ABSTRACT ALGEBRA: A PRESENTATION ON PROFINITE GROUPS

Similar documents
INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS

Infinite Galois Theory

Profinite Groups. Hendrik Lenstra. 1. Introduction

TEST CODE: PMB SYLLABUS

NAME: Mathematics 205A, Fall 2008, Final Examination. Answer Key

Notas de Aula Grupos Profinitos. Martino Garonzi. Universidade de Brasília. Primeiro semestre 2018

Ultraproducts of Finite Groups

1. Group Theory Permutations.

Exploring the Exotic Setting for Algebraic Geometry

Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem

Real Analysis Prelim Questions Day 1 August 27, 2013

Some algebraic properties of. compact topological groups

Metric Spaces Math 413 Honors Project

RUDIMENTARY GALOIS THEORY

Profinite number theory

Page Points Possible Points. Total 200

8 Complete fields and valuation rings

MAS3706 Topology. Revision Lectures, May I do not answer enquiries as to what material will be in the exam.

Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille

What is the Langlands program all about?

Introductory Analysis I Fall 2014 Homework #5 Solutions

If X is a compact space and K X is a closed subset, then K is

Galois theory of fields

Math 203A - Solution Set 1

3 Hausdorff and Connected Spaces

Infinite Galois theory

Math General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 8 Solutions

GALOIS CATEGORIES MELISSA LYNN

ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL

ALGEBRA PH.D. QUALIFYING EXAM September 27, 2008

MASTERS EXAMINATION IN MATHEMATICS SOLUTIONS

Chapter 8. P-adic numbers. 8.1 Absolute values

NOTES IN COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA: PART 2

The p-adic numbers. Given a prime p, we define a valuation on the rationals by

1 Adeles over Q. 1.1 Absolute values

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO LOCAL FIELDS

MATH 54 - TOPOLOGY SUMMER 2015 FINAL EXAMINATION. Problem 1

Math 418 Algebraic Geometry Notes

Math 203A - Solution Set 1

June 2014 Written Certification Exam. Algebra

Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra

MA257: INTRODUCTION TO NUMBER THEORY LECTURE NOTES

Exercises on chapter 1

Some Background Material

Chapter 4 Vector Spaces And Modules

GALOIS EXTENSIONS ZIJIAN YAO

Filters in Analysis and Topology

0.2 Vector spaces. J.A.Beachy 1

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

2.23 Theorem. Let A and B be sets in a metric space. If A B, then L(A) L(B).

February 1, 2005 INTRODUCTION TO p-adic NUMBERS. 1. p-adic Expansions

Problem Set 2: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS. Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes!

NOTES FOR DRAGOS: MATH 210 CLASS 12, THURS. FEB. 22

Name: Solutions Final Exam

Part III. 10 Topological Space Basics. Topological Spaces

Contradiction. Theorem 1.9. (Artin) Let G be a finite group of automorphisms of E and F = E G the fixed field of G. Then [E : F ] G.

Contents. Index... 15

Connectedness. Proposition 2.2. The following are equivalent for a topological space (X, T ).

Lecture 6: Etale Fundamental Group

(1) Consider the space S consisting of all continuous real-valued functions on the closed interval [0, 1]. For f, g S, define

* 8 Groups, with Appendix containing Rings and Fields.

CSIR - Algebra Problems

Graduate Preliminary Examination

Galois theory (Part II)( ) Example Sheet 1

Topology, Math 581, Fall 2017 last updated: November 24, Topology 1, Math 581, Fall 2017: Notes and homework Krzysztof Chris Ciesielski

Fields and Galois Theory. Below are some results dealing with fields, up to and including the fundamental theorem of Galois theory.

MATH 101: ALGEBRA I WORKSHEET, DAY #1. We review the prerequisites for the course in set theory and beginning a first pass on group. 1.

2.31 Definition By an open cover of a set E in a metric space X we mean a collection {G α } of open subsets of X such that E α G α.

Solve EACH of the exercises 1-3

Notes on graduate algebra. Robert Harron

Real Analysis Chapter 4 Solutions Jonathan Conder

Valuation Rings. Rachel Chaiser. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Puget Sound

ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS. 1. Algebra

Algebra Exam Topics. Updated August 2017

4 Countability axioms

Lesson 2 The Unit Circle: A Rich Example for Gaining Perspective

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday September 21, 2004 (Day 1)

10 l-adic representations

Topological properties

LOCAL FIELDS AND p-adic GROUPS. In these notes, we follow [N, Chapter II] most, but we also use parts of [FT, L, RV, S].

ANALYSIS WORKSHEET II: METRIC SPACES

Definitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations

INDECOMPOSABILITY IN INVERSE LIMITS WITH SET-VALUED FUNCTIONS

Theorem 5.3. Let E/F, E = F (u), be a simple field extension. Then u is algebraic if and only if E/F is finite. In this case, [E : F ] = deg f u.

3. Prove or disprove: If a space X is second countable, then every open covering of X contains a countable subcollection covering X.

Lecture Notes Math 371: Algebra (Fall 2006) by Nathanael Leedom Ackerman

1 The Local-to-Global Lemma

2 Metric Spaces Definitions Exotic Examples... 3

Galois Theory and the Insolvability of the Quintic Equation

Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings

Galois Theory TCU Graduate Student Seminar George Gilbert October 2015

Linear Algebra. Chapter 5

The Fundamental Group and Covering Spaces

Imaginary Quadratic Fields With Isomorphic Abelian Galois Groups

1 Notations and Statement of the Main Results

Simple Abelian Topological Groups. Luke Dominic Bush Hipwood. Mathematics Institute

7 Lecture 7: Rational domains, Tate rings and analytic points

CW complexes. Soren Hansen. This note is meant to give a short introduction to CW complexes.

The Margulis-Zimmer Conjecture

Transcription:

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA: A PRESENTATION ON PROFINITE GROUPS JULIA PORCINO Our brief discussion of the p-adic integers earlier in the semester intrigued me and lead me to research further into this topic. That research lead to the main focus of this project, profinite groups. This project traces the connections between several different algebraic ideas in group theory. It is a culmination of old and new material. Beginning with familiar topics such as topology and the p-adics, I approached several of these ideas in new ways that allowed me to deepen my understanding of these areas. This provided a secure point of departure to explore completely new algebraic topics such as profinite groups and some introductory Galois theory (Appendix B). Topology Since this project is directed towards students in an abstract algebra course with no other assumptions about background, I will begin by reviewing certain basic topological ideas that will be necessary as we progress through the material. We will begin with the definition of a topological group: A topological group G is a group that is also a topological space such that the product map: and the inverse map: p : G G G (g, g ) gg i : G G g g 1 are continuous functions (with respect to the topology). Throughout this paper we will take G to be a topological group, and we will let X represent the more general topological space. A space X could be equipped with a wide variety of topologies, including the subspace topology, the product topology, or the quotient topology. One topology that we will be concerned with later on is the discrete topology: A topological space X is equipped with the discrete topology if every subset of X is open. 1

2 JULIA PORCINO Sometimes the definition of the topological group includes that G must be Hausdorff, but as this notion is important in later discussions, we will define it separately here. The property of being a Hausdorff space (sometimes also known as a T 2 -space) is one of the separation axioms. A topological space X is Hausdorff if for all x, y X there exist open sets U, V X such that x U, y V and the intersection of U and V is empty. Related to the separation axioms is the idea of connectedness: A topological space X is connected if it cannot be written as the union of two disjoint nonempty open sets. Otherwise, X is called disconnected. Later on we will be most concerned with the idea of a topological space that is totally disconnected: X is totally disconnected if the only connected subsets of X are the one-element sets. The final key definition to review is compactness: X is compact if every open cover of X has a finite subcover. Here, we take a cover of X to refer to a collection of subsets of X whose union is X, and an open cover requires those subsets to be open. The p-adic Integers Before moving on to the discussion of profinite groups, I would like to briefly review a topic that we saw earlier in the semester, the p-adic integers. The p-adic integers, Z p for p prime, were first introduced during our discussion of group products since an algebraic way to define these integers is as the limit of group products: Z p = lim e Z/p e We later compared this construction of the p-adic integers with the more classical definition as the completion of Z under the p-adic metric, a review of which is included in the first appendix below. Under this classical construction, it might be easier to think of the p-adic integers as an extension of the integers, and so retains some of the algebraic structure of Z. It is important to note that different metrics can give rise to the same topology. Thus, the topology that is uniquely determined by the product topologies on lim e Z/p e is the same topology as the one that arises from the p-adic metric.

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA: A PRESENTATION ON PROFINITE GROUPS 3 One of our motivations for introducing the limit construction of Z p was that some of the properties of the p-adics are more evident from this construction as compared to the set-theoretic definition. In particular, we discussed that the compactness of Z p is easily inherited from the group products, yet this topological property is much more difficult to tease out from the classical construction. Certain other topological properties are inherent in Z p as an extension of the integers or from the classical construction such as Z p being totally disconnected. The fact that Z p is Hausdorff also follows from the classical definition since the Hausdorff property relies on open sets, which the metric helps to define. Profinite Groups With the idea of p-adic integers in mind, we now turn our focus to profinite groups. The group of p-adic integers under addition is a profinite group, and many of the properties of the p-adics discussed in the previous section will be important in contributing to the group being profinite. There are two equivalent ways to define profinite groups. The first relies on the topology introduced in the earlier section, and so we will focus our attention on this definition first. A profinite group is a compact, Hausdorff, and totally disconnected topological group. These topological properties that define profinite groups unsurprisingly affect other properties of the groups and their subgroups. The product of arbitrarily many profinite groups is again profinite, and the product topology matches the topology inherent from the groups profinite properties. Closed subgroups of profinite groups are also profinite, and similarly, the subspace topology is consistent with the profinite topology. If a closed subgroup is also normal, then the quotient group will be profinite with the quotient topology consistent with the profinite topology. Profinite groups are particularly useful for the property of being compact Hausdorff, which is useful as a measuring property. A profinite group can also be constructed from a finite group if the finite group is given the discrete topology. This leads us to the other definition for profinite groups. This second definition requires us to first define some new algebraic objects: A directed partially ordered set is a set I with a partial order such that for any two elements i, j I there exists a k I such that k i and k j. A projective system is a collection of groups G i, i I, with group homomorphisms f i,j : G j G i for i, j, I and j i

4 JULIA PORCINO such that f i,i = id Gi k j i. for all i I and f i,j f j,k = f i,k for Given a projective system (G i, f i,j ), the projective limit is a particular subgroup of the direct product of G i s: lim G i = {(g i ) G i g i = f i,j (g i ) j i}. With these terms in place, the equivalent definition for a profinite group follows: A profinite group is a topological group that is isomorphic to the inverse (or projective) limit of finite groups. Returning again to the example of the p-adic integers, since Z/p n Z is a finite group for n N, it clearly follows that Z p is the projective limit of these groups. As examined earlier, Z p is a topological group, and thus we find that the p-adic integers also satisfy this definition of the profinite group. In fact, since this definition of profinite groups is algebraic in structure, the algebraic construction of the p-adic integers complements this definition well. With the p-adic integers as a motivation, we can create other profinite groups with constructions similar to those of the p-adics. The best way to do so is by generalizing the projective limit for any a Z 1 : Z a = lim Z/a n Z. We refer to Z a as the a-adic integers. From this definition, the following isomorphism holds: Z a p a Z p. Since a Z and p a, let a = p i b, where b Z such that p does not divide b, Z a = limz/a n Z = limz/(p i b) n Z = limz/p in b n Z Then by the Sun-Ze Theorem, limz/p in b n Z = lim(z/p in Z Z/b n Z) Z p Z b. With induction on b we reach the desired relation.

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA: A PRESENTATION ON PROFINITE GROUPS 5 Appendix A: The Classical Analytic Construction of the p-adic Integers Let p be prime and let x Z such that x = p n a, a Z/pZ and n Z. Then we define the p-adic norm to be: x p = p n. For all x, y Z, the p-adic norm has the following properties: 0 p = 0, x y p = x p y p, x + y p max{ x p, y p }, equality if x p y p. This allows us to define a metric d p : d p (x, y) = x y p. This metric does satisfy the following three properties as necessary: d p (x, y) 0 with equality iff x = y, d p (x, y) = d p (y, x), d p (x, y) d p (x, z) + d p (y, z), x, y, z Z. Then the p-adic integers Z p are defined as the completion of the metric space (Z, d p ). Appendix B: Profinite Groups in Relation to Galois Theory We ended the semester with a brief glimpse into Galois theory. As it turns out, the research on profinite groups is also related to Galois theory. However, since the ideas needed to discuss profinite groups in Galois theory are not directly related to the main body of this project, I am including the topic in a fairly brief overview, similar to how we ended the semester. When we saw Galois theory briefly at the end of the semester, we were constructing the 17th-root of unity by introducing the roots of quadratics. In fact, what we were doing was creating extension fields: A field E is an extension field of a field F if F E and the operations of F are those of E restricted to F. We ve seen other examples of field extensions before, although we may not have recognized them. One example is the complex number field, which is isomorphic to the extension field of the reals, R[x]/ < x 2 + 1 >. Field extensions are particularly helpful for creating finite fields of specific orders since an extension field E will have a degree: Let E be an extension field of a field F. Then E has degree n over F and write [E : F ] = n if E has dimension n as a vector space over F. If [E : F ] is finite, E is called a finite extension of F. Otherwise, E is an infinite extension of F.

6 JULIA PORCINO This extension field is sometimes referred to as algebraic, which can then be related to the Galois extension: An algebraic field extension E/F is a Galois extension if it is normal and separable. Normal and separable are two properties of extension fields: A field extension E/F is normal if E is the splitting field of a family of polynomials in F [x], i.e. for f(x) F [X], f(x) can be factored as a product of linear factors in E[x], but in no proper subfield of E[x]. An extension field E of F is separable if and only if for every e E the minimal polynomial of e over F is a separable polynomial (i.e., has distinct roots). Otherwise, the extension is called inseparable. This leads to the definition of the Galois group: Let E be an extension field of the field F such that E/F is a Galois extension. The Galois group of E over F, Gal(E/F ), is the set of all automorphisms of E that take every element of F to itself, where an automorphism of E is understood to be a ring automorphism from E onto E. Consider the collection of Galois groups, Gal(E i /F ), such that each E i /F is a finite extension field. Then taking the projective limit of these finite groups, we have: lim Gal(E i/f ) = Gal(E/F ) where the group homomorphisms are the mappings Gal(E i /F ) Gal(E j /F ), E j E i. Thus, the resulting Galois group Gal(E/F ) over the infinite extension field E/F is profinite.