arxiv: v1 [math.fa] 26 Dec 2018

Transcription

1 arxiv: v [math.fa] 26 Dec 208 COMPLEX SYMMETRIC WEIGHTED COMPOSITION OPERATORS ON DIRICHLET SPACES AND HARDY SPACES IN THE UNIT BALL XIAO-HE HU, ZI-CONG YANG AND ZE-HUA ZHOU Abstract. In this paper, we investigate when weighted composition operators acting on Dirichlet spaces DB N ) are complex symmetric with respect to some special conjugations, and provide some characterizations of Hermitian weighted composition operators on DB N ). Furthermore, we give a sufficient and necessary condition for J-symmetric weighted composition operators on Hardy spaces H 2 B N ) to be unitary or Hermitian, then some new examples of complex symmetric weighted composition operators on H 2 B N ) are obtained. We also discuss the normality of complex symmetric weighted composition operators on H 2 B N ).. Introduction Let B N be the unit ball in C N and S N denote the unit sphere. Let HB N ) be the space of all holomorphic functions on B N. Denote by SB N ) the set of all holomorphic self-maps of B N. The Dirichlet space DB N ) is defined as DB N ) = {f HB N ) : f0) 2 + fz) 2 dν N z) < }, B N where dν N z) is the normalized volume measure on B N. The Hardy space H 2 B N ) is defined as H 2 B N ) = {f HB N ) : sup frζ) 2 dσζ) < }, 0<r< S N where dσζ) is the normalized surface measure on S N. Recall that for any analytic self-map ϕ SB N ) and any analytic function ψ HB N ), the weighted composition operator is given by W ψ,ϕ f = ψ f ϕ. If ψ, we get the composition operator C ϕ. In the past five decades, the study of weighted) composition operator attracted attention of the researchers. It is very interesting to explore how the function theoretic behavior of ϕ affects the properties of C ϕ on various holomorphic function spaces. For general information about composition operator, we refer the readers to book [] for more details. 200 Mathematics Subject Classification. MSC: 47B33, 47B5, 47B38, 32A35, 32A37. Key words and phrases. weighted composition operator, complex symmetric, Hermitian operator, Dirichlet space, Hardy space. Corresponding author. The work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant Nos ; 37276; 30373).

2 2 XIAO-HE HU, ZI-CONG YANG AND ZE-HUA ZHOU An anti-linear operators C on a complex Hibert space H is called a conjugation if it satisfies the following conditions: i) involution, i.e. C 2 = I. ii) isometric, i.e. Cx,Cy = y,x for all x,y H. A bounded linear operator T on H is called complex symmetric if there exists a conjugation C such that TC = CT CTC = T ). We also say that T is a C-symmetric operator. It is well known that the general study of complex symmetric weighted composition operators on H are derived from the work of Gracia and Putinar in [5], the authors show that every normal operator is complex symmetric. Since then, many significant results about the complex symmetric weighted) composition operators are obtained. In [7], Garica and Wogen got that if an operator T is algebraic of order 2, then T is complex symmetric, so C ϕa is complex symmetric when ϕ a is an involutiveautomorphism. Furthermore, anexplicit conjugationoperatorj a = JW a on H 2 B N ) such that C ϕa = J a C ϕ a J a was given in [5]. Very recently, in [0] Jung et al. studied which combinations of weights ψ and maps of the disk ϕ give rise to complex symmetric weighted composition operators with respect to classical conjugation Jfz) = fz). In [8], Gao and Zhou gave a complete description of complex symmetric composition operators on H 2 D) whose symbols are linear fractional. Since all conjugation can be considered as a product of a J-symmetric unitary operator U and the conjugation J. Fatehi in [3] find all unitary weighted composition operators which are J-symmetric and consider complex symmetric weighted composition operators with special conjugation W ka,ϕ a J on H 2 D). Moreover, a criterion for complex symmetric structure of W ψ,ϕ on H γ D) with reproducing kernels K γ w = wz) γ, where γ N) was discovered in [2]. In [9], Yuan and Zhou characterized the adjoint of linear fractional composition operators C ϕ acting ondb N ). In [3], the authorsshowedthat no nontrivialnormalweightedcomposition operator exist on the Dirichlet space in the unit disk when ϕ is linear-fractional with fixed point p D. Motivated by these researches, we attempt to generalize some discussion into more spaces, such as DB N ), H 2 B N ). The rest of the paper is organizedas follows: First, we recall some fundamental definitions and theorems concerning our results. Then we examine the question Which weighted composition operator on DB N ) are complex symmetric?. We prove that W ψ,ϕ is J-symmetric JC Uz -symmetric) if and only if W ψ,ϕ is a multiple of the corresponding complex symmetric composition operator C ϕ. In addition, we also show that C ϕ is J-symmetric if and only if ϕz) = ϕ 0)z for z B N and ϕ 0) is a symmetric matrix with ϕ 0). We then provide characterizations of Hermitian weighted composition operators on DB N ). Moreover, we study when the class of J-symmetric weighted composition operator to be unitary or Hermitian. By providing some sufficient conditions for weighted composition operators to be both unitary and J-symmetric, then we get some new examples of complex symmetric weighted composition operators on H 2 B N ). Finally, we discuss the normality of complex symmetric weighted composition operators on H 2 B N ). 2.. Linear fractional map. 2. Preliminaries

3 COMPLEX SYMMETRIC WEIGHTED COMPOSITION OPERATORS 3 Definition 2.. A linear fractional map ϕ of C N is a map of the form ϕz) = Az +B z,c +D, where A = a j,k ) be an N N-matrix, B = b j ), C = c i ) be N-column vectors, D be a complex number, and.,. indicates the usual Euclidean inner product in C N. If ϕb N ) B N, ϕ is said to be a linear fractional self-map of B N and signed as ϕz) LFTB N ). In this paper, we identify N N-matrices with linear transformations of C N via the standard basis of C N. Definition 2.2. If ϕz) = Az+B z,c +D is a linear fractional map, the matrix ) A B m ϕ = C D will be called a matrix associated with ϕ. If ϕz) LFTB N ), the adjoint map σ = σ ϕ is defined by σz) = A z C z, B +D and the associated matrix of σ is m σ = ) A C B D, where A = a ji ) denote the conjugate transpose matrix of A. Theorem 2.3. [2, Theorem 4]) If the matrix ) A B m ϕ = C D is a multiple of an isometry on the Kreĭn space with ) I 0 J =, 0 then ϕz) = Az+B z,c +D maps the unit ball B N onto itself. Conversely, if ϕz) = Az+B z,c +D is a linear fractional map of the unit ball onto itself, then m ϕ is a multiple of an isometry. Fix a vector a B N, we denote by ϕ a : B N B N the linear fractional map ϕ a z) = a P az s a Q a z, z,a where s a = a 2, P a be the orthogonal projection of C n onto the complex line generated by a and Q a = I P a, or equivalently, ϕ a z) = a Tz z,a, where T is a self-adjoint map depending on a. We use AutB N ) to denote the set of all automorphism of B N.

4 4 XIAO-HE HU, ZI-CONG YANG AND ZE-HUA ZHOU 2.2. Spaces and weightedcompositionoperator. IntheDirichletspaceDB N ), evaluation at w in the unit ball is given by fw) = f,k w where K w z) = +ln z,w and K w 2 = +ln w 2. Let k w be the normalization of K w, then k w z) = ln w 2 )) 2 ln z,w. And in H 2 B N ) the kernel for evaluation at w is given by K w z) = z,w ) N and K w 2 = w 2 ) N, then k w = w 2 ) N 2 z,w ) N. Next we list some fundamental properties of bounded weighted composition operators. Proposition2.4. [9, Remark2.4]) If ϕ is an automorphism of B N and ψ AB N ) where AB N ) denotes the set of functions that holomorphic on B N and continuous up to the boundary S N, then W ψ,ϕ = M ψ C ϕ. Proposition2.5. [9,Proposition2.5])Suppose that W ψ,ϕ is bounded on DB N )H 2 B N )), then we have W ψ,ϕk w z) = ψw)k ϕw) z) for all z,w B N. In particular, since C ϕ = W,ϕ, we get C ϕk w z) = K ϕw) z). Theorem 2.6. [2, Theorem 6]) Suppose ϕz) = Az+B z,c +D is a linear fractional map of B N into itself for which C ϕ is a bounded operator on H. Let σz) = A z C z, B +D be the adjoint mapping. Then C σ is a bounded operator on H, gz) = z, B +D ) r and hz) = z,c +D) r are in H B N ), and C ϕ = T gc σ T h Some others notations. In this section, we first recall the first partial derivative reproducing kernel on DB N ). Let Ka D,Ka D2,...,Ka Dn denote the kernels for the first partial derivatives at a, that is It can be shown that f,k Dj a = f z j a), K Dj a = j =,2,...,n. z j, j =,2,...,n. 2.) z,a Continue to the kernels for the first partial derivatives at a, we have f,w ψ,ϕ KD k a = W ψ,ϕf,k D k a = ψa) z k fϕa))+ψa) = f, ψa) z k K ϕa) +ψa) for any k =,2,...,n and f DB N ). fϕa)) ϕ j a) ϕ j z) z k ϕ j a) z k K Dj ϕa)

5 COMPLEX SYMMETRIC WEIGHTED COMPOSITION OPERATORS 5 Thus, we have W ψ,ϕk D k a = ψa) z k K ϕa) +ψa) for any k =,2,...,n and f DB N ). In the same way, we will write f,ka Di,j = 2 f z iz j and K Di,j a = for i,j =,2,...,n. Also, we find that f,wψ,ϕ KD a = W ψ,ϕ f,ka D Therefore, = W ψ,ϕ KD a ψz) fϕz))+ψz) n ϕ j a) z k K Dj ϕa) 2.2) z i z j z,a ) 2 2.3) = { 2 ψz) z 2 fϕz))+2 ψz) +ψz) n fϕz)) ϕ j z j ) } = 2 ψa) z 2 fϕa))+2 ψa) +ψa) +...+ψa) ϕ na) z=a fϕz)) ϕ j z j ) z=a fϕz)) ϕ j z j fϕa)) ϕ j a) z j 2 ϕ j a) fϕa)) z 2 +ψa) ϕ a) z j = f, 2 ψa) z 2 K ϕa) +2 ψa) +ψa) +...+ψa) ϕ na) 2 fϕa)) z n z j ϕ j a) ) ϕ j a) K Dj ϕa) 2 ϕ j a) z 2 K Dj ϕa) +ψa) ϕ a) = 2 ψa) z 2 K ϕa) +2 ψa) +ψa) +...+ψa) ϕ na) ϕ j a) K Dnj ϕa) ). ϕ j a) K Dj ϕa) 2 ϕ j a) z 2 K Dj ϕa) +ψa) ϕ a) 2 fϕa)) z j ϕ j a) ) ϕ j a) K Dj ϕa) ) ϕ j a) K Dj ϕa) ) ϕ j a) K Dnj z ϕa) ). 2.4)

6 6 XIAO-HE HU, ZI-CONG YANG AND ZE-HUA ZHOU 3. Complex symmetric composition operators on DB N ) 3.. Complex symmetric composition operators on D. Let us start by characterize composition operators on the Dirichlet space in the unit disk which are complex symmetric with respect to the conjugation Jfz) = f z). First we give the following theorem, which limits the kinds of maps that can induce complex symmetric composition operators on DD). Theorem 3.. Let ϕ be an analytic self-map of the unit disk. Suppose that C ϕ is a complex symmetric operator on DD), then ϕ has a fixed point in the unit disk. Proof. Since C ϕ is complex symmetric with non-empty point spectrum. [4, Proposition 3.] shows that C ϕ is not hypercyclic. By [8, Theorem.], we obtain ϕ has a fixed point in the unit disk. Theorem 3.2. Let ϕ be an analytic self-map of the unit disk. Then C ϕ is J- symmetric on D if and only if C ϕ is normal. Proof. Since C ϕ is J-symmetric, it follows from [4, Proposition 2.4] that ϕz) = az for some a, and so C ϕ is normal. For the converse, suppose C ϕ is normal on D, by [, Theorem 8.2], we conclude that ϕz) = az with a. An easy calculation gives C ϕ JK w z) = JCϕ K wz), for all z,w D and hence C ϕ is J-symmetric. Remark 3.3. Indeed, every normal operator is complex symmetric, so it is natural to ask if there any complex symmetric but not normal composition operator C ϕ whose symbol is not a constant and also not involution? 3.2. Complex symmetric weighted composition operators on DB N ). Following this idea, one is interested in determining whether the J-symmetric of composition operator is equivalent to its normality for the dimension greater than. Now, we begin with the theorem that gives the sufficient and necessary condition for weighted composition operators W ψ,ϕ to be J-symmetric. Theorem 3.4. Let ϕ be an analytic self-map of B N and ψ be an analytic function on B N for which W ψ,ϕ is bounded on DB N ). Then W ψ,ϕ is complex symmetric with conjugation J if and only if ψz) = c and ϕz) = ϕ 0)z, where c is a constant and ϕ 0) is a symmetric matrix with ϕ 0). proof. If W ψ,ϕ is complex symmetric with conjugation J, then we have W ψ,ϕ JK w z) = JW ψ,ϕk w z) for all z,w B N, which implies that ψz)+ln ϕz),w ) = ψw)+ln ). 3.) z,ϕw) Putting w = 0 in Equation 3.), then we have ψz) = ψ0)+ψ0)ln z,ϕ0). 3.2) Subsituting the formula for ψz) into Equation 3.), we obtain ln z,ϕ0) )) ln ϕz),w )) = ln w,ϕ0) )) ln z,ϕw) )). 3.3)

7 COMPLEX SYMMETRIC WEIGHTED COMPOSITION OPERATORS 7 Taking partial derivate with respect to w on the both sides of Equation 3.3), we get ϕ z) ln z,ϕ0) )) ϕz),w = ln w,ϕ0) )) ϕ w) w ϕ 0) + ln z,ϕw) )) w,ϕ0). Setting w = 0 in the above equation, we have Similarly, we get ϕ z) = ϕ 0)+ ϕ k z) = ϕ k 0)+ for k =,2,...,n. So we have ϕz) = ϕ0)+ z ϕnw) w z n z,ϕw) ϕ 0) w z ϕn0) w z n z,ϕ0) ) ln z,ϕ0) )). ϕ 0) w k z ϕn0) w k z n z,ϕ0) ) ln z,ϕ0) )) ϕ 0) T z z,ϕ0) ) ln z,ϕ0) )), 3.4) here ϕ 0) T denote the transpose matrix of ϕ 0). Next, we claim that ϕ0) = 0 when W ψ,ϕ is complex symmetric with conjugation J. Note that W ψ,ϕ J K D ạ. K Dnn a = JWψ,ϕ K D ạ. K Dnn a Putting a = 0 in Equation 3.5), and by Equation 2.3), we have. 3.5) W ψ,ϕ z 2.. = JWψ,ϕ K D ) z 2 n K Dnn 0 It follows from Equation 3.6) that ψz)ϕ 2 z) = JW ψ,ϕk D 0 z). 3.7)

8 8 XIAO-HE HU, ZI-CONG YANG AND ZE-HUA ZHOU Since we obtain a precise formula for ψz) and ϕz) when W ψ,ϕ is complex symmetric with conjugation J, thus by Equation 3.2) and 3.4) we get ψz)ϕ 2 z) = ψ0)ϕ 2 0)+ln z,ϕ0) )+2ψ0)ϕ 0) ψ0) ϕ 0) ψ0) ϕ n0) ϕ j 0) ϕ j 0) On the other hand, by Equation 2.4), we have JW ψ,ϕ KD 0 z) = 2 ψ0) z 2 K ϕ0) z)+2 ψ0) ψ0) ϕ 0) and By Equation 3.2), we have Thus, and ϕ j 0) z j z,ϕ0) + z z j z,ϕ0) ) 2 ln z,ϕ0) )) z n z j z,ϕ0) ) 2 ln z,ϕ0) )). 3.8) ϕ j 0) K Dj ϕ0) z)+ψ0) n ϕ j 0) K Dj ϕ0) z))+...+ψ0) ϕ n0) ψz) ϕ 0) = ψ0) z,ϕ0) 2 ψz) z 2 2 ϕ j 0) z 2 K Dj z)+ ϕ0) ϕ j 0) K Dnj z)). 3.9) ϕ0) ϕ 2 = ψ0) 0) z,ϕ0) ) 2. ψ0) = ψ0)ϕ 0) 3.0) 2 ψ0) z 2 Then by Equation 3.4), a calculation gives 2 ϕ z) z 2 = ϕ 0) { ϕ0) z ϕn0) Fz) ϕ0) Fz) 4 = ψ0)ϕ 0) 2. 3.) z n ) 2 Fz) z 2 Fz) 2 z ϕn0) z n ) Fz) }2Fz) Fz) Fz) 4,

9 COMPLEX SYMMETRIC WEIGHTED COMPOSITION OPERATORS 9 where Fz) = z,ϕ0) ) ln z,ϕ0) )). Since F0) Similarly, we have 2 ϕ 0) z 2 = 0, so we have = ) 2 ϕ j 0) z 2 = 0 3.3) for j =,2,...,n. Putting all our information together and returning to the Equation 3.9), we get JW ψ,ϕ KD 0 z) = ψ0)ϕ 0) 2 +ln +ψ0) ϕ 0) ψ0) ϕ n0) z,ϕ0) )+2ψ0)ϕ 0) ϕ j 0) ϕ j 0) z z j z,ϕ0) ) z n z j z,ϕ0) ) Combining Equation 3.8) and Equation 3.4), we have ϕ j 0) z j z,ϕ0) ) ϕ0) = ) Finally, from Equation 3.2), Equation 3.4) and Equation 3.5) we easily deduce that ψz) = ψ0) = c and ϕz) = ϕ 0)z where c is constant and ϕ 0) is a symmetric matrix with ϕ 0). Indeed, notice that if C ϕ 0)z is J-symmetric, it is easy to show that ϕ 0) = ϕ 0), that is, ϕ 0) is a symmetric matrix. The converse is clear. Corollary 3.5. Let ϕ be an analytic self-map of B N, if C ϕ is bounded on DB N ), then C ϕ is J-symmetric on DB N ) if and only if ϕz) = ϕ 0)z for z B N and ϕ 0) is a symmetric matrix with ϕ 0). Next we consider the unitary composition operator C ϕ on DB N ). Then we can use the unitary composition operator to construct another conjugation operator on DB N ). Lemma 3.6. [9, Theorem 4.]) Let ϕ be an analytic self-map of B N. Then C ϕ is unitary on DB N ) if and only if ϕz) = Uz where U is a unitary matrix. Proposition 3.7. If U is a unitary symmetric matrix, then JC Uz is a conjugation. Using similar proof of Theorem 3.4, we also easily prove the following theorem. Theorem 3.8. Let ϕ be an analytic self-map of B N and ψ be an analytic function on B N for which W ψ,ϕ is bounded on DB N ). If W ψ,ϕ is complex symmetric with conjugation JC Uz if and only if ψz) = c and ϕz) = ϕ 0)Uz, where c is constant, ϕ 0) is a symmetric matrix with ϕ 0) and ϕ 0)U = Uϕ 0).

10 0 XIAO-HE HU, ZI-CONG YANG AND ZE-HUA ZHOU proof. Since W ψ,ϕ is complex symmetric with conjugation JC Uz, then which means that It follows from Theorem 3.4 that JC Uz W ψ,ϕ JC Uz = W ψ,ϕ ) JC Uz W ψ,ϕ = C Uz W ψ,ϕ ) J. ψuz) = ψ0) and ϕuz) = ϕ 0)z. Therefore, replace Uz by z, we have ψz) = c and ϕz) = ϕ 0)Uz, where c is constant, ϕ 0) is a symmetric matrix with ϕ 0) and ϕ 0)U = Uϕ 0). In fact, notice that if C ϕ is JC Uz -symmetric, it is easy to check that that ϕ 0)U = Uϕ 0). The converse direction follows readily from a simple calculation, so we omit the proof Hermitian weighted composition operators on DB N ). In this section, we will find out the functions ψ and ϕ when W ψ,ϕ are bounded Hermitian weighted composition operators. Not surprisingly, we will prove that no nontrivial Hermitian weighted composition operator exist on DB N ). Theorem 3.9. Let ϕ be an analytic self-map of B N and ψ be an analytic function on B N for which W ψ,ϕ is bounded on DB N ). Then W ψ,ϕ is a Hermitian weighted composition operator on DB N ) if and only if ψz) = c and ϕz) = ϕ 0)z where c is a real constant and ϕ 0) is a Hermitian matrix. Proof. Since W ψ,ϕ is a bounded Hermitian weighted operator on DB N ), then we have W ψ,ϕ K w z) = W ψ,ϕ K wz) for all z,w B N, that is for all z,w B N. Thus ψz)+ln ψz)k w ϕz)) = ψw)k ϕw) z) Letting w = 0 in Equation 3.6) gives ϕz),w ) = ψw)+ln ). 3.6) z,ϕw) ψz) = ψ0)+ln z,ϕ0) ) 3.7) for all z B N. Putting z = 0, we get ψ0) = ψ0), i.e. ψ0) is a real number. Substituting the formula for ψz) into Equation 3.6), we obtain ln z,ϕ0) )) ln ϕz),w ) = ln ϕ0),w )) ln z,ϕw) )).

11 COMPLEX SYMMETRIC WEIGHTED COMPOSITION OPERATORS Taking partial derivative with respect to w, we obtain ϕ z) ln z,ϕ0) )) ϕz),w = ln ϕ0),w )) ϕ w) w ϕ 0) + ln z,ϕw) )) ϕ0),w. Putting w = 0 in the above equation, we get Similarly, we get ϕ z) = ϕ 0)+ ϕ k z) = ϕ k 0)+ for k =,2,...,n. Therefore we obtain ϕz) = ϕ0)+ z ϕnw) w z n z,ϕw) ϕ 0) w z ϕn0) w z n z,ϕ0) ) ln z,ϕ0) )). ϕ 0) w k z ϕn0) w k z n z,ϕ0) ) ln z,ϕ0) )) ϕ 0) z z,ϕ0) ) ln z,ϕ0) )). 3.8) Taking derivative with respect to z, and putting z = 0, we have ϕ 0) = ϕ 0), that is, ϕ 0) is a Hermitian matrix. Furthermore, we obtain ϕ0) = 0, the proof is similar to that of Theorem 3.4, so we omit the details. It follows from Equation 3.7) and Equation 3.8) that ψz) = c and ϕz) = ϕ 0)z where c is a real constant and ϕ 0) is a Hermitian matrix. Conversely, if ψz) = c and ϕz) = ϕ 0)z, where c is a real constant and ϕ 0) is a Hermitian matrix. It is easy to see that W ψ,ϕk w z) = W ψ,ϕ K w z) for all z,w B N, which completes the proof of the theorem. Corollary 3.0. Let ϕ be an analytic self-map of B N, if C ϕ is bounded on DB N ), then C ϕ is Hermitian on DB N ) if and only if ϕz) = ϕ 0)z for z B N and some Hermitian matrix ϕ 0) with ϕ 0). 4. Complex symmetric weighted composition operators on H 2 B N ) In this section, we begin with some results about complex symmetric weighted composition operators with respect to the conjugation J. Then we give some nontrivial sufficient conditions for weighted composition operators to be unitary and J-symmetric. Based upon this, we obtain more new examples of complex symmetric weighted composition operators on H 2 B N ). Finally, we characterize the normality of C Uz J-symmetric weighted composition operators.

12 2 XIAO-HE HU, ZI-CONG YANG AND ZE-HUA ZHOU 4.. Unitary and Hermitian complex symmetric weighted composition operators on H 2 B N ). We first point out when the classof J-symmetric weighted composition operator is unitary or Hermitian. a Theorem 4.. Let ψz) = z,a 0 ), and ϕz) = a0 Az N z,a, where a 0 0,a 0 B N and A is a symmetric matrix such that ϕ is a self-map of B N. Then W ψ,ϕ is unitary if and only if a = λ a 0 2 ) N 2, AA a0 a T 0 = a 0 2 )I N and Aa 0 a 0 = 0, where a 0 B N {0}. In particular, if a 0 = 0, W ψ,ϕ is unitary if and only if ψz) = λ for some λ C with λ = and ϕz) = Az where A is a unitary and symmetric matrix. Proof. First recall that the adjoint of ϕ is defined by σz) = a 0 A z z,a 0, z B N. Our hypotheses show that W ψ,ϕ is J-symmetric see [7, Theorem 3.]), then by [, Corollary 3.6], we have W ψ,ϕ is a unitary operator if and only if ψz) = λkϕ N 0)z) for some complex number λ with λ = and ϕz) is an automorphism of B N. Therefore ϕ 0) = σ0) = a 0 = ϕ0), a = λ a 0 2 ) N 2. Since ϕ is an analytic self-map of B N and ϕ is one-to-one also see [7, Theorem 3.]), due to the Theorem 2.3, we have ϕz) AutB N ) if and only if ) A a0 m ϕ = a 0 is a non-zero multiple of Kreĭn isometry on Kreĭn space C N+. So we have ) ) ) ) k 2 A a 0 IN 0 A a0 IN 0 a =. 0 0 a 0 0 Then we can obtain from direct computations that If a 0 = 0 in Equation 4.3), we get for some λ C with λ = and k 2 A A a 0 a 0) = I N, 4.) k 2 A a 0 +a 0 ) = 0, 4.2) k 2 a 0a 0 ) =. 4.3) ψz) = a = λ A A = AA = I N. Thus we have ϕz) = Az, where A is a symmetric unitary matrix. Ifa 0 0inEquation4.3), weget k 2 = a 0 2, thensubstitutingtheexpression of k 2 into Equation 4.) and 4.2) we have AA a 0 a T 0 = a 0 2 )I N, Aa 0 a 0 = 0. Combining these two cases, we have our conclusion.

13 COMPLEX SYMMETRIC WEIGHTED COMPOSITION OPERATORS 3 a Theorem 4.2. Let ψz) = z,a 0 ), and ϕz) = a0 Az N z,a, where a 0 0, a 0 B N and A is a symmetric matrix such that ϕ is a self map of B N. Then W ψ,ϕ is Hermitian if and only if a is a real number, a 0 is a real vector, and A is a real matrix. Proof. We know from the [7, Theorem 3.] that W ψ,ϕ is complex symmetric with conjugation J, and note that W ψ,ϕ is Hermitian i.e. W ψ,ϕ = Wψ,ϕ ) if and only if for any z,w B N, which implies W ψ,ϕ JK w z) = JW ψ,ϕ K w z) a z,a 0 ) N ϕz),w ) N = a a 0,z ) N w,ϕz) ) N. 4.4) Putting w = 0 in Equation 4.4) we have a z,a 0 ) N = a a 0,z ) N. Thus, a is a real number and a 0 is a real vector. Combining these with Equation 4.4) we get Hence, we have ϕz) = ϕz), that is ϕz),w ) N = w,ϕz) ) N. a 0 Az z,a 0 = a 0 Az z,a 0. It follows that A is a real matrix, so we complete our proof Some new examples of complex symmetric weighted composition operators on H 2 B N ). In this section, wewill givesomenew examples ofcomplex symmetric weighted composition operators on H 2 B N ). For this purpose, we first present some sufficient conditions for weighted composition operators to be both unitary and J-symmetric. Proposition 4.3. Let Φ be an analytic self-map of B N and Ψ ba an analytic function. If Ψz) = λ, Φz) = Uz where λ =, U is a unitary and symmetric matrix or Ψz) = µ a 2 ) N 2 z,a ), Φz) = U a Tz N z,a, where µ C, µ =, Ua = a and U is a symmetric unitary matrix, and T is a self-adjoint map depending on a. Then the weighted composition operator W Ψ,Φ is unitary and J-symmetric. Proof. Clearly if Ψz) = λ and Φz) = Uz, where λ =, U is a unitary and symmetric matrix, then W Ψ,Φ is unitary and J-symmetric. Suppose that Ψz) = µ a 2 ) N 2 z,a ) N, Φz) = U a Tz z,a,

14 4 XIAO-HE HU, ZI-CONG YANG AND ZE-HUA ZHOU where µ =, Ua = a. From [, Corollary 3.6], we see that W Ψ,Φ is unitary. Notice that Ua = a, so we have UT = a 2 U + a 2 ) UaaT a 2 = a 2 U + a 2 ) aa a 2 4.5) SinceU isasymmetricunitarymatrix, wecanthenuseequation4.5)toobtainut is a symmetric matrix. Then [7, Theorem 3.] implies that W Ψ,Φ is a J-symmetric weighted composition operator. Problem 4.4. Try to give a sufficient and necessary condition for a weighted composition operator to be both unitary and J-symmetric. Note that the case for H 2 D) was solved by Fatehi [3]. Before beginning any proofs, we present an example that is simple enough that unitary and J-symmetric weighted composition operator W Ψ,Φ can be carried out concretely. Example. i) Let Φ be an analytic self-map of B N and Ψ ba an analytic function. If Ψz) = µ a 2 ) N 2 z,a ), Φz) = a Tz N z,a, where µ C, µ = and a R N B N. Then the weighted composition operator W Ψ,Φ is unitary and J-symmetric. ii) Let Φ be an analytic self-map of B N and Ψ ba an analytic function. If Ψz) = µ a 2 ) N 2 z,a ) N, Φz) = U a Tz z,a, where µ C, µ =, a = a j) with a j 0 for j =,2,...,n and U = e 2iarga e 2iarga2... e 2iargan. Then the weighted composition operatorw Ψ,Φ is unitary and J-symmetric. Next, we will use the unitary and J-symmetric weighted composition operator in constructing some special conjugations. Corollary 4.5. If Ψ and Φ satisfy the conditions in Proposition 4.3, then W Ψ,Φ J is a conjugation. Proof. The conclusion follows directly from [6, Lemma 3.2]. Next we present a sufficient and necessary condition for weighted composition operators to be W Ψ,Φ J-symmetric, where Ψ and Φ satisfy the conditions in Proposition 4.3. Most of them are direct extensions of results in [3], so we omit the details. a Theorem 4.6. Let ψz) = z,a 0 ), and ϕz) = a0 Az N z,a, where a 0 0,a 0 B N and A is a symmetric matrix such that ϕ is a self map of B N. i) For a 0, the weighted composition operator W ψ, ϕ is complex symmetric with conjugation W Ψ,Φ J if and only if ψ = Ψ ψ Φ, ϕ = ϕ Φ.

15 COMPLEX SYMMETRIC WEIGHTED COMPOSITION OPERATORS 5 ii) If U is a unitary symmetric matrix, the weighted composition operator W ψ, ϕ is complex symmetric with conjugation C Uz J if and only if ψz) = ψuz) and ϕz) = ϕuz). Due to a result of [6, Theorem 2.0], Narayan, Sievewright, and Thompson give some examples of linear-fractional, not automorphic maps that induce complex symmetric composition operators on H 2 D). The ideals in [6] may be adapted to prove when C Az+c is JW ψb,ϕ b -symmetric on H 2 B N ), where ψ b z) = k N b z) = b 2 ) N 2 z,b ), ϕ N b z) = b Tz z,b with b = I A) c, and T = b 2 I + b 2 ) bbt b. However, the result can fail when N >, we do have the following 2 restricted version. Lemma 4.7. Let γ > 0 be given. Suppose ϕ is a linear fractional map of B N into itself, then C ϕ is bounded on H γ. Lemma 4.8. Let σz) = Az +c is a linear fractional map of B N into B N. Then C σ is bounded on H 2 B N ) and we have C σ = T ψ C ϕ, where ψz) = + z, c ) N, ϕz) = A z + z, c. Proof. We know from Lemma 4.7 that C σ is bounded on H 2 B N ), then by the adjointformulaonh 2 B N ) givenbytheorem2.6, we will getthis result byasimple computation. Theorem 4.9. Let A = a i,j ) be N N-symmetric matrix, and is not a eigenvalue of A, c = c i ) be N-column vectors. Let b = I A) c B N R N, and Ab = λb for some λ C, let σz) = Az +c, then C σ is JW ψb,ϕ b -symmetric. Proof. we need to prove that C σ JW ψb,ϕ b K w z) = JW ψb,ϕ b C σk w z) 4.6) for all z,w B N, where Cσ = M A ψc ϕ = z + z, c ) N + z, c, ψ bz) = kb Nz) = b 2 ) N 2, and ϕ z,b ) N b z) = b Tz z,b with T is a self-adjoint operator depending on b. For the left side of of Equation 4.6), we have C Az+c JW ψb,ϕ b K w z) = C Az+c J b 2 ) N 2 z,b ) NK w b Tz z,b ) b 2 ) N 2 b TAz +c) = b,az +c ) NK w Az +c,b ) = = b 2 ) N 2 b,az +c ) N w, b TAz+c) Az+c,b )N b 2 ) N 2 b,az +c w,b TAz Tc ) N.

16 6 XIAO-HE HU, ZI-CONG YANG AND ZE-HUA ZHOU For the right side of of Equation 4.6), we have JW ψb,ϕ b C Az+c K wz) = J b 2 ) N 2 b Tz z,b ) NC z,b + z, c ) NK w A z + z, c = b 2 ) N 2 b,z ) N b Tz + c, z,b )N w, = ) A b A Tz z,b + b Tz, c )N b 2 ) N 2 b,z + c,b + c,tz Aw,b + Aw,Tz ) N. To see Equation 4.6) holds, by the previous calculations, it is enough to show that z T A T b b T w+z T A T Tw+c T Tw = z T b+z T Tc b T Aw +z T TAw. 4.7) Since T = b 2 I+ b 2 ) bbt b 2 and Ab = λb for some λ C, we have c = kb with k = λ and Tc = b 2 c+ b 2 )bb T b 2 kb = b 2 kb+ b 2 )kb = kb = c. 4.8) By now, if we can verify that A and T are commute, i.e. AT = TA, 4.9) then by Equations 4.7), 4.8) and 4.9), we get Equation 4.6) holds, immediately. Indeed, we just need to prove Abb T = bb T A holds. Since Abb T = A c c T c ) c T = k k) k c k = cct k 2 cct k and bb T A = c k c k ) TA = c k Ac k ) T c c ) T = k k c cc T = k 2 cct k, where we use the fact that A is a symmetric matrix, so we have Abb T = bb T A, as desired Normality of complex symmetric weighted composition operators on H 2 B N ). We turn next to the problem of identifying the when the class of complex symmetric weighted composition operators mentioned in Theorem 4.6ii) is normal. a Theorem 4.0. Let ψz) = Uz,a 0 ), and ϕz) = a0 AUz N Uz,a, where a 0 0,a 0 B N, A is a symmetric matrix and U is a unitary symmetric matrix such that ϕ is a self map of B N. Then W ψ,ϕ is normal if and only if UAAU Ua 0 a T 0 U = AA a 0a 0 and UAa 0 Ua 0 = Aa 0 a 0.

17 COMPLEX SYMMETRIC WEIGHTED COMPOSITION OPERATORS 7 Proof. Since ϕz) = a0 AUz Uz,a 0, the associated matrix of ϕ is ) AU a0 m ϕ = a T 0 U and the adjoint map σ = σ ϕ is defined by σz) = AU) z +Ua 0 + z, a 0 with the associated matrix of σ is AU) Ua m σ = 0 a 0 Thereforewehave ϕ0) = a 0 = Ua 0 = σ0), ψz) = a K Ua0 z) = a K σ0) z), by [, Proposition 4.6], we see that W ψ,ϕ is normal if and only if ϕ σ = σ ϕ. Since the multiple of m ϕ σ give the same linear fractional map, we must have W ψ,ϕ is normal if and only if m ϕ σ = km σ ϕ for some k 0. A calculation shows that ). UAAU Ua 0 a T 0U = kaa a 0 a 0), 4.0) UAa 0 +Ua 0 = k Aa 0 +a 0 ), 4.) a 0 T a 0 + = k a T 0a 0 +). 4.2) Because a 0 = ϕ0) =, by Equation 4.2), we have k =. Then combining this with Equation 4.0) and 4.), we have W ψ,ϕ is normal if and only if UAAU Ua 0 a T 0 U = AA a 0a 0 and UAa 0 Ua 0 = Aa 0 a 0, as desired. References [] C. C. Cowen, B. D. MacCluer, Composition Operators on Spaces of Analytic Functions, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 995. [2] C. C. Cowen, B. D. MacCluer, Linear fractional maps of the ball and their composition operator. Acta Sci. Math. Szeged), ) [3] M. Fatehi, Complex symmetric weighted composition operators, ArXiv e-prints 208). [4] S. R. Garcia, C. Hammond, Which weighted composition operators are complex symmetric?, Oper. Theory. Adv. Appl ) [5] S. Garcia, M. Putinar, Complex symmetric operators and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc ) [6] S. R. Garcia, E. Prodan and M. Putinar, Mathematical and physical aspects of complex symmetric operators, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor ) [7] S. Garcia, W. Wogen, Some new classes of complex symmetric operators, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc ) [8] Y. X. Gao, Z. H. Zhou, Complex symmetric composition operators induced by linear fractional maps. Indiana. Univ. Math. J. preprint, 208. [9] Y. X. Gao, Z. H. Zhou, Spectra of some invertible weighted composition operators on the unit ball. ArXiv e-prints 204). [0] S. Jung, Y. Kim, E. Ko and J. Lee, Complex symmetric weighted composition operators on H 2 D), J. Funct. Anal ) [] T. Le, Self-adjoint, unitary, and normal weighted composition operators in several variables, J. Math. Anal. Appl )

18 8 XIAO-HE HU, ZI-CONG YANG AND ZE-HUA ZHOU [2] R. Lim, L. H. Khoi, Complex symmetric weighted composition operators on H γ D), J. Math. Anal. Appl ) 0-8. [3] L. Li, Y. Nakada, D. Nestor, et al, Normal weighted composition operators on weighted Dirichlet spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl ) [4] S. Noor, Complex symmetric composition operators, arxiv: v2, 203. [5] S. Noor, Complex symmetry of composition operators induced by involutive ball automorphisms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc ) [6] S. K. Narayan, D. Sievewright, D. Thompson, Complex symmetric composition operators on H 2, J. Math. Anal. Appl ) [7] M. Wang, X. Yao, Complex symmetry of weighted composition operators in several variables, Int. J. Math ) 4pp. [8] B. Yousefi, H. Rezaei, Hypercyclic property of weighted composition operators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc ) [9] C. Yuan, Z. H. Zhou, Linear fractional composition operators on the Dirichlet space in the unit ball, Sci. China Series A ) Xiao-He Hu School of Mathematics, Tianjin University, Tianjin , P.R. China. address: huxiaohe94@63.com Zi-Cong Yang School of Mathematics, Tianjin University, Tianjin , P.R. China. address: zicongyang@26.com Ze-Hua Zhou School of Mathematics, Tianjin University, Tianjin , P.R. China. address: zehuazhoumath@aliyun.com;zhzhou@tju.edu.cn