Proceedings of the International Conference on Theory and Applications of Mathematics and Informatics ICTAMI 2003, Alba Iulia

Similar documents
Chapter 3 Single Random Variables and Probability Distributions (Part 2)

Functions of bounded variation

ON THE C-INTEGRAL BENEDETTO BONGIORNO

f(x)dx . Show that there 1, 0 < x 1 does not exist a differentiable function g : [ 1, 1] R such that g (x) = f(x) for all

Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions

Advanced Calculus: MATH 410 Notes on Integrals and Integrability Professor David Levermore 17 October 2004

A short introduction to local fractional complex analysis

Continuity. Recall the following properties of limits. Theorem. Suppose that lim. f(x) =L and lim. lim. [f(x)g(x)] = LM, lim

W. We shall do so one by one, starting with I 1, and we shall do it greedily, trying

Regulated functions and the regulated integral

QUADRATURE is an old-fashioned word that refers to

Calculus of variations with fractional derivatives and fractional integrals

Chapter 6. Riemann Integral

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

The one-dimensional Henstock-Kurzweil integral

The Hadamard s Inequality for s-convex Function

Review of Riemann Integral

Math 554 Integration

Fact: All polynomial functions are continuous and differentiable everywhere.

Calculus in R. Chapter Di erentiation

7.2 Riemann Integrable Functions

NON-NEWTONIAN IMPROPER INTEGRALS

For a continuous function f : [a; b]! R we wish to define the Riemann integral

On some Hardy-Sobolev s type variable exponent inequality and its application

Advanced Calculus I (Math 4209) Martin Bohner

The Banach algebra of functions of bounded variation and the pointwise Helly selection theorem

5.4. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. 356 Chapter 5: Integration. Mean Value Theorem for Definite Integrals

Math 1431 Section M TH 4:00 PM 6:00 PM Susan Wheeler Office Hours: Wed 6:00 7:00 PM Online ***NOTE LABS ARE MON AND WED

Chapter 6 Continuous Random Variables and Distributions

AN INEQUALITY OF OSTROWSKI TYPE AND ITS APPLICATIONS FOR SIMPSON S RULE AND SPECIAL MEANS. I. Fedotov and S. S. Dragomir

NAME: MR. WAIN FUNCTIONS

The Bochner Integral and the Weak Property (N)

M344 - ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS

Section - 2 MORE PROPERTIES

Principles of Real Analysis I Fall VI. Riemann Integration

NOTES AND PROBLEMS: INTEGRATION THEORY

LINEAR ALGEBRA APPLIED

SOME INTEGRAL INEQUALITIES OF GRÜSS TYPE

In Mathematics for Construction, we learnt that

The Regulated and Riemann Integrals

A HELLY THEOREM FOR FUNCTIONS WITH VALUES IN METRIC SPACES. 1. Introduction

Appendix to Notes 8 (a)

Lecture 3 ( ) (translated and slightly adapted from lecture notes by Martin Klazar)

Section The Precise Definition Of A Limit

Time in Seconds Speed in ft/sec (a) Sketch a possible graph for this function.

The Trapezoidal Rule

Section 6.1 Definite Integral

UNIFORM CONVERGENCE MA 403: REAL ANALYSIS, INSTRUCTOR: B. V. LIMAYE

a n+2 a n+1 M n a 2 a 1. (2)

CS344: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence

Suppose we want to find the area under the parabola and above the x axis, between the lines x = 2 and x = -2.

Riemann Stieltjes Integration - Definition and Existence of Integral

Multiplicative calculus and its applications

5.1 How do we Measure Distance Traveled given Velocity? Student Notes

Calculus Module C21. Areas by Integration. Copyright This publication The Northern Alberta Institute of Technology All Rights Reserved.

Topics Covered AP Calculus AB

Lecture 1: Introduction to integration theory and bounded variation

Chapter 2. Random Variables and Probability Distributions

Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

MAT137 Calculus! Lecture 20

The final exam will take place on Friday May 11th from 8am 11am in Evans room 60.

1 i n x i x i 1. Note that kqk kp k. In addition, if P and Q are partition of [a, b], P Q is finer than both P and Q.

Some estimates on the Hermite-Hadamard inequality through quasi-convex functions

Math 360: A primitive integral and elementary functions

Math 1431 Section 6.1. f x dx, find f. Question 22: If. a. 5 b. π c. π-5 d. 0 e. -5. Question 33: Choose the correct statement given that

1.3 The Lemma of DuBois-Reymond

Theoretical foundations of Gaussian quadrature

Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequalities for harmonically convex functions via fractional integrals

DEFINITE INTEGRALS. f(x)dx exists. Note that, together with the definition of definite integrals, definitions (2) and (3) define b

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 55 (130) (2005), , Abbotsford. 1. Introduction

Section 6.1 INTRO to LAPLACE TRANSFORMS

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ho] 16 Dec 2003

FUNCTIONS OF α-slow INCREASE

Week 7 Riemann Stieltjes Integration: Lectures 19-21

MAA 4212 Improper Integrals

CMDA 4604: Intermediate Topics in Mathematical Modeling Lecture 19: Interpolation and Quadrature

Chapter 22. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

MAT612-REAL ANALYSIS RIEMANN STIELTJES INTEGRAL

Integrals along Curves.

7.2 The Definition of the Riemann Integral. Outline

Improper Integrals with Infinite Limits of Integration

The Henstock-Kurzweil integral

Lecture 3: Curves in Calculus. Table of contents

MonotonicBehaviourofRelativeIncrementsofPearsonDistributions

Chapter 4. Additional Variational Concepts

CAVALIERI INTEGRATION

Some Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for functions whose exponentials are convex

Chapter 4. Lebesgue Integration

Chapter 6 Techniques of Integration

NEW INEQUALITIES OF SIMPSON S TYPE FOR s CONVEX FUNCTIONS WITH APPLICATIONS. := f (4) (x) <. The following inequality. 2 b a

Homework 4. (1) If f R[a, b], show that f 3 R[a, b]. If f + (x) = max{f(x), 0}, is f + R[a, b]? Justify your answer.

Some integral inequalities on time scales

4.6 Numerical Integration

MAT 403 NOTES 4. f + f =

Phil Wertheimer UMD Math Qualifying Exam Solutions Analysis - January, 2015

Definite integral. Mathematics FRDIS MENDELU

1. On some properties of definite integrals. We prove

Complex integration. L3: Cauchy s Theory.

Optimization Lecture 1 Review of Differential Calculus for Functions of Single Variable.

WHEN IS A FUNCTION NOT FLAT? 1. Introduction. {e 1 0, x = 0. f(x) =

Transcription:

Proceedings o the Interntionl Conerence on Theor nd Applictions o Mthemtics nd Inormtics ICTAMI 2003, Al Iuli CARACTERIZATIONS OF TE FUNCTIONS WIT BOUNDED VARIATION Dniel Lesnic Astrct. The present stud concerns the clss o the unctions with ounded vritions nd its reltions with other clsses o well-known chrcterized unctions. Deinition 1.1. A unction : [,] R is clled with ounded vrition on [,] i there is M > 0 such tht or n prtition = = o < 1 < < n = o the intervl [,] we hve: V = sup { V division o [,]} is clled the totl vrition o the unction on the intervl [,]. Remrks. i the concept o the unction with ounded vrition hs sense onl on compct intervls; ii the deinition cn esil e etended when the unction tkes vlues in metric spce. For etter understnding o the clss o unctions with ounded vrition one inds pproprite to list series o well-known results, see or instnce [1], the proo eing reserved onl or no clssicl results. 1.PROPERTIES OF TE FUNCTIONS WIT BOUNDED VARIATION Proposition 2.1. A unction : [,] R is constnt i nd onl i is unction with ounded vrition nd V = 0. Proposition 2.2. A unction : [,] R is monotonic i nd onl i is unction with ounded vrition nd V =. 47

Dniel Lesnic - Chrcteriztions o the unctions with ounded vrition Theorem 2.1. The set o the unctions with ounded vrition on given compct intervl orms n lger which is not closed. Furthermore, the set o unctions with ounded vrition nd with nonzero vlues on given compct intervl orms commuttive ield. Proposition 2.3. Let : [,] R e unction with ounded vrition on [,] nd let V: [,] R e unction deined s: V V = or n [,]. Then V nd V re incresing unctions nd stis the ollowing inequlit: V 2 1 d V d V d V d 2 1 d Proo. Let, [,] such tht >. Then V V = V 0 nd V V V + = + 0. ence, V nd V re incresing unctions. Appling the Ceîşev s inequlit or the unctions V nd V results in: 1 V V d V d V d d which is in ct the requested inequlit. Theorem 2.2. Jordn A unction is with ounded vrition i nd onl i it cn e represented s the dierence o two incresing decresing unctions. Remrks. i the two monotonic unctions cn e tken positive dding suicientl lrge constnt nd continuous i in ddition the initil unction is continuous; ii the decomposition is not unique. Corollr 2.1. I unction is with ounded vrition is not continuous it hs onl discontinuities o the irst kind. Corollr 2.2. Frod The set o the discontinuit points o unction with ounded vrition is t most countle. 48

Dniel Lesnic - Chrcteriztions o the unctions with ounded vrition Corollr 2.3. A unction with ounded vrition is Riemnn integrle. The reciprocl is lse nd contreemple is given the unction: sinπ/ i 0 < 2 : [0,2] R, = 0 i = 0 which is Riemnn integrle on [0,2] eing continuous, ut is not with ounded vrition on [0,2]. Corollr 2.4. Leesque A unction with ounded vrition is lmost everwhere derivle. Oservtion. Bsed on corollr 2.4., clss o continuous unctions which re not even locll with ounded vrition is the clss o continuous unctions nowhere derivle. Proposition 2.4. A unction with with ounded vrition is ounded. The reciprocl is lse nd contreemple is given the Dirichlet unction, nmel 0, i [, ] Q : [,] R, = 1, i [,] R - Q which is ounded, ut is not with ounded vrition rom corollr 2.2. Oservtion. The unction : [0,1] R 1/, i 0,1] = 0, i = 0 is not with ounded vrition eing unounded ut this emple shows tht monotonic unction on noncompct intervl, nmel g : 0,1] R, g=1/ could e structurll r w rom unction with ounded vrition. Proposition 2.5. Let,g : [,] R nd K > 0, c 1 e with the propert tht K g g c or n, [,]. I g is with ounded vrition then is with ounded vrition. Proo. From proposition 2.4. there is M > 0such tht g < M or n [,]. Then or n division = = o < 1 < < n = o the intervl [,] we hve: n 1 V = i= 0 n 1 i1 i i= 0 c i+ 1 g i K g 49

Dniel Lesnic - Chrcteriztions o the unctions with ounded vrition n 1 K 2M c-1 K g i+ 1 g i K 2M c-1 g. i= 0 ence, is with ounded vrition on [, ]. Corollr 2.5. A Lipschitz unction is with ounded vrition. Corollr 2.6. Let Φ : [,] R e Riemnn integrle unction. Then the unction : [,] R deined s: is with ounded vrition. V = Φ tdt or n [,] Corollr 2.7. A derivle unction with ounded derivtive on [, ] is with ounded vrition on [, ]. Theorem 2.3. A derivle unction : [,] R with integrle derivtive is with ounded vrition nd V = ' d. 2.RELATIONS WIT OTER CLASSES OF FUNCTIONS g Proposition 3.1. Let [,] [c,d] R e unctions with the properties tht is with ounded vrition on [c, d] nd g is monotonic on [, ]. Then the composition o g is with ounded vrition on [, ]. Proo. Suppose g is n incresing unction. Since is with ounded vrition, rom Jordn s theorem there re Φ nd Ψ incresing unctions such tht = Φ Ψ. Then o g = Φ o g - Ψ o g nd Φ o g nd Ψ o g re incresing unctions. Finll, rom Jordn s theorem, results tht o g is with ounded vrition on [, ]. Proposition 3.2. Let : [,] R e unction with Drou propert such tht is with ounded vrition. Then is continuous. Proo. It is es to oserve tht, since hs Drou propert, then hs this propert s well. First we shll prove tht is continuous. Assume, contrdiction, tht there is 0 discontinuit point or. 50

Dniel Lesnic - Chrcteriztions o the unctions with ounded vrition Since is with ounded vrition, rom corollr 2.1., results tht 0 is discontinuit point o the irst kind or. This conclusion is in contrdiction with the ct tht hs Drou propert since such unction cnnot hve discontinuit o the irst kind. ence, is continuous. Assume gin, contrdiction, tht there is 0 discontinuit point or. Since hs Drou propert results tht 0 is point o discontinuit o the second kind or nd thus 0 is et point o discontinuit or or which we hve proved tht is continuous. This is contrdiction nd hence, is continuous. Oservtion. We recll tht unction with ounded vrition nd with Drou propert is necessr continuous. This oservtion will e reerred s nlsis o discontinuities. The ollowing corollries cn esil e proved rom this nlsis. Corollr 3.1. Let, 0 nd e rel numers such tht < 0 < nd let : [,] R e unction with the ollowing properties: i is locl with ounded vrition t 0, i.e. there is compct intervl included in [, ] nd contining in interior the point 0 on which is with ounded vrition. ii possesses primitives on, 0 nd 0,. Then possesses primitives on, i nd onl i is continuous t 0. Corollr 3.2. Let : [,] I e unction, where I is n intervl included in [, ]. Then: ii o o... o is discontinuous nd with ounded vrition then hs not Drou propert. ii I hs Drou propert nd o is with ounded vrition then 2n = 1o 4243 o... o is continuous. 2ntimes Corollr 3.3. A unction with ounded vrition which cn e represented s rtio o two unctions possessing primitives is continuous. Lemm 3.1. Let : [,] R e continuous one to one unction nd let g : [,] R e unction possessing primitives. Then the product. g possesses primitives. Proo. Since is one-to-one there is n let-inverse -1, s, such tht 1 o = or n [, ]. In ddition, since is continuous results tht -1 is continuous. Let 1 e primitive o the unction g, so = g. then the unction o is continuous nd 1 hence possesses primitives. Let e such primitive, so = o. We prove now tht the unction. g possesses primitives showing tht the unction T : [,] 51

Dniel Lesnic - Chrcteriztions o the unctions with ounded vrition 52 R, deined s T =. o is derivle nd its derivtive is the unction. g. or this, let e n ritrr point in [, ]. Then, T T lim = + + lim = lim + lim. We ppl now Lgrnge s men vlue theorem to the unction on the intervl [, ]. Thus there is ξ [, ] such tht: = 1 ξ, whence it eists η [, ] such tht = η. Then the limit clculted ove ecomes: T T lim = g+ η lim = g+ + g η lim =. g. So, T is derivle nd T =. g, hence. g possesses primitives. Lemm 3.2. Let : [,] R e continuous monotonic unction nd let g : [,] R e unction possesses primitives. Proo. Suppose is n incresing unction on [, ]. Then the unction h : [,] R, deined s h = +, or n [, ] is strictl incresing unction nd hence one-to-one unction. From lemm 3.1. it results tht the unction p : [,] R deined s: p = hg = + g or n [, ] possesses primitive P, s, such tht P = p. Also, rom lemm 3.1.. it results tht the unction q : [,] R deined s: q =. g or n [, ] possesses primitive Q, s, such tht Q = q.

Dniel Lesnic - Chrcteriztions o the unctions with ounded vrition It is ovious now tht. g = p-q nd thus primitive o the product. g is the derivle unction P Q. Theorem 3.1. Let : [,] R e continuous unction with ounded vrition nd let g : [,] R e unction possesses primitives. Then the product. g possesses primitives. Proo. Since is continuous unction with ounded vrition, rom Jordn s theorem, there re Φ nd Ψ two continuous incresing unctions such tht = Φ Ψ. Then. g = Φ. g - Ψ. g. now using lemm 3.2 it results tht Φ. g nd Ψ. g possesses primitives nd hence, product. g possesses primitives. Proposition 3.3. Let : [,] R e unction with ounded vrition with the propert tht there is unction g : [,] R\{0} possesses primitives such tht the product. g possesses primitives. Then the product. h possesses primitives or n unction h : [,] R possessing primitives. Proo. Let Φ : [,] R e unction deined s Φ =. g or n [, ]. Then rom hpothesis the unctions g nd Φ possess primitives nd is with ounded vrition. Since g 0 or n [, ] nd = Φ /g, rom corollr 3.3 it results tht is continuous. Now the conclusion o the proposition is given the proposition 3.1. Deinition 3.1. Two sets re sid to e equipotent or crdinl equivlent i there is n univoc ppliction etween them. Proposition 3.4. For, R denote BV[, ] = { : [,] R is with ounded vrition on [, ]} B[, ] = { : [,] R is ounded on [, ]} DP[, ] = { : [,] R hs Drou propert on [, ]} Then BV[, ] nd B[, ] re not equipotent nd so there re BV[, ] nd DP[, ]. Proo. Assume, contrdiction, tht there is n univoc ppliction Φ : B[,] BV[, ] nd tke : [,] R deined s 0, i [, ] Q =. 1, i [, ] R - Q Oviousl, B[, ] nd Φ0, i [, ] Q Φ o =. Φ1, i [, ] R - Q 53

Dniel Lesnic - Chrcteriztions o the unctions with ounded vrition Recll now tht Φ is Dirichlet-tpe unction nd it is with ounded vrition i nd onl i is constnt, ut this in contrdiction with Φ is one-to-one unction. ence, BV[, ] nd B[, ] re not equipotent. For the second conclusion ssume gin, contrdiction, tht there is n univoc ppliction Ψ : BV[,] DP[, ] nd tke g : [,] R deined s g = 0, 1, i i [, + /2]. [ + /2, ] Oviousl, g BV[, ] nd Ψ0, Ψ o g =. Ψ1, i i [, + /2] [ + /2, ] Agin Ψ g is Dirichlet-tpe unction nd hs Drou propert i nd onl i is constnt, ut this in contrdiction with Ψ is one-to-one unction. ence, BV[, ] nd DP[, ] re not equipotent. REFERENCE 1. S. MĂRCUŞ, Mthemticl Anlsis in Romnin, Vol. 2, 1968. Author: Dniel Lesnic, Deprtment o Applied Mthemticl Studies, Leeds LS2 9JT, Englnd 54