York University. Faculty of Science and Engineering MATH 1090, Section M Final Examination, April NAME (print, in ink): Instructions, remarks:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "York University. Faculty of Science and Engineering MATH 1090, Section M Final Examination, April NAME (print, in ink): Instructions, remarks:"

Transcription

1 York University Faculty of Science and Engineering MATH 1090, Section M ination, NAME (print, in ink): (Family name) (Given name) Instructions, remarks: 1. In general, carefully read all instructions in a problem before beginning it. Make sure you have problems 1 through You have 180 minutes. If you run out of space, continue on the backs of pages. Do not waste your time giving more detail than is asked for. 3. Note: Everywhere in this exam, unless otherwise indicated, the word prove in a problem means give a syntactic proof of. You are NOT allowed to use Completeness (i.e., tautological implication, i.e., Post s theorem) in ANY step of ANY proof on this exam. Proofs can be either Hilbert-style or equational or a mix, unless one type or the other is required in the instructions. (And, as we know, bullet proofs are always equational.) 4. Unless otherwise stated in a problem, it is understood that in solving a problem, you may use any result from an earlier problem on this exam or from an earlier part of the same problem, EVEN IF you did not prove the earlier result. 5. The marks assigned to a problem do NOT necessarily correspond to its difficulty. There are 127 marks available on this exam, but it will be marked out of 100. Problem Marks Name 2 Total 127

2 Page 1 1. Give a bullet proof that p (q p) p q. (I guess I know of only one way to start the proof or at least only one best way according to our general strategy for approaching bullet proofs the troublesome connective here is find a way to get rid of it. Bullet always means no ping-pong, no D.T.) 2. Give a bullet proof that, for any wffs A and B, ( A B) (A B).

3 Page 2 3. One of the following wffs A, B is a theorem; the other is not. A is ( (p q) q ) p. B is ( (p q) p ) q. (a) Give a bullet proof of the theorem. (The Deduction Theorem is NOT allowed in this problem. You may use any theorems on your lists; you may also use Shunting: (C D) E C (D E). You may not use other theorems than the ones mentioned above unless you prove them first.) (b) Explain carefully, using and naming facts from the course, how we know that the other wff is not a theorem.

4 Page 3 4. GIVE A BULLET PROOF that the wff below is a theorem. In your proof, you may use any theorem on your lists. (p r) (p q) q (r p) (Getting rid of the arrows in a SMART way gives a very short proof. Note also that the first disjunction has a in it, and the third does not. That might remind you of something.)

5 5. Several unrelated problems. Page 4 (a) State the Completeness Theorem, as given in class. (It can be stated the same way for predicate logic as for boolean logic, with the same symbols. So you don t have to say which logic you are talking about; it works for both.) (b) State the general form of the Deduction Theorem, as given in class. (Again, the same version works in both boolean and predicate logic.) (c) State the general form of the Soundness Theorem, as given in class. (Same comment as in parts (a), (b).)

6 Page 5 (d) In each case below, finish the sentence in one of two ways. Either write undefined., or not defined., or write out the wff that results from the substitution (write it out without [ := ] notation, of course). You may show work or explain, or not, as you prefer. Correct answers without explanation will get full marks. Wrong answers with no explanation get 0. Wrong answers with some relevant explanation MAY get part marks. w, x, y and z here are really the variables they seem to be. They are four different variables. There is a superfluous pair of parentheses in part iv. below (and, later, in part (e)), to clarify what is being asked. i. ( ( x)(( y) (y = z)) ) [z := y] is ii. ( ( x)(( y) (y = z)) ) [y := x] is iii. ( ( x)(( y) (y = z)) ) [y := w] is iv. ((y = w) [w := y]) [y := w] is (e) True or false?: For all wffs A and all object variables x, y, (A [x := y]) [y := x] is A. Justify your answer.

7 Page 6 6. Let A and B be wffs. Give a BULLET proof that ( x) (A B) ( x) A ( x) B. You may use any theorem on the lists that you have. 7. Using any method you like, and anything on your lists, prove syntactically that, for any wff A, ( x)a ( x)a.

8 Page 7 8. (a) Give a Hilbert-style proof that (x = y y = x). (b) Give a VERY short Hilbert proof that, for any boolean wffs A, B, D, (D (A B)) (D (B A)) is a theorem. Explain every little thing in your proof, using standard Hilbert format.

9 Page 8 9. (a) A very short, easy proof of this fact was posted on the course page: If x dnof in a wff D, then ( x) D D. Now take this fact as GIVEN, and use it to prove that if x dnof in D then ( x) D D. (b) Suppose that x does not occur in ( y)a. Prove that it is. The following wff is then a theorem. ( x) ( A[y := x] ( y) A ) (But FIRST: See bottom of page.) Note: A bullet proof works. First use our favourite way to get rid of an arrow. Then use Problem 6 even if you didn t prove it, then part (a) above, to simplify something. Finally: Look again at the first sentence of 9.(b). Why is dno there rather than dnof?

10 Page Give a bullet proof that, for all wffs A, B, ( x)(a ( x)b) (( x)a ( x)b) is a theorem. (There is a very short proof.)

11 Page Prove the following English statement. (Using the Deduction Theorem is strongly recommended here.) Given any wffs P, Q, R, if y dnof in R and x dnof in Q, then ( x)( R ( y)(q P ) ) ( y)( Q ( x)(r P ) ). You may NOT use Ax3 in your proof. I want a proof that uses our basic techniques but does not use Ax3. Before jumping into the proof, THINK about what combination of standard techniques will lead to a proof. If your proof used Ax3, go back and find a new proof.

12 Page Use metatheorem to prove that { ( x)(a B), ( x)a } ( x)b. No credit will be given for a proof that does not use (This was an example in our text, understanding which I recommended as good exam preparation.) Write up the proof as such proofs are written in our text, and in accordance with the wording of on the sheets you have at this exam.

13 Page Show that ( x)(a B) A ( x)b is, in general, NOT a theorem. In particular, find specific wffs A and B such that the above conditional is NOT a theorem. (Look at if you did not already think of doing that.) Explain in detail, using facts from the course, how you KNOW that the above conditional is not a theorem, for your A and B. 14. Let φ be a 2-ary predicate symbol. Find a model in which the following wff interprets as true: ( x)( y)(φ(x, y)) ( x)( y)( z)( ( φ(x, y) φ(y, z) ) φ(x, z) ) ( x)( φ(x, x)) Don t explain unless you want to. Just name the domain, D, and the interpretation of φ(, ).

MATH 1090 Problem Set #3 Solutions March York University

MATH 1090 Problem Set #3 Solutions March York University York University Faculties of Science and Engineering, Arts, Atkinson MATH 1090. Problem Set #3 Solutions Section M 1. Use Resolution (possibly in combination with the Deduction Theorem, Implication as

More information

Chapter 1 Review of Equations and Inequalities

Chapter 1 Review of Equations and Inequalities Chapter 1 Review of Equations and Inequalities Part I Review of Basic Equations Recall that an equation is an expression with an equal sign in the middle. Also recall that, if a question asks you to solve

More information

AI Principles, Semester 2, Week 2, Lecture 5 Propositional Logic and Predicate Logic

AI Principles, Semester 2, Week 2, Lecture 5 Propositional Logic and Predicate Logic AI Principles, Semester 2, Week 2, Lecture 5 Propositional Logic and Predicate Logic Propositional logic Logical connectives Rules for wffs Truth tables for the connectives Using Truth Tables to evaluate

More information

Final Exam Theory Quiz Answer Page

Final Exam Theory Quiz Answer Page Philosophy 120 Introduction to Logic Final Exam Theory Quiz Answer Page 1. (a) is a wff (and a sentence); its outer parentheses have been omitted, which is permissible. (b) is also a wff; the variable

More information

For all For every For each For any There exists at least one There exists There is Some

For all For every For each For any There exists at least one There exists There is Some Section 1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers Assume universe of discourse is all the people who are participating in this course. Also let us assume that we know each person in the course. Consider the following

More information

Practice Test III, Math 314, Spring 2016

Practice Test III, Math 314, Spring 2016 Practice Test III, Math 314, Spring 2016 Dr. Holmes April 26, 2016 This is the 2014 test reorganized to be more readable. I like it as a review test. The students who took this test had to do four sections

More information

Manual of Logical Style

Manual of Logical Style Manual of Logical Style Dr. Holmes January 9, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Conjunction 3 2.1 Proving a conjunction...................... 3 2.2 Using a conjunction........................ 3 3 Implication

More information

Supplementary Logic Notes CSE 321 Winter 2009

Supplementary Logic Notes CSE 321 Winter 2009 1 Propositional Logic Supplementary Logic Notes CSE 321 Winter 2009 1.1 More efficient truth table methods The method of using truth tables to prove facts about propositional formulas can be a very tedious

More information

Math 308 Spring Midterm Answers May 6, 2013

Math 308 Spring Midterm Answers May 6, 2013 Math 38 Spring Midterm Answers May 6, 23 Instructions. Part A consists of questions that require a short answer. There is no partial credit and no need to show your work. In Part A you get 2 points per

More information

cis32-ai lecture # 18 mon-3-apr-2006

cis32-ai lecture # 18 mon-3-apr-2006 cis32-ai lecture # 18 mon-3-apr-2006 today s topics: propositional logic cis32-spring2006-sklar-lec18 1 Introduction Weak (search-based) problem-solving does not scale to real problems. To succeed, problem

More information

Math 10850, fall 2017, University of Notre Dame

Math 10850, fall 2017, University of Notre Dame Math 10850, fall 2017, University of Notre Dame Notes on first exam September 22, 2017 The key facts The first midterm will be on Thursday, September 28, 6.15pm-7.45pm in Hayes-Healy 127. What you need

More information

Some Applications of MATH 1090 Techniques

Some Applications of MATH 1090 Techniques 1 Some Applications of MATH 1090 Techniques 0.1 A simple problem about Nand gates in relation to And gates and inversion (Not) Gates. In this subsection the notation A means that A is proved from the axioms

More information

Examples: P: it is not the case that P. P Q: P or Q P Q: P implies Q (if P then Q) Typical formula:

Examples: P: it is not the case that P. P Q: P or Q P Q: P implies Q (if P then Q) Typical formula: Logic: The Big Picture Logic is a tool for formalizing reasoning. There are lots of different logics: probabilistic logic: for reasoning about probability temporal logic: for reasoning about time (and

More information

Solving Equations by Adding and Subtracting

Solving Equations by Adding and Subtracting SECTION 2.1 Solving Equations by Adding and Subtracting 2.1 OBJECTIVES 1. Determine whether a given number is a solution for an equation 2. Use the addition property to solve equations 3. Determine whether

More information

MATH 1553, SPRING 2018 SAMPLE MIDTERM 1: THROUGH SECTION 1.5

MATH 1553, SPRING 2018 SAMPLE MIDTERM 1: THROUGH SECTION 1.5 MATH 553, SPRING 28 SAMPLE MIDTERM : THROUGH SECTION 5 Name Section Please read all instructions carefully before beginning You have 5 minutes to complete this exam There are no aids of any kind (calculators,

More information

Do not start until you are given the green signal

Do not start until you are given the green signal SOLUTIONS CSE 311 Winter 2011: Midterm Exam (closed book, closed notes except for 1-page summary) Total: 100 points, 5 questions. Time: 50 minutes Instructions: 1. Write your name and student ID on the

More information

A statement is a sentence that is definitely either true or false but not both.

A statement is a sentence that is definitely either true or false but not both. 5 Logic In this part of the course we consider logic. Logic is used in many places in computer science including digital circuit design, relational databases, automata theory and computability, and artificial

More information

Unit 1. Propositional Logic Reading do all quick-checks Propositional Logic: Ch. 2.intro, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4. Review 2.9

Unit 1. Propositional Logic Reading do all quick-checks Propositional Logic: Ch. 2.intro, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4. Review 2.9 Unit 1. Propositional Logic Reading do all quick-checks Propositional Logic: Ch. 2.intro, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4. Review 2.9 Typeset September 23, 2005 1 Statements or propositions Defn: A statement is an assertion

More information

Section 1.2: Propositional Logic

Section 1.2: Propositional Logic Section 1.2: Propositional Logic January 17, 2017 Abstract Now we re going to use the tools of formal logic to reach logical conclusions ( prove theorems ) based on wffs formed by some given statements.

More information

Math 111, Introduction to the Calculus, Fall 2011 Midterm I Practice Exam 1 Solutions

Math 111, Introduction to the Calculus, Fall 2011 Midterm I Practice Exam 1 Solutions Math 111, Introduction to the Calculus, Fall 2011 Midterm I Practice Exam 1 Solutions For each question, there is a model solution (showing you the level of detail I expect on the exam) and then below

More information

Propositional Logic: Part II - Syntax & Proofs 0-0

Propositional Logic: Part II - Syntax & Proofs 0-0 Propositional Logic: Part II - Syntax & Proofs 0-0 Outline Syntax of Propositional Formulas Motivating Proofs Syntactic Entailment and Proofs Proof Rules for Natural Deduction Axioms, theories and theorems

More information

Logic. Propositional Logic: Syntax

Logic. Propositional Logic: Syntax Logic Propositional Logic: Syntax Logic is a tool for formalizing reasoning. There are lots of different logics: probabilistic logic: for reasoning about probability temporal logic: for reasoning about

More information

Propositional Logic: Syntax

Propositional Logic: Syntax Logic Logic is a tool for formalizing reasoning. There are lots of different logics: probabilistic logic: for reasoning about probability temporal logic: for reasoning about time (and programs) epistemic

More information

THE LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS

THE LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS CHAPTER 2 THE LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. SECTION 2.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logical Form

More information

Line Integrals and Path Independence

Line Integrals and Path Independence Line Integrals and Path Independence We get to talk about integrals that are the areas under a line in three (or more) dimensional space. These are called, strangely enough, line integrals. Figure 11.1

More information

Mathematics 114L Spring 2018 D.A. Martin. Mathematical Logic

Mathematics 114L Spring 2018 D.A. Martin. Mathematical Logic Mathematics 114L Spring 2018 D.A. Martin Mathematical Logic 1 First-Order Languages. Symbols. All first-order languages we consider will have the following symbols: (i) variables v 1, v 2, v 3,... ; (ii)

More information

AI Programming CS S-09 Knowledge Representation

AI Programming CS S-09 Knowledge Representation AI Programming CS662-2013S-09 Knowledge Representation David Galles Department of Computer Science University of San Francisco 09-0: Overview So far, we ve talked about search, which is a means of considering

More information

Completeness for FOL

Completeness for FOL Completeness for FOL Completeness Theorem for F Theorem. Let T be a set of sentences of a firstorder language L and let S be a sentence of the same language. If S is a first-order consequence of T, then

More information

1.4 Mathematical Equivalence

1.4 Mathematical Equivalence 1.4 Mathematical Equivalence Introduction a motivating example sentences that always have the same truth values can be used interchangeably the implied domain of a sentence In this section, the idea of

More information

Calculus II (Fall 2015) Practice Problems for Exam 1

Calculus II (Fall 2015) Practice Problems for Exam 1 Calculus II (Fall 15) Practice Problems for Exam 1 Note: Section divisions and instructions below are the same as they will be on the exam, so you will have a better idea of what to expect, though I will

More information

Mathematical Logic Part One

Mathematical Logic Part One Mathematical Logic Part One Question: How do we formalize the definitions and reasoning we use in our proofs? Where We're Going Propositional Logic (oday) Basic logical connectives. ruth tables. Logical

More information

The semantics of propositional logic

The semantics of propositional logic The semantics of propositional logic Readings: Sections 1.3 and 1.4 of Huth and Ryan. In this module, we will nail down the formal definition of a logical formula, and describe the semantics of propositional

More information

MATH 1553, FALL 2018 SAMPLE MIDTERM 2: 3.5 THROUGH 4.4

MATH 1553, FALL 2018 SAMPLE MIDTERM 2: 3.5 THROUGH 4.4 MATH 553, FALL 28 SAMPLE MIDTERM 2: 3.5 THROUGH 4.4 Name GT Email @gatech.edu Write your section number here: Please read all instructions carefully before beginning. The maximum score on this exam is

More information

MATH 1553 PRACTICE MIDTERM 1 (VERSION A)

MATH 1553 PRACTICE MIDTERM 1 (VERSION A) MATH 1553 PRACTICE MIDTERM 1 (VERSION A) Name Section 1 2 3 4 5 Total Please read all instructions carefully before beginning. Each problem is worth 1 points. The maximum score on this exam is 5 points.

More information

Midterm Exam 2 CS 341: Foundations of Computer Science II Fall 2016, face-to-face day section Prof. Marvin K. Nakayama

Midterm Exam 2 CS 341: Foundations of Computer Science II Fall 2016, face-to-face day section Prof. Marvin K. Nakayama Midterm Exam 2 CS 341: Foundations of Computer Science II Fall 2016, face-to-face day section Prof. Marvin K. Nakayama Print family (or last) name: Print given (or first) name: I have read and understand

More information

Logic. Propositional Logic: Syntax. Wffs

Logic. Propositional Logic: Syntax. Wffs Logic Propositional Logic: Syntax Logic is a tool for formalizing reasoning. There are lots of different logics: probabilistic logic: for reasoning about probability temporal logic: for reasoning about

More information

Logic As Algebra COMP1600 / COMP6260. Dirk Pattinson Australian National University. Semester 2, 2017

Logic As Algebra COMP1600 / COMP6260. Dirk Pattinson Australian National University. Semester 2, 2017 Logic As Algebra COMP1600 / COMP6260 Dirk Pattinson Australian National University Semester 2, 2017 Recap: And, Or, and Not x AND y x y x y 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 x OR y x y x y 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1

More information

CS1021. Why logic? Logic about inference or argument. Start from assumptions or axioms. Make deductions according to rules of reasoning.

CS1021. Why logic? Logic about inference or argument. Start from assumptions or axioms. Make deductions according to rules of reasoning. 3: Logic Why logic? Logic about inference or argument Start from assumptions or axioms Make deductions according to rules of reasoning Logic 3-1 Why logic? (continued) If I don t buy a lottery ticket on

More information

Inference in Propositional Logic

Inference in Propositional Logic Inference in Propositional Logic Deepak Kumar November 2017 Propositional Logic A language for symbolic reasoning Proposition a statement that is either True or False. E.g. Bryn Mawr College is located

More information

Manual of Logical Style (fresh version 2018)

Manual of Logical Style (fresh version 2018) Manual of Logical Style (fresh version 2018) Randall Holmes 9/5/2018 1 Introduction This is a fresh version of a document I have been working on with my classes at various levels for years. The idea that

More information

Description Logics. Foundations of Propositional Logic. franconi. Enrico Franconi

Description Logics. Foundations of Propositional Logic.   franconi. Enrico Franconi (1/27) Description Logics Foundations of Propositional Logic Enrico Franconi franconi@cs.man.ac.uk http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/ franconi Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester (2/27) Knowledge

More information

Math 115 Practice for Exam 2

Math 115 Practice for Exam 2 Math 115 Practice for Exam Generated October 30, 017 Name: SOLUTIONS Instructor: Section Number: 1. This exam has 5 questions. Note that the problems are not of equal difficulty, so you may want to skip

More information

Section 1.1: Logical Form and Logical Equivalence

Section 1.1: Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Section 1.1: Logical Form and Logical Equivalence An argument is a sequence of statements aimed at demonstrating the truth of an assertion. The assertion at the end of an argument is called the conclusion,

More information

Propositional logic. First order logic. Alexander Clark. Autumn 2014

Propositional logic. First order logic. Alexander Clark. Autumn 2014 Propositional logic First order logic Alexander Clark Autumn 2014 Formal Logic Logical arguments are valid because of their form. Formal languages are devised to express exactly that relevant form and

More information

Logic: Propositional Logic (Part I)

Logic: Propositional Logic (Part I) Logic: Propositional Logic (Part I) Alessandro Artale Free University of Bozen-Bolzano Faculty of Computer Science http://www.inf.unibz.it/ artale Descrete Mathematics and Logic BSc course Thanks to Prof.

More information

Intermediate Algebra. Gregg Waterman Oregon Institute of Technology

Intermediate Algebra. Gregg Waterman Oregon Institute of Technology Intermediate Algebra Gregg Waterman Oregon Institute of Technology c 2017 Gregg Waterman This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. The essence of the license

More information

Introduction to Metalogic

Introduction to Metalogic Philosophy 135 Spring 2008 Tony Martin Introduction to Metalogic 1 The semantics of sentential logic. The language L of sentential logic. Symbols of L: Remarks: (i) sentence letters p 0, p 1, p 2,... (ii)

More information

Math 51 Midterm 1 July 6, 2016

Math 51 Midterm 1 July 6, 2016 Math 51 Midterm 1 July 6, 2016 Name: SUID#: Circle your section: Section 01 Section 02 (1:30-2:50PM) (3:00-4:20PM) Complete the following problems. In order to receive full credit, please show all of your

More information

I have read and understand all of the instructions below, and I will obey the University Code on Academic Integrity.

I have read and understand all of the instructions below, and I will obey the University Code on Academic Integrity. Midterm Exam CS 341-451: Foundations of Computer Science II Fall 2016, elearning section Prof. Marvin K. Nakayama Print family (or last) name: Print given (or first) name: I have read and understand all

More information

GÖDEL S COMPLETENESS AND INCOMPLETENESS THEOREMS. Contents 1. Introduction Gödel s Completeness Theorem

GÖDEL S COMPLETENESS AND INCOMPLETENESS THEOREMS. Contents 1. Introduction Gödel s Completeness Theorem GÖDEL S COMPLETENESS AND INCOMPLETENESS THEOREMS BEN CHAIKEN Abstract. This paper will discuss the completeness and incompleteness theorems of Kurt Gödel. These theorems have a profound impact on the philosophical

More information

Midterm Exam 2 CS 341: Foundations of Computer Science II Fall 2018, face-to-face day section Prof. Marvin K. Nakayama

Midterm Exam 2 CS 341: Foundations of Computer Science II Fall 2018, face-to-face day section Prof. Marvin K. Nakayama Midterm Exam 2 CS 341: Foundations of Computer Science II Fall 2018, face-to-face day section Prof. Marvin K. Nakayama Print family (or last) name: Print given (or first) name: I have read and understand

More information

Axiomatic systems. Revisiting the rules of inference. Example: A theorem and its proof in an abstract axiomatic system:

Axiomatic systems. Revisiting the rules of inference. Example: A theorem and its proof in an abstract axiomatic system: Axiomatic systems Revisiting the rules of inference Material for this section references College Geometry: A Discovery Approach, 2/e, David C. Kay, Addison Wesley, 2001. In particular, see section 2.1,

More information

Arguments and Proofs. 1. A set of sentences (the premises) 2. A sentence (the conclusion)

Arguments and Proofs. 1. A set of sentences (the premises) 2. A sentence (the conclusion) Arguments and Proofs For the next section of this course, we will study PROOFS. A proof can be thought of as the formal representation of a process of reasoning. Proofs are comparable to arguments, since

More information

Math 31 Lesson Plan. Day 2: Sets; Binary Operations. Elizabeth Gillaspy. September 23, 2011

Math 31 Lesson Plan. Day 2: Sets; Binary Operations. Elizabeth Gillaspy. September 23, 2011 Math 31 Lesson Plan Day 2: Sets; Binary Operations Elizabeth Gillaspy September 23, 2011 Supplies needed: 30 worksheets. Scratch paper? Sign in sheet Goals for myself: Tell them what you re going to tell

More information

cs4004/cs4504: formal verification

cs4004/cs4504: formal verification cs4004/cs4504: formal verification Lecture 11: Proofs in First Order Logic and classical vs. intuitionistic logic Vasileios Koutavas School of Computer Science and Statistics Trinity College Dublin Proofs

More information

4 Derivations in the Propositional Calculus

4 Derivations in the Propositional Calculus 4 Derivations in the Propositional Calculus 1. Arguments Expressed in the Propositional Calculus We have seen that we can symbolize a wide variety of statement forms using formulas of the propositional

More information

Number Theory Math 420 Silverman Exam #1 February 27, 2018

Number Theory Math 420 Silverman Exam #1 February 27, 2018 Name: Number Theory Math 420 Silverman Exam #1 February 27, 2018 INSTRUCTIONS Read Carefully Time: 50 minutes There are 5 problems. Write your name neatly at the top of this page. Write your final answer

More information

Chapter 2. Logical Notation. Bahar Aameri. Department of Computer Science University of Toronto. Jan 16, Mathematical Expression and Reasoning 1

Chapter 2. Logical Notation. Bahar Aameri. Department of Computer Science University of Toronto. Jan 16, Mathematical Expression and Reasoning 1 Chapter 2 Logical Notation Bahar Aameri Department of Computer Science University of Toronto Jan 16, 2015 Mathematical Expression and Reasoning 1 Announcements Assignment 1: Assignment 1 will be posted

More information

Proof Rules for Correctness Triples

Proof Rules for Correctness Triples Proof Rules for Correctness Triples CS 536: Science of Programming, Fall 2018 A. Why? We can t generally prove that correctness triples are valid using truth tables. We need proof axioms for atomic statements

More information

Propositional natural deduction

Propositional natural deduction Propositional natural deduction COMP2600 / COMP6260 Dirk Pattinson Australian National University Semester 2, 2016 Major proof techniques 1 / 25 Three major styles of proof in logic and mathematics Model

More information

Math 5a Reading Assignments for Sections

Math 5a Reading Assignments for Sections Math 5a Reading Assignments for Sections 4.1 4.5 Due Dates for Reading Assignments Note: There will be a very short online reading quiz (WebWork) on each reading assignment due one hour before class on

More information

First Order Logic (1A) Young W. Lim 11/18/13

First Order Logic (1A) Young W. Lim 11/18/13 Copyright (c) 2013. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software

More information

Lecture 9. Model theory. Consistency, independence, completeness, categoricity of axiom systems. Expanded with algebraic view.

Lecture 9. Model theory. Consistency, independence, completeness, categoricity of axiom systems. Expanded with algebraic view. V. Borschev and B. Partee, October 17-19, 2006 p. 1 Lecture 9. Model theory. Consistency, independence, completeness, categoricity of axiom systems. Expanded with algebraic view. CONTENTS 0. Syntax and

More information

02 Propositional Logic

02 Propositional Logic SE 2F03 Fall 2005 02 Propositional Logic Instructor: W. M. Farmer Revised: 25 September 2005 1 What is Propositional Logic? Propositional logic is the study of the truth or falsehood of propositions or

More information

MATH 1553, C.J. JANKOWSKI MIDTERM 1

MATH 1553, C.J. JANKOWSKI MIDTERM 1 MATH 155, C.J. JANKOWSKI MIDTERM 1 Name Section Please read all instructions carefully before beginning. You have 5 minutes to complete this exam. There are no aids of any kind (calculators, notes, text,

More information

MATH SPEAK - TO BE UNDERSTOOD AND MEMORIZED

MATH SPEAK - TO BE UNDERSTOOD AND MEMORIZED FOM 11 T0 INTRODUCING PARABOLAS 1 MATH SPEAK - TO BE UNDERSTOOD AND MEMORIZED 1) QUADRATIC FUNCTION = a statement containing different kinds of variables where one variable lacks a visible exponent and

More information

Mathematical Logic Part One

Mathematical Logic Part One Mathematical Logic Part One Question: How do we formalize the defnitions and reasoning we use in our proofs? Where We're Going Propositional Logic (Today) Basic logical connectives. Truth tables. Logical

More information

Astronomy 102 Math Review

Astronomy 102 Math Review Astronomy 102 Math Review 2003-August-06 Prof. Robert Knop r.knop@vanderbilt.edu) For Astronomy 102, you will not need to do any math beyond the high-school alegbra that is part of the admissions requirements

More information

6. Logical Inference

6. Logical Inference Artificial Intelligence 6. Logical Inference Prof. Bojana Dalbelo Bašić Assoc. Prof. Jan Šnajder University of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing Academic Year 2016/2017 Creative Commons

More information

Choosing Logical Connectives

Choosing Logical Connectives Choosing Logical Connectives 1. Too Few Connectives?: We have chosen to use only 5 logical connectives in our constructed language of logic, L1 (they are:,,,, and ). But, we might ask, are these enough?

More information

Introducing Proof 1. hsn.uk.net. Contents

Introducing Proof 1. hsn.uk.net. Contents Contents 1 1 Introduction 1 What is proof? 1 Statements, Definitions and Euler Diagrams 1 Statements 1 Definitions Our first proof Euler diagrams 4 3 Logical Connectives 5 Negation 6 Conjunction 7 Disjunction

More information

COMP219: Artificial Intelligence. Lecture 19: Logic for KR

COMP219: Artificial Intelligence. Lecture 19: Logic for KR COMP219: Artificial Intelligence Lecture 19: Logic for KR 1 Overview Last time Expert Systems and Ontologies Today Logic as a knowledge representation scheme Propositional Logic Syntax Semantics Proof

More information

(c) Establish the following claims by means of counterexamples.

(c) Establish the following claims by means of counterexamples. sample paper I N T R O D U C T I O N T O P H I L O S O P H Y S E C T I O N A : L O G I C Volker Halbach Michaelmas 2008 I thank the author of the 2008 Trinity Term paper, Andrew Bacon, and Kentaro Fujimoto

More information

Math 144 Summer 2012 (UCR) Pro-Notes June 24, / 15

Math 144 Summer 2012 (UCR) Pro-Notes June 24, / 15 Before we start, I want to point out that these notes are not checked for typos. There are prbally many typeos in them and if you find any, please let me know as it s extremely difficult to find them all

More information

COMP219: Artificial Intelligence. Lecture 19: Logic for KR

COMP219: Artificial Intelligence. Lecture 19: Logic for KR COMP219: Artificial Intelligence Lecture 19: Logic for KR 1 Overview Last time Expert Systems and Ontologies Today Logic as a knowledge representation scheme Propositional Logic Syntax Semantics Proof

More information

Logic. Quantifiers. (real numbers understood). x [x is rotten in Denmark]. x<x+x 2 +1

Logic. Quantifiers. (real numbers understood). x [x is rotten in Denmark]. x<x+x 2 +1 Logic One reason for studying logic is that we need a better notation than ordinary English for expressing relationships among various assertions or hypothetical states of affairs. A solid grounding in

More information

Přednáška 12. Důkazové kalkuly Kalkul Hilbertova typu. 11/29/2006 Hilbertův kalkul 1

Přednáška 12. Důkazové kalkuly Kalkul Hilbertova typu. 11/29/2006 Hilbertův kalkul 1 Přednáška 12 Důkazové kalkuly Kalkul Hilbertova typu 11/29/2006 Hilbertův kalkul 1 Formal systems, Proof calculi A proof calculus (of a theory) is given by: A. a language B. a set of axioms C. a set of

More information

Math 016 Lessons Wimayra LUY

Math 016 Lessons Wimayra LUY Math 016 Lessons Wimayra LUY wluy@ccp.edu MATH 016 Lessons LESSON 1 Natural Numbers The set of natural numbers is given by N = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4...}. Natural numbers are used for two main reasons: 1. counting,

More information

Manipulating Radicals

Manipulating Radicals Lesson 40 Mathematics Assessment Project Formative Assessment Lesson Materials Manipulating Radicals MARS Shell Center University of Nottingham & UC Berkeley Alpha Version Please Note: These materials

More information

Day 5. Friday May 25, 2012

Day 5. Friday May 25, 2012 Day 5 Friday May 5, 01 1 Quantifiers So far, we have done math with the expectation that atoms are always either true or false. In reality though, we would like to talk about atoms like x > Whose truth

More information

Learning Goals of CS245 Logic and Computation

Learning Goals of CS245 Logic and Computation Learning Goals of CS245 Logic and Computation Alice Gao April 27, 2018 Contents 1 Propositional Logic 2 2 Predicate Logic 4 3 Program Verification 6 4 Undecidability 7 1 1 Propositional Logic Introduction

More information

Faculty of Science and Engineering

Faculty of Science and Engineering Faculty of Science and Engineering MATH1090 Solutions to Problem Set No 1 1. (3 marks) Consider the string ( ( (p q))), (a) Show that the above string is a well-formed formula (by the procedural definition).

More information

CSE 20: Discrete Mathematics

CSE 20: Discrete Mathematics Spring 2018 Summary Last time: Today: Logical connectives: not, and, or, implies Using Turth Tables to define logical connectives Logical equivalences, tautologies Some applications Proofs in propositional

More information

Math 3336: Discrete Mathematics Practice Problems for Exam I

Math 3336: Discrete Mathematics Practice Problems for Exam I Math 3336: Discrete Mathematics Practice Problems for Exam I The upcoming exam on Tuesday, February 26, will cover the material in Chapter 1 and Chapter 2*. You will be provided with a sheet containing

More information

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2010 Tse/Wagner MT 2 Soln

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2010 Tse/Wagner MT 2 Soln CS 70 Discrete Mathematics and Probability heory Fall 00 se/wagner M Soln Problem. [Rolling Dice] (5 points) You roll a fair die three times. Consider the following events: A first roll is a 3 B second

More information

Classical First-Order Logic

Classical First-Order Logic Classical First-Order Logic Software Formal Verification Maria João Frade Departmento de Informática Universidade do Minho 2008/2009 Maria João Frade (DI-UM) First-Order Logic (Classical) MFES 2008/09

More information

PHIL12A Section answers, 28 Feb 2011

PHIL12A Section answers, 28 Feb 2011 PHIL12A Section answers, 28 Feb 2011 Julian Jonker 1 How much do you know? Give formal proofs for the following arguments. 1. (Ex 6.18) 1 A B 2 A B 1 A B 2 A 3 A B Elim: 2 4 B 5 B 6 Intro: 4,5 7 B Intro:

More information

Math Final Exam December 14, 2009 Page 1 of 5

Math Final Exam December 14, 2009 Page 1 of 5 Math 201-803-Final Exam December 14, 2009 Page 1 of 5 (3) 1. Evaluate the expressions: (a) 10 C 4 (b) 10 P 4 (c) 15!4! 3!11! (4) 2. (a) In how many ways can a president, a vice president and a treasurer

More information

3 The Semantics of the Propositional Calculus

3 The Semantics of the Propositional Calculus 3 The Semantics of the Propositional Calculus 1. Interpretations Formulas of the propositional calculus express statement forms. In chapter two, we gave informal descriptions of the meanings of the logical

More information

PHIL12A Section answers, 16 February 2011

PHIL12A Section answers, 16 February 2011 PHIL12A Section answers, 16 February 2011 Julian Jonker 1 How much do you know? 1. Show that the following sentences are equivalent. (a) (Ex 4.16) A B A and A B A B (A B) A A B T T T T T T T T T T T F

More information

Lecture 4: Proposition, Connectives and Truth Tables

Lecture 4: Proposition, Connectives and Truth Tables Discrete Mathematics (II) Spring 2017 Lecture 4: Proposition, Connectives and Truth Tables Lecturer: Yi Li 1 Overview In last lecture, we give a brief introduction to mathematical logic and then redefine

More information

1 Propositional Logic

1 Propositional Logic 1 Propositional Logic Required reading: Foundations of Computation. Sections 1.1 and 1.2. 1. Introduction to Logic a. Logical consequences. If you know all humans are mortal, and you know that you are

More information

Direct Proofs. the product of two consecutive integers plus the larger of the two integers

Direct Proofs. the product of two consecutive integers plus the larger of the two integers Direct Proofs A direct proof uses the facts of mathematics and the rules of inference to draw a conclusion. Since direct proofs often start with premises (given information that goes beyond the facts of

More information

Give students a few minutes to reflect on Exercise 1. Then ask students to share their initial reactions and thoughts in answering the questions.

Give students a few minutes to reflect on Exercise 1. Then ask students to share their initial reactions and thoughts in answering the questions. Student Outcomes Students understand that an equation is a statement of equality between two expressions. When values are substituted for the variables in an equation, the equation is either true or false.

More information

CS280, Spring 2004: Final

CS280, Spring 2004: Final CS280, Spring 2004: Final 1. [4 points] Which of the following relations on {0, 1, 2, 3} is an equivalence relation. (If it is, explain why. If it isn t, explain why not.) Just saying Yes or No with no

More information

Proving Things. Why prove things? Proof by Substitution, within Logic. Rules of Inference: applying Logic. Using Assumptions.

Proving Things. Why prove things? Proof by Substitution, within Logic. Rules of Inference: applying Logic. Using Assumptions. 1 Proving Things Why prove things? Proof by Substitution, within Logic Rules of Inference: applying Logic Using Assumptions Proof Strategies 2 Why Proofs? Knowledge is power. Where do we get it? direct

More information

Mat 243 Exam 1 Review

Mat 243 Exam 1 Review OBJECTIVES (Review problems: on next page) 1.1 Distinguish between propositions and non-propositions. Know the truth tables (i.e., the definitions) of the logical operators,,,, and Write truth tables for

More information

Math 308 Midterm 1. February 21, 2018

Math 308 Midterm 1. February 21, 2018 Math 308 Midterm 1 February 21, 2018 Name: Show your work. If you solve a problem with anything other than a straightforward computation, write one complete sentence explaining what you re doing. For example,

More information

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DISCLAIMER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General Information: This midterm is a sample midterm. This means: The sample midterm contains problems that are of similar,

More information