arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 20 Apr 2016
|
|
- Wendy Jordan
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Average distance of random pure states from the maximally entangled and coherent states Kaifeng Bu,, Uttam Singh,, Lin Zhang, 3, and Junde Wu, School of Mathematical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 3007, PR hina Harish-handra Research Institute, Allahabad, 09, India 3 Institute of Mathematics, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 3008, PR hina arxiv: v [quant-ph] 0 Apr 06 It is well known that random bipartite pure states are typically maximally entangled within an arbitrarily small error. Showing that the marginals of random bipartite pure states are typically extremely close to the maximally mixed state, is a way to prove the above. However, a more direct way to prove the above is to estimate the distance of random bipartite pure states from the set of maximally entangled states. Here, we find the average distance between a random bipartite pure state and the set of maximally entangled states as quantified by three different quantifiers of the distance and investigate the typical properties of the same. We then consider random pure states of a single quantum system and give an account of the typicality of the average l norm of coherence for these states scaled by the maximum value of the l norm of coherence. We also calculate the variance of the l norm of coherence of random pure states to elaborate more on the typical nature of the scaled average l norm of coherence. Moreover, We compute the distance of a random pure state from the set of maximally coherent states and obtain the average distance. I. ITRODUTIO The typicality of various quantities such as the quantum entanglement [ 3] and the diagonal entropy (the entropy of the diagonal part of a density matrix in a fixed basis [4] has been proved very fruitful. In particular, the existence of typicality helps in the reduction of computational complexity of these quantities which is extremely relevant for the systems having higher dimensional Hilbert spaces. Also, the typicality of quantum entanglement of random bipartite pure states sampled from the uniform Haar measure provides a satisfactory explanation to the equal a priori postulate of the statistical physics [5, 6]. Recently, in the context of metrology [7 0], it has been proved that random pure states sampled from the uniform Haar measure typically do not lead to the superclassical scaling of precision, however, random states from the symmetric subspace typically lead to the optimal Heisenberg scaling []. The key ingredient in the proof of all these results is the concentration of measure phenomenon, in particular Lévy s lemma []. The remarkable result that random bipartite pure states are typically maximally entangled within vanishingly small error has been obtained by proving that the reduced density matrices corresponding to random bipartite pure states are typically very close to the maximally mixed state. However, here we present a direct way to investigate this feature of random bipartite pure states by finding the distance of Haar distributed bipartite pure states from the set of maximally entangled states. This results in various finer details of the problem of the typicality of quantum entanglement. We also find a complementarity type relationship between this distance and the negativity a computable measure of entanglement of Haar distributed bipartite pure states and further delineate the typicality of negativity. bkf@zju.edn.cn uttamsingh@hri.res.in linyz@zju.edu.cn wjd@zju.edn.cn Recent advances in the fields of quantum thermodynamics [3 3] and quantum biology [4 9] suggest the crucial role of quantum superposition in various physical processes and have led to the development of various resource theories of quantum coherence [30 34]. This has ignited a great deal of interest towards proposing various measures of quantum coherence[3, 35 4], establishing its connection to the other characteristic traits of quantum physics such as entanglement [43] and providing operational meaning to the quantifiers of coherence [44, 45]. In the spirit of finding the typical coherence content of random quantum states, the average relative entropy of coherence of random pure and mixed quantum states sampled from various probability measures has been calculated and shown to be typical [46, 47]. The immense importance of these results has been shown explicitly in estimating analytically the typical entanglement content of a specific class of random bipartite mixed states, which is an extremely difficult task for higher dimensional quantum systems [47]. However, not much is known of the typicality of the l norm of coherence, which is one of the computable measures of quantum coherence [3], of the Haar-distributed pure quantum states. In this work, we calculate the expected value and the variance of l norm of coherence of Haar distributed pure sates of a single quantum system and show that the average l norm of coherence does not show the typicality, however, the average l norm of coherence scaled by its maximum value does show the typicality. In particular, we find that the ratio of the average l norm of coherence and its maximum value for most of the Haar distributed pure quantum states is concentrated around the fixed value π/4. Furthermore, similar to the entanglement case, we investigate the average distance between a random pure state and the set of the maximally coherent states with respect to three different distance measures. The paper is organized as follows. We start with giving an exposition of the quantum coherence and other preliminaries in Sec. II. In Sec. III we prove the concentration of negativity and calculate the average distance between random pure states and the set of maximally entangled states employing three different distance measures. We calculate the expected value and variance of the l norm of coherence for Haar distributed pure
2 quantum states in Sec. IV. In Sec. V we find the average value of the distance between Haar distributed pure quantum states and the set of maximally coherent states. Furthermore, we calculate the average value of the α-classical purity and show its typicality in Sec. VI. Finally, we conclude in Sec. VII with a discussion on the results presented in this work. II. PRELIMIARIES Here we present the relevant basic tools and concepts that are required for presenting our main results. Quantum coherence. In the pursuit of finding natural restricted class of operations (allowed operations for an operationally motivated resource theory of coherence, various resource theories of coherence have been developed very recently [30 34]. We consider here a measure of coherence, namely, the l norm of coherence introduced in the resource theory of coherence based on the incoherent operations [3]. For a d dimensional quantum system in a state ρ and a fixed reference basis { i }, the l norm of coherence l (ρ is defined as l (ρ := d i ρ j. ( i,j= We emphasize that the notion of coherence is intrinsically basis dependent and applicable to finite dimensional systems. Lévy s lemma (see [] and []. Let G : S k R be a Lipschitz continuous function from the k-sphere to the real line with a Lipschitz constant η (with respect to the Euclidean norm. Let a point z S k is chosen uniformly at random. Then for any ε > 0, (k + ε Pr { G(z EG > ε } exp ( 9π 3 η, ( ln where EG is the expected value of G. Measures of distance (see [48]. We consider three different distance measures, namely, the trace distance, the Hilbert- Schmidt distance and the Bures distance for our purposes. ( The trace distance between two quantum states ρ and σ is defined as [ ] ρ σ := Tr (ρ σ. (3 ( The Hilbert-Schmidt distance between two quantum states ρ and σ, induced by the Hilbert-Schmidt scalar product, is defined as ρ σ := Tr [(ρ σ ]. (4 (3 The Bures distance between two quantum states ρ and σ is defined as D B (ρ, σ = ( Tr [ (ρ / σρ / /]. (5 The Dirichlet integral. The Dirichlet distribution [49] of order with parameters α = (α, α,..., α, denoted by Dir( α, has a probability density function on the simplex = { (x,..., x p(x,..., x ; α = (α x αi i (6 x i =, x i 0 for i }. i Γ(αi The normalization constant (α = Γ( αi comes from the Dirichlet integral [50] on the simplex, which is given by III. x α x α dx dx = ( Γ(α i.(7 Γ α i DISTAE OF A RADOM PURE STATE FROM THE SET OF MAXIMALLY ETAGLED STATES onsider a bipartite quantum system H A H B (dimh A = dimh B = in a state ψ AB. The state admits the Schmidt decomposition as ψ AB = λi φ i A ϕ i B. If all λ i =, then such a state is called maximally entangled state. Denote by M E, the set of alimally entangled pure states. ow, we consider the distance between a pure state ψ AB = ψ AB ψ AB and the set M E of the maximally entanglement states. Using the distance measures, given in Eqs. (3, (4 and (5, we have D Tr (ψ AB, M E := inf ψ AB φ AB φ AB M E ( = λi. (8 D HS (ψ AB, M E := inf ψ AB φ AB φ AB M E = ( λi = D T r (ψ AB, M E. (9 D B (ψ AB, M E := inf D B (ψ AB, φ AB φ AB M E = ( λi. (0 The above distances show complementarity with a computable measure of entanglement, namely, the negativity [5].
3 3 For a bipartite state ρ AB, the negativity across the bipartition A : B is defined as ρ T B AB (ρ AB =, ( where T B denotes the partial transpose with respect to the subsystem B. For a pure state ψ AB = λi φ i A ϕ i B, the negativity is given by (ψ AB = ( λi. ( The maximum value of negativity, denoted by max, is equal. ow, we have (see also [5] to D Tr (ψ AB, M E + (ψ AB = max ; 8 (3 D HS (ψ AB, M E + (ψ AB = max. 4 (4 The meaning of the complementary relations (Eqs. (3 and (4 is easy to grasp: the larger the negativity of a state ψ AB, the closer it is to the maximally entangled state and vice versa. ext we discuss the concentration of measure phenomenon for the negativity of random bipartite pure quantum states. A. oncentration of the negativity around its average value The average value of negativity E ψab = (ψab dψ AB over Haar distributed pure quantum states has been calculated in Ref. [53] and it is demonstrated numerically that in the limit it is a constant multiple of the maximal negativity, i.e., E ψab max. (5 Moreover, in Ref. [53], the numerical evidence of concentration of (scaled negativity around its average value is provided. Here we give an analytical proof of the concentration of (scaled negativity based on the concentration of measure phenomenon []. But before we proceed further, we find the Lipschitz constant for the negativity in the following. Proposition. Let ψ AB H A H B with dimh A = = dimh B. Then, the Lipschitz constant for the function : ψ AB (ψ AB is less than /, i.e., for two states ψ AB H A H B and φ AB H A H B (ψ AB (φ AB ψ AB φ AB. (6 Proof. Suppose the Schmidt coefficients of ψ AB = ψ AB ψ AB and φ AB = φ AB φ AB are { λ i } and { µ i }, respectively. Based on the definition of negativity, we have (ψ AB (φ AB = [Tr ρ A ] [Tr σ A ] = [Tr ρ A ] [Tr Uσ A U ], where ρ A and σ A are the reduced states of ψ AB and φ AB, respectively, and U is a unitary operator. ote that F (ρ, I/ = Tr( ρ, where F (ρ, σ := Tr( ρσ ρ is the fidelity between states ρ and σ. This implies that (ψ AB (φ AB = F (ρa, I/ F (Uσ A U, I/ F (ρ A, Uσ A U, (7 where the last inequality follows from the fact that [54, 55] F (ρ, τ F (σ, τ F (ρ, σ, for any states ρ, σ and τ. From Lemma of Ref. [56] and Uhlmann s theorem [57, 58], we have max U F (ρ A, Uσ A U = ψ AB φ AB λ i µ i, λ i µ i, where λ i and µ i denote that { λ i } and { µ i } are listed in the decreasing order. Thus, there exists a unitary operator U such that F (ρ A, Uσ A U ψ AB φ AB. Therefore, using Eq. (7 and the fact that ψ AB φ AB = ψab φ AB, we have (ψ AB (φ AB ψ AB φ AB. (8 This completes the proof of the proposition. ow, applying Lévy s lemma (see Eq. ( to the function s : ψ AB (ψ AB / max := s (ψ AB and using the above proposition, we have Pr { s (ψ AB E ψab s > ε } exp ( 6( ε 9π 3. (9 ln The above equation is a statement of concentration of (scaled negativity around its average value. Together with Eq. (5 we have that for large values of, most of the random bipartite pure states have (scaled negativity equal to within an arbitrarily small error. ext, we compute the average values of distances given by Eqs. (8, (9 and (0.
4 4 B. Typicality of the average values of D Tr(ψ AB, M E, D HS(ψ AB, M E and D B(ψ AB, M E The average values of the distances E ψab D Tr (ψ AB, M E and E ψab D HS (ψ AB, M E can be obtained by integrating the complementarity relations (3 and (4, respectively. ow using Eq. (5, we have E ψab D Tr(ψ AB, M E.85, E ψab D HS(ψ AB, M E To establish typicality of E ψab D Tr (ψ AB, M E and E ψab D HS (ψ AB, M E, we need Lipschitz constants for the functions G : ψ AB D Tr (ψ AB, M E := G (ψ AB and G : ψ AB D HS (ψ AB, M E := G (ψ AB, respectively. Let us consider two bipartite pure states ψ AB and φ AB. ote that G (ψ AB G (φ AB = 8 (ψ AB (φ AB ψ AB φ AB. (0 Here in first line, we have used the complementarity relation given by Eq. (3 and in the second line we have used Proposition. Similarly, G (ψ AB G (φ AB = 4 (ψ AB (φ AB ψ AB φ AB. ( Having found the Lipschitz constants for the functions G (ψ AB and G (ψ AB, we apply Lévy s lemma to the functions G (ψ AB and G (ψ AB. This establishes that DTr (ψ AB, M E and DHS (ψ AB, M E concentrate around their respective average values as. As it is a proven fact that Haar distributed bipartite states are maximally entangled states [], it is a bit surprising that in most of the states maintain a finite nonzero distance from the set of maximally entangled states in contrast to our expectations that most states should have this distance very close to zero. However, the point that in most of the states maintain a finite nonzero distance from the set of maximally entangled state makes sense in the view that for most of the random bipartite pure states (scaled negativity doesn t tend to one. This may mean that the distances cons idered i n this work explains the entanglement features as seen by the negativity. ow, we compute the expected value of DB (ψ AB, M E. The joint distribution of Schmidt coefficients Λ = (λ,..., λ for a bipartite system with subsystems being of equal dimensions is given by [59] P (ΛdΛ = δ( λ i (λ i λ j dλ k, i<j k= where is the normalization constant, δ is the Dirac delta function and dλ = [ k= dλ k. Since DB (ψ AB, M E = ( ] λi, we only need to calculate λi P (ΛdΛ. ( We introduce new variables q i = tλ i such that [53, 60, 6] Q(qdq i<j (q i q j e qm dq m m= = e t t P (ΛdΛdt, (3 where q i [0, and t = q i. Integrating both sides of Eq. (3, we obtain that the normalization constant is equal to Q/Γ(, where Q Q(qdq =! m= Γ(m [53, 6]. Thus, qi Q(qdq = Q Γ( + / Γ( λi P (ΛdΛ. (4 The product i<j (q i q j is the square of the Van der Monde determinant [53, 60, 6] q q (q i q j =. i<j.... q q Γ(L 0 (q Γ(L 0 (q Γ(L (q Γ(L (q = c..... (5. Γ(L (q Γ(L (q The second determinant in Eq. (5 is due to the fact that the determinant does not change when we add a multiple of one row to another. The factor c = ± depends on. The polynomials L k (x are Laguerre polynomials [50], defined as L k (x := ex d k k! dx k (e x x k, for k 0. (6 The Laguerre polynomials satisfy 0 dxe x L i (xl j (x = δ ij. (7 ow, we are ready to compute the following integral: qi Q(qdq qi = = i<j σ,τ S ( sgn(σ+sgn(τ (q i q j dq m m= Γ(σ(iΓ(τ(i dq i qi e qi L σ(i (q i L τ(i (q i m i = Γ(σ(mΓ(τ(m σ S m= = (! dq m e qm L σ(m (q m L τ(m (q m Γ(σ(m dq i qi e qi L σ(i (q i L σ(i (q i ( Γ(m m= k= I (/,
5 5 where S is the permutation group on {,..., } and I (α ij is defined as [53, 6] Thus, It implies that I (α ij = 0 qi Q(qdq =! λi P (ΛdΛ = e x x α L i (xl j (xdx. (8 = Q where I (/ is given by [53] I (/ = ( k k! Γ(m ( I (/ m= ( k= I (/ k= ( Γ( Γ( I (/, (9 + / k= k n=0 ( k n [Γ(n + 3/] n!γ(n k + 3/. (30 Thus, the average value of DB (ψ AB, M E over Haardistributed pure states is given by [ ( Γ( ] Γ( I (/. (3 + / k= onsider the map G : ψ AB D B (ψ AB, M E := G(ψ AB. Then, similar to the reasoning as in the proof of Proposition, we have D B (ψ AB, M E D B(φ AB, M E = F (ρ A, I/ F (Uσ A U, I/ F (ρ A, Uσ A U ψ AB φ AB. (3 Thus, the Lipschitz constant for the function G : ψ AB DB (ψ AB, M E can be taken to be. ow, using Lévy s lemma we establish that DB (ψ AB, M E concentrates around its expected value as. Again the average distance E ψab DB (ψ AB, M E is finite and nonzero in contrast to our expectations (see Figure. Furthermore, we ask how close the reduced state ρ A of ψ AB to the maximally mixed state. Let H be a complex Hilbert space, then for any two positive semidefinite operators ρ and σ in H [6], we have ρ σ ρ σ. (33 ow, taking ρ = ρ A where ρ A is the reduced state of ψ AB and σ = I, we obtain ρ A I DB(ψ AB, M E.. Average Bures distance κ FIG.. The plot of the average Bures distance of random bipartite pure states from the set of maximally entangled states as a function of κ such that = κ. It shows that as we increase, the Bures distance approaches to a fixed value which is close to (see Eq. 3. Thus, E ψab ρ A I E ψab DB(ψ AB, M E. The average value of DB (ψ AB, M E over Haar-distributed pure states approaches to a fixed value which is close to. Thus, we see that the average value of ρa I will not tend to zero in limit. IV. TYPIALITY OF THE AVERAGE l ORM OF OHEREE OF RADOM PURE STATES For a random pure state ψ = ( λ e iθ,..., λ e iθ T, the joint distribution of { λ i } will be the uniform {( distribution on a simplex := λ,..., λ } λ i =, λ i 0 for i and is given by [46] ( p c (ΛdΛ = Γ(δ λ i dλ i. (34 where dλ = k= dλ k. This distribution is a special Dirichlet distribution [49]. Moreover, moments of such uniform Dirichlet-distributed random variables can be written as [49] [ ] Γ( E λ αi i = Γ( + α i Γ( + α i. (35 This will be crucial for our calculations. The l norm of coherence for the pure state ψ = ( λ e iθ,..., λ e iθ T is given by l (ψ = ( λi λ j = λi. (36 Here and in the rest parts of the paper we have ψ = ψ ψ. The average value of the l norm of coherence over all pure
6 6 states, denoted by E ψ l (ψ, is defined as E ψ l (ψ := d(ψl (ψ, which can be easily calculated as E ψ l (ψ = d(ψ l (ψ = Γ( λi λj δ( λ i dλ i ( π =, 4 where we have made use of the Dirichlet s integral (cf. [5]. In the dimensional case, the maximum value of the l norm of coherence is given by. Therefore, E ψ l (ψ = π , (37 4 which holds for any dimension. However, the expected value of the relative entropy of coherence over all pure states has been shown to be [46] E ψ r (ψ = /k. (38 k= When is very large, k= /k ln( + γ, where γ is Euler s constant [50]. Besides the maximal relative entropy of coherence of an dimensional quantum system is r max = ln(. Thus, E ψ r (ψ max r as, (39 which is very different from the case of l norm of coherence. In Ref.[46], the authors have shown the concentration of measure phenomenon for relative entropy coherence based on the Levy s Lemma. In the following, we show that l norm of coherence does not show the concentration phenomenon. Theorem (o concentration for the l norm of coherence. Let ψ be a random pure state in dimensional Hilbert space, then the probability that l (ψ is not close to π 4 ( is nonzero even for very large, i.e., for any ε > 0 { l Pr (ψ π } 4 ( > ε exp ( 4ε 9π 3. ln (40 Proof. We use Lévy s lemma (Eq. ( to prove the theorem. For this, we need to find the Lipschitz constant for the l norm of coherence, i.e., l : ψ l (ψ, where ψ H. Let ψ = ψ i i and φ = φ i i. ow, similar to Proposition, it can be shown that l (ψ l (φ ψ φ. (4 Thus, the Lipschitz constant η for the l norm of coherence, i.e., l : ψ l (ψ, where ψ H, is less than. Take ψ = and φ = i, then l (ψ l (φ = and ψ φ =. Then η, when is large. Thus, η can be taken to be, as is very large. Having obtained the Lipschitz constant and the average value of the l norm of coherence, we are ready to use Lévy s lemma (Eq. (, which for any ε > 0 reads as { l Pr (ψ π } 4 ( > ε exp ( 4ε 9π 3. ln This completes the proof of the theorem. Theorem tells that the probability that the l norm of coherence does not concentrate around ( π/4 is nonvanishing in the limit. Thus, based on Levy s Lemma, we proved that the l norm of coherence does not show the concentration phenomenon. However, in the following we show that the scaled l norm of coherence l (ψ concentrates around π/4 for very large values of. This is consequence of the following corollary to the above theorem. orollary 3. Let ψ be a random pure state in an dimensional Hilbert space, then the probability that l (ψ is not close to π 4 is bounded from above by an exponentially small number when is large, i.e., for any ε > 0 { } l (ψ Pr π 4 > ε exp ( 4( ε 9π 3. ln (4 Proof. From Theorem, the Lipschitz constant for the function l (ψ is given by ( as for any two pure states ψ and φ, we have l (ψ (φ l ψ φ. (43 ( ow, applying Lévy s lemma to the function l (ψ, the proof follows. orollary 3 shows that the probability that l (ψ is not close to π 4 is close to zero for sufficiently large. Therefore, l (ψ max l shows concentration phenomenon, although l (ψ does not show the same. This point can also be seen from the calculation of the variance D ψ l (ψ of the l norm of coherence of Haar distributed pure states, where D ψ l (ψ = E ψ l (ψ (E ψ l (ψ. (44 ( 4 Based on the following formula [53], λi = + ( i,j,k= i,j= λi λ j + λ i λ j + 4 λ i λj λ k + k
7 7 i,j,k,l= k l λi λ j λ k λ l, we have [ l (ψ = ( λi = λ i λ j + 4 i,j= i,j,k= k ] Thus, E ψ l (ψ = d(ψl (ψ λ i λj λ k + i,j,k,l= k l λi λ j λ k λ l. will concentrate around its average value as increases to infinity. In fact, let Y be a random variable with expected value EY and variance DY, then the hebyshev s inequality [63], implies Pr ( l (ψ max l Pr( Y EY > ε DY ε E ψ l (ψ max l > ε D ψ l (ψ max l ε. (45 The right hand side will tend to zero as increases to infinity. This is in agreement with orollary 3. = Γ( [ = = + i,j,k,l= k l + λ i λ j + 4 i,j= i,j,k= k λi λ j λ k λ l ] δ( Γ( Γ( k l k Γ( Γ( + (Γ(3 4 ( ( ( 3 π + 6( + + Also, we have ( +. (E ψ l (ψ = Using above equations, we have λ i λj λ k λ i dλ i Γ( Γ( + Γ(3 ( ( π + ( π. 6 D ψ l (ψ = E ψ l (ψ (E ψ l (ψ = 6( + [ (6 5π + (7π 3π + 3 ]. The variance of the l norm of coherence D ψ l (ψ O( and therefore will tend to infinity as increases to infinity. The variance of l (ψ is given by l (ψ D ψ = ( D ψ l (ψ = 6( [ (6 5π + (7π 3π + 3 ]. For, D l (ψ ψ goes to zero. As the variance measures the spread of a set of data around the average (mean value, the l norm of coherence will not concentrate around its average value while the scaled l norm of coherence l (ψ V. DISTAE OF A RADOM PURE STATE FROM THE SET OF MAXIMALLY OHERET STATES AD ITS TYPIALITY Given a state ψ = λi e iθi i, we ask how far this state is from the set M of maximally coherent states. The maximally coherent states are given by φ = j= j in the resource theory of coherence [3, eiθj 4]. We first consider the trace distance and the Hilbert- Schmidt distance and then the Bures distance as the distance measures. A. The trace distance and the Hilbert-Schmidt distance From Eqs. (3 and (4, we have Tr (ψ, M := inf ψ φ φ M ( = λi ; HS (ψ, M := inf ψ φ φ M = ( λi. Since HS (ψ, M is equivalent to Tr (ψ, M up to a factor, we only need to consider Tr (ψ, M here. From l (ψ = ( Thus, we have λi, we have Tr (ψ, M = ( l (ψ + = l (ψ. (46 Tr (ψ, M + l (ψ = 4. (47 Similarly for Hilbert-Schmidt norm we have HS (ψ, M + l (ψ =. (48
8 8 ow, integrating both sides of Eq. (47, we get d(ψ 4 Tr(ψ, M + d(ψ l (ψ =. Defining RMS Tr = d(ψ Tr (ψ, M, we have RMS Tr = (4 π, which for approaches to 4 π In the following, we show the concentration of the distance Tr (ψ, M around its average value. Proposition 4. Let ψ be a random pure state in H with dimh =. Then, the probability that Tr (ψ, M is not close to (4 π is bounded from above by an exponentially small number when is large, i.e., for any ε > 0 P Tr exp ( ε 36π 3, (49 ln where P Tr = Pr { Tr (ψ, M (4 π > ε }. Proof. onsider the functional G : ψ G(ψ = Tr (ψ, M. Then, Tr(ψ, M Tr(φ, M = 4 l (ψ l (φ ψ φ, where in the last line, we have used Eq. (4. Then, Lipschitz constant for Tr (ψ, M is η. ow, from Lévy s lemma, the proof of the proposition follows. B. Bures distance The Bures distance between a random pure state ψ = λi e iθi i and the set M of maximally coherent states is given by B (ψ, M : = inf D B(ψ, φ φ M = ( λi. (50 Let us calculate E ψ B (ψ, M = d(ψ B (ψ, M. d(ψ B(ψ, M = Γ(( λi δ( λ i dλ i = λi Γ( δ( λ i dλ i = Γ( Γ( 3 Γ( + = ( B,, where the beta function B(x, y is defined as B(x, y := 0 tx ( t y dt for Re x > 0 and Re y > 0 [50]. Moreover, B(x, y can be written as B(x, y = Γ(xΓ(y Γ(x+y [50]. In the limit, Γ( π / e [50]. Then B(, π, which implies E ψ B (ψ, M π 0.75 as. Moreover, similar to Proposition 4, we have the following proposition. Proposition 5. Let ψ be random pure state in H with dimh =. Then, the probability that B (ψ, M is not close to B(, is bounded from above by an exponentially small number when is large, i.e., for any ε > 0 P B exp ( ε 9π 3, (5 ln { where P B = Pr B (ψ, M ( } B(, > ε. Proof. onsider the map G : ψ B (ψ, M. Then, similar to the DB (ψ AB, M E case, B(ψ, M B(φ, M ψ φ. Thus, the Lipschitz constant for the function G : ψ B (ψ, M can be taken to be. ow, applying Lévy s Lemma to the function G : ψ B (ψ, M, the proof of the proposition follows. While it is natural to consider the distance between a random pure state ψ and the set M of maximally coherent states, the distance between the diagonal part of a random pure state and the maximally mixed state can also be viewed as a quantifier to measure how far ψ is away from the maximally coherent state. Here, the diagonal part of a random pure state ψ = λi e iθi i is denoted by ψ (d = diag { λ, λ,..., λ }. In Ref. [46], an explicit formula for the average trace distance between the diagonal part ψ (d of a random pure state ψ and the maximally mixed state I is obtained, and is given by E ψ ψ (d I ( =. (5 In limit, E ψ ψ (d I e. We wonder if there is any connection between the quantity ψ (d I and the three distances that we have defined in the preceding paragraphs. Similar to the entanglement case, we find that B (ψ, M is a lower bound of ψ (d I. Using Eq. (33 with ρ = ψ (d and σ = I, we obtain ψ(d I B(ψ, M. Thus, E ψ ψ (d I E ψ B(ψ, M. As we have elaborated, the average distances between a random pure state and the set of the maximally coherent
9 9 states, namely, RMS Tr (similarly RMS HS and RMS B and E ψ ψ (d I do not tend to zero in the limit. This is consistent with the fact that E ψ l (ψ = π 4 for any dimension. VI. AVERAGE α-lassial PURITY AD ITS TYPIALITY The classical purity P cl (ρ with respect to a fixed measurement basis { i } i of a state ρ is defined as P cl (ρ := Tr[(ρ (d ], where ρ (d = i i ρ i i i is the diagonal part of ρ in the basis { i } i. The classical purity has been shown to be related to the l norm of coherence [64]. Moreover, in catalytic coherence transformations as in Ref. [65] the functions of the form Pcl α(ρ := Tr[(ρ(d α ] appear naturally. We call Pcl α (ρ α-classical purity of ρ and it can be seen as a generalization of the classical purity. Here we calculate the expected value of the α-classical purity of pure states for α (0, (, +. Let ψ (d = {λ,... λ } denotes the diagonal part of the pure state ψ in a fixed basis, then the expected α-classical purity is given by E ψ Tr[(ψ (d α ] = p c (Λλ α i dλ = Γ(α + Γ( +. (53 Γ(α + Here p c (ΛdΛ is given by Eq. (34. For α >, E ψ Tr[(ψ (d α ] tends to zero as increases to infinity. Moreover, amazingly, we will show that Tr[(ψ (d α ] will concentrate to 0 for α > as. First, the variance of Tr[(ψ (d α ] can be expressed as ( D ψ Tr[(ψ (d α ] = E ψ (Tr[(ψ (d α ] E ψ Tr[(ψ (d ] α, It is easy to see that for α >, D ψ Tr[(ψ (d α ] 0, as. Thus, by the hebyshev inequality [63], Tr[(ψ (d α ] concentrates to 0 as. However, for 0 < α < D ψ Tr[(ψ (d α ] as. Thus, as the variance measures the spread of a set of data around the average (mean value, it seems that there is no concentration phenomenon for α-classical purity in α (0,. VII. OLUSIO In this work, we have investigated the average distance of Haar distributed pure quantum states from the set of maximally entangled and coherent states in order to delineate the typical properties of the average entanglement and average l norm of coherence. The average distance of Haar distributed bipartite pure quantum states from the set of maximally entangled states is typically nonzero in the limit of larger Hilbert space dimensions which is unexpected. We further demonstrate the typicality of l norm of coherence scaled by the maximum value of the l norm of coherence by finding E ψ l (ψ/ = π 4 and utilizing Lévy s lemma. This is in contrast to the case of relative entropy of coherence for which E ψ r (ψ/r max as, where r (ψ = Tr ( ψ (d ln ψ (d with ψ (d being the diagonal part of ψ i n the gi ven reference basis. Here we have obtained the average l norm of coherence of random pure states, however, the average l norm of coherence for random mixed states is still unknown and it will be interesting to obtain it. Also, for pure states, we have following relationship l (ψ max { r (ψ, r(ψ } [66] between the l norm of coherence and the relative entropy of coherence, but we don t know whether this relationship holds in the case of mixed states too. It will be insightful to pursue this problem in future. and E ψ (Tr[(ψ (d α ] = p c (Λλ α i dλ + i p c (Λλ α i λ α j dλ AKOWLEDGMETS Thus = Γ( + Γ( + α [Γ(α + + ( Γ(α + ]. D ψ Tr[(ψ (d α ] = Γ( + Γ( + α [Γ(α + + ( Γ(α + ] Γ(α + Γ( + Γ(α + U.S. acknowledges a research fellowship of Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India. L.Z. acknowledges the ational atural Science Foundation of hina (o.304 for support. J.W. is supported by the atural Science Foundations of hina (Grants o.730 and o and the Doctoral Programs Foundation of the Ministry of Education of hina (Grant o. J [] P. Hayden, D. Leung, P. W. Shor, and A. Winter, ommun. Math. Phys. 50, 37 (004. [] P. Hayden, D. W. Leung, and A. Winter, ommun. Math. Phys. 65, 95 (006.
10 0 [3] B. ollins and I. echita, J. Math. Phys. 57, 055 (06. [4] O. Giraud and I. García-Mata, arxiv: [5] S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, at. Phys., 754 (006. [6] S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and. Zanghì, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, (006. [7] V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Science 306, 330 (004. [8] V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 0040 (006. [9] V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, at. Photon. 5, (0. [0] G. Tóth and I. Apellaniz, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, (04. [] M. Oszmaniec, R. Augusiak,. Gogolin, J. Kołodyński, A. Acín, and M. Lewenstein, arxiv: [] M. Ledoux, The oncentration of Measure Phenomenon (American Mathematical Society, 005. [3]. A. Rodríguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, and A. Aspuru- Guzik, arxiv: [4] M. Horodecki and J. Oppenheim, at. ommun. 4, 059 (03. [5] P. Skrzypczyk, A. J. Short, and S. Popescu, at. ommun. 5, 485 (04. [6] V. arasimhachar and G. Gour, at. ommun. 6, 7689 (05. [7] F. Brandão, M. Horodecki,. g, J. Oppenheim, and S. Wehner, Proc. atl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 375 (05. [8] M. Lostaglio, D. Jennings, and T. Rudolph, at. ommun. 6, 6383 (05. [9] M. Lostaglio, K. Korzekwa, D. Jennings, and T. Rudolph, Phys. Rev. X 5, 000 (05. [0] P. Ćwikliński, M. Studziński, M. Horodecki, and J. Oppenheim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 0403 (05. [] B. Gardas and S. Deffner, Phys. Rev. E 9, 046 (05. [] A. Misra, U. Singh, M.. Bera, and A. K. Rajagopal, Phys. Rev. E 9, 046 (05. [3] J. Goold, M. Huber, A. Riera, L. del Rio, and P. Skrzypczyk, arxiv: [4] M. B. Plenio and S. F. Huelga, ew J. Phys. 0, 309 (008. [5] F. Levi and F. Mintert, ew J. Phys. 6, (04. [6] P. Rebentrost, M. Mohseni, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, J. Phys. hem. B 3, 994 (009. [7] S. Lloyd, J. Phys.: onf. Ser. 30, 0037 (0. [8].-M. Li,. Lambert, Y.-. hen, G.-Y. hen, and F. ori, Sci. Rep., 885 (0. [9] S. Huelga and M. Plenio, ontemp. Phys. 54, 8 (03. [30] G. Gour and R. W. Speens, ew J. Phys. 0, (008. [3] I. Marvian and R. W. Speens, Phys. Rev. A 90, 060 (04. [3] T. Baumgratz, M. ramer, and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 4040 (04. [33] A. Streltsov, arxiv: [34] E. hitambar and G. Gour, arxiv: [35]. apoli, T. R. Bromley, M. ianciaruso, M. Piani,. Johnston, and G. Adesso, arxiv: [36] M. Piani, M. ianciaruso, T. R. Bromley,. apoli,. Johnston, and G. Adesso, arxiv: [37]. Killoran, F. E. S. Steinhoff, and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, (06. [38] D. Girolami, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 7040 (04. [39] E. hitambar, A. Streltsov, S. Rana, M.. Bera, G. Adesso, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, (06. [40] A. Streltsov, S. Rana, M. ath Bera, and M. Lewenstein, arxiv: [4] E. hitambar and M.-H. Hsieh, arxiv: [4] Y. Peng, Y. Jiang, and H. Fan, Phys. Rev. A 93, 0336 (06. [43] A. Streltsov, U. Singh, H. S. Dhar, M.. Bera, and G. Adesso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, (05. [44] A. Winter and D. Yang, arxiv: [45] U. Singh, M.. Bera, A. Misra, and A. K. Pati, arxiv: [46] U. Singh, L. Zhang, and A. K. Pati, Phys. Rev. A 93, 035 (06. [47] L. Zhang, U. Singh, and A. K. Pati, arxiv: [48] M. M. Wilde, Quantum Information Theory (ambridge University Press, 03. [49] B. A. Frigyik, A. Kapila, and M. R. Gupta, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Washignton, UWEETR (00. [50] G. E. Andrews, R. Askey, and R. Roy, Special Functions (ambridge University Press, 999. [5] G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 65, 0334 (00. [5] Z. Puchała, Ł. Pawela, and K. Życzkowski, arxiv: [53] A. Datta, Phys. Rev. A 8, 053 (00. [54] A. E. Rastegin, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 5, S647 (003. [55] L. Zhang, L. hen, and K. Bu, Quantum Inf. Process. 4, 475 (05. [56] G. Vidal, D. Jonathan, and M. A. ielsen, Phys. Rev. A 6, 0304 (000. [57] A. Uhlmann, Rep. Math. Phys. 9, 73 (976. [58] R. Jozsa and B. Schumacher, J. Mod. Opt. 4, 343 (994. [59] S. Lloyd and H. Pagels, Annals of Physics 88, 86 (988. [60] S. Sen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, (996. [6] A. J. Scott and. M. aves, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36, 9553 (003. [6] J. Watrous, Theory of quantum information (Unpublished, 0. [63] O. Kallenberg, Foundations of modern probability (Springer Science & Business Media, 006. [64] S. heng and M. J. W. Hall, Phys. Rev. A 9, 040 (05. [65] K. Bu, U. Singh, and J. Wu, Phys. Rev. A 93, 0436 (06. [66] S. Rana, P. Parashar, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. A 93, 00 (06.
arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 30 Apr 2018
Estimating Coherence Measures from Limited Experimental Data Available Da-Jian Zhang,, 2 C. L. Liu, Xiao-Dong Yu, and D. M. Tong, Department of Physics, Shandong University, Jinan 25000, China 2 Department
More informationValerio Cappellini. References
CETER FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS OF THE POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIECES WARSAW, POLAD RADOM DESITY MATRICES AD THEIR DETERMIATS 4 30 SEPTEMBER 5 TH SFB TR 1 MEETIG OF 006 I PRZEGORZAłY KRAKÓW Valerio Cappellini
More informationMax-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig Coherence of Assistance and Regularized Coherence of Assistance by Ming-Jing Zhao, Teng Ma, and Shao-Ming Fei Preprint no.: 14 2018
More informationCoherence, Discord, and Entanglement: Activating one resource into another and beyond
586. WE-Heraeus-Seminar Quantum Correlations beyond Entanglement Coherence, Discord, and Entanglement: Activating one resource into another and beyond Gerardo School of Mathematical Sciences The University
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 12 Sep 2017
APS/13-QED Quantum uncertainty relation using coherence Xiao Yuan, 1 Ge Bai, Tianyi Peng, 1 and Xiongfeng Ma 1, 1 Center for Quantum Information, Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua
More informationEinselection without pointer states -
Einselection without pointer states Einselection without pointer states - Decoherence under weak interaction Christian Gogolin Universität Würzburg 2009-12-16 C. Gogolin Universität Würzburg 2009-12-16
More informationMP 472 Quantum Information and Computation
MP 472 Quantum Information and Computation http://www.thphys.may.ie/staff/jvala/mp472.htm Outline Open quantum systems The density operator ensemble of quantum states general properties the reduced density
More informationMax-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig
Max-Planc-Institut für Mathemati in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig Uncertainty Relations Based on Sew Information with Quantum Memory by Zhi-Hao Ma, Zhi-Hua Chen, and Shao-Ming Fei Preprint no.: 4 207
More informationOn PPT States in C K C M C N Composite Quantum Systems
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 42 (2004) pp. 25 222 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 42, No. 2, August 5, 2004 On PPT States in C K C M C N Composite Quantum Systems WANG Xiao-Hong, FEI
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 17 Nov 2014
REE From EOF Eylee Jung 1 and DaeKil Park 1, 1 Department of Electronic Engineering, Kyungnam University, Changwon 631-701, Korea Department of Physics, Kyungnam University, Changwon 631-701, Korea arxiv:1404.7708v3
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 5 Jun 2015
Entanglement and swap of quantum states in two qubits Takaya Ikuto and Satoshi Ishizaka Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima, 739-8521, Japan (Dated:
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 21 Oct 2013
Genuine hidden quantum nonlocality Flavien Hirsch, 1 Marco Túlio Quintino, 1 Joseph Bowles, 1 and Nicolas Brunner 1, 1 Département de Physique Théorique, Université de Genève, 111 Genève, Switzerland H.H.
More informationCompression and entanglement, entanglement transformations
PHYSICS 491: Symmetry and Quantum Information April 27, 2017 Compression and entanglement, entanglement transformations Lecture 8 Michael Walter, Stanford University These lecture notes are not proof-read
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 24 May 2011
Geometry of entanglement witnesses for two qutrits Dariusz Chruściński and Filip A. Wudarski Institute of Physics, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Grudzi adzka 5/7, 87 100 Toruń, Poland May 25, 2011 arxiv:1105.4821v1
More informationIs the world more classical or more quantum?
Is the world more classical or more quantum? A. Lovas, A. Andai BUTE, Department of Analysis XXVI International Fall Workshop on Geometry and Physics Braga, 4-7 September 2017 A. Lovas, A. Andai Is the
More informationNON-GAUSSIANITY AND PURITY IN FINITE DIMENSION
International Journal of Quantum Information Vol. 7, Supplement (9) 97 13 c World Scientific Publishing Company NON-GAUSSIANITY AND PURITY IN FINITE DIMENSION MARCO G. GENONI, and MATTEO G. A. PARIS,,
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 7 Apr 2014
Quantum Chernoff bound as a measure of efficiency of quantum cloning for mixed states arxiv:1404.0915v [quant-ph] 7 Apr 014 Iulia Ghiu Centre for Advanced Quantum Physics, Department of Physics, University
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 26 Sep 2018
Tightening the entropic uncertainty relations for multiple measurements and applying it to quantum coherence H. Dolatkhah Department of Physics, University of Kurdistan, P.O.Box 6677-575, Sanandaj, Iran
More informationDistribution of Bipartite Entanglement of a Random Pure State
Distribution of Bipartite Entanglement of a Random Pure State Satya N. Majumdar Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modèles Statistiques,CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, France Collaborators: C. Nadal (Oxford
More informationTHE INTERFEROMETRIC POWER OF QUANTUM STATES GERARDO ADESSO
THE INTERFEROMETRIC POWER OF QUANTUM STATES GERARDO ADESSO IDENTIFYING AND EXPLORING THE QUANTUM-CLASSICAL BORDER Quantum Classical FOCUSING ON CORRELATIONS AMONG COMPOSITE SYSTEMS OUTLINE Quantum correlations
More informationNullity of Measurement-induced Nonlocality. Yu Guo
Jul. 18-22, 2011, at Taiyuan. Nullity of Measurement-induced Nonlocality Yu Guo (Joint work with Pro. Jinchuan Hou) 1 1 27 Department of Mathematics Shanxi Datong University Datong, China guoyu3@yahoo.com.cn
More informationDECAY OF SINGLET CONVERSION PROBABILITY IN ONE DIMENSIONAL QUANTUM NETWORKS
DECAY OF SINGLET CONVERSION PROBABILITY IN ONE DIMENSIONAL QUANTUM NETWORKS SCOTT HOTTOVY Abstract. Quantum networks are used to transmit and process information by using the phenomena of quantum mechanics.
More informationSemidefinite programming strong converse bounds for quantum channel capacities
Semidefinite programming strong converse bounds for quantum channel capacities Xin Wang UTS: Centre for Quantum Software and Information Joint work with Runyao Duan and Wei Xie arxiv:1610.06381 & 1601.06888
More informationQuantum Fisher information and entanglement
1 / 70 Quantum Fisher information and entanglement G. Tóth 1,2,3 1 Theoretical Physics, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Bilbao, Spain 2 IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain
More informationEstimating entanglement in a class of N-qudit states
Estimating entanglement in a class of N-qudit states Sumiyoshi Abe 1,2,3 1 Physics Division, College of Information Science and Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China 2 Department of Physical
More informationMajorization-preserving quantum channels
Majorization-preserving quantum channels arxiv:1209.5233v2 [quant-ph] 15 Dec 2012 Lin Zhang Institute of Mathematics, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China Abstract In this report, we give
More informationRESOURCE THEORIES OF QUANTUM COHERENCE AND ENTANGLEMENT
RESOURCE THEORIES OF QUANTUM COHERENCE AND ENTANGLEMENT By UTTAM SINGH PHYS08201104009 Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad A thesis submitted to the Board of Studies in Physical Sciences In partial
More informationSemidefinite programming strong converse bounds for quantum channel capacities
Semidefinite programming strong converse bounds for quantum channel capacities Xin Wang UTS: Centre for Quantum Software and Information Joint work with Wei Xie, Runyao Duan (UTS:QSI) QIP 2017, Microsoft
More informationPermutations and quantum entanglement
Journal of Physics: Conference Series Permutations and quantum entanglement To cite this article: D Chruciski and A Kossakowski 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 104 012002 View the article online for updates
More informationSome Bipartite States Do Not Arise from Channels
Some Bipartite States Do Not Arise from Channels arxiv:quant-ph/0303141v3 16 Apr 003 Mary Beth Ruskai Department of Mathematics, Tufts University Medford, Massachusetts 0155 USA marybeth.ruskai@tufts.edu
More informationA Holevo-type bound for a Hilbert Schmidt distance measure
Journal of Quantum Information Science, 205, *,** Published Online **** 204 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/**** http://dx.doi.org/0.4236/****.204.***** A Holevo-type bound for a Hilbert Schmidt
More informationEnsembles and incomplete information
p. 1/32 Ensembles and incomplete information So far in this course, we have described quantum systems by states that are normalized vectors in a complex Hilbert space. This works so long as (a) the system
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 3 Jan 2008
A paradigm for entanglement theory based on quantum communication Jonathan Oppenheim 1 1 Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge U.K. arxiv:0801.0458v1 [quant-ph]
More informationVolume of the set of separable states
PHYSICAL REVIEW A VOLUME 58, NUMBER 2 AUGUST 998 Volume of the set of separable states Karol Życzkowski* Institute for Plasma Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 2742 Paweł Horodecki
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 9 Apr 1998
On the volume of the set of mixed entangled states Karol Życzkowski Institute for Plasma Research, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742 USA Pawe l Horodecki Faculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics
More informationFidelity and Metrics of quantum states
Fidelity and Metrics of quantum states Zhi-Hao Ma, Fu-Lin Zhang, Jing-Ling Chen arxiv:08.3453v [quant-ph] ov 008 Abstract Fidelity plays an important role in quantum information theory. In this paper,
More informationAbstract. In this article, several matrix norm inequalities are proved by making use of the Hiroshima 2003 result on majorization relations.
HIROSHIMA S THEOREM AND MATRIX NORM INEQUALITIES MINGHUA LIN AND HENRY WOLKOWICZ Abstract. In this article, several matrix norm inequalities are proved by making use of the Hiroshima 2003 result on majorization
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 28 May 2011
Detection of Multiparticle Entanglement: Quantifying the Search for Symmetric Extensions Fernando G.S.L. Brandão 1 and Matthias Christandl 2 1 Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais,
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 2 Nov 2018
Entanglement and Measurement-induced quantum correlation in Heisenberg spin models arxiv:1811.733v1 [quant-ph] 2 Nov 218 Abstract Indrajith V S, R. Muthuganesan, R. Sankaranarayanan Department of Physics,
More informationMultiplicativity of Maximal p Norms in Werner Holevo Channels for 1 < p 2
Multiplicativity of Maximal p Norms in Werner Holevo Channels for 1 < p 2 arxiv:quant-ph/0410063v1 8 Oct 2004 Nilanjana Datta Statistical Laboratory Centre for Mathematical Sciences University of Cambridge
More informationQuantum Entanglement- Fundamental Aspects
Quantum Entanglement- Fundamental Aspects Debasis Sarkar Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Calcutta, 92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata- 700009, India Abstract Entanglement is one of the most useful
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 24 Dec 2018
QUANTUM INFORMATION GEOMETRY IN THE SPACE OF MEASUREMENTS arxiv:1812.09810v1 [quant-ph] 24 Dec 2018 WARNER A. MILLER Abstract. We introduce a new approach to evaluating entangled quantum networks using
More informationTrivariate analysis of two qubit symmetric separable state
Pramana J. Phys. (8) 9:4 https://doi.org/.7/s4-8-598-x Indian Academy of Sciences Trivariate analysis of two qubit symmetric separable state SPSUMA and SWARNAMALA SIRSI Department of Physics, Yuvaraa s
More informationEntanglement, mixedness, and spin-flip symmetry in multiple-qubit systems
Boston University OpenBU College of General Studies http://open.bu.edu BU Open Access Articles 2003-08-01 Entanglement, mixedness, and spin-flip symmetry in multiple-qubit systems Jaeger, Gregg AMER PHYSICAL
More informationEntanglement versus quantum degree of polarization
Entanglement versus quantum degree of polarization arxiv:1804.04863v1 [quant-ph] 13 Apr 2018 Iulia Ghiu University of Bucharest, Faculty of Physics, Centre for Advanced Quantum Physics, PO Box MG-11, R-077125,
More informationThe general reason for approach to thermal equilibrium of macroscopic quantu
The general reason for approach to thermal equilibrium of macroscopic quantum systems 10 May 2011 Joint work with S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, C. Mastrodonato, and N. Zanghì. Claim macroscopic quantum
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 19 Oct 2016
Hamiltonian extensions in quantum metrology Julien Mathieu Elias Fraïsse 1 and Daniel Braun 1 1 Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Institut für Theoretische Physik, 72076 Tübingen, Germany Abstract arxiv:1610.05974v1
More informationMultipartite Monogamy of the Entanglement of Formation. Abstract
Multipartite Monogamy of the Entanglement of Formation Xian Shi Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese
More informationCapacity Estimates of TRO Channels
Capacity Estimates of TRO Channels arxiv: 1509.07294 and arxiv: 1609.08594 Li Gao University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign QIP 2017, Microsoft Research, Seattle Joint work with Marius Junge and Nicholas
More informationA Condition for Entropy Exchange Between Atom and Field
Commun. Theor. Phys. 57 (2012) 209 213 Vol. 57, No. 2, February 15, 2012 A Condition for Entropy Exchange Between Atom and Field YAN Xue-Qun ( ) and LÜ Yu-Guang (ù ½) Institute of Physics and Department
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 11 Dec 2018
The stabilizer for n-qubit symmetric states Xian Shi Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese Academy
More informationarxiv: v4 [quant-ph] 19 Sep 2017
Coherence depletion in the Grover quantum search algorithm Hai-Long Shi, 1, Si-Yuan Liu, 1, 3, Xiao-Hui Wang,, 3 Wen-Li Yang, 1, 3 Zhan-Ying Yang,, 3 4, 1, 3 and Heng Fan 1 Institute of Modern Physics,
More informationENTANGLEMENT VERSUS QUANTUM DEGREE OF POLARIZATION
Romanian Reports in Physics 70, 104 (2018) ENTANGLEMENT VERSUS QUANTUM DEGREE OF POLARIZATION IULIA GHIU University of Bucharest, Faculty of Physics, Centre for Advanced Quantum Physics, PO Box MG-11,
More informationTheory of Quantum Entanglement
Theory of Quantum Entanglement Shao-Ming Fei Capital Normal University, Beijing Universität Bonn, Bonn Richard Feynman 1980 Certain quantum mechanical effects cannot be simulated efficiently on a classical
More informationExtremal properties of the variance and the quantum Fisher information; Phys. Rev. A 87, (2013).
1 / 24 Extremal properties of the variance and the quantum Fisher information; Phys. Rev. A 87, 032324 (2013). G. Tóth 1,2,3 and D. Petz 4,5 1 Theoretical Physics, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU,
More informationThermodynamics beyond free energy relations or Quantum Quantum Thermodynamics. Matteo Lostaglio Imperial College London
Thermodynamics beyond free energy relations or Quantum Quantum Thermodynamics Matteo Lostaglio Imperial College London David Jennings Kamil Korzekwa This is wind, he is actually slim Terry Rudolph What
More informationOn a Block Matrix Inequality quantifying the Monogamy of the Negativity of Entanglement
On a Block Matrix Inequality quantifying the Monogamy of the Negativity of Entanglement Koenraad M.R. Audenaert Department of Mathematics, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham TW0 0EX, United Kingdom
More informationHilbert Space, Entanglement, Quantum Gates, Bell States, Superdense Coding.
CS 94- Bell States Bell Inequalities 9//04 Fall 004 Lecture Hilbert Space Entanglement Quantum Gates Bell States Superdense Coding 1 One qubit: Recall that the state of a single qubit can be written as
More informationQuantum thermodynamics
Quantum thermodynamics a primer for the curious quantum mechanic Lídia del Rio, ETH Zurich QIP 2017 Seattle This talk is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Why quantum
More informationStrong converse theorems using Rényi entropies
Strong converse theorems using Rényi entropies Felix Leditzky joint work with Mark M. Wilde and Nilanjana Datta arxiv:1506.02635 5 January 2016 Table of Contents 1 Weak vs. strong converse 2 Rényi entropies
More informationQuantification of Gaussian quantum steering. Gerardo Adesso
Quantification of Gaussian quantum steering Gerardo Adesso Outline Quantum steering Continuous variable systems Gaussian entanglement Gaussian steering Applications Steering timeline EPR paradox (1935)
More informationQuantum Entanglement and Measurement
Quantum Entanglement and Measurement Haye Hinrichsen in collaboration with Theresa Christ University of Würzburg, Germany 2nd Workhop on Quantum Information and Thermodynamics Korea Institute for Advanced
More informationMany-Body physics meets Quantum Information
Many-Body physics meets Quantum Information Rosario Fazio Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa & NEST, Istituto di Nanoscienze - CNR, Pisa Quantum Computers Interaction between qubits two-level systems Many-Body
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 14 Nov 2018
Comparing coherence measures for X states: Can quantum states be ordered based on quantum coherence? arxiv:1811.05599v1 [quant-ph] 14 Nov 018 Sandeep Mishra, 1, Kishore Thapliyal,, 3, Anirban Pathak,,
More informationDecay of the Singlet Conversion Probability in One Dimensional Quantum Networks
Decay of the Singlet Conversion Probability in One Dimensional Quantum Networks Scott Hottovy shottovy@math.arizona.edu Advised by: Dr. Janek Wehr University of Arizona Applied Mathematics December 18,
More informationDynamics of Geometric Discord and Measurement-Induced Nonlocality at Finite Temperature. Abstract
Dynamics of Geometric Discord and Measurement-Induced Nonlocality at Finite Temperature Guo-Feng Zhang State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment, Beihang University, Xueyuan Road No. 37,
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 30 Oct 2017
Noname manuscript No (will be inserted by the editor) Lower bound on concurrence for arbitrary-dimensional tripartite quantum states Wei Chen Shao-Ming Fei Zhu-Jun Zheng arxiv:160304716v3 [quant-ph] 30
More informationMathematical Methods for Quantum Information Theory. Part I: Matrix Analysis. Koenraad Audenaert (RHUL, UK)
Mathematical Methods for Quantum Information Theory Part I: Matrix Analysis Koenraad Audenaert (RHUL, UK) September 14, 2008 Preface Books on Matrix Analysis: R. Bhatia, Matrix Analysis, Springer, 1997.
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 26 Mar 2012
Optimal Probabilistic Simulation of Quantum Channels from the Future to the Past Dina Genkina, Giulio Chiribella, and Lucien Hardy Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline Street North,
More informationDistinguishing different classes of entanglement for three qubit pure states
Distinguishing different classes of entanglement for three qubit pure states Chandan Datta Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar chandan@iopb.res.in YouQu-2017, HRI Chandan Datta (IOP) Tripartite Entanglement
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 12 Mar 2016
One-way Quantum Deficit Decoherence for Two-qubit X States Biao-Liang Ye, 1 Yao-Kun Wang,, 3 Shao-Ming Fei 1, 1 School of Mathematical Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 18, China Institute of
More informationEntanglement: concept, measures and open problems
Entanglement: concept, measures and open problems Division of Mathematical Physics Lund University June 2013 Project in Quantum information. Supervisor: Peter Samuelsson Outline 1 Motivation for study
More informationINSTITUT FOURIER. Quantum correlations and Geometry. Dominique Spehner
i f INSTITUT FOURIER Quantum correlations and Geometry Dominique Spehner Institut Fourier et Laboratoire de Physique et Modélisation des Milieux Condensés, Grenoble Outlines Entangled and non-classical
More informationConcentration of Measure Effects in Quantum Information. Patrick Hayden (McGill University)
Concentration of Measure Effects in Quantum Information Patrick Hayden (McGill University) Overview Superdense coding Random states and random subspaces Superdense coding of quantum states Quantum mechanical
More informationarxiv: v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 5 Apr 2018
MIT-CTP/4739 Subsystem Eigenstate Thermalization Hypothesis Anatoly Dymarsky, 1 Nima Lashkari, 2 and Hong Liu 2 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, arxiv:1611.08764v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 5 Apr 2018
More informationThe great conceptual puzzle of statistical mechanics is how a
ARTICL ntanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics ANDU POPCU 1,, ANTHONY J. HORT 1 * AND ANDRA WINTR 3 1 H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol B8
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 23 Jun 2015
Convex ordering and quantification of quantumness arxiv:1004.1944v2 [quant-ph] 23 Jun 2015 J Sperling Arbeitsgruppe Theoretische Quantenoptik, Institut für Physik, Universität Rostock, D-18051 Rostock,
More informationDetecting genuine multipartite entanglement in higher dimensional systems
University of Vienna March 16, 2011 (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 1 / 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (University of Vienna) March 16, 2011 2 / 19 To start with some easy basics (University of Vienna) March
More informationQuantum Thermodynamics
Quantum Thermodynamics In this chapter we wish to give some insights to quantum thermodynamics. It can be seen as an introduction to the topic, however not a broad one but rather an introduction by examples.
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 24 May 2017
A Stronger Multi-observable Uncertainty Relation Qiu-Cheng Song, Jun-Li Li,, Guang-Xiong Peng, and Cong-Feng Qiao,,* Department of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, YuQuan Road 9A, Beijing
More informationQuantum Hadamard channels (II)
Quantum Hadamard channels (II) Vlad Gheorghiu Department of Physics Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA August 5, 2010 Vlad Gheorghiu (CMU) Quantum Hadamard channels (II) August 5, 2010
More informationMax-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den aturwissenschaften Leipzig Genuine multipartite entanglement detection and lower bound of multipartite concurrence by Ming Li, Shao-Ming Fei, Xianqing Li-Jost,
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 6 Sep 2014
Unambiguous discrimination of linearly independent pure quantum states: Optimal average probability of success Somshubhro Bandyopadhyay Department of Physics and Center for Astroparticle Physics and Space
More informationQuantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective
1 / 41 Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective Géza Tóth 1 Theoretical Physics, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Bilbao, Spain 2 IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science,
More informationEntropic Formulation of Heisenberg s Measurement-Disturbance Relation
Entropic Formulation of Heisenberg s Measurement-Disturbance Relation arxiv:1311.7637 QPL 2014, Kyoto, 6. June 2014 Fabian Furrer Joint work with: Patrick Coles @ Different Uncertainty Trade-Offs Uncertainty
More informationRelativistic quantum pseudo-telepathy
Relativistic quantum pseudo-telepathy P. Gawron Ł. Pawela Institute of Theoretical and Applied Informatics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bałtycka 5, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland 09.IX.2014 arxiv:1409.2708v1 [quant-ph]
More informationAlgebraic Theory of Entanglement
Algebraic Theory of (arxiv: 1205.2882) 1 (in collaboration with T.R. Govindarajan, A. Queiroz and A.F. Reyes-Lega) 1 Physics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y. and The Institute of Mathematical
More informationEntanglement: Definition, Purification and measures
Entanglement: Definition, Purification and measures Seminar in Quantum Information processing 3683 Gili Bisker Physics Department Technion Spring 006 Gili Bisker Physics Department, Technion Introduction
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v5 6 Apr 2005
Nonunitary quantum circuit Hiroaki Terashima 1, and Masahito Ueda 1, arxiv:quant-ph/3461v5 6 Apr 5 1 Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 15-8551, Japan CREST, Japan Science and
More informationQuantum NP - Cont. Classical and Quantum Computation A.Yu Kitaev, A. Shen, M. N. Vyalyi 2002
Quantum NP - Cont. Classical and Quantum Computation A.Yu Kitaev, A. Shen, M. N. Vyalyi 2002 1 QMA - the quantum analog to MA (and NP). Definition 1 QMA. The complexity class QMA is the class of all languages
More informationMaximal vectors in Hilbert space and quantum entanglement
Maximal vectors in Hilbert space and quantum entanglement William Arveson arveson@math.berkeley.edu UC Berkeley Summer 2008 arxiv:0712.4163 arxiv:0801.2531 arxiv:0804.1140 Overview Quantum Information
More informationA completely entangled subspace of maximal dimension
isibang/ms/2006/6 March 28th, 2006 http://www.isibang.ac.in/ statmath/eprints A completely entangled subspace of maximal dimension B. V. Rajarama Bhat Indian Statistical Institute, Bangalore Centre 8th
More information1 Quantum states and von Neumann entropy
Lecture 9: Quantum entropy maximization CSE 599S: Entropy optimality, Winter 2016 Instructor: James R. Lee Last updated: February 15, 2016 1 Quantum states and von Neumann entropy Recall that S sym n n
More informationLecture 4: Purifications and fidelity
CS 766/QIC 820 Theory of Quantum Information (Fall 2011) Lecture 4: Purifications and fidelity Throughout this lecture we will be discussing pairs of registers of the form (X, Y), and the relationships
More informationQuantum entanglement and symmetry
Journal of Physics: Conference Series Quantum entanglement and symmetry To cite this article: D Chrucisi and A Kossaowsi 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 87 012008 View the article online for updates and enhancements.
More informationIntroduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann
Introduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Theoretische Physik III Summer school Bleubeuren July 014 Contents 1 Quantum Mechanics...........................
More informationQuantum Systems Measurement through Product Hamiltonians
45th Symposium of Mathematical Physics, Toruń, June 1-2, 2013 Quantum Systems Measurement through Product Hamiltonians Joachim DOMSTA Faculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics Gdańsk University of Technology
More informationClassical and Quantum Channel Simulations
Classical and Quantum Channel Simulations Mario Berta (based on joint work with Fernando Brandão, Matthias Christandl, Renato Renner, Joseph Renes, Stephanie Wehner, Mark Wilde) Outline Classical Shannon
More informationA complete criterion for convex-gaussian states detection
A complete criterion for convex-gaussian states detection Anna Vershynina Institute for Quantum Information, RWTH Aachen, Germany joint work with B. Terhal NSF/CBMS conference Quantum Spin Systems The
More informationRandom Matrix Theory in Quantum Information
Random Matrix Theory in Quantum Information Some generic aspects of entanglement Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 & Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Cécilia Lancien BMC & BAMC 2015 - Cambridge Cécilia
More information