Six degree-of-freedom loading of a circular flat footing on loose sand: Experimental data
|
|
- Stephanie Sanders
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Six degree-of-freedom loading of a circular flat footing on loose sand: Experimental data by B. Bienen 1, B.W. Byrne 2 and G.T. Houlsby 2 Report No. OUEL 2289/05 University of Oxford, Department of Engineering Science, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PJ, U.K. Tel / Fax civil@eng.ox.ac.uk 1 Centre for Offshore Foundations Systems, University of Western Australia 2 Department of Engineering Science, Oxford University 1
2 Six degree-of-freedom loading of a circular flat footing on loose sand: Experimental data B. Bienen 1, B.W. Byrne 2 and G.T. Houlsby 2 Summary This report documents a series of model tests of a rough circular flat footing on loose sand. Using a new experimental rig, the footing was subjected to general loading in three dimensions (six degrees-of-freedom). The data collected will be used to validate a footing macro model catering for all six degrees-of-freedom within the plasticity framework. Introduction Combined loading on shallow foundations has been successfully modelled through the framework of plasticity theory (Martin 1994, Cassidy 1999, Byrne 2000). By adjusting only a few parameters, these models can capture the main features of footing response on various soils. Based on experimental data on Kaolin clay, Martin (1994) developed Model B whereas Cassidy s (1999) Model C was calibrated with data from similar tests on dense silica sand. Since then, the model has also been successfully used to predict footing behaviour on loose carbonate sand (Byrne and Houlsby 2001). So far, the models have been applied to predict the response of flat circular footings, spudcans and suction caisson subjected to (V, M, H) planar loading. Model B and Model C have been theoretically extended to allow for general loading (Martin 1994, Cassidy and Bienen 2002) situations in six degrees-of-freedom and combined into one plasticity footing macro model known as ISIS (Houlsby 2003, Cassidy et al. 2004). However, only few data exist on shallow circular footings under loading in all three dimensions (Cassidy and Cheong 2005, Ap Gwilym 2004, Williams 2005) and full experimental validation of the model, particularly with regards to torsion and combined loading directions remains desirable. Experimental rig At the University of Oxford, a novel experimental rig has been developed for testing of shallow foundations under six degree-of-freedom loading (Byrne and Houlsby 2005, Figure 1). The footing to be tested is supported by a loading platform, which is moved by six actuators. These are pin-joined to the loading platform on the one end and the loading rig, which is bolted onto a steel ring, on the other. Using a control program, the six actuators act in concert to move the loading platform and thus the footing to the desired position. The actuators are arranged such 1 Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems, The University of Western Australia 2 Department of Engineering Science, The University of Oxford 2
3 that their combined movement in three dimensions is well-conditioned (Figure 1). To date, the rig is displacement-controlled only. The footing used in the tests reported here is circular (150 mm in diameter), flat and rough. The footing loads are monitored with a six degree-of-freedom load cell mounted between the footing and the loading platform (Figure 1). The footing displacements are measured with a set of six LVDTs, arranged in a similar fashion to the actuators but supported on a separate frame, which is also bolted onto the steel ring. The LVDT arrangement is illustrated in Figure 2. The separate frame ensures independence of the displacement measurements from the loading frame and thus minimises the influence of rig flexibility. Both the loading and the LVDT frames are mounted on a steel ring which in turn is bolted onto the testing tank. This ensures that the two frames do not move relative to each other, even when taken off the testing tank to prepare a new soil sample. The coordinates of both ends of all actuators and LVDTs as well as several distinct points on the frames and steel ring have been surveyed using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). The measurements are reported in Table 1 and the coordinates in the rig coordinate system (Figure 3) are given in Table 2. The x-axis of the rig coordinate system runs parallel to actuators 1 and 2, whereas the y-axis is in line with actuator 3. z is positive downwards with the datum being the top of the steel ring. Note that the coordinate system and sign convention (Figure 3b) differs from the ISIS sign convention (Figure 4). All results reported here are defined using the ISIS sign convention. Soil characteristics The experiments were performed on dry yellow Leighton Buzzard sand. It has a specific gravity G s of 2.65 and minimum and maximum dry densities of kn/m 3 and 18 kn/m 3, respectively. Further soil characteristics are provided in Schnaid (1990). The sand was placed into the testing tank from a low drop height to achieve a very loose state; the average dry density of all tests performed being kn/m 3. The density for each test is included in Table 3, which also provides the testing programme. Results In this series of experiments, vertical load-penetration tests have been carried out as well as radial displacement tests. The majority of the testing programme, however, consisted of swipe tests either in one loading direction or a combination of two loading directions. In some swipe tests, the combined loading was simultaneous, for instance applying a moment and horizontal load at the same time. Several swipe tests of simultaneous in-plane moment and horizontal load (H 1 and M 1 or H 2 and M 2 according to Figure 3b) carried out at various ratios of H / M provide information on the eccentricity of the yield surface cross-section in the (H, M/2R) plane. In other tests, the footing was displaced in one direction before the displacement in that direction was halted as the footing was swiped in another direction. These tests, for instance applying H 1 first followed by H 2, may be used to show that the footing load path still traces the same yield surface, thus proving that the respective degrees-of-freedom are independent of 3
4 each other. In the yield surface equation this is reflected by the loading directions being uncoupled. A few elasticity tests have been attempted, too, but without feedback load control keeping the other degrees-of-freedom at their respective target value during the test, the results are ambiguous. The testing programme, documented in Table 3, has the following format: Test number Event Description V 0 w u 2 u 3 ω θ 2 θ 3 Density Time V load hold before swipe [N] [mm] [mm] [mm] [ ] [ ] [ ] [kn/m 3 ] [s] The files provided for each test include a test description (e.g. BBXX_description.xls) and the results file (e.g. BBXX_ResultsFile.dat). The format of the results file is time [s] in the first column, then loads in the order {V, H 2, H 3,, M 2, M 3 } in [N] and [Nm], respectively. This is followed by the displacements calculated from the LVDT readings {w, u 2, u 3, ω, θ 2, θ 3 } in [mm] and [rad], respectively. The loads and displacements refer to the ISIS sign convention shown in Figure 4. Time history plots are provided for all tests on a particular sample (e.g. BBXX.pdf, showing all events on sample XX). For each individual event, the horizontal, moment and torsional loads have also been plotted against the vertical load. The data files are denoted BBXX_EventY.pdf which contains the Y event on sample XX only. The corresponding data file is named BBXX_EventY.dat. The data in these files has the same order as in the results files. Conclusions Reported here is a comprehensive series of laboratory experiments on a rough circular flat footing on very loose sand subjected to loading in all six degrees-of-freedom. The tests were carried out to provide a database for validation of the theoretical extension of the ISIS plasticity footing macro model to cater for general loading in six-degrees-of-freedom. Acknowledgements This research was supported by an Australian Research Council's Linkage International Award (LX ), which is gratefully acknowledged. The first author also gratefully acknowledges the support of an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship of Australia and the University of Western Australia Postgraduate Students Association Research Travel Award. The funding for the development of the loading rig was obtained from the Lubbock Trustees, the Royal Society, EPSRC and the Department of Engineering Science at Oxford. The load cell was built by Clive Baker and the loading frame by Chris Waddup. The experiments described here could not have been carried out without the assistance of Bob Sawala and Chris Waddup. References Ap Gwilym, T.L Control of a six degree of freedom loading rig. Fourth Year Project, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford. Byrne, B.W Investigations of suction caissons in dense sand. D.Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford. 4
5 Byrne, B.W. and Houlsby, G.T Observations of Footing Behaviour on Loose Carbonate Sands. Géotechnique 51 5: Byrne, B.W. and Houlsby, G.T Investigating 6 degree-of-freedom loading on shallow foundations. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics (ISFOG), Perth. Butterfield, R., Houlsby, G.T. and Gottardi, G. (1997). Standardised sign conventions and notation for generally loaded foundations. Géotechnique 47 5: ; corrigendum Géotechnique 48 1:157. Cassidy, M.J Non-Linear Analysis of Jack-Up Structures Subjected to Random Waves. D.Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford. Cassidy, M.J. and Bienen, B Three-Dimensional Numerical Analysis of Jack-Up Structures on Sand. Proc. 12th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Kitakyushu, Japan. Cassidy, M.J. and Cheong, J The behaviour of circular footings on sand subjected to combined vertical-torsion loading. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, accepted. Cassidy, M.J., Martin, C.M. and Houlsby, G.T Development and application of force resultant models describing jack-up foundation behaviour. Marine Structures 17: Houlsby, G.T., Modelling of shallow foundations for offshore structures. International Conference on Foundations, Dundee, Scotland. Martin, C.M., Physical and Numerical Modelling of Offshore Foundations Under Combined Loads. D.Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford. Schnaid, F A study of the cone-pressuremeter test in sand. D.Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford. Williams, R Six degree of freedom loading tests on clay and sand. Fourth Year Project, Department of Engineering Science, The University of Oxford. 5
6 Set 1 COORDINATES (CMM) Number Type Size Description X Y Z 1 plane top surface of steel ring circle steel ring circle footing surface point Point 1 on steel ring surface point Point 2 on steel ring surface point Point 3 on steel ring sphere Pinned end actuator sphere Pinned end actuator sphere Fixed end actuator sphere Fixed end actuator sphere Pinned end actuator sphere Pinned end actuator sphere Fixed end actuator sphere Fixed end actuator sphere Fixed end actuator sphere Pinned end actuator sphere Pinned end actuator sphere Fixed end actuator Set 2 COORDINATES (CMM) Number Type Size Description X Y Z 1 plane top surface of steel ring circle steel ring circle footing surface point Point 3 on steel ring surface point Point 1 on steel ring surface point Point 2 on steel ring sphere Pinned end actuator sphere Fixed end actuator sphere Fixed end actuator sphere Pinned end actuator surface point outer corner of blue frame behind the end of actuator surface point outer corner of blue frame behind the end of actuator surface point middle of sticker on blue frame near end of actuator surface point outer corner of LVDT frame near the end of LVDT surface point outer corner of LVDT frame near the end of LVDT circle bolt (exchange for eye bolt) on top of blue frame sphere Fixed end of LVDT sphere Pinned end of LVDT sphere Pinned end of LVDT sphere Fixed end of LVDT sphere Fixed end of LVDT sphere Fixed end of LVDT sphere Pinned end of LVDT sphere Pinned end of LVDT sphere Fixed end of LVDT sphere Fixed end of LVDT sphere Pinned end of LVDT sphere Fixed end of LVDT sphere Pinned end of LVDT surface point cross x = y = 0 on platform Table 1: Coordinates obtained from Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) (Two sets of data in the CMM coordinate system because the testing rig moved during the measuring procedure.) 6
7 FINAL COORDINATES (6DOF) Description X Y Z top surface of steel ring steel ring footing Point 1 on steel ring Point 2 on steel ring Point 3 on steel ring Pinned end actuator Fixed end actuator Fixed end actuator Pinned end actuator Pinned end actuator Fixed end actuator Fixed end actuator Fixed end actuator Pinned end actuator Pinned end actuator Fixed end actuator Pinned end actuator outer corner of blue frame behind the end of actuator outer corner of blue frame behind the end of actuator middle of sticker on blue frame near end of actuator outer corner of LVDT frame near the end of LVDT outer corner of LVDT frame near the end of LVDT bolt (exchange for eye bolt) on top of blue frame Fixed end of LVDT Pinned end of LVDT Pinned end of LVDT Fixed end of LVDT Fixed end of LVDT Fixed end of LVDT Pinned end of LVDT Pinned end of LVDT Fixed end of LVDT Fixed end of LVDT Pinned end of LVDT Fixed end of LVDT Pinned end of LVDT cross x = y = 0 on platform Table 2: Testing rig coordinates 7
8 Test number Event Description V0 w u2 u3 omega theta2 theta3 density time V load hold [N] [mm] [mm] [mm] [degrees] [degrees] [degrees] [kn/m3] [s] before swipe BB01 Vertical 0.02 mm/s N/A BB02 Vertical 0.02 mm/s, N/A unload - reload z = 6 mm and z = 10 mm, 0.01 mm/s BB03 swipe H mm/s n BB04 swipe M degs/s n BB05 swipe simultaneous H3M3 swipe (out of 0.04 mm/s and degs/s n BB06 swipe simultaneous H3M2 swipe (in 0.04 mm/s and degs/s n BB07 swipe simultaneous H3M2 swipe (in 0.04 mm/s and degs/s n BB08 swipe1 H mm/s n swipe2 H mm/s n BB09 swipe1 H mm/s n swipe2 H mm/s n BB10 swipe1 M degs/s n swipe2 M degs/s n BB11 swipe degs/s n swipe degs/s n BB12 swipe1 H3 (@ mm/s), then H2 swipe (@ mm/s) (then) 1.85 (first) y BB13 swipe2 H2 (@ mm/s), then H3 swipe (@ mm/s) (first) (then) y BB14 swipe1 M3 (@ degs/s), then M2 (@ degs/s) (then) 1.34 (first) y swipe2 M2 (@ degs/s), then M3 (@ degs/s) (first) (then) y swipe3 M3 swipe (@ degs/s) y swipe4 M3 (@ degs/s), then M2 swipe (@ degs/s) (then) (first) y BB15 swipe1 H3 swipe ( mm/s) y swipe2 H2 swipe ( mm/s) y swipe3 H3 swipe ( mm/s) y swipe4 H2 swipe ( mm/s) y BB16 swipe1 H2 swipe ( mm/s) y swipe2 H3 swipe ( mm/s) y swipe3 H2 swipe ( mm/s) y swipe4 H3 swipe ( mm/s) y swipe5 H2 swipe ( mm/s) y swipe6 H3 swipe ( mm/s) y swipe7 H2 swipe ( mm/s) y BB17 swipe1 swipe (@ degs/s) y swipe2 swipe (@ degs/s) y swipe3 swipe (@ degs/s) y swipe4 simultaneous H3 swipe (@ mm/s and degs/s) y swipe5 simultaneous H3 swipe (@ mm/s and degs/s) y swipe6 swipe (@ degs/s) y swipe7 simultaneous H3 swipe (@ mm/s and degs/s) y swipe8 simultaneous H3 swipe (@ mm/s and degs/s) y Table 1: Test programme 8
9 Test number Event Description V0 w u2 u3 omega theta2 theta3 density time V load hold [N] [mm] [mm] [mm] [degrees] [degrees] [degrees] [kn/m3] [s] before swipe BB18 swipe1 simultaneous H3M2 swipe (@ mm/s and degs/s) (in plane) y swipe2 simultaneous H2M3 swipe (@ mm/s and degs/s) (in plane) y swipe3 simultaneous H3M2 swipe (@ mm/s and degs/s) (in plane) y swipe4 simultaneous H2M3 swipe (@ mm/s and degs/s) (in plane) y BB19 swipe1 H3 (@ mm/s), then H2 swipe (@ mm/s) (then) 1.75 (first) y swipe2 H2 (@ mm/s), then H3 swipe (@ mm/s) (first) 0.35 (then) y swipe3 H3 (@ mm/s), then H2 swipe (@ mm/s) (then) -1.5 (first) y swipe4 H2 (@ mm/s), then H3 swipe (@ mm/s) (first) (then) y swipe5 H3 (@ mm/s), then H2 swipe (@ mm/s) (then) 1.7 (first) y swipe6 H2 (@ mm/s), then H3 swipe (@ mm/s) (first) 0.3 (then) y BB20 swipe1 M3 (@ degs/s), then M2 swipe (@ degs/s) (then) 1.3 (first) y swipe2 M2 (@ degs/s), then M3 swipe (@ degs/s) (first) 0.2 (then) y swipe3 M3 (@ degs/s), then M2 swipe (@ degs/s) (then) 1.35 (first) y 4raddispl radial displacement test domega / dz = N/A BB21 swipe1 H3 (@ mm/s), then M3 swipe (@ degs/s) (out of plane) (first) 0.25 (then) -1.5 N/A y swipe2 H3 (@ mm/s), then swipe (@ degs/s) (first) 0.25 (then) 1.5 N/A y 3raddispl radial displacement test du2 / dz = N/A 500 N/A BB22 swipe1 H3 (@ mm/s), then M2 swipe (@ degs/s) (in plane) (first) 0.25 (then) y swipe2 H2 (@ mm/s), then M2 swipe (@ degs/s) (out of plane) (first) 0.25 (then) y 3raddispl radial displacement test domega / dz = N/A BB23 swipe1 M3 (@ degs/s), then H3 swipe (@ mm/s) (out of plane) (then) 1.5 (first) y swipe2 M3 (@ degs/s), then swipe (@ degs/s) (then) 1.38 (first) y 3raddispl radial displacement test dtheta3 / dz = N/A BB24 swipe1 M2 (@ degs/s), then H2 swipe (@ mm/s) (out of plane) (then) 1.35 (first) y swipe2 M2 (@ degs/s), then swipe (@ degs/s) (then) 1.38 (first) y 3raddispl radial displacement test du3 / dz = N/A BB25 swipe1 H2 (@ mm/s), then swipe (@ degs/s) (first) 0.25 (then) y swipe2 (@ degs/s), then H2 swipe (@ mm/s) (then) 1.5 (first) y 3raddispl radial displacement test dtheta3 / dz = (-1.0) N/A BB26 swipe1 H3 (@ mm/s), then M3 swipe (@ degs/s) (out of plane) (first) 0.25 (then) y swipe2 H3 (@ mm/s), then swipe (@ degs/s) ~ 23 (first) 0.25 (then) y 3raddispl radial displacement test domega / dz = N/A BB27 swipe1 H3 (@ mm/s), then swipe (@ degs/s) (first) 0.25 (then) y swipe2 M3 (@ degs/s), then swipe (@ degs/s) (then) 2.5 (first) y 3raddispl radial displacement test du2 / dz = N/A BB28 swipe1 (@ degs/s), then M3 swipe (@ degs/s) (first) 0.12 (then) y swipe2 (@ degs/s), then M2 swipe (@ degs/s) (first) 0.12 (then) y 3raddispl radial displacement test domega / dz = N/A BB29 swipe1 (@ degs/s), then H3 swipe (@ mm/s) (then) 1.5 (first) y swipe2 H3 (@ mm/s), then swipe (@ degs/s) (first) 0.25 (then) y 3raddispl radial displacement test domega / dz = N/A Table 3: Test programme (continued) 9
10 Test number Event Description V0 w u2 u3 omega theta2 theta3 density time V load hold [N] [mm] [mm] [mm] [degrees] [degrees] [degrees] [kn/m3] [s] before swipe BB30 swipe1 M2 (@ degs/s), then H3 swipe (@ mm/s) (in plane) (then) 1.75 (first) y swipe2 M3 (@ degs/s), then H3 swipe (@ mm/s) (out of plane) (then) 1.75 (first) y 3raddispl radial displacement test domega / dz = N/A BB31 swipe1 H3 (@ mm/s), then M2 swipe (@ degs/s) (in plane) (first) 0.25 (then) y swipe2 H2 (@ mm/s), then M3 swipe (@ degs/s) (in plane) (first) 0.25 (then) y 3raddispl radial displacement test domega / dz = N/A BB32 swipe1 H3 (@ mm/s), then M3 swipe (@ degs/s) (out of plane) (first) 0.25 (then) y swipe2 swipe (@ degs/s) y 3raddispl radial displacement test dy / dz = N/A BB33 1raddispl radial displacement test domega / dz = N/A 2swipe swipe (@ degs/s) y 3swipe H3 (@ mm/s), then H2 swipe (@ mm/s) (then) 1.75 (first) y 4raddispl radial displacement test du2 / dz = N/A BB34 1raddispl radial displacement test domega / dz = N/A 2elasticity elasticity omega (@ degs/s) ~ 350 N ~ N/A 3elasticity elasticity theta2 (@ degs/s) ~ 350 N N/A 4swipe simultaneous H2M3 swipe (@ mm/s and degs/s) (in plane) y 5elasticity elasticity omega (@ degs/s) ~ 907 N N/A 6elasticity elasticity theta2 (@ degs/s) ~ 907 N N/A BB35 1raddispl radial displacement test domega / dz = N/A 2swipe swipe from low V/V0 (@ degs/s) y 3swipe swipe from low V/V0 (@ degs/s) y 4Vunloadreload Vertical 0.02 mm/s, various N/A unload - reload z = 6 mm and z = 10 mm, 0.01 mm/s BB36 1raddispl radial displacement test du2 / dz = 1.0 and dbeta / dz = N/A 2swipe simultaneous H2M3 swipe (@ mm/s and degs/s) (in plane) y 3swipe simultaneous H2M3 swipe (@ mm/s and degs/s) (in plane) y 4Vunloadreload Vertical 0.02 mm/s, various N/A unload - reload z = 6 mm and z = 10 mm, 0.01 mm/s BB37 1raddispl radial displacement test du2 / dz = N/A 2swipe simultaneous H3M2 swipe (@ mm/s and degs/s) (in plane) y BB38 1raddispl radial displacement test dtheta2 / dz = N/A 2swipe simultaneous H3M2 swipe (@ mm/s and 0.01 degs/s) (in plane) y BB39 1raddispl radial displacement test du2 / dz = 0.5 and domega / dz = N/A 2swipe simultaneous H3M2 swipe (@ mm/s and 0.01 degs/s) (in plane) ~ y Table 3: Test programme (continued) 10
11 Actuator 4 Actuator 6 Actuator 1 Actuator 5 Actuator 2 Actuator 3 Footing Load cell Figure 1: Photo of six degree-of-freedom loading rig, actuator arrangement LVDT 5 LVDT 3 LVDT 6 LVDT 2 LVDT 1 LVDT 4 Figure 2: Close-up of loading platform, LVDT arrangement 11
12 y Actuator 6 Actuator 3 M 1, β H 2, y Actuator 2 M 2, α Actuator 1 Actuator 5 Actuator 4 x, γ H 1, x V, z a) b) Figure 3: 6 dof testing rig coordinate system and sign convention H 2 2 2R M 2 H 3 1 V M 3 3 Figure 4: ISIS sign convention (after Butterfield et al., 1997) 12
13 Record of test: BB01_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
14 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB01_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
15 Record of test: BB02_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
16 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB02_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
17 Record of test: BB03_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
18 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB03_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
19 Record of test: BB04_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
20 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB04_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
21 Record of test: BB05_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
22 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB05_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
23 Record of test: BB06_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
24 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB06_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
25 Record of test: BB07_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
26 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB07_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
27 Record of test: BB08_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
28 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB08_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
29 Record of test: BB09_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
30 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB09_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
31 Record of test: BB10_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
32 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB10_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
33 Record of test: BB11_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
34 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB11_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
35 Record of test: BB12_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
36 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB12_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
37 Record of test: BB13_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
38 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB13_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
39 Record of test: BB14_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
40 Record of test: BB14_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
41 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB14_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
42 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB14_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
43 Record of test: BB15_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
44 Record of test: BB15_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
45 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB15_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
46 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB15_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
47 Record of test: BB16_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
48 Record of test: BB16_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
49 Record of test: BB16_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
50 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB16_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
51 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB16_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
52 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB16_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
53 Record of test: BB17_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
54 Record of test: BB17_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
55 Record of test: BB17_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
56 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB17_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
57 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB17_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
58 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB17_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
59 Record of test: BB18_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
60 Record of test: BB18_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
61 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB18_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
62 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB18_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
63 Record of test: BB19_ResultsFile_I V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
64 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB19_ResultsFile_I 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
65 Record of test: BB19_ResultsFile_II V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
66 Record of test: BB19_ResultsFile_II V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
67 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB19_ResultsFile_II 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
68 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB19_ResultsFile_II 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
69 Record of test: BB20_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
70 Record of test: BB20_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
71 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB20_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
72 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB20_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
73 Record of test: BB21_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
74 Record of test: BB21_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
75 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB21_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
76 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB21_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
77 Record of test: BB22_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
78 Record of test: BB22_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
79 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB22_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
80 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB22_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
81 Record of test: BB23_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
82 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB23_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
83 Record of test: BB24_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
84 Record of test: BB24_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
85 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB24_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
86 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB24_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
87 Record of test: BB25_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
88 Record of test: BB25_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
89 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB25_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
90 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB25_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
91 Record of test: BB26_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
92 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB26_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
93 Record of test: BB27_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
94 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB27_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
95 Record of test: BB28_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
96 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB28_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
97 Record of test: BB29_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
98 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB29_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
99 Record of test: BB30_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
100 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB30_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
101 Record of test: BB31_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
102 Record of test: BB31_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
103 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB31_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
104 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB31_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
105 Record of test: BB32_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
106 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB32_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
107 Record of test: BB33_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
108 Record of test: BB33_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
109 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB33_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
110 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB33_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
111 Record of test: BB34_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
112 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB34_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
113 Record of test: BB35_ResultsFile_I V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
114 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB35_ResultsFile_I 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
115 Record of test: BB35_ResultsFile_II V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
116 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB35_ResultsFile_II 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
117 Record of test: BB36_ResultsFile_I V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
118 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB36_ResultsFile_I 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
119 Record of test: BB36_ResultsFile_II V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
120 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB36_ResultsFile_II 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
121 Record of test: BB37_ResultsFile_I V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
122 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB37_ResultsFile_I 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
123 Record of test: BB37_ResultsFile_II V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
124 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB37_ResultsFile_II 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
125 Record of test: BB38_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
126 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB38_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
127 Record of test: BB39_ResultsFile V H H 3 M 2 M t (s)
128 Oxford University: 6dof tests on loose sand Record of test: BB39_ResultsFile 40.0 w u u ω θ θ t (s)
129 Record of test: BB03_swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 129
130 Record of test: BB04_swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 130
131 Record of test: BB05_swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 131
132 Record of test: BB06_swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 132
133 Record of test: BB07_swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 133
134 Record of test: BB08_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 134
135 Record of test: BB08_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 135
136 Record of test: BB09_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 136
137 Record of test: BB09_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 137
138 Record of test: BB10_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 138
139 Record of test: BB10_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 139
140 Record of test: BB11_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 140
141 Record of test: BB11_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 141
142 Record of test: BB12_swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 142
143 Record of test: BB13_swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 143
144 Record of test: BB14_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 144
145 Record of test: BB14_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 145
146 Record of test: BB14_swipe3 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 146
147 Record of test: BB14_swipe4 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 147
148 Record of test: BB15_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 148
149 Record of test: BB15_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 149
150 Record of test: BB15_swipe3 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 150
151 Record of test: BB15_swipe4 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 151
152 Record of test: BB16_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 152
153 Record of test: BB16_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 153
154 Record of test: BB16_swipe3 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 154
155 Record of test: BB16_swipe4 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 155
156 Record of test: BB16_swipe5 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 156
157 Record of test: BB16_swipe6 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 157
158 Record of test: BB16_swipe7 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 158
159 Record of test: BB17_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 159
160 Record of test: BB17_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 160
161 Record of test: BB17_swipe3 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 161
162 Record of test: BB17_swipe4 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 162
163 Record of test: BB17_swipe5 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 163
164 Record of test: BB17_swipe6 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 164
165 Record of test: BB17_swipe7 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 165
166 Record of test: BB17_swipe8 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 166
167 Record of test: BB18_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 167
168 Record of test: BB18_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 168
169 Record of test: BB18_swipe3 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 169
170 Record of test: BB18_swipe4 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 170
171 Record of test: BB19_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 171
172 Record of test: BB19_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 172
173 Record of test: BB19_swipe3 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 173
174 Record of test: BB19_swipe4 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 174
175 Record of test: BB19_swipe5 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 175
176 Record of test: BB19_swipe6 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 176
177 Record of test: BB20_4raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 177
178 Record of test: BB20_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 178
179 Record of test: BB20_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 179
180 Record of test: BB20_swipe3 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 180
181 Record of test: BB21_3raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 181
182 Record of test: BB21_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 182
183 Record of test: BB21_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 183
184 Record of test: BB22_3raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 184
185 Record of test: BB22_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 185
186 Record of test: BB22_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 186
187 Record of test: BB23_3raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 187
188 Record of test: BB23_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 188
189 Record of test: BB23_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 189
190 Record of test: BB24_3raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 190
191 Record of test: BB24_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 191
192 Record of test: BB24_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 192
193 Record of test: BB25_3raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 193
194 Record of test: BB25_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 194
195 Record of test: BB25_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 195
196 Record of test: BB26_3raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 196
197 Record of test: BB26_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 197
198 Record of test: BB26_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 198
199 Record of test: BB27_3raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 199
200 Record of test: BB27_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 200
201 Record of test: BB27_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 201
202 Record of test: BB28_3raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 202
203 Record of test: BB28_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 203
204 Record of test: BB28_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 204
205 Record of test: BB29_3raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 205
206 Record of test: BB29_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 206
207 Record of test: BB29_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 207
208 Record of test: BB30_3raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 208
209 Record of test: BB30_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 209
210 Record of test: BB30_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 210
211 Record of test: BB31_3raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 211
212 Record of test: BB31_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 212
213 Record of test: BB31_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 213
214 Record of test: BB32_3raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 214
215 Record of test: BB32_swipe1 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 215
216 Record of test: BB32_swipe2 H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 216
217 Record of test: BB33_1raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 217
218 Record of test: BB33_2swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 218
219 Record of test: BB33_3swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 219
220 Record of test: BB34_1raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 220
221 Record of test: BB34_2elasticity H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 221
222 Record of test: BB34_3elasticity H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 222
223 Record of test: BB34_4swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 223
224 Record of test: BB34_5elasticity H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 224
225 Record of test: BB34_6elasticity H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 225
226 Record of test: BB35_1raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 226
227 Record of test: BB35_2swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 227
228 Record of test: BB35_3swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 228
229 Record of test: BB36_1raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 229
230 Record of test: BB36_2swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 230
231 Record of test: BB36_3swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 231
232 Record of test: BB37_1raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 232
233 Record of test: BB37_2swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 233
234 Record of test: BB38_1raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 234
235 Record of test: BB38_2swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 235
236 Record of test: BB39_1raddispl H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 236
237 Record of test: BB39_2swipe H 2, H 3 M 2, M V 237
Seabed instability and 3D FE jack-up soil-structure interaction analysis
Seabed instability and 3D FE jack-up soil-structure interaction analysis Lindita Kellezi, GEO Danish Geotechnical Institute, Denmark Gregers Kudsk, Maersk Contractors, Denmark Hugo Hofstede, Marine Structure
More informationA plasticity model for spudcan foundations in soft clay
A plasticity model for spudcan foundations in soft clay Youhu Zhang*; Mark J. Cassidy; Britta Bienen Youhu Zhang* (corresponding author) PhD Candidate Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems and ARC CoE
More informationNumerical Investigation of the Effect of Recent Load History on the Behaviour of Steel Piles under Horizontal Loading
Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Recent Load History on the Behaviour of Steel Piles under Horizontal Loading K. Abdel-Rahman Dr.-Ing., Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower
More informationCentrifuge experiments on laterally loaded piles with wings
Centrifuge experiments on laterally loaded piles with wings J. Dührkop & J. Grabe Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany B. Bienen, D.J. White & M.F. Randolph Centre for Offshore Foundation
More informationEffect of installation on the bearing capacity of a spudcan under combined loading in soft clay
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Effect of installation on the bearing capacity of a spudcan under combined loading in soft clay Youhu Zhang*, Dong Wang, Mark J. Cassidy and Britta Bienen Youhu Zhang* (corresponding
More informationSETTLEMENT EVALUATION OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION SUBJECTED TO VERTICAL LOAD ON THE MULTI-LAYER SOIL
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 9, Issue 12, December 18, pp. 1025 1034, Article ID: IJCIET_09_12_105 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=9&itype=12
More informationDisplacement of gravity retaining walls under seismic loading
Displacement of gravity retaining walls under seismic loading M. Okamura, Y. Saito, K. Tamura Public Works Research Institute, Tsukuba-shi, 35-8516, Japan. O. Matsuo National Institute for Land and Infrastructure
More informationModeling of Cyclic Load-Deformation Behavior of Shallow Foundations Supporting Rocking Shear Walls. Sivapalan Gajan. Advisor: Bruce Kutter
Modeling of Cyclic Load-Deformation Behavior of Shallow Foundations Supporting Rocking Shear Walls Sivapalan Gajan Advisor: Bruce Kutter Seminar 06. 01. 2005 Overview of Presentation Background Experimental
More informationProf. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
28 Module 7: Lecture -3 on Geotechnical Physical Modelling Hydraulic Gradient Similitude Method Example: Uplift behavior of pile in saturated sand profile Applications of Hydraulic Gradient Similitude
More informationNumerical modelling of the effects of consolidation on the undrained spudcan capacity under combined loading in silty clay.
Numerical modelling of the effects of consolidation on the undrained spudcan capacity under combined loading in silty clay. Manuscript resubmitted to Computers and Geotechnics on 5/12/2016 by: Raffaele
More informationALIGNMENT OF THE MSGC BARREL SUPPORT STRUCTURE
ALIGNMENT OF THE MSGC BARREL SUPPORT STRUCTURE Kari Tammi*, Miikka Kotamäki*, Antti Onnela+, Tommi Vanhala* *HIP, Helsinki Institute of Physics, CERN/EP, CH-1211 GENEVA + CERN, European Laboratory for
More informationNONLINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF JACKUP PLATFORMS CONSIDERING SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION
The 212 World Congress on Advances in Civil, Environmental, and Materials Research (ACEM 12) Seoul, Korea, August 26-3, 212 NONLINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF JACKUP PLATFORMS CONSIDERING SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION
More informationEvaluation of short piles bearing capacity subjected to lateral loading in sandy soil
Evaluation of short piles bearing capacity subjected to lateral loading in sandy soil [Jafar Bolouri Bazaz, Javad Keshavarz] Abstract Almost all types of piles are subjected to lateral loads. In many cases,
More informationSTATIC PILE SOIL PILE INTERACTION IN OFFSHORE PILE GROUPS
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 9, Issue 4, April 2018, pp. 1649 1653, Article ID: IJCIET_09_04_182 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=9&itype=4
More informationFLAC3D analysis on soil moving through piles
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 211 FLAC3D analysis on soil moving through piles E H. Ghee Griffith University
More informationA study on the bearing capacity of steel pipe piles with tapered tips
Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication The 6th Japan-China Geotechnical Symposium A study on the bearing capacity of steel pipe piles with tapered tips Hironobu Matsumiya i), Yoshiro Ishihama
More informationCite this paper as follows:
Cite this paper as follows: Naughton P.J. and O Kelly B.C. 2001. An overview of the University College Dublin hollow cylinder apparatus. Proceedings of the 14th Young European Geotechnical Engineer s Conference,
More informationSmall-Scale Testing of Cyclic Laterally Loaded Monopiles in Dense Saturated Sand
Journal of Ocean and Wind Energy (ISSN 2310-3604) Copyright by The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers Vol. 1, No. 4, November 2014, pp. 240 245 http://www.isope.org/publications Small-Scale
More informationTOPIC D: ROTATION EXAMPLES SPRING 2018
TOPIC D: ROTATION EXAMPLES SPRING 018 Q1. A car accelerates uniformly from rest to 80 km hr 1 in 6 s. The wheels have a radius of 30 cm. What is the angular acceleration of the wheels? Q. The University
More informationShear strength model for sediment-infilled rock discontinuities and field applications
Shear strength model for sediment-infilled rock discontinuities and field applications Buddhima Indraratna 1, Wuditha Premadasa 2, Jan Nemcik 3 and Mylvaganam Jayanathan 4 1 Centre for Geomechanics and
More informationChristian Linde Olsen Griffith University, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, Gold Coast Campus.
1 Introduction Test on Cyclic Lateral Loaded Piles in Sand Christian Linde Olsen Griffith University, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, Gold Coast Campus. Abstract The following paper
More informationCementing Material on Mechanical Property of Calcareous Sand
Send Orders of Reprints at reprints@benthamscience.org The Open Ocean Engineering Journal, 1, 5, 16 1 Cementing Material on Mechanical Property of Calcareous Sand Open Access X. B. Lu *, L. Wang and X.
More informationCentrifuge modelling of municipal solid waste landfills under earthquake loading
Centrifuge modelling of municipal solid waste landfills under earthquake loading N.I. Thusyanthan Ph.D research student, Schofield Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0EL, UK. Email: it206@cam.ac.uk
More informationExperimental study of sand deformations during a CPT
3 rd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - 2014 Experimental study of sand deformations during a CPT A.V. Melnikov & G.G. Boldyrev Penza State University of Architecture
More informationEQUATIONS OF MOTION: ROTATION ABOUT A FIXED AXIS (Section 17.4) Today s Objectives: Students will be able to analyze the planar kinetics of a rigid
EQUATIONS OF MOTION: ROTATION ABOUT A FIXED AXIS (Section 17.4) Today s Objectives: Students will be able to analyze the planar kinetics of a rigid body undergoing rotational motion. APPLICATIONS The crank
More informationTwo UK Joint Industry Projects
Two UK Joint Industry Projects Piles driven piles in chalk Monopiles driven in sand & stiff clay Richard Jardine Chalk: Axial behaviour Motivated by Offshore Wind Farms such as Wikinger, German Baltic
More informationPLANAR KINETICS OF A RIGID BODY: WORK AND ENERGY Today s Objectives: Students will be able to: 1. Define the various ways a force and couple do work.
PLANAR KINETICS OF A RIGID BODY: WORK AND ENERGY Today s Objectives: Students will be able to: 1. Define the various ways a force and couple do work. In-Class Activities: 2. Apply the principle of work
More informationPISA New Design Methods for Offshore Wind Turbine Monopiles
PISA New Design Methods for Offshore Wind Turbine Monopiles Professor Byron Byrne Ørsted / Royal Academy of Engineering Research Chair University of Oxford Comité Français de la Mécanique des Sols et de
More informationOPTIMAL SHAKEDOWN ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED PILE WITH LIMITED RESIDUAL STRAIN ENERGY
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION IN CIVIL ENGINEERING Int. J. Optim. Civil Eng., 2018; 8(3):347-355 OPTIMAL SHAKEDOWN ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED PILE WITH LIMITED RESIDUAL STRAIN ENERGY M. Movahedi
More informationProf. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
56 Module 4: Lecture 7 on Stress-strain relationship and Shear strength of soils Contents Stress state, Mohr s circle analysis and Pole, Principal stressspace, Stress pathsin p-q space; Mohr-Coulomb failure
More informationDetermining G-γ decay curves in sand from a Seismic Dilatometer Test (SDMT)
Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization 4 Coutinho & Mayne (eds) 213 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978--415-62136-6 Determining G-γ decay curves in sand from a Seismic Dilatometer Test
More informationEffect of embedment depth and stress anisotropy on expansion and contraction of cylindrical cavities
Effect of embedment depth and stress anisotropy on expansion and contraction of cylindrical cavities Hany El Naggar, Ph.D., P. Eng. and M. Hesham El Naggar, Ph.D., P. Eng. Department of Civil Engineering
More informationthe tests under simple shear condition (TSS), where the radial and circumferential strain increments were kept to be zero ( r = =0). In order to obtai
Institute of Industrial Science, niversity of Tokyo Bulletin of ES, No. 4 (0) STESS-DILATANCY CHAACTEISTICS OF SAND IN DAINED CYLIC TOSIONAL SHEA TESTS Seto WAHYDI and Junichi KOSEKI ABSTACT: Stress-dilatancy
More informationISC 5 SELF-BORING PRESSUREMETER TESTS AT THE NATIONAL FIELD TESTING FACILITY, BALLINA 5 9 SEPT 2016
ISC 5 5 9 SEPT 2016 SELF-BORING PRESSUREMETER TESTS AT THE NATIONAL FIELD TESTING FACILITY, BALLINA Fillippo Gaone James Doherty Susan Gourvenec Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems, UWA School of Civil,
More informationMOTION IN TWO OR THREE DIMENSIONS
MOTION IN TWO OR THREE DIMENSIONS 3 Sections Covered 3.1 : Position & velocity vectors 3.2 : The acceleration vector 3.3 : Projectile motion 3.4 : Motion in a circle 3.5 : Relative velocity 3.1 Position
More informationEVALUATION OF BENDING LOAD IN BATTER PILES SET IN SOFT CLAY
EVALUATION OF BENDING LOAD IN BATTER PILES SET IN SOFT CLAY Tetsuya KOHNO 1, Hiroyuki TANAKA 2, Masahiro SHIRATO 3 and Shoichi NAKATANI 4 Abstract In this study, we conducted centrifuge tests to evaluate
More informationMEI STRUCTURED MATHEMATICS 4763
OXFORD CAMBRIDGE AND RSA EXAMINATIONS Advanced Subsidiary General Certificate of Education Advanced General Certificate of Education MEI STRUCTURED MATHEMATICS 76 Mechanics Monday MAY 006 Morning hour
More informationEmbedment Depth Effect on the Shallow Foundation - Fault Rupture Interaction
Embedment Depth Effect on the Shallow Foundation - Fault Rupture Interaction M. Ashtiani & A. Ghalandarzadeh Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran SUMMARY: The 1999 earthquakes in Turkey
More informationNON-LINEAR ANALYSIS OF SOIL-PILE-STRUCTURE INTERACTION UNDER SEISMIC LOADS
NON-LINEAR ANALYSIS OF SOIL-PILE-STRUCTURE INTERACTION UNDER SEISMIC LOADS Yingcai Han 1 and Shin-Tower Wang 2 1 Fluor Canada Ltd., Calgary AB, Canada Email: yingcai.han@fluor.com 2 Ensoft, Inc. Austin,
More informationImplementation of Laterally Loaded Piles in Multi-Layer Soils
Implementation of Laterally Loaded Piles in Multi-Layer Soils JTRP SPR- 3261 Final SAC meeting SAC members Mir Zaheer and Keith Hoernschemeyer Purdue University Introduction Analysis developed for the
More informationDeflections and Strains in Cracked Shafts due to Rotating Loads: A Numerical and Experimental Analysis
Rotating Machinery, 10(4): 283 291, 2004 Copyright c Taylor & Francis Inc. ISSN: 1023-621X print / 1542-3034 online DOI: 10.1080/10236210490447728 Deflections and Strains in Cracked Shafts due to Rotating
More informationEMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 3 Torsion
EMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 3 Torsion Introduction Stress and strain in components subjected to torque T Circular Cross-section shape Material Shaft design Non-circular
More informationINTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA
EGC373 (F) / Page 1 of 5 INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA UK DEGREE TRANSFER PROGRAMME INTI ADELAIDE TRANSFER PROGRAMME EGC 373: FOUNDATION ENGINEERING FINAL EXAMINATION : AUGUST 00 SESSION This paper consists of
More informationDetermination of silica sand stiffness
Engineering Geology 68 (2003) 225 236 www.elsevier.com/locate/enggeo Determination of silica sand stiffness G.R. Lashkaripour a, *, R. Ajalloeian b a Department of Geology, Sistan & Balochestan University,
More informationSensor Accessories. Rotary Motion Accessory Pack. Pendulum Rod with two masses, Angular Momentum disc set and Linear Rack with mini c-clamp
Sensor Accessories Rotary Motion Accessory Pack (Product No 3288) Pendulum Rod with two masses, Angular Momentum disc set and Linear Rack with mini c-clamp DATA HARVEST Data Harvest Group Ltd 1 Eden Court,
More informationOffshore sediments. Numerical analysis of pipeline-seabed interaction using a constitutive model that considers clay destructuration
Offshore sediments The main research goal of the Offshore Sediments stream is to identify the key mechanisms at a micro-structural level that dictate critical aspects of behaviour, and quantify that behaviour
More informationStructural Analysis I Chapter 4 - Torsion TORSION
ORSION orsional stress results from the action of torsional or twisting moments acting about the longitudinal axis of a shaft. he effect of the application of a torsional moment, combined with appropriate
More informationMINIMISING THE KINEMATIC LOADING DEMAND ON BRIDGE PIERS FROM LATERALLY SPREADING CRUSTAL LAYERS
Paper No. MTKKN MINIMISING THE KINEMATIC LOADING DEMAND ON BRIDGE PIERS FROM LATERALLY SPREADING CRUSTAL LAYERS Jonathan KNAPPETT 1, Joseph SLATTERY 2, Scott WILSON 3 ABSTRACT During earthquake-induced
More informationOedometer and direct shear tests to the study of sands with various viscosity pore fluids
3 r d International Conference on New Developments in Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Oedometer and direct shear tests to the study of sands with various viscosity pore fluids Rozhgar Abdullah
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF DROP WEIGHT IMPACT TEST MACHINE
CHAPTER-8 DEVELOPMENT OF DROP WEIGHT IMPACT TEST MACHINE 8.1 Introduction The behavior of materials is different when they are subjected to dynamic loading [9]. The testing of materials under dynamic conditions
More informationStep 1: Mathematical Modeling
083 Mechanical Vibrations Lesson Vibration Analysis Procedure The analysis of a vibrating system usually involves four steps: mathematical modeling derivation of the governing uations solution of the uations
More informationLindita Kellezi. GEO Danish Geotechnical Institute, Denmark. Gregers Kudsk. Maersk Contractors, Denmark. Hugo Hofstede
Seabed instability and 3D FE jack-up soil-structure interaction analysis L instabilité des fonds marins et l analyse 3D par éléments finis de l interaction sol / structure des plateformes autoélévatrices
More informationLow velocity perforation design of metal plates
Structures Under Shock and Impact IX 179 Low velocity perforation design of metal plates N. Jones & R. S. Birch Impact Research Centre, The University of Liverpool, UK Abstract This article examines some
More informationSECOND ENGINEER REG. III/2 APPLIED MECHANICS
SECOND ENGINEER REG. III/2 APPLIED MECHANICS LIST OF TOPICS Static s Friction Kinematics Dynamics Machines Strength of Materials Hydrostatics Hydrodynamics A STATICS 1 Solves problems involving forces
More informationThe theories to estimate lateral earth pressure due to a strip surcharge loading will
Chapter LITERATURE REVIEW The theories to estimate lateral earth pressure due to a strip surcharge loading will be introduced in this chapter. Commonly geotechnical engineers apply the equations suggested
More informationMagnetic moment in the magnetic field (Item No.: P )
Magnetic moment in the magnetic field (Item No.: P2430400) Curricular Relevance Area of Expertise: Physics Education Level: University Topic: Electricity and Magnetism Subtopic: Magnetic Field and Magnetic
More informationModelling installation of helical anchors in clay
Modelling installation of helical anchors in clay C. Todeshkejoei & J.P. Hambleton ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering, Centre for Geotechnical and Materials Modelling, The
More informationADAM PIŁAT Department of Automatics, AGH University of Science and Technology Al. Mickiewicza 30, Cracow, Poland
Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 2004, Vol. 14, No. 4, 497 501 FEMLAB SOFTWARE APPLIED TO ACTIVE MAGNETIC BEARING ANALYSIS ADAM PIŁAT Department of Automatics, AGH University of Science and Technology
More informationROTATING RING. Volume of small element = Rdθbt if weight density of ring = ρ weight of small element = ρrbtdθ. Figure 1 Rotating ring
ROTATIONAL STRESSES INTRODUCTION High centrifugal forces are developed in machine components rotating at a high angular speed of the order of 100 to 500 revolutions per second (rps). High centrifugal force
More informationNONLINEAR CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PILE-SOIL SYSTEM UNDER VERTICAL VIBRATION
IGC 2009, Guntur, INDIA NONLINEAR CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PILE-SOIL SYSTEM UNDER VERTICAL VIBRATION B. Manna Lecturer, Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela 769008, India.
More informationBehavior of Offshore Piles under Monotonic Inclined Pullout Loading
Behavior of Offshore Piles under Monotonic Inclined Pullout Loading Mohamed I. Ramadan Lecturer, Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt, mihr81@gmail.com
More informationMiniball Flexible Frame
Miniball Flexible Frame Author: Nigel Warr Date: 6 th March 2015. Contents 1 Overview 2 2 Modifications 3 2.1 Modifications to the height..................................... 3 2.2 Modifications to the
More informationCEE 271: Applied Mechanics II, Dynamics Lecture 25: Ch.17, Sec.4-5
1 / 36 CEE 271: Applied Mechanics II, Dynamics Lecture 25: Ch.17, Sec.4-5 Prof. Albert S. Kim Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa Date: 2 / 36 EQUATIONS OF MOTION: ROTATION
More informationFoundation Engineering Prof. Mahendra Singh Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee
Foundation Engineering Prof. Mahendra Singh Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee Module - 03 Lecture - 05 Field Tests Hello viewers, welcome back to the course on Foundation
More informationSimulation of Cyclic Direct Simple Shear Loading Response of Soils Using Discrete Element Modeling
Simulation of Cyclic Direct Simple Shear Loading Response of Soils Using Discrete Element Modeling A. Dabeet, D. Wijewickreme, & P. Byrne University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada SUMMARY: The
More informationEngineering Mechanics: Statics. Chapter 7: Virtual Work
Engineering Mechanics: Statics Chapter 7: Virtual Work Introduction Previous chapters-- FBD & zero-force and zero-moment equations -- Suitable when equilibrium position is known For bodies composed of
More informationNumerical Modeling of Direct Shear Tests on Sandy Clay
Numerical Modeling of Direct Shear Tests on Sandy Clay R. Ziaie Moayed, S. Tamassoki, and E. Izadi Abstract Investigation of sandy clay behavior is important since urban development demands mean that sandy
More informationDue Date 1 (for confirmation of final grade): Monday May 10 at 11:59pm Due Date 2 (absolute latest possible submission): Friday May 14 at 5pm
! ME345 Modeling and Simulation, Spring 2010 Case Study 3 Assigned: Friday April 16! Due Date 1 (for email confirmation of final grade): Monday May 10 at 11:59pm Due Date 2 (absolute latest possible submission):
More informationModule 4 : Deflection of Structures Lecture 4 : Strain Energy Method
Module 4 : Deflection of Structures Lecture 4 : Strain Energy Method Objectives In this course you will learn the following Deflection by strain energy method. Evaluation of strain energy in member under
More informationSource Wave Design for Downhole Seismic Testing
Source Wave Design for Downhole Seismic Testing Downhole seismic testing (DST) has become a very popular site characterizing tool among geotechnical engineers. DST methods, such as the Seismic Cone Penetration
More informationNonlinear Rolling Element Bearings in MADYN 2000 Version 4.3
- 1 - Nonlinear Rolling Element Bearings in MADYN 2000 Version 4.3 In version 4.3 nonlinear rolling element bearings can be considered for transient analyses. The nonlinear forces are calculated with a
More informationGet Discount Coupons for your Coaching institute and FREE Study Material at Force System
Get Discount Coupons for your Coaching institute and FEE Study Material at www.pickmycoaching.com Mechanics Force System When a member of forces simultaneously acting on the body, it is known as force
More informationwww.onlineexamhelp.com www.onlineexamhelp.com *5840741268* UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS General Certificate of Education Advanced Level FURTHER MATHEMATICS 9231/02 Paper 2 October/November
More informationLaboratory Testing Total & Effective Stress Analysis
SKAA 1713 SOIL MECHANICS Laboratory Testing Total & Effective Stress Analysis Prepared by: Dr. Hetty Mohr Coulomb failure criterion with Mohr circle of stress 2 ' 2 ' ' ' 3 ' 1 ' 3 ' 1 Cot Sin c ' ' 2
More informationStress Analysis Lecture 3 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy
Stress Analysis Lecture 3 ME 276 Spring 2017-2018 Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy Axial Stress 2 Beam under the action of two tensile forces 3 Beam under the action of two tensile forces 4 Shear Stress
More informationCEE 271: Applied Mechanics II, Dynamics Lecture 27: Ch.18, Sec.1 5
1 / 42 CEE 271: Applied Mechanics II, Dynamics Lecture 27: Ch.18, Sec.1 5 Prof. Albert S. Kim Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa Tuesday, November 27, 2012 2 / 42 KINETIC
More informationENGI Multiple Integration Page 8-01
ENGI 345 8. Multiple Integration Page 8-01 8. Multiple Integration This chapter provides only a very brief introduction to the major topic of multiple integration. Uses of multiple integration include
More informationApplication of cyclic accumulation models for undrained and partially drained general boundary value problems
Application of cyclic accumulation models for undrained and partially drained general boundary value problems A. M. Page Risueño Yngres Dag 2014, May 15 th 2014 Introduction Cyclic loads in geotechnical
More informationFoundation models for the dynamic response of offshore wind turbines
Marine Renewable Energy Conference (MAREC), Newcastle, UK, September 00. Foundation models for the dynamic response of offshore wind turbines. M.B. Zaaijer, MSc Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
More informationTheory and Practice of Rotor Dynamics Prof. Dr. Rajiv Tiwari Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
Theory and Practice of Rotor Dynamics Prof. Dr. Rajiv Tiwari Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati Module - 2 Simpul Rotors Lecture - 2 Jeffcott Rotor Model In the
More informationNEW DOWN-HOLE PENETROMETER (DHP-CIGMAT) FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS
NEW DOWN-HOLE PENETROMETER (DHP-CIGMAT) FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS 1 2 C. Vipulanandan 1, Ph.D., M. ASCE and Omer F. Usluogullari 2 Chairman, Professor, Director of Center for Innovative Grouting Materials
More informationCentrifuge Shaking Table Tests and FEM Analyses of RC Pile Foundation and Underground Structure
Centrifuge Shaking Table s and FEM Analyses of RC Pile Foundation and Underground Structure Kenji Yonezawa Obayashi Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. Takuya Anabuki Obayashi Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. Shunichi
More informationLABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF PULLING FORCE AND GROUND MOVEMENT DURING A PIPE BURSTING TEST
North American Society for Trenchless Technology (NASTT) NO-DIG 2004 New Orleans, Louisiana March 22-24, 2004 LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF PULLING FORCE AND GROUND MOVEMENT DURING A PIPE BURSTING TEST Brian
More informationTC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON. Jérôme Racinais. September 15, 2015 PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS
Jérôme Racinais September 15, 215 TC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS Table of contents 1. Reminder about pressuremeter tests 2. General behaviour
More informationProjectile Motion. x = v ox t (1)
Projectile Motion Theory Projectile motion is the combination of different motions in the x and y directions. In the x direction, which is taken as parallel to the surface of the earth, the projectile
More informationNumerical Modelling of Dynamic Earth Force Transmission to Underground Structures
Numerical Modelling of Dynamic Earth Force Transmission to Underground Structures N. Kodama Waseda Institute for Advanced Study, Waseda University, Japan K. Komiya Chiba Institute of Technology, Japan
More informationSoil type identification and fines content estimation using the Screw Driving Sounding (SDS) data
Mirjafari, S.Y. & Orense, R.P. & Suemasa, N. () Proc. th NZGS Geotechnical Symposium. Eds. GJ Alexander & CY Chin, Napier Soil type identification and fines content estimation using the Screw Driving Sounding
More informationCity, University of London Institutional Repository
City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Li, Y. Q., Hu, Z., Fang, X. & Fonseca, J. (2015). Analysis of micro characteristics and influence factors of foundation
More informationInternational Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 7, Issue 5, May ISSN
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 7, Issue 5, May-2016 36 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF INTERFACES BETWEEN CARBON FIBRE REINFORCED POLYMERS AND SC SOIL S. Subburaj
More informationfile:///d /suhasini/suha/office/html2pdf/ _editable/slides/module%202/lecture%206/6.1/1.html[3/9/2012 4:09:25 PM]
Objectives_template Objectives In this section you will learn the following Introduction Different Theories of Earth Pressure Lateral Earth Pressure For At Rest Condition Movement of the Wall Different
More informationProf. Dr.-Ing. Martin Achmus Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering. Offshore subsoil investigations
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Achmus Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering Offshore subsoil investigations Addis Ababa, September 2010 Offshore subsoil investigations Presentation
More informationTE 75R RESEARCH RUBBER FRICTION TEST MACHINE
TE 75R RESEARCH RUBBER FRICTION TEST MACHINE Background: The Research Rubber Friction Test Machine offers the ability to investigate fully the frictional behaviour of rubbery materials both in dry and
More informationMechanical Vibrations Prof. Rajiv Tiwari Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati
Mechanical Vibrations Prof. Rajiv Tiwari Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Module - 12 Signature analysis and preventive maintenance Lecture - 3 Field balancing
More informationName: Fall 2014 CLOSED BOOK
Name: Fall 2014 1. Rod AB with weight W = 40 lb is pinned at A to a vertical axle which rotates with constant angular velocity ω =15 rad/s. The rod position is maintained by a horizontal wire BC. Determine
More informationDeflections and Strains in Cracked Shafts Due to Rotating Loads: A Numerical and Experimental Analysis
International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 9: 303 311, 2003 Copyright c Taylor & Francis Inc. ISSN: 1023-621X DOI: 10.1080/10236210390147416 Deflections and Strains in Cracked Shafts Due to Rotating
More informationwww.onlineexamhelp.com www.onlineexamhelp.com *2465618767* UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS General Certificate of Education Advanced Level FURTHER MATHEMATICS 9231/21 Paper 2 May/June
More informationFINITE GRID SOLUTION FOR NON-RECTANGULAR PLATES
th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering June 5-8, 7 Paper No. 11 FINITE GRID SOLUTION FOR NON-RECTANGULAR PLATES A.Halim KARAŞĐN 1, Polat GÜLKAN ABSTRACT Plates on elastic foundations
More informationSongklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology SJST R1 Ukritchon. Undrained lateral capacity of I-shaped concrete piles
Undrained lateral capacity of I-shaped concrete piles Journal: Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology Manuscript ID SJST-0-0.R Manuscript Type: Original Article Date Submitted by the Author:
More informationMECHANICS OF MATERIALS
STATICS AND MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Ferdinand P. Beer E. Russell Johnston, Jr, John T. DeWolf David E Mazurek \Cawect Mc / iur/» Craw SugomcT Hilt Introduction 1 1.1 What is Mechanics? 2 1.2 Fundamental
More informationClassical Dynamics: Question Sheet
Pt 1B Advanced Physics Lent 5 Classical Dynamics: Question Sheet J. Ellis Questions are graded A to C in increasing order of difficulty. Energy Method 1(B) A ladder of length l rests against a wall at
More information