Virtual Homotopy. February 26, 2009
|
|
- Theresa Reeves
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 arxiv:math/ v2 [math.gt] 9 Nov 2006 Virtual Homotopy H. A. Dye MADN-MATH United States Military Academy 646 Swift Road West Point, NY hdye@ttocs.org Louis H. Kauffman Department of Mathematics, Statistics, & Computer Science University of Illinois at Chicago 851 South Morgan St Chicago, IL kauffman@uic.edu February 26, 2009 Abstract Two welded (respectively virtual) link diagrams are homotopic if one may be transformed into the other by a sequence of extended Reidemeister moves, classical Reidemeister moves, and self crossing changes. In this paper, we extend Milnor s µ and µ invariants to welded and virtual links. We conclude this paper with several examples, and compute the µ invariants using the Magnus expansion and Polyak s skein relation for the µ invariants. 1 Introduction Virtual link diagrams are a generalization of classical link diagrams introduced by Louis H. Kauffman in 1996 [9]. A virtual link diagram is a decorated immersion of n copies of S 1 with two types of crossings: classical and 1
2 virtual. Classical crossings are indicated by over/under markings and virtual crossings are indicated by a solid encircled X. An example of a virtual link diagram is shown in figure 1. Figure 1: Kishino s knot Two virtual link diagrams are said to be virtually isotopic if one may be transformed into another by a sequence of classical Reidemeister moves (shown in 2) and the virtual Reidemeister moves shown in figure 3. Two welded links diagrams are said to be welded equivalent if one may be transformed in the other by a sequence of Reidemeister moves (classical and virtual) and the upper forbidden move (shown in figure 4). The forbidden move is not allowed during virtual isotopy. I. II. III. Figure 2: Classical Reidemeister moves I. II. III. IV. Figure 3: The virtual Reidemeister moves In this paper, we apply a variety of results from the area of virtual knot theory. We will extend the definition of link homotopy to virtual and welded link diagrams, and Milnor s µ invariants for virtual and welded links. 2
3 Figure 4: The upper forbidden move We define two virtual link diagrams to be virtually homotopic if one diagram may be transformed into the other by virtual isotopy and self crossing change. (By self crossing change, we mean changing the over/under markings at a crossing between two segments of the same link component.) Two welded diagrams are welded homotopic if one diagram may be transformed into the other by a sequence of classical and virtual Reidemeister moves, the forbidden move, and self crossing change. Homotopic classical link diagrams (and braids) have been studied extensively, starting with Milnor [13] [14], Goldsmith [6], and more recently Habeggar and Lin [7]. There are significant differences between the study of homotopy classes in the classical case and the virtual case. We introduce these differences by examining the homotopy class of several virtual and welded knot diagrams. We first consider virtual knot and link diagrams. To distinguish homotopy classes of virtual knot diagrams, we recall the category of flat virtual knot diagrams. A flat virtual knot diagram is a decorated immersion of S 1 into the plane with two types of crossings: flat crossings and virtual crossings. (Flat crossings are indicated by an unmarked X.) Two flat diagrams are equivalent if one may be transformed into another by a sequence of flat Reidemeister moves and virtual Reidemeister moves. The flat classical Reidemeister moves are shown in figure 5. The flat versions of virtual move IV. and the forbidden move are shown in figure 6. I. II. III. Figure 5: Flat Reidemeister moves We map the category of virtual knot diagrams into the category of flat virtual knot diagrams by flattening all the classical crossings in the diagram as indicated in figure 7. 3
4 IV. F. Figure 6: The flat virtual Reidemeister move and the flat forbidden move Figure 7: Mapping into the flat knot diagrams We observe that equivalence classes of homotopic virtual knot diagrams are in 1-1 correspondence with equivalence classes of flat virtual knot diagrams. The existence of non-trivial flat virtual diagrams demonstrates that not all virtual knot diagrams are homotopy equivalent to the unknot. (Recall that all classical knot diagrams are homotopic to the unknot.) In fact, we prove the following theorem: Theorem 1.1. The category of flat virtual link diagrams is an invariant image of the category of homotopic virtual link diagrams. In the case of knot diagrams, the category of flat virtual knot diagrams is equivalent to the category of homotopic virtual link diagrams. Proof: Let L and L be homotopic virtual link diagrams. Then there is a finite sequence of Reidemeister moves and self crossing changes transforming L into the L. The Flat version of this sequence may be applied to Flat(L). This demonstrates that the category of flat virtual links is an invariant image of the category of homotopic virtual link diagrams. We restrict our attention to knot diagrams. Let K and K be virtual knot diagrams. Suppose that Flat(K) is equivalent to Flat(K ). Then there exists a sequence of flat and virtual Reidemeister moves transforming F lat(k) into Flat(K ). Each step of the sequence may be realized as a virtual or classical Reidemeister move by switching the classical crossings appropriately. Hence K is homotopic to the K. We immediately obtain the following corollary. Corollary 1.2. A virtual knot diagram K is homotopic to the unknot if and only if Flat(K) is equivalent to the unknot. 4
5 Note that as a result, Kishino s knot is not equivalent to the unknot. It was shown in [11] that there is no sequence of flat moves that transforms a flat Kishino s knot into the unknot. Theorem 1.3. If K is a welded knot then K is homotopic to the unknot. Proof:Two welded knots are equivalent if one can be transformed into the other by a sequence of virtual and classical moves, including the forbidden move. Note that in the forbidden move, two classical crossings pass over a virtual crossing. We can switch the crossings on this move, so that two classical crossing pass under a virtual crossing. Using both the under and over version of the forbidden move, any virtual knot can be unknotted [5]. The category of flat virtual links (more than one component) is not equivalent to homotopy classes of virtual links. We can not flatten crossings between the components. Similarly, the approach using both forbidden moves can not be applied to welded link diagrams. To unknot and unlink a link diagram, we may need to switch crossings between two different components of the link diagram. In the next section, we generalize Milnor s link group to virtual and welded link diagrams. 2 Link Groups In [13], Milnor defined the link group of a classical link and we extend this definition to virtual and welded link diagrams. Remark 2.1. The link group is also referred to as the reduced group in [7] and [13]. Let L be a virtual link diagram with n components: K 1, K 2,...K n. Recall that the fundamental group of the virtual link digram, π 1 (L), is a free group modulo relations determined by the classical crossings. We compute the fundamental group by assigning generators, a i1, a i2,...a ik, to the segments (of the i th component) that initiate and terminate at a classical crossing. We then record relations, r 1, r 2,...r m, that are determined by each crossing, as shown in figure 8. The fundamental group of a link L is: π 1 (L) = {a 11, a 12,...a 1k, a 21...a nˆk r 1, r 2,...r m } 5
6 a b a b a b 1 b c b = a c 1 b c b = a c no relation Figure 8: Fundamental group relations The commutators of the generators for the i th component have the form: a ij a ik a 1 ij a 1 ik and are denoted [a ij, a ik ]. We use A to denote the smallest normal subgroup generated by the commutators formed by the meridians of a fixed component: [a ij, b ik ] from all components (i {1, 2,...n}) of the diagram. The link group of L, denoted as G(L), is the fundamental group, π 1 (L), modulo A (G(L) = π 1 (L)/A). Milnor proved the following theorem. Theorem 2.1. Let L be a classical link diagram and let ˆL be the trivial link. If G(L) is isomorphic to G(ˆL), via an isomorphism preserving the conjugate classes corresponding to meridians, then L is homotopic to the trivial link. Proof: See [13]. For virtual link diagrams, the requirement that G(L) = G(ˆL) is necessary but not sufficient. (Kishino s knot demonstrates that two non-homotopic virtual links may have the same link group.) However, we can prove this theorem using the Wirtinger presentation and extend the result to virtual link diagrams. Theorem 2.2. If two virtual(welded) link diagrams, L and ˆL, are homotopic then G(L) = G(ˆL). Proof: The fundamental group is invariant under the Reidemeister moves. We need only prove that the link group is invariant under crossing change. We examine the case when two diagrams differ by exactly one crossing, as illustrated in figure 9. In this figure, the dotted line indicates that both segments of the crossing are in the same component. (Alternate choices for this connection are possible, but the arguments are similar to the one given below.) From the crossing, L, in figure 9 we obtain the following relationships: a = c bc = ad. 6
7 d a d a c b c b L L s Figure 9: Invariance under crossing change Since the segments b and c are part of the same component, we observe that b = gcg 1 where g π 1 (L). Substituting this equation into bc = ad, we compute that b = cdc 1. Since d and c are meridians of the same component, we observe that b d in G(L). In the diagram, L s, from figure 9: b = d da = bc Rewriting the last equation, we observe that bcb 1 = a. Note that b and c are meridians of the same component, so that c a in G(L s ). The two diagrams only differ at a single crossing and we conclude that G(L) and G(L s ) are equivalent. Many non-trivial virtual link diagrams have a fundamental group equivalent to the fundamental group of the unknot; indicating that link group does not determine the virtual homotopy class. For example, Kishino s knot has a trivial link group (since π 1 (K) = Z) but Kishino s knot is not virtually homotopic to the unknot. However, Kishino s knot is welded homotopic to the unknot. For welded link diagrams we make the following conjectures: Conjecture 2.3. If L is welded link diagram and π 1 (L) Z... Z then L is welded equivalent to the unlink. Conjecture 2.4. If L is a welded link diagram and G(L) Z... Z then L is homotopic to the unlink. We now extend Milnor s µ invariants by utilizing Milnor s original definition of the invariant. 7
8 3 The µ Invariants We extend Milnor s µ and µ invariants to k component virtual (and welded) link diagrams by computing the representatives of the longitude of each component in the Chen group: π 1 (L)/π 1 (L) n. (The classical analog of this proof is given in [14].) We then apply the Magnus expansion to to the longitude of each component. For each component i, we obtain a polynomial, P i, in k variables. We then compute the modulus of each polynomial, producing the µ invariants. Finally, we will show that this invariant unchanged by link homotopy. Let ˆL be an k component virtual (or welded) braid diagram with all strands oriented downwards such that the closure of ˆL is the link diagram L. Label the uppermost meridian of these components as: a 10, a 20, a 30,...a k0. Using the Wirtinger presentation, we can compute π 1 (L). Let a i0, a i1,...a iji be the generators of the meridians of the i th component. Then L has a presentation of the form: π 1 (L) = {a 10, a 11...a 1j1, a 20, a 21...a k,mk r i1 a i0 r 1 i1 = a i1,...r ij a ij r 1 ij = a ij+1, a i0 = a iki for i 1, 2,...k} where r ij π 1 (L). Let l ij = r i0 r i1...r ij then a ij = l ij a i0 l 1 ij. Now, let l i denote l iki and a i denote a i0. Then a i = l i a i l 1 i. Each l i is word consisting of conjugates of the terms a i and represents the longitude of the longitude of the i th component. Let A denote the free group generated by {a 1, a 2,...a n }. We may rewrite the presentation of the fundamental group as: {a 1, a 2,...a n [a i, l i ] = 1}. Let A 1 = A and A n = [A, A n 1 ] (the n th commutator subgroup). In this context, we will denote the Chen group, π 1 (L)/π 1 (L) (n), as G(n). A presentation of G(n) for the link L is given by: {a 1, a 2...a n [a i, l i ] = 1, A n }. We will use the following lemma to simplify the presentation of the Chen group. Lemma 3.1. Let g be an element of A. Let g ĝ modulo A n 1 then in A/A n. gbg 1 b 1 ĝbĝ 1 b 1 8
9 Proof: Let gbg 1 b 1 ĝbĝ 1 b 1 modulo A n 1. If ĝ 1 gbg 1 ĝb 1 is not equivalent to 1 modulo A n then ĝ 1 g is not an element of A n 1. This contradicts our assumption. Let l (n 1) i denote a representative of l i modulo A n 1 then G(n) = {a 1, a 2,...a n [a i, l (n 1) i ] = 1, A n }. Note that G(1) = 1, the trivial group. The group G(2) is the abelianization of the fundamental group, since any conjugate of a i a i modulo A 2. We have now demonstrated that the Chen group of any n component link diagram has a standard presentation: Proposition 3.2. Let L be an k component link diagram. Then we may write the presentation of n th Chen group as: G(n) = {a 1, a 2...a k [a i, l (n 1) i ] = 1, A n }. (1) where w i is a reduced word in A/A n 1. We now apply the Magnus expansion to the group G(n). The Magnus expansion is a homomorphism ψ such that: ψ : G(n) Z[x 1, x 2,...x k ] where Z[x 1, x 2,...x k ] is a non-commutative ring. We define the Magnus expansion on G(n) by specifying the generators: ψ(a i ) = 1 + x i ψ(a 1 i ) = 1 x i + x 2 i x3 i... Notice that ψ(a i a 1 i ) = ψ(1) = 1 but ψ(a i a j ) ψ(a j a i ) since the x i do not commute. For convenience, we will denote l (n 1) i as w i for the remainder of this paper. The image of the longitude of the i th component, w i, can be written as a polynomial in n variables. ψ(w i ) = 1 + Σµ(i 1,...i s, w i )x i1 x i2...x is. (2) Let J is a proper subset of {i 1, i 2,...i s }. We define (i 1, i 2,...i s, w i ) as follows: { the g.c.d. of µ{j, w i } if i / {i 1, i 2,...i s }, (i 1, i 2,...i s, w i ) = 0 if i {i 1, i 2,...i s }. 9
10 Then µ(i 1, i 2,...i s, w i ) Z/ (i 1, i 2,...i s, w i )Z. We use to define an ideal D i,n. For any w i G(n), the Magnus expansion of w i ( ψ(w i )) modulo D i,n determines the µ invariants. That is, µ(j, w i ) Z[x 1, x 2,...x n ]/D i,n. Let v = cx i1 x i2...x is. Then v D i,n if {i 1, i 2,...i s } n c 0 modulo (i 1, i 2,...i s, w i ) i {i 1, i 2,...i s } We observe that if µ(j, w i ) 0 then the cardinality of J is less than n ( J < n). Remark 3.1. The definition of (i 1, i 2,...i s, w i ) in the virtual (welded) case differs from the classical case. In the classical case, if i {i 1, i 2,...i s } then µ(i 1, i 2,...i s, w i ) = 0. We will discuss the implications of this fact in sections 5 and 6. We need several facts about this ideal in order to prove that Z [x 1, x 2,...x k ] modulo D i,n is a homotopy invariant. We first prove the following technical lemmas about D i,n. Lemma 3.3. If v = cx i1 x i2...x is is an element of D i,n, that is, v is equivalent to 0 in Z[x 1, x 2,...x k ]/D i,n then vx j and x j v are elements of D i,n. Proof: Let v = cx i1 x i2... x is. If j = i then vx j and x j v are elements of D i,n. If s n 1 then x j v and vx j are elements of D i,n. If s < k 1, we observe that c 0 modulo (i 1, i 2,...i s, w i ). Note that {i 1, i 2,...i s } is a subset of {i 1, i 2,...i s, j}. As a result, (i 1, i 2,...i s, j, w i ) divides (i 1, i 2,...i s ). Then (i 1, i 2,...i s, j, w i ) divides c and vx j D i. Similarly, we may argue that x j v D i We have demonstrated that D i,n is a two sided ideal. Lemma 3.4. If m A n then ψ(m) 1 modulo D i,n. Proof: To demonstrate that ψ(m) D i,n, we will show that each nonconstant term has degrees greater than or equal to n. We consider m A 2. Without loss of generality, we assume that m = [a i, a j ]. Now, ψ(m) = (1 + x i )(1 + x j )(1 x i + x 2 i x 3 i...)(1 x j + x 2 j x 3 j...) (3) 10
11 Let v i = (1 x i + x 2 i x 3 i...) v j = (1 x j + x 2 j x3 j...) Rewriting equation 3: ψ(m) = (1 + x i + x j + x i x j )v i v j = (1 + x j v i + x i x j v i )v j = (1 + x j + ( x j x i + x j x 2 i x j x 3 i...) + x i x j v i )v j = 1 + ( x j x i + x j x 2 i x jx 3 i...)v j + x i x j v i v j. All non-constant terms have degrees greater than or equal to two. Let m A n 1, ψ(m) = 1 + M and ψ(m 1 ) = 1 + ˆM. By assumption, all terms in M and ˆM have degree greater than or equal to n 1. Note that (1+M)(1+ ˆM) = (1 + ˆM)(1 + M) = 1. Now, without loss of generality, we may assume that all elements of A n have the form: We compute that [m, a i ] where m A n 1. ψ([m, a i ]) = (1 + M)(1 + x i )(1 + ˆM)(1 x i + x 2 i x3 i...) Letting v i denote 1 x i + x 2 i x 3 i..., we multiply: ψ([m, a i ]) = (1 + M + x i + x i M + ˆM + M ˆM + x i ˆM + xi M ˆM)v i = (v i + x i v i + Mx i v i + x i ˆMvi + Mx i ˆMvi ) = 1 + Mx i v i + x i ˆMvi + Mx i ˆMvi. Since each term in M and ˆM has degree greater than or equal to n 1, we observe that ψ([m, a i ]) 1 modulo D i,n. 4 Invariance of µ Under Homotopy We first prove that µ is a link invariant. The fundamental group is invariant under virtual isotopy and the upper forbidden move. As a result, G(n) is also invariant under virtual isotopy and the upper forbidden move. We need only show that the image of G(n) is invariant under change of base point and invariant under multiplication by elements of A n and [a i, w i ]. 11
12 Lemma 4.1. Let G(n) denote the Chen group, π 1 (L)/π 1 (L) n, of a link diagram L. Let w i = l (n 1) i and let a j represent the image of the generator of j t h component in G(n). 1. ψ(a j w i a 1 j ) = ψ(w i ) and ψ(a j a i a 1 j ) = ψ(a i ) (Invariance under conjugation by a j, representing a change of base point). 2. ψ([a j, w j ]) = 1 ( Verification of [a j, w j ] = 1). 3. ψ(m) = 1 for m A n (Verification of the identity m 1 for m A n ). Proof of Part 1: We compute ψ(a j a i a 1 j ). ψ(a j a i a 1 j ) = (1 + x j )(1 + x i )(1 x j + x 2 j x3 j...) = 1 + (x i x i x j + x i x 2 j...) + (x jx i x j x i x j + x i x 2 j...) Note that the term x i has coefficient 1. Since {i} is a proper subset of {j, i} and {j, i}, it follows that ψ(a j a i a 1 j ) ψ(a i ) mod D i,n. It immediately follows that ψ(w i ) ψ(a j w i a 1 j ). Proof of Part 2: We now demonstrate that ψ([a j, w j ]) = 1. From part 1, we note that Now, ψ(a j w j a 1 j ) = ψ(w j ). ψ([a j, w j ]) = ψ(w j (w j ) 1 ) = ψ(1). Proof of Part 3: See Lemma 3.4. Theorem 4.2. The term µ(x i1, x i2,...x is, w i ) is a link invariant. Proof: We note that the fundamental group of a virtual (welded) link diagram is invariant under the Reidemeister moves and the extended Reidemeister moves. To show that this is a link invariant, we need only apply Lemma 4.1. This demonstrates that µ is not altered by a change of base point or multiplication by elements equivalent to 1. We now consider the effect of crossing changes on the µ invariants. 12
13 Lemma 4.3. Let L be a k component link, and let w i represent the longitude of the i th component. 1. The Magnus expansion of w i is unchanged when multiplied by an element of the normal subgroup generated by the [a j ] 2 (a crossing change on the j th strand). 2. The Magnus expansion of w i is unchanged when multiplied by an element of the group generated by conjugates of a i, the generator of the meridian of the i th component. (a crossing change on the i th strand). To demonstrate that µ is a homotopy invariant, we must prove that the image of w i in Z[x 1, x 2,...x n ]/D i,n is invariant under crossing change. We consider the effect of a self crossing change on w i. Suppose that a crossing change occurs on the j th component. Locally, the meridians of the j th arc are replaced by a different conjugate of a j. Let w i = b 1 b 2...b m. Let b 1 = ca j c (where c is a conjugate of a j, indicating a self-crossing). The term b 1 represents the i th component under passing the j th strand. After a self-crossing change, w i = ˆb 1 b 2...b n and ˆb 1 = ĉa j ĉ 1 where ĉ is a conjugate of a j. To replace b 1 with ˆb 1, we multiply w i by ĉa j ĉ 1 a 1 j a j ca 1 j c 1 and element of the commutator subgroup generated by a j (elements of the form: [k, ˆk] where both k and ˆk are conjugates of a j ). We now consider a crossing change on the i th strand. Let w i = b 1 b 2... b m and suppose that b 1 represents the i th strand under passing itself, that is b 1 = ca ±1 i c 1. After the crossing change, w i = b 2...ˆb k...b m, where ˆb k is the new over crossing (generated by the crossing change). Note that ˆb k = ĉb 1 1 ĉ 1, and to replace b 1 with ˆb k,we multiply w i by (b 2... b k 1 ĉb 1 1 ĉ 1 b 1 k 1...b 1 2 )b 1 1, an element of the subgroup generated by conjugates of a i. Therefore, we need only show that w i is invariant under multiplication by an element of a i, the subgroup generated by conjugates of a i. Proof of Lemma 4.3, Part 1: Suppose X is an element of [a j ] 2. Then we may assume that X = [ca j c 1, a 1 j ] = [c, a j ][c, a 1 j ]. Note that [c, a j ] and [c, a 1 j ] are elements of A 2. Hence, each non-constant term in ψ([c, a j ]) and ψ([c, a 1 j ]) has degree 2 or greater and each term has contains at least two copies of x j since ψ(c) = 1 + x j.... Now, each non-constant term of ψ(x) has degree 2 or higher and contains at least two copies of x j. However, since µ(j, w i ) 0 if J contains duplicate entries, we see that ψ(xw i ) ψ(w i ). 13
14 Proof of Lemma 4.3, Part 2: Let ψ(w i ) = 1+W. We may assume that y = ca i c 1. Applying Lemma Let ψ(y) = 1+Y, where each term in Y has at least one copy of x i, so that 1+Y 1 D i,n. Now, ψ(yw i ) = (1+Y )(1+W) so that ψ(yw i ) = 1 + Y + W + Y W 1 + W modulo D i,n We apply this lemma to prove that µ(x i1, x i2,...x is, w i ) is a link homotopy invariant. Theorem 4.4. The term µ(x i1, x i2,...x is, w i ) is a homotopy link invariant. Proof: We apply lemma 4.3 to demonstrate that µ(x i1, x i2,...x is, w i ), obtained from the Magnus expansion of the reduced representative of the i th longitude, is unchanged by a self crossing change. Combined with theorem 4.2, this demonstrates that µ is a link homotopy invariant. 5 Computational Examples In this section, we compute some simple examples using the Magnus expansion. We then apply Polyak s skein relation [15] for the µ invariant to the same examples. The proof of this skein relation appeals directly to the classical proof of µ invariance, which uses the Magnus expansion. The relationship between the Magnus expansion and Fox s free calculus (applied to the fundamental group), allows us to apply Polyak s skein relation to virtual and welded links. Remark 5.1. Although we can use Polyak s results to compute the µ invariant, we can not use his result to directly determine the µ invariants. To compute the µ invariants we need to reduce modulo D i,n. We should also note that the closure of two inequivalent braids may result in two welded (virtual) braids. We recall the skein relation given by Polyak in [15] in figure 10. We refer to a crossing between the strand l + and L k or a crossing between the 14
15 Case R: l + Lk l Lk l l0 Case L: L k l L l l l + k 0 (Dashed lines indicate deleted edges.) Figure 10: Polyak s skein relation strand l and L k. In case R, the µ invariant is determined by the following equations: µ k (l + ) µ k (l ) = 1 µ i1...i nk(l + ) µ i1...i nk(l ) = µ i1...i n (l ) µ ki1...i n (l + ) µ ki1...i n (l ) = µ i1...i n (l 0 ) µ i1...i k 1 ki k+1...i n (l + ) µ i1...i k 1 ki k+1...i n (l ) = µ i1...i k 1 (l )µ ik+1...i n (l 0 ) In case L, the µ invariant is determined by: µ k (l ) µ k (l + ) = 1 µ i1...i nk(l ) µ i1...i nk(l + ) = µ i1...i n (l ) µ ki1...i n (l ) µ ki1...i n (l + ) = µ i1...i n (l 0 ) µ i1...i k 1 ki k+1...i n (l ) µ i1...i k 1 ki k+1...i n (l + ) = µ i1...i k 1 (l )µ ik+1...i n (l 0 ) 5.1 Virtual Hopf Link The closure of the braid shown in figure 11 is the virtual Hopf link. We compute the fundamental group of the virtual Hopf link is generated by a and b modulo the following relation: a = bab 1 The longitude of the strands is given by: w a = b w b = 1 15
16 a b Figure 11: Virtual Hopf link We apply the Magnus expansion (sending b 1 + b and a 1 + a ) to the longitudes: ψ(b) = 1 + b and ψ(1) = 1. There are no proper subsets of {b} and {a}. As a result, µ(b, w a ) = 1 and µ(a, w b ) = 0. Note that link(b, a) = 1 and that link(b, a) = 0. We apply the skein relation to the virtual Hopf link and observe that it is correct. µ(l, L + ) µ(l, L ) = Virtual Link Example The closure of the of the braid shown in figure 12 is a two component virtual link. Observe that link(b, a) = 1 and link(a, b) = 2. The fundamental group of the link is generated by a and b. The relations in fundamental group are: a = bab 1 b = ba 2 ba 2 b 1. The longitudes of the strands are: w a = b and w b = ba 2. 16
17 a b Figure 12: Virtual link example Applying the Magnus expansion to the reduced longitudes: ψ(w a ) = 1 + b ψ(w b ) = (1 + b)(1 + a) 2 = 1 + b + 2a + 2ba + ba 2. Since there are two strands, all elements with degree greater than 1 are in D a,2 and D b,2. Now, µ(b, w a ) = µ(b, w a ) = 1 and µ(a, w b ) = µ(a, w b ) = 2. Applying the skein relation, we again verify that µ(l, L + ) µ(l, L 1 ) = Modification of the Borromean Links The closure of the braid shown in figure 13 is obtained by adding a classical and virtual twist to the Borromean links on 2 nd and 3 rd strands. If the 2 nd or 3 rd strand is removed from the closure of this braid, we obtain an unknotted 2 component unlink. If the first strand is removed, we obtain a 2 component link. The fundamental group of this link is generated by a, b, c. We obtain the following relations: a = a 1 b 1 ac 1 a 1 bacac 1 a 1 b 1 aca 1 ba b = cac 1 a 1 baca 1 c 1 c = cac 1 b 2 aca 1 c 1 a 1 b 2 aca 1 c 1. 17
18 Figure 13: Modification of the Borromean links The longitude of these components: w a = a 1 b 1 ac 1 a 1 bac w b = cac 1 a 1 w c = cac 1 a 1 b 2 aca 1 c 1 a 1 b 1 a. We now reduce the longitudes modulo A 2. w a (a 1 b 1 ac 1 a 1 ba)(c 0 ) b 1 c 1 bc modulo A 2 w b cac 1 a 1 w c (cac 1 a 1 b 2 aca 1 c 1 )(a 1 b 1 a) b 2 a 1 b 1 a We now apply the Magnus expansion to the reduced form of w a, that is: b 1 c 1 bc. ψ(b 1 c 1 bc) = (1 b + b 2...)(1 c + c 2...)(1 + b)(1 + c) = (1 b + b 2... c + bc b 2 c... + c 2 bc 2 + b 2 c 2...)(1 + b + c + bc) = 1 b + b 2... c + bc b 2 c... + c 2 bc 2 + b 2 bc b b 2 cb + c bc... + bc) All terms with degree greater than 2 are in D a,3. Collecting coefficients, we 18
19 observe that: µ(b, w a ) = 0 µ(c, w a ) = 0 µ(b, c, w a ) = 1 µ(c, b, w a ) = 1 The computation for ψ(w b ) is similar. Hence: µ(a, w b ) = 0 µ(c, w b ) = 0 µ(a, c, w b ) = 1 µ(c, a, w b ) = 1 We compute ψ(w c ) = ψ(b 2 a 1 b 1 a). Note that (1 + b) 2 (1 a + a 2...)(1 b + b 2...)(1 + a) = 1 + b + ab ba b 2... From this equation, we obtain: µ(a, w c ) = 0 µ(b, w c ) = 1 µ(a, b, w c ) = 1 µ(b, a, w c ) = 1 Note that since µ(i, w j ) = 0 for all i, j except for the case where i = b and j = c, that µ(i, k, w j ) = µ(i, k, w j ). We now apply Polyak s skein relation to this braid, as shown in figure 14. We apply case L of the skein relation to determine that: We also obtain: µ ab (l ) µ ab (l + ) = µ a (l )µ ba (l ) µ ba (l + ) = µ a (l 0 ) µ b (l ) µ b (l + ) = 1 which may be verified by computing link(b, l ) and link(b, l + ). Note that µ ab (l + ) = 0, µ ba (l + ) = 0, µ a (l ) = 1, and µ a (l 0 ) = 1. Hence, µ ab (l ) 0 = 1 µ ba (l ) 0 = 1 These results agree with those obtained from the Magnus expansion. 19
20 a b l a b l a a + l l 0 Figure 14: Application of Polyak s skein relation, case L 5.4 A Virtual Link with Linking Number Zero The closure of the link shown in figure 15 is obtained by changing two classical crossings in a link homotopic to the identity into virtual crossings. Remark 5.2. Note that link(a, b) = 0 and link(b, a) = 0 for this link. A classical, 2 component link with linking number zero is homotopically trivial. If this link is homotopic to a classical link then it is homotopic to the unknotted, 2 component unlink. b a Figure 15: Modification of a link homotopic to the identity 20
21 The fundamental group is generated by a and b with the relations: a = b 1 aba 1 baba 1 b 2 ab 2 ab 1 a 1 b 1 aba 1 b b = aba 1 baba 1. From these relations, the longitudes of the components are: w a = b 1 aba 1 baba 1 b 2 w b = aba 1. We apply the Magnus expansion to w a : ψ(w a ) 1 mod D a,2 Applying the Magnus expansion to w b : ψ(w b ) = 1 + (b ba + ba 2 ba 3...) + (ab aba + aba 2 aba 3...) We conclude that µ(b, w b ) = 1. Note that µ(b, w b ) 0 by definition. In the next section, we demonstrate that µ(i, w i ) = 0 for all components of a classical link and a link homotopic to a classical link, allowing us to conclude that this link is not homotopic to any classical link. 6 The µ invariant and virtual link diagrams In this section, we consider the invariant µ(a, w b ) for a b and a = b. We recall that the definition of linking number for virtual link diagrams. The sign of a crossing, c is determined by the local orientation as shown in figure Figure 16: Crossing sign 21
22 We define the link(b,a) to be: sign(c) (4) c where c is a crossing such that the strand a passes under strand b. Note that link(b, a) is not necessarily equivalent to link(a, b). Remark 6.1. In the classical case, link(a, b) = link(b, a) for a = b and a b. Remark 6.2. In [14], Milnor observes that µ(j, k, w i ) = µ(k, j, w i ) and develops the idea of shuffles, symmetry relations on the µ invariants. The symmetry relations need to be re-examined for virtual and welded diagrams. We will demonstrate that µ(b, w a ) = µ(b, w a ) = link(b, a) for a 0. Theorem 6.1. Let L be a link with at least two components, a and b. Then µ(b, w a ) = µ(b, w a ) = link(b, a). Proof: Consider the strand a. If strand strand passes under strand b with a positive orientation k times and with a negative orientation j times, then link(b, a) = k j. We compute the longitude of a, w a. When a i undercrosses b j, we note that a i+1 = (b c )a i (b c ) 1, where b c is a conjugate of b. Hence, for each positive undercrossing, w a contains a b and for each negative crossing a b 1. Now, applying the Magnus expansion to w a, we see that k factors have the form (1 + b) and j factors have the form (1 b + b 2 b 3...). All other terms are of the form (1 + c) or (1 c + c 2 c 3...). To compute the coefficient of b in the Magnus expansion, (1 + b) k (1 b + b 2 b 3...) j = (1 + kb +...)(1 jb +...) (5) = 1 + (k j)b +... (6) Hence µ(b, w a ) = k j. We observe that {b} does not contain a proper subset. Then µ(b, w a ) = k j. We now consider µ(a, w a ). In the classical case, µ(a, w a ) = 0 for all components. For the example given in section 5.4, µ(a, w a ) = 1. Theorem 6.2. Let L be a classical n component link diagram. Then µ(i, w i ) = 0 for any component i of the braid whose closure is L. 22
23 Proof: Let L be a classical n component link diagram. Then L is homotopic to the closure of a pure classical braid and does not have any self-crossings. Consider the generator of the meridian of component i, a i. The longitude of this component, w i has the form: w i = l 1 l 2...l n where each l k is conjugate of the generator of a component that underpasses component i. Hence, l k is not a conjugate of a i for all k {1, 2,...n}. The meridian a i occurs only as a part of a conjugate pair in the longitude. Hence, µ(i, w i ) = 0. Corollary 6.3. Let L be a link diagram. Let i be a component of L with longitude w i. If µ(i, w i ) 0 then L is not a classical link diagram. Proof: The proof of this corollary is immediate. Remark 6.3. We can amend Polyak s skein relation to include µ(i, w i ). Let L be an n component diagram and let w + i represent the i th component with a fixed positive self crossing. Let w i represent the diagram with the fixed self crossing changed to a negative crossing. Then µ(i, w + i ) µ(i, w i ) 0 modulo 2. Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank Xiao Song Lin for the suggestion to investigate virtual link homotopy. It gives the second author great pleasure to acknowledge support from NSF Grant DMS This research was performed while the first author held a National Research Council Research Associateship Award jointly at the Army Research Laboratory and the United States Military Academy. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright annotations thereon. The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of the United States Military Academy or the U.S. Government. (Copyright 2006.) References [1] Artin, E., Theory of braids, Ann. of Math. (2) 48, (1947), p [2] Bardakov, Valerij G., The virtual and universal braids. Fund. Math. 184 (2004), p
24 [3] Fenn, Roger, Techniques of geometric topology. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 57. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, [4] Fenn, Roger; Kauffman, Louis H.; Manturov, Vassily O., Virtual knot theory unsolved problems. Fund. Math. 188 (2005),p [5] Finite Type Invariants Goussarov, Mikhail; Polyak, Michael; Viro, Oleg Finite-type invariants of classical and virtual knots. Topology 39 (2000), 5, p [6] Goldsmith, Deborah Louise, Homotopy of braids in answer to a question of E. Artin. Topology Conference (Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, Va., 1973), p Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 375, Springer, Berlin, 1974 [7] Habegger, Nathan and Lin, Xiao-Song, The classification of links up to link-homotopy. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1990), 2, [8] Kamada, Seiichi, Invariants of virtual braids and a remark on left stabilizations and virtual exchange moves. Kobe J. Math. 21 (2004), 1-2, p [9] Kauffman, Louis H., Virtual Knot Theory, European Journal of Combinatorics, 20 (1999), 7, p , [10] Kauffman, Louis H. and Lambropoulou, Sofia, Virtual braids. Fund. Math. 184 (2004), p [11] Kadokami, Teruhisa, Detecting non-triviality of virtual links. J. Knot Theory Ramifications 12 (2003), 6, p [12] Kishino, Toshimasa and Satoh, Shin, A note on non-classical virtual knots. J. Knot Theory Ramifications 13 (2004), 13, p [13] Milnor, John, Link groups. Ann. of Math. 59 (1954), 2, p [14] Milnor, John, Isotopy of Links. Algebraic geometry and topology. A symposium in honor of S. Lefschetz, p Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., [15] Polyak, Michael, Skein relation for Milnor s µ invariants. Algebraic and Geometric Topology. 5 (2005), p
Virtual Crossing Number and the Arrow Polynomial
arxiv:0810.3858v3 [math.gt] 24 Feb 2009 Virtual Crossing Number and the Arrow Polynomial H. A. Dye McKendree University hadye@mckendree.edu Louis H. Kauffman University of Illinois at Chicago kauffman@uic.edu
More informationarxiv: v3 [math.gt] 7 Aug 2008
arxiv:0711.1638v3 [math.gt] 7 Aug 2008 The Classification of Spun Torus Knots Blake Winter State University of New York, Buffalo Email: bkwinter@buffalo.edu ABSTRACT S. Satoh has defined a construction
More informationFlat hierarchy. Vassily O. Manturov (Moscow)
FUNDAMENTA MATHEMATICAE 188 (2005) Flat hierarchy by Vassily O. Manturov (Moscow) Abstract. We consider the hierarchy flats, a combinatorial generalization of flat virtual links proposed by Louis Kauffman.
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gt] 14 Apr 2012
GROUPS OF VIRTUAL AND WELDED LINKS VALERIY G. BARDAKOV AND PAOLO BELLINGERI arxiv:1204.3205v1 [math.gt] 14 Apr 2012 Abstract. We define new notions of groups of virtual and welded knots (or links) and
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.gt] 16 Aug 2000
arxiv:math/0008118v1 [math.gt] 16 Aug 2000 Stable Equivalence of Knots on Surfaces and Virtual Knot Cobordisms J. Scott Carter University of South Alabama Mobile, AL 36688 cartermathstat.usouthal.edu Masahico
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.gt] 26 Aug 2017
ARROW CALCULUS FOR WELDED AND CLASSICAL LINKS JEAN-BAPTISTE MEILHAN AND AKIRA YASUHARA arxiv:1703.04658v2 [math.gt] 26 Aug 2017 Abstract. We develop a calculus for diagrams of knotted objects. We define
More informationA brief Incursion into Knot Theory. Trinity University
A brief Incursion into Knot Theory Eduardo Balreira Trinity University Mathematics Department Major Seminar, Fall 2008 (Balreira - Trinity University) Knot Theory Major Seminar 1 / 31 Outline 1 A Fundamental
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gt] 1 Jul 2014
VIRTUAL, WELDED, AND RIBBON LINKS IN ARBITRARY DIMENSIONS BLAKE K. WINTER arxiv:1407.0421v1 [math.gt] 1 Jul 2014 Abstract. We define a generalization of virtual links to arbitrary dimensions by extending
More informationp-coloring Classes of Torus Knots
p-coloring Classes of Torus Knots Anna-Lisa Breiland Layla Oesper Laura Taalman Abstract We classify by elementary methods the p-colorability of torus knots, and prove that every p-colorable torus knot
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.gt] 2 Nov 2018
AN UNKNOTTING INDEX FOR VIRTUAL LINKS KIRANDEEP KAUR, MADETI PRABHAKAR, AND ANDREI VESNIN arxiv:1806.01798v [math.gt] Nov 018 Abstract. Given a virtual link diagram D, we define its unknotting index U(D)
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gt] 28 Feb 2019
MILNOR INVARIANTS, 2n-MOVES AND V n -MOVES FOR WELDED STRING LINKS HARUKO A. MIYAZAWA, KODAI WADA, AND AKIRA YASUHARA arxiv:1903.00347v1 [math.gt] 28 Feb 2019 Abstract. In a previous paper, the authors
More informationarxiv:math.gt/ v1 20 Mar 2007
Virtual Knot Invariants from Group Biquandles and Their Cocycles arxiv:math.gt/0703594v1 0 Mar 007 J. Scott Carter University of South Alabama Masahico Saito University of South Florida Susan G. Williams
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.gt] 16 Jul 2017
QUASI-TRIVIAL QUANDLES AND BIQUANDLES, COCYCLE ENHANCEMENTS AND LINK-HOMOTOPY OF PRETZEL LINKS MOHAMED ELHAMDADI, MINGHUI LIU, AND SAM NELSON ariv:1704.01224v2 [math.gt] 16 Jul 2017 ABSTRACT. We investigate
More informationarxiv: v3 [math.gt] 11 Dec 2016
VIRTUAL KNOT GROUPS AND ALMOST CLASSICAL KNOTS HANS U. BODEN, ROBIN GAUDREAU, ERIC HARPER, ANDREW J. NICAS, AND LINDSAY WHITE arxiv:1506.01726v3 [math.gt] 11 Dec 2016 Abstract. We define a group-valued
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.gt] 15 Mar 2017
BAND-PASSES AND LONG VIRTUAL KNOT CONCORDANCE MICAH CHRISMAN arxiv:1603.00267v2 [math.gt] 15 Mar 2017 Abstract. Every classical knot is band-pass equivalent to the unknot or the trefoil. The band-pass
More informationA geometric interpretation of Milnor s triple linking numbers
ISSN 1472-2739 (on-line) 1472-2747 (printed) 557 Algebraic & Geometric Topology Volume 3 (2003) 557 568 Published: 19 June 2003 ATG A geometric interpretation of Milnor s triple linking numbers Blake Mellor
More informationVIRTUAL KNOT GROUPS. Daniel S. Silver. Susan G. Williams
VIRTUAL KNOT GROUPS Daniel S. Silver Susan G. Williams ABSTRACT. Virtual knot groups are characterized, and their properties are compared with those of classical knot groups. A coloring theory, generalizing
More informationGenerell Topologi. Richard Williamson. May 28, 2013
Generell Topologi Richard Williamson May 28, 2013 1 20 Thursday 21st March 20.1 Link colourability, continued Examples 20.1. (4) Let us prove that the Whitehead link is not p-colourable for any odd prime
More informationµ INVARIANT OF NANOPHRASES YUKA KOTORII TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING 1. Introduction A word will be a sequ
µ INVARIANT OF NANOPHRASES YUKA KOTORII TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING 1. Introduction A word will be a sequence of symbols, called letters, belonging to a given
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.gt] 26 Jul 1999
VIRTUAL KNOT GROUPS arxiv:math/9907172v1 [math.gt] 26 Jul 1999 SE-GOO KIM Abstract. Virtual knots, defined by Kauffman, provide a natural generalization of classical knots. Most invariants of knots extend
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gt] 2 Jun 2016
CONVERTING VIRTUAL LINK DIAGRAMS TO NORMAL ONES NAOKO KAMADA arxiv:1606.00667v1 [math.gt] 2 Jun 2016 Abstract. A virtual link diagram is called normal if the associated abstract link diagram is checkerboard
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.gt] 16 Oct 2006
QUATERNIONIC INVARIANTS of VIRTUAL KNOTS and LINKS arxiv:math/0610484v1 [math.gt] 16 Oct 2006 ANDREW BARTHOLOMEW, ROGER FENN 1 1 School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Sussex Falmer, Brighton,
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.gt] 2 Nov 1999
A MOVE ON DIAGRAMS THAT GENERATES S-EQUIVALENCE OF KNOTS Swatee Naik and Theodore Stanford arxiv:math/9911005v1 [math.gt] 2 Nov 1999 Abstract: Two knots in three-space are S-equivalent if they are indistinguishable
More informationPower sums and Homfly skein theory
ISSN 1464-8997 (on line) 1464-8989 (printed) 235 Geometry & Topology Monographs Volume 4: Invariants of knots and 3-manifolds (Kyoto 2001) Pages 235 244 Power sums and Homfly skein theory Hugh R. Morton
More informationThe Knot Quandle. Steven Read
The Knot Quandle Steven Read Abstract A quandle is a set with two operations that satisfy three conditions. For example, there is a quandle naturally associated to any group. It turns out that one can
More information= A + A 1. = ( A 2 A 2 ) 2 n 2. n = ( A 2 A 2 ) n 1. = ( A 2 A 2 ) n 1. We start with the skein relation for one crossing of the trefoil, which gives:
Solutions to sheet 4 Solution to exercise 1: We have seen in the lecture that the Kauffman bracket is invariant under Reidemeister move 2. In particular, we have chosen the values in the skein relation
More informationOn the K-category of 3-manifolds for K a wedge of spheres or projective planes
On the K-category of 3-manifolds for K a wedge of spheres or projective planes J. C. Gómez-Larrañaga F. González-Acuña Wolfgang Heil July 27, 2012 Abstract For a complex K, a closed 3-manifold M is of
More informationENTRY GROUP THEORY. [ENTRY GROUP THEORY] Authors: started Mark Lezama: October 2003 Literature: Algebra by Michael Artin, Mathworld.
ENTRY GROUP THEORY [ENTRY GROUP THEORY] Authors: started Mark Lezama: October 2003 Literature: Algebra by Michael Artin, Mathworld Group theory [Group theory] is studies algebraic objects called groups.
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gt] 22 Oct 2017
THE BAR-NATAN HOMOLOGY AND UNKNOTTING NUMBER arxiv:1710.07874v1 [math.gt] 22 Oct 2017 AKRAM ALISHAHI Abstract. We show that the order of torsion homology classes in Bar- Natan deformation of Khovanov homology
More informationRepresentations of the singular braid monoid and group invariants of singular knots
Topology and its Applications 114 2001) 117 140 Representations of the singular braid monoid and group invariants of singular knots Bernd Gemein Mathematisches Institut der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf,
More informationGeneric section of a hyperplane arrangement and twisted Hurewicz maps
arxiv:math/0605643v2 [math.gt] 26 Oct 2007 Generic section of a hyperplane arrangement and twisted Hurewicz maps Masahiko Yoshinaga Department of Mathematice, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University,
More informationPolynomials in knot theory. Rama Mishra. January 10, 2012
January 10, 2012 Knots in the real world The fact that you can tie your shoelaces in several ways has inspired mathematicians to develop a deep subject known as knot theory. mathematicians treat knots
More informationUnitary Solutions to the Yang-Baxter. Equation in Dimension Four
arxiv:quant-ph/02050 v3 Aug 2003 Unitary Solutions to the Yang-Baxter Equation in Dimension Four H. A. Dye Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science University of Illinois at Chicago
More informationDETERMINING THE HURWITZ ORBIT OF THE STANDARD GENERATORS OF A BRAID GROUP
Yaguchi, Y. Osaka J. Math. 52 (2015), 59 70 DETERMINING THE HURWITZ ORBIT OF THE STANDARD GENERATORS OF A BRAID GROUP YOSHIRO YAGUCHI (Received January 16, 2012, revised June 18, 2013) Abstract The Hurwitz
More informationGenerell Topologi. Richard Williamson. May 29, 2013
Generell Topologi Richard Williamson May 29, 2013 1 21 Thursday 4th April 21.1 Writhe Definition 21.1. Let (L, O L ) be an oriented link. The writhe of L is sign(c). crossings C of L We denote it by w(l).
More informationTHE GRIGORCHUK GROUP
THE GRIGORCHUK GROUP KATIE WADDLE Abstract. In this survey we will define the Grigorchuk group and prove some of its properties. We will show that the Grigorchuk group is finitely generated but infinite.
More informationLocal Moves and Gordian Complexes, II
KYUNGPOOK Math. J. 47(2007), 329-334 Local Moves and Gordian Complexes, II Yasutaka Nakanishi Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Kobe University, Rokko, Nada-ku, Kobe 657-8501, Japan e-mail
More informationFAMILIES OF ALGEBRAIC CURVES AS SURFACE BUNDLES OF RIEMANN SURFACES
FAMILIES OF ALGEBRAIC CURVES AS SURFACE BUNDLES OF RIEMANN SURFACES MARGARET NICHOLS 1. Introduction In this paper we study the complex structures which can occur on algebraic curves. The ideas discussed
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gt] 27 Sep 2018
NP HARD PROBLEMS NATURALLY ARISING IN KNOT THEORY arxiv:1809.10334v1 [math.gt] 27 Sep 2018 DALE KOENIG AND ANASTASIIA TSVIETKOVA Abstract. We prove that certain problems naturally arising in knot theory
More informationALEXANDER GROUPS AND VIRTUAL LINKS
Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications (in press) ALEXANDER GROUPS AND VIRTUAL LINKS DANIEL S. SILVER and SUSAN G. WILLIAMS Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of South Alabama Mobile,
More informationA Theorem of Sanderson on Link Bordisms in Dimension 4
ISSN 1472-2739 (on-line) 1472-2747 (printed) 299 Algebraic & Geometric Topology Volume 1 (2001) 299 310 Published: 23 May 2001 ATG A Theorem of Sanderson on Link Bordisms in Dimension 4 Abstract J. Scott
More informationAN OVERVIEW OF KNOT INVARIANTS
AN OVERVIEW OF KNOT INVARIANTS WILL ADKISSON ABSTRACT. The central question of knot theory is whether two knots are isotopic. This question has a simple answer in the Reidemeister moves, a set of three
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gt] 25 Jan 2011
AN INFINITE FAMILY OF CONVEX BRUNNIAN LINKS IN R n BOB DAVIS, HUGH HOWARDS, JONATHAN NEWMAN, JASON PARSLEY arxiv:1101.4863v1 [math.gt] 25 Jan 2011 Abstract. This paper proves that convex Brunnian links
More informationGeneralized Knot Polynomials and An Application
Generalized Knot Polynomials and An Application Greg McNulty March 17, 2005 ABSTRACT: In this paper we introduce two generalized knot polynomials, the Kauffman and HOMFLY polynomials, show that they are
More informationWhen does a satellite knot fiber? Mikami Hirasawa. Kunio Murasugi. Daniel S. Silver
When does a satellite knot fiber? Mikami Hirasawa DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, NAGOYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, NAGOYA AICHI 466-8555 JAPAN E-mail address: hirasawa.mikami@nitech.ac.jp Kunio Murasugi DEPARTMENT
More informationVassiliev Invariants, Chord Diagrams, and Jacobi Diagrams
Vassiliev Invariants, Chord Diagrams, and Jacobi Diagrams By John Dougherty X Abstract: The goal of this paper is to understand the topological meaning of Jacobi diagrams in relation to knot theory and
More informationGassner Representation of the Pure Braid Group P 4
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 3, 2009, no. 16, 793-798 Gassner Representation of the Pure Braid Group P 4 Mohammad N. Abdulrahim Department of Mathematics Beirut Arab University P.O. Box 11-5020,
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.gt] 14 Oct 2003
KNOT AND BRAID INVARIANTS FROM CONTACT HOMOLOGY II LENHARD NG arxiv:math/0303343v2 [math.gt] 14 Oct 2003 Abstract. We present a topological interpretation of knot and braid contact homology in degree zero,
More informationClasp-pass moves on knots, links and spatial graphs
Topology and its Applications 122 (2002) 501 529 Clasp-pass moves on knots, links and spatial graphs Kouki Taniyama a,, Akira Yasuhara b,1 a Department of Mathematics, College of Arts and Sciences, Tokyo
More informationConcordance of certain 3-braids and Gauss diagrams
Concordance of certain 3-braids and Gauss diagrams Michael Brandenbursky Abstract. Let β := σ 1 σ 1 2 be a braid in B 3, where B 3 is the braid group on 3 strings and σ 1, σ 2 are the standard Artin generators.
More informationDefinitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations
Page 1 Definitions Tuesday, May 8, 2018 12:23 AM Notations " " means "equals, by definition" the set of all real numbers the set of integers Denote a function from a set to a set by Denote the image of
More informationTwisted Alexander Polynomials Detect the Unknot
ISSN numbers are printed here 1 Algebraic & Geometric Topology Volume X (20XX) 1 XXX Published: XX Xxxember 20XX [Logo here] Twisted Alexander Polynomials Detect the Unknot Daniel S. Silver Susan G. Williams
More informationHow many units can a commutative ring have?
How many units can a commutative ring have? Sunil K. Chebolu and Keir Locridge Abstract. László Fuchs posed the following problem in 960, which remains open: classify the abelian groups occurring as the
More informationSPINNING AND BRANCHED CYCLIC COVERS OF KNOTS. 1. Introduction
SPINNING AND BRANCHED CYCLIC COVERS OF KNOTS C. KEARTON AND S.M.J. WILSON Abstract. A necessary and sufficient algebraic condition is given for a Z- torsion-free simple q-knot, q >, to be the r-fold branched
More informationHigh-dimensional knots corresponding to the fractional Fibonacci groups
F U N D A M E N T A MATHEMATICAE 161 (1999) High-dimensional knots corresponding to the fractional Fibonacci groups by Andrzej S z c z e p a ń s k i (Gdańsk) and Andreĭ V e s n i n (Novosibirsk) Abstract.
More informationCLASSICAL AND VIRTUAL PSEUDODIAGRAM THEORY AND NEW BOUNDS ON UNKNOTTING NUMBERS AND GENUS
CLASSICAL AND VIRTUAL PSEUDODIAGRAM THEORY AND NEW BOUNDS ON UNKNOTTING NUMBERS AND GENUS A. HENRICH, N. MACNAUGHTON, S. NARAYAN, O. PECHENIK, AND J. TOWNSEND arxiv:0908.1981v [math.gt] 11 Jan 010 Abstract.
More informationLocal indicability in ordered groups: braids and elementary amenable groups
Local indicability in ordered groups: braids and elementary amenable groups Akbar Rhemtulla Dale Rolfsen September 18, 2002 Abstract Groups which are locally indicable are also right-orderable, but not
More informationBI-ORDERINGS ON PURE BRAIDED THOMPSON S GROUPS. Introduction
BI-ORDERINGS ON PURE BRAIDED THOMPSON S GROUPS JOSÉ BURILLO AND JUAN GONZÁLEZ MENESES Abstract. In this paper it is proved that the pure braided Thompson s group BF admits a bi-order, analog to the bi-order
More informationCaractérisation topologique de tresses virtuelles (Topological characterization of virtual braids)
UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE UFR Sciences et Techniques Institut de Mathématiques de Bourgogne THÈSE Pour obtenir le grade de Docteur de l Université de Bourgogne Discipline : Mathématiques par Bruno Aarón
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gt] 22 Jan 2019
A parity for 2-colourable links William Rushworth Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University E-mail address: will.rushworth@math.mcmaster.ca arxiv:1901.07406v1 [math.gt] 22 Jan 2019
More informationThe Invariants of 4-Moves
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 6, 2012, no. 14, 667-674 The Invariants of 4-Moves Noureen A. Khan Department of Mathematics and Information Sciences University of North Texas at Dallas, TX 75241 USA
More informationA note on Samelson products in the exceptional Lie groups
A note on Samelson products in the exceptional Lie groups Hiroaki Hamanaka and Akira Kono October 23, 2008 1 Introduction Samelson products have been studied extensively for the classical groups ([5],
More informationCLASSIFYING AND APPLYING RATIONAL KNOTS AND RATIONAL TANGLES
CLASSIFYING AND APPLYING RAIONAL KNOS AND RAIONAL ANGLES LOUIS H. KAUFFMAN AND SOFIA LAMBROPOULOU Abstract. In this survey paper we sketch new combinatorial proofs of the classification of rational tangles
More informationHomework 10 M 373K by Mark Lindberg (mal4549)
Homework 10 M 373K by Mark Lindberg (mal4549) 1. Artin, Chapter 11, Exercise 1.1. Prove that 7 + 3 2 and 3 + 5 are algebraic numbers. To do this, we must provide a polynomial with integer coefficients
More informationMonomial orderings, rewriting systems, and Gröbner bases for the commutator ideal of a free algebra
Monomial orderings, rewriting systems, and Gröbner bases for the commutator ideal of a free algebra Susan M. Hermiller Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, NE
More informationThe pure braid groups and the Milnor μ-invariants of links
HIROSHIMA MATH J 12 (1982), 485-489 The pure braid groups and the Milnor μ-invariants of links Tetsusuke OHKAWA (Received January 14, 1982) 1 The statement of results In this note, we study a relation
More informationKLEIN LINK MULTIPLICITY AND RECURSION. 1. Introduction
KLEIN LINK MULTIPLICITY AND RECURSION JENNIFER BOWEN, DAVID FREUND, JOHN RAMSAY, AND SARAH SMITH-POLDERMAN Abstract. The (m, n)-klein links are formed by altering the rectangular representation of an (m,
More informationALEXANDER-LIN TWISTED POLYNOMIALS
Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications c World Scientific Publishing Company ALEXANDER-LIN TWISTED POLYNOMIALS DANIEL S. SILVER and SUSAN G. WILLIAMS Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University
More informationA NOTE ON QUANTUM 3-MANIFOLD INVARIANTS AND HYPERBOLIC VOLUME
A NOTE ON QUANTUM 3-MANIFOLD INVARIANTS AND HYPERBOLIC VOLUME EFSTRATIA KALFAGIANNI Abstract. For a closed, oriented 3-manifold M and an integer r > 0, let τ r(m) denote the SU(2) Reshetikhin-Turaev-Witten
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gt] 11 Aug 2008
Link invariants from finite Coxeter racks Sam Nelson Ryan Wieghard arxiv:0808.1584v1 [math.gt] 11 Aug 2008 Abstract We study Coxeter racks over Z n and the knot and link invariants they define. We exploit
More informationThe Three-Variable Bracket Polynomial for Reduced, Alternating Links
Rose-Hulman Undergraduate Mathematics Journal Volume 14 Issue 2 Article 7 The Three-Variable Bracket Polynomial for Reduced, Alternating Links Kelsey Lafferty Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL, kelsey.lafferty@my.wheaton.edu
More informationON KIRBY CALCULUS FOR NULL-HOMOTOPIC FRAMED LINKS IN 3-MANIFOLDS
ON KIRBY CALCULUS FOR NULL-HOMOTOPIC FRAMED LINKS IN 3-MANIFOLDS KAZUO HABIRO AND TAMARA WIDMER Abstract. Kirby proved that two framed links in S 3 give orientationpreserving homeomorphic results of surgery
More informationSome non-trivial PL knots whose complements are homotopy circles
Some non-trivial PL knots whose complements are homotopy circles Greg Friedman Vanderbilt University May 16, 2006 Dedicated to the memory of Jerry Levine (May 4, 1937 - April 8, 2006) 2000 Mathematics
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gt] 7 Nov 2017
Additional gradings on generalisations of Khovanov homology and invariants of embedded surfaces Vassily Olegovich Manturov and William Rushworth Bauman Moscow State Technical University and Chelyabinsk
More informationRings. Chapter 1. Definition 1.2. A commutative ring R is a ring in which multiplication is commutative. That is, ab = ba for all a, b R.
Chapter 1 Rings We have spent the term studying groups. A group is a set with a binary operation that satisfies certain properties. But many algebraic structures such as R, Z, and Z n come with two binary
More informationRATIONAL TANGLES AND THE MODULAR GROUP
MOSCOW MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL Volume, Number, April June 0, Pages 9 6 RATIONAL TANGLES AND THE MODULAR GROUP FRANCESCA AICARDI Dedicated to V.I. Arnold, with endless gratitude Abstract. There is a natural
More informationDelta link homotopy for two component links, III
J. Math. Soc. Japan Vol. 55, No. 3, 2003 elta link homotopy for two component links, III By Yasutaka Nakanishi and Yoshiyuki Ohyama (Received Jul. 11, 2001) (Revised Jan. 7, 2002) Abstract. In this note,
More informationVirtual Tribrackets. Sam Nelson Shane Pico
Virtual Tribrackets Sam Nelson Shane Pico arxiv:1803.03210v2 [math.gt] 6 Dec 2018 Abstract We introduce virtual tribrackets, an algebraic structure for coloring regions in the planar complement of an oriented
More informationPure Braid Group Representations of Low Degree
International Journal of Algebra, Vol 5, 2011, no 21, 1011-1020 Pure Braid Group Representations of Low Degree Mohammad N Abdulrahim and Ghenwa H Abboud Department of Mathematics Beirut Arab University
More informationON POSITIVITY OF KAUFFMAN BRACKET SKEIN ALGEBRAS OF SURFACES
ON POSITIVITY OF KAUFFMAN BRACKET SKEIN ALGEBRAS OF SURFACES THANG T. Q. LÊ Abstract. We show that the Chebyshev polynomials form a basic block of any positive basis of the Kauffman bracket skein algebras
More informationON THE CENTER OF THE GROUP OF A LINK
ON THE CENTER OF THE GROUP OF A LINK KUNIO MURASUGI 1. Introduction. A group G is said to be finitely presented if it has a finite presentation (P, i.e., (P consists of a finite number, «say, of generators
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.gt] 9 Apr 2015
ALEXANDER INVARIANTS FOR VIRTUAL KNOTS HANS U. BODEN, EMILY DIES, ANNE ISABEL GAUDREAU, ADAM GERLINGS, ERIC HARPER, AND ANDREW J. NICAS arxiv:1409.1459v2 [math.gt] 9 Apr 2015 Abstract. Given a virtual
More informationLifting Smooth Homotopies of Orbit Spaces of Proper Lie Group Actions
Journal of Lie Theory Volume 15 (2005) 447 456 c 2005 Heldermann Verlag Lifting Smooth Homotopies of Orbit Spaces of Proper Lie Group Actions Marja Kankaanrinta Communicated by J. D. Lawson Abstract. By
More informationCOMPOSITE KNOT DETERMINANTS
COMPOSITE KNOT DETERMINANTS SAMANTHA DIXON Abstract. In this paper, we will introduce the basics of knot theory, with special focus on tricolorability, Fox r-colorings of knots, and knot determinants.
More informationKnot Floer Homology and the Genera of Torus Knots
Knot Floer Homology and the Genera of Torus Knots Edward Trefts April, 2008 Introduction The goal of this paper is to provide a new computation of the genus of a torus knot. This paper will use a recent
More informationA GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander
A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander During the first three days of September, 1997, I had the privilege of giving a series of five lectures at the beginning of the School on Algebraic
More informationA NOTE ON SPACES OF ASYMPTOTIC DIMENSION ONE
A NOTE ON SPACES OF ASYMPTOTIC DIMENSION ONE KOJI FUJIWARA AND KEVIN WHYTE Abstract. Let X be a geodesic metric space with H 1(X) uniformly generated. If X has asymptotic dimension one then X is quasi-isometric
More informationPERFECT SUBGROUPS OF HNN EXTENSIONS
PERFECT SUBGROUPS OF HNN EXTENSIONS F. C. TINSLEY (JOINT WITH CRAIG R. GUILBAULT) Introduction This note includes supporting material for Guilbault s one-hour talk summarized elsewhere in these proceedings.
More informationSERGEI CHMUTOV AND IGOR PAK
Dedicated to Askold Khovanskii on the occasion of his 60th birthday THE KAUFFMAN BRACKET OF VIRTUAL LINKS AND THE BOLLOBÁS-RIORDAN POLYNOMIAL SERGEI CHMUTOV AND IGOR PAK Abstract. We show that the Kauffman
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.gt] 4 Sep 2017
ON REALIZABILITY OF GAUSS DIAGRAMS Andrey Grinblat and Viktor Lopatkin arxiv:.v [math.gt] Sep Abstract. The problem of which Gauss diagram can be realized by knots is an old one and has been solved in
More information2-GENERATED CAYLEY DIGRAPHS ON NILPOTENT GROUPS HAVE HAMILTONIAN PATHS
Volume 7, Number 1, Pages 41 47 ISSN 1715-0868 2-GENERATED CAYLEY DIGRAPHS ON NILPOTENT GROUPS HAVE HAMILTONIAN PATHS DAVE WITTE MORRIS Abstract. Suppose G is a nilpotent, finite group. We show that if
More informationThe Hurewicz Theorem
The Hurewicz Theorem April 5, 011 1 Introduction The fundamental group and homology groups both give extremely useful information, particularly about path-connected spaces. Both can be considered as functors,
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n
REPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n EVAN JENKINS Abstract. These are notes from three lectures given in MATH 26700, Introduction to Representation Theory of Finite Groups, at the University of Chicago in November
More informationOn orderability of fibred knot groups
Under consideration for publication in Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 1 On orderability of fibred knot groups By BERNARD PERRON Laboratoire de Topologie, Université de Bourgogne, BP 47870 21078 - Dijon Cedex,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gt] 20 Nov 2018
Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications c World Scientific Publishing Company arxiv:1811.08384v1 [math.gt] 20 Nov 2018 Detecting and visualizing 3-dimensional surgery Stathis Antoniou School of Applied
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.gt] 7 Jan 1998
A Presentation of the Mapping Class Groups arxiv:math/9801025v1 [math.gt] 7 Jan 1998 Feng Luo Dept. of Math., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 e-mail: fluo@math.rutgers.edu Abstract. Using the
More informationOn the Classification of Rational Knots
arxiv:math/0212011v2 [math.gt] 27 Nov 2003 On the Classification of ational Knots Louis H. Kauffman and Sofia Lambropoulou Abstract In this paper we give combinatorial proofs of the classification of unoriented
More informationBi-oriented Quantum Algebras, and a Generalized Alexander Polynomial for Virtual Links
Contemporary Mathematics Bi-oriented Quantum Algebras, and a Generalized Alexander Polynomial for Virtual Links Louis H. Kauffman and David Radford Abstract. This paper discusses the construction of a
More informationMATH540: Algebraic Topology PROBLEM SET 3 STUDENT SOLUTIONS
Key Problems 1. Compute π 1 of the Mobius strip. Solution (Spencer Gerhardt): MATH540: Algebraic Topology PROBLEM SET 3 STUDENT SOLUTIONS In other words, M = I I/(s, 0) (1 s, 1). Let x 0 = ( 1 2, 0). Now
More information58 CHAPTER 2. COMPUTATIONAL METHODS
58 CHAPTER 2. COMPUTATIONAL METHODS 23 Hom and Lim We will now develop more properties of the tensor product: its relationship to homomorphisms and to direct limits. The tensor product arose in our study
More information