighedsvej 4 2970
More informationStandard Test Method for Field Measurement of Sound Power Level by the Two- Surface Method 1
Designation: E 1124 97 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS 100 Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA 19428 Reprinted from the Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Copyright ASTM Standard Test Method
More informationACCURACY AND PRECISION IN TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION
ACCURACY AND PRECISION IN TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION Wolfgang Probst DataKustik GmbH, Greifenberg, Germany wolfgang.probst@datakustik.de Abstract Traffic is the main source responsible for unacceptable exposure
More informationDETERMINATION OF AIRBORNE SOUND POWER LEVELS EMITTED BY GEAR UNITS
DETERMINATION OF AIRBORNE SOUND POWER LEVELS EMITTED BY GEAR UNITS CONTENTS... PAGE 0 SCOPE... 4 1 REFERENCE... 4. 2. TERMS. DEFINITIONS AND UNITS... 4 3. INSTRUMENTATION... 6 4. TEST REQUIREMENTS... 6
More informationCONSOLIDATED GRANULAR MEDIA FOR SOUND INSULATION: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION THROUGH DIFFERENT METHODS
Twelfth International Congress on Sound and Vibration CONSOLIDATED GRANULAR MEDIA FOR SOUND INSULATION: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION THROUGH DIFFERENT METHODS G. Pispola a and K. V. Horoshenkov b a Department
More informationOn the declaration of the measurement uncertainty of airborne sound insulation of noise barriers
On the declaration of the measurement uncertainty of airborne sound insulation of noise barriers Massimo Garai and Paolo Guidorzi 2,2 University of Bologna - DIN Viale Risorgimento 2, 036 Bologna, Italy
More informationIn-situ measurements of the complex acoustic impedance of materials in vehicle interiors
19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007 In-situ measurements of the complex acoustic impedance of materials in vehicle interiors Leonardo Miranda Group Research/Vehicle Concepts,
More informationREFLECTION AND ABSORPTION OF SOUND, IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF ROAD SURFACE - USING MICROFLOWN SURFACE IMPEDANCE METER
REFLECTION AND ABSORPTION OF SOUND, IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF ROAD SURFACE - USING MICROFLOWN SURFACE IMPEDANCE METER *Nasim Akhtar 1, Kafeel Ahmad 2 and S. Gangopadhyay 3 1 Transport Planning Division, CSIR-Central
More informationROOM RESONANCES USING WAVE BASED GEOMET- RICAL ACOUSTICS (WBGA)
ROOM RESONANCES USING WAVE BASED GEOMET- RICAL ACOUSTICS (WBGA) Panos Economou, Panagiotis Charalampous P.E. Mediterranean Acoustics Research & Development Ltd, Cyprus email: panos@pemard.com Geometrical
More informationTHE ACOUSTIC SOURCE STRENGTH OF HIGH-ENERGY BLAST WAVES: COMBINING MEASUREMENTS AND A NON-LINEAR MODEL
Proceedings of 20 th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 2010 23-27 August 2010, Sydney, Australia THE ACOUSTIC SOURCE STRENGTH OF HIGH-ENERGY BLAST WAVES: COMBINING MEASUREMENTS AND A NON-LINEAR
More informationERRATA AND ADDITIONS FOR "ENGINEERING NOISE CONTROL" 4th Edn. First printing April 23, 2018
ERRATA AND ADDITIONS FOR "ENGINEERING NOISE CONTROL" 4th Edn. First printing April 3, 08 p4, Eq..3 should not have the ± symbol on the RHS p36, 3 lines from the bottom of the page, replace cos b with cos
More informationAn integrated approach to Acoustics - sound propagation and the phenomena affecting it
An integrated approach to Acoustics - sound propagation and the phenomena affecting it IOA LONDON BRANCH EVENING MEETING, WSP PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF PRESENTATION BY PANOS ECONOMOU OF PEMARD, 19 TH APRIL
More information1. Introduction. 2. ISO 3745 and ISO standard comparison
Acoustic performance analysis of anechoic chambers based on ISO 3745 and ISO 26101: standards comparison and performance analysis of the anechoic chamber at the University of Split Mladen Russo Luka Kraljević
More informationTHE DEPENDENCE OF SOUND ABSORPTION BY AN ISOLATED ACOUSTIC RESONATOR ON THE RESONATOR S VOLUME
THE DEPENDENCE OF SOUND ABSORPTION BY AN ISOLATED ACOUSTIC RESONATOR ON THE RESONATOR S VOLUME PACS REFERENCE: 4.55.Ev Stauskis Vytautas J. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Sauletekio al., LT-4 Vilnius.
More informationinter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE
Copyright SFA - InterNoise 2000 1 inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering 27-30 August 2000, Nice, FRANCE I-INCE Classification: 7.2 LABORATORY MEASUREMENT
More informationNotes on Absorption and Impedance Measurements
Notes on Absorption and Impedance Measurements Andrew F. Seybert University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 456-18 859-257-6336 x 8645 seybert@engr.uky.edu Applicable Standards. There are two standards 1,2 for
More informationProduct Data. Brüel & Kjær B. Sound Intensity Calibrator Type 3541
Product Data Sound Intensity Calibrator Type 3541 USES: Sound intensity and particle velocity calibrations Sound pressure calibration Measurement of pressure-residual intensity index FEATURES: Intensity
More informationISSUES ON THE REVERBERATION ROOM METHOD FOR MEASURING THE SCATTERING COEFFICIENTS -BORTHER SETTING AND REVOLUTION OF TEST SAMPLE-
ISSUES ON THE REVERBERATION ROOM METHOD FOR MEASURING THE SCATTERING COEFFICIENTS -BORTHER SETTING AND REVOLUTION OF TEST SAMPLE- Hyojin LEE 1 ; Yuzo TSUCHIYA 2 ; Tetsuya SAKUMA 3 1,2,3 Graduate School
More informationModeling Measurement Uncertainty in Room Acoustics P. Dietrich
Modeling Measurement Uncertainty in Room Acoustics P. Dietrich This paper investigates a way of determining and modeling uncertainty contributions in measurements of room acoustic parameters, which are
More informationAvailable online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 78 (2015 ) th International Building Physics Conference, IBPC 2015
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Energy Procedia 78 (2015 ) 128 133 6th International Building Physics Conference, IBPC 2015 Sound insulation of building elements at low frequency:
More informationUsing windscreens to improve the efficiency of noise barriers in wind: finite-difference time-domain simulations
Using windscreens to improve the efficiency of noise barriers in wind: finite-difference time-domain simulations PACS REFERENCE: 43.8.Js, 43.8.Gq, 43.5.Gf Van Renterghem Timothy; Botteldooren Dick University
More informationComparison of Noise Test Codes when Applied to air Compressors
VDI-Berichte Nr. 1932, 2006 A 6 83 Comparison of Noise Test Codes when Applied to air Compressors Michael J. Lucas, INCE Bd. Cert., Ingersoll-Rand Company, Davidson/NC INTRODUCTION Beginning January 2004,
More informationREPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS OF WOVEN IMAGE ECHO PANEL 7MM TESTED WITH A 20MM AIR GAP IN A REVERBERATION ROOM.
REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS OF WOVEN IMAGE ECHO PANEL 7MM TESTED WITH A 20MM AIR GAP IN A REVERBERATION ROOM. Testing Procedure: AS ISO 354-2006 Testing Laboratory: Client:
More informationPart 2: Methods for special reverberation test rooms
Provläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 3743-2 Second edition 2018-02 Acoustics Determination of sound power levels of noise sources using sound pressure Engineering methods for small,
More informationDELTA Test Report. DANAK TEST Reg. no Measurement of Sound Absorption Coefficient for Kvadrat Soft Cells Wall Panel Type Time
We help ideas meet the real world DELTA Test Report DANAK TEST Reg. no. 100 Measurement of Sound Absorption Coefficient for Kvadrat Soft Cells Wall Panel Type Time Client: Kvadrat Soft Cells A/S Page 1
More informationinter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE
Copyright SFA - InterNoise 2000 1 inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering 27-30 August 2000, Nice, FRANCE I-INCE Classification: 7.5 IMPEDANCE CONSIDERATION
More informationThis is a repository copy of An application of Kozeny Carman flow resistivity model to predict the acoustical properties of polyester fibre.
This is a repository copy of An application of Kozeny Carman flow resistivity model to predict the acoustical properties of polyester fibre. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/93426/
More informationWitold MIKULSKI. Central Institute for Labour Protection National Research Institute Czerniakowska 16, Warszawa, Poland;
ARCHIVES OF ACOUSTICS Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 177 183 (2013) Copyright c 2013 by PAN IPPT DOI: 10.2478/aoa-2013-0020 Method of Determining the Sound Absorbing Coefficient of Materials within the Frequency
More informationUsers Manual. Marshall Day Acoustics. Double Panels Contact 33 Details Marshall Day 37.8 Acoustics PO Box
New materials can be permanently entered into the materials.txt file. This is a simple ASCII text file. See the section New Materials for details of how to enter new materials. If desired you can send
More informationTest Report. RI Acoustic Lab. Measurement of Sound Absorption Coefficient for RockDelta NoiStop Noise Barrier. 20 Feb. 07
Test Report RI Acoustic Lab Measurement of Sound Absorption Coefficient for RockDelta NoiStop Noise Barrier 20 Feb. 07 Title Measurement of Sound Absorption Coefficient for RockDelta NoiStop Noise Barrier
More informationUsing an ambisonic microphone for measurement of the diffuse state in a reverberant room
Proceedings of 20 th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 2010 23-27 August 2010, Sydney, Australia Using an ambisonic microphone for measurement of the diffuse state in a reverberant room John Bassett
More informationMethod of Measuring Machinery Sound Within an Equipment Space
ANSI/AHRI Standard 575 (Formerly ARI Standard 575) 2008 Standard for Method of Measuring Machinery Sound Within an Equipment Space Price $15.00 (M) $30.00 (NM) Printed in U.S.A. 8Copyright 1994, by Air-Conditioning
More informationNonlinear parabolic equation model for finite-amplitude sound propagation in an inhomogeneous medium over a non-flat, finite-impedance ground surface
Nonlinear parabolic equation model for finite-amplitude sound propagation in an inhomogeneous medium over a non-flat, finite-impedance ground surface T. Leissing a, P. A H Jean a, J. Defrance a and C.
More informationSound field decomposition of sound sources used in sound power measurements
Sound field decomposition of sound sources used in sound power measurements Spyros Brezas Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt Germany. Volker Wittstock Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt Germany.
More informationAcoustic Quantities. LMS Test.Lab. Rev 12A
Acoustic Quantities LMS Test.Lab Rev 12A Copyright LMS International 2012 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Acoustic quantities... 5 Section 1.1 Sound power (P)... 5 Section 1.2 Sound pressure... 5 Section
More informationChalmers Publication Library
Chalmers Publication Library A scale model study of parallel urban canyons This document has been downloaded from Chalmers Publication Library (CPL). It is the author s version of a work that was accepted
More informationPorous Materials for Sound Absorption and Transmission Control
Purdue e-pubs Publications of the Ray W. School of Mechanical Engineering 8-2005 Porous Materials for Sound Absorption and Transmission Control J Stuart Bolton, bolton@purdue.edu Follow this and additional
More informationSOUND ABSORPTION OF SLAT STRUCTURES FOR PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
SOUND ABSORPTION OF SLAT STRUCTURES FOR PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS J Riionheimo N Näveri T Lokki H Möller Aalto University, Akukon Ltd. Helsinki, Finland Akukon Ltd. Helsinki, Finland Aalto University, Espoo,
More informationContents. Page 1 of 12
Contents Calculation method for road traffic noise Description of the calculation method NMPB General comment on the similarities and differences of NMPB with the END and on the possible use as Interim
More informationIntroduction to Acoustics Exercises
. 361-1-3291 Introduction to Acoustics Exercises 1 Fundamentals of acoustics 1. Show the effect of temperature on acoustic pressure. Hint: use the equation of state and the equation of state at equilibrium.
More informationPRODUCT DATA. Sound Intensity Calibrator Type 3541-A. Uses and Features
PRODUCT DATA Sound Intensity Calibrator Type 3541-A Type 3541-A enables calibration of sound intensity measuring instruments by using a coupler designed especially for sound intensity calibrations. Intensity-probe
More informationStandard ECMA-108 3rd Edition - December Measurement of High-frequency Noise emitted by Information Technology and Telecommunications Equipment
Standard ECMA-108 3rd Edition - December 1996 Standardizing Information and Communication Systems Measurement of High-frequency Noise emitted by Information Technology and Telecommunications Equipment
More informationIn situ estimation of acoustic impedance on the surfaces of realistic interiors: an inverse approach
In situ estimation of acoustic impedance on the surfaces of realistic interiors: an inverse approach Gabriel Pablo Nava, Yoichi Sato, Shinichi Sakamoto Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo,
More information1817. Research of sound absorption characteristics for the periodically porous structure and its application in automobile
1817. Research of sound absorption characteristics for the periodically porous structure and its application in automobile Xian-lin Ren School of Mechatronics Engineering, University of Electronic Science
More informationIn Situ Measurements of Acoustic Properties of Surfaces
In Situ Measurements of Acoustic Properties of Surfaces by Scott W. Mallais A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Science
More informationCross-spectral Matrix Diagonal Reconstruction
Cross-spectral Matrix Diagonal Reconstruction Jørgen HALD 1 1 Brüel & Kjær SVM A/S, Denmark ABSTRACT In some cases, measured cross-spectral matrices (CSM s) from a microphone array will be contaminated
More informationLaboratory and In Situ Sound Absorption Measurement under a Synthetized Diffuse Acoustic Field: a Case Study on Five Materials
Laboratory and In Situ Sound Absorption Measurement under a Synthetized Diffuse Acoustic Field: a Case Study on Five Materials Olivier Robin, Celse Kafui Amedin, Alain Berry, Noureddine Atalla, Olivier
More informationExperimental investigation of perforations interactions effects under high sound pressure levels
Experimental investigation of perforations interactions effects under high sound pressure levels Rostand Tayong and Philippe Leclaire Laboratoire de Recherche en Mécanique et Acoustique Université de Bourgogne,
More informationInfluence of loudspeaker directivity on the measurement uncertainty of the acoustic testing of facades.
Influence of loudspeaker directivity on the measurement uncertainty of the acoustic testing of facades. Antonio Pedrero, José Luis Sánchez, Vladimir Ulin and César Díaz ABSTRACT One of the most significant
More informationAPPENDIX B. Noise Primer
APPENDIX B Noise Primer NOISE PRIMER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...1 2. BASIC SOUND PRINCIPLES...1 2.1. SOUND AS A WAVE...1 2.2. SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL...2 2.2.1. Decibel Math...4 2.2.2. Descriptive
More informationDetermination of sound absorption coefficient in impedance tubes according to ISO (2 appendices)
issued by an Accredited Testing Laboratory Date Reference Page 2011-05-16 PX03759-02-5A 1 (3) Contact person Xuetao Zhang Energy Technology +46 10 516 50 21, xuetao.zhang@sp.se SP Wood Technology Att:
More informationEFFECTS OF PERMEABILITY ON SOUND ABSORPTION AND SOUND INSULATION PERFORMANCE OF ACOUSTIC CEILING PANELS
EFFECTS OF PERMEABILITY ON SOUND ABSORPTION AND SOUND INSULATION PERFORMANCE OF ACOUSTIC CEILING PANELS Kento Hashitsume and Daiji Takahashi Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University email: kento.hashitsume.ku@gmail.com
More informationTFI Report Sound Absorption Impact Sound Insulation
TFI Report 481380-01 Sound Absorption Impact Sound Insulation Customer NEWSPEC CARPET (NINGBO) CO. LTD Cevin Yindong South Road NO. 399 315100 Ningbo CHINA VR Product textile floor covering This report
More informationLateral directivity of aircraft noise
Acoustics 8 Paris Lateral directivity of aircraft noise W. Krebs and G. Thomann Empa, Ueberlandstrasse 128, 86 Duebendorf, Switzerland walter.krebs@empa.ch 13 Acoustics 8 Paris A three-dimensional model
More informationNumerical modeling of the primary source in a hemi-anechoic room
Numerical modeling of the primary source in a hemi-anechoic room R. Arina 1, K. Völkel 2 1 Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy 2 Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, Germany ABSTRACT An
More informationMeasuring system for sound source location for a systematic design modification of electrical machines
Measuring system for sound source location for a systematic design modification of electrical machines Roland Lach, Stefan Soter Institute of Electrical Machines, Drives and Power Electronics University
More informationBenefits of Reduced-size Reverberation Room Testing
Benefits of Reduced-size Reverberation Room Testing Dr. Marek Kierzkowski (1), Dr. Harvey Law (2) and Jonathon Cotterill (3) (1) Acoustic Engineer, Megasorber Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia (2) Technical
More informationSIMPLE APPLICATION OF STI-METHOD IN PREDICTING SPEECH TRANSMISSION IN CLASSROOMS. Jukka Keränen, Petra Larm, Valtteri Hongisto
SIMPLE APPLICATION OF STI-METHOD IN PREDICTING SPEECH TRANSMISSION IN CLASSROOMS Jukka Keränen, Petra Larm, Valtteri Hongisto Finnish Institute of Occupational Health Laboratory of Ventilation and Acoustics
More informationEfficient outdoor sound propagation modelling in time-domain
Efficient outdoor sound propagation modelling in time-domain Timothy Van Renterghem Acoustics Group Department of Information Technology Ghent University/iMinds CEAS, X-Noise : Atm. and ground effects
More informationErik Sloth Vestas. Niels Christian Møller Nielsen VESTAS Ejler Kristensen BONUS Energy Bo Søndergaard DELTA
Problems related to the use of the existing noise measurement standards when predicting noise from wind turbines and wind farms. Erik Sloth Vestas Niels Christian Møller Nielsen VESTAS Ejler Kristensen
More informationImpedance of standard impact sources and their effect on impact sound pressure level of floors
Impedance of standard impact sources and their effect on impact sound pressure level of floors B. Zeitler and T. Nightingale NRC - Institute for Research in Construction, 1 Montreal Road, Building M-7,
More informationInfluence of directivity and spectral shape on the measured sound power level
Influence of directivity and spectral shape on the measured sound power level K. Voelkel 1, V. Wittstock Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, Germany ABSTRACT The sound power is the main
More informationQualitative behaviour of L1 and L2 standard deviation in insulations measurements according to standard UNE EN ISO 140-4
Qualitative behaviour of L and L standard deviation in insulations measurements according to standard UNE EN ISO 4-4 María A. Navacerrada, Cesar Díaz and Antonio Pedrero Grupo de Acústica Arquitectónica,
More informationA discussion on the uncertainty of absorption characteristics measured by ensemble averaging technique for room acoustics simulations
Challenges and Solutions in Acoustical Measurements and Design: Paper ICA2016-325 A discussion on the uncertainty of absorption characteristics measured by ensemble averaging technique for room acoustics
More informationPaseo Recoletos, nº Madrid TEST REPORT
LGAI LGAI Technological Center, S.A. Campus de la UAB Apartado de Correos 18 E - 08193 BELLATERRA (Barcelona) T +34 93 567 20 00 F +34 93 567 20 01 www.applus.com 9/LE766 Bellaterra: June 5 th, 2012 File
More informationAcoustic response in non-diffuse rooms
Acoustic response in non-diffuse rooms Jack Harvie-Clark Apex Acoustics, Gateshead, United Kingdom. Nicholas Dobinson Apex Acoustics, Gateshead, United Kingdom. Richard Hinton Apex Acoustics, Gateshead,
More information45º CONGRESO ESPAÑOL DE ACÚSTICA 8º CONGRESO IBÉRICO DE ACÚSTICA EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON SMART CITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACOUSTICS
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES OF THE SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENT OF A MATERIAL ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO DE LAS TÉCNICAS DE MEDIDA DEL COEFICIENTE DE ABSORCIÓN SONORA DE UN MATERIAL PACS:
More informationGesellschaft für Akustikforschung Dresden mbh Acoustic Engineering Dresden AED Acoustic Measuring Instruments & Analysis Software
Gesellschaft für Akustikforschung Dresden mbh Acoustic Engineering Dresden AED Acoustic Measuring Instruments & Analysis Software Overview Measuring Systems AcoustiFlow Airflow resistivity meter AcoustiAdrienne
More informationNumber Title Year Organization Page
Id Number Title Year Organization Page 19690 S1.1 Acoustical Terminology Errata; ASA 111 R(1999) 1994 ASA 0 19691 S1.4 Specification for Sound Level Meters ASA 47-1983 1983 ASA 0 19692 S1.6 Preferred Frequencies,
More informationSOUND TRANSMISSION LOSS MEASUREMENTS - AN AUTOMOTIVE OVERVIEW
NSA-15 Goa National Symposium on Acoustics Acoustics for Ocean Environment SOUND TRANSMISSION LOSS MEASUREMENTS - AN AUTOMOTIVE OVERVIEW Paresh Shravage Alfa Acoustics Pune, Maharashtra 1133, India e-mail:
More informationConstruction noise database (phase 3): Evaluation of established measurement protocol
Construction noise database (phase 3): Evaluation of established measurement protocol Waddington, DC and Moorhouse, AT Title Authors Type URL Published Date 2006 Construction noise database (phase 3):
More information