INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOVERNANCE

Transcription

1 UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA JĀNIS KAULIŅŠ INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOVERNANCE SUMMARY OF THE DOCTORAL THESIS to the degree of Dr.Geogr. Branch: Environmental science Sub-branch: Environmental management Riga, 2015

2 The Doctroal thesis is developed and approved at the University of Latvia, Faculty of Geography and Earth sciences from Doctoral work is realised by support of European Social Funding Doctoral thesis contains introduction, 6 chapters, conclusions, list of published papers. cited or used sources and 20 appendices. Eiropas Sociālā fonda projekts Atbalsts doktora studijām Latvijas Universitātē Nr.2009/0138/ 1DP/ / 09/IPIA/ VIAA/004. Scientific supervisor: Dr.h.Paed., prof. Raimonds Ernšteins Reviewers: 1) Asoc.prof. Dr. geogr. Pēteris Šķiņķis, LU ĢZZF 2) Dr. geogr. Jānis Brizga 3) Prof. PhD Mart Külvik, The Estonian University of Life sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Public defence of the Doctoral thesis to be held at an open session of Doctoral Council of University of Latvia, Faculty of geography and geosciences on January 21, 2015, at 14:00 Room 313, Alberta str. 10, Riga The Doctoral thesis is available at Library of the University of Latvia, Kalpaka boulevard 4, Riga. The opinions are to be sent to the Doctoral Council, the University of Latvia at Raiņa boulevard 19, Riga, LV1586 Chairman of the Council prof. Dr.biol. Viesturs Melecis Secretary of the Council asoc.prof. Dr.biol. Gunta Spriņģe University of Latvia, 2015 Jānis Kauliņš,

3 ANNOTATION The theoretical basis of the formation of the indicator systems for the governance of sustainable development (IS GSD) has been insufficiently developed and linked with the practice of integrated governance of the particular territory. The research has been completed about GSD indicators and models of IS and their development in the planning process of territorial development. The formulation of the indicator of GSD has been specified from the origin of which the prerequisites for the information provision of the indicator are derived, the domain and the functions of IS GSD in integrated governance. The relationship of indicator selection with indicator integration among sustainable environment and governance levels has been proved which is formulated as horizontal and vertical integration of IS. The results of the research are fully approbated by implementing IS GSD into municipal practice of governance of Saulkrasti district. The recommendations have been produced for the complementary implementation of indicator systems into different levels of governance. Keywords: indicators, sustainability, development, governance, integration CONTENTS ABBREVIATURES... 4 INTRODUCTION TOPICALITY OF THE THEME AND NOVELTY OF THE RESEARCH Tasks and objectives of doctoral thesis The main scientific and practical novelties Publications OVERVIEW OF DOCTORAL THESIS Research methods applied Procedure of the reserach Integrated planning of sustainable development governance Defining of sustainable development indicator Integrative properties of indicators Indicator systems and their integration into development planning process Indicator systems in state-level planning documents THE MAIN CONCLUSIONS, RESULTS AND PROPOSALS The main conclusions about indicators and their systems for the governance of suatainable developemnt Other scientific results Practical results of the research Proposals SOURCES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

4 ABBREVIATURES DEDUCE Développement durable des Côtes Européennes, EU Interreg project DPSIR driving forces, pressures, stresses, impacts, responses EEA European Environment Agency EIA environmental impact assessment FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GID Governance of integrated (sustainable) development GIS geographical information system GSD governance of sustainable development ICLEI International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives ICZM Integrated coastal zone management IDRC ICLEI International Development Research Centre IS indicator system MK Chamber of Ministers NAP National development plan PKC Cross-sectoral coordination center (along Bureau of Prime minister of Republic of Latvia) SDS sustainable development strategy TAPIS information system for territorial development planning UN United Nations UNESCO United Nations Organization for Education, Science and Culture VARAM Ministry of Environment Protection and Regional Development VidM Ministry of Environment (former) WCED World Commission on Environment and Development INTRODUCTION It has already become clear in the middle of the last century that the development process has its restrictions related to the finite character of the amount of resources. (Meadows et al., 1972). It became obvious that the successful development process can not be fully characterized by simple direct parameters or even sufficiently general characteristics of separate areas. While searching for the clues, the researchers came across the notions of sustainable development, that is, the models under which development can continue, at least, during several generations, at the same time, without depleting existing resources being at the disposal of the society (WCED, 1987). Summarizing the efforts of experts and manifestations of good will by politicians, during the historically important 1992 Rio conference, the declaration on environment and development was adopted (UN, 1992a), determining 27 basic principles and components of the model of global sustainable development. Simultaneously, the sustainable development action plan of methodological character was also approved- Agenda for 21 st century (Agenda 21; UN, 1992b), which prescribes the routes towards the realization of sustainable development principles into practice of global governance. The significant part of this plan was the continuous observation of sustainability and its aspects, using quantitative and numerical assessment by the help of indicators, the chosen characteristic values. 4

5 Very significant part within the context of doctoral thesis is the adaptation of AGENDA 21 principles to the local planning levels, commonly known as the Local Agenda 21. Even though such term is not mentioned, it is proved that the sustainable development planning must be of integrative character, i.e., not only sustainability dimensions and community target groups have to be taken into account, but also their mutual relations and correlations (IDRC, ICLEI, 1996). One of the most important elements of governance of sustainable development, mentioned by Agenda 21 and Local Agenda 21 is the assessment principle of the planning process: the requirement for the measurability of the development targets and consequently, the measurement system with the requirement for periodical completion of such kind of measurements. Applying this principle for the specific planning documents, it means that the effects of quantitative assessment from completion of planned activities must be included there, which is based on using systems; that is measurements of indicators and structured complex of them, being of complementary character. During the second half 1990s and particularly in the beginning of 21 st century, at the time when practice of integrated development planning became more pronounced, the indicators were more often used as a policy planning instrument with increasing significance in the process of decision making. The environmental factors were the prevailing ones in the concept of sustainable development, but within course of time, economic and social factors gained more permanent meaning and these were supplemented by the fourth dimension the governance (George, 2007). Nowadays this approach is widely accepted and UN is using it as a self-evident model (UNESCO, 2010). Therefore, it can be judged that fully embracing characteristics of sustainable development is possible when natural, economic, social and governance environments are reviewed in a balanced way. From the practical viewpoint of the realization of sustainable development, we can speak of the governance of sustainable development (GSD). While moving on from the models towards the real governance activities, i.e., sustainable development planning documents, it is possible to assert that the indicator system, correctly composed and applied, which is simultaneously related to four dimensions of the governance of sustainable development showing mutual relationships among them, will provide profound and extensive information for the decision makers and society. On the international level, the indicator systems of the governance of sustainable development had been developing on the basis of earlier known environmental and economic indicator systems and came into the light right after approving the concept of Agenda 21. If initially, the great emphasis was placed on environmental indicators (Hammond, 1995), then after the concept of sustainability and sustainable development had advanced rapidly, the role of environmental, social and economic factors gradually became more evenly balanced (Meadows, 1998, Bossel, 1999). The great contribution into elaboration of indicator systems that can be practically applicable, has been given by FAO, not only gradually developing indicator systems of the assessment of different aspects of the world s food sector, but also producing theoretical outlines and summarizing their conclusions (Brown, Reyntjens, 2005). 5

6 In Latvia, the indicators of the governance of sustainable development first appeared after Based on the three classic dimensions of sustainability, the indicator system of sustainable development was elaborated within the Ministry of Environment. The review of its indicators was first published in 2006 (VidM, 2006), but 2007 the report about enacting of sustainable development in the country (VidM, 2007). The particular indicator system was related to the strategy of sustainable development of Latvia for the period of , but no quantitative goals were mentioned in the strategy. There is no connection with long term development planning documents of the country and no reflection of governance aspects offered by this system. The reviews after 2007 are not produced anymore. The national environmental indicator system was strengthened by the regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers in 2009 (MK, 2009); the appropriate reports about environmental condition in the country are produced on irregular basis (Eindorfa, Smita u.c., 2008); information is restored in 2011 (VARAM, 2011). Starting from 2006, the regular indicator system reviews have been produced by municipality of Riga (Rīga, 2006), however, this detailed indicator system is not integrated into the development planning documents of the city (Rīga, 2013a) and into the strategy (Rīga, 2013b). On the municipal level, for the first time in Latvia, the indicator system of GSD, as the part of integrated supervision system for the development documents, was introduced in the district of Saulkrasti in 2013, under the leadership of the author of doctoral thesis (The Strategy of long term development of district of Saulkrasti, 2013) but for the other 5 municipalities this is implemented into supervision system as a proposal. The first state-level planning document in Latvia, where the indicator system was exclusively used for the progress monitoring of realization of the strategy of the planning documents, was the Strategy of Sustainable Development of Latvia till 2030 (VARAM, 2010), which in current version contains 56 indicators, grouped into 6 development priorities, bringing out common strategic indicator group. The supervision report based upon exactly the results produced by the indicator system has been prepared for this document in 2012 (Kauliņš u.c., 2012). The National Development Plan for also contains the indicator system (PKC, 2012), classified as the basic instrument for supervision progress. It is assumed that the progress reports that are common to the strategy Latvia and NDP, based upon indicator measurements are produced once in two years (NDP, paragraph 450 and 451). In Latvia participated in Interreg IIIc project DEDUCE The European coast sustainability assessment model the goal of which was to elaborate the sustainability model of European coast based on indicator measurements and to produce recommendations for the assessment of sustainability of European coast based on this model and appropriate indicator system in the whole European Union and to its separate member states. Within the framework of this particular project, working at the calculation of sustainability indicators for the Latvian coast and trying to adapt the proposed indicator to the circumstances of Latvia, the author of doctoral thesis came to 6

7 the conclusion that neither scientific nor practical literature provides appropriate answers related to the indicators and elaboration of indicator systems. The indicator system formation models described at that time, were formed based upon functional analysis of system to be researched (Bossel, 2001) or the problem analysis of the territory (Rydin et al., 2003), but were not directly linked with the governance of the territory and consequently with the content of development planning documents. The latter being very important condition for the process of making governance decisions because such approach in formation of indicator systems provides extensive information about sustainability of the territory while at the same time makes it difficult the assessment of progress of governance planning documents. Two basic approaches for the formulation of the definition for the indicator of governance of sustainable development are found in literature (Brown, Reyntjens, 2005): Conceptual approach which describes the general tasks of the indicator, without going deep into requirements for the selection of indicator and rather answering the question Why do we need an indicator, what kind of information does it provide? ; Functional approach, defining specific functions of the indicator ( What does indicator do, what kind of process is it involved in? ). The available definitions of sustainable development indicator provided different kind of answers about the role of indicator in the governance of sustainable development, though not allowing understand which of the circumstances are important for the practical selection of the indicator from the range of possible parameters. Besides, these formulations contained tasks for the governance but didn t include governance as the component of sustainable development. 1. TOPICALITY OF THE THEME AND NOVELTY OF THE RESEARCH 1.1. TASKS AND OBJECTIVES OF DOCTORAL THESIS Improving understanding about formation principles of indicators and their systems, developing indicator systems adapted on national and local (municipal) level, it could be concluded that the theoretical bases of methods for formation of sustainable development indicators and their systems have not been sufficiently elaborated up till now: 1. theoretical definitions of indicators of sustainable governance and their application for elaboration of indicator and usage for measurement of governance of sustainable development, 2. conditions that must comply with information support of indicator, 7

8 3. the application restrictions of indicator methods in governance process, 4. integration of system formation into development planning process, 5. the place of indicator and indicator system in development planning documentation, 6. the assessment and supervision system of planning document realization in Latvia is more suitable for control of activity completion and not for assessment of strategic advancement and sustainable development and connectivity of timely warning about problems with mechanisms of decision making. Indicators, being the main informative assessment instrument for the governance of sustainable development, have lately become increasingly important in the process of elaboration and assessment of documents. Government, and in future, municipal planning and different cross-sectional planning (coast, agglomerations, sectors, etc.) demand much better elaborated principles for formation of indicator systems, information basis for provision of it and practical recommendations for the usage of it. Taking into account previous statements the following objective of doctoral thesis was put forward: to prove theoretically the selection of indicators for the governance of sustainable development and the set of prerequisites for their system structure and elaboration for the integrated governance of territorial development and practically produce and approbate the proposals for local level indicator systems, linking them hierarchically and structurally with the indicator systems of higher governance levels. Generally it can be said that, as the result of research, theoretically based and flexibly applicable instruments had to be generated, allowing to produce and use indicators of GSD and their systems for supervision of middle and long term sustainable development planning documents for the purposes of territorial governance of different levels and functions. To achieve the objective, the following tasks of doctoral thesis were determined: 1. to carry out theoretical assessment of indicator systems for GSD elaborated within the framework of international cooperation and local practice, to carry out document and scientific literature studies to explore their connection with the planning process; theoretically prove and formulate the set of prerequisites of required information provision for the elaboration of indicator for the governance of sustainable development; 2. to carry out integrative situation research of the territories in order to assess functional integrity of sectoral and cross-sectoral indicators and explore the possibilities of their application for indicator system 8

9 elaboration, to study notions of experts about the role of indicators in measuring of sustainability; 3. to evaluate theoretical bases of indicator system formation and elaborate proposal for complementary set of required prerequisites, that determines what IS content and formation process should be like, to produce the system as the result of indicator selection for profound and general characterization of governance of sustainable development; 4. to elaborate and carry out approbation research about indicator system for the application of GSD for supervision of progress of municipal planning process, based upon integrated planning principles of sustainable development; 5. to prepare proposals and methodological recommendation for the development of supervision indicator systems of development planning documents in Latvia, considering the peculiarities of planning levels and mutual interaction of levels. The directions and objects of research were determined by the following hypothesis: The set of complementary prerequisites allow form and develop, within integrated governance, the indicator systems for the governance of sustainable development, for the purposes of branch and territorial evaluation, which consist of informative provision of indicator, domain, integrity of indicator and horizontal and vertical integration of indicators, if: 1. the set of prerequisites of informative provision is defined for the indicator that allows determine if the selected factor and its readings can become the basis for the governance decision making in the process of evaluation, supervision and planning of territorial development; 2. the integrativity of indicator is evaluated that characterizes the relationship of separate indictors with sustainability dimensions and related areas, determining the interconnectedness of indicators; 3. indicator system is characterized by horizontal integration, ensuring the compliance with interconnectedness of sustainability dimensions and integrative problem areas, allowing adequately and complementary reflect both sustainability dimensions, its branch integrity and distribution of common and specific factors; 4. indicator system is characterized by vertical integration, allowing to form harmonic meta-system from different levels of indicators and understand its condition of governance of sustainable development, progress and contribution within the context of the whole sustainable development in all of the governance levels. 9

10 1.2. THE MAIN SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL NOVELTIES Scientific novelties 1. The definition of indicator of the governance of sustainable development has been significantly specified in comparison with the ones encountered in literature sources in terms of territorial governance, with the concept developed about the domain of the indicator. 2. Based on definition of the indicator, the set of proposals for indicator selection and system formation has been produced. 3. The selection of algorithms has been developed for the formation of indicator system for the governance of sustainable development, for its practical usage, based upon sustainability and integrated planning approaches. Practical novelties 1. The fully functioning system of indicators for the governance of sustainable development has been for the first time produced and implemented in Latvia as the direct supervision instrument for the governance and strategy progress for the usage in the governance practice of the local municipality. 2. The manual of indicator system for monitoring the development and sustainability has been produced for the sustainable development strategy of Saulkrasti district with the perspective of 25 years. 3. The implementation of the principle of horizontal integration in formation of indicator system in governance practice of the local municipality. 4. The approach, based upon usage of indicator system, has been approbated for the reflection of specialized sustainability aspects and evaluation from thematic and territorial viewpoint. 5. For the first time, the complex overview of the sustainability condition of the country s coast through usage of indicator system s readings has been obtained PUBLICATIONS Articles Articles at indexed editions are bolded. 1. Ernšteins R., Lontone-Ieviņa A., Kauliņš J., Strazdiņš J., Šteinberga Z., Kudreņickis I., Zīlniece I., Ķepals A. Municipal climate change adaptation governance in Latvia: cross-sectoral and multi-instrumental understanding. Regional Formation and Development Studies (2014, Nr.3 (14); p

11 2. Kauliņš J., Ernšteins R., Lontone-Ieviņa A., Zvirbule L., Graudiņa-Bombiza S., Zīlniece I. Ilgtspējīgas attīstības pārvaldība Latvijas pašvaldībās: stratēģiskās plānošanas integrācijas paradigma (The new paradigm for sustainable development governance at municipalities in Latvia: integration of strategical planning). 18 p. Proceedings of 17th international scientific conference Society and Culture: Science Through the Ages, University of Liepāja, 2014, p Kauliņš J., Ernšteins R., Zīlniece I., Lintone-Ieviņa A., Ķepals A. Piekrastes integrētas pārvaldības pamatnostādnes: indikatori un telpiskās plānošanas prakses attīstība Latvijas pašvaldībās (ICZM Guidelines: indicators and praxis of spatial development planning at municipalities of Latvia). 17 p. Proceedings of 17th international scientific conference Society and Culture: Science Through the Ages, University of Liepāja, 2014, p Ernšteins R., Kauliņš J., Zīlniece I., Municipālā attīstības plānošana un vides pārvaldība Latvijā: integrētās pieejas metodoloģija un instrumentu komplementāra attīstība (Municipal development and environmental planning in Latvia: complementary development of integrated planning methodology and tools). Proceedings Sabiedrība un kultūra XV, University of Liepāja, Liepāja, 2014., pp Ernšteins R., Kauliņš J., Zvirbule L., Lontone A., Ilgtspējīgas pārtikas pārvaldības attīstība vietējo pašvaldību līmenī: pamatnosacījumi un instrumenti (Basic requirements and tools for sustainable food governance at municipal level). Symposium Sabiedrība un kultūra XV, University of Liepāja, Liepāja, 2014., pp Ernšteins R., Lontone A., Zvirbule L., Antons V., Zīlniece I., Kauliņš J., Vasariņa L., Climate change adaptation integration into Coastal Municipal Development: governance environment and communication preconditions. In: 12th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference SGEM 2012, Proceedings, Bulgaria, Albena, 2012, p Ernšteins R., Kauliņš J., Līce E., Štāls A. (2011). Integrated coastal management for local municipalities in Latvia: sustainability governance and indicator system. WIT transaction to The Built Environment, 2011, vol.149, p Kauliņš J., Ernšteins R., Kudreņickis I. Sustainable development indicators for integrated coastal management: definition area and spatial properties. WIT transaction to Ecology and the Environment, 2011, vol.144, p R. Ernšteins, J.Kauliņš, I.Kudreņickis. Sustainable coastal development indicator system studies in Latvia. 3 rd International Conference on Sustainable Development and Planning, Sustainable Development and Planning IV, WIT Transactions to Ecology and the Environment, Vol 120, WIT Press, pp

12 10. Ernšteins R, Kudrenickis I., Kaulins J. Sustainable Coastal Development Indicator Systems: Strategy and Practice in Latvia. Proceedings of the International Conference Current Issues in Management of Business and Society Development, May 2009, University of Latvia, Faculty of Economics and Management, Riga, Latvia, Kauliņš J., Vietējā līmeņa reģionālās plānošanas prakse Latvijā un piekrastes problemātika (Local level regional planning praxis in Latvia and coastal issues). Proceedings Piekrastes ilgtspējīga attīstība: sadarbības pārvaldība. UL, Academical Publisher, Riga, 2008, pp Kauliņš J., Iespējas Latvijas piekrastes ilgtspējības novērtēšanai ar indikatoru metodi (Possibilities for assessment of coastal sustainability in Latvia, using indicator method). Symposium. Piekrastes ilgtspējīga attīstība: sadarbības pārvaldība. UL, Academical Publisher, Riga, 2008, pp Kudreņickis I., Ernšteins R., Kauliņš J., Kadikis R., Environmental Information and Systems for Sustainable Coastal Development in Latvia. Proceedings: International workshop, Geographic Information Facilities Supporting Access to Environmental Information, Turku University, dpt. of Geography and Geology, Turku, Finland, pp Published message thesis 1. Ernšteins R., Kauliņš J., Lontone A. Integrēta plānošana un piekrastes problemātika Salacgrīvas novadā: ilgtspējīgas attīstības ilgtermiņa stratēģijas izstrāde (Integrated planning and coastal issues at Salacgrīva district: elaboration of long-term strategy of sustainable development). 72nd scientific conference, LU, 2014., Geography, Geology and Environmental science. Proceedings. Riga, 2014, pp Kauliņš J. Indikatoru atlase un sistēmas veidošana teritorijas ilgtspējīgas attīstības pārvaldībai (Indicator selection and creation of systems to manage sustainable development at spatial areas). 72nd scientific conference, LU, 2014., Geography, Geology and Environmental science. Proceedings. Riga, 2014, pp Kauliņš J. Ilgtspējīgas attīstības pārvaldības indikatoru sistēmas: pašvaldību integrēta pārvaldība praksē (Indicator systems for sustainable development governance: integrated municipal governance in praxis). 72nd scientific conference, LU, 2013., Geography, Geology and Environmental science. Proceedings. Riga, 2013, pp Raimonds Ernšteins, Ivars Kudreņickis, Andris Viesturs Urtāns, Valdis Antons, Sintija Kušinska, Jānis Kauliņš Piekrastes pašvaldības stratēģija klimata pārmaiņu adaptācijai Latvijā: interdisciplinārais audits un rīcības vadlīnijas (Interdisciplinary audition and action guidelines for coastal climate change adaptation municipal strategy). International conference Environmental science and education in Latvia and Europe, proceedings 5. Ernšteins R., Kudreņickis I., Kauliņš J., Integrētā vides pārvaldība: piekrastes ilgtspējīga attīstība (Integrated environmental management: sustainable development at coastal zone). International conference Environmental science and education in Latvia and Europe, proceedings, RTU publisher, Riga, 2007, pp

13 Other publications 1. Lagzdiņa Ē., Kauliņš J. Integrated coastal management. Symposium Vides komunikācija un vides politikas integrācija. Riga: REC Latvija, p., pp Marti X., Lescrauvaet A.-K. et al., incl. Kaulins J. Indicators guideline: to adopt and indicator-based approach to evaluate coastal sustainable development. Barcelona, EU DEDUCE consortium, p. 3. Kauliņš J., Vesperis V., Dombrovskis V. (2012) Latvijas ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģijas līdz 2030.gadam īstenošanas uzraudzības ziņojums (Supervision message for strategy Latvia-2030 ). Cross-sectoral co-ordination center. Riga, 2012, 127 p. 4. Kauliņš J. Saulkrastu novada ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģija 25 gadu perspektīvā. Stratēģijas pamatelementi un dokumentu analīze (Strategy for 25 year sustainable development perspective at Saulkrasti district. Basic elements and analysis of sources). KBLC Ltd., 2013., 90 p. 5. Kauliņš J. Saulkrastu novada ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģija 25 gadu perspektīvā. Attīstības un ilgtspējības monitoringa indikatoru sistēmas lietošanas rokasgrāmata (Strategy for 25 year sustainable development perspective at Saulkrasti district. Indicator system manual). KBLC Ltd., 2013., 160 p. 6. Kauliņš J. Latvijas attīstības plānošanas dokumentu indikatoru rokasgrāmata (Manual for indicators of state-level planning documents in Latvia). Crosssectoral co-ordination center, p. 7. Kauliņš J. Par grozījumiem Latvijas ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģijas līdz 2030.gadam indikatoru sistēmā (On amendments to the indicator system for the Latvian Sustainable Development Strategy to 2030). Cross-sectoral coordination center., p. Most important messages at international conferences (does not mentioned if it is the same name published abstracts or article) 1. Kaulins J., Ernsteins R., Integration principle for coastal municipal strategic development planning: sustainability indicator system design and implementation. 6th International Conference on Sustainable Development and Planning May 2013, Kos, Greece. 2. Kauliņš J., Piekrastes ilgtspējīgas attīstības indikatori Latvijas vietējās pašvaldībās: diferencētas sistēmas nepieciešamība un iespējas (Sustainable coastal development indicators at municipalities of Latvia: the need and opportunities for a differentiated system). 9th International scientific conference Man and Environment, , Liepāja 3. Kauliņš J., Kudreņickis J., Ernšteins R. Sustainable costal development indicators for local municipalities: Saulkrasti case. International conference New Socio-economic Challenges of Development in Europe 2010, Rīga, Oct. 7-9th. Awarded as the conference best poster message. 4. Ernšteins R., Kauliņš J., Kudreņickis I., Antons V. Integrated coastal management model approach for local municipalities in Latvia. International 13

14 conference New Socio-economic Challenges of Development in Europe 2010, Rīga, Oct. 7-9th.* 5. Kauliņš J. Piekrastes ilgtspējīgas attīstības indikatori pašvaldības plānošanā labas prakses piemēri (Good praxis examples for coastal sustainable development municipal indicators). 10th International scientific conference Man and Environment, Liepāja, , Kauliņš J., Ernšteins R., Kudreņickis I. Piekrastes ilgtspējīgas attīstības indikatori vietējās pašvaldībās: nepieciešamība un iespējas (Indocators of coastal sustainable development at local governance: the need and opportunities). 68th scientific conference, UL, Kauliņš J., Introduction in Indicator System for Measuring of Coastal Sustainability in Latvia. 66th scientific conference, UL, OVERVIEW OF DOCTORAL THESIS The doctoral thesis is composed of six main parts that deal with the tasks and stages of research completion: 1. Research methodology and procedure of completion, 2. The integrated planning fro the governance of sustainable development, 3. The formulation of indicator for the governance of sustainable development, 4. The functional classification of indicators and integrative properties, 5. Indicator systems and their integration into development planning process, 6. Indicator systems in government planning documents. The first chapter deals with the research methods that were used for the acquisition of the results of the work, as well as the basic stages of research which, in chronological order reveal the procedure of the research and the main conclusions obtained in each of these stages. The second chapter describes the integrated planning of the governance of sustainable development, its main models and development in Latvia, the ways of how assessment and supervision mechanisms are formed and integrated into development planning documents. The third chapter describes the properties of separate indicator, with the research reflection of it that leads to the improvements of indicator definition, set of prerequisites for the informative provision of the indicator and its domain. The fourth chapter focuses on integrity of indicator- the property of indicator that connects them with each other and with sustainability dimensions and research is about what is necessary to be able to form the system-structured, complementary set of indicators. The fifth chapter provides insight into development of concepts of vertical and horizontal integration of municipal indicator systems, as well as researches about the 14

15 properties of indicators and their systems in such specific cases as branch and coastal governance. The sixth chapter reveals the role of indicators in government planning documents in Latvia, the assessment of currently used indicator systems and sustainable development of the country has been provided with proposals of their improvement RESEARCH METHODS APPLIED The following main groups of research methods were used: Case study research, which implies acquisition of thematically coordinated information during the field studies using the analysis of socio-economic and natural environment data, document studies, interviews with target group representatives, interviews and inquiries of focus groups. Deep interviews with experts and specialists; Document studies; Approbation research; Spatial analysis of territory, using GIS instruments and methods. The overall methodological scheme of the doctoral thesis is shown in figure 1 at next page. Case study research is a complex method that contains the examination of particular case from different aspects and acquiring information from different sources (Yin, 1994). The main principles of usage of the case study research are the simultaneousness of research activities with respect to process to be researched and the synergic complimentarity of qualitative and quantitative methods for the information acquisition that helps to avoid erroneous conclusions, using these methods separately or even ignoring one or another group (Brannen, 2005). The case study research was mainly applied in five research works carried out within the framework of planning works of municipal territorial development (districts (of Aglona, Beverīna, Cesvaine, Salacgrīva and Saulkrasti). The research begins with complex analysis of natural environment and socioeconomic data that allowed to obtain initial overview of different types of resources of the territory and formed the informational basis for the further procedure of the research. Likewise, information sources and types were also explored that would be possible to use later on in application of indicator system for GSD. Interviews with the representatives of target groups. The most significant information was obtained during seven interviews from the following respondents in the districts of Aglona, Beverīna, Cesvaine, Salacgrīva and Saulkrasti. The interviews included information about the aspects of integrated planning and indicator usage in elaboration of municipal development planning documents. 15

16 Example of IS; standard indicator forms (DEDUCE) Calculations Assessment of coastal sustainability in Latvia GIS tools Adaptation for Latvia Adapted indicator system Studies of analogs Problems with selection of new indicators Assessing of indicator definitions Assessing of selection rules Place of the indicator in system Document studies Definitions formation conditions Integrativity of the indicator Sustainability Legislative requirements The definition Studies of analogs; interviews Case study research Requirements for information support GID indicator system Integrative planning method Document studies, interviews Latvija-2030 NAP Case study research Horizontal integration Thematical GID IS Case study research IS in state-level planning documents Vertical integration Municipal GID IS Supervizing reports Assessment; handbook Documentation for municipal GID IS GIS tools Research base points Milestones Academical outcomes Applicable outcomes Research methods used Fig.1 Overall methodological scheme of research Focus group interviews were carried out during research works of the territory while completing the audit of sustainability dimensions, identifying integrated territorial problem areas and setting priorities. 24 focus group interviews took place in five research territories, with 3 to 18 respondents taking part in each of them; typical number of respondents into group of interviewees was

17 Inquiries were made with several goals: To obtain the resident s opinion about social, economic, environmental and governance situation and its problems in the territory of research, as an additional information to the one obtained during focus group interviews, To obtain resident s opinion about the development possibilities of the territory to be researched, To obtain information that is necessary for calculations of several indicators, To obtain information about relationships of residents with definite parts of their administrative territorial units and other territorial units. 5 inquiries took place in four research territories with 534 respondents taking part at them. Within the context of doctoral thesis, the most significant information was obtained from questions related to governance and environmental condition and which were displayed in the district of Saulkrasti in the indicator system for the governance of sustainable development. The inquiries made in Liepupe and Saulkrasti were useful for theoretical conclusions which, along the concepts of physical and economical geography, help define the coastal areas as the socially-geographic phenomenon, but systematic accumulation of these concepts is the basis for the implementation of progress indicator for integrated coastal governance. The goal of document studies was to point out the aspects of development planning and assessment within the legal framework, including the principles of sustainability and integration, to obtain information about vertical (with higher levels of planning) and horizontal integration (among neighboring territories and mutually internal problems). Within the framework of development planning, the document studies were carried out according to unified scheme; international and national legislative acts related to the topic of research and planning documents, the policy planning documents of governmental sectors, the development planning documents of regional and local significance, as well as sectoral planning documents, not directly associated with administrative territories related to particular part of certain territory of the country. One of the consistent methods used was deep interviews with experts and specialists. The goal of these interviews was to obtain information about notions, opinions and attitudes of respondents towards usage of indicators for the governance of sustainable development and their systems not only in specific territory or planning document but also how indicators for GSD and their systems are incorporated into planning process and legislation and what kind of usage perspectives this instrument would have. In total, nine deep interviews took place during the research. The most significant conclusions arising from these interviews are associated with requirements for horizontal and vertical (inter-level) integration of indicator systems, in a sense that the autonomous indicator system will benefit a lot if the results are compared with 17

18 similar territories. The specialists from public authorities also expressed their opinion about implementation perspectives of IS GSD, emphasizing the complexity of process and costs, but on the whole there was unanimous opinion that only IS GSD in future could become the informative basis of supervision and assessment systems of long and middle term planning documents of territorial cross-section, as it is now government level planning documents. Several conclusions were also obtained in relation to integrated coastal management and its planning. Three types of approbations can be distinguished among the methods: in seminars of practical research, in planning process and final approbation. The intermediate results of different sub-systems and different levels of the readiness of research have been presented and, consequently, discussed in many practical research seminars and discussions taking place within the framework of scientific and practical conferences. Great part of these events had taken place in relation to international research projects where the author had participated in a capacity of expert of indicators of the governance of sustainable development. These were the following research projects: EU Interreg IV project Baltic environment, food and health: from habits to awareness (FOODWEB), , EU CORDIS The 7 th framework project Innovative technologies for safer European coasts in a changing climate (THESEUS), , EEA grant financed Project Environmental communication instruments for environmental policy integration financed by EEA grant, within the framework of the program Environment policy integration in Latvia , EU Baltic region project Climate Change: Impacts, Costs and Adaptation in the Baltic Sea Region (BaltCICA) EU Interreg III projekct Développement durable des Côtes Européennes (DEDUCE), Several dozens of seminars had been organized within the framework of these projects where around 20 presentations from author had taken place with resulting discussions also about indicator systems for the governance of sustainable development, their formation and usage. The assessment of sustainable coastal development, the first of its kind in Latvia, is associated with the results of DEDUCE project, which is based on indicator usage. The expert interviews have contributed a lot to the issues of the elaboration and application of indicator definition, as well as discussions within framework of regular scientific conferences at the University of Latvia and University of Liepāja. The principles, upon which practically applicable definition of indicator for the governance of sustainable development had been approbated right there, the concept about 18

19 application boundaries of indicator method within the context of governance had been specified together with set of prerequisites for indicator information provision. The completion of practical development planning works were of great significance both in polishing of the method of integrated sustainable planning and in acquisition of important conclusions with relation to understanding about the place of indicators and their systems into a planning process. If indicators up till now were considered as part of process assessment and supervision of development plan, then these approbations provided insight that indicators (even not calculated) has great importance in all the planning circle, starting from studies and elaboration of policy principles because these give points of reference for provision and understanding of integrity of the planning document. The doctoral thesis includes the results from research works and approbations carried out within the framework of the following planning projects: Development of strategy and sustainable development programs for the districts of Aglona, Beverīna, Cesvaine and Saulkrasti, Development of environmental reviews within planning documents for the procedure of EIA in the town of Gulbene and district of Saulkrasti, Development of sustainable development strategy for the district of Aloja and Salacgrīva. The final approbation took place in the district of Saulkrasti, where indicators were used both for information acquisition and structuring in the planning process and as a part of supervision of sustainable development strategy. Indicator system for GSD in the district of Saulkrasti was implemented in three phases. First of all, the indicator list was specified and elaborated based on the results of research carried out during the planning process. After that, the manual of indicator system was produced, consisting of system s description, instructions for the result reflection, all indicator statements, detailed data acquisition and calculation methodologies and samples of how to demand information form the institutions. The training of the personnel of the municipality also took place within the process of implementation. Document studies were also consistent research method besides the framework of case study research. These were mainly associated with the evaluation of legislative acts: the ways the development planning legislation is constructed and how the requirements for integrated sustainable planning are incorporated there and what kind of regulation is planned for the process of supervision and assessment. The number of different of planning documents was analyzed apart from case study research. The main idea here was to examine how the aspects and instruments of sustainability, integrity and assessment are incorporated into legislative acts and planning documents that were not directly linked with research territories and what kind of conclusions can be achieved to make the elaboration of these principles into planning documents realistic and efficient. 19

20 The spatial analysis methods within the framework of research can be seen as the usage of GIS instruments for indicator calculations and visualization, as well as for determination of distribution of other factors influencing the development and for the determination of this statistical distribution. The spatial analyses had the following functions: the research of spatial distribution of different factors in coastal areas and adjacent territories, spatial distribution research of the factors influencing territorial development and environment in the territory of municipality, the illustrative instrument, depicting on the map indicator measurement results and spatial development perspectives of the territory. The coastal information classification according to geospatial features was elaborated within DEDUCE project (Marti et al., 2007), that was later supplemented according to specifics of Latvian coastal areas PROCEDURE OF THE RESERACH The procedure of the research can be relatively divided into four functionally different and subsequent stages. 1. The problem identification and formulation, the definition of indicator ( ). 2. The development of indicator selection methodology bases ( ). 3. The multi-sectoral and sectoral integration of indicator application. Development of integrative methodology of territorial development planning ( ). 4. The horizontal and vertical integration of indicator systems into/among different governance levels ( ) Integrated planning of sustainable development governance Integrated planning method has been developed based upon 4P planning model and two mutually complementary research groups: studies of legislation and planning documents and research works carried out in municipal development planning process. The planning experts in local level have been well informed about possible advantages of the planning method while in planning regions there was certain lack of understanding about applied integrated planning method, particularly in Vidzeme planning region. In fact, regional experts lack this kind of experience in evaluation of such documents. The main cause of it was mainly the lack of suitable methodological materials. 20

21 In comparison with previous integrated planning models (Local Agenda 21, 4P), the integrated planning model has acquired following supplements: 1. Evaluation of interconnectedness in levels of goals, priorities and courses of action, 2. The usage of information, characteristic to indicators, in all of the stages of planning and the indicator linking not only with planning results but also with information evaluation acquired during the planning process, 3. Informative support of supervision and assessment mechanism by the information basis provided by indicator system for GSD, 4. Usage of communication function of indicators in the planning process. The above mentioned improvements are the basis for the further development of integrated planning methodology on the municipal, regional and national level. The method is approbated in the planning process and with the related seminars in the districts of Aglona, Aloja, Beverīna, Cesvaine, Salacgrīva and Saulkrasti. It is based on acquired information about territorial resources and needs using case study research. This approach allows understand the connection of the basic elements of the strategy, i.e., goals, priorities and courses of action, with sustainable development and among themselves, consisting of the following main steps: sector audit, integrative problem area audit, the formulation of the main elements of the strategy, the elaboration of spatial development strategy, formulation of course of action, the elaboration of proposals for investment and course of action plan and the elaboration of supervision system planning document. The last stage also includes the elaboration of proposal for indicator system of GSD Defining of sustainable development indicator The definition of indicator for the governance of sustainable development in terms of territorial governance was significantly specified, in comparison with the ones available in literature, and the concept about domain of the indicator was elaborated. First of all, the set of prerequisites was elaborated, that would have to be taken into account for the definition of sustainable development indicator, including governance function into it. Viewing it systemically, the definition of the indicator has to respond to the following criteria: What values can be indicators, What these values reflect, What are their place into governance system, What are the restrictions of indicator applicability, What sort of indicator features are different from other measurable values, What is the significance of measurable parameter for the given governance system. 21