More on Asymptotic Running Time Analysis CMPSC 122

Transcription

1 More on Asymptotic Running Time Analysis CMPSC 122 I. Asymptotic Running Times and Dominance In your homework, you looked at some graphs. What did you observe? When analyzing the running time of algorithms, we really care about what happens in the long run, or what happens when n is large. Thus We are not terribly concerned with what happens when (input size is small) We are concerned with how quickly (running time functions grow) Details like don't matter when n is large (coeffs, lower order terms) We call this kind of analysis asymptotic analysis or, sometimes, aymptotics. We say that a function f (x) dominates a function g (x) when Examples: 1. Does 23n 2 dominate n + 7? 2. How about n3 5 vs. 2n3 + 7? 3. How about n vs. 3 n? 4. How about 150 n vs. 20 n? (Please note that we are being a little informal with some of this analysis in this course.) Page 1 of 6 Prepared by D. Hogan for PSU CMPSC 122

2 II. Key Families of Functions It turns out that there are a few families of functions that tend to be important. Ranked in order of dominance, they are: 1. n n 2. n! 3. c n for all constants c s.t. c > 1, where if a > b, a n dominates b n 4. n c for all constants c s.t. c 2, where if a > b, c a dominates c b 5. n lg n 6. n 7. lg n 8. c Two notes: Since all constants grow at the same rate, anything that you might think to call Θ(c) gets simplified to Θ(1). In Θ-notation, each function in each of families 1-2 and 5-8 would all reduce to the same thing. Different constant choices in families 3 and 4 yield different Θ-notation expressions. This list leaves some matters vague, but covers most of the common functions that arise. You should convince yourself of the correctness of this ranking by plotting several of these kinds of functions on the same axis. Problem: Simplify each function of n to Θ-notation and then rank the functions by dominance. 3n! n! 12 + n3 17lgn + n 3 + nlgn 100 n + n n nlgn + nn 2 + 7n Problem: Simplify each function of n to Θ-notation and then rank the functions by dominance. n 35 + lgn lg 3n + 3 n 37 n(n +1) 2n(1+ 3lgn) III. O-Notation Another kind of asymptotic notation is O-notation. While O-notation was invented before Θ-notation, it is less precise. So, let's first give a more formal definition for Θ-notation: We say a function f (x) is Θ(g (x)) when (for all sufficiently large n ) Now, let's give a more definition for O-notation: We say a function f (x) is O(g (x)) when Page 2 of 6 Prepared by D. Hogan for PSU CMPSC 122

3 This asymptotic notation is said to put bounds on the functions. In this sense, Θ gives an asymptotic tight bound, while O gives an asymptotic upper bound. Or, analogously, (= vs. <=) Example: 2n 2 is and also 2n 2 is. But we could also say 2n 2 is. Example: n! is O( ) Example: 5n lg n is O( ), but not O( ). Example: n 2 + 7n + 6 is O( ), but not O( ) In some sense, we could think of a Θ-notation bound as being the best O-notation bound possible, and sometimes you'll see the expression "best big-o bound" as a result. IV. Example Code Fragments Having gone a bit further, let's look at some code examples. Once again, we will, in each case, count the exact number of elementary operations that are done. But we will then also simplify to Θ-notation too. (Intentionally, the first few are review, and the numbering picks up where we left off before. Example 1: for i = 1 to n a = b + c - i Example 8: for i = 1 to n a = b + c i for i = 1 to n a = b + c i Example 9: for i = 1 to n for j = 1 to n a = b + c + max(i, j) Page 3 of 6 Prepared by D. Hogan for PSU CMPSC 122

4 Example 10: for i = 1 to 2n for j = 1 to n a = b + c + max(i, j) Example 11: for i = 0 to n/2 for j = n/2 downto 1 for k = 1 to n a = ib + jc + kd Example 12: for i = 0 to n/2 for j = n/2 downto 1 for k = 1 to n a = ib + jc + kd z = z + 2^a Example 13: for i = 0 to n/2 for j = 1 to n a = j + 3a for j = n downto 1 b = 50 + j - a Example 14: for i = 1 to n for j = 1 to n/3 // 3 elementary operations for j = n/3 to 2n/3 // n elementary operations for j = 2n/3 to n // 1 elementary operation Page 4 of 6 Prepared by D. Hogan for PSU CMPSC 122

5 Problem: Rank the running time functions for all of the above examples from fastest growing to slowest growing. V. Back to Binary Search When we starting discussing analysis, we looked at binary search under the assumption n was a power of 2. What if it's not? Backing up, what did we conclude was the worst-case running time for a binary search when n is a power of 2? Let's look at a few not-as-nice input sizes, again, in the worst case: How does this fit with asymptotic notation? Page 5 of 6 Prepared by D. Hogan for PSU CMPSC 122

6 VI. How This Fits in the Course and Curriculum Problem: Presumably, you've written code to traverse or walk an array, i.e., print out all of the elements of that array. Suppose an array has size n. What is the worst-case running time to walk an array and why? In the remainder of the course, we'll look at more advanced data structures, algorithms on those structures, and sorting algorithms. In all cases, we'll make a point of analyzing their asymptotic running times. Your final project will carry the analysis of running times of sorts further and make connections between theory and practice. Examples of code fragments we have handled here are ones where the math is "nice." In 360, we'll look at sequences and counting tools that will help you to be able to analyze the running time of "harder" problems. Finally, as 465 is the main analysis course in the curriculum, we'll look at more formal definitions of O and Θ-notation, as well as a few other kinds of asymptotic notation there. We'll also encounter many more advanced analysis techniques, and a running theme will be to analyze, formally, the running time of many new algorithms. Page 6 of 6 Prepared by D. Hogan for PSU CMPSC 122