arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 17 Sep 2014

Transcription

1 Can the hint of δ CP from TK also indicate the hierarchy and octant? Monojit Ghosh and Srubabati Goswami Physical Research Laboratory, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad 3 9, India Sushant K. Raut Physical Research Laboratory, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad 3 9, India and Department of Theoretical Physics, School of Engineering Sciences, KTH Royal Institute of Technology AlbaNova University Center, Roslagstullsbacken 1, 1 91 Stockholm, Sweden arxiv:19.5v1 [hep-ph] 17 Sep 1 Introduction: The TK experiment running in the neutrino mode has already provided a hint for the best-fit value of 9 for the leptonic CP phase δ CP. In this paper we show that if this is confirmed by future neutrino runs of TK then that will simultaneously indicate the mass hierarchy to be normal and the octant of the -3 mixing angle to be higher (θ 3 > 5 ). This is due to the fact that with only neutrino data the other combinations of hierarchy and octant admit degenerate solutions at other δ CP values as well, thus precluding an unambiguous hint for δ CP = 9. We also show that the main role of antineutrino data in improving CP sensitivity is to remove the degenerate solutions with the wrong octant of θ 3. Thus the antineutrino run will be useful for those hierarchy and octant combinations where this degeneracy is present. If this degeneracy is absent then better sensitivity is obtained from only neutrino run due to higher statistics. PACS numbers: 1..Pq,1..Lm, g Neutrino physics is currently poised at an interesting juncture. Among the parameters of the neutrino mass matrix, oscillation experiments have measured the mass squared differences 1, 31 ( ij = m i m j ) and the mixing angles (θ 1,θ 3,θ 13 ) with considerable precision. The remaining unknown oscillation parameters are (i) the mass hierarchy: normal hierarchy (NH, m 3 > m > m 1 ) or inverted hierarchy (IH, m 3 < m m 1 ), (ii) octant of θ 3 : θ 3 < 5 (lower octant, LO) or θ 3 > 5 (higheroctant, HO)and(iii)theCP-violatingphaseδ CP. The global analysis of current oscillation data gives no indication of the mass hierarchy. There is also no clear indication of the octant of θ 3. For inverted hierarchy higher octant is preferred while for normal hierarchy the lower octant is preferred [1]. However these indications are still fragile. Recently, an indication for δ CP 9 has been obtained, driven mainly by a combination of TK and reactor data []. This hint comes from TK running in the neutrino mode with % of the expected total flux of TK ( protons on target (pot)) []. In this paper we consider the possibility of determination of the above unknowns in future runs of TK. The relevant channel is the ν µ ν e oscillation probability P µe. This is sensitive to all the three unmeasured parameters described above. However the lack of knowledge of δ CP can give rise to three additional spurious solutions corresponding to wrong hierarchy-right octant, right hierarchy-wrong octant and wrong hierarchy-wrong octant in addition to the correct solution. Thus there is a -fold degeneracy which is a subset of the -fold degeneracy discussed in the literature [3]. These degenerate solutions can occur for different values of δ CP other than the true value making its determination difficult. In this study, we work with the assumption that the current hint of δ CP = 9 coming from TK data will be further confirmed by TK running in its full beam power in only neutrino mode. In that case, we argue that the data will also indicate the true hierarchy as NH and true octant as HO. This is because, for the other combinations of true hierarchy and octant in nature, degenerate solutions occur for wrong values of δ CP, preventing a distinct signature for δ CP = 9. This provides an indirect indication of the hierarchy and octant from TK. Thus, for the first time we show that the TK experiment by itself can give a hint of all three unknowns by running only in neutrino mode. In this context we also elucidate on the role played by antineutrinos in improving CP sensitivity, and identify the cases for which antineutrino runs can be helpful. An early hint of the unknown parameters is useful from the point of view of planning neutrino facilities in future. In addition, knowledge of these parameters provides an important test for neutrino mass models and will therefore significantly influence our search for models of new physics beyond the Standard Model. Degeneracies in P µe : The TK experiment uses the neutrino beam from J- PARC and has a baseline of 95 km. The probability relevant for the measurement of CP violation is [], P µe = s 13s sin (Â 1) 3 (Â 1) +αs 13 sinθ 1 sinθ 3 cos( +δ CP ) sinâ sin(â 1) +O(α ). (1) Â Â 1

2 True NH, True LO = -9 o True NH, True HO = -9 o True IH, True LO = -9 o True IH, True HO = -9 o FIG. 1: δ CP sensitivity of TK neutrino run True NH, True LO = -9 o True NH, True HO = -9 o True IH, True LO = -9 o True IH, True HO = -9 o FIG. : δ CP sensitivity of TK for equal neutrino+antineutrino run (Total pot = 1 1 ) Here s ij (c ij ) sinθ ij (cosθ ij ), = 31 L/E where L is the distance travelled and E is the energy of the neutrino. Â = EV/ 31, where V = G F n e is Wolfenstein s matter potential in terms of the electron density n e. The lack of definite information about hierarchy, octant and δ CP gives rise to two types of degeneracies. They are (i) Hierarchy-δ CP degeneracy: P µe (δ CP, ) = P µe (δ CP, ) i.e. the probability for NH can be mimicked byih and a different δ CP value givingrise to wrong hierarchy-wrong δ CP solutions [3, 5] and (ii) Octant-δ CP ), i.e. the probability in the right octant can be the same as that for wrong octant and a different δ CP giving wrong octantwrong δ CP solutions [, 7]. Hierarchy determination is facilitated if nature has chosen favourable combinations of hierarchy and δ CP {δ CP [ 1, ], NH} and {δ CP [,1 ], IH}), which hold for both neutrinos and antineutrinos []. The situation is different for octant determination. For true LO, the degenerate solutions arise for ({δ CP [ 1, ] and for true HO they occur for {δ CP [,1 ]} in the neutrino mode; for antineutrino mode the behaviour is opposite [9]. This degeneracy : P(θ LO 3,δ CP ) = P(θ HO 3,δ CP feature in the oscillation probability can be understood from the following simple arguments. For neutrinos the values of P µe are higher for NH and lower for IH, and it is opposite for anti-neutrinos. But there is also a flip in the relative sign of δ CP between neutrinos and antineutrinos. That causes the hierarchy-δ CP degeneracy to appear in the same region for both neutrinos and antineutrinos. Onthe otherhand the value ofp µe islowerfor LO and higher for HO for neutrinos as well as antineutrinos. Therefore the octant-δ CP degeneracy behaves differently with neutrinos and antineutrinos. This implies that combination of neutrino and antineutrino channel is helpful for removal of octant-δ CP degeneracy but it does not help in removal of hierarchy-δ CP degeneracy. Results: We simulate the TK experiment using the GLoBES package [1] along with its auxiliary files [11]. We consider TK running a total of 1 1 pot. Event rates have been simulated for various combinations of hierarchy (NH or IH) and octant (LO or HO). Here LO corresponds to θ 3 = 39 and HO corresponds to θ 3 = 51, while NH/IH correspond to 31 = ±. 1 3 ev.

3 3 NH, LO + + NH, HO + + IH, LO + + IH, HO FIG. 3: δ CP discovery potential of TK for various combinations of neutrino+antineutrino runs (in units of 1 1 pot) (a) Hint for hierarchy and octant: Fig. 1, shows the sensitivity of TK to δ CP, for each of the four true combinations in nature,, and. The true value of δ CP in nature is taken to be 9, since we are working with the assumption that the current TK hint will be confirmed in future. In the first panel, is taken as the true combination of hierarchy and octant. The various curves show fits to δ CP for all of the four test combinations, of which one is correct and the other three wrong. Expectedly, the correct combination () gives a best-fit (minimum ) at the true value of δ CP = 9. With as the test combination, we get a best-fit around 135 while with as the test combination, we have a best-fit close to. The combination is seen to be excluded with minimum 3. Therefore, on marginalizing over the hierarchy and octant to find the overall best-fit value of δ CP, one would see allowed values of δ CP around 9, and 135. In other words, there would not be a strong indication for any single value of δ CP from the data. Similar conclusions can be drawn if the true combinations in nature are or, as evidenced from the last two panels. The true combination is the only one, for which one can see an unambiguous signal at 9, as the second panel shows. This is easy to explain, since neutrino probabilities for NH are higher than for IH, and those for HO arehigher thanthose forlo.therefore, it isnot possible for any other combination of parameters to match the high event rates of and create a degeneracy when δ CP = 9. Thus, a hint for δ CP = 9 would also signify normal mass hierarchy and higher octant of θ 3 by elimination of the other options. (b) Impact of antineutrino run: Fig. is obtained using 1 1 pot exposure each in the neutrino and antineutrino modes. This figure demonstrates the actual role of antineutrinos in improving CP sensitivity of TK. As before, the true value of δ CP is assumed to be 9. The first panel for true shows that with equal neutrino-antineutrino data the degenerate solutions with wrong octant and are excluded at > σ confidence level. Similarly for true (third panel) the degenerate solutions corresponding to get disfavoured with the antineutrino run. But since the antineutrinos do not help in solving hierarchy degeneracy, the wrong hierarchy solutions corresponding to arestill allowed. For true case (last panel) the degenerate solutions occurred for and antineutrino run does not help in solving these. Rather the precision for δ CP = 9 i.e the statistical significance with which other δ CP values can be disfavoured, reduces as compared to the full neutrino run because of less statistics. The plot in the second panel is for true. Since thereis nodegeneracy, in this casealsothe CP sensitivity for δ CP = 9 becomes worse with antineutrino run. (c) Discovery of CP violation: Discovering CP violationimpliesdifferentiatingbetweenatruevalueofδ CP from the CP conserving values or 1. In the previoussections, wehaveseenthatexceptfortrue,in all other cases the correct fit δ CP = 9 is accompanied by degenerate solutions around or 1 using only the neutrino data. This affects the CP discovery potential of TK. In this section we examine how far antineutrino run is useful in disfavoring these solutions thereby improving the chanceof discoveringδ CP using variouscombinations of hierarchy and octant. For this purpose the simulated event spectrum is generated for true values of δ CP spanning the range [ 1,1 ). This is compared with the test event spectrum, with δ CP = or 1. In Fig. 3, we plot the CPV discovery potential of TK for different combinations of true hierarchy and octant, NH- HO, and. In the test events, the hierarchy and octant are marginalized over. We present the results for different combinations of neutrino+antineutrino exposures +,, +, and in units of 1 1 pot. Let us consider the behaviour of the for true δ CP = 9. From the first panel, we observe that for true

4 no hint is possible at δ CP = 9 with only neutrino mode. This is because the min occurs for test δ CP =,1 for the test case, as we have already seen in the top left panel of Fig. 1. Thus δ CP = 9 cannotbedistinguishedfromδ CP =,1 since the minima occurs at these values for the wrong hierarchy-wrong octant solutions. These solutions can be disfavoured by antineutrino runs as can be seen from Fig., improving the CP discovery as is seen from the top-left panel of Fig 3. However we find that equal neutrino and antineutrino run is not always the best option. The optimal antineutrino run is determined by the amount of antineutrino data that is required to disfavour thewrongδ CP solutionsoccurringwiththewrongoctant. Once this is accomplished, further antineutrino data is superfluous. In fact, since the antineutrino cross-sections are smaller, such runs suffer from lesser statistics, worsening the sensitivity. Similarly as seen from the third panel of Fig. 3, for the true case, a lower value of min occurs because of the degenerate solutions at δcp test =,1 for. Here, the CP discovery signal gets masked by the wrong-hierarchy solution. For true, the degenerate case can give lower min at δtest CP =,1 and hence once again, no signal for CP discovery is obtained. In both the above cases the CP discovery potential is compromised because of wrong hierarchy solutions. Since hierarchy degeneracy does not get resolved by antineutrino data, including antineutrino run does not improve the in these cases for true δ CP = 9. For true, there are no degenerate wrong octant solutions. Therefore, adding the antineutrino data is not useful for this case as well. If TK were to run in both neutrino and antineutrino mode with equal exposure, then a hint at δ CP = 9 could be an indication for either or, with a slight preference for the lower octant. Note that similar conclusions can also be drawn if true δ CP = +9 in which case the indication would be for from only neutrino run. Conclusions: In this paper we have shown that if future TK data confirms the current hint of δ CP 9 by running only in the neutrino mode then that would indicate the hierarchy to be normal and θ 3 octant to be higher. For the other hierarchy-octant combinations, parameter degeneracies forbid a clear hint for δ CP = 9 in only neutrino mode. The main role of the antineutrino data in enhancing δ CP sensitivity is to remove the octant degeneracy. If this degeneracy is not present then the decrease in statistics associated with antineutrino run worsens the CP sensitivity. Even when this degeneracy is present, equal neutrino and antineutrino run do not always give the best results. Once the degenerate solution is eliminated further addition of antineutrino data worsens the CP sensitivity because of reduced statistics. If the current indication for δ CP is true, then the TK experiment has the unique opportunity to give hints on all the unknown oscillation parameters by running only in the neutrino mode. The results also underscore the importance of optimizing antineutrino run, and can significantly impact the planning of neutrino facilities in future. Acknowledgements: We thank S. Uma Sankar for useful comments and discussions. Address: monojit@prl.res.in Address: sruba@prl.res.in Address: raut@kth.se [1] M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. Salvado, and T. Schwetz, JHEP 11, 13 (1), arxiv:19.33; G. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, D. Montanino, A. Palazzo, et al., Phys.Rev. D, 131 (1), arxiv:15.55; D. V. Forero, M. Tortola and J. W. F. Valle, arxiv:15.75 [hep-ph]. [] K. Abe et al. (TK Collaboration), Phys.Rev.Lett. 11, 1 (1), arxiv: [3] V. Barger, D. Marfatia, and K. Whisnant, Phys.Rev. D5, 733 (), hep-ph/ [] A. Cervera, A. Donini, M. B. Gavela, J. J. Gomez Cadenas, P. Hernandez, et al., Phys. B579, 17 (), hepph/1; E. K. Akhmedov, R. Johansson, M. Lindner, T. Ohlsson, and T. Schwetz, JHEP, 7 (), hep-ph/175; M. Freund, Phys. Rev. D, 533 (1), hep-ph/133. [5] H. Minakata and H. Nunokawa, JHEP 1, 1 (1), hep-ph/15; J. Burguet-Castell, M. Gavela, J. Gomez-Cadenas, P. Hernandez and O. Mena, Nucl. Phys. B, 31 (), hep-ph/7; H. Minakata, H. Nunokawa and S. J. Parke, Phys. Rev. D, 931 (), hep-ph/13. [] G. L. Fogli and E. Lisi, Phys. Rev. D 5, 37 (199) [hep-ph/915]. [7] A. Chatterjee, P. Ghoshal, S. Goswami and S. K. Raut, JHEP 13, 1 (13), arxiv:13.137; M. Ghosh, P. Ghoshal, S. Goswami and S. K. Raut, Nucl. Phys. B, 7 (1), arxiv:11.73; P. Coloma, H. Minakata and S. J. Parke, arxiv:1.551 [hep-ph]. [] S. Prakash, S. K. Raut, and S. U. Sankar, Phys.Rev. D, 331 (1), arxiv:11.5. [9] S. K. Agarwalla, S. Prakash and S. U. Sankar, JHEP 137, 131 (13) [arxiv: [hep-ph]]; P. Machado, H. Minakata, H. Nunokawa and R. Z. Funchal, JHEP 15, 19 (1), arxiv:137.3; S. Prakash, U. Rahaman and S. U. Sankar, JHEP 17 (1) 7 [arxiv:13.15 [hep-ph]]. [1] P. Huber, M. Lindner, and W. Winter, Comput.Phys.Commun. 17, 195 (5), hep-ph/7333; P. Huber, J. Kopp, M. Lindner, M. Rolinec, and W. Winter, Comput.Phys.Commun. 177, 3 (7), hep-ph/7117. [11] M. D. Messier, Ph.D. thesis (1999); E. Paschos and J. Yu, Phys.Rev. D5, 33 (), hep-ph/171; Y. Itow et al. (TK Collaboration), pp. 39- (1), hep-ex/119; M. Ishitsuka, T. Kajita, H. Minakata, and H. Nunokawa, Phys.Rev. D7, 333 (5), hep-

5 5 ph/5; P. Huber, M. Lindner, and W. Winter, Nucl.Phys. B5, 3 (), hep-ph/35; M. Fechner, Ph.D. thesis (); I. Kato (TK Collaboration), J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 13, 1 ().