arxiv: [v2] LEPP Particle Theory Pizza Seminar, 4 Feb 2011

Transcription

1 arxiv: [v2] Cornell University In collaboration with Csaba Csáki, Yuval Grossman, and Yuhsin Tsai LEPP Particle Theory Pizza Seminar, 4 Feb / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 1/25 25

2 A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away (One year ago in Newman Lab, Yuhsin s last talk) Anarchic RS flavor model Loop calculation of µ eγ Mild tension with tree-level constraints Matching 5D and KK formalisms H 0, G 0 New developments Goldstone cancellation & many more diagrams Mild non-tension with tree-level flavor constraints Empire: anarchic models aren t so anarchic Finiteness from 5D power counting Comments on two-loop structure. * thanks to M. Blanke, K. Agashe, Y. Hori, T. Okui 2 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 2/25 25

3 Reminder: Randall-Sundrum Randall, Sundrum (99); ds 2 = ( ) 2 R z (dx 2 dz 2 ) 3 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 3/25 25

4 Reminder: Randall-Sundrum Fermion Gauge Boson ds 2 = ( ) 2 R z (dx 2 dz 2 ) Randall, Sundrum (99); Davoudiasl, Hewett, Rizzo (99); Grossman, Neubert (00); Gherghetta, Pomarol (00); Bulk Higgs: Agashe, Contino, Pomarol (04); Davoudiasl, Lille, Rizzo (05) 3 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 3/25 25

5 Reminder: Yukawa matrices Fermion Gauge Boson Y (4D) ij = f i Y ij f j f i = 1 2c i 1 (R/R ) 1 2c i Flavor: Huber, Shafi (03); Burdman (03); Kalil, Mohapatra (04); Agashe, Perez, Soni (04); Chen (05); Agashe, Blechman, Petriello (06); Davidson, Isidori, Uhlig (07); Csáki, Falkowski, Weiler (08); Chen, H.B. Yu (08); Agashe, Okui, Sundrum (08); Chen, Mahanthappa, F. Yu (09),... 4 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 4/25 25

6 Anarchic Flavor in RS Definition: anarchic matrix All entries O(1) with arbitrary phase. The product of anarchic matrices is also anarchic. Assumption: this is true in all preferred bases. Y (4D) ij = f i Y ij f j f i = 1 2c i 1 (R/R ) 1 2c i The Y ij are anarchic matrices that are 5D parameters, Y ij = Y ij The mass heirarchy m i = f i Y ii f i v comes from the exponentially small overlap of the zero-mode fermions with the Higgs vev. This is controlled by the fermion bulk masses, c i / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 5/25 25

7 Lepton Flavor Violation Penguin constraints Assuming the mass hierarchies are controlled by the f i s, we would like to constrain the anarchic and KK scales: Y and M KK. Y µ e Y Y ( 1 M loop M KK ( 1 M KK ) 2 f L Y 3 f E ) 2 Y 2 m Decoupling: M goes like negative power of M KK. No coupling : M goes like positive power of Y. 6 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 6/25 25

8 Lepton Flavor Violation Tree level constraints µ e e Z, Z Fermion µ e Gauge Boson Ti Z, Z e ( )2 ( ) 1 1 M tree M KK Y Must maintain SM spectrum m i f i Y ii f i v. As Y increases, zero-mode fermion profiles are pushed away from the IR brane. This reduces their overlap with the non-universal part of the Z. 7 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 7/25 25

9 Lepton Flavor Violation A possible tension between tree- and loop-level bounds µ e Fermion Gauge Boson Ti µ e Tree-level bound: ( ) 2 ( ) 3 TeV 2 < 0.5, 1.6 (Custodial) M KK Y Penguin bound: ay 2 + b ( 3 TeV M KK ) What the heck is this? Tree: Chang & Ng 05. Loop NDA: Agashe et al / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 8/25 25

10 Operator analysis of µ eγ Match to 4D EFT, integrate over each z i : R 2 e 16π 2 v ( 2 f Li akl Y ik Y kl Y ) lj + b ij Y L(0) ij f Ej i σ µν E (0) j F µν (0) These may be Y E or Y N For c i = c, Y ij is a spurion of U(3) 3 lepton flavor Higher (odd) powers of Y ij suppressed by vr 0.1 Indices on a ij and b ij encode bulk mass dependence 9 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 9/25 25

11 Operator analysis of µ eγ: alignment Definition: anarchic matrix, All entries O(1) with arbitrary phase. The product of anarchic matrices is also anarchic. Assumption: this is true in all preferred bases. R 2 e v ( 2 f 16π 2 Li akl Y ik Y kl Y ) lj + b ij Y ij f Ej L (0) i σ µν E (0) Compare to zero mode mass matrix: m ij = f Li Y ij f Ej v j F µν (0) Up to the bulk mass non-universality, the b terms have the flavor structure of 4D mass terms Alignment: b ij term almost diagonalized in the mass basis Structure behind anarchy. The empire strikes back! Alignment in RS: Agashe, Perez, Soni 04; Agashe, Azatov, Zhu / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 10/25 25

12 A bunch of diagrams: a and b coefficients R 2 e v ( 2 f 16π 2 Li akl Y ik Y kl Y ) lj + b ij Y ij f Ej L (0) i σ µν E (0) j F µν (0) H 0, G 0 H 0, G 0 H ± H ± Z Z W H ±, W Z Z W W, H ± 11 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 11/25 25

13 The structure of RS penguins: a coefficient H 0, G 0 H 0, G 0 H ± H ± B 10 4 AC 10 4 B 10 4 AD 10 3 Z Z W H ±, W A 2 B 10 5 A A 2 B 10 5 A 2 B 10 5 A. Mass insertion 10 1 per insertion (cross) B. Equation of motion 10 4 (external arrows point same way) C. Higgs/Goldstone cancellation 10 3 (H 0, G 0 diagram only) D. Proportional to charged scalar mass / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 12/25 25

14 The structure of RS penguins: b coefficient Z Z W W, H ± BE 10 4 A 10 1 BE 10 4 AE 10 2 A. Mass insertion 10 1 per insertion (cross) B. Equation of motion 10 4 (external arrows point same way) E. No sum over internal flavors 10 1 Gauge boson diagrams are enhanced by g 2 5 /g 2 = ln R /R O(10) This is a common factor for the b diagrams, and ends up being cancelled by a numerical factor of 1/10 in the 3MIZ a diagram. 13 / 25 Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 13/25

15 Leading order diagrams H ± H ± L µ E i Z E e L j E e E µ L e L e ν N Y E Y N Y N Y E Y E Y E Z Y E Three coefficients (a H, a Z, b) with arbitrary relative signs Defined ay 3 = k,l a kly ik Y kl Y lj and by = k,l (U L) ik b kl Y kl (U R ) lj So, just calculate these: (many details in paper) 5D position/momentum space: external zero modes Mass insertion approximation, but sum over all KK modes Gauge invariance: only identify (p + p ) µ coefficient 14 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 14/25 25

16 Representative Bounds Y * (Left of this ruled out) ( ) 2 ( ) 3 TeV 2 M KK Y < 0.5, 1.6 Generic Custodial a H a Z Favorable b µ eγ, b = b 1σ (Above this ruled out) µ eγ, average ay 2 + b ( 3TeV M KK ) 2 <.015 µ eγ, b = + b 1σ 2 0 For M KK = 3 TeV, b = 0 a =.001 and generic 3.7 Y 4 a =.016 and custodial 1 Y M KK (TeV) 15 / 25 KK bound Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 15/25

17 Finiteness: naïve dimensional analysis 4D Naïve: d 4 k F γ µ F B log(λ) Really log divergent? No, finite. Here s why: Gauge invariance: q µ M µ = 0. Lorentz invariance: d 4 k /k = 0. k2n Indeed, M 4D Λ 2. Suspect that M 5D Λ 1. 5D bulk, i.e. d 4 k d 5 k 16 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 16/25 25

18 Finiteness: bulk 5D fields Neutral Charged Loop integral (d 4 k) Gauge invariance (p + p ) 1 1 Bulk boson propagator 1 2 Bulk vertices (dz) 3 3 Overall z-momentum Derivative coupling 0 +1 Mass insertion/eom 1 1 Total degree of divergence 1 1 Note: everything trivially carries over to the KK picture 17 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 17/25 25

19 Finiteness: brane-localized Higgs Neutral Charged W H ± Loop integral (d 4 k) Gauge invariance (p + p ) Brane boson propagators Bulk boson propagator Bulk vertices (dz) Derivative coupling Brane chiral cancellation Brane MW 2 cancellation Total degree of divergence / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 18/25 25

20 Finiteness: brane-localized Higgs The M 2 W cancellation comes from the form of the photon coupling to the brane-localized H ± : (2k p p ) µ [(k p ) 2 MW 2 ][(k p)2 MW 2 ] = (p + p ) µ [ k 2 ] 1 (k 2 MW 2 )2 k 2 MW 2 = M2 W (p + p ) µ (k 2 M W 2 O(1/k6 ) )3 We have used the fact that the (p + p ) µ coefficient gives the complete gauge-invariant contribution. 19 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 19/25 25

21 Finiteness: brane-localized Higgs Neutral Charged W H ± Loop integral (d 4 k) Gauge invariance (p + p ) Brane boson propagators Bulk boson propagator Bulk vertices (dz) Photon Feynman rule Brane chiral cancellation Brane MW 2 cancellation Total degree of divergence / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 20/25 25

22 Finiteness: brane-localized Higgs The chiral cancellation comes from the UV structure of the sum of the two diagrams: Fermion propagator goes like /k + kγ 5, numerator structures are M a /kγ µ /k/k kγ µ k/k = k 2 (/kγ µ γ µ /k) M b /k/kγ µ /k /kkγ µ k = k 2 (γ µ /k /kγ µ ) This is hard to see in the KK picture! See Agashe et al / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 21/25 25

23 Perturbativity and the 2-loop result Yin-yang and double rainbow topologies. Insert a photon and odd number of mass insertions. Dotted line represents gauge or Higgs boson. Purely bulk fields: Loop integrals (d 4 k) +8 Gauge invariance (p + p ) 1 Bulk boson propagators 2 Bulk vertices (dz) 5 Total degree of divergence 0 Must do full calculation Like 1-loop, hard to determine brane Higgs power counting. It may not be unreasonable to expect 1-loop cancellations to carry over to 2-loop. Log Λ large perturbative regime 22 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 22/25 25

24 The disappearing KK term 5D Lorentz invariance: must take the M n = nm KK and Λ = λm KK cutoffs together. Otherwise might lose leading term! M H 0 = gv 16π 2 f µf e ū e (p + p ) µ u µ 1 [ ( v ) ] 2 M 2 c 0 + O M c 0 = λ 2 N N n=1 m=1 ( n ) 2 ĉ 0 (n, n) for n λ λ ( n ) 0 ĉ 0 (n, n) for n λ λ ( ) 4 λ ĉ 0 (n, n) for n λ. n λ 2 (n 2 + m 2 ) + 2n 2 m 2 4 (n 2 + λ 2 ) 2 (m 2 + λ 2 ) 2 1 N N ĉ λ 2 0 (n, m), n=1 m=1 Dominant contribution from n λ. Taking λ for fixed n will lose this term! This is not a non-decoupling effect, just EFT. 23 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 23/25 25

25 Flight of the Warped Penguins Future directions with local collaborators 1. Bulk Higgs models (integrals are much nastier) 2. b sγ (operator mixing with b sg, quark c hierarchy) H 0, G 0, H ± No Goldstone cancellation! 24 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 24/25 25

26 Conclusion Calculation of µ eγ in a warped extra dimension: Mild non-tension for between loop- and tree-level bounds Three separate flavor structures (Y E Y N Y N, Y E Y E Y E, Y E ) Finite at one-loop, reasonable to expect perturbativity 5D calculation can make certain features more transparent Thanks! 25 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 25/25 25

27 Gauge invariance This is a dipole operator and the Ward identity forces the gauge invariant amplitude to take the form M = ɛ µ M µ ɛ µ ū p [(p + p ) µ (m µ + m e )γ µ ] u p Thus it is sufficient to calculate the coefficient of the (p + p ) µ term in M µ to determine the overall gauge invariant amplitude. Diagrams which are not 1PI, such as external photon emissions, are gauge redundant to the 1PI diagrams. Lavoura / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 25/25 25

28 The standard µ eγ EFT Traditional parameterization for the µ eγ amplitude ic L,R 2m µ ū L,R σ µν u R,L F µν, For the case of RS, C L,R = ( ) ay 3 + by R 2 e 16π 2 v 2 2m µ f L2,1 f E1,2 Br(µ eγ) = Trick: C 2 L + C 2 R 2C L C R 12π2 (G F m 2 µ) 2 ( C L 2 + C R 2 ) < Br(µ eγ) 6 ay 2 + b 2 α 4π ( ) R 2 2 m e 25 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 25/25 25 G F m µ

29 Operator subtleties EFT: match amplitude to Wilson coefficient. Important caveat in higher dimensions 5D amplitudes with 4D external states are non-local. M 5D = C(z H, z L, z E, z A ) H(z H ) L i (z L )σ MN E j (z E )F MN (z A ) Must integrate over each z i independently. Pathological e.g.: H(z) δ(z R ). What happens to operators like H 2? Another e.g.: Cannot write a naïve local effective operator for bulk fields coupled through a heavy brane-localized field. O UV Φ 3 (z)δ(z R ) O EFT Φ 3 (z). UV theory: brane-localized operator. IR theory: bulk fields bulk operator. 25 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 25/25 25 IR

30 Mixed 5D position/momentum space Mixed position/momentum space: (p µ, z) Due to the explicit z-dependence of the geometry and the localization of the Higgs, it is natural to work in mixed space. d dk i k 2 e ik (x x ) i d k z k 2 kz 2 e ikz (z z ) Usual momentum space in Minkowski directions Propagator dimension: [ 5D ] = [ 4D ] + 1 Each vertex: perform dz overlap integral 1/k External states carry zero-mode z-profile 25 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 25/25 25

31 5D Feynman rules See our paper for lots of appendices on performing 5D calculations. = ig 5 ( R z ) 4 γ µ = ie 5 (p + p ) µ = i 2 e 5g 5 v η µν = i ( R R ) 3 Y5 = k (z, z ) = iη µν G k (z, z ) = ɛ µ (q)f (0) A ( ) 2 ( ) c = fc z z R R R u(p) g 2 5 = g 2 SMR ln R /R e 5 f (0) A = e SM Y 5 = RY 25 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 25/25 25

32 Analytic expressions M(1MIH ± ) = M(3MIZ) = M(1MIZ) = i 16π 2 (R ) 2 f cl Y E Y N Y ev Nf ce 2I 1MIH ± 2 i ( 16π 2 (R ) 2 f cl Y E Y E Y ev E f ce 2 i ( 16π 2 (R ) 2 ev f cl Y E f ce g 2 ln R 2 R g 2 ln R R ) I 1MIZ. ) ( R v 2 ) 2 I 3MIZ Written in terms of dimensionless integrals. See paper for explicit formulae. 25 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 25/25 25

33 Finiteness in the KK picture Power counting for the brane-localized Higgs Charged Higgs: same M 2 W cancellation argument as 5D Neutral Higgs: much more subtle! A basis of chiral KK fermions: χ = ( χ (0) L i, χ (1) R i, χ (1) ) L i ψ = ( ψ (0) R i, ψ (1) R i, ψ (1) ) L i Worry about the following type of diagram: ˆχ 2 ˆψ J ˆχ J ˆψ1 ŷ 2J MJJ ŷ J1 The (KK) mass term in the propagator can be Λ. Have to show that the mixing with large KK numbers is small. 25 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 25/25 25

34 Finiteness in the KK picture Power counting for the brane-localized Higgs A basis of chiral KK fermions: ψ = ( ψ (0) R i, ψ (1) R i, ψ (1) ) L i χ = ( χ (0) L i, χ (1) R i, χ (1) ) L i Mass and Yukawa matrices (gauge basis, ψmχ + h.c.): m 11 0 m 13 M = m 21 M KK,1 m M KK,2 The zeroes are fixed by gauge invariance. ŷ 1J ŷ J2 = 0 Indices run from 1,..., 9 labeling flavor and KK number y / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 25/25 25

35 Finiteness in the KK picture Power counting for the brane-localized Higgs ( ) ψ = ψ (0) R i, ψ (1) R i, ψ (1) L i ( ) M = m11 0 m 13 m 21 M KK,1 m 23 χ = χ (0) L i, χ (1) R i, χ (1) L i 0 0 M KK,2 Rotating to the mass basis, ɛ v/m KK : Now we have y 1J y J2 ɛ, good! ɛ 1 ŷ ɛ 25 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 25/25 25

36 Finiteness in the KK picture Power counting for the brane-localized Higgs ( ) ψ = ψ (0) R i, ψ (1) R i, ψ (1) L i ( ) M = m11 0 m 13 m 21 M KK,1 m 23 χ = χ (0) L i, χ (1) R i, χ (1) L i 0 0 M KK,2 Rotating to the mass basis, ɛ v/m KK : ɛ ɛ 1 + ɛ ŷ ɛ ɛ 1 ɛ Must include large rotation of m 21 and m 13 blocks representing mixing of chiral zero modes into light Dirac SM fermions. This mixes wrong-chirality states and does not affect the mixing with same-chirality KK modes. Indeed, O(1) factors cancel: y 1J y J2 ɛ, good! 25 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 25/25 25

37 Image Credits and Colophon Empire Strikes Back logo adapted from LucasArts Rebel alliance penguin from Free Range Duck Beamer theme Flip, available online All other images were made by Flip using TikZ and Illustrator 25 / Flip Tanedo pt267@cornell.edu Warped Penguins: the Empire Strikes Back 25/25 25