EVALUATION OF WILD JUGLANS SPECIES FOR CROWN GALL RESISTANCE

Similar documents
Applying crown gall research-based knowledge to orchard management. E. Fichtner, UCCE Tulare County

THE DEVELOPMENT OF PLANT REGENERATION SYSTEMS FOR THE GENETIC IMPROVEMENT OF WALNUT. Walt Tu1ecke and Gale McGranahan

North American Bramble Growers Research Foundation 2016 Report. Fire Blight: An Emerging Problem for Blackberry Growers in the Mid-South

Transferring Powdery Mildew Resistance Genes from Wild Helianthus into Cultivated Sunflower. Pilar Rojas-Barros, Chao-Chien Jan, and Thomas J.

Unit D: Controlling Pests and Diseases in the Orchard. Lesson 5: Identify and Control Diseases in the Orchard

Managing segregating populations

AGROBACTERIUM. First described by Smith and Townsend (1907) Responsible for crown gall. Performed Koch's postulates

Cryotherapy: A New Method to Eliminate Pathogens from Sweetpotato Propagation Materials

Sporic life cycles involve 2 types of multicellular bodies:

Using Crossbreeding and Hybrids

You are encouraged to answer/comment on other people s questions. Domestication conversion of plants or animals to domestic uses

Useful Propagation Terms. Propagation The application of specific biological principles and concepts in the multiplication of plants.

4/26/18. Domesticated plants vs. their wild relatives. Lettuce leaf size/shape, fewer secondary compounds

Bacterial spot of pepper and tomato

Unit G: Pest Management. Lesson 2: Managing Crop Diseases

Plant Stress and Phytophthora ramorum Infection

California Agriculture

Do you remember the 5 life stages of Cronartium ribicola, including time of year and host they are produced on?

Plant transformation

Somaclonal Variation

An Alternaria Leaf Spot of the Sugar Beet

The impact of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and other soil borne disease causing agents of economic importance in production of roses

Deterioration of Crop Varieties Causes and Maintenance

Research on infection by S.subterranea and host resistance to powdery scab. Alison Lees

6 2 Insects and plants

AMADEPA Association Martiniquaise pour le Developpement des Plantes Alimentaires

GENERAL INFORMATION From British Colombia south to California, west into Idaho and south of Sierra Nevada. (2,3,7)

HORTSCIENCE 38(3):

Plant Disease Introduction. Larry A. Sagers Utah State University Extension Regional Horticulturist

By the end of this lesson, you should be able to

Importing Plant Stock for Wetland Restoration and Creation: Maintaining Genetic Diversity and Integrity

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW VARIETIES OF PLANTS EXPLANATORY NOTES ON THE DEFINITION OF VARIETY

Abiotic Stress in Crop Plants

Bacterial diseases of almond rootstocks

Understanding Plant Life Cycles

Wheat Genetics and Molecular Genetics: Past and Future. Graham Moore

Model plants and their Role in genetic manipulation. Mitesh Shrestha

Towards the Ultimate Solution: Genetic Resistance to HLB in Commercial Citrus. Greening Summit Florida Citrus Growers Institute 2008

Commercial microbial inoculants with endophytes (an overview)

Horticulture Science

3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of selective breeding?

Plant disease. Plant Diseases: Learning objectives: Plant Disease: Any physiological or structural abnormality that is harmful to the plant

EC Cedar Apple Rust

Breeding value for cassava mosaic disease resistance analyzed in a seedling nursery

It is one of the most serious oak diseases in the United States, killing thousands of trees each year.

Assessment of Genetic Diversity of Pawpaw Cultivars with Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat Markers

Research Notes: G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology

Part 1: /15 Part 2: /77 Part 3: /16 Part 4: /24.5

Plant Propagation PLS 3223/5222

TYPES AND MECHANISMS. Course teacher Dr. A. Prabhuraj Professor Department of Entomology UAS, Raichur

Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth) Tristylous, clonal

INTRODUCING PLANT TISSUE CULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM CONCEPTS & HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

Chapter 1 Introduction

Plant Disease Introduction

Kabloom and Crave Calibrachoa. Plug and Finish Culture

Evolutionary Genetics: Part 0.2 Introduction to Population genetics

The ways of oat winterhardiness improvement in Poland Bogusław Łapiński and Agnieszka Rachwalska

I to the renewed scientific interest in the introduction of cotton stocks from

Sclerotinia Stem and Crown Rot of Alfalfa: Symptoms & Disease Cycle

Chapter 8. Summarizing Discussion

Last time: Obtaining information from a cloned gene

Germplasm. Introduction to Plant Breeding. Germplasm 2/12/2013. Master Gardener Training. Start with a seed

Introduction to Plant Breeding. Master Gardener Training

Biodiversity and sustainability of grasslands

Rose Black spot-diplocarpon rosae

Studies on Fertility Restoration Using Newly Derived Restorers in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

Plant Pathology Fact Sheet

GENETIC ANALYSES OF ROOT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IN THE TOMATO CROP MODEL

Epidemiology of Grapevine leafroll associated virus-3 and regional management

Scholarship 2008 Biology

Pitahayas: introduction, agrotechniques and breeding

FAMILY AND CLONAL VARIATION IN SUSCEPTIBILITY OF PINUS RADIATA TO AGROBACTERIUM TUMEFACIENS IN RELATION TO IN VITRO SHOOT GROWTH RATE

Chorisia speciosa (floss-silk tree)

MNLA Certification Manual Learning Objectives

In-vitro Evaluation of Arabidopsis thaliana Ecotypes against Ralstonia solanacearum Race4

Frost Survival of Plants

PEST MANAGEMENT: WEEDS

Ti plasmid derived plant vector systems: binary and co - integrative vectors transformation process; regeneration of the transformed lines

Breeding for Resistance to Basal Rot in Narcissus

EC1806 Revised 1955 Cedar Apple Rust

DIFFERENTIATION OF AVOCADO BLOSSOM BUDS IN FLORIDA

Scale Insects. Hemiptera: Many families

7.2: Natural Selection and Artificial Selection pg

Title: The Plant Disease Triangle - How Plants Defend Themselves, Part II Speaker: Dean Glawe. online.wsu.edu

Stripe Rust (Yellow Rust) of Wheat

Major Plant Hormones 1.Auxins 2.Cytokinins 3.Gibberelins 4.Ethylene 5.Abscisic acid

Introduction. Phylogeny. Taxonomy

TUNDRA. Column 1 biome name Column 2 biome description Column 3 examples of plant adaptations

Washington Grain Commission Wheat and Barley Research Annual Progress Reports and Final Reports

DOCTOR Of PHILOSOPHY IN AGRICUL TI1.RE

Lab tomorrow: Bacterial Diseases. Bacteria

Characterisation of abiotic stress inducible plant promoters and bacterial genes for osmotolerance using transgenic approach

Ecology of Infectious Disease

THE USE OF DOUBLED-HAPLOIDS IN CASSAVA BREEDING

Chapters AP Biology Objectives. Objectives: You should know...

Propagating Plants Sexually

LIFE HISTORY STRATEGIES

Evolution of sugarcane leaf scald in Guadeloupe and impact on disease management

VERY DISTRUCTIVE DISEASE SOIL BORNE WITH LONGLIFE SURVIVAL SPORES (CHLAMIDOSPORES) COMPLETELY CONTROL METHOD IS NOT YET AVAILABLE

Plant Juvenility Text Pages: 15 18,

Transcription:

EVALUATION OF WILD JUGLANS SPECIES FOR CROWN GALL RESISTANCE Ed Stover, Malendia Maccree, Malli Aradhya, Ali E. McClean, and Daniel A. Kluepfel INTRODUCTION Crown Gall disease of walnut is caused by the ubiquitous soil-borne bacterium, Agrobacterium tumefaciens which is able to transfer a specific piece of its own DNA into the genome of the plant host cell. The result of this genetic transformation is the autonomous undifferentiated massive growth of infected plant cells which generates the most obvious symptom of this disease, plant galls or tumors. Paradox rootstocks are widely used in CA walnut production. These rootstocks are usually interspecific hybrids between J. hindsii and J. regia (Howard, 1945), which are typically highly susceptible to Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Extensive formation of tumors around the crown of the tree can often stunt the tree and result in reduced vigor and yields. If left untreated, tumors continue to grow and completely girdle the tree which contributes to premature death of the tree. Currently, Crown Gall Disease in mature orchards is managed using surgery to remove the gall and adjacent infected tissues. However, durable host resistance is the preferred form of resistance to all soil borne plant pathogens. This is especially important for Crown Gall Disease given the fact that Agrobacterium spp are found in the soil in all the walnut growing regions of California examined. The wild relatives of cultivated species are often a rich source of genes coding for such desirable traits as, resistance to insect pests and microbial pathogens, and abiotic stresses. Identification of a durable source of resistance to crown gall in the Juglans germplasm collection, that could be utilized directly or introgressed into commercially viable rootstocks, is likely to be an effective strategy for controlling crown gall disease in walnut. The walnut germplasm collection at the National Clonal Germplasm Repository, USDA-ARS in Davis, CA represents a wide range of intra- and interspecific diversity for some of the black walnuts and butternuts that are adapted to California conditions. The potentially useful black walnut species include J. hindsii, J. nigra, J. microcarpa, J. major, in addition to some of their hybrids with cultivated species. The Asian butternuts, J. ailantifolia, J. mandshurica, and J. cathayensis, which grow well in the germplasm collection, also could be used directly or in the development of Crown Gall resistant interspecific hybrids. Although wild species have contributed to walnut rootstock development programs, the range of genetic variation for crown gall resistance within and between these wild species has never been examined. It is anticipated that a systematic evaluation of the Juglans germplasm for crown gall resistance will unravel a hitherto unknown source of resistance/tolerance to crown gall disease and other plant pathogens.

As a step towards development of crown gall resistant rootstocks, here we report on the identification of Juglans species exhibiting resistance/tolerance to infection by A. tumefaciens EC1. Once identified, these novel sources of Agrobacterium resistance can be exploited in the ongoing U.C. Davis Walnut root stock breeding program to help reduce the incidence of Crown Gall in both nursery and production fields. OBJECTIVE Identify and characterize a novel source of Crown Gall (CG) resistance in the Juglans germplasm collection maintained in the USDA/ARS National Clonal Germplasm Repository in Davis, CA. Anticipated Outcome We anticipate the identification of a new source of Crown Gall resistance which will be useful in the development of Crown Gall resistant rootstocks in the UC Davis walnut breeding program. The germplasm thus identified also will be shared with other pathologists and horticulturists for further evaluation for resistance to other diseases, especially Phytophthora and to test for their ability to propagate vegetatively. PROCEDURES Seedling germination and inoculation. Open pollinated seeds were collected from each of the black walnut and butternut accessions maintained at the Wolfskill Experimental Orchards in Winters, CA. Seeds were cold treated, germinated and grown under glasshouse conditions. Once the seedlings reach a trunk diameter of at least 0.5cm the crown of the trees were inoculated with A. tumefaciens strain EC1. Depending on germination and growth rates, 4-6 trees from each accession were screened. Seedlings were inoculated by generating a T-cut 1-2mm deep at the crown, in to which either 500ul or 300ul of a 10 7 cells/ml suspension of EC-1 was introduced by micropipet. After inoculation, the wound was closed and wrapped with parafilm. Standard cultural practices were followed during the experiment and observations on tumor development were recorded at monthly intervals by noting first-appearance and then recording tumor size. To confirm virulence of EC1, susceptible Paradox seedlings were inoculated with EC1 as described above. To assess typical wounding response in absence of the pathogen, Paradox seedlings and a variety of accessions from the germplasm collection were inoculated as described above with the exception that EC1 was replaced with sterile water. Evaluation of inoculated saplings. Tumor formation was monitored at two week (indicates monthly in paragraph above) intervals following inoculation. Relative rates and trends in tumor initiation and formation in different germplasm assessions were noted and recorded. Tumor size was measured and recorded for each seedling at 60 days post-inoculation. Photos of each seedling were taken at various intervals following inoculation. Seedlings were monitored for three to six months after inoculation to monitor for late-forming or slow growing tumors.

To confirm the durability of observed resistance throughout a natural growing cycle, previously inoculated saplings were cold-treated and allowed to go dormant. After emerging from dormancy, saplings were monitored for tumor formation during a second growing season. Saplings which continue to show resistance or limited susceptibility will be reinoculated in subsequent growing seasons after the original inoculation. These reinoculated plants will be handled as described above for the original inoculation series. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Objective: Identification of a novel source of Crown Gall (CG) resistance in the Juglans germplasm collection maintained in the USDA/ARS National Clonal Germplasm Repository in Davis, CA. During the 2005 growing season, a total of 313 seedlings from 116 mother trees representing four species of black walnut (J. hindsii, J. nigra, J. microcarpa, and J. major); three of butternuts (J. ailantifolia, J. mandshurica, and J. cathayensis); and J. sinensis were tested for resistance to Crown Gall Disease (Table 1). For the 2006 screening, additional germplasm from wingnut and butternut species were added to the study. A significant number of J. microcarpa accessions found promising from the 2005 study failed to germinate in 2006 and could not be investigated. During the 2006 season, a total of 468 seedlings from 85 mother trees representing the English walnut (J. regia), and its conspecific taxon, J. sinensis, five species of black walnut (J. hindsii, J. nigra, J. microcarpa, J. californica and J. major), three of butternuts (J. ailantifolia, J. mandshurica, and J. cathayensis), a wingnut species (Pterocarya stenoptera), and a small number of intergenic hybrids were evaluated (Table 1).

Table 1. Summary of germplasm material screened in 2005 and 2006 Species used as source (2005) used as source (2006) Total Number of saplings screened (2005-2006) Black walnuts J. hindsii 76 30 440 J. nigra 5 3 32 J. microcarpa 20 5 57 J. major 9 13 98 J. californica 0 9 47 Butternuts J. ailantifolia 1 10 60 J. mandshurica 3 3 31 J. cathayensis 1 0 1 Others J. regia 0 4 20 J. sinensis 1 1 5 Pterocarya 0 5 29 Juglans hybrid 0 2 10 Total 116 85 830

Table 2. Summary table of results from 2005 screening experiments (Observations at 3 and 12 months post inoculation) No. of saplings No. of mother trees producing CG resistant progeny, No. saplings showing CG resistance, showing CG resistance in saplings, 12 months showing CG resistance in saplings, 12 months post inoc. Species 3months post inoc 3months post inoc. post inoc. Black walnuts J. hindsii 10 10 3 3 J. nigra 2 4 1 1 J. 4 10 microcarpa 4 19 J. major 2 1 1 1 Butternuts J. ailantifolia 0 J. mandshurica 0 J. cathayensis 0 Others J. sinensis 1 Total 18 35 9 15

Table 3. Summary of 2006 preliminary results Species No. of mother trees used as source producing CG resistant progeny No. saplings showing CG resistance; 60 days postinoculation Black walnuts J. hindsii 30 4 6 J. nigra 3 1 1 J. microcarpa 5 0 0 J. major 13 3 4 J. californica 9 3 3 Butternuts J. ailantifolia 10 8 18 J. mandshurica 3 3 10 Others J. regia 4 3 5 J. sinensis 1 0 0 Pterocarya 5 4 6 Juglans hybrid 2 1 1 Total 84 30 54 Results from the 2005 testing indicate that resistance is most common and durable in J. microcarpa (Table 2). The resultant phenotypes ranged from total resistance to delayed gall development after dormancy to immediate gall formation three week post inoculation. Unfortunatley, some of these promising accessions failed to germinate and could not be evaluated during the 06 cycle to confirm 2005 results. Further testing is needed in 2007 to confirm which mother trees are producing resistant progeny. Preliminary results from the 2006 screenings indicate that J. ailantifolia and J. mandishurica and Pterocarya accessions showed the greatest number of progenies with some level of resistance at 60 days post-inoculation (Table 3). Nearly 50% of the progeny from J. ailantifolia, J. madichurica, J regia, J. hindsii and Pterocarya mother trees showed no tumor formation at 60 days post-inoculation. In the summer 2006 screen, Pterocarya species exhibited the highest degree of resistance to A. tumefaciens infection and subsequent tumor formation.

Conclusion: A simple and reproducible method for infecting trees with Agrobacterium tumefaciens to produce crown gall disease has been established. In our investigations we have found some variability in the rate of infection and growth of tumors on different saplings. Continued monitoring of resistant trees through a dormant cycle and into the next growing season is needed to confirm resistance. Finally, our preliminary data suggests that several Juglans species and a single Pterocarya species exhibit resistance to the formation of crown gall after inoculation with A. tumefaciens strain EC1.