The 23rd Annual Yale Mock Trial Invitational December 1-2, 2018 New Haven, Connecticut Show Business Division

Transcription

1 Show Business Division π v. Yale A Δ v. Lafayette π v. NYU B Δ v. Penn State Alabama WLT L L L W W W W T CS: 14 OCS: 71 Jon Stewart PD PD: -8 Δ v. Haverford π v. Yale B Δ v. Hillsdale π v. William & Mary Brown WLT W W L L L L W W CS: 17 OCS: 62.5 James Corden PD PD: 10 π v. Rochester A Δ v. Tufts A π v. Yale B Δ v. Northwood A BU A WLT W T W W L W T T CS: 18.5 OCS: 69.5 Dick Clark PD PD: 23 Δ v. Fordham LC A π v. Penn State π v. Minnesota A Δ v. Rutgers A Columbia WLT L W W W L W L L CS: 20 OCS: 60 Trevor Noah PD PD: -9 π v. Columbia Δ v. Princeton A Δ v. WUSTL π v. Yale A Fordham LC A WLT W L L W W W W L CS: 15 OCS: 77.5 Seth Meyers PD PD: 23 π v. Northwood A Δ v. NYU B Δ v. William & Mary π v. Harvard Georgia State WLT L L L W L W L L CS: 12 OCS: 62 Jay Leno PD PD: -53 Δ v. Yale B π v. Haverford π v. Rochester A Δ v. Georgia State Harvard WLT L L W L W L W W CS: 14 OCS: 59 Steve Harvey PD PD: 9 π v. Brown Δ v. Harvard π v. Penn State Δ v. NYU A Haverford WLT L L L W L L W W CS: 12 OCS: 63.5 Stephen Colbert PD PD: -36 π v. Lafayette Δ v. Yale A π v. Brown Δ v. Northwestern Hillsdale WLT W L L W W W W W CS: 18 OCS: 70.5 Johnny Carson PD PD: 19 Δ v. Hillsdale π v. Alabama Δ v. Tufts A π v. WUSTL Lafayette WLT L W W L W L W W CS: 17 OCS: 67.5 Conan O'Brien PD PD: 16 Δ v. WUSTL π v. Xavier Δ v. Columbia π v. Princeton A Minnesota A WLT L W W W W L W W CS: 13 OCS: 68 Craig Ferguson PD PD: 34 Δ v. Xavier π v. WUSTL Δ v. Princeton A π v. Hillsdale Northwestern WLT W W W L L W L L CS: 15 OCS: 66 David Letterman PD PD: -14 Δ v. Georgia State π v. Rutgers A Δ v. Wesleyan A π v. BU A Northwood A WLT W W W L W L* T T CS: 19 OCS: 60.5 Vanna White PD * 0 0 PD: 41 π v. Princeton A Δ v. Wesleyan A Δ v. Xavier π v. Haverford NYU A WLT L L L L L W L L CS: 15.5 OCS: 55 Jimmy Fallon PD PD: -31

2 Show Business Division Δ v. Rutgers A π v. Georgia State Δ v. Alabama π v. Xavier NYU B WLT L L W L L L L L CS: 15.5 OCS: 53 Bill Maher PD PD: -19 π v. Wesleyan A Δ v. Columbia Δ v. Haverford π v. Alabama Penn State WLT L T L L W W L T CS: 17 OCS: 61 Samantha Bee PD PD: -1 Δ v. NYU A π v. Fordham LC A π v. Northwestern Δ v. Minnesota A Princeton A WLT W W W L W L L L CS: 16 OCS: 58.5 Bob Barker PD PD: -22 Δ v. BU A π v. William & Mary Δ v. Harvard π v. Tufts A Rochester A WLT L T W L L W L T CS: 16 OCS: 61.5 Chuck Woolery PD PD: -8 π v. NYU B Δ v. Northwood A Δ v. Yale A π v. Columbia Rutgers A WLT W W L W W L W W CS: 15 OCS: 76 Richard Dawson PD PD: 9 Δ v. William & Mary π v. BU A π v. Lafayette Δ v. Rochester A Tufts A WLT W W L L L W W T CS: 15.5 OCS: 65 Regis Philbin PD PD: 2 Δ v. Penn State π v. NYU A π v. Northwood A Δ v. Yale B Wesleyan A WLT W T W W L W* W L CS: 15 OCS: 70.5 Chelsea Handler PD * +6-7 PD: 27 π v. Tufts A Δ v. Rochester A π v. Georgia State Δ v. Brown William & Mary WLT L L L W W L L L CS: 13.5 OCS: 60.5 Larry Wilmore PD PD: -31 π v. Minnesota A Δ v. Northwestern π v. Fordham LC A Δ v. Lafayette WUSTL WLT W L L W L L L L CS: 20 OCS: 60 Pat Sajak PD PD: -3 π v. Northwestern Δ v. Minnesota A π v. NYU A Δ v. NYU B Xavier WLT L L L L W L W W CS: 12 OCS: 59 Jimmy Kimmel PD PD: -32 Δ v. Alabama π v. Hillsdale π v. Rutgers A Δ v. Fordham LC A Yale A WLT W W W L L W L W CS: 21.5 OCS: 62 Alex Trebek PD PD: 26 π v. Harvard Δ v. Brown Δ v. BU A π v. Wesleyan A Yale B WLT W W W W W L L W CS: 19 OCS: 64.5 John Oliver PD PD: 28 R1 Coin Flip: Tails. Team Code last name closer to Z gets better rank. R3 Coin Flip: Tails. Cards switch sides. *This ballot from the round between Northwood A and Wesleyan A was found to be mistabulated. Upon further examination, Tab concluded that the Defense won this ballot by 3 points. Because this error was brought to Tab's attention after the conclusion of the tournament (and thus after the 30-minute review period for Round 3), Tab cannot retroactively change Round 4 pairings or final team rankings. However, Tab would like to recognize Northwood A for an outstanding performance at the tournament. Had all else been equal, Northwood A would have finished the tournament with 6 Wins and a CS of 18.

3 Show Business Division Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 OUTSTANDING TRIAL TEAMS 1 Yale B 6 Wins; CS 19; OCS Hillsdale 6 Wins; CS 18; OCS Rutgers A 6 Wins; CS 15; OCS 76 4 Minnesota A 6 Wins; CS 13; OCS 68 5 BU A 5.5 Wins; CS 18.5; OCS Wesleyan A 5.5 Wins; CS 15; OCS Yale A 5 Wins; CS 21.5; OCS 62 8 Northwood A* 5 Wins*; CS 19; OCS Lafayette 5 Wins; CS 17; OCS Fordham LC A 5 Wins; CS 15; OCS 77.5 OUTSTANDING ATTORNEYS 20/17 π/δ Christopher Grant Northwood A 20 π Mike Kleynman Rutgers 19 Δ Evan Donaldson Fordham Lincoln Center A 19 Δ Mason Aberle Hillsdale 19 Δ Daniel Cohen WUSTL 18 Δ Rochelle Sun Rochester 18/17 π/δ Elizabeth Bays Yale A 18 Δ Sarah Shapiro Brown 17 π Andrew Sullivan Columbia 17 π Natalie Garson BU A 17 π Crystal Xue Harvard 17 Δ Daniel Richardson Alabama 17 π Katelyn Frazier NYU B 17 π Travis Knoppert Fordham Lincoln Center A 17 Δ Steven Becker Tufts A Summary OUTSTANDING WITNESSES 19 π Joe Shipley Princeton 18 π Karli Zubek Northwood A 17 Δ Ashley Alphonse Tufts A 17 Δ Daniel Bruce Haverford 17 Δ Konrad Ludwig Hillsdale 17 π Dylan Sanders BU A 17 Δ Robert Servilio Rutgers A 17 Δ Mariana Suarez-Rebling Yale B 17 π Sean Rogers Yale B 17 Δ Ashlyn Cooper Alabama Tabulation Director: Jeffrey Guo (Yale) Assistant Tabulation Director: Nick Beachy (HLS) Tabulation Room Volunteers: Ed Stern (BU); Rebecca Koper (North Central); Reilly Knorr (Minnesota); Anneliese Mahoney (George Washington); Andy Hogan (Xavier); Michael D'Ippolito (Brown)

4 Monkey Business Division π v. Northwood B Δ v. Fordham LC B π v. Yale C Δ v. MIT Amherst College WLT W T L W W L W W CS: 13 OCS: 74.5 Mandrill PD PD: 38 Δ v. Bye π v. UMass Amherst Δ v. Vermont π v. Wesleyan B Bowdoin WLT L W L L W W W L CS: 12 OCS: 65 Macaque PD PD: -9 π v. North Central Δ v. MIT π v. UMCP Δ v. Yale C BU B WLT W L L W W T W W CS: 14.5 OCS: 72.5 Gorilla PD PD: 54 Δ v. Vermont π v. Tufts B π v. Fordham LC B Δ v. Rochester B Cornell College WLT W W W L L W W W CS: 15 OCS: 71.5 Capuchin PD PD: 47 Δ v. UMBC π v. Amherst College Δ v. Cornell College π v. Tufts B Fordham LC B WLT W W W L W L L W CS: 18.5 OCS: 66.5 Langur PD PD: 12 π v. Rutgers B Δ v. GW Δ v. Northwood B π v. UPenn A Georgetown WLT W L L L W W W T CS: 14 OCS: 69 Gibbon PD PD: 27 Δ v. Wesleyan B π v. Rochester B Δ v. UPenn A π v. UMBC Gonzaga WLT L W W L L W W W CS: 12.5 OCS: 68.5 Howler PD PD: 40 Δ v. UMass Amherst π v. Georgetown Δ v. Tufts B π v. Princeton B GW WLT W W W W W L L W CS: 21 OCS: 69.5 Chimpanzee PD PD: 42 Δ v. Princeton B π v. UMBC Δ v. Rutgers B π v. UMass Amherst La Salle WLT L W W L W W L L CS: 16.5 OCS: 69 Bonobo PD PD: -15 π v. Yale C Δ v. North Central Δ v. Bye π v. Vermont Minnesota B WLT L L L T L W W W CS: 11 OCS: 66.5 Marmoset PD PD: -24 Δ v. UPenn B π v. BU B Δ v. Princeton B π v. Amherst College MIT WLT W W W L L L L L CS: 20.5 OCS: 54 Mangabey PD PD: -49 Δ v. BU B π v. Minnesota B Δ v. UMass Amherst π v. Northwood B North Central WLT L W W T L L W W CS: 16.5 OCS: 59.5 Lemur PD PD: -3 Δ v. Amherst College π v. Vermont π v. Georgetown Δ v. North Central Northwood B WLT L T W L L L L L CS: 15.5 OCS: 58.5 Saki PD PD: -42

5 Monkey Business Division π v. La Salle Δ v. Yale C π v. MIT Δ v. GW Princeton B WLT W L W T W W W L CS: 16.5 OCS: 78 Surili PD PD: -3 π v. UPenn A Δ v. Gonzaga Δ v. Wesleyan B π v. Cornell College Rochester B WLT W L L W W W L L CS: 17.5 OCS: 60.5 Aye-Aye PD PD: -38 Δ v. Georgetown π v. UPenn B π v. La Salle Δ v. UMCP Rutgers B WLT L W W L L L L W CS: 16 OCS: 56 Baboon PD PD: -21 π v. UMCP Δ v. Cornell College π v. GW Δ v. Fordham LC B Tufts B WLT W W L W L W W L CS: 20.5 OCS: 70 Tamarin PD PD: 2 π v. GW Δ v. Bowdoin π v. North Central Δ v. La Salle UMass Amherst WLT L L W W W W W W CS: 18.5 OCS: 66 Loris PD PD: 61 π v. Fordham LC B Δ v. La Salle π v. UPenn B Δ v. Gonzaga UMBC WLT L L L W W L L L CS: 18 OCS: 57.5 Guenon PD PD: -49 Δ v. Tufts B π v. Bye Δ v. BU B π v. Rutgers B UMCP WLT L L W W L T W L CS: 15.5 OCS: 66 Tarsier PD PD: 17 Δ v. Rochester B π v. Wesleyan B π v. Gonzaga Δ v. Georgetown UPenn A WLT L W W L W L L T CS: 16.5 OCS: 60.5 Bushbaby PD PD: 12 π v. MIT Δ v. Rutgers B Δ v. UMBC π v. Bye UPenn B WLT L L L W L W W W CS: 10 OCS: 69.5 Colobus PD PD: 29 π v. Cornell College Δ v. Northwood B π v. Bowdoin Δ v. Minnesota B Vermont WLT L L L W L L L L CS: 15 OCS: 53.5 Orangutan PD PD: -33 π v. Gonzaga Δ v. UPenn A π v. Rochester B Δ v. Bowdoin Wesleyan B WLT W L L W L L L W CS: 16.5 OCS: 58.5 Galago PD PD: -20 Δ v. Minnesota B π v. Princeton B Δ v. Amherst College π v. BU B Yale C WLT W W L T L W L L CS: 20 OCS: 55 Indri PD PD: -14 π v. Bowdoin Δ v. UMCP π v. Minnesota B Δ v. UPenn B Bye WLT W L L L W L L L CS: 15 OCS: 48.5 Human PD PD: -61 R1 Coin Flip: Tails. Team Code closer to Z gets better rank. R3 Coin Flip: Tails. Cards switch sides.

6 Monkey Business Division Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 OUTSTANDING TRIAL TEAMS 1 GW 6 Wins; CS 21; OCS UMass Amherst 6 Wins; CS 18.5; OCS 66 3 Cornell College 6 Wins; CS 15; OCS Princeton B 5.5 Wins; CS 16.5; OCS 78 5 BU B 5.5 Wins; CS 14.5; OCS Amherst College 5.5 Wins; CS 13; OCS Tufts B 5 Wins; CS 20.5; OCS 70 8 Fordham LC B 5 Wins; CS 18.5; OCS Gonzaga 5 Wins; CS 12.5; OCS 68.5 OUTSTANDING ATTORNEYS 19 Δ Peter Jones UMass Amherst 19 π Gabby Cabeza UPenn B 18 π Jack Beaumaster Cornell College 18 π Luke Pfister Gonzaga 17 π Courtney Cappelli Princeton B 17 Δ Jillian Pincus Wesleyan B 17 Δ Margaret Kruzner Gonzaga 17 Δ Ian Miller Amherst College 17 Δ Samantha Myers Rochester B 17 π Maya Durnal Georgetown 17 Δ Kaylee Slusser UPenn A 17 π Samantha Paralikas George Washington Summary OUTSTANDING WITNESSES 20 π Julia Cohen Tufts B 20 π Jacob Garwood La Salle 18 π Lizzie Eckert BU B 18 Δ Tyler Whitacker Tufts B 18 π Kaarish Maniar Georgetown 17 π Sean Buss George Washington 16 π Abby Fritz Minnesota B 16 π Ben Ratcliff Gonzaga 16 Δ Amrita Sarma UMBC 16 π Gavin Starr UPenn B Tabulation Director: Jeffrey Guo (Yale) Assistant Tabulation Director: Nick Beachy (HLS) Tabulation Room Volunteers: Ed Stern (BU); Rebecca Koper (North Central); Reilly Knorr (Minnesota); Anneliese Mahoney (George Washington); Andy Hogan (Xavier); Michael D'Ippolito (Brown)

7 Judges' Choice - Summary Statistics Choice by Side Side Chosen by Judge Percentage P % D 95 47% Total 202 Agreement by Side Side P % D % Total % Choice on Ties Side Chosen in Tie Percentage P 5 45% D 6 55% Total 11 Agreement by Point Differential - All Wins PD % % % Total % Agreement by Point Differential - Plaintiff Wins PD % % % Total % Agreement by Point Differential - Defense Wins PD % % % Total % Notes: [1] Each scoring judge was asked to answer, at the bottom of their blue ballot, this question: Which team put on the better performance? Their answer to this question constitutes their "judge's choice." [2] Six ballots (five won by the Defense, one by the Plaintiff) did not contain a judge's choice. One judge, even after having his ballot sent back, still refused to choose a team and wrote "HUNG JURY." [3] The figures above are calculated using ballot data from both divisions. [4] Raw data can be downloaded at