Modeling of Dependence Between Critical Failure and Preventive Maintenance: The Repair Alert Model

Transcription

1 Modeling of Dependence Between Critical Failure and Preventive Maintenance: The Repair Alert Model Bo Lindqvist Helge Langseth Bård Støve Department of Mathematical Sciences Norwegian University of Science and Technology Workshop Delft June 2003 p.1/20

2 Purpose of talk Explicit modeling of maintenance in repairable systems: Several failure mechanisms Imperfect repair Degraded failures Preventive Maintenance (PM) (scheduled/unscheduled) Several failure mechanisms Periodically tested components Workshop Delft June 2003 p.2/20

3 Simultaneous Modeling of Time to Failure and PM 0 X (failure time) Competing risk problem: Z (PM) X is the (potential) failure time of an item Z is the time of a (potential) PM action before time X Possible outcomes: Failure at X, no PM, Z is not observed PM at Z (< X), while X is not observed Typical observations: N independent pairs {min(x, Z), I(Z < X)} are observed, represented as x 1,..., x m ; z 1,..., z n where N = m + n Workshop Delft June 2003 p.3/20

4 Cooke s Random Signs Censoring 0 X (failure time) Definition: Motivation: Z (PM) The event {Z < X} is independent of X Suppose the item emits some warning of deterioration, prior to failure. If warning signal is observed, then the item will be preventively maintained and the PM variable Z is observed. If the event of observing the signal is independent of the item s age, then random signs censoring is appropriate. Workshop Delft June 2003 p.4/20

5 Definition: Motivation: Repair Alert Model The pair (X, Z) satisfies the requirements of the Repair Alert Model provided the following two conditions both hold. 1. Random signs censoring, that is {Z < X} is independent of X 2. There exists an increasing function G(x) such that for all x > 0, P (Z z Z < X, X = x) = G(z) 0 z x G(x), The function G(z) is called the cumulative repair alert function. Its derivative g(z) is called the repair alert function. G(x) G(z) Z = z X = x Workshop Delft June 2003 p.5/20

6 Some Notation F X (x) = P (X x) (Distribution function) F Z (z) = P (Z z) FX (x) = P (X x, X < Z) (Subdistribution function) FZ (z) = P (Z z, Z < X) F X (x) = P (X x X < Z) (Conditional subdistribution function) F Z (z) = P (Z z Z < X) Only the subdistribution functions are in general identifiable from competing risk data Under Random Signs Censoring we have by definition F X (x) = P (X x X < Z) = P (X x) = F X (x) making F X (x) identifiable. Workshop Delft June 2003 p.6/20

7 Identification of G( ) in Repair Alert Model Recall assumptions: {Z < X} is independent of X P (Z z Z < X, X = x) = G(z) G(x), 0 z x From this: F Z (z) = P (Z z Z < X) = = 0 0 P (Z z Z < X, X = x)p (x X x + dx Z < X) min( G(z) G(x), 1) f X(x)dx = F X (z) + G(z) z f X (x) G(x) dx Differentiate: f Z (z) = f X (z) + g(z) z f X (x) G(x) dx G(z) f X(z) G(z) = g(z) z f X (x) G(x) dx. Combine: F Z (z) = F X (z) + G(z) f Z (z) g(z) Workshop Delft June 2003 p.7/20

8 Identification of G( ) in Repair Alert Model Basic formula: F Z (z) = F X (z) + G(z) f Z (z) g(z) Rearranging: g(z) G(z) = fz (z) F Z (z) F X (z). Integrating from fixed point a > 0, assuming G(a) > 0: w a g(z) G(z) dz = w a f Z (z) F Z (z) F X (z) dz G(w) G(a) dy y = FZ (w) F Z (a) dy 1 y F X ( F Z (y)). G(w) FZ (w) G(a) = exp{ F Z (a) dy }. 1 y F X ( F Z (y)) Hence, G(z) is identifiable from data, modulo a constant. Workshop Delft June 2003 p.8/20

9 Nonparametric Estimation of Cumulative Repair Function Let x 1,..., x m and z 1,..., z n be the observed X and Z. F X (t) is estimated by (1) ˆF X (t) = i m for x i t < x i+1, i = 0, 1,..., m. With t = 1 F Z (y) we get (2) ˆF X ( F 1 Z (y)) = i m for F Z (x i ) y < F Z (x i+1 ), i = 0, 1,..., m. Thus (3) FZ (x j ) F Z (x 1 ) y ˆF X ( dy F 1 Z (y)) = j 1 i=1 FZ (x i+1 ) F Z (x i ) dy y i/m = j 1 i=1 ln F Z (x i+1 ) i/m F Z (x i ) i/m. yielding the estimator (4) Ĝ(x j ) Ĝ(x 1 ) = j 1 i=1 ˆ F Z (x i+1 ) i/m. ˆ F Z (x i ) i/m The estimator for F Z (t) is Workshop Delft June 2003 p.9/20

10 Simulated example: Repair alert model Failure time X is exponentially distributed, failure rate λ = 1 q = P (Z < X) = 0.5 Cumulative repair function is G(x) = x, i.e. Z given Z < X, X = x is uniform on (0, x) m + n = Cumulative Repair Alert Function 6 Log Log Cumulative Repair Alert Function m+n= m+n= q= q=0.5 log(g) X exponentially distributed X independent of Z<X Z Z<X,X=x uniform on (0,x) 2 X exponentially distributed X independent of Z<X Z Z<X,X=x uniform on (0,x) Time log(time) Workshop Delft June 2003 p.10/20

11 Parametric statistical inference for repair alert model Suppose we observe N independent copies of the pair This gives data x 1,..., x m ; z 1,..., z n, with obvious meaning, where n + m = N. {min(x, Z), I(Z < X)} We are interested in estimating Density of X, f X (x) (for example exponential, Weibull, etc.) Repair probability q Repair function g(x) LIKELIHOOD FUNCTION Likelihood contribution from an observation is under the repair alert model: f(x i, X < Z) = (1 q)f X (x i ) for x i f(z i, Z < X) = q f Z (z i ) for z i = qg(z i ) z i (f X (x)/g(x))dx Workshop Delft June 2003 p.11/20

12 An Exponential-Power Repair Alert Model f X (x) = λe λx, q = P (Z < X), G(x) = x β Likelihood contributions: Complete log-likelihood: f(x i, X < Z) = (1 q)f X (x i ) = (1 q)λe λx i f(z i, Z < X) = qg(z i ) = qβz β 1 i z i z i = qλβ(λz i ) β 1 (f X (x)/g(x))dx λe λx x β dx λz i w β e w dw l(λ, β, q) = m ln(1 q) + n ln q + (n + m) ln λ + n ln β λ n (β 1) ln(λz i ) + i=1 n i=1 m x i + i=1 ln( w β e w dw). λz i Workshop Delft June 2003 p.12/20

13 Simulated parametric example N = m + n = 100 Parameter True value Estimate Lower bound Upper bound λ β q Maximum likelihood estimates and approximate 95% confidence intervals for simulated data The 95% confidence region for λ (horizontal axis) and β from the simulated data Workshop Delft June 2003 p.13/20

14 The EM-algorithm general description Y is the observed data; X is a piece of unknown data; θ is the parameter of interest; and l C (θ; Y, X ) is the hypothetical complete-data log-likelihood, defined for all θ Ω. Starting with an initial parameter value θ (0) Ω, the EM algorithm repeats the following two steps until convergence. E-step: Compute l (j) (θ) = E X Y,θ (j 1) [l C (θ; Y, X )], where the expectation is taken with respect to the conditional distribution of the missing data X given the observed data Y, and the current numerical value θ (j 1) is used in evaluating the expected value. M-step: Find θ (j) Ω that maximizes l (j) (θ). Workshop Delft June 2003 p.14/20

15 The EM-algorithm in our model Likelihood contributions to complete likelihood are now simplified: Resulting iterative algorithm: f(x i, X < Z) = (1 q)f X (x i ) = (1 q)λe λx i f(x i, z i, Z < X) = qλe λx i βzβ 1 i x β i ˆq = n N ˆλ j+1 = N m i=1 x i + (1/ˆλ j ) n i=1 ˆλj zi ˆλj zi w ( ˆβ j 1) e w dw w ˆβ j e w dw ˆβ j+1 = n ˆλj z ln(w)w ˆβ j e w dw i i=1 w ˆβ j e w dw ˆλj zi n ln(ˆλ j z i ) Workshop Delft June 2003 p.15/20

16 Example: VHF data (Mendenhall and Hader, 1958) Times to failure for ARC-1 VHF communication transmitter-receivers of a single commercial airline. X = time to confirmed failure, m = 218 Z = time to unconfirmed failure (censoring), n = X Z Workshop Delft June 2003 p.16/20

17 Example: VHF data (Mendenhall and Hader, 1958) Left: Estimated subsurvival functions for X, thin line, and Z, thick line Right: Estimated conditional subsurvival functions for X, thin line, Z, thick line, estimated Φ(t) = P (Z < X X > t, Z > t), and the estimated CSF corresponding to an independent exponential model Null hypothesis of independent exponentials is accepted at p-value.15 Workshop Delft June 2003 p.17/20

18 Estimated failure rate for X, VHF data Assuming Failure rate for X Repair Alert, X exponentially distributed X, Z independent exponentials Bounds for the failure rate of X. Thick line: accounting for sampling fluctuations. Thin line: without sampling fluctuations Workshop Delft June 2003 p.18/20

19 VHF data: Nonparametric Repair Alert Model The estimated ln G(x j ) G(x 1 ) plotted against ln(x j) Workshop Delft June 2003 p.19/20

20 VHF data: Parametric Repair Alert Model MODEL Failure time X is exponentially distributed, failure rate λ Cumulative repair function is G(x) = x β Parameter Estimate Lower bound Upper bound λ β q estimates and approximate 95% confidence Maximum likelihood intervals for parametric repair alert model Workshop Delft June 2003 p.20/20