The SIRS Model Approach to Host/Parasite Relationships

Similar documents
Applications in Biology

Non-Linear Models Cont d: Infectious Diseases. Non-Linear Models Cont d: Infectious Diseases

Epidemics in Networks Part 2 Compartmental Disease Models

Thursday. Threshold and Sensitivity Analysis

Qualitative Analysis of a Discrete SIR Epidemic Model

PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN EPIDEMIC MODELS: SIMPLIFIED FORMULAS

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

The SIR Disease Model Trajectories and MatLab

APPM 2360 Lab 3: Zombies! Due April 27, 2017 by 11:59 pm

Qualitative Analysis of Tumor-Immune ODE System

Spotlight on Modeling: The Possum Plague

Project 1 Modeling of Epidemics

Global Stability of a Computer Virus Model with Cure and Vertical Transmission

Mathematical Analysis of Epidemiological Models: Introduction

Fixed Point Analysis of Kermack Mckendrick SIR Model

Electronic appendices are refereed with the text. However, no attempt has been made to impose a uniform editorial style on the electronic appendices.

LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS FOR THE SIRS EPIDEMIC

Markov Chains and Pandemics

Modeling Prey and Predator Populations

Models of Infectious Disease Formal Demography Stanford Summer Short Course James Holland Jones, Instructor. August 15, 2005

We have two possible solutions (intersections of null-clines. dt = bv + muv = g(u, v). du = au nuv = f (u, v),

Introduction to SEIR Models

On the Spread of Epidemics in a Closed Heterogeneous Population

Systems of Differential Equations

Applied Calculus I. Lecture 29

(mathematical epidemiology)

Qualitative Analysis of Tumor-Immune ODE System

Figure The Threshold Theorem of epidemiology

Linearization of Differential Equation Models

MATH 56A: STOCHASTIC PROCESSES CHAPTER 0

Any live cell with less than 2 live neighbours dies. Any live cell with 2 or 3 live neighbours lives on to the next step.

Mathematical Analysis of Epidemiological Models III

SYMBIOTIC MODELS WITH AN SIR DISEASE

Mathematical Modeling and Analysis of Infectious Disease Dynamics

ME 406 S-I-R Model of Epidemics Part 2 Vital Dynamics Included

Three Disguises of 1 x = e λx

ECS 289 / MAE 298, Lecture 7 April 22, Percolation and Epidemiology on Networks, Part 2 Searching on networks

Behavior Stability in two SIR-Style. Models for HIV

Stability of SEIR Model of Infectious Diseases with Human Immunity

Epidemics in Complex Networks and Phase Transitions

Systems of Ordinary Differential Equations

U(s) = 0 + 0s 3 + 0s 2 + 0s + 125

Final Project Descriptions Introduction to Mathematical Biology Professor: Paul J. Atzberger. Project I: Predator-Prey Equations

M469, Fall 2010, Practice Problems for the Final

Analysis of Numerical and Exact solutions of certain SIR and SIS Epidemic models

Global Analysis of an Epidemic Model with Nonmonotone Incidence Rate

A NEW SOLUTION OF SIR MODEL BY USING THE DIFFERENTIAL FRACTIONAL TRANSFORMATION METHOD

Models of Infectious Disease Formal Demography Stanford Spring Workshop in Formal Demography May 2008

MA 138 Calculus 2 for the Life Sciences Spring 2016 Final Exam May 4, Exam Scores. Question Score Total

A. Incorrect! Replacing is not a method for solving systems of equations.

(e) Use Newton s method to find the x coordinate that satisfies this equation, and your graph in part (b) to show that this is an inflection point.

dy dt = a by y = a b

Mathematical Epidemiology Lecture 1. Matylda Jabłońska-Sabuka

The Dynamic Properties of a Deterministic SIR Epidemic Model in Discrete-Time

SIR model. (Susceptible-Infected-Resistant/Removed) Outlook. Introduction into SIR model. Janusz Szwabiński

Analytically tractable processes on networks

Understanding the contribution of space on the spread of Influenza using an Individual-based model approach

Dynamical models of HIV-AIDS e ect on population growth

Dynamical Analysis of Plant Disease Model with Roguing, Replanting and Preventive Treatment

A Mathematical Analysis on the Transmission Dynamics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Yk j N k j

Smoking as Epidemic: Modeling and Simulation Study

Available online at J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2 (2012), No. 6, ISSN:

A New Mathematical Approach for. Rabies Endemy

Modeling Prey-Predator Populations

Stability Analysis of a SIS Epidemic Model with Standard Incidence

SIR Epidemic Model with total Population size

Modelling of the Hand-Foot-Mouth-Disease with the Carrier Population

Exam 2. Principles of Ecology. March 25, Name

Disease Dynamics in Hive Populations

Introduction to Epidemic Modeling

1 The pendulum equation

Dynamic network sampling

MATH 415, WEEK 11: Bifurcations in Multiple Dimensions, Hopf Bifurcation

MATHEMATICAL MODELS Vol. III - Mathematical Models in Epidemiology - M. G. Roberts, J. A. P. Heesterbeek

University of Leeds. Project in Statistics. Math5004M. Epidemic Modelling. Supervisor: Dr Andrew J Baczkowski. Student: Ross Breckon

D1.3 Separable Differential Equations

On epidemic models with nonlinear cross-diffusion

A survey of mathematical models of Dengue fever

VERIFIED SOLUTION OF NONLINEAR DYNAMIC MODELS IN EPIDEMIOLOGY

Math 1280 Notes 4 Last section revised, 1/31, 9:30 pm.

THE INVERSE PROBLEM FOR DIRECTED CURRENT ELECTRICAL NETWORKS

MCMC 2: Lecture 2 Coding and output. Phil O Neill Theo Kypraios School of Mathematical Sciences University of Nottingham

A Note on the Spread of Infectious Diseases. in a Large Susceptible Population

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. Effect of Education Campaign on Transmission Model of Conjunctivitis

Limit Cycles and Dynamics of Rumor Models. A thesis. presented to. the faculty of the Department of Mathematics. East Tennessee State University

ANALYSIS OF DIPHTHERIA DISSEMINATION BY USING MULTI GROUPS OF DYNAMIC SYSTEM METHOD APPROACH

Models Involving Interactions between Predator and Prey Populations

Dynamics of a Population Model Controlling the Spread of Plague in Prairie Dogs

GLOBAL STABILITY OF SIR MODELS WITH NONLINEAR INCIDENCE AND DISCONTINUOUS TREATMENT

Preservation of local dynamics when applying central difference methods: application to SIR model

Social Influence in Online Social Networks. Epidemiological Models. Epidemic Process

Supplemental Information Population Dynamics of Epidemic and Endemic States of Drug-Resistance Emergence in Infectious Diseases

Hepatitis C Mathematical Model

Delay SIR Model with Nonlinear Incident Rate and Varying Total Population

The Spreading of Epidemics in Complex Networks

Lab 5: Nonlinear Systems

Calculus for the Life Sciences II Assignment 6 solutions. f(x, y) = 3π 3 cos 2x + 2 sin 3y

Physics: spring-mass system, planet motion, pendulum. Biology: ecology problem, neural conduction, epidemics

The death of an epidemic

Epidemics and information spreading

Transcription:

= B I + y (N I ) 1 8 6 4 2 I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 The IR Model Approach to Host/Parasite Relationships Brianne Gill May 16, 28 5 1 15 2 The IR Model... Abstract In this paper, we shall explore examples of host/parasite relationships, specifically viral infections, and how they can be described by the IR model. 1. The IR Model For Disease When considering the many problems that have faced human society, one of the most deadly and devastating is that of disease. Mathematical models have often been used as attempts towards greater understanding of diseases and epidemics, what factors are involved, and perhaps why certain massive epidemics have occurred. An excellent analytical approach to try and describe how a viral infection spreads is the IR model. This model, which owes much of its early development to Kermack and McKendrick, is based on the premise that you can describe a population in terms of three different groups: those who are susceptible to a virus, those infected with the virus, and those who have already recovered from the viral infection. To describe this with a formula, the first step is to define N be the total population subsisting of three groups: susceptible individuals, infected individuals I, and recovered individuals R. Thus Page 1 of 2 Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) 1 8 6 4 I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 N = + I + R. (1) 2 5 1 15 2 Within the population N, there is movement from one group to another. As susceptible, uninfected people in group become infected, they enter the infected group I. This rate of transmission is related to the amount of contact between those without the disease,, and those with the disease, labeled I. A reasonable way of describing the rate of transmission then is by multiplying the product I (representing the contact between group I and group ) by the constant rate of infection which we will label β. o far, the rate of change of the group can be described as follows: The IR Model... d dt = βi. Not only are there people becoming infected with the virus however, there are also individuals from the recovered group, R, who are losing their immunity and becoming susceptible again. Therefore, a certain number of people will be re-entering the susceptible stage as they lose their immunity at a constant rate which we will call γ. The decrease in the Recovered population due to this loss of immunity will be given by the product of the recovered population, R, and γ. Adding this to our equation above, we get a completed description of the rate of change of the population in the following equation d dt = βi + γr. (2) To describe the rate of change of the population group I, the rate of increase in the infected population is already given above by the rate of infection, or decrease in the Page 2 of 2 Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) usceptible population, βi. However, it is also necessary to account for the individuals who are recovering, causing a decrease in the infected population. This decrease can be accounted for by multiplying a constant rate of recovery, which we will call ν, by the infected population I and subtracting this from the rate of increase, βi. The equation for the rate of change of the Infected Population then becomes, di dt = βi νi. (3) Finally, to describe the rate of change of the last group, the Recovered Population, a similar process is followed as for the first two. The rate of increase of our recovered population (conversely the decrease of our infective population ) is accounted for by the product νi. Additionally, there is also a certain rate of loss due to the number of people who are losing their immunity. This decrease is given by the product γr. Therefore, the rate of change of the recovered population is given by the following differential equation dr dt = νi γr. (4) I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 1 8 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 The IR Model... Page 3 of 2 2. In a graph of the equations for these three different groups, we would expect three curves representing changing population levels. A great deal of the behavior of the population depends upon the initial conditions. tarting out with a population where there are initially only susceptible victims and a few infected hosts, a sudden decrease in the population accompanied bya sudden increase in the population I would be expected. Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) 1 8 6 4 2 I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 5 1 15 2 I R Figure 1: A diagram of the flow between the susceptible, infected, and recovered populations. But as population I increases, there should also be a related rise of population R, as individuals begin to recover. This will result in some balancing or leveling out of the population I. Depending on the constants we choose for the rates of infection, recovery, and immunity loss, the results will differ greatly. To graph an example of how these three groups,, I, and R behave in relation to one another within a total population N, we use the program MatLab to graph our set of three differential equations. First, we will rename each of our functions, I and R as u 1, u 2 and u 3. Therefore, if The IR Model... Page 4 of 2 = u 1, I = u 2, R = u 3, Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) 1 8 I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 5 45 4 35 3 25 usceptible Infected Recovered The IR Model... 2 15 1 5.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Page 5 of 2 Figure 2: The plot of,i, and R. Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) then, = u 1, I = u 2, R = u 3. Making the appropriate substitutions, the three equations for d/dt, di/dt, and dr/dt become I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 1 8 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 The IR Model... u 1 = βu 1 u 2 + γu 3, u 2 = βu 1 u 2 νu 2, u 3 = νu 2 γu 3. Then, we can write an function m-file as follows function uprime=sirs(t,u,b,gamma,v); uprime=zeros(3,1); uprime(1)=-b*u(1)*u(2)+gamma*u(3); uprime(2)=b*u(1)*u(2)-v*u(2); uprime(3)=v*u(2)-gamma*u(3); aving this function as sirs.m, next we write an m-file to graph our equations using ode45. To do so, we must provide Matlab with the initial conditions of our equations as well as values for the rate constants for infection (β), recovery (v), and immunity loss (γ). For a hypothetical example let s set Page 6 of 2 Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) 1 8 6 4 I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 β =.33, ν =.9, γ =.7. tarting with an initial population of 5 susceptible individuals,1 infected agent, and recovered individuals, as time t runs from to 4, we enter our values into an m-file as shown below [t,u]=ode45(@sirs,[,4],[5;1;],[],.33,.7,.9); plot(t,u) Legend( usceptible, Infected, Recovered ) shg 2 5 1 15 2 The IR Model... The result is the graph shown in Figure 1. From this graph we see that we do indeed get a sudden decrease in the population. It also appears that the susceptible population never reaches very high levels again. Considering the fact that the rate of removal from population is given by the product of I and as well as the rate constant β, this makes sense because this number will always be comparatively high. As for populations I and, they both end up leveling off around R = 28 and I = 22. Adding these two together,we get 5, which is very close to our initial population, especially if we take into account the very small number of susceptible individuals still present. This simply illustrates the equation presented earlier where the entire population was said to be comprised of only three groups: susceptible, infected, and recovered individuals, or in other words Page 7 of 2 Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) 1 8 6 4 I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 N = + I + R 2 5 1 15 2 3. Equilibrium Points of the IR Model In summary, the three differential equations for the IR model are The IR Model... d dt di dt dr dt = βi + γr, = βi νi, = νi γr. However, this system can be simplified from three to two equations. Recalling that N = + I + R, a substitution of N I for R in the first equation can be made. Doing so results in the following planar system Page 8 of 2 d = βi + γ(n I), (5) dt di = βi νi. (6) dt We can analyze this system of equations by finding its equilibrium points and using the Jacobian to determine the nature of those equilibrium points. Taking the partial derivatives of the two equations, the Jacobian can be written, Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) 1 8 I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 ( βi γ β γ J = βi β ν ). (7) econdly, to find the nullclines of the equations requires setting both equations equal to zero. If d/dt is equal to, can be solved for as follows, = βi + γ(n I), βi = γ(n I), 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 The IR Model... βi + γ = γ(n I). (8) This final equation can be solved for either or I. Analyzing our second equation, di/dt, and once again setting the equation equal to zero, we can determine that, Page 9 of 2 = βi νi, = I(β ν) Full creen Then I = (9)

= B I + y (N I ) or, 1 8 6 4 I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 = β ν 2 5 1 15 2 = ν β. (1) This means there will be a nullcline at I =, = ν/β, and βi = γ(n I). N > ν β. (11) Using the Jacobian, assuming that variables β, ν, and γ are all positive and subbing in our equilibrium values, we can analyze the types of equilibrium points at each intersection of the nullclines. At the point where the nullcline βi = γ(n I ) crosses the nullcline I =, we can determine that J = ( γ β γ β ν in which case the determinant D = γ(β ν), is negative. Therefore, there will be a saddle point at this equilibrium point. At the point where = ν/β and βi = γ(n I ), or I = γ(n ) β+γ, cross, we see that ( β(γ(n ν/β)) ) βν βν/β+γ β γ J = ν. β(γ(n ν/β)) βν/β+γ implifying this matrix, the Jacobian becomes βν β ). The IR Model... Page 1 of 2 Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) 1 8 I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 J = ( β(γ(n ν/β)) ν+γ β(γ(n ν/β)) ν+γ ν γ Assuming that N > ν/β, which we will later discover is something known as the threshold effect, it is simple to observe that the trace T is equal to β( γ(n ν/β)) ν+γ, which is a negative number. The determinant D can be calculated as follows ). 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 The IR Model... β(γ(n ν/β)) D = ( ν γ) ν + γ β(γ(n ν/β)) D = (ν + γ) ν + γ D = β(γ(n ν/β)) < β(γ(n ν/β)). Once again, assuming that N > ν/β and all the constants are positive, the determinant D will also be positive. Therefore, the equilibrium point here will be some kind of sink. To get an idea of how this would look, it would be helpful to graph this set of equations using pplane7 in MatLab. After entering the command pplane7 into MatLab, we enter our two equations for and I. We also choose values for the variables N,β,γ, and ν so that Page 11 of 2 Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 1 8 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 The IR Model... 1 = B I + y (N I ) I = B I v I N = 5 B =.3 v = 25 y =.8 8 6 BI=y(N I ) =v/b I 4 2 I= 5 1 15 2 Page 12 of 2 Figure 3: A plot of the nullclines for the I system. Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) 1 8 6 4 I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 N = 5, β =.3, γ =.8, ν = 25. According to the nullcline equations, there should be an equilibrium point where the lines = ν γ(n ) β and I = β+y cross. Plugging in our values for N,β,γ and ν as chosen above, we get the following values for and I. 2 5 1 15 2 The IR Model... = 25.3 = 83.3333.8(5 83.3333) I = 25 +.8 I = 12.9199. Page 13 of 2 As shown in the graph in Figure 2, the point (83.3333, 12.9199) does appear to be an equilibrium point. Plugging these numbers into the Jacobian matrix, the matrix becomes Full creen J = (.3(12.9199).8.3(83.3333).8.3(12.9199).3(83.3333) 25 ).

= B I + y (N I ) I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 1 8 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 The IR Model... 1 = B I + y (N I ) I = B I v I N = 5 B =.3 v = 25 y =.8 8 I 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 Page 14 of 2 Figure 4: A phase plane plot of and I with an equilibrium point at (83.3333, 12.9199). Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) implifying this gives the following matrix J = ( 4.676 25.8 3.876 The trace T of J is 4.676 and the determinant D is 1.8. ince the trace is negative but the determinant is positive, this point is clearly a sink. To determine what kind of sink, we need to determine where on the trace determinant plane the point ( 4.676, 1.8) lies. ince ). T 2 4D = ( 4.676) 2 4(1.8), ( 4.676) 2 4(1.8) = 21.865 4.32, > 421.8682, I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 1 8 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 The IR Model... the point ( 4.676, 1.8) lies above the line T 2 4D. This means that the equilibrium point is a spiral sink, as is further evidenced by its appearance in Figure 3. According to the nullcline equations, there should also be a second equilibrium point where the lines I = and = γ(n I) βi+γ. ubstituting the given value of I, we can solve the system for. Page 15 of 2 = = γn γ, = N. γ(n ) β() + γ, Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) This means that the lines I = and = γ(n I) βi+γ intersect at the point (5, ). Analytically, this is an obvious answer. If we have a population where there are zero infected individuals, or I =, then the entire population N will be constituted of susceptible individuals, meaning = N. To determine the nature of this equilibrium point, the next step is to plug in values for I and into the Jacobian matrix for the planar system. If = 5, I =, I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 1 8 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 The IR Model... then the Jacobian becomes J = (.8 15.8 125 The trace of this Jacobian matrix is 124.2 and the determinant is -1. ince the determinant is negative, this equilibrium point shown in Figure 5 is a saddle point. ). Page 16 of 2 4. Another important discovery in the study of the IR model is the existence of the threshold effect. The basis of this effect is that, unless the population is initially large enough, with considerable amount of contact between individuals and a high enough rate of infection, the virus will die out before becoming established in the population. To explain this mathematically requires re-examining the equilibrium equations. Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) 1 8 I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 = B I + y (N I ) I = B I v I 2 N = 5 B =.3 v = 25 y =.8 The IR Model... I 2 4 498 499 5 51 52 Page 17 of 2 Figure 5: A phase plane plot of I and with an equilibrium point at (5, ). Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) 1 8 6 4 I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 βi = γ(n I ). 2 5 1 15 2 olving this for I we find that βi + γi = γ(n ) I(β + γ) = γ(n ) I = γ(n ) β + γ. The IR Model... Analyzing this equation, if is greater than N, I is going to be negative. This means that, in order for the infection to be established, or become endemic in the population, N must be greater. However, according to another equilibrium equation. = ν β. Page 18 of 2 Therefore, N > ν β. Now, using the numerical example from earlier on, if N is set to equal a number less than the ratio ν/β, the graph should show a phase plane where, no matter what Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) 1 8 I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 I 3 25 2 15 = B I + y (N I ) I = B I v I N = 83 B =.25 v = 5 y =.8 The IR Model... 1 5 1 2 3 4 5 Page 19 of 2 Figure 6: A phase plane plot of I and where N < ν/β. Full creen

= B I + y (N I ) initial value is chosen, the infected population I will decrease to and the virus will not be established. Using the same constant values as before, if N = 83, then N < ν β. As we see in Figure 6, this phase plane does indicate that the population I will eventually decrease to zero. 5. The IR system shown in this paper is a very simplistic model, and yet it illustrates many important aspects of a viral infection. By applying some basic analysis, it is easy to describe and observe possible scenarios by examining the equilibrium points. Also, these equations provide us with a correlation between population size and the chances of a disease becoming endemic by relating the entire population number to the ratio between the recovery and infectivity rate. As a method of approach, the IR model is an excellent tool to use in studying the spread of a viral disease. I = B I v I N = 5 v = 25 1 8 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 The IR Model... References [1] Edelstein-Keshet, Leah Mathematical Models in Biology,McGraw-Hill, 1988, First Edition. [2] Murray, James D. Mathematical Biology pringer-verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1993, econd Corrected Edition. Page 2 of 2 Full creen