An experimental investigation of soil arching within basal reinforced and unreinforced piled embankments
|
|
- Bertina Jefferson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Geotextiles and Geomembranes (00) 7 An experimental investigation of soil arching within basal reinforced and unreinforced piled embankments Chen Yun-min, Cao Wei-ping, Chen Ren-peng Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, ] Zheda Road, Hangzhou 007, PR China Received September 00; received in revised form May 007; accepted 7 May 007 Available online 9 July 007 Abstract Geotechnical engineers face several challenges when constructing embankments over soft soils. These include potential bearing failure, intolerable settlement, and global or local instability. Piled embankments provide an economic and effective method to construct roads on soft soils. Soil arching developed within such embankments has significant influence on its behavior. A total of model tests were conducted to evaluate the effects of pile subsoil relative displacement, embankment height, cap beam width and clear spacing, and geosynthetics with different tensile strengths on stress concentration ratios and settlements in the embankments. The test results indicate that stress concentration ratio varies with pile subsoil relative displacement and has upper and lower bounds. A higher ratio of embankment height to cap beam clear spacing, as well as a higher ratio of cap beam width to clear spacing, would result in a higher stress concentration ratio. The inclusion of a geosynthetic membrane can increase the stress concentration ratio. When the embankment height to the cap beam clear spacing ratio, h/s, is less than., apparent differential settlements may occur on the surface of embankment. When h/s is greater than., however, no apparent differential settlements will occur on the embankment surface. In addition, experimental results were also compared to several current design methods. r 007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Piled embankments; Model test; Soil arching; Stress concentration ratio; Settlements. Introduction Piled embankments are increasingly used to construct highways on soft soils due to their rapid construction, low costs, and small total and differential settlements compared to the traditional soft soils improvement methods such as preloading, vertical drains or grouting injection (Magnan, 99; Shen et al., 00). The interactions among embankment fill, geosynthetic reinforcement, pile (cap) and foundation soil are complex and can be schematically described as shown in Fig.. Since compression stiffness of the pile is greater than that of the foundation soil, the embankment fill mass directly above the foundation soil has a tendency to move downward. This movement is partially restrained by shear stress, t, from the embankment fill mass directly above the pile cap. The shear stress Corresponding author. Tel.: ; fax: address: caowp@zju.edu.cn (C. Wei-ping). increases the pressure acting on the pile cap but reduces the pressure on the foundation soil. This load transfer mechanism was termed the soil arching effect by Terzaghi (9). The inclusion of geosynthetic reinforcements complicates the load transfer mechanism. The soil arching has a significant influence on the behavior of piled embankments. Stress concentration ratio, n, is an important parameter to assess the degree of soil arching and is defined by Han and Gabr (00) as follows: n ¼ s p, () s s where s p is the applied pressure on the pile cap and s s is the average pressure applied on the foundation soil. n ¼ represents no soil arching. The greater the value of n, the higher the degree of soil arching. If the degree of soil arching is not sufficient, too much embankment load will be born by the foundation soil and the pile subsoil relative displacement, Ds (Fig. ) will be reflected to the top of the embankment and an unacceptable differential settlement 0-/$ - see front matter r 007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:0.0/j.geotexmem
2 C. Yun-min et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes (00) 7 Nomenclature a c arching coefficient b cap beam width c cohesive strength of embankment fill C c coefficient of curvature G specific gravity h embankment height h c embankment critical height h e equal settlement plane height K empirical constant in Terzaghi s trench model K p ¼ðþsin fþ=ð sin fþ n stress concentration ratio geosynthetic reinforcement tensile strength T g s cap beam clear spacing a coefficient of distribution uniformity of soil pressure on the foundation soil s p vertical soil pressure applied on pile cap s s vertical soil pressure applied on soft soils s r radial stress in sand arch s y tangential stress in sand arch g unit weight of embankment fill t shear stress d ¼ b=ðs þ bþ f internal friction angle of embankment fill f max peak secant angle of shearing resistance Ds pile subsoil relative displacement Ds c critical pile subsoil relative displacement may occur, which would harm normal function and durability of the embankment. However, too large value of the stress concentration ratio, n, implies that nearly all the embankment load will be born by the piles and high costs. Consequently, a thorough understanding of soil arching mechanism within piled embankments is essential for engineering design. A number of research studies associated with this subject have been performed in the past two decades. Hewlett and Randolph (9) conducted D model tests and presented a semi-spherical model to describe soil arching, but the effects of geosynthetic reinforcement and pile subsoil relative displacement on soil arching were not considered. Low et al. (99) undertook D model tests to evaluate soil arching. However, the settlements in the embankment and the influence of geosynthetic reinforcements with different tensile strengths on soil arching were not considered. In addition, pile subsoil relative displacement was not taken into account. Chen et al. (00) improved the semispherical model initiated by Hewlett and Randolph (9), but the effect of geosynthetic reinforcement was not evaluated. Marston s formula is applied to estimate the load on the pile cap in the British Standard BS00 (99), but the soil resistance below the reinforcement is ignored. Moreover, the embankment fill material properties are not considered. Han and Gabr (00) and Pham et al. (00) conducted numerical analyses on the embankments. Fig.. Soil arching in piled embankments. Nevertheless, the conclusions on the effect of geosynthetic reinforcement drawn from these numerical analyses are inconsistent. Existing methods for determining the magnitude of arching in piled embankments yield very different results (Russell and Pierpoint, 997; Naughton and Kempton, 00; Stewart and Filz, 00). Moreover, no design methods are available to estimate the total and the differential settlements of the embankments, and a wellaccepted design method is absent. Gabr and Han (00) argued that the effects of soil arching developed in the embankment remained poorly understood, current design methods for such system have not been well verified and that further studies must be performed. In this study, a total of model tests were conducted to evaluate the effects of pile subsoil relative displacement, embankment height, cap beam width and clear spacing, and geosynthetic reinforcements with different tensile strengths on stress concentration ratio and settlements in such embankments. In addition, experimental results have been compared to the predictions of several design methods.. Model tests.. Model test set-up Model test system consisted of a bricked base, two rubber water bags and a tank. Toughened glass was used for the four walls of the tank to allow observation. The system was 00 mm long, 000 mm wide and 0 mm high as shown in Fig.. The base was 0 mm high. The two side walls and the middle wall of the base were used to represent the cap beams. The two water bags, measuring 000 mm long, 00 mm wide and 0 mm high, were placed inside the base and filled with water. On top of that, an embankment of sand was added and water in the two water bags was permitted to flow out gradually under control causing the upper surface of water bags to descend and model the consolidation of foundation soil.
3 ARTICLE IN PRESS C. Yun-min et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes (00) 7 strengths on stress concentration ratio, the settlement of the embankments with a relatively low height and that of the one with relatively high height. Tests, and formed a series to investigate the effects of the cap beam width on stress concentration ratio and settlement of embankment with a relatively low height and without reinforcement... Material properties The sand used in the model tests came from Qiantang River Beach, China. The specific gravity G ¼., the coefficient of uniformity C u ¼. and the coefficient of curvature C c ¼ 0.9. Other characteristics were D 0 ¼ 0. mm, D 0 ¼ 0. mm, D max ¼ mm, e max ¼ 0.9 and e min ¼ 0.. Sand grains were subangular and predominantly quartz. The unit weight of the fill in the tank was.. kn/m and corresponded to a relative density of 77%. At a relative density of %, the peak secant angle of shearing resistance, f max, was found from triaxial tests to be at a confining pressure equal to 0 kpa, and at a confining pressure of 0 kpa. Following the recommendations of Bolton (9), a value of f max ¼ was used in the analyses of results. Three types of geosynthetic reinforcements were used in the model tests with biaxial tensile strengths 0.,.0 and. kn/m at % axial strain... Model test procedure Fig.. Layout of test set-up (unit: mm): (a) top view and (b) side view. The test set-up had two major advantages: () During the embankment sand filling, no water in the two water bags was released and no consolidation occurred in the foundation soil at this stage. () As soon as the water in the two water bags was discharged, consolidation begins but the consolidating process is much quicker than that of real soils and the test can be completed within a short time... Program of experiments The experimental program is detailed in Table. A preliminary investigation into the influence of the embankment height on stress concentration ratio, n, and settlement of the embankment without geosynthetic reinforcement was based on Tests 7. Tests 0 and Tests were performed to examine, respectively, the effect of geosynthetic reinforcement with different tensile After installation of the test set-up and filling water into the two bags so that the top surface of the water bag was in level with the top of the cap beams, seven soil stress transducers (SSTs) were placed on the top of water bags and the middle cap beam as shown in Fig. (a). According to Eq. (), the stress concentration ratio, n, is the ratio of pressure of SST to the average pressure of the others. In the case of Tests 0 and Tests, after installation of SSTs, geosynthetic reinforcement was laid across the two water bags and the middle cap beam and fixed on the top of the two side cap beams. In Tests and, prior to placing the SSTs, toughened glass plates, 990 mm long and mm thick, with width of 0 mm (for Test ) or 0 mm (for Test ), 90 mm (for Test ) or mm (for Test ) were fixed on the top of the middle cap beam and the two side cap beams, respectively. A layer of sand mm thick was then poured on the top of the water bags and leveled with the top of the toughened glass plates. SSTs were placed as shown in Fig. (a). Dry sand was poured evenly on the cap beams and the two water bags in the tank by using a funnel modified from a metal pail. The funnel had an outlet fitted with a plastic hose with a net diameter of 00 mm. The funnel was inverted by a crane so that the outlet of the hose was pointing downwards and the distance between the point where the sand was discharged and the sand surface was 00 mm throughout the tests. For each 00 mm increment
4 C. Yun-min et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes (00) 7 7 Table Experiment details Test no. Embankment height h (mm) Width of middle cap beam a b (mm) Cap beam clear spacing s (mm) Geosynthetic tensile strength T g (kn/m) Notes h/s ¼ h/s ¼ h/s ¼ h/s ¼ h/s ¼ h/s ¼ h/s ¼ h/s ¼ h/s ¼ h/s ¼ h/s ¼ h/s ¼ h/s ¼ b/s ¼ / b/s ¼ / a The width of the side cap beam is half the middle cap beam width. in layer thickness, the sand surface was leveled and the height of sand and SSTs readings were recorded. The unit weight of the sand fill was.. kn/m in the tests. Along the observation wall, a strip of paper 00 mm long and 00 mm wide was laid on the top of each layer of sand, the paper had almost no tensile strength to avoid influencing sand behavoir. Marks were made on the outer side of the observation wall at the height of each layer of paper to observe the settlements of the fill. After completion of the embankment filling, an equal amount of water in the two water bags was discharged simultaneously and at the same rate. The settlements and SSTs readings were recorded h after each time the water was discharged. For each of the tests, the same process was repeated times. The test set-up had a D symmetry and the experiments in the study were designed to simulate plane soil arching in the embankments. Along the length direction of the water bags, four rigid iron strips measuring 90 mm in length, 0 mm in width, and. mm in thickness were affixed on the top of each water bag and spaced at 00 mm centers to ensure that deformation of the top surface of the water bag was similar to that of a single-direction slab rather than that of a two-direction slab under transverse loading. After each water discharge, the settlement of the top surface of the water bags in the mid-span over their width was equivalent to the pile subsoil relative displacement, Ds. Wall friction could influence the test results. Low et al. (99) used Perspex for the two long walls of the tank in their experiments, and a wall friction of 0. kpa was calculated. Compared to toughened glass, Perspex is soft and flexible and has a greater wall friction compared with that of toughened glass used in the study, which was determined to be 0.0 kpa. In view of the low value of wall friction, this effect was ignored in this series of tests. As the principles of similarity between the physical model and prototype were not strictly maintained, the results obtained from the model tests are more qualitative than quantitative and cannot be directly extrapolated to real embankments, but they are useful to gain a better understanding of the mechanism of soil arching in embankments and can be used to verify the validity of current design methods (James, 97).. Test results.. Soil pressures on the soft soils and cap beam The variation of soil pressure showed nearly identical characteristics in all tests, and only the results of Test 7 are presented herein (Fig. ). As shown in Fig. (a), the increase in soil pressure is almost linear during embankment filling. When the embankment height was less than 00 mm, all soil pressure readings were nearly the same. Beyond 00 mm high, soil pressure on the cap beam was greater than that on soft soils. Soil pressure on the cap beam reached 0. kpa at height 00 mm, while the maximum soil pressure on soft soils was 7. kpa. This implies that soil arching occurred during embankment filling. Fig. (a) also shows that soil pressures on soft soils were not uniformly distributed. Fig. (b) shows the variation of soil pressures during the process of water discharge from water bags. With an increase in the pile subsoil relative displacement, Ds, the soil pressure increased on the cap beam and decreased on soft soils. When the pile subsoil relative displacement, Ds, was about mm, pressure on the cap beam and soft soils reach a maximum value of.97 kpa and a minimum average value of. kpa, respectively. Then, with a continuous increase in pile subsoil relative displacement, Ds, soil pressure on the cap beam decreases gradually and
5 ARTICLE IN PRESS C. Yun-min et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes (00) 7 Soil Pressure (kpa) SST SST SST SST SSTa SSTa SSTa 0 h/s=0.7 h/s=. h/s=. h/s=.0 h/s=0.9 h/s=. h/s=. Soil Pressure (kpa) Embankment Height (mm) SST SST SST SST SSTa SSTa SSTa 0 Fig.. The variation of soil pressures (Test 7): (a) during embankment filling and (b) during water discharge. reaches a relatively constant value of.0 kpa after DsX mm. Meanwhile the pressures on the soft soils increase and attain a constant average value of 7. kpa... The influence of embankment height on stress concentration ratio and settlements Fig. shows the results of Tests 7. It is observed that, for different magnitudes of embankment height to cap beam clear spacing ratio, h/s, the stress concentration ratio versus pile subsoil relative displacement had the same characteristics. With an increase in pile subsoil relative displacement, Ds, stress concentration ratio increased and reached a maximum value, then decreased gradually and maintained nearly a constant value. The larger the ratio h/s, the higher the stress concentration ratio, and the greater the difference between the maximum value and constant value. Han and Gabr (00) and Murugesan and Rajagopal (00) reported that a higher embankment Fig.. Influence of embankment h/s ratio on stress concentration ratio. height would result in a higher stress concentration ratio. Results from current investigations are in close agreement with their observations. A higher value of stress concentration ratio indicates that a higher percentage of the embankment load is transferred to cap beams. Fig. also shows that soil arching is strongly dependent on pile subsoil relative displacement, and there exists a critical relative displacement, Ds c (Ds c ¼ mm), at which the soil arching developed most effectively and beyond which there may be less effective arching. In other words, the stress concentration ratio has upper and lower bounds. In Tests, when h/sp., it was observed that the surface of the embankments was non-uniform implying differential settlement occurred on the top of the embankments. Fig. (a) shows the settlement of the embankment for Test when pile soil relative displacement Ds ¼ mm. As can be seen, at height 00 mm, the maximum differential settlement was mm, and the maximum differential settlement at the top of the embankment was mm. This is the coupled effects of soil arching and the compression of the embankment fill. When h/sp., the embankment height was relatively low and no completed soil arch was formed and the pile subsoil relative displacement, Ds, was reflected on the surface of the embankment, and differential settlement occurred. In Tests 7, when h/sx., the settlements in the lower part of the embankment were non-uniform, but the embankment surface remained almost horizontal. Fig. (b) shows the settlements of the embankment for Test 7 when the pile subsoil relative displacement Ds ¼ mm. As can be seen, at height 00 mm, the maximum differential settlement was mm, but the differential settlement on the top of the embankment was only mm. This is because, when h/sx., embankment height was relatively high, a completed soil arch was formed and an equal settlement plane existed and pile subsoil relative displacement, Ds, was restrained below the equal settlement
6 C. Yun-min et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes (00) 7 9 Embankment Height (mm) Embankment Height (mm) mm mm mm mm mm 0mm Water Bag Water Bag Side Cap-beam Middle Cap-beam Side Cap-beam 9mm 9mm 9mm mm 0mm 0mm mm 9mm mm 7mm 00 mm mm 0 Water Bag Water Bag Side Cap-beam Middle Cap-beam Side Cap-beam Fig.. Pictures of deformed embankments (not to scale): (a) Test and (b) Test 7. plane. As a result, no apparent differential settlement occurred on the embankment surface. Deformations in embankments of Tests 7 also suggest that the height of the equal settlement plane, h e, is about.. times the cap beam clear spacing, i.e., h e ¼ (..)s. To ensure that no differential settlement occurs on the embankment surface, a minimum embankment height of.s is necessary... The influence of geosynthetic reinforcements on stress concentration ratio and settlements The influence of geosynthetic reinforcements with different tensile strengths on stress concentration ratio is shown in Fig. (a) for the case of low embankment height. Compared to Test, the inclusion of reinforcement can improve the stress concentration ratio, but when the reinforcement tensile strength was low as in Test, the effect was not significant. When the reinforcement with a high tensile strength was used as in Tests 9 and 0, the effect was significant. Fig. (b) presents the results of Test and Tests, showing the influence of geosynthetic reinforcement on stress concentration ratio in the case of an embankment with a relatively high height (h/s ¼..). Although the relationship of stress concentration ratio versus pile subsoil relative displacement exhibits similar characteristics to that in Tests 0, the difference is apparent. For the same reinforcement, the effect for improving the stress Test TesT Test9 Test0 0 Test Test Test Test Pile-subsoil Relative Displacement(mm) Fig.. Influence of geosynthetic reinforcement tensile strength on stress concentration ratio: (a) for h/s ¼ 0.7 and (b) for h/s ¼.. concentration ratio in embankments with different heights is different. In the case of h/s ¼ 0.7, the inclusion of a reinforcement with a tensile strength of. kn/m can increase the maximum stress concentration ratio from. (Test ) to.9 (Test 0), equivalent to 9%. However, with the same reinforcement as used for the case of h/s ¼., the maximum stress concentration ratio was increased from 7. (Test ) to. (Test ), an increase of %. This suggests that the use of geosynthetic reinforcement to improve the stress concentration ratio is more significant for embankments with a relatively high height than for embankments with a relatively low height. The influence of geosynthetic reinforcements with different tensile strengths on the settlements when pile subsoil relative displacement Ds ¼ mm, is shown in Table. It can be seen that irrespective of embankment height, the inclusion of reinforcement can reduce the maximum settlement and the maximum differential settlement, but
7 70 C. Yun-min et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes (00) 7 Table Influence of geosynthetic reinforcement tensile strength on embankment settlement Test no. 9 0 Geosynthetic tensile strength (kn/m) Maximum settlement (mm) 7 9 Maximum differential settlement (mm) 9 o o o o the effect is more pronounced for the case of h/s ¼ 0.7, than for the case of h/s ¼.. As Collin et al. (99) and Hufenus et al. (00) have suggested, reinforcement effects depend on tensile strength and degree of lateral anchoring of the reinforcement. The two lateral sides of the reinforcement in these tests were fixed on the side cap beams, so the effects of improvement of stress concentration ratio and reduction in differential settlements could be over-predicted compared with real embankments in which fully lateral anchoring of the reinforcement is not possible... The influence of cap beam width on stress concentration ratio and settlements Fig. 7 shows the results of Tests, and. It is observed that the larger the ratio of cap beam width to clear spacing, the higher the stress concentration ratio. At a cap beam width to clear spacing ratio of / (Test), the maximum stress concentration ratio was., and at a cap beam width to clear spacing ratio of /. (Test ) and / (Test ), the maximum stress concentration ratio was increased to.7 and., respectively. Jones et al. (990) reported similar findings for stress concentration ratio. The influence of the ratio of the cap beam width to clear spacing on the settlements is shown in Table. As can be seen, the larger the ratio, the smaller the differential and the total settlement. It seems that the reduction effect is more significant on the differential settlement than on the total settlement. When increasing the cap beam width to clear spacing ratio from / to /, the maximum settlement was reduced from 7 to mm, equivalent to %. Meanwhile, the maximum differential settlement was reduced from to mm, equivalent to %. For a given embankment height, increasing the cap beam width to clear spacing ratio, which means soil arch in the embankment has a tendency to transform from an incomplete to a full condition with an inevitable decrease of differential settlement.. Several current design methods of stress concentration ratio.. Method of Low et al. (99) Low et al. (99) improved the calculation method of soil arching based on semi-spherical crown model Test Test Test Pile-subsoil Relative Displcement (mm) Fig. 7. Influence of cap beam width on stress concentration ratio. Table Influence of cap beam width on embankment settlement Test no. Cap beam width to clear spacing ratio / /. / Maximum settlement (mm) 7 7 Maximum differential settlement (mm) introduced by Hewlett and Randolph (9). The main points are reproduced here. A plane semi-cylindrical sand arch with a thickness equal to half the width of the cap beam is assumed in the embankment fill as depicted in Fig.. Low et al. (99) argued that the sand element critical state would be reached at the crown of the arch or just above the cap beam. The radial equilibrium of an element in the crown of the arch requires ds r dr þ s r s y ¼ g, () r where s r is the radial stress, s y the tangential stress, r the radial distance and g the embankment fill unit weight. s y ¼ K p s r, K p ¼ðþsin fþ=ð sin fþ,andfthe sand fill friction angle.
8 C. Yun-min et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes (00) 7 7 Fig. 9. Trench model for soil arching (Terzaghi, 9). Considering the boundary condition at the top of the crown (r ¼ (s/b)/ s r ¼ g(h (s+b)/)), Eq. () can be solved and soil pressure on the foundation soil s s can be expressed as follows: s s ¼ ag ðk p Þð dþðs þ bþ ðk p Þ þð dþ Kp h s þ b s þ b ðk p Þ, ðþ where d ¼ b/(s+b), a is the coefficient of distribution uniformity of soil pressure on the foundation soil and can be taken as 0. in the following calculation as Low et al. (99) recommended. So the soil pressure on the cap beam s p is given by s p ¼ ðs þ bþhg s ss. () b Then, stress concentration ratio can be obtained easily by n ¼ s p /s s. For the sand element just above the cap beam, another stress concentration ratio can be obtained by using a similar procedure and the minor stress concentration ratio is the real one... Method of Terzaghi (9) Terzaghi (9) proposed an analytical solution based on the famous Trap door experiment. He assumed that two vertical shear planes and as shown in Fig. 9 occurred in the soil as the Trap door descended slightly and the shear stress applied on the soil mass directly above the Trap door by the adjoining stationary soil mass decreases the soil pressure on the Trap door and increases the pressure on the adjoining stationary soil mass. The force equilibrium in the vertical direction for the infinitesimal slice of thickness dz is ds v dz Fig.. Semi-cylindrical arch in embankment (Low et al., 99). tan f þ K s v ¼ g, () s where g is the embankment fill unit weight, f the fill friction angle and K the empirical constant and can be taken as 0.7 according to Terzaghi (9). Solving the linear differential equation and imposing the boundary condition that s v ¼ 0atz¼0, one obtains the average pressure on the trap door s vh ¼ s v j z¼h ¼ sg K tan f tan f e Kðh=sÞ. () The descent of the Trap door is similar to the settlement of foundation soil, and the pressure on the Trap door is similar to the soil pressure on foundation soil. Consequently, soil pressure on the cap beam is given by s p ¼ hðs þ bþg s vhs, (7) b where h is the embankment height and b the cap beam width. Stress concentration ratio can be easily obtained by n ¼ s p /s vh. Eq. () is only valid for hps... British Standard design method, BS00 Marston s formula was adopted and modified in BS00 (99) to calculate the average pressure acting on a pile cap (s p ) and is given by: s p gh ¼ a cb, () h where b is the pile cap width, h the embankment height, g the embankment fill unit weight, a c the arching coefficient, a c ¼ :9ðh=bÞ 0: for end-bearing piles and a c ¼ :ðh=bþ 0:07 for friction piles. Eq. () is suitable for the D case; for the D situation, s p is given by s p gh ¼ a cb h. (9) Then, the average pressure on foundation soils s s can be written as s s ¼ ðs þ bþhg s pb, (0) s where s is the cap clear spacing. BS00 defines a critical height h c ¼.s, Eqs. () (0) are valid only for hph c.
9 7 ARTICLE IN PRESS C. Yun-min et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes (00) 7 Test Low et al. Terzaghi BS00(D) Test Low et al. Terzaghi BS00( D) 7 Test Low et al. Terzaghi BS00(D) 7 Test Low et al. Terzaghi BS00( D) 9 7 Test Low et al. Terzaghi BS00( D) Test Low et al. Terzaghi BS00( D) Test7 Low et al. Terzaghi BS00(D) Fig. 0. Comparison between the test results and design methods for stress concentration ratio: (a) Test, (b) Test, (c) Test, (d) Test, (e) Test, (f) Test and (g) Test 7.
10 C. Yun-min et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes (00) 7 7 The weight of the embankment fill above h c and the surface load are both completely transferred to the pile caps. A limitation of the BS00 is that the fill strength parameters were not taken into consideration... Comparison of predictions of design methods with experimental results None of the design methods for soil arching stated above considers the influence of reinforcements. Consequently, only the results of Tests 7 are compared with analytical predictions. It should be noted that Eq. (9) was used when test results were compared to BS00. Fig. 0 compares the experimental results to the calculated results of the design methods mentioned in Sections.., assuming c ¼ 0 kpa, f ¼ and g ¼. kn/m. Although the stress concentration ratios obtained from the design methods are not related to the pile subsoil relative displacement, horizontal lines represent the calculated stress concentration ratios, plotted in Fig. 0 for comparison. Fig. 0 shows that Terzaghi (9) method always overpredicts the stress concentration ratio. However, when h/sx., the results of this method show good agreement with the maximum stress concentration ratio from model tests. Method of Low et al. (99) gives slightly larger result compared to experimental values for h/so0.9. This is attributed to the limit analysis of soil element assumed in the arch. In fact, at a low embankment height, neither the soil element at the arch crown nor the soil element on the cap beam reach a limit state. Nevertheless, results of Low et al. (99) are by far the most relevant when compared to experimental results for h/sx.. As a whole, the stress concentration is strongly underestimated by BS00 when compared to the test results. From Fig. 0, it is also observed that method of Terzaghi (9) can be used to predict the upper bound of the stress concentration ratio. However, none of the three methods can predict the lower bound of the stress concentration ratio accurately.. Conclusions A series of D model tests have been undertaken to investigate soil arching in piled embankments with or without geosynthetic reinforcements. The test results have been compared with several current design methods. Model tests show that stress concentration ratios and settlements are influenced significantly by embankment height, cap beam width and clear spacing, and reinforcement tensile strength. Moreover, stress concentration ratio is strongly dependent on the pile subsoil relative displacement and has upper and lower bounds. Comparison of test results to current design methods shows a good agreement with the results of the method of Low et al. (99). The Terzaghi (9) trench model can be used to capture the maximum stress concentration ratio. And it seems that the method for D situation in BS00 underestimates stress concentration ratio. Although the scaling relations between the physical model and prototype have not been considered rigorously, the results obtained from the model tests are helpful to gain a better understanding of the mechanism of soil arching in piled embankments and can be used to verify the validity of design methods. Further studies using centrifuge or fullscale prototypes would be useful to evaluate the validity of the current design methods to real structures. Acknowledgments The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 0, 000, 000) and is greatly appreciated. The authors would also like to thank the reviewers for their valuable suggestions. References Bolton, M.D., 9. The strength and dilatancy of sands. Geotechnique (), 7. British Standard BS00, 99. Code of Practice for Strengthened/ Reinforced Soils and Other Fills. British Standard Institution, London. Chen, Y.M., Jia, N., Chen, R.P., 00. Soil arch analysis of piled embankment. China Journal of Highway and Transport 7 (), (in Chinese). Collin, J.G., Kinney, T.C., Fu, X., 99. Full scale highway load test of flexible pavement systems with geogrid base courses. Geosynthetics International (), 9 7. Gabr, M., Han, J., 00. Geosynthetic reinforcement for soft foundations: US perspectives. International Perspectives on Soil Reinforcement Applications, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, 7 9. Han, J., Gabr, M.A., 00. Numerical analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported earth platforms over soft soil. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (),. Hewlett, W.J., Randolph, M.F., 9. Analysis of piled embankments. Ground Engineering (),. Hufenus, R., Rueegger, R., Banjac, R., Mayor, P., Springman, S.M., Bronnimann, R., 00. Full-scale field tests on geosynthetic reinforced unpaved roads on soft subgrade. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 7. James, R.G., 97. Some aspects of soil mechanics model testing. Stress Strain Behaviour of Soils, Roscoe Memorial Symposium, Cambridge, UK, pp Jones, C.J.F.P, Lawson, C.R., Ayres, D.J., 990. Geotextile reinforced piled embankments. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Geotextiles: Geomembranes and Related Products, Rotterdam, pp. 0. Low, B.K., Tang, S.K., Choa, V., 99. Arching in piled embankments. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 0 (), Magnan, J.P., 99. Methods to reduce the settlement of embankments on soft clay: a review. Vertical and Horizontal Deformations of Foundations and Embankments, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication 0, Murugesan, S., Rajagopal, K., 00. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: numerical evaluation. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 9. Naughton, P.J., Kempton, G.T., 00. Comparison of analytical and numerical analysis design methods for piled embankments.
11 7 ARTICLE IN PRESS C. Yun-min et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes (00) 7 Contemporary Issues in Foundation Engineering, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication,. Pham, H.T.V., Suleiman, M.T., White, D.J., 00. Numerical analysis of geosynthetic-rammed aggregate pier-supported embankment. Proceeding of Geotrans 00 Conference, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, 7. Russell, D., Pierpoint, N., 997. An assessment of design methods for piled embankments. Ground Engineering 0 (), 9. Shen, S.L., Chai, J.C., Hong, Z.S., Cai, F.X., 00. Analysis of field performance of embankments on soft clay deposit with and without PVD-improvement. Geotextiles and Geomembranes (),. Stewart, M.E., Filz, G.M., 00. Influence of clay compressibility on geosynthetic loads in bridging layers for column-supported embankments. Contemporary Issues in Foundation Engineering, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, Terzaghi, K., 9. Theoretical Soil Mechanics. Wiley, New York.
On equal settlement plane height in piled reinforced embankments
Available online www.jocpr.com Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2014, 6(4):23-29 Research Article ISSN : 0975-7384 CODEN(USA) : JCPRC5 On equal settlement plane height in piled reinforced
More informationREINFORCED PILED EMBANK- MENT FOR A HIGH-SPEED RAILWAY OVER SOFT SOIL: A NUMERICAL AND ANALYTI- CAL INVESTIGATION
REINFORCED PILED EMBANK- MENT FOR A HIGH-SPEED RAILWAY OVER SOFT SOIL: A NUMERICAL AND ANALYTI- CAL INVESTIGATION Yan Zhuang (corresponding author) Hohai University, Geotechnical Research Institute Key
More informationColumn-Supported Embankments: Past, Present, and Future
Column-Supported Embankments: Past, Present, and Future Jie Han, Ph.D., PE, ASCE Fellow Professor The University of Kansas Column-Supported Embankments Also referred to as Pile-Supported Embankments Piled
More informationAnalysis of Load-Settlement Relationship for Unpaved Road Reinforced with Geogrid
ISGSR7 First International Symposium on Geotechnical Safety & Risk Oct. 8~9, 7 Shanghai Tongji University, China Analysis of Load-Settlement Relationship for Unpaved Road Reinforced with Geogrid Y. C.
More informationAnalysis of CMC-Supported Embankments Considering Soil Arching
Analysis of CMC-Supported Embankments Considering Soil Arching Balaka Ghosh 1, Behzad Fatahi 2, Hadi Khabbaz 3, and A. H. M. Kamruzzaman 4 1 PhD Candidate, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
More informationULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY OF ECCENTRICALLY LOADED STRIP FOUNDATION ON SAND REINFORCED WITH GEOGRIDS
ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY OF ECCENTRICALLY LOADED STRIP FOUNDATION ON SAND REINFORCED WITH GEOGRIDS C. R. Patra National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India B. M. Das California State University,
More informationPullout Tests of Geogrids Embedded in Non-cohesive Soil
Archives of Hydro-Engineering and Environmental Mechanics Vol. 51 (2004), No. 2, pp. 135 147 Pullout Tests of Geogrids Embedded in Non-cohesive Soil Angelika Duszyńska, Adam F. Bolt Gdansk University of
More informationGeosynthetics and Reinforced Soil Structures Geosynthetic Reinforced Pile Platforms
Geosynthetics and Reinforced Soil Structures Geosynthetic Reinforced Pile Platforms Dr. K. Rajagopal Professor of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai, India e-mail: gopalkr@iitm.ac.in Problems Construction
More informationFollowing are the results of four drained direct shear tests on an overconsolidated clay: Diameter of specimen 50 mm Height of specimen 25 mm
444 Chapter : Shear Strength of Soil Example. Following are the results of four drained direct shear tests on an overconsolidated clay: Diameter of specimen 50 mm Height of specimen 5 mm Normal Shear force
More informationDynamic Response of EPS Blocks /soil Sandwiched Wall/embankment
Proc. of Second China-Japan Joint Symposium on Recent Development of Theory and Practice in Geotechnology, Hong Kong, China Dynamic Response of EPS Blocks /soil Sandwiched Wall/embankment J. C. Chai 1
More informationPILE-SUPPORTED RAFT FOUNDATION SYSTEM
PILE-SUPPORTED RAFT FOUNDATION SYSTEM Emre Biringen, Bechtel Power Corporation, Frederick, Maryland, USA Mohab Sabry, Bechtel Power Corporation, Frederick, Maryland, USA Over the past decades, there has
More informationFinite Element analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles on Sloping Ground
Indian Geotechnical Journal, 41(3), 2011, 155-161 Technical Note Finite Element analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles on Sloping Ground K. Muthukkumaran 1 and N. Almas Begum 2 Key words Lateral load, finite
More information(Refer Slide Time: 02:18)
Geology and Soil Mechanics Prof. P. Ghosh Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Lecture 40 Shear Strength of Soil - C Keywords: Shear strength of soil, direct shear test,
More informationDeveloping an Analytical Method to Study Vertical Stress Due to Soil Arching During Tunnel Construction
Geotech Geol Eng (2016) 34:1247 1255 DOI 10.1007/s10706-016-0030-x TECHNICAL NOTE Developing an Analytical Method to Study Vertical Stress Due to Soil Arching During Tunnel Construction Chunlin Li Received:
More informationSimulation of Cyclic Direct Simple Shear Loading Response of Soils Using Discrete Element Modeling
Simulation of Cyclic Direct Simple Shear Loading Response of Soils Using Discrete Element Modeling A. Dabeet, D. Wijewickreme, & P. Byrne University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada SUMMARY: The
More informationOP-13. PROCEDURES FOR DESIGN OF EMBANKMENT
Page 1 of 8 WORK INSTRUCTIONS FOR ENGINEERS TYC Compiled by : LSS Checked by : GSS Approved by : OP-13. PROCEDURES FOR DESIGN OF EMBANKMENT Page of 8 13.0 13.1. OVERALL PROCEDURES This section will briefly
More informationEvaluation of short piles bearing capacity subjected to lateral loading in sandy soil
Evaluation of short piles bearing capacity subjected to lateral loading in sandy soil [Jafar Bolouri Bazaz, Javad Keshavarz] Abstract Almost all types of piles are subjected to lateral loads. In many cases,
More informationNumerical Modeling of Direct Shear Tests on Sandy Clay
Numerical Modeling of Direct Shear Tests on Sandy Clay R. Ziaie Moayed, S. Tamassoki, and E. Izadi Abstract Investigation of sandy clay behavior is important since urban development demands mean that sandy
More informationGEOTEXTILE-REINFORCED EMBANKMENTS ON SOFT CLAYS - EFFECTS OF A FOUNDATION SOIL CRUST STRENGTHENED BY LIME DIFFUSION
Technical Paper by A. Edinçliler and E. Güler GEOTEXTILE-REINFORCED EMBANKMENTS ON SOFT CLAYS - EFFECTS OF A FOUNDATION SOIL CRUST STRENGTHENED BY LIME DIFFUSION ABSTRACT: This paper presents the results
More informationMECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR OF DAMAGED HDPE GEOMEMBRANES
MECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR OF DAMAGED HDPE GEOMEMBRANES Guangming Xu, Mingchang Yang, Xianghai Zong Geotechnical Engineering Department, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, China gmxu@nhri.cn Abstract HDPE
More informationThe theories to estimate lateral earth pressure due to a strip surcharge loading will
Chapter LITERATURE REVIEW The theories to estimate lateral earth pressure due to a strip surcharge loading will be introduced in this chapter. Commonly geotechnical engineers apply the equations suggested
More informationA Comparative Study on Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations in Sand from N and /
DOI 10.1007/s40030-017-0246-7 ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION A Comparative Study on Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations in Sand from N and / V. A. Sakleshpur 1 C. N. V. Satyanarayana Reddy 1 Received: 9 January
More informationEffect of Moisture on Shear Strength Characteristics of Geosynthetic Reinforcement Subgrade
Journal of Geotechnical and Transportation Engineering Received 4/15/2015 Accepted 6/15/2015 Volume 1 Issue 1 Published 6/22/2015 Effect of Moisture on Shear Strength Characteristics of Geosynthetic Reinforcement
More informationNumerical Investigation of the Effect of Recent Load History on the Behaviour of Steel Piles under Horizontal Loading
Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Recent Load History on the Behaviour of Steel Piles under Horizontal Loading K. Abdel-Rahman Dr.-Ing., Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower
More informationTIME-DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR OF PILE UNDER LATERAL LOAD USING THE BOUNDING SURFACE MODEL
TIME-DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR OF PILE UNDER LATERAL LOAD USING THE BOUNDING SURFACE MODEL Qassun S. Mohammed Shafiqu and Maarib M. Ahmed Al-Sammaraey Department of Civil Engineering, Nahrain University, Iraq
More informationStudy on Settlement Prediction Model of High-Speed Railway Bridge Pile Foundation
Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 187 193 (2015) DOI: 10.6180/jase.2015.18.2.12 Study on Settlement Prediction Model of High-Speed Railway Bridge Pile Foundation Zhong-Bo
More informationANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED FIXED HEADED SINGLE FLOATING PILE IN MULTILAYERED SOIL USING BEF APPROACH
INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY, KOLKATA CHAPTER GEOTECHNICS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT KOLKATA 11 th 12 th March 2016, Kolkata, West Bengal, India ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED FIXED HEADED SINGLE FLOATING
More informationReinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai
Geosynthetics and Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls continued Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai e-mail: gopalkr@iitm.ac.inac in Outline of the Lecture
More informationEffect of Geotextile on the Liquefaction Behavior of Sand in Cyclic Triaxial Test
Scientific Cooperations Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, August-2015 31 Effect of Geotextile on the Liquefaction Behavior of Sand in Cyclic Triaxial Test Naeini, Seyed Abolhasan
More informationEffect of embedment depth and stress anisotropy on expansion and contraction of cylindrical cavities
Effect of embedment depth and stress anisotropy on expansion and contraction of cylindrical cavities Hany El Naggar, Ph.D., P. Eng. and M. Hesham El Naggar, Ph.D., P. Eng. Department of Civil Engineering
More informationfile:///d /suhasini/suha/office/html2pdf/ _editable/slides/module%202/lecture%206/6.1/1.html[3/9/2012 4:09:25 PM]
Objectives_template Objectives In this section you will learn the following Introduction Different Theories of Earth Pressure Lateral Earth Pressure For At Rest Condition Movement of the Wall Different
More informationEvaluation of dynamic behavior of culverts and embankments through centrifuge model tests and a numerical analysis
Computer Methods and Recent Advances in Geomechanics Oka, Murakami, Uzuoka & Kimoto (Eds.) 2015 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-138-00148-0 Evaluation of dynamic behavior of culverts and embankments
More informationOh, Erwin, Bolton, Mark, Balasubramaniam, Bala, Buessucesco, B.
Undrained Behavior of Lime Treated Soft Clays Author Oh, Erwin, Bolton, Mark, Balasubramaniam, Bala, Buessucesco, B. Published 8 Conference Title Proceedings of the Eighteenth (8) International Offshore
More information3D FEM investigation on bending failure mechanism of column inclusion under embankment load
Lowland Technology International 215; 17 (3): 157-166 International Association of Lowland Technology (IALT): ISSN 1344-9656 Research Paper 3D FEM investigation on bending failure mechanism of column inclusion
More information8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.
8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses. 8.2. Some soils show a peak shear strength. Why and what type(s)
More informationShear Strength of Soils
Shear Strength of Soils STRESSES IN A SOIL ELEMENT t s v Analyze Effective Stresses (s ) Load carried by Soil t Where: s H t t s H s = t f = s v = s H = t = s v Stresses in a Soil Element after Figure
More informationSOIL MODELS: SAFETY FACTORS AND SETTLEMENTS
PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA SER. CIV. ENG. VOL. 48, NO. 1 2, PP. 53 63 (2004) SOIL MODELS: SAFETY FACTORS AND SETTLEMENTS Gabriella VARGA and Zoltán CZAP Geotechnical Department Budapest University of Technology
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 07 3.0 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES LEARNING OUTCOMES Learning outcomes: At the end of this lecture/week the students would be able to: Understand
More informationColumn Supported Embankments with Geosynthetic Encased Columns: Parametric Study
Column Supported Embankments with Geosynthetic Encased Columns: Parametric Study Majid Khabbazian ; Christopher L. Meehan 2 ; Victor N. Kaliakin 3 Abstract: Three-dimensional finite element analyses were
More informationSoil strength. the strength depends on the applied stress. water pressures are required
Soil Strength Soil strength u Soils are essentially frictional materials the strength depends on the applied stress u Strength is controlled by effective stresses water pressures are required u Soil strength
More informationGeotechnical Properties of Soil
Geotechnical Properties of Soil 1 Soil Texture Particle size, shape and size distribution Coarse-textured (Gravel, Sand) Fine-textured (Silt, Clay) Visibility by the naked eye (0.05 mm is the approximate
More informationCite this paper as follows:
Cite this paper as follows: Naughton P.J. and O Kelly B.C. 2001. An overview of the University College Dublin hollow cylinder apparatus. Proceedings of the 14th Young European Geotechnical Engineer s Conference,
More informationExperimental and numerical studies of load transfers and arching effect in the trap-door problem
Experimental and numerical studies of load transfers and arching effect in the trap-door problem B. Chevalier, G. Combe & P. Villard Laboratoire Sols, Solides, Structures - Risques, Grenoble, France Bastien.chevalier@ujf-grenoble.fr
More informationProf. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
56 Module 4: Lecture 7 on Stress-strain relationship and Shear strength of soils Contents Stress state, Mohr s circle analysis and Pole, Principal stressspace, Stress pathsin p-q space; Mohr-Coulomb failure
More informationEN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.
EN 1997 1: Sections 3 and 6 Your logo Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 EN 1997-1 Eurocode 7 Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations Trevor L.L. Orr
More informationColumn Supported Embankments with Geosynthetic Encased Columns: Validity of the Unit Cell Concept
Column Supported Embankments with Geosynthetic Encased Columns: Validity of the Unit Cell Concept Majid Khabbazian 1 ; Victor N. Kaliakin 2 ; Christopher L. Meehan 3 Abstract: Column supported embankments
More informationCh 5 Strength and Stiffness of Sands
Ch. 5 - Strength and Stiffness of Sand Page 1 Ch 5 Strength and Stiffness of Sands Reading Assignment Ch. 5 Lecture Notes Sections 5.1-5.7 (Salgado) Other Materials Homework Assignment Problems 5-9, 5-12,
More informationEffectiveness of Vertical Drains in Dissipating Excess Pore Pressures Induced by Cyclic Loads in Clays
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 27 Effectiveness of Vertical Drains in Dissipating Excess Pore Pressures
More informationTransactions on Information and Communications Technologies vol 20, 1998 WIT Press, ISSN
Design Of Retaining Walls : System Uncertainty & Fuzzy Safety Measures J. Oliphant *, P. W. Jowitt * and K. Ohno + * Department of Civil & Offshore Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh.
More informationUNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH PREDICTION AND STABILITY ANALYSIS OF GEOCOMPOSITE REINFORCED EMBANKMENT WITH CLAYEY BACKFILL
Proceeding of the 4 th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics June 7 -, 8 Shanghai, China 585 UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH PREDICTION AND STABILITY ANALYSIS OF GEOCOMPOSITE REINFORCED EMBANKMENT WITH CLAYEY
More informationCHARACTERISTICS OF VACUUM CONSOLIDATION COMPARING WITH SURCHARGE LOAD INDUCED CONSOLIDATION
International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering, Ground Improvement and Geosynthetics for Human Security and Environmental preservation, Bangkok, Thailand CHARACTERISTICS OF VACUUM CONSOLIDATION COMPARING
More informationA study on the bearing capacity of steel pipe piles with tapered tips
Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication The 6th Japan-China Geotechnical Symposium A study on the bearing capacity of steel pipe piles with tapered tips Hironobu Matsumiya i), Yoshiro Ishihama
More informationExperimental study on the effectiveness of prefabricated vertical drains under cyclic loading
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 211 Experimental study on the effectiveness of prefabricated vertical
More informationParticle flow simulation of sand under biaxial test
5th International Conference on Civil Engineering and Transportation (ICCET 2015) Particle flow simulation of sand under biaxial test Xiao-li Dong1,2, a *,Wei-hua Zhang1,a 1 Beijing City University, China
More informationINVESTIGATION OF SATURATED, SOFT CLAYS UNDER EMBANKMENTS. Zsolt Rémai Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Geotechnics
INVESTIGATION OF SATURATED, SOFT CLAYS UNDER EMBANKMENTS PhD thesis Zsolt Rémai Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Geotechnics Budapest December, 2012 1. IMPORTANCE OF THE RESEARCH
More informationTrue Triaxial Tests and Strength Characteristics Study on Silty Sand Liang MA and Ping HU
217 2 nd International Conference on Test, Measurement and Computational Method (TMCM 217) ISBN: 978-1-6595-465- True Triaxial Tests and Strength Characteristics Study on Silty Sand Liang MA and Ping HU
More informationPiles in Lateral Spreading due to Liquefaction: A Physically Simplified Method Versus Centrifuge Experiments
"Pile-Group Response to Large Soil Displacements and Liquefaction: Centrifuge Experiments Versus A Physically Simplified Analysis", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol.
More informationTC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON. Jérôme Racinais. September 15, 2015 PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS
Jérôme Racinais September 15, 215 TC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS Table of contents 1. Reminder about pressuremeter tests 2. General behaviour
More informationFLAC3D analysis on soil moving through piles
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 211 FLAC3D analysis on soil moving through piles E H. Ghee Griffith University
More informationObserved soil displacements above rigid culverts
Observed soil displacements above rigid culverts R.P. McAffee 1, W.A. Take 2, and A.J. Valsangkar 1 1 Stantec Consulting Ltd., Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada 2 Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario,
More informationTHE SHEAR BEHAVIOR OBTAINED FROM THE DIRECT SHEAR AND PULLOUT TESTS FOR DIFFERENT POOR GRADED SOIL-GEOSYNTHETIC SYSTEMS
Journal of Hsieh GeoEngineering, and Ham: The Vol. Shear 6, No. Behavior 1, pp. Obtained 15-26, April from 211 the Direct Shear and Pullout Tests for Different Poor Graded Soil-Geosynthetic Systems 15
More informationEFFECT OF PARTICLE SHAPE ON SAND-GEOSYNTHETIC INTERFACES
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: 2395-56 Volume: 4 Issue: 4 Apr -217 www.irjet.net p-issn: 2395-72 EFFECT OF PARTICLE SHAPE ON SAND-GEOSYNTHETIC INTERFACES Krupa
More informationBenefits of Collaboration between Centrifuge Modeling and Numerical Modeling. Xiangwu Zeng Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Benefits of Collaboration between Centrifuge Modeling and Numerical Modeling Xiangwu Zeng Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio ABSTRACT There is little doubt that collaboration between centrifuge
More informationPRINCIPLES OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
PRINCIPLES OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Fourth Edition BRAJA M. DAS California State University, Sacramento I(T)P Boston Albany Bonn Cincinnati London Madrid Melbourne Mexico City New York Paris San Francisco
More informationChapter (12) Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad
Chapter (12) Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad 2017-2016 Chapter Outlines Shear strength in soils Direct shear test Unconfined Compression Test Tri-axial Test Shear Strength The strength of a material is the
More informationPGroupN background theory
12/12/03 Dr Francesco Basile, Geomarc Ltd PGroupN background theory Estimation of the deformations and load distributions in a group of piles generally requires the use of computer-based methods of analysis.
More informationLATERAL EARTH PRESSURE AND RETAINING STRUCTURES
Topic Outline LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE AND RETAINING STRUCTURES Types of retaining structures Lateral earth pressure Earth pressure at rest Rankine s Theory Coulomb s Theory Cullman s graphic solution Braced
More informationSoil Geosynthetic Interaction: Design Parameters from Experimental and Theoretical Analysis
Transp. Infrastruct. Geotech. (2014) 1:165 227 DOI 10.1007/s40515-014-0007-2 TECHNICAL PAPER Soil Geosynthetic Interaction: Design Parameters from Experimental and Theoretical Analysis Nicola Moraci &
More informationChapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil
Page 5 Chapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil. The internal resistance per unit area that the soil mass can offer to resist failure and sliding along any plane inside it is called (a) strength (b) shear strength
More informationChanges in soil deformation and shear strength by internal erosion
Changes in soil deformation and shear strength by internal erosion C. Chen & L. M. Zhang The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China D. S. Chang AECOM Asia Company Ltd., Hong Kong,
More informationwalls, it was attempted to reduce the friction, while the friction angle mobilized at the interface in the vertical direction was about degrees under
Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo Bulletin of ERS, No. 8 (5) ANALYSIS OF RE-LIQUEFACTION PROPERTIES BASED ON ENERGY APPROACH Seto WAHYUDI and Junichi KOSEKI ABSTRACT: Analysis of re-liquefaction
More informationEVALUATION OF BENDING LOAD IN BATTER PILES SET IN SOFT CLAY
EVALUATION OF BENDING LOAD IN BATTER PILES SET IN SOFT CLAY Tetsuya KOHNO 1, Hiroyuki TANAKA 2, Masahiro SHIRATO 3 and Shoichi NAKATANI 4 Abstract In this study, we conducted centrifuge tests to evaluate
More informationComputers and Geotechnics
Computers and Geotechnics 37 (2010) 977 990 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Computers and Geotechnics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compgeo Numerical and experimental studies of pressure-controlled
More informationA Fundamental Approach for an Investigation of Behavior Characteristics of the Vegetation Structures Using Seeded Sandbags
A Fundamental Approach for an Investigation of Behavior Characteristics of the Vegetation Structures Using Seeded Sandbags H. T. Kim & S. D. Yoo Dept. of Civil Engineering, Hongik University, Seoul, Korea.
More informationDeformation And Stability Analysis Of A Cut Slope
Deformation And Stability Analysis Of A Cut Slope Masyitah Binti Md Nujid 1 1 Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Technology MARA (Perlis), 02600 Arau PERLIS e-mail:masyitahmn@perlis.uitm.edu.my
More informationResearch Article 3D FE Analysis of an Embankment Construction on GRSC and Proposal of a Design Method
ISRN Civil Engineering Volume 1, Article ID 97, 11 pages http://dx.doi.org/1.1155/1/97 Research Article D FE Analysis of an Embankment Construction on GRSC and Proposal of a Design Method Yogendra K. Tandel,
More informationSoil Mechanics Prof. B.V.S. Viswanathan Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture 51 Earth Pressure Theories II
Soil Mechanics Prof. B.V.S. Viswanathan Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture 51 Earth Pressure Theories II Welcome to lecture number two on earth pressure theories.
More informationMODEL TESTS OF DRAGGING HALL ANCHORS IN SAND
26 Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 26-31 (216) DOI: 1.6119/JMST-16-125-4 MODEL TESTS OF DRAGGING HALL ANCHORS IN SAND Yu-Xiao Ren 1, 2, Zhen-Ming Lei 3, Li-Qiang Sun 1, 2,
More informationSTUDY OF PERFORMANCE OF GEOGRID AND SOIL INTERFACE USING VERTICAL PULLOUT TEST. Uttarakhand,
International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Scientific Research, Vol.4, Issue 2, Feb-Apr-2017, pp 49-54 ISSN: 2349 3607 (Online), ISSN: 2349 4824 (Print) www.arseam.com Impact Factor: 2.48 DOI:
More informationSTUDY OF THE BEHAVIOR OF PILE GROUPS IN LIQUEFIED SOILS
STUDY OF THE BEHAVIOR OF PILE GROUPS IN LIQUEFIED SOILS Shin-Tower Wang 1, Luis Vasquez 2, and Lymon C. Reese 3, Honorary Member,, ASCE ABSTRACT : 1&2 President & Project Manager, Ensoft, Inc. Email: ensoft@ensoftinc.com
More informationCavity Expansion Methods in Geomechanics
Cavity Expansion Methods in Geomechanics by Hai-Sui Yu School of Civil Engineering, University of Nottingham, U. K. KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS DORDRECHT / BOSTON / LONDON TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword Preface
More informationDesign of Reinforced Soil Walls By Lrfd Approach
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) ISSN: 2278-1684, PP: 16-26 www.iosrjournals.org Design of Reinforced Soil Walls By Lrfd Approach A.D. Maskar 1, N.T. Suryawanshi 2 1 Assistant
More informationCHAPTER 3 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF INTERFACE BEHAVIOR BETWEEN COMPOSITE PILES AND TWO SANDS
CHAPTER 3 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF INTERFACE BEHAVIOR BETWEEN COMPOSITE PILES AND TWO SANDS 3.1 INTRODUCTION The properties of materials used in composite piles can differ significantly from those of conventional
More informationNumerical simulation of inclined piles in liquefiable soils
Proc. 20 th NZGS Geotechnical Symposium. Eds. GJ Alexander & CY Chin, Napier Y Wang & R P Orense Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland, NZ. ywan833@aucklanduni.ac.nz
More informationNumerical model comparison on deformation behavior of a TSF embankment subjected to earthquake loading
Numerical model comparison on deformation behavior of a TSF embankment subjected to earthquake loading Jorge Castillo, Yong-Beom Lee Ausenco, USA Aurelian C. Trandafir Fugro GeoConsulting Inc., USA ABSTRACT
More informationSmall-Strain Stiffness and Damping of Soils in a Direct Simple Shear Device
Small-Strain Stiffness and Damping of Soils in a Direct Simple Shear Device B. D Elia, G. Lanzo & A. Pagliaroli Dipartimento di Ingegneria Strutturale e Geotecnica, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Italy.
More informationLandslide FE Stability Analysis
Landslide FE Stability Analysis L. Kellezi Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering, GEO-Danish Geotechnical Institute, Denmark S. Allkja Altea & Geostudio 2000, Albania P. B. Hansen Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering,
More informationSHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL
SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL Necessity of studying Shear Strength of soils : Soil failure usually occurs in the form of shearing along internal surface within the soil. Shear Strength: Thus, structural strength
More informationA non-linear elastic/perfectly plastic analysis for plane strain undrained expansion tests
Bolton, M. D. & Whittle, R. W. (999). GeÂotechnique 49, No., 33±4 TECHNICAL NOTE A non-linear elastic/perfectly plastic analysis for plane strain undrained expansion tests M. D. BOLTON and R. W. WHITTLE{
More informationAn analytical model of PVD-assisted soft ground consolidation
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences - Papers: Part A Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 2016 An analytical model of PVD-assisted soft ground
More informationInfluences of material dilatancy and pore water pressure on stability factor of shallow tunnels
Influences of material dilatancy and pore water pressure on stability factor of shallow tunnels YANG Xiao-li( ), HUANG Fu( ) School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Central South University, Changsha
More informationEffect of Different Category of Geogrid and Sand Layer on Pull-out Behaviour
Proceedings of the 2 nd World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE 17) Barcelona, Spain April 2 4, 17 Paper No. ICGRE 175 ISSN: 2371-5294 DOI:.11159/icgre17.175 Effect of
More informationON THE FACE STABILITY OF TUNNELS IN WEAK ROCKS
33 rd 33 Annual rd Annual General General Conference conference of the Canadian of the Canadian Society for Society Civil Engineering for Civil Engineering 33 e Congrès général annuel de la Société canadienne
More informationPILE SOIL INTERACTION MOMENT AREA METHOD
Pile IGC Soil 2009, Interaction Moment Guntur, INDIA Area Method PILE SOIL INTERACTION MOMENT AREA METHOD D.M. Dewaikar Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, India. E-mail:
More informationDiscussion: behaviour of jacked and driven piles in sandy soil
Title Discussion: behaviour of jacked and driven piles in sandy soil Author(s) Yang, J; Tham, LG; Lee, PKK; Chan, ST; Yu, F Citation Géotechnique, 27, v. 7 n., p. 47-478 Issued Date 27 URL http://hdl.handle.net/1722/7161
More informationAnalysis of different equations of undrained shear strength estimations using Atterberg Limits on Pontianak Soft Clay
Analysis of different equations of undrained shear strength estimations using Atterberg Limits on Pontianak Soft Clay Slamet Widodo, Abdelazim Ibrahim, Shen Hong Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg
More informationEffect of Cementation on the Shear Strength of Tehran Gravelly Sand Using Triaxial Tests
Journal of Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran 5(): 65-7 (24) University of Tehran, ISSN 6-4 Effect of Cementation on the Shear Strength of Tehran Gravelly Sand Using Triaxial Tests E. Asghari,, * D. G.
More informationLiquefaction and Foundations
Liquefaction and Foundations Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar Short Course on Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings 26 30 November, 2012 What is Liquefaction? Liquefaction
More informationAppendix A Results of Triaxial and Consolidation Tests
Appendix A Results of Triaxial and Consolidation Tests Triaxial and consolidation tests were performed on specimens of the soils used for interface testing. The objectives of these tests were as follows:
More informationCo-author: Dr B. He Engineer, Power China Huadong Engineering Limited Corporation, China
General information of the article Type of paper: Article Title: Cyclic lateral response and failure mechanisms of a semi-rigid pile in soft clay: centrifuge tests and numerical modelling Authors: Y. Hong
More information