arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 8 Aug 2016

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 8 Aug 2016"

Erik Daniel
5 years ago
Views:

1 1 Sarching for lpton-flavor-violating dcay at supr charm-tau factory arxiv: v3 [hp-ph] 8 Aug 016 Zhou Hao a, Zhang Rn-You a, Han Liang a, Ma Wn-Gan a, Guo Li b, and Chn Chong a a Dpartmnt of Modrn Physics, Univrsity of Scinc and Tchnology of China, Hfi, Anhui 3006, P.R.China b Dpartmnt of Physics, Chongqing Univrsity, Chongqing, , P.R. China Abstract W invstigat th possibility of sarching th lpton-flavor-violating (LFV) rar dcay at th Supr Charm-Tau Factory (CTF). By comparing th kinmatic distributions of th LFV signal and th standard modl (SM) background, w dvlop an optimizd vnt slction critria which can significantly rduc th background vnts. It is concludd that nw σ uppr limit of about on Br( ) can b obtaind at th CTF, which is byond th capability of Supr-B factory in sarching lpton rar dcay. Within th framwork of th scalar lptoquark modl, a joint constraint on λ 1 λ and M LQ can b drivd from th uppr bound on Br( ). With 00 fb 1 data xpctd at th CTF, w gt λ 1 λ < 7. (M LQ = 800 GV) and M LQ > 900 GV (λ 1 λ = 9 ) at 95% confidnc lvl (C.L.). PACS: Dx, Fg, Fs, Sv

2 I. Introduction Th standard modl (SM) [1, ] of lmntary particl physics provids a rmarkably succssful dscription of strong, wak and lctromagntic intractions at th nrgy scal up to O( ) GV. It is an SU(3) C SU() L U(1) Y SU(3) C U(1) EM spontanously brokn gaug thory, which also consrvs th total baryon numbr B and th thr lpton numbrs L, L and L, i.., th lpton flavors, rspctivly. Howvr, a numbr of concptual and xprimntal difficultis, such as th hirarchy problm, dark mattr and nutrino oscillations, driv physicists to considr nw mchanisms byond. Many xtnsions of th SM, such as th suprsymmtric modls, lft-right symmtric modls, littl Higgs modl with T parity, and lptoquark modls, could bring in lpton-flavor-violating (LFV) trms in natural ways, and introduc non-zro nutrino masss and rar dcays of chargd lpton. As th havist lpton, lpton has mor LFV dcay mods compard to th lpton. Th branching ratios of th lpton LFV dcays ar prdictd at th lvl of 7 [3 6]. Thrfor, sarching for LFV dcays and improving limits on th branching ratio bcoms incrasingly important of currnt and futur xprimnts. All th LFV dcays of lpton, such as l, lll ( ) and lh, whr l,l = or and h is a hadronic systm, ar snsitiv to nw physics byond th SM. Among ths mods, th radiativ dcays and ar prdictd to hav th largst probability clos to currnt xprimntal uppr limits in a wid varity of nw physics scnarios. So far th most stringnt limits ar Br( ) < and Br( ) < at 90% confidnc lvl (C.L.), with (963±7) 6 dcays of data collctd by thbfactoris [7]. Toachiv mor snsitivity in probing LFV dcay, high intnsiv lctron-positron bam facilitis ar dsird. On main projct is th wll-stablishd upgrad of B factory, i.., Supr-B factory, running at nrgis from opn charm thrshold to abov Υ(5S) rsonanc with intndd accumulatd luminosity of 75 ab 1. Th Supr-B factory would provid grat opportunity in sarching rar dcay, whr a 90% C.L. uppr limit on Br( ) is xpctd as.4 9 [8]. Anothr proposal, so-calld th Supr Charm-Tau factory (CTF), is an + collidr dsignd to work in th nrgy rgion from to 5 GV with instant luminosity of 35 cm s 1 [9]. Compard

3 3 to th Supr-B factory, lptons can b copiously producd in pairs at th CTF with cntrof-mass (c.m.s) nrgis E + not far abov th m thrshold, and th radiativ background + + is not significant. In this papr, w invstigat th potntial of sarching th LFV dcay at th CTF and dmonstrat its bttr chanc than th Supr-B factory. Th papr is organizd as follows: Th LFV signal and dominant background at th CTF ar discussd. Thn a stratgy of xprimntal vnt slction to improv signal significanc is dvlopd, and an xpctd uppr limit on Br( ) is prsntd. Finally, constraints on th lptoquark modl paramtrs ar givn as an xampl of intrprtation of nw physics. II. LFV signal and background at th CTF At th CTF, th cross sction for + + incrass significantly as th incrmnt of th colliding nrgy from th thrshold of -pair production ( 3.55 GV) to th thrshold of D mson production ( 3.74 GV). W st th CTF c.m.s nrgy as 3.7 GV, in ordr to gt lpton pair producd copiously. Th signal undr discussion is that on lpton follows LFV dcay into a muon and a photon, whil th othr follows SM dcay into a muon and two nutrinos, i.., ( + ν ν ) + ( ) and ( + ) + ( ν ν ). Th Fynman diagram for th signal procss ν ν is dpictd in Fig.1. Du to th fact that Γ m O( 1 ) is sufficintly small, th naiv narrow width approximation (NWA) is adoptd whn calculating th LFV dcay, and th muon and photon ar assumd isotropic in th rst framof th lpton. Howvr, w donot mploy thnaiv NWA to dal with thsmdcay ν ν for th LFV signal, and kp th off-shll contribution and spin corrlation ffct from th potntially rsonant intrmdiat lpton. In othr words, w trat th LFV signal as 4-body production procsss, ν ν and + + ν ν + 1, followd by squntial -body LFV dcay. Thn th cross sction of th signal procss ν ν can b factorizd as σ( ν ν ) = σ( ν ν ) Br( ). (.1) 1 ± might b off-shll dpnding on th kinmatics of th final ± ν () ν () systm.

4 4 /Z ν W ν Figur 1: Th Fynman diagram for th signal procss ν ν. Givn th fficincy of dtctor rsolution, no rquirmnt on missing nrgy /E raisd by scaping nutrinos is imposd. Thus, th dtctabl LFV signal at th CTF is comprisd of two muons and an isolatd photon in final stat as + + X, whr X dnots all th undtctd nutrinos and on hard muon is from LFV dcay and th othr soft on from th standard lptonic dcay. Accordingly, th lading background to th LFV signal coms from th + + procss, which is dpictd in Fig. as th lading ordr (LO) contribution. (a) Z (b) (c) Z (d) () Z (f) (g) Z (h) Figur : Th LO Fynman diagrams for th background procss + +. Howvr, du to th smallnss of th LFV dcay branching ratio, th ffct of th SM background that involvs four nutrinos in final stat can not b ignord. In our calculation, w mainly considr th rsonanc contribution from ν ν ν ν, whr + and ar tratd as on-shll particls. Spcifically, th sublading background is that on lptondcaysintoamuonandtwonutrinosandthothrdcaysintoamuon,twonutrinosand aphoton, i.., ( + ν ν )+ ( ν ν ) and + + ( ν ν )+ + ( + ν ν ). Considring th gomtric accptanc of th dtctor and to avoid th soft divrgnc inducd

5 5 by low nrgy infrard radiation, a st of kinmatic cuts on final particls is imposd as baslin, E > 0.5 GV, η < 5, η < 3, R(,) > 0.3, (.) whr E is photon nrgy, η and η ar th psudorapiditis of photon and muon, and R(,) = (η η ) +(φ φ ) is th sparation on th psudorapidity-azimuthal-angl plan btwn muon and photon. Aftr applying th baslin cuts, th cross sctions of th LFV signal and th SM background at th s = 3.7 GV CTF ar obtaind as σ S = σ( ν ν )+σ( ν ν ) = pb Br( ), σ B = σ( + + )+σ( ν ν ν ν ) = pb+0. pb, (.3) whr in numrical calculation, th SM input paramtrs ar takn as m = MV, m = 5.7 MV, m = GV, Γ =.67 1 GV, M W = GV, M Z = GV and α w = α(0) = 1/ III. Rsults and discussion By following Eq.(.3), on can gt that th vnt numbr of background is about 8 ordr of magnitud largr than that of th LFV signal, N S N B = σ S σ B Br( ) < 4.4 8, (3.1) if only baslin cuts ar takn. Howvr, by xploring th distinction btwn th LFV signal and background kinmatic distributions, an optimizd vnt slction algorithm can b dvlopd to supprss th SM background and nhanc th snsitivity of sarching LFV dcay at th CTF. First, for an vnt of + +X final stat, th lading muon 1 can b dfind as +, M + m < M m 1 =, (3.), M m < M + m

6 6 whr M ± is th invariant mass of ± systm. Th invariant mass distributions of th 1 systm ar dpictd in Fig.3, for th LFV signal and th SM background rspctivly aftr applying baslin cuts. Th lading muons in signal procsss ar prdominatly from th lpton LFV radiativ dcay, and th signal is manifstd as a striking pak around m in th 1 mass spctrum. Thrfor, a stringnt mass window can b imposd to ffctivly supprss th continuous spctrum of th SM background. Sinc th lpton dcay width is ngligibl, th sprad of signal mass pak is dominatd by dtctor rsolution. Compard with th BESIII, th CTF puts forward a highr rquirmnt on dtctor prformanc,.g., th nrgy rsolution of lctromagntic calorimtr for photon at th CTF is about 1.5% at E = 1 GV [9], whras th corrsponding rsolution of th BESIII is about.5% []. Th momntum rsolutions of th track systm for both th CTF and th BESIII ar about 0.5%. Accordingly, a consrvativ mass window cut1 on 1 systm can b chosn as M 1 m < 0.06 GV. (3.3) ) -1 ( GV signal lading background sublading background 1/σ dσ/dm M 1 ( GV ) Figur 3: 1 invariant mass distributions for th LFV signal and th SM background aftr applying baslin cuts. Th scond muon othr than th lading on is dnotd as. Aftr applying succssiv baslin cuts and cut1, th trailing momntum spctrum of th LFV signal would b wll sparatd from that of th SM lading background, as shown in Fig.4. For th LFV signal,

7 7 th trailing muon is from th branch of standard 3-body lptonic dcay, whos momntum distribution is irrlvant to th 1 invariant mass window imposd around m. But th trailing muon momntum distribution for th SM lading background obviously dpnds on th 1 invariant mass window and will ovrlap that for th LFV signal as th mass window incrass to about 0.3 GV. For th SM sublading background, th trailing muon is crtainly from th branch of standard + ν 4-body lptonic dcay aftr cut1 and thrfor is rlativly soft. As shown in Fig.4, th trailing muon momntum distribution for th SM sublading background ovrlaps that for th LFV signal in low momntum rgion. Basd on th bhaviors of ths trailing muon momntum distributions, a cut on th trailing muon momntum can b dfind to rduc th SM contamination, 0.45 GV < p < 1.1 GV. (3.4) ) -1 ( GV 1/σ dσ/dp signal lading background sublading background p ( GV ) Figur 4: Th trailing muon momntum spctra of th LFV signal and th SM background aftr applying succssiv baslin cuts and cut1. For th LFV signal, th nrgy and th momntum of 1 systm ar strictly limitd to s/ = 1.85 GV and s/4 m = GV, rspctivly. Whil for th SM sublading background, th nrgy and th momntum of 1 systm ar continuously distributd. Thrfor, an nrgy window cntrd at 1.85 GV and a momntum window cntrd at GV on 1 systm can gratly rduc th SM sublading background. Taking th nrgy and th

8 8 momntum rsolutions of th dtctor mntiond abov into considration, th nrgy window cut3 and th momntum window cut4 on 1 systm can b chosn as E GV < 0.05 GV, p GV < GV. (3.5) Basd on th abov discussion, an optimizd vnt slction critria can b proposd: Cut1 ( 1 invariant mass cut): M 1 m < 0.06 GV; Cut ( momntum cut): 0.45 GV < p < 1.1 GV; Cut3 ( 1 nrgy cut): E GV < 0.05 GV; Cut4 ( 1 momntum cut): p GV < GV. This four-stp cut stratgy could thortically sav 79.3% of signal vnts, rmov all th lading background vnts, and only rtain of th sublading background vnts. Thn th significanc of signal ovr background aftr th abov kinmatic cuts applid is givn by S = N S NB = Br( ) L, (3.6) whr L is th accumulatd luminosity in unit of fb 1, and it s rasonabl to prsum an annual intgratd luminosity of about 1 ab 1 at th CTF. If th LFV signal is not dtctd with crtain accumulatd luminosity at th CTF, a nw uppr bound on Br( ) can b st at a C.L. of σ, as shown in Fig.5. Th σ uppr limits on Br( ) for som typical valus of th intgratd luminosity ar also givn in Tabl 1. W can s that th dirct sarch for th LFV dcay at th CTF would giv much mor stringnt limit on Br( ) than th currnt xprimntal limit drivd at th B factory. For xampl, with on yar data ( 00 fb 1 ) takn at th CTF, a nw σ uppr boundbr( ) < 4. 9 can b obtaind, which is about on ordr of magnitud smallr than th currnt xprimntal uppr bound of ; with thr yar run, th CTF could surpass th proposd Supr-B factory in th snsitivity of sarching LFV dcay.

9 currnt xp. uppr limit 40 Br( ) 30 0 S< Luminosity ( fb ) Figur 5: σ uppr bound on th branching ratio for as a function of th intgratd luminosity at th CTF. L [fb 1 σ uppr bound on ] L [fb 1 σ uppr bound on ] Br( ) Br( ) Tabl 1: σ uppr bounds on th branching ratio for at diffrnt luminositis. IV. Constraints on nw physics Nw uppr bound on Br( ) xpctd at th CTF would constrain nw physics byond th SM. Among all th xtnsions of th SM, th lptoquark (LQ) modl is a promising on to intrprt LFV dcays and has bn xtnsivly studid. In addition to th spin and gaug quantum numbrs, th lptoquarks carry both lpton numbr and baryon numbr, and th spin- 0 and spin-1 particls ar calld scalar and vctor lptoquarks rspctivly. Th rnormalizabl andsu(3) C SU() L U(1) Y invariantintractionsbtwnscalarlptoquarksandsmfrmions ar givn by th following Lagrangian [11]: L LQ = [ ] [ λ L 0qL ci l L +λ R 0 u c R R S + λ L 0, 0d c 1 R RS + 0, λ R 1 q L i R +λ L 1(u R l L ) T] S 1, λ L 1(d R l L ) T S 1 +λ L 1q, 1 L ci l L S +h.c., (4.1) 1, whr q L and l L dnot th lft-handd SU() L doublt quarks and lptons of th SM, and u R, d R and R ar th right-handd SU() L singlt quarks and chargd lptons rspctivly. W us

10 S j, Y to dnot scalar lptoquark, whr th subscript j can valu 0 and 1/ indicating SU() L singlt and doublt rspctivly, and Y stands for hyprcharg. Color and gnration indics hav bn supprssd. i (i = 1,,3) ar thr Pauli matrics. In invstigating th rar dcay, w also rquir th intractions btwn th scalar lptoquarks and photon. Th photon intractions aris from th following SU() L U(1) Y invariant kinmatic trms of th scalar lptoquarks: L kintic = (D S) (D S). (4.) Th SU() L U(1) Y covariant drivativ D is givn by D = ig i=1,,3 W i Ti ig Y B, (4.3) whr W i (i = 1,,3) and B ar th SU() L and U(1) Y gaug filds, rspctivly, and T i (i = 1,,3) ar th gnrator matrics for th SU() L rprsntation occupid by th scalar lptoquarks. From Eq.(4.) w obtain th photon intraction for a scalar lptoquark as ] L LQ, = iq LQ [( S )S S ( S) A, (4.4) whr A is th photon fild and Q LQ rprsnts th lctric charg of th scalar lptoquark S. For simplicity, w assum that all th LFV couplings xcpt λ L 1 (i = 1,j =,3), whr,ij i and j ar quark and lpton flavor indics, ar zro. Thrfor, only -u-lq and -u-lq couplings ar non-zro, and th lpton can dcay into + via quark-lptoquark involvd loops at th LO, as shown in Fig.6. LQ u (a) u u LQ (b) LQ LQ (c) u LQ u (d) Figur 6: Th lowst ordr Fynman diagrams for th LFV dcay procss in th scalar lptoquark modl. Th LO dcay width for th LFV dcay procss is givn by Γ( ) = 1 1 8π p,cm m M, (4.5) spin

11 11 whr M is th amplitud for th Fynman diagrams in Fig.6 and p,cm is th thrmomntum of in th rst fram of th initial lpton. Th summation is takn ovr th spins of th initial and final stat particls and th factor 1 ariss from th spin avrag of th initial stat. W comput M by using th rlatd Fynman ruls obtaind from Eqs.(4.1) and (4.4), and adopt Passarino-Vltman rduction mthod to convrt on-loop amplitud to scalar intgrals. Th loop divrgnc is naturally cancld for ths four diagrams with no ncssary to introduc any countrtrm. Th LFV dcay branching ratio for can thus b xprssd as Br( ) = 9α w(λ 1 λ ) (m m ] ) [( F 4π 4 Γ m F )(m +m ) 4R(F 1F )m m, (4.6) whr λ 1 = λ L 1,1 and λ = λ L 1,13, dnoting th -u-lq and -u-lq coupling strngths, rspc- tivly. Th form factors F 1, ar givn in Appndix. Undr th simplicity assumption, thr ar only thr paramtrs of scalar lptoquark dtrmining th LFV dcay, namly th couplings λ 1, and th scalar lptoquark mass M LQ. As shown in Eq.(4.6), th LFV dcay branching ratio is proportional to (λ 1 λ ) but is much complicatdly rlatd to M LQ. Th dpndnc of Br( ) as functions of λ 1 λ and th lptoquark mass M LQ is prsntd in Fig.7. According to th dpndnc, a joint constraint on λ 1 λ and M LQ can b drivd from th uppr bound on Br( ) xpctd at th CTF, as shown in Fig.8. On can stimat from th plot th uppr bound on λ 1 λ and th lowr bound on M LQ for givn M LQ and λ 1 λ, rspctivly. For xampl, with 00 fb 1 data xpctd at th CTF, on can gt λ 1 λ < 7., (M LQ = 800 GV, 95% C.L.), M LQ > 900 GV, (λ 1 λ = 9, 95% C.L.). (4.7) Bsids th abov spcifid lptoquark intrprtation, th LFV dcay can b xprssd in a modl-indpndnt formalism. An ffctiv vrtx -- can b introducd in a form of i m σ ν p ν (σ L P L +σ R P R ), whr σ ν = i [, ν ], P L,R = (1 5 )/ and p ν is th momntum of th photon [1]. Thn th branching ratio for can b simply xprssd in trms of th

12 (a) currnt xp. uppr limit Br( ) M LQ =600 GV M LQ =00 GV M LQ =1500 GV λ 1 λ (b) currnt xp. uppr limit Br( ) λ 1 λ =0.05 λ 1 λ =0.15 λ 1 λ = M LQ ( GV ) Figur 7: Th branching ratio for as functions of (a) λ 1 λ and (b) M LQ. 1 currnt xp. bound -1 L = 00 fb λ 1 λ M LQ ( GV ) Figur 8: Th joint constraint on λ 1 λ and M LQ with 00 fb 1 intgratd luminosity at 95% C.L..

13 13 form factors σ L and σ R as Br( ) = (m m ) 3( σ L + σ R ) 16πΓ m 5. (4.8) Similarly, a joint uppr bound on σ L and σ R can b dducd from th uppr bound on Br( ). As shown in Fig.9, a mor stringnt uppr bound of σ L + σ R < 5., much smallr than th currnt xprimntal limit, could b drivd, if th LFV dcay is not dtctd with 00 fb 1 intgratd luminosity xpctd at th CTF. σ R σ L currnt xp. bound -1 L = 00 fb Figur 9: Th joint uppr bound on σ L and σ R with 00 fb 1 intgratd luminosity at 95% C.L.. -9 V. Summary In this papr, w invstigat th potntial of sarching LFV dcay at th CTF. With a cntr-of-mass 3.7 GV of lctron-positron collision, lptons can b copiously producd in pairs at th CTF. Th LFV signal procsss ν () ν () ar faturd by dtctabl final stat of 1 +X, namly on hard lading 1 along with a hard photon from radiativ LFV dcay and on soft trailing from th standard lptonic dcay, and laving th missing nrgy from scaping nutrinos unmasurd. To improv th significanc of th LFV dcay at th CTF, w propos a four-stp vnt slction stratgy: an invariant mass window on 1 systm around m and a momntum cut on ar imposd to liminat th dominant + + SM background, and thn an nrgy window and a

14 14 momntum window on 1 systm ar succssivly applid to significantly supprss th ν ν ν ν sublading SM background. It can b prdictd with a coupl yars of CTF running, nw snsitivitis on Br( ), which could surpass currnt xprimntal uppr bound and thos xpctd at th Supr-B factory, can b achivd. Th nw uppr limit on Br( ) xpctd at th CTF would crtainly constrain paramtr spac of nw physics byond th SM, ithr in spcific thoris as lptoquark or in modl-indpndnt ffctiv formalism. VI. Acknowldgmnts This work was supportd in part by th National Natural Scinc Foundation of China (Grants. No , No , No ). VII. Appndix Th form factors F 1 and F ar xprssd as whr [ ( ) ( ) F 1 = Q u C (1) 00 +m C (1) 1 +C (1) 11 +C(1) 1 +m C (1) +C (1) +C(1) 1 m uc (1) 0 1 ] Q LQ C () 00 m ( ) m B (1) m 0 +B (1) 1 + F = Q u m m ( C (1) 0 +C (1) 1 +C (1) ) m m m m m m m ( ) B () 0 +B () 1 ( B (1) 0 +B (1) 1 B () 0 B () 1 ), (7.1) B (1) i = B i (m,m LQ,m u) B () i = B i (m,m LQ,m u) C (1) {j,jk} = C {j,jk} (m,0,m,m LQ,m u,m u) C () {j,jk} = C {j,jk} (m,m,0,m LQ,m u,m LQ), (7.) and M LQ is th mass of scalar lptoquark. Th dfinitions of on-loop - and 3-point functions B i (i = 0,1) and C {j,jk} (j,k = 0,1,) ar givn in Rf. [13]. Not addd

15 15 [14]. Aftr submitting this papr w found anothr calculation of this LFV signal at th HIEPA Rfrncs [1] S. L. Glashow, Nucl. Phys., 579 (1961). [] S. Winbrg, Phys. Rv. Ltt. 19, 164 (1967). [3] G. Cvtic, C. Dib, C. S. Kim, and J. D. Kim, Phys. Rv. D 66, (00). [4] T. Fukuyama, T. Kikuchi, and N. Okada, Phys. Rv. D 68, (003). [5] A. Brignol and A. Rossi, Phys. Ltt. B 566, 17 (003). [6] M. Blank, A. J. Buras, B. Duling, S. Rcksigl, and C. Tarantino, Acta Phys. Polon. B 41, 657 (0). [7] B. Aubrt, t al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rv. Ltt. 4, 0180 (0). [8] B. O Lary, t al. (SuprB Collaboration), arxiv: [9] A. E. Bondar t al.(charm-tau Factory Collaboration), Phys. Atom. Nucl. 76, 7 (013). [] M. Ablikim, t al. (BESIII Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Mthods Phys. Rs. Sct. A 614, 345 (0). [11] S. Davidson, D. Baily, and B. A. Campbll, Z. Phys. C 61, 613 (1994). [1] L. Lavoura, Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 191 (003). [13] T. Hahn and M. Pérz-Victoria, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153 (1999). [14] Yu-Bo Li, Chng-Ping Shn, and Chang-Zhng Yuan, Sci. Bull. 61, 307 (016).

Self-interaction mass formula that relates all leptons and quarks to the electron

Self-interaction mass formula that relates all leptons and quarks to the electron Slf-intraction mass formula that rlats all lptons and quarks to th lctron GERALD ROSEN (a) Dpartmnt of Physics, Drxl Univrsity Philadlphia, PA 19104, USA PACS. 12.15. Ff Quark and lpton modls spcific thoris