CAUCHY INTEGRAL THEOREM
|
|
- Laureen Flynn
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CAUCHY INTEGRAL THEOREM XI CHEN 1. Differential Forms, Integration an Stokes Theorem Let X be an open set in R n an C (X) be the set of complex value C functions on X. A ifferential 1-form is (1.1) ω = f 1 (x 1, x 2,..., x n )x 1 + f 2 (x 1, x 2,..., x n )x f n (x 1, x 2,..., x n )x n = f i x i for some f i C (X). Let { } (1.2) Ω X = Ω 1 X = f i x i : f i C (X). We can consier Ω X as a free moule generate by x 1, x 2,..., x n over the ring C (X). Let Ω X = C (X) an { } (1.3) Ω k X = k Ω X = fi x I : f I C (X), I {1, 2,..., n}, I = k where we use the notation x I for (1.4) x I = x i1 x i2... x ik for I = {i 1, i 2,..., i k } with i 1 < i 2 <... < i k. So Ω k X is a free moule over C (X) generate by x I. Obviously, Ω k X = for k > n an Ω k X is a grae ring (noncommutative without multiplicative ientity) with multiplication efine by the wege prouct (1.5) : (ω 1, ω 2 ) ω 1 ω 2. Note that (1.6) ω 1 ω 2 = ( 1) k 1k 2 ω 2 ω 1 for ω i Ω k i X. In particular, Ω 2k X is a commutative ring without multiplicative ientity. The wege prouct also gives us a pairing (1.7) Ω k X Ω n k X ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 Ω n X = C (X). Date: January 18,
2 2 XI CHEN We have the ifferential operator : C (X) Ω X efine by (1.8) f = f x 1 x 1 + f x 2 x f x n x n for f C an can extene to Ω k X Ωk+1 X by (1.9) (f I x I ) = f I x I. So we can think as an operator on n (1.1) It satisfies Leibniz rule k= Ω k X n Ω k X. k= (1.11) (ω 1 ω 2 ) = ω 1 ω 2 + ( 1) k ω 1 ω 2 for ω 1 Ω k X an (1.12) 2 =. An (1.12) shows that inuces a complex (1.13) Ω X on Ω X with (1.14) im(ω k 1 X Ω 1 X Ω 2 X Ω k X) ker(ω k X... Ω n X Ω k+1 X ). Definition 1.1. Let X an Y be open sets in R n an R m, respectively. For a C function F : Y X, we have a ring homomorphism (1.15) F : C (X) C (Y ) sening f to f F an corresponingly a homomorphism of moules (1.16) F : Ω k X Ω k Y efine by (1.17) for F = (F 1, F 2,..., F n ). F (f I x i1 x i2... x ik ) = (f I F )F i1 (y 1, y 2,..., y m ) Clearly, F satisfies (1.18) (F G) = F G (F ω) = F (ω) F i2 (y 1, y 2,..., y m )... F ik (y 1, y 2,...y m ) for all C functions F 1 : Y X an F 2 : Z Y an all ω Ω X. For a measurable subset M X an an n-form ω Ω n X, we efine the integral (1.19) ω = fx 1 x 2...x n for ω = fx 1 x 2... x n. M M
3 CAUCHY INTEGRAL THEOREM 3 For a C map F : Y X, a measurable subset M Y an an m-form ω Ω m X, we have a well-efine integral M F M. Theorem 1.2 (Stokes Theorem on Cubes). Let D n = { x i 1 : i = 1, 2,...n} R n be the n-cube, F : D X be a C map an ω be an (n 1)-form on X. Then (1.2) (F ω) = F ω = ( 1) i (Fi,ω Fi,1ω) D n D n D n 1 where F i,t : D n 1 X are the maps given by (1.21) F i,t (x 1, x 2,..., x n 1 ) = F (x 1, x 2,..., x i 1, t, x i,..., x n 1 ). Proof. Let (1.22) F ω = Then (1.23) (F ω) = an (1.24) (F ω) = D n = = f i x 1 x 2... x i... x n. D n ( 1) i+1 f i x i x 1 x 2... x n ( 1) i+1 f i x i x 1 x 2... x n ( 1) i+1 f i x 1 x 2...x n D n x i ( 1) i (f i (x 1, x 2,..., x i 1,, x i+1,...x n ) D n 1 f i (x 1, x 2,..., x i 1, 1, x i+1,...x n ))x 1 x 2... x i...x n = ( 1) i (Fi,ω Fi,1ω). D n 1 Although F an ω are C in the theorem, we just nee them to be C 1 in orer for (1.2) to hol. For a C 1 map F an a C 1 form ω, we can erive this from the theorem by approximating F an ω using a sequence of C functions F m an forms ω m uner C 1 -norm. For approximating continuous functions by smooth functions, we quote Stone-Weierstrass Theorem:
4 4 XI CHEN Theorem 1.3 (Stone-Weierstrass Theorem). Let X be a compact Hausorff space, C(X, C) be the complex-value continuous functions on X an S be a subset of C(X, C) which separates points. Then the complex unital -algebra generate by S is ense in C(X, C). 2. Homotopy Version of Cauchy Integral Theorem Let X an Y be two topological spaces. We say two continuous maps f : X Y an g : X Y are homotopy if there exists a continuous function F : X [, 1] Y such that F (x, ) f(x) an F (x, 1) g(x). We consier a close curve : S 1 X, which is a continuous function from the circle R/Z to X. Alternatively, we can regar it as a continuous function : [, 1] X satisfying () = (1). Two close curves 1 : S 1 X an 2 : S 1 X are homotopic if there exists a continuous function F : S 1 [, 1] X such that F (t, ) 1 (t) an F (t, 1) 2 (t). Alternatively, we can regar F as a continuous function F : [, 1] [, 1] X satisfying (2.1) F (t, ) 1 (t), F (t, 1) 2 (t) an F (, s) F (1, s). For a continuous complex function f(z) on an open set G C an a C 1 curve : [, 1] G, we efine 1 (2.2) f(z)z = (f(z)z). We nee to be piece-wise C 1 (more generally rectifiable) in orer for the integral to converge. However, we can efine the integral for continuous curves by 1 (2.3) f(z)z = lim f(z)z = lim α (f(z)z) α α α if the limit exists for α C ([, 1], G), where α is the C norm. As it turns out, when f(z) is holomorphic, f(z)z only epens on the homotopy type of. So the right han sie (RHS) of (2.3) always converges for f(z) holomorphic. Theorem 2.1 (Cauchy Integral Theorem, Homotopy Version). Let f(z) be an analytic function on an open set G C with f (z) continuous. If 1 : S 1 G an 2 : S 1 G are two homotopic close curves on G, then (2.4) f(z)z = 1 f(z)z. 2
5 CAUCHY INTEGRAL THEOREM 5 Proof. Since f(z) is analytic, we have f/ z = an hence ω = (f(z)z) = (f(z)) z ( ) f f (2.5) = z + z z z z = f z z = z on G for ω = f(z)z. Let F : D 2 = [, 1] [, 1] G be a continuous function satisfying (2.1). If F is C, then by Stokes Theorem 1.2, = F (ω) = F (ω) = F (ω) D 2 D 2 D 2 (2.6) 1 1 = (F1,ω F1,1ω) + (F2,ω F2,1ω) ( 1 1 ) = f(f (, s))f (, s) f(f (1, s))f (1, s) ( 1 + f(f (t, ))F (t, ) = ω 1 ω. 2 1 ) f(f (t, 1))F (t, 1) By Stone-Weierstrass theorem 1.3, we can fin a sequence of C functions F n : S 1 [, 1] G such that (2.7) lim n F F n =. Let α 1,n (t) = F n (t, ) an α 2,n = F n (t, 1). Then (2.8) lim 1 α 1,n = lim 2 α 2,n = n n an (2.9) ω = α 1,n ω α 2,n for all n by (2.6). We claim that for every continuous close curve : S 1 G, there exists r > such that (2.1) f(z)z const for all C close curves β : S 1 G satisfying β < r. By the compactness of [, 1], we can fin r > such that (2.11) {z : z (t) < r} G β for all t [, 1]. For two C close curves β 1 an β 2 satisfying (2.12) β 1 < r an β 2 < r,
6 6 XI CHEN we have a C homotopy E : S 1 [, 1] G efine by (2.13) E(t, s) = sβ 1 (t) + (1 s)β 2 (t). So we have (2.14) ω = ω. β 1 β 2 Therefore, we have (2.1). Consequently, (2.15) ω = lim ω = lim ω. 1 β 1 β n α 1,n Similarly, (2.16) 2 ω = an (2.4) follows from (2.9). lim ω = lim ω β 2 β n α 2,n Corollary 2.2. Let f(z) be an analytic function on an open set D C. Then f(z)z exists for all continuous curves : [, 1] D. Proof. We have prove it for close. In case that () (1), we fin a C curve β : [, 1] D such that () = β() an (1) = β(1). We let { (2t) if t 1/2 (2.17) α = β(2 2t) if 1/2 < t 1 Then α is close an hence α f(z)z exists. Therefore, (2.18) f(z)z = f(z)z f(z)z exists. α We say that a topological space X is simply connecte if every close curve in X is homotopic to a fixe point p X. We say that two topological spaces X an Y are homotopic if there exists continuous function f : X Y an g : Y X such that g f is homotopic to 1 X an f g is homotopic to 1 Y. In other wors, f an g are homotopy inverse to each other. We say a topological space X is contractible if there is a point p X such that f : {p} X an g : X {p} are homotopy inverse to each other. Obviously, every contractible space is simply connecte. A set X R n is star-shape if there exists a point p X such that the line segment (2.19) pq = {(1 s)p + sq : s 1} X for all q X. A star-shape set X is contractible an hence simply connecte by the homotopy F : X [, 1] X (2.2) F (q, s) = (1 s)p + sq. β
7 CAUCHY INTEGRAL THEOREM 7 Every convex set is star-shape an hence simply connecte. We call 3. Homology Version of Cauchy Integral Theorem (3.1) n = {(t, t 1,..., t n ) : t k = 1, t k for k n} R n+1 k= the n-simplex. The k-th face α k : n 1 n is the map (3.2) α k (t, t 1,..., t n 1 ) = (t, t 1,..., t k 1,, t k,..., t n 1 ). For a topological space X, we let C n (X) be the free abelian groups generate by continuous maps f : n X, i.e., { a } (3.3) C n (X) = m i f i : m i Z, f i C( n, X). We have a group homomorphism : C n (X) C n 1 (X) inuce by (3.4) f = ( 1) k f α k k= for all f C( n, X). One can check that (3.5) 2 =. So efines a complex on C (X) an the n-th homology group of X is (3.6) H n (X) = ker(c n(x) C n 1 (X)). Im(C n+1 (X) C n (X)) Let G be an open set in C. For an analytic function f(z) on G an C 1 (X), we efine a (3.7) f(z)z = m i f(z)z i if = m i i with i : 1 = [, 1] G continuous. Theorem 3.1 (Cauchy Integral Theorem, Homology Version). Let f(z) be an analytic function on an open set G C with f (z) continuous. If C 1 (G) satisfies = an = in H 1 (G), then (3.8) f(z)z =. Proof. Since = an = in H 1 (G), by the efinition of H 1 (G), = σ for some σ C 2 (G). It suffices to show that (3.9) f(z)z = σ for all continuous maps σ : 2 G.
8 8 XI CHEN Let α : [, 1] 2 be the close curve (, 3t, 1 3t) for t 1/3 (3.1) α(t) = (3t 1, 2 3t, ) for 1/3 t 2/3 (3 3t,, 3t 2) for 2/3 t 1. Clearly, (3.11) σ f(z)z = σ α f(z)z. Since 2 is contractible, α is homotopic to a point in 2. Hence σ α is homotopic to a point in G. Then by the homotopy version of CIT, we have (3.12) f(z)z = f(z)z =. σ The avantage of the homology version of CIT is that it is very easy to verify two curves are homologous by triangularization. For example, let G = C\{z 1 z 2 }. It is easy to see that σ α (3.13) 1 = in H 1 (G) by Figure 1, where i are the circles (3.14) { z = R}, { z z 1 = r 1 } an { z z 2 = r 2 }, respectively, oriente counter-clockwise with r 1 +r 2 < z 1 z 2 << R. Then we can conclue (3.15) f(z)z = 1 f(z)z + 2 f(z)z 3 for all analytic functions f(z) on G. 632 Central Acaemic Builing, University of Alberta, Emonton, Alberta T6G 2G1, CANADA aress: xichen@math.ualberta.ca
9 CAUCHY INTEGRAL THEOREM Figure 1. The sum of the bounaries of all triangles, oriente counterclockwise, is 1 2 3
Math 530 Lecture Notes. Xi Chen
Math 530 Lecture Notes Xi Chen 632 Central Academic Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G1, CANADA E-mail address: xichen@math.ualberta.ca 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary
More informationAlgebra IV. Contents. Alexei Skorobogatov. December 12, 2017
Algebra IV Alexei Skorobogatov December 12, 2017 Abstract This course is an introuction to homological algebra an group cohomology. Contents 1 Moules over a ring 2 1.1 Definitions an examples.........................
More information7. Localization. (d 1, m 1 ) (d 2, m 2 ) d 3 D : d 3 d 1 m 2 = d 3 d 2 m 1. (ii) If (d 1, m 1 ) (d 1, m 1 ) and (d 2, m 2 ) (d 2, m 2 ) then
7. Localization To prove Theorem 6.1 it becomes necessary to be able to a enominators to rings (an to moules), even when the rings have zero-ivisors. It is a tool use all the time in commutative algebra,
More informationStep 1. Analytic Properties of the Riemann zeta function [2 lectures]
Step. Analytic Properties of the Riemann zeta function [2 lectures] The Riemann zeta function is the infinite sum of terms /, n. For each n, the / is a continuous function of s, i.e. lim s s 0 n = s n,
More information2.1 Derivatives and Rates of Change
1a 1b 2.1 Derivatives an Rates of Change Tangent Lines Example. Consier y f x x 2 0 2 x-, 0 4 y-, f(x) axes, curve C Consier a smooth curve C. A line tangent to C at a point P both intersects C at P an
More informationCHAPTER 1 : DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. 1.1 The definition of a differentiable manifold
CHAPTER 1 : DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS 1.1 The efinition of a ifferentiable manifol Let M be a topological space. This means that we have a family Ω of open sets efine on M. These satisfy (1), M Ω (2) the
More informationJUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER DIFFERENTIATION 2 (Rates of change) A.J.Hobson
JUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER 10.2 DIFFERENTIATION 2 (Rates of change) by A.J.Hobson 10.2.1 Introuction 10.2.2 Average rates of change 10.2.3 Instantaneous rates of change 10.2.4 Derivatives 10.2.5 Exercises
More informationNotes on Lie Groups, Lie algebras, and the Exponentiation Map Mitchell Faulk
Notes on Lie Groups, Lie algebras, an the Exponentiation Map Mitchell Faulk 1. Preliminaries. In these notes, we concern ourselves with special objects calle matrix Lie groups an their corresponing Lie
More informationREVERSIBILITY FOR DIFFUSIONS VIA QUASI-INVARIANCE. 1. Introduction We look at the problem of reversibility for operators of the form
REVERSIBILITY FOR DIFFUSIONS VIA QUASI-INVARIANCE OMAR RIVASPLATA, JAN RYCHTÁŘ, AND BYRON SCHMULAND Abstract. Why is the rift coefficient b associate with a reversible iffusion on R given by a graient?
More information1 Definition of the derivative
Math 20A - Calculus by Jon Rogawski Chapter 3 - Differentiation Prepare by Jason Gais Definition of the erivative Remark.. Recall our iscussion of tangent lines from way back. We now rephrase this in terms
More informationDIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, LECTURE 15, JULY 10
DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, LECTURE 15, JULY 10 5. Levi-Civita connection From now on we are intereste in connections on the tangent bunle T X of a Riemanninam manifol (X, g). Out main result will be a construction
More informationThe planar Chain Rule and the Differential Equation for the planar Logarithms
arxiv:math/0502377v1 [math.ra] 17 Feb 2005 The planar Chain Rule an the Differential Equation for the planar Logarithms L. Gerritzen (29.09.2004) Abstract A planar monomial is by efinition an isomorphism
More informationFURTHER BOUNDS FOR THE ESTIMATION ERROR VARIANCE OF A CONTINUOUS STREAM WITH STATIONARY VARIOGRAM
FURTHER BOUNDS FOR THE ESTIMATION ERROR VARIANCE OF A CONTINUOUS STREAM WITH STATIONARY VARIOGRAM N. S. BARNETT, S. S. DRAGOMIR, AND I. S. GOMM Abstract. In this paper we establish an upper boun for the
More informationNOTES ON EULER-BOOLE SUMMATION (1) f (l 1) (n) f (l 1) (m) + ( 1)k 1 k! B k (y) f (k) (y) dy,
NOTES ON EULER-BOOLE SUMMATION JONATHAN M BORWEIN, NEIL J CALKIN, AND DANTE MANNA Abstract We stuy a connection between Euler-MacLaurin Summation an Boole Summation suggeste in an AMM note from 196, which
More informationPeriods of quadratic twists of elliptic curves
Perios of quaratic twists of elliptic curves Vivek Pal with an appenix by Amo Agashe Abstract In this paper we prove a relation between the perio of an elliptic curve an the perio of its real an imaginary
More informationSYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 3
SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 3 LIAT KESSLER 1. Local forms Vector fiels an the Lie erivative. A vector fiel on a manifol M is a smooth assignment of a vector tangent to M at each point. We think of M as
More informationPDE Notes, Lecture #11
PDE Notes, Lecture # from Professor Jalal Shatah s Lectures Febuary 9th, 2009 Sobolev Spaces Recall that for u L loc we can efine the weak erivative Du by Du, φ := udφ φ C0 If v L loc such that Du, φ =
More informationREAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 5
REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 5 CİHAN BAHRAN The questions are from Stein an Shakarchi s text, Chapter 3. 1. Suppose ϕ is an integrable function on R with R ϕ(x)x = 1. Let K δ(x) = δ ϕ(x/δ), δ > 0. (a) Prove
More informationLINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF ORDER 1. where a(x) and b(x) are functions. Observe that this class of equations includes equations of the form
LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF ORDER 1 We consier ifferential equations of the form y + a()y = b(), (1) y( 0 ) = y 0, where a() an b() are functions. Observe that this class of equations inclues equations
More informationMath 115 Section 018 Course Note
Course Note 1 General Functions Definition 1.1. A function is a rule that takes certain numbers as inputs an assigns to each a efinite output number. The set of all input numbers is calle the omain of
More informationRules of Differentiation
LECTURE 2 Rules of Differentiation At te en of Capter 2, we finally arrive at te following efinition of te erivative of a function f f x + f x x := x 0 oing so only after an extene iscussion as wat te
More informationA. Incorrect! The letter t does not appear in the expression of the given integral
AP Physics C - Problem Drill 1: The Funamental Theorem of Calculus Question No. 1 of 1 Instruction: (1) Rea the problem statement an answer choices carefully () Work the problems on paper as neee (3) Question
More information3. Prove or disprove: If a space X is second countable, then every open covering of X contains a countable subcollection covering X.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of South Florida TOPOLOGY QUALIFYING EXAM January 24, 2015 Examiners: Dr. M. Elhamdadi, Dr. M. Saito Instructions: For Ph.D. level, complete at least
More information0.1 The Chain Rule. db dt = db
0. The Chain Rule A basic illustration of the chain rules comes in thinking about runners in a race. Suppose two brothers, Mark an Brian, hol an annual race to see who is the fastest. Last year Mark won
More informationExamples of function spaces
(February 11, 2017) Examples of function spaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.eu http://www.math.umn.eu/ garrett/ [This ocument is http://www.math.umn.eu/ garrett/m/fun/notes 2016-17/examples.pf] 1. Non-Banach
More informationSINGULAR PERTURBATION AND STATIONARY SOLUTIONS OF PARABOLIC EQUATIONS IN GAUSS-SOBOLEV SPACES
Communications on Stochastic Analysis Vol. 2, No. 2 (28) 289-36 Serials Publications www.serialspublications.com SINGULAR PERTURBATION AND STATIONARY SOLUTIONS OF PARABOLIC EQUATIONS IN GAUSS-SOBOLEV SPACES
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.cv] 2 Mar 2018
The quaternionic Gauss-Lucas Theorem Riccaro Ghiloni Alessanro Perotti Department of Mathematics, University of Trento Via Sommarive 14, I-38123 Povo Trento, Italy riccaro.ghiloni@unitn.it, alessanro.perotti@unitn.it
More informationHomotopy colimits in model categories. Marc Stephan
Homotopy colimits in moel categories Marc Stephan July 13, 2009 1 Introuction In [1], Dwyer an Spalinski construct the so-calle homotopy pushout functor, motivate by the following observation. In the category
More informationCalculus of Variations
Calculus of Variations Lagrangian formalism is the main tool of theoretical classical mechanics. Calculus of Variations is a part of Mathematics which Lagrangian formalism is base on. In this section,
More informationDefine each term or concept.
Chapter Differentiation Course Number Section.1 The Derivative an the Tangent Line Problem Objective: In this lesson you learne how to fin the erivative of a function using the limit efinition an unerstan
More informationSolutions Final Exam May. 14, 2014
Solutions Final Exam May. 14, 2014 1. Determine whether the following statements are true or false. Justify your answer (i.e., prove the claim, derive a contradiction or give a counter-example). (a) (10
More informationDarboux s theorem and symplectic geometry
Darboux s theorem an symplectic geometry Liang, Feng May 9, 2014 Abstract Symplectic geometry is a very important branch of ifferential geometry, it is a special case of poisson geometry, an coul also
More information1 Lecture 20: Implicit differentiation
Lecture 20: Implicit ifferentiation. Outline The technique of implicit ifferentiation Tangent lines to a circle Derivatives of inverse functions by implicit ifferentiation Examples.2 Implicit ifferentiation
More informationMath Chapter 2 Essentials of Calculus by James Stewart Prepared by Jason Gaddis
Math 231 - Chapter 2 Essentials of Calculus by James Stewart Prepare by Jason Gais Chapter 2 - Derivatives 21 - Derivatives an Rates of Change Definition A tangent to a curve is a line that intersects
More informationSturm-Liouville Theory
LECTURE 5 Sturm-Liouville Theory In the three preceing lectures I emonstrate the utility of Fourier series in solving PDE/BVPs. As we ll now see, Fourier series are just the tip of the iceberg of the theory
More informationACTIONS IN MODIFIED CATEGORIES OF INTEREST WITH APPLICATION TO CROSSED MODULES Dedicated to Teimuraz Pirashvili on his 60th birthday
Theory an Applications of Categories, Vol. 30, No. 25, 2015, pp. 882 908. ACTIONS IN MODIFIED CATEGORIES OF INTEREST WITH APPLICATION TO CROSSED MODULES Deicate to Teimuraz Pirashvili on his 60th birthay
More informationMunkres Chapter 9. The Fundamental Group
Munkres 51. Homotopy of Paths 1 Munkres Chapter 9. The Fundamental Group Note. These supplemental notes are based on James R. Munkres Topology, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall (2000). Note. We are interested
More informationCohomology of Stacks
Cohomology of Stacks K. Behren Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canaa Lectures given at the School an Conference on Intersection Theory an Mouli Trieste, 9-27 September
More informationSchrödinger s equation.
Physics 342 Lecture 5 Schröinger s Equation Lecture 5 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Wenesay, February 3r, 2010 Toay we iscuss Schröinger s equation an show that it supports the basic interpretation of
More informationCohomology of Stacks
Cohomology of Stacks K Behren University of British Columbia Lectures given at the: School an conference on Intersection theory an mouli September 9 27, 2002 LNS Abstract We construct the e Rham cohomology
More informationWitt#5: Around the integrality criterion 9.93 [version 1.1 (21 April 2013), not completed, not proofread]
Witt vectors. Part 1 Michiel Hazewinkel Sienotes by Darij Grinberg Witt#5: Aroun the integrality criterion 9.93 [version 1.1 21 April 2013, not complete, not proofrea In [1, section 9.93, Hazewinkel states
More informationCOMPLEX ANALYSIS Spring 2014
COMPLEX ANALYSIS Spring 2014 1 Preliminaries Homotopical topics Our textbook slides over a little problem when discussing homotopy. The standard definition of homotopy is for not necessarily piecewise
More informationA Note on Exact Solutions to Linear Differential Equations by the Matrix Exponential
Avances in Applie Mathematics an Mechanics Av. Appl. Math. Mech. Vol. 1 No. 4 pp. 573-580 DOI: 10.4208/aamm.09-m0946 August 2009 A Note on Exact Solutions to Linear Differential Equations by the Matrix
More informationZachary Scherr Math 503 HW 5 Due Friday, Feb 26
Zachary Scherr Math 503 HW 5 Due Friay, Feb 26 1 Reaing 1. Rea Chapter 9 of Dummit an Foote 2 Problems 1. 9.1.13 Solution: We alreay know that if R is any commutative ring, then R[x]/(x r = R for any r
More informationSimilar Operators and a Functional Calculus for the First-Order Linear Differential Operator
Avances in Applie Mathematics, 9 47 999 Article ID aama.998.067, available online at http: www.iealibrary.com on Similar Operators an a Functional Calculus for the First-Orer Linear Differential Operator
More informationHungry, Hungry Homology
September 27, 2017 Motiving Problem: Algebra Problem (Preliminary Version) Given two groups A, C, does there exist a group E so that A E and E /A = C? If such an group exists, we call E an extension of
More information11.7. Implicit Differentiation. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes
Implicit Differentiation 11.7 Introuction This Section introuces implicit ifferentiation which is use to ifferentiate functions expresse in implicit form (where the variables are foun together). Examples
More informationMAT 545: Complex Geometry Fall 2008
MAT 545: Complex Geometry Fall 2008 Notes on Lefschetz Decomposition 1 Statement Let (M, J, ω) be a Kahler manifol. Since ω is a close 2-form, it inuces a well-efine homomorphism L: H k (M) H k+2 (M),
More information1 Lecture 13: The derivative as a function.
1 Lecture 13: Te erivative as a function. 1.1 Outline Definition of te erivative as a function. efinitions of ifferentiability. Power rule, erivative te exponential function Derivative of a sum an a multiple
More informationEuler equations for multiple integrals
Euler equations for multiple integrals January 22, 2013 Contents 1 Reminer of multivariable calculus 2 1.1 Vector ifferentiation......................... 2 1.2 Matrix ifferentiation........................
More informationThe derivative of a function f(x) is another function, defined in terms of a limiting expression: f(x + δx) f(x)
Y. D. Chong (2016) MH2801: Complex Methos for the Sciences 1. Derivatives The erivative of a function f(x) is another function, efine in terms of a limiting expression: f (x) f (x) lim x δx 0 f(x + δx)
More informationON THE OPTIMAL CONVERGENCE RATE OF UNIVERSAL AND NON-UNIVERSAL ALGORITHMS FOR MULTIVARIATE INTEGRATION AND APPROXIMATION
ON THE OPTIMAL CONVERGENCE RATE OF UNIVERSAL AN NON-UNIVERSAL ALGORITHMS FOR MULTIVARIATE INTEGRATION AN APPROXIMATION MICHAEL GRIEBEL AN HENRYK WOŹNIAKOWSKI Abstract. We stuy the optimal rate of convergence
More informationFebruary 21 Math 1190 sec. 63 Spring 2017
February 21 Math 1190 sec. 63 Spring 2017 Chapter 2: Derivatives Let s recall the efinitions an erivative rules we have so far: Let s assume that y = f (x) is a function with c in it s omain. The erivative
More informationIterated Point-Line Configurations Grow Doubly-Exponentially
Iterate Point-Line Configurations Grow Doubly-Exponentially Joshua Cooper an Mark Walters July 9, 008 Abstract Begin with a set of four points in the real plane in general position. A to this collection
More informationDifferentiability, Computing Derivatives, Trig Review
Unit #3 : Differentiability, Computing Derivatives, Trig Review Goals: Determine when a function is ifferentiable at a point Relate the erivative graph to the the graph of an original function Compute
More informationHomotopy and homology groups of the n-dimensional Hawaiian earring
F U N D A M E N T A MATHEMATICAE 165 (2000) Homotopy and homology groups of the n-dimensional Hawaiian earring by Katsuya E d a (Tokyo) and Kazuhiro K a w a m u r a (Tsukuba) Abstract. For the n-dimensional
More informationTable of Common Derivatives By David Abraham
Prouct an Quotient Rules: Table of Common Derivatives By Davi Abraham [ f ( g( ] = [ f ( ] g( + f ( [ g( ] f ( = g( [ f ( ] g( g( f ( [ g( ] Trigonometric Functions: sin( = cos( cos( = sin( tan( = sec
More informationLecture 4 : General Logarithms and Exponentials. a x = e x ln a, a > 0.
For a > 0 an x any real number, we efine Lecture 4 : General Logarithms an Exponentials. a x = e x ln a, a > 0. The function a x is calle the exponential function with base a. Note that ln(a x ) = x ln
More information2 ODEs Integrating Factors and Homogeneous Equations
2 ODEs Integrating Factors an Homogeneous Equations We begin with a slightly ifferent type of equation: 2.1 Exact Equations These are ODEs whose general solution can be obtaine by simply integrating both
More informationMath 328 Course Notes
Math 328 Course Notes Ian Robertson March 3, 2006 3 Properties of C[0, 1]: Sup-norm and Completeness In this chapter we are going to examine the vector space of all continuous functions defined on the
More informationTHE DIVERGENCE. 1. Interpretation of the divergence 1 2. The divergence theorem Gauss law 6
THE DIVERGENCE CRISTIAN E. GUTIÉRREZ SEPTEMBER 16, 2008 CONTENTS 1. Interpretation of the ivergence 1 2. The ivergence theorem 4 2.1. Gauss law 6 1. INTERPRETATION OF THE DIVERGENCE Let F(, t) : R n R
More informationDifferentiability, Computing Derivatives, Trig Review. Goals:
Secants vs. Derivatives - Unit #3 : Goals: Differentiability, Computing Derivatives, Trig Review Determine when a function is ifferentiable at a point Relate the erivative graph to the the graph of an
More informationALGEBRAICALLY TRIVIAL, BUT TOPOLOGICALLY NON-TRIVIAL MAP. Contents 1. Introduction 1
ALGEBRAICALLY TRIVIAL, BUT TOPOLOGICALLY NON-TRIVIAL MAP HONG GYUN KIM Abstract. I studied the construction of an algebraically trivial, but topologically non-trivial map by Hopf map p : S 3 S 2 and a
More informationCLARK-OCONE FORMULA BY THE S-TRANSFORM ON THE POISSON WHITE NOISE SPACE
CLARK-OCONE FORMULA BY THE S-TRANSFORM ON THE POISSON WHITE NOISE SPACE YUH-JIA LEE*, NICOLAS PRIVAULT, AND HSIN-HUNG SHIH* Abstract. Given ϕ a square-integrable Poisson white noise functionals we show
More informationMath Implicit Differentiation. We have discovered (and proved) formulas for finding derivatives of functions like
Math 400 3.5 Implicit Differentiation Name We have iscovere (an prove) formulas for fining erivatives of functions like f x x 3x 4x. 3 This amounts to fining y for 3 y x 3x 4x. Notice that in this case,
More informationWitten s Proof of Morse Inequalities
Witten s Proof of Morse Inequalities by Igor Prokhorenkov Let M be a smooth, compact, oriente manifol with imension n. A Morse function is a smooth function f : M R such that all of its critical points
More informationDifferentiation Rules. Oct
Differentiation Rules Oct 10 2011 Differentiability versus Continuity Theorem If f (a) exists, then f is continuous at a. A function whose erivative exists at every point of an interval is continuous an
More informationTEST CODE: PMB SYLLABUS
TEST CODE: PMB SYLLABUS Convergence and divergence of sequence and series; Cauchy sequence and completeness; Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem; continuity, uniform continuity, differentiability; directional
More informationOutline. MS121: IT Mathematics. Differentiation Rules for Differentiation: Part 1. Outline. Dublin City University 4 The Quotient Rule
MS2: IT Mathematics Differentiation Rules for Differentiation: Part John Carroll School of Mathematical Sciences Dublin City University Pattern Observe You may have notice the following pattern when we
More informationImplicit Differentiation
Implicit Differentiation Implicit Differentiation Using the Chain Rule In the previous section we focuse on the erivatives of composites an saw that THEOREM 20 (Chain Rule) Suppose that u = g(x) is ifferentiable
More informationALGEBRAIC AND ANALYTIC PROPERTIES OF ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS
ALGEBRAIC AND ANALYTIC PROPERTIES OF ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS MARK SCHACHNER Abstract. When consiere as an algebraic space, the set of arithmetic functions equippe with the operations of pointwise aition an
More information1 Lecture 18: The chain rule
1 Lecture 18: The chain rule 1.1 Outline Comparing the graphs of sin(x) an sin(2x). The chain rule. The erivative of a x. Some examples. 1.2 Comparing the graphs of sin(x) an sin(2x) We graph f(x) = sin(x)
More informationFundamental group. Chapter The loop space Ω(X, x 0 ) and the fundamental group
Chapter 6 Fundamental group 6. The loop space Ω(X, x 0 ) and the fundamental group π (X, x 0 ) Let X be a topological space with a basepoint x 0 X. The space of paths in X emanating from x 0 is the space
More informationMath Notes on differentials, the Chain Rule, gradients, directional derivative, and normal vectors
Math 18.02 Notes on ifferentials, the Chain Rule, graients, irectional erivative, an normal vectors Tangent plane an linear approximation We efine the partial erivatives of f( xy, ) as follows: f f( x+
More informationProof of SPNs as Mixture of Trees
A Proof of SPNs as Mixture of Trees Theorem 1. If T is an inuce SPN from a complete an ecomposable SPN S, then T is a tree that is complete an ecomposable. Proof. Argue by contraiction that T is not a
More informationMath 225A: Differential Topology, Homework 4
Math 225A: Differential Topology, Homework 4 Ian Coley February 10, 2014 Problem 1.5.4. Let X and Z be transversal submanifolds of Y. Prove that if y X Z, then T y (X Z) = T y (X) T y (Z). Since X Z is
More informationCauchy s Theorem (rigorous) In this lecture, we will study a rigorous proof of Cauchy s Theorem. We start by considering the case of a triangle.
Cauchy s Theorem (rigorous) In this lecture, we will study a rigorous proof of Cauchy s Theorem. We start by considering the case of a triangle. Given a certain complex-valued analytic function f(z), for
More informationFree rotation of a rigid body 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon Physics 611, Theoretical Mechanics 5 November 2012
Free rotation of a rigi boy 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon Physics 611, Theoretical Mechanics 5 November 2012 1 Introuction In this section, we escribe the motion of a rigi boy that is free to rotate
More information4.2 First Differentiation Rules; Leibniz Notation
.. FIRST DIFFERENTIATION RULES; LEIBNIZ NOTATION 307. First Differentiation Rules; Leibniz Notation In this section we erive rules which let us quickly compute the erivative function f (x) for any polynomial
More informationDerivatives and the Product Rule
Derivatives an the Prouct Rule James K. Peterson Department of Biological Sciences an Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University January 28, 2014 Outline Differentiability Simple Derivatives
More informationMATH 120 Theorem List
December 11, 2016 Disclaimer: Many of the theorems covere in class were not name, so most of the names on this sheet are not efinitive (they are escriptive names rather than given names). Lecture Theorems
More informationMORE CONSEQUENCES OF CAUCHY S THEOREM
MOE CONSEQUENCES OF CAUCHY S THEOEM Contents. The Mean Value Property and the Maximum-Modulus Principle 2. Morera s Theorem and some applications 3 3. The Schwarz eflection Principle 6 We have stated Cauchy
More informationLinear Algebra- Review And Beyond. Lecture 3
Linear Algebra- Review An Beyon Lecture 3 This lecture gives a wie range of materials relate to matrix. Matrix is the core of linear algebra, an it s useful in many other fiels. 1 Matrix Matrix is the
More informationSection The Chain Rule and Implicit Differentiation with Application on Derivative of Logarithm Functions
Section 3.4-3.6 The Chain Rule an Implicit Differentiation with Application on Derivative of Logarithm Functions Ruipeng Shen September 3r, 5th Ruipeng Shen MATH 1ZA3 September 3r, 5th 1 / 3 The Chain
More informationMath 341: Convex Geometry. Xi Chen
Math 341: Convex Geometry Xi Chen 479 Central Academic Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G1, CANADA E-mail address: xichen@math.ualberta.ca CHAPTER 1 Basics 1. Euclidean Geometry
More informationDIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY OF CURVES AND SURFACES 7. Geodesics and the Theorem of Gauss-Bonnet
A P Q O B DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY OF CURVES AND SURFACES 7. Geoesics an the Theorem of Gauss-Bonnet 7.. Geoesics on a Surface. The goal of this section is to give an answer to the following question. Question.
More informationf(x) f(a) Limit definition of the at a point in slope notation.
Lesson 9: Orinary Derivatives Review Hanout Reference: Brigg s Calculus: Early Transcenentals, Secon Eition Topics: Chapter 3: Derivatives, p. 126-235 Definition. Limit Definition of Derivatives at a point
More informationAnalysis IV, Assignment 4
Analysis IV, Assignment 4 Prof. John Toth Winter 23 Exercise Let f C () an perioic with f(x+2) f(x). Let a n f(t)e int t an (S N f)(x) N n N then f(x ) lim (S Nf)(x ). N a n e inx. If f is continuously
More informationAlgebraic Topology Homework 4 Solutions
Algebraic Topology Homework 4 Solutions Here are a few solutions to some of the trickier problems... Recall: Let X be a topological space, A X a subspace of X. Suppose f, g : X X are maps restricting to
More information8/28/2017 Assignment Previewer
Proucts an Quotients (10862446) Due: Mon Sep 25 2017 07:31 AM MDT Question 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Instructions Rea toay's Notes an Learning Goals. 1. Question Details
More informationx = c of N if the limit of f (x) = L and the right-handed limit lim f ( x)
Limit We say the limit of f () as approaches c equals L an write, lim L. One-Sie Limits (Left an Right-Hane Limits) Suppose a function f is efine near but not necessarily at We say that f has a left-hane
More informationSection 7.2. The Calculus of Complex Functions
Section 7.2 The Calculus of Complex Functions In this section we will iscuss limits, continuity, ifferentiation, Taylor series in the context of functions which take on complex values. Moreover, we will
More informationMath 225B: Differential Geometry, Homework 6
ath 225B: Differential Geometry, Homework 6 Ian Coley February 13, 214 Problem 8.7. Let ω be a 1-form on a manifol. Suppose that ω = for every lose urve in. Show that ω is exat. We laim that this onition
More informationLECTURE 1: BASIC CONCEPTS, PROBLEMS, AND EXAMPLES
LECTURE 1: BASIC CONCEPTS, PROBLEMS, AND EXAMPLES WEIMIN CHEN, UMASS, SPRING 07 In this lecture we give a general introuction to the basic concepts an some of the funamental problems in symplectic geometry/topology,
More informationDifferentiation Rules Derivatives of Polynomials and Exponential Functions
Derivatives of Polynomials an Exponential Functions Differentiation Rules Derivatives of Polynomials an Exponential Functions Let s start with the simplest of all functions, the constant function f(x)
More informationMarkov Chains in Continuous Time
Chapter 23 Markov Chains in Continuous Time Previously we looke at Markov chains, where the transitions betweenstatesoccurreatspecifietime- steps. That it, we mae time (a continuous variable) avance in
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.at] 29 Aug 2015
A BRANCHING RULE FOR PARTITION COMPLEXES arxiv:1508.05086v2 [math.at] 29 Aug 2015 G. Z. ARONE Abstract. Let Σ n be the symmetric group, an let Σ n1 Σ nk Σ n be a Young subgroup. Let Π n be the complex
More informationMath 342 Partial Differential Equations «Viktor Grigoryan
Math 342 Partial Differential Equations «Viktor Grigoryan 6 Wave equation: solution In this lecture we will solve the wave equation on the entire real line x R. This correspons to a string of infinite
More information(a 1 m. a n m = < a 1/N n
Notes on a an log a Mat 9 Fall 2004 Here is an approac to te eponential an logaritmic functions wic avois any use of integral calculus We use witout proof te eistence of certain limits an assume tat certain
More information