ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure in 2010 Data from the LHC
|
|
- Melinda Wilkinson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure in 20 Data from the LHC With a particular focus on experimental issues and effects David W. Miller On behalf of The ATLAS Experiment SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and Stanford University Northwest Terascale Research Projects Using jet substructure to find new physics at the LHC February 2, 2011 David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
2 Roadmap 1 Introduction Historical context Pile-up and underlying event at the LHC Experimental conditions at the energy frontier 2 Jets in ATLAS Jet finding, reconstruction in ATLAS JES uncertainty JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Jet-vertex association for pile-up filtering 3 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Inclusive jet and di-jet cross-section Search for new particles in two-jet final states Jet shapes and corrections for pile-up Jet substructure observables in data New directions 4 Summary and conclusions David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
3 Introduction Roadmap 1 Introduction Historical context Pile-up and underlying event at the LHC Experimental conditions at the energy frontier 2 Jets in ATLAS Jet finding, reconstruction in ATLAS JES uncertainty JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Jet-vertex association for pile-up filtering 3 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Inclusive jet and di-jet cross-section Search for new particles in two-jet final states Jet shapes and corrections for pile-up Jet substructure observables in data New directions 4 Summary and conclusions David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
4 Introduction Historical context First convincing evidence for jet production: UA2 (1982)...at a hadron collider s = 540 GeV m 1,2 = 140 GeV p T,1 = 60 GeV p T,2 = 57 GeV David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
5 Introduction Historical context s = 7 TeV m 1,2 = 3.1 TeV, p T,1 = 520 GeV, p T,2 = 460 GeV David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35 Entering a new era for hadronic final states: ATLAS (20) Our window into the Terascale!
6 Introduction Pile-up and underlying event at the LHC The (busy) environment of a hadron-hadron collision David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
7 Introduction Experimental conditions at the energy frontier Machine conditions during 20 The average number of interactions as inferred from the luminosity measurements as a function of time throughout 20 (assumes σ inel = 71.5 mb) [arxiv: , Submitted to EPJC]. Peak number of interactions, µ ATLAS Preliminary Data 20 Mar 26 Apr 25 May 25 Jun 24 Jul 24 Aug 23 Sep 22 Oct 22 Day in 20 March-June N PV (fraction with N PV 2: <%) June-October N PV (fraction with N PV 2: 40-60%) October+ N PV > 3 (fraction with N PV 2: 0%) David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
8 Jets in ATLAS Roadmap 1 Introduction Historical context Pile-up and underlying event at the LHC Experimental conditions at the energy frontier 2 Jets in ATLAS Jet finding, reconstruction in ATLAS JES uncertainty JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Jet-vertex association for pile-up filtering 3 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Inclusive jet and di-jet cross-section Search for new particles in two-jet final states Jet shapes and corrections for pile-up Jet substructure observables in data New directions 4 Summary and conclusions David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
9 Jets in ATLAS Jet finding, reconstruction in ATLAS Inputs to jet reconstruction ATLAS has a highly flexible and robust set of input signals to consider for jet reconstruction: Towers without noise suppression Topological clusters Towers with noise suppression Tracks Each of these has been studied in detail in the data in order to ensure a thorough understanding of the jet reconstruction itself and the signal model being used to form the basis for physics measurements. David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
10 Jets in ATLAS Jet finding, reconstruction in ATLAS Inputs to jet reconstruction Since the Tevatron and H1, techniques have been used for combining calorimeter cells for noise-suppression using 3-D clustering, or topological clustering 1 Find seed cells above some noise threshold (E cell /σ noise cell N threshold ) 2 Then cluster cells around that in 3-dimensions, successively allowing in more cells For example: 4σ seed, several layers of 2σ cells, last layer of all cells In ATLAS, these clusters can then be used as the basic object of calibration instead of entire jets. David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, 2011 / 35
11 Jets in ATLAS Jet finding, reconstruction in ATLAS Building a noise suppressed calorimeter grid Mapping clustered cells onto (pseudo-)projective towers David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
12 Jets in ATLAS Jet finding, reconstruction in ATLAS jet track T jet EM+JES T Inputs to jet reconstruction: validation Using the very first 400 µb 1, a complete study of the input constituents to jets was performed. Mean number of constituents 120 ATLAS Preliminary anti-k t R=0.6 tower jets MC QCD di-jets Data 20 s = 7 TeV Mean number of constituents 28 ATLAS Preliminary anti-k t R=0.6 cluster jets MC QCD di-jets Data 20 s = 7 TeV Number of jets ATLAS Preliminary anti-k t R=0.6 cluster jets y < 1.9, p > 0.5 GeV MC QCD di-jets Data 20 s = 7 TeV Number of jets / ATLAS Preliminary anti-k t R=0.6 cluster jets y <2.8, p > 20 GeV Data 20 MC QCD di-jets s = 7 TeV jet Jet y jet Jet y Number of matched tracks Width Towers in jets Topo-clusters in jets Tracks in jets Jet width In nearly all cases, slight discrepancies between the data and PYTHIA 6.4 are observed, and are believed to be primarily due to a combination of difference in the modeling of soft processes and the hard jet fragmentation, as well as a potential need for improvements in the jet-energy scale calibration. David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
13 Jets in ATLAS JES uncertainty Jet energy scale uncertainty The JES uncertainty is the single largest uncertainty for any analysis I will present. Fractional JES Systematic Uncertainty Underlying event (Perugia0) ALPGEN, HERWIG 6, JIMMY Additional Dead Material Noise Thresholds JES calibration non-closure anti k t R=0.6, 0.3<! <0.8, PYTHIA 6 2 Fragmentation (MC09-Pro) Shifted Beam Spot Hadronic Shower Model LAr/Tile Absolute EM Scale Total JES Systematic Uncertainty 2 2 ATLAS 3 p [GeV] T Relative JES pile-up uncertainty Data 20, s=7 TeV ATLAS Preliminary AntiK T, R=0.6 0 <! < <! < <! < <! < <! < jet p [GeV] T It is crucial to determine each component systematically and to provide a well-understood uncertainty, over and above a small uncertainty. Extensive work has gone into performing each of these tasks I will focus on the component which is known to change over time, and to become ever more important as the luminosity of the machine increases to its nominal value: the uncertainty due to multiple interactions in same bunch crossing: pile-up. David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
14 Jets in ATLAS JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Measuring the effects of pile-up on the jet energy scale As the level of in-time pile-up increases (i.e. the number of simultaneous proton-proton collisions in the same bunch-crossing) the average total energy deposition in the calorimeters also increases. Clusters, cells (Tile, LAr, HEC) energy 2 minimum bias interactions 3 minimum bias interactions minimum bias interactions Fundamental aspects Assumed to be completely independent of the hard-scattering activity Thus, also independent from the hard-scatter jet p T Roughly uniform in φ with respect to the hard-scatter not with respect to the UE! David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
15 Jets in ATLAS JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Measuring the effects of pile-up on the jet energy scale As the level of in-time pile-up increases (i.e. the number of simultaneous proton-proton collisions in the same bunch-crossing) the average total energy deposition in the calorimeters also increases. Clusters, cells (Tile, LAr, HEC) energy 2 minimum bias interactions 3 minimum bias interactions minimum bias interactions Fundamental aspects Assumed to be completely independent of the hard-scattering activity Thus, also independent from the hard-scatter jet p T Roughly uniform in φ with respect to the hard-scatter not with respect to the UE! David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
16 Jets in ATLAS JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Measuring the effects of pile-up on the jet energy scale As the level of in-time pile-up increases (i.e. the number of simultaneous proton-proton collisions in the same bunch-crossing) the average total energy deposition in the calorimeters also increases. Clusters, cells (Tile, LAr, HEC) energy 2 minimum bias interactions 3 minimum bias interactions minimum bias interactions Fundamental aspects Assumed to be completely independent of the hard-scattering activity Thus, also independent from the hard-scatter jet p T Roughly uniform in φ with respect to the hard-scatter not with respect to the UE! David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
17 Jets in ATLAS JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Thinking about pile-up contributions to the jet-energy scale Traditional approach: pile-up contributes an uncorrelated, soft, diffuse background. subtract this contribution on average or using individual event & jet information. E corrected T = E T O(η, L; N PV, A) ( ) O(η, L; N PV, A) = ρ A Must derive the quantity (density) to subtract David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
18 Jets in ATLAS JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Thinking about pile-up contributions to the jet-energy scale Traditional approach: pile-up contributes an uncorrelated, soft, diffuse background. subtract this contribution on average or using individual event & jet information. E corrected T = E T O(η, L; N PV, A) ( ) O(η, L; N PV, A) = ρ A Must derive the quantity (density) to subtract Measure the average tower energy density in events with different number of interactions (N PV ) David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
19 Jets in ATLAS JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Thinking about pile-up contributions to the jet-energy scale Traditional approach: pile-up contributes an uncorrelated, soft, diffuse background. subtract this contribution on average or using individual event & jet information. E corrected T = E T O(η, L; N PV, A) ( ) O(η, L; N PV, A) = ρ A Must derive the quantity (density) to subtract Measure the average tower energy density in events with different number of interactions (N PV ) Measure the event-by-event density by looking at the entire event (Salam, et al.) David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
20 Jets in ATLAS JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Thinking about pile-up contributions to the jet-energy scale Traditional approach: pile-up contributes an uncorrelated, soft, diffuse background. subtract this contribution on average or using individual event & jet information. E corrected T = E T O(η, L; N PV, A) ( ) O(η, L; N PV, A) = ρ A Must derive the quantity (density) to subtract Measure the average tower energy density in events with different number of interactions (N PV ) Measure the event-by-event density by looking at the entire event (Salam, et al.) Use a 2D/3D grid at any energy scale, with any input under study David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
21 Jets in ATLAS JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Thinking about pile-up contributions to the jet-energy scale Traditional approach: pile-up contributes an uncorrelated, soft, diffuse background. subtract this contribution on average or using individual event & jet information. E corrected T = E T O(η, L; N PV, A) ( ) O(η, L; N PV, A) = ρ A Must derive the quantity (density) to subtract Measure the average tower energy density in events with different number of interactions (N PV ) Measure the event-by-event density by looking at the entire event (Salam, et al.) Use a 2D/3D grid at any energy scale, with any input under study Must estimate the metric (area) with which we perform the subtraction David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
22 Jets in ATLAS JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Thinking about pile-up contributions to the jet-energy scale Traditional approach: pile-up contributes an uncorrelated, soft, diffuse background. subtract this contribution on average or using individual event & jet information. E corrected T = E T O(η, L; N PV, A) ( ) O(η, L; N PV, A) = ρ A Must derive the quantity (density) to subtract Measure the average tower energy density in events with different number of interactions (N PV ) Measure the event-by-event density by looking at the entire event (Salam, et al.) Use a 2D/3D grid at any energy scale, with any input under study Must estimate the metric (area) with which we perform the subtraction A tower jet [determined jet-by-jet with towers, averaged with clusters] David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
23 Jets in ATLAS JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Thinking about pile-up contributions to the jet-energy scale Traditional approach: pile-up contributes an uncorrelated, soft, diffuse background. subtract this contribution on average or using individual event & jet information. E corrected T = E T O(η, L; N PV, A) ( ) O(η, L; N PV, A) = ρ A Must derive the quantity (density) to subtract Measure the average tower energy density in events with different number of interactions (N PV ) Measure the event-by-event density by looking at the entire event (Salam, et al.) Use a 2D/3D grid at any energy scale, with any input under study Must estimate the metric (area) with which we perform the subtraction A tower jet A ghost jet [determined jet-by-jet with towers, averaged with clusters] [theoretically dynamic, but near δ-function for anti-k t jets] David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
24 Jets in ATLAS JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Thinking about pile-up contributions to the jet-energy scale Traditional approach: pile-up contributes an uncorrelated, soft, diffuse background. subtract this contribution on average or using individual event & jet information. E corrected T = E T O(η, L; N PV, A) ( ) O(η, L; N PV, A) = ρ A Must derive the quantity (density) to subtract Measure the average tower energy density in events with different number of interactions (N PV ) Measure the event-by-event density by looking at the entire event (Salam, et al.) Use a 2D/3D grid at any energy scale, with any input under study Must estimate the metric (area) with which we perform the subtraction A tower jet A ghost jet [determined jet-by-jet with towers, averaged with clusters] [theoretically dynamic, but near δ-function for anti-k t jets] David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
25 Jets in ATLAS JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Thinking about pile-up contributions to the jet-energy scale Traditional approach: pile-up contributes an uncorrelated, soft, diffuse background. subtract this contribution on average or using individual event & jet information. E corrected T = E T O(η, L; N PV, A) ( ) O(η, L; N PV, A) = ρ A Must derive the quantity (density) to subtract Measure the average tower energy density in events with different number of interactions (N PV ) Measure the event-by-event density by looking at the entire event (Salam, et al.) Use a 2D/3D grid at any energy scale, with any input under study Must estimate the metric (area) with which we perform the subtraction A tower jet A ghost jet [determined jet-by-jet with towers, averaged with clusters] [theoretically dynamic, but near δ-function for anti-k t jets] The point of the offset correction is to render the jet calibration independent of the instantaneous luminosity (pile-up). David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
26 Jets in ATLAS JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Validation using track-jets at s = 7 TeV [GeV] jet,em T Landau+Gauss fit (MPV) jet p ATLAS Preliminary Data < p T,track-jet 25 < p T,track-jet 30 < p T,track-jet 35 < p T,track-jet 40 < p T,track-jet 45 < p T,track-jet < 25 GeV < 30 GeV < 35 GeV < 40 GeV < 45 GeV < 50 GeV Number of primary vertices (N ) PV Topo-cluster jet p EM T vs N PV (MPV from fit) [GeV] calo T Landau+Gauss fit (MPV) jet p ATLAS Preliminary Data Number of primary vertices (N ) PV Jet-level closure test (MPV from fit) Validation method applied to topo-cluster jets (at the EM scale) Pick discrete p track jet T bins and measure the average calorimeter jet p jet T Slope agrees well with E = 0.5 GeV / vertex systematic due to area average + slight undercorrection David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
27 Jets in ATLAS Jet-vertex association for pile-up filtering Jet-vertex association Originally developed by the DØ Collaboration The Jet Vertex Fraction (JVF) Associate jets to primary vertices using tracks and obtain a jet-by-jet energy correction and jet-selection criterion. Improve jet-energy reconstruction, missing E t resolution and primary vertex (PV) selection using this jet-vertex fraction, or JVF. JVF measures the fraction of charged particle transverse momentum in each jet (in the form of tracks) originating in each identified primary vertex in the event. JVF[jet2, PV1] = 0 JVF[jet2, PV2] = 1 jet2 jet1 JVF discriminant definition PV2 PV1 JVF[jet1, PV1] = 1 f JVF[jet1, PV2] = f Z JVF(jet i, vtx j ) = k p T(trk jet i k, vtx j ) l p T(trk jet i l, vtx n ) n For jet i, JVF is the track p T fraction from vertex j. David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
28 Jets in ATLAS Jet-vertex association for pile-up filtering Jet-vertex association and JVF with simulated data -15% of hard-scatter jets (with tracks) have between 1-40% of their energy from MB interactions. ATLAS work in progress April 2009 APS Meeting Fraction of total jets η <2.0, p >20 GeV T Jets without Pure hard-scatter jets Jets with some contribution from pile-up collisions matched tracks 0.3 Jets from 0.2 pile-up collisions ATLAS work in progress Jet-vertex fraction (JVF) JVF distribution for QCD di-jets at L = 33 cm 2 s 1, N MB =2.3 JVF = 1 : Pure hard-scatter jets 0 < JVF < 1: MB spoiled hard-scatter jets JVF = 0 : MB jets JVF = 1 : Jets with no matched tracks QCD di-jets at L = 33 cm 2 s 1, N MB =2.3 94% jets with JVF > 0.75 Cone jets (R=0.4) built from topological clusters Incremental JVF cuts illustrate pile-up contamination David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
29 Jets in ATLAS Jet-vertex association for pile-up filtering Jet selection using JVF As instantaneous luminosity increases, pile-up backgrounds increase while rare, hard-scatter processes remain constant. Jet multiplicity due to the hard scatter interaction should remain flat as a function of luminosity. Average jet multiplicity All jets JVF > 0.75 ATLAS work in progress >=6 Reconstructed vertex multiplicity L = 33 cm 2 s 1, N MB =2.3 (tt) Average jet multiplicity 16 All jets JVF > 0.75 ATLAS work in progress >=8 Reconstructed vertex multiplicity L = 2 33 cm 2 s 1, N MB =4.6 (tt) Using JVF, we can recover the expected flat jet-multiplicity distribution vs. # additional interactions increases without raising the p T threshold. David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
30 Jets in ATLAS Jet-vertex association for pile-up filtering Jet selection using JVF As instantaneous luminosity increases, pile-up backgrounds increase while rare, hard-scatter processes remain constant. Jet multiplicity due to the hard scatter interaction should remain flat as a function of luminosity. Average jet multiplicity All jets JVF > 0.75 ATLAS work in progress >=6 Reconstructed vertex multiplicity L = 33 cm 2 s 1, N MB =2.3 (tt) Average jet multiplicity 16 All jets JVF > 0.75 ATLAS work in progress >=8 Reconstructed vertex multiplicity L = 2 33 cm 2 s 1, N MB =4.6 (tt) However, due to low efficiency for a simple JVF cut (previous slide) jet-energy correction strategies for jets with pile-up contributions are necessary. David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
31 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Roadmap 1 Introduction Historical context Pile-up and underlying event at the LHC Experimental conditions at the energy frontier 2 Jets in ATLAS Jet finding, reconstruction in ATLAS JES uncertainty JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Jet-vertex association for pile-up filtering 3 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Inclusive jet and di-jet cross-section Search for new particles in two-jet final states Jet shapes and corrections for pile-up Jet substructure observables in data New directions 4 Summary and conclusions David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
32 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 First jet physics measurements in ATLAS The program of both standard model measurements and the search for new physics has begun in earnest. I will discuss several important measurements that are not only important in their own right, but also highlight the importance and lasting value of the issues I have been discussing: The inclusive jet cross-section measurement Jet shapes at high p T Search for excited quarks in two-jet events Commissioning jet substructure observables Of course, these are only a tiny fraction of the physics program currently underway, and I refer you to the ATLAS Physics Results pages for a full breakdown of the current public analysis results. David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
33 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Inclusive jet and di-jet cross-section Inclusive jet and di-jet cross-sections Single inclusive jet cross-section vs. jet p T for anti-k t, R = 0.6 [pb/gev] dy T!/dp 2 d " 19 L ATLAS -3 jets, R=0.6 anti-k t -1 dt=17 nb, s=7 TeV Systematic Uncertainties NLO pqcd (CTEQ 6.6) Non-pert. corr. 12 y < 0.3 ( ) < y < 0.8 ( ) < y < 1.2 ( ) < y < 2.1 ( ) < y < 2.8 ( ) p [GeV] T NLO pqcd calculated with NLOJET++ Theoretical uncertainties vary µ R and µ F within factor 2, include hadronization and underlying event. Approximately 5%, except at low p T (15% for R = 0.6, % R = 0.4, in appendix) Comparison of cone sizes helps to assess non-perturbative corrections Jet energy scale (JES) uncertainty dominates in all cases Data and theory consistent in all p T and y ranges Double differential cross-section vs. p T David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
34 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Inclusive jet and di-jet cross-section Inclusive jet and di-jet cross-sections Di-jet inclusive cross-section vs. jet m 12 for anti-k t, R = 0.6 [pb/gev] max!/dm 12 d y 2 d ATLAS anti-k t jets, R = s = 7 TeV, " L dt = 17 nb 2 2 Systematic uncertainties NLO pqcd (CTEQ 6.6) Non-pert. corr < y < 2.8 ( ) max < y < 2.1 ( ) max < y < 1.2 ( ) max < y < 0.8 ( ) max 0 y < 0.3 ( ) max [GeV] m 12 m 12 is invariant mass of two leading jets p T,1 > 60 GeV p T,2 > 30 GeV y max max( y 1, y 2 ) Observe di-jet masses beyond 2 TeV With this measurement, we begin to see the benefits of extending the energy reach of previous accelerators. However, we pay a price to be at the energy frontier... Double differential di-jet cross-section vs. m 12 David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
35 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Search for new particles in two-jet final states Search for excited quarks Events B (D - B) / Data Fit q*(600) q*(900) q*(1500) ATLAS Preliminary s = 7 TeV -1! L dt = 3.1 pb jj Reconstructed m [GeV] The di-jet final state offers a rich arena in which to search for new physics Excited quarks, extra dimensions, additional strong dynamics A bump hunting technique is used: look for a narrow resonance signal, and if none is found, set a limit on Acceptance (A) σ. p T,1 > 80 GeV, p T,2 > 30 GeV and η < 2.5, η < 1.3 Fit a 4-parameter function to the data for the background model Perform a simultaneous 5-parameter fit to the signal and background when extracting the limit PRL 5, , ATLAS-CONF ijet mass distribution (filled points) fitted using a binned background (B) dis- David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
36 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Search for new particles in two-jet final states Search for excited quarks # " A [pb] q* MC09 q* Perugia0 q* MC09 Observed 95% CL upper limit Expected 95% CL upper limit Expected limit 68% and 95% bands! -1 L dt = 3.1 pb s = 7 TeV Use several PYTHIA tunes, each utilizing LO theory cross-sections Bayesian prior Excluded at 95%C.L. with MC09 (MRST): 0.30 < m q < 1.53 TeV This is to be compared with m q < 870 GeV, with 1.1 fb 1 from CDF. PRD 79 (2009) 1 ATLAS Preliminary Resonance Mass [GeV] In doing so, we have opened up a new regime in the search for new massive objects. As our reach extends, we will become sensitive phase space for which the decay products of such massive objects merge... ATLAS-CONF pper limit on # A as a function of dijet resonance mass (black filled circles). David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
37 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Jet shapes and corrections for pile-up Jet shapes at high p T arxiv: , accepted by Phys. Rev. D! (r) 1 ATLAS (a)! (r) 1 ATLAS -1-1 Data " L dt = 0.7 nb - 3 pb PYTHIA-Perugia20 HERWIG++ (c) ALPGEN PYTHIA-MC09-1 anti-k t jets R = GeV < p < 400 GeV T y < anti-k t jets R = GeV < p < 600 GeV T y < 2.8 DATA / MC r DATA / MC r 3 < p T < 400 GeV (N PV =1) 500 < p T < 600 GeV (N PV =1) Jet shapes represent one of most important handles we have on establishing the description of jets in the data by the Monte Carlo, and is also the first component of jet substructure. We observe that our MC systematically underestimates the width of the jet predicts that the jet mass will be underestimated to some extent as well. Dominant systematic uncertainty is the cluster-level energy scale David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
38 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Jet shapes and corrections for pile-up Correcting the jet shape for pile-up ρ a (r) / Ψ(0.7) Ratio Data, One Vertex Events Data, Two Vertex Events Data, Two Vertex Events, Corr. 1.2< y <2.1, 60<p <80 GeV T ATLAS Preliminary Data R = η + φ ρ a (r) / Ψ(0.7) Ratio ATLAS Preliminary Data 20 Data, One Vertex Events Data, Three Vertex Events Data, Three Vertex Events, Corr. 1.2< y <2.1, 60<p <80 GeV T R = η + φ N PV = 1 and 2 (1.2 < y jet < 2.1) N PV = 1 and 3 (1.2 < y jet < 2.1) In order to measure the jet shape in the future, we must be able to reduce the effect of pile-up Potential solution: subtract the measured energy density (from the tower grid) from the jet in annuli Preliminary result: not too bad! Exploring the possibility of full substructure corrections as well. David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
39 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Jet substructure observables in data Jet mass and instrumental effects Jet mass [GeV] Data / MC ATLAS Preliminary anti-k t R=1.0 LC cluster jets: η <1.0 MC QCD Jets Data Ldt = 13.8 pb -1 Data Ldt = 13.8 pb Data ( JVF > 0.99) -1 (N Jet p = 1) PV reco T [GeV] reco Jet p [GeV] anti-k t, R = 1.0, p T,1 > 250 GeV, η < 1 T In the context of the LHC, it is crucial to determine instrumental effects on complex observables. Prior to pile-up filtering, jets are observed to have a mean jet mass approximately % higher than events with only a single primary vertex (N PV = 1) for PYTHIA 6. After JVF selection, the agreement with events having no pile-up is within a few %. Punchline: Even very massive jets can have important contributions due to pile-up that must be mitigated. We have developed techniques to do so. David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
40 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Jet substructure observables in data Correlating the jet mass with tracking information Calorimeter jet mass [GeV] Data / MC ATLAS Preliminary anti-k t R=1.0 LC cluster jets: η <1.0 MC QCD Jets Data Ldt = 13.8 pb -1 Data Ldt = 13.8 pb Data ( JVF > 0.99) -1 (N = 1) PV Track jet mass [GeV] Track jet mass [GeV] anti-k t, R = 1.0, p T,1 > 250 GeV, η < 1 We can utilize the insensitivity of hard-scatter track-jets to pile-up in order to constrain effects on substructure. The calorimeter jet mass is highly correlated with the track-jet mass. Because the track-jets are constructed from only hard-scattering tracks, the impact of pile-up on calorimeter jets can be immediately inferred. In addition, despite the shortcomings of the PYTHIA MC, when measured against the track-jet mass, the agreement is very good. David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
41 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Jet substructure observables in data Jet re-clustering and comparisons with tracks ), sub-jet R(sub-jet ATLAS Preliminary anti-k t R=1.0 LC cluster jets: η <1.0 MC QCD Jets -1 Data Ldt = 13.8 pb (N = 1) PV -1 Data Ldt = 13.8 pb Data ( JVF > 0.99) Number of jets 250 ATLAS Preliminary anti-k t R=1.0 LC cluster jets: η <1.0 MC QCD Jets -1 Data Ldt = 13.8 pb (N = 1) PV Data Ldt = 13.8 pb Data ( JVF > 0.99) R(track,track 1 ) z = min(p,p )/p T,1 T,2 T,J Anti-k t R = 1.0, sub-jet R Anti-k t R = 1.0, sub-jet z Define sub-jets using the k t algorithm with R = 0.3 Left: R separation of the 2 hardest sub-jets compared to the 2 hardest tracks in the jet. Right: Ratio of the 2 nd sub-jet p T to the the original jet p T (crucial parameter in pruning). Punchline: Observe a relative stability of sub-jet kinematics with respect to pile-up David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
42 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 New directions Improving and extending existing/new tools There are many directions in which to take these tools in order to perform precise and robust substructure-based analyses for the lifetime of the LHC: Jet-vertex fraction jet-by-jet corrections: Being established in the data now using asymmetry and track-jet validation Can be applied to any jet algorithm or input constituent type Jet area-based UE/pile-up subtraction: Use the per-event energy density instead of N PV to calculate ρ First proposed by Salam, et al. and offers a dynamic approach to pile-up subtraction Issue: experimental aspects (i.e. JES) may become more complicated Jet grooming tools: It is possible to use the grooming tools (as in the ATLAS Higgs analysis) in powerful ways, but but how to set JES after? Can we tune these advanced procedures for pile-up subtraction using JVF? David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
43 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 New directions Correcting jet energies for pile-up contributions L = 33 cm 2 s 1 and N MB =2.3, derived using PYTHIA di-jets truth / p T reco Jet Response: p T QCD di-jet events ATLAS work in progress Jet JVF(PV) Jet response vs. JVF at L = 33 cm 2 s 1 Response < JVF <= < JVF <= < JVF <= < JVF <= 1.00 ATLAS work in progress reco Jet p [GeV] T Jet-energy response vs. p reco T and JVF (di-jet events) Using JVF to correct jet energies in a luminosity independent manner We can derive a jet-energy correction to correct for pile-up contributions on a per-jet basis. JVF(jet i, vtx j ) = k p T(trk jet i k, vtx j ) l p T(trk jet i l, vtx n ) n R(JVF, pjet T ) pcorr T = p jet T /R(JVF, pjet T ) David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
44 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 New directions Tuning the pruning parameters using JVF See a significant variation of the jet area even after pruning as a function of the number of particles pointing toward the jet from additional interactions. Generator-level study where we define JVF using the stable charged particles from the hard-scattering and we overlay additional min bias events using the generator. Samples provided by David Krohn. David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
45 Summary and conclusions Roadmap 1 Introduction Historical context Pile-up and underlying event at the LHC Experimental conditions at the energy frontier 2 Jets in ATLAS Jet finding, reconstruction in ATLAS JES uncertainty JES pile-up uncertainty and corrections Jet-vertex association for pile-up filtering 3 Jet physics at ATLAS in 20 Inclusive jet and di-jet cross-section Search for new particles in two-jet final states Jet shapes and corrections for pile-up Jet substructure observables in data New directions 4 Summary and conclusions David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
46 Summary and conclusions Status and future jet physics at ATLAS The physics program is well underway at ATLAS, with many of the first results based on hadronic final states, and many more to come. Jet substructure commissioning is progressing fast, so expect many more public results ready soon. It is already clear that our MC is doing very well at describing these very complex observables. A coherent, combined approach to performing integrated measurements of the hadronic final state drives these pursuits, and techniques have been developed that are suitable to the context provided by the LHC, namely, luminosity! As these tools and approaches are combined with the advanced theoretical concepts, the wealth of information that lies inside of jets at the energy frontier can be mined and extracted in order to shed light on new physics manifested through jets. David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 35
47 Backup slides and additional information Roadmap 5 Backup slides and additional information David W. Miller (Stanford, SLAC) ATLAS Jet Physics Results and Jet Substructure February 2, / 1
QCD Jets at the LHC. Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago. on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations
QCD Jets at the LHC Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations Outline Physics at the LHC Jet Reconstruction and Performance Clustering Algorithms
More informationInclusive jet cross section in ATLAS
Inclusive jet cross section in ALAS (on behalf of the ALAS collaboration) Pavel Starovoitov CERN -04-0 he researcher is supported by Marie Curie Incoming International Fellowship of the European Commission
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 21 Aug 2011
arxiv:18.155v1 [hep-ex] 1 Aug 011 Early Searches with Jets with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC University of Chicago, Enrico Fermi Institute E-mail: georgios.choudalakis@cern.ch We summarize the analysis
More informationRecent QCD results from ATLAS
Recent QCD results from ATLAS PASCOS 2013 Vojtech Pleskot Charles University in Prague 21.11.2013 Introduction / Outline Soft QCD: Underlying event in jet events @7TeV (2010 data) Hard double parton interactions
More informationHard And Soft QCD Physics In ATLAS
Hard And Soft QCD Physics In ALAS Stefanie Adomeit on behalf of the ALAS collaboration International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics - Crete, June -6, QCD Measurements in ALAS at LHC every kind
More informationQCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets
QCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets Mike Strauss The University of Oklahoma The Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics for the CDF and DØD Collaborations APS 2009 Denver, Colorado
More informationQCD and jets physics at the LHC with CMS during the first year of data taking. Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU Louvain-la-Neuve
QCD and jets physics at the LHC with CMS during the first year of data taking Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU Louvain-la-Neuve February 8, 2006 Bon appétit! February 8, 2006 Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU 1 Why this seminar?
More informationJet Energy Calibration. Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool
Jet Energy Calibration Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool Fermilab, August 14th 2006 1 Outline Introduction CDF and D0 calorimeters Response corrections Multiple interactions η-dependent corrections
More informationDetermination of the strong coupling constant from multi-jet production with the ATLAS detector
Determination of the strong coupling constant from multi-jet production with the ATLAS detector WNPPC 22 Marc-André Dufour McGill University February 22 Marc-André Dufour February 22 Determination of strong
More informationMeasurement of multijets and the internal structure of jets at ATLAS
Measurement of multijets and the internal structure of jets at ALAS Bilge M. Demirköz, on behalf of the ALAS Collaboration Institut de Fisica d Altes Energies, Barcelona, SPAIN also at Middle East echnical
More informationJet physics in ATLAS. Paolo Francavilla. IFAE-Barcelona. Summer Institute LNF , QCD, Heavy Flavours and Higgs physics
Jet physics in ATLAS IFAE-Barcelona Summer Institute LNF-2012-2, QCD, Heavy Flavours and Higgs physics Frascati National Laboratories 27 June 2012 Jets in the LHC era At the Large Hadron Collider (LHC),
More informationATLAS jet and missing energy reconstruction, calibration and performance in LHC Run-2
Prepared for submission to JINS International Conference on Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 7 February - March, 7 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia ALAS jet and missing
More informationMeasurement of the jet production properties at the LHC with the ATLAS Detector
Measurement of the jet production properties at the LHC with the ALAS Detector Stanislav okar Comenius University, Bratislava On behalf of the ALAS collaboration Different features of the jet production
More informationJet Reconstruction and Energy Scale Determination in ATLAS
Jet Reconstruction and Energy Scale Determination in ATLAS Ariel Schwartzman 3 rd Top Workshop: from the Tevatron to ATLAS Grenoble, 23-Oct-2008 1 Outline ATLAS Calorimeters Calorimeter signal reconstruction:
More informationProton anti proton collisions at 1.96 TeV currently highest centre of mass energy
Tevatron & Experiments 2 Proton anti proton collisions at 1.96 TeV currently highest centre of mass energy Tevatron performing very well 6.5 fb 1 delivered (per experiment) 2 fb 1 recorded in 2008 alone
More informationPhysics at Hadron Colliders
Physics at Hadron Colliders Part 2 Standard Model Physics Test of Quantum Chromodynamics - Jet production - W/Z production - Production of Top quarks Precision measurements -W mass - Top-quark mass QCD
More informationMeasurement of the associated production of direct photons and jets with the Atlas experiment at LHC. Michele Cascella
Measurement of the associated production of direct photons and jets with the Atlas experiment at LHC Michele Cascella Graduate Course in Physics University of Pisa The School of Graduate Studies in Basic
More informationTwo Early Exotic searches with dijet events at ATLAS
ATL-PHYS-PROC-2011-022 01/06/2011 Two Early Exotic searches with dijet events at ATLAS University of Toronto, Department of Physics E-mail: rrezvani@physics.utoronto.ca This document summarises two exotic
More informationQCD Studies at LHC with the Atlas detector
QCD Studies at LHC with the Atlas detector Introduction Sebastian Eckweiler - University of Mainz (on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration) Examples of QCD studies Minimum bias & underlying event Jet-physics
More informationSOFT QCD AT ATLAS AND CMS
SAHAL YACOOB UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN ON BEHALF OF THE ATLAS AND CMS COLLABORATIONS SOFT QCD AT ATLAS AND CMS 28th Rencontres de Blois INTRODUCTION IN 15 MINUTES 2 Inelastic cross section ATLAS and CMS
More informationJet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC
Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC Ulrike Schnoor Michigan State University High Energy Physics Institutsseminar IKTP TU Dresden, Nov 4, 010 Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC
More informationPhysics at Hadron Colliders Part II
Physics at Hadron Colliders Part II Marina Cobal Università di Udine 1 The structure of an event One incoming parton from each of the protons enters the hard process, where then a number of outgoing particles
More informationQCD dijet analyses at DØ
QCD dijet analyses at DØ Pavel Demine for the DØ collaboration DAPNIA-SPP, CEA Saclay, France Contents: DØ detector Jet reconstruction at DØ Dijet mass spectrum Dijet azimuthal angle decorrelation XII
More informationNikos Varelas. University of Illinois at Chicago. CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 20, Nikos Varelas. CTEQ Meeting Nov 20, 2009
QCD Physics at CMS University of Illinois at Chicago CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 0, 009 1 QCD Physics at CMS University of Illinois at Chicago CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern
More informationResults on QCD jet production at the LHC (incl. Heavy flavours)
Results on QCD jet production at the LHC (incl. Heavy flavours) R. Seuster (TRIUMF) On behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations Recontres du Vietnam August 11th 17th, 2013 Windows on the Universe Outline
More informationMeasurement of the Inclusive Isolated Prompt Photon Cross Section at CDF
of the Inclusive Isolated Cross at IFAE Barcelona HEP Seminar University of Virginia Outline Theoretical introduction Prompt photon production The The Photon detection prediction The pqcd NLO prediction
More informationAtlas results on diffraction
Atlas results on diffraction Alessia Bruni INFN Bologna, Italy for the ATLAS collaboration Rencontres du Viet Nam 14th Workshop on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering Qui Nhon, 16/12/2011 EDS 2011 Alessia
More informationDon Lincoln. QCD Results from the Tevatron
Recent Don Lincoln Fermilab DØ Calorimeter Uranium-Liquid Argon Calorimeter stable, uniform response, radiation hard Compensating: e/π 1 Uniform hermetic coverage η 4.2, recall η ln[tan(θ/2)] Longitudinal
More informationMinimum Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CDF
FERMILAB-CONF--531-E Minimum Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CDF INFN, Bologna E-mail: moggi@bo.infn.it Soft, non-perturbative, interactions are poorly understood from the theoretical point of view
More informationResults from D0: dijet angular distributions, dijet mass cross section and dijet azimuthal decorrelations
Results from D: dijet angular distributions, dijet mass cross section and dijet azimuthal decorrelations Zdenek Hubacek Czech Technical University in Prague E-mail: zdenek.hubacek@cern.ch on behalf of
More informationMeasurement of Jet Energy Scale and Resolution at ATLAS and CMS at s = 8 TeV
Measurement of Jet Energy Scale and Resolution at ATLAS and CMS at s = 8 TeV EDSBlois 2015 02.07.2015 Dominik Haitz on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations INSTITUT FÜR EXPERIMENTELLE KERNPHYSIK
More informationColin Jessop. University of Notre Dame
Colin Jessop University of Notre Dame Test the evolution of QCD to higher energies ( and lower x) Search for new particles with Quarks, gluons and photons in Final state Jet production is dominant process
More informationMeasurement of multi-jet cross sections in proton proton collisions at a 7 TeV center-of-mass energy
Eur. Phys. J. C (2011) 71:1763 DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1763-6 Regular Article - Experimental Physics Measurement of multi-jet cross sections in proton proton collisions at a 7 TeV center-of-mass energy
More informationJet reconstruction with first data in ATLAS
University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada E-mail: damir.lelas@cern.ch The algorithms used for jet reconstruction in ATLAS are presented. General performance aspects like jet signal linearity and the
More informationMini-Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CMS
Yuan Chao Department of Physics National Taiwan University 1617 Taipei, TAIWAN 1 Introduction The Tevatron experiments provide us very good information for the quantum chromodynamics (QCD) modelings of
More informationFeasibility of a cross-section measurement for J/ψ->ee with the ATLAS detector
Feasibility of a cross-section measurement for J/ψ->ee with the ATLAS detector ATLAS Geneva physics meeting Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Outline Motivation Theoretical background for J/ψ hadroproduction
More informationQCD at CDF. Régis Lefèvre IFAE Barcelona On behalf of the CDF Collaboration
QCD at CDF Régis Lefèvre IFAE Barcelona On behalf of the CDF Collaboration Jet Inclusive Cross-Section Underlying event studies Jet Shapes Specific processes _ W+Jets, γ + γ, γ + b/c, b-jet / bb jet Diffraction
More informationRecent Results on Jet Physics and α s
Recent Results on Jet Physics and α s XXI Physics in Collision Conference Seoul, Korea June 8, Presented by Michael Strauss The University of Oklahoma Outline Introduction and Experimental Considerations
More informationPrecision QCD at the Tevatron. Markus Wobisch, Fermilab for the CDF and DØ Collaborations
Precision QCD at the Tevatron Markus Wobisch, Fermilab for the CDF and DØ Collaborations Fermilab Tevatron - Run II Chicago Ecm: 1.8 1.96 TeV more Bunches 6 36 Bunch Crossing 3500 396ns CDF Booster Tevatron
More informationDistinguishing quark and gluon jets at the LHC
Distinguishing quark and jets at the LHC Giorgia Rauco (on behalf of the ALAS and CMS Collaborations) Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland Abstract: Studies focused on discriminating between jets originating
More informationTop quarks objects definition and performance at ATLAS
5th International Workshop on op Quark Physics (OP) doi:.88/74-6596/45// op quarks objects definition and performance at ALAS V. Boisvert on behalf of the ALAS Collaboration Royal Holloway University of
More informationEarly physics with Atlas at LHC
Early physics with Atlas at LHC Bellisario Esposito (INFN-Frascati) On behalf of the Atlas Collaboration Outline Atlas Experiment Physics goals Next LHC run conditions Physics processes observable with
More informationECFA Meeting March 9 10, Prague. Alexander Kupčo. Institute of Physics, Center for Particle Physics, Prague
ECFA Meeting March 9, Prague Alexander Kupčo Institute of Physics, Center for Particle Physics, Prague DIRAC experiment Phase I: Precise measurement of pionium lifetime Alexander Kupčo, Institute of Physics,
More informationTop Quark Production at the LHC. Masato Aoki (Nagoya University, Japan) For the ATLAS, CMS Collaborations
Top Quark Production at the LHC Masato Aoki (Nagoya University, Japan) For the ATLAS, CMS Collaborations Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 091503, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 054018, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 054028, Comput.
More informationStatus of the LHCb experiment and minimum bias physics
Status of the LHCb experiment and minimum bias physics Sebastian Bachman Heidelberg University on behalf of the LHCb collaboration 6/19/2010 Sebastian Bachmann 1 Beauty and Charm at the LHC LHC is a factory
More informationJet Calibration Issues in t t Events
Jet Calibration Issues in t t Events Andreas Jantsch Max-Planck-Institut für Physik Munich 39. Herbstschule für Hochenergiephysik Maria Laach A. Jantsch (MPI für Physik) Jet Calibration Issues in t t Events
More informationMeasurement of Quenched Energy Flow for Dijets in PbPb collisions with CMS
Measurement of Quenched Energy Flow for Dijets in PbPb collisions with CMS For the CMS Collaboration NPA Seminar Yale, USA 15 October, 2015 Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Trying to answer two important
More informationPhysics with Tau Lepton Final States in ATLAS. Felix Friedrich on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration
Physics with Tau Lepton Final States in ATLAS on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration HEP 2012, Valparaiso (Chile), 06.01.2012 The Tau Lepton m τ = 1.8 GeV, heaviest lepton cτ = 87 μm, short lifetime hadronic
More informationMeasurement of photon production cross sections also in association with jets with the ATLAS detector
Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings 00 (07) 6 Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings Measurement of photon production cross sections also in association with jets with the detector Sebastien Prince
More informationEarly Physics with the CMS detector at LHC
Early Physics with the CMS detector at LHC HLPW2008 6. 8. March 2008 Spa, Belgium Andre Holzner CERN/CMS Outline Status and schedule CMS LHC Early data analyses: The roadmap to discovering new physics
More informationQCD Jet Physics with CMS LHC
QCD Jet Physics with CMS Detector @ LHC Y.Chao for the CMS Collaboration (National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan) QCD10 (25th annivervary) 2010/06/28-07/03 The Large Hadron Collider Four major experiments
More informationOverview of PDF-sensitive measurements from Run I in ATLAS
Overview of PDF-sensitive measurements from Run I in ATLAS on behalf of ATLAS Parton Distributions for the LHC 05 February 5- ATLAS SM Measurements Traditional processes for PDF fits include jets, Drell-Yan
More informationW/Z+jet results from the Tevatron
W/Z+jet results from the Tevatron Dmitry Bandurin Florida State University On behalf of D0 and CDF Collaborations Moriond QCD 2012, March 15, La Thuile, Italy Precision QCD tests Photon, W, Z etc. p parton
More informationReview of LHCb results on MPI, soft QCD and diffraction
Review of LHCb results on MPI, soft QCD and diffraction Marcin Kucharczyk on behalf of LHCb collaboration HNI Krakow EDS Blois 2015, Borgo (Corse), 30.06.2015 Outline LHCb - general purpose forward experiment
More informationPhysics object reconstruction in the ATLAS experiment
Physics object reconstruction in the ALAS experiment, on behalf of the ALAS Collaboration Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University Blegdamsvej 7, Denmark E-mail: xella@nbi.dk his document presents a
More informationLuminosity measurement and K-short production with first LHCb data. Sophie Redford University of Oxford for the LHCb collaboration
Luminosity measurement and K-short production with first LHCb data Sophie Redford University of Oxford for the LHCb collaboration 1 Introduction Measurement of the prompt Ks production Using data collected
More informationATLAS: Status and First Results
ATLAS: Status and First Results, University of Sheffield, on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 1 Overview of the ATLAS detector Status of the experiment Performance and physics results in the first six
More informationHighlights of top quark measurements in hadronic final states at ATLAS
Highlights of top quark measurements in hadronic final states at ATLAS Serena Palazzo 1,2,, on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 1 Università della Calabria 2 INFN Cosenza Abstract. Measurements of inclusive
More informationThe ATLAS Detector at the LHC
The ATLAS Detector at the LHC Results from the New Energy Frontier Cristina Oropeza Barrera Experimental Particle Physics University of Glasgow Somewhere near the Swiss Alps... A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS
More informationMeasurements of BB Angular Correlations based on Secondary Vertex Reconstruction at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV in CMS
Measurements of BB Angular Correlations based on Secondary Vertex Reconstruction at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV in CMS Published: JHEP03(2011)136 (arxiv:1102.3194) L. Sala (ETH Zurich) on behalf of the CMS Collaboration
More information2 ATLAS operations and data taking
The ATLAS experiment: status report and recent results Ludovico Pontecorvo INFN - Roma and CERN on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 1 Introduction The ATLAS experiment was designed to explore a broad
More informationRecent DØ results in Diffractive and Jet Physics
Recent DØ results in Diffractive and Jet Physics * Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510 E-mail: odell@fnal.gov DØ measurements of the inclusive jet cross section and the
More informationBoosted Top Resonance Searches at CMS
Boosted Top Resonance Searches at CMS Justin Pilot, UC Davis on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Northwest Terascale Workshop, Using Jet Substructure University of Oregon 5 April 013 Introduction Many new
More informationJet quenching in PbPb collisions in CMS
Jet quenching in PbPb collisions in CMS Bolek Wyslouch École Polytechnique Massachusetts Institute of Technology arxiv:1102.1957 Orsay, February 18, 2011 1 Heavy Ions at the LHC Huge energy jump from RHIC:
More informationReconstruction in Collider Experiments (Part IX)
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments (Part IX) Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson,
More informationJet Results in pp and Pb-Pb Collisions at ALICE
Jet Results in pp and Pb-Pb Collisions at ALICE Oliver Busch for the ALICE Collaboration Motivation Jet reconstruction in ALICE Jets in pp Jets in Pb-Pb Hadron triggered recoil jets Motivation Jets originate
More informationLHC State of the Art and News
LHC State of the Art and News ATL-GEN-SLIDE-2010-139 16 June 2010 Arno Straessner TU Dresden on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration FSP 101 ATLAS Vulcano Workshop 2010 Frontier Objects in Astrophysics and
More informationEvent shapes in hadronic collisions
Event shapes in hadronic collisions Andrea Banfi ETH Zürich SM@LHC - Durham - April Event shapes at hadron colliders Event shapes are combinations of hadron momenta in a number related to the geometry
More informationResults on QCD and Heavy Flavors Production at the Tevatron
Results on QCD and Heavy Flavors Production at the Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova October 21 Padova Outline: Machine and detector description Latest results on QCD Heavy Flavor:
More informationQCD and Top physics studies in proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV centre-of-mass energy with the ATLAS detector
Journal of Physics: Conference Series QCD and Top physics studies in proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV centre-of-mass energy with the ATLAS detector To cite this article: Marcello Barisonzi 2012 J. Phys.:
More informationAzimuthal Correlations for Inclusive 2-jet, 3-jet and 4-jet events in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV with CMS
Azimuthal Correlations for Inclusive 2-jet, 3-jet and 4-jet events in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV with CMS Paris Gianneios University of Ioannina 29 th March 2018, HEP Athens Outline 1 2 3 4 5 CMS Detector
More informationJets (and photons) at the LHC. J. Huston LPC March 10, 2010
Jets (and photons) at the LHC J. Huston LPC March 10, 2010 More references Understanding cross sections at the LHC we have to understand QCD (at the LHC) PDF s, PDF luminosities and PDF uncertainties LO,
More informationLHC MPI and underlying event results
LHC MPI and underlying event results Marianna Testa (ATLAS) for the ALICE, ATLAS, CMS & LHCb collaborations SM@LHC 2012, Copenhagen, 10-13 April 2012 The Underlying Event Everything in hadron collisions
More informationSM and jet measurements at the LHC
SM and jet measurements at the LHC Andy Pilkington IPPP and Manchester Presented at the Young Experiment and Theory Ins7tute, Durham, January 2011 Part I jet characteris.cs 1) Introduc?on to ATLAS and
More informationRecent results on soft QCD topics from ATLAS
Recent results on soft QCD topics from ATLAS Roman Lysák Institute of Physics, Prague on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration Bormio 2016 Overview Understanding of soft-qcd interactions has direct impact
More informationConference Report Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland
Available on the CMS information server CMS CR 212/178 The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment Conference Report Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland 212//9 Measurement of isolated photon
More informationUnderlying Event Measurements at the LHC
14th EDS Blois Workshop Underlying Event Measurements at the LHC Michael Heinrich for the ATLAS and CMS collaborations INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL PARTICLE PHYSICS (EKP) PHYSICS FACULTY KIT University of
More informationStatus of ATLAS and CMS
Status of ATLAS and CMS A. Di Simone Università & INFN Roma Tor Vergata On behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations High precision for Hard Processes at the LHC GGI, Arcetri, 14-17/09/2010 Outline Introduction
More informationAtlas Status and Perspectives
Atlas Status and Perspectives Bruno Mansoulié (IRFU-Saclay) On behalf of the Topics The hot news: Heavy Ion analysis Data taking in 2010 Luminosity, Data taking & quality, trigger Detector performance
More informationTop production measurements using the ATLAS detector at the LHC
Top production measurements using the ATLAS detector at the LHC INFN, Sezione di Bologna and University of Bologna E-mail: romano@bo.infn.it This paper is an overview of recent results on top-quark production
More informationRecent Results of + c + X and + b + X Production Cross Sections at DØ
Recent Results of + c + X and + b + X Production Cross Sections at DØ Florida State University Wednesday March 18th Virginia HEP Seminar 1 The Standard Model (SM) The Standard Model (SM) describes the
More informationTests of QCD Using Jets at CMS. Salim CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration IPM /10/2017
Tests of QCD Using Jets at CMS Salim CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration IPM-2017 24/10/2017 2/25 Outline Introduction QCD at LHC QCD measurements on the LHC data Jets The strong
More informationSearch for Quark Substructure in 7 TeV pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector
Search for Quark Substructure in 7 TeV pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector Frank Berghaus SUPERVISOR: Michel Lefebvre University of Victoria June 12, 2012 Introduction ATLAS and the LHC The LHC provides
More informationInclusive top pair production at Tevatron and LHC in electron/muon final states
Inclusive top pair production at Tevatron and LHC in electron/muon final states Andreas Jung for the ATLAS, CDF, CMS and D Collaboration Fermilab, DAB5 - MS 357, P.O. Box 5, Batavia, IL, 651, USA DOI:
More informationMaria Fiascaris (University of Oxford) ATLAS UK Meeting, Durham 10/01/08
Summary W/Z + Jets Analyses Maria Fiascaris (University of Oxford) Aim and Motivations Work of the W/Z + jets Csc Note Group Goal: Measure W/Z+jets cross section in function of Jet Multiplicity and Leading
More informationMoriond QCD. Latest Jets Results from the LHC. Klaus Rabbertz, KIT. Proton Structure (PDF) Proton Structure (PDF) Klaus Rabbertz
Latest Jets Results from the LHC Proton Structure (PDF) Proton Structure (PDF), KIT 1 Flash Menu Motivation Accelerators and Detectors Jet Algorithms and Calibration Inclusive Jets Dijets and 3-Jets The
More informationHadronic Exotica Searches at CMS
Hadronic Exotica Searches at CMS Dinko Ferenček Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey On behalf of the CMS Collaboration SEARCH2012 Workshop March 19, 2012 College Park, Maryland Introduction and
More informationUsing Drell-Yan to Probe the
Using Drell-Yan to Probe the Underlying Event in Run 2 at CDF Deepak Kar University of Florida (On behalf of the CDF Collaboration) Experimental Particle Physics Seminar 30 th October 2008 Prologue: We
More informationPerformance of muon and tau identification at ATLAS
ATL-PHYS-PROC-22-3 22/2/22 Performance of muon and tau identification at ATLAS On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration University of Oregon E-mail: mansoora.shamim@cern.ch Charged leptons play an important
More informationDirect measurement of the W boson production charge asymmetry at CDF
Direct measurement of the boson production charge asymmetry at CDF Eva Halkiadakis Rutgers University For the CDF collaboration Joint Experimental-Theoretical Physics Seminar Fermilab May 22 2009 Outline
More informationDouble Parton Scattering in CMS. Deniz SUNAR CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Low-x th June 2017 Bari, Italy
Double Parton Scattering in CMS Deniz SUNAR CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Low-x 2017 17th June 2017 Bari, Italy Outline Introduction to DPS DPS measurements with CMS 2b +
More informationRisultati dell esperimento ATLAS dopo il run 1 di LHC. C. Gemme (INFN Genova), F. Parodi (INFN/University Genova) Genova, 28 Maggio 2013
Risultati dell esperimento ATLAS dopo il run 1 di LHC C. Gemme (INFN Genova), F. Parodi (INFN/University Genova) Genova, 28 Maggio 2013 1 LHC physics Standard Model is a gauge theory based on the following
More informationElectroweak Physics at the Tevatron
Electroweak Physics at the Tevatron Adam Lyon / Fermilab for the DØ and CDF collaborations 15 th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics June 2004 Outline Importance Methodology Single Boson Measurements
More informationThe inclusive jet cross section, jet algorithms, underlying event and fragmentation corrections. J. Huston Michigan State University
The inclusive jet cross section, jet algorithms, underlying event and fragmentation corrections J. Huston Michigan State University Tevatron in Run II 36 bunches (396 ns crossing time) 2 CDF in Run II
More informationJet energy measurement in the ATLAS detector
Jet energy measurement in the ATLAS detector Jet energy scale uncertainties are usually among largest experimental uncertainties Need precise jet energy measurements and provide uncertainties and theit
More informationHadron Collider Physics, HCP2004, June 14-18
) " % "" ' & % % " ) " % '% &* ' ) * ' + " ' ) ( $#! ' "") ( * " ) +% % )( (. ' + -, '+ % &* ' ) ( 021 % # / ( * *' 5 4* 3 %( '' ' " + +% Hadron Collider Physics, HCP2004, June 14-18 The Run II DØ Detector
More informationFirst V+jets results with CMS. Vitaliano Ciulli (Univ. & INFN Firenze) V+jets workshop, 8-10 Sep 2010, Durham
First V+jets results with CMS Vitaliano Ciulli (Univ. & INFN Firenze) V+jets workshop, 8- Sep 20, Durham Outline Jet and missing energy reconstruction W and Z selections and cross-section measurement First
More informationFYST17 Lecture 6 LHC Physics II
FYST17 Lecture 6 LHC Physics II 1 Today & Monday The LHC accelerator Challenges The experiments (mainly CMS and ATLAS) Important variables Preparations Soft physics EWK physics Some recent results Focus
More informationOctober 4, :33 ws-rv9x6 Book Title main page 1. Chapter 1. Measurement of Minimum Bias Observables with ATLAS
October 4, 2018 3:33 ws-rv9x6 Book Title main page 1 Chapter 1 Measurement of Minimum Bias Observables with ATLAS arxiv:1706.06151v2 [hep-ex] 23 Jun 2017 Jiri Kvita Joint Laboratory for Optics, Palacky
More informationPileup measurement and mitigation techniques in CMS
Pileup measurement and mitigation techniques in CMS A Perloff, on behalf of the CMS collaboration Graduate Student, Department of Physics and Astronomy, exas A&M University, College Station, X 7784-44,
More information