Chapter 6. Panel Data. Joan Llull. Quantitative Statistical Methods II Barcelona GSE


 Derrick Chambers
 10 months ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Chapter 6. Panel Data Joan Llull Quantitative Statistical Methods II Barcelona GSE
2 Introduction Chapter 6. Panel Data 2
3 Panel data The term panel data refers to data sets with repeated observations over time (or other dimensions) for a given crosssection of units. Units can be persons, households, rms, countries,... It is dierent from repeated crosssections. Main advantages of panel data: Permanent unobserved heterogeneity. Dynamic responses and error components. Chapter 6. Panel Data 3
4 Cigarette Consumption We will use the same example throughout the chapter. Consider the estimation of the demand for cigarettes: ln C it = β 0 + β 1 ln P it + β 2 ln Y it + η i + v it, where: ln C it is log consumption of cigarettes, ln P it is log price of the cigarettes, ln Y it is log income of the individual, η i + v it is unobserved. Chapter 6. Panel Data 4
5 Static Models Chapter 6. Panel Data 5
6 General notation We consider the following model: y it = x itβ + (η i + v it ). where y it and x it are observed, and η i + v it is unobserved. Let {y it, x it } t=1,...,t i=1,...,n be our sample. We dene: y i y y i1. y it y 1. y N, X i =, X = x i1. x it X 1. X N, η i = η i ι T, and v i =, η = where ι T is a size T vector of ones. η 1. η N, and v = Hence, we can use the following compact notation: v i1. v it v 1. v N y i = X i β + (η i + v i ), and y = Xβ + (η + v). Chapter 6. Panel Data 6,,
7 General assumptions for static models For static models, we assume: Fixed eects: E[x it η i ] 0 or random eects: E[x it η i ] = 0. Strict exogeneity: E[x it v is ] = 0 s, t. This assumption rules out eects of past v is on current x it (e.g. x it cannot include lagged dependent variables). Error components: E[η i ] = E[v it ] = E[η i v it ] = 0. Serially uncorrelated shocks: E[v it v is ] = 0 s t. Homoskedasticity and i.i.d. errors: η i iid(0, σ 2 η) and v it iid(0, σ 2 v), which does not aect any crucial result, but simplies some derivations. Chapter 6. Panel Data 7
8 Pooled OLS A simple approach: dene: u η + v and estimate β by OLS: ˆβ OLS = (X X) 1 X y. The properties of ˆβ OLS depend on E[x it η i ], as E[x it v it ] = 0: If E[x itη i] = 0 E[x ju j] = 0 (random eects): E[x it v it ]=0 ˆβ OLS is consistent as N, or T, or both. it is ecient only if σ 2 η = 0. If E[x itη i] 0 E[x ju j] 0 (xed eects): ˆβ OLS is inconsistent as N, or T, or both. crosssection results are also inconsistent (but panel helps in constructing a consistent alternative). Chapter 6. Panel Data 8
9 Pooled OLS in Cigarette Demand In our previous example, we would redene our regression as: ln C j = β 0 + β 1 ln P j + β 2 ln Y j + u j, where I used subindex j to emphasize that each observation it is considered as one independent observation. Potential problems: preferences, education, OLS ln Prices (β 1 ) (0.015) ln Income (β 2 ) (0.006) parental smoking behavior,... Chapter 6. Panel Data 9
10 The xed eects model. Within groups estimation. Chapter 6. Panel Data 10
11 Within groups estimator Write the model in deviations from individual means, ỹ it y it ȳ i, where ȳ i T 1 T t=1 y it: ỹ it = (x it x i ) β + (η i η i ) + (v it v i ) = x itβ + ṽ it. Given the previous assumptions: E[ x it ṽ it ] = 0. Therefore, OLS on the transformed model: ˆβ W G = ( X X) 1 X ỹ, is a consistent estimator either if E[x it η i ] 0 or E[x it η i ] = 0. Strict exogeneity is a crucial assumption (see next slide). Chapter 6. Panel Data 11
12 The role of strict exogeneity In the case where N and T is xed, consistency depends on strict exogeneity. To see it, recall that: x it = x it 1 T (x i x it ) and ṽ it = v it 1 T (v i v it ). Therefore E[ x it ṽ it ] = 0 requires E[x it v is ] = 0 s, t unless T. This has motivated the development of dynamic panel data models, to relax this assumption. Chapter 6. Panel Data 12
13 Pros and cons of within groups estimator Advantage: consistent either if E[x it η i ] 0 or E[x it η i ] = 0. Limitations: Not ecient: When N but T is xed, less ecient that e.g. ˆβGLS if E[x it η i ] = 0. If E[x it η i ] 0, it is only ecient when all regressors are correlated with η i. It does not allow to identify coecients for timeinvariant regressors, and identication is through switchers. Chapter 6. Panel Data 13
14 Within Groups in Cigarette Demand In our example: OLS WG ln Prices (β 1 ) (0.015) (0.023) ln Income (β 2 ) (0.006) (0.019) Chapter 6. Panel Data 14
15 Least Squares Dummy Variables The Within Groups estimator can also be obtained by including a set of N individual dummy variables: y it = x itβ + η 1 D 1i η N D Ni + v it, where D hi = 1{h = i} (e.g. D 1i takes the value of 1 for the observations on individual 1 and 0 for all other observations). OLS estimation of this model gives numerically equivalent estimates to WG (that's why ˆβ W G is a.k.a. ˆβLSDV ). This gives intuition on why WG is not very ecient if there is only limited timeseries variation (degrees of freedom are N T K N = N(T 1) K). Chapter 6. Panel Data 15
16 LSDV in Cigarette Demand We can generate individual (rm) dummies and estimate by OLS, to check that it delivers the same results: OLS WG LSDV ln Prices (β 1) (0.015) (0.023) (0.023) ln Income (β 2) (0.006) (0.019) (0.019) Individual 1 (β 0 + η 1) (0.288) Individual 2 (β 0 + η 2) (0.398) Individual 3 (β 0 + η 3) (0.416) Individual 4 (β 0 + η 4) (0.384) Individual 5 (β 0 + η 5) (0.433) Individual 6 (β 0 + η 6) (0.325) Individual 7 (β 0 + η 7) (0.393) Chapter 6. Panel Data 16
17 FirstDierenced Least Squares Another transformation we can consider is rst dierences: y it = x itβ + v it, for i = 1,..., N; t = 2,..., T where y it = y it y it 1. Takes out timeinvariant individual eects ( η i = η i η i = 0), so OLS on the dierenced model is consistent. Consistency requires E[ x it v it ] = 0 which is implied by but weaker than strict exogeneity. WG more ecient than FDLS under classical assumptions. FDLS more ecient if v it random walk ( v it = ε it iid(0, σ 2 ε)). Chapter 6. Panel Data 17
18 FDLS in Cigarette Demand To get FDLS we generate st dierences and estimate by OLS: OLS WG LSDV FDLS ln Prices (β 1 ) (0.015) (0.023) (0.023) (0.035) ln Income (β 2 ) (0.006) (0.019) (0.019) (0.055) Individual 1 (β 0 + η 1 ) (0.288) Individual 2 (β 0 + η 2 ) (0.398) Individual 3 (β 0 + η 3 ) (0.416) Individual 4 (β 0 + η 4 ) (0.384) Individual 5 (β 0 + η 5 ) (0.433) Individual 6 (β 0 + η 6 ) (0.325) Chapter 6. Panel Data Individual 7 (β 0 + η 7 )
19 The random eects model. Error components. Chapter 6. Panel Data 19
20 Uncorrelated eects Now we assume uncorrelated or random eects: E[x it η i ] = 0. In this case, OLS is consistent, but not ecient. The ineciency is provided by the serial correlation induced by η i : E[u it u is ] = E[(η i + v it )(η i + v is )] = E[η 2 i ] = σ 2 η. The variance of the unobservables (under classical assumptions) is: E[u 2 it] = E[η 2 i ] + E[v 2 it] = σ 2 η + σ 2 v. Chapter 6. Panel Data 20
21 Error structure Therefore, the variancecovariance matrix of the unobservables is: ση 2 + σv 2 ση 2... σ 2 η E[u i u ση 2 ση 2 + σv 2... σ 2 η i] = = Ω i, ση 2 ση 2... ση 2 + σv 2 whose dimensions are T T, and E[u i u h ] = 0 i h, or: Ω E[uu 0 Ω ] = = Ω, Ω N which is blockdiagonal with dimension NT NT. Chapter 6. Panel Data 21
22 Generalized Least Squares Under the classical assumptions, GLS (BalestraNerlove) estimator is consistent and ecient if E[x it η i ] = 0: ˆβ GLS = ( X Ω 1 X ) 1 X Ω 1 y. If E[x it η i ] 0 GLS is inconsistent as N and T is xed. This estimator is unfeasible because we do not know σ 2 η and σ 2 v. Chapter 6. Panel Data 22
23 Thetadierencing ˆβ GLS is equivalent to OLS on the thetadierenced model: y it = x it β + u it, where: and: y it = y it (1 θ)ȳ i, σ 2 v θ 2 = σv 2 + T ση 2. Consistency relies on E[x it η i ] = 0 (as η i not eliminated). Two special cases: If σ 2 η = 0 (i.e. no individual eect), OLS is ecient. If T, then θ 0, and y it ỹ it = y it ȳ i: WG is ecient. Chapter 6. Panel Data 23
24 Feasible GLS ˆβ GLS is unfeasible because we do not know ση 2 and σv. 2 A consistent estimator of σv 2 is provided by the WG residuals: ˆṽ it ỹ it x ˆβ it W G ˆσ 2 v = ˆṽ ˆṽ N(T 1) K Then, a consistent estimator of σ 2 η is given by the BG residuals: ȳ i = x iβ + η i + v i, i = 1,..., N ˆβ BG ( ˆσ ū 2 = ση ) T σ2 v ˆū i ȳ i x i ˆβ BG = ˆū ˆū N K ˆσ2 η = ˆσ 2 ū 1 T ˆσ2 v. Chapter 6. Panel Data 24
25 Feasible GLS in Cigarette Demand In our example, if we now estimate ˆβ F GLS, we get: OLS WG FGLS ln Prices (β 1 ) (0.015) (0.023) (0.014) ln Income (β 2 ) (0.006) (0.019) (0.004) Chapter 6. Panel Data 25
26 Testing for correlated individual eects. Chapter 6. Panel Data 26
27 Testing for correlated eects (Hausman test) ˆβ W G is consistent regardless of E[x it η i ] being equal to zero or not. ˆβ F GLS is consistent only if E[x it η i ] = 0. we can test whether both estimates are similar! The Hausman test does exactly this comparison: h = ˆq [avar(ˆq)] 1 ˆq a χ 2 (K), under the null hypothesis E[x it η i ] = 0, where: ˆq = ˆβ W G ˆβ F GLS, and: ( ) ( ) avar(ˆq) = avar ˆβ W G avar ˆβ F GLS. Requires classical assumptions (FGLS to be more ecient than WG). Chapter 6. Panel Data 27
28 Hausman test in Cigarette Demand Output from software packages often includes the Hausman test. In our example: Statistic Pvalue Hausman test Chapter 6. Panel Data 28
29 Dynamic Models Chapter 6. Panel Data 29
30 Autoregressive models with individual eects Chapter 6. Panel Data 30
31 Autorregressive panel data model We consider the following model: y it = αy it 1 + η i + v it α < 1. Other regressors can be included, but main results unaected. We assume: Error components: E[η i ] = E[v it ] = E[η i v it ] = 0. Serially uncorrelated shocks: E[v it v is ] = 0 s t. Predetermined initial cond.: E[y i0 v it ] = 0 t = 1,..., T. Chapter 6. Panel Data 31
32 Properties of pooled OLS and WG estimators Even assuming E[y it 1v it] = 0, still OLS delivers: because E[y it 1η i] = σ 2 η ( plim ˆα OLS > α, N 1 α t 1 1 α ) + α t 1 E[y i0η i] > 0. Doing the within groups transformation we see that: because E[ỹ it 1ṽ it] = Aσ 2 v < 0. plim ˆα W G < α, N ( ( ( A = (1 α) 1+T 1 α t 1 α T 1 t)) +αt (1 α T 1) ) T 2 (1 α) 2 WG bias vanishes as T (bias not small even with T = 15). Supposedly consistent estimators that give ˆα >> α OLS or ˆα << ˆα W G should be seen with suspicion. Chapter 6. Panel Data 32
33 Anderson and Hsiao Consider the model in rst dierences: y it = α y it 1 + v it. OLS in rst dierences is inconsistent: E[ y it 1 v it ] = σv 2 < 0. However, y it 2 or y it 2 are valid instruments for y it 1 : Relevance: E[ y it 2 y it 1] 0, E[y it 2 y it 1] 0. Orthogonality: E[ y it 2 v it] = E[y it 2 v it] = 0. Anderson and Hsiao (1981) proposed this 2SLS estimators: ) 1 ˆα AH = ( y 1 y 1 y 1 y, where: y 1 = Z (Z Z) 1 Z y 1, where Z can be y 2 or y 2. Requires min. three periods (T = 2 and y i0 ). Only ecient if T = 2. Chapter 6. Panel Data 33
34 AR(1) Cigarette Demand (No Covariates) In our example, we redene the model to be an AR(1) process (for now without regressors): ln C it = α ln C it 1 + η i + v it. The AndersonHsiao results (together with OLS and WG) are: OLS WG Anderson Hsiao Lagged cons. (ln C it 1 ) (0.003) (0.061) (0.090) Chapter 6. Panel Data 34
35 Dierenced GMM estimation. Chapter 6. Panel Data 35
36 GMM in 3 slides (I): the setup GMM nds parameter estimates that come as close as possible to satisfy orthogonality conditions (or moment conditions) in the sample. E.g., consider K regressors x i and L instruments z i : u i = y i f(x i, β) z i = g(x i ). The model species L moment conditions: E[z i u i ] = 0. Sample analogue: b N (β) = 1 N N z i u i (β). i=1 Chapter 6. Panel Data 36
37 GMM in 3 slides (II): the estimation Two possible cases cases: L = K (just identied): b N ( ˆβ GMM ) = 0. L > K (overidentied): ˆβGMM = arg min β b N (β) W N b N (β). W N is a positive denite weighting matrix. Optimal GMM (ecient) uses ( 1 N N i=1 E[z iu i u i z i ] ) 1, the inverse of the variancecovariance matrix, as weighting matrix. Chapter 6. Panel Data 37
38 GMM in 3 slides (III): asymptotic properties ˆβ GMM is a consistent estimator of β. It is asymptotically normal, with the following variance: where: avar( ˆβ GMM ) = (D W D) 1 D W S 0 W D(D W D) 1, b N (β) D plim N β, W plim W N, N S 0 1 N N E[z i u i u iz i]. i=1 Chapter 6. Panel Data 38
39 Moment conditions Given previous assumptions, several moment conditions: Equation Instruments Orthogonality cond. y i2 = α y i1 + v i2 y i0 E[ v i2 y i0 ] = 0 [ ( )] yi0 y i3 = α y i2 + v i3 y i0, y i1 E v i3 = 0 y i1 y i0 y i4 = α y i3 + v i4 y i0, y i1, y i2 E v i4 y i1 = 0 y i2. y it = α y it 1 + v it y i0, y i1, y i2,..., y it 2 E.. v it y i0 y i1 y i2. y it 2 = 0 We end up with (T 1)T/2 moment conditions. Chapter 6. Panel Data 39
40 Moment conditions in matrix form We can write these moment conditions as E[Z i v i] = 0, where: y i y i0 y i Z i = y i0 y i1... y it 2 v i2 v i3 and vi =., v it and the sample analogue is: b N (α) = 1 N N Z i v i(α). Hence, the GMM estimator (proposed by Arellano and Bond, 1991) is: ( ) ( ) 1 N ˆα GMM = arg min v 1 N α i(α)z i W N Z i v i(α) = N N i=1 i=1 i=1 = ( y 1 ZWN Z y 1 ) 1 y 1 ZWN Z y. Chapter 6. Panel Data 40
41 Optimal weighting matrix The optimal weighting matrix (ecient GMM) is: ( 1 1 N W N = E[Z i v i v iz i]). N The sample analogue is obtained in a twostep procedure: i=1 ( ) 1 1 N W N = [Z i v N i(ˆα) v i (ˆα)Zi]. i=1 Windeijer (2005) proposes a nite sample correction of the variance that accounts for α being estimated. The most common onestep (and rststep) matrix uses the structure of E[ v i v i]: E[ v i v i] = σv Chapter 6. Panel Data 41
42 GMM in Cigarette Demand GMM results in our example are: Coecient Standard Error Least Squares (OLS) (0.003) Within Groups (WG) (0.061) AndersonHsiao (0.090) Onestep GMM (0.104) Twostep GMM (0.040) Twostep GMM small sample (0.121) Chapter 6. Panel Data 42
43 Potential limitations of ArellanoBond Weak instruments: When α 1, relevance of the instrument decreases. Instruments are still valid, but have poor small sample properties. Monte Carlo evidence shows that with α > 0.8, estimator behaves poorly unless huge samples available. There are alternatives in the literature. Overtting: Too many instruments if T relative to N is relatively large. We might want to restrict the number of instruments used. It is always good practice to check robustness to dierent combinations of instruments. Chapter 6. Panel Data 43
44 Dynamic linear model Once we include regressors, the model is: y it = αy it 1 + x itβ + η i + v it α < 1. We maintain the previous assumptions: error components, serially uncorrelated shocks, and predetermined initial conditions. Therefore, moment conditions of the kind: are still valid. E[y it s v it ] = 0 t = 2,..., T, s 2, Chapter 6. Panel Data 44
45 Assumptions on regressors Dierent assumptions regarding x it will enable dierent additional orthogonality conditions: x it can be correlated or uncorrelated with η i. x it can endogenous, predetermined, or strictly exogenous with respect to v it. For instance, if assumptions are analogous to those for y it 1, we may use x it 1 (and longer lags) as instruments: y i0 x i0 x i Z i = y i0... y it 2 x i0... x it 1 Chapter 6. Panel Data 45
46 Dynamic Cigarette Demand with Regressors In our example, we rewrite the employment equations as follows: ln C it = α ln C it 1 + β 1 ln P it + β 2 ln Y it + η i + v it. Results are: OLS WG GMM Lagged dep (α) (0.011) (0.064) (0.127) ln Prices (β 1 ) (0.006) (0.098) (0.143) ln Income (β 2 ) (0.011) (0.044) (0.051) Chapter 6. Panel Data 46
47 System GMM estimation Chapter 6. Panel Data 47
48 Additional orthogonality conditions Recall our (T 1)T/2 moment conditions: E[y it s v it ] = 0 t = 2,..., T ; s 2. System GMM (Arellano and Bover, 1995) uses the assumption E[y i0 η i ] = η i 1 α : E[ y it η i ] = 0, t or, alternatively: E[ y it s u it ] = 0, u it = η i + v it, s = 1,..., T 1. Chapter 6. Panel Data 48
49 The System GMM estimator Analogously to the rstdierenced GMM, the estimator is given by E[(Z ) u i ] = 0: where: ˆα Sys GMM = ( (X ) Z W N (Z ) X ) 1 X Z W N (Z ) y, ( ) ( ) ( ) Zi Zi = 0, u vi i =, X y 1i i = y i1... y it 1 η i + v it y it 1 ( ) and y yi i = y it This estimator is more ecient, as it uses additional moment conditions. It reduces small sample bias, especially when α 1. Chapter 6. Panel Data 49
50 SystemGMM in Cigarette Demand GMM results in our example are: Coecient Standard Error Least Squares (OLS) (0.003) Within Groups (WG) (0.061) AndersonHsiao (0.090) Onestep GMM (0.104) Twostep GMM (0.040) Twostep GMM small sample (0.121) Onestep SystemGMM (0.023) Twostep SystemGMM small (0.032) Chapter 6. Panel Data 50
51 Specication tests Chapter 6. Panel Data 51
52 Specication tests There are several relevant aspects for the validity of the estimation that can be tested formally. Orthogonality conditions: are they small enough to not reject that they are zero (overidentifying restrictions). Validity of a subset of more restrictive assumptions (dierence Sargan test, Hausman test). Serial correlation in the data: vital for the validity of the instruments (ArellanoBond test). Chapter 6. Panel Data 52
53 Sargan/Hansen overidentifying restrictions test The null hypothesis is whether the orthogonality conditions are satised (i.e. moments are equal to zero). The test can only be implemented if the problem is overidentied (otherwise the sample moments are exactly zero by construction). The test is: S = NJ N (β) = N 1 N ( N û 1 iz i N i=1 ) 1 N Z iû iû iz i i=1 1 N N Z iû i, i=1 where û are predicted residuals from the rst step and û are those predicted from the second stage, and: S a χ 2 (L K). Chapter 6. Panel Data 53
54 Testing stronger assumptions Some of the assumptions that we make are stronger than others. If the problem is overidentied, we can test whether results change if we include or exclude the orthogonality conditions generated by them. If they are true, increase eciency, but if not, inconsistent! Two ways of testing it: Overidentifying restrictions (dierence in Sargan should be close to zero: S = S S A a χ 2 (L L A )). Dierences in coecients (Hausman test: ˆq = ˆδ A GMM ˆδ GMM ). Chapter 6. Panel Data 54
55 Direct test for serial correlation The test was proposed by ArellanoBond (1991). Tests for the presence of second order autocorrelation in the rstdierenced residuals. If dierences in residuals are secondorder correlated, some instruments would not be valid! The test is: m 2 = v 2 v se a N (0, 1), where v 2 is the second lagged residual in dierences, and v is the part of the vector of contemporaneous rst dierences for the periods that overlap with the second lagged vector. Values close to zero do not reject the hypothesis of no serial correlation. Chapter 6. Panel Data 55
Repeated observations on the same crosssection of individual units. Important advantages relative to pure crosssection data
Panel data Repeated observations on the same crosssection of individual units. Important advantages relative to pure crosssection data  possible to control for some unobserved heterogeneity  possible
More informationEconometrics of Panel Data
Econometrics of Panel Data Jakub Mućk Meeting # 6 Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Meeting # 6 1 / 36 Outline 1 The FirstDifference (FD) estimator 2 Dynamic panel data models 3 The Anderson and Hsiao
More informationPanel Data Models. Chapter 5. Financial Econometrics. Michael Hauser WS17/18 1 / 63
1 / 63 Panel Data Models Chapter 5 Financial Econometrics Michael Hauser WS17/18 2 / 63 Content Data structures: Times series, cross sectional, panel data, pooled data Static linear panel data models:
More informationAdvanced Econometrics
Based on the textbook by Verbeek: A Guide to Modern Econometrics Robert M. Kunst robert.kunst@univie.ac.at University of Vienna and Institute for Advanced Studies Vienna May 16, 2013 Outline Univariate
More informationMultiple Equation GMM with Common Coefficients: Panel Data
Multiple Equation GMM with Common Coefficients: Panel Data Eric Zivot Winter 2013 Multiequation GMM with common coefficients Example (panel wage equation) 69 = + 69 + + 69 + 1 80 = + 80 + + 80 + 2 Note:
More informationLinear dynamic panel data models
Linear dynamic panel data models Laura Magazzini University of Verona L. Magazzini (UniVR) Dynamic PD 1 / 67 Linear dynamic panel data models Dynamic panel data models Notation & Assumptions One of the
More information1 Estimation of Persistent Dynamic Panel Data. Motivation
1 Estimation of Persistent Dynamic Panel Data. Motivation Consider the following Dynamic Panel Data (DPD) model y it = y it 1 ρ + x it β + µ i + v it (1.1) with i = {1, 2,..., N} denoting the individual
More informationDealing With Endogeneity
Dealing With Endogeneity Junhui Qian December 22, 2014 Outline Introduction Instrumental Variable Instrumental Variable Estimation TwoStage Least Square Estimation Panel Data Endogeneity in Econometrics
More informationDynamic Panel Data Models
Models Amjad Naveed, Nora Prean, Alexander Rabas 15th June 2011 Motivation Many economic issues are dynamic by nature. These dynamic relationships are characterized by the presence of a lagged dependent
More informationPanel Data Econometrics
Panel Data Econometrics RDB 2428 September 2012 Contents 1 Advantages of Panel Longitudinal) Data 5 I Preliminaries 5 2 Some Common Estimators 5 21 Ordinary Least Squares OLS) 5 211 Small Sample Properties
More informationEconomics 582 Random Effects Estimation
Economics 582 Random Effects Estimation Eric Zivot May 29, 2013 Random Effects Model Hence, the model can be rewritten as = x 0 β + + [x ] = 0 (no endogeneity) [ x ] = = + x 0 β + + [x ] = 0 [ x ] = 0
More informationDynamic panel data methods
Dynamic panel data methods for crosssection panels Franz Eigner University Vienna Prepared for UK Econometric Methods of Panel Data with Prof. Robert Kunst 27th May 2009 Structure 1 Preliminary considerations
More informationPanel Data Model (January 9, 2018)
Ch 11 Panel Data Model (January 9, 2018) 1 Introduction Data sets that combine time series and cross sections are common in econometrics For example, the published statistics of the OECD contain numerous
More informationDynamic Panels. Chapter Introduction Autoregressive Model
Chapter 11 Dynamic Panels This chapter covers the econometrics methods to estimate dynamic panel data models, and presents examples in Stata to illustrate the use of these procedures. The topics in this
More informationLecture 8 Panel Data
Lecture 8 Panel Data Economics 8379 George Washington University Instructor: Prof. Ben Williams Introduction This lecture will discuss some common panel data methods and problems. Random effects vs. fixed
More informationTopic 10: Panel Data Analysis
Topic 10: Panel Data Analysis Advanced Econometrics (I) Dong Chen School of Economics, Peking University 1 Introduction Panel data combine the features of cross section data time series. Usually a panel
More informationChapter 2. Dynamic panel data models
Chapter 2. Dynamic panel data models School of Economics and Management  University of Geneva Christophe Hurlin, Université of Orléans University of Orléans April 2018 C. Hurlin (University of Orléans)
More informationShort T Panels  Review
Short T Panels  Review We have looked at methods for estimating parameters on timevarying explanatory variables consistently in panels with many crosssection observation units but a small number of
More informationECONOMETRICS II (ECO 2401) Victor Aguirregabiria (March 2017) TOPIC 1: LINEAR PANEL DATA MODELS
ECONOMETRICS II (ECO 2401) Victor Aguirregabiria (March 2017) TOPIC 1: LINEAR PANEL DATA MODELS 1. Panel Data 2. Static Panel Data Models 2.1. Assumptions 2.2. "Fixed e ects" and "Random e ects" 2.3. Estimation
More informationEconometrics I. Ricardo Mora
Econometrics I Department of Economics Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Master in Industrial Economics and Markets Outline Motivation 1 Motivation 2 3 4 Motivation The Analogy Principle The () is a framework
More informationNonlinear panel data modeling
Nonlinear panel data modeling Laura Magazzini University of Verona laura.magazzini@univr.it http://dse.univr.it/magazzini May 2010 Laura Magazzini (@univr.it) Nonlinear panel data modeling May 2010 1
More informationLecture 6: Dynamic panel models 1
Lecture 6: Dynamic panel models 1 Ragnar Nymoen Department of Economics, UiO 16 February 2010 Main issues and references Predeterminedness and endogeneity of lagged regressors in FE model, and RE model
More informationApplied Microeconometrics (L5): Panel DataBasics
Applied Microeconometrics (L5): Panel DataBasics Nicholas Giannakopoulos University of Patras Department of Economics ngias@upatras.gr November 10, 2015 Nicholas Giannakopoulos (UPatras) MSc Applied Economics
More informationLinear Panel Data Models
Linear Panel Data Models Michael R. Roberts Department of Finance The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania October 5, 2009 Michael R. Roberts Linear Panel Data Models 1/56 Example First Difference
More informationPanel Data: Linear Models
Panel Data: Linear Models Laura Magazzini University of Verona laura.magazzini@univr.it http://dse.univr.it/magazzini Laura Magazzini (@univr.it) Panel Data: Linear Models 1 / 45 Introduction Outline What
More informationDynamic Panel Data Workshop. Yongcheol Shin, University of York University of Melbourne
Dynamic Panel Data Workshop Yongcheol Shin, University of York University of Melbourne 1012 June 2014 2 Contents 1 Introduction 11 11 Models For Pooled Time Series 12 111 Classical regression model 13
More informationEconometrics of Panel Data
Econometrics of Panel Data Jakub Mućk Meeting # 2 Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Meeting # 2 1 / 26 Outline 1 Fixed effects model The Least Squares Dummy Variable Estimator The Fixed Effect (Within
More informationPanel Data Exercises Manuel Arellano. Using panel data, a researcher considers the estimation of the following system:
Panel Data Exercises Manuel Arellano Exercise 1 Using panel data, a researcher considers the estimation of the following system: y 1t = α 1 + βx 1t + v 1t. (t =1,..., T ) y Nt = α N + βx Nt + v Nt where
More informationEconometrics. Week 8. Fall Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague
Econometrics Week 8 Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague Fall 2012 1 / 25 Recommended Reading For the today Instrumental Variables Estimation and Two Stage
More informationEconometrics of Panel Data
Econometrics of Panel Data Jakub Mućk Meeting # 4 Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Meeting # 4 1 / 30 Outline 1 Twoway Error Component Model Fixed effects model Random effects model 2 Nonspherical
More informationEcon 582 Fixed Effects Estimation of Panel Data
Econ 582 Fixed Effects Estimation of Panel Data Eric Zivot May 28, 2012 Panel Data Framework = x 0 β + = 1 (individuals); =1 (time periods) y 1 = X β ( ) ( 1) + ε Main question: Is x uncorrelated with?
More informationEC327: Advanced Econometrics, Spring 2007
EC327: Advanced Econometrics, Spring 2007 Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics (3rd ed, 2006) Chapter 14: Advanced panel data methods Fixed effects estimators We discussed the first difference (FD) model
More informationSpecification testing in panel data models estimated by fixed effects with instrumental variables
Specification testing in panel data models estimated by fixed effects wh instrumental variables Carrie Falls Department of Economics Michigan State Universy Abstract I show that a handful of the regressions
More informationInstrumental Variables and GMM: Estimation and Testing. Steven Stillman, New Zealand Department of Labour
Instrumental Variables and GMM: Estimation and Testing Christopher F Baum, Boston College Mark E. Schaffer, Heriot Watt University Steven Stillman, New Zealand Department of Labour March 2003 Stata Journal,
More informationPANEL DATA RANDOM AND FIXED EFFECTS MODEL. Professor Menelaos Karanasos. December Panel Data (Institute) PANEL DATA December / 1
PANEL DATA RANDOM AND FIXED EFFECTS MODEL Professor Menelaos Karanasos December 2011 PANEL DATA Notation y it is the value of the dependent variable for crosssection unit i at time t where i = 1,...,
More informationConsistent OLS Estimation of AR(1) Dynamic Panel Data Models with Short Time Series
Consistent OLS Estimation of AR(1) Dynamic Panel Data Models with Short Time Series Kazuhiko Hayakawa Department of Economics Hitotsubashi University January 19, 006 Abstract In this paper, we examine
More informationLecture 10: Panel Data
Lecture 10: Instructor: Department of Economics Stanford University 2011 Random Effect Estimator: β R y it = x itβ + u it u it = α i + ɛ it i = 1,..., N, t = 1,..., T E (α i x i ) = E (ɛ it x i ) = 0.
More informationWooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, 4th ed. Chapter 15: Instrumental variables and two stage least squares
Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, 4th ed. Chapter 15: Instrumental variables and two stage least squares Many economic models involve endogeneity: that is, a theoretical relationship does not fit
More informationRecent Advances in the Field of Trade Theory and Policy Analysis Using MicroLevel Data
Recent Advances in the Field of Trade Theory and Policy Analysis Using MicroLevel Data July 2012 Bangkok, Thailand Cosimo Beverelli (World Trade Organization) 1 Content a) Classical regression model b)
More informationEconometrics. Week 4. Fall Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague
Econometrics Week 4 Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague Fall 2012 1 / 23 Recommended Reading For the today Serial correlation and heteroskedasticity in
More informationApplied Econometrics (MSc.) Lecture 3 Instrumental Variables
Applied Econometrics (MSc.) Lecture 3 Instrumental Variables Estimation  Theory Department of Economics University of Gothenburg December 4, 2014 1/28 Why IV estimation? So far, in OLS, we assumed independence.
More informationEconometrics of Panel Data
Econometrics of Panel Data Jakub Mućk Meeting # 1 Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Meeting # 1 1 / 31 Outline 1 Course outline 2 Panel data Advantages of Panel Data Limitations of Panel Data 3 Pooled
More informationInstrumental Variables, Simultaneous and Systems of Equations
Chapter 6 Instrumental Variables, Simultaneous and Systems of Equations 61 Instrumental variables In the linear regression model y i = x iβ + ε i (61) we have been assuming that bf x i and ε i are uncorrelated
More informationPanel Data Models. James L. Powell Department of Economics University of California, Berkeley
Panel Data Models James L. Powell Department of Economics University of California, Berkeley Overview Like Zellner s seemingly unrelated regression models, the dependent and explanatory variables for panel
More informationEconometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data Jeffrey M. Wooldridge / The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England Contents Preface Acknowledgments xvii xxiii I INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
More informationEconometrics. Week 6. Fall Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague
Econometrics Week 6 Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague Fall 2012 1 / 21 Recommended Reading For the today Advanced Panel Data Methods. Chapter 14 (pp.
More information10 Panel Data. Andrius Buteikis,
10 Panel Data Andrius Buteikis, andrius.buteikis@mif.vu.lt http://web.vu.lt/mif/a.buteikis/ Introduction Panel data combines crosssectional and time series data: the same individuals (persons, firms,
More informationRobust Standard Errors to spatial and time dependence in. stateyear panels. Lucciano Villacorta Gonzales. June 24, Abstract
Robust Standard Errors to spatial and time dependence in stateyear panels Lucciano Villacorta Gonzales June 24, 2013 Abstract There are several settings where panel data models present time and spatial
More informationEfficient Estimation of Dynamic Panel Data Models: Alternative Assumptions and Simplified Estimation
Efficient Estimation of Dynamic Panel Data Models: Alternative Assumptions and Simplified Estimation Seung C. Ahn Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85187, USA Peter Schmidt * Michigan State University,
More informationØkonomisk Kandidateksamen 2004 (I) Econometrics 2. Rettevejledning
Økonomisk Kandidateksamen 2004 (I) Econometrics 2 Rettevejledning This is a closedbook exam (uden hjælpemidler). Answer all questions! The group of questions 1 to 4 have equal weight. Within each group,
More informationAsymptotic Properties and simulation in gretl
Asymptotic Properties and simulation in gretl Quantitative Microeconomics R. Mora Department of Economics Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Outline 1 Asymptotic Results for OLS 2 3 4 5 Classical Assumptions
More informationRecent Advances in the Field of Trade Theory and Policy Analysis Using MicroLevel Data
Recent Advances in the Field of Trade Theory and Policy Analysis Using MicroLevel Data July 2012 Bangkok, Thailand Cosimo Beverelli (World Trade Organization) 1 Content a) Endogeneity b) Instrumental
More informationECONOMETRICS II (ECO 2401S) University of Toronto. Department of Economics. Spring 2013 Instructor: Victor Aguirregabiria
ECONOMETRICS II (ECO 2401S) University of Toronto. Department of Economics. Spring 2013 Instructor: Victor Aguirregabiria SOLUTION TO FINAL EXAM Friday, April 12, 2013. From 9:0012:00 (3 hours) INSTRUCTIONS:
More informationFinite Sample Performance of A Minimum Distance Estimator Under Weak Instruments
Finite Sample Performance of A Minimum Distance Estimator Under Weak Instruments Tak Wai Chau February 20, 2014 Abstract This paper investigates the nite sample performance of a minimum distance estimator
More informationDynamic Panel Data Models
June 23, 2010 Contents Motivation 1 Motivation 2 Basic setup Problem Solution 3 4 5 Literature Motivation Many economic issues are dynamic by nature and use the panel data structure to understand adjustment.
More informationEconometric Methods and Applications II Chapter 2: Simultaneous equations. Econometric Methods and Applications II, Chapter 2, Slide 1
Econometric Methods and Applications II Chapter 2: Simultaneous equations Econometric Methods and Applications II, Chapter 2, Slide 1 2.1 Introduction An example motivating the problem of simultaneous
More informationApplied Quantitative Methods II
Applied Quantitative Methods II Lecture 10: Panel Data Klára Kaĺıšková Klára Kaĺıšková AQM II  Lecture 10 VŠE, SS 2016/17 1 / 38 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Pooled OLS 3 First differences 4 Fixed effects
More informationShort Questions (Do two out of three) 15 points each
Econometrics Short Questions Do two out of three) 5 points each ) Let y = Xβ + u and Z be a set of instruments for X When we estimate β with OLS we project y onto the space spanned by X along a path orthogonal
More informationEconometrics of Panel Data
Econometrics of Panel Data Jakub Mućk Meeting # 4 Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Meeting # 4 1 / 26 Outline 1 Twoway Error Component Model Fixed effects model Random effects model 2 HausmanTaylor
More informationLecture: Simultaneous Equation Model (Wooldridge s Book Chapter 16)
Lecture: Simultaneous Equation Model (Wooldridge s Book Chapter 16) 1 2 Model Consider a system of two regressions y 1 = β 1 y 2 + u 1 (1) y 2 = β 2 y 1 + u 2 (2) This is a simultaneous equation model
More informationLinear Regression with Time Series Data
Econometrics 2 Linear Regression with Time Series Data Heino Bohn Nielsen 1of21 Outline (1) The linear regression model, identification and estimation. (2) Assumptions and results: (a) Consistency. (b)
More informationLinear models. Linear models are computationally convenient and remain widely used in. applied econometric research
Linear models Linear models are computationally convenient and remain widely used in applied econometric research Our main focus in these lectures will be on single equation linear models of the form y
More informationEconometrics I KS. Module 2: Multivariate Linear Regression. Alexander Ahammer. This version: April 16, 2018
Econometrics I KS Module 2: Multivariate Linear Regression Alexander Ahammer Department of Economics Johannes Kepler University of Linz This version: April 16, 2018 Alexander Ahammer (JKU) Module 2: Multivariate
More informationQuantile Regression for Dynamic Panel Data
Quantile Regression for Dynamic Panel Data Antonio Galvao 1 1 Department of Economics University of Illinois NASM Econometric Society 2008 June 22nd 2008 Panel Data Panel data allows the possibility of
More informationCasuality and Programme Evaluation
Casuality and Programme Evaluation Lecture V: DifferenceinDifferences II Dr Martin Karlsson University of DuisburgEssen Summer Semester 2017 M Karlsson (University of DuisburgEssen) Casuality and Programme
More informationHeteroskedasticity. We now consider the implications of relaxing the assumption that the conditional
Heteroskedasticity We now consider the implications of relaxing the assumption that the conditional variance V (u i x i ) = σ 2 is common to all observations i = 1,..., In many applications, we may suspect
More information1 Introduction The time series properties of economic series (orders of integration and cointegration) are often of considerable interest. In micro pa
Unit Roots and Identification in Autoregressive Panel Data Models: A Comparison of Alternative Tests Stephen Bond Institute for Fiscal Studies and Nuffield College, Oxford Céline Nauges LEERNAINRA Toulouse
More informationLecture 4: Linear panel models
Lecture 4: Linear panel models Luc Behaghel PSE February 2009 Luc Behaghel (PSE) Lecture 4 February 2009 1 / 47 Introduction Panel = repeated observations of the same individuals (e.g., rms, workers, countries)
More informationInstrumental Variables
Università di Pavia 2010 Instrumental Variables Eduardo Rossi Exogeneity Exogeneity Assumption: the explanatory variables which form the columns of X are exogenous. It implies that any randomness in the
More informationStrength and weakness of instruments in IV and GMM estimation of dynamic panel data models
Strength and weakness of instruments in IV and GMM estimation of dynamic panel data models Jan F. Kiviet (University of Amsterdam & Tinbergen Institute) preliminary version: January 2009 JELcode: C3;
More informationLecture 4: Heteroskedasticity
Lecture 4: Heteroskedasticity Econometric Methods Warsaw School of Economics (4) Heteroskedasticity 1 / 24 Outline 1 What is heteroskedasticity? 2 Testing for heteroskedasticity White GoldfeldQuandt BreuschPagan
More informationClusterRobust Inference
ClusterRobust Inference David Sovich Washington University in St. Louis Modern Empirical Corporate Finance Modern day ECF mainly focuses on obtaining unbiased or consistent point estimates (e.g. indentification!)
More informationEconomics 472. Lecture 10. where we will refer to y t as a mvector of endogenous variables, x t as a qvector of exogenous variables,
University of Illinois Fall 998 Department of Economics Roger Koenker Economics 472 Lecture Introduction to Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Models In this lecture we will introduce some simple dynamic simultaneous
More informationEcon 510 B. Brown Spring 2014 Final Exam Answers
Econ 510 B. Brown Spring 2014 Final Exam Answers Answer five of the following questions. You must answer question 7. The question are weighted equally. You have 2.5 hours. You may use a calculator. Brevity
More informationInstrumental Variables and the Problem of Endogeneity
Instrumental Variables and the Problem of Endogeneity September 15, 2015 1 / 38 Exogeneity: Important Assumption of OLS In a standard OLS framework, y = xβ + ɛ (1) and for unbiasedness we need E[x ɛ] =
More informationChapter 6: Endogeneity and Instrumental Variables (IV) estimator
Chapter 6: Endogeneity and Instrumental Variables (IV) estimator Advanced Econometrics  HEC Lausanne Christophe Hurlin University of Orléans December 15, 2013 Christophe Hurlin (University of Orléans)
More informationPanel Data. March 2, () Applied Economoetrics: Topic 6 March 2, / 43
Panel Data March 2, 212 () Applied Economoetrics: Topic March 2, 212 1 / 43 Overview Many economic applications involve panel data. Panel data has both crosssectional and time series aspects. Regression
More informationLecture 7: Dynamic panel models 2
Lecture 7: Dynamic panel models 2 Ragnar Nymoen Department of Economics, UiO 25 February 2010 Main issues and references The Arellano and Bond method for GMM estimation of dynamic panel data models A stepwise
More informationFixed Effects Models for Panel Data. December 1, 2014
Fixed Effects Models for Panel Data December 1, 2014 Notation Use the same setup as before, with the linear model Y it = X it β + c i + ɛ it (1) where X it is a 1 K + 1 vector of independent variables.
More informationEconometrics Summary Algebraic and Statistical Preliminaries
Econometrics Summary Algebraic and Statistical Preliminaries Elasticity: The point elasticity of Y with respect to L is given by α = ( Y/ L)/(Y/L). The arc elasticity is given by ( Y/ L)/(Y/L), when L
More informationECON Introductory Econometrics. Lecture 16: Instrumental variables
ECON4150  Introductory Econometrics Lecture 16: Instrumental variables Monique de Haan (moniqued@econ.uio.no) Stock and Watson Chapter 12 Lecture outline 2 OLS assumptions and when they are violated Instrumental
More informationEconometrics of Panel Data
Econometrics of Panel Data Jakub Mućk Meeting # 3 Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Meeting # 3 1 / 21 Outline 1 Fixed or Random Hausman Test 2 Between Estimator 3 Coefficient of determination (R 2
More informationChapter 1: A Brief Review of Maximum Likelihood, GMM, and Numerical Tools. Joan Llull. Microeconometrics IDEA PhD Program
Chapter 1: A Brief Review of Maximum Likelihood, GMM, and Numerical Tools Joan Llull Microeconometrics IDEA PhD Program Maximum Likelihood Chapter 1. A Brief Review of Maximum Likelihood, GMM, and Numerical
More informationLinear Regression with Time Series Data
u n i v e r s i t y o f c o p e n h a g e n d e p a r t m e n t o f e c o n o m i c s Econometrics II Linear Regression with Time Series Data Morten Nyboe Tabor u n i v e r s i t y o f c o p e n h a g
More informationRegression with time series
Regression with time series Class Notes Manuel Arellano February 22, 2018 1 Classical regression model with time series Model and assumptions The basic assumption is E y t x 1,, x T = E y t x t = x tβ
More informationIntermediate Econometrics
Intermediate Econometrics Heteroskedasticity Text: Wooldridge, 8 July 17, 2011 Heteroskedasticity Assumption of homoskedasticity, Var(u i x i1,..., x ik ) = E(u 2 i x i1,..., x ik ) = σ 2. That is, the
More informationRegression and Statistical Inference
Regression and Statistical Inference Walid Mnif wmnif@uwo.ca Department of Applied Mathematics The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada 1 Elements of Probability 2 Elements of Probability CDF&PDF
More informationNotes on Panel Data and Fixed Effects models
Notes on Panel Data and Fixed Effects models Michele Pellizzari IGIERBocconi, IZA and frdb These notes are based on a combination of the treatment of panel data in three books: (i) Arellano M 2003 Panel
More informationWe begin by thinking about population relationships.
Conditional Expectation Function (CEF) We begin by thinking about population relationships. CEF Decomposition Theorem: Given some outcome Y i and some covariates X i there is always a decomposition where
More informationINTRODUCTION TO BASIC LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL
INTRODUCTION TO BASIC LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL 13 September 2011 Yogyakarta, Indonesia Cosimo Beverelli (World Trade Organization) 1 LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL In general, regression models estimate the effect
More informationBias Correction Methods for Dynamic Panel Data Models with Fixed Effects
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Bias Correction Methods for Dynamic Panel Data Models with Fixed Effects Mohamed R. Abonazel Department of Applied Statistics and Econometrics, Institute of Statistical
More informationEconometric Methods for Panel Data
Based on the books by Baltagi: Econometric Analysis of Panel Data and by Hsiao: Analysis of Panel Data Robert M. Kunst robert.kunst@univie.ac.at University of Vienna and Institute for Advanced Studies
More informationWeak Instruments and the FirstStage Robust Fstatistic in an IV regression with heteroskedastic errors
Weak Instruments and the FirstStage Robust Fstatistic in an IV regression with heteroskedastic errors Uijin Kim u.kim@bristol.ac.uk Department of Economics, University of Bristol January 2016. Preliminary,
More information8. Instrumental variables regression
8. Instrumental variables regression Recall: In Section 5 we analyzed five sources of estimation bias arising because the regressor is correlated with the error term Violation of the first OLS assumption
More information4.8 Instrumental Variables
4.8. INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES 35 4.8 Instrumental Variables A major complication that is emphasized in microeconometrics is the possibility of inconsistent parameter estimation due to endogenous regressors.
More information1 Outline. 1. Motivation. 2. SUR model. 3. Simultaneous equations. 4. Estimation
1 Outline. 1. Motivation 2. SUR model 3. Simultaneous equations 4. Estimation 2 Motivation. In this chapter, we will study simultaneous systems of econometric equations. Systems of simultaneous equations
More informationLinear Regression with Time Series Data
u n i v e r s i t y o f c o p e n h a g e n d e p a r t m e n t o f e c o n o m i c s Econometrics II Linear Regression with Time Series Data Morten Nyboe Tabor u n i v e r s i t y o f c o p e n h a g
More informationLinear Regression. Junhui Qian. October 27, 2014
Linear Regression Junhui Qian October 27, 2014 Outline The Model Estimation Ordinary Least Square Method of Moments Maximum Likelihood Estimation Properties of OLS Estimator Unbiasedness Consistency Efficiency
More informationA Course in Applied Econometrics Lecture 4: Linear Panel Data Models, II. Jeff Wooldridge IRP Lectures, UW Madison, August 2008
A Course in Applied Econometrics Lecture 4: Linear Panel Data Models, II Jeff Wooldridge IRP Lectures, UW Madison, August 2008 5. Estimating Production Functions Using Proxy Variables 6. Pseudo Panels
More informationMax. Likelihood Estimation. Outline. Econometrics II. Ricardo Mora. Notes. Notes
Maximum Likelihood Estimation Econometrics II Department of Economics Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Máster Universitario en Desarrollo y Crecimiento Económico Outline 1 3 4 General Approaches to Parameter
More information