Estimation of Optimal Treatment Regimes Via Machine Learning. Marie Davidian
|
|
- Maria Kelly
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Estimation of Optimal Treatment Regimes Via Machine Learning Marie Davidian Department of Statistics North Carolina State University Triangle Machine Learning Day April 3, /28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
2 Precision medicine The right treatment for the right patient at the right time 2/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
3 Precision medicine Patent heterogeneity: Genetic/genomic profiles Demographic, physiological characteristics Medical history, concomitant conditions Environment, lifestyle factors Adverse reactions, adherence to prior treatment... Fundamental premise: A patient s characteristics are implicated in which treatment options s/he should receive 3/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
4 Clinical decision-making Clinical practice: Clinicians make a series of treatment decisions over the course of a patient s disease or disorder Key decision points in the disease/disorder process Fixed schedule, milestones, events necessitating a decision Multiple treatment options at each decision point Synthesize all information on the patient to decide on an option Goal: Make the best decisions leading to the most beneficial expected clinical outcome for this patient given his/her characteristics 4/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
5 Example: Acute leukemia Two decision points: Decision 1 : Induction chemotherapy (2 options: C 1, C 2 ) Decision 2 : Maintenance treatment for patients who respond (2 options: M 1, M 2 ) Salvage chemotherapy for those who don t respond (2 options: S 1, S 2 ) Clinical outcome: Progression-free or overall survival time 5/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
6 Treatment regime Precision medicine: Formalize clinical decision-making and make it evidence-based At each decision point, would like a formal rule that takes as input all available information on the patient to that point and outputs a recommended treatment action from among the possible, feasible options Treatment regime: A set of decision rules, each corresponding to a decision point Aka dynamic treatment regime, adaptive treatment strategy, adaptive intervention, treatment policy 6/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
7 Two decision regime: Acute leukemia At baseline: Information x 1, accrued information h 1 = x 1 H 1 Decision 1: Set of options A 1 = {C 1,C 2 }; rule 1: d 1 (h 1 ): H 1 A 1 Between Decisions 1 and 2: Collect additional information x 2, including responder status Accrued information h 2 = (x 1, chemotherapy at decision 1, x 2 ) H 2 Decision 2: Set of options A 2 = {M 1,M 2,S 1,S 2 }; rule 2: d 2 (h 2 ): H 2 {M 1,M 2 } (responder), d 2 (h 2 ): H 2 {S 1,S 2 } (nonresponder) Treatment regime : d = {d 1 (h 1 ), d 2 (h 2 )} = (d 1, d 2 ) 7/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
8 In general Treatment regime with K decision points: Baseline information x 1 X 1, intermediate information x k X k between Decisions k 1 and k, k = 2,..., K Set of treatment options A k at Decision k, elements a k A k Accrued information or history h 1 = x 1 H 1 h k = (x 1, a 1,..., x k 1, a k 1, x k ) H k, k = 2,..., K, Decision rules d 1 (h 1 ), d 2 (h 2 ),..., d K (h K ), d k : H k A k Treatment regime d = {d 1 (h 1 ),..., d K (h K )} = (d 1, d 2,..., d K ) Class of all possible K -decision regimes: D 8/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
9 Optimal treatment regime Goal: Find the best or optimal regime in D d opt = (d opt 1,..., d opt K ) Assume: There is a clinical outcome by which treatment benefit can be assessed Survival time, CD4 count,... Coded so that larger is better Causal inference perspective... 9/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
10 Optimal treatment regime Potential outcomes: For any regime d D Y * (d) = the outcome a patient would achieve if s/he were to receive treatment according to the rules in d Value of d V(d) = E{Y * (d)}, the population average outcome if all patients in the population were to receive treatment options according to d Optimal regime: d opt = arg max V(d) d D I.e., E{Y * (d)} E{Y * (d opt )} for all d D 10/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
11 Optimal treatment regime Challenge: Can we estimate d opt = arg max d D V(d) from data? From a randomized clinical trial or observational database d opt is defined in terms of potential outcomes Must be able to express the definition of d opt equivalently in terms of the observed data 11/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
12 Statistical framework Simplest setting: A single decision with two treatment options A 1 = {0, 1} Treatment regime: d D comprises a single rule d 1 d = {d 1 (h 1 )} Data: Independent and identically distributed (iid) (X 1i, A 1i, Y i ), i = 1,..., n n subjects indexed by i X 1i = baseline information observed on subject i A 1i = treatment option in A 1 actually received by subject i Y i = observed outcome for subject i History for subject i: H 1i = X 1i 12/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
13 Assumptions Consistency: Y = Y * (1)I(A 1 = 1) + Y * (0)I(A 1 = 0) Positivity: pr(a 1 = a 1 H 1 = h 1 ) > 0 for all h 1 H 1, a 1 = 0, 1 No unmeasured confounders: {Y * (1), Y * (0)} A 1 H 1 The history H 1 contains all information used to assign treatments in the observed data Automatically satisfied for data from a randomized trial Standard but unverifiable assumption for observational studies 13/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
14 Value of a regime Under these assumptions: Can be shown that V(d) = E{Y * (d)} [ ] = E E{Y * (1) H 1 }I{d 1 (H 1 ) = 1} + E{Y * (0) H 1 }I{d 1 (H 1 ) = 0} = E [E(Y H 1, A 1 = 1)I{d 1 (H 1 ) = 1} + E(Y H 1, A 1 = 0)I{d 1 (H 1 ) = 0}] = E [Q 1 (H 1, 1)I{d 1 (H 1 ) = 1} + Q 1 (H 1, 0)I{d 1 (H 1 ) = 0}], Implies: Optimal regime Q 1 (h 1, a 1 ) = E(Y H 1 = h 1, A 1 = a 1 ) d opt 1 (h 1 ) = I{Q 1 (h 1, 1) Q 1 (h 1, 0)} = I{Q 1 (h 1, 1) Q 1 (h 1, 0) 0} = I{C 1 (h 1 ) 0} C 1 (h 1 ) = Q 1 (h 1, 1) Q 1 (h 1, 0) is the contrast function 14/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
15 Regression estimator for optimal regime Regression model: Q 1 (h 1, a 1 ; β 1 ) Fitted model Q 1 (h 1, a 1 ; β 1 ) Estimated optimal regime d opt 1 (h 1 ) = I{Q 1 (h 1, 1; β 1 ) Q 1 (h 1, 0; β 1 ) 0} Simplest form of Q-learning Concern: Misspecification of regression model 15/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
16 Direct/policy search estimator for optimal regime Restricted class of regimes D η : Indexed by η 1 d η = {d 1 (h 1 ; η 1 )}, η = η 1 Motivated by a regression model, e.g., h 1 = (x 11, x 12 ), d 1 (h 1 ; η 1 ) = I(η 11 + η 12 x 11 + η 13 x 12 0), η 1 = (η 11, η 12, η 13 ) T Based on cost, feasibility in practice, interpretability; e.g., d 1 (h 1 ; η 1 ) = I(x 11 < η 11, x 12 < η 12 ), η 1 = (η 11, η 12 ) T Or d 1 (h 1 ; η 1 ) in the form of a list (if-then-else clauses) Optimal restricted regime d opt η = {d 1 (h 1 ; η opt 1 )} d 1 (h 1 ; η opt 1 ), ηopt 1 = arg max V(d η ) η 1 16/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
17 Direct/policy search estimator for optimal regime Optimal restricted regime: d opt η = {d 1 (h 1 ; η opt 1 )} d 1 (h 1 ; η opt 1 ), ηopt 1 = arg max V(d η ) η 1 Suggests: Obtain an estimator V(d η ) for V (d η ) for any fixed η 1 Treat V(d η ) as a function of η 1 and maximize in η 1 That is, estimate η opt 1 by η opt 1 = arg max η 1 V(dη ) = d opt η = {d 1 (h 1, η opt 1 )} 17/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
18 Inverse probability weighted value estimators Define: Consistency indicator C dη = I{A 1 = d 1 (H 1 ; η 1 )} Propensity of treatment consistent with d η π dη,1(h 1 ; η 1 ) = pr(c dη = 1 H 1 ) = π 1 (H 1 )I{d 1 (H 1 ; η 1 ) = 1} + {1 π 1 (H 1 )}I{d 1 (H 1 ; η 1 ) = 0} π 1 (h 1 ) = pr(a 1 = 1 H 1 = h 1 ) is the propensity score π 1 (h 1 ) known in a randomized trial; can posit a model π 1 (h 1 ; γ 1 ) in an observational study and obtain π dη,1(h 1 ; η 1, γ 1 ) Semiparametric theory for missing data yields... 18/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
19 Inverse probability weighted value estimators Inverse probability weighted estimator for V(d η ): For fixed η 1 V IPW (d η ) = n 1 n i=1 C dη,iy i π dη,1(h 1i ; η 1, γ 1 ) Doubly robust augmented inverse probability weighted estimator: More efficient and stable V AIPW (d η ) = n [ n 1 i=1 C dη,iy i π dη,1(h 1i ; η 1, γ 1 ) C d η,i π dη,1(h 1i ; η 1, γ 1 ) π dη,1(h 1i ; η 1, γ 1 ) ] Q dη,1(h 1i ; η 1, β 1 ) Q dη,1(h 1 ; η 1, β 1 ) = Q 1 (h 1, 1; β 1 )I{d 1 (h 1 ; η 1 ) = 1}+Q 1 (h 1, 0; β 1 )I{d 1 (h 1 ; η 1 ) = 0} 19/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
20 Direct/policy search estimators for optimal regime Result: Estimators for η opt 1 by maximizing V IPW (d η )or V AIPW (d η ) in η 1 Estimators for optimal restricted regime d opt η = {d 1 (h 1 ; η opt 1 )} d opt η,ipw = {d 1(h 1, η opt opt 1,IPW )} and d η,aipw = {d 1(h 1, η opt 1,AIPW )} Challenge: nonsmooth functions of η 1 ; nonstandard optimization problem 20/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
21 Classification analogy So what is the connection to machine learning? ψ 1 (H 1, A 1, Y ) = A 1Y π 1 (H 1 ) {A 1 π 1 (H 1 )} Q 1 (H 1, 1), π 1 (H 1 ) ψ 0 (H 1, A 1, Y ) = (1 A 1)Y 1 π 1 (H 1 ) + {A 1 π 1 (H 1 )} Q 1 (H 1, 0). 1 π 1 (H 1 ) E{ψ 1 (H 1, A 1, Y ) ψ 0 (H 1, A 1, Y ) H 1 } = Q 1 (H 1, 1) Q 1 (H 1, 0) = C 1 (H 1 ), the contrast function Predictor of the contrast function Ĉ 1 (H 1i, A 1i, Y i ) = ψ 1 (H 1i, A 1i, Y i ) ψ 0 (H 1i, A 1i, Y i ) with fitted models Q 1 (h 1, a 1 ; β 1 ) and π 1 (h 1 ; γ 1 ) substituted 21/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
22 Classification analogy Lots of algebra: Maximizing V AIPW (d η ) in η 1 is equivalent to minimizing n 1 n i=1 [ ] Ĉ1(H 1i, A 1i, Y i ) I I{Ĉ1(H 1i, A 1i, Y i ) 0} d 1 (H 1i ; η 1 ) A weighted classification error with Label I{Ĉ1(H 1i, A 1i, Y i ) 0} Weight Ĉ1(H 1i, A 1i, Y i ) Classifier d 1 (H 1i ; η 1 ) And similarly for V IPW (d η ) with ψ 1 (H 1, A 1, Y ) = A 1Y π 1 (H 1 ), ψ 0(H 1, A 1, Y ) = (1 A 1)Y 1 π 1 (H 1 ), 22/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
23 Classification analogy Result: Direct/policy search estimation of dη opt by maximizing V IPW (d η ) or V AIPW (d η ) is equivalent to minimizing a weighted classification error Choice of classification approach dictates the restricted class D η E.g., linear or nonlinear SVM, CART, random forests, etc etc Can add a penalty to achieve parsimonious representation Outcome weighted learning (O-learning ) uses V IPW (d η ) with nonlinear SVM 23/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
24 K > 1 decisions Extensions: d opt = (d opt 1,..., d opt K ) Q-learning Direct/policy search estimation within restricted class D η Backward induction implementation with classification representation at each step 24/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
25 Discussion Summary: Direct/policy search estimation of an optimal treatment regime can be cast as a weighted classification problem Can exploit existing machine learning techniques to estimate an optimal treatment regime 25/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
26 Acknowledgement IMPACT Innovative Methods Program for Advancing Clinical Trials A joint venture of Duke, UNC-Chapel Hill, NC State Supported by NCI Program Project P01 CA ( ) Statistical methods for precision cancer medicine 26/28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
27 Upcoming SAMSI: Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute Program on Statistical, Mathematical, and Computational Methods for Precision Medicine Opening Workshop: August 13-17, /28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
28 Some references Zhang, B., Tsiatis, A. A., Laber, E. B., and Davidian, M. (2012). A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes. Biometrics 68, Zhang, B., Tsiatis, A. A., Davidian, M., Zhang, M., and Laber, E. B. (2012). Estimating optimal treatment regimes from a classification perspective. Stat 1, Zhang, B., Tsiatis, A. A., Laber, E. B., and Davidian, M. (2013). Robust estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes for sequential treatment decisions. Biometrika 100, Zhang, Y., Laber, E. B., Tsiatis, A. A., and Davidian, M. (2015). Using decision lists to construct interpretable and parsimonious treatment regimes Biometrics 71, Zhang, Y., Laber E. B., Davidian, M., and Tsiatis, A. A. (2018). Estimation of optimal treatment regimes using lists. Journal of the American Statistical Association, in press. Zhao, Y., Zeng, D., Rush, A. J., and Kosorok, M. R. (2012). Estimating individualized treatment rules using outcome weighted learning. Journal of the American Statistical Association 107, Zhao, Y. Q., Zeng, D., Laber, E. B., and Kosorok, M. R. (2015). New statistical learning methods for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes. Journal of the American Statistical Association 110, /28 Optimal DTRs Via ML
Implementing Precision Medicine: Optimal Treatment Regimes and SMARTs. Anastasios (Butch) Tsiatis and Marie Davidian
Implementing Precision Medicine: Optimal Treatment Regimes and SMARTs Anastasios (Butch) Tsiatis and Marie Davidian Department of Statistics North Carolina State University http://www4.stat.ncsu.edu/~davidian
More informationA Sampling of IMPACT Research:
A Sampling of IMPACT Research: Methods for Analysis with Dropout and Identifying Optimal Treatment Regimes Marie Davidian Department of Statistics North Carolina State University http://www.stat.ncsu.edu/
More informationOptimal Treatment Regimes for Survival Endpoints from a Classification Perspective. Anastasios (Butch) Tsiatis and Xiaofei Bai
Optimal Treatment Regimes for Survival Endpoints from a Classification Perspective Anastasios (Butch) Tsiatis and Xiaofei Bai Department of Statistics North Carolina State University 1/35 Optimal Treatment
More informationReader Reaction to A Robust Method for Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes by Zhang et al. (2012)
Biometrics 71, 267 273 March 2015 DOI: 10.1111/biom.12228 READER REACTION Reader Reaction to A Robust Method for Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes by Zhang et al. (2012) Jeremy M. G. Taylor,* Wenting
More informationMethods for Interpretable Treatment Regimes
Methods for Interpretable Treatment Regimes John Sperger University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill May 4 th 2018 Sperger (UNC) Interpretable Treatment Regimes May 4 th 2018 1 / 16 Why Interpretable Methods?
More informationLecture 9: Learning Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes. Donglin Zeng, Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina
Lecture 9: Learning Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes Introduction Refresh: Dynamic Treatment Regimes (DTRs) DTRs: sequential decision rules, tailored at each stage by patients time-varying features and
More informationA Robust Method for Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes
Biometrics 63, 1 20 December 2007 DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00454.x A Robust Method for Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes Baqun Zhang, Anastasios A. Tsiatis, Eric B. Laber, and Marie Davidian Department
More informationSet-valued dynamic treatment regimes for competing outcomes
Set-valued dynamic treatment regimes for competing outcomes Eric B. Laber Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University JSM, Montreal, QC, August 5, 2013 Acknowledgments Zhiqiang Tan Jamie
More informationWeb-based Supplementary Materials for A Robust Method for Estimating. Optimal Treatment Regimes
Biometrics 000, 000 000 DOI: 000 000 0000 Web-based Supplementary Materials for A Robust Method for Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes Baqun Zhang, Anastasios A. Tsiatis, Eric B. Laber, and Marie Davidian
More informationTREE-BASED REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FOR ESTIMATING OPTIMAL DYNAMIC TREATMENT REGIMES. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Submitted to the Annals of Applied Statistics TREE-BASED REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FOR ESTIMATING OPTIMAL DYNAMIC TREATMENT REGIMES BY YEBIN TAO, LU WANG AND DANIEL ALMIRALL University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
More informationEstimating the Mean Response of Treatment Duration Regimes in an Observational Study. Anastasios A. Tsiatis.
Estimating the Mean Response of Treatment Duration Regimes in an Observational Study Anastasios A. Tsiatis http://www.stat.ncsu.edu/ tsiatis/ Introduction to Dynamic Treatment Regimes 1 Outline Description
More informationSEQUENTIAL MULTIPLE ASSIGNMENT RANDOMIZATION TRIALS WITH ENRICHMENT (SMARTER) DESIGN
SEQUENTIAL MULTIPLE ASSIGNMENT RANDOMIZATION TRIALS WITH ENRICHMENT (SMARTER) DESIGN Ying Liu Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin Yuanjia Wang Department of Biostatistics & Psychiatry,
More informationRobustifying Trial-Derived Treatment Rules to a Target Population
1/ 39 Robustifying Trial-Derived Treatment Rules to a Target Population Yingqi Zhao Public Health Sciences Division Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Workshop on Perspectives and Analysis for Personalized
More informationCausal Inference Basics
Causal Inference Basics Sam Lendle October 09, 2013 Observed data, question, counterfactuals Observed data: n i.i.d copies of baseline covariates W, treatment A {0, 1}, and outcome Y. O i = (W i, A i,
More informationSupplement to Q- and A-learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes
Submitted to the Statistical Science Supplement to - and -learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes Phillip J. Schulte, nastasios. Tsiatis, Eric B. Laber, and Marie Davidian bstract.
More informationWeighting Methods. Harvard University STAT186/GOV2002 CAUSAL INFERENCE. Fall Kosuke Imai
Weighting Methods Kosuke Imai Harvard University STAT186/GOV2002 CAUSAL INFERENCE Fall 2018 Kosuke Imai (Harvard) Weighting Methods Stat186/Gov2002 Fall 2018 1 / 13 Motivation Matching methods for improving
More informationImproving Efficiency of Inferences in Randomized Clinical Trials Using Auxiliary Covariates
Improving Efficiency of Inferences in Randomized Clinical Trials Using Auxiliary Covariates Anastasios (Butch) Tsiatis Department of Statistics North Carolina State University http://www.stat.ncsu.edu/
More informationRecent Advances in Outcome Weighted Learning for Precision Medicine
Recent Advances in Outcome Weighted Learning for Precision Medicine Michael R. Kosorok Department of Biostatistics Department of Statistics and Operations Research University of North Carolina at Chapel
More informationSemiparametric Regression and Machine Learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes
Semiparametric Regression and Machine Learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes by Yebin Tao A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
More informationDouble Robustness. Bang and Robins (2005) Kang and Schafer (2007)
Double Robustness Bang and Robins (2005) Kang and Schafer (2007) Set-Up Assume throughout that treatment assignment is ignorable given covariates (similar to assumption that data are missing at random
More informationA Bayesian Machine Learning Approach for Optimizing Dynamic Treatment Regimes
A Bayesian Machine Learning Approach for Optimizing Dynamic Treatment Regimes Thomas A. Murray, (tamurray@mdanderson.org), Ying Yuan, (yyuan@mdanderson.org), and Peter F. Thall (rex@mdanderson.org) Department
More informationComparative effectiveness of dynamic treatment regimes
Comparative effectiveness of dynamic treatment regimes An application of the parametric g- formula Miguel Hernán Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Harvard School of Public Health www.hsph.harvard.edu/causal
More informationEstimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes from Clustered Data
Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes from Clustered Data Bibhas Chakraborty Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University bc2425@columbia.edu Society for Clinical Trials Annual Meetings Boston,
More informationQ learning. A data analysis method for constructing adaptive interventions
Q learning A data analysis method for constructing adaptive interventions SMART First stage intervention options coded as 1(M) and 1(B) Second stage intervention options coded as 1(M) and 1(B) O1 A1 O2
More informationAdaptive Trial Designs
Adaptive Trial Designs Wenjing Zheng, Ph.D. Methods Core Seminar Center for AIDS Prevention Studies University of California, San Francisco Nov. 17 th, 2015 Trial Design! Ethical:!eg.! Safety!! Efficacy!
More informationExtending causal inferences from a randomized trial to a target population
Extending causal inferences from a randomized trial to a target population Issa Dahabreh Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University issa dahabreh@brown.edu January 16, 2019 Issa Dahabreh
More informationLecture 2: Constant Treatment Strategies. Donglin Zeng, Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina
Lecture 2: Constant Treatment Strategies Introduction Motivation We will focus on evaluating constant treatment strategies in this lecture. We will discuss using randomized or observational study for these
More informationEstimating direct effects in cohort and case-control studies
Estimating direct effects in cohort and case-control studies, Ghent University Direct effects Introduction Motivation The problem of standard approaches Controlled direct effect models In many research
More informationDiscussion of Papers on the Extensions of Propensity Score
Discussion of Papers on the Extensions of Propensity Score Kosuke Imai Princeton University August 3, 2010 Kosuke Imai (Princeton) Generalized Propensity Score 2010 JSM (Vancouver) 1 / 11 The Theme and
More informationStat 642, Lecture notes for 04/12/05 96
Stat 642, Lecture notes for 04/12/05 96 Hosmer-Lemeshow Statistic The Hosmer-Lemeshow Statistic is another measure of lack of fit. Hosmer and Lemeshow recommend partitioning the observations into 10 equal
More informationIntroduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference Lecture 01: Introduction and Overview
Introduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference Lecture 01: Introduction and Overview Michael R. Kosorok, Ph.D. Professor and Chair of Biostatistics Professor of Statistics and Operations
More informationCombining multiple observational data sources to estimate causal eects
Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University Combining multiple observational data sources to estimate causal eects Shu Yang* syang24@ncsuedu Joint work with Peng Ding UC Berkeley May 23,
More informationarxiv: v1 [stat.me] 15 May 2011
Working Paper Propensity Score Analysis with Matching Weights Liang Li, Ph.D. arxiv:1105.2917v1 [stat.me] 15 May 2011 Associate Staff of Biostatistics Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland
More informationEstimating Causal Effects of Organ Transplantation Treatment Regimes
Estimating Causal Effects of Organ Transplantation Treatment Regimes David M. Vock, Jeffrey A. Verdoliva Boatman Division of Biostatistics University of Minnesota July 31, 2018 1 / 27 Hot off the Press
More informationSample size considerations for precision medicine
Sample size considerations for precision medicine Eric B. Laber Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University November 28 Acknowledgments Thanks to Lan Wang NCSU/UNC A and Precision Medicine
More informationDynamic Prediction of Disease Progression Using Longitudinal Biomarker Data
Dynamic Prediction of Disease Progression Using Longitudinal Biomarker Data Xuelin Huang Department of Biostatistics M. D. Anderson Cancer Center The University of Texas Joint Work with Jing Ning, Sangbum
More informationApplication of Time-to-Event Methods in the Assessment of Safety in Clinical Trials
Application of Time-to-Event Methods in the Assessment of Safety in Clinical Trials Progress, Updates, Problems William Jen Hoe Koh May 9, 2013 Overview Marginal vs Conditional What is TMLE? Key Estimation
More informationAn Introduction to Causal Analysis on Observational Data using Propensity Scores
An Introduction to Causal Analysis on Observational Data using Propensity Scores Margie Rosenberg*, PhD, FSA Brian Hartman**, PhD, ASA Shannon Lane* *University of Wisconsin Madison **University of Connecticut
More informationComparing Adaptive Interventions Using Data Arising from a SMART: With Application to Autism, ADHD, and Mood Disorders
Comparing Adaptive Interventions Using Data Arising from a SMART: With Application to Autism, ADHD, and Mood Disorders Daniel Almirall, Xi Lu, Connie Kasari, Inbal N-Shani, Univ. of Michigan, Univ. of
More informationStructural Nested Mean Models for Assessing Time-Varying Effect Moderation. Daniel Almirall
1 Structural Nested Mean Models for Assessing Time-Varying Effect Moderation Daniel Almirall Center for Health Services Research, Durham VAMC & Dept. of Biostatistics, Duke University Medical Joint work
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.st] 29 Jul 2014
On Estimation of Optimal Treatment Regimes For Maximizing t-year Survival Probability arxiv:1407.7820v1 [math.st] 29 Jul 2014 Runchao Jiang 1, Wenbin Lu, Rui Song, and Marie Davidian North Carolina State
More informationTargeted Group Sequential Adaptive Designs
Targeted Group Sequential Adaptive Designs Mark van der Laan Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley School of Public Health Liver Forum, May 10, 2017 Targeted Group Sequential
More informationThe Supervised Learning Approach To Estimating Heterogeneous Causal Regime Effects
The Supervised Learning Approach To Estimating Heterogeneous Causal Regime Effects Thai T. Pham Stanford Graduate School of Business thaipham@stanford.edu May, 2016 Introduction Observations Many sequential
More informationA Decision Theoretic Approach to Causality
A Decision Theoretic Approach to Causality Vanessa Didelez School of Mathematics University of Bristol (based on joint work with Philip Dawid) Bordeaux, June 2011 Based on: Dawid & Didelez (2010). Identifying
More informationPower and Sample Size Calculations with the Additive Hazards Model
Journal of Data Science 10(2012), 143-155 Power and Sample Size Calculations with the Additive Hazards Model Ling Chen, Chengjie Xiong, J. Philip Miller and Feng Gao Washington University School of Medicine
More information7 Sensitivity Analysis
7 Sensitivity Analysis A recurrent theme underlying methodology for analysis in the presence of missing data is the need to make assumptions that cannot be verified based on the observed data. If the assumption
More informationGov 2002: 13. Dynamic Causal Inference
Gov 2002: 13. Dynamic Causal Inference Matthew Blackwell December 19, 2015 1 / 33 1. Time-varying treatments 2. Marginal structural models 2 / 33 1/ Time-varying treatments 3 / 33 Time-varying treatments
More informationHigh Dimensional Propensity Score Estimation via Covariate Balancing
High Dimensional Propensity Score Estimation via Covariate Balancing Kosuke Imai Princeton University Talk at Columbia University May 13, 2017 Joint work with Yang Ning and Sida Peng Kosuke Imai (Princeton)
More informationBayesian regression tree models for causal inference: regularization, confounding and heterogeneity
Bayesian regression tree models for causal inference: regularization, confounding and heterogeneity P. Richard Hahn, Jared Murray, and Carlos Carvalho June 22, 2017 The problem setting We want to estimate
More informationA Gate-keeping Approach for Selecting Adaptive Interventions under General SMART Designs
1 / 32 A Gate-keeping Approach for Selecting Adaptive Interventions under General SMART Designs Tony Zhong, DrPH Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (Feb 20, 2019) Workshop on Design of mhealth Intervention
More information5 Methods Based on Inverse Probability Weighting Under MAR
5 Methods Based on Inverse Probability Weighting Under MAR The likelihood-based and multiple imputation methods we considered for inference under MAR in Chapters 3 and 4 are based, either directly or indirectly,
More informationLearning Classification with Auxiliary Probabilistic Information Quang Nguyen Hamed Valizadegan Milos Hauskrecht
Learning Classification with Auxiliary Probabilistic Information Quang Nguyen Hamed Valizadegan Milos Hauskrecht Computer Science Department University of Pittsburgh Outline Introduction Learning with
More informationCausal inference in epidemiological practice
Causal inference in epidemiological practice Willem van der Wal Biostatistics, Julius Center UMC Utrecht June 5, 2 Overview Introduction to causal inference Marginal causal effects Estimating marginal
More informationDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology And Pharmacoeconomics Technical Report Series
Division of Pharmacoepidemiology And Pharmacoeconomics Technical Report Series Year: 2013 #006 The Expected Value of Information in Prospective Drug Safety Monitoring Jessica M. Franklin a, Amanda R. Patrick
More informationPrevious lecture. P-value based combination. Fixed vs random effects models. Meta vs. pooled- analysis. New random effects testing.
Previous lecture P-value based combination. Fixed vs random effects models. Meta vs. pooled- analysis. New random effects testing. Interaction Outline: Definition of interaction Additive versus multiplicative
More informationPropensity Score Weighting with Multilevel Data
Propensity Score Weighting with Multilevel Data Fan Li Department of Statistical Science Duke University October 25, 2012 Joint work with Alan Zaslavsky and Mary Beth Landrum Introduction In comparative
More informationDeductive Derivation and Computerization of Semiparametric Efficient Estimation
Deductive Derivation and Computerization of Semiparametric Efficient Estimation Constantine Frangakis, Tianchen Qian, Zhenke Wu, and Ivan Diaz Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School
More informationConstruction and statistical analysis of adaptive group sequential designs for randomized clinical trials
Construction and statistical analysis of adaptive group sequential designs for randomized clinical trials Antoine Chambaz (MAP5, Université Paris Descartes) joint work with Mark van der Laan Atelier INSERM
More informationCovariate Balancing Propensity Score for General Treatment Regimes
Covariate Balancing Propensity Score for General Treatment Regimes Kosuke Imai Princeton University October 14, 2014 Talk at the Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Joint work with Christian
More informationPSC 504: Dynamic Causal Inference
PSC 504: Dynamic Causal Inference Matthew Blackwell 4/8/203 e problem Let s go back to a problem that we faced earlier, which is how to estimate causal effects with treatments that vary over time. We could
More informationIndividualized Treatment Effects with Censored Data via Nonparametric Accelerated Failure Time Models
Individualized Treatment Effects with Censored Data via Nonparametric Accelerated Failure Time Models Nicholas C. Henderson Thomas A. Louis Gary Rosner Ravi Varadhan Johns Hopkins University July 31, 2018
More informationSemiparametric Mixed Effects Models with Flexible Random Effects Distribution
Semiparametric Mixed Effects Models with Flexible Random Effects Distribution Marie Davidian North Carolina State University davidian@stat.ncsu.edu www.stat.ncsu.edu/ davidian Joint work with A. Tsiatis,
More informationUniversity of California, Berkeley
University of California, Berkeley U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series Year 2008 Paper 241 A Note on Risk Prediction for Case-Control Studies Sherri Rose Mark J. van der Laan Division
More informationQuantile-Optimal Treatment Regimes
Quantile-Optimal Treatment Regimes Lan Wang, Yu Zhou, Rui Song and Ben Sherwood Abstract Finding the optimal treatment regime (or a series of sequential treatment regimes) based on individual characteristics
More informationInteractive Q-learning for Probabilities and Quantiles
Interactive Q-learning for Probabilities and Quantiles Kristin A. Linn 1, Eric B. Laber 2, Leonard A. Stefanski 2 arxiv:1407.3414v2 [stat.me] 21 May 2015 1 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology
More informationModification and Improvement of Empirical Likelihood for Missing Response Problem
UW Biostatistics Working Paper Series 12-30-2010 Modification and Improvement of Empirical Likelihood for Missing Response Problem Kwun Chuen Gary Chan University of Washington - Seattle Campus, kcgchan@u.washington.edu
More informationPersonalized Treatment Selection Based on Randomized Clinical Trials. Tianxi Cai Department of Biostatistics Harvard School of Public Health
Personalized Treatment Selection Based on Randomized Clinical Trials Tianxi Cai Department of Biostatistics Harvard School of Public Health Outline Motivation A systematic approach to separating subpopulations
More informationGroup Sequential Designs: Theory, Computation and Optimisation
Group Sequential Designs: Theory, Computation and Optimisation Christopher Jennison Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, UK http://people.bath.ac.uk/mascj 8th International Conference
More informationTargeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Safety Analysis
Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Safety Analysis Sam Lendle 1 Bruce Fireman 2 Mark van der Laan 1 1 UC Berkeley 2 Kaiser Permanente ISPE Advanced Topics Session, Barcelona, August 2012 1 / 35
More informationCausal modelling in Medical Research
Causal modelling in Medical Research Debashis Ghosh Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health Biostatistics Workshop Series Goals for today Introduction to Potential
More informationMarginal versus conditional effects: does it make a difference? Mireille Schnitzer, PhD Université de Montréal
Marginal versus conditional effects: does it make a difference? Mireille Schnitzer, PhD Université de Montréal Overview In observational and experimental studies, the goal may be to estimate the effect
More informationUniversity of California, Berkeley
University of California, Berkeley U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series Year 2010 Paper 260 Collaborative Targeted Maximum Likelihood For Time To Event Data Ori M. Stitelman Mark
More informationPubh 8482: Sequential Analysis
Pubh 8482: Sequential Analysis Joseph S. Koopmeiners Division of Biostatistics University of Minnesota Week 10 Class Summary Last time... We began our discussion of adaptive clinical trials Specifically,
More informationFair Inference Through Semiparametric-Efficient Estimation Over Constraint-Specific Paths
Fair Inference Through Semiparametric-Efficient Estimation Over Constraint-Specific Paths for New Developments in Nonparametric and Semiparametric Statistics, Joint Statistical Meetings; Vancouver, BC,
More informationData-Efficient Information-Theoretic Test Selection
Data-Efficient Information-Theoretic Test Selection Marianne Mueller 1,Rómer Rosales 2, Harald Steck 2, Sriram Krishnan 2,BharatRao 2, and Stefan Kramer 1 1 Technische Universität München, Institut für
More informationDATA-ADAPTIVE VARIABLE SELECTION FOR
DATA-ADAPTIVE VARIABLE SELECTION FOR CAUSAL INFERENCE Group Health Research Institute Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington shortreed.s@ghc.org joint work with Ashkan Ertefaie Department
More informationEvaluation of Viable Dynamic Treatment Regimes in a Sequentially Randomized Trial of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Evaluation of Viable Dynamic Treatment Regimes in a Sequentially Randomized Trial of Advanced Prostate Cancer Lu Wang, Andrea Rotnitzky, Xihong Lin, Randall E. Millikan, and Peter F. Thall Abstract We
More informationAdaptive Designs: Why, How and When?
Adaptive Designs: Why, How and When? Christopher Jennison Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, UK http://people.bath.ac.uk/mascj ISBS Conference Shanghai, July 2008 1 Adaptive designs:
More informationImproved Doubly Robust Estimation when Data are Monotonely Coarsened, with Application to Longitudinal Studies with Dropout
Biometrics 64, 1 23 December 2009 DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00454.x Improved Doubly Robust Estimation when Data are Monotonely Coarsened, with Application to Longitudinal Studies with Dropout Anastasios
More informationCausal Inference. Miguel A. Hernán, James M. Robins. May 19, 2017
Causal Inference Miguel A. Hernán, James M. Robins May 19, 2017 ii Causal Inference Part III Causal inference from complex longitudinal data Chapter 19 TIME-VARYING TREATMENTS So far this book has dealt
More informationA short introduction to supervised learning, with applications to cancer pathway analysis Dr. Christina Leslie
A short introduction to supervised learning, with applications to cancer pathway analysis Dr. Christina Leslie Computational Biology Program Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center http://cbio.mskcc.org/leslielab
More informationCausal Inference for Mediation Effects
Causal Inference for Mediation Effects by Jing Zhang B.S., University of Science and Technology of China, 2006 M.S., Brown University, 2008 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
More informationGroup Sequential Tests for Delayed Responses. Christopher Jennison. Lisa Hampson. Workshop on Special Topics on Sequential Methodology
Group Sequential Tests for Delayed Responses Christopher Jennison Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, UK http://people.bath.ac.uk/mascj Lisa Hampson Department of Mathematics and Statistics,
More informationEstimating the Marginal Odds Ratio in Observational Studies
Estimating the Marginal Odds Ratio in Observational Studies Travis Loux Christiana Drake Department of Statistics University of California, Davis June 20, 2011 Outline The Counterfactual Model Odds Ratios
More informationFULL LIKELIHOOD INFERENCES IN THE COX MODEL
October 20, 2007 FULL LIKELIHOOD INFERENCES IN THE COX MODEL BY JIAN-JIAN REN 1 AND MAI ZHOU 2 University of Central Florida and University of Kentucky Abstract We use the empirical likelihood approach
More informationPropensity Score Analysis with Hierarchical Data
Propensity Score Analysis with Hierarchical Data Fan Li Alan Zaslavsky Mary Beth Landrum Department of Health Care Policy Harvard Medical School May 19, 2008 Introduction Population-based observational
More informationBayesian Inference on Joint Mixture Models for Survival-Longitudinal Data with Multiple Features. Yangxin Huang
Bayesian Inference on Joint Mixture Models for Survival-Longitudinal Data with Multiple Features Yangxin Huang Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, COPH, USF, Tampa, FL yhuang@health.usf.edu January
More informationBIOS 6649: Handout Exercise Solution
BIOS 6649: Handout Exercise Solution NOTE: I encourage you to work together, but the work you submit must be your own. Any plagiarism will result in loss of all marks. This assignment is based on weight-loss
More informationProbabilistic classification CE-717: Machine Learning Sharif University of Technology. M. Soleymani Fall 2016
Probabilistic classification CE-717: Machine Learning Sharif University of Technology M. Soleymani Fall 2016 Topics Probabilistic approach Bayes decision theory Generative models Gaussian Bayes classifier
More informationMulti-state Models: An Overview
Multi-state Models: An Overview Andrew Titman Lancaster University 14 April 2016 Overview Introduction to multi-state modelling Examples of applications Continuously observed processes Intermittently observed
More informationSUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE
SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE Mainly based on https://nlp.stanford.edu/ir-book/pdf/15svm.pdf 1 Overview SVM is a huge topic Integration of MMDS, IIR, and Andrew Moore s slides here Our foci: Geometric intuition
More informationWeighted MCID: Estimation and Statistical Inference
Weighted MCID: Estimation and Statistical Inference Jiwei Zhao, PhD Department of Biostatistics SUNY Buffalo JSM 2018 Vancouver, Canada July 28 August 2, 2018 Joint Work with Zehua Zhou and Leslie Bisson
More informationSwitching-state Dynamical Modeling of Daily Behavioral Data
Switching-state Dynamical Modeling of Daily Behavioral Data Randy Ardywibowo Shuai Huang Cao Xiao Shupeng Gui Yu Cheng Ji Liu Xiaoning Qian Texas A&M University University of Washington IBM T.J. Watson
More informatione author and the promoter give permission to consult this master dissertation and to copy it or parts of it for personal use. Each other use falls
e author and the promoter give permission to consult this master dissertation and to copy it or parts of it for personal use. Each other use falls under the restrictions of the copyright, in particular
More informationPackage Rsurrogate. October 20, 2016
Type Package Package Rsurrogate October 20, 2016 Title Robust Estimation of the Proportion of Treatment Effect Explained by Surrogate Marker Information Version 2.0 Date 2016-10-19 Author Layla Parast
More informationAchieving Optimal Covariate Balance Under General Treatment Regimes
Achieving Under General Treatment Regimes Marc Ratkovic Princeton University May 24, 2012 Motivation For many questions of interest in the social sciences, experiments are not possible Possible bias in
More informationA Bayesian Nonparametric Approach to Monotone Missing Data in Longitudinal Studies with Informative Missingness
A Bayesian Nonparametric Approach to Monotone Missing Data in Longitudinal Studies with Informative Missingness A. Linero and M. Daniels UF, UT-Austin SRC 2014, Galveston, TX 1 Background 2 Working model
More informationLecture 1: Bayesian Framework Basics
Lecture 1: Bayesian Framework Basics Melih Kandemir melih.kandemir@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de April 21, 2014 What is this course about? Building Bayesian machine learning models Performing the inference of
More informationCausal Inference with General Treatment Regimes: Generalizing the Propensity Score
Causal Inference with General Treatment Regimes: Generalizing the Propensity Score David van Dyk Department of Statistics, University of California, Irvine vandyk@stat.harvard.edu Joint work with Kosuke
More informationUsing modern statistical methodology for validating and reporti. Outcomes
Using modern statistical methodology for validating and reporting Patient Reported Outcomes Dept. of Biostatistics, Univ. of Copenhagen joint DSBS/FMS Meeting October 2, 2014, Copenhagen Agenda 1 Indirect
More information