arxiv: v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 6 Sep 2017

Transcription

1 Impementation and vaidation of two-phase boiing fow modes in OpenFOAM Kai Fu a, Henryk Angart a, arxiv: v1 [physics.fu-dyn] 6 Sep 2017 a Division of Nucear Reactor Technoogy, Roya Institute of Technoogy, S Stockhom, Sweden Abstract Prediction of two-phase boiing fows using the computationa fuid dynamics CFD) approach is very chaenging since severa sub-modes for interfacia mass, momentum and energy transfer in such fows are sti not we estabished and require further deveopment and vaidation. Once vaidating a particuar mode, it is important that a key parameter invoved in the mode are carefuy verified. Such verification is typicay performed by separate effect tests, where one parameter at a time is compared to a measured or otherwise known vaue. Needess to say that for compex modes, which are typica for CFD appications to two-phase fow, the number of independent parameters that need to be verified can be quite high. This particuar feature makes the vaidation process of compex CFD modes in open source codes very attractive, since fu access to the impementation detais is possibe. This paper is concerned with impementation and vaidation of two-phase boiing bubby fow modes using the OpenFOAM, open source environment. The mode empoys the two-fuid formuation of the conservation equations with the Reynods-averaged treatment of the turbuent terms. The mode consists of six conservation equations for the iquid and the vapor phase, aowing for the thermodynamic non-equiibrium and compressibiity of both phases. In addition, the mode incudes two transport equations for the turbuence kinetic energy and energy dissipation and one transport equation for the interfacia area concentration. New modes for wa heat partitioning as we as for the phase change terms in nuceate boiing have been impemented. Sensitivity studies as we as vaidation of the mode against measured data avaiabe in the open iterature have been performed and it has been shown that a reasonabe agreement between predictions and experiments has been achieved. Keywords: Subcooed; Interfacia area concentration; Bubby fow; Wa boiing; OpenFOAM; Abbreviations: DNB, departure from nuceate boiing. Corresponding author. Te.: Emai addresses: kaifu@kth.se Kai Fu), henryk@kth.se Henryk Angart) September 7, 2017

2 1. Introduction One of the important issues of the current and future sustainabe energy systems is the efficiency and stabiity of heat remova due to natura or mixed convection, forced convection or boiing heat transfer. In some energy systems natura heat convection is envisaged during norma operation. This type of heat remova is very reiabe since it doesn t depend on avaiabiity of externa pumping resources, and cooant fow through the system is assured by the gravity force. The drawback of the natura circuation is its inherent instabiity and aso reativey ow heat transfer efficiency. Thus, in many high heat fux technoogies, such as e.g. nucear reactors, the boiing heat transfer is preferred as the most efficient heat transfer mode. The design of high heat fux systems requires a thorough fuid fow and heat transfer anaysis in compex geometries. Traditionay experimenta methods have been used for these purposes in the past. The drawback of such methods is their arge cost and time consumption, inherenty reated to a required experimenta work. In addition, experimenta methods are rather difficut to be used for a design optimization, where various geometry and/or operation condition variations are to be tested. For such purposes the most efficient design and optimization approach is based on computationa toos, which are abe to capture the geometry detais and to incude the governing phenomena. Currenty the computationa fuid dynamics CFD) technoogy is widey used to design and to optimize heat transfer and fuid fow systems if singe-phase fow conditions prevai. For two-phase fow appications, and in particuar for boiing heat transfer conditions the CFD technoogy is sti not mature enough. In particuar, there is sti ack of thoroughy vaidated and generay vaid cosure aws for subcooed and saturated nuceate fow boiing heat transfer, with a potentia to be extended to predict the departure from nuceate boiing DNB). The major aim of this paper is to contribute with new mode deveopment and vaidation in this particuar area using open source CFD code OpenFOAM. The first mode suitabe for CFD appications was deveoped by Kuru and Podowski 1990), who proposed a heat fux partitioning scheme to separatey dea with vapor generation, sensibe heat and quenching terms in the proximity of the heated wa. In the buk bubby fow, Hibiki and Ishii 2002) proposed a two-equation mode to predict the bubbe size and thus the interfacia area concentration) as a function of oca fow conditions. 2. Fied equation in two-phase bubby fow The present mode incudes mass, inear momentum and energy conservation equations for iquid and vapor phase. In addition, transport equations for the interfacia area concentration and for the turbuence are used to cose the mode. The detais of the empoyed governing equations are given beow Phase continuity equation α k ρ k ) + α k ρ k U k ) = Γ k 1) t Γ k means the mass gained by phase k. k =, v) 2

3 2.2. Linear momentum conservation equation α k ρ k U k ) t + α k ρ k U k U k ) = α k p + [α k τ k + τ t k) ] + α k ρ k g + Γ k U ki + M ki 2) Here the interfacia veocity is modeed as { U if Γ v > 0, evaporation U ki = if Γ v < 0, condensation U v 3) using the upwind scheme. According to the Boussinesq hypothesis, the turbuent stress strain reation is anaogous to that of Newtonian fuids and consequenty the effective stress appears as a function of fuid properties and veocity, which is used by Rusche 2002) in OpenFOAM, τ eff k = τ k + τ t k = ρ k ν eff k U k + U k ) T 2 ) 3 I U k 2 3 Iρ kk k 4) and, ν eff k = ν k + ν t k 5) 2.3. Enthapy equation α k ρ k h k ) t + α k ρ k h k U k ) = [α k q k + q t k) ] + Γ k h ki + a i q ki + a w q kw 6) where a w refers to heated area per unit controed voume of fuid between the wa and the iquid phase. Kuru and Podowski 1991) discussed the mass conservation and energy conservation at the interface and first proposed the corresponding equations in two-phase fow. Here we formuate the mass fux Γ from phase v to phase furthermore as, Γ = a i q i + a iq vi h v h,sat a i q i + a iq vi h v,sat h condensation evaporation where the interfacia enthapy h ki k =, v) is modeed with the upwind approximation. The modeing of interfacia heat transfer a i q i and a iq vi wi be introduced in the foowing section. Equation 7 coud be appied to the heat transfer in the buk. For those ces which are adjacent to the wa directy, we have totay different heat transfer mechanism since there are interaction among the iquid, vapor and was. Here we assume that ony evaporation is aowed in those ces, which is consistent with the situation in boiing fows. In those ces, the tota heat transfer per unit voume to phase is given as, 7) q = a i q i Γ v h + a w q w 8) 3

4 and the tota heat transfer to phase v as, q v = a i q vi + Γ v h v + a w q vw 9) The energy baance in those ces coud be written as q + q v = a w q w 10) Usuay we make an assumption that in subcooed fow boiing, the temperature of the vapor phase is constant and equa to the saturation temperature. In addition, we negect a direct heating of vapor from the wa, that is: a w q vw = 0. With these assumptions it is straightforward to cacuate the heat fux to each phase in ces adjacent to the heated was. Using the Fourier s aw of conduction for the iquid phase, the moecuar heat fux in Eqn. 6 can be written as, q k = λ c p h 11) where λ and c p are respectivey the therma conductivity and the specific heat. The turbuent heat fux is found as foows, where the turbuent therma conductivity is given as,, q t = λt c p h 12) λ t = c pρ ν t Pr t 13) where Pr t is the turbuent Prandt number of phase. A constant vaue of 0.9 has been chosen for Pr t in the cacuations presented in this paper. In OpenFOAM, equation 6 of iquid phase is reorganized into a phase intensive form, where, h t + U h κ eff Γ v h,sat Γ v h + a i q i βρ a i q i = βρ a i q i + a wq w βρ κ eff = λ ρ c p + νt Pr t h ) κ eff βρ ) h βρ buk condensation buk evaporation near wa ces The term a wq w on the right hand side RHS) of Eqn. 14 resuts from the therma βρ boundary condition at heated was. Thus we treat this term by a gradient boundary condition in the energy transport equation. 4 14) 15)

5 In a simiar manner, equation 6 of the vapor phase is given as foows, where, h v t + U v h v κ eff v h v ) κ eff αρ v ) v h v αρ v a i q vi buk condensation αρ v Γ v h v,sat Γ v h v + a i q vi = buk evaporation a i q vi αρ v αρ v κ eff v = λ v ρ v c pv + νt v Pr t v near wa ces 16) 17) 2.4. Interfacia area concentration transport equation The interfacia area concentration corresponds to the area of the gas bubbes per unit voume. For spherica bubbes, a i = 6α D S 18) where D S is the bubbe Sauter diameter, equa to the diameter of a sphere of an equivaent voume. Hibiki and Ishii 2002) modeed sink and source terms of the interfacia area concentration based on mechanisms of bubbe-bubbe and bubbe-turbuent eddy random coisions, and they aso introduced the effect by gas expansion, a i t + a iu v ) = 2 a i 3 α α t + αu v) ) + Φ BB + Φ BC + Φ NUC 19) The first term on the RHS of Eqn. 19 refers to the contribution of phase change and expansion due to the pressure change. Φ BB and Φ BC represent the bubbe number variations induced by the breakup and coaescence phenomena, respectivey. In the Hibiki and Ishii 2002) mode, they are defined as, Φ BC = 1 ) ) 2 α α 2 ɛ 1/3 Γ C 3ψ a i α max α) exp D 11/3 S ρ 1/2 ɛ 1/3 K C 20) σ 1/2 D 11/3 S with Γ C = and K C = 1.29, α max = 0.74, and Φ BB = 1 3ψ α a i ) 2 Γ B α1 α)ɛ 1/3 D 11/3 S α max α) exp K B σ D 5/3 S ρ ɛ 2/3 with Γ B = and K B = Here ψ = 1/36π) for spherica bubbes. Φ NUC refers to an increase of interfacia area concentration by a bubbe nuceation at the heated wa. Bae et a. 2008) proposed the nuceation source term as, ) 21) Φ NUC = πd 2 o N fa w 22) 5

6 where d o is the bubbe ift-off diameter, N the active nuceation site density, and f the bubbe departure frequency. Yao and More 2004) proposed the breakup and coaescence term as, Φ BC = 1 3ψ α a i ) 2 K c1 α 2 ɛ 1/3 D 11/3 S ) 1 We 1 α/α max ) 1/3 + K c2 α exp K c3 We/We cr We cr 23) where K c1 = 2.86, K c2 = 1.922, K c3 = 1.017, We cr = 1.24 and α max = Φ BB = 1 ) 2 α α1 α)ɛ 1/3 1 K b1 3ψ a i D 11/3 1 + K S b2 1 α) exp We ) cr We/We cr We where K b1 = 1.6, and K b2 = Lo and Zhang 2009) proposed a S γ mode in which the breakup terms can be written down as, Here n = 6α πd 3 S of bubbe diameter, Φ BB = π D Scr 24) 2 1/3 1)D 2 S τ br np dd S 25) is the bubbe number density. P represents the og-norma distribution P = 1 2πDS ˆσ exp nd S nd S ) 2 ) 2ˆσ 2 where we use ˆσ = 0.5 in the current sover. In the origina paper, the breakup source term is modeed in two regimes: the viscous breakup regime and inertia breakup regime. And the overa source term shoud be summed up over the two regimes. However, since the mechanism is not we expained in the viscous regime, ony the inertia breakup part is incuded in the current sover. The Komogorov ength scae L k is used to evauate the regime that breakup takes pace. ) ν 3 1/4 L k = 27) ɛ Considering that ony those bubbes of big size can break, the critica size in the inertia regime becomes as foows, ) 3/5 σwecr D Scr = 1 + C α α) ɛ 2/5 28) 2ρ 26) 3ρv + 2ρ )DS 3 τ br = 2πk br 192σ with C α = 0 and k br = 0.2. The source term from bubbe coaescence is modeed as, 29) ) 2 6α Φ BC = π2 1/3 2) k cou r P coad 2 S 30) π 6

7 where, k co = ) 1/2 2π 31) 15 P coa = Φ max π U r = ɛd S ) 1/3 32) Φ max = 1 k2 c,2 We We 0) 2 16Φ 2 max ) 1/2 33) 8h2 0ρ σ We 0 µ 2 vd S 34) with the foowing coefficient: k c,2 = 12.7, We 0 = 0.8We cr and h 0 = 8.3h cr ) 1/3 AH D S h cr = 35) 24πσ where A H = is the Hamaker constant Turbuence modeing Turbuence of iquid phase Rusche 2002) proposed the standard k ɛ mode as foows, βρ ɛ ) t βρ k ) t [ + βρ U k ) = β + βρ U ɛ ) = [ β µ eff σ ɛ µ eff σ k ) k ] + βg βρ ɛ 36) ) ɛ ] + βɛ k C ɛ1 G C ɛ2 ρ ɛ ) 37) Here G stands for the production of turbuent kinetic energy and is defined as, G = 2µ t U dev U + U ) T ) ) 38) In the above mode, no effect of the dispersed phase on the turbuence in the continuous phase is taken into account. This deficiency is removed in the mode proposed by Yao and More 2004), where an additiona source term, representing the abovementioned effect, is incuded, βρ k ) t βρ ɛ ) t [ ) ] µ t + βρ U k ) = β k βρ ɛ + βτ : U σ k M d v + M vm v ) U v U ) σφ BC + Φ BB ) + k i Γ 39) [ ) ] µ t + βρ U ɛ ) = β ɛ 2 ɛ C ɛ2 βρ + C ɛ1 β ɛ τ : U 2 σ ɛ k k 3 βρ ɛ U C ɛ3 M d v + M vm v ) U v U ) 7 ɛ D 2 S ) 1/3 + ɛ iγ 40)

8 The iquid Reynods stress tensor is modeed as, τ = ρ ν t U + U ) T ) 2 3 ρ k + ν t ) U I 41) The turbuent viscosity of iquid phase is given by Sato and Sekoguchi 1975) as, ν t = C µ k 2 ɛ C µbd S α U v U 42) The coefficients used in this work are σ k = 1.0, σ ɛ = 1.3, C ɛ1 = 1.44, C ɛ2 = 1.92, C ɛ3 = 0.6, C µ = 0.09 and C µb = Turbuence of vapor phase The turbuence of vapor phase is assumed to be dependent on that of the iquid phase. To this end, a turbuence response coefficient C t, defined as the ratio of the root mean square vaues of dispersed phase veocity, is introduced. In this approach, the effective viscosity of the vapor phase is expressed as ν eff v = ν v + C 2 t ν t 43) In a more eaborated mode, C t coud be cacuated as a function of oca parameters, such as e.g. void fraction. However, in the present approach the infuence of the iquid phase is negected and C t is set equa to zero. 3. Interfacia momentum transfer cosure aws The interfacia forces acting on a bubbe are caused by the iquid which surrounds it. Ignoring the effect of the change of the mean curvature on the mixture momentum source, we have, M v + M = 0 44) The cosure reationships for the interfacia forces are expressed in terms of the foowing non-dimensiona numbers, Eotvos number, Reynods number, Eo = ρ ρ v )gd 2 S σ 45) Re b = U v U D S ν 46) Here, Re bm = ρ U v U D S µ m 47) µ m = µ 1 α ) 2.5αmaxµ 48) α max µ = µ v + 0.4µ µ v + µ 49) 8

9 The interfacia momentum transfer terms incude different kinds of forces, each of them representing a separate physica phenomenon, incuding the drag force, the ift force, the wa ubrication force, the turbuent dispersion force and the virtua mass force, which constitute the tota interfacia force as foows, 3.1. Drag force M v = M d v + M v + M w v + M td v + M vm v 50) This force represents a resistance of the reative motion between two phases. M d v = 3 C ds ρ α U v U U v U ) 51) 4 D S The foowing two modes for the drag force coefficient are incuded in the current sover: Schier and Naumann 1935), ) 24 C ds = max Re b ), ) Re b Ishii and Zuber 1979), C ds = max ) Re bm ), 0.44 Re bm 53) 3.2. Lift force When a partice traves through the fuid with a non-uniform atera veocity fied, a atera force wi be acting between the fuid and the partice, M v = C ρ αu v U ) U 54) In the present mode the ift coefficient C is cacuated from the Tomiyama 1998) mode, min0.288tanh0.121re b ), feo d )) Eo d < 4 C = feo d ) 4 < Eo d < 10 55) 0.27 Eo d > 10 Here, feo d ) = Eo 3 d Eo 2 d Eo d ) Eo d = ρ ρ v )gd 2 h σ 57) d h = D S Eo ) 1/3 58) It shoud be noted that the force is turned off in the ces adjacent to was in order to avoid unexpected fuctuation of void fraction in those ces in numerica simuation. 9

10 3.3. Wa ubrication force This force was first proposed by Anta et a. 1991) in order to expain the near wa void fraction features. M w v = C w ρ α U r U r n w )n w 2 n w 59) The foowing two modes for the wa ubrication force coefficient are incuded in the current sover: Tomiyama 1998), C w = 1 ) 1 2 C 1 wd S yw 2 D pipe y w ) 2 60) Frank 2005), 0.47 Eo < 1 exp 0.933Eo ) 1 < Eo < 5 C w = Eo < Eo < Eo > 33 C w = C w max 0, 1 C wd It is suggested that C wc = 10.0, C wd = 6.8 and p = Turbuent dispersion force ) 1 y w /C wc D S y w y w /C wc D S ) p 1 The turbuent dispersion force accounts for the turbuent fuctuations of the iquid phase and the effects, which the fuctuations have on the distribution of the gas phase. The foowing modes are currenty incuded in the sover: Gosman et a. 1992), M td 3 ρ ν t v = C d U r α 63) 4 D S σ α Lopez de Bertodano 1992), 61) 62) M td v = C td ρ k α 64) 3.5. Virtua mass force M vm v Currenty it is assumed that C vm = 0.5. = C vm ρ DUv Dt DU ) Dt 65) 10

11 4. Liquid-vapor interfacia heat transfer cosure aws Yao and More 2004) proposed the foowing mode for the iquid phase interfacia heat transfer, { a i q i c i a i h,sat h ) buk = 66) not specified near wa ces and, c i = λ c p D S Nu 67) The Nusset number is { Re 0.5 Pr 0.33 if Ja < 0, condensation Nu = maxnu 1, Nu 2, Nu 3 ) if Ja > 0, evaporation where, Ja = ρ c p T T sat ) ρ v h fg 4Pe Nu 1 = 68), Re = D SU r, Pe = D SU r 69) ν κ π, Nu 2 = 12 π Ja, Nu 3 = 2 70) The interface to vapor heat transfer is expressed in the foowing manner, a i q vi = c vi h v,sat h v ) 71) c vi = αρ v 72) δt where δt is numerica time step. The above equations make sure that the vapor temperature is very cose to the saturation temperature. 5. Subcooed nuceate boiing mode The wa heat transfer mode for subcooed boiing fow was first proposed by Kuru and Podowski 1990), who partitioned the wa heat fux into three components: singe phase convection, transient conduction as we as evaporation. The heat transfer coefficient for each process is correated against experiment respectivey. More recent work is done by Steiner et a. 2005) and they beieve that the tota heat fux is assumed to be additivey composed of a forced convective and a nuceate boiing component Singe phase convective heat transfer The singe phase forced convection heat fux outside the infuence area is cacuated by Kuru and Podowski 1990) as, q c = h fc A 1Φ T w T ) 73) where h fc is the singe phase iquid heat transfer coefficient, A 1Φ is the area fraction dominated by singe phase convection, T w is wa temperature and T is the subcooed iquid temperature. 11

12 The singe phase forced convective heat transfer coefficient h fc is modeed as, h fc = ρ c p u τ T + 74) where the dimensioness temperature is modeed by Kader 1981), T + = Pr y + exp η) n y + + β t ) exp 1/η) 75) and, β t = 3.85Pr 1/3 1.3) n Pr 76) η = 0.01Pr y+ ) Pr 3 y + 77) y + = ρ u τ U µ 78) The friction veocity is couped with k ɛ mode, u τ = Cµ 0.25 k; 79) 5.2. Quenching heat transfer The quenching or transient conduction) heat fux is modeed as, q q = h q A b T w T ) 80) where A b represents the bubbe infuenced area fraction. According to Kuru and Podowski 1990), the bubbe infuenced area is determined by [ )] πd A b = min 1, N 2 K o 81) 4 Here K determines the size of the bubbe infuence area around the nuceation site on the surface. K = 4 is recommended by De Vae and Kenning 1985). The quenching heat transfer coefficient is given by De Vae and Kenning 1985), λ h q = 2 πκ t 82) where t = 0.8/f represents the ife span that the quenching heat fux experiences Evaporation heat transfer The evaporation rate is cacuated as, Γ v = π 6 d2 oρ v fn a w 83) 12

13 5.4. Bubbe detachment size There are quite a few modes to cacuate the ift-off diameter & departure diameter. Üna 1976) made a correation of bubbe detachment diameter which is vaidated with pressure from 0.1 to 17.7 Mpa, heat fux from 0.47 to MW/m 2, inet veocity from 0.08 to 9.15 m/s, inet subcooing from 3.0 to 86 K. Situ et a. 2005) deveoped a bubbe ift-off mode based on force anaysis. Their test runs were performed at 1 bar, and the mode was vaidated with heat fux from 60.7 to 206 kw/m 2, inet veocity from to m/s, inet subcooing from 1.5 to 20 K. Krepper and Rzehak 2011) deveoped a correation against the experimenta data directy, d o = d ref exp T ) sat T 84) T refd where the reference vaue coud be found at Krepper and Rzehak 2011) for certain experiment Bubbe detachment frequency A simpe estimation of the bubbe departure frequency as the termina rise veocity over the departure size is used here, Ceumern-Lindenstjerna 1977), 5.6. Active nuceation site density f = 4 3 ρ ρ v )g ρ d o 85) A few modes have been impement in the current sover Lemmert and Chwaa, 1977; Hibiki and Ishii, 2003; Krepper et a., 2007; Krepper and Rzehak, 2011). Here the Krepper and Rzehak 2011) mode is used for the vaidation. N = N ref Tw T T refn The reference vaue can be found in Krepper and Rzehak 2011) Liquid buk temperature ) p 86) Another issue arises from the buk iquid temperature. Here we used T buk = T w T + y + buk T + y + ce T w T ce ) 87) which is aready impemented in ANSYS CFX5. The buk temperature is obtained by setting y + buk = 250. Here the subscript ce refers to the ces adjacent to was. 13

14 6. Test cases Two data sets were considered in cacuations: the void fraction measurements performed by Bartoomej for subcooed boiing heat transfer to water under 45 bar pressure Kuru, 1990; Krepper et a., 2007) and subcooed boiing heat transfer to refrigerant R- 12 performed in the DEBORA experiment Yao and More, 2004; Krepper and Rzehak, 2011). The experiment conditions used as test case are isted in Tabe 1. Tabe 1: Seected test cases and their experiment conditions Case Working fuid Pressure Mass fow rate q w T in bar) kg/m 2 /s) kw/m 2 ) C) Bart water DEB5 R DEB6 R The tests were simuated in a quasi-two-dimensiona cyindrica geometry, with 100 meshes in the axia direction and 20 meshes in the radia direction. The center of the grid ce adjacent to the wa has a non-dimensiona coordinate of y + = 60 in Bartoomej test and y + = 100 in DEBORA test, approximatey. Grid refinement study performed by Krepper and Rzehak 2011) for the DEBORA experiment indicates that these vaues of y + provide grid-independent soutions. The boundary condition for iquid enthapy adopted the fixedgradient type in order to account for the appied wa heat fux into iquid see in Eqn. 14), as, f h = a iq i + a wq w βρ κ eff 88) The mass conservation and energy conservation over the whoe pipe are carefuy checked in the steady state. A typica error is G/G in = 0.048% and q /q w = 1.6%. In this test case, the foowing interfacia modes are seected: 1. Drag force: Ishii and Zuber 1979) 2. Lift force: Tomiyama 1998) 3. Wa ubrication force: Tomiyama 1998) 4. Turbuent dispersion force: Lopez de Bertodano 1992) Figure 1 shows the comparison between the experimenta and cacuation resuts for the Bartoomej experiment, using the Yao and More 2004) modes with C td = 2.5. Since we used a uniformy distributed temperature profie as the inet boundary condition for the energy conservation equation, there is a discrepancy between the predicted and measured temperature in the region nearby, as shown in Fig. 1b. However, the temperature of the buk and at the centerine coud be we predicted after the fow becomes fuy deveoped. The averaged void fraction is somehow underestimated, which may be due to severa reasons. Firsty, we used a two-equation interfacia area concentration mode in which the condensation rate coud be overestimated due to underestimated bubbe size. Unfortunatey, the measurement of the bubbe size is not avaiabe in the Bartoomej experiment, rending it difficut to evauate the prediction of the bubbe size. Secondy, the underestimation of void fraction coud be aso reated to the modeing of 14

15 Sover Exp Bartoomej Bartoomej Void fraction Distance from inet [m] a) T T sat [K] Distance from inet [m] b) T buk T c T w Figure 1: Axia steady state distribution of void fraction in Bartoomej experiment interfacia forces, for exampe, turbuent dispersion force. If we have a arge turbuent dispersion force that drives bubbes towards the cod buk, the condensation coud aso be overestimated and resuts in a rather ow void fraction. Thirdy, the observed discrepancy coud aso resut from the underestimation of evaporation rate, which depends on the wa heat partitioning mode. Figures 2-4 show the comparison between the measured and predicted resuts of DEBORA experiment. Two sets of breakup and coaescence modes were tested in our simuation. One shoud notice that Yao and More 2004) breakup and coaescence mode is used together with their turbuence modeing and Lo and Zhang 2009) breakup and coaescence mode together with the standard k ɛ mode. In addition, the sensitivity of turbuent dispersion force coefficient was tested here. The suggested vaue of C td is usuay in the region [0.1, 1.0] for bubby fow. However C td = 1.0 is not sufficient enough to push the evaporation bubbes away from the surface, eading to an accumuation of void fraction near the wa, as shown in Fig. 2a. Due to that the oca void fraction cose to the wa may reach too high eves above 0.74) exceeding the imits of the appicabiity of the present bubby fow mode. That is why we coud not do the simuation with Lo and Zhang 2009) mode together with C td = 1.0 in case of DEB6, as shown in Fig. 2b. In genera, a quite satisfactory agreement between the measured and the cacuated void fraction distribution has been obtained. In particuar, Fig. 2b reveas that significant improvement in over-a accuracy can be obtained by choosing the turbuence dispersion force coefficient in the range between 1.0 and 2.5. The accuracy of prediction of bubbe size is, however, not satisfactory. As shown in Fig. 3a, the bubbe size is significanty underestimated in the observation part of the test section. This coud be caused by underestimation of the bubbe coaescence rate in this region. The resuts indicate that more work is needed to improve the interfacia area transport modes. Figure 4 shows a very good agreement between predicted and measured radia temperature distributions 15

16 YaoMore, Ctd=1.0 YaoMore, Ctd=2.5 LoRao, Ctd=1.0 LoRao, Ctd=2.5 Exp DEB YaoMore, Ctd=1.0 YaoMore, Ctd=2.5 LoRao, Ctd=2.5 Exp DEB Void fraction Void fraction Radia position [m] Radia position [m] a) b) Figure 2: Comparison between the DEBORA experiment and cacuation resuts: Radia void fraction Sauter mean diameter [m] DEB5 x YaoMore, Ctd=1.0 YaoMore, Ctd= LoRao, Ctd=1.0 LoRao, Ctd=2.5 Exp Radia position [m] a) Sauter mean diameter [m] DEB6 x YaoMore, Ctd=1.0 YaoMore, Ctd=2.5 LoRao, Ctd=2.5 Exp Radia position [m] b) Figure 3: Comparison between the DEBORA experiment and cacuation resuts: Radia Sauter mean diameter 16

17 360.5 DEB DEB Liquid temperature [K] Liquid temperature [K] YaoMore, Ctd=1.0 YaoMore, Ctd= LoRao, Ctd=1.0 LoRao, Ctd=2.5 Exp Radia position [m] 358 YaoMore, Ctd=1.0 YaoMore, Ctd=2.5 LoRao, Ctd=2.5 Exp Radia position [m] a) b) Figure 4: Comparison between the DEBORA experiment and cacuation resuts: Radia iquid temperature for both cases. 7. Concusion A two-fuid boiing fow mode has been impemented into the OpenFOAM sover and vaidated against the Bartoomej and the DEBORA experimenta data. The mode incudes the cosure reationships for the heat transfer and phase change for bubbes moving in a subcooed iquid. Bubbe size is predicted from the interfacia area concentration transport equations, incuding the source and sink terms resuting from the bubbe coaescence and breakup, nuceation at was as we as phase change induced source term. The present mode has been vaidated against measurements performed in a vertica upward fow in a heated pipe. The prediction of void fraction as we as the iquid temperature profie coud be done with quite satisfactory accuracy. The accuracy of prediction of the bubbe size distribution is found quite ow, indicating that sti more work is needed to improve the interfacia area transport modes. 8. Acknowedgments Financia supports from NORTHNET, as we as support from the Swedish Nationa Infrastructure for Computing are gratefuy acknowedged. 17

18 Nomencature A a i C c i c p c vi D S d d h Eo f G g h h fc h fg h q Ja k M N Nu n w Pe Pr p q, q q Re T t U u τ We area fraction interfacia area concentration, m 1 interfacia force coefficient 1 heat transfer coefficient given by Eqn. 67, kg m 2 s 1 specific heat, J kg 1 K 1 heat transfer coefficient given by Eqn. 72, kg m 3 s Sauter mean diameter, m diameter, m hydrauic diameter, m Eotvos number bubbe departure frequency, s 1 turbuent production, kg m 1 s 3 1 or mass fow rate, kg m 2 s gravity constant, m s 2 enthapy, J kg 1 1 singe phase convective heat transfer coefficient, W m 2 K atent heat, J kg 1 1 quenching heat transfer coefficient, W m 2 K Jacob number 2 turbuent kinetic energy, m2 s 2 interfacia momentum transfer rate, kg m 2 s active nuceation site density, m 2 Nusset number unit vector norma to wa Pécet number Prandt number pressure, Pa heat fux, W m 2 heat fow rate per unit voume, W m 3 Reynods number temperature, K time, s veocity, m s 1 friction veocity, m s 1 Weber number Greek etters α void fraction β void fraction for continuous phase 3 ɛ turbuent dissipation rate, m2 s 1 Γ rate of phase change, kg m 3 s 18

19 1 κ therma diffusivity, m2 s 1 λ therma conductivity, W m 1 K 1 µ dynamic viscosity, kg m 1 s 1 ν kinematic viscosity, m2 s ψ factor depending on bubbe shape ρ density, kg m 3 σ interfacia tension, N m 1 τ stress tensor, N m 2 wa shear stress, N m 2 τ w Superscripts eff effective d drag ift t turbuence td turbuent dispersion vm virtua mass w wa w wa ubrication Subscripts 1Φ singe phase BB bubbe breakup BC bubbe coaescence b bubbe c convection f c singe phase forced convection i interphase k phase iquid o ift-off NUC nuceation q quenching r reative ref reference sat saturation v vapor w wa References Anta, S., Laheyjr, R., Faherty, J., Anaysis of phase distribution in fuy deveoped aminar bubby two-phase fow. Int. J. Mutiphase Fow 7, Bae, B., Yoon, H., Euh, D., Song, C., Park, G., Computationa anaysis of a subcooed boiing fow with a one-group interfacia area transport equation. J. Nuc. Sci. Techno. 45, Lopez de Bertodano, M., Turbuent bubby two-phase fow in a trianguar duct. Ph.D. thesis. Rensseaer Poytechnic Institute. Troy, NY. 19

20 Ceumern-Lindenstjerna, W.V., Bubbe departure diameter and reease frequencies during nuceate poo boiing of water and aqueous nac soutions, in: Hahne, E., Grigu, U. Eds.), Heat transfer in Boiing. Academic Press and Hemisphere. De Vae, V.H., Kenning, D.B.R., Subcooed fow boiing at high heat fux. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 28, Frank, T., Advances in computationa fuid dynamics cfd) of 3-dimensiona gas-iquid mutiphase fows, in: NAFEMS Seminar Simuation of Compex Fows CFD), Wiesbaden, Germany. p. 1. Gosman, A.D., Lekakou, C., Poitis, S., Issa, R.I., Looney, M.K., Mutidimensiona modeing of turbuent two-phase fow in stirred vesses. AIChE J. 38, Hibiki, T., Ishii, M., Deveopment of one-group interfacia area transport equation in bubby fow systems. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 45, Hibiki, T., Ishii, M., Active nuceation site density in boiing systems. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 46, Ishii, M., Zuber, N., Drag coefficient and reative veocity in bubby, dropet or particuate fows. AIChE J. 25, Kader, B.A., Temperature and concentration profies in fuy turbuent boundary ayers. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 24, Krepper, E., Koncar, B., Egorov, Y., CFD-modeing of subcooed boiing - Concept, vaidation and appication to fue assemby design. Nuc. Eng. Des. 237, Krepper, E., Rzehak, R., CFD for subcooed fow boiing: Simuation of debora experiments. Nuc. Eng. Des. 241, Kuru, N., Mutidimensiona effects in two-phase fow incuding phase change. Ph.D. thesis. Rensseaer Poytechnic Institute. Troy, NY. Kuru, N., Podowski, M.Z., Mutidimensiona effects in forced convection subcooed boiing, in: Proceedings of the 9th Internationa Heat Transfer Conference, Jerusaem, Israe. p. 21. Kuru, N., Podowski, M.Z., On the modeing of mutidimensiona effects in boiing channes, in: Proceedings of the 27th Nationa Heat Transfer Conference, Minneapois, Minn, USA. Lemmert, M., Chwaa, J.M., Infuence of fow veocity on surface boiing heat transfer coefficient, in: Hahne, E., Grigu, U. Eds.), Heat transfer in Boiing. Academic Press and Hemisphere. Lo, S., Zhang, D., Modeing of break-up and coaescence in bubby two-phase fows. The Journa of Computationa Mutiphase Fows 1, Rusche, H., Computationa fuid dynamics of dispersed two-phase fows at high phase fractions. Ph.D. thesis. Imperia Coege. London. Sato, Y., Sekoguchi, K., Liquid veocity distribution in two-phase bubby fow. Int. J. Mutiphase Fow 2, Schier, L., Naumann, Z., A drag coefficient correation. Z. Ver. Deutsch. Ing. 77, Situ, R., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M., Mori, M., Bubbe ift-off size in forced convective subcooed boiing fow. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 48, Steiner, H., Kobor, A., Gebhard, L., A wa heat transfer mode for subcooed boiing fow. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 48, Tomiyama, A., Strugge with computationa bubbe dynamics, in: Third Internationa Conference on Mutiphase Fow. Üna, H.C., Maximum bubbe diameter, maximum bubbe-growth time and bubbe-growth rate during the subcooed nuceate fow boiing of water up to 17.7 MN/m 2. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 19, Yao, W., More, C., Voumetric interfacia area prediction in upward bubby two-phase fow. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 47,