Optimal upper bounds on expected kth record values from IGFR distributions
|
|
- Cory Williams
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 arxiv:92.32v [math.st] 4 Feb 29 Optimal upper bounds on expected kth record values from IGFR distributions Agnieszka Goroncy Nicolaus Copernicus University Chopina 2/8, 87 Toruń, Poland gemini@mat.umk.pl Abstract The paper concerns the optimal upper bounds on the expectations of the kth record values k )centered aboutthesamplemean. Weconsiderthecase, whentherecords are based on the infinite sequence of the independent identically distributed random variables, which distribution function is restricted to the family of distributions with the increasing generalized failure rate IGFR). Such a class can be defined in terms of the convex orders of some distribution functions. Particularly important examples of IGFR class are the distributions with the increasing density ID) and increasing failure rate IFR). Presented bounds were obtained with use of the projection method, and are expressed in the scale units based on the standard deviation of the underlying distribution function. 2 Mathematics Subject Classification: 6E5,62G32. Key words: optimal bound, kth record value, increasing density, increasing failure rate, increasing generalized failure rate. Introduction Let us consider the infinite sequence {X n }, n, of independent and identically distributed random variables with the common cummulative distribution function cdf) F and finite meanµandvariance 2. ByX :n,...,x n:n denotetheorderstatisticsofx,...,x n. Further, we are interested in the increasing subsequences of X,X 2,... of the kth greatest order statistics, for a fixed k =,2,... Formally, we define the upper) kth records R n k), n =,,..., by introducing first the kth record times T n k) as T k) = k, T n k) = min{j > T k) n : X j > X k) T }, n =,2,... n + k:tk) n Then the kth record values are given by R k) n = X T k) n + k:t k) n, n =,,...
2 Note that classic upper records are defined by k =, and we say that such a record occurs at time j if X j is greater than the maximum of previous observations X,...,X j. Records are widely used, not only in the statistical applications. The most obvious one that arises at the first glance is the prediction of sport achievements and natural disasters. The first mention of the classic records comes from Chandler 952), while the kth record values were introduced by Dziubdziela and Kopociński 976). For the comprehensive overview of the results on the record values the reader is referred to Arnold, Balakrishnan and Nagaraja 998) and Nevzorov 2). The distribution function of the kth record value R n k) is given by the following formula F k) n = [ Fx)] k n i= k i i! ln[ Fx)])i..) If the cdf F is absolutely continuous with a probability density function pdf) f, then the distribution function.) also has the pdf given by f k) n kn+ x) = ln[ Fx)]) n [ Fx)] k fx). n! In particular case of the standard unform underlying cdf F, the corresponding distribution of the uniform kth record is given by the following equations G k) n x) = x)k g k) n n i= k i i! [ ln x)]i, < x <, k, n, kn+ x) = [ ln x)] n x) k, < x <, k, n..2) n! Now, recall the cdf of the generalized Pareto distribution αx) /α, for x, if α <, W α x) = αx) /α, for x, if α >, α e x, for x, if α =..3) Next, we say that the cdf F precedes the cdf G in the convex transform order, and we write F G, if the composition F G is concave on the support of G. Following the reasoning of Goroncy and Rychlik 25) and Bieniek and Szpak 27), we consider the following family of distributions with the increasing generalized failure rate defined as with respect to.3) IGFRα) = {F : F W α }..4) Indeed, if the distribution function F is continuous with the density function f, then the generalized failure rate defined as γ α x) = W α F)) x) = Fx)) α fx),.5) 2
3 is increasing. Note that the expression in.5) is just the product of the conventional failure rate and a power of the survival function F. For α = we obtain the standard uniform distribution function W = U and the family IGFR)=ID of the increasing density distributions, respectively. On the other hand for α =, the cdf W = V is the cdf of the standard exponential distribution and in the result we get the family IGFR)=IFR of the increasing failure rate distributions. The aim of this paper is to establish the optimal upper bounds on E Rk) n µ,.6) where the cdf F is restricted to the IGFRα) class of distributions, for arbitrarily chosen k and n. In the special case n =, which reduces to the order statistics X :k, the readers are referred to Rychlik 24), who established the optimal bounds for ID and IFR distributions. The bounds on the kth records, in particular classic record values have been widely considered in the literature, beginning with Nagaraja978). He used the Schwarz inequality to obtain the upper bounds on the expectations of the classic records, which were expressed in terms of the mean and standard deviation of the underlying distribution. The Hölder inequality was used by Raqab 2), who presented more general bounds expressed in the scale units generated by the pth central absolute moments p, p. Also, he considered records from the symmetric populations. Differences of the consecutive record values called record spacings) based on the general populations and from distributions with the increasing density and increasing failure rate were considered by Rychlik 997). His results were generalized by Danielak 25) into the arbitrary record increments. The kth record values were considered by Grudzień and Szynal 985), who by use of the Schwarz inequality obtained non-sharp upper bounds expressed in terms of the population mean and standard deviation. Respective optimal bounds were derived by Raqab 997), who applied the Moriguti 953) approach. Further, the Hölder along with the Moriguti inequality were used by Raqab and Rychlik 22) in order to get more general bounds. Gajek and Okolewski 23) dealt with the expected kth record values based on the nonnegative decreasing density and decreasing failure rate populations evaluated in terms of the population second raw moments. Results for the adjacent and non-adjacent kth records were obtained by Raqab 24) and Danielak and Raqab 24a). Evaluations for the second records from the symmetric populations were considered by Raqab and Rychlik 24). Danielak and Raqab 24b) presented the mean-variance bounds on the expectations of kth record spacings from the decreasing density and decreasing failure rate families of distributions. Further, Raqab 27) considered second record increments from decreasing density families. Bounds for the kth records from decreasing generalized failure rate populations were evaluated by Bieniek 27). Expected kth record values, as well as their differences from bounded populations were determined by Klimczak 27), who expressed the bounds in terms of the lengths of the support intervals. Regarding the lower bounds on the record values, there are not many papers concerning the problem, in opposite to the literature on the lower bounds for the order statistics and their 3
4 linear combinations see e.g. Goroncy and Rychlik 26a), Goroncy and Rychlik 26b, 28), Rychlik 27), Goroncy29)). The lower bounds on the expected kth record values expressed in units generated by the central absolute moments of various orders, in the general case of the arbitrary parent distributions were presented by Goroncy and Rychlik 2). There are also a few papers concerning the lower bounds on records indirectly, namely in the more general case of the generalized order statistics Goroncy 24), Bieniek and Goroncy 27)). Below we present a procedure which provides the basis of obtaining the optimal upper bounds on.6) in the case of our interest. It is well known that therefore ER k) n = F x)g n k) x)dx = E Rk) n µ = F x) kn+ [ ln x)] n x) k dx, n! F x) µ [g n k) x) ]dx..7) Due to the further application, we subtract from g k) n x) in the formula above, but one could replace it with an arbitrary constant. Changing the variables in.7), for a fixed, absolutely continuous cdf W with the pdf w on the support [,d), d, we obtain E Rk) n µ = d Further assume that W satisfies F Wx)) µ d g n k) Wx)) )wx)dx..8) x 2 wx)dx <..9) Let us consider the Hilbert space L 2 W of the square integrable functions with respect to w on [,d), and denote the norm of an arbitrary function f L 2 W as d /2 f W = fx) wx)dx) 2. Moreover, let P W stand for the projection operator onto the following convex cone C W = {g L 2 W : g is nondecreasing and concave}..) In order to find the upper optimal bounds on.8), we will use the Schwarz inequality combined with the well-known projection method see Rychlik 2), for details). It is clear that.8) can be bounded by the L 2 W -norm of the projection P W of the function h W x) = g n k) Wx)), as follows E Rk) n µ P W h W W,.) 4
5 with the equality attained for cdf F satisfying F Wx)) µ = P Wh W x) P W h W W..2) In our case we fix W = W α and the problem of establishing the optimal upper bounds on.6) easily boils down to determining the L 2 W α -norm of the projection P α = P Wα of the function h Wα onto C Wα. Note that in order to apply the projection method, we need the condition.9) to be fulfilled by the distribution function.3). Bieniek 28) showed, that in that case we need to confine ourselves to parameters α >, what we do in our further 2 considerations. 2 Auxiliary results In this section we recall the results of Goroncy and Rychlik 25, 26), who determined the projection of the function h L 2 W satisfying particular conditions, onto the cone.) of nondecreasing and concave functions. These conditions are presented below. A) Let h be bounded, twice differentiable function on [,d), such that d hx)wx)dx =. Moreover, assume that h is strictly decreasing on, a), strictly convex increasing on a, b), strictly concave increasing on b,c) with h) < hc), and strictly decreasing on c,d) with hd) = h) for some a < b < c < d. The projection of the function h satisfying conditions A) onto the convex cone.) is either first linear, then coinciding with h and ultimately constant, or just linear and then constant, depending on the behaviour on some particular auxiliary functions, which are introduced below. First, denote T W β) = hβ) Wβ)) d β hx)wx)dx, β d, 2.) which is decreasing on,a), increasing on a,c) and decreasing on c,d), having the unique 5
6 zero β in a,c). Moreover, let λ W y) = x y)hx) hy))wx)dx, 2.2) x y) 2 wx)dx Y W y) = λ W y) h y), 2.3) Z W y) = hx) hy) λ W y)x y))wx)dx, 2.4) for y < d. The precise form of the projection of the function h satisfying A) onto the cone.) is described in the proposition below cf. Goroncy and Rychlik 26), Proposition ). Proposition. If the zero β a,c) of 2.) belongs to the interval b,c) and the set Y = {y b,β ) : Y W y),z W y) = } is nonempty, then hy )+λ W y )x y ), x < y, P W hx) = hx), y x < β, hβ ), β x < d, where y = inf{y Y} is the projection of h onto.). Otherwise we define with P y h 2 W = P y hx) = d y d y ht)wt)dt x y),y) x) Wy) +, β y < d, t y)wt)dt ) 2 [ hx)wx)dx x y) 2 wx)dx Wy)) y ) ] 2 x y)wx)dx) ) 2. x y)wx)dx Let Z denote the set of arguments y β satisfying the following condition d y hx)wx)dx Wy) = x y)hx)wx)dx x y) 2 wx)dx y x y)wx)dx ) 2 >. 2.5) x y)wx)dx Then Z is nonempty and P W hx) = P y hx) for unique y = argmax y Z P yh 2 W. 6
7 Note that there are only two possible shapes of projection functions of the function h onto.). The first one requires compliance with certain conditions and can be briefly described as: linear - identical with h - constant l-h-c, for short). The second possible shape does not have a part which corresponds to the function h, and we will refer to it as l-c linear and constant) from now on. The original version of this proposition can be found in Goroncy and Rychlik 25), however there was no clarification about the parameter y in case of the l-c type of the projection, therefore we refer to Goroncy and Rychlik 26). We will also need some results on the projection of the functions satisfying conditions Ã), which are a slight modification of conditions A). We state that the function h satisfies Ã) if conditions A) are modified so that c = d = and suphx) = lim hx) >. This x in general means that the function does not have the decreasing part at the right end of the support and in particular does not have to be bounded from above. The proposition below cf. Goroncy and Rychlik 26), Proposition 6) describes the shape of the projection in this case. Proposition 2. If the function h satisfies conditions Ã), then the set Ỹ = {y > b : Y Wy),Z W y) = } is nonempty and for y = inf{y Ỹ} we have { hy )+λ P W hx) = W y )x y ), x < y, hx), x y. 3 Main results Let us focus now on the case W = W α and denote where x> h α x) = h Wα x) = ĝ n k) x), 3.) ĝ k) n = g k) n W α. 3.2) We also denote Ĝk) n x) = G k) n W α x)). The substantial matter in determining the bounds on.6) is to learn the shapes of the functions 3.) for arbitrary k =,2,... and n, which correspond with the shapes of compositions 3.2), and are presented in the lemma below comp. with Bieniek 27), Lemma 3.2). Lemma. If α >, then the shape of ĝ k) n is as follows: i) If k =, then ĝ ) n, n, is convex increasing. ii) If 2 k < α 2 decreasing. +, then ĝk) n, n, is convex increasing, concave increasing and concave iii) If α + k + α, then ĝk) 2 is concave increasing-decreasing, and ĝ n k), n 2, is convex increasing, concave increasing and concave decreasing. 7
8 iv) If k > +α, then ĝ k) is concave increasing, concave decreasing and convex decreasing, and ĝ n k), n 2, is convex increasing, concave increasing, concave decreasing and convex decreasing. If α =, then the shape of ĝ k) n is as follows: i) If k =, then ĝ ) is linear increasing and ĝ ) n, n 2, is convex increasing. ii) If k 2, then ĝ k) is concave increasing and then decreasing, ĝ k) n, n 2, is convex increasing, concave increasing, and decreasing. If α <, then the shape of ĝ k) n is as follows: i) If k =, then ĝ ) is concave increasing, ĝ ) n, n 2, is convex increasing and concave increasing. ii) If k 2, then ĝ k) is concave increasing, concave decreasing and convex decreasing and ĝ n k), n 2, is convex increasing, concave increasing, concave decreasing and convex decreasing. It is worth mentioning that slight differences between the lemma above and Lemma 3.2 in Bieniek 27) are the result of different notations of record values. Note that the case α = is covered by the above lemma, except the setting ii) for α >, which is not possible in this case cf. Rychlik 2), p.36). Case α = comes from Rychlik 2, p.36). In order to determine the shape of 3.2) for α, we notice that for k 2 and n 2 ĝ k) n x)) = ĝ k) n x)) = αx [kĝk) n x) k )ĝ n k) x)], 3.3) ĝ k) αx) 2[k2 n 2 x) k2k α 2)ĝk) n x) +k )k α)ĝ k) n x)], 3.4) and use the variation diminishing property VDP) of the linear combinations of g n k) W α see Gajek and Okolewski, 23). Other special cases of k, n we calculate separately in order to obtain the shapes of 3.2). Faced with this knowledge, we conclude that 3.) satisfy conditions A) with a =, for k 2 and n 2 if α =, for n = and 2 k < α + or k 2 and n 2 if α >, as well 2 as for k 2 and n 2 if α <. Moreover, we have d h α x)wx)dx = g k) n u) )du =, h α ) = g k) n W α )) =, h α d) = g k) n W α d)) =. The value of 3.) in the local maximum point c has to be positive, since the function starts and finishes with negative 8
9 values and integrates to zero, which means that 3.) has to cross the x-asis and changes the sign from negative to positive, finishing with negative value at d. Therefore, we can use Proposition in order to obtain the projection of 3.) onto.) and finally determine the desired bounds according to.). Moreover, 3.) satisfy conditions Ã) in case of the first record values k = ) for α <, n 2 and we are entitled to use Proposition 2 then. Other cases can be dealt without the above results. These imply the particular shapes of the projections which can be one of the three possible kinds. The first one coincides with the original function 3.) first values of the classic records for α ), the second shape is the linear increasing function classic record values for n and α > or n 2 and α = ), and the last one is the projection coinciding with the function h at the beginning and ultimately constant first values of the kth records for α < and k 2 or α >, k max{2, α +}). 2 In order to simplify the notations, we will denote the projection of function 3.) onto.) with respect to.3) by P α h α from now on. 3. Bounds for the classic records In the proposition below we present the bounds on the classic record values k = ). This case does not require using the Proposition, since the shapes of the densities of records do not satisfy conditions A), but possibly satisfy conditions Ã). Proposition 3. Assume that k =. i) Let 2 < α <. If n =, then we have the following bound E R) µ, 3.5) with the equality attained for the exponential distribution function { Fx) = exp x µ }, x > µ. 3.6) If n 2, then the set Ỹ = {y > b : Y α y),z α y) = } is nonempty and for y = inf{y Ỹ} we have E R) n µ C α y ), 3.7) 9
10 where Cα 2 y) = [ αy) /α][ + ] ĝ n ) y) ) 2 Ĝ) n y) ) 2+2α) ĝ n ) y) [ y+α) αy) /α+ ] 2 2 αy) /α+2 +y+2α)αy+y 2) ĝ n ) y) y+α) + αy)/α+ Ĝ ) n x)dx +α 2α) [y+α) + αy) /α+ ]ĝ n ) y) +α) + +α)[2 2 αy) /α+2 +y+2α)αy +y 2)] ) 2 Ĝ ) n x)dx. 3.8) The equality in 3.7) is attained for distribution functions F IGFRα) that satisfy the following condition [ ] ĝ n ) y ) +λ α y )x y ) +µ, x < y, C α y ) F W α x)) = [ ] ĝ n ) x) +µ, y x < d. C α y ) ii) Let now α =. We have the following bound E R) n µ n, with the equality attained for the exponential distribution function 3.6). iii) Suppose α >, n. Then we have the following bound E R) n µ 2α+)2a b +α+)b 2 )+2a 2, 3.9) +α)2α+) where a = +α) 2 2α+) α+α) /α n x)dx, 3.) Ĝ ) b = a +α = +α)2α+) α+α) /α n x)dx. 3.) Ĝ )
11 The equality in 3.9) is attained for the following distribution function Fx) = α + x µ) a 2α+)2a b +α+)b 2 )+2a2 +α)2α+) ))/α Proof. Fix k =. Let us first consider case i), i.e. α <. Here we have to add an additional restriction α >, which has been mentioned at the end of Section 2. If n =, 2 then the function h α is increasing and concave, hence its projection onto.) is the same as h α. The bound can be determined via its norm, which square is given by since P α h α 2 = h α 2 = d ĝ k) n x) )2 w α x)dx = k 2n+) 2n)!, 3.2) n!) 2 2k ) 2n+. d [ĝk) n x)] 2 wα x)dx = = [ g k) n x)] 2 dx = k 2n+) 2n)! n!) 2 2k ) 2n+ g 2k ) 2n x)dx = k 2n+) 2n)! n!) 2 2k ) 2n+. Taking into account that k as well as n are equal to one, formula 3.2) implies 3.5). Suppose now that n 2. Note that in this case 3.) satisfy conditions Ã). Using Proposition 2, we have the following projection of 3.) onto the cone.), P α h α x) = ĝ k) n y ) +λ α y )x y ), x < y, ĝ k) n x), y x < d. An appropriate counterpart of function 2.2) in our case is λ α y) = λ Wα y) = ĝ n k) y) W α x)dx Ĝ k) n y)dx, 3.3) 2y W α x)dx 2 xw α x)dx
12 with k =, since simple calculations show that Having x y)w α x)dx = x y) 2 w α x)dx = 2 y W α x)dx, 3.4) W α x)dx y xĝ n k) x)w αx)dx = yĝk) n y) W α x)dx = y + αy)+/α, +α xw α x)dx, 3.5) Ĝ k) n x)dx. 3.6) xw α x)dx = 2 y2 + αy)+/α y + αy)2+/α +α +α)+2α), for α, we conclude that 3.3) takes the form [y+α) + αy) /α+ ]ĝ k) n y) +α) Ĝ k) n x)dx λ α y) = +2α) 2 2 αy) /α+2 +y+2α)αy+y 2), 3.7) with k =. In consequence for 2 < α < and k = we have P α h α 2 = C 2 α y ), where Cα 2 y) is given in 3.8). The square root of the expression above determines the optimal bound on.6). Consider now case iii) with α > and n, which requires more explanation. With such parameters function h α is increasing and convex. This implies that its projection onto the cone of the nondecreasing and concave functions is linear increasing. The justification for this is similar as e.g. in Rychlik 24, p.9). The only possible shape of the closest increasing and convex function to the function h α is the linear increasing one P α h α x) = a x+b, say, which has at most two crossing points with h α. Since d h α x)w α x)dx = d P α h α x)w α x) =, 3.8) 2
13 see e.g. Rychlik 2)), we obtain b = a +α. 3.9) Next, in order to determine the optimal parameter a, we need to minimize the distance between the function 3.) and its projection D α a ) = P α h α h α 2. For α > we have ĝ ) n = n! ln αx)/α ) n and w α x) = αx) /α. Therefore D α a) = a 2 Using /α x ) 2 w α x)dx 2a +α /α x ) +α h α x)w α x)dx+ /α h 2 α x)w αx)dx. 3.2) /α /α x ) 2 w α x)dx = +α x ) h α x)w α x)dx = +α 2α+)+α) 2, α+α) /α Ĝ ) n x)dx, we get the minimum of 3.2) equal to 3.). Since 3.9), we also obtain 3.). Finally, the optimal bound can be determined by calculating the square root of P α h α 2 = /α a x+b ) 2 αx) /α dx, which equals 3.9). Let finally consider the case ii). Note that for n = function h α is increasing and concave, and the case is analogous to i) with n =, when we get the bound equal to. If n 2, then h α is increasing and convex and its projection onto the cone of the nondecreasing and concave functions is linear, as in case iii). Here the analogue to 3.9) is b = a. For α =, we have ĝ n ) x) = xn, n 2, which gives us the distance function n! D a) = a 2 2an 2+ 2n)!, which is minimized for a n!) 2 = n. Hence P h x) = nx ), and we get the optimal bound equal to P h = n. The distributions for which the equalities are attained in all the above cases can be determined using the condition.2) with W = W α and h = h α. 3
14 3.2 Bounds for the kth records, k 2 As soon as we give some auxiliary calculations, we are ready to formulate the results on the upper bounds of the expected kth record values, k 2 based on the the IGFRα) family of distributions. For W α being the GPD distribution, we have the corresponding function of 2.) given by [ T α β) = T Wα β) = W α β)) n ĝ k) i β)+ ) ] ĝ n k) k k β),β,d). 3.2) i= Knowing the properties of 2.), we notice that T α ) =, T α d) =, and 3.2) is first negative, then positive, which follows from the VDP property of the linear combinations of ĝ k) i, i =,...,n see Gajek and Okolewski, 23). We conclude that 3.2) increases from to T α c) >, and then decreases to, which means that 3.2) has the unique zero β in the interval,c). Therefore the condition β b,c), required in the Proposition for the l-h-c type of the projection of the function 3.), is equivalent to T α b) <. Moreover, respective functions 2.2)-2.4) in case of the nth values of the kth records, n =,..., k = 2,..., are following ĝ k) n y) W α x)dx Ĝ k) n y)dx Y α y) = Y Wα y) = 2y W α x)dx 2 xw α x)dx k n+ ) w α y) ĝ k ) k ) n n y) ĝ n k ) y), Z α y) = Z Wα y) = Ĝk) n y) W αy)ĝ k) n y)+λ αy) together with λ α presented in 3.3), since 3.4), 3.5) and 3.6) hold. Proposition 4. Let F IGFRα) and k 2. i) Fix n = and let < α or < α 2k. Then for 2, α =, kk ) β = )) exp α, α, α kk ) we have the following bound where B 2 α,β) = E Rk) µ W α x)dx, 3.22) B α, β ), 3.23) 2k 4 [ 2. 2k ) 3Ĝ2k ) 2 β) 2Ĝk) β)+w α β)+ W α β)) ĝ k) β) ] 3.24) 4
15 The equality in 3.23) is attained for the following IGFRα) distribution function F B α, β ) ĝk) x) )+µ, x < β, F W α x)) = B α, β ) ĝk) β ) )+µ, β x d. 3.25) ii) Let < α and n 2 or α > and n = with 2 k < α + or n If T α b) <, and the set Y α = {y b,β ) : Y α y),z α y) = } is nonempty, then let y = inf{y Y α } and we have the following bound where E Rk) n µ B α, y,β ), 3.26) Bα, 2 y,β) = W αy) [ ĝ n k) y) ] 2 + Wα β)) [ ĝ n k) β) ] 2 y 2λ α y)[ĝ n k) y) ] W α x)dx+2λ 2 α y) y W α x)dx F W α x)) = + k2n+) 2n)! ] [Ĝ2k ) n!) 2 2k ) 2n+ 2n β) Ĝ2k ) 2n y) [Ĝk) 2 n β) Ĝk) n ]+W y) α β) W α y), xw α x)dx with λ α given by 3.3). The equality in 3.26) is attained for distributions F IGFRα) satisfying the following condition [ ] ĝ n k) y ) +λ α y )x y ) +µ, x < y, B α, y,β ) ) ĝ n k) x) +µ, y x < β, B α, y,β ) ) ĝ n k) β ) +µ, β x < d. B α, y,β ) Otherwise we define P y h α x) = W α y) Ĝk) n y) W α y) x y +, x < y, W α x)dx W α y) Ĝk) n y), y x < d, W α y) )
16 with 2 P y h α 2 W α = W α y) Ĝk) n y) 2y W α y)) W α x)dx W α x)dx 2 xw α x)dx 2 W α x)dx. Let Z denote the set of arguments y β satisfying the following condition y ) W α x)dx W α x)dx Ĝ k) n x)dx Ĝ k) n y) = W αy) W α y)) ). 3.28) 2y W α x)dx W α x)dx 2 xw α x)dx Then Z is nonempty and P y h α x) = P y h α x) for unique y = argmax P yh α Wα, and we y Z have the following bound E Rk) n µ B α,2 y ), 3.29) where B α,2 y ) = P y h α Wα W α y = ) Ĝk) n y ) 2y y W α y )) W α x)dx W α x)dx 2 xw α x)dx 2 W α x)dx. The equality in 3.29) is attained for distributions F IGFRα) satisfying the following condition F W α x)) = W α y ) Ĝk) n y )) x y + W α y ))B α,2 y ) y +µ, x < y, W α x)dx 3.3) W α y ) Ĝk) n y )) )B W α y α,2 y )+µ, y x < d. ) Remark. Proposition 4 describes general results for all possible parameters α, with k 2. Integrals that appear in expressions above strictly depend on α and since they have long 6
17 analytic representations, we do not present them in the proposition, but gather them below, +y +e y, α =, W α x)dx = y + +αy)/α+, α, +α xw α x)dx = Ĝ k) n x)dx = 2 y2 +e y +y), α =, 2 y2 + αy)/α+ y + αy)/α+2 +α +α)+2α), α, [ ] y n i e ky ky) j, α =, k i= j= j! [ y n k i i αy) k/α+[ ln αy) /α] j i= k +α) i+ j= ] +α)j k, α. j! Moreover, λ α can be calculated from 3.7) if λ, and λ α = λ V, further defined in 3.4), if α =. Proof of Proposition 4. Consider first case i). Note that due to Lemma in this setting of parameters, 3.) is concave increasing and then decreasing. In this case the projection onto the cone of nondecreasing and concave functions is in fact the same as the projection onto the cone of nondecreasing functions. Indeed, the projection onto the family of nondecreasing functions coincides first with the original function on a subinterval of its concave increase, and then becomes constant. Therefore it is a nondecreasing concave function, and so it is the projection onto the cone of nondecreasing concave functions as well. Hence h α x), x < β, P α h α x) = 3.3) h α β), β d, for some β,d). In order to determine parameter β such that 3.3) is the projection of 3.) onto.), we use condition 3.8) with d P α h α x)w α x)dx = β d h α x)w α x)dx+h α β) w α x)dx which is equivalent to = Ĝk) n β) W α β)+ĝ k) n β) ) W α β)), Ĝ k) β) = ĝk) β) W αβ)), β < d, 3.32) 7 β
18 for n =, and finally W α β) = exp kk ) ), β < d, which allows to determine parameter 3.22). The bound 3.23) is determined by the norm of 3.3). Note that for parameters k, n, α, settled in case ii), functions 3.) satisfy conditions A) and we directly use Proposition, presenting only a draft proof here. Note that if T α b) < and the set Y α is nonempty, then the projection of h α is of the following form P α h α x) = ĝ k) n y ) +λ α y )x y ), x < y, ĝ k) n x), y x < β, ĝ k) n β ), β x < d. Otherwise, if these conditions are not satisfied, then the projection is just the linear increasing and constant function corresponding with formula 3.27). Here the condition 2.5) turns out to be identical with 3.28). The bounds in ii), according to.) can be determined by the norm of the projections P α h α, therefore we obtain3.26) andfinally 3.29) corresponding to P y h α Wα, respectively. The equality distributions for all considered cases can be determined using.2) with W = W α and h = h α and appropriate projection functions P α h α. Remark 2. Note that for n = and < α 2k, the construction of bounds implies that they are equal to the general ones, i.e. those derived without restricting to any special families of distributions see Raqab, 997). The parameter 3.22) is then the transformation of so called Moriguti point β here equal to.3935), which defines the projection in the general case, according to the formula β = Wα β ). Indeed, our condition 3.32) for α = is the same as the equation given by Raqab 997, see formula 2.4) for n = 2), with β = W β ) = U β ) =.3935, matching parameter u in Raqab s paper. For α = we obtain transformed β = W β ) = V β ) =.5, and the same value of the bound equal to.345 in both cases see Table below). The particularly important cases of the distributions F IGFRα) are the distributions with the increasing density and increasing failure rate. The corresponding results are presented in the next subsections. 8
19 3.3 Bounds for distributions with increasing density In case of the increasing density distributions ID, for short) we fix α = and W x) = Ux) = x, x <, as the standard uniform distribution, hence ĝ n k) x) = g n k) given by.2) and h U x) = h x) = g n k) x). 3.33) Case k =, when 3.33) is convex increasing see Rychlik 2, p.36) and Lemma ), has already been considered in Proposition 3. Here we consider other cases, when 3.33) is concave increasing on, exp )) and decreasing on exp ),) for k 2, k k n =, and when 3.33) satisfy conditions A) for k 2, n 2 with exp n )), k = 2, ) b = b U = exp 2kn 3n n 2 +4nk )k 2), k 3, 2k )k 2) c = c U = exp n ). k Note that functions defined in 2.)-2.4) take the following form in the ID case of distributions [ T U β) = β) n g k) i β)+ ) ] g n k) k k β), 3.34) i= { n } λ U y) = 3 k i y 3 k +) i+gk+) i y)+ α2 2 gk) n y) y i= { = 3 ) n+ α+ α2 k n i )} k i k +) j y 3 2 gk) n y) k + k +) i+ k +2) j+gk+2) j y), i= j= ) Y U y) = λ U y) kn+ g k ) k ) n n y) g n k ) y), n Z U y) = yg n k) y) k i k +) i+gk+) i y) i= { + 3 ) n+ α+ α2 k n i )} 2y 2 gk) n y) k i k +) j k + k +) i+ k +2) j+gk+2) j y), i= j= for β,y <. The results below follow from the Proposition 4 for α =. Corollary. Let F be the increasing density distribution function and fix k 2. i) For n = let β satisfy the following condition G k) β) = gk) β)β )+, β. 9
20 Then where B U, β) = E Rk) µ B U, β ), 3.35) 2k 4 2k ) 3G2k ) 2 β) 2G k) β)+β + β)g k) β) ) 2. The equality in 3.35) is attained for the following distribution function Fx) =, x < µ B U, β ), g k) ) BU, β ) x µ +), µ x < gk) B U, β β ) +µ, ) B U, β ), x gk) β) B U, β ) +µ. ii) Let now n 2 and β U denote the unique zero of 3.34) in the interval,c U ). If T U b U ) < and the set Y U = {y b U,β U ) : Y U y),z U y) = } is nonempty, then g n k) y U ) +λ U y U )x y U ), x < y U, P U h U x) = g n k) x), y U x < β U, g k) n β U ), β U x <, where y U = inf{y Y U } and we have the following bound where E Rk) n µ B U, y U,β U ), 3.36) [ g BU,y,β) 2 k) = y n y) ) 2 yλu y)+2)g n k) y)+ ] 3 yλ Uy)yλ U y)+3) +β 2 [ G k) n β) Gk) n y)] + β) g k) + k2n+) 2n)! [ n!) 2 2k ) 2n+ G 2k ) 2n β) G 2k ) 2n y) n β) ) 2 ]. 2
21 The equality in 3.36) holds for the following distribution function, x < gk) n y) yλ U y) +µ, B Fx) = y + ) B x µ g n k) y)+, λ U y) g k) n ) + x µ B), g n k) y) yλ U y) B < gk) n y) B +µ, g n k) y) B, x gk) n β) B +µ, +µ x +µ x < gk) n β) B +µ, with B = B U, y U,β U ), y = y U and β = β U. Otherwise let 2y G k) n y)) y 2 y) x 2 y)y Gk) n y)), x < y, y y) P y h U x) = y G k) n y), y x <, y with P y h U 2 U = 4 3y 3y y G k) n y) y Let Z U denote the set of y β U being the solution to the following equation ) G k) n y) = y 6 y) y 2 n y4 3y) 2 y + k i k +) i+gk+) i y). Then Z U is nonempty and P y h U x) = P y U h U x) for unique yu = argmax P y h U U and we y Z U have the following bound E Rk) n µ B U,2 yu ), 3.37) with B U,2 yu) = y U Gk) n yu ) 4 3yU. yu 3yU The equality in 3.37) holds for the following distribution function, x < A y U B C )+µ, Fx) = C x µ B A )+y U, A y U B C )+µ x < A +µ, B, x A +µ, B 2 i= ) 2.
22 with A = y U Gk) n yu ), yu B = B U,2 yu ), C = 2 y U) Distributions with increasing failure rate Let us now consider distibutions with the increasing failure rate IFR, for short), i.e. α = and W x) = Vx) = e x, x <, which is the standard exponential distribution. Therefore we have ĝ n k) kn+ x) = gk) n Vx)) = x n e xk ), n! n Ĝ k) xk) i n k i n x) = e kx = i! k +) i+ĝk+) i x), i= i= h V x) = h x) = ĝ n k) x). 3.38) The case of the first records k = ) with n for the increasing failure rate distributions was presented in Proposition 3 ii). Therefore below we consider only k 2 with n. Here b = b V = n n k, c = c V = n k, and the respective functions 2.)-2.4) are following n k i T V β) = +ĝk+) k n k +) i i β)+k ) k +) nĝk+) n β), 3.39) i= { λ V y) = y n+ ) [ ] n k i y 2 +2 y e y ) k k +) i+ĝk+) i y) 3.4) i= } n+)kn k +) n+2ĝk+) n+ y) y e y )ĝ n k) y), Y V y) = λ V y) [kĝ n y) k k) )ĝ n k) y)], n k i Z V y) = k +) i+ĝk+) i y) e y )ĝ n k) y) λ V y) y e y ). i= The results below are the straightforward implication of Proposition 4, therefore the proof of the corollary below is immediate and will not be presented here. 22
23 Corollary 2. Let F be the increasing failure rate cdf and fix k 2. i) Let n = and β satisfy condition Ĝ k) Then we have the following bound where B 2 V,β) = n β) = e β ĝ k) β), β <. E Rk) µ B V, β ), 2k 4 2k ) 3Ĝ2k ) 2 β) 2Ĝk) β)+ e β [ ĝ k) β) ) 2 ]. The equality above is attained for the following distribution function, x < µ, B V, β ) Fx) = exp ĝ k) ) B V, β ) x µ )) +, µ B V, β ) x < B V, β ) ĝk) β ) )+µ,, x B V, β ) ĝk) β ) )+µ. ii) Let n 2 and let β V denote the unique zero of 3.39). If T V b V ) < and the set Y V = {y b V,β V ) : Y V y),z V y) = } is nonempty, then ĝ n k) y V ) +λ V y V )x y V ), x < y V, P V h V x) = ĝ n k) x), y V x < β V, ĝ k) n β V ), x β V, where y V = inf{y Y V } and we have the following bound where E Rk) n µ B V, y V,β V ), 3.4) B 2 V,y,β) = e y ) ĝ k) n y) ) 2 2ĝ k) n y)[ e y λ V y) y e y )] +λ 2 V y)[y2 +2 y e y )] 2λ V y) y e y )++e β [ĝ n k) β) )2 ] + k2n+) 2n)! ) Ĝ2k ) Ĝk) ) n!) 2 2k ) 2n+ 2n β) Ĝ2k ) 2n y) 2 n β) Ĝk) n y). 23
24 The equality in 3.4) holds for the following distribution function Fx) =, x < By,β) ĝk) n y) yλ V y))+µ, V V λ V y) Bx µ ĝ k) n y)+)+y ), B ĝk) n y) yλ V y))+µ x < B ĝk) n y) )+µ, ) ) B ĝ n k) x µ +), B ĝk) n y) )+µ x < B ĝk) n β) )+µ,, x B ĝk) n β) )+µ, with B = B V, y V,β V ), y = y V and β = β V. Otherwise let with P y h V x) = P y h V 2 V = ) y e Ĝk) n y) x y e y e y +y +, x < y, y e Ĝk) n y), x y, e y ) 2 n y) e 2y 2ye y ). e y +y y e Ĝk) Let Z V denote the set of y β V which satisfy the following equation [ Ĝ k) n y) = e y + e y y e y ) n+ +e y e y e y +2y) k + y n+ ) n k i k k +) i+ĝk+) i y) n+)kn k +) n+2ĝk+) i= n+ y) Then Z V is nonempty and P y h V x) = P y V h V x) for unique yv = argmax P y h V V and we y Z V have the following bound E Rk) n µ B V,2 yv ), 3.42) where e y Ĝk) n y) B V,2 y) = P y h V V = e 2y 2ye e y +y y. ]. 24
25 The equality in 3.42) holds for the following distribution function, x < A y V B C )+µ, Fx) = V ) C x µ B A )+y V, A y V B C )+µ x < A +µ, B, x A +µ, B with 3.5 Numerical calculations A = e y V Ĝ k) n yv ), B = B V,2 y V), e y V C = e y V +y V. We illustrate the obtained results with the numerical calculations of the bounds on.6) for fixed values of parameters n, k and α. Table below contains the numerical values of the upper bounds on the nth values of the second records k = 2), n =,...,9, in two particular cases of the IGFR distributions: F ID and F IFR. The column y presents the values of y U,y V in case of the l-h-c type of the projection inclined font of y) and yu,y V, if the projection has the shape l-c. For n = column y presents β see Corollary and 2, cases i)) for particular shape of projection h-c, say). As it was mentioned before see Remark 2 above), for n = we obtain the same value y = β =.3935 as Raqab 997) obtained for u in case of ID distribution, and for the IFR family the parameter is transformed, y = β = V.3935) =.5. Moreover, Raqab s numerical value of the bound B 2,2 2) =.3457 is the same as our bounds for both ID and IFR families. The only case among those considered when the projection shape is l-h-c, is the case F IFR, n = 2, where β V =.366. Moreover, for F ID and n = 6,...,9, the value y =. is only the approximation of the change point which approaches to, from which the projection becomes constant. Note that the bounds increase while n increases, and so do the parameters y. Moreover, the bounds in the IFR case are greater than the bounds in the ID case, which is consistent with the general dependencies between those two families of distributions. Table 2 presents the optimal bounds on the expectations of the fifth values n = 5) of the kth records, k =,2,...,, based on the distributions with the increasing density ID) and increasing failure rate IFR) respectively. For k = Proposition 3 ii) and iii) was usefull. For k 2 all the cases of the bounds were determined based on the second kind of the projection shape, l-c Corollary and 2, cases ii)). Note that the bounds decrease along with the increase of the parameter k, and the same concerns the parameters yu, y V, determining the points in which the projection breaks from the linear increasing into the constant function. It is not possible deliver parameter yw, W = U,V for n =, since the shapes of 3.33) and 3.38) are then linear increasing. 25
26 Table : Upper bounds on the expectations of standardized nth values of the second records from restricted families F ID F IFR n y bound y bound Table 2: Upper bounds on the expectations of standardized fifth values of the kth records from restricted families F ID F IFR k yu bound yv bound Acknowledgements The author is greatly indebted to anonymous reviewers for many valuable comments which helped in the preparation of the final version of the paper. The research was supported by the Polish National Science Center Grant no. 25/9/B/ST/3. References [] Arnold, B.C., Balakrishnan, N. and Nagaraja, H.N. 998), Records, Wiley, New York. [2] Bieniek, M. 27), Projection mean-variance bounds on expectations of kth record values from restricted families, Commun. Statist. Theor. Meth. 36,
27 [3] Bieniek, M. 28), On families of distributions for which optimal bounds on expectations of GOS can be derived, Commun. Stat. Theor. Meth. 37, [4] Bieniek, M. and Goroncy, A. 27), Sharp lower bounds on expectations of gos based on DGFR distributions, Stat. Papers, [5] Bieniek, M. and Szpak, M. 28), Sharp bounds for the mean of the total time on test for distributions with increasing generalized failure rate, Statistics 52, [6] Chandler, K.N. 952), The distribution and frequency of record values, J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B 4, [7] Danielak, K. 25), Distribution-free bounds for expectations of increments of records, J. Statist. Plann. Inference 33, [8] Danielak, K. and Raqab, M.Z. 24a), Sharp upper bounds for expectations of kth record increments, Austral. New Zeal. J. Statist. 46, [9] Danielak, K. and Raqab, M.Z. 24b), Sharp upper bounds on expectations of kth record spacings from restricted families, Statist. Probab. Lett. 69, [] Dziubdziela, W. and Kopociński, B. 976), Limiting properties of the kth record values, Zastos. Mat. 5, [] Gajek, L. and Okolewski, A. 23), Projection bounds on expectations of record statistics from restricted families, J. Statist. Plann. Inference, [2] Goroncy, A. 29), Lower bounds on positive L-statistics, Commun. Statist. Theor. Meth. 38, [3] Goroncy, A. 24), Bounds on expected generalized order statistics, Statistics, 48, [4] Goroncy, A. and Rychlik, T. 26a), How deviant can you be? The complete solution. Math. Inequal. Appl. 9, [5] Goroncy, A. and Rychlik, T. 26b), Lower bounds on expectations of positive L- statistics based on samples drawn with replacement. Statistics 4 26), [6] Goroncy, A. and Rychlik, T. 28), Lower bounds on expectations of positive L- statistics from without replacement models, J. Statist. Plann. Inference 38, [7] Goroncy, A., Rychlik, T. 2), Lower bounds on the expectations of upper record values, J. Statist. Plann. Inference, 4, [8] Goroncy, A. and Rychlik, T. 25), Optimal bounds on expectations of order statistics and spacings from nonparametric families of distributions generated by convex transform order, Metrika, 78,
28 [9] Goroncy, A. and Rychlik, T. 26), Evaluations of expectations of order statistics and spacings based on IFR distributions, Metrika 79, [2] Grudzień, Z. and Szynal, D. 985), On the expected values of kth record values and associated characterizations of distributions, in: Probability and Statistical Decision Theory, Vol. A F. Konecny, J. Mogyoródy, and W. Wertz, eds.) Reidel, Dordrecht, [2] Klimczak, M. 27), Best bounds of kth records from bounded samples, Commun. Statist. Theor. Meth. 36, [22] Moriguti, S. 953), A modification of Schwarz s inequality with applications to distributions. Ann. Math. Statist. 24, 7 3. [23] Nagaraja, H. N. 978), On the expected values of record values, Austral. J. Statist. 2, [24] Nevzorov, V.B. 2), Records: Mathematical Theory, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 94, American Mathematical Society, Providence. [25] Raqab, M. Z. 997), Bounds based on the greatest convex minorants for moments of record values, Statist. Probab. Lett. 36, [26] Raqab, M.Z. 2), On the moments of record values, Commun. Statist. Theor. Meth. 29, [27] Raqab, M.Z. 24), Projection P-norm bounds on the moments of Kth record increments, J. Statist. Plann. Inference 24, [28] Raqab, M.Z. 27). Sharp bounds on expectations of second record increments from decreasing density families, J. Statist. Plann. Inference 37, [29] Raqab, M.Z. and Rychlik, T. 22), Sharp bounds for the mean of kth record value, Commun. Statist. Theory Meth. 3, [3] Raqab, M.Z. and Rychlik, T. 24), Sharp bounds on the expectations of second record values from symmetric populations, Statistics 38, [3] Rychlik, T. 997), Evaluating improvements of records. Appl. Math. Warsaw) 24, [32] Rychlik, T. 2), Projecting Statistical Functionals. Lecture Notes in Statistics, Vol. 6, Springer-Verlag, New York. [33] Rychlik, T. 27), Optimal bounds for linear functionals on monotone functions, Math. Inequal. Appl., Correction: Math. Inequal. Appl., 7. [34] Rychlik, T. 24), Maximal expectations of extreme order statistics from increasing density and failure rate populations, Commun. Statist. Theor. Meth. 43,
EVALUATIONS OF EXPECTED GENERALIZED ORDER STATISTICS IN VARIOUS SCALE UNITS
APPLICATIONES MATHEMATICAE 9,3 (), pp. 85 95 Erhard Cramer (Oldenurg) Udo Kamps (Oldenurg) Tomasz Rychlik (Toruń) EVALUATIONS OF EXPECTED GENERALIZED ORDER STATISTICS IN VARIOUS SCALE UNITS Astract. We
More informationOn Characteristic Properties of the Uniform Distribution
Sankhyā : The Indian Journal of Statistics 25, Volume 67, Part 4, pp 715-721 c 25, Indian Statistical Institute On Characteristic Properties of the Uniform Distribution G. Arslan Başkent University, Turkey
More informationJordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 7(4), 2014, pp
Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 7(4), 2014, pp.257-271 ON RELATIONS FOR THE MOMENT GENERATING FUNCTIONS FROM THE EXTENDED TYPE II GENERALIZED LOGISTIC DISTRIBUTION BASED ON K-TH UPPER
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ca] 12 Jul 2018
arxiv:1807.04811v1 [math.ca] 12 Jul 2018 A new invariance identity and means Jimmy Devillet and Janusz Matkowski Abstract. The invariance identity involving three operations D f,g : X X X of the form D
More informationBest linear unbiased and invariant reconstructors for the past records
Best linear unbiased and invariant reconstructors for the past records B. Khatib and Jafar Ahmadi Department of Statistics, Ordered and Spatial Data Center of Excellence, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad,
More informationConvergence rates in weighted L 1 spaces of kernel density estimators for linear processes
Alea 4, 117 129 (2008) Convergence rates in weighted L 1 spaces of kernel density estimators for linear processes Anton Schick and Wolfgang Wefelmeyer Anton Schick, Department of Mathematical Sciences,
More informationTWO MAPPINGS RELATED TO SEMI-INNER PRODUCTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS IN GEOMETRY OF NORMED LINEAR SPACES. S.S. Dragomir and J.J.
RGMIA Research Report Collection, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1999 http://sci.vu.edu.au/ rgmia TWO MAPPINGS RELATED TO SEMI-INNER PRODUCTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS IN GEOMETRY OF NORMED LINEAR SPACES S.S. Dragomir and
More informationStatic Problem Set 2 Solutions
Static Problem Set Solutions Jonathan Kreamer July, 0 Question (i) Let g, h be two concave functions. Is f = g + h a concave function? Prove it. Yes. Proof: Consider any two points x, x and α [0, ]. Let
More informationStochastic Design Criteria in Linear Models
AUSTRIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS Volume 34 (2005), Number 2, 211 223 Stochastic Design Criteria in Linear Models Alexander Zaigraev N. Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland Abstract: Within the framework
More informationMAXIMUM VARIANCE OF ORDER STATISTICS
Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. Vol. 47, No. 1, 185-193 (1995) MAXIMUM VARIANCE OF ORDER STATISTICS NICKOS PAPADATOS Department of Mathematics, Section of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Athens,
More informationDensity estimators for the convolution of discrete and continuous random variables
Density estimators for the convolution of discrete and continuous random variables Ursula U Müller Texas A&M University Anton Schick Binghamton University Wolfgang Wefelmeyer Universität zu Köln Abstract
More informationOn Semicontinuity of Convex-valued Multifunctions and Cesari s Property (Q)
On Semicontinuity of Convex-valued Multifunctions and Cesari s Property (Q) Andreas Löhne May 2, 2005 (last update: November 22, 2005) Abstract We investigate two types of semicontinuity for set-valued
More informationBounds on expectation of order statistics from a nite population
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 113 (2003) 569 588 www.elsevier.com/locate/jspi Bounds on expectation of order statistics from a nite population N. Balakrishnan a;, C. Charalambides b, N.
More informationLecture 2: Convex Sets and Functions
Lecture 2: Convex Sets and Functions Hyang-Won Lee Dept. of Internet & Multimedia Eng. Konkuk University Lecture 2 Network Optimization, Fall 2015 1 / 22 Optimization Problems Optimization problems are
More informationReliability of Coherent Systems with Dependent Component Lifetimes
Reliability of Coherent Systems with Dependent Component Lifetimes M. Burkschat Abstract In reliability theory, coherent systems represent a classical framework for describing the structure of technical
More information1 Review of di erential calculus
Review of di erential calculus This chapter presents the main elements of di erential calculus needed in probability theory. Often, students taking a course on probability theory have problems with concepts
More informationThe Nearest Doubly Stochastic Matrix to a Real Matrix with the same First Moment
he Nearest Doubly Stochastic Matrix to a Real Matrix with the same First Moment William Glunt 1, homas L. Hayden 2 and Robert Reams 2 1 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Austin Peay State
More informationII. An Application of Derivatives: Optimization
Anne Sibert Autumn 2013 II. An Application of Derivatives: Optimization In this section we consider an important application of derivatives: finding the minimum and maximum points. This has important applications
More informationChapter 1 Preliminaries
Chapter 1 Preliminaries 1.1 Conventions and Notations Throughout the book we use the following notations for standard sets of numbers: N the set {1, 2,...} of natural numbers Z the set of integers Q the
More informationCharacterizations of Weibull Geometric Distribution
Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications Volume 10, Number 4, 2011, pp. 581-590 ISSN 1538-7887 Characterizations of Weibull Geometric Distribution G. G. Hamedani Department of Mathematics, Statistics
More informationCHAPTER II HILBERT SPACES
CHAPTER II HILBERT SPACES 2.1 Geometry of Hilbert Spaces Definition 2.1.1. Let X be a complex linear space. An inner product on X is a function, : X X C which satisfies the following axioms : 1. y, x =
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 3 Nov 2014
SPARSE MATRICES DESCRIBING ITERATIONS OF INTEGER-VALUED FUNCTIONS BERND C. KELLNER arxiv:1411.0590v1 [math.co] 3 Nov 014 Abstract. We consider iterations of integer-valued functions φ, which have no fixed
More informationLecture notes: Introduction to Partial Differential Equations
Lecture notes: Introduction to Partial Differential Equations Sergei V. Shabanov Department of Mathematics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA CHAPTER 1 Classification of Partial Differential
More informationAsymptotic behavior for sums of non-identically distributed random variables
Appl. Math. J. Chinese Univ. 2019, 34(1: 45-54 Asymptotic behavior for sums of non-identically distributed random variables YU Chang-jun 1 CHENG Dong-ya 2,3 Abstract. For any given positive integer m,
More informationTopological properties
CHAPTER 4 Topological properties 1. Connectedness Definitions and examples Basic properties Connected components Connected versus path connected, again 2. Compactness Definition and first examples Topological
More informationSome Properties of the Augmented Lagrangian in Cone Constrained Optimization
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH Vol. 29, No. 3, August 2004, pp. 479 491 issn 0364-765X eissn 1526-5471 04 2903 0479 informs doi 10.1287/moor.1040.0103 2004 INFORMS Some Properties of the Augmented
More informationFunctional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability...
Functional Analysis Franck Sueur 2018-2019 Contents 1 Metric spaces 1 1.1 Definitions........................................ 1 1.2 Completeness...................................... 3 1.3 Compactness......................................
More informationOn the mean connected induced subgraph order of cographs
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF COMBINATORICS Volume 71(1) (018), Pages 161 183 On the mean connected induced subgraph order of cographs Matthew E Kroeker Lucas Mol Ortrud R Oellermann University of Winnipeg Winnipeg,
More informationON GAP FUNCTIONS OF VARIATIONAL INEQUALITY IN A BANACH SPACE. Sangho Kum and Gue Myung Lee. 1. Introduction
J. Korean Math. Soc. 38 (2001), No. 3, pp. 683 695 ON GAP FUNCTIONS OF VARIATIONAL INEQUALITY IN A BANACH SPACE Sangho Kum and Gue Myung Lee Abstract. In this paper we are concerned with theoretical properties
More informationTheorem (4.11). Let M be a closed subspace of a Hilbert space H. For any x, y E, the parallelogram law applied to x/2 and y/2 gives.
Math 641 Lecture #19 4.11, 4.12, 4.13 Inner Products and Linear Functionals (Continued) Theorem (4.10). Every closed, convex set E in a Hilbert space H contains a unique element of smallest norm, i.e.,
More information4 Sums of Independent Random Variables
4 Sums of Independent Random Variables Standing Assumptions: Assume throughout this section that (,F,P) is a fixed probability space and that X 1, X 2, X 3,... are independent real-valued random variables
More informationk-protected VERTICES IN BINARY SEARCH TREES
k-protected VERTICES IN BINARY SEARCH TREES MIKLÓS BÓNA Abstract. We show that for every k, the probability that a randomly selected vertex of a random binary search tree on n nodes is at distance k from
More informationProblem 2: ii) Completeness of implies that for any x X we have x x and thus x x. Thus x I(x).
Bocconi University PhD in Economics - Microeconomics I Prof. M. Messner Problem Set 1 - Solution Problem 1: Suppose that x y and y z but not x z. Then, z x. Together with y z this implies (by transitivity)
More informationConvex Feasibility Problems
Laureate Prof. Jonathan Borwein with Matthew Tam http://carma.newcastle.edu.au/drmethods/paseky.html Spring School on Variational Analysis VI Paseky nad Jizerou, April 19 25, 2015 Last Revised: May 6,
More informationMath Camp II. Calculus. Yiqing Xu. August 27, 2014 MIT
Math Camp II Calculus Yiqing Xu MIT August 27, 2014 1 Sequence and Limit 2 Derivatives 3 OLS Asymptotics 4 Integrals Sequence Definition A sequence {y n } = {y 1, y 2, y 3,..., y n } is an ordered set
More informationMAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 1. Sets Functions Countability Axiom of choice Equivalence relations 9
MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES PROFESSOR: JOHN QUIGG SEMESTER: FALL 204 Contents. Sets 2 2. Functions 5 3. Countability 7 4. Axiom of choice 8 5. Equivalence relations 9 6. Real numbers 9 7. Extended
More informationGENERALIZATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS OF AN INEQUALITY OF HARDY-LITTLEWOOD-PÓLYA. Sadia Khalid and Josip Pečarić
RAD HAZU. MATEMATIČKE ZNANOSTI Vol. 18 = 519 014: 73-89 GENERALIZATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS OF AN INEQUALITY OF HARDY-LITTLEWOOD-PÓLYA Sadia Khalid and Josip Pečarić Abstract. Some generalizations of an inequality
More informationAPPROXIMATE ISOMETRIES ON FINITE-DIMENSIONAL NORMED SPACES
APPROXIMATE ISOMETRIES ON FINITE-DIMENSIONAL NORMED SPACES S. J. DILWORTH Abstract. Every ε-isometry u between real normed spaces of the same finite dimension which maps the origin to the origin may by
More informationA CHARACTERIZATION OF STRICT LOCAL MINIMIZERS OF ORDER ONE FOR STATIC MINMAX PROBLEMS IN THE PARAMETRIC CONSTRAINT CASE
Journal of Applied Analysis Vol. 6, No. 1 (2000), pp. 139 148 A CHARACTERIZATION OF STRICT LOCAL MINIMIZERS OF ORDER ONE FOR STATIC MINMAX PROBLEMS IN THE PARAMETRIC CONSTRAINT CASE A. W. A. TAHA Received
More informationTHE BANG-BANG PRINCIPLE FOR THE GOURSAT-DARBOUX PROBLEM*
THE BANG-BANG PRINCIPLE FOR THE GOURSAT-DARBOUX PROBLEM* DARIUSZ IDCZAK Abstract. In the paper, the bang-bang principle for a control system connected with a system of linear nonautonomous partial differential
More informationEC9A0: Pre-sessional Advanced Mathematics Course. Lecture Notes: Unconstrained Optimisation By Pablo F. Beker 1
EC9A0: Pre-sessional Advanced Mathematics Course Lecture Notes: Unconstrained Optimisation By Pablo F. Beker 1 1 Infimum and Supremum Definition 1. Fix a set Y R. A number α R is an upper bound of Y if
More informationCHARACTERIZATIONS OF UNIFORM AND EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONS VIA MOMENTS OF THE kth RECORD VALUES RANDOMLY INDEXED
APPLICATIONES MATHEMATICAE 24,3(1997), pp. 37 314 Z. GRUDZIEŃ and D. SZYNAL(Lublin) CHARACTERIZATIONS OF UNIFORM AND EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONS VIA MOMENTS OF THE kth RECORD VALUES RANDOMLY INDEXED Abstract.
More informationConvex Analysis and Economic Theory AY Elementary properties of convex functions
Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences Ec 181 KC Border Convex Analysis and Economic Theory AY 2018 2019 Topic 6: Convex functions I 6.1 Elementary properties of convex functions We may occasionally
More informationOn a Problem of Alsina Again
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 54, 67 635 00 doi:0.006 jmaa.000.768, available online at http: www.idealibrary.com on On a Problem of Alsina Again Janusz Matkowski Institute of Mathematics,
More information1 Introduction The study of the existence of solutions of Variational Inequalities on unbounded domains usually involves the same sufficient assumptio
Coercivity Conditions and Variational Inequalities Aris Daniilidis Λ and Nicolas Hadjisavvas y Abstract Various coercivity conditions appear in the literature in order to guarantee solutions for the Variational
More informationORDER RESTRICTED STATISTICAL INFERENCE ON LORENZ CURVES OF PARETO DISTRIBUTIONS. Myongsik Oh. 1. Introduction
J. Appl. Math & Computing Vol. 13(2003), No. 1-2, pp. 457-470 ORDER RESTRICTED STATISTICAL INFERENCE ON LORENZ CURVES OF PARETO DISTRIBUTIONS Myongsik Oh Abstract. The comparison of two or more Lorenz
More informationSTAT 512 sp 2018 Summary Sheet
STAT 5 sp 08 Summary Sheet Karl B. Gregory Spring 08. Transformations of a random variable Let X be a rv with support X and let g be a function mapping X to Y with inverse mapping g (A = {x X : g(x A}
More informationFinal Exam - Math Camp August 27, 2014
Final Exam - Math Camp August 27, 2014 You will have three hours to complete this exam. Please write your solution to question one in blue book 1 and your solutions to the subsequent questions in blue
More information460 HOLGER DETTE AND WILLIAM J STUDDEN order to examine how a given design behaves in the model g` with respect to the D-optimality criterion one uses
Statistica Sinica 5(1995), 459-473 OPTIMAL DESIGNS FOR POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION WHEN THE DEGREE IS NOT KNOWN Holger Dette and William J Studden Technische Universitat Dresden and Purdue University Abstract:
More informationFunctions of several variables of finite variation and their differentiability
ANNALES POLONICI MATHEMATICI LX.1 (1994) Functions of several variables of finite variation and their differentiability by Dariusz Idczak ( Lódź) Abstract. Some differentiability properties of functions
More informationAsymptotic of Enumerative Invariants in CP 2
Peking Mathematical Journal https://doi.org/.7/s4543-8-4-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Asymptotic of Enumerative Invariants in CP Gang Tian Dongyi Wei Received: 8 March 8 / Revised: 3 July 8 / Accepted: 5 July 8
More informationProof. We indicate by α, β (finite or not) the end-points of I and call
C.6 Continuous functions Pag. 111 Proof of Corollary 4.25 Corollary 4.25 Let f be continuous on the interval I and suppose it admits non-zero its (finite or infinite) that are different in sign for x tending
More informationUnimodality of Steady Size Distributions of Growing Cell Populations
Unimodality of Steady Size Distributions of Growing Cell Populations F. P. da Costa, Department of Mathematics Instituto Superior Técnico Lisboa, Portugal J. B. McLeod Department of Mathematics University
More informationWEAK CONVERGENCE OF RESOLVENTS OF MAXIMAL MONOTONE OPERATORS AND MOSCO CONVERGENCE
Fixed Point Theory, Volume 6, No. 1, 2005, 59-69 http://www.math.ubbcluj.ro/ nodeacj/sfptcj.htm WEAK CONVERGENCE OF RESOLVENTS OF MAXIMAL MONOTONE OPERATORS AND MOSCO CONVERGENCE YASUNORI KIMURA Department
More informationRelationships between upper exhausters and the basic subdifferential in variational analysis
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 334 (2007) 261 272 www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa Relationships between upper exhausters and the basic subdifferential in variational analysis Vera Roshchina City University of Hong
More informationRichard F. Bass Krzysztof Burdzy University of Washington
ON DOMAIN MONOTONICITY OF THE NEUMANN HEAT KERNEL Richard F. Bass Krzysztof Burdzy University of Washington Abstract. Some examples are given of convex domains for which domain monotonicity of the Neumann
More informationIntroduction to Real Analysis Alternative Chapter 1
Christopher Heil Introduction to Real Analysis Alternative Chapter 1 A Primer on Norms and Banach Spaces Last Updated: March 10, 2018 c 2018 by Christopher Heil Chapter 1 A Primer on Norms and Banach Spaces
More information0, otherwise. Find each of the following limits, or explain that the limit does not exist.
Midterm Solutions 1, y x 4 1. Let f(x, y) = 1, y 0 0, otherwise. Find each of the following limits, or explain that the limit does not exist. (a) (b) (c) lim f(x, y) (x,y) (0,1) lim f(x, y) (x,y) (2,3)
More informationON A CERTAIN GENERALIZATION OF THE KRASNOSEL SKII THEOREM
Journal of Applied Analysis Vol. 9, No. 1 23, pp. 139 147 ON A CERTAIN GENERALIZATION OF THE KRASNOSEL SKII THEOREM M. GALEWSKI Received July 3, 21 and, in revised form, March 26, 22 Abstract. We provide
More informationA Note on the Central Limit Theorem for a Class of Linear Systems 1
A Note on the Central Limit Theorem for a Class of Linear Systems 1 Contents Yukio Nagahata Department of Mathematics, Graduate School of Engineering Science Osaka University, Toyonaka 560-8531, Japan.
More information3 Integration and Expectation
3 Integration and Expectation 3.1 Construction of the Lebesgue Integral Let (, F, µ) be a measure space (not necessarily a probability space). Our objective will be to define the Lebesgue integral R fdµ
More informationLecture 8: Basic convex analysis
Lecture 8: Basic convex analysis 1 Convex sets Both convex sets and functions have general importance in economic theory, not only in optimization. Given two points x; y 2 R n and 2 [0; 1]; the weighted
More informationCONVERGENCE THEOREMS FOR MULTI-VALUED MAPPINGS. 1. Introduction
CONVERGENCE THEOREMS FOR MULTI-VALUED MAPPINGS YEKINI SHEHU, G. C. UGWUNNADI Abstract. In this paper, we introduce a new iterative process to approximate a common fixed point of an infinite family of multi-valued
More informationProjection. Ping Yu. School of Economics and Finance The University of Hong Kong. Ping Yu (HKU) Projection 1 / 42
Projection Ping Yu School of Economics and Finance The University of Hong Kong Ping Yu (HKU) Projection 1 / 42 1 Hilbert Space and Projection Theorem 2 Projection in the L 2 Space 3 Projection in R n Projection
More informationRemarks on localized sharp functions on certain sets in R n
Monatsh Math (28) 85:397 43 https://doi.org/.7/s65-7-9-5 Remarks on localized sharp functions on certain sets in R n Jacek Dziubański Agnieszka Hejna Received: 7 October 26 / Accepted: August 27 / Published
More informationconditional cdf, conditional pdf, total probability theorem?
6 Multiple Random Variables 6.0 INTRODUCTION scalar vs. random variable cdf, pdf transformation of a random variable conditional cdf, conditional pdf, total probability theorem expectation of a random
More informationA Lower Estimate for Entropy Numbers
Journal of Approximation Theory 110, 120124 (2001) doi:10.1006jath.2000.3554, available online at http:www.idealibrary.com on A Lower Estimate for Entropy Numbers Thomas Ku hn Fakulta t fu r Mathematik
More informationHouston Journal of Mathematics. c 2015 University of Houston Volume 41, No. 4, 2015
Houston Journal of Mathematics c 25 University of Houston Volume 4, No. 4, 25 AN INCREASING FUNCTION WITH INFINITELY CHANGING CONVEXITY TONG TANG, YIFEI PAN, AND MEI WANG Communicated by Min Ru Abstract.
More informations P = f(ξ n )(x i x i 1 ). i=1
Compactness and total boundedness via nets The aim of this chapter is to define the notion of a net (generalized sequence) and to characterize compactness and total boundedness by this important topological
More informationK-theoretic analog of Postnikov Shapiro algebra distinguishes graphs
Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 148 (2017) 316 332 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A www.elsevier.com/locate/jcta K-theoretic analog of Postnikov
More informationOn Some Estimates of the Remainder in Taylor s Formula
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 263, 246 263 (2) doi:.6/jmaa.2.7622, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on On Some Estimates of the Remainder in Taylor s Formula G. A. Anastassiou
More informationORTHOGONAL SERIES REGRESSION ESTIMATORS FOR AN IRREGULARLY SPACED DESIGN
APPLICATIONES MATHEMATICAE 7,3(000), pp. 309 318 W.POPIŃSKI(Warszawa) ORTHOGONAL SERIES REGRESSION ESTIMATORS FOR AN IRREGULARLY SPACED DESIGN Abstract. Nonparametric orthogonal series regression function
More informationConservative Control Systems Described by the Schrödinger Equation
Conservative Control Systems Described by the Schrödinger Equation Salah E. Rebiai Abstract An important subclass of well-posed linear systems is formed by the conservative systems. A conservative system
More information1 + lim. n n+1. f(x) = x + 1, x 1. and we check that f is increasing, instead. Using the quotient rule, we easily find that. 1 (x + 1) 1 x (x + 1) 2 =
Chapter 5 Sequences and series 5. Sequences Definition 5. (Sequence). A sequence is a function which is defined on the set N of natural numbers. Since such a function is uniquely determined by its values
More informationRandom Bernstein-Markov factors
Random Bernstein-Markov factors Igor Pritsker and Koushik Ramachandran October 20, 208 Abstract For a polynomial P n of degree n, Bernstein s inequality states that P n n P n for all L p norms on the unit
More information2. Function spaces and approximation
2.1 2. Function spaces and approximation 2.1. The space of test functions. Notation and prerequisites are collected in Appendix A. Let Ω be an open subset of R n. The space C0 (Ω), consisting of the C
More informationNear-Potential Games: Geometry and Dynamics
Near-Potential Games: Geometry and Dynamics Ozan Candogan, Asuman Ozdaglar and Pablo A. Parrilo January 29, 2012 Abstract Potential games are a special class of games for which many adaptive user dynamics
More informationElements of Convex Optimization Theory
Elements of Convex Optimization Theory Costis Skiadas August 2015 This is a revised and extended version of Appendix A of Skiadas (2009), providing a self-contained overview of elements of convex optimization
More informationGraphs with few total dominating sets
Graphs with few total dominating sets Marcin Krzywkowski marcin.krzywkowski@gmail.com Stephan Wagner swagner@sun.ac.za Abstract We give a lower bound for the number of total dominating sets of a graph
More informationSome tight polynomial-exponential lower bounds for an exponential function
Some tight polynomial-exponential lower bounds for an exponential function Christophe Chesneau To cite this version: Christophe Chesneau. Some tight polynomial-exponential lower bounds for an exponential
More information6.1 Matrices. Definition: A Matrix A is a rectangular array of the form. A 11 A 12 A 1n A 21. A 2n. A m1 A m2 A mn A 22.
61 Matrices Definition: A Matrix A is a rectangular array of the form A 11 A 12 A 1n A 21 A 22 A 2n A m1 A m2 A mn The size of A is m n, where m is the number of rows and n is the number of columns The
More informationStochastic Comparisons of Order Statistics from Generalized Normal Distributions
A^VÇÚO 1 33 ò 1 6 Ï 2017 c 12 Chinese Journal of Applied Probability and Statistics Dec. 2017 Vol. 33 No. 6 pp. 591-607 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4268.2017.06.004 Stochastic Comparisons of Order Statistics
More informationMathematical Institute, University of Utrecht. The problem of estimating the mean of an observed Gaussian innite-dimensional vector
On Minimax Filtering over Ellipsoids Eduard N. Belitser and Boris Y. Levit Mathematical Institute, University of Utrecht Budapestlaan 6, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands The problem of estimating the mean
More informationF (x) = P [X x[. DF1 F is nondecreasing. DF2 F is right-continuous
7: /4/ TOPIC Distribution functions their inverses This section develops properties of probability distribution functions their inverses Two main topics are the so-called probability integral transformation
More informationCHAPTER 2: CONVEX SETS AND CONCAVE FUNCTIONS. W. Erwin Diewert January 31, 2008.
1 ECONOMICS 594: LECTURE NOTES CHAPTER 2: CONVEX SETS AND CONCAVE FUNCTIONS W. Erwin Diewert January 31, 2008. 1. Introduction Many economic problems have the following structure: (i) a linear function
More informationHOMEOMORPHISMS OF BOUNDED VARIATION
HOMEOMORPHISMS OF BOUNDED VARIATION STANISLAV HENCL, PEKKA KOSKELA AND JANI ONNINEN Abstract. We show that the inverse of a planar homeomorphism of bounded variation is also of bounded variation. In higher
More informationChapter 3a Topics in differentiation. Problems in differentiation. Problems in differentiation. LC Abueg: mathematical economics
Chapter 3a Topics in differentiation Lectures in Mathematical Economics L Cagandahan Abueg De La Salle University School of Economics Problems in differentiation Problems in differentiation Problem 1.
More informationSTRONG CONVERGENCE THEOREMS BY A HYBRID STEEPEST DESCENT METHOD FOR COUNTABLE NONEXPANSIVE MAPPINGS IN HILBERT SPACES
Scientiae Mathematicae Japonicae Online, e-2008, 557 570 557 STRONG CONVERGENCE THEOREMS BY A HYBRID STEEPEST DESCENT METHOD FOR COUNTABLE NONEXPANSIVE MAPPINGS IN HILBERT SPACES SHIGERU IEMOTO AND WATARU
More informationAsymptotic Tail Probabilities of Sums of Dependent Subexponential Random Variables
Asymptotic Tail Probabilities of Sums of Dependent Subexponential Random Variables Jaap Geluk 1 and Qihe Tang 2 1 Department of Mathematics The Petroleum Institute P.O. Box 2533, Abu Dhabi, United Arab
More informationSome New Results on Information Properties of Mixture Distributions
Filomat 31:13 (2017), 4225 4230 https://doi.org/10.2298/fil1713225t Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Some New Results
More informationDISPERSIVE FUNCTIONS AND STOCHASTIC ORDERS
APPLICATIONES MATHEMATICAE 24,4(1997), pp. 429 444 J. BARTOSZEWICZ(Wroc law) DISPERSIVE UNCTIONS AND STOCHASTIC ORDERS Abstract. eneralizations of the hazard functions are proposed and general hazard rate
More informationarxiv: v1 [cs.ds] 11 Oct 2018
Path matrix and path energy of graphs arxiv:1810.04870v1 [cs.ds] 11 Oct 018 Aleksandar Ilić Facebook Inc, Menlo Park, California, USA e-mail: aleksandari@gmail.com Milan Bašić Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics,
More informationThe small ball property in Banach spaces (quantitative results)
The small ball property in Banach spaces (quantitative results) Ehrhard Behrends Abstract A metric space (M, d) is said to have the small ball property (sbp) if for every ε 0 > 0 there exists a sequence
More informationConfidence and prediction intervals based on interpolated records
Confidence and prediction intervals based on interpolated records Jafar Ahmadi, Elham Basiri and Debasis Kundu Department of Statistics, Ordered and Spatial Data Center of Excellence, Ferdowsi University
More informationOptimization under Ordinal Scales: When is a Greedy Solution Optimal?
Optimization under Ordinal Scales: When is a Greedy Solution Optimal? Aleksandar Pekeč BRICS Department of Computer Science University of Aarhus DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark pekec@brics.dk Abstract Mathematical
More informationHigher monotonicity properties of q gamma and q-psi functions
Advances in Dynamical Systems and Applications ISSN 973-5321, Volume x, Number x, pp. 1 13 (2xx) http://campus.mst.edu/adsa Higher monotonicity properties of q gamma and q-psi functions Mourad E. H. Ismail
More informationDivision of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Supergradients. KC Border Fall 2001 v ::15.45
Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences Supergradients KC Border Fall 2001 1 The supergradient of a concave function There is a useful way to characterize the concavity of differentiable functions.
More informationECON2285: Mathematical Economics
ECON2285: Mathematical Economics Yulei Luo Economics, HKU September 17, 2018 Luo, Y. (Economics, HKU) ME September 17, 2018 1 / 46 Static Optimization and Extreme Values In this topic, we will study goal
More informationON A CHARACTERISATION OF INNER PRODUCT SPACES
Georgian Mathematical Journal Volume 8 (2001), Number 2, 231 236 ON A CHARACTERISATION OF INNER PRODUCT SPACES G. CHELIDZE Abstract. It is well known that for the Hilbert space H the minimum value of the
More informationIf Y and Y 0 satisfy (1-2), then Y = Y 0 a.s.
20 6. CONDITIONAL EXPECTATION Having discussed at length the limit theory for sums of independent random variables we will now move on to deal with dependent random variables. An important tool in this
More information