arxiv:hep-th/ v1 28 Jan 2000

Transcription

1 Partial supersymmetry breaking in Multidimensional N=4 SUSY QM. E. E. Donets, JINR Laboratory of High Energies, Dubna, Moscow region, Russia, arxiv:hep-th/ v1 28 Jan 2000 A. Pashnev, J.J.Rosales, and M. Tsulaia JINR Bogoliubov Theoretical Laboratory, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia Abstract The multidimensional N = 4 supersymmetric quantum mechanics (SUSY QM) is constructed and the various possibilities for partial supersymmetry breaking are discussed. It is shown that quantum mechanical models with one quarter, one half and three quarters of unbroken(broken) supersymmetries can exist in the framework of the multidimensional N = 4 SUSY QM. Talk given at the International Workshop SQS99 in Dubna. edonets@sunhe.jinr.ru pashnev@thsun1.jinr.dubna.su rosales@thsun1.jinr.dubna.su tsulaia@thsun1.jinr.dubna.su

2 The supersymmetric quantum mechanics (SUSY QM), being first introduced in [1] [2] for the N = 2 case, turns out to be a convenient tool for investigating problems of supersymmetric field theories, since it provides the simple and, at the same time, quite adequate understanding of various phenomena arising in relativistic theories. The important question of all modern theories of fundamental interactions, including superstrings and M theory, is the problem of spontaneous breaking of supersymmetry. Supersymmetry, as a fundamental symmetry of the nature, if exists, has to be spontaneously broken at low energies since particles with all equal quantum numbers, except the spin, are not observed experimentally. The problem of spontaneous breaking of supersymmetry could be investigated in the framework of the supersymmetric quantum mechanics as well. The one dimensional N = 4 SUSY QM was constructed first in [5] [6]. Partial breaking of supersymmetry, caused by the presence of the central charges in the corresponding superalgebra, was also discussed in [6]. It was the first example of partial breaking of supersymmetry in the framework of SUSY QM and the corresponding mechanism is in full analogy with that in [3] [4] in the field theory. The main point is that the presence of central charges in the superalgebra allows the partial supersymmetry breaking, whereas according to Witten s theorem [1], no partial supersymmetry breaking is possible if the SUSY algebra includes no central charges. The main goal of our paper is further generalization of the construction, proposed in [6] to the multidimensional case and investigation of partial breaking of supersymmetry under consideration. Consideration of the supersymmetric algebra with central charges is of particular importance for several reasons. First, it provides a good tool to study dyon solutions of quantum field theory since in such theories the mass and electric and magnetic charges turns out to be the central charges [7]. Second, the central charges produce the rich structure of supersymmetry breaking. Namely, it is possible to break part of all supersymmetries retaining all others exact [8]. In fact, the invariance of a state with respect to the supersymmetry transformation means saturation of the Bogomol ny bound, and this situation takes place in N = 2 and N = 4 supersymmetric Yang Mills theory [9] as well as in the theories of extended supergravity [10]. The investigation of supersymmetric properties of branes in the M theory has also revealed that partial breaking of supersymmetry takes place. Namely, the ordinary branes break half of the supersymmetries, while intersecting and rotating branes can leave only 1/4, 1/8, 1/16 or 1/32 of the supersymmetries unbroken [11]. 2

3 The main characteristic features of partial SUSY breaking in the field theories with the extended supersymmetry can be revealed in supersymmetric QM, since in the both cases partial supersymmetry breakdown is provided by the central charges in the SUSY algebra. Therefore the detailed study of partial supersymmetry breakdown in supersymmetric quantum mechanics can lead to the deeper understanding of analogous effect in supersymmetric field theories. Let us describe a general formalism of the D dimensional (D 1) N = 4 supersymmetric quantum mechanics [12]. The physical content of the theory is: the bosonic fields φ i and fermionic fields ψ ai and ψ a i, where i = 1,..., D and index a = 1, 2 is SU(2) group index. 1 The hamiltonian and the supercharges, desribing the multidimensional N=4 SUSY QM have the form: Q a = ψ i a R i 2i ψ i a mj ( 2 ij A) + 2iψi a nj ( 2 ij A) 1 2 iλc ai ψ i c, (1) Q b = L i ψ bi + 2iψ bi m j ( 2 ij A) + 2i ψ bi n j ( 2 ij A) iλb di ψdi, (2) H quant. = 1 2 L i( 2 ij A) 1 R j λa bi λb aj ( 2 ij A) 1 + 2( 2 ij A)(mi m j + n i n j ) + + ( 3 ijk A)([ ψ i a ψaj ]m k + ψ ai ψ j a nk + ψ i a ψ aj n k ) 1 4 λa bp ( 2 pk A) 1 ( 3 ijk A)[ ψ i a, ψbj ] ( 4 ijkl A)( ψ i a ψ ja )(ψ bk ψ l b ) ( 2 pk A) 1 (( 3 ikp A)( 3 qjl A) + ( 3 ijp A)( 3 qkl A)) ψ j a ψ k b ψbl ψ ai, (3) where m i is a set of real constants, n i and n i are mutually complex conjugated constants, λ a bi is a set of SU(2) valued constant matrices, A(φ i ) is an arbitrary function, called the superpotential and L i = p i + i ψ j a ψak ( 3 ijk A) i 2 ( 2 jk A) 1 ( 3 ijk A), R i = p i i ψ a j ψak ( ijk 3 A) + i 2 ( 2 jk A) 1 ( ijk 3 A). (4) The momentum operators are Hermitean with respect to the integration measure d D φ det( 2 ija) if they have the following form: p i = i φ i i 4 φ ik)a ) 2iω iln( det( 2 iαβ ψα a ψ aβ, (5) 1 Our conventions for spinors are as follows: ψ a = ψ b ε ba, ψ a = ε ab θ b, ψa = ψ b ε ba, ψa = ε ab ψ b, ψa = (ψ a ), ψa = (ψ a ), ε 12 = 1, ε 12 = 1. 3

4 with the new fermionic variables ψ α a and ψaβ connected with the old ones via the tetrad e α i (e α i eβ j η αβ = 2 ij A) ψ α a = eα i ψ i a and ψ α a = eα i ψi a, (6) and ω iαβ in (5) is the spin connection, which corresponds to the metric 2 ija. These operators form the following N = 4 SUSY algebra with the central charges { Q a, Q b } = δ b ah quant. + λ b aim i, { Q a, Q b } = λ abi n i, {Q a, Q b } = λ ab i n i, (7) with respect to the (anti)commutators [φ i, p j ] = iδ i j, {ψ ai, ψ j b } = 1 2 δa b( 2 ija) 1 [ψ ai, p j ] = i 2 ψap ( 3 pmj A)( 2 mi A) 1, [ ψ i a, p j] = i 2 ψ p a ( 3 pmj A)( 2 mi A) 1 and [p i, p j ] = 1 2 ( 2 pq A) 1 (( 3 ikp A)( 3 qjl A) ( 3 ilp A)( 3 qjk A)) ψ k a ψal Let us investigate in detail the question of partial supersymmetry breaking in the framework of the constructed N = 4 SUSY QM in an arbitrary number of dimensions D. We shall see that in contrast with the one dimensional N = 4 SUSY QM, the multidimensional one provides also possibilities when either only one quarter of all supersymmetries is exact (for D 2), or one quarter of all supersymmetries is broken (for D 3). In order to study partial SUSY breaking it is convenient to introduce a new set of real valued supercharges S a = Q a + Q a, T a = i( Q a Q a ). and the label a has now to be considered just as the number of supercharges denoted by S and T. The new supercharges form the following N = 4 superalgebra with the central charges {S a, S b } = H(δb a + δb a ) + (λa bi + λb ai )mi + (λ abi n i λ ab i n i ), (8) {T a, T b } = H(δb a + δb a ) + (λa bi + λb ai )mi (λ abi n i λ ab i n i ), (9) {S a, T b } = i(λ a bi λ b ai)m i + i(λ abi n i + λ ab i n i ), (10) 4

5 where λ a bi = (σ I) a b ΛI i and ΛI i are real parameters. The algebra (8) (10) is still nondiagonal. However, some particular choices of the constant parameters m i, n i and Λ I i bring the algebra to the standard form, i.e., to the form when the right hand side of (10) vanishes and the right hand sides of (8) and (9) are diagonal with respect to the indices a and b. Now we consider several cases separately. Four supersymmetries exact / Four supersymmetries broken. If we put equal to zero all central charges, appearing in the algebra, then no partial breaking of supersymmetry is possible. In this case, all supersymmetries are exact, if the energy of the ground state is zero; otherwise all of them are broken. This statement is obviously independent of the number of dimensions D. Two supersymmetries exact. The case of partial supersymmetry breaking, when the half of supersymmetries are exact, have been considered earlier [6] in the framework of one-dimensional N = 4 SUSY QM, but we shall describe it for completeness as well. Consider the one dimensional (D = 1) N = 4 SUSY QM and put all the constants entering into the right hand sides of (8) (10) equal to zero, except m 1 and Λ 3 1. Then, the algebra (8) (10) takes the form {S 1, S 1 } = {T 1, T 1 } = 2H + 2m 1 Λ 3 1, {S 2, S 2 } = {T 2, T 2 } = 2H 2m 1 Λ 3 1, (11) It means that if the energy of the ground state is equal to m 1 Λ 3 1 and the last-mentioned product is positive, then S 2 and T 2 supersymmetries are exact, while the other two are broken. If m 1 Λ 3 1 is negative, then S1 and T 1 supersymmetries are exact provided the energy of the ground state is equal to m 1 Λ 3 1. One supersymmetry exact The case of the three quarters breaking of supersymmetry is possible if the dimension of N = 4 SUSY QM is at least two (D 2). Indeed, for D = 2 let us keep the following set of parameters nonvanished: Λ 3 1, Λ 1 2, m 1 Re(n 2 ) N 2. After the further choice m 1 Λ 3 1 = Λ 1 2 N2 one obtains {S 1, S 1 } = {S 2, S 2 } = 2H {T 1, T 1 } = 2H + 4m 1 Λ 3 1 {T 2, T 2 } = 2H 4m 1 Λ 3 1 (12) Therefore only T 2 supersymmetry is exact, while all others are broken if the energy of the ground state is equal to 2m 1 Λ 3 1, and m1 Λ 3 1 > 0. If m1 Λ 3 1 is 5

6 negative, then T 1 is exact provided the energy of the ground state is equal to m 1 Λ 3 1. Three supersymmetries exact The situation of the one quarter breaking of supersymmetry can exist, if we add to the consideration one more dimension, i.e., consider the three dimensional D = 3 N = 4 supersymmetric quantum mechanics. Keeping the following set of the parameters nonvanished Λ 3 1, Λ1 2, Λ2 3, m1, N 2 and Im(n 3 ) M 3, under the conditions m 1 Λ 3 1 = Λ 1 2N 2 = Λ 2 3M 3 and m 1 Λ 3 1 < 0 we have {S 1, S 1 } = {S 2, S 2 } = {T 1, T 1 } = 2H + 2m 1 Λ 3 1 {T 2, T 2 } = 2H 6m 1 Λ 3 1, (13) then T 2 supersymmetry is broken, while all others are exact under the condition that the energy of the ground state is equal to m 1 Λ 3 1. If the last mentioned product is positive, then T 2 supersymmetry is exact, while all others are broken provided that the energy of the ground state is 3m 1 Λ 3 1 and we arrive at the three-dimensional generalization of the case of three quarter breaking of supersymmetry. It is obvious that all these cases can be obtained from the higher dimensional (D 3) N = 4 supersymmetric quantum mechanics. To summarize one should note that according to the given general analysis of partial SUSY breaking in the N = 4 multidimensional SUSY QM, there exist possibilities of constructing the models with 1, 1 and 3 supersymmetries unbroken, as well as models with totally broken or totally unbroken supersymmetries. However, the answer to the question which of these possibilities can be realized for the considered system, crucially depends on the form of the chosen superpotential and on the imposed boundary conditions of the quantum mechanical problem. The problem left opened is finding of the class of superpotentials A(φ i ) which lead to N=4 supersymmetric Calogero and Calogero Moser models [13], which are related to the RN black hole quantum mechanics and to D = 2 SYM theory [14]. Another topic the application of the given technique of N=4 SUSY QM to the description of the particle dynamics on AdS metric will be given in subsequent publication. We would like to thank E. A. Ivanov for the helpful and stimulating discussions and A. V. Gladyshev and C. Sochichiu for some comments. Work of A. P. was supported in part by INTAS Grant and by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Grant Work of M. T. was supported in part by INTAS Grant J. J. R. would like to thank CONACyT for the support under the program: Estancias Posdoctorales en el Extranjero, and 6

7 Bogoliubov Laboratory of JINR for hospitality. References [1] E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B188, 513 (1981). [2] E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B202, 253 (1982). [3] I. Antoniadis, H. Partouche and T. R. Taylor, Phys. Lett. B372, 83 (1996). [4] E. Ivanov and B. Zupnik, Yad. Fiz. 62, 1110 (1999). [5] V. P. Berezovoj, A. I. Pashnev, Class. Quantum Grav. 8, 19 (1991). [6] E. A. Ivanov, S. O. Krivonos, A. I. Pashnev, Class. Quantum Grav. 8, 19 (1991). [7] E. Witten, D. Olive, Phys. Lett. B78, 97 (1978). [8] J. Bagger, J. Wess, Phys. Lett. B138, 105 (1984); J. Hughes, J. Polchinski, Nucl. Phys. B278, 147 (1986); J. Hughes, J. Liu, J. Polchinski, Phys. Lett. B180, 37 (1986); M. Rocek, A.A. Tseytlin, Phys. Rev. D59, (1999); J. Bagger, A. Galperin, Phys. Lett. B336, 25 (1994); Phys. Rev. D55, 1091 (1997); Phys.Lett. B412, 296 (1997); S. Ferrara, L. Girardello, M. Poratti, Phys.Lett. B376, 275 (1996). [9] J. P. Gauntlett, Nucl. Phys. B411, 443 (1994); J. Blum, Phys. Lett. B333, 92 (1994). [10] R. Kallosh, A. Linde, T. Ortin, A. Peet, A. Van Proeyen, Phys. Rev. D46, 5278 (1992). [11] K. S. Stelle, BPS branes in Supergravity, CERN - TH/98-80, Imperial/TP/97-98/30, hep-th/ ; P. K. Townsend, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 67, 88 (1998); N. Ohta and P. K. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B418, 77 (1998); J. P. Gauntlett, R. C. Myers, P. K. Townsend, Phys. Rev. D59, (1999). [12] E.E. Donets, A. Pashnev, J.J. Rosales and M. Tsulaia, Phys. Rev. D61, (2000). 7

8 [13] N.Wyllard, DAMPT , hep-th/ [14] G. W. Gibbons, P. K. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B454, 187 (1999); J.Michelson, A.Strominger, JHEP (1999). 8