arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.other] 24 Mar 2005

Transcription

1 arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.other] 4 Mar 005 Abstract Vortices as Yukawa bosons in the two-dimensional Harmonic confinement K. K. Rajagopal A system of N vortices in a two-dimensional harmonic trap is considered. The vortices are treated as Yukawa bosons. The problem is solved using the Density functional theory within Kohn-Sham scheme. Key words: Bose-Einstein condensation; Vortices and DFT. PACS: Fi, Jp, 3.80.Pj 1 Introduction Nelson et al. [1] have shown that the statistical mechanics of the flux-line lattice (FLL) of high-t c superconductors can be studied through an appropriate mapping onto the D Yukawa boson system interacting with potential V Y (r) = ǫk 0 (r/σ) where ǫ is an energy scale and σ is a length scale having the meaning of a screening length. The function K 0 (x) being the modified Bessel function and the coefficient ǫ attached to it is the coupling strength that scales the energy of interaction. The Hamiltonian of N bosons describing this system reads H = i Λ i + i<j K 0 (r ij ). (1) Here i, j are particle indices and the de Boer dimensionless parameter is defined by Λ = h /mσ ǫ. Meanwhile the reduced density of the system is denoted by ρ = N/Aσ, where A is the surface area. These two dimensionless parameter characterize the system. Corresponding author, bose@gmx.co.uk Preprint submitted to Elsevier Science 6 March 008

2 Liquid Liquid 0.07 Solid Λ ρ 1 10 Fig. 1. The phase diagram of Yukawa bosons reproduced from Magro and Ceperley []. The pluses are transition points computed with DMC. The dashed lines at high densities is the scaling law: Λ 0.04/ ρ. On the other hand, the Hamiltonian for a system of N vortices mapped as a system of N boson interacting with Yukawa potential is written as H = i (k B T) i ǫ + i<j φ 0 8π λ K 0(r ij /λ). () The system described by the Hamiltonian () is equal to one described by Hamiltonian (1) if we set σ = λ and Λ = (πk B T) )/ ǫφ 0. Following this idea, Magro and Ceperley [] have performed a Diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) and Variational Monte Carlo (VMC) numerical calculation to calibrate the ground state vortex properties for a homogeneous D Yukawa boson system. Of particular interest to us is the phase diagram obtained for the data of (ρ, Λ) at transition points displayed in Fig (1). They observed that for a particular region Λ > 0.09 the system is dominated by kinetic energy and does not crystallize. Below this threshold however a peculiar behaviour of reentrant liquid has been observed. Which means that system is in the liquid phase at very low density as well at high density. The crystal melts on compression and expansion. Nevertheless this reentrant liquid behaviour has not been fully understood. Inspired by their work, I will investigate the ground state property of a system of N vortices mapped as N bosons interacting via D Yukawa potential V (x) = ǫ K 0 (x) confined in a D harmonic planar geometry 1 mω r. As a

3 matter of fact, the Yukawa potential has an interesting combination of short range with soft core. For small x, K 0 (x) diverges like ln(x) while for large x it decays as exp( x)/ x. The logaritmic term represents the inter-vortex repulsion and the exponential decay signifies that vortices far apart do not feel each other. 1.1 Density Functional Theory With the Yukawa potential we cannot use the similar approach used for the contact delta potential V 0 δ(r r ) in deriving a dynamical equation of motion as described in chapter 1. Here we use the Density functional theory (DFT) which is originally based on the notion that for a many-electron system there is a one-to-one mapping between the external potential and the electron density: v ext (r) ρ(r). In other words, the density is uniquely determined given a potential, and vice versa. All properties are therefore a functional of the density, because the density determines the potential, which determines the Hamiltonian, which determines the energy and the wave function. Following this train of reasoning, the inhomogeneous dilute system of N interacting bosons can be described within the second quantization language as Ĥ = Ĥ0 + drψ (r)v ext (r)ψ(r) + 1 dr dr ψ (r)ψ (r )V ( r r )ψ(r )ψ(r) = Ĥ0 + ˆV ext + ˆV int (3) where Ĥ0 = drψ (r) [ h m µ ] ψ(r) and V ( r r ) is the inter-atomic interaction potential. The annihilation and creation field operators are denoted by ψ (r) and ψ(r ) respectively and obey Bose-Einstein commutation relations: [ψ(r), ψ (r )] = δ(r r ) [ψ(r), ψ(r )] = [ψ (r), ψ (r )] = 0. (4) Let us denote the ground state of the system as g so the ground state energy is defined as E 0 = g Ĥ g and the density as n(r) = g ψ ψ g. The Hohenberg-Kohn (HK) theorem [6] guarantees that there exists a unique functional of the density, F[n(r)] = g Ĥ0 + ˆV int g, (5) irrespective of the external potential. The theorem was originally proved for fermions but its generalization also covers bosons. Following HK, we can write 3

4 the total energy functional of the system as following, E[n(r)] = F[n(r)] + drv ext (r)n(r) (6) Determination of the ground state energy follows by imposing the stationary conditions δe[n(r)] = 0 (7) δn(r) In general, the ground state cannot be determined exactly, but one has to resort to the Kohn-Sham procedure [5] to introduce an accurate approximation. The idea is to map the interacting system of interest to an auxiliary system [7]. In order to describe the auxiliary system, let us first decompose the Bose quantum field operators ψ(r) as a sum of spatially varying condensate Φ(r) and a fluctuation field operator ψ : ψ(r) = Φ(r) + ψ(r), ψ (r) = Φ (r) + ψ (r) (8) The wave function Φ(r) is also known as the order parameter and is defined as the statistical average of the particle field operator Φ(r) =< ψ >. On the other hand, the condensate density is defined in term of order parameter as n c (r) = Φ(r). In the well-known Bogoliubov approximation [8] for a dilute weakly interacting gas, in which almost all the atoms are Bose condensed, one keeps only the term up to quadratic in the non-condensate field operators ψ and ψ. When the fluctuation field is comparably small to the spatial order parameter (in an average sense, ψ Φ) one can comfortably utilise a Mean-field approach. Using the decomposition in Eq.(8) above and applying the Bogoliubov approximation, one can replace the product of field operators ψ (r)ψ (r )ψ(r )ψ(r) in the interaction energy term of Eq.(3) by ψ (r)ψ (r )ψ(r )ψ(r)= Φ(r) Φ(r ) + Φ(r) [ Φ(r ) ψ (r ) + Φ (r ) ψ(r ) ] + Φ(r ) ψ (r) ψ(r) + Φ (r )Φ(r) ψ (r) ψ (r ) + 1 Φ (r )Φ (r) ψ(r) ψ(r ) + 1 Φ(r )Φ(r) ψ (r) ψ (r ). (9) So now we are in a position to define the Hamiltonian of the auxiliary system that includes the inter-particle potential defined above as Ĥ s = dr ψ (r) ] [ h m µ ψ(r) + ˆV s + dr ψ (r)vext s (r)ψ(r). (10) where our definition of auxiliary interparticle potential reads 4

5 ˆV s = dr dr V ( r r ) Φ(r) [ Φ(r ) ψ (r ) + Φ (r ) ψ(r ) ] + 1 dr dr V ( r r )[Φ (r )Φ(r) ψ (r) ψ(r ) + Φ(r )Φ(r) ψ (r) ψ (r ) + Φ (r )Φ (r) ψ(r) ψ(r )]. (11) Thus for the ground state g s we can define the unique ground state energy functional of the auxiliary system as F s [n s (r)] = g s drψ (r) ] [ h m µ ψ(r) g s + g s ˆV s g s, (1) which does not depend on the auxiliary external potential V s ext. Hence, the total energy functional of the auxiliary system can be written as E s [n s (r)] = F s [n s (r)] + dr n(r)v s ext(r) (13) in which E s [n s (r)] can be approximated to E[n(r)] or in other word the density of the auxiliary system n s (r) is identical to the real system n(r) by choosing a proper choice of auxiliary external potential Vext. s Since the non-interacting part of Eq. (1) is equal to the non-interacting part of Eq. (5) and comparing terms in Eq.(11) with Eq. (9) we obtain the following functional relation: F[n(r)] = F s [n(r)] + dr dr V (r r )n(r)n(r ) + F xc [n(r)]. (14) The second term ˆV H is called the Hartree-energy defined as ˆV H = 1 dr dr V ( r r )n(r)n(r ) (15) in which the total density n(r) includes a non-condensate local density defined as ñ(r) < ψ (r) ψ(r) >= n(r) Φ(r). (16) The last term in Eq. (14) represents the exchange-correlation energy E xc [n(r)] and includes all the contributions to the interaction energy beyond mean field. Calculating the variational derivatives in Eq. (7) using Eq.(14), one finds δf s [n(r)] δn(r) + V H (r) + δf xc[n(r)] δn(r) + V ext (r) = 0 (17) where the Hartree field read V H (r) = dr V ( r r )n(r ). (18) 5

6 Performing a similar variational calculation on Eq. (13) we deduce that the density of the auxiliary system is identical to the actual system if Vext(r) s = V ext (r) + V H (r) + δf xc[n(r)]. (19) δn(r) 1. Interacting auxiliary system : Bogoliubov approach In general, if an interacting auxiliary system is chosen, one needs to do further analysis by using a Bogoliubov approach. We rewrite the auxiliary Hamiltonian Eq. (10) using the decomposition in Eq. (8) by Ĥ s = + drφ (r)lφ(r) + dr ψ (r)lφ(r) + drφ (r)l ψ(r) dr ψ (r)l ψ(r) + 1 dr dr V Y ( r r )[Φ (r )Φ(r) ψ (r) ψ(r ) + Φ(r )Φ(r) ψ (r) ψ (r ) + Φ (r )Φ (r) ψ(r) ψ(r )] (0) where the operator ˆL is defined by ˆL ( ) m + V ext s µ. (1) In order to diagonalize Eq. (0), we first eliminate the terms linear in ψ and ψ by requiring that Φ(r) satisfy the equation Hence our auxiliary Hamiltonian Eq. (0)reduces to ˆLΦ(r) = 0. () Ĥ s = dr ψ (r)l ψ(r) + dr dr V ( r r )Φ (r )Φ(r) ψ (r) ψ(r ) + 1 dr dr V ( r r )[Φ(r )Φ(r) ψ (r) ψ (r ) + Φ (r )Φ (r) ψ(r) ψ(r )]. (3) The quadratic expression given by this equation can be diagonalized by the usual Bogoliubov transformation [8] ψ(r) = i ψ (r) = i [u j (r)α j v j (r)α j] [u j (r)α j v j (r)α j ], (4) 6

7 where the quasiparticle operators α i and α i satisfy Bose commutation relations. The values of u i and v i are obtained by solving the following coupled Bogoliubov equations: ˆLu i + + dr V ( r r )Φ (r )Φ(r)u i (r ) dr V ( r r )Φ(r )Φ(r)v i (r ) = E i u i (r) (5) and ˆLv i + + dr V ( r r )Φ (r)φ(r )v i (r ) dr V ( r r )Φ (r)φ (r)u i (r ) = E i v i (r). (6) Hence with the solution of u i and v i from the above coupled equations, the Hamiltonian in Eq. (0) can be shown to reduce to Ĥ s new = i E i dr v j (r) + i E i α iα i, (7) which describes a non-interacting gas of quasiparticles of energy E j. The ground state expectation value of Eq. (7) is given by E s 0 = i E i dr v j (r), (8) taking into consideration that the ground state g s obeys α g s = 0. Besides, using Eq. (??), the local non-condensate density defined in Eq. (16) can be written as ñ(r ) g s ψ (r) ψ(r) g s = v i (r). (9) i Thus performing a little algebra, the new auxiliary functional which includes depletion of the condensate is defined by F s [n(r)] = ( ) drφ (r) m µ Φ(r) i dr v i (r) [E j + V s (r)]. (30) The key element in the above derivation is that one can take into account the depletion of the condensate as shown in Eq. (9). Using the the auxiliary system defined by the Hamiltonian Eq. (10) and the relation in Eq (19), both the condensate density n c Φ(r) and also the total density n(r) can be computed. The difficulties in finding the solution for Eq. (), Eqs (5) and (6) lies in the fact that the exact functional dependence of the exchange-correlation 7

8 potential v xc [n(r)] = δf xc [n(r)]/δn(r) is unknown for most of the system of interest and thus one has to resort to approximations such as the Local Density Approximation (LDA). 1.3 Application of DFT to N vortex problem We are now in a position to analyse our problem of N vortices treated as N Yukawa bosons via the one-to-one mapping of Nelson and Seung [1] with the DFT tool summarized in the previous section within our approriate scaling. By choosing an auxiliary system of N non-interacting bosons (referring to Eq. (1) and Eq. (19)), Eq. () then can be written more explicitly as satisfying the following equation: ( h m + V ext (r) + V H (r) + δf ) xc[n(r)] Φ(r) = µφ(r). (31) δn(r) This equation is a sort of generalization of Gross-Pitaevskii equation for a dilute inhomogeneous gas at T = 0. Since we have chosen a non-interacting auxillary system, we expect that at T = 0 all the atoms are Bose condensed as their total density n(r) is approximated by condensate density n c (r) = Φ(r). Setting F xc [n(r)] = 0 one recovers a closed non-linear Schrödinger equation (NLSE). The available numerical data of Magro and Ceperley [] and Strepparola et. al [3] permit one to obtain information on the homogeneous excess free energy f ex [n] rather than the homogeneous exchange correlation energy f xc [n]. Thus it is much convenient to work with excess free energy defined as [9] F ex [n(r)] = ˆV H [n(r)] + F xc [n(r)]. (3) In general, the excess correlation functional energy F ex [n(r)] in a DFT calculation is not known exactly. One can resort to approximations such as the Local density approximation (LDA) which reads, F ex [n(r)] drf hom ex [n] n n(r) (33) where Fex hom [n] = nfex hom [n]. The functional derivatives (excess-correlation potential) of the above relation can be written as [10] V ex (r, n(r)) = δf ex[n(r)] δn(r) = (nf ex[n]) n n(r). (34) n Information of the homogeneous excess correlation energy f ex [n] can be obtained by subtracting the kinetic energy from the total ground state energy of 8

9 a homogeneous system with N boson. A plot of the DMC data of Magro and Ceperley [] and the STLS data of Strepparola et. al. [3] are depicted along with the following fit f ex [ρ] = ρ ln(1/ρ), (35) in Fig (). To be consistent with the scaling of Magro and Ceperley [] I will scale all lengths by harmonic oscillator length σ = h/mω and the energy by ǫ = hω /. Eq. (31) is solved numerically by using the excess correlation potentials of Eq.(34) and Eq. (35) self-consistently with the condition that the areal integral of the condensate density Φ(r) is equal to the total number N of bosons. 9

10 fex[ρ] ρ 1 Fig.. Homogeneous excess-correlation energy f ex (ρ) versus the dimensionless homogenous density ρ gas of the VMC data of Magro and Ceperley [] (pluses) and STLS data of Strepparola et. al. [3] (crosses) compared to the fit function Eq. (35) (dashed-lines) N = 50 n(r) a ho /N N = r/a ho Fig. 3. Density profiles n(r) ( in units a ho /N, with a ho = h/mω ) versus the radial distance r (in units a ho ) obtained using Eq.(31) for N = 50 and N = 100 bosons 10

11 Acknowledgement I would like to acknowledge SNS Pisa for the hospitability and financial support during early part of this work. 11

12 References [1] D. R. Nelson and S. Seung. Phys. Rev. B, 39:9153, [] W. R. Magro and D. M. Ceperley. Phys. Rev. B, 48:411, [3] E. Strepparola and R. Nifosi and M. P. Tosi. J. Phys: Condens. Matter, 10:11645, [4] A. Görlitz, J. M. Vogels, A. E. Leanhardt, C. Raman, T. L. Gustavson, J. R. Abo-Shaeer, A. P. Chikkatur, S. Gupta, S. Inouye, T. Rosenband, and W. Ketterle. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87:13040, 001. [5] W. Kohn and L. J. Sham. Phys. Rev., 140:1133, [6] P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn. Phys. Rev., B136:864, [7] A. Griffin cond-matt/ , [8] N. Bogoliubov J. Phys. USSR, 11:3, [9] S. Moroni and G. Senatore. Phys. Rev. B., 44:9864, [10] A. P. Albus, F. Illuminati and M. Wilkins. Phys. Rev. A., 67:063606,