DESCRIPTION OF SIMPLE MODULES FOR SCHUR SUPERALGEBRA S(2j2)
|
|
- Christian Rich
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DESCRIPTION OF SIMPLE MODULES FOR SCHUR SUPERALGEBRA S(22) A.N. GRISHKOV AND F. MARKO Abstract. The goal of this paper is to describe explicitly simple modules for Schur superalgebra S(22) over an algebraically closed eld K of characteristic zero or of positive characteristic p > 2. Notation and outline of the paper Notation. Throughout the paper we shall work over an algebraically closed eld K of characteristic p = 0 or p > 2 and use the basic terminology of bialgebras A(mn), general linear supergroups GL(mn), Schur superagebras S(mn) and superderivations i D from papers [8, 6]. All modules considered in this paper will be left modules and all superderivations will be right superderivations. In this manuscript we shall only work with G = GL(22) and S(22) and we can therefore describe them in a down-to-earth fashion as follows. Start by de ning the parity i of symbols i = 1; : : : ; 4 by 1 = 2 = 0 and 3 = 4 = 1, and the parity c i of an element c i by c i = i+ (mod 2). Elements of parity 0 will be called even and of parity 1 will be called odd. Let A = A(22) be a commutative superalgebra freely generated over K by elements c i for 1 i; 4, where c 11 ; c 12 ; c 21 ; c 22 ; c 33 ; c 34 ; c 43 and c 44 are even and c 13 ; c 14 ; c 23 ; c 24 ; c 31 ; c 32 ; c 41 and c 42 are odd. The superalgebra A has a structure of a bialgebra given by comultiplication : A! AA de ned as (c i ) = P k c ik c k. The superalgebra A has a natural grading given by the total degree, and is a direct sum A = r0 A(22; r) of its homogeneous components A(22; r). Each component A(22; r) is a coalgebra and its dual A(22; r) is the component S(22; r) of degree r of the Schur superalgebra S(22) = r0 S(22; r). The localization of A(22) by elements d 12 = c 11 c 22 c 12 c 21 and d 34 = c 33 c 44 c 34 c 43 is the coordinate superalgebra K[G] of the general linear supergroup G. The general linear supergroup G is a group functor from the category SAlg K of commutative superalgebras over K to the category of groups, represented by its coordinate ring K[G], that is G(A) = Hom SAlgK (K[G]; A) for A 2 SAlg K. Here, for g 2 G(A) and f 2 K[G] we de ne f(g) = g(f). Modules over Schur superalgebra S(22) correspond to polynomial representations of G. In order to study the structure of G-modules, we will use the superalgebra of distributions Dist(G) of G described in Section 3 of [3]. Denote Dist 1 (G) = (K[G]=m 2 ), where is the duality Hom K ( ; K) and m is the kernel of the augmentation map of the Hopf algebra K[G], and by e i the elements of Dist 1 (G) determined by e i (c hk ) = ih k and e i (1) = 0. Denote the parity of e i to be sum of parities i of i and of. Then e i belong to the Lie superalgebra 2000 Mathematics Subect Classi cation. 17A70;20G05;15A72;13A50;05E15. Key words and phrases. general linear group, Schur superalgebra, character of a simple module. Research was partially supported by CAPES, FAPESP and CNPq(Brazil). 1
2 2 A.N. GRISHKOV AND F. MARKO Lie(G) = (m=m 2 ) which is identi ed with the general linear Lie superalgebra gl(mn). Under this identi cation e i corresponds to the matrix unit which has all entries zeroes except the entry at the position (i,) which equals one. The commutation relations for the matrix units e i are given as [e ab ; e cd ] = e ad bc + ( 1) (a+b)(c+d) e cb ad : Let U C be the universal enveloping algebra of gl(mn) over the eld of complex numbers. Then the Kostant Z-form U Z is generated by elements e i for odd e i, e (r) i = er i r! for even e i, and eii r = e ii(e ii 1):::(e ii r+1) r! for all r > 0. We will consider all G-modules as left modules and use the terminology of right superderivations i D of A(22) de ned on generators c kl as (c kl ) l D = c k and (c kl ) i D = 0 for l 6= i. There is a surective map Dist(G)! S(22; r) explicitly described in Lemma 4.2 of [6]. Composition of this map with the representation S(22; r)! End K (A(22; r)) given by left action of S(22; r) on A(22; r) gives a left action of Dist(G) on A(22; r). Under this action, the generators e i, e (t) i and eii t, respectively, of Dist(G) correspond to i D, i D (t) and iid t, respectively, where id (t) = idt t! and iid t = iid( iid 1):::( iid t+1) t! - for more details see section 4 of [6]. Therefore the action of S(22; r) on A(22; r) is completely determined by right superderivations i D. While doing computations, we extend the superderivations id of A(22) to superderivations of A(22) d = K[G]. Since the simple module L S(22) () is included in the costandard module r S(22) (), which in turn is included in A(22; r) (by Proposition 3.1 of [6]), we conclude that the action of S(22; r) on L S(22) () is completely determined using the action of superderivations i D. Let G ev ' GL(2) GL(2) be an even supersubgroup of G, Lie(G ev ) ' gl(2) gl(2) be the corresponding Lie algebra of G ev and S = sl(2) sl(2). Let B be the lower triangular Borel subsupergroup of G. Fix a dominant weight = ( 1 ; 2 3 ; 4 ) of G, that is 1 2 and 3 4. Following [8], we denote by HG 0 () the induced G-module H 0 (G=B; K ), where K is the one-dimensional (even) B- supermodule corresponding to the weight. Finally, using the restriction of B to G ev de ne by HG 0 ev () the induced G ev -module corresponding to the weight. The induced G ev -module HG 0 ev (), denoted by V, can identi ed with the subspace of superalgebra K[c 11 ; c 12 ; c 21 ; c 22 ; c 33 ; c 34 ; c 43 ; c 44 ], generated by polynomials d 2 12 ca 1 2 a 11c12 d 4 34 cb 3 4 b 33c34 ; where d = d 12 = c 11 c 22 c 12 c 21, d 34 = c 33 c 44 c 34 c 43 and 0 a 1 2, 0 b 3 4. The induced G-supermodule HG 0 () can be described explicitly using the isomorphism : HG 0 ev ()K[c 13 ; c 14 ; c 23 ; c 24 ]! HG 0 () de ned in Lemma 5.2 and on p.163 of [8]. This isomorphism is given by (d 12 ) = d 12 ; (c 11 ) = c 11 ; (c 12 ) = c 12 ; and (c 13 ) = c 22c 13 c 12 c 23 d = y 13 ; (c 14 ) = c 22c 14 c 12 c 24 d = y 14 ; (c 23 ) = c 21c 13 + c 11 c 23 = y 23 ; (c 24 ) = c 21c 14 + c 11 c 24 = y 24 ; d d (c 33 ) = c 33 c 31 y 13 c 32 y 23 = z 1 ; (c 34 ) = c 34 c 31 y 14 c 32 y 24 = z 2 (d 34 ) = (c 33 c 31 y 13 c 32 y 23 )(c 44 c 41 y 14 c 42 y 24 ) (c 34 c 31 y 14 c 32 y 24 )(c 43 c 41 y 13 c 42 y 23 ) = x:
3 SIMPLE MODULES FOR SCHUR SUPERALGEBRA S(22) 3 Then the supermodule HG 0 () has a basis w(a; b; 13 ; 14 ; 23 ; 24 ) = d 2 c a 1 2 a 11c12 x 4 z1z b 3 4 b 2 y y14 y23 y24 with a; b as before and 13 ; 14 ; 23 ; 24 2 f0; 1g: The weight of w(a; b; 13 ; 14 ; 23 ; 24 ) is ( 2 + a ; 1 a b ; 3 b ): We shall write v a;b for w(a; b; 0; 0; 0; 0) and v = v 1 2; 3 4. Then v is the highest vector of the simple G-module L(). Outline of the paper. We will now explain the basic approach of the paper. For analogous results for S(21) and S(31) see [4] and [7]. The basis of our investigation of the description of the G ev -module structure of HG 0 () and its simple submodule L(). Although it would be natural to describe the G ev -module structure using the Lie algebra Lie(G ev ) ' gl(2)gl(2), it is easier to work with modules over the Lie algebra S = sl(2) sl(2) since the S-weights are described by only two parameters (instead of four for Lie(G ev )). The structure of G ev -modules can be easily retrieved once their S-module structure is known. One advantage of this approach is exhibited in section 4.1, where we use a certain isomorphism V of S-modules. If the characteristic p of the ground eld K is bigger than two, then using the Steinberg Theorem (see Theorem 4.4 of [5]), it is enough to determine the structure of the simple S(22)-module L S(22) () for restricted, that is when 1 2 ; 3 4 < p. If is restricted, then the action of even elements e (pr ) i 2 Dist(G) for r > 0 on HG 0 () is trivial. Since the G ev-structure of Hev() 0 is known, the G-structure of HG 0 () is then determined completely by the action of superderivations id. In Section 1 we compute the action of superderivations i D on elements in HG 0 ev () and on elements (X 12 ). Furthermore, we de ne the concept of atypicality of the weight (extending the clasical de nition of Kac from characteristic zero case). The module HG 0 () decomposes into a direct sum of S-submodules F 0() F 1 ()F 2 ()F 3 ()F 4 (), where the submodule F k (), that will be called the k- oor, is given as a K-span of all vectors w(a; b; 13 ; 14 ; 23 ; 24 ), where P 4 i=0 i4 = k. Equivalently, F k () is spanned by vectors of weights = ( 1 ; 2 3 ; 4 ) such that k = = Clearly each F i () is a S-module. Denote by Y a four-dimensional S-module spanned by elements y 13 ; y 14 ; y 23 and y 24. Then F 0 () = V,F 1 () = V Y, F 2 () = V (Y ^ Y ), F 3 () = V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ) and F 4 () = V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ^ Y ). The complete description of the S-module structure of each oor F i will be carried out in sections 2 through 5. In order to describe L S(22) (), we will use PBW theorem, and corresponding to our choice of the Borel subsupergroup B, we order the generators of Dist(G) as follows: e (r) i for i < rst, followed by eii (r) r and e i for i >, and then by odd e i where i >. The simple module L S(22) () is generated by the vector v. The elements e (r) e i 2 Dist(G) for i < act trivially on v and elements ii (r) r and e i for i > applied to v generate the module V. Using the previously discussed action of Dist(G) on A(22; r) we conclude that L S(22) () is generated by V and its images under compositions of superderivations i D for i <. We can identify these images with elements of various oors F k. Since the superderivations i D supercommute,
4 4 A.N. GRISHKOV AND F. MARKO the maps 1 : F 1 ()! F 1 () given by 2 : F 2 ()! F 2 () given by 3 : F 3 ()! F 3 () given by v a;b y i 7! (v a;b ) i D; v a;b (y i1 1 ^ y i2 2 ) 7! (v a;b ) i1 1 D i2 2 D; v a;b (y i1 1 ^ y i2 2 ^ y i3 3 ) 7! (v a;b ) i1 1 D i2 2 D i33 D; and 4 : F 4 ()! F 4 () given by v a;b (y 13 ^ y 23 ^ y 14 ^ y 24 ) 7! (v a;b ) 13 D 23 D 14 D 24 D are well de ned. It is easy to check that they are S-morphisms. We will compute images 1 (F 1 ), 2 (F 2 ), 3 (F 3 ) and 4 (F 4 ) in sections 2 through 5. These images together with V constitute the whole module L S(22) (). In each section 2 through 5 we follow this procedure: We determine primitive vectors in characteristics zero rst, then we establish the S-module structure of each oor. Special care is taken in the cases when either 1 2 or 3 4 is equal to p 2 or p 1, since in those cases HG 0 () is not semisimple as an S-module. Afterwards we compute the S-module structure of the image k (F k ()). Finally, in section 6, we combine the results of preceeding sections and determine the character and dimension of the simple module L S(22) (). 1. Basic formulas 1.1. Basic formulas for S(22). It is clear that V = H 0 G ev () = L() is an irreducible S-module if is restricted. Lemma 1.1. The actions of superderivations 12 D; 21 D; 13 D; 14 D; 23 D; 24 D; 34 D and 43 D on elements d; x; c 11 ; c 12 ; y 13 ; y 23 ; y 14 ; y 24 ; z 1 and z 2 is given in the following table. 12D 21 D 13D 14D 23D 24D 34D 43 D d 0 0 dy 13 dy 14 dy 23 dy x 0 0 xy 13 xy 14 xy 23 xy c 11 c 12 0; c 11 y 13 + c 12 y 23 c 11 y 14 + c 12 y c 12 0 c c 11 y 13 + c 12 y 23 c 11 y 14 + c 12 y y 13 0 y 23 0 y 13 y 14 y 13 y 23 y 23 y 14 y 14 0 y 23 y 13 0 y 23 y 13 y 13 y 24 0 y 23 y 24 y 24 0 y 14 0 y 24 y 14 y 13 0 y 13 y 24 y 14 y 24 0 y 13 y 24 y 14 0 y 23 y 14 y 24 y 14 y 24 y y 23 z z 1 y 13 z 2 y 13 z 1 y 23 z 2 y 23 z 2 0 z z 1 y 14 z 2 y 14 z 1 y 24 z 2 y 24 0 z 1 Proof. It is straightforward computation using the properties (c kl ) i D = li c k, where li is the Kronecker delta, and (ab) i D = ( 1) idb (a) i Db+a(b) i D, where the symbol denotes the parity. As a consequence, we obtain the following fundamental formulas.
5 SIMPLE MODULES FOR SCHUR SUPERALGEBRA S(22) 5 Lemma 1.2. (v a;b ) 12D = av a 1;b ; (v a;b ) 21D = ( 1 2 a)v a+1;b ; (v a;b ) 13D = ( b + a)v a;b y 13 + av a 1;b y 23 + ( 3 4 b)v a;b+1 y 14; (v a;b ) 14D = ( b + a)v a;b y 14 + av a 1;b y 24 + bv a;b 1 y 13; (v a;b ) 23D = ( b a)v a;b y 23 + ( 1 2 a)v a+1;b y 13 + ( 3 4 b)v a;b+1 y 24; (v a;b ) 24D = ( b a)v a;b y 24 + ( 1 2 a)v a+1;b y 14 + bv a;b 1 y 23; (v a;b ) 34D = bv a;b 1 (v a;b ) 43D = ( 3 4 b)v a;b+1 : Proof. It follows by repeated application of Lemma 1.1. Other identities of interest are dy 13 y 23 = c 13 c 23 ; dy 14 y 24 = c 14 c 24 ; d(y 13 y 24 + y 14 y 23 ) = c 13 c 24 + c 14 c 23 : 1.2. Further notation. The simple S-module of the highest weight and of the highest vector w shall be denoted either by L() or by L(w) depending on the circumstances. Denote 1 2 = A and 3 4 = B. Further denote! 12 = 1 2,! 34 = 3 4,! 13 = ,! 14 = 1 + 4,! 23 = and! 24 = If p = 0, then we shall write i = 0 if! i = 0 and i = 1 otherwise, and 1 i = 1 if! i = 1 and 1 i = 1 otherwise. If p > 2, then we denote i = 0 if! i 0 (mod p) and i = 1 otherwise, and 1 i = 0 if! i 1 (mod p) and 1 i = 1 otherwise. De nition 1.3. A weight is called typical if = 1, is called 13-atypical if 13 = 0 but = 1, is called 14-atypical if 14 = 0 but = 1, is called 23-atypical if 23 = 0 but = 1, is called 24-atypical if 24 = 0 but = 1, is called (13,14)-atypical if 13 = 14 = 0 but = 1, is called (13,23)-atypical if 13 = 23 = 0 but = 1, is called (13,24)-atypical if 13 = 24 = 0 but = 1, is called (14,23)-atypical if 14 = 23 = 0 but = 1, is called (14,24)-atypical if 14 = 24 = 0 but = 1, is called (23,24)-atypical if 23 = 24 = 0 but = 1, is called (13,14,23,24)-atypical if 13 = 14 = 23 = 24 = 0. It is easy to see that if p = 0, then every dominant weight is either typical, 14-atypical, 23-atypical, 24-atypical or (14,23)-atypical. If p > 2, then weights of all above atypical types are possible. In this case observe the following. If is 13-atypical, then B 6 p 1 (mod p). If is 23-atypical, then B 6 p 1 (mod p) and A 6 p 1 (mod p). If is 24-atypical, then A 6 p 1 (mod p). If is (13,14)-atypical, then B p 1 (mod p) and A 6 p 1 (mod p). If is (13,23)-atypical, then A p 1 (mod p) and B 6 p 1 (mod p). If is (14,24)-atypical, then A p 1 (mod p) and B 6 p 1 (mod p). If is (23,24)- atypical, then B p 1 (mod p) and A 6 p 1 (mod p). If is (13,24)-atypical, then A + B p 2 (mod p) and A; B 6 p 1 (mod p). If is (14,23)-atypical,
6 6 A.N. GRISHKOV AND F. MARKO then A B (mod p) and A; B 6 p 1 (mod p). If is (13,14,23,24)-atypical, then A; B p 1 (mod p). Furthermore, denote v w if and only if both v; w 6= 0 and one of them is a constant multiple of the other one. 2. First floor 2.1. Characteristic zero. In order to describe V Y as an S-module consider the following elements: l 1 = v AB y 23, l 2 = v AB y 24 v A;B 1 y 23, l 3 = v AB y 13 + v A 1;B y 23, l 4 = v AB y 14 + v A 1;B y 24 v A;B 1 y 13 v A 1;B 1 y 23. Lemma 2.1. The module V Y is isomorphic to the direct sum L(l 1 ) 34 L(l 2 ) 12 L(l 3 ) L(l 4 ). Proof. The vectors l 1 ; l 2 ; l 3 and l 4 are primitive vectors. A dimension count completes the argument. The image of the rst oor under the action of superderivations is given in the following Proposition. Proposition 2.2. Let 1 : V Y! V Y be a morphism of S-modules given by vy i 7! (v) i D. Then the image 1 (V Y ) = 23 L(l 1 ) L(l 2 ) L(l 3 ) L(l 4 ). Proof. We compute 1 (l 1 ) =! 23 l 1, 1 (l 2 ) =! 24 l 2, 1 (l 3 ) =! 13 l 3, 1 (l 4 ) =! 14 l 4, and the claim follows Characteristic p. Assume that the weight is restricted. The question of describing the S-module structure of V Y is related to a classical problem of decomposing the tensor product of a simple module and the natural or dual of the natural module over the general linear group GL(n). These questions were studied in [2] in relation to a complete reducibility criterion, primitive vectors and socles of the tensor products of the above type. In particular, costandard ltrations of these modules were described on p. 88 of [2]. We will only need a description of the tensor product of the simple module with the natural module for G + = GL(2). Actually, we will only determine its explicit structure over S + = sl(2). Assign to a G + -weight + = ( 1 ; 2 ) its corresponding restricted S + -weight A = 1 2 < p. Let V + be a simple S + -module generated by an element v + A of highest S+ - weight A. Then the dimension of V + is A + 1 and V + is a span of vectors v + A i for 0 i A such that (v + A i ) 12D = (A i)v + A i 1, (v+ A i ) 21D = iv + A i+1, and 12D (pk) and 21 D (pk) for k 1 act trivially. Denote by W + the two-dimensional S + -module which is a K-span of elements w + 1 and w + 1 for which (w + 1 ) 21D = 0; (w + 1 ) 21D = w + 1, (w+ 1 ) 12D = w + 1, (w + 1 ) 12D = 0 and 12 D (pk) and 21 D (pk) for k 1 act trivially. The following lemma describes the S + -module structure of V + W +. Although it is a classical result, we include it here for the convenience of the reader.
7 SIMPLE MODULES FOR SCHUR SUPERALGEBRA S(22) 7 Lemma 2.3. The S + -module structure of the module V + W + is given as follows. If A = 0, then V + W + = U 1 +, where U 1 + = hu + 1 = v+ A w+ 1 i, is a simple S + -module. If 0 < A < p 1, then V + W + = U 1 + U 2 +, where U 1 + is as above and U 2 + = hu+ 2 = v+ A 1 w+ 1 v + A w+ 1 i, is a simple S+ -module. If A = p 1, then V + W + has a composition series U + 3 V + W + = U + 1 ; U + 2 where U + 1, U + 2 as above, and U + 3 = hu+ 3 = v+ A w+ 1 i is a simple S+ -module. Proof. Since (u + 1 ) 21D = 0, u + 1 is a primitive vector of the highest weight A + 1. If A = 0, then dimensions of V + W + and U 1 + are both equal to 2. If A > 0, then (u + 2 ) 21D = 0 shows that u + 2 is a primitive vector of the highest weight A 1 and dimension A. Assume 0 < A < p 1. Then the dimension of U 1 + is A+2, and the dimensions of U 1 + and U 2 + add up to the dimension of V + W +. Since (u + 1 ) 12D 6 u + 2, Ext1 S (U ; U 2 + ) = 0, and the S+ -module structure of V + W + follows. Assume now A = p 1. Then (u + 3 ) 21D = u + 1 shows that u+ 3 is a primitive vector of weight A 1 and dimension p 2. The vector u + 1 is primitive of weight p and L(u + 1 ) has dimension 2 (and is spanned by u+ 1 and (u+ 1 ) 12D (p) ). Since u + 2 is a primitive vector of weight A 1 and dimension p 2, dimensions of U 1 +, U 2 + and U 3 + add up to the dimension of V + W +. Finally, (u + 1 ) 12D = u + 2 implies that the S + -module structure of V + W + is as stated. The even supergroup G ev of G is a product of two copies of GL(2), the rst copy (based on letter 1 and 2) can be be identi ed with G + and we can denote the second copy (based on letters 3 and 4) by G. Assign to a G -weight = ( 3 ; 4 ) its corresponding restricted S = sl(2)-weight B = 3 4 < p. Then we can de ne V and W analogously to V + and W + and obtain the following analogous result for the S -module structure of V W. Lemma 2.4. The S -module structure of the module V W is given as follows. If B = 0, then V W = U 1, where U 1 = hu 1 = v B w 1 i, is a simple S -module. If 0 < B < p 1, then V W = U 1 U 2, where U 1 as above and U 2 = hu 2 = v B 1 w 1 v B w 1 i, is a simple S -module. If B = p 1, then V W has a composition series U 3 V W = U 1 ; where U 1, U 2 as above, and U 3 = hu 3 = v B w 1 i is a simple S -module. Now we are ready to describe the S-module structure of the rst oor. U 2
8 8 A.N. GRISHKOV AND F. MARKO Proposition 2.5. The S-module V Y is described as follows. 1) If A; B < p 1, then V Y = L(l 1 ) 34 L(l 2 ) 12 L(l 3 ) L(l 4 ). 2) If A = p 1 and B < p 1, then V Y = L 5 34 L 6. Here the indecomposable module L 5 is given as L(l 5 ) L 5 = L(l 1 ) ; L(l 3 ) where l 5 = v A;B y 13. The indecomposable module L 6 given as L(l 6 ) L 6 = L(l 2 ) L(l 4 ) where l 6 = v A;B 1 y 13 + v A;B y 14. 3) If A < p 1 and B = p 1, then V Y = L 7 12 L 8. Here the indecomposable module L 7 is given as L(l 7 ) L 7 = L(l 1 ) ; L(l 2 ) where l 7 = v A;B y 24. The indecomposable module module L 8 given as L(l 8 ) L 8 = L(l 3 ) L(l 4 ) where l 8 = v A 1;B y 24 + v A;B y 14. 4) If A = B = p 1, then V Y = L 9 has the composition series L(l 9 ) L(l 5 ) L(l 7 ) L(l 6 ) L(l 1 ) L(l 8 ) L(l 2 ) L(l 3 ) L(l 4 ) of simple S-modules, where l 9 = v A;B y 14. Proof. There is an isomorphism of S-modules W + W and Y which sends w 1 + w 1 7! y 23, w 1 + w 1 7! y 24, w + 1 w 1 7! y 13 and w + 1 w 1 7! y 14. For an S-module V of highest weight (A; B) there is an isomorphism V = V + V, where V + and V are de ned as above. ; ;
9 SIMPLE MODULES FOR SCHUR SUPERALGEBRA S(22) 9 The claim follows from Lemmas 2.3 and 2.4 using the standard properties of tensor products Image under 1. The structure of the S-module 1 (V Y ) is given as follows. Proposition 2.6. The following statements describe S-modules isomorphic to V 1 = 1 (V Y ). If A; B < p 1, then V 1 = 23 L(l 1 ) L(l 2 ) L(l 3 ) L(l 4 ). Assume A = p 1 and B < p 1. If is typical, then V 1 = V Y. If is (13; 23)- atypical, then V 1 = L(l3 ) 34 L 6. If is (14; 24)-atypical, then V 1 = L5 34 L(l 4 ). Assume A < p 1 and B = p 1. If is typical, then V 1 = V Y. If is (13; 14)- atypical, then V 1 = L7 12 L(l 4 ). If is (23; 24)-atypical, then V 1 = L(l2 ) 12 L 8. Assume A = B = p 1. If typical, then V 1 = V Y. If is (13; 14; 23; 24)- atypical, then V 1 = L( l 6 + l 8 ) L 10 = L(l 2 ) L(l 3 ) : L(l 4 ) Proof. Assume rst that A; B < p 1. The images of generators l 1 ; l 2 ; l 3 and l 4 of V Y were determined earlier. The image V 1 = 23 L(l 1 ) L(l 2 ) L(l 3 ) L(l 4 ) as in the characteristic zero case. Next, assume that A = p 1 and B < p 1. The images of additional primitive vectors under 1 equal 1 (l 5 ) =! 13 l 5 l 3 and 1 (l 6 ) =! 14 l 6 l 4. The structure of V 1 follows. Now assume that A < p 1 and B = p 1. Then the images of additional primitive vectors under 1 equal 1 (l 7 ) =! 24 l 7 + l 2 and 1 (l 8 ) =! 14 l 8 + l 4. The structure of V 1 follows. Finally, assume that A = B = p 1. We compute rst the image of the generator l 9 under 1 as 1 (l 9 ) =! 14 l 9 l 8 + l 6. If is typical, then 1 (V Y ) = V Y. If is (13; 14; 23; 24)-atypical, then 1 (l 5 ) = l 3, 1 (l 7 ) = l 2, 1 (l 6 ) = l 4, 1 (l 8 ) = l 4, and the images of the remaining elements l i vanish. In this case V 1 is an indecomposable module generated by l 6 + l 8 = v A;B 1 y 13 + v A 1;B y 24 that has the structure described in the statement of the proposition. 3. Second floor 3.1. Characteristic zero. The S-module Y ^ Y is a direct sum of 2 irreducible modules Y 1 = hy 23 ^ y 24 i and Y 2 = hy 23 ^ y 13 i. Consider the following elements: m 1 = v AB y 23 ^ y 24, m 2 = 2v A 1;B y 23 ^ y 24 v AB y 13 ^ y 24 + v AB y 14 ^ y 23, m 3 = v A 2;B y 23 ^y 24 +v A 1;B y 13 ^y 24 v A 1;B y 14 ^y 23 +v AB y 13 ^y 14, n 1 = v AB y 13 ^ y 23, n 2 = 2v A;B 1 y 13 ^ y 23 v AB y 13 ^ y 24 v AB y 14 ^ y 23, and n 3 = v A;B 2 y 13 ^y 23 v A;B 1 y 13 ^y 24 v A;B 1 y 14 ^y 23 +v AB y 14 ^y 24. Lemma 3.1. The module V (Y ^ Y ) is isomorphic to the direct sum L(m 1 ) L(n 1 ) 12 L(m 2 ) 34 L(n 2 ) L(m 3 ) L(n 3 ).
10 10 A.N. GRISHKOV AND F. MARKO Proof. The action of 34 D; 43 D on V Y 1 is given by (v a;b y 1 ) 34 D = bv a;b 1 y 1 and (v a;b y 1 ) 43 D = ( 3 4 b)v a;b+1 y 1 for any y 1 2 Y 1. The action of 12D; 21 D on V Y 2 is given by (v a;b y 2 ) 12 D = av a 1;b y 2 and (v a;b y 2 ) 21 D = ( 1 2 a)v a+1;b y 2 for any y 2 2 Y 2. Since the vectors m 1, m 2 and m 3 are primitive, the dimension count gives that the module V Y 1 is a direct sum of simple modules L(m 1 ) 12 L(m 2 ) L(m 3 ). Analogously, since the vectors n 1, n 2 and n 3 are primitive, the dimension count gives that the module V Y 2 is a direct sum of simple modules L(n 1 ) 34 L(n 2 ) L(n 3 ). Therefore V (Y ^ Y ) = L(m 1 ) L(n 1 ) 12 L(m 2 ) 34 L(n 2 ) L(m 3 ) L(n 3 ). If t; s > 0, then L(m 2 ) = L(n 2 ) = L( 13;24 ). We shall denote the simple module L( 13;24 ) by L. Lemma 3.2. The S-morphism 2 is described completely by images of generating vectors 2 (m 1 ) =! 23! 24 m 1 ; 2 (n 1 ) =! 13! 23 n 1 ; 2 (m 2 ) = ( )( ) + (1 2 (n 2 ) = 2 2 (m 3 ) =! 13! 14 m 3 ; m 2 + ( )( ) 2 (n 3 ) =! 14! 24 n 3. (1 2)(2+3 4) Proof. It is a straightforward computation. 2)(22+3+4) ( 3 4)(2+ 1 2) 2 m2 ( 3 4)( ) 2 2 n 2 ; n2 ; Lemma 3.3. The image 2 (m 2 ) vanishes if and only if! 23! 13 = 0 and s = 0. The image 2 (n 2 ) vanishes if and only if! 23! 24 = 0 and t = 0. If s; t > 0 and! 13! 14! 23! 24 = 0, then 2 (m 2 ) 2 (n 2 ). Proof. Lemma 3.2 implies that 2 (m 2 ) = 0 implies s = 0, and 2 (n 2 ) = 0 implies t = 0. It is easy to verify that 2 (m 2 ) =! 23! 13 m 2 for s = 0 and 2 (n 2 ) =! 23! 24 m 2 for t = 0. If s; t > 0, then the restriction ~ 2 of the map 2 to the 2-dimensional space of primitive vectors hm 2 ; n 2 i of weight, is represented by a matrix! ( )( ) + ( 1 2 )( ) ( 1 2 )( ) 2 2 ( 3 4 )( ) ( )( ) The determinant of this matrix is! 13! 14! 23! 24 and our claim follows. ( 3 4 )( ) 2 Proposition 3.4. The image 2 (V Y ^ Y ) = L(m 1 ) L(n 1 ) L(m 3 ) L(n 3 ) Z, where Z = L L if! 13! 14! 23! 24 6= 0; Z = L if! 13! 14! 23! 24 = 0 and one of the following conditions is satis ed: - s; t > 0, - t = 0; s > 0 and! 23! 24 6= 0, and - s = 0; t > 0 and! 23! 13 6= 0; and Z = 0 if one of the following conditions is satis ed: - t = 0; s > 0 and! 23! 24 = 0, - s = 0; t > 0 and! 23! 13 = 0, and - s = t = 0 Proof. It follows from Lemma 3.2 and 3.3. :
11 SIMPLE MODULES FOR SCHUR SUPERALGEBRA S(22) Characteristic p. Assume that the weight is restricted. As in the case of characteristic zero, we also have that the S-module Y ^ Y is a direct sum of 2 irreducible S-modules Y 1 = hy 23 ^ y 24 i and Y 2 = hy 23 ^ y 13 i. We shall determine the S-module structures of V Y 1 and V Y 2 rst and then combine them. Since S acts trivially on V Y 1 and S + acts trivially on V Y 2, instead of S-modules we shall deal with appropriate sl(2)-modules and the computations shall become easier Module V Y 1. De ne the elements m 4 = v A;B (y 13 ^ y 24 y 14 ^ y 13 ) and m 5 = 1 2 v A 2;B (y 23 ^ y 24 ) + v A;B (y 13 ^ y 14 ). Lemma 3.5. The S-module of the module V Y 1 is given as follows. 1) If A < p 2, then V Y 1 = L(m1 ) 12 L(m 2 ) L(m 3 ). 2) If A = p 2, then V Y 1 = M4 1 12L(m 3 ), where the S-module M 4 has the composition series L(m 4 ) M 4 = L(m 1 ) : L(m 2 ) 3) If A = p 1, then V Y 1 = M5 L(m 2 ), where the S-module M 5 has the composition series L(m 5 ) M 5 = L(m 1 ) : L(m 3 ) Proof. Since (m 1 ) 21 D = (m 2 ) 21 D = (m 3 ) 21 D = 0, we obtain that the vectors m 1, m 2 and m 3 are primitive, of highest S + -weights A + 2,A and A 2 respectively. To nd possible extension between L(m 1 ), L(m 2 ) and L(m 3 ), we compute that (m 2 ) 12 D 6 m 3 ; (m 1 ) 12 D m 2 if and only if A = p 2; and (m 1 ) 12 D 2 m 3 if and only if A = p 1. If A < p 2, the dimensions of modules L(m 1 ), L(m 2 ) and L(m 3 ) are (A + 3)(B + 1), (A + 1)(B + 1) and (A 1)(B + 1), respectively. Since (A + 3) + 12 (A + 1) (A 1) = 3(A + 1), the dimension of the module L(m 1 ) 12 L(m 2 ) L(m 3 ) is the same as the dimension of V Y 1. Since there are no extensions between L(m 1 ), L(m 2 ) and L(m 3 ), part 1) follows. If A = p 2, then (m 4 ) 21 D = 2m 1 shows that the vector m 4 is a primitive vector of the highest S + -weight A. Since L(m 1 ) has dimension 2(B + 1), L(m 2 ) and L(m 4 ) have dimensions (p 1)(B +1), and if A 6= 1, then L(m 3 ) has dimension (p 3)(B + 1); the dimensions of these modules add up to the dimension of V Y 1. Since (m 4 ) 21 D = 2m 1 and (m 1 ) 12 D = m 2, and (m 4 ) 12 D 6 m 3 and (m 2 ) 12 D 6 m 3, we infer the S-module structure of the module V Y 1. If A = p 1, then (m 5 ) 21 D 2 = m 1 shows that the vector m 5 is a primitive vector of the highest S + -weight A 2. Since the dimensions of the modules L(m 1 ), L(m 2 ), L(m 3 ) and L(m 5 ) are 4(B + 1), p(b + 1), (p 2)(B + 1) and (p 2)(B + 1), respectively, they add up to the dimension of V Y 1. Since (m 5 ) 21 D 2 = m 1,
12 12 A.N. GRISHKOV AND F. MARKO (m 1 ) 12 D 2 = 2m 3, and (m 1 ) 12 D 6 m 2, we infer the S-submodule structure of the module V Y Module V Y 2. De ne the elements n 4 = v A;B (y 13 ^ y 24 + y 14 ^ y 23 ) and n 5 = 1 2 v A;B 2 y 13 ^ y 23 + v A;B y 14 ^ y 24. Lemma 3.6. The S-module of the module V Y 2 is given as follows. 1) If B < p 2, then V Y 2 = L(n1 ) 34 L(n 2 ) L(n 3 ). 2) If B = p 2, then V Y 2 = N4 1 34L(n 3 ), where the S-module N 4 has the composition series L(n 4 ) N 4 = L(n 1 ) : L(n 2 ) 3) If B = p 1, then V Y 2 = N5 L(n 2 ), where the S-module N 5 has the composition series L(n 5 ) N 5 = L(n 1 ) L(n 3 ) Proof. It is symmetric to the proof of Lemma 3.5. : V (Y ^ Y ). Combining the descriptions of V Y 1 and V Y 2 we get Proposition 3.7. The S-module V (Y ^ Y ) is isomorphic to 1) Case 0 < A; B < p 2 L(m 1 ) L(n 1 ) L(m 2 ) L(n 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) 1 34L(n 3 ) 2) Case A = 0; 0 < B < p 2 L(m 1 ) L(n 1 ) L(n 2 ) 1 34L(n 3 ) 3) Case 0 < A < p 2; B = 0 L(m 1 ) L(n 1 ) L(m 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) 4) Case A = B = 0 L(m 1 ) L(n 1 ) 5) Case A = p 2; 0 < B < p 2 M 4 L(n 1 ) L(n 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) 1 34L(n 3 ) 6) Case A = p 2; B = 0 M 4 L(n 1 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) 7) Case 0 < A < p 2; B = p 2 L(m 1 ) N 4 L(m 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) 1 34L(n 3 ) 8) Case A = 0; B = p 2 L(m 1 ) N L(n 3 ) 9) Case A = B = p 2 M 4 N L(m 3 ) 1 34L(n 3 ) 10) Case A = p 1; 0 < B < p 2 M 5 L(n 1 ) L(m 2 ) L(n 2 ) 1 34L(n 3 )
13 SIMPLE MODULES FOR SCHUR SUPERALGEBRA S(22) 13 11) Case A = p 1; B = 0 M 5 L(n 1 ) L(m 2 ) 12) Case 0 < A < p 2; B = p 1 L(m 1 ) N 5 L(m 2 ) L(n 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) 13) Case A = 0; B = p 1 L(m 1 ) N 5 L(n 2 ) 14) Case A = p 1; B = p 2 M 5 N 4 L(m 2 ) 1 34L(n 3 ) 15) Case A = p 2; B = p 1 M 4 N 5 L(n 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) 16) Case A = B = p 1 M 5 N 5 L(m 2 ) L(n 2 ) Proof. Combine Lemmas 3.5 and 3.6. The reason why we split the above Proposition into 16 cases instead of 9 is to prepare for its application in the next subsection Image under 2. We shall analyze the modules 2 (V Y 1 ) and 2 (V Y 2 ) rst, and then determine 2 (V (Y ^ Y )). The starting point is Lemma 3.2 which holds in positive characteristic as well. Lemma 3.3 is modi ed as follows. Lemma 3.8. If! 23! 13 = 0 and B = 0, then 2 (m 2 ) = 0. If! 23! 13 = 0 and B = p 2, then 2 (n 2 ) = 0. If! 23! 24 = 0 and A = 0, then 2 (n 2 ) = 0. If! 23! 24 = 0 and A = p 2, then 2 (m 2 ) = 0. In all other cases, when de ned, the images 2 (m 2 ) and 2 (n 2 ) are nonzero, and if A; B > 0 and! 13! 14! 23! 24 = 0, then 2 (m 2 ) 2 (n 2 ). Proof. Lemma 3.2 shows that 2 (m 2 ) = 0 implies A = p 2 or B = 0, and 2 (n 2 ) = 0 implies A = 0 or B = p 2. It is easy to verify that 2 (m 2 ) =! 23! 13 m 2 for B = 0, 2 (n 2 ) =! 23! 13 n 2 for B = p 2, 2 (n 2 ) =! 23! 24 m 2 for A = 0, and 2 (m 2 ) =! 23! 24 m 2 for A = p 2. The remaining arguments are as in Lemma 3.3. For computation of 2 (V Y 1 ) and 2 (V Y 2 ) we shall use Lemmas 3.2 and 3.8 repeatedly. To combine both 2 (V Y 1 ) and 2 (V Y 2 ), we shall need the following lemma. Denote a K-span of 2 (m 2 ) and 2 (n 2 ) by X. Lemma 3.9. The dimension of the space X is described as follows: dimx = 2 if and only if! 13! 14! 23! 24 6= 0; dimx = 1 if and only if! 13! 14! 23! 24 = 0 and one of the following conditions is satis ed: - A; B > 0, - A = 0; B > 0 and! 23! 24 6= 0, and - A > 0; B = 0 and! 23! 13 6= 0; and dimx = 0 if and only if one of the following conditions is satis ed: - A = 0; B > 0 and! 23! 24 = 0, - A > 0; B = 0 and! 23! 13 = 0, and - A = B = 0 Proof. Use Lemmas 3.2 and 3.8.
14 14 A.N. GRISHKOV AND F. MARKO If 2 (M) = M and L( 2 (w)) = L(w), respectively, then we shall denote M = 2 (M) and w = 2 (w), respectively Module 2 (V Y 1 ). We shall need the following lemma, a part of which shall be useful for the determination of 2 (V (Y ^ Y )). Lemma If A = p 2 and! 24 = 0, then 2 (m 4 ) = 2 (n 2 ) 6= 0. Assume A = p 2 and! 23 = 0. If B 6= 0; p 2, then 2 (m 4 ) 2 (n 2 ). If B = 0, then 2 (m 4 ) = 0 and 2 (n 2 ) 6= 0. If B = p 2, then 2 (m 4 ) 6= 0 and 2 (n 2 ) = 0. Proof. If! 24 = 0, then 2 (m 4 ) = (2 + B)m 2 Bn 2 = 2 (n 2 ). If! 23 = 0, then 2 (m 4 ) = B(m 2 + n 2 ) and 2 (n 2 ) = (B + 2)(m 2 + n 2 ). The structure of the S-module 2 (V Y 1 ) is given as follows. Proposition The following statements describe S-modules isomorphic to V 21 = 2 (V Y 1 ). Assume A < p 2. If is typical, then V 21 = L(m1 ) 12 L(m 2 ) L(m 3 ). If is 13-atypical, then V 21 = L(m1 ) L(m 2 ). If is 14- or (13; 14)-atypical, then V 21 = L(m1 ) 12 L(m 2 ). If is 23-atypical, then V 21 = L(m 2 ) L(m 3 ). If is 24- or (23; 24)-atypical, then V 21 = 12 L(m 2 ) L(m 3 ). If is (13; 24)-atypical or (14; 23)-atypical, then V 21 = L(m 2 ). Assume now A = p 2. If is typical, then V 21 = M L(m 3 ). If is 13-, 14- or (13; 14)-atypical, then V 21 = M 4. If is 24- or (23; 24)-atypical, then V 21 = L((B + 2)m2 Bn 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ). If is (13; 24)-atypical, then V 21 = L((B + 2)m2 Bn 2 ). If is 23-atypical, then V 21 = 34 L(m 2 + n 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ). If is (14; 23)-atypical, then V 21 = L(m2 + n 2 ). Finally, assume A = p 1. If is typical, then V 21 = M 5 L(m 2 ). If is (13; 23)-atypical and B 6= 0, then V 21 = L(m5 ) L(m 2 ). If is (13; 23)-atypical and B = 0, then V 21 = L(m5 ). If is (14; 24)-atypical, then V 21 = L(m5 ) L(m 2 ). If is (13; 14; 23; 24)-atypical, then V 21 = L(m2 ). Proof. If A < p 2, then V Y 1 is semisimple by the rst part of Proposition 3.5 and the highest weights of primitive vectors are pairwise di erent. Therefore it is enough to determine whether the images of these primitive vectors under 2 vanish or not, and this follows from Lemma 3.2 and 3.8. For A = p 2, we use the second part of Proposition 3.5. Since L(m 2 ) is the S-socle of M 4, Lemma 3.8 shows that 2 (M 4 ) = M 4 provided! 23! 24 6= 0. If! 23! 24 = 0, then using Lemma 3.2 we infer 2 (m 1 ) = 0 and therefore 2 (M 4 ) = 2 (L(m 4 )). Lemma 3.10 determines 2 (m 4 ) and Lemma 3.2 concludes the proof in the case A = p 2. Assume now that A = p 1. If is typical, then Lemma 3.2 shows that 2 (V 21 ) = V 21. Assume now is not typical. Then! 13 =! 23 and! 14 =! 24 imply that! 23! 24 = 0. Since 2 (m 1 ) =! 23! 24 m 1, using the third part of Proposition 3.5 we
15 SIMPLE MODULES FOR SCHUR SUPERALGEBRA S(22) 15 conclude 2 (M 5 ) = 2 (L(m 5 )). We verify that! 23 = 0 implies 2 (m 5 ) = (B+1)m 3 and! 24 = 0 implies 2 (m 5 ) = (B + 1)m 3. Therefore 2 (m 5 ) = 0 if and only if B = p 1. Lemma 3.2 concludes the proof Module 2 (V Y 2 ). We shall need the following lemma, a part of which shall be useful for the determination of 2 (V (Y ^ Y )). Lemma If B = p 2 and! 13 = 0, then 2 (n 4 ) = 2 (m 2 ) 6= 0. Assume B = p 2 and! 23 = 0. If A 6= 0; p 2, then 2 (n 4 ) 2 (m 2 ). If A = 0, then 2 (n 4 ) = 0 and 2 (m 2 ) 6= 0. If A = p 2, then 2 (n 4 ) 6= 0 and 2 (m 2 ) = 0. Proof. If! 13 = 0, then 2 (n 4 ) = Am 2 + (2 + A)n 2 = 2 (m 2 ). If! 23 = 0, then 2 (n 4 ) = A(m 2 + n 2 ) and 2 (m 2 ) = (2 + A)(m 2 + n 2 ). The structure of the S-module 2 (V Y 2 ) is given as follows. Proposition The following statements describe S-modules isomorphic to V 22 = 2 (V Y 2 ). Assume B < p 2. If is typical, then V 22 = L(n1 ) 34 L(n 2 ) L(n 3 ). If is 14- or (14; 24)-atypical, then V 22 = L(n1 ) 34 L(n 2 ). If is is 24-atypical, then V 22 = L(n1 ) L(n 2 ). If is 13- or (13; 23)-atypical, then V 22 = 34 L(n 2 ) L(n 3 ). If is 23-atypical, then V 22 = L(n 2 ) L(n 3 ). If is (13; 24)-atypical or (14; 23)-atypical, then V 22 = L(n 2 ). Assume now B = p 2. If is typical, then V 22 = N L(n 3 ). If is 14- or 24- or (14; 24)-atypical, then V 22 = N 4. If is 13- or (13; 23)-atypical, then V 22 = L( Am2 + (2 + A)n 2 ) 1 34L(n 3 ). If is (13; 24)-atypical, then V 22 = L( Am2 + (2 + A)n 2 ). If is 23-atypical, then V 22 = 12 L(m 2 + n 2 ) 1 34L(n 3 ). If is (14; 23)-atypical, then V 22 = L(m2 + n 2 ). Finally, assume B = p 1. If is typical, then V 22 = N 5 L(n 2 ). If is (23; 24)-atypical and A 6= 0, then V 22 = L(n5 ) L(n 2 ). If is (23; 24)-atypical and A = 0, then V 22 = L(n5 ). If is (13; 14)-atypical, then V 22 = L(n5 ) L(n 2 ). If is (13; 14; 23; 24)-atypical, then V 22 = L(n2 ). Proof. The proof is analogous to the proof of Proposition 3.11 and uses the following identities. If B = p 1 and! 13 = 0, then 2 (n 5 ) = (A + 1)n 3. If B = p 1 and! 23 = 0, then 2 (n 5 ) = (A + 1)n Module 2 (V (Y ^ Y )). Now we shall determine 2 (V (Y ^ Y )). Proposition The S-module V 2 = 2 (V (Y ^ Y )) is isomorphic to the following modules. 1) Case 0 < A; B < p 2 - L(m 1 ) L(n 1 ) L(m 2 ) L(n 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is typical - L(m 1 ) L(m 2 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is 13-atypical
16 16 A.N. GRISHKOV AND F. MARKO - L(m 1 ) L(n 1 ) L(m 2 ), if is 14-atypical - L(m 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is 23-atypical - L(n 1 ) L(m 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ), if is 24-atypical - L(m 2 ), if is (13; 24)-atypical or (14; 23)-atypical 2) Case A = 0; 0 < B < p 2 - L(m 1 ) L(n 1 ) L(n 2 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is typical - L(m 1 ) L(n 2 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is 13-atypical - L(m 1 ) L(n 1 ) L(n 2 ), if is 14-atypical L(n 3 ), if is 23-atypical - L(n 1 ), if is 24-atypical 3) Case 0 < A < p 2; B = 0 - L(m 1 ) L(n 1 ) L(m 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ), if is typical - L(m 1 ), if is 13-atypical - L(m 1 ) L(n 1 ) L(m 2 ), if is 14-atypical L(m 3 ), if is 23-atypical - L(m 2 ) L(n 1 ) 1 12L(m 3 ), if is 24-atypical 4) Case A = B = 0 - L(m 1 ) L(n 1 ), if is typical - L(m 1 ), if is 13-atypical - L(n 1 ), if is 24-atypical - 0, if is (14; 23)-atypical 5) Case A = p 2; 0 < B < p 2 - M 4 L(n 1 ) L(n 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is typical - M L(n 3 ), if is 13-atypical - L(n 1 ) M 4, if is 14-atypical - L(m 2 + n 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is 23-atypical - L(n 1 ) L((B + 2)m 2 Bn 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ), if is 24-atypical 6) Case A = p 2; B = 0 - M 4 L(n 1 ) 1 12L(m 3 ), if is typical - L(n 1 ) M 4, if is 14-atypical L(m 3 ), if is 23-atypical - L(m 2 ), if is (13; 24)-atypical 7) Case 0 < A < p 2; B = p 2 - L(m 1 ) N 4 L(m 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is typical - L(m 1 ) N 4, if is 14-atypical - N L(m 3 ), if is 24-atypical - L(m 1 ) L( Am 2 + (A + 2)n 2 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is 13-atypical - L(m 2 + n 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is 23-atypical 8) Case A = 0; B = p 2 - L(m 1 ) N L(n 3 ), if is typical - L(m 1 ) N 4, if is 14-atypical L(n 3 ), if is 23-atypical - L(n 2 ), if is (13; 24)-atypical 9) Case A = B = p 2 - M 4 N L(m 3 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is typical - M L(n 3 ), if is 13-atypical - N L(m 3 ), if is 24-atypical
17 SIMPLE MODULES FOR SCHUR SUPERALGEBRA S(22) 17 - L(m 2 + n 2 ), if is (14; 23)-atypical 10) Case A = p 1; 0 < B < p 2 - M 5 L(n 1 ) L(m 2 ) L(n 2 ) L(m 3 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is typical - L(m 3 ) L(m 2 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is (13; 23)-atypical - L(m 3 ) L(n 1 ) L(m 2 ), if is (14; 24)-atypical 11) Case A = p 1; B = 0 - M 5 L(n 1 ) L(m 2 ) L(m 3 ), if is typical - L(m 3 ), if is (13; 23)-atypical - L(m 3 ) L(m 2 ) L(n 1 ), if is (14; 24)-atypical 12) Case 0 < A < p 2; B = p 1 - L(m 1 ) N 5 L(m 2 ) L(n 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) L(n 3 ), if is typical - L(m 1 ) L(n 3 ) L(m 2 ), if is (13; 14)-atypical - L(n 3 ) L(m 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ), if is (23; 24)-atypical 13) Case A = 0; B = p 1 - L(m 1 ) N 5 L(n 2 ) L(n 3 ), if is typical - L(m 1 ) L(n 3 ) L(n 2 ), if is (13; 14)-atypical - L(n 3 ), if is (23; 24)-atypical 14) Case A = p 1; B = p 2 - M 5 N 4 L(m 2 ) L(m 3 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is typical - L(m 3 ) L(m 2 + n 2 ) 1 34L(n 3 ), if is (13; 23)-atypical - L(m 3 ) N 4, if is (14; 24)-atypical 15) Case A = p 2; B = p 1 - M 4 N 5 L(n 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ) L(n 3 ), if is typical - L(n 3 ) L(m 2 + n 2 ) 1 12L(m 3 ), if is (23; 24)-atypical - L(n 3 ) M 4, if is (13; 14)-atypical 16) Case t = s = p 1 - M 5 N 5 L(m 2 ) L(n 2 ) L(m 3 ) L(n 3 ), if is typical - L(m 2 ), if is (13; 14; 23; 24)-atypical. Proof. It follows from Propositions 3.11, 3.13, and Lemmas 3.2, 3.8, 3.9, 3.10 and For the convenience of the reader we shall point out cases when the nonzero images under 2 of di erent primitive vectors of the highest weight (A; B) are colinear. If A = p 2; 0 < B < p 2 and is 23-atypical or 24-atypical, then 2 (m 4 ) 2 (n 2 ). If 0 < A < p 2; B = p 2 and is 13-atypical or 23-atypical, then 2 (n 4 ) 2 (m 2 ). If A = B = p 2 and is 13-atypical, then 2 (n 4 ) 2 (m 2 ). If A = B = p 2 and is 24-atypical, then 2 (m 4 ) 2 (n 2 ). If A = B = p 2 and is (14; 23)-atypical, then 2 (m 4 ) 2 (n 4 ) while 2 (m 2 ) = 2 (n 2 ) = 0. If t = A 1; 0 < B < p 2 and is (13; 23)- or (14; 24)-atypical, then 2 (n 2 ) 2 (m 2 ). If 0 < A < p 2; B = p 1 is (13; 14)- or (23; 24)-atypical, then 2 (m 2 ) 2 (n 2 ). If A = p 1; B = p 2 and is (13; 23)-atypical, then 2 (n 4 ) 2 (m 2 ). If A = p 1; B = p 2 and is (14; 24)-atypical, then 2 (m 2 ) 2 (n 2 ). If A = p 2; B = p 1 and is (23; 24)-atypical, then 2 (m 4 ) 2 (n 2 ). If A = p 2; B = p 1 and is (13; 14)-atypical, then 2 (m 2 ) 2 (n 2 ).
18 18 A.N. GRISHKOV AND F. MARKO If A = B = p 1 and is (13; 14; 23; 24)-atypical, then 2 (m 2 ) 2 (n 2 ). 4. Third floor 4.1. Characteristic zero. Denote z 23 = y 13 ^ y 23 ^ y 24, z 24 = y 14 ^ y 23 ^ y 24, z 13 = y 13 ^ y 14 ^ y 23, z 14 = y 13 ^ y 14 ^ y 24. Furthermore, set k 1 = v AB z 23, k 2 = v AB z 24 v A;B 1 z 23, k 3 = v AB z 13 + v A 1;B z 23, and k 4 = v AB z 14 + v A 1;B z 24 v A;B 1 z 13 v A 1;B 1 z 23. Let : Y! Y ^Y ^Y be a map that sends y 23 7! z 23, y 24 7! z 24, y 13 7! z 13 and y 14 7! z 14. Then is an isomorphism of S-modules and it induces an isomorphism of S-modules V : V Y! V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ) via V (v y i ) = v (y i ) = v z i for appropriate i;. Lemma 4.1. The module V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ) is isomorphic to the direct sum L(k 1 ) 34 L(k 2 ) 12 L(k 3 ) L(k 4 ). Proof. Since the map : Y! Y ^ Y ^ Y is an isomorphism of S-modules, the module Y ^ Y ^ Y is irreducible of the highest vector z 23. Since the map V is an isomorphism of S-modules and the S-module structure of V Y was already determined, we can use V to describe the S-module structure of V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ). Using Lemma 2.1 we establish V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ) = L(k 1 ) 34 L(k 2 ) 12 L(k 3 ) L(k 4 ). Proposition 4.2. The image 3 (V (Y ^Y ^Y )) = K K K K 4. Proof. The S-morphism 3 is described completely by images of generating vectors 3 (k 1 ) =! 13! 23! 24 k 1, 3 (k 2 ) =! 14! 23! 24 k 2, 3 (k 3 ) =! 13! 14! 23 k 3, and 3 (k 4 ) =! 13! 14! 24 k 4 : 4.2. Characteristic p. Assume that the weight is restricted. Recall that the map V : V Y! V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ) is an isomorphism of S-modules, and for each 5 i 9, denote V (l i ) = k i and K i = V (L i ). Proposition 4.3. The S-module V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ) is isomorphic to 1) Case A; B < p 1 L(k 1 ) 34 L(k 2 ) 12 L(k 3 ) L(k 4 ). 2) Case A = p 1, B < p 1 K 5 34 K 6. 3) Case A < p 1, B = p 1 K 7 12 K 8. 4) Case A = B = p 1 K 9. Here, the composition series of the S-module K i, for every 5 i 9, is analogous to that of corresponding S-module L i from Proposition 2.5. Proof. The map V is an isomorphism of S-modules. Since the S-module structure of V Y was already determined, we can use V to describe the S-module structure of V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ). All that is necessary to do is to replace every appearance of l and L in Proposition 2.5 with k and K, respectively.
19 SIMPLE MODULES FOR SCHUR SUPERALGEBRA S(22) Image under 3. The structure of the S-module 3 (V (Y ^Y ^Y )) is given as follows. Proposition 4.4. The following statements describe S-modules isomorphic to V 3 = 3 (V (Y ^ Y ^ Y )). If A; B < p 1, then V 3 = K K K K 4. Assume A = p 1 and B < p 1. If is typical, then V 3 = V (Y ^Y ^Y ). If is (13; 23)-atypical, then V 3 = 34 L(k 4 ). If is (14; 24)-atypical, then V 3 = L(k3 ). Assume A < p 1 and B = p 1. If is typical, then V 3 = V (Y ^Y ^Y ). If is (13; 14)-atypical, then V 3 = L(k2 ). If is (23; 24)-atypical, then V 3 = 12 L(k 4 ). Assume A = B = p 1. If is typical, then V 3 = V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ). If is (13; 14; 23; 24)-atypical, then V 3 = 0. Proof. If A; B < p 1, then V 3 = K K K K 4 as in the characteristic zero case. If A = p 1 and B < p 1, then the images of generators of K 5 and K 6 are 3 (k 5 ) =! 13! 14! 23 k 5! 13! 23 k 3 and 3 (k 6 ) =! 13! 14! 24 k 6! 14! 24 k 4. The structure of V 3 follows. If A < p 1 and B = p 1, then the images of generators of K 7 and K 8 are 3 (k 7 ) =! 14! 23! 24 k 7 +! 23! 24 k 2 and 3 (k 8 ) =! 13! 14! 24 k 8! 13! 14 k 4. The structure of V 3 follows. If A = B = p 1, then! 13 =! 14 =! 23 =! 24 =!. The image of the generator k 9 of V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ) is 3 (k 9 ) =! 3 k 9! 2 k 6! 2 k 8 2!k 4 and the claim follows. 5. Fourth floor 5.1. Characteristic zero. The S-module Y ^ Y ^ Y ^ Y is the trivial module of the highest vector y 13 ^ y 14 ^ y 23 ^ y 24. The S-module V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ^ Y ) is irreducible of the highest vector l = v AB y 13 ^ y 14 ^ y 23 ^ y 24 and is isomorphic to V as S-module. Proposition 5.1. The image 4 (V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ^ Y )) = V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ^ Y ). Proof. The morphism 4 is given by 4 (l) =! 13! 14! 23! 24 l Characteristic p. Assume that the weight is restricted. The S-module V (Y ^Y ^Y ^Y ) = L(v A;B (y 13 ^y 14 ^y 23 ^y 24 )) is irreducible and isomorphic to V as S-module Image under 4. The S-module structure of 4 (V (Y ^Y ^Y ^Y )) is given as follows. Proposition 5.2. The S-module 4 (V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ^ Y )) is isomorphic to V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ^ Y ) ' V if is typical, and is isomorphic to 0 if is atypical. 6. Character and dimension of simple module L S(22) () Combining the previous results we obtain the following theorem. Theorem 6.1. The S-module H 0 G () is isomorphic to the direct sum V (V Y ) (V (Y ^ Y )) (V (Y ^ Y ^ Y )) (V (Y ^ Y ^ Y ^ Y )), where the middle summands are described in Propositions 2.5, 3.7 and 4.3.
20 20 A.N. GRISHKOV AND F. MARKO Theorem 6.2. The S-module L S(22) () is isomorphic to V 1 (F 1 ()) 2 (F 2 ()) 3 (F 3 ()) 4 (F 4 ()); where the images V 1 = 1 (F 1 ()), V 2 = 2 (F 2 ()), V 3 = 3 (F 3 ()) and V 4 = 4 (F 4 ()) respectively are described in Propositions 2.6, 3.14, 4.4 and 5.2, respectively Characteristic zero. Combining previous results we obtain the following theorem. Theorem 6.3. The simple module L S(22) (), viewed as an S-module, is isomorphic to the direct sum V 1 (F 1 ()) 2 (F 2 ()) 3 (F 3 ()) 4 (F 4 ()), where the images 1 (F 1 ()), 2 (F 2 ()), 3 (F 3 ()) and 4 (F 4 ()), respectively, are described in Propositions 2.2, 3.4, 4.2 and 5.1, respectively. Corollary 6.4. The induced module H 0 G () is isomorphic to L S(22)() if and only if is typical which happens if and only if 2 2. In order to relate the last results to Hook Schur functions, we need to explain how a simple module L S(22) corresponds to a (2,2)-hook partition = ( 1 ; : : : ; k ). The correspondence is such that 1 = 1, 2 = 2 and the partition ( 3 ; : : : ; k ) is the transpose of ( 3 ; 4 ). The character of the induced module HG 0 () is given by the formula (H0 G ()) = (1 + y1 x 1 )(1 + y2 x 1 )(1 + y1 x 2 )(1 + y2 x 2 )s (1; 2)(x 1 ; x 2 )s (3; 4)(y 1 ; y 2 ), where s (1; 2)(x 1 ; x 2 ) denotes the Schur function corresponding to the partition ( 1 ; 2 ) and s (3; 4)(y 1 ; y 2 ) denotes the Schur function corresponding to the transpose of the partition ( 3 ; 4 ). The character of L S(22) () is given by the Hook Schur function HS (x 1 ; x 2 ; y 1 ; y 2 ). Therefore, we have the following equivalence which strengthens Theorem 6.20 of [1] in the case of (2; 2)-hook partitions. Proposition 6.5. For a (2; 2)-hook partition, the following are equivalent: 1) 2 2 2) HS (x 1 ; x 2 ; y 1 ; y 2 ) = (H 0 G ()) 3) H 0 G () is isomorphic to L S(22)(). Proof. If 2 2, then in the notation of Theorem 6.20 of [1] we have (HG 0 ()) = (x 1 + y 1 )(x 1 + y 2 )(x 2 + y 1 )(x 2 + y 2 )s (x 1 ; x 2 )s (y 1 ; y 2 ) and HS (x 1 ; x 2 ; y 1 ; y 2 ) = (HG 0 ()). The remaining statements follow from Corollary Characteristic p. We give a compact formula for the character and dimension of a simple S(22) module of restricted weight. Using the Steinberg Tensor Product theorem we can then determine the same for an arbitrary highest weight. If ( 1 2 ) is a dominant weight for the algebra sl(2), then the character of a simple sl(2)-module with highest weight ( 1 ; 2 ) is given by the Schur function S (1; 2)(x 1 ; x 2 ). For a dominant weight = ( ) for the algebra S, the character S() of the simple S-module L() of the highest weight is given by S (1 ; 2 )(x 1 ; x 2 ) S (3 ; 4 )(x 3 ; x 4 ). Denote by S( 1 ; 2 3 ; 4 ) the product S (1; 2)(x 1 ; x 2 )S (3; 4)(x 3 ; x 4 ) of two Schur functions if 1 2 and 3 4 and S( 1 ; 2 3 ; 4 ) = 0 otherwise. For short, write it as S() and call it the Schur function corresponding to. Then S(k; 0l; 0) = p(k; l).
21 SIMPLE MODULES FOR SCHUR SUPERALGEBRA S(22) 21 Denote 13 = ( 1; 01; 0), 14 = ( 1; 00; 1), 23 = (0; 11; 0) and 24 = (0; 10; 1) and write the "decorated" weights derived from as follows: ~ 13 = + 13, ~ 14 = + 14, ~ 23 = + 23, ~ 24 = + 24, 13;14 = , 13;23 = , 13;24 = = 14;23 = , 14;24 = , 23;24 = , 14 = , 13 = , 23 = , 24 = , ^ = Then the S-weights of these decorated weights are given in the following table. 13 ~ 14 ~ 23 ~ 24 ~ (A; B) (A 1; B + 1) (A 1; B 1) (A + 1; B + 1) (A + 1; B 1) 13;14 13;23 13;24 14;23 14;24 23;24 (A 2; B) (A; B + 2) (A; B) (A; B) (A; B 2) (A + 2; B) ^ (A + 1; B + 1) (A + 1; B 1) (A 1; B 1) (A 1; B + 1) (A; B) We have already seen that weight 13;24 = 14;23 is of special signi cance and we shall denote it by. The space spanned by all elements of the simple module L S(22) () that lie on the i-th oor shall be called the sector of that oor corresponding to and shall be denoted by L i (). Each L i () is a S- module and to each L i () we assign a "partial" character i () that records the multiplicities of weight spaces of L i (). Then the character () of the simple module L S(22) () equals () = 0 () + 1 () + 2 () + 3 () + 4 (). The character and dimension of a simple S(22)-module L S(22) () of restricted weight are given below. Theorem 6.6. Let L S(22) () be a simple S(22)-module of restricted highest weight. If is typical, then (L S(22) ()) = S() + S( ~ 23 ) + S( ~ 13 ) + S( ~ 24 ) + S( ~ 14 ) + S( 13;23 ) + S( 23;24 ) + 12 S() + 34 S() + S( 13;14 ) + S( 14;24 ) + S( 14 ) + S( 24 ) + S( 13 ) + S( 23 ) + S(^) and diml() = 16(A + 1)(B + 1). If is 13-atypical or (13,14)-atypical, then (L S(22) ()) = S() + S( ~ 23 ) + S( ~ 24 ) + S( ~ 14 ) + S( 23;24 ) + 34 S() + S( 14;24 ) + S( 13 ) and diml() = 8 + 4A + 12B + 8AB. If is 14-atypical, then (L S(22) ()) = S() + S( ~ 23 ) + S( ~ 13 ) + S( ~ 24 ) + S( 13;23 ) + S( 23;24 ) + S() + S( 14 ) and diml() = A + 12B + 8AB. If is 23-atypical,(13,23)-atypical or (23,24)-atypical, then (L S(22) ()) = S() + S( ~ 13 ) + S( ~ 24 ) + S( ~ 14 ) S() + S( 13;14 ) + S( 14;24 ) + S( 23 ) and diml() = 4A + 4B + 8AB. If is 24-atypical,(14,24)-atypical, then (L S(22) ()) = S() + S( ~ 23 ) + S( ~ 13 ) + S( ~ 14 ) + S( 13;23 ) + 12 S() + S( 13;14 ) + S( 24 ) and diml() = A + 4B + 8AB. If is (13,24)-atypical, then (L S(22) ()) = S() + S( ~ 23 ) + S( ~ 14 ) + S()
BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)
BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n) VERA SERGANOVA Abstract. We decompose the category of finite-dimensional gl (m n)- modules into the direct sum of blocks, show that
More information12. Projective modules The blanket assumptions about the base ring k, the k-algebra A, and A-modules enumerated at the start of 11 continue to hold.
12. Projective modules The blanket assumptions about the base ring k, the k-algebra A, and A-modules enumerated at the start of 11 continue to hold. 12.1. Indecomposability of M and the localness of End
More informationLECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)
LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F) IVAN LOSEV In this lecture we will discuss the representation theory of the algebraic group SL 2 (F) and of the Lie algebra sl 2 (F), where F is
More informationMATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA
MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA These are notes for our first unit on the algebraic side of homological algebra. While this is the last topic (Chap XX) in the book, it makes sense to
More informationMODULAR REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SUPERGROUP Q(n), I
MODULAR REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SUPERGROUP Q(n), I JONATHAN BRUNDAN AND ALEXANDER KLESHCHEV To Professor Steinberg with admiration 1. Introduction The representation theory of the algebraic supergroup Q(n)
More informationCategory O and its basic properties
Category O and its basic properties Daniil Kalinov 1 Definitions Let g denote a semisimple Lie algebra over C with fixed Cartan and Borel subalgebras h b g. Define n = α>0 g α, n = α
More informationDe Rham Cohomology. Smooth singular cochains. (Hatcher, 2.1)
II. De Rham Cohomology There is an obvious similarity between the condition d o q 1 d q = 0 for the differentials in a singular chain complex and the condition d[q] o d[q 1] = 0 which is satisfied by the
More informationREPRESENTATIONS OF S n AND GL(n, C)
REPRESENTATIONS OF S n AND GL(n, C) SEAN MCAFEE 1 outline For a given finite group G, we have that the number of irreducible representations of G is equal to the number of conjugacy classes of G Although
More informationLECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O
LECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O CHRISTOPHER RYBA Abstract. These are notes for a seminar talk given at the MIT-Northeastern Category O and Soergel Bimodule seminar (Autumn
More informationThus we get. ρj. Nρj i = δ D(i),j.
1.51. The distinguished invertible object. Let C be a finite tensor category with classes of simple objects labeled by a set I. Since duals to projective objects are projective, we can define a map D :
More informationRepresentations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III
Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III Lie algebras. Let K be again an algebraically closed field. For the moment let G be an arbitrary algebraic group
More informationNOTES ON POLYNOMIAL REPRESENTATIONS OF GENERAL LINEAR GROUPS
NOTES ON POLYNOMIAL REPRESENTATIONS OF GENERAL LINEAR GROUPS MARK WILDON Contents 1. Definition of polynomial representations 1 2. Weight spaces 3 3. Definition of the Schur functor 7 4. Appendix: some
More informationLecture 4 Super Lie groups
Lecture 4 Super Lie groups In this lecture we want to take a closer look to supermanifolds with a group structure: Lie supergroups or super Lie groups. As in the ordinary setting, a super Lie group is
More informationNew York Journal of Mathematics. Cohomology of Modules in the Principal Block of a Finite Group
New York Journal of Mathematics New York J. Math. 1 (1995) 196 205. Cohomology of Modules in the Principal Block of a Finite Group D. J. Benson Abstract. In this paper, we prove the conjectures made in
More informationModular Littlewood-Richardson Coefficients
Modular Littlewood-Richardson Coefficients Jonathan Brundan and Alexander Kleshchev Introduction Let F be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p 0. We are interested in polynomial representations
More informationDECOMPOSITION OF TENSOR PRODUCTS OF MODULAR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS FOR SL 3 (WITH AN APPENDIX BY C.M. RINGEL)
DECOMPOSITION OF TENSOR PRODUCTS OF MODULAR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS FOR SL 3 (WITH AN APPENDIX BY CM RINGEL) C BOWMAN, SR DOTY, AND S MARTIN Abstract We give an algorithm for working out the indecomposable
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY IN HOMOTOPY AND THE EHP SEQUENCES FOR (p 1)-CELL COMPLEXES
REPRESENTATION THEORY IN HOMOTOPY AND THE EHP SEQUENCES FOR (p 1)-CELL COMPLEXES J. WU Abstract. For spaces localized at 2, the classical EHP fibrations [1, 13] Ω 2 S 2n+1 P S n E ΩS n+1 H ΩS 2n+1 play
More informationLECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)
LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C) IVAN LOSEV Introduction We proceed to studying the representation theory of algebraic groups and Lie algebras. Algebraic groups are the groups
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS
REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS IVAN LOSEV Introduction The aim of this lecture is to recall some standard basic things about the representation theory of finite dimensional algebras and finite
More informationEXTERIOR AND SYMMETRIC POWERS OF MODULES FOR CYCLIC 2-GROUPS
EXTERIOR AND SYMMETRIC POWERS OF MODULES FOR CYCLIC 2-GROUPS FRANK IMSTEDT AND PETER SYMONDS Abstract. We prove a recursive formula for the exterior and symmetric powers of modules for a cyclic 2-group.
More informationTopics in Module Theory
Chapter 7 Topics in Module Theory This chapter will be concerned with collecting a number of results and constructions concerning modules over (primarily) noncommutative rings that will be needed to study
More informationMAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY
MAT 445/1196 - INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY CHAPTER 1 Representation Theory of Groups - Algebraic Foundations 1.1 Basic definitions, Schur s Lemma 1.2 Tensor products 1.3 Unitary representations
More informationCOLOR LIE RINGS AND PBW DEFORMATIONS OF SKEW GROUP ALGEBRAS
COLOR LIE RINGS AND PBW DEFORMATIONS OF SKEW GROUP ALGEBRAS S. FRYER, T. KANSTRUP, E. KIRKMAN, A.V. SHEPLER, AND S. WITHERSPOON Abstract. We investigate color Lie rings over finite group algebras and their
More informationTCC Homological Algebra: Assignment #3 (Solutions)
TCC Homological Algebra: Assignment #3 (Solutions) David Loeffler, d.a.loeffler@warwick.ac.uk 30th November 2016 This is the third of 4 problem sheets. Solutions should be submitted to me (via any appropriate
More informationFrom Schur-Weyl duality to quantum symmetric pairs
.. From Schur-Weyl duality to quantum symmetric pairs Chun-Ju Lai Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in Bonn cjlai@mpim-bonn.mpg.de Dec 8, 2016 Outline...1 Schur-Weyl duality.2.3.4.5 Background.. GL
More informationNOTES ON SPLITTING FIELDS
NOTES ON SPLITTING FIELDS CİHAN BAHRAN I will try to define the notion of a splitting field of an algebra over a field using my words, to understand it better. The sources I use are Peter Webb s and T.Y
More information1 Recall. Algebraic Groups Seminar Andrei Frimu Talk 4: Cartier Duality
1 ecall Assume we have a locally small category C which admits finite products and has a final object, i.e. an object so that for every Z Ob(C), there exists a unique morphism Z. Note that two morphisms
More informationKOSZUL DUALITY FOR STRATIFIED ALGEBRAS I. QUASI-HEREDITARY ALGEBRAS
KOSZUL DUALITY FOR STRATIFIED ALGEBRAS I. QUASI-HEREDITARY ALGEBRAS VOLODYMYR MAZORCHUK Abstract. We give a complete picture of the interaction between Koszul and Ringel dualities for quasi-hereditary
More informationis an isomorphism, and V = U W. Proof. Let u 1,..., u m be a basis of U, and add linearly independent
Lecture 4. G-Modules PCMI Summer 2015 Undergraduate Lectures on Flag Varieties Lecture 4. The categories of G-modules, mostly for finite groups, and a recipe for finding every irreducible G-module of a
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009
FACTORING TILTING MODULES FOR ALGEBRAIC GROUPS arxiv:0909.2239v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009 S.R. DOTY Abstract. Let G be a semisimple, simply-connected algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of
More informationIRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS. Contents
IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS NEEL PATEL Abstract. The goal of this paper is to study the irreducible representations of semisimple Lie algebras. We will begin by considering two
More informationON TYPES OF MATRICES AND CENTRALIZERS OF MATRICES AND PERMUTATIONS
ON TYPES OF MATRICES AND CENTRALIZERS OF MATRICES AND PERMUTATIONS JOHN R. BRITNELL AND MARK WILDON Abstract. It is known that that the centralizer of a matrix over a finite field depends, up to conjugacy,
More informationALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER Let k be an algebraically closed field. varieties unless otherwise stated. 1. Definitions and Examples For simplicity we will work strictly with affine Definition 1.1. An algebraic
More information2 ERIC M. FRIEDLANDER AND ANDREI SUSLIN our functor category is closely related to the category of modules over classical Schur algebras as shown in s
COHOMOLOGY OF FINITE GROUP SCHEMES OVER A FIELD Eric M. Friedlander and Andrei Suslin A nite group scheme G over a eld k is equivalent to its coordinate algebra, a nite dimensional commutative Hopf algebra
More informationKOSZUL DUALITY FOR STRATIFIED ALGEBRAS II. STANDARDLY STRATIFIED ALGEBRAS
KOSZUL DUALITY FOR STRATIFIED ALGEBRAS II. STANDARDLY STRATIFIED ALGEBRAS VOLODYMYR MAZORCHUK Abstract. We give a complete picture of the interaction between the Koszul and Ringel dualities for graded
More informationREPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE: EXERCISES. Notation. 1. GL n
REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE: EXERCISES ZHIWEI YUN Fix a prime number p and a power q of p. k = F q ; k d = F q d. ν n means ν is a partition of n. Notation Conjugacy classes 1. GL n 1.1.
More informationPolynomial Hopf algebras in Algebra & Topology
Andrew Baker University of Glasgow/MSRI UC Santa Cruz Colloquium 6th May 2014 last updated 07/05/2014 Graded modules Given a commutative ring k, a graded k-module M = M or M = M means sequence of k-modules
More informationSCHUR-WEYL DUALITY QUANG DAO
SCHUR-WEYL DUALITY QUANG DAO Abstract. We will switch gears this week and talk about the relationship between irreducible representations of the symmetric group S k and irreducible finite-dimensional representations
More informationCellular structures using U q -tilting modules
Cellular structures using U q -tilting modules Or: centralizer algebras are fun! Daniel Tubbenhauer q(λ) g λ i M f λ j ι λ T q(λ) N g λ i f λ j π λ q(λ) Joint work with Henning Haahr Andersen and Catharina
More informationLECTURE 4: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES
LECTURE 4: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES DMYTRO MATVIEIEVSKYI Abstract. These are notes for a talk given at the MIT-Northeastern Graduate Student Seminar on category O and Soergel bimodules,
More informationSchur Algebras of Classical Groups II
Schur Algebras of Classical Groups II Qunhua Liu 1 Mathematics Institute, University of Koeln, Weyertal 86-90, 50931 Koeln, Germany. Email address: qliu@math.uni-koeln.de Abstract We study Schur algebras
More informationCommutative algebra and representations of finite groups
Commutative algebra and representations of finite groups Srikanth Iyengar University of Nebraska, Lincoln Genoa, 7th June 2012 The goal Describe a bridge between two, seemingly different, worlds: Representation
More informationMATH 101A: ALGEBRA I PART C: TENSOR PRODUCT AND MULTILINEAR ALGEBRA. This is the title page for the notes on tensor products and multilinear algebra.
MATH 101A: ALGEBRA I PART C: TENSOR PRODUCT AND MULTILINEAR ALGEBRA This is the title page for the notes on tensor products and multilinear algebra. Contents 1. Bilinear forms and quadratic forms 1 1.1.
More informationMath 250: Higher Algebra Representations of finite groups
Math 250: Higher Algebra Representations of finite groups 1 Basic definitions Representations. A representation of a group G over a field k is a k-vector space V together with an action of G on V by linear
More informationCOMMUTING PAIRS AND TRIPLES OF MATRICES AND RELATED VARIETIES
COMMUTING PAIRS AND TRIPLES OF MATRICES AND RELATED VARIETIES ROBERT M. GURALNICK AND B.A. SETHURAMAN Abstract. In this note, we show that the set of all commuting d-tuples of commuting n n matrices that
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEKS 10 11
REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEKS 10 11 1. Representations of quivers I follow here Crawley-Boevey lectures trying to give more details concerning extensions and exact sequences. A quiver is an oriented graph.
More informationSCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR U(n)
SCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR U(n) EVAN JENKINS Abstract. These are notes from a lecture given in MATH 26700, Introduction to Representation Theory of Finite Groups, at the University of Chicago in December 2009.
More informationMath 210C. The representation ring
Math 210C. The representation ring 1. Introduction Let G be a nontrivial connected compact Lie group that is semisimple and simply connected (e.g., SU(n) for n 2, Sp(n) for n 1, or Spin(n) for n 3). Let
More informationOn integrals of Quantum Supergroup U q gl(n m)
On integrals of Quantum Supergroup U q gl(n m) Jianjun Paul Tian Department of Mathematical Sciences New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88001 Abstract A linear basis of quantum supergroup U q
More informationON THE MODIFIED MOD p LOCAL LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE FOR GL 2 (Q l )
ON THE MODIFIED MOD p LOCAL LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE FOR GL 2 (Q l ) DAVID HELM We give an explicit description of the modified mod p local Langlands correspondence for GL 2 (Q l ) of [EH], Theorem 5.1.5,
More informationRepresentations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture I
Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture I Set-up. Let K be an algebraically closed field. By convention all our algebraic groups will be linear algebraic
More informationELEMENTARY SUBALGEBRAS OF RESTRICTED LIE ALGEBRAS
ELEMENTARY SUBALGEBRAS OF RESTRICTED LIE ALGEBRAS J. WARNER SUMMARY OF A PAPER BY J. CARLSON, E. FRIEDLANDER, AND J. PEVTSOVA, AND FURTHER OBSERVATIONS 1. The Nullcone and Restricted Nullcone We will need
More information4.1. Paths. For definitions see section 2.1 (In particular: path; head, tail, length of a path; concatenation;
4 The path algebra of a quiver 41 Paths For definitions see section 21 (In particular: path; head, tail, length of a path; concatenation; oriented cycle) Lemma Let Q be a quiver If there is a path of length
More informationALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS
ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS Your Name: Conventions: all rings and algebras are assumed to be unital. Part I. True or false? If true provide a brief explanation, if false provide a counterexample
More informationCOHOMOLOGY AND DIFFERENTIAL SCHEMES. 1. Schemes
COHOMOLOG AND DIFFERENTIAL SCHEMES RAMOND HOOBLER Dedicated to the memory of Jerrold Kovacic Abstract. Replace this text with your own abstract. 1. Schemes This section assembles basic results on schemes
More informationFOCK SPACE TECHNIQUES IN TENSOR ALGEBRAS OF DIRECTED GRAPHS
FOCK SPACE TECHNIQUES IN TENSOR ALGEBRAS OF DIRECTED GRAPHS ALVARO ARIAS Abstract. In [MS], Muhly and Solel developed a theory of tensor algebras over C - correspondences that extends the model theory
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n
REPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n EVAN JENKINS Abstract. These are notes from three lectures given in MATH 26700, Introduction to Representation Theory of Finite Groups, at the University of Chicago in November
More informationHighest-weight Theory: Verma Modules
Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules Math G4344, Spring 2012 We will now turn to the problem of classifying and constructing all finitedimensional representations of a complex semi-simple Lie algebra (or,
More informationLie algebra cohomology
Lie algebra cohomology November 16, 2018 1 History Citing [1]: In mathematics, Lie algebra cohomology is a cohomology theory for Lie algebras. It was first introduced in 1929 by Élie Cartan to study the
More informationVanishing Ranges for the Cohomology of Finite Groups of Lie Type
for the Cohomology of Finite Groups of Lie Type University of Wisconsin-Stout, University of Georgia, University of South Alabama The Problem k - algebraically closed field of characteristic p > 0 G -
More informationXin Tang's research paper on derivations
Fayetteville State University DigitalCommons@Fayetteville State University Math and Computer Science Working Papers College of Arts and Sciences 6-7-2011 Xin Tang's research paper on derivations Xin Tang
More informationTowers of algebras categorify the Heisenberg double
Towers of algebras categorify the Heisenberg double Joint with: Oded Yacobi (Sydney) Alistair Savage University of Ottawa Slides available online: AlistairSavage.ca Preprint: arxiv:1309.2513 Alistair Savage
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 9
REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 9 1. Jordan-Hölder theorem and indecomposable modules Let M be a module satisfying ascending and descending chain conditions (ACC and DCC). In other words every increasing sequence
More informationHopf algebroids and the structure of MU (MU)
Hopf algebroids and the structure of MU (MU) Vitaly Lorman July 1, 2012 Note: These are my notes on sections B.3 and B.4 of Doug Ravenel s Orange Book (Nilpotence and Periodicity in Stable Homotopy Theory).
More informationDecompositions of Modules and Comodules
Decompositions of Modules and Comodules Robert Wisbauer University of Düsseldorf, Germany Abstract It is well-known that any semiperfect A ring has a decomposition as a direct sum (product) of indecomposable
More informationA NOTE ON THE RADICAL OF A MODULE CATEGORY. 1. Introduction
A NOTE ON THE RADICAL OF A MODULE CATEGORY CLAUDIA CHAIO AND SHIPING LIU Abstract We characterize the finiteness of the representation type of an artin algebra in terms of the behavior of the projective
More informationTHE 2-MODULAR DECOMPOSITION MATRICES OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS S 15, S 16, AND S 17
THE 2-MODULAR DECOMPOSITION MATRICES OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS S 15, S 16, AND S 17 Abstract. In this paper the 2-modular decomposition matrices of the symmetric groups S 15, S 16, and S 17 are determined
More informationThe signed random-to-top operator on tensor space (draft)
The signed random-to-top operator on tensor space (draft) Darij Grinberg October 7, 2017 1. Introduction The purpose of this note is to answer a question I asked in 2010 in [Grinbe10]. It concerns the
More informationRELATIVE HOMOLOGY. M. Auslander Ø. Solberg
RELATIVE HOMOLOGY M. Auslander Ø. Solberg Department of Mathematics Institutt for matematikk og statistikk Brandeis University Universitetet i Trondheim, AVH Waltham, Mass. 02254 9110 N 7055 Dragvoll USA
More informationLECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES
LECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES IVAN LOSEV Introduction In this lecture we continue to study the category O 0 and explain some ideas towards the proof of the Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture. We start by introducing
More informationLECTURE NOTES AMRITANSHU PRASAD
LECTURE NOTES AMRITANSHU PRASAD Let K be a field. 1. Basic definitions Definition 1.1. A K-algebra is a K-vector space together with an associative product A A A which is K-linear, with respect to which
More information10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann
82 Andreas Gathmann 10. Smooth Varieties Let a be a point on a variety X. In the last chapter we have introduced the tangent cone C a X as a way to study X locally around a (see Construction 9.20). It
More information1 Fields and vector spaces
1 Fields and vector spaces In this section we revise some algebraic preliminaries and establish notation. 1.1 Division rings and fields A division ring, or skew field, is a structure F with two binary
More informationKraśkiewicz-Pragacz modules and some positivity properties of Schubert polynomials
Kraśkiewicz-Pragacz modules and some positivity properties of Schubert polynomials Masaki Watanabe Graduate School of Mathematical Sciences, the University of Tokyo December 9, 2015 Masaki Watanabe KP
More informationne varieties (continued)
Chapter 2 A ne varieties (continued) 2.1 Products For some problems its not very natural to restrict to irreducible varieties. So we broaden the previous story. Given an a ne algebraic set X A n k, we
More informationINTRO TO TENSOR PRODUCTS MATH 250B
INTRO TO TENSOR PRODUCTS MATH 250B ADAM TOPAZ 1. Definition of the Tensor Product Throughout this note, A will denote a commutative ring. Let M, N be two A-modules. For a third A-module Z, consider the
More informationAtypical representations of the Lie superalgebra sl(1,n) for n greater than 1
Seminar Sophus Lie 3 (1993) 15 24 Atypical representations of the Lie superalgebra sl(1,n) for n greater than 1 Hartmut Schlosser 1. Preliminaries The Lie superalgebra (LSA) sl(1, n) with n > 1 is a concrete
More informationL(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS 61 5. Root systems and semisimple Lie algebras 5.1. Characteristic 0 theory. Assume in this subsection that chark = 0. Let me recall a couple of definitions made earlier: G is called reductive
More informationQualifying Exam Syllabus and Transcript
Qualifying Exam Syllabus and Transcript Qiaochu Yuan December 6, 2013 Committee: Martin Olsson (chair), David Nadler, Mariusz Wodzicki, Ori Ganor (outside member) Major Topic: Lie Algebras (Algebra) Basic
More informationRings, Integral Domains, and Fields
Rings, Integral Domains, and Fields S. F. Ellermeyer September 26, 2006 Suppose that A is a set of objects endowed with two binary operations called addition (and denoted by + ) and multiplication (denoted
More informationRecall: a mapping f : A B C (where A, B, C are R-modules) is called R-bilinear if f is R-linear in each coordinate, i.e.,
23 Hom and We will do homological algebra over a fixed commutative ring R. There are several good reasons to take a commutative ring: Left R-modules are the same as right R-modules. [In general a right
More informationCHARACTERISTIC CLASSES
1 CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES Andrew Ranicki Index theory seminar 14th February, 2011 2 The Index Theorem identifies Introduction analytic index = topological index for a differential operator on a compact
More informationDefinitions, Theorems and Exercises. Abstract Algebra Math 332. Ethan D. Bloch
Definitions, Theorems and Exercises Abstract Algebra Math 332 Ethan D. Bloch December 26, 2013 ii Contents 1 Binary Operations 3 1.1 Binary Operations............................... 4 1.2 Isomorphic Binary
More informationLie Superalgebras and Lie Supergroups, II
Seminar Sophus Lie 2 1992 3 9 Lie Superalgebras and Lie Supergroups, II Helmut Boseck 6. The Hopf Dual. Let H = H 0 H 1 denote an affine Hopf superalgebra, i.e. a Z 2 -graded commutative, finitely generated
More informationDETECTING RATIONAL COHOMOLOGY OF ALGEBRAIC GROUPS
DETECTING RATIONAL COHOMOLOGY OF ALGEBRAIC GROUPS EDWARD T. CLINE, BRIAN J. PARSHALL AND LEONARD L. SCOTT Let G be a connected, semisimple algebraic group defined over an algebraically closed field k of
More informationThe Cartan Decomposition of a Complex Semisimple Lie Algebra
The Cartan Decomposition of a Complex Semisimple Lie Algebra Shawn Baland University of Colorado, Boulder November 29, 2007 Definition Let k be a field. A k-algebra is a k-vector space A equipped with
More informationINTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7.
INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7. 7. Killing form. Nilpotent Lie algebras 7.1. Killing form. 7.1.1. Let L be a Lie algebra over a field k and let ρ : L gl(v ) be a finite dimensional L-module. Define
More informationRepresentations. 1 Basic definitions
Representations 1 Basic definitions If V is a k-vector space, we denote by Aut V the group of k-linear isomorphisms F : V V and by End V the k-vector space of k-linear maps F : V V. Thus, if V = k n, then
More informationINTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 10.
INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 10. 10. Jordan decomposition: theme with variations 10.1. Recall that f End(V ) is semisimple if f is diagonalizable (over the algebraic closure of the base field).
More informationD-MODULES: AN INTRODUCTION
D-MODULES: AN INTRODUCTION ANNA ROMANOVA 1. overview D-modules are a useful tool in both representation theory and algebraic geometry. In this talk, I will motivate the study of D-modules by describing
More informationThe Major Problems in Group Representation Theory
The Major Problems in Group Representation Theory David A. Craven 18th November 2009 In group representation theory, there are many unsolved conjectures, most of which try to understand the involved relationship
More informationLECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS
LECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS IVAN LOSEV 18. Category O for rational Cherednik algebra We begin to study the representation theory of Rational Chrednik algebras. Perhaps, the class of representations
More informationWeeks 6 and 7. November 24, 2013
Weeks 6 and 7 November 4, 03 We start by calculating the irreducible representation of S 4 over C. S 4 has 5 congruency classes: {, (, ), (,, 3), (, )(3, 4), (,, 3, 4)}, so we have 5 irreducible representations.
More informationSolutions of exercise sheet 8
D-MATH Algebra I HS 14 Prof. Emmanuel Kowalski Solutions of exercise sheet 8 1. In this exercise, we will give a characterization for solvable groups using commutator subgroups. See last semester s (Algebra
More informationHOPF ALGEBRAS AND LIE ALGEBRAS UCHICAGO PRO-SEMINAR - JANUARY 9, 2014
HOPF ALGEBRAS AND LIE ALGEBRAS UCHICAGO PRO-SEMINAR - JANUARY 9, 2014 Hopf Algebras Lie Algebras Restricted Lie Algebras Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt Theorem Milnor-Moore Theorem Cohomology of Lie Algebras Remark
More information`-modular Representations of Finite Reductive Groups
`-modular Representations of Finite Reductive Groups Bhama Srinivasan University of Illinois at Chicago AIM, June 2007 Bhama Srinivasan (University of Illinois at Chicago) Modular Representations AIM,
More informationComputational Approaches to Finding Irreducible Representations
Computational Approaches to Finding Irreducible Representations Joseph Thomas Research Advisor: Klaus Lux May 16, 2008 Introduction Among the various branches of algebra, linear algebra has the distinctions
More informationLecture 11 The Radical and Semisimple Lie Algebras
18.745 Introduction to Lie Algebras October 14, 2010 Lecture 11 The Radical and Semisimple Lie Algebras Prof. Victor Kac Scribe: Scott Kovach and Qinxuan Pan Exercise 11.1. Let g be a Lie algebra. Then
More informationPacific Journal of Mathematics
Pacific Journal of Mathematics PICARD VESSIOT EXTENSIONS WITH SPECIFIED GALOIS GROUP TED CHINBURG, LOURDES JUAN AND ANDY R. MAGID Volume 243 No. 2 December 2009 PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 243,
More informationThe real root modules for some quivers.
SS 2006 Selected Topics CMR The real root modules for some quivers Claus Michael Ringel Let Q be a finite quiver with veretx set I and let Λ = kq be its path algebra The quivers we are interested in will
More information