NON-SELF MAPPINGS UNDER COMMON LIMIT RANGE PROPERTY IN SYMMETRIC SPACES AND FIXED POINTS
|
|
- Herbert Simmons
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TWMS J. App. Eng. Math. V.8, N.1, 018, pp NON-SELF MAPPINGS UNDER COMMON LIMIT RANGE PROPERTY IN SYMMETRIC SPACES AND FIXED POINTS SUMIT CHANDOK 1, DEEPAK KUMAR, Abstract. In this paper, some sufficient conditions are provided for the existence of fixed points for two pairs of non-self mappings satisfying CLR property without the condition of continuity on mappings in the framework of symmetric spaces. Several interesting corollaries are also deduced. Some examples are also provided which illustrate the usability of the results obtained. Keywords: weak compatible mappings, (φ, ψ)-weak rational type contraction mappings, metric space. AMS Subject Classification: 47H10; 54H5; 46J10; 46J Introduction The classical Banach s contraction principle given by S. Banach proved to be an effective tool which assures the existence and uniqueness of fixed points in complete metric spaces. Besides offering a constructive procedure to compute the fixed points of the underlying mappings this principle has played a major role in the development of nonlinear analysis. A vast amount of mathematical activites has been carried out in various branches of mathematics and in economics, life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, computer science, and others by using Banach s contraction principle by the several authors. Fixed point theorems for various types of nonlinear contractive mappings in different abstract spaces have been scrutinized extensively by various researchers (see [1]-[17] and the references cited therein). Sometimes one may come across situations the full force of metric requirements are not used in the proofs of certain metrical fixed point theorems. Motivated by this fact, several authors obtained fixed point and common fixed point results in symmetric and semi-metric space. In this paper, we establish some theorems of common fixed point for two pairs of non-self weakly compatible mappings using CLR (common limit range) property satisfying a generalized rational type contractive condition in the setting of symmetric spaces. To discuss the importance of the results obtained some illustrative examples have been discussed at the last.. Preliminaries In this section, definitions and notations are defined which are required to establish the results. Definition.1. A symmetric function d 1 defined on a nonempty set X as d 1 : X X [0, ) satisfies the following conditions: (1) d 1 (s 1, t 1 ) = 0 if and only if s 1 = t 1, for s 1, t 1 X; 1 School of Mathematics, Thapar University, Patiala , Punjab, India. sumit.chandok@thapar.edu; ORCID: IKG Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar-Kapurthala Highway, Kapurthala , Punjab, India. Department of Mathematics, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab , India. deepakanand@live.in; ORCID: Manuscript received: October 10, 0; accepted: January 17, 017. TWMS Journal of Applied and Engineering Mathematics, Vol.8, No.1 c Işık University, Department of Mathematics, 018; all rights reserved. 0
2 S. CHANDOK, D. KUMAR : NON-SELF MAPPINGS UNDER COMMON LIMIT RANGE... 1 () d 1 (s 1, t 1 ) = d 1 (t 1, s 1 for s 1, t 1 X. A symmetric space (X, d 1 ) is a toplogical space whose topology is induced by symmetric d 1. The main difference between a metric and a symmetric space is of triangle inequality. Since a symmetric space may not be Hausdorff, therefore to prove fixed point theorems we required some additional axioms. which are discussed in [1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 17]. From now on (X, d 1 ) stands for a symmetric space, as X denotes an arbitrary non-empty set. Then (W 3 ) [17] for given t n, s and t in X, lim n d 1 (t n, s) = 0 and lim n d 1 (t n, t) = 0 imply s = t; (W 4 ) [17] for given t n, s n and s in X, lim n d 1 (t n, s) = 0 and lim n d 1 (t n, s n ) = 0 imply lim n d 1 (s n, s) = 0; (HE) [1] for given t n, s n and s in X, lim n d 1 (t n, s) = 0 and lim n d 1 (s n, s) = 0 imply lim n d 1 (t n, s n ) = 0; (1C) [5] a symmetric d 1 is said to be 1-continuous if lim n d 1 (t n, s) = 0 implies lim n d 1 (t n, s) = d 1 (s, t) t n is a sequence in X and s, t X; (CC) [5] a symmetric d 1 is said to be continuous if lim n d 1 (t n, s) = 0 and lim n d 1 (s n, t) = 0 implies lim n d 1 (t n, s n ) = d 1 (s, t) t n, s n are sequences in X and s, t X. Here, it can be seen that (1C) (W 3 ) and (W 4 ) (W 3 ) but the converse implications i.e (W ) (1C) and (W 3 ) (W 4 ) are not true. In general, all other possible implications amongst (W 3 (1C) and (HE) are not true. However, (CC) implies (W 3 (W 4 (HE) and (1C). For detail, we refer to an interesting note written by Cho et al.[4] which contains few illustrative examples. Employing these axioms, several authors have proved some common fixed point theorems in the framework of semi-metric and symmetric spaces (see, e.g.,[1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 17]). It is noted that if (X, d 1 ) is a cone metric space over a normal cone and d = d 1 then (X, d ) is a symmetric space which satisfies axioms (CC) but not in general a metric space (see [10] ). Some results on fixed point were obtained in the framework of cone symmetric spaces.[15]. Definition.. Let (X, d 1 ) be symmetric space. The mappings P and Q: X X are said to be (1) commuting if P Qt = QP t for all t X; () compatible [11] if lim n d 1 (P Qt n, QP t n ) = 0 for each sequence t n in X such that lim n P t n = lim n Qt n ; (3) non-compatible [14] if a sequence t n exists in X such that lim n P t n = lim n Qt n, but lim n d 1 (P Qt n, QP t n ) is either nonzero or nonexistent; (4) weakly compatible [1] if P and Q commute at their coincidence points, that is, P Qt = QP t whenever P t = Qt, for some t X. Definition.3. [9] Two families P i m i=1 and Q k n k=1 of self mappings are said to pairwise commuting if (1) P i P j = P j P i for all i, j 1,,..., m; () Q k Q l = Q l Q k for all k, l 1,,..., n; (3) P i Q k = Q k P i for all i 1,,..., m and k 1,,..., n. Some definitions for non-self mappings are given below; Definition.4. Let Y be an arbitrary set, (X, d) be a symmetric space and let P, Q, R, S be mappings from Y into X. Then (1) the pair (P, R) is said to satisfy (E.A) property [] if there exists a sequence t n in Y such that lim n P t n = lim n Rt n = z 1, for some z 1 X; () the pairs (P, R) and (Q, S) are said to share the common (E.A) property [13], if there exists two sequences t n and s n in Y such that lim n P t n = lim n Rt n = lim n Qs n = lim n Ss n = z 1, for some z 1 X; (3) the pairs (P, R) is said to have (CLR R )) property [] if there exists a sequence t n in Y such that lim n P t n = lim n Rt n = z, for some z 1 R(Y );
3 TWMS J. APP. ENG. MATH. V.8, N.1, 018 (4) the pairs (P, R) and (Q, S) are said to share (CLR RS ) property [7] if there exit two sequences t n and s n in Y such that lim n P t n = lim n Rt n = lim n Qs n = lim n Ss n = z 1, for some z 1 R(Y ) S(Y ). Remark.1. Note that (1) If we set P = Q and R = S, then condition (4) reduces to condition (3). () Evidently, (CLR RS ) property implies the common (E.A) property but converse is not true. 3. Main Results To begin our main section, we have some notations which will be required in the sequel to establish the results. Let Ψ be the collection of all functions ψ : [0, ) [0, ) satisfying the following conditions: (i) ψ is continuous as well as monotonically nondecreasing function on [0, ); (ii) ψ(t 1 ) = 0 if and only if t 1 = 0. Let Θ be the collection of all functions α : [0, ) [0, ) satisfying the following conditions: (i) α is continuous as well as monotonically non decreasing on [0, ) ; (ii) α(t 1 ) = 0 if and only if t 1 = 0 and α(t 1 ) t 1 for all t 1 > 0. Let Φ be the collection of all functions ϕ : [0, ) [0, ) satisfying the following conditions: (i) ϕ is continuous on [0, ); (ii) ϕ(t 1 ) = 0 if and only if t 1 = 0. we begin with the following lemma. Lemma 3.1. Let (X, d 1 ) be symmetric space d 1 satisfies the condition (CC) while Y be an arbitrary non- empty set with P, Q, R, S : Y X. Suppose that the following hypotheses hold: (1) the pair (P, R) satisfies the (CLR R ) property [respectively the pair (Q, S) satisfies the (CLR S ) property]; () P (Y ) S(Y ) [respectively Q(Y ) R(Y )]; (3) S(Y ) [respectively, R(Y )] is a closed subset of X; (4) Qy n converges for every sequence y n in Y such that Sy n converges [repectively P x n converges for every sequence x n in Y such that Rx n converges]; (5) for all t 0, ψ(t) ϕ(t) 0 and ψ(t) ϕ(t) = 0 t = 0, for some ψ Ψ, ϕ Φ, α Θ, (6) the mappings P, Q, R and S satisfy, for some ψ Ψ, ϕ Φ, α Θ, ψ(d 1 (P x, Qy)) α(m(x, y)) β(ϕ(d 1 (P x, Rx) ϕ(d 1 (P x, Sy))) (3.1) M(x, y) = max ϕ(d 1 (P x, Qy) ϕ(d 1 (P x, Rx) ϕ(d 1 (Qy, Sy) ϕ( d 1(P x, Sy) + d 1 (Rx, Qy) (3.) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P x, Rx) 1 + d 1 (P x, Qy) d 1(Qy, Sy) ϕ( 1 + d 1(Qy, Sy) 1 + d 1 (P x, Qy) d 1(P x, Rx) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P x, Sy) + d 1 (Rx, Qy) 1 + d 1 (P x, Rx) + d 1 (Qy, Sy) d 1(P x, Rx)) and β : [0, ) [0, ) is a continuous mapping such that β(x, y) = 0 if and only if x = 0, y = 0 for all x, y X. Then the pair (P, R) and (Q, S) share the (CLR RS ) property. Proof. Suppose that (CLR R ) property for the pair (P, R) holds. So, there exists a sequence of x n in Y such that lim n P x n = lim n Rx n = z, z R(Y ). As S(Y ) is a closed subset of X, P (Y ) S(Y ) and for each x n Y there corresponds a sequence y n Y such that P x n = Sy n. Therefore, lim n Sy n = lim n P x n = z, z R(Y ) S(Y ). Thus, we have lim n d 1 (P x n, z) = lim n d 1 (Rx n, z) = lim n d 1 (Sy n, z) = 0 Therefore, we have lim n d 1 (P x n, Rx n ) = 0 and lim n d 1 (Rx n, Sy n ) = 0.
4 S. CHANDOK, D. KUMAR : NON-SELF MAPPINGS UNDER COMMON LIMIT RANGE... 3 By (4 sequence Qy n converges. Now, we need to show that Qy n z as n. By (CC we get lim n d 1 (P x n, Qy n ) = lim n d 1 (z, lim n Qy n ), lim n d 1 (Rx n, Qy n ) = lim n d 1 (z, lim n Qy n ) and lim n d 1 (Qy n, Sy n ) = d 1 (lim n Qy n z). By inserting x = x n and y = y n in equation (3.1) we get M(x n, y n ) = max ψ(d 1 (P x n, Qy n )) α(m(x n, y n )) β(ϕ(d 1 (P x n, Rx n ) ϕ(d 1 (P x n, Sy n )) (3.3) ϕ(d 1 (P x n, Qy n ) ϕ(d 1 (P x n, Rx n d 1 (Qy n, Sy n ) ϕ( d 1(P x n, Sy n ) + d 1 (Rx n, Qy n ) Taking the limit n in equation (3.3 we have ϕ( 1 + d 1(P x n, Rx n ) 1 + d 1 (P x n, Qy n ) d 1(Qy n, Sy n ) ϕ( 1 + d 1(Qy n, Sy n ) 1 + d 1 (P x n, Qy n ) d 1(P x n, Rx n ) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P x n, Sy n ) + d 1 (Rx n, Qy n ) 1 + d 1 (P x n, Rx n ) + d 1 (Qy n, Sy n ) d 1(P x n, Rx n )) ψ(d 1 (z, lim n Qy n)) α( lim n M(x n, y n )) β(ϕ(d 1 (z, z) ϕ(d 1 (z, z)) (3.4) = max 1+d 1(z,z) lim n M(x n, y n ) d1(z,z)+d1(z,limn Qyn) ϕ(d 1 (z, lim n Qy n ) ϕ(d 1 (z, z) ϕ(d 1 (lim n Qy n, z) ϕ( ϕ( 1+d 1(z,lim n Qy d n) 1(lim n Qy n, z) ϕ( 1+d 1(z,lim n Qy d n) 1(z, z) ϕ( 1+d 1(z,z)+d 1(lim n Qy d n,z) 1(z, z)) 1+d1(limn Qyn,z) 1+d1(z,z)+d1(z,limn Qyn) = max ϕ(d 1 (z, lim n) ϕ(0 ϕ(d 1 ( lim n, z) ϕ( d 1(z, lim n Qy n ) n n 1 ϕ( 1 + d 1 (z, lim n Qy n ) d 1( lim n, z) ϕ(0 ϕ(0) n Hence equation (3.4) implies = ϕ(d 1 (z, lim n Qy n)) ψ(d 1 (z, lim n Qy n)) α(ϕ(d 1 (z, lim n Qy n)) β(ϕ(0 ϕ(0) ψ(d 1 (z, lim Qy n)) α(ϕ(d 1 (z, lim Qy n) n n Using property of Θ, we get Using condition (5 we have hence ψ(d 1 (z, lim n Qy n)) ϕ(d 1 (z, lim n Qy n)) ψ(d 1 (z, lim n Qy n)) ϕ(d 1 (z, lim n Qy n)) 0 ψ(d 1 (z, lim n Qy n)) ϕ(d 1 (z, lim n Qy n)) 0 ψ(d 1 (z, lim n Qy n)) ϕ(d 1 (z, lim n Qy n)) = 0 Again by using condition (5 we have d 1 (z, lim n Qy n ) = 0, Hence lim n Qy n = z which shows that the pair (P, R) and (Q, S) share the (CLR RS ) property.
5 4 TWMS J. APP. ENG. MATH. V.8, N.1, 018 Theorem 3.. Let (X, d 1 ) be a symmetric space the symmetric d 1 satisfies the condition (HE) and (1C) and Y be a non-empty set with P, Q, R, S : Y X. Suppose that the conditions (5) and (6) of Lemma 3.1 holds. If the pair (P, R) and (Q, S) share the (CLR RS ) property, then (P, R) and (Q, S) have a coincidence point each. Moreover if Y = X both the pair (P, R) and (Q, S) are weakly compatible then P, Q, R and S have a unique common fixed point. Proof. Since the pair (P, R) and (Q, S) share (CLR RS ) property. Therefore there exist two sequences x n and y n in Y such that lim n P x n = lim n Rx n = lim n Sy n = lim n Qy n = z, z R(Y ) S(Y ). Since z R(Y there exists a pair u Y such that Ru = z. Putting x = u and y = y n in equation (3.1) we get M(u, y n ) = max ψ(d 1 (P u, Qy n )) α(m(u, y n )) β(ϕ(d 1 (P u, Ru) ϕ(d 1 (P u, Sy n ))) (3.5) ϕ(d 1 (P u, Qy n ) ϕ(d 1 (P u, Ru) ϕ(d 1 (Qy n, Sy n ) ϕ( d 1(P u, Sy n ) + d 1 (Ru, Qy n ) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P u, Ru) 1 + d 1 (P u, Qy n ) d 1(Qy n, Sy n ) ϕ( 1 + d 1(Qy n, Sy n ) 1 + d 1 (P u, Qy n ) d 1(P u, Ru) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P u, Sy n ) + d 1 (Ru, Qy n ) 1 + d 1 (P u, Ru) + d 1 (Qy n, Sy n ) d 1(P u, Ru)) Letting n (taking the limit) in equation (3.5) and using the properties (1C) and (HE we have ψ(d 1 (P u, z)) α( lim n M(u, y n)) β( lim n (ϕ(d 1(P u, Ru) ϕ(d 1 (P u, Sy n ))) (3.6) lim M(u, y n) = max n ϕ(d 1 (P u, z) ϕ(d 1 (P u, z) ϕ(d 1 (z, z) ϕ( d 1(P u, z) + d 1 (z, z) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P u, z) 1 + d 1 (P u, z) d 1(z, z) ϕ( 1 + d 1(z, z) 1 + d 1 (P u, z) d 1(P u, z) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P u, z) + d 1 (z, z) 1 + d 1 (P u, z) + d 1 (z, z) d 1(P u, z)) = max ϕ(d 1 (P u, z) ϕ(d 1 (P u, z) ϕ(0 ϕ( d 1(P u, z) From equation (3.6 we obtain = ϕ(d 1 (P u, z)) ψ(d 1 (P u, z)) α(ϕ(d 1 (P u, z))) β(ϕ(d 1 (P u, z) ϕ(d 1 (P u, z))) 1 ϕ(0 ϕ( 1 + d 1 (P u, z) d 1(P u, z) ϕ(d 1 (P u, z)) Using property of Θ, we get ψ(d 1 (P u, z)) α(ϕ(d 1 (P u, z))) ψ(d 1 (P u, z)) ϕ(d 1 (P u, z)) ψ(d 1 (P u, z)) ϕ(d 1 (P u, z)) 0 Using condition 5 of lemma, we have ψ(d 1 (P u, z)) ϕ(d 1 (P u, z)) 0 Therefore ψ(d 1 (P u, z)) ϕ(d 1 (P u, z)) = 0 and hence it follows easily that P u = z. Therefore P u = Ru = z, which shows that u is a coincidence point of the pair (P, R).
6 S. CHANDOK, D. KUMAR : NON-SELF MAPPINGS UNDER COMMON LIMIT RANGE... 5 As z S(Y there exists a point v Y such that Sv = z. Putting x = u and y = v in equation (3.1 we have ψ(d 1 (z, Qv)) = ψ(d 1 (P u, Qv)) α(m(u, v)) β(ϕ(d 1 (z, z) ϕ(d 1 (z, z)) (3.7) M(u, v) = max ϕ(d 1 (P u, Qv) ϕ(d 1 (P u, Ru) ϕ(d 1 (Qv, Sv) ϕ( d 1(P u, Sv) + d 1 (Ru, Qv) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P u, Ru) 1 + d 1 (P u, Qv) d 1(Qv, Sv) ϕ( 1 + d 1(Qv, Sv) 1 + d 1 (P u, Qv) d 1(P u, Ru) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P u, Sv) + d 1 (Ru, Qv) 1 + d 1 (P u, Ru) + d 1 (Qv, Sv) d 1(P u, Ru)) = max ϕ(d 1 (z, Qv) ϕ(d 1 (z, z) ϕ(d 1 (Qv, z) ϕ( d 1(z, z) + d 1 (z, Qv) ϕ( 1 + d 1(z, z) 1 + d 1 (z, Qv) d 1(Qv, z) ϕ( 1 + d 1(Qv, z) 1 + d 1 (z, Qv) d 1(z, z))ϕ( 1 + d 1(z, z) + d 1 (z, Qv) 1 + d 1 (z, z) + d 1 (Qv, z) d 1(z, z)) = max ϕ(d 1 (z, Qv) ϕ(0 ϕ(d 1 (Qv, z) ϕ( d 1(z, Qv) Hence the equation (3.7) implies Using property of Θ, we get Using condition 5 of lemma, we have Hence = ϕ(d 1 (z, Qv)) ψ(d 1 (z, Qv)) α(ϕ(d 1 (z, Qv))) β(ϕ(0 ϕ(0) ψ(d 1 (z, Qv)) α(ϕ(d 1 (z, Qv))) ψ(d 1 (z, Qv)) ϕ(d 1 (z, Qv)) ψ(d 1 (z, Qv)) ϕ(d 1 (z, Qv)) 0, ψ(d 1 (z, Qv)) ϕ(d 1 (z, Qv)) 0, ψ(d 1 (z, Qv)) ϕ(d 1 (z, Qv)) = 0, 1 ϕ( 1 + d 1 (z, Qv) d 1(Qv, z) ϕ(0 ϕ(0) and it follows easily that z = Qv. Thus Qv = Sv = z, which shows that v is a coincidence point of the pair (Q, S). Suppose now that Y = X. Since the pair (P, R) and (Q, S) are weakly compatible, P u = Ru and Qv = Sv, therefore P z = P Ru = RP u = Rz and Qz = QSv = SQv = Sz. Putting x = z and y = v in equation (3.1 we have ψ(d 1 (P z, z)) = ψ(d 1 (P z, Qv)) α(m(z, v)) β(ϕ(d 1 (P z, Rz) ϕ(d 1 (P z, Sv)) (3.8) M(z, v) = max ϕ(d 1 (P z, Qv) ϕ(d 1 (P z, Rz) ϕ(d 1 (Qv, Sv) ϕ( d 1(P z, Sv) + d 1 (Rz, Qv) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P z, Rz) 1 + d 1 (P z, Qv) d 1(Qv, Sv) ϕ( 1 + d 1(Qv, Sv) 1 + d 1 (P z, Qv) d 1(P z, Rz) ϕ( 1 + d 1(Az, T v) + d 1 (Sz, Bv) 1 + d 1 (Az, Sz) + d 1 (Bv, T v) d 1(Az, Sz))
7 6 TWMS J. APP. ENG. MATH. V.8, N.1, 018 = max ϕ(d 1 (P z, z) ϕ(d 1 (P z, P z) ϕ(d 1 (z, z) ϕ( d 1(P z, z) + d 1 (P z, z) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P z, P z) 1 + d 1 (P z, z) d 1(z, z) ϕ( 1 + d 1(z, z) 1 + d 1 (P z, z) d 1(P z, P z) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P z, z) + d 1 (P z, z) 1 + d 1 (P z, z) + d 1 (z, z) d 1(P z, P z)) = max ϕ(d 1 (P z, z) ϕ(0 ϕ(0 ϕ(d 1 (P z, z) ϕ(0 ϕ(0 ϕ(0) = ϕ(d 1 (P z, z)) From equation (3.8 we get ψ(d 1 (P z, z)) α(ϕ(d 1 (P z, z))) β(ϕ(d 1 (P z, P z) ϕ(d 1 (P z, z))) ψ(d 1 (P z, z)) α(ϕ(d 1 (P z, z))) β(ϕ(0 ϕ(d 1 (P z, z))) Using property of Θ, we get ψ(d 1 (P z, z)) α(ϕ(d 1 (P z, z))) ψ(d 1 (P z, z)) ϕ(d 1 (P z, z)) Using condition 5 of lemma, we have Hence, ψ(d 1 (P z, z)) ϕ(d 1 (P z, z)) 0 ψ(d 1 (P z, z)) ϕ(d 1 (P z, z)) 0 ψ(d 1 (P z, z)) ϕ(d 1 (P z, z)) = 0 Using condition 5 of Lemma 3.1 it follows easily that z = P z = Rz and therefore z is a common fixed point of the pair (P, R). Putting x = u and y = z in equation (3.1 we have ψ(d 1 (z, Qz)) = ψ(d 1 (P u, Qz)) α(m(u, z)) β(ϕ(d 1 (P u, Ru) ϕ(d 1 (P u, Sz))) (3.9) M(u, z) = max ϕ(d 1 (P u, Qz) ϕ(d 1 (P u, Ru) ϕ(d 1 (Qz, Sz) ϕ( d 1(P u, Sz) + d 1 (Ru, Qz) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P u, Ru) 1 + d 1 (P u, Qz) d 1(Qz, Sz) ϕ( 1 + d 1(Qz, Sz) 1 + d 1 (P u, Qz) d 1(P u, Ru) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P u, Sz) + d 1 (Ru, Qz) 1 + d 1 (P u, Ru) + d 1 (Qz, Sz) d 1(P u, Ru)) = max ϕ(d 1 (z, Qz) ϕ(d 1 (z, z) ϕ(d 1 (Qz, Qz) ϕ( d 1(z, Qz) + d 1 (z, Qz) ϕ( 1 + d 1(z, z) 1 + d 1 (z, Qz) d 1(Qz, Qz) ϕ( 1 + d 1(Qz, Qz) 1 + d 1 (z, Qz) d 1(z, z) ϕ( 1 + d 1(z, Qz) + d 1 (z, Qz) d 1 (z, z)) 1 + d 1 (z, z) + d 1 (z, z) = max ϕ(d 1 (z, Qz) ϕ(0 ϕ(0 ϕ(d 1 (z, Qz) ϕ(0 ϕ(0 ϕ(0) = ϕ(d 1 (z, Qz)) From equation (3.9) we get ψ(d 1 (z, Qz)) α(ϕ(d 1 (z, Qz))) β(ϕ(d 1 (z, z) ϕ(d 1 (z, Qz))) ψ(d 1 (z, Qz)) α(ϕ(d 1 (z, Qz)))
8 S. CHANDOK, D. KUMAR : NON-SELF MAPPINGS UNDER COMMON LIMIT RANGE... 7 Using property of Θ, we get ψ(d 1 (z, Qz)) ϕ(d 1 (z, Qz)) Using condition 5 of lemma, we have Hence, ψ(d 1 (z, Qz)) ϕ(d 1 (z, Qz)) 0 ψ(d 1 (z, Qz)) ϕ(d 1 (z, Qz)) 0 ψ(d 1 (z, Qz)) ϕ(d 1 (z, Qz)) = 0 Using condition 5 of Lemma 3.1 it follows easily that z = Qz. Therefore Qz = Sz = z and we can conclude that z is a common fixed point of P, Q, R and S. The uniqueness of a common fixed point can be easily checked using the equation (3.1). Theorem 3.3. Let (X, d 1 ) be symmetric space, the symmetric d 1 satisfies the condition (CC and Y be an arbitrary non-empty set with P, Q, R, S : Y X. Suppose that the conditions (1 6) of Lemma 3.1 hold. Then (P, R) and (Q, S) have coincidence point each. Moreover, if Y = X and both the pairs (P, R) and (Q, S) are weakly compatible then P, Q, R and S have a unique common fixed point. Proof. In view of Lemma 3.1, the pairs (P, R) and (Q, S) share the (CLR RS ) property, therefore there exist two sequences x n and y n in Y such that lim n P x n = lim n Rx n = lim n Sy n = lim n Qy n = z, z R(Y ) S(Y ). The rest proof can be done on the same lines of Theorem 3.. Theorem 3.4. Let (X, d 1 ) be symmetric space, the symmetirc d 1 satisfies the conditions (HE) and (1C and let Y be an arbitrary non-empty set with P, Q, R, S : Y X. Suppose that the conditions (5) and (6) of Lemma 3.1 and the following hypotheses hold: (1) the pairs (P, R) and (Q, S) satisfy the common property (E.A); () R(Y ) and S(Y ) are closed subsets of X. Then (P, R) and (Q, S) have coincidence point each. Moreover, if Y = X and both the pairs (P, R) and (Q, S) are weakly compatible then P, Q, R and S have a unique common fixed point. Proof. If the pairs (P, R) and (Q, S) share the common property (E.A then there exist two sequences x n and y n in Y such that lim n P x n = lim n Rx n = lim n Sy n = lim n Qy n = z, for some z X. Since R(Y ) is closed, lim n Rx n = z = Ru for some u Y. Also, since S(Y ) is closed, then lim n Sy n = z = Sν for some ν Y. The rest proof can be done on the same lines of Theorem 3.. Corollary 3.5. The conclusion of Theorem 3.4 remain same on replacing condition () by the following: ( ) P (Y ) S(Y ) and Q(Y ) R(Y P (Y ) and Q(Y ) denote the closure of ranges of the mappings P and Q. Corollary 3.6. The conclusion of Theorem 3.4 remain same on replacing condition () by the following: ( ) P (Y ) and Q(Y ) are closed subsets of X, and P (Y ) S(Y Q(Y ) R(Y ). Corollary 3.7. Let (X, d 1 ) be symmetric space the symmetric d 1 satisfies the conditions (HE) and (1C and Y be an arbitrary non- empty set with P, R : Y X. Suppose that the given hypotheses hold:
9 8 TWMS J. APP. ENG. MATH. V.8, N.1, 018 (1) the pair (P, R) satisfies the (CLR R ) property; () for some ψ Ψ, ϕ Φ, α Θ and all x, y Y, satisfies ψ(d 1 (P x, P y)) α(m(x, y)) β(ϕ(d 1 (P x, Rx) ϕ(d 1 (P x, Ry))) (3.10) M(x, y) = max ϕ(d 1 (P x, P y) ϕ(d 1 (P x, Rx) ϕ(d 1 (P y, Ry) ϕ( d 1(P x, Ry) + d 1 (Rx, P y) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P x, Rx) 1 + d 1 (P x, P y) d 1(P y, Ry) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P y, Ry) 1 + d 1 (P x, P y) d 1(P x, Rx) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P x, Ry) + d 1 (Rx, P y) 1 + d 1 (P x, Rx) + d 1 (P y, Ry) d 1(P x, Rx)) and β : [0, ) [0, ) is a continuous mapping such that β(x, y) = 0 if and only if x = 0, y = 0 for all x, y Y Then the pair (P, R) has a coincidence point. Moreover, if Y = X and the pair (P, R) is weakly compatible then P and R have a unique common fixed point. Corollary 3.8. Let (X, d 1 ) be symmetric space the symmetric d 1 satisfies the conditions (HE) and (1C and Y be an arbitrary non- empty set with P, Q, T, R, S : Y X. Suppose that the following hypotheses hold: (1) the pairs (P, RT ) and (Q, S) satisfies the (CLR (RT )(S) ) property. () for some ψ Ψ, ϕ Φ, α Θ and all x, y Y, satisfies ψ(d 1 (P x, Qy)) α(m(x, y)) β(ϕ(d 1 (P x, RT x) ϕ(d 1 (P x, Sy))) (3.11) M(x, y) = max ϕ(d 1 (P x, Qy) ϕ(d 1 (P x, RT x) ϕ(d 1 (Qy, Sy) ϕ( d 1(P x, Sy) + d 1 (RT x, Qy) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P x, RT x) 1 + d 1 (P x, Qy) d 1(Qy, Sy) ϕ( 1 + d 1(Qy, Sy) 1 + d 1 (P x, Qy) d 1(P x, RT x) ϕ( 1 + d 1(Ax, T y) + d 1 (SRx, By) 1 + d 1 (Ax, SRx) + d 1 (By, T y) d 1(Ax, SRx)) and β : [0, ) [0, ) is a continuous mapping such that β(x, y) = 0 if and only if x = 0, y = 0 for all x, y Y Then the pairs (P, RT ) and (Q, S) have a coincidence point each. Moreover, if Y = X and both the pairs (P, RT ) and (Q, S) commute pairwise, that is P R = RP, P T = T P, RT = T R, QS = SQ then P, Q, T, R and S have a unique common point. Corollary 3.9. Let P, Q, R and S be self mappings of a symmetric space (X, d 1 ) satisfying the conditions (HE) and (1C). Suppose that, for fixed positive integer m, n, p, q. (1) the pair (P m, R p ) and (Q n, S q ) share the (CLR Rp Sq) property; () for some ψ Ψ, ϕ Φ, α Θ and all x, y Y, satisfies ψ(d 1 (P m x, Q n y)) α(m(x, y)) β(ϕ(d 1 (P m x, R p x) ϕ(d 1 (P m x, S q y))) (3.1)
10 S. CHANDOK, D. KUMAR : NON-SELF MAPPINGS UNDER COMMON LIMIT RANGE... 9 M(x, y) = max ϕ(d 1 (P m x, Q n y) ϕ(d 1 (P m x, R p x) ϕ(d 1 (Q n y, S q y) ϕ( d 1(P m x, S q y) + d 1 (R p x, Q n y) ϕ( 1 + d 1(P m x, R p x) 1 + d 1 (P m x, Q n y) d 1(Q n y, S q y) ϕ( 1 + d 1(Q n y, S q y) 1 + d 1 (P m x, Q n y) d 1(P m x, R p x)), ϕ( 1 + d 1(P m x, S q y) + d 1 (R p x, Q n y) 1 + d 1 (P m x, R p x) + d 1 (Q n y, S q y) d 1(P m x, R p x)) and β : [0, ) [0, ) is a continuous mapping such that β(x, y) = 0 if and only if x = 0, y = 0 for all x, y Y If P R = RP and QS = SQ then P, Q, R and S have a unique common fixed point. Example Let Y = [, 11) [1, ) = X equipped with the symmetric d 1 (s, t) = (s t) for all s, t Y which also satisfies (1C) and (HE). Define the mappings P, Q, R, S : Y X by if s (4, 11) if s (4, 11) P (s) =, Q(s) = 1 if s (, 4] 14 if s (, 4] if s = if s = R(s) = 11 if s (, 4], S(s) = 11 if s (, 4] 3s+ 7 ifs (4, 11) s if s (4, 11) Then we have P (Y ) =, 9 [, 9) 11 = S(Y ) and Q(Y ) =, 5 [, 5) 11 = R(Y ). Consider two sequences s n = n n N and t n = n N. Then the pair (P, R) and (Q, S) satisfies the (CLR RS ) property. Indeed we have lim P s n = lim Rs n = lim Qs n = lim St n = n n n n R(Y ) S(Y ); however, R(Y ) and S(Y ) are not closed subsets of X. Now define φ Φ by φ(t 1 ) = t 1, ψ Φ by ψ(t 1 ) = t1, α Θ by α(t 1) = t 1 and β : [0, ) [0, ) by β(t 1, s 1 ) = t1+s1. In order to verify the inequality (3.1 we distinguish the following possible cases: (1) If s = t =, then we get d 1 (P s, Qt) = 0 and hence ψ(0) = 0 and (3.1) is trivially satisfied; () If s =, t (, 4], then we get d 1 (P s, Qt) = 144 and hence ψ(d 1 (P s, Qt)) = 7, M(s, t) = 144, α(m(s, t)) = 144, β(φ(d 1 (P s, Rs φ(d 1 (P s, St)))) = 81, therefore R.H.S of the inequality (3.1) is 3 so L.H.S R.H.S; (3) If s =, t (4, 11 d 1 (P s, Qt) = 0 and hence ψ(d 1 (P s, Qt)) = 0, M(s, t) = (4 t), α(m(s, t)) = (4 t), β(φ(d 1 (P s, Rs φ(d 1 (P s, St)))) = (4 t), therefore R.H.S of the inequality (3.1) is 15(4 t) so L.H.S R.H.S; (4) If s (, 4], t =,then d 1 (P s, Qt) = 100 and hence ψ(d 1 (P s, Qt)) = 50, M(s, t) = 100, α(m(s, t)) = 100, β(φ(d 1 (P s, Rs φ(d 1 (P s, St)))) = 101, therefore R.H.S of the inequality (3.1) is 1499 so L.H.S R.H.S; (5) If s, t (, 4], then d 1 (P s, Qt) = 4 and hence ψ(d 1 (P s, Qt)) =, M(s, t) = 9, α(m(s, t)) = 9, β(φ(d 1 (P s, Rs φ(d 1 (P s, St)))) = , therefore R.H.S of the inequality (3.1) is 8 so L.H.S R.H.S;
11 30 TWMS J. APP. ENG. MATH. V.8, N.1, 018 (6) If s (, 4], t (4, 11then d 1 (P s, Qt) = 100 and hence ψ(d 1 (P s, Qt)) = 50, M(s, t) = 100 and β(φ(d 1 (P s, Rs φ(d 1 (P s, St)))) = 1+(14 t), therefore the R.H.S of the inequality (3.1) is 1599 (4 s) so L.H.S R.H.S; (7) If s (4, 11 t = then, d 1 (P s, Qt) = 0 and hence ψ(d 1 (P s, Qt)) = 0, M(s, t) = (1 3s) 49, α(m(s, t)) = (1 3s) 49, β(φ(d 1 (P s, Rs φ(d 1 (P s, St)))) = (1 3s) 98, therefore R.H.S of the inequality (3.1) is (1 3s) 98 so L.H.S R.H.S; (8) If s (4, 11 t (, 4] then, d 1 (P s, Qt) = 144 and hence ψ(d 1 (P s, Qt)) = 7, M(s, t) = 144 and β(φ(d 1 (P s, Rs φ(d 1 (P s, St)))) = (1 3s) , thereforer.h.s of the inequality (3.1) is (1 3s) 784 so L.H.S R.H.S; (9) If s, t (4, 11) then, d 1 (P s, Qt) = 0 and hence ψ(d 1 (P s, Qt)) = 0, M(s, t) = (49+(1 3s) )(4 s) and β(φ(d 1 (P s, Rs φ(d 1 (P s, St)))) = (1 3s) +49(4 s) 98, therefore, in all the cases inequality (3.1) holds; Thus, the above example satisfies all the conditions of Theorem 3., except for Y = X, but a unique common fixed point of the pair (P, R) and (Q, S) is. Here, one may check that all the involved mappings are discontinuous at their unique fixed point. Example In the setting of Example 3.10, replace the mappings R and T by the following, beside retaining the rest: if t = R(t) = S(t) = if t (, 4] 9t+6 7 ift (4, 11) Then we have P (Y ) =, 1 [, ] = S(Y ) and Q(Y ) =, 14 [, ] = R(Y ); Now R(Y ) and S(Y ) are closed subsets of X. Thus, all the conditions of Theorem 3.3 are satisfied, except Y = X; however the unique common fixed point of the pairs (P, R) and (Q, S) is. Example 3.1. In the setting of Example 3.10, replace the mappings R and S by the following, beside retaining the rest: if t = R(t) = S(t) = if t (, 4] 8t+17 7 ift (4, 11) Then we have P (Y ) =, 1 [, 15) = S(Y ) and Q(Y ) =, 14 [, 15) = R(Y ). Now, R(Y ) and S(Y ) are not closed subsets of X, but the conditions ( ) and ( ) of Corollaries 3.5 and 3.6 are satisfied, except Y = X; however the unique common fixed point of the pairs (P, R) and (Q, S) is. Acknowledgements. Authors are thankful to the learned referees for the valuable suggestions. References [1] A. Aliouche, A common fixed point theorem for weakly compatible mappings in symmetric spaces satisfying a contrative condition of integral type, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 3()( [] M. Aamri, D. EI Moutawakil, Common fixed points under contractive conditions in symmetric spaces, Appl. Math. E-notes 3( [3] I.D. Arandjelović, D. Kečkić, Symmetric spaces approach to some fixed point result, Nonlinear Anal. 75( [4] S.H. Cho, G.Y.Lee, J.S. Bae, On coincidence and fixed-point theorems in symmetric spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl. (008) Article ID 56130, 9 pages. [5] F. Galvin, S.D. Shore, Completeness in semi-metric, Pacific. J. Math. 113(1)(
12 S. CHANDOK, D. KUMAR : NON-SELF MAPPINGS UNDER COMMON LIMIT RANGE [6] M. Imdad, A.H. Soliman, Some common fixed point theorems for a pair of tangential mappings in symmetic spaces, Appl. Math. Lett. 3(4)( [7] M. Imdad, B.D. Pant, S. Chauhan, Fixed points theorems in Menger spaces using (CLRST ) property and applications. J. Nonlinear Anal. Optim. 3()( [8] M. Imdad, S. Chauhan, Z. Kadelburg, C. Vetro, Fixed point theorems for non-self mappings in symmetric spaces under φ-weak contractive conditions and an application to functional equations in dynamic programming, Appl. Math. Comp. 7( [9] M. Imdad, J. Ali, M. Tanveer, Coincidence and common fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in Menger PM spaces, Choas Solitons Fractals 4 (5)( [10] M. Jovanovic, Z. Kadelburg, S. Radenovic, Common fixed point results in metric-type spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl. (010 Article ID pages. [11] G. Jungck, Compatible mappings and common fixed points. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 9(4)( [1] G. Jungck, B.E. Rhodes, Fixed points for set valued functions without continuity, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 9(3)( [13] Y. Liu, J. Wu, Z. Li, Common fixed points of single-valued and multivalued maps, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 19( [14] R.P. Pant, Noncompatible mappings and common fixed points, Soochow J. Math. 6(1)( [15] S. Radenovic, Z. Kadelburg, Quasi-contractions on symmetric and cone symmetric spaces, Banach J. Math. Anal. 5( [] W. Sintunavarat, P. Kumam, Common fixed point theorems for a pair of weakly compatible mappings in fuzzy metric sapces, J. Appl. Math.(011) Article ID pages. [17] W.A. Wilson, On semi-metric space, Am. J. Math. 53( Sumit Chandok obtained his Ph.D. Degree from Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India. He published a book and more than 70 research papers in the International/National journals of high repute on Fixed Point Theory, Approximation Theory and Nonlinear Analysis. Deepak Kumar obtained his M.Sc. Degree from Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India. He published research papers in the International/National journals of high repute on Fixed Point Theory and Nonlinear Analysis.
A Common Fixed Point Theorem For Occasionally Weakly Compatible Mappings In Fuzzy Metric Spaces With The (Clr)-Property
Advances in Fuzzy Mathematics. ISSN 0973-533X Volume 11, Number 1 (2016), pp. 13-24 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com A Common Fixed Point Theorem For Occasionally Weakly Compatible
More informationCommon Fixed Point Theorems for Two Pairs of Weakly Compatible Mappings in Fuzzy Metric Spaces Using (CLR ST ) Property
IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM) e-issn: 2278-5728, p-issn: 2319-765X. Volume 12, Issue 6 Ver. I (Nov. - Dec.2016), PP 66-71 www.iosrjournals.org Common Fixed Point Theorems for Two Pairs of Weakly
More informationAvailable online at Advances in Fixed Point Theory, 2 (2012), No. 4, ISSN:
Available online at http://scik.org Advances in Fixed Point Theory, 2 (2012), No. 4, 452-463 ISSN: 1927-6303 SOME FIXED POINT RESULTS IN MENGER SPACES SUNNY CHAUHAN 1, SANDEEP BHATT 2, AND NEERAJ DHIMAN
More informationSOME FIXED POINT RESULTS FOR ADMISSIBLE GERAGHTY CONTRACTION TYPE MAPPINGS IN FUZZY METRIC SPACES
Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems Vol. 4, No. 3, 207 pp. 6-77 6 SOME FIXED POINT RESULTS FOR ADMISSIBLE GERAGHTY CONTRACTION TYPE MAPPINGS IN FUZZY METRIC SPACES M. DINARVAND Abstract. In this paper, we
More informationSome Common Fixed Point Theorems on G-Metric Space
Gen. Math. Notes, Vol. 1, No., April 014, pp.114-14 ISSN 19-7184; Copyright c ICSRS Publication, 014 www.i-csrs.org Available free online at http://www.geman.in Some Common Fixed Point Theorems on G-Metric
More informationCommon Fixed Point Results in Complex Valued Metric Spaces with (E.A) and (CLR) Properties
Advances in Analysis, Vol., No. 4, October 017 https://dx.doi.org/10.606/aan.017.400 47 Common Fixed Point Results in Complex Valued Metric Spaces with (E.A) (CLR) Properties Mian Bahadur Zada 1, Muhammad
More informationCommon Fixed Point Theorems For Weakly Compatible Mappings In Generalisation Of Symmetric Spaces.
IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM) e-issn: 2278-5728, p-issn:2319-765x. Volume 9, Issue 1 (Nov. Dec. 2013), PP 01-05 Common Fixed Point Theorems For Weakly Compatible Mappings In Generalisation Of Symmetric
More informationCOMMON RANDOM FIXED POINTS UNDER QUASI CONTRACTION CONDITIONS IN SYMMETRIC SPACES
Available online at http://scik.org Adv. Fixed Point Theory, 7 (2017), No. 3, 451-457 ISSN: 1927-6303 COMMON RANDOM FIXED POINTS UNDER QUASI CONTRACTION CONDITIONS IN SYMMETRIC SPACES Maulana Azad National
More informationFixed point theorems for generalized contraction mappings in multiplicative metric spaces
Available online at www.tjnsa.com J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 9 (2016), 237 2363 Research Article Fixed point theorems for generalized contraction mappings in multiplicative metric spaces Afrah A. N. Abdou
More informationCommon Fixed Point Theorem Governed by Implicit Relation and Property (E. A.)
Common Fixed Point Theorem Governed by Implicit Relation and Property (E. A.) G. P. S. Rathore 1, Bijendra Singh 2, Kirty Chauhan 3 College of Horticulture, Mandsaur, India 1 S.S. in Mathematics, Vikram
More informationAhmed Hussein Soliman, Mohammad Imdad, and Mohammad Hasan
Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 25 (2010), No. 4, pp. 629 645 DOI 10.4134/CKMS.2010.25.4.629 PROVING UNIFIED COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS VIA COMMON PROPERTY (E-A) IN SYMMETRIC SPACES Ahmed Hussein Soliman, Mohammad
More informationBhavana Deshpande COMMON FIXED POINT RESULTS FOR SIX MAPS ON CONE METRIC SPACES WITH SOME WEAKER CONDITIONS. 1. Introduction and preliminaries
F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I Nr 43 2010 Bhavana Deshpande COMMON FIXED POINT RESULTS FOR SIX MAPS ON CONE METRIC SPACES WITH SOME WEAKER CONDITIONS Abstract. The existence of coincidence points
More informationFixed points and functional equation problems via cyclic admissible generalized contractive type mappings
Available online at www.tjnsa.com J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 9 (2016), 1129 1142 Research Article Fixed points and functional equation problems via cyclic admissible generalized contractive type mappings
More informationSome Common Fixed Point Theorems using Faintly Compatible Maps in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Metricspace
Research Article Some Common Fixed Point Theorems using Faintly Compatible Maps in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Metricspace IJAESTR International Journal ISSN(Online):2394-9627 2017. Vol. 4I(1)433-441 The Author(s)
More informationA Common Fixed Point Theorem Satisfying Integral Type Implicit Relations
Applied Mathematics E-Notes, 7(27, 222-228 c ISSN 167-251 Available free at mirror sites of http://www.math.nthu.edu.tw/ amen/ A Common Fixed Point Theorem Satisfying Integral Type Implicit Relations Hemant
More informationCoincidence point results of multivalued weak C-contractions on metric spaces with a partial order
Available online at www.tjnsa.com J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 6 (2013), 7 17 Research Article Coincidence point results of multivalued weak C-contractions on metric spaces with a partial order Binayak S. Choudhury
More informationCommon fixed point results for multi-valued mappings with some examples
Available online at www.tjnsa.com J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 9 (2016), 787 798 Research Article Common fixed point results for multi-valued mappings with some examples Afrah Ahmad Noan Abdou Department of
More informationCOMMON FIXED POINT THEOREM IN PROBABILISTIC METRIC SPACE
Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics Volume 35 Number 3 (2011), Pages 463 470. COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREM IN PROBABILISTIC METRIC SPACE B. D. PANT, SUNNY CHAUHAN AND QAMAR ALAM Abstract. The notion of weakly
More informationFIXED POINTS AND CYCLIC CONTRACTION MAPPINGS UNDER IMPLICIT RELATIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO INTEGRAL EQUATIONS
SARAJEVO JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol.1 (23) (214), 257 27 DOI: 1.5644/SJM.1.2.11 FIXED POINTS AND CYCLIC CONTRACTION MAPPINGS UNDER IMPLICIT RELATIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO INTEGRAL EQUATIONS HEMANT KUMAR
More informationA GENERALIZATION OF CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE IN QUASI-METRIC SPACES
Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications ISSN: 1821-1291, URL: http://www.bmathaa.org Volume 9 Issue 1(2017), Pages 92-108. A GENERALIZATION OF CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE IN QUASI-METRIC SPACES HAMZA
More informationCommon fixed points for α-ψ-ϕ-contractions in generalized metric spaces
Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, 214, Vol. 19, No. 1, 43 54 43 Common fixed points for α-ψ-ϕ-contractions in generalized metric spaces Vincenzo La Rosa, Pasquale Vetro Università degli Studi
More informationUnifying a Multitude of Common Fixed Point Theorems in Symmetric Spaces
Filomat 28:6 (2014), 1113 1132 DOI 10.2298/FIL1406113I Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Unifying a Multitude of
More informationNew Coupled Common Fixed Point for Four Mappings satisfying Rational Contractive Expression
New Coupled Common Fixed Point for Four Mappings satisfying Rational Contractive Expression H K Nashine 1, A Gupta 2 1 Department of Mathematics, Amity University, Manth Kharora, Raipur-(Chhattisgarh),
More informationA Common Fixed Point Theorems in Menger(PQM) Spaces with Using Property (E.A)
Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, Vol. 6, 2011, no. 4, 161-167 A Common Fixed Point Theorems in Menger(PQM) Spaces with Using Property (E.A) Somayeh Ghayekhloo Member of young Researchers club, Islamic
More informationFixed Point Theorem for Cyclic (µ, ψ, φ)-weakly Contractions via a New Function
DOI: 10.1515/awutm-2017-0011 Analele Universităţii de Vest, Timişoara Seria Matematică Informatică LV, 2, 2017), 3 15 Fixed Point Theorem for Cyclic µ, ψ, φ)-weakly Contractions via a New Function Muaadh
More informationCommon Fixed Point of Four Mapping with Contractive Modulus on Cone Banach Space via cone C-class function
Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. ISSN 0973-768 Volume 3, Number 9 (207), pp. 5593 560 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/gjpam.htm Common Fixed Point of Four Mapping
More informationFixed Point Theorem in Cone B-Metric Spaces Using Contractive Mappings
Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. ISSN 0973-1768 Volume 13, Number 7 (2017), pp. 2997-3004 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com Fixed Point Theorem in Cone B-Metric Spaces
More informationSome Results of Compatible Mapping in Metric Spaces
International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES) ISSN (Online) 2319-183X, (Print) 2319-1821 Volume 6, Issue 3 (March 2017), PP.38-44 Some Results of Compatible Mapping in Metric Spaces
More informationBEST PROXIMITY POINT RESULTS VIA SIMULATION FUNCTIONS IN METRIC-LIKE SPACES
Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics Volume 44(3) (2020), Pages 401 413. BEST PROXIMITY POINT RESULTS VIA SIMULATION FUNCTIONS IN METRIC-LIKE SPACES G. V. V. J. RAO 1, H. K. NASHINE 2, AND Z. KADELBURG 3
More informationCommon Fixed Point Theorems on Fuzzy Metric Spaces Using Implicit Relation
Math Sci Lett 1 No 2 89-96 (2012) 89 Common Fixed Point Theorems on Fuzzy Metric Spaces Using Implicit Relation Sunny Chauhan 1 and Neeraj Dhiman 2 1 Near Nehru Training Centre H No 274 Nai Basti B-14
More informationInvariant Approximation Results of Generalized Contractive Mappings
Filomat 30:14 (016), 3875 3883 DOI 10.98/FIL1614875C Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Invariant Approximation Results
More informationCOMMON FIXED POINT WITH CONTRACTIVE MODULUS ON REGULAR CONE METRIC SPACE VIA CONE C-CLASS FUNCTION
International J. of Math. Sci. & Engg. Appls. (IJMSEA) ISSN 0973-944, Vol. No. II (August, 07), pp. 43-6 COMMON FIXED POINT WITH CONTRACTIVE MODULUS ON REGULAR CONE METRIC SPACE VIA CONE C-CLASS FUNCTION
More informationCOMMON FIXED POINT THEOREM OF THREE MAPPINGS IN COMPLETE METRIC SPACE
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREM OF THREE MAPPINGS IN COMPLETE METRIC SPACE Latpate V.V. and Dolhare U.P. ACS College Gangakhed DSM College Jintur Abstract:-In this paper we prove common fixed point theorem
More informationBest proximity points of Kannan type cyclic weak ϕ-contractions in ordered metric spaces
An. Şt. Univ. Ovidius Constanţa Vol. 20(3), 2012, 51 64 Best proximity points of Kannan type cyclic weak ϕ-contractions in ordered metric spaces Erdal Karapınar Abstract In this manuscript, the existence
More informationOccasionally Weakly Compatible Mapping in Cone Metric Space
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 6, 2012, no. 55, 2711-2717 Occasionally Weakly Compatible Mapping in Cone Metric Space Arvind Bhatt Applied Science Department (Mathematics) Bipin trpathi Kumaun institute
More informationCOMMON FIXED POINT THEOREM FOR SIX MAPPINGS ON FUZZY METRIC SPACES
TWMS J. Pure Appl. Math. V.6, N.2, 2015, pp.213-223 COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREM FOR SIX MAPPINGS ON FUZZY METRIC SPACES BHAVANA DESHPANDE 1, ROHIT PATHAK 2 Abstract. In this paper we extend the result of
More informationCoincidence and Common Fixed Points in Symmetric Spaces under Implicit Relation and Application
International Mathematical Forum, 3, 2008, no. 30, 1489-1499 Coincidence and Common Fixed Points in Symmetric Spaces under Implicit Relation and Application H. K. Pathak School of Studies in Mathematics
More informationCommon Fixed Point Results in S-metric Spaces
Journal of Advances in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 4, No. 2, April 2019 https://dx.doi.org/10.22606/jaam.2019.42002 45 Common Fixed Point Results in S-metric Spaces Jierong Yao * and Liping Yang School of
More informationFixed point results for generalized multi-valued contractions
Available online at www.tjnsa.com J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 8 (2015), 909 918 Research Article Fixed point results for generalized multi-valued contractions Jamshaid Ahmad a,, Nawab Hussain b, Abdul Rahim
More informationSome Fixed Point Results for the Generalized F -suzuki Type Contractions in b-metric Spaces
Sahand Communications in Mathematical Analysis (SCMA) Vol. No. (208) 8-89 http://scma.maragheh.ac.ir DOI: 0.2230/scma.208.52976.55 Some Fixed Point Results for the Generalized F -suzuki Type Contractions
More informationOn the effect of α-admissibility and θ-contractivity to the existence of fixed points of multivalued mappings
Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, Vol. 21, No. 5, 673 686 ISSN 1392-5113 http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/na.2016.5.7 On the effect of α-admissibility and θ-contractivity to the existence of fixed points
More informationA Fixed Point Theorem Satisfying a Generalized. Weak Contractive Condition of Integral Type
Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 6, 2012, no. 38, 1883 1889 A Fixed Point Theorem Satisfying a Generalized Weak Contractive Condition of Integral Type Vishal Gupta Department of Mathematics Maharishi
More informationCommon Fixed Point Results in Complex Valued Metric Spaces with Application to Integral Equations
Filomat 8:7 (04), 363 380 DOI 0.98/FIL407363H Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Common Fixed Point Results in Complex
More informationSome fixed point theorems in G-metric spaces
Math. Sci. Lett. 1, No. 1, 25-31 (2012) 25 Mathematical Sciences Letters. An International Journal Some fixed point theorems in G-metric spaces Binayak S 1. Choudhury 1, Sanjay Kumar 2, Asha 3 and Krishnapada
More informationSemi-Compatibility, Weak Compatibility and. Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 61, 3041-3051 Semi-Compatibility, Weak Compatibility and Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space Bijendra Singh*, Arihant Jain** and Aijaz Ahmed Masoodi*
More informationNonexpansive Mappings in the Framework of Ordered S-Metric Spaces and Their Fixed Points
American International Journal of Research in Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics Available online at http://www.iasir.net ISSN (Print): 2328-349, ISSN (Online): 2328-3580, ISSN (CD-ROM): 2328-3629
More informationSPACES ENDOWED WITH A GRAPH AND APPLICATIONS. Mina Dinarvand. 1. Introduction
MATEMATIČKI VESNIK MATEMATIQKI VESNIK 69, 1 (2017), 23 38 March 2017 research paper originalni nauqni rad FIXED POINT RESULTS FOR (ϕ, ψ)-contractions IN METRIC SPACES ENDOWED WITH A GRAPH AND APPLICATIONS
More informationThe (CLR g )-property for coincidence point theorems and Fredholm integral equations in modular metric spaces
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS Vol. 1, No., 17, 38-54 ISSN 137-5543 www.ejpam.com Published by New York Business Global The (CLR g )-property for coincidence point theorems and Fredholm
More informationOn Some Results in Fuzzy Metric Spaces
Theoretical Mathematics & Applications, vol.4, no.3, 2014, 79-89 ISSN: 1792-9687 (print), 1792-9709 (online) Scienpress Ltd, 2014 On Some Results in Fuzzy Metric Spaces Arihant Jain 1, V. H. Badshah 2
More informationCLR Properties in Complex-Valued Metric Space
J. Ana. Num. Theor. 4, No. 1, 75-80 (2016) 75 Journal of Analysis & Number Theory An International Journal http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/jant/040111 CLR Properties in Complex-Valued Metric Space Harpreet
More informationWEAKLY COMPATIBLE MAPS IN FUZZY METRIC SPACES
WEAKLY COMPATIBLE MAPS IN FUZZY METRIC SPACES M. Rangamma, G. Mallikarjun Reddy*, P. Srikanth Rao Department of Mathematics,O.U.,Hyderabad. 500 007. *Corresponding address: mrcoolmallik@gmail.com Received
More informationA fixed point theorem for (µ, ψ)-generalized f-weakly contractive mappings in partially ordered 2-metric spaces
Mathematica Moravica Vol. 21, No. 1 (2017), 37 50 A fixed point theorem for (µ, ψ)-generalized f-weakly contractive mappings in partially ordered 2-metric spaces Nguyen Trung Hieu and Huynh Ngoc Cam Abstract.
More informationWEAK SUB SEQUENTIAL CONTINUOUS MAPS IN NON ARCHIMEDEAN MENGER PM SPACE VIA C-CLASS FUNCTIONS
BULLETIN OF THE INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICAL VIRTUAL INSTITUTE ISSN (p) 2303-4874, ISSN (o) 2303-4955 www.imvibl.org /JOURNALS / BULLETIN Vol. 8(2018), 135-143 DOI: 10.7251/BIMVI1801135A Former BULLETIN
More informationBest proximity point results in set-valued analysis
Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, Vol. 21, No. 3, 293 305 ISSN 1392-5113 http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/na.2016.3.1 Best proximity point results in set-valued analysis Binayak S. Choudhury a, Pranati
More informationFIXED POINT THEOREM USING COMPATIBILITY OF TYPE (A) AND WEAK COMPATIBILITY IN MENGER SPACE
www.arpapress.com/volumes/vol10issue3/ijrras_10_3_11.pdf FIXED POINT THEOREM USING COMPATIBILITY OF TYPE (A) AND WEAK COMPATIBILITY IN MENGER SPACE Bijendra Singh 1, Arihant Jain 2 and Javaid Ahmad Shah
More informationCommon Fixed Point Theorems for Six Mappings Satisfying Almost Generalized (S, T)-Contractive Condition in Partially Ordered Metric Spaces
Annals of Pure Applied Mathematics Vol. 1, No., 016, 143-151 ISSN: 79-087X (P), 79-0888(online) Published on 7 November 016 www.researchmathsci.org Annals of Common Fixed Point Theorems for Six Mappings
More informationFixed Points for Multivalued Mappings in b-metric Spaces
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 10, 2016, no. 59, 2927-2944 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ams.2016.68225 Fixed Points for Multivalued Mappings in b-metric Spaces Seong-Hoon
More informationCOMMON FIXED POINT OF SEMI COMPATIBLE MAPS IN FUZZY METRIC SPACES
COMMON FIXED POINT OF SEMI COMPATIBLE MAPS IN FUZZY METRIC SPACES 1 M. S. Chauhan, 2 V. H. Badshah, 3 Virendra Singh Chouhan* 1 Department of Mathematics, Govt. Nehru PG College, Agar Malwa (India) 2 School
More informationSome Fixed Point Results for (α, β)-(ψ, φ)-contractive Mappings
Filomat 28:3 214), 635 647 DOI 12298/FIL143635A Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://wwwpmfniacrs/filomat Some Fixed Point Results for α, β)-ψ,
More informationSome common fixed points of multivalued mappings on complex-valued metric spaces with homotopy result
Available online at wwwisr-publicationscom/jnsa J Nonlinear Sci Appl 10 (2017) 3381 3396 Research Article Journal Homepage: wwwtjnsacom - wwwisr-publicationscom/jnsa Some common fixed points of multivalued
More informationFixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces using (CLRG) property
Available online at www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Advances in Applied Science Research, 2015, 6(6):17-22 ISSN: 0976-8610 CODEN (USA): AASRFC Fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces using (CLRG) property
More informationA COINCIDENCE AND FIXED POINT THEOREMS FOR SEMI-QUASI CONTRACTIONS
Fixed Point Theory, 17(2016), No. 2, 449-456 http://www.math.ubbcluj.ro/ nodeacj/sfptcj.html A COINCIDENCE AND FIXED POINT THEOREMS FOR SEMI-QUASI CONTRACTIONS RAJENDRA PANT, S.L. SINGH AND S.N. MISHRA
More informationFixed point theorems for a class of maps in normed Boolean vector spaces
RESEARCH Fixed point theorems for a class of maps in normed Boolean vector spaces Swaminath Mishra 1, Rajendra Pant 1* and Venkat Murali 2 Open Access * Correspondence: pant. rajendra@gmail.com 1 Department
More informationFIXED POINT OF α-geraghty CONTRACTION WITH APPLICATIONS
U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series A, Vol. 78, Iss., 016 ISSN 13-707 FIXED POINT OF α-geraghty CONTRACTION WITH APPLICATIONS Muhammad Arshad 1, Aftab Hussain, Akbar Azam 3 Cho, Bae and Karapinar [Fixed point theorems
More informationSome Fixed Point Theorems for Certain Contractive Mappings in G-Metric Spaces
Mathematica Moravica Vol. 17-1 (013) 5 37 Some Fixed Point Theorems for Certain Contractive Mappings in G-Metric Spaces Amit Singh B. Fisher and R.C. Dimri Abstract. In this paper we prove some fixed point
More informationResearch Article Coupled Fixed Point Theorems for a Pair of Weakly Compatible Maps along with CLRg Property in Fuzzy Metric Spaces
Applied Mathematics Volume 2012, Article ID 961210, 13 pages doi:10.1155/2012/961210 Research Article Coupled Fixed Point Theorems for a Pair of Weakly Compatible Maps along with CLRg Property in Fuzzy
More informationFixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space Using (CLRg) Property
International Journal of Engineering Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 6734, ISSN (Print): 2319 6726 Volume 5 Issue 4 April 2016 PP.35-39 Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space Using (CLRg) Property
More informationA Generalized Contraction Mapping Principle
Caspian Journal of Applied Mathematics, Ecology and Economics V. 2, No 1, 2014, July ISSN 1560-4055 A Generalized Contraction Mapping Principle B. S. Choudhury, A. Kundu, P. Das Abstract. We introduce
More informationCommon Fixed Point Theorem in Complex Valued Metric Spaces
ISSN: 219-875 (An ISO 297: 2007 Certified Organization) Vol. 2, Issue 12, December 201 Common Fixed Point Theorem in Complex Valued Metric Spaces Dr. Yogita R. Sharma Head, Department of Mathematics, Saffrony
More informationFixed Point Theorems via Absorbing Maps
Thai Journal of Mathematics Volume 6 (2008) Number 1 : 49 60 www.math.science.cmu.ac.th/thaijournal Fixed Point Theorems via Absorbing Maps U. Mishra, A. S. Ranadive and D. Gopal Abstract : The purpose
More informationCommon Fixed Point Theorems for Ćirić-Berinde Type Hybrid Contractions
International Journal of Mathematical Analysis Vol. 9, 2015, no. 31, 1545-1561 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ijma.2015.54125 Common Fixed Point Theorems for Ćirić-Berinde Type
More informationResearch Article Impact of Common Property (E.A.) on Fixed Point Theorems in Fuzzy Metric Spaces
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Fixed Point Theory and Applications Volume 2, Article ID 29736, 4 pages doi:.55/2/29736 Research Article Impact of Common Property E.A. on Fixed Point Theorems in Fuzzy Metric
More informationSOME COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN FUZZY 2-METRIC SPACES UNDER STRICT CONTRACTIVE CONDITIONS FOR MAPPINGS SATISFYING NEW PROPERTY
SOME COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN FUZZY 2-METRIC SPACES UNDER STRICT CONTRACTIVE CONDITIONS FOR MAPPINGS SATISFYING NEW PROPERTY *Amita Joshi Department of Mathematics, IPS Academy, ISLE, Indore, India
More informationSome topological properties of fuzzy cone metric spaces
Available online at www.tjnsa.com J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 9 2016, 799 805 Research Article Some topological properties of fuzzy cone metric spaces Tarkan Öner Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences,
More informationInternational Journal of Mathematical Archive-7(12), 2016, Available online through ISSN
International Journal of Mathematical Archive-7(12), 2016, 112-119 Available online through www.ijma.info ISSN 2229 5046 COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREM IN FUZZY METRIC SPACES FOR COMPATIBLE MAPS M. VIJAYA
More informationCommon fixed points for a class of multi-valued mappings and application to functional equations arising in dynamic programming
Malaya J. Mat. 2(1)(2014) 82 90 Common fixed points for a class of multi-valued mappings and application to functional equations arising in dynamic programming A. Aghajani, a E. Pourhadi b, a,b School
More informationRemark on a Couple Coincidence Point in Cone Normed Spaces
International Journal of Mathematical Analysis Vol. 8, 2014, no. 50, 2461-2468 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ijma.2014.49293 Remark on a Couple Coincidence Point in Cone Normed
More informationCOMMON FIXED POINTS OF COMPATIBLE MAPS OF TYPE (β) ON FUZZY METRIC SPACES. Servet Kutukcu, Duran Turkoglu, and Cemil Yildiz
Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 21 (2006), No. 1, pp. 89 100 COMMON FIXED POINTS OF COMPATIBLE MAPS OF TYPE (β) ON FUZZY METRIC SPACES Servet Kutukcu, Duran Turkoglu, Cemil Yildiz Abstract. In this paper we
More informationCommon fixed point of -approximative multivalued mapping in partially ordered metric space
Filomat 7:7 (013), 1173 118 DOI 1098/FIL1307173A Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://wwwpmfniacrs/filomat Common fixed point of -approximative
More informationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENGINEERING RESEARCH, DINDIGUL Volume 1, No 4, 2011
Some common fixed point theorems for occasionally weakly compatible mappings in Fuzzy metric spaces Malhotra S.K 1, Navin Verma 2, Ravindra Sen 3 1- Department of Mathematics, Govt. S.G.S.P.G. College
More informationAvailable online at Adv. Fixed Point Theory, 3 (2013), No. 4, ISSN:
Available online at http://scik.org Adv. Fixed Point Theory, 3 (2013), No. 4, 595-599 ISSN: 1927-6303 A COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREM UNDER ϕ-contractive CONDITIONS PH.R. SINGH 1,, AND M.R. SINGH 2, 1 Department
More informationFixed Point Theorems for -Monotone Maps on Partially Ordered S-Metric Spaces
Filomat 28:9 (2014), 1885 1898 DOI 10.2298/FIL1409885D Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Fixed Point Theorems for
More informationModular cone metric spaces
Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal 2013; 2(6): 191-196 Published online January 30, 2014 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/pamj) doi: 10.11648/j.pamj.20130206.14 Modular cone metric spaces Saeedeh
More informationSOME FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN EXTENDED b-metric SPACES
U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series A, Vol. 80, Iss. 4, 2018 ISSN 1223-7027 SOME FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN EXTENDED b-metric SPACES Wasfi Shatanawi 1, Kamaleldin Abodayeh 2, Aiman Mukheimer 3 In this paper, we introduce
More informationCONVERGENCE THEOREMS FOR MULTI-VALUED MAPPINGS. 1. Introduction
CONVERGENCE THEOREMS FOR MULTI-VALUED MAPPINGS YEKINI SHEHU, G. C. UGWUNNADI Abstract. In this paper, we introduce a new iterative process to approximate a common fixed point of an infinite family of multi-valued
More informationSOME FIXED POINT THEOREMS FOR ORDERED REICH TYPE CONTRACTIONS IN CONE RECTANGULAR METRIC SPACES
Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae Vol. LXXXII, 2 (2013), pp. 165 175 165 SOME FIXED POINT THEOREMS FOR ORDERED REICH TYPE CONTRACTIONS IN CONE RECTANGULAR METRIC SPACES S. K. MALHOTRA, S. SHUKLA and R. SEN Abstract.
More informationJordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 8(3), 2015, pp SOME RESULTS ON A CONE RECTANGULAR METRIC SPACE
Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 8(3), 2015, pp 239-255 SOME RESULTS ON A CONE RECTANGULAR METRIC SPACE SHISHIR JAIN (1) AND SHOBHA JAIN (2) Abstract. The notion of cone rectangular
More informationConvergence of Common Fixed Point Theorems in Fuzzy Metric Spaces
Journal of mathematics and computer science 8 (2014), 93-97 Convergence of Common Fixed Point Theorems in Fuzzy Metric Spaces Virendra Singh Chouhan Department of Mathematics Lovely Professional University,
More informationWEAK SUB SEQUENTIAL CONTINUOUS MAPS IN NON ARCHIMEDEAN MENGER PM SPACE
BULLETIN OF THE INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICAL VIRTUAL INSTITUTE ISSN (p) 2303-4874, ISSN (o) 2303-4955 www.imvibl.org /JOURNALS / BULLETIN Vol. 7(2017), 65-72 Former BULLETIN OF THE SOCIETY OF MATHEMATICIANS
More informationFixed point results and an application to homotopy in modular metric spaces
Available online at www.tjnsa.com J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 8 (015), 900 908 Research Article Fixed point results and an application to homotopy in modular metric spaces Meltem Erden Ege a, Cihangir Alaca
More informationInternational Journal of Mathematical Archive-5(10), 2014, Available online through ISSN
International Journal of Mathematical Archive-5(10), 2014, 217-224 Available online through www.ijma.info ISSN 2229 5046 COMMON FIXED POINT OF WEAKLY COMPATIBLE MAPS ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY METRIC SPACES
More informationFIXED POINT THEOREMS IN D-METRIC SPACE THROUGH SEMI-COMPATIBILITY. 1. Introduction. Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 36, No. 1, 2006, 11-19
Novi Sad J Math Vol 36, No 1, 2006, 11-19 FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN D-METRIC SPACE THROUGH SEMI-COMPATIBILITY Bijendra Singh 1, Shobha Jain 2, Shishir Jain 3 Abstract The objective of this paper is to introduce
More informationTwo-Step Iteration Scheme for Nonexpansive Mappings in Banach Space
Mathematica Moravica Vol. 19-1 (2015), 95 105 Two-Step Iteration Scheme for Nonexpansive Mappings in Banach Space M.R. Yadav Abstract. In this paper, we introduce a new two-step iteration process to approximate
More informationFixed Point Theorem for Cyclic Maps on Partial Metric spaces
Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 6, No. 1, 39-44 (01) 39 Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences An International Journal Fixed Point Theorem for Cyclic Maps on Partial Metric spaces E. Karapınar 1, İ. M. Erhan
More informationFixed point results in Fuzzy Menger space
Journal of Applied Mathematics & Bioinformatics, vol.5, no.1, 2015, 67-75 ISSN: 1792-6602 (print), 1792-6939 (online) Scienpress Ltd, 2015 Fixed point results in Fuzzy Menger space Ruchi Singh 1, A.D.
More informationCommon fixed point theorems on non-complete partial metric spaces
466 Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, 2013, Vol. 18, No. 4, 466 475 Common fixed point theorems on non-complete partial metric spaces Shaban Sedghi a, Nabi Shobkolaei b, Ishak Altun c a Department
More informationISSN: ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 5, Issue 1, July 2015
Semi Compatibility and Weak Compatibility in Fuzzy Metric Space and Fixed Point Theorems Chandrajeet Singh Yadav Vadodara Institute of Engineering, Vadodara (Gujarat) For all x, y, zx and s, t 0, Abstract:
More informationResearch Article Coupled Fixed Point Theorems for Weak Contraction Mappings under F-Invariant Set
Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume 2012, Article ID 324874, 15 pages doi:10.1155/2012/324874 Research Article Coupled Fixed Point Theorems for Weak Contraction Mappings under F-Invariant Set Wutiphol
More informationCONVERGENCE OF HYBRID FIXED POINT FOR A PAIR OF NONLINEAR MAPPINGS IN BANACH SPACES
International Journal of Analysis and Applications ISSN 2291-8639 Volume 8, Number 1 2015), 69-78 http://www.etamaths.com CONVERGENCE OF HYBRID FIXED POINT FOR A PAIR OF NONLINEAR MAPPINGS IN BANACH SPACES
More informationMultiplicative metric spaces and contractions of rational type
Advances in the Theory of Nonlinear Analysis and its Applications 2 (2018) No. 4, 195 201. https://doi.org/10.31197/atnaa.481995 Available online at www.atnaa.org Research Article Multiplicative metric
More information