arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 7 Dec 2018

Transcription

1 Kaons and antikaons in strong magnetic fields Anuj Kumar Singh, Neeraj Singh Rawat, Pratik Aman, and Amruta Mishra Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 7 Dec 2018 Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi , India Abstract The in-medium masses of the kaons and antikaons in strongly magnetized asymmetric nuclear matter are studied using a chiral SU(3) model. The medium modifications of the masses of these open strange pseudoscalar mesons arise due to their interactions with the nucleons and scalar mesons within the model. The proton, the charged nucleon, has effects from the Landau energy levels in the presence of the magnetic field. The anomalous magnetic moments (AMM) of the nucleons are taken into consideration in the present study and these are seen to be large at high magnetic fields and high densities. The isospin effects are appreciable at high densities. The density effects are observed to be the dominant medium effects, as compared to the effects from magnetic field and isospin asymmetry. Electronic address: anuj0630@gmail.com Electronic address: neerajrawat377@gmail.com Electronic address: pratikaman.atom@gmail.com Electronic address: amruta@physics.iitd.ac.in 1

2 I. INTRODUCTION The topic of hadrons in hot and/or dense matter has been a subject of extensive research due to its relevance in relativistic heavy ion collision experiments in various high energy particle accelerators, as well as, for study of bulk properties of astrophysical objects, e.g., neutron stars. There are huge magnetic fields produced in noncentral ultrarelativistic heavy ion collision experiments [1]. There is also natural occurrence of large magnetic fields in magnetars. The study of the effects of magnetic fields, in addition to the effects of high density and/or temperature on the properties of hadrons has emerged as an intense research topic in strong interaction physics in the recent years. The initial system of the heavy ion collisions has isospin asymmetry as the colliding nuclei have larger number of neutrons than the protons. Hence it is important to study the effects of the isospin asymmetry on the properties of the hadrons. The various approaches used for the study of in-medium properties of hadrons are the QCD sum rule approach [2, 3], the effective hadronic models, e.g., Quantum Hadrodynamics (QHD) model [4] and its generalizations, the Quark meson coupling (QMC) model [5] where the quarks/antiquarks inside of the hadron interact via exchange of scalar and vector mesons, and effective hadronic models based on low energy properties of QCD, e.g., chiral symmetry breaking, as well as, coupled channel approach. In the present work, using a chiral SU(3) model [6, 7], the medium modifications of the masses of the kaons and antikaons in asymmetric nuclear matter in the presence of strong magnetic fields are studied. The proton has contributions from the Landau energy levels in the presence of an external magnetic field. The medium modifications of kaons and antikaons arise due to the interaction with the nucleons and scalar mesons, within the chiral SU(3) model. The model has been used to study the kaons and antikaons in isospin asymmetric nuclear (hyperonic) matter [8 11], nuclear matter [7], finite nuclei [6], vector mesons [12, 13], neutron stars [14]. The in-medium masses of open (strange) charm [15 19], open bottom mesons [20, 21], charmonium [18, 22] and bottomonium states [23] have also been studied within the hadronic model by generalizing the model to the charm and bottom sectors. The partial decay widths of the charmonium states to D D pair [18, 24 26], as well as, of bottomonium states to B B [27] in the hadronic medium have been studied, from the mass modifications of these hidden and open heavy flavour mesons. Recently, the effects of 2

3 magnetic fields have been considered on the light vector mesons [28] as well as the heavy flavour mesons [29 33], through the coupling of the nucleons with the uniform magnetic field, within the chiral effective model. The effects of the anomalous magnetic moments of the nucleons [34 40] on the mass modifications of these hadrons are also studied. The outline of the paper is as follows : In section II, we describe briefly the chiral SU(3) model used to investigate the mass modifications of the kaons and antikaons in asymmetric nuclear matter in the presence of strong magnetic fields. Section III discusses the results of the medium modifications of the masses of these open strange pseudoscalar mesons in the magnetized asymmetric nuclear matter. In section IV, we summarize the findings of the present investigation. II. THE CHIRAL SU(3) MODEL We use a chiral SU(3) model [6] to obtain the in-medium masses of the kaons and antikaons in magnetized nuclear matter. The model is based on the nonlinear realization of chiral symmetry [41 43] and broken scale invariance [6, 7, 12]. The concept of broken scale invarianceleading tothetraceanomalyinqcd, θ µ µ = β QCD 2g G a µνg µνa, whereg a µν isthegluon field strength tensor of QCD, is simulated in the effective Lagrangian at tree level through the introduction of a logarithmic potential in terms of a scalar dilaton field, χ [44, 45]. The Lagrangian density of the chiral SU(3) model, in the presence of magnetic field, is given as [29, 30] L = L kin + W =X,Y,V,A,u L BW +L vec +L 0 +L scalebreak +L SB +L mag, (1) where, L kin is the kinetic energy term, L BW contains the baryon-meson interactions, L vec describes the dynamical mass generation of the vector mesons via couplings to the scalar fields and contains additionally quartic self-interactions of the vector fields, L 0 contains the meson-meson interaction terms inducing the spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry, L scalebreak is a scale invariance breaking logarithmic potential, L SB describes the explicit chiral symmetry breaking and L mag describes the effects due to the magnetic field through the coupling of the nucleons to the electromagnetic field. 3

4 Thecalculationsinthepresent workofstudyofthekaonsandantikaonsinthemagnetized nuclear matter are carried out in the mean field approximation, where the meson fields are replaced by their expectation values. We use the frozen glueball approximation, i.e., we fix χ = χ 0, the vacuum value of the dilaton field. This is due to the reason that the medium modification of the dilaton field in nuclear medium is observed to be negligible as compared to the medium changes of the scalar fields, σ, ζ and δ. The coupled equations of motions of these scalar fields are derived from the Lagrangian density of the chiral SU(3) model, and, are solved to obtain the values of these fields in the asymmetric nuclear medium in the presence of magnetic field. The interaction Lagrangian modifying the K and K mesons masses can be written as [11] L KN = i [(2 pγ µ p+ nγ µ n) (K ( 4fk 2 µ K + ) ( µ K )K + ) + ( pγ µ p+2 nγ µ n) ( K 0 ( µ K 0 ) ( µ K0 )K 0 )] + m2 K 2f 2 k [ (σ + 2ζ +δ)(k + K )+(σ + 2ζ δ)(k 0 K0 ) ] 1 f k [(σ + 2ζ +δ)( µ K + )( µ K )+(σ + 2ζ δ)( µ K 0 )( µ K0 )] + d 1 [( pp+ nn)(( 2fk 2 µ K + )( µ K )+( µ K 0 )( µ K0 ))] + d 2 [( pp( 2fk 2 µ K + )( µ K )+( nn)( µ K 0 )( µ K0 )] (2) In the above, the first term is the vectorial Weinberg-Tomozawa interaction term, which is the leading contribution in the chiral perturbation theory. This term is attractive for K mesons but repulsive for K mesons. The next to leading contributions are given by the scalar meson exchange term(the second term) and the range term(the last three terms). The parametersd 1 andd 2 inthelasttworangetermsaredeterminedtobe2.56/m K and0.73/m K respectively [11], by fitting to the empirical values of the kaon-nucleon (KN) scattering lengths for I and I =1 channels [46]. The Fourier transformations of the equations of motion for kaons (antikaons) lead to the dispersion relations, ω 2 + k 2 +m 2 k Π K( K)(ω, k ) = 0 (3) where Π K( k) denotes the kaon (antikaon) self energy in the medium. Explicitly, these self 4

5 energies are given as Π K (ω, k ) = 1 [3(ρ 4fk 2 p +ρ n )±(ρ p ρ n )]ω + m2 k (σ + 2ζ ±δ )+[ 1 (σ + 2ζ ±δ ) 2f k f k + d 1 [ρ s 2fk 2 p +ρ s n]+ d 2 [(ρ s 4fk 2 p +ρ s n)±(ρ s p ρ s n)](ω 2 k 2 ) (4) where the ± signs refer to the K + and K 0 respectively, and, Π K(ω, k ) = 1 [3(ρ 4fk 2 p +ρ n )±(ρ p ρ n )]ω + m2 k [σ + 2ζ ±δ ]+[ 1 (σ + 2ζ ±δ ) 2f k f k + d 1 (ρ s 2fk 2 p +ρs n )+ d 2 [(ρ s 4fk 2 p +ρs n )±(ρs p ρs n )](ω2 k 2 ) (5) where the ± signs refer to the K and K 0 respectively. The effective masses for K( K) are calculated using the dispersion relation given by equation (3), using the self energies for the kaons and antikaons given by equations (4) and (5). The mass of the charged kaon (antikaon) K + (K ) has an additional positive mass shift due to the presence of the magnetic field, which retaining only the lowest Landau level [29, 30], is given as m eff K = ± (m K ) 2 + eb ± (6) whereas for the neutral kaons (antikaons), K 0 ( K 0 ), the effective masses are given as m eff K 0 ( K 0 ) = m K 0 ( K 0 ) (7) In the above, m K( K) are the solutions for ω at k = 0 of the dispersion relations given by Eq. (3). III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS The in-medium masses of the K and K mesons are investigated in asymmetric nuclear matter in the presence of an external magnetic field, using a chiral SU(3) model. The medium modifications arise due to the interactions of these mesons with the protons, neutrons, and the scalar mesons (σ, ζ, and δ). In the presence of an external magnetic field B = (0,0,B), the values of the scalar fields, σ, ζ and δ in the magnetized nuclear matter are solved in 5

6 700 eb=2 m eb=4 m 2 Energy, (k )(MeV) (a) K (b) eb=6 m Energy, (k)(mev) (c).3.5 (d) eb=8 m B/ 0 B/ 0 FIG. 1: (Color online) Effective mass of K + (in MeV) plotted as a function of the baryon density (in units of nuclear matter saturation density, ρ 0 ), with different values of isospin asymmetric parameter η, accounting for the effects of the anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) for the nucleons. The results are compared with the case of not accounting for anomalous magnetic moments (shown as dotted lines). 6

7 Energy, (k)(mev) eb=2 m 2 K 0 (a) eb=4 m 2 (b) Energy, (k)(mev) eb=6 m 2 (c) eb=8 m 2 (d) B/ 0 B/ 0 FIG. 2: (Color online) Effective mass of K 0 (in MeV) plotted as a function of the baryon density (in units of nuclear matter saturation density, ρ 0 ), with different values of isospin asymmetric parameter η, accounting for the effects of the anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) for the nucleons. The results are compared with the case of not accounting for anomalous magnetic moments (shown as dotted lines). 7

8 Energy, (k)(mev) (a) K - eb=2 m (b) eb=4 m Energy, (k)(mev) eb=6 m (c) (d) eb=8 m B/ 0 B/ 0 FIG. 3: (Color online) Effective mass of K (in MeV) plotted as a function of the baryon density (in units of nuclear matter saturation density, ρ 0 ), with different values of isospin asymmetric parameter η, accounting for the effects of the anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) for the nucleons. The results are compared with the case of not accounting for anomalous magnetic moments (shown as dotted lines). 8

9 Energy, (k)(mev) Energy, (k)(mev) K 0 (a) eb=2 m eb=6 m B/ (c) 250 (b) eb=4 m (d) eb=8 m B/ 0 FIG. 4: (Color online) Effective mass of K0 (in MeV) plotted as a function of the baryon density (in units of nuclear matter saturation density, ρ 0 ), with different values of isospin asymmetric parameter η, accounting for the effects of the anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) for the nucleons. The results are compared with the case of not accounting for anomalous magnetic moments (shown as dotted lines). 9

10 the mean field approximation from their equations of motion, for given values of the baryon density, ρ B, theisospinasymmetryparameter, η = (ρ n ρ p )/(2ρ B )andthemagneticfield, B. The number density and scalar density of the charged baryon, the proton, have contributions from the Landau energy levels in the presence of the external magnetic field. The in-medium masses of the K and K mesons are calculated by using the dispersion relation given by (3), with the self-energies for the kaons (K +,K 0 ) and antikaons (K, K0 ) given by Eqs. (4) and (5) respectively. The charged K and K mesons, i.e, K ± have additional mass modifications due to the Landau quantization effects in the presence of the external magnetic field, as given by Eq.(6). The effective massses of K +, K 0, K and K 0 are plotted as functions of ρ B /ρ 0 (the baryon density in units of the nuclear matter saturation density) in Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. These are shown for various values of the isospin asymmetry parameter η, including the effects from the anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) of the nucleons. These are compared with the case that does not account for the effects from the anomalous magnetic moments (shown as dotted lines). At ρ B = 0, there are still mass modifications of charged kaons and antikaons, i.e, K ± due to the external magnetic field as can be seen from Eq.(6), while for the electrically charged neutral kaons and antikaons, i.e, K 0 ( K 0 ), there is no such mass modification for ρ B = 0 due to magnetic field. For the case of isospin asymmetry parameter, η = 0.5, the medium comprises of only neutrons, and hence the only effect of magnetic field is due to the anomalous magnetic moment of the neutrons. Hence, in the case when the AMM effects are not taken into consideration, the scalar fields, remain independent of the magnetic field. The contribution from the vector interaction (Weinberg-Tomozawa term) leads to a increase (drop) in the masses of the kaons (antikaons). The scalar mesons exchange term arising from the scalar-isoscalar fields (σ and ζ) is attractive for both K and K doublets. The first term of the range term of Eq. (2) is repulsive whereas the second term has an isospin symmetry attraction contribution for both kaons and antikaons, with contribution arising due to interaction with nucleons, i.e, proton and neutron. The third term of the range term has an isospin dependence, i.e, dependence on proton number density for kaons and on neutron number density for antikaons. 10

11 In Fig.1, the isospin asymmetry effects on the kaon K + are illustrated for values of the magnetic field eb of 2m 2 π,4m 2 π,6m 2 π, and 8m 2 π, in panels (a), (b), (c) and (d) respectively. From this plot, we see that as we move from vacuum to the dense medium, the mass of K + meson is observed to increase, with an initial rapid rise upto nuclear matter saturation density, ρ 0. The rise in the mass of K + is observed to be much slower when the AMMs are not taken into account. The effects of AMMs are observed to be large for higher values of magnetic fields and the isospin asymmetry is observed to lead to smaller changes due to AMM effects as compared to the η = 0 case. The mass shifts for the K + mesons are observed to be larger for the symmetric nuclear matter as compared to the asymmetric nuclear matter. In symmetric nuclear matter (η = 0), for ρ B = ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ), without including the effects of AMM,thein-mediummassesofK + (inmev)areobtainedas561.1(535.39),593.69(634.18), (657.01), (676.41) for eb equal to 2m 2 π,4m 2 π,6m 2 π, and 8m 2 π respectively. Including the effects of AMM, these masses are changed to (610.48), (647.46), (680.28), 656.3(712.48) respectively. The values of the K + mass in the presence of magnetic field may be compared with the values of (576) for density ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ) for zero magnetic field [11]. In the presence of magnetic field, there is additional contribution from the lowest Landau level as can be seen from equation (6). For asymmetric nuclear matter with η = 0.3, at ρ B = ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ), without including the effects of AMM, the values of the in-medium K + mass (in MeV) are obtained as (584.68), (612.12), (638.73), (666.3) for magnetic fields with eb equal to2m 2 π,4m 2 π,6m 2 π, and8m 2 π respectively. These valuesmaybecomparedwiththein-medium masses of (586.74), (619.71), (652.9) and (685.29) MeV respectively, when the effects of AMM are included. For asymmetric nuclear matter with η = 0.5, at ρ B = ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ), without including the effects of AMM, the values for the K + mass (in MeV) are obtained as (582.22), (614.48), (645.1),.27 (674.44) for magnetic fields with eb equal to 2m 2 π,4m2 π,6m2 π, and 8m2 π respectively. For the same magnetic fields, including the effects of AMM, these masses (in MeV) are found to be (582.99), (617.89), 620.6(652.04),.98(686.76). In the absence of AMM effects for the case of η = 0.5, the values of the scalar fields remain indpendent of the magnetic field, as there are 11

12 only neutrons in the system and the only effect from magnetic field is due to the anomalous magnetic moment of the neutron. Here, the dependence of the K + mesons on the magnetic field is due to the lowest Landau level contribution for K + meson. In Fig. 2 the isospin asymmetry effects on the kaon K 0 are illustrated for values of eb equal to 2m 2 π,4m 2 π,6m 2 π, and 8m 2 π, in panels (a), (b), (c), and (d) respectively. The major contribution in mass modification of K 0 meson is due to the leading term, the vectorial Weinberg-Tomozawa interaction term, which leads to an increase in the mass of K 0 from its vacuum mass of 494 MeV. The isospin asymmetry is observed to lead to larger shift in the mass of K 0 as compared to the isospin symmetric case, which is opposite of the behaviour of K + with isospin asymmetry. For symmetric nuclear matter (η = 0), at ρ B = ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ), without including the effects of AMM, the values of the in-medium mass (in MeV) of K 0 meson are obtained as (570.89), (567.17), (561.63), (553.23) for magnetic fields with eb equal to 2m 2 π,4m 2 π,6m 2 π, and 8m 2 π respectively. Including the effects of AMM, these values, are found to be (573.05), (580.03), (585.5) and (597.29) respecitvely. The valuesofthek 0 mass inthepresence ofmagneticfield maybecomparedwiththevalues of 521 (573.2) for density ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ) for zero magnetic field [11]. In the case of the neutral K 0 meson in the presence of magnetic field, the effective mass is calculated from the dispersion relation (3) and there is no additional positive contribution due to Landau level, as is the case for the K + meson. The neutral K 0 meson has been studied recently in the presence of magnetic field for electrally charge neutral matter, using the chiral SU(3) model as used in the present investigation and including one loop corrections to the kaon propagator [47]. There is observed to be a similar rise in the mass of K 0 as has been obtained in the present work. For asymmetric nuclear matter with η = 0.3, for ρ B = ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ), without including the effects of AMM, the values for the in-medium mass (in MeV) of K 0 meson are obtained as (608.12), (604.77), (601.39), (598.31) for magnetic fields 2m 2 π,4m 2 π,6m 2 π, and 8m 2 π respectively, which are modified to (610.33), (613.58), (619.29), (627.5), when the effects of AMM are considered. For asymmetric nuclear matter with η = 0.5, for ρ B = ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ), including the effects of AMM, the mass modifi- 12

13 cation(inmev) ofk 0 mesonareobtainedas529.36(647.03),529.82(652.02),530.21(659.25), (669.67) for magnetic fields 2m 2 π,4m 2 π,6m 2 π, and 8m 2 π respectively. In the absence of AMM, the mass of K 0 is independent of the magnetic field for this situation of η.5, as the medium has only neutrons in this case and the only dependence of the magnetic field of the neutrons is due to the AMM of the neutron. The mass of K 0 turns out to be (645.11) for density of ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ), when AMM of nucleons are not taken into consideration. In Fig. 3 the isospin asymmetry effects on the kaon K are illustrated for values of the magnetic field eb of 2m 2 π,4m 2 π,6m 2 π, and 8m 2 π, in panels (a), (b), (c), and (d) respectively. The major contribution in mass modification of K meson is due to vectorial Weinberg- Tomozawa interaction term which leads to a drop in the mass of K in the nuclear medium. There is positive contribution to the mass of K in the presence of magnetic field from the lowest Landau level as can be seen from equation (6. For symmetric nuclear matter (η = 0), for ρ B = ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ), without including the effects of AMM, the in-medium masses of K (in MeV) are obtained as (323.83), (377.82), (424.93), and (466.04) for magnetic fields 2m 2 π,4m2 π,6m2 π, and 8m 2 π respectively, which are changed to (324.66), (381.64), (429.29) and (473.89), while including the effects of AMM of the nucleons. The values of the K mass in the presence of magnetic field may be compared with the values of (256.7) for density ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ) for zero magnetic field [11]. For asymmetric nuclear matter with η = 0.3, for ρ B = ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ), without including the effects ofamm, thein-medium masses ofk meson (inmev) areobtainedas505.37(346.6), (397.19), (441.98), (483.04) for magnetic fields 2m 2 π,4m 2 π,6m 2 π,and 8m 2 π respectively, which are changed to (347.38), (399.85), (444.6), (488.21), while including the effects of AMM of the nucleons. For asymmetric nuclear matter with η = 0.5, for ρ B = ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ), without including the effects of AMM, the in-medium masses of K (in MeV) are obtained as (370.02), (419), (462.81), (502.84)for magnetic fields 2m 2 π,4m2 π,6m2 π, and 8m2 π respectively, which are changed to (370.34), (420.21), (465.37), 615.2(507.03), when the effects of AMM are included. In Fig. 4 the isospin asymmetry effects on the kaon K 0 are illustrated for values of the 13

14 magnetic field eb of 2m 2 π,4m2 π,6m2 π, and 8m2 π, in panels (a), (b), (c), and (d) respectively. There is observed to be a drop in the mass of K0 with density. For symmetric nuclear matter (η = 0), for ρ B = ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ), without including the effects of AMM, the values of the K 0 mass (in MeV) are obtained as (254.22), (253.26), (252.15), 453.4(249.6) for magnetic fields 2m 2 π,4m 2 π,6m 2 π, and 8m 2 π respectively, which are changed to 455.2(255.04), (257.56), (258.62), (261.98), when the effects of AMM are taken into consideration. The values of the K 0 mass in the presence of magnetic field may be compared with the values of (255) for density ρ 0 (ρ 0 ) for zero magnetic field [11]. For asymmetric nuclear matter with η = 0.3, at ρ B = ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ), without including the effects of AMM, the values of the K0 meson mass (in MeV) are obtained as (233.42), (232.57), (231.73), (231.5) for magnetic fields with eb equal to 2m 2 π,4m2 π,6m2 π, and 8m2 π respectively, which are changed to (233.96), (234.94), (235.17), (238.11), when the AMMs of nucleons are taken into consideration. For asymmetric nuclear matter with η = 0.5, at ρ B = ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ), including the effects of AMM, the in-medium masses (in MeV) of K0 meson are obtained as (223.26), (224.13), (225.78), and (228.14) for magnetic fields with eb equal to 2m 2 π,4m2 π,6m2 π, and 8m2 π respectively. In the case when the AMM of the nucleons are not considered, the nuclear medium, which consists of only neutrons for η.5, is independent of the magnetic field, and the mass of K0 for ρ 0 (6ρ 0 ) is observed to be 438 (223) MeV. IV. SUMMARY To summarize, we have calculated the in-medium masses of the kaons and antikaons in asymmetric nuclear matter in the presence of strong magnetic fields using a chiral SU(3) model. The modifications of the masses of these strange pseudoscalar mesons arise due to the leading and next to leading order terms within the chiral perturbative theory. The leading contribution (Weinberg-Tomozawa term) gives a drop (rise) of the antikaons (kaons) due to the attractive(repulsive) interaction in the nuclear matter. The next to leading contributions are due to the scalar exchange and the range terms. The effects of the anomalous magnetic moments (AMM) of the nucleons are taken into consideration in the present work. These 14

15 are observed to be appreciable for high magnetic fields at high densities. There is observed to be rise (drop) in the in-medium masses of the kaons and the antikaons with density for given isospin asymmetry and magetic fields. For the charged K ± mesons, there is additionl positive shift in the mass from the Landau level in the presence of magnetic field. The isospin effects are observed to be large at high densities. However, the density effects are observed to be the dominant medium effects as compared to the effects from the magnetic field and isospin asymmetry of the magnetized nuclear medium. Acknowledgments One of the authors (AM) is grateful to ITP, University of Frankfurt, for warm hospitality and acknowledges financial support from Alexander von Humboldt foundation when this work was initiated. [1] V. Skokov, A. Y. Illarionov and V. Toneev, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 5925 (2009); W. T. Deng and X.G.Huang, Phys.Rev. C 85, (2012); D. Kharzeev, L. McLerran and H. Warringa, Nucl. Phys. A 803, 227 (2008); K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev and H. J. Warringa, Phys. Rev. D 78, (2008). [2] M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B 147, 385 (1979). [3] M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B 147, 448 (1979). [4] B. D. Serot and J. D. Walecka, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 16, 1 (1986); S. A. Chin, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 108, 301 (1977). [5] K. Tsushima, D.H. Lu, A.W. Thomas, K. Saito, R.H. Landau, Phys. Rev. C 59, 2824 (1999); A. Sibirtsev, K. Tsushima, A.W. Thomas, Eur. Phys. J. A 6, 351 (1999). [6] P. Papazoglou, D. Zschiesche, S. Schramm, J. Schaffner-Bielich, H. Stöcker, and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 59, 411 (1999). [7] A. Mishra, K. Balazs, D. Zschiesche, S. Schramm, H. Stöcker and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 69, (2004). 15

16 [8] A. Mishra, E. L. Bratkovskaya, J. Schaffner-Bielich, S. Schramm and H. Stöcker, Phys. Rev. C 70, (2004). [9] A. Mishra and S. Schramm, Phys. Rev. C 74, (2006). [10] A. Mishra, S. Schramm and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 78, (2008). [11] Amruta Mishra, Arvind Kumar, Sambuddha Sanyal, S. Schramm, Eur. Phys, J. A 41, 205 (2009). [12] D. Zschiesche, A. Mishra, S. Schramm, H. Stöcker and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 70, (2004). [13] Amruta Mishra, Phys. Rev. C 91, (2015). [14] A. Mishra, A. Kumar, S. Sanyal, V. Dexheimer, S. Schramm, Eur. Phys. Jour. A 45, 169 (2010). [15] A. Mishra, E. L. Bratkovskaya, J. Schaffner-Bielich, S.Schramm and H. Stöcker, Phys. Rev. C 69, (2004). [16] Amruta Mishra and Arindam Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. C 79, (2009). [17] Arvind Kumar and Amruta Mishra, Phys. Rev. C 81, (2010). [18] Arvind Kumar and Amruta Mishra, Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 164 (2011). [19] Divakar Pathak and Amruta Mishra, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015, (2015). [20] Divakar Pathak and Amruta Mishra, Phys. Rev. C 91, (2015). [21] Divakar Pathak and Amruta Mishra, Int. J. Mod. Phy. E 23, 1473 (2014). [22] Arvind Kumar and Amruta Mishra, Phys. Rev. C 82, (2010). [23] Amruta Mishra and Divakar Pathak, Phys. Rev. C 90, (2014). [24] A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene and J. C. Raynal, Phys. Rev. D 8, 2223 (1973); ibid, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1415 (1974); ibid, Phys. Rev. D 11, 1272 (1975); T. Barnes, F. E. Close, P. R. Page and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. D 55, 4157 (1997). (2002). [25] B. Friman, S. H. Lee and T. Song, Phys. Lett, B 548, 153 (2002). [26] Amruta Mishra, S. P. Misra and W. Greiner, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, 153 (2015). [27] Amruta Mishra and S. P. Misra, Phys. Rev. C 95, (2017). [28] Ankit Kumar, Pallabi Parui, Sourodeep De, Amruta Mishra, arxiv: (nucl-th). [29] Sushruth Reddy P., Amal Jahan C.S., Nikhil Dhale, Amruta Mishra, J. Schaffner-Bielich, 16

17 Phys. Rev. C 97, (2018). [30] Nikhil Dhale, Sushruth Reddy P., Amal Jahan C.S., Amruta Mishra, Phys. Rev. C 98, (2018). [31] Amal Jahan C.S., Nikhil Dhale, Sushruth Reddy P., Shivam Kesarwani and Amruta Mishra, arxiv: (nucl-th). [32] Amal Jahan C.S., Shivam Kesarwani, Sushruth Reddy P., Nikhil Dhale, and Amruta Mishra, arxiv: (nucl-th). [33] Pallabi Parui, Ankit Kumar, Sourodeep De, Amruta Mishra, arxiv: (nucl-th). [34] A. Broderick, M. Prakash and J.M.Lattimer, Astrophys. J. 537, 351 (2002). [35] A.E. Broderick, M. Prakash and J. M. Lattimer, Phys. Lett. B 531, 167 (2002). [36] F. X. Wei, G. J. Mao, C. M. Ko, L. S. Kisslinger, H. Stöcker, and W. Greiner, J. Phys. G, Nucl. Part. Phys. 32, 47 (2006). [37] Guang-Jun Mao, Akira Iwamoto, Zhu-Xia Li, Chin. J. Astrophys. 3, 359 (2003). [38] M. Pitschmann and A. N. Ivanov, arxive : (math-ph). [39] V. Dexheimer, R. Negreiros, S. Schramm, Eur. Phys. Journal A 48, 189 (2012); V. Dexheimer, B. Franzon and S. Schramm, Jour. Phys. Conf. Ser. 861, (2017). [40] R. M. Aguirre and A. L. De Paoli, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 343 (2016). [41] S.Weinberg, Phys. Rev (1968). [42] S. Coleman, J. Wess, B. Zumino, Phys. Rev (1969); C.G. Callan, S. Coleman, J. Wess, B. Zumino, Phys. Rev (1969). [43] W. A. Bardeen and B. W. Lee, Phys. Rev (1969). [44] J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D 21, 3393 (1980). [45] J.Ellis, Nucl. Phys. B 22, 478 (1970); B. A. Campbell, J. Ellis and K. A. Olive, Nucl. Phys. B 345, 57 (1990). [46] T. Barnes and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. C 49, 1166 (1994). [47] R. M. Aguirre, arxiv: (nucl-th). 17